Topics Subject Index
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Courier Subject Index
New York State Covered Bridge Society Empire State Courier Subject Index Advertising signs June 1972, p 4 & 5; March 1975, p 6; November 1978, p 1 & 7; November 1979, p 1 & 3 (P); July 1980, p 8; November 1980, p 2 & 8 (P); March 1985, p 4 & 5; July 1986, p 6; July 1988, p 1 & 8 (P) Alaska 1st Judicial Div. Hyder September 1970, p 3 3rd Judicial Div. Afognak Island September 1970, p 1 Alaska's bridges September 1970, p 1 & 3 Allen, Richard Sanders November 1980, p 3 (P); March 1984, p 5 & 7 (P) Anderson, Stott October 1972, p 5 (P) Arizona November 1978, p 2 (P) Gila County Roberts Ranch June 1969, p 3 Maricopa County Tempe August 1967, p 5 Navajo County Maureta B. Thomas Memorial November 1978, p 2 Arizona bridges August 1967, p 5 (P); June 1969, p 3 (P) Arm chair covered bridging June 1973, p 3 & 5 Arson September 1966, p 1; August 1967, p 7 & 8; December 1967, p 4; June 1968, p 5 (P); February 1969, p 4; September 1970, p 2; November 1971, p 3 & 6; February 1972, p 2 (P); November 1976, p 3 (P); July 1978, p 7; July 1981, p 2 Auvil, Myrtle March 1986, p 5 (P) Books Alabama's Covered Bridges, past and April 1974, p 6 present by A.G. Prince Covered Bridges of Mass., A Guide by July 1978, p 7 A. R. Howard Covered Bridges of Somerset County, March 1980, p 2 PA by Sheldon Barkman Covered Bridges of the Middle Atlantic September 1966, p 8 States by R. -
Death Records from the Salem Press Collected and Compiled by Susan Wade, First Washington County Historian
Death records from the Salem Press collected and compiled by Susan Wade, first Washington County Historian Published 2 Jan. 1874 In Salem, Dec. 16, Mrs. HANNAH L. FIFIELD, wife of Frank N. Fifield, aged 25 years. In Salem, Dec. 23, at the residence of Mr. Daniel Rich of typhoid fever, JAMES MCNISH, in the 26th year of his age. In New York City, Dec. 27, at the residence of Robert McMurray, M. D., Mrs. MARY GRACE MCMURRAY, wife of Hon. Ebenezer McMurray of this town, aged 53 years. In Easton, on Saturday evening, December 20th, Capt. FREDERICK MARSHALL, aged about 78 years. In Lakeville, on Wednesday, Dec. 10th, EUNICE, wife of Walter G. STEWART, aged 54 years. Published 9 Jan. 1874 In Rupert, Jan, 3d ASHER LOVELAND, aged 62. In Rupert, Jan, 5th, little CHARLIE son, of Cyrus F. and Elizabath SHELDON, aged 11 months. Published 16 Jan. 1874 In Salem, January 10th, 1874, JOHN M. CLAPP, in the 32d year of his age. In this village, December 29th, 1873, DAVID HILL, aged about 6 years. JAMES BALDWIN, at the residence of his brother, aged about 28 years. In Jackson, Jan. 11th, 1874, ELIZABETH, wife of Thomas MCMORRIS, aged 64 years. In Argyle, January 1, Mrs. MARY, relict of John FLACK, aged 73 years. Published 23 Jan. 1874 In Salem, at the Central House, Jan. 22, PATRICK MCCLEAR, in the 27th year of his age. In Salem, Jan. 19, MARIA E., infant daughter of Martin and Ellen MALTHANER, aged 2 months and 4 days. In Salem, Jan. 19, EDWARD C., infant son of Horace P. -
Feed Grain Transportation and Storage Assistance Regulations
CANADA CONSOLIDATION CODIFICATION Feed Grain Transportation and Règlement sur l’aide au Storage Assistance Regulations transport et à l’emmagasinage des céréales C.R.C., c. 1027 C.R.C., ch. 1027 Current to November 21, 2016 À jour au 21 novembre 2016 Published by the Minister of Justice at the following address: Publié par le ministre de la Justice à l’adresse suivante : http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca OFFICIAL STATUS CARACTÈRE OFFICIEL OF CONSOLIDATIONS DES CODIFICATIONS Subsections 31(1) and (3) of the Legislation Revision and Les paragraphes 31(1) et (3) de la Loi sur la révision et la Consolidation Act, in force on June 1, 2009, provide as codification des textes législatifs, en vigueur le 1er juin follows: 2009, prévoient ce qui suit : Published consolidation is evidence Codifications comme élément de preuve 31 (1) Every copy of a consolidated statute or consolidated 31 (1) Tout exemplaire d'une loi codifiée ou d'un règlement regulation published by the Minister under this Act in either codifié, publié par le ministre en vertu de la présente loi sur print or electronic form is evidence of that statute or regula- support papier ou sur support électronique, fait foi de cette tion and of its contents and every copy purporting to be pub- loi ou de ce règlement et de son contenu. Tout exemplaire lished by the Minister is deemed to be so published, unless donné comme publié par le ministre est réputé avoir été ainsi the contrary is shown. publié, sauf preuve contraire. -
Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13Th) Edition
Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13th) Edition T OF EN CO M M T M R E A R P C E E D U N A I C T I E R D E S M T A ATES OF U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) RDML Timothy Gallaudet., Ph.D., USN Ret., Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management Cover image courtesy of Megan Greenaway—Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI III Preface Distances Between United States Ports is published by the Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C. 883a and b), and the Act of 22 October 1968 (44 U.S.C. 1310). Distances Between United States Ports contains distances from a port of the United States to other ports in the United States, and from a port in the Great Lakes in the United States to Canadian ports in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Distances Between Ports, Publication 151, is published by National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and distributed by NOS. NGA Pub. 151 is international in scope and lists distances from foreign port to foreign port and from foreign port to major U.S. ports. The two publications, Distances Between United States Ports and Distances Between Ports, complement each other. -
Aroostook County Visitor Guide © Visitaroostook.Com 1 the Trail Less Traveled
PROUD HOST REGION OF Aroostook County Visitor Guide © visitaroostook.com 1 The Trail Less Traveled E NJOY A VISIT TO A ROOSTOOK C OUNTY , M AINE Amid a natural wonderland, visitors to the largest county east of the Mississippi River revel in a place populated by friendly folk and free roaming wildlife, in a land watered by thousands of miles of clear-running streams and hundreds of lakes. When coupled with the Great North Woods covering a vast region larger than many states, Aroostook County is your destination for uncrowded recreational pursuits, wildlife viewing, hunting and fishing – or just a solitary walk along the trail less traveled. Aroostook County’s pristine beauty and cultural heritage make VISION: it the ideal destination for an uncomplicated experience. To develop and implement a tourism MISSION: marketing program for Aroostook County. This publication produced by Aroostook County Tourism 888-216-2463 and Paid for in part by a grant from the Northern Maine Development Commission (800) 427-8736. Maine Office of Tourism. For more information, visit these websites: For additional information on Maine, visitaroostook.com & nmdc.org call 1-888-MAINE45 or go to visitmaine.com. 2 Aroostook County Visitor Guide © visitaroostook.com AROOSTOOK COUNTY NORTH MAINE WOODS AROOSTOOK STATE PARK How to use this map & guide North Maine Woods ....................Green St. John Valley ............................Yellow NORTH Central Aroostook ..........................Blue GATE TO Southern Aroostook........................Red BAXTER SHIN D ISTAN C ES POND W IT H IN A ROOSTOOK T O A ROOSTOOK Fort Kent to Caribou .......... 45 miles New York, NY ............601 miles Madawaska to Houlton .... -
Hoosicriver Shoreline Survey
HOOSIC RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION Shoreline Survey Report & Action Plan: Summer 2012 Report Compiled by Julieanne Fontana Edited by HooRWA Photo: View from Buskirk Bridge, July 2012 I. Introduction: Hoosic River Shoreline Surveys In the summer of 2012, the summer interns for the Hoosic River Watershed Association conducted Shoreline Surveys along the Hoosic River. The river was broken down into various sections based on characteristic changes in the stream and riparian habitat. The surveys identified human impacts on the river that require immediate attention for the health of the river. They also provide a documentation of other human impacts, like outflow and drainage pipes, and natural qualities for reference in the future. II. Priority Action for Immediate Attention The items mentioned here should be reviewed as soon as possible, as immediate change could make a difference to the health of the river. Other less urgent problems are mentioned in the full report summaries. Priority Action 1: Oily, red-brown seepage GPS Location: N42.71785 W73.18877 Oily orange-brown seepage was seeping out of the ground near outflow pipes just upstream of Cole Avenue bridge in Williamstown. The seepage did not seem directly related to the outflow pipes, but may be an affect of the nearby road or old mill building. {Checked with DEP – seepage is organic with iron oxide; Editor} Priority Action 2: Sewage odor outflow pipe GPS Location: N42.71973 W73.19049 Downstream of the Cole Avenue bridge about 100 yards, this outflow pipe was flagged as potentially unsafe. It had a sewer gas odor and the area where the outflow dumped into the stream was separated off, though not sealed from the rest of the river. -
Final Report
