DOCSLIB.ORG

Rt~ TRANSMOUNTAIN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rt~ TRANSMOUNTAIN rT~ TRANSMOUNTAIN Trans Mountain Expansion Project ~~~ Email: [email protected] ~ Y Phone: 1.866.514.6700 ~ 4 Website: www.transmountain.com ~ @TransMtn VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION August 1, 2014 National Energy Board 517 — 10th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P OA8 To: Ms. Sheri Young, Secretary National Energy Board Dear Ms. Young: Re: Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Trans Mountain Expansion Project Application Hearing Order OH-001-2014 Errata regarding: NEB IR 1.26c Katrie First Nation Round I Intervenor Motion 1.01 b Traditional Land and Resource Use Supplemental Technical Report Due to an oversight, the Katzie First Nation record is currently incorrect. Kindly revise as follows. On May 14, 2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC (Trans Mountain) submitted a response to NEB IR 1.26c (Filing ID A3W9H8) regarding the status of traditional use and traditional ecological studies in which Trans Mountain inaccurately reported the status for Katzie First Nation as "TLU study not requested by Katzie First Nation". Please see accurate text in red included in Table 1.26C-1. On July 11, 2014, Trans Mountain submitted a response to Katzie First Nation Round 1 Intervenor Motion 1.01b (Filing ID A3Z1T9) regarding the corridors in consideration within the Katzie First Nation Traditional Territory in which Trans Mountain inaccurately reported "Katzie First Nation has not requested a traditional use study". Please see accurate text in red included in Motion 1.01 b. On July 21, 2014, Trans Mountain submitted its Traditional Land and Resource Use Supplemental Technical Report (Filing ID A3Z4Z2), in which Trans Mountain inaccurately reported "Trans Mountain notes that Katzie First Nation has not requested Traditional Use Study". Please see accurate text in red, included in Table 3.1. Trans Mountain apologizes for these errors. Trans Mountain apologizes to Katzie First Nation and the Board for the error in the record, and trust that it is now corrected. Yours truly, ~of •. Scott Stones Vice President, Finance and Regulatory Affairs Kinder Morgan Canada 403 514 6525 Work [email protected] KINDER~MORGAgN 2844 Bainbridge Avenue, PO Box 84028, Bainbridge, Burnaby, BC, V5A 4T9 CANADA 1 ~~`r~i TRANSMOUNTAIN Trans Mountain Expansion Project TABLE 1.26C-1 REVISED TIME TABLE OF TRADITIONAL LAND USE (TLU) STUDIES FOR EACH PARTICIPATING COMMUNITY(MAY 2014) Socio- Results Proposed Economic Review/ Pipeline Study Map Ground Mitigation Community Segments) Regions Review Interviews Overflight Reconnaissance Meetings Saddle Lake Edmonton to Rural TERA-led TLU study (underway). Cree Nation Hinton Alberta Region Enoch Cree Edmonton to Edmonton June 7, August 29 to September September 18 to 26, November Nation Hinton Region 2013 30, 2013 7, 2013 2013 28, 2013 Alexander Edmonton to Edmonton October 4, October 18 October 30, October 30 to November First Nation Hinton Region 2012 and 19, 2012 November 1, 2012 28, 2013 2012 Independent, third-party review underway with Alexander First Nation. Samson Cree Edmonton to Edmonton September September March 22 to November 6 to 9, December Nation Hinton Region 20, 2012 20, 2012 23, 2013 2012 18, 2013 September 25 to October 3, 2013 Metis Nation Edmonton to Edmonton Independent, third-party engagement report (underway). of Alberta Hinton Region (Region 4) O'Chiese First Edmonton to Rural Independent, third-party TLU study. Final report received on September 25, 2013. Nation Hinton Alberta Region Ermineskin Edmonton to Edmonton September September September September 5 to 7, October 31, Cree Nation Hinton Region 4, 2012 4, 2012 5 to 7, 2012 2012 2013 Montana First Edmonton to Edmonton August 7 to August 7 to N/A To be determined Interim Nation Hinton Region 8, 2013 8, 2013 results review memo sent November 28, 2013 Louis Bull Edmonton to Edmonton TLU study not requested by Louis Bull Tribe. Tribe Hinton Region Alexis Nakota Edmonton to Edmonton October 19, May 16 to November November 6 to 10, To be Sioux Nation Hinton Region 2012 17, 2013 5, 2012 2012 determined Independent, third-party review underway with Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation. i KINDER~MORGAN 2844 Bainbridge Avenue, PO Box 84028, Bainbridge, Burnaby, BC, V5A 4T9 CANADA 2 CANADA ri'i~ TRANSMOUNTAIN Trans Mountain Expansion Project TABLE 1.26C-1 REVISED TIME TABLE OF TRADITIONAL LAND USE (TLU) STUDIES FOR EACH PARTICIPATING COMMUNITY(MAY 2014)(continued) Results Proposed Review/ Pipeline Socio-Economic Map Ground Mitigation Community Segments) Study Regions Review Interviews Overflight Reconnaissance Meetings Foothills Edmonton to Rural Alberta Declined TLU study participation; identified preliminary interests on June 5, Ojibway Hinton Region 2013. Society Paul First Edmonton to Edmonton Region