DOCSLIB.ORG

Metazoan Parasite Survey of Selected Macro-Inshore Fish of Southeastern Australia, Including Species of Commercial Importance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metazoan Parasite Survey of Selected Macro-Inshore Fish of Southeastern Australia, Including Species of Commercial Importance Metazoan parasite survey of selected macro-inshore fish of southeastern Australia, including species of commercial importance FINAL REPORT FRDC Project No. 2007/225 KS Hutson, SR Catalano & ID Whittington 28 February 2011 Metazoan parasite survey of selected macro-inshore fish of southeastern Australia, including species of commercial importance KS Hutson, SR Catalano & ID Whittington Final Report for the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation FRDC Project No. 2007/225 ISBN 978-0-646-55210-1 28 February 2011 Cover image: A parasitic isopod, Ceratothoa sp., from the mouth of silver trevally Pseudocaranx georgianus captured in Coffin Bay, South Australia. Image provided by Brian Saunders. ii This publication may be cited as: K.S. Hutson, S.R. Catalano and I.D. Whittington. 2011. Metazoan parasite survey of selected macro-inshore fish of southeastern Australia, including species of commercial importance. Final Report to FRDC (Project No. 2007/225). James Cook University, Townsville. 259 pp. James Cook University Parasitology Laboratory Discipline of Aquaculture School of Marine and Tropical Biology James Cook University Townsville QLD 4811 tel: + 61 7 4781 6216 fax: +61 4781 4585 Disclaimer: The authors do not warrant that the information in this document is free from errors or omissions. The authors do not accept any form of liability be it contractual, tortious or otherwise, for the contents of this document or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. The information, opinions and advice contained in this document may not relate, or be relevant, to a readers particular circumstances. Opinions expressed by the authors are the individual opinions expressed by those persons and are not necesssarily those of the publisher, the insitutions represented or the research funding agenicies. © 2011 James Cook University This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the first author. Authors: Kate S. Hutson, Sarah R. Catalano and Ian D. Whittington Reviewers: This report was peer reveiwed through the Aquatic Animal Health Subcommitte FRDC by an anonymous reviewer. Parts of this report that have been submitted for publication have also been peer-reviewed anonymously. Distribution: FRDC, FRAB representatives, Australian Biological Resources Study, libraries and scientific contributors Circulation: Public Domain iii Table of Contents Non-technical Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Need ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Objectives................................................................................................................................ 7 2 METAZOAN PARASITES OF IMPORTANT FISHES IN AUSTRALIA .............................. 8 2.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Methods ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.3.1 Fish collections and deposition of fish tissue ........................................................... 9 2.3.2 Fish necropsies ........................................................................................................ 12 2.3.3 Parasite preservation, staining and mounting ......................................................... 12 2.3.4 Parasite identification.............................................................................................. 12 2.4 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................... 13 2.4.1 Fishes sampled ........................................................................................................ 13 2.4.2 Target fish species sampled .................................................................................... 15 Arripidae ....................................................................................................................... 15 Carangidae .................................................................................................................... 23 Coryphaenidae .............................................................................................................. 32 Hemiramphidae ............................................................................................................. 46 Latidae........................................................................................................................... 49 Rachycentridae .............................................................................................................. 53 Sciaenidae ..................................................................................................................... 62 Sillaginidae ................................................................................................................... 66 Sparidae......................................................................................................................... 69 2.4.3 Non-target fish species sampled .............................................................................. 74 Carangidae .................................................................................................................... 74 Centrolophidae .............................................................................................................. 75 Cheilodactylidae ........................................................................................................... 75 iv Kyphosidae ................................................................................................................... 77 Latridae ......................................................................................................................... 78 Mugilidae ...................................................................................................................... 