DOCSLIB.ORG

Harris'lines, Mummies, Radiographs, Cremation, Normal Bones

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harris'lines, Mummies, Radiographs, Cremation, Normal Bones Harris'lines, Cremation, Normal Bones, Instruments L1 L2 L3 L4 L1 : H.A.Harris, G.Elliot Smith & Waren Dawson L2 : Harris Lines : Tibia / Burgh Castle L3 & L4 : Harris Lines : Tibia / Caister-on-Sea L6 L7 L6 : Fracture Tibia paired with normal. Line absorption L7 : Harris Lines per bone : Index of Morbidity L8 : Absence of Harris Lines : Frequency Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.1 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L9 : Harris Lines : Age of distribution L10 : Absence of Harris Lines : Frequency L11 : Caister-by-Yarmouth : Percentage of Harris Lines in each group Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.2 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L13 : Caister-by-Yarmouth : Number of Harris Lines plotted against stature (mm) Number of Harris lines L15 : Number of Harris Lines & intermembral index (scattergram) Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.3 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L16 : Harris Lines & Age at death L17 : Harris Lines & Age at death (scattergram) Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.4 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L18 : Harris Lines & Parondotal Abscesses L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L191& L20 : Harris Lines : Tibia (radiograph) / Caister on Sea L21: Harris Lines : Fibular (radiograph) / Red Castle L 22 : Harris Lines : Radial / Caister-on-See L 23 : Harris Lines : Radiograph & Section / California 4000 BC L24 L32 L33 L34 L24: Tibia with infused epiphyses L32 : Humeri : proximal halves (radiograph) L33 & L34 : Femoral trabeculae (radiograph) / Ludgate Hill P.21 Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.5 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L34bis L35 L37 L38 L34 bis: Femoral trabeculae (radiograph) / Ludgate Hill P.21 L35 : Ulna : proximal 1/3 (radiograph) / Thetford Priory L37 : Tibia : pair : polio ? (radiograph) L38 : Mummified Cat(radiograph) / Egypt / Ipswich Museum L40 L41 L42 L44 L40 : Mummy’s Skull (radiograph) / Egypt / N.C.M. L41 : Mummy’s Pelvis (radiograph) / Egypt / N.C.M L42 : Mummy’s Knee (radiograph) / Egypt / N.C.M L45 L46 L44 & L45: Mummy’s vertebrae : pseudo ochronosis (radiograph) / Egypt / N.C.M L46 : Mummy’s Head Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.6 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L47 L48 L47: Mummy: Natural dehydration / Nubia / Egypt / N.C.M L48 : Megaceros jaw: Forest Bed / N.C.M. L49 L50 L51 L49: Human Bones under sand / Valreas 1961 / France L50 : Skull Silhouette / Schayk / Holland L51 : Differential bone erosion over gullies / Eriswell L52 L55 L60 L52: Inhumation / Burgh Castle L55: Frozen Head / Pasyryk / Proto -Scythian L60 : Human coprolites / Lines Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.7 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L61 L62 L63 L64 L65 L61 to L65: Cremated fragments / Bronze-Age / Lancs L66 L67 L66 : Cremated fragments / Romano-British / Welwyn / Herts L67: Cremated petrous temporal / Child L68 L69 L70 L71 L68 : Cremated zygomatic fragment L69 : Cremated mandibular condyle L70 : Cremated proximal radius fragment L71: Cremated dens axis Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.8 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L72 L73 L74 L72 : Cremated molar L73 : Cremated vertebral fragment with osteophytosis L74 : Cremation Urn / Anglo-Saxon /N.C.M. L78 L79 L80 L78 : Normal externed auditory meatus L79 : Normal Infra-nasal spine L80 : Normal acetabulum & femoral head L81 L82 L83 L81 : Normal femoral condyles L82 : Stumpshaw skull / Mesolithic? L83 : Negroid & Anglo-Saxon skulls /N.E.P.5 L84 L85 L86 L84 : Section femoral head & neck L85 : Ossified costochondral cartilage L86 : Cortex-Medulla ratio femoral shafts Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.9 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L91 L92 L93 L91 : Epicondylar arch : Pleistocene Lion humerus (normal) L92 : Horn Cone / Anglo-Saxon / Sedgeford L93 : Elephas normal tooth L96 L97 L99 L100 L96 : Tsetse fly (Glossina palpebris) / Oligocene / Colorado L97 : Man with Mammoth's femur L99 : Psammolepis L100 : Heterostrachon L101 L112 L101 : Ostracoderm : dermal armour L112 : M.E.K. using Watanabe arthroscope Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.10 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 L112 L115 L112 : Amerindian baby on cradleboard L115 : Egyptian harvest scene L119 L120 L119 & L120 : Schizophrenic fantasy : Louis Wain's cats Calvin WELLS / Slides L / Harris'lines, Cremations, Normal Bones, etc. / p.11 / © L2AP LYON1 / 2013 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 18 October 2018 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Caswell, E. and Roberts, B.W. (2018) 'Reassessing community cemeteries : cremation burials in Britain during the Middle Bronze Age (c. 16001150 cal BC).', Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society., 84 . pp. 329-357. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2018.9 Publisher's copyright statement: c The Prehistoric Society 2018. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, page 1 of 29 © The Prehistoric Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Incorporation of Human Cremation Ashes Into Objects and Tattoos in Contemporary British Practices