November November December December 3, November Nation Hinton 14, 2012 14, 2012 3, 2012 2012 8, 2013 Nakcowinewak Edmonton to Edmonton Region September September N/A September 21 to November Nation of Hinton 19 to 20, 19 to 20, 26, 2013; 25, 2013 Canada 2013 2013 November 5 to 6, 2013 Sunchi~d First Edmonton to Rural Alberta Independent, third-party TLU study (underway). Preliminary interest letter Nation Hinton Region received November 28, 2013. Michel First Edmonton to Rural Alberta Independent, third-party TLU study report (underway). Nation Hinton Region Gunn Metis Edmonton to Rural Alberta Independent, third-party TLU information report (underway). (Lac Ste. Anne Hinton Region Metis) Aseniwuche Edmonton to Jasper National Independent, third-party TLU study. Final report received on November 18, Winewak Hinton Park Region 2013. Nation Lheidli T'enneh Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort Independent, third-party TLU study. Interim report received on November Darfield George/Thompson- 20, 2013. Nicola Region Simpcw First Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort Independent, third-party TLU study (underway). Nation Darfield George/Thompson- Nicola Region Lhtako Dene Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort TERA-led TLU study (underway). Nation Darfield George/Thompson- Nicola Region i — —— KINDER~MORGAN 2844 Bainbridge Avenue, PO Box 84028, Bainbridge, Burnaby, BC, V5A 4T9 CANADA 3 CANADA r~fi TRANSMOUNTAIN Trans Mountain Expansion Project TABLE 1.26C-1 REVISED TIME TABLE OF TRADITIONAL LAND USE (TLU) STUDIES FOR EACH PARTICIPATING COMMUNITY(MAY 2014)(continued) Results Proposed Review/ Pipeline Socio-Economic Map Ground Mitigation Community Segments) Study Regions Review Interviews Overtlight Reconnaissance Meetings Canim Lake Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort May 1, October 9, October 9, October 10, 2013 November Band Darfield George/Thompson- 2013 2013 2013 5, 2013 Nicola Region Whispering Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort Whispering Pines has requested confidentiality. Pines Darfield George/Thompson- (Clinton Nicola Region Indian Band) Horse Lake Hargreaves to Rural Alberta Region No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. First Nation Darfield Ktunaxa First Hargreaves to Rural Alberta Region No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Nation Darfield Stoney Hargreaves to Rural Alberta Region No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Nakoda Darfield Nation Sturgeon Hargreaves to Rural Alberta Region No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Lake Cree Darfield Nation Kelly Lake Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Cree Nation Darfield George/Thompson Nicola Region Kelly Lake Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Metis Darfield George/Thompson Settlement Nicola Region Society Kelly Lake Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Nation Darfield George/Thompson Nicola Region KINDER,/MORGAN 2844 Bainbridge Avenue, PO Box 84028, Bainbridge, Burnaby, BC, V5A 4T9 CANADA 4 / CANADA r~i~ TRANSMOUNTAIN Trans Mountain Expansion Project TABLE 1.26C-1 REVISED TIME TABLE OF TRADITIONAL LAND USE (TLU) STUDIES FOR EACH PARTICIPATING COMMUNITY(MAY 2014)(continued) Results Proposed Review/ Pipeline Socio-Economic Map Ground Mitigation Community Segments) Study Regions Review Interviews Overtlight Reconnaissance Meetings LIenlleney'ten First Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Nation (High Bar) Darfield George/Thompson Nicola Region Sts'wecem'c/XgaYtem Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. (Canoe Creek/Dog Darfield George/Thompson Creek) Nicola Region SYuxwetews Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. (Bonaparte Indian Darfield George/Thompson Band) Nicola Region T'exelc (Williams Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Lake Indian Band) Darfield George/Thompson Nicola Region Toosey Indian Band Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Darfield George/Thompson Nicola Region TsilhgoYin National Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. Government Dartield George/Thompson Nicola Region XaYsull First Nation Hargreaves to Fraser-Fort No interest communicated to Trans Mountain to date. (Soda Creek) Darfield George/Thompson Nicola Region KINDER%/MORGAN~a~Qoa 2844 Bainbridge Avenue, PO Box 84028; Bainbridge, Burnaby, BC, V5A 4T9 CANADA 5 r~i TRANSMOUNTAIN Trans Mountain Expansion Project TABLE 1.26C-1 REVISED TIME TABLE OF TRADITIONAL LAND USE (TLU) STUDIES FOR EACH PARTICIPATING COMMUNITY(MAY 2014)(continued) Results Proposed Review/ Pipeline Socio-Economic Map Ground Mitigation Community Segments) Study Regions Review Interviews Overflight Reconnaissance Meetings Metis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A GUIDE to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013)