78 Oplegnathidae ............................................................................................................... 79 Percichthyidae ............................................................................................................... 79 Platycephalidae ............................................................................................................. 81 Scorpaenidae ................................................................................................................. 81 Sparidae......................................................................................................................... 82 Triakidae ....................................................................................................................... 82 Urolophidae................................................................................................................... 84 3 BIOGEOGRAPHICAL RELEVANCE OF PARASITE-HOST CHECKLISTS: A CASE STUDY ......................................................................................................................................... 85 3.1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 85 3.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 85 3.3 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................... 87 3.3.1 Fish collection .......................................................................................................... 87 3.3.2 Dissection and parasite preservation ........................................................................ 88 3.3.3 Statistical Analyses .................................................................................................. 89 3.4 Results ............................................................................................................................ 90 3.4.1 Variation in parasite abundance ............................................................................... 91 3.5 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 100 4 PARASITE REDESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 105 4.1 Redescriptions of two species of microcotylid monogeneans from three arripid hosts 105 4.1.1 Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 105 4.1.2 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 105 4.1.3 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................... 106 4.1.3.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Hook, Line and Infection: A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback Alexander Stewart*, Joseph Jacksonx, Iain Barber{, Christophe Eizaguirrejj, Rachel Paterson*, Pieter van West#, Chris Williams** and Joanne Cable*,1 *Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom x University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom { University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom jj Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom #Institute of Medical Sciences, Aberdeen, United Kingdom **National Fisheries Service, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom 1Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Stickleback Husbandry 7 2.1 Ethics 7 2.2 Collection 7 2.3 Maintenance 9 2.4 Breeding sticklebacks in vivo and in vitro 10 2.5 Hatchery 15 3. Common Stickleback Parasite Cultures 16 3.1 Argulus foliaceus 17 3.1.1 Introduction 17 3.1.2 Source, culture and infection 18 3.1.3 Immunology 22 3.2 Camallanus lacustris 22 3.2.1 Introduction 22 3.2.2 Source, culture and infection 23 3.2.3 Immunology 25 3.3 Diplostomum Species 26 3.3.1 Introduction 26 3.3.2 Source, culture and infection 27 3.3.3 Immunology 28 Advances in Parasitology, Volume 98 ISSN 0065-308X © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2017.07.001 All rights reserved. 1 j ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 Alexander Stewart et al. 3.4 Glugea anomala 30 3.4.1 Introduction 30 3.4.2 Source, culture and infection 30 3.4.3 Immunology 31 3.5 Gyrodactylus Species 31 3.5.1 Introduction 31 3.5.2 Source, culture and infection 32 3.5.3 Immunology 34 3.6 Saprolegnia parasitica 35 3.6.1 Introduction 35 3.6.2 Source, culture and infection 36 3.6.3 Immunology 37 3.7 Schistocephalus solidus 38 3.7.1 Introduction 38 3.7.2 Source, culture and infection 39 3.7.3 Immunology 43 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 1756-3305-1-23.Pdf
    Parasites & Vectors BioMed Central Research Open Access Composition and structure of the parasite faunas of cod, Gadus morhua L. (Teleostei: Gadidae), in the North East Atlantic Diana Perdiguero-Alonso1, Francisco E Montero2, Juan Antonio Raga1 and Aneta Kostadinova*1,3 Address: 1Marine Zoology Unit, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, PO Box 22085, 46071, Valencia, Spain, 2Department of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Campus Universitari, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain and 3Central Laboratory of General Ecology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Gagarin Street, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria Email: Diana Perdiguero-Alonso - [email protected]; Francisco E Montero - [email protected]; Juan Antonio Raga - [email protected]; Aneta Kostadinova* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 18 July 2008 Received: 4 June 2008 Accepted: 18 July 2008 Parasites & Vectors 2008, 1:23 doi:10.1186/1756-3305-1-23 This article is available from: http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/1/1/23 © 2008 Perdiguero-Alonso et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Although numerous studies on parasites of the Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua L. have been conducted in the North Atlantic, comparative analyses on local cod parasite faunas are virtually lacking. The present study is based on examination of large samples of cod from six geographical areas of the North East Atlantic which yielded abundant baseline data on parasite distribution and abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined!Effects!In!Europe's!Seas!
