Watershed Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Watershed Plan CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This watershed plan for the Hoko-Lyre Watershed provides a comprehensive review and evaluation of vital water resources in Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 19 and lays the groundwork for future management and stewardship of these resources. Located on the Olympic Peninsula (see Figure 1-1), WRIA 19 is a beautiful and remote area with few human inhabitants, though it carries a legacy of large- scale logging throughout the region. Based on the review of water resources, this plan outlines steps for ensuring the optimum ongoing use of the watershed’s surface waters and groundwater in a way that balances water needs for human use and environmental protection. An overview of the important characteristics of WRIA 19 is provided below. Appendix A provides more detailed descriptions of WRIA 19 features that are important for consideration in a watershed plan. Figure 1-1. WRIA 19 and Subbasins 1.1 WHY WAS THIS PLAN DEVELOPED? In 1998, the Washington State Legislature created the Watershed Management Act (Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 90.82) to support local communities in addressing water resource management issues. The act established a voluntary watershed management planning process for the major river basins in the state. The goal of the planning process is to support economic growth while promoting water availability and quality. The Act encourages local governments and interested groups and citizens to assess basin water resources and develop strategies for managing them. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) defined boundaries that divide the state into WRIAs, which correspond to the watersheds of major rivers, and established funding for groups in each WRIA that choose to undertake the planning process (funding is broken down by phases of the planning 1-1 WRIA 19 Watershed Plan… effort, as described in Appendix B). The Watershed Management Act requires that each watershed planning process address the issue of water quantity and defines three optional planning elements: water quality, habitat, and instream flow (the amount of flow that must be left in a stream to support habitat features). If a planning group chooses to undertake any of the optional planning elements, additional funding is available. The WRIA 19 Planning Unit chose to undertake all three of the additional elements, as described in Section 1.4.2. Watershed planning conducted under the Watershed Management Act may be initiated only with the unanimous consent of the “Initiating Governments” in the WRIA, which include all counties in the watershed, the largest city or town, and the largest water utility. All tribes with reservation lands in the watershed must be invited to participate as an Initiating Government. The Initiating Governments appoint a lead agency for the planning process, decide upon the elements to be covered in the planning process, and designate a “Planning Unit,” consisting of stakeholders within the watershed. When the legislation was enacted, areas of WRIA 19 were facing problems stemming from a long history of environmental damage from logging and overfishing. Although logging practices and their associated impacts have improved over the years, the long-term effects of past practices left present-day communities in WRIA 19 to deal with problems such as poor water quality, loss of habitat (especially old-growth forest), streambank erosion, and diminishing salmon runs. The delicate balance between maintaining an economy driven by natural resource extraction and protecting natural resources is a key theme in the watershed planning effort for WRIA 19. The Planning Unit has the authority to approve or reject the watershed plan, but it cannot create obligations for entities that are not represented on the Planning Unit. Nor can the recommendations of the Watershed Plan supplant existing legislation pertaining to established forest practices. Specifically, RCW 90.82.120 states that watershed planning “shall not create any obligations or restrictions on forest practices additional to or inconsistent with” the state’s forest practices law (RCW 76.09). However, RCW 90.82 does not prevent a planning unit from proposing recommendations, such as monitoring, that can complement or assist the implementation of the forest practices law. Nor does the legislation preclude the forest industry from agreeing to undertake additional voluntary actions to protect watershed health. 