DOCSLIB.ORG

State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2016 STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS, AND RELATED PROGRAMS APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2015 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:07 a.m., in room SD–192, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Lindsey Graham (chairman) presiding. Present: Senators Graham, Kirk, Blunt, Boozman, Moran, Lankford, Daines, Leahy, Durbin, Coons, Merkley, and Murphy. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY STATEMENT OF HON. JOHN F. KERRY, SECRETARY OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM Senator GRAHAM. The committee will come to order. It is my pleasure to have Secretary Kerry with us today. We all look forward to your testimony, Mr. Secretary. I just want to ac- knowledge your hard work on behalf of our Nation. You are very energetic, traveling from one end of the globe to the other, trying to bring some calm out of chaos. As to the subcommittee itself, I am now the chairman. I appre- ciate the honor of chairing the subcommittee, but my partner, Sen- ator Leahy, we will continue to do what we have been doing since I have been here, and that is work together for the common good. This is one account that has been bipartisan. We intend to keep it that way. It represents 1 percent of the Federal budget, give or take a bit. The amount of return on investment the American tax- payer has achieved from this account I think is something we should all be proud of. There is more than one way to deal with a problem. The military options are sometimes the most talked about, and there are other ways to engage the world. This account represents ways to engage the world without the use of military force. I worry deeply about the effects of sequestration, Mr. Secretary, on this account. We are due to spend 2.3 percent of GDP, some- where in that range, on defense by the 2024 period. That will be the lowest amount we spend on our national defense in decades. (1) 2 This account, which I believe is national defense in another form, gets dramatically reduced. What does that mean? It means that all the efforts we have made to counter malaria and AIDS in Africa and throughout the world are put in jeopardy. We have made such progress. Mother- to-child AIDS transmission has been dramatically reduced. There are countries on the continent of Africa that are inside the 10-yard line in terms of eradicating their AIDS problems. We are turning the corner on malaria and almost eradicated polio. The developing world needs America now more than ever. From an American taxpayer point of view, this has been a good invest- ment to bring stability, particularly to the continent of Africa. All is in jeopardy if the Congress continues to sit on the sidelines and watch sequestration being implemented. Finally, Embassy security. The entire State Department’s budget is under the appropriation of this subcommittee. To the diplomats and the contractors who are serving in faraway places with strange sounding names, God bless you. We worry about your safety daily. I am here to say, from my point of view as chairman of the sub- committee, if sequestration is not somehow moderated or replaced, we are putting in jeopardy the ability to post people overseas in dangerous areas safely. That, to me, is not an alarmist view. It is reality. So I look forward to hearing from the Secretary about a variety of challenges throughout the world, and would love to hear your comments about the effects of sequestration on your ability to man- age the department. You have a hard stop at noon, so we will try to get through the 7-minute rounds. With that, I will turn it over to Senator Leahy. STATEMENT OF SENATOR PATRICK J. LEAHY Senator LEAHY. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I congratulate you in the way your staff worked with me and my staff throughout the years. The chairman was right in saying that this is a committee where we are pretty transparent. We try to work in a bipartisan way. I remember Senators Dan Inouye and Ted Stevens doing that. I did it with Senator McConnell. We went back and forth. Part of the time, I was chairman. Part of the time, he was chairman. And then it was Senator Gregg in New Hampshire, and now Senator Graham. We did work closely together. Our bill was one of the few that came out with virtually unanimous support. We tried to check the priorities of whoever was in the White House, whether it was a Democrat or Republican as President. One of the things we tried to do also was to give the view to the rest of the world that we are a lot stronger when we work together. Mr. Secretary, you have one of the most difficult jobs in the world. We have known each other for decades. I have talked to you about your travels, your indefatigable travels. But the world seems to