DOCSLIB.ORG

WRIA 19 (Hoko-Lyre) Watershed Plan Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WRIA 19 (Hoko-Lyre) Watershed Plan Draft Lead Entity : Clallam County Funded by Washington Department of Ecology Grant no. G050013 (Intentionally Left Blank) WRIA 19 (LYRE - HOKO) WATERSHED PLAN Public Review DRAFT October 2008 Prepared by the Lyre-Hoko Watershed (WRIA 19) Planning Unit Cover photo: Hoko River (Intentionally Left Blank) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WRIA 19 Planning Non-governmental Unit Members Herb Balch, Citizen Margaret Owens, Citizen Harry Bell, Green Crow Josey Paul, Citizen John Burdick, Citizen Janeen Porter, Citizen Karolyn Burdick, Citizen Patrick Raymond, Olympic Resource Management Coleman Byrnes, Citizen Ken Sadilek, Citizen Bill Drath, Clallam Bay/Sekiu Chamber of Commerce Louise Sadilek, Citizen Don Hamerquist, Citizen Frank Silvernail, Crown Pacific (formerly) Ian MacIver, Rayonier Jane Vanderhoof, Citizen Sasha Medlen, Citizen Peter Vanderhoof, Citizen Joe Murray, Merrill & Ring Connie Beauvais, Crescent Water Association, Inc. Carol Johnson/Don Hansen, North Olympic Timber Action Committee Cindy Kelly, Dry Creek Water Association, Inc. WRIA 19 Planning Unit Initiating Governments Members Jim Medlen, Lyle Almond, Jeff Shellberg, Gwen Bridge, Andy Ritchie – Makah Tribe Tom Martin, Mike Kitz – Clallam Public Utility District Cathy Lear, Pat Crain, Debi Barnes, Jeff Bohman, Andy Brastad – Clallam County Doug Morrill, Ted Schmidt – Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe A special thank you is extended to the government policy makers who supported this planning process and who are ultimately responsible for implementing these recommendations: Clallam County Commissioners: Clallam PUD Commissioners: Mike Chapman – District 2 Hugh “Ted” Simpson, District 3 Mike Doherty – District 3 Will Purser, District 1 Steve Tharinger – District 1 Hugh Haffner, District 2 Lower Elwha Klallam Tribal Council: Makah Tribal Council: Frances G. Charles – Chairwoman Micah McCarty – Chairman Dennis Sullivan – Vice Chairman Michael Lawrence – Vice Chairman Phillip L. Charles, Jr. – Secretary/ Timothy J Green – Treasurer/Council Treasurer Member Joe Turrey – Council Member Nathan Tyler – Council Member Russ Hepfer – Council Member Blanchard Matte – Council Member JoDean Haupt-Richards – Tribal Secretary Shirley Perete – Enrollment Officer WRIA 19 Planning Unit State Government Representative Member Bob Duffy and Cynthia Nelson – WA Department of Ecology Jim Pacheco and Terra Hegy – Instream flow technical team Other members (in alphabetical order): Bob and June Bowlby, Citizens Aaron Brooks, Fisheries Technician, Makah Tribe Fisheries Department Dick Goin, Citizen Mike McGarvie, Citizen Ringo McGimpsey, Fisheries Technician, Makah Tribe Fisheries Department Mike McHenry, Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Chuck Owens, Citizen Clea Rome, Clallam Conservation District Assisting: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: Michael Blanton, Tim Rymer, Anne Shaffer, Terra Hegy, Bob Burkle Consultants: Cynthia Carlstad, Andrea Petzel, and April Magrane – Tetra Tech John Blum – EES Consulting Bob Wheeler – Triangle Associates Jeremy Pratt– Entrix (Intentionally Left Blank) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.......................................................................................................................1 Intent of the Watershed Planning Process......................................................................3 Goals...................................................................................................................................4 Initiation of Planning........................................................................................................5 Tribal Provisons................................................................................................................6 History of WRIA 19 Planning Process............................................................................6 Perspectives .......................................................................................................................8 Overview of WRIA 19 ....................................................................................................13 Instream Flow Element ..................................................................................................21 Water Quantity Element ................................................................................................54 Water Quality Element...................................................................................................55 Habitat Element ..............................................................................................................60 Plan Recommendations ..................................................................................................68 