    A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) INTRODUCTORY NOTE A Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia is a provincial listing of First Nation, Métis and Aboriginal organizations, communities and community services. The Guide is dependent upon voluntary inclusion and is not a comprehensive listing of all Aboriginal organizations in B.C., nor is it able to offer links to all the services that an organization may offer or that may be of interest to Aboriginal people. Publication of the Guide is coordinated by the Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch of the Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation (MARR), to support streamlined access to information about Aboriginal programs and services and to support relationship-building with Aboriginal people and their communities. Information in the Guide is based upon data available at the time of publication. The Guide data is also in an Excel format and can be found by searching the DataBC catalogue at: http://www.data.gov.bc.ca. NOTE: While every reasonable effort is made to ensure the accuracy and validity of the information, we have been experiencing some technical challenges while updating the current database. Please contact us if you notice an error in your organization’s listing. We would like to thank you in advance for your patience and understanding as we work towards resolving these challenges. If there have been any changes to your organization’s contact information please send the details to: Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation PO Box 9100 Stn Prov.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Our Lives Middle Years Development Instrumentfor 2019–2020 Survey of Grade 7 Students
    ONLY USE UNDERSTANDING OUR LIVES MIDDLE YEARS DEVELOPMENT INSTRUMENTFOR 2019–2020 SURVEY OF GRADE 7 STUDENTS BRITISH COLUMBIA You can preview the survey online at INSTRUCTIONALSAMPLE SURVEY www.mdi.ubc.ca. NOT © Copyright of UBC and contributors. Copying, distributing, modifying or translating this work is expressly forbidden by the copyright holders. Contact Human Early Learning Partnership at [email protected] to obtain copyright permissions. Version: Sep 13, 2019 H18-00507 IMPORTANT REMINDERS! 1. Prior to starting the survey, please read the Student Assent on the next page aloud to your students! Students must be given the opportunity to decline and not complete the survey. Students can withdraw anytime by clicking the button at the bottom of every page. 2. Each student has their own login ID and password assigned to them. Students need to know that their answers are confidential, so that they will feel more comfortable answering the questions honestly. It is critical that they know this is not a test, and that there are no right or wrong answers. 3. The “Tell us About Yourself” section at the beginning of the survey can be challenging for some students. Please read this section aloud to make sure everybody understands. You know your students best and if you are concerned about their reading level, we suggest you read all of the survey questions aloud to your students. 4. The MDI takes about one to two classroom periods to complete.ONLY The “Activities” section is a natural place to break. USE Thank you! What’s new on the MDI? 1. We have updated questions 5-7 on First Nations, Métis and Inuit identity, and First Nations languages learned and spoken at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared For: Prepared By
    333A TRADITIONAL LAND AND RESOURCE USE TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE ULC TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT December 2013 REP-NEB-TERA00035 Prepared for: Prepared by: Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. TERA Environmental Consultants Suite 2700, 300 – 5th Avenue S.W. Suite 1100, 815 - 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 5J2 Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P2 Ph: 403-514-6400 Ph: 403-265-2885 Volume 5D, ESA – Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Socio-Economic Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Traditional Land and Resource Use Technical Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC would like to acknowledge Chief and Council, the Lands Department, Administration and members of the following communities: • Enoch Cree Nation; • Nicomen Indian Band; • Alexander First Nation; • Nooaitch Indian Band; • Samson Cree Nation; • Yale First Nation; • Métis Nation of Alberta • Chawathil First Nation; (Region 4); • Shxw’ōwhámel First Nation; • O’Chiese First Nation; • Cheam First Nation; • Ermineskin Cree Nation; • Sumas First Nation; • Montana First Nation; • Popkum First Nation; • Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation; • Scowlitz First Nation; • Foothills Ojibway Society; • Skowkale First Nation; • Paul First Nation; • Yakweakwioose First Nation; • Nakcowinewak Nation of Canada; • Aitchelitz First Nation; • Sunchild First Nation; • Skwah First Nation; • Aseniwuche Winewak Nation; • Kwaw-kwaw-apilt First Nation; • Lheidli T’enneh; • Soowahlie First Nation; • Simpcw First Nation; • Shxwha:y Village; • Lhtako Dene Nation; • Tzeachten First Nation; • Canim Lake Band; • Squiala First Nation; • Whispering Pines (Clinton • Leq’á:mel First Nation; Indian Band); • Semiahmoo First Nation; and • Lower Nicola Indian Band; • Métis Nation British Columbia. • Shackan Indian Band; All of their time, effort, commitment and participation is much appreciated and was fundamental to the success of the traditional land use studies for the proposed Trans Mountain Expansion Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Mountain Attachment 1 Condition 43
    Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Watercourse Crossing Inventory Trans Mountain Expansion Project March 2017 APPENDIX L ABORIGINAL GROUPS TO BE ENGAGED ON NEB CONDITION 43: WATERCOURSE CROSSING INVENTORY Adams Lake Indian Band Aitchelitz First Nation (Stó:lō) Alexander First Nation Alexis Nakota Sioux First Nation Aseniwuche Winewak Nation Ashcroft Indian Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Asini Wachi Nehiyawak Boothroyd Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Boston Bar Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) British Columbia Métis Federation Canim Lake Band (Tsq’escen') Canoe Creek (Stswecem'c Xgat'tem) Indian Band Chawathil First Nation (Stó:lō) Cheam First Nation (Stó:lō) Clinton Indian Band/Whispering Pines First Nation Coldwater Indian Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Cook’s Ferry Indian Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Enoch Cree Nation Ermineskin Cree Nation Foothills Ojibway Society High Bar Horse Lake First Nation (Treaty 8) Kanaka Bar Katzie First Nation Kelly Lake Cree Nation Kelly Lake First Nation Kelly Lake Métis Settlement Society Ktunaxa Nation Kwantlen First Nation (Stó:lō) Kwaw-kwaw-Apilt First Nation (Stó:lō) Kwikwetlem First Nation Leq’a:mel First Nation (Stó:lō) Lheidli T’enneh First Nation Lhtako Dene Nation Little Shuswap Indian Band Louis Bull Tribe Lower Nicola Indian Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Lower Similkameen Indian Band Lyackson First Nation Lytton First Nation (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Matsqui First Nation (Stó:lō) Métis Nation of Alberta Gunn Métis Local 55 Métis Nation of British Columbia Métis Regional Council Zone IV of
    [Show full text]
  • EAO's Assessment of an Application for Certificate Amendment
    EAO’s Assessment of an Application for Certificate Amendment Trans Mountain Expansion Project EA Certificate #E17-01 Amendment #2 Requested by: Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC May 6, 2020 Pursuant to Section 19 of the Environmental Assessment Act, S.B.C. 2002, c.43 2 1 BACKGROUND On December 1, 2016, the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (Project) received the National Energy Board (NEB)1 Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) OC-064. On January 10, 2017, Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC (Trans Mountain) was issued Environmental Assessment Certificate (EAC) #E17-01 under the Environmental Assessment Act (2002) for the construction and operation of the Project. The Environmental Assessment Office (EAO) relied on the NEB assessment as the provincial assessment, consistent with the EA Equivalency Agreement2 between the NEB and the EAO. In March 2017, Trans Mountain submitted five applications to the NEB under Section 21 of the National Energy Board Act to vary the proposed pipeline route outside of the approved corridor in British Columbia (B.C.). Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessments were prepared and submitted to the NEB in support of the Section 21 applications to vary the CPCN. On April 12, 2018, the Governor-in-Council (GIC) issued orders approving four of the five route variances and on July 3, 2018, the GIC issued an order approving the fifth route variance. On August 30, 2018, the Federal Court of Appeal quashed CPCN OC-064, rendering it legally void. After reconsideration by the GIC and the NEB, the CPCN was reissued on June 21, 2019, as CPCN OC-065. On August 26, 2019, the NEB issued new amending orders re-approving the five route variances under CPCN OC-065 (AO-001-OC-065; AO-002-OC-065; AO-003-OC-065; AO-004-OC-065; and AO007-OC-065).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Futures British Columbia Aboriginal Engagement Toolkit
