Wreckfish ITQ Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wreckfish ITQ Review Review of the Wreckfish Individual Transferable Quota Program of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council August 2019 A publication of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number FNA10NMF4410012 Table of Contents Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................................3 List of Tables ...............................................................................................................................................4 List of Figures ..............................................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................6 1 Introduction and Background ..............................................................................................................7 1.1 Legal requirements for the review ............................................................................................... 7 1.2 Pre-ITQ management ................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 ITQ program description ............................................................................................................ 10 1.3.1 ITQ Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................... 10 1.3.2 ITQ Design and Structure ................................................................................................... 13 1.3.3 Conclusions and Recommendations from Initial Review ................................................... 14 2 Data Collection and Reporting within the Wreckfish ITQ Program .................................................16 3 Environment .......................................................................................................................................17 3.1 Biological ................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Economic Environment .............................................................................................................. 20 3.2.1 Shareholders ........................................................................................................................ 20 3.2.2 Permits ................................................................................................................................ 22 3.2.3 Vessels ................................................................................................................................ 24 3.2.4 Dealers ................................................................................................................................ 25 3.2.5 Economic Performance Indicators ...................................................................................... 27 3.2.6 Economic Returns ............................................................................................................... 28 3.2.7 Imports ................................................................................................................................ 29 3.2.8 Economic Impacts of the ITQ Program .............................................................................. 30 3.3 Social .......................................................................................................................................... 33 4 Eligibility and Participation in the Wreckfish ITQ Program .............................................................36 4.1 Eligibility .................................................................................................................................... 36 4.2 Participation in the IFQ program ............................................................................................... 37 4.3 New Entrants/Replacement Fishermen in the Wreckfish ITQ Program .................................... 38 5 Price Analyses ....................................................................................................................................39 5.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 Analysis and discussion ............................................................................................................. 40 5.2.1 Share prices ......................................................................................................................... 40 5.2.2 ITQ Coupon prices .............................................................................................................. 40 5.2.3 Preferred Practices for the Collection of Price Data ........................................................... 43 5.2.4 Summary of key findings .................................................................................................... 44 6 Allocations, Transferability, and Caps within the Wreckfish ITQ Program .....................................45 1 6.1 Shares ......................................................................................................................................... 45 6.2 ITQ Coupons (Annual Allocation) ............................................................................................. 46 6.3 Recreational Allocation of Wreckfish ........................................................................................ 48 6.4 Distributions of Landings, Revenues, and Shares ...................................................................... 49 6.5 Market Concentration and Market Power .................................................................................. 52 7 Safety at Sea .......................................................................................................................................55 8 Monitoring and Enforcement in the Wreckfish ITQ Program ...........................................................56 9 Administration and Cost Recovery in the Wreckfish ITQ Program ..................................................56 10 Privilege Duration and Subsequent Distribution in the Wreckfish ITQ Program .............................57 11 Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................................................59 11.1 Progress Towards Goals and Objectives ................................................................................ 59 11.2 Review Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 64 11.2.1 Future Research Needs ....................................................................................................... 64 11.2.2 Confidentiality and Constraints .......................................................................................... 64 11.2.3 Cost Recovery ..................................................................................................................... 65 11.2.4 Migration to an Electronic System ..................................................................................... 67 11.2.5 Eliminate the Wreckfish Permit Requirement .................................................................... 69 11.2.6 Allocation Issues ................................................................................................................. 70 11.2.7................................................................................................................................................. 70 11.2.8 Mandatory economic data collection ..................................................................................... 71 11.3 AP recommendations .............................................................................................................. 71 11.4 Shareholder recommendations ............................................................................................... 72 11.5 SSC/SEP recommendations .................................................................................................... 73 11.6 Council recommendations ...................................................................................................... 73 12 List of Interdisciplinary Plan Team (IPT) Members..........................................................................75 13 References ..........................................................................................................................................76 2 Abbreviations ACL Annual catch limit ALS Accumulated Landings System Council South Atlantic Fishery Management Council CSP Catch share programs EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EJ Environmental Justice FMP Fishery Management Plan FTE Full time equivalent HHI Herfindahl-Hirschman Index ITQ Individual Transferable Quota LAPP Limited Access Privilege Program LKE Lowest known entity Magnuson-Stevens Act Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act mp Million pounds MRFSS Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey MRIP Marine Recreational Information Program NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NS National Standards OY Optimum yield SEFSC Southeast Fisheries Science Center SERO Southeast Regional Office SSC Scientific and
Recommended publications
  • Combined!Effects!In!Europe's!Seas!