Supplemental Plan Information ....................................................................................77 Glossary ...........................................................................................................................89 Common Water Terms & Measurements ....................................................................95 Acronyms & Abbreviations ...........................................................................................96 Bibliograpy ......................................................................................................................97 APPENDICES...............................................................................................................103 APPENDIX 1: Chapter 90.82 RCW; Watershed Planning .....................................105 APPENDIX 2: Memorandum of Understanding...........................................107 APPENDIX 3: Ground Rules For WRIA 19..................................................115 APPENDIX 4: Intergovernmental Agreement ..............................................119 APPENDIX 5: Public Information & Education Plan ..................................125 APPENDIX 6: Citizen Interviews; Tribal Interviews ...................................127 APPENDIX 7: Crescent Water Association Report......................................137 APPENDIX 8: Instream Flow Study Methods Used in Washington ...........139 APPENDIX A-1: WRIA-Wide Technical Information................................ A-1 APPENDIX B-1: Subbasin Descriptions ........................................................B-1 APPENDIX C-1: Hydrology ........................................................................... C-1 APPENDIX H-1: Habitat And Water Quality Summary Matrices............ H-1 (Intentionally Left Blank) INTRODUCTION The pristine sparkling water of the Lyre River; the gently curving Clallam Bay; the open coastal waters all the way west to the tip of the continent at Tatoosh Island at Neah Bay, these scenic landscapes are part of the Lyre- Hoko watershed for which this document was developed. The watershed provides a livelihood and home for approximately 4,500 people. Water is becoming a critical issue in much of Washington State. A local group has been meeting since 2000 to understand and make recommendations regarding elements that they chose to address: water quality, water quantity, instream flows, habitat, and water storage. Many, many hours and a substantial amount of dollars have gone into this effort. The following sections set the stage for why this work is being done. Included in this report are the group’s final recommendations. What is the purpose of this plan summary? This summary is intended to provide an extremely brief overview of the Lyre-Hoko Watershed Plan for citizens and officials. The full plan is divided into the following key components: Background Watershed Process Plan Elements Plan Recommendations Appendices Why was this plan prepared? This plan was prepared as a result of legislation, passed by the Washington State Legislature in 1998, that authored a planning process. This process provided an opportunity to develop recommendations for local solutions to water conflicts. Who paid for, wrote & approved, and adopted this plan? Grant funds from the Washington Department of Ecology funded the planning process. The plan is intended to reflect local knowledge, interests, and recommendations. The Planning Unit, comprised of local government, business & industry, private landowners, environmental, tribal, and some State agency representatives, drafted the plan with consultant assistance and approved the document. The Clallam County Commissioners are responsible for plan adoption. How will the plan affect me? The plan contains recommendations to local and state government regarding water quality, water quantity, fish habitat, and instream flows. Governmental agencies will consider the recommendations in the plan as regulations and rules are developed. In particular, the Department of Ecology will use recommendations on minimum instream flows to develop rules regarding the future availability of water to new water right applicants. (Existing water rights are not affected.) The recommendations also will be considered when future activities aimed at improving the natural environment are developed. 1 What are some other important plan recommendations that can affect me? Plan recommendations address: Education and public outreach Watershed monitoring Land use Instream flows and groundwater Fish habitat Water quality Climate change Where are the boundaries for the plan located? The planning boundaries are defined by the area encompassed by the Lyre/Hoko Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA 19). This area is located on the Olympic Peninsula, covers 384 square miles, and lies entirely within
Recommended publications
  • History & Culture