FINAL REPORT VOLUME 1 OF 2: ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT BRUNSWICK PIPELINE PROJECT PROJECT NO. 1003790 MAY 2006 REPORT NO. 1003790 REPORT TO Brunswick Pipeline Project c/o 1801 Hollis Street, Suite 1600 Halifax, NS B3J 3N4 FOR Brunswick Pipeline Project ON Environmental & Socio-Economic Assessment May 2006 Jacques Whitford 711 Woodstock Road Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5C2 Phone: 506-457-3200 Fax: 506-452-7652 www.jacqueswhitford.com BRUNSWICK PIPELINE PROJECT PROJECT 1003790. May 2006 i BRUNSWICK PIPELINE PROJECT PROJECT 1003790. May 2006 ii GLOSSARY Units % percent $ dollars oC degrees Celsius cm centimetre dB decibel dBA decibel on the A-weighted scale Dth/d decatherms per day ha hectare km kilometre kPa kilopascal kPag kilopascal, gauge km/h kilometre per hour L litre Leq equivalent sound level Lpm litres per minute m metre m2 square metre m3 cubic metre mg/L milligrams per litre mm millimetre NTU nephelometric turbidity units ppb parts per billion ppm parts per million psig pounds per square inch, gauge tcf trillion cubic feet µg/m3 micrograms per cubic metre Acronyms/Abbreviations AC CDC Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Al aluminum BRUNSWICK PIPELINE PROJECT PROJECT 1003790. May 2006 iii As arsenic ARD acid rock drainage ASU Archaeological Services Unit ATV all terrain vehicle BCWLAP British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection CAC conventional air contaminant CBSA Canadian Blood Services Agency CCME Canadian Council of Ministers -
Transportation During and After Hurricane Sandy
Transportation During and After Hurricane Sandy Sarah Kaufman, Carson Qing, Nolan Levenson and Melinda Hanson Rudin Center for Transportation NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service November 2012 1 Executive Summary Hurricane Sandy demonstrated the strengths and limits of the transportation infrastructure in New York City and the surrounding region. As a result of the timely and thorough preparations by New York City and the MTA, along with the actions of city residents and emergency workers to evacuate and adapt, the storm wrought far fewer casualties than might have occurred otherwise. The MTA and New York City Police Department, Departments of Transportation, Environmental Protection, and Sanitation worked quickly to pump water out of tunnels, repair infrastructure, enforce bus lanes, and clear debris. They also informed riders of service updates and the status of infrastructure, particularly with up-to-date maps, photos and videos provided by the MTA. The experience of Hurricane Sandy reinforced the importance of having multiple modes of transportation in the New York Region: subways, buses, bridges and tunnels, ferries as well as commuter rail systems in moving people in, through and out of the New York City and surrounding region. Hurricane Sandy also highlighted key investments and policies that should be considered to assure the viability of our infrastructure during future disasters: • Install backup power for subway pumps • Consider the use of porous pavement for streets in flood-prone areas • Locate building generators and fuel sources in flood prone areas on higher floors Hurricane Sandy and its impact on transportation also provided a timely message to all New Yorkers that public transportation is essential to the economic and social well being of the people who live, work and visit here. -
Community Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment (CCCVA) Process During 2014 -2015
COMMUNITY CLIMATE CH ANGE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Acknowledgements : This study is the result of a collaboration with four municipalities in the Western Valley Region, New Brunswick. This work was made possible by the participation of dedicated the residents from each community who formed the working groups, the Western Valley Regional Service Commission’s Planning Manager Katelyn Hayden, as well as Mark Castonguay and Dr. Paul Arp of the UNB Forest Watershed Research Centre. This work was funded by the Royal Bank of Canada Reproduction of this report in part or full requires written permission from WWF General disclaimer: Information in this report was obtained from highly regarded data sources, references, and individual experts. It is the intent to print accurate and reliable information. However, the authors are not responsible for the validity of all information presented in this report or for the consequences of its use. The views, opinions, or conclusions expressed in this report are those of the communities and do not necessarily reflect those of the WWF-Canada or the authors. Published: January 2017 By : Simon J. Mitchell (Senior Specialist, Freshwater) WWF Canada; Kim Reeder, Consultant Cover photo: St. John River near Woodstock, New Brunswick © Simon Mitchell / WWF-Canada TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Background ..................................................................................................................................................................... -
Covered Bridges Tour 10/4/2009
