DOCSLIB.ORG

The Tulu Moye Geothermal Development Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Tulu Moye Geothermal Development Project THE TULU MOYE GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Photograph by Ms. Aida Muluneh. Meeting at the Window, 2009 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN VERSION 02 November 2017 RG SEP–02: 2017 CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES 5 LIST OF FIGURES 5 REPORT REVIEW AND VERIFICATION 6 ACRONMYS 7 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Overview 8 1.2 Objectives of Stakeholder Engagement 8 1.3 Scope of Application 9 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 10 2.1 Project Location 10 2.2 Project Settings 10 2.3 Project Description 11 2.4 Project Area of Influence 13 3 NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 16 3.1 Overview 16 3.2 Policies 16 3.2.1 Environmental Policy and Strategy, 1997 16 3.2.2 Ethiopian National Policy on Women, 1993 16 3.2.3 IFC PSs on Environment and Social Sustainability (2012) 17 3.2.4 IFC Good Practice Handbook on Stakeholder Engagement 18 3.2.5 Other Relevant International Policies and Conventions 19 3.3 National Laws 20 3.3.1 The Constitution 20 3.3.2 Environmental Protection Organs, Proclamation No. 295 /2002 20 3.3.3 Environmental Impact Assessment, Proclamation No. 299 /2002 21 4 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION /MAPPING 22 4.1 Introduction 22 4.1.1 Primary Stakeholder 22 4.1.2 Secondary Stakeholder 22 4.1.3 Tertiary Stakeholder 22 4.2 Stakeholders Identification 22 4.2.1 Government Officials 23 4.2.2 Project Proponent 23 4.2.3 Project Affected Persons 23 4.2.4 Vulnerable Groups 24 4.2.5 CSOs, NGO and Conservation Organizations 24 4.2.6 Development Partners 25 4.2.7 Media 25 4.3 Indigenous Peoples 25 2 RG SEP–02: 2017 4.4 List of Stakeholders 26 4.5 Project Phases and Stakeholders Engagement 27 4.5.1 Pre-feasibility and Feasibility Study Phase 27 4.5.2 Operation Phases 29 4.5.3 Decommissioning Phases 30 5 SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 31 5.1 Background 31 5.2 Initial Stakeholder Consultations 32 5.2.1 Approach and Study Methods 32 5.2.2 Summary of Key Issues Discussed with Stakeholders 34 5.3 ESIA Impacts and Mitigation Measures Consultations 38 5.3.1 Approach and Study Methods 38 5.3.2 Summary of Key Issues Discussed by Stakeholders 40 6 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS AND ENGAGEMENT PLAN 42 6.1 General Information 42 6.1.1 Stakeholder Analysis 42 6.1.2 Conceptual Framework and Proposed Structure 45 6.2 Stakeholder Methods 46 6.2.1 General Information 46 6.2.2 Activities and Methods 46 6.3 Stakeholder Engagement Plan 48 6.3.1 Plan Overview 48 6.3.2 ESIA Implementation 48 6.3.3 Final ESIA Disclosure and Consultation 53 6.3.4 Indicative Timeframes 53 7 RESOURCES FOR SEP IMPLIMENTATION 54 7.1 Resources and Responsibilities 54 7.1.1 Top Management 54 7.1.2 Environmental and Social Manager 54 7.1.3 Community Liaison Officers 55 7.2 Logistics and Capacity Building 55 7.2.1 Equipment and Office Space 55 7.2.2 Capacity Building 56 7.2.3 Stakeholder Engagement Materials 56 8 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 57 8.1 Introduction 57 8.1.1 Objectives 57 8.2 Roles and Responsibilities 57 8.2.1 RG’s Responsibility 57 8.2.2 Tentative Committee 57 8.3 Procedure for Grievance/Comment Response 58 8.4 Record Keeping 60 8.5 Appeal and Disclosure 60 8.5.1 Appeal 60 3 RG SEP–02: 2017 8.5.2 Disclosure 60 9 MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED SEP 61 9.1 Definition and Purpose 61 9.2 Monitoring the SEP Implementation Inputs 61 9.3 Monitoring the SEP Implementation Process 61 9.4 Methods of Monitoring the Efficiency of SEP Implementation 61 9.4.1 Monitoring the Overall Efficiency of SEP Implementation 61 9.4.2 Developing Summary Indicators 62 9.4.3 Indicators of the Efficiency of Individual SEP Activities 62 9.4.4 Studying Community Level Organizations 62 9.5 Impact Evaluation 62 9.5.1 Estimation of Net Impacts 62 9.5.2 Comparison of ‘Effectiveness’ of 2 or More Alternative Strategies 62 9.6 Tools for Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation 63 9.6.1 Quantitative Surveys 63 9.6.2 Focus Group Discussions 63 9.7 Reports and Deliverables 63 9.7.1 Weekly CLOs Reports 63 9.7.2 Monthly Reports 64 9.7.3 Quarterly Reports 64 9.7.4 Annual Reports 64 10 LIST OF APPENDICES 65 Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement Forms 66 Appendix 1.1: Grievance and Concerns Logging Form 66 Appendix 1.2: Feedback Logging Form 67 Appendix 1.3: Simple Grievance and Concerns Logging Database 68 Appendix 1.4: Simple Commitment Register 68 Appendix 2: Introduction Consultation Meeting Series 69 Appendix 2.1: Stakeholders Interviewed 69 Appendix 2.2: Minutes of Meetings with Stakeholders 72 Appendix 3: Disclosure of ESIA Impacts and Mitigation Measures 110 Appendix 3.1 Stakeholders Program Schedule 110 Appendix 3.2: Minutes of Meetings with Stakeholders 112 4 RG SEP–02: 2017 LIST OF TABLES Table Description Page Table 4-1: Local Communities within the Project /Study Area 24 Table 4-2: CSOs and NGOs Actively Working in the Project /Study Area 24 Table 4-3: Stakeholder Bodies and their Relevance to Project 26 Table 5-1: Number of Participants in the Public Meetings 33 Table 6-1: Stakeholder Analysis 43 Table 6-2: Consultations on Stakeholder Engagement 51 Table 6-3: Engagements Prior to Civil Works 51 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Description Page Figure 1: The Project /Study Area ............................................................................................................... 