    Community Futures British Columbia Aboriginal Engagement Toolkit Aboriginal Strategic Committee March 2008 First printing March 2007 This Guide, or portions of this guide, may be reproduced for use; however, we ask that credit be given to Community Futures British Columbia. The information in this guide is considered to be part of the public domain. It is not intended to be used for profit. The material in this Guide remains the intellectual property of Community Futures British Columbia. Community Futures British Columbia offers this guide without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Nor does Community Futures British Columbia assume any liability for any damages arising from the use of, or inability to use, the product Prepared for the Aboriginal Strategy Committee Community Futures British Columbia Suite 1056 - 409 Granville Street, Vancouver BC, V6C 1T2 Phone: (604) 685-2332 Fax: (604) 681-6575 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.communityfutures.ca Support provided by Western Economic Diversification The term Aboriginal as used throughout this document is intended to include all persons of Aboriginal ancestry; status Indian (First Nation), non-status Indian, Métis and Inuit. Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 Chapter 1: Guidelines To Engage With Aboriginal Peoples In BC 9 ~ Aboriginal Business Etiquette Guidelines 9 ~ Engaging a Community 19 ~ Building Capacity with Aboriginal Small Business Training 23 ~ Central Interior First Nations Recommendations for Training Programs 25 ~ Guidelines for
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing the Diversity of B.C.'S First Nations Languages
    Recognizing the Diversity of BC's First Nations Languages First Peoples' Cultural Council, January 2018 S. Gessner, T. Herbert & A. Parker Exceptional Diversity British Columbia is unique within Canada when it comes to Indigenous language diversity. There are 7 distinct language families, completely unrelated to each other. Within these families there are 34 different First Nations languages and at least 93 different dialects (varieties) of those languages. Besides these 34 living languages, at least three languages which were spoken in British Columbia are now sleeping. In addition to First Nations languages, Michif, the language of the Métis people, is spoken here, and Chinuk Wawa (aka Chinook Jargon), a creole language, was once actively spoken. In the context of Canada, BC's languages make up more than 50% of the approximately 61 languages indigenous to this country. Why are regions such as BC’s northwest coast so linguistically diverse? In discussing the genesis of the linguistic diversity of the Pacific Northwest, Beck (2000, p. 154) observes that “Nichols (1992, p. 13) refers to such areas as ‘residual zones’—regions containing a number of genetically diverse languages that have coexisted for long periods of time in a state of cultural and political equilibrium in which no one group has attained ascendancy over another. Residual zones, she points out, are a "hallmark" of the Pacific Rim (Nichols 1992, p. 22) and most typically arise in mountainous areas and other geographical regions in which numerically smaller individual languages can remain sheltered and relatively autonomous (1992, p. 233-34). These zones are typified by the internal diversity of the languages that exist within them.” Threat to Diversity While celebrating this rich diversity that is integral to Canada’s unique cultural heritage, we must recognize that this diversity is under threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Toolkit: a Guide to Nation Building
    BRITISH COLUMBIA ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS Governance Toolkit A GUIDE TO NATION BUILDING BCAFN GOVERNANCE TOOLKIT /// LETTER FROM REGIONAL CHIEF JODY WILSON-RAYBOULD /// PAGE 1 LETTER FROM REGIONAL CHIEF JODY WILSON-RAYBOULD Dear Leaders, The BCAFN is pleased to present the BCAFN Governance Toolkit: A Guide to Nation Building in accordance with the Building on OUR Success action plan and the first pillar of that plan, “Strong and Appropriate Governance.” The Governance Toolkit is a comprehensive guide intended to assist your Nation in building or rebuilding governance and navigating its way out from under the Indian Act at its own pace and based on its own priorities. Since it was first conceived, this project has taken on a life of its own and continues to grow. The Governance Toolkit also continues the work of previous BC Regional Chiefs and draws on the growing governance experiences of Nations in BC, working together to improve the lives of our people. Simply defined, “Governance” means “establishing rules to coordinate our actions and achieve our goals.” As societies, the institutions we create to make rules and then enforce them, we call “government.” Gover- nance and government come in many forms but are always needed. They can, of course, be done well or badly. Research and experts tell us that the quality of governance, much more than its specific form, has a huge impact on the fortunes of any given society. Ours are no exception. Societies that govern well simply do better economically, socially and politically than those that do not. Strong and appropriate governance increases a society’s chances of efectively meeting the needs of its people.