    Ashes to Art, Dust to Diamonds: The incorporation of human cremation ashes into objects and tattoos in contemporary British practices Samantha McCormick A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Sociology August 2015 Declaration I declare that the work in this thesis was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the University’s regulations and Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes and all the material provided in this thesis are original and have not been published elsewhere. I declare that while registered as a candidate for the University’s research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy SINGED ………………………………… i ii Abstract This thesis examines the incorporation of human cremated remains into objects and tattoos in a range of contemporary practices in British society. Referred to collectively in this study as ‘ashes creations’, the practices explored in this research include human cremation ashes irreversibly incorporated or transformed into: jewellery, glassware, diamonds, paintings, tattoos, vinyl records, photograph frames, pottery, and mosaics. This research critically analyses the commissioning, production, and the lived experience of the incorporation of human cremation ashes into objects and tattoos from the perspective of two groups of people who participate in these practices: people who have commissioned an ashes creations incorporating the cremation ashes of a loved one and people who make or sell ashes creations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Cremation Authorization Form
    NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF FUNERAL SERVICE STANDARD CREMATION AUTHORIZATION FORM NOTICE: THIS IS A LEGAL DOCUMENT. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT PROVISIONS CONCERNING CREMATION. THE PROCESS IS IRREVERSIBLE AND FINAL. READ THIS DOCUMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING. _________________________________________________________________________________ Name of Individual for which cremation is being arranged (“Decedent”) ____________________ / __________________ / __________________ / _____________ Date of Birth Date of Death Time of Death Age Place of Death: _______________________________________________________________Hospice (Yes or No): __________ Medical Examiner’s Authorization Required (Yes or No):_________ Death Due to an Infectious Disease (Yes or No): _________ Individual Confirming Identity of Decedent: ______________________________________________________ / ____________________________________________________ (Typed / Printed Name) (Signature) A. The undersigned (hereinafter referred to as "Authorizing Agent{s}”) hereby certify, warrant, and represent that I/we have the full legal right and authority to authorize and arrange for the cremation and final disposition of _______________________________________________________(hereinafter referred to as "Decedent"); Authorizing Agent(s) is (are) not aware of any living person who has a superior right to that of Authorizing Agent(s) as set forth in G.S. 90-210.124; or, if there is another living person who does have a superior right to that of Authorizing Agent(s), Authorizing Agent(s) represent that
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture of Afterlife: Future Cemetery in Metropolis
    ARCHITECTURE OF AFTERLIFE: FUTURE CEMETERY IN METROPOLIS A DARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF ARCHITECTURE MAY 2017 BY SHIYU SONG DArch Committee: Joyce Noe, Chairperson William Chapman Brian Takahashi Key Words: Conventional Cemetery, Contemporary Cemetery, Future Cemetery, High-technology Innovation Architecture of Afterlife: Future Cemetery in Metropolis Shiyu Song April 2017 We certify that we have read this Doctorate Project and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Architecture in the School of Architecture, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. Doctorate Project Committee ___________________________________ Joyce Noe ___________________________________ William Chapman ___________________________________ Brian Takahashi Acknowledgments I dedicate this thesis to everyone in my life. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my committee chair, Professor Joyce Noe, for her support, guidance and insight throughout this doctoral project. Many thanks to my wonderful committee members William Chapman and Brian Takahashi for their precious and valuable guidance and support. Salute to my dear professor Spencer Leineweber who inspires me in spirit and work ethic. Thanks to all the professors for your teaching and encouragement imparted on me throughout my years of study. After all these years of study, finally, I understand why we need to study and how important education is. Overall, this dissertation is an emotional research product. As an idealist, I choose this topic as a lesson for myself to understand life through death. The more I delve into the notion of death, the better I appreciate life itself, and knowing every individual human being is a bless; everyday is a present is my best learning outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Archaeologies of Cremation Howard Williams, Jessica I