ORPCA COVERED BRIDGES TOUR 10/4/2009 Tour created by Bob and Kathleen Ellis Abiqua Creek (Gallon House) Covered Bridge Background: The Gallon House Bridge, the last of Marion County's original covered bridges, is located over Abiqua Creek a little more than a mile northwest of Silverton. The name Gallon House was due to the bridge's use as a "pigeon drop" for liquor at the north entrance. Operators at a liquor dispensary nearby sold "white lightening" whiskey by the gallon to Silverton residents. At the time, Silverton was "dry," not allowing liquor to be sold in town, while Mt. Angel was "wet." County: Marion The Gallon House along Abiqua Creek was in Mt. Angel territory. Stream: Abiqua Creek During the 1964 Christmas Flood, the bridge suffered considerable Bridge Length (ft): 84 damage. The County Board of Commissioners, however, decided the Year Built: 1917 bridge should be repaired and maintained as an historical landmark, as it was the only covered bridge in the county at the time. In 1985, the old wooden structure was closed to all traffic when a damaged chord rendered it useless. County road crews repaired the bridge to accept traffic up to a 10-ton limit by reinforcing a lower chord, as well as making repairs to the beams and flooring. Also included in the renovation was a change in the size and shape of the portals. The revamped portals were hinged to allow them to be opened for taller loads when necessary. In 1990, because of poor structural condition, the bridge was rehabilitated to mint condition and the hinged portals were removed. -
Capital District Transportation Committee
SECTION IV - APPENDICIES 133 2016-21 TIP Appendix A - Transit Project Details APPENDIX A - TRANSIT PROJECT DETAILS Millions of Dollars (Values in Parentheses are Quantities) 2015-16 Project Description (Committed) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 T6B STAR Buses: STAR Buses (#) .400(5) 0.400(5) 0.200(3) 0.400(5) 0.200(3) 0.400(5) T11 Passenger Facility Improvements: Bus Shelters .235 .114 .200 .190 .190 .200 Bus Signs .010 .010 Total .235 .114 .200 .200 .200 .200 T17 Transit Vehicles (Bus Replacement): Transit Buses (#) 3.390 (7) 5.290 (10) 5.488 (11) 5.438 (11) 5.787 (12) 5.732(11) T77 Capital Cost of Contracting for Commuter Service: Computer Service .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 Total .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 .600 A-1 2016-21 TIP Appendix B - Glossary APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY Names and Titles ACAA Albany County Airport Authority ANCA Adirondack North Country Association ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ATMS Advanced Traffic Management System (a.k.a. ITS) BRT Bus Rapid Transit CDRPC Capital District Regional Planning Commission CDTA Capital District Transportation Authority CDTC Capital District Transportation Committee FAST Act Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HBRR Highway Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems (a.k.a. ITS) MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act MPO Metropolitan -
Chapter 1 — Background and Planning Context
Chapter 1 1 BACKGROUND AND PLANNING CONTEXT 1 Background and Planning Context The West of the Hudson Regional Transit Access Study (WHRTAS) has been initiated by MTA Metro- North Railroad (Metro-North) in partnership with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Port Authority) and in cooperation with New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and New Jersey Transit (NJT) to improve mobility and accessibility in the West of Hudson region. Projected population and employment growth in Orange County, together with growth in ridership on Metro-North’s West of Hudson commuter service and a projected rise in Stewart International Airport (SWF) operations, necessitates the consideration of improved and expanded transit services for travelers in the region. WHRTAS evaluates alternatives for improving transit services between Central Orange County and Manhattan and access to SWF from the surrounding regions, Lower Hudson Valley and New York City. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is the lead federal agency for this study which is being conducted in accordance with FTA’s Alternatives Analysis requirements for New Starts program funds. The study also considered the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Extensive agency coordination and public outreach was implemented to obtain input and guidance throughout this study. This included the formation of a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which reviewed study material, advised on technical issues, and coordinated with a broad array of elected officials, agencies, organizations, and the general public through direct communication, workshops, roundtable discussions, and open houses. WHRTAS is being conducted in two phases. Phase I is the initial Alternatives Analysis (AA) phase, which evaluates the benefits, costs, and impacts of broad range of transit alternatives with the potential to meet the project's goals and objectives and concludes with the recommendation of a short list of alternatives.