    OCP/EEA/NSS/18/002.ETC/ICM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ETC/ICM!Technical!Report!4/2019! Multiple!pressures!and!their! combined!effects!in!Europe’s!seas! Prepared!by!/!compiled!by:!! Samuli!Korpinen,!Katja!Klančnik! Authors:!! Samuli Korpinen & Katja Klančnik (editors), Monika Peterlin, Marco Nurmi, Leena Laamanen, Gašper Zupančič, Ciarán Murray, Therese Harvey, Jesper H Andersen, Argyro Zenetos, Ulf Stein, Leonardo Tunesi, Katrina Abhold, GerJan Piet, Emilie Kallenbach, Sabrina Agnesi, Bas Bolman, David Vaughan, Johnny Reker & Eva Royo Gelabert ETC/ICM'Consortium'Partners:'' Helmholtz!Centre!for!Environmental!Research!(UFZ),!Fundación!AZTI,!Czech!Environmental! Information!Agency!(CENIA),!Ioannis!Zacharof&!Associates!Llp!Hydromon!Consulting! Engineers!(CoHI(Hydromon)),!Stichting!Deltares,!Ecologic!Institute,!International!Council!for! the!Exploration!of!the!Sea!(ICES),!Italian!National!Institute!for!Environmental!Protection!and! Research!(ISPRA),!Joint!Nature!Conservation!Committee!Support!Co!(JNCC),!Middle!East! Technical!University!(METU),!Norsk!Institutt!for!Vannforskning!(NIVA),!Finnish!Environment! Institute!(SYKE),!Thematic!Center!for!Water!Research,!Studies!and!Projects!development!! (TC!Vode),!Federal!Environment!Agency!(UBA),!University!Duisburg.Essen!(UDE)! ! ! ! Cover'photo! ©!Tihomir!Makovec,!Marine!biology!station!Piran,!Slovenia! ' Layout! F&U!confirm,!Leipzig! ! Legal'notice' The!contents!of!this!publication!do!not!necessarily!reflect!the!official!opinions!of!the!European!Commission!or!other!institutions!
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 8/Thursday, January 12, 2017/Notices
    3726 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Notices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Washington, DC 20230 (or via the issuance, quota transfers, use caps, crab Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Internet at [email protected]). harvesting cooperatives, protections for Conservation and Management FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gulf of Alaska groundfish fisheries, Reauthorization Act established the CCC Requests for additional information or arbitration system, monitoring, by amending Section 302 (16 U.S.C. copies of the information collection economic data collection, and cost 1852) of the MSA. The committee instrument and instructions should be recovery fee collection. consists of the chairs, vice chairs, and directed to Sally Bibb, (907) 586–7389 II. Method of Collection executive directors of each of the eight or [email protected]. Regional Fishery Management Councils SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Respondents have a choice of either authorized by the MSA or other Council electronic or paper forms. Methods of members or staff. NMFS will host this I. Abstract submittal include online, email of meeting and provide reports to the CCC This request is for extension of a electronic forms, mail, and facsimile for its information and discussion. All currently approved information transmission of paper forms. sessions are open to the public. Updates collection. III. Data to this meeting will be provided in The king and Tanner crab fisheries in subsequent notices and additional the exclusive economic zone of the OMB Control Number: 0648–0514. information will be posted on http:// Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, Alaska, Form Number: None. www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/management/ are managed under the Fishery Type of Review: Regular submission councils/ccc/ccc.htm when available.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple!Pressures!And!Their! Combined!Effects!In!Europe's!Seas!