    Introduction Archaeologies of Cremation Howard Williams, Jessica I. Cerezo-Román, and Anna Wessman Williams, H., Cerezo-Román, J.I., and Wessman, A. (eds) 2017. Introduction: Archaeologies of Cremation, in J.I. Cerezo-Román, A. Wessman and H. Williams (eds) Cremation and the Archaeology of Death, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–24 Then the warriors began to kindle the greatest of funeral fires on the hill; woodsmoke ascended, dark over the flame, the soaring fire mingled with weeping – the raging wind subsided – until it had broken the body, hot at the heart. Depressed in soul, they lamented their grief, mourned the liege lord. Likewise the Geatish woman lamented for Beowulf, with bound hair, sang a sorrowful song, said often that she greatly feared evil days for herself, many slaughters, fear of the foe, humiliation and captivity. Heaven swallowed the smoke. Beowulf 3143–3155 (Owen-Crocker 2000: 91, 93) INTRODUCTION Four dramatic funerals punctuate the tenth- or eleventh-century Anglo-Saxon poem Beowulf; two involve the burning of the dead. While a Christian work to its core, the poem draws upon far older stories and at its very conclusion the poet provides a striking vision of an early medieval open-air cremation ceremony. Having died by the fire and poisonous bite of a dragon dwelling in a stone mound, the king of the Geats is cremated with treasures: helmets, swords, and coats of mail (Owen-Crocker 2000: 89). Before the raising of a burial mound upon a headland overlooking the sea, Beowulf ’s cremation is a focus of more than personal loss by mourners.
    [Show full text]
  • Grave Goods, Hoards and Deposits ‘In Between’I
    Spectrums of depositional practice in later prehistoric Britain and beyond: grave goods, hoards and deposits ‘in between’i Anwen Cooper, Duncan Garrow and Catriona Gibson Paper accepted for publication in Archaeological Dialogues 27(2), Dec 2020 Abstract This paper critically evaluates how archaeologists define ‘grave goods’ in relation to the full spectrum of depositional contexts available to people in the past, including hoards, rivers and other ‘special’ deposits. Developing the argument that variations in artefact deposition over time and space can only be understood if different ‘types’ of finds location are considered together holistically, we contend that it is also vital to look at the points where traditionally defined contexts of deposition become blurred into one another. In this paper, we investigate one particular such category – body-less object deposits at funerary sites – in later prehistoric Britain. This category of evidence has never previously been analysed collectively, let alone over the extended time period considered here. On the basis of a substantial body of evidence collected as part of a nationwide survey, we demonstrate that body-less object deposits were a significant component of funerary sites during later prehistory. Consequently, we go on to question whether human remains were actually always a necessary element of funerary deposits for prehistoric people, suggesting that the absence of human bone could be a positive attribute rather than simply a negative outcome of taphonomic processes. We also argue that modern, fixed depositional categories sometimes serve to mask a full understanding of the complex realities of past practice and ask whether it might be productive in some instances to move beyond interpretatively confining terms such as ‘grave’, ‘hoard’ and ‘cenotaph’.
    [Show full text]
  • Mummies and Mummification Practices in the Southern and Southwestern United States Mahmoud Y
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications Natural Resources, School of 1998 Mummies and mummification practices in the southern and southwestern United States Mahmoud Y. El-Najjar Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan Thomas M. J. Mulinski Chicago, Illinois Karl Reinhard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard El-Najjar, Mahmoud Y.; Mulinski, Thomas M. J.; and Reinhard, Karl, "Mummies and mummification practices in the southern and southwestern United States" (1998). Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications. 13. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in MUMMIES, DISEASE & ANCIENT CULTURES, Second Edition, ed. Aidan Cockburn, Eve Cockburn, and Theodore A. Reyman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 7 pp. 121–137. Copyright © 1998 Cambridge University Press. Used by permission. Mummies and mummification practices in the southern and southwestern United States MAHMOUD Y. EL-NAJJAR, THOMAS M.J. MULINSKI AND KARL J. REINHARD Mummification was not intentional for most North American prehistoric cultures. Natural mummification occurred in the dry areas ofNorth America, where mummies have been recovered from rock shelters, caves, and over­ hangs. In these places, corpses desiccated and spontaneously mummified. In North America, mummies are recovered from four main regions: the south­ ern and southwestern United States, the Aleutian Islands, and the Ozark Mountains ofArkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in Defiance of a Stylistic Stereotype: British Crematoria, Architecture
    In Defiance of a Stylistic Stereotype: British Crematoria, Architecture, Design & Landscape Hilary J. Grainger When awarding Telford Crematorium a West Midlands Regional Award in 2000 the R.I.B.A judges observed that A crematorium is a meeting point for complex human and cultural issues whose resolution into a successful building is potentially very difficult. Cremation was revived in the late nineteenth century as an alternative to burial, but did not claim widespread support until the second half of the twentieth century. It is therefore remarkable that it should have attained so rapidly cultural normality, indeed ritual dominance. By late 1990 the ratio of cremation to burial in Britain stood at 70% to 30%. Although one might not choose a crematorium as an architectural icon of modernity as one might a skyscraper, Britain’s 251 crematoria are essentially modern and they carry upon them the marks of modernity. They are modern in terms of the complexity of their technology, much of which can seem secretive. Cremation called for a new building type – one without architectural precedent and the crematorium was in that sense analogous to the early nineteenth century railway station. Although the first opened in 1889, at Woking, Surrey – the crematorium as a building type belongs more to the twentieth century. As cremation slowly gained acceptance in Britain, this progress was reflected in its architectural expression and each crematorium can be seen as a ‘symbol of social change’. 1 Paradoxically, despite the growing popularity of cremation, those using crematoria often find them unsatisfactory, their design uninspiring, banal and inconsequential.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global History of Paleopathology