1.2 HOKO-LYRE WATERSHED DESCRIPTION 1.2.1 Area Evaluated for the Watershed Plan WRIA 19 covers 384 square miles in Clallam County, extending along the Strait of Juan de Fuca from Freshwater Bay west of Port Angeles to Cape Flattery. The northernmost peaks of the Olympic Mountains make up the southern boundary of the watershed; the northern boundary is the Strait of Juan de Fuca. This plan does not address water resource issues pertaining to the Makah Reservation at the northwest tip of the Olympic Peninsula. This land is excluded as “federally reserved” based on the 1908 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in /Winters v. United States/, which states, “when the Federal Government withdraws land from the public domain for a particular purpose, by implication it also reserves whatever unappropriated water is necessary to accomplish this purpose. That reserved right carries a priority as of the date of the reservation, regardless of when the water is actually used” (Authorities and Definitions, USFWS Manual, 1993). These rights were given a priority date of “time immemorial” and are the most senior water rights in WRIA 19. Although reservation land falls outside the scope of watershed planning, both the Makah and the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe have “Usual and Accustomed” hunting and fishing rights in many of the subbasins 1-2 …1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND throughout WRIA 19. The Usual and Accustomed (U&A) areas overlap with the land contained within the land defined in the WRIA 19. The Tribes have a federal right to manage natural resources on the landscape in their respective U & A’s. The Tribal rights are separate and distinct from any outcome of the WRIA 19 planning process. Management of Tribal resources, including water, in the U&A is the responsibility of the tribes as defined by their respective Treaties and the federal, state and county governments. The Tribe works cooperatively with federal, state, county and other government representatives to ensure tribal rights are protected. 1.2.2 Streams and Water Bodies WRIA 19 includes all rivers and streams that drain into the Strait of Juan de Fuca along the western part of the north coast of the Olympic Peninsula. This watershed plan provides detailed evaluation of all streams in the watershed’s nine major subbasins outside of tribal lands that flow north from the Olympic Mountains through the foothills and lowland valleys to sea level (referred to as “the Big 9”): • Sekiu River • Deep Creek • Hoko River • East and West Twin Rivers • Clallam River • Lyre River • Pysht River • Salt Creek. Several smaller streams originate in the foothills and lowlands. Lake Crescent is the only major lake in WRIA 19; it is entirely surrounded by National Park lands. 1.2.3 Land Use The dominant land use in WRIA 19 is commercial forestry. Almost the entire watershed has been harvested at least once in the past 100 years, and much of it is in its third rotation of harvest (Johnson and O’Neill, 2001). Sixty-eight percent of the WRIA is zoned for commercial forestry, of which 53 percent is privately owned and the remainder is managed by state and federal agencies (24 and 19 percent, respectively). Figure 1-2 shows the distribution of timberlands by owner category, and Figure 1-3 shows the distribution of timberlands held by the largest private owners. In addition to commercial forestry, WRIA 19 has a long agricultural tradition. Early settlers were encouraged to relocate to the Olympic Peninsula by the Donation Land Act of 1850, which granted 320 acres to a single settler or 640 acres to a family. After an early period of homesteading and farming, logging began to dominate the economy by the early 1900s, after which much of the land in the eastern, coastal areas of WRIA 19 was further converted to agriculture. The agricultural community developed important livestock, farming and especially dairy industries that Cowan Ranch (photo courtesy of Bill Drath) supplemented the forest economy (Crop and Livestock Reporting Services Bulletin, 1956). Today, 7 percent of WRIA 19 is zoned rural. Minor portions of the watershed are zoned tribal, public, industria l, tideland, or urban (see Figure 1-4). 1-3 WRIA 19 Watershed Plan… 50,000 Other 45,764 4% 45,000 40,000 35,000 State 24% 30,000 25,590 25,000 21,280 20,000 Private 53% 15,000 10,000 Timberland Area Owned (acres) 5,000 3,105 2,634 Federal 0 19% Bloedel Rayonier Merrill& Ring Ring Familty Ltd. Cascade Timberlands Figure 1-2. Timberland Ownership by Owner Class Figure 1-3. Large Private Timberland Owners (ONRC Clearinghouse for the Olympic Peninsula) (ONRC Clearinghouse for the Olympic Peninsula) Other 12% Public 6% Rural 7% Commercial Forestry 75% Figure 1-4. Zoning Distribution by Area (ONRC Clearinghouse for the Olympic Peninsula) 1.2.4 Population Early native communities on the Olympic Peninsula thrived on the abundant fish and wildlife food sources in the peninsula’s hospitable climate. By the late 1700s, approximately 4,000 Native Americans of the S’Klallam, Makah, and Ozette tribes inhabited 17 villages along the northern peninsula. By the mid-1800s, European settlers were establishing communities in what is now Clallam County, with fur trading, canning, timber and wood products, and farming as the economic base. Commercial forestry 1-4 …1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND continues to employ many people throughout WRIA 19. Other major employment categories include retail, recreation, tourism, and staffing of the Clallam Bay Corrections Center.