    OCP/EEA/NSS/18/002.ETC/ICM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ETC/ICM!Technical!Report!4/2019! Multiple!pressures!and!their! combined!effects!in!Europe’s!seas! Prepared!by!/!compiled!by:!! Samuli!Korpinen,!Katja!Klančnik! Authors:!! Samuli Korpinen & Katja Klančnik (editors), Monika Peterlin, Marco Nurmi, Leena Laamanen, Gašper Zupančič, Ciarán Murray, Therese Harvey, Jesper H Andersen, Argyro Zenetos, Ulf Stein, Leonardo Tunesi, Katrina Abhold, GerJan Piet, Emilie Kallenbach, Sabrina Agnesi, Bas Bolman, David Vaughan, Johnny Reker & Eva Royo Gelabert ETC/ICM'Consortium'Partners:'' Helmholtz!Centre!for!Environmental!Research!(UFZ),!Fundación!AZTI,!Czech!Environmental! Information!Agency!(CENIA),!Ioannis!Zacharof&!Associates!Llp!Hydromon!Consulting! Engineers!(CoHI(Hydromon)),!Stichting!Deltares,!Ecologic!Institute,!International!Council!for! the!Exploration!of!the!Sea!(ICES),!Italian!National!Institute!for!Environmental!Protection!and! Research!(ISPRA),!Joint!Nature!Conservation!Committee!Support!Co!(JNCC),!Middle!East! Technical!University!(METU),!Norsk!Institutt!for!Vannforskning!(NIVA),!Finnish!Environment! Institute!(SYKE),!Thematic!Center!for!Water!Research,!Studies!and!Projects!development!! (TC!Vode),!Federal!Environment!Agency!(UBA),!University!Duisburg.Essen!(UDE)! ! ! ! Cover'photo! ©!Tihomir!Makovec,!Marine!biology!station!Piran,!Slovenia! ' Layout! F&U!confirm,!Leipzig! ! Legal'notice' The!contents!of!this!publication!do!not!necessarily!reflect!the!official!opinions!of!the!European!Commission!or!other!institutions!
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple!Pressures!And!Their! Combined!Effects!In!Europe's!Seas!
    OCP/EEA/NSS/18/002.ETC/ICM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ETC/ICM!Technical!Report!4/2019! Multiple!pressures!and!their! combined!effects!in!Europe’s!seas! Prepared!by!/!compiled!by:!! Samuli!Korpinen,!Katja!Klančnik! Authors:!! Monika Peterlin, Marco Nurmi, Leena Laamanen, Gašper Zupančič, Andreja Popit, Ciarán Murray, Therese Harvey, Jesper H Andersen, Argyro Zenetos, Ulf Stein, Leonardo Tunesi, Katrina Abhold, GerJan Piet, Emilie Kallenbach, Sabrina Agnesi, Bas Bolman, David Vaughan, Johnny Reker & Eva Royo Gelabert ETC/ICM'Consortium'Partners:'' Helmholtz!Centre!for!Environmental!Research!(UFZ),!Fundación!AZTI,!Czech!Environmental! Information!Agency!(CENIA),!Ioannis!Zacharof&!Associates!Llp!Hydromon!Consulting! Engineers!(CoHI(Hydromon)),!Stichting!Deltares,!Ecologic!Institute,!International!Council!for! the!Exploration!of!the!Sea!(ICES),!Italian!National!Institute!for!Environmental!Protection!and! Research!(ISPRA),!Joint!Nature!Conservation!Committee!Support!Co!(JNCC),!Middle!East! Technical!University!(METU),!Norsk!Institutt!for!Vannforskning!(NIVA),!Finnish!Environment! Institute!(SYKE),!Thematic!Center!for!Water!Research,!Studies!and!Projects!development!! (TC!Vode),!Federal!Environment!Agency!(UBA),!University!Duisburg.Essen!(UDE)! ! ! ! Cover'photo! ©!Tihomir!Makovec,!Marine!biology!station!Piran,!Slovenia! ' Layout! F&U!confirm,!Leipzig! ! Legal'notice' The!contents!of!this!publication!do!not!necessarily!reflect!the!official!opinions!of!the!European!Commission!or!other!institutions! of!the!European!Union.!Neither!the!European!Environment!Agency,!the!European!Topic!Centre!on!Inland,!Coastal!and!Marine!
