Tmgo Stakeholder Engagement Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tmgo Stakeholder Engagement Plan TMGO T U L U M O Y E G E O T H E R M A L STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN TMGO STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN Document Ref.No. TMGO-SEP-002 Date: November 2017 Version:3 Prepared by Gibb International Reviewed by: Aynalem Getachew (E&S Manager) Approved by Darrell Boyd (CEO) Revision History Description Date Responsible (signature not necessary) Internal draft prepared September 2015 Gibb International Internal draft review October 2015 Reykjavik Geothermal (LR) 1st version published March 2016 Gibb International 2nd draft prepared January 2017 Reykjavik Geothermal (LR) 2nd draft updated August 2017 Reykjavik Geothermal (LR) 2nd draft reviewed 29.09.2017 ERM (Mike Everett & Haroub Ahmed) 2nd draft reviewed 10.11.2017 RG (Aynalem Getachew) 2nd draft approved, November 2017 Reykjavik Geothermal (ThF) published 2nd Version November 2017 Reykjavik Geothermal (ThF) 3rd Version March 2020 Aynalem Getachew TMGO T U L U M O Y E G E O T H E R M A L STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES 5 ACRONMYS 6 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Overview 8 1.2 Objectives of Stakeholder Engagement 9 1.3 Scope of Application 9 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 10 2.1 Project Location 10 2.2 Project Settings 11 2.3 Project Description 12 2.4 Project Area of Influence 15 3 NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 19 3.1 Overview 19 3.2 Policies 19 3.2.1 Environmental Policy and Strategy, 1997 19 3.2.2 Ethiopian National Policy on Women, 1993 19 3.2.3 IFC PSs on Environment and Social Sustainability (2012) 20 3.2.4 IFC Good Practice Handbook on Stakeholder Engagement 22 3.2.5 Other Relevant International Policies and Conventions 24 3.3 National Laws 25 3.3.1 The Constitution 25 3.3.2 Environmental Protection Organs, Proclamation No. 295 /2002 26 3.3.3 Environmental Impact Assessment, Proclamation No. 299 /2002 26 4 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION /MAPPING 28 4.1 Introduction 28 4.1.1 Primary Stakeholder 28 4.1.2 Secondary Stakeholder 28 4.1.3 Tertiary Stakeholder 28 4.2 Stakeholders Identification 29 4.2.1 Government Officials 29 4.2.2 Project Proponent 30 4.2.3 Project Affected Persons 30 4.2.4 Vulnerable Groups 31 4.2.5 CSOs, NGO and Conservation Organizations 31 4.2.6 Development Partners 32 4.2.7 Media 33 4.3 Indigenous Peoples 33 2 TMGO T U L U M O Y E G E O T H E R M A L STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN 4.4 List of Stakeholders 34 4.5 Project Phases and Stakeholders Engagement 36 4.5.1 Pre-feasibility and Feasibility Study Phase 36 4.5.2 Operation Phases 39 4.5.3 Decommissioning Phases 40 5 SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 42 5.1 Background 42 5.2 Initial Stakeholder Consultations 44 5.2.1 Approach and Study Methods 44 5.2.2 Summary of Key Issues Discussed with Stakeholders 46 5.3 ESIA Impacts and Mitigation Measures Consultations 53 5.3.1 Approach and Study Methods 53 5.3.2 Summary of Key Issues Discussed by Stakeholders 55 6 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS AND ENGAGEMENT PLAN 58 6.1 General Information 58 6.1.1 Stakeholder Analysis 58 6.1.2 Conceptual Framework and Proposed Structure 62 6.2 Stakeholder Methods 63 6.2.1 General Information 63 6.2.2 Activities and Methods 63 6.3 Stakeholder Engagement Plan 65 6.3.1 Plan Overview 65 6.3.2 ESIA Implementation 66 6.3.3 Final ESIA Disclosure and Consultation 72 6.3.4 Indicative Timeframes 72 7 RESOURCES FOR SEP IMPLIMENTATION 73 7.1 Resources and Responsibilities 73 7.1.1 Top Management 73 7.1.2 Environmental and Social Manager 73 7.1.3 Community Liaison Officers 74 7.2 Logistics and Capacity Building 75 7.2.1 Equipment and Office Space 75 7.2.2 Capacity Building 75 7.2.3 Stakeholder Engagement Materials 75 8 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 77 8.1 Introduction 77 8.1.1 Objectives 77 8.2 Roles and Responsibilities 77 8.2.1 RG’s Responsibility 77 8.2.2 Tentative Committee 77 8.3 Procedure for Grievance/Comment Response 78 3 TMGO T U L U M O Y E G E O T H E R M A L STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN 8.4 Record Keeping 80 8.5 Appeal and Disclosure 80 8.5.1 Appeal 80 8.5.2 Disclosure 80 9 MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED SEP 81 9.1 Definition and Purpose 81 9.2 Monitoring the SEP Implementation Inputs 81 9.3 Monitoring the SEP Implementation Process 81 9.4 Methods of Monitoring the Efficiency of SEP Implementation 82 9.4.1 Monitoring the Overall Efficiency of SEP Implementation 82 9.4.2 Developing Summary Indicators 82 9.4.3 Indicators of the Efficiency of Individual SEP Activities 82 9.4.4 Studying Community Level Organizations 82 9.5 Impact Evaluation 83 9.5.1 Estimation of Net Impacts 83 9.5.2 Comparison of ‘Effectiveness’ of 2 or More Alternative Strategies 83 9.6 Tools for Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation 83 9.6.1 Quantitative Surveys 83 9.6.2 Focus Group Discussions 83 9.7 Reports and Deliverables 83 9.7.1 Weekly CLOs Reports 84 9.7.2 Monthly Reports 84 9.7.3 Quarterly Reports 84 9.7.4 Annual Reports 84 10 LIST OF APPENDICES 86 Appendix 1: Stakeholder Engagement Forms 87 Appendix 1.1: Grievance and Concerns Logging Form 87 Appendix 1.2: Feedback Logging Form 88 Appendix 1.3: Simple Grievance and Concerns Logging Database 89 Appendix 1.4: Simple Commitment Register 89 Appendix 2: Introduction Consultation Meeting Series 90 Appendix 2.1: Stakeholders Interviewed 90 Appendix 2.2: Minutes of Meetings with Stakeholders 94 Appendix 3: Disclosure of ESIA Impacts and Mitigation Measures 137 Appendix 3.1 Stakeholders Program Schedule 137 Appendix 3.2: Minutes of Meetings with Stakeholders 139 LIST OF TABLES Table Description Page Table 4-1: Local Communities within the Project /Study Area 30 4 TMGO T U L U M O Y E G E O T H E R M A L STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN Table 4-2: CSOs and NGOs Actively Working in the Project /Study Area 31 Table 4-3: Stakeholder Bodies and their Relevance to Project 34 Table 5-1: Number of Participants in the Public Meetings 45 Table 6-1: Stakeholder Analysis 60 Table 6-2: Consultations on Stakeholder Engagement 69 Table 6-3: Engagements Prior to Civil Works 69 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Description Page Figure 1: The Project /Study Area .................................................................................................. 10 Figure 2: The Project Area Sub-Districts (Kebeles) ........................................................................ 12 Figure 3: The Drilling Area within the Project /Study Area ............................................................ 14 Figure 4: Directional Drilling Targets .............................................................................................. 17 Figure 5: Initial Proposal of Access Road (new road marked with red) ......................................... 18 Figure 6: Location of Drilling Targets (existing road marked with yellow) .................................... 18 Figure 7: Public Announcement ..................................................................................................... 54 Figure 8: Stakeholder Analysis Matrix ............................................................................................ 59 Figure 9: Expected Communication Flow among Stakeholders .................................................... 62 Figure 11: Grievance Mechanism ................................................................................................... 79 5 TMGO T U L U M O Y E G E O T H E R M A L STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN ACRONMYS AfDB Africa Development Bank CBO Community Based Organizations CDP Community Development Plan /Program CLO Community Liaison Officer CSOs Civil Society Organizations CSR Community and Stakeholder Relations CSR Corporate Social Responsibility EE Environmental Experts EEPO Ethiopian Electric Power Office EHS Environment and Social Sustainability EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIB Europe International Bank EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPs Equator Principles E&S Environmental and Social ESAP Environmental and Social Action Plan ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan ESMS Environmental and Social Management System