10 Figure 2: The Project Area Sub-Districts (Kebeles) ...................................................................................... 11 Figure 3: The Drilling Area within the Project /Study Area ......................................................................... 12 Figure 4: Directional Drilling Targets ........................................................................................................... 14 Figure 5: Initial Proposal of Access Road (new road marked with red) ...................................................... 15 Figure 6: Location of Drilling Targets (existing road marked with yellow) .................................................. 15 Figure 7: Public Announcement .................................................................................................................. 39 Figure 8: Stakeholder Analysis Matrix ......................................................................................................... 42 Figure 9: Expected Communication Flow among Stakeholders .................................................................. 45 Figure 11: Grievance Mechanism ................................................................................................................ 59 5 RG SEP–02: 2017 REPORT REVIEW AND VERIFICATION Prepared for/client: Environment and Community Development Directorate, Ministry of Mines Project name: Ethiopia – Tulu Moye RG report number: 17005-03 Project manager: Thorleifur Finnsson /ESIA: Loftur R. Gissurarson Author(s): Reykjavik Geothermal & Gibb International Distribution of all Reykjavik Geothermal reports is restricted as the general rule, unless otherwise stated. Report review and verification: Description Date Responsible (signature not necessary) Internal draft prepared September 2015 Gibb International Internal draft review October 2015 Reykjavik Geothermal (LR) 1st version published March 2016 Gibb International 2nd draft prepared January 2017 Reykjavik Geothermal (LR) 2nd draft updated August 2017 Reykjavik Geothermal (LR) 2nd draft reviewed 29.09.2017 ERM (Mike Everett & Haroub Ahmed) 2nd draft reviewed 10.11.2017 RG (Aynalem Getachew) 2nd draft approved, published November 2017 Reykjavik Geothermal (ThF) 6 RG SEP–02: 2017 ACRONMYS AfDB Africa Development Bank CBO Community Based Organizations CDP Community Development Plan /Program CLO Community Liaison Officer CSOs Civil Society Organizations CSR Community and Stakeholder Relations CSR Corporate Social Responsibility EE Environmental Experts EEPO Ethiopian Electric Power Office EHS Environment and Social Sustainability EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIB Europe International Bank EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPs Equator Principles E&S Environmental and Social ESAP Environmental and Social Action Plan ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan ESMS Environmental and Social Management System FDRE Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia FGDs Focus Group Discussions FPIC Free, Prior, and Informed Consent HIV /AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus /Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome H&S Health and Safety ICP Informed Consultation and Participation IFC International Finance Corporation IPP Independent Power Producer ISS Integrated Safeguards System KPI Key Performance Indicator masl Meters above sea level M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MFI Micro Finance Institutions MoM Ministry of Mines NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations NTS Non-Technical Summary OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development OMS Operational Manual Statement OP Operation Policy PAP Project Affected Persons /People PM Project Manager PS Performance Standards RAP Resettlement Action Plan RFP Resettlement Policy Framework RG Reykjavik Geothermal SE Stakeholder Engagement SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan SNNPR Southern Nations, Nationalities and People’s Region TBD To Be Decided TGE Transitional Government of Ethiopian TV Television UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe WB World Bank 7 RG SEP–02: 2017 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview The Government of Ethiopia and Reykjavik Geothermal (RG) entered into an agreement in October 2013 to develop and operate geothermal power of up to 1,000 MW in two phases of 500 MW each. The first 500 MW plant is to be built inside the Corbetti Caldera, which is currently in progress. The second, a 500 MW power plant is planned in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Existing and Proposed Irrigation Scheme on Hydrology Of
    Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies Addis Ababa Institute of Technology The Impact of Existing and Proposed Irrigation scheme on Hydrology of lake Ziway A thesis Submitted and presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Science in Civil & Environmental Engineering (Major in Hydraulic Engineering) By Daniel Fekadu Advisor Dr. Mebruk Mohammed Addis Ababa University October, 2016 The impact of existing and proposed irrigation scheme on Hydrology of lake Ziway 2016 Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies Addis Ababa Institute of Technology The Impact of Existing and Proposed Irrigation scheme on Hydrology of lake Ziway A thesis submitted and presented to the school of graduate studies of Addis Ababa University in partial fulfillment of the degree of Masters of Science in Civil Engineering (Major Hydraulic Engineering) By Daniel Fekadu Approval by Board of Examiners ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Advisor Signature ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Internal Examiner Signature ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------ External Examiner Signature ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Chairman (Department of Graduate Committee) Signature AAIT/SCEE 2 The impact of existing and proposed irrigation scheme on Hydrology of lake Ziway 2016 ABSTRACT Lake Ziway is located in Oromia Regional State near the Town of Ziway some 150 km south of Addis Ababa at the northern end of the southern Rift Valley. The lake covers an area of some 450 km2 at its average surface level of 1,636.12 m and has a maximum depth of 8 m. The two major rivers flowing to the lake are Meki and Katar Rivers and there is Bulbula river as an outflow from the lake.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • Limnologica 65 (2017) 61–75
    Limnologica 65 (2017) 61–75 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Limnologica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/limno Farmers’ awareness and perception of Lake Ziway (Ethiopia) and its MARK watershed management ⁎ Hayal Destaa,b, , Brook Lemmab,c, Till Stellmacherd a Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Leopoldstr. 11a, D-80802, Munich, Germany b Chair of Ecosystem Planning and Management, EiABC, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 518, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia c Department of Zoological Sciences, College of Natural Science, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia d Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, D-53113, Bonn, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The article examines how heads of farmers’ households perceive the socioeconomic benefits of Lake Ziway Watershed management (Ethiopia), the causes of its current degradation, and the state of land and water use management in its wa- Local perception tershed. The investigation was based on in-depth empirical field work including a survey with 635 heads of Awareness smallholder farmers’ households via interview using semi-structured questionnaires. Further, water abstraction Lake was estimated from three districts that border with the lake. Respondents believe that Lake Ziway provides a Water abstraction number of individual and collective benefits for local communities, private companies and public institution. They stated, however, that the lake is under pressure from the floriculture industry and other investment pro- jects, high population growth and subsequent expansion of settlements and irrigation farms, high applications of agrochemicals, soil erosion, uncontrolled water abstraction, and deforestation in the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 and Reassessment of Crop
    Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 And Reassessment Of Crop Production and Marketing For 2014/15 October 2015 Final Report Ethiopia: Bellmon Analysis - 2014/15 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................ iii Table of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Economic Background ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Wage Labor ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Agriculture Sector Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Full Report (Pdf)