    [Show full text]
  • Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Page | 29-1
    PORT METRO VANCOUVER | Roberts Bank Terminal 2 29.0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND EFFECTS OF CHANGES TO THE ENVIRONMENT This section summarises potential environmental effects, proposed mitigation, residual effects, and cumulative effects in relation to the categories of environmental effects as specified in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA), 2012 section 5 and in the EIS Guidelines part 2, sections 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 11.1.2, and 12.1.3. These summaries are based on findings presented in the detailed biophysical VC effects assessments (Sections 11.0 through 16.0), socio-economic VC effects assessments (Sections 19.0 through 28.0), and Section 32.0 Potential or Established Aboriginal and Treaty Rights and Related Interests. Where applicable, descriptions of change for ICs are also provided. 29.1 CHANGES TO COMPONENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT WITHIN FEDERAL JURISDICTION Appendix 29-A summarises changes that may be caused by the Project to components of the environment within federal jurisdiction as listed in CEAA, 2012 s. 5(1)(a), including: (i) fish and fish habitat as defined in subsection 2(1) of the Fisheries Act; (ii) aquatic species as defined in subsection 2(1) of the Species at Risk Act; and (iii) migratory birds as defined in subsection 2(1) of the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994. Appendix 29-A also summarises the mitigation measures, follow-up and related commitments, and the residual environmental effects (including cumulative environmental effects) identified in relation to this category of environmental effects. Thus, Appendix 29-A addresses the requirements in sections 10.1.2, 11.1.2, and 12.1.3 of the EIS Guidelines pertaining to changes to components of the environment within federal jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • R~I TRANSMOUNTAIN
    r~i TRANSMOUNTAIN Trans Mountain Expansion Project ~7 ~~~ Gmail: info~.ctrai~smountain.com ~ 5'► Plione: 1.866.514.6700 ~ ~~'ebsite: www.trausmountain.com ~ a~TransMfi VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION September 2, 2014 National Energy Board 517 — 10th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P OA8 To: Ms. Sheri Young, Secretary National Energy Board Dear Ms. Young: Re: Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Trans Mountain Expansion Project Application Hearing Order OH-001-2014 Errata Regarding Traditional Land and Resource Use Supplemental Technical Report On July 21, 2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC (Trans Mountain) submitted its Traditional Land Resource Use (TLRU) Supplemental Technical Report (Filing ID A3Z4Z1) in which Trans Mountain inaccurately reported TLRU participation information about Alexander First Nation and Alexis Nakota First Nation (Table 3.1; Filing ID A3Z4Z2) within the report. Additionally, Trans Mountain incorrectly reported the date of the Results Review and Mitigation Meeting with Esquimalt First Nation in the previously filed errata (Filing ID A3Z6E6). Trans Mountain apologizes for these errors; please see the updated table attached to this letter. Yours truly, -, ~~~ Scott Stoness Vice President, Finance and Regulatory Affairs Kinder Morgan Canada 403 514 6525 Work [email protected] _. _ _ _ _ _ KINDER~MORGAN CAkAdA Suite 2700, 300 -5th Avenue SW Calgary; Alberta,T2P 5J2 TABLE 3.1 TIME TABLE OF TRADITIONAL MARINE RESOURCE USE STUDIES FOR EACH PARTICIPATING COMMUNITY Results Reviews) Community Map Review Interviews Ground Reconnaissance Mitigation Meetings Cowichan Tribes Third-party, independent study. Final report received November 29, 2013 Esquimalt Nation November 13, 2013 November 13 and 14, 2013 November 13 and 14, 2013 January 30, 2014 Ditidaht First Nation Third-party, independent TMRU study (underway).
    [Show full text]