be on fire, sometimes literally, in so many parts of the world. We had a 14-year war in Afghanistan that set wildly optimistic goals. But today, much of that country remains under Taliban con- trol with a weak central government. The government I believe we should support struggles to function in a highly insecure and cor- 3 rupt environment. We had tens of billions of dollars in aid pro- grams implemented by U.S. contractors, very little of that can be or will be sustained by the Afghans. In Iraq, we spent hundreds of billions while dire needs in other parts of the world, including our own hemisphere, to say nothing about our own country, were neglected. But there it is, an unstable, corrupt environment. I believe the future is anything but secure. Syria is the world’s biggest disaster. Libya looks like it can be- come another Syria. Relations between Israelis and Palestinians have gone from bad to worse, and we are at a decisive point with Iran. ISIL has emerged seemingly out of nowhere. It is probably the best illustration of how naive some were to think that launching a war to overthrow Saddam Hussein meant that we were going to be created in that area as liberators. I have more of my statement that I will put in my record. But look at Central America. Decades of corrupt oligarchies, civil wars, despots. Governments there have squandered the past two decades. Now you have organized crime and corruption deeply root- ed, widespread. I do welcome a new focus in that region, but I want to make sure that the billions that are being requested are going to be spent differently than they were in the past. Then we have Ebola, HIV/AIDS, spiraling cost of U.N. peace- keeping, global warming. There is a lot going on. I do commend the administration. I have spoken to you privately and the President about this. I realized that 50 years of policy on Cuba hadn’t worked. I think of the memos sent to the President, to hold tough and those Cas- tros will be gone any day now. Of course, the first such memo was sent to President Eisenhower and then President Kennedy and President Johnson, President Nixon, and so on. PREPARED STATEMENT So I think it won’t change overnight, but the nice thing now is that the mistakes made in Cuba and the failures of their own econ- omy, the Cuban Government can no longer blame it on us because of our embargo. They are going to have to take responsibility for their own mistakes. I will put my full statement in the record. [The statement follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF SENATOR PATRICK J. LEAHY Thank you Mr. Chairman. This is Senator Graham’s first hearing as chairman of this subcommittee, and I congratulate him and thank him for the way he and his staff have worked with me and my staff over the years. This subcommittee has a history of bipartisanship. I remember 30 years ago when Senators Dan Inouye and Bob Kasten worked to- gether, and myself with Senator McConnell, Senator Gregg, and since then with Senator Graham. I have served as chairman and ranking member. We have switched back and forth. But unlike some committees we have worked in a transparent, cooperative way, drafting the bills and reports together. We include the priorities of both sides, which has made it possible to report bills with strong bipartisan votes and the support of the White House—whether Repub- lican or Democrat. In a world as dangerous as today, we are far stronger when we act together. 4 Mr. Secretary, thank you for being here. You have one of the most difficult jobs in the Government. The world seems to be on fire—literally or figuratively—in so many places it is hard to keep track. We appreciate that you are here requesting the resources to try to put those fires out. I think today we are reaping some of what we have sowed. After a 14 year war in Afghanistan that set wildly optimistic goals, much of that country remains under Taliban control. A weak central government—a government I believe we should sup- port—struggles to function in a highly insecure and corrupt environment. After tens of billions of dollars on aid programs implemented by U.S. contractors, very little of our investment can be sustained by the Afghans. In Iraq, where we spent hundreds of billions while dire needs in other parts of the world—including our own hemisphere—were neglected, there is a similarly un- stable, corrupt environment where the future is anything but secure.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Omar-Ashour-English.Pdf