Recommended publications
  • Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities
    NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN THE FIRST 10 YEARS (1994–2003) Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities Lita P. Buttolph, William Kay, Susan Charnley, Cassandra Moseley, and Ellen M. Donoghue General Technical Report United States Forest Pacific Northwest PNW-GTR-679 Department of Service Research Station July 2006 Agriculture The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all pro- grams.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-18 Olympic Peninsula Travel Planner
    Welcome! Photo: John Gussman Photo: Explore Olympic National Park, hiking trails & scenic drives Connect Wildlife, local cuisine, art & native culture Relax Ocean beaches, waterfalls, hot springs & spas Play Kayak, hike, bicycle, fish, surf & beachcomb Learn Interpretive programs & museums Enjoy Local festivals, wine & cider tasting, Twilight BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER ISLAND BRITISH COLUMBIA IDAHO 5 Discover Olympic Peninsula magic 101 WASHINGTON from lush Olympic rain forests, wild ocean beaches, snow-capped 101 mountains, pristine lakes, salmon-spawning rivers and friendly 90 towns along the way. Explore this magical area and all it has to offer! 5 82 This planner contains highlights of the region. E R PACIFIC OCEAN PACIFIC I V A R U M B I Go to OlympicPeninsula.org to find more O L C OREGON details and to plan your itinerary. 84 1 Table of Contents Welcome .........................................................1 Table of Contents .............................................2 This is Olympic National Park ............................2 Olympic National Park ......................................4 Olympic National Forest ...................................5 Quinault Rain Forest & Kalaloch Beaches ...........6 Forks, La Push & Hoh Rain Forest .......................8 Twilight ..........................................................9 Strait of Juan de Fuca Nat’l Scenic Byway ........ 10 Joyce, Clallam Bay/Sekiu ................................ 10 Neah Bay/Cape Flattery .................................. 11 Port Angeles, Lake Crescent
    [Show full text]
  • Chsda Cowlitz It Pub
    67884 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Notices Secretary of Health and Human be made available by the IHS to include Columbia County in the State of Services. Information about the RoC and members of an identified Indian Oregon, and Kittitas and Wahkiakum the review process is available on its community who reside in the area. Counties in the State of Washington. Web site (http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/ Residence with a CHSDA or SDA by a Under 42 CFR 136.23 those otherwise roc) or by contacting Dr. Lunn (see FOR person who is within the scope of the eligible Indians who do not reside on a FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above). Indian health program, as set forth in 42 reservation but reside within a CHSDA Dated: December 9, 2009. CFR 136.12, creates no legal entitlement must be either members of the Tribe or John R. Bucher, to contract health services but only maintain close economic and social ties potential eligibility for services. Associate Director, National Toxicology with the Tribe. In this case, the Tribe Program. Services needed but not available at a estimates the current eligible population IHS/Tribal facility are provided under [FR Doc. E9–30300 Filed 12–18–09; 8:45 am] will be increased by 35 individuals’ the CHS program depending on the enrolled Cowlitz members who are BILLING CODE 4140–01–P availability of funds, the person’s actively involved with the Tribe, but not relative medical priority, and the actual eligible for health services. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND availability and accessibility of alternate In applying the aforementioned HUMAN SERVICES resources in accordance with the CHSDA re-designation criteria required regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pysht River Conservation Area
    A Place Worth Getting There: From Port Angeles, drive about 3 miles west on Hwy 101. Turn right onto Hwy 112 Protecting and drive about 37 miles. The parking area is at milepost 24. North Olympic Land Trust is your community nonprofit dedicated to the conservation of open spaces, local food, local resources, healthy watersheds and recreational opportunities. Our long-term Pysht River goal and mission is to conserve lands that sustain the communities of Clallam County. Conservation Area Since 1990, North Olympic Land Trust has permanently conserved: More than 520 acres of local farmland 12 miles of stream and river habitat More than 1,800 602 EAST FRONT ST. P.O. BOX 2945 (MAILING) acres of forestland PORT ANGELES, WASH I NGTON 98362 (360) 417-1815 FOR THE LATEST NEWS | TO EXPLORE THE LAND | TO DONATE: [email protected] northolympiclandtrust.org northolympiclandtrust.org Pysht River Habitat Restoration The Pysht River Conservation Area, located 8.7 miles from the mouth of the Pysht River, protects 74 acres of land, including 2/3 mile of the Pysht River, 1,500 feet of Green Creek and four wetlands. The Pysht River is used by coho salmon, cutthroat trout, and steelhead. The Area also is vital for the recovering productivity of chinook and chum salmon. The Makah Tribe led initial restoration efforts within the Area by removing the dilapidated structures and non-native invasive vegetation, and with the help of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, re-planted over 7,000 native trees. Further plantings were completed in partnership with the Clallam Conservation District, USDA Farm Service Agency and Merrill & Ring.