    History & Culture

    Tatoosh Island & Lighthouse Washington Cape Flattery 10 Neah Bay Vancouver Island State Route 112 8 Victoria Neah Bay Au to and Hobuck Beach 9 Makah Makah Strait of Juan de Fuca Bay Reservation P The Strait of Sooes Ri assenger-Only Sekiu 112 Point Clallam Shi Shi Beach ve Bay 5 r 6 Point of er Clallam Bay the Arches Sekiu F DE o Riv erries UAN k J FUCA Ho Ozette Indian Hoko-Ozette Pillar Point Cape Pysht Alava Reservation Road HIGHWAY r Pysht River Crescent Ozette ve Bay Island 7 Big Ri The Working Forest 2 Freshwater West Twin Striped 113 4 3 Bay Ediz Hook Sand Point Dickey River Peak Port Lake Lake Beaver Lake East Twin Lyre River Angeles ITINERARY #1 Ozette River Joyce 112 Olympic Salt Creek Lake Sappho er Pleasant Fairholm 1 National er 101 rk 101 Lake Crescent Riv Park Fo Riv Lake HISTORY & CULTURE ckey Beaver To Seattle Sol Duc Riv er Sutherland Di East ckey Di ah River Heart O’ the orth Fork Calaw S N Summer Hills Ranger y y Onl Station Summer Only Mora Olympic National Forest S Hurricane Ranger Sol Duc Hot Springs Ridge 1. ElwhaStation River Interpretive Center This self-guided Scenterol Duc Falls presents an overview of the largest Highway 112 has Rialto Beach Forks Elwha Ri U.S. Forest Service and Quileute Indian 110 National Park Service River ve damRese removalrvation and restoration project in the Unitedk Calaw ahStates occurring on the nearby Elwha River.r Nature trails lead Information Station South For Olympic National Park La Push Bogachiel Map Legend from the parking lot to views ofState the Park Elwha River gorge and the former Elwha Dam site.
  • Watershed Plan

    Watershed Plan

    CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This watershed plan for the Hoko-Lyre Watershed provides a comprehensive review and evaluation of vital water resources in Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 19 and lays the groundwork for future management and stewardship of these resources. Located on the Olympic Peninsula (see Figure 1-1), WRIA 19 is a beautiful and remote area with few human inhabitants, though it carries a legacy of large- scale logging throughout the region. Based on the review of water resources, this plan outlines steps for ensuring the optimum ongoing use of the watershed’s surface waters and groundwater in a way that balances water needs for human use and environmental protection. An overview of the important characteristics of WRIA 19 is provided below. Appendix A provides more detailed descriptions of WRIA 19 features that are important for consideration in a watershed plan. Figure 1-1. WRIA 19 and Subbasins 1.1 WHY WAS THIS PLAN DEVELOPED? In 1998, the Washington State Legislature created the Watershed Management Act (Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 90.82) to support local communities in addressing water resource management issues. The act established a voluntary watershed management planning process for the major river basins in the state. The goal of the planning process is to support economic growth while promoting water availability and quality. The Act encourages local governments and interested groups and citizens to assess basin water resources and develop strategies for managing them. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) defined boundaries that divide the state into WRIAs, which correspond to the watersheds of major rivers, and established funding for groups in each WRIA that choose to undertake the planning process (funding is broken down by phases of the planning 1-1 WRIA 19 Watershed Plan… effort, as described in Appendix B).
  • Bicycling the O Lympic Peninsula