    Working Together The sharing of water and sanitation support services for small towns and villages A WELL study produced under Task 510 by Brian Reed WELL Water and Environmental Health at London and Loughborough Water, Engineering and Development Centre Loughborough University Leicestershire LE11 3TU UK [email protected] www.lboro.ac.uk/WELL © LSHTM/WEDC, 2001 Reed, B.J. (2001) Working Together -the sharing of water and sanitation support services for small towns and villages WELL. Contents amendment record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Revision Description Date Signed 1 Draft final July 01 APC 2 Final 01/10/01 APC Designed and produced at WEDC Task Management by Andrew Cotton Quality Assurance by Andrew Cotton Cover photograph: Brian Reed (W/r Dirbe Ebrahem, village water committee member and w/r Likehesh Mengesha, tap attendant, Tereta, Ethiopia) WELL TASK 510 Working Together: draft final report Table of contents Table of contents...........................................................................................................................i List of tables................................................................................................................................ ii List of figures .............................................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................iii Summary .......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization of Shelter/NFI Needs
    Prioritization of Shelter/NFI needs Date: 31st May 2018 Shelter and NFI Needs As of 18 May 2018, the overall number of displaced people is 345,000 households. This figure is based on DTM round 10, partner’s assessments, government requests, as well as the total of HH supported since July 2017. The S/NFI updated its prioritisation in early May and SNFI Cluster partners agreed on several criteria to guide prioritisation which include: - 1) type of emergency, 2) duration of displacement, and 3) sub-standard shelter conditions including IDPS hosted in collective centres and open-air sites and 4) % of vulnerable HH at IDP sites. Thresholds for the criteria were also agreed and in the subsequent analysis the cluster identified 193 IDP hosting woredas mostly in Oromia and Somali regions, as well as Tigray, Gambella and Addis Ababa municipality. A total of 261,830 HH are in need of urgent shelter and NFI assistance. At present the Cluster has a total of 57,000 kits in stocks and pipeline. The Cluster requires urgent funding to address the needs of 204,830 HHs that are living in desperate displacement conditions across the country. This caseload is predicted to increase as the flooding continues in the coming months. Shelter and NFI Priority Activities In terms of priority activities, the SNFI Cluster is in need of ES/NFI support for 140,259 HH displaced mainly due to flood and conflict under Pillar 2, primarily in Oromia and Somali Regions. In addition, the Shelter and NFI Cluster requires immediate funding for recovery activities to support 14,000 HH (8,000 rebuild and 6,000 repair) with transitional shelter support and shelter repair activities under Pillar 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Zones of Ethiopia: a Parametric Approach
    Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online) Vol.5, No.3, 2014 Smallholder Wheat Production Efficiency in Selected Agro- ecological Zones of Ethiopia: A Parametric Approach Tolesa Alemu 1* , Bezabih Emana 2, Jema Haji 1, and Belaineh Legesse 1 1. School of Agricultural Economics & Agribusiness, Haramaya University, Ethiopia 2. General Manager, HEDBED Business & Consultancy PLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia * E-mail of the corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Wheat productivity is very low in Ethiopia. Improving production efficiency is one of the options for enhancing wheat productivity. To identify the level of production efficiency and sources of inefficiencies, this study was carried out in three major wheat producing agro-ecologies. It used cross-sectional data collected from randomly selected 381 farm households for 2012/13 cropping season. A Cobb-Douglas Production Function and Stochastic Frontier Analysis were employed to achieve the objectives. The study found considerable variation in production efficiency among agro-ecologies and within agro-ecology. The mean technical efficiency estimates for lowland, midland and highland agro-ecologies were 57 percent, 82 percent and 78 percent, respectively. The technical efficiency ranges from 24.4 to 88.6 percents in the lowland, 51.6 to 94.4 percents in the midland, and 34.5 to 94.3 percents in the highland agro-ecologies. There is more capacity to increase wheat yield given the current state of technology and input levels. Wheat output elasticities associated with land, labor, chemical fertilizers and other inputs (seed and pesticides) were positive and significant in the lowland whereas in mid and highland agro- ecologies, output elasticities of land and chemical fertilizers were significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia a M Tigray a Afar M H U Amhara a Uz N M