    [Show full text]
  • History & Culture
    Tatoosh Island & Lighthouse Washington Cape Flattery 10 Neah Bay Vancouver Island State Route 112 8 Victoria Neah Bay Au to and Hobuck Beach 9 Makah Makah Strait of Juan de Fuca Bay Reservation P The Strait of Sooes Ri assenger-Only Sekiu 112 Point Clallam Shi Shi Beach ve Bay 5 r 6 Point of er Clallam Bay the Arches Sekiu F DE o Riv erries UAN k J FUCA Ho Ozette Indian Hoko-Ozette Pillar Point Cape Pysht Alava Reservation Road HIGHWAY r Pysht River Crescent Ozette ve Bay Island 7 Big Ri The Working Forest 2 Freshwater West Twin Striped 113 4 3 Bay Ediz Hook Sand Point Dickey River Peak Port Lake Lake Beaver Lake East Twin Lyre River Angeles ITINERARY #1 Ozette River Joyce 112 Olympic Salt Creek Lake Sappho er Pleasant Fairholm 1 National er 101 rk 101 Lake Crescent Riv Park Fo Riv Lake HISTORY & CULTURE ckey Beaver To Seattle Sol Duc Riv er Sutherland Di East ckey Di ah River Heart O’ the orth Fork Calaw S N Summer Hills Ranger y y Onl Station Summer Only Mora Olympic National Forest S Hurricane Ranger Sol Duc Hot Springs Ridge 1. ElwhaStation River Interpretive Center This self-guided Scenterol Duc Falls presents an overview of the largest Highway 112 has Rialto Beach Forks Elwha Ri U.S. Forest Service and Quileute Indian 110 National Park Service River ve damRese removalrvation and restoration project in the Unitedk Calaw ahStates occurring on the nearby Elwha River.r Nature trails lead Information Station South For Olympic National Park La Push Bogachiel Map Legend from the parking lot to views ofState the Park Elwha River gorge and the former Elwha Dam site.
    [Show full text]
  • Vgfw2006.Pdf
    2 FALL 2006/WINTER 2007 NORTH OLYMPIC PENINSULA NEWCOMERS’ AND VISITORS’ GUIDE 6A275232 DISCOVERDISCOVER an INTERNATIONALINTERNATIONAL VAVACATIONCATION Port Angeles-Victoria Passenger/Vehicle Ferry Spring/Summer/Fall Year 2006 Daily round trip passenger and vehicle service from Port Angeles, WA to Victoria, BC since 1959. For schedule and online reservations please visit us on our website at www.ferrytovictoria.com or www.cohoferry.com or call our Port Angeles office at 360-457-4491 or Victoria at 250-386-2202. Identification is required for U.S.. and Canadian Customs and Immigration. It is strongly recommende d if possible to use a passport. However, at the present time, if you are a U.S. born or Canadian born citizen, a valid dri vers license along with an original or certified copy of a birth certificate and photo ID is acceptable. International Identifi cation Rulings may change in January 2008 requiring every International traveler to have a valid passport. September 28, 2006 – October 5, 2006 8:20 a.m. 10:30 a.m. 1:45 p.m. 4:00 p.m. SAILINGS FOR THE CANADIAN THANKSGIVING DAY WEEKEND AND U.S. COLUMBUS DAY WEEKEND Oct. 6, 7, 8, 9, 2006 8:20 a.m. 10:30 a.m. 12:45 p.m. 3:00 p.m. 5:15 p.m. 7:30 p.m. Oct. 10, 2006 – January 3, 2007 8:20 a.m. 10:30 a.m. 1:45 p.m. 4:00 p.m. PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP REQUIRED FOR ENTRY INTO CANADA NOW ACCEPTING RESERVATIONS INTO CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED STATES 6A275231 Crossing Time: 95 Minutes Vertical Clearance: 14 Feet BLACLACK BAALLLL TRANSTRANSPPORT, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Ranked List of Projects for 2015-17 Capital Budget Funding
    Work on the Puyallup River Proposed Ranked List of Projects for 2015-17 Capital Budget Funding Ecology Publication #: 14-06-033 October 2014 / revised February 2019 Proposed Ranked Projects for 2015-17 Capital Budget Funding I,Whitma _,.,J n D C PA R I M E N I O F Projects above $50 million total ECOLOGY State of Wa>h ington DProjects below $50 million total Sources: NASA, USGS, ESRI,NAIP,Washington State Orthoportal, other suppliers Ecology Publication #: 14-06-033 October 2014 / revised February 2019 Ecology FY 2015-17 Proposed Floodplain by Design Project List Rank Project Description Grant Local Project Legis Request Match Total Dist. Yakima FP Management Program: Rambler's Park Phase IV and Trout 1 Meadows Phase II (Yakima County) $2,358,000 $592,000 $2,950,000 15 Puyallup Watershed Floodplain 2 Reconnections - Tier 1 (Pierce County) $10,240,000 $2,544,250 $12,784,250 31 Lower Dungeness River Floodplain 3 Restoration (Clallam County) $9,501,600 $2,375,400 $11,877,000 24 Boeing Levee/Russell Road Improvements & Floodplain Restoration 4 (King County Flood & Control District) $4,900,000 $24,400,000 $29,300,000 33 South Fork Nooksack - Flood, Fish and Farm Conservation (Whatcom Land 5 Trust) $3,216,958 $811,090 $4,028,048 42 Middle Green River/Porter Gateway Protection and Restoration (King 6 County) $3,648,926 $1,737,373 $5,386,299 31 Cedar River Corridor Plan 7 Implementation (King County) $5,000,000 $3,000,000 $8,000,000 5 Sustainable Management of the Upper Quinault River Floodplain (Quinault 8 Indian Nation) $560,000 $140,000 $700,000