    Bicycling the O Lympic Peninsula

    Eastern Clallam County Bicycle Map Be Visible • Be Alert • Wear a Helmet • Have Fun RCW 46.61.755 states: Signal before turns and lane Be visible day or night. Be courteous. Choose the best way to turn left: Ride defensively. Be aware of other Ride predictably. changes. Wear bright clothes. Traffic laws apply to persons ❚ LIKE a CAR—scan behind, yield, signal vehicles. Leave adequate space between you and riding bicycles. Audibly alert pedestrians as Check behind and ahead before RCW 46.61.780 states: you approach. and when safe, move into the left lane Do not pass on the right. parked cars. and turn left. Obey all traffic signs, signals and turning. At night you must have a Be careful of opening car doors. laws. Ride in the same direction white headlight and taillight Yield to pedestrians in the ❚ LIKE a PEDESTRIAN—dismount and CAUTION: Always watch for cars as traffic. Yield to vehicles with the or red rear reflector. crosswalk. walk your bike across the intersection stopping or turning. Do not weave in and out of parked cars right-of-way. in the crosswalk. and traffic. Twin Salt Creek County Park Crescent Bay Strait of Juan de Fuca Agate Bay d R r e Lyre River Pvt. Beach To iv gate R n d Clallam Bay i R w r T e d Pvt. t iv s R and Sekiu R Field Creek Lower Elwha Klallam e re r y e Crescent School W L . v i Striped Indian Reservation W R (Parking in South Whiskey Creek e r Peak End of Bus Route y end of lot beside gate L Salt Creek .
  • A G~Ographic Dictionary of Washington

    A G~Ographic Dictionary of Washington

    ' ' ., • I ,•,, ... I II•''• -. .. ' . '' . ... .; - . .II. • ~ ~ ,..,..\f •• ... • - WASHINGTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY HENRY LANDES, State Geologist BULLETIN No. 17 A G~ographic Dictionary of Washington By HENRY LANDES OLYMPIA FRAN K M, LAMBORN ~PUBLIC PRINTER 1917 BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. Governor ERNEST LISTER, Chairman. Lieutenant Governor Louis F. HART. State Treasurer W.W. SHERMAN, Secretary. President HENRY SuzzALLO. President ERNEST 0. HOLLAND. HENRY LANDES, State Geologist. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. Go,:ernor Ernest Lister, Chairman, and Members of the Board of Geological Survey: GENTLEMEN : I have the honor to submit herewith a report entitled "A Geographic Dictionary of Washington," with the recommendation that it be printed as Bulletin No. 17 of the Sun-ey reports. Very respectfully, HENRY LAKDES, State Geologist. University Station, Seattle, December 1, 1917. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page CHAPTER I. GENERAL INFORMATION............................. 7 I Location and Area................................... .. ... .. 7 Topography ... .... : . 8 Olympic Mountains . 8 Willapa Hills . • . 9 Puget Sound Basin. 10 Cascade Mountains . 11 Okanogan Highlands ................................ : ....' . 13 Columbia Plateau . 13 Blue Mountains ..................................... , . 15 Selkirk Mountains ......... : . : ... : .. : . 15 Clhnate . 16 Temperature ......... .' . .. 16 Rainfall . 19 United States Weather Bureau Stations....................... 38 Drainage . 38 Stream Gaging Stations. 42 Gradient of Columbia River. 44 Summary of Discharge
  • Draft CCP, Chapters 3-6, November 2012 (Pdf 3.0

    Draft CCP, Chapters 3-6, November 2012 (Pdf 3.0

    Physical Environment Chapter 3 © Mary Marsh Chapter 6 Chapter 5 Chapter 4 Chapter 3 Chapter 2 Chapter 1 Environmental Human Biological Physical Alternatives, Goals, Introduction and Appendices Consequences Environment Environment Environment Objectives, and Strategies Background Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge Draft CCP/EA Chapter 3. Physical Environment 3.1 Climate and Climate Change 3.1.1 General Climate Conditions The climate at Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) is a mild, mid-latitude, west coast marine type. Because of the moderating influence of the Pacific Ocean, extremely high or low temperatures are rare. Summers are generally cool and dry while winters are mild but moist and cloudy with most of the precipitation falling between November and January (USDA 1987, WRCC 2011a). Annual precipitation in the region is low due to the rain shadow cast by the Olympic Mountains and the extension of the Coastal Range on Vancouver Island (Figure 3-1). Snowfall is rare or light. During the latter half of the summer and in the early fall, fog banks from over the ocean and the Strait of Juan de Fuca cause considerable fog and morning cloudiness (WRCC 2011a). Climate Change Trends The greenhouse effect is a natural phenomenon that assists in regulating and warming the temperature of our planet. Just as a glass ceiling traps heat inside a greenhouse, certain gases in the atmosphere, called greenhouse gases (GHG), absorb and emit infrared radiation from sunlight. The primary greenhouse gases occurring in the atmosphere include carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, methane, and nitrous oxide. CO2 is produced in the largest quantities, accounting for more than half of the current impact on the Earth’s climate.
  • NOPLE Work Plan 2016