FDRE Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia FGDs Focus Group Discussions FPIC Free, Prior, and Informed Consent HIV /AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus /Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome H&S Health and Safety ICP Informed Consultation and Participation IFC International Finance Corporation IPP Independent Power Producer ISS Integrated Safeguards System KPI Key Performance Indicator masl Meters above sea level M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MFI Micro Finance Institutions MoM Ministry of Mines NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations NTS Non-Technical Summary OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development OMS Operational Manual Statement OP Operation Policy PAP Project Affected Persons /People PM Project Manager PS Performance Standards RAP Resettlement Action Plan RFP Resettlement Policy Framework RG Reykjavik Geothermal 6 TMGO T U L U M O Y E G E O T H E R M A L STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN SE Stakeholder Engagement SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan SNNPR Southern Nations, Nationalities and People’s Region TBD To Be Decided TGE Transitional Government of Ethiopian TV Television UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe WB World Bank 7 TMGO T U L U M O Y E G E O T H E R M A L STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview Tulu Moye Geothermal Operations Private Limited Company (the “Company” or “TMGO”), an Ethiopian registered company, is at an advanced stage of developing a geothermal power generation opportunity at Tulu Moye, in the Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia. TMGO intends to develop a total generation capacity of 150 MW under a build own operate transfer (“BOOT”) structure under the Concession. The first phase will have a generation capacity of 50 MW (the “Project”). The Company is 100% owned by Tulu Moye SAS (“TM SAS”), a company registered in France, which in turn is owned by: (i) Meridiam Infrastructure Africa Fund and Meridiam Infrastructure Africa Parallel Fund (together, “MIAF”), which are managed by Meridiam SAS (“Meridiam”); and (ii) Reykjavik Geothermal, Ltd.
Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Existing and Proposed Irrigation Scheme on Hydrology Of
    Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies Addis Ababa Institute of Technology The Impact of Existing and Proposed Irrigation scheme on Hydrology of lake Ziway A thesis Submitted and presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Science in Civil & Environmental Engineering (Major in Hydraulic Engineering) By Daniel Fekadu Advisor Dr. Mebruk Mohammed Addis Ababa University October, 2016 The impact of existing and proposed irrigation scheme on Hydrology of lake Ziway 2016 Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies Addis Ababa Institute of Technology The Impact of Existing and Proposed Irrigation scheme on Hydrology of lake Ziway A thesis submitted and presented to the school of graduate studies of Addis Ababa University in partial fulfillment of the degree of Masters of Science in Civil Engineering (Major Hydraulic Engineering) By Daniel Fekadu Approval by Board of Examiners ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Advisor Signature ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Internal Examiner Signature ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------ External Examiner Signature ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Chairman (Department of Graduate Committee) Signature AAIT/SCEE 2 The impact of existing and proposed irrigation scheme on Hydrology of lake Ziway 2016 ABSTRACT Lake Ziway is located in Oromia Regional State near the Town of Ziway some 150 km south of Addis Ababa at the northern end of the southern Rift Valley. The lake covers an area of some 450 km2 at its average surface level of 1,636.12 m and has a maximum depth of 8 m. The two major rivers flowing to the lake are Meki and Katar Rivers and there is Bulbula river as an outflow from the lake.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • Limnologica 65 (2017) 61–75