    OCP/EEA/NSS/18/002.ETC/ICM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ETC/ICM!Technical!Report!4/2019! Multiple!pressures!and!their! combined!effects!in!Europe’s!seas! Prepared!by!/!compiled!by:!! Samuli!Korpinen,!Katja!Klančnik! Authors:!! Monika Peterlin, Marco Nurmi, Leena Laamanen, Gašper Zupančič, Andreja Popit, Ciarán Murray, Therese Harvey, Jesper H Andersen, Argyro Zenetos, Ulf Stein, Leonardo Tunesi, Katrina Abhold, GerJan Piet, Emilie Kallenbach, Sabrina Agnesi, Bas Bolman, David Vaughan, Johnny Reker & Eva Royo Gelabert ETC/ICM'Consortium'Partners:'' Helmholtz!Centre!for!Environmental!Research!(UFZ),!Fundación!AZTI,!Czech!Environmental! Information!Agency!(CENIA),!Ioannis!Zacharof&!Associates!Llp!Hydromon!Consulting! Engineers!(CoHI(Hydromon)),!Stichting!Deltares,!Ecologic!Institute,!International!Council!for! the!Exploration!of!the!Sea!(ICES),!Italian!National!Institute!for!Environmental!Protection!and! Research!(ISPRA),!Joint!Nature!Conservation!Committee!Support!Co!(JNCC),!Middle!East! Technical!University!(METU),!Norsk!Institutt!for!Vannforskning!(NIVA),!Finnish!Environment! Institute!(SYKE),!Thematic!Center!for!Water!Research,!Studies!and!Projects!development!! (TC!Vode),!Federal!Environment!Agency!(UBA),!University!Duisburg.Essen!(UDE)! ! ! ! Cover'photo! ©!Tihomir!Makovec,!Marine!biology!station!Piran,!Slovenia! ' Layout! F&U!confirm,!Leipzig! ! Legal'notice' The!contents!of!this!publication!do!not!necessarily!reflect!the!official!opinions!of!the!European!Commission!or!other!institutions! of!the!European!Union.!Neither!the!European!Environment!Agency,!the!European!Topic!Centre!on!Inland,!Coastal!and!Marine!
    [Show full text]
  • AGE and GROWTH of the GIANT SEA BASS, STEREOLEPIS GIGAS Calcofi Rep., Vol
    HAWK AND ALLEN: AGE AND GROWTH OF THE GIANT SEA BASS, STEREOLEPIS GIGAS CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 55, 2014 AGE AND GROWTH OF THE GIANT SEA BASS, STEREOLEPIS GIGAS HOLLY A. HAWK LARRY G. ALLEN Department of Biology Department of Biology California State University California State University Northridge, CA 91330-8303 Northridge, CA 91330-8303 ph: (818) 677-3356 [email protected] ABSTRACT bass stocks to the point that a moratorium was declared The giant sea bass, Stereolepis gigas, is the largest bony in 1982. Although this species cannot be targeted, com- fish that inhabits California shallow rocky reef com- mercial vessels are now allowed to retain and sell one munities and is listed by IUCN as a critically endan- individual per trip as incidental catch. Giant sea bass gered species, yet little is known about its life history. To caught in Mexican waters by recreational anglers are address questions of growth and longevity, 64 samples allowed to be landed and sold in California markets; were obtained through collaborative efforts with com- however the limit is two fish per trip per angler. There mercial fish markets and scientific gillnetting. Sagittae are no commercial or recreational restrictions on giant (otoliths) were cross-sectioned and analyzed with digi- sea bass in Mexico today (Baldwin and Keiser 2008). tal microscopy. Age estimates indicate that S. gigas is a In 1994, gillnetting was banned within state waters long-lived species attaining at least 76 years of age. Over (three miles off mainland) and one mile from the Chan- 90% of the variation between age (years) and standard nel Islands in southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery, Aquaculture, and Marine Mammal Issues in the 112Th Congress
    Fishery, Aquaculture, and Marine Mammal Issues in the 112th Congress Eugene H. Buck Specialist in Natural Resources Policy Harold F. Upton Analyst in Natural Resources Policy November 4, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41613 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Fishery, Aquaculture, and Marine Mammal Issues in the 112th Congress Summary Fish and marine mammals are important resources in open ocean and nearshore coastal areas; many federal laws and regulations guide their management as well as the management of their habitat. Aquaculture or fish farming enterprises seek to supplement food traditionally provided by wild harvests. Commercial and sport fishing are jointly managed by the federal government and individual states. States generally have jurisdiction within 3 miles of the coast. Beyond state jurisdiction and out to 200 miles in the federal exclusive economic zone (EEZ), the federal government (National Marine Fisheries Service, NMFS) manages fisheries under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA) through eight regional fishery management councils. Beyond 200 miles, the United States participates in international agreements relating to specific areas or species. The 112th Congress may oversee implementation of the MSFCMA as well as address individual habitat and management concerns for U.S. commercial and sport fisheries in an attempt to modify the balance between resource use and protection. Additional concerns might include providing additional