    NOPLE Work Plan 2016

    22001166 WWoorrkk PPllaann North Olympic Peninsula Lead Entity for Salmon Clallam County Courthouse 223 E. Fourth Street, # 5 Port Angeles, WA 98362 360/417-2326 1 NOPLE Work Plan 2016 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Membership ................................................................................................................................................. 5 List of Ranked 2016 Work Plan Narratives .................................................................................................. 7 2016 Narrative Ranking Workbook ........................................................................................................... 18 Capital Scoring Criteria ............................................................................................................................ 30 Non-Capital Scoring Criteria .................................................................................................................... 33 2016 Review of Narrative Ranking ............................................................................................................ 36 Project Narratives....................................................................................................................................... 38 2 NOPLE Work Plan 2016 North Olympic Peninsula Lead Entity for Salmon Cl allam County Courthouse February, 2016 223 E. Fourth Street, # 5 Port Angeles,
  • Preface Preface

    Preface Preface

    PREFACE PREFACE This Historic Structures Report was completed in accordance with examples of recreational development during the Forest Service the University of Oregon, Historic Preservation Masters program administration. The primary house refl ects the craftsman archi- and Terminal Project requirements. This report was also written tectural period and is the only remaining historic recreational resi- with the intention of assisting Olympic National Park in its stew- dence of this period and style owned by Olympic National Park. ardship of the presented historic buildings. The Wendel property was listed on the National Register of His- toric Places in 2005. An Historic Structures Report is a planning guide. The purpose of a Historic Structure Report to develop an assimilation of historic context and existing conditions of a building(s) to form the basis of recommendations on the care and conservation of the historic resource. The subject of the report is two structures located within Olympic National Park on the North shore of Lake Crescent, near the head of the Lyre River. The Wendel House and associated boathouse were built in 1936. The two structures are signifi cant Wendel House - Historic Structure Report Olympic National Park Page TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES INTRODUCTION STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ADMINISTRATIVE DATA GEOGRAPHIC/NATURAL SETTING CHAPTER I: Historic Background Recreational Development The Olympics Before the Forest Reserve Olympic Forest Reserve 1893-1905 Recreational Development in the Olympics Before the National
  • Highway Drive Time: 1.5 to 2 Hours One Way Beginning at Either End Washington State Route 112 More Information

    Highway Drive Time: 1.5 to 2 Hours One Way Beginning at Either End Washington State Route 112 More Information