    Limnologica 65 (2017) 61–75 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Limnologica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/limno Farmers’ awareness and perception of Lake Ziway (Ethiopia) and its MARK watershed management ⁎ Hayal Destaa,b, , Brook Lemmab,c, Till Stellmacherd a Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Leopoldstr. 11a, D-80802, Munich, Germany b Chair of Ecosystem Planning and Management, EiABC, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 518, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia c Department of Zoological Sciences, College of Natural Science, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia d Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, D-53113, Bonn, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The article examines how heads of farmers’ households perceive the socioeconomic benefits of Lake Ziway Watershed management (Ethiopia), the causes of its current degradation, and the state of land and water use management in its wa- Local perception tershed. The investigation was based on in-depth empirical field work including a survey with 635 heads of Awareness smallholder farmers’ households via interview using semi-structured questionnaires. Further, water abstraction Lake was estimated from three districts that border with the lake. Respondents believe that Lake Ziway provides a Water abstraction number of individual and collective benefits for local communities, private companies and public institution. They stated, however, that the lake is under pressure from the floriculture industry and other investment pro- jects, high population growth and subsequent expansion of settlements and irrigation farms, high applications of agrochemicals, soil erosion, uncontrolled water abstraction, and deforestation in the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 and Reassessment of Crop
    Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 And Reassessment Of Crop Production and Marketing For 2014/15 October 2015 Final Report Ethiopia: Bellmon Analysis - 2014/15 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................ iii Table of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Economic Background ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Wage Labor ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Agriculture Sector Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Fruits and Vegetables
    Meki Batu Fruits & Vegetables Producer Cooperatives Union Organizational O v e r v i e w April , 2016 MekiBatu Fruits & Vegetables Producer Cooperatives Union Establishment • Established on May 11, 2002 • Head office located in Meki township at 135km on the road to Hawassa and 60km south of Mojo town south in East Shoa Zone, Dugda woreda of Oromia region, MekiBatu Fruits & Vegetables Producer Cooperatives Union Vision To see betterment in members living condition and a union with a good competing capacity in the free market economy. Mission To contribute to improvement in production, productivity and marketability of members products. MekiBatu Fruits & Vegetables Producer Cooperatives Union Major Functions • To consolidate and sell members’ produce to local and foreign market • To supply appropriate agricultural inputs for producers at fair price, on time and required amount. • To facilitate better access to credit service • To collect and distributing market information to producers • Provision of technical and advisory support for producers • To provide mechanization and maintenance services • To provide Training & education To participate in cooperatives Social service MekiBatu Fruits & Vegetables Producer Cooperatives 13 year’s Organizational development: 2002 to 2016 Union At establishment Parameter As at December 2016 Growth On May 2002 Membership geographic 2 woredas (Dugda & 6 Woredas in 2 Zones 3 folds coverage ATJK ) in East - 4 woredas (Dugda ,Bora, ATJK & Adama) Shewa zone in East shewa zone; - 2 Woredas (Ziway-Dugda & Dodota)
    [Show full text]
  • Full Report (Pdf)