    [Show full text]
  • Catch Share Management in New England: Groundfish Sectors
    Catch Share Management in New England: Groundfish Sectors Kimberly Gordon Date: _________________________ Approved: ________________________________ Dr. Douglas Nowacek, Advisor Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences of Duke University May 2010 ABSTRACT: The management of domestic fisheries by the use of catch shares has become a topic of increased attention in recent years. The New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) recently voted to adopt a catch share program for their Northeast Multispecies Fishery, proposing the addition of 17 new sectors which will manage a collective quota for the multispecies complex. This paper discusses the specifics of the Fishery Management Plan amendment as it pertains to the sector program and highlights three potential concerns that have been raised with regard to the implementation of sectors: insufficient monitoring, excessive consolidation, and impacts on communities. An exploration of actions taken by other regional Fishery Management Councils to address these concerns provides insight into potential management options that the New England Fishery Management Council may wish to consider as they move forward. These options are evaluated in the context of New England’s groundfish fishery, culminating in recommended actions that would enhance the ability of the management program to achieve its desired goals. Evaluation of the monitoring program in the British Columbia Groundfish Fishery reveals the potential benefits of full monitoring coverage for the Northeast Multispecies Sector program. Considering accumulation limits set in 10 domestic catch share programs to address consolidation reveals the need for the NEFMC to establish accumulation limits at a level commensurate with the management plan’s total objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES
    FMP for Groundfish of the BSAI Management Area Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES Appendix A History of the Fishery Management Plan ...................................................................... A-1 A.1 Amendments to the FMP ......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B Geographical Coordinates of Areas Described in the Fishery Management Plan ..... B-1 B.1 Management Area, Subareas, and Districts ............................................................................. B-1 B.2 Closed Areas ............................................................................................................................ B-2 B.3 PSC Limitation Zones ........................................................................................................... B-18 Appendix C Summary of the American Fisheries Act and Subtitle II ............................................. C-1 C.1 Summary of the American Fisheries Act (AFA) Management Measures ............................... C-1 C.2 Summary of Amendments to AFA in the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 ................ C-2 C.3 American Fisheries Act: Subtitle II Bering Sea Pollock Fishery ............................................ C-4 Appendix D Life History Features and Habitat Requirements of Fishery Management Plan SpeciesD-1 D.1 Walleye pollock (Theragra calcogramma) ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reinitiated Biological Opinion on Groundfish Fisheries Affecting Humpback Whales
    Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological and Conference Opinion Continuing Operation of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery (Reinitiation of consultation #NWR-2012-876) – Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) NMFS Consultation Number: WCRO-2018-01378 ARN 151422WCR2018PR00213 Action Agency: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Affected Species and NMFS’ Determinations: ESA-Listed Species Status Is Action Is Action Is Action Is Action Likely Likely to Likely To Likely to To Destroy or Adversely Jeopardize Adversely Adversely Affect the Species? Affect Modify Critical Species? Critical Habitat? Habitat? Humpback whale Endangered Yes No No No (Megaptera novaeangliae) – Central America DPS Humpback whale – Threatened Yes No No No Mexico DPS Consultation Conducted By: National Marine Fisheries Service, West Coast Region Issued By: _______________________________ Barry A. Thom Regional Administrator Date: October 26, 2020 ESA Section 7 Consultation Number WCRO-2018-01378 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 7 1.1. Background ..................................................................................................................................................................7 1.2. Consultation History ................