    Located on the north edge of Washington State’s Olympic Peninsula, the natural beauty of this National Scenic The Strait of Byway is as unique as it is spectacular. Its remote stretches of rugged coastline will make your ride along its Juan de Fuca 61-mile length a stand-out adventure. The Strait of Juan de Fuca connects the Pacic Ocean with Puget Sound, parallels the western half of the Strait and traverses the northwestern corner of the United States. Highway Drive Time: 1.5 to 2 hours one way beginning at either end Washington State Route 112 More information: www.highway112.org Distances Port Angeles Joyce Cl. Bay/Sekiu Lake Ozette Neah Bay & Mileages Miles / Time Miles / Time Miles / Time Miles / Time Miles / Time 17 Tatoosh Island & Makah Cultural and Port Angeles 16/24 min. 50/1 hr.16 min. 75/2hrs.7 min. 68/1 hr.47 min. Lighthouse Research Center Joyce 16/24 min. 34/53 min. 59/1 hr.45 min. 54/1 hr.20 min. Cape Flattery Neah Bay Cl. Bay/Sekiu 50/1 hr.16 min. 34/53 min. 25/50 min. 20/32 min. Vancouver Island 12 Lake Ozette 75/2hrs.7 min. 59/1 hr.45 min. 25/50 min. 38/1 hr.11 min. Neah Bay Sail and Seal Rocks Victoria Neah Bay 68/1 hr.47 min. 54/1 hr.20 min. 75/2hrs.7 min. 38/1 hr.11 min. Au to and P Hobuck Beach 13 Makah Strait of Juan de Fuca Makah Bay Reservation assenger-Only F Flattery Rocks Sooes Ri National Wildlife Clallam Bay Spit Refuge Sekiu 112 Point ve 10 County Park Shi Shi Beach r Clallam Bay Point of the Arches erries er Clallam Bay Ozette Indian Sekiu Pillar Point o Riv Village Hok 9 County Park Archaeological Pysht
  • Sub-Region: Western Strait (See Map with Habitat Complexes and Drift)

    Sub-Region: Western Strait (See Map with Habitat Complexes and Drift)

    Appendix B – 1: Western Strait Sub-Region Table of Contents Sub-Region Summary ……………………………………………………………. 2 Geographic Location …………………………………………………….. 2 Geology and Shoreline Sediment Drift …………………………………. 2 Information Sources …………………………………………………….. 3 Description of Sub-regional Habitat Complexes ………………………. 4 Habitat Changes and Impairment of Ecological Processes …………… 7 Relative Condition of Habitat Complexes ……………………………… 7 Management Recommendations …………………………………………8 Habitat Complex Narratives …………………………………………………….10 Neah Bay ………………………………………………………………….10 Sail River ………………………………………………………………….18 Snow Creek ……………………………………………………………… 20 Bullman Creek ……………………………………………………………22 Rasmussen, Jansen, and Olsen creeks …………………………………. 24 Sekiu River ………………………………………………………………. 24 Hoko River ………………………………………………………………. 28 Clallam River ……………………………………………………………. 36 References…………………………………………………………………………45 1 Western Strait Sub-Region Sub-Region Summary Geographic Location The Western Strait sub-region extends from Koitlah Point that marks the west end of Neah Bay (west of the breakwater) to an area of “no appreciable drift” along rocky headlands located between Clallam Bay and the Pysht River (Figure 1). Shorelines in the Western and Central Strait sub-regions alternate between relatively protected pockets (largest ones being Neah Bay, Clallam Bay, Pysht, and Crescent Bay) that tend to accumulate sediment material sometimes derived from fluvial sources, and the more exposed and often very steep rocky shorelines. Geology and Shoreline Sediment Drift Geologically,
  • 2.1 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Olympic Peninsula Landscapes, And

    2.1 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Olympic Peninsula Landscapes, And

    Chapter 2.1 Natural Environment Page 2.1-1 2.1 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Olympic Peninsula landscapes, and the region’s flora and fauna, have been shaped by the geology and climatic history of the region. The landscapes have been reworked by the persistent, long-term action of gradual environmental changes such as glaciation and mountain-building. They have responded to erratic, catastrophic events, such as major floods, fires, and the breaching of glacial lakes. And they evidence the pervasive effects of human influences. The wildlife and plantlife of the peninsula reflect this long, complex, and significantly altered character. This section discusses the many factors that define the current condition of the natural environment of WRIA 18. This is a diverse area with important differences across its full extent. Consequently, the discussion below contains some information that is generally applicable to the entire planning area. In addition, much work has been done in specific areas within WRIA 18 that makes it possible to present more detailed information relating to portions of the WRIA, especially in distinguishing between East WRIA 18 and West WRIA 18. Where possible and appropriate, information here is presented separately for these eastern and western portions. 2.1.1 Geography West WRIA 18 – Elwha Morse Planning Area West WRIA 18 (WRIA 18W) includes, on the west, the Elwha River and its tributaries, Morse Creek on the east, and the smaller, urban drainages between, including Dry, Tumwater, Valley, Peabody, White, Ennis, and Lees creeks. The headwaters of the Elwha River and Morse Creek lie in the Olympic Mountains. The smaller streams originate in foothills to the north of the main Olympic range and along the northern boundary of Olympic National Park.
  • Disproportionate Importance of Nearshore Habitat for the Food Web of a Deep Oligotrophic Lake