    35°0'0"E 40°0'0"E Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia A m Tigray A Afar m h u Amhara a uz N m Dera u N u u G " / m r B u l t Dire Dawa " r a e 0 g G n Hareri 0 ' r u u Addis Ababa ' n i H a 0 Gambela m s Somali 0 ° b a K Oromia Ü a I ° o A Hidabu 0 u Wara o r a n SNNPR 0 h a b s o a 1 u r Abote r z 1 d Jarte a Jarso a b s a b i m J i i L i b K Jardega e r L S u G i g n o G A a e m e r b r a u / K e t m uyu D b e n i u l u o Abay B M G i Ginde e a r n L e o e D l o Chomen e M K Beret a a Abe r s Chinaksen B H e t h Yaya Abichuna Gne'a r a c Nejo Dongoro t u Kombolcha a o Gulele R W Gudetu Kondole b Jimma Genete ru J u Adda a a Boji Dirmeji a d o Jida Goro Gutu i Jarso t Gu J o Kembibit b a g B d e Berga l Kersa Bila Seyo e i l t S d D e a i l u u r b Gursum G i e M Haro Maya B b u B o Boji Chekorsa a l d Lalo Asabi g Jimma Rare Mida M Aleltu a D G e e i o u e u Kurfa Chele t r i r Mieso m s Kegn r Gobu Seyo Ifata A f o F a S Ayira Guliso e Tulo b u S e G j a e i S n Gawo Kebe h i a r a Bako F o d G a l e i r y E l i Ambo i Chiro Zuria r Wayu e e e i l d Gaji Tibe d lm a a s Diga e Toke n Jimma Horo Zuria s e Dale Wabera n a w Tuka B Haru h e N Gimbichu t Kutaye e Yubdo W B Chwaka C a Goba Koricha a Leka a Gidami Boneya Boshe D M A Dale Sadi l Gemechis J I e Sayo Nole Dulecha lu k Nole Kaba i Tikur Alem o l D Lalo Kile Wama Hagalo o b r Yama Logi Welel Akaki a a a Enchini i Dawo ' b Meko n Gena e U Anchar a Midega Tola h a G Dabo a t t M Babile o Jimma Nunu c W e H l d m i K S i s a Kersana o f Hana Arjo D n Becho A o t
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)
    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • Tulu Moye Geothermal Development Project - Phase I: Environmental and Social Impact Assessement ESIA Report: Part I of III Version 02 – Nov
    Tulu Moye Geothermal Development Project - Phase I: Environmental and Social Impact Assessement ESIA Report: Part I of III Version 02 – Nov. 2017 Report no. 17005-01 www.vso.is Borgartún 20 585 9000 105 Reykjavík [email protected] Report review and verification: Prepared for/client Reykjavik Geothermal Project/report name Tulu Moye Geothermal Development Project – Phase I: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report RG report number 17005-01 Project manager (PM) Thorleifur Finnsson / ESIA: Loftur R. Gissurarson Authors VSO: Audur Magnusdottir, Stefan Gunnar Thors, Guðjon Jonsson Responsible (signature not Description Date necessary) VSO: Audur Magnusdottir, Stefan Initial draft prepared 23.2.2016 Gunnar Thors, Gudjon Jonsson VSO: Audur Magnusdottir, Stefan Draft review 15.3.2016 Gunnar Thors, Gudjon Jonsson Draft review 29.4.2016 RG: Loftur Reimar Final copy review 3.5.2016 RG: Loftur Reimar ESIA V.01 published for stake- 17.5.2016 VSO & RG holder disclosure and consulation Input for ESIA V.02 prepared 10.03.2017 RG: Loftur Reimar VSO: Audur Magnusdottir, Stefan Input for ESIA V.02 prepared 11.7.2017 Gunnar Thors, Gudjon Jonsson ERM: Mike Everett & Haroub Draft ESIA V.02 review 29.09.2017 Ahmed Draft ESIA V.02 review 10.11.2017 RG: Loftur Reimar Draft ESIA V.02 review 10.11.2017 RG Consultant: Aynalem Getachew ESIA V.02 published for MoM & 15.11.2017 RG & VSO EPA review and approval Final copy verified by MoM Geothermal utlization in Tulu Moye ESIA Report Executive summary Reykjavik Geothermal (RG) is responsible for this Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) report on geothermal development in the Tulu Moye area, Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • AKLDP Indebtedness Oromia Final
    El Niño and Indebtedness in Ethiopia Impacts of drought on household debts in Oromia National Regional State Early impacts of drought in Oromia National Regional State Introduction In Ethiopia in 2015 and 2016 a major drought affected the country, caused by failed spring belg rains in 2015, followed by erratic and poor summer kiremt rains associated with El Niño the same year. AKLDP Field Notes described the early impacts of the drought on rain-fed smallholder farming communities, including in East and West Hararghe zones of Oromia National Regional State.i These impacts included stress sales due to a decline in income from agricultural production, and reduced purchasing power due to the declining terms of trade of cereals versus livestock. In these Field Notes the AKLDP explores the impact of the 2015 El Niño episode on household indebtedness in two drought-affected areas of Oromia region in Ethiopia. Methodology The study was conducted in June 2016 in two severely drought affected woredas in Oromia, namely Dodota in Arsi Zone and Babile in East Hararghe Zone. In Ethiopia there is a large-scale social protection program called the Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP), which includes capacity to provide additional support to households affected by crises through food or cash transfers. Households in a drought-affected area might receive support from the PSNP, or more typical emergency assistance. Therefore, the study also assessed indebtedness in PSNP and non-PSNP households. The fieldwork included visits to drought affected communities and used: • focus group discussions – 6 with non-PSNP households and 6 with PSNP households • individual interviews using a questionnaire – 90 households in Dodota and 100 households in Babile woreda • interviews with kebele and woreda officials in each location.
    [Show full text]