    CENTER ON DEMOCRACY, DEVELOPMENT, AND THE RULE OF LAW STANFORD UNIVERSITY BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER - STANFORD PROJECT ON ARAB TRANSITIONS PAPER SERIES Number 3, November 2012 FROM BAD COP TO GOOD COP: THE CHALLENGE OF SECURITY SECTOR REFORM IN EGYPT OMAR ASHOUR PROGRAM ON ARAB REFORM AND DEMOCRACY, CDDRL FROM BAD COP TO GOOD COP: THE CHALLENGE OF SECURITY SECTOR REFORM IN EGYPT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY gence within the police force of a cadre of reform- ist officers is also encouraging and may help shift Successful democratic transitions hinge on the the balance of power within the Ministry of Interi- establishment of effective civilian control of the or. These officers have established reformist orga- armed forces and internal security institutions. The nizations, such as the General Coalition of Police transformation of these institutions from instru- Officers and Officers But Honorable, and begun to ments of brutal repression and regime protection push for SSR themselves. The prospects for imple- to professional, regulated, national services – secu- menting these civil society and internal initiatives, rity sector reform (SSR) – is at the very center of however, remain uncertain; they focus on admira- this effort. In Egypt, as in other transitioning Arab ble ends but are less clear on the means of imple- states and prior cases of democratization, SSR is mentation. They also have to reckon with strong an acutely political process affected by an array of elements within the Ministry of Interior – “al-Ad- different actors and dynamics. In a contested and ly’s men” (in reference to Mubarak’s longstanding unstable post-revolutionary political sphere, the minister) – who remain firmly opposed to reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    1 Introduction Dennis Blair The second volume of Military Engagement relates the stories of how democratic civil-military relations developed in five world regions and fourteen individual countries. This introduction pro- vides some background on those who authored these stories and describes the patterns observed and the lessons that can be drawn from them. The Authors The regional summaries were written by a team of coauthors, almost all having both practical experience in armed forces or defense ministries of their countries and subsequent careers with security think tanks. They also contributed ideas and criticisms of the analysis and recommendations in the companion volume. Juan Emilio Cheyre, while chief of staff of the Chilean army, took the final steps to bring his service out of the Pinochet era. Matthew Rhodes is a professor at the Marshall Center in Germany, an insti- tution at the center of military-military relations among countries around the world. Istvan Gyarmati, who participated in the early brainstorming sessions for the handbook, was deputy defense minister of Hungary during the Hungarian armed forces’ transi- tion from its Warsaw Pact organization to meet NATO standards. Muthiah Alagappa, a general in the Malaysian Army, has become the foremost scholar of Asian civil-military relations subsequent to 1 01-2478-0 ch1.indd 1 5/16/13 6:03 PM 2 Dennis Blair his retirement. Tannous Mouawad served as Lebanon’s military attaché to the United States and the chief of Lebanon’s military intelligence service. Martin Rupiya was an officer in the Zimbabwean National Army and now heads a security affairs think tank in South Africa Each of the regional coauthors recruited additional authors to write the indi- vidual case studies; two of them wrote a case study as well.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Armed Forces in the Arab Uprisings
    The Role of Armed Forces in the Arab Uprisings 9 Derek Lutterbeck I. Introduction1 As popular uprisings, demanding greater political freedoms and in several countries even regime change, swept across much of the Arab world, a crucial role has been played by the armed forces of these countries in confronting the pro-reform movements. Practically all Arab countries can be described as military-based regimes, where the armed forces have been at the core of the political system, even though the status and role of the military has varied significantly from one country to the next. Moreover, powerful military forces, as well as a robust security apparatus more generally, have been seen by many, as one, if not the main, obstacle to political reform and democratization in the region.2 However, military forces have responded quite differently across the region to pro-democracy movements, ranging from openness to protest movements, to internal fracturing, to firm support for the regime in power. These different responses, in turn, have been crucial in determining the outcome of the popular uprisings, and whether authoritarian leaders were eventually overthrown. The aim of this paper is to discuss the role the armed forces have played in six Middle Eastern countries, which have 1 A more extensive study on this topic has been published as Lutterbeck, Derek, 2011: Arab Uprisings and Armed forces: between openness and resistance. DCAF SSR Paper 2. 2 See, e.g., Cook, Steven A., 2007: Ruling But Not Governing. The Military and Political Development in Egypt, Algeria and Turkey (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2007); Bellin, Eva, 2004: “The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Uprisings and Armed Forces: Between Openness and Resistance