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Thousand Parasites Under The
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Departament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia Tesis Doctoral Twenty thousand parasites under the sea: a multidisciplinary approach to parasite communities of deep-dwelling fishes from the slopes of the Balearic Sea (NW Mediterranean) Tesis doctoral presentada por Sara Maria Dallarés Villar para optar al título de Doctora en Acuicultura bajo la dirección de la Dra. Maite Carrassón López de Letona, del Dr. Francesc Padrós Bover y de la Dra. Montserrat Solé Rovira. La presente tesis se ha inscrito en el programa de doctorado en Acuicultura, con mención de calidad, de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Los directores Maite Carrassón Francesc Padrós Montserrat Solé López de Letona Bover Rovira Universitat Autònoma de Universitat Autònoma de Institut de Ciències Barcelona Barcelona del Mar (CSIC) La tutora La doctoranda Maite Carrassón Sara Maria López de Letona Dallarés Villar Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Bellaterra, diciembre de 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cuando miro atrás, al comienzo de esta tesis, me doy cuenta de cuán enriquecedora e importante ha sido para mí esta etapa, a todos los niveles.
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTEMATICS of the CALIGIDAE, COPEPODS PARASITIC on MARINE FISHES Vii
    Systematics of the Caligidae, copepods parasitic on marine fishes CRUSTACEANA MONOGRAPHS constitutes a series of books on carcinology in its widest sense. Contributions are handled by the Series Editor and may be submitted through the office of KONINKLIJKE BRILL Academic Publishers N.V., P.O. Box 9000, NL-2300 PA Leiden, The Netherlands. Series Editor: CHARLES H.J.M. FRANSEN, c/o Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected] Founding Editor: J.C. VON VAUPEL KLEIN, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Editorial Committee: N.L. BRUCE, Wellington, New Zealand; Mrs. M. CHARMANTIER-DAURES, Montpellier, France; Mrs. D. DEFAYE, Paris, France; H. DIRCKSEN, Stockholm, Sweden; R.C. GUIA¸SU, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; R.G. HARTNOLL, Port Erin, Isle of Man; E. MACPHERSON, Blanes, Spain; P.K.L. NG, Singapore, Rep. of Singapore; H.-K. SCHMINKE, Oldenburg, Germany; F.R. SCHRAM, Langley, WA, U.S.A.; C.D. SCHUBART, Regensburg, Germany; G. VA N D E R VELDE, Nijmegen, Netherlands; H.P. WAGNER, Leiden, Netherlands; D.I. WILLIAMSON, Port Erin, Isle of Man. Published in this series: CRM 001 - Stephan G. Bullard Larvae of anomuran and brachyuran crabs of North Carolina CRM 002 - Spyros Sfenthourakis et al. (eds.) The biology of terrestrial isopods, V CRM 003 - Tomislav Karanovic Subterranean Copepoda from arid Western Australia CRM 004 - Katsushi Sakai Callianassoidea of the world (Decapoda, Thalassinidea) CRM 005 - Kim Larsen Deep-sea Tanaidacea from the Gulf of Mexico CRM 006 - Katsushi Sakai Upogebiidae of the world (Decapoda, Thalassinidea) CRM 007 - Ivana Karanovic Candoninae (Ostracoda) from the Pilbara region in Western Australia CRM 008 - Frank D.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Ceratomyxa Batam N. Sp. (Myxozoa: Ceratomyxidae) Infecting the Gallbladder of Th
    Parasitology Research (2019) 118:1647–1651 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06217-w FISH PARASITOLOGY - SHORT COMMUNICATION Morphological and molecular characterization of Ceratomyxa batam n. sp. (Myxozoa: Ceratomyxidae) infecting the gallbladder of the cultured Trachinotus ovatus (Perciformes: Carangidae) in Batam Island, Indonesia Ying Qiao1 & Yanxiang Shao1 & Theerakamol Pengsakul 2 & Chao Chen1 & Shuli Zheng3 & Weijian Wu3 & Tonny Budhi Hardjo3 Received: 5 September 2017 /Accepted: 17 January 2019 /Published online: 23 March 2019 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract A new coelozoic myxozoan species, Ceratomyxa batam n. sp., was identified in cultured carangid fish, Trachinotus ovatus (Perciformes: Carangidae), in waters off Batam Island of Indonesia. The bi- and trivalved spores were observed in the gallbladder of T. ovatus. Mature bivalved spores of C. batam n. sp. were transversely elongated and narrowly crescent in shape, 3.8 ± 0.36 (2.7–4.6) μm long and 19.2 ± 1.75 (16.2–22.0) μm thick. Two sub-spherical polar capsules were 2.3 ± 0.18 (2.0–2.8) μmlong and 2.6 ± 0.16 (2.3–2.9) μm wide. Prevalence was 72.2% in 72 examined T. ovatus according to evaluations dating from November 2016. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on small subunit rDNA sequence showed similarity with Ceratomyxa robertsthomsoni and Ceratomyxa thalassomae found in Australia. This is the first report of Ceratomyxa species identified in a seawater fish at Batam Island, Indonesia. Keywords Ceratomyxa Batam n. sp. Characterization . Parasite . Gallbladder . Trachinotus ovatus Introduction Cryptocaryonidae) (Dan et al. 2006), Paradeontacylix mcintosh (Trematoda: Sanguinicolidae), Benedenia diesing The Carangid fish ovate pompano (Trachinotus ovatus)isthe (Monogenea: Capsalidae), and Trichodibna ehrenberg most successfully cultured marine fish in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Myxozoan Presence and Diversity with Environmental DNA
    *Manuscript Click here to view linked References Assessing myxozoan presence and diversity with environmental DNA Hanna Hartikainen1,2,3*, David Bass3,4, Andrew G. Briscoe3, Hazel Knipe3,5, Andy J. Green6, Beth 5 Okamura3 1 Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland 2 Institute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland 3 Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, 10 UK 4 Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Barrack Road, The Nothe, Weymouth, Dorset, DT4 8UB, UK 5 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, UK 15 6Department of Wetland Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, EBD-CSIC, Américo Vespucio s/n, 41092 Sevilla, Spain *Corresponding author: Hanna Hartikainen; Eawag, Ueberlandstrasse 133, Duebendorf, Switzerland; phone: +41 58 765 5446; [email protected] 20 Note: Supplementary data associated with this article Abstract Amplicon sequencing on a High Throughput Sequencing (HTS) platform (custom barcoding) was used to detect and characterise myxosporean communities in environmental DNA samples from 25 marine and freshwater environments and in faeces of animals that may serve as hosts or whose prey may host myxosporean infections. A diversity of myxozoans in filtered water samples and in faeces of piscivores (otters and great cormorants) was detected, demonstrating the suitability of lineage specific amplicons for characterising otherwise difficult to sample parasite communities. The importance of using the approach was highlighted by the lack of myxosporean detection using 30 commonly employed, broadly-targeted eukaryote primers. These results suggest that, despite being frequently present in eDNA samples, myxozoans have been generally overlooked in ‘eukaryote- wide’ surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Assessment Tasks
    SAMPLE ASSESSMENT TASKS MARINE AND MARITIME STUDIES GENERAL YEAR 11 Copyright © School Curriculum and Standards Authority, 2014 This document – apart from any third party copyright material contained in it – may be freely copied, or communicated on an intranet, for non-commercial purposes in educational institutions, provided that the School Curriculum and Standards Authority is acknowledged as the copyright owner, and that the Authority’s moral rights are not infringed. Copying or communication for any other purpose can be done only within the terms of the Copyright Act 1968 or with prior written permission of the School Curriculum and Standards Authority. Copying or communication of any third party copyright material can be done only within the terms of the Copyright Act 1968 or with permission of the copyright owners. Any content in this document that has been derived from the Australian Curriculum may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. Disclaimer Any resources such as texts, websites and so on that may be referred to in this document are provided as examples of resources that teachers can use to support their learning programs. Their inclusion does not imply that they are mandatory or that they are the only resources relevant to the course. 2014/18740v5 1 Sample assessment task Marine and Maritime Studies – General Year 11 Task 3 — Unit 1 Assessment type: Extended response Conditions Period allowed for completion of the task – three weeks; a combination of in-class and out-of-class time Task weighting: 2.5% of the school mark for this pair of units __________________________________________________________________________________ Marine resource management research (25 marks) Background Commercial fishing is an important contributor to the Western Australian economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Ecology of Samson Fish Seriola Hippos