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3. Proposed Federal Action .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota Program 5-Year Review
    Golden Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota Program 5-Year Review September 2017 Prepared by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council in cooperation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Council Address NMFS Address Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council Greater Atlantic Regional Northeast Fisheries 800 North State Street, Fisheries Office Science Center Suite 201 55 Great Republic Drive 166 Water St Dover, DE 19901 Gloucester, MA 01930 Woods Hole, MA 02543 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 SUMMARY OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROGRAM REVIEW ............................ 8 3.0 PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................. 9 4.0 HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROGRAM ..................................................... 9 4.1 PRE-GTF-IFQ STOCK STATUS AND MANAGEMENT HISTORY ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • FISHERY ECOSYSTEM PLAN of the SOUTH ATLANTIC REGION VOLUME IV: THREATS to the SOUTH ATLANTIC ECOSYSTEM and RECOMMENDATIONS Apri
    FISHERY ECOSYSTEM PLAN OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC REGION VOLUME IV: THREATS TO THE SOUTH ATLANTIC ECOSYSTEM AND RECOMMENDATIONS April 2009 South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201 North Charleston, South Carolina 29405 (843) 571-4366 / FAX (843) 769-4520 Toll Free (866) SAFMC-10 Email: [email protected] THIS IS A PUBLICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL PURSUANT TO National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. FNA05NMF4410004 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ABC Acceptable Biological Catch ACCSP Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program ACE Ashepoo-Combahee-Edisto Basin National Estuarine Research Reserve APA Administrative Procedures Act AUV Autonomous Underwater Vehicle B A measure of stock biomass either in weight or other appropriate unit BMSYB The stock biomass expected to exist under equilibrium conditions when fishing at FMSY BOYB The stock biomass expected to exist under equilibrium conditions when fishing at FOY BCURRB The current stock biomass CEA Cumulative Effects Analysis CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFMC Caribbean Fishery Management Council CPUE Catch per unit effort CRP Cooperative Research Program CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement EA Environmental Assessment EBM Ecosystem-Based Management EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EFH Essential Fish Habitat EFH-HAPC Essential Fish Habitat - Habitat Area of Particular Concern EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPAP Ecosystem Principles Advisory Panel ESA Endangered Species Act
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Humpback Whale Bycatch in the U.S. West Coast Groundfish Fisheries, 2002 - 2019
    Agenda Item G.4.a NMFS Report 4 June 2021 Estimated Humpback Whale Bycatch in the U.S. West Coast Groundfish Fisheries, 2002 - 2019 M. Bradley Hanson1, Thomas P. Good1, Jason E. Jannot2, and Jason Eibner2 Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA 2725 Montlake Blvd. E. Seattle, WA 98112 2021-05-24 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................................. 4 U.S. West Coast Groundfish Fisheries ......................................................................................................... 8 Northwest Fisheries Science Center Groundfish Observer Program ............................................ 9 Humpback Whale Bycatch in West Coast Groundfish Fisheries ..................................................... 9 Methods ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Data Sources ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Estimating
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]