    Disproportionate Importance of Nearshore Habitat for the Food Web of a Deep Oligotrophic Lake

    CSIRO PUBLISHING Marine and Freshwater Research, 2011, 62, 350–358 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/mfr Disproportionate importance of nearshore habitat for the food web of a deep oligotrophic lake Stephanie E. HamptonA,E, Steven C. FradkinB, Peter R. LeavittC and Elizabeth E. RosenbergerD ANational Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, 735 State St. Suite 300, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA. BOlympic National Park, National Park Service, 600 East Park Avenue, Port Angeles, WA 98362, USA. CUniversity of Regina, Department of Biology, Regina, SK, S4S 0A2 Canada. DRocky Mountain Research Station, Boise Aquatic Sciences Lab, 322 East Front St. Suite 401, Boise, ID 83709, USA. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. In large deep oligotrophic lakes, multiple lines of evidence suggest that the shallow nearshore water provides disproportionately important feeding and breeding habitat for the whole-lake food web. We examined the trophic importance of the nearshore environment, human impacts nearshore, and several approaches to disturbance detection in a deep (190 m) oligotrophic lake with relatively modest residential development. In Lake Crescent, on the Olympic Peninsula of Washington (USA), stable isotope analysis demonstrated that apex salmonid predators derived more than 50% of their carbon from nearshore waters, even though this nearshore water accounted for only 2.5% of total lake volume. Unfortunately, it is this land–water interface that is initially degraded as shorelines are developed. We hypothesised that under these conditions of relatively modest disturbance, the effects of residential development would be strongly localised near to shore. Indeed, we found striking differences between developed and undeveloped sites in periphyton and associated organic matter, though there were no offshore signals of human impact in water nutrient analysis or paleolimnological investigations.
  • Speciation Via Isolation: the Lake Crescent Trout

    Speciation Via Isolation: the Lake Crescent Trout

    Speciation via Isolation: The Lake Crescent Trout Set in the north of Olympic National Park in Washington State, Lake Crescent is a large lake covering more than 5,000 acres and exceeding 600 feet in depth. Lake Crescent occupies a valley where a river once drained through current Lake Sutherland and into the Elwha River. Approximately 9,000 years ago a great landslide dammed that outlet, raising the level of the lake. Sea run steelhead and cutthroat trout that once used this river to access the ocean were trapped in the rising lake. A new outlet formed at the Lyre River, however, a waterfall prevents the trout from gaining access to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The Lake Crescent population of steelhead and cutthroat trout became isolated from other populations of trout on the Olympic Peninsula and have changed genetically (due to mutations and natural selection) over time to become two unique variants, the Beardslee trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus var. beardsleei which arose from the steelhead trout) and the Crescenti cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki var. crescenti that arose from coastal cutthroat trout). Distinguishing between the two was not easy even when they were both abundant, up until the early years of the 20th century. Identification today is considerably more difficult. Between 1920 and 1975, stocks of several other varieties of rainbow trout and cutthroat trout were introduced into Lake Crescent. During the 1970s, it was possible to catch trout of almost all shapes, sizes and colors without being certain that any individual was either the native rainbow or cutthroat.