    The biology of Samson Fish Seriola hippos with emphasis on the sportfishery in Western Australia. By Andrew Jay Rowland This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Murdoch University 2009 DECLARATION I declare that the information contained in this thesis is the result of my own research unless otherwise cited. ……………………………………………………. Andrew Jay Rowland 2 Abstract This thesis had two overriding aims. The first was to describe the biology of Samson Fish Seriola hippos and therefore extend the knowledge and understanding of the genus Seriola. The second was to uses these data to develop strategies to better manage the fishery and, if appropriate, develop catch-and-release protocols for the S. hippos sportfishery. Trends exhibited by marginal increment analysis in the opaque zones of sectioned S. hippos otoliths, together with an otolith of a recaptured calcein injected fish, demonstrated that these opaque zones represent annual features. Thus, as with some other members of the genus, the number of opaque zones in sectioned otoliths of S. hippos are appropriate for determining age and growth parameters of this species. Seriola hippos displayed similar growth trajectories to other members of the genus. Early growth in S. hippos is rapid with this species reaching minimum legal length for retention (MML) of 600mm TL within the second year of life. After the first 5 years of life growth rates of each sex differ, with females growing faster and reaching a larger size at age than males. Thus, by 10, 15 and 20 years of age, the predicted fork lengths (and weights) for females were 1088 (17 kg), 1221 (24 kg) and 1311 mm (30 kg), respectively, compared with 1035 (15 kg), 1124 (19 kg) and 1167 mm (21 kg), respectively for males.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Parasitic Copepods and Their Hosts in the Western Wadden Sea in 1968 and 2010
    INVENTORY OF PARASITIC COPEPODS AND THEIR HOSTS IN THE WESTERN WADDEN SEA IN 1968 AND 2010 Wouter Koch NNIOZIOZ KKoninklijkoninklijk NNederlandsederlands IInstituutnstituut vvooroor ZZeeonderzoekeeonderzoek INVENTORY OF PARASITIC COPEPODS AND THEIR HOSTS IN THE WESTERN WADDEN SEA IN 1968 AND 2010 Wouter Koch Texel, April 2012 NIOZ Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Zeeonderzoek Cover illustration The parasitic copepod Lernaeenicus sprattae (Sowerby, 1806) on its fish host, the sprat (Sprattus sprattus) Copyright by Hans Hillewaert, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license; CC-BY-SA-3.0; Wikipedia Contents 1. Summary 6 2. Introduction 7 3. Methods 7 4. Results 8 5. Discussion 9 6. Acknowledgements 10 7. References 10 8. Appendices 12 1. Summary Ectoparasites, attaching mainly to the fins or gills, are a particularly conspicuous part of the parasite fauna of marine fishes. In particular the dominant copepods, have received much interest due to their effects on host populations. However, still little is known on the copepod fauna on fishes for many localities and their temporal stability as long-term observations are largely absent. The aim of this project was two-fold: 1) to deliver a current inventory of ectoparasitic copepods in fishes in the southern Wadden Sea around Texel and 2) to compare the current parasitic copepod fauna with the one from 1968 in the same area, using data published in an internal NIOZ report and additional unpublished original notes. In total, 47 parasite species have been recorded on 52 fish species in the southern Wadden Sea to date. The two copepod species, where quantitative comparisons between 1968 and 2010 were possible for their host, the European flounder (Platichthys flesus), showed different trends: Whereas Acanthochondria cornuta seems not to have altered its infection rate or per host abundance between years, Lepeophtheirus pectoralis has shifted towards infection of smaller hosts, as well as to a stronger increase of per-host abundance with increasing host length.
    [Show full text]