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian and Alaska Native Traditional Resources
    3.11 American Indian and Alaska Native Traditional Resources Northwest Training and Testing Final Supplemental EIS/OEIS September 2020 Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/ Overseas Environmental Impact Statement Northwest Training and Testing TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.11 American Indian and Alaska Native Traditional Resources ........................................... 3.11-1 3.11.1 Affected Environment ......................................................................................... 3.11-1 3.11.1.1 Government-to-Government Consultation ....................................... 3.11-1 3.11.1.2 American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes ........................................ 3.11-3 3.11.1.3 Tribal Fishing Areas and Use ............................................................ 3.11-13 3.11.2 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 3.11-16 3.11.2.1 Impeding Access to Usual and Accustomed Fishing Grounds or Traditional Fishing Areas .................................................................................. 3.11-16 3.11.2.2 Changes in the Availability of Marine Resources or Habitat ........... 3.11-19 3.11.2.3 Loss of Fishing Gear ......................................................................... 3.11-20 List of Figures Figure 3.11-1: Tribal Lands for American Indian Tribes Associated with the Offshore Area ................ 3.11-4 Figure 3.11-2: Tribal Lands for American Indian Tribes Associated with the Inland Waters .............. 3.11-11 Figure 3.11-3:
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Wildlife Grant Final Report Makah Cougar and Bobcat Research Grant: F12AP00260
    Tribal Wildlife Grant Final Report Makah Cougar and Bobcat Research Grant: F12AP00260 Prepared by: Shannon Murphie and Rob McCoy 1 INTRODUCTION Mountain lions or cougars (Puma concolor) and bobcats (Lynx rufus) are both native mammals of the family Felidae. Mountain lions are large solitary cats with the greatest range of any large wild terrestrial mammal in the Western Hemisphere (Iriarte et al. 1990). Bobcats are also solitary cats that range from southern Canada to northern Mexico, including most of the continental United States. Both species are predators and as such play a prominent role in Native American mythology and culture due to their perceived attributes such as grace, strength, eyesight, and hunting ability. Similar to other Native American Tribes, predators have played a key role in the culture and ceremonies of the Makah people. Gray wolves (Canis lupus), black bear (Ursus americanus), cougars, and bobcats all are important components of Makah culture both historically and in contemporary times. For example, black bears and gray wolves both represented important clans in Makah history. Gray wolves exhibited cooperative behavior that provided guidelines for human behavior and “Klukwalle,” or wolf ritual, was a secret society that required a 6 day initiation period (G. Arnold, personal communication). Wolf hides were also used in dance and costume regalia. Bear hides were worn by men of status (Chapman 1994) and as regalia during whale hunts (G. Ray, personal communication). Cougars and bobcats play a smaller, but still important role in Makah history and contemporary culture. During naming ceremonies a Makah name is given which best reflects an individual, often an animal such as the mountain lion is used as it represents intelligence and power.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State's Scenic Byways & Road Trips
    waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS inSide: Road Maps & Scenic drives planning tips points of interest 2 taBLe of contentS waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS introduction 3 Washington State’s Scenic Byways & Road Trips guide has been made possible State Map overview of Scenic Byways 4 through funding from the Federal Highway Administration’s National Scenic Byways Program, Washington State Department of Transportation and aLL aMeRican RoadS Washington State Tourism. waShington State depaRtMent of coMMeRce Chinook Pass Scenic Byway 9 director, Rogers Weed International Selkirk Loop 15 waShington State touRiSM executive director, Marsha Massey nationaL Scenic BywayS Marketing Manager, Betsy Gabel product development Manager, Michelle Campbell Coulee Corridor 21 waShington State depaRtMent of tRanSpoRtation Mountains to Sound Greenway 25 Secretary of transportation, Paula Hammond director, highways and Local programs, Kathleen Davis Stevens Pass Greenway 29 Scenic Byways coordinator, Ed Spilker Strait of Juan de Fuca - Highway 112 33 Byway leaders and an interagency advisory group with representatives from the White Pass Scenic Byway 37 Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington State Tourism, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and State Scenic BywayS Audubon Washington were also instrumental in the creation of this guide. Cape Flattery Tribal Scenic Byway 40 puBLiShing SeRviceS pRovided By deStination
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the National Workshop on Effects of Habitat Alteration on Salmonid Stocks
    Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 105 Proceedings of the National Workshop on Effects of Habitat Alteration on Salmonid Stocks Edited by: C. D. Levings, L. B. Holtby, and M. A. Henderson DFO -11 Lib 11 1ary 111 / 11MPO 1111 Bibliothèque1111 II 12018946 QL 626 C314 #105 c.2 Fisheries Pêches and Oceans et Océans Canad13. 3r-/ Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 105 ii e z Proceedings of the National Workshop on O Effects of Habitat Alte R Yceans on Salmonid Stoc YID 27 1989 Edited by BIBLIOTHÈQUE Pêches & Océans C.D. Levings Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Biological Sciences Branch, West Vancouver Laboratory, 4160 Marine Drive, West Vancouver, B.C. V7V 1N6 L.B. Holtby Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Biological Sciences Branch, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K6 and M.A. Henderson Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Biological Sciences Branch, 555 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6B 5G3 Scientific Excellence Resource Protection & Conservation Benefits for Canadians DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS 0 TTA WA 1989 Published by Publié par Fisheries Pêches 1*11 and Oceans et Océans Communications Direction générale Directorate des communications Ottawa K1 A 0E6 ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1989 Available from authorized bookstore agents, other bookstores or you may send your prepaid order to the Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K 1 A 0S9 Make cheques or money orders payable in Canadian funds to the Receiver General for Canada A deposit copy of this publication is also available for reference in public libraries across Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Implementation Final Report
    Puget Sound National Estuary Program: Tribal Implementation Award PA-00J32201: FY10-13 Final report March 15, 2018 Contact: Dani Madrone Puget Sound Recovery Projects Coordinator, NWIFC [email protected] 360-528-4318 This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement PA-00J32201 to the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. EPA Award PA-00J32201: FY10-13 Final report Introduction On behalf of the federally recognized tribes of Puget Sound, the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission (NWIFC) developed a program to administer the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Estuary Program award dedicated to tribal restoration and protection projects in the Puget Sound watershed. These funds were awarded under a cooperative agreement (PA-00J32201), under which NWIFC served as the Lead Organization (LO) for the tribal distribution of these funds. This report details the outcomes, successes, and reflections of this first cooperative agreement, which included four awards that spanned federal fiscal years 2010- 13 and closed December 31, 2017, and offers a forward looking approach on the continuation of tribal implementation projects for Puget Sound under this program. Overview of Approach As the Lead Organization (LO) for the tribal distribution of the National Estuary Program award for Puget Sound, NWIFC has a unique, non-competitive approach to the allocation of this award. The cooperative agreement between NWIFC and EPA Region 10 recognizes the federal government’s trust responsibility to each of the federally recognized Indian tribes within the region.
    [Show full text]