    SSR PAPER 2 Arab Uprisings and Armed Forces: Between Openness and Resistance Derek Lutterbeck DCAF DCAF a centre for security, development and the rule of law SSR PAPER 2 Arab Uprisings and Armed Forces Between Openness and Resistance Derek Lutterbeck DCAF The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. The Centre develops and promotes norms and standards, conducts tailored policy research, identifies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector governance, and provides in‐country advisory support and practical assistance programmes. SSR Papers is a flagship DCAF publication series intended to contribute innovative thinking on important themes and approaches relating to security sector reform (SSR) in the broader context of security sector governance (SSG). Papers provide original and provocative analysis on topics that are directly linked to the challenges of a governance‐driven security sector reform agenda. SSR Papers are intended for researchers, policy‐makers and practitioners involved in this field. ISBN 978‐92‐9222‐180‐5 © 2011 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces EDITORS Alan Bryden & Heiner Hänggi PRODUCTION Yury Korobovsky COPY EDITOR Cherry Ekins COVER IMAGE © Suhaib Salem/Reuters The views expressed are those of the author(s) alone and do not in any way reflect the views of the institutions referred to or
    [Show full text]
  • SFM Research Handbook
    SFM Research Handbook Apr 15, 2020 Introduction 1 Research Handbook for Security Force Monitor1 2 Research methodology 3 3 Tutorials 7 4 Countries 9 5 What data does the Monitor collect? 19 6 Data integrity measures 21 7 Units 25 8 Persons 59 9 Persons Extra 73 10 Incidents 81 11 Sources 97 12 Frequently Asked Questions about WhoWasInCommand 111 13 Unit Records on WhoWasInCommand 117 14 Person records on WhoWasInCommand 127 15 Incident Records on WhoWasInCommand 135 i ii CHAPTER 1 Research Handbook for Security Force Monitor 1.1 About Security Force Monitor The Security Force Monitor works to make police, military and other security forces around the world more transparent and accountable. Human rights researchers, journalists, advocates, litigators and others engaged in making security forces accountable face a common problem – a lack of clear, detailed information on those forces. Often, answering even simple questions can be difficult: • Who is in charge of the specialized anti-riot police unit? • What army unit has jurisdiction over what areas? • Where did this commander previously serve? • When was a particular police unit based in a specific city? There is a vast amount of public information on security forces around the world, but it is unstructured and scattered among a wide variety of sources, making it prohibitively costly for those engaged in public interest work to understand the security forces of a particular country. The Security Force Monitor aims to solve this problem and aid those working to make police, military and other security forces accountable. The Monitor analyzes and compiles public information to provide data on: the command hierarchy, location, areas of operation, commanders and the other linkages between units – all tracked through time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journal of the Center for Complex Operations Vol. 4, No. 3
    VOL. 4, NO. 3 2013 A JOURNA L O F THE CEN TER F OR C O MPL EX O PER ATIONS About PRISM is published by the Center for Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, Vol. 4, no. 3 2013 and other partners on complex and integrated national security operations; reconstruction and state-building; relevant policy and strategy; lessons learned; Editor and developments in training and education to transform America’s security Michael Miklaucic and development Associate Editors Mark D. Ducasse Stefano Santamato Communications Constructive comments and contributions are important to us. Direct Editorial Assistant communications to: Megan Cody Editor, PRISM Copy Editors 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64, Room 3605) Dale Erikson Fort Lesley J. McNair Sara Thannhauser Washington, DC 20319 Nathan White Telephone: (202) 685-3442 Advisory Board FAX: Dr. Gordon Adams (202) 685-3581 Dr. Pauline H. Baker Email: [email protected] Ambassador Rick Barton Professor Alain Bauer Dr. Joseph J. Collins (ex officio) Ambassador James F. Dobbins Contributions Ambassador John E. Herbst (ex officio) PRISM welcomes submission of scholarly, independent research from security policymakers and shapers, security analysts, academic specialists, and civilians Dr. David