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN TH E GLOBA L H ISTORY OF PALEOPATHOLOGY 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd i 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:58:03:58 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd iiii 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:59:03:59 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN TH E GLOBA L H ISTORY OF PALEOPATHOLOGY Pioneers and Prospects EDITED BY JANE E. BUIKSTRA AND CHARLOTTE A. ROBERTS 3 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd iiiiii 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:59:03:59 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN 1 Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With o! ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland " ailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © #$%# by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. %&' Madison Avenue, New York, New York %$$%( www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. CIP to come ISBN-%): ISBN $–%&- % ) * + & ' ( , # Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd iivv 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:59:03:59 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN To J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cremation-2016.Pdf
    Cremation Cremation is the act of reducing a corpse to ashes by burning, generally in a crematorium furnace or crematory fire. In funerals, cremation can be an alternative funeral rite to the burial of a body in a grave. Modern Cremation Process The cremation occurs in a 'crematorium' which consists of one or more cremator furnaces or cremation 'retorts' for the ashes. A cremator is an industrial furnace capable of generating 870-980 °C (1600-1800 °F) to ensure disintegration of the corpse. A crematorium may be part of chapel or a funeral home, or part of an independent facility or a service offered by a cemetery. Modern cremator fuels include natural gas and propane. However, coal or coke was used until the early 1960s. Modern cremators have adjustable control systems that monitor the furnace during cremation. A cremation furnace is not designed to cremate more than one body at a time, which is illegal in many countries including the USA. The chamber where the body is placed is called the retort. It is lined with refractory brick that retain heat. The bricks are typically replaced every five years due to heat stress. © 2016 All Star Training, Inc. Page 1 Modern cremators are computer-controlled to ensure legal and safe use, e.g. the door cannot be opened until the cremator has reached operating temperature. The coffin is inserted (charged) into the retort as quickly as possible to avoid heat loss through the top- opening door. The coffin may be on a charger (motorized trolley) that can quickly insert the coffin, or one that can tilt and tip the coffin into the cremator.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Cremation in Mexico 3,000 Years Ago
    Human cremation in Mexico 3,000 years ago William N. Duncan*†, Andrew K. Balkansky‡, Kimberly Crawford‡, Heather A. Lapham‡, and Nathan J. Meissner‡ *Department of Anthropology, St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY 14618; and ‡Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901 Edited by Joyce Marcus, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, and approved February 22, 2008 (received for review November 10, 2007) Mixtec nobles are depicted in codices and other proto-historic ological contexts and osteological analyses of the burials, and documentation taking part in funerary rites involving cremation. evaluate the evidence based on known aspects of the Mixtec The time depth for this practice was unknown, but excavations at mortuary program. These early examples of cremation, along the early village site of Tayata, in the southern state of Oaxaca, with other factors, could reflect the emergence of ranked Mexico, recovered undisturbed cremation burials in contexts dat- society in the ancient Mixteca Alta and indicate that proto- ing from the eleventh century B.C. These are the earliest examples historic methods of marking social status had precursors of a burial practice that in later times was reserved for Mixtec kings extending back 3,000 years from the present. and Aztec emperors. This article describes the burial contexts and human remains, linking Formative period archaeology with eth- Archaeological Context nohistorical descriptions of Mixtec mortuary practices. The use of Survey and excavation indicate that Tayata was among the cremation to mark elevated social status among the Mixtec was largest villages of the preurban Formative period in the established by 3,000 years ago, when hereditary differences in Mixteca Alta of Oaxaca, Mexico (18, 19).
    [Show full text]