    Working Together The sharing of water and sanitation support services for small towns and villages A WELL study produced under Task 510 by Brian Reed WELL Water and Environmental Health at London and Loughborough Water, Engineering and Development Centre Loughborough University Leicestershire LE11 3TU UK [email protected] www.lboro.ac.uk/WELL © LSHTM/WEDC, 2001 Reed, B.J. (2001) Working Together -the sharing of water and sanitation support services for small towns and villages WELL. Contents amendment record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Revision Description Date Signed 1 Draft final July 01 APC 2 Final 01/10/01 APC Designed and produced at WEDC Task Management by Andrew Cotton Quality Assurance by Andrew Cotton Cover photograph: Brian Reed (W/r Dirbe Ebrahem, village water committee member and w/r Likehesh Mengesha, tap attendant, Tereta, Ethiopia) WELL TASK 510 Working Together: draft final report Table of contents Table of contents...........................................................................................................................i List of tables................................................................................................................................ ii List of figures .............................................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................iii Summary .......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization of Shelter/NFI Needs
    Prioritization of Shelter/NFI needs Date: 31st May 2018 Shelter and NFI Needs As of 18 May 2018, the overall number of displaced people is 345,000 households. This figure is based on DTM round 10, partner’s assessments, government requests, as well as the total of HH supported since July 2017. The S/NFI updated its prioritisation in early May and SNFI Cluster partners agreed on several criteria to guide prioritisation which include: - 1) type of emergency, 2) duration of displacement, and 3) sub-standard shelter conditions including IDPS hosted in collective centres and open-air sites and 4) % of vulnerable HH at IDP sites. Thresholds for the criteria were also agreed and in the subsequent analysis the cluster identified 193 IDP hosting woredas mostly in Oromia and Somali regions, as well as Tigray, Gambella and Addis Ababa municipality. A total of 261,830 HH are in need of urgent shelter and NFI assistance. At present the Cluster has a total of 57,000 kits in stocks and pipeline. The Cluster requires urgent funding to address the needs of 204,830 HHs that are living in desperate displacement conditions across the country. This caseload is predicted to increase as the flooding continues in the coming months. Shelter and NFI Priority Activities In terms of priority activities, the SNFI Cluster is in need of ES/NFI support for 140,259 HH displaced mainly due to flood and conflict under Pillar 2, primarily in Oromia and Somali Regions. In addition, the Shelter and NFI Cluster requires immediate funding for recovery activities to support 14,000 HH (8,000 rebuild and 6,000 repair) with transitional shelter support and shelter repair activities under Pillar 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) Modjo-Zeway
    Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ethiopian Roads Authority M ODJO A WASSA R OAD P ROJECT – L OT 1 M ODJO Z IWAY Oromia Regional State Phase II Detail Engineering Design Final Version Code S / 37 / ICB / RP /GE / 2001EFY Phase II. Detail Engineering Design RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (FINAL VERSION) Techniplan Addis Ababa, May 2013 ETHIOPIAN ROADS AUTHORITY MODJO AWASSA ROAD PROJECT – LOT 1 MODJO ‐ ZIWAY Phase II ‐ Detail Engineering Design RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Via Guido d’Arezzo, 14 ‐ 00198 Roma Italy Head office address Tel. +39 06 8535.0880 ‐ Fax +39 06 8535.4044 E‐Mail: [email protected] [email protected] 210, Lex Plaza Building ‐ Haile Gebre Selassie Road. ‐ Addis Ababa Ethiopia Project office address Tel ‐ Fax (251) 11 618.3729 ‐ E‐Mail: [email protected] Techniplan Addis Ababa, May 2013 Page i Techniplan RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Table of contents page Executive Summary 1 CHAPTER 1 Description of the project 8 CHAPTER 2 Impact of the project 13 CHAPTER 3 Institutional organization 14 CHAPTER 4 Public and stakeholders consultation 19 CHAPTER 5 Socioeconomic environment of the project road 21 CHAPTER 6 Policy, legal and administrative framework 36 CHAPTER 7 Institutional and administrative framework 45 CHAPTER 8 Eligibility criteria and project entitlement 48 CHAPTER 9 Methods of valuing affected properties 54 CHAPTER 10 Implementation schedule 51 CHAPTER 11 Compensation for project affected property 55 CHAPTER 12 Monitoring, evaluation and reporting 57 CHAPTER 13 The RAP disclosure 60 Appendices 1. List and Profiles of PAPs at 70m RoW 2. Affected Utilities 3. Minutes of Public Consultation 4. Unit rates of Compensation 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Zones of Ethiopia: a Parametric Approach
    Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online) Vol.5, No.3, 2014 Smallholder Wheat Production Efficiency in Selected Agro- ecological Zones of Ethiopia: A Parametric Approach Tolesa Alemu 1* , Bezabih Emana 2, Jema Haji 1, and Belaineh Legesse 1 1. School of Agricultural Economics & Agribusiness, Haramaya University, Ethiopia 2. General Manager, HEDBED Business & Consultancy PLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia * E-mail of the corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Wheat productivity is very low in Ethiopia. Improving production efficiency is one of the options for enhancing wheat productivity. To identify the level of production efficiency and sources of inefficiencies, this study was carried out in three major wheat producing agro-ecologies. It used cross-sectional data collected from randomly selected 381 farm households for 2012/13 cropping season. A Cobb-Douglas Production Function and Stochastic Frontier Analysis were employed to achieve the objectives. The study found considerable variation in production efficiency among agro-ecologies and within agro-ecology. The mean technical efficiency estimates for lowland, midland and highland agro-ecologies were 57 percent, 82 percent and 78 percent, respectively. The technical efficiency ranges from 24.4 to 88.6 percents in the lowland, 51.6 to 94.4 percents in the midland, and 34.5 to 94.3 percents in the highland agro-ecologies. There is more capacity to increase wheat yield given the current state of technology and input levels. Wheat output elasticities associated with land, labor, chemical fertilizers and other inputs (seed and pesticides) were positive and significant in the lowland whereas in mid and highland agro- ecologies, output elasticities of land and chemical fertilizers were significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia a M Tigray a Afar M H U Amhara a Uz N M
    35°0'0"E 40°0'0"E Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia A m Tigray A Afar m h u Amhara a uz N m Dera u N u u G " / m r B u l t Dire Dawa " r a e 0 g G n Hareri 0 ' r u u Addis Ababa ' n i H a 0 Gambela m s Somali 0 ° b a K Oromia Ü a I ° o A Hidabu 0 u Wara o r a n SNNPR 0 h a b s o a 1 u r Abote r z 1 d Jarte a Jarso a b s a b i m J i i L i b K Jardega e r L S u G i g n o G A a e m e r b r a u / K e t m uyu D b e n i u l u o Abay B M G i Ginde e a r n L e o e D l o Chomen e M K Beret a a Abe r s Chinaksen B H e t h Yaya Abichuna Gne'a r a c Nejo Dongoro t u Kombolcha a o Gulele R W Gudetu Kondole b Jimma Genete ru J u Adda a a Boji Dirmeji a d o Jida Goro Gutu i Jarso t Gu J o Kembibit b a g B d e Berga l Kersa Bila Seyo e i l t S d D e a i l u u r b Gursum G i e M Haro Maya B b u B o Boji Chekorsa a l d Lalo Asabi g Jimma Rare Mida M Aleltu a D G e e i o u e u Kurfa Chele t r i r Mieso m s Kegn r Gobu Seyo Ifata A f o F a S Ayira Guliso e Tulo b u S e G j a e i S n Gawo Kebe h i a r a Bako F o d G a l e i r y E l i Ambo i Chiro Zuria r Wayu e e e i l d Gaji Tibe d lm a a s Diga e Toke n Jimma Horo Zuria s e Dale Wabera n a w Tuka B Haru h e N Gimbichu t Kutaye e Yubdo W B Chwaka C a Goba Koricha a Leka a Gidami Boneya Boshe D M A Dale Sadi l Gemechis J I e Sayo Nole Dulecha lu k Nole Kaba i Tikur Alem o l D Lalo Kile Wama Hagalo o b r Yama Logi Welel Akaki a a a Enchini i Dawo ' b Meko n Gena e U Anchar a Midega Tola h a G Dabo a t t M Babile o Jimma Nunu c W e H l d m i K S i s a Kersana o f Hana Arjo D n Becho A o t
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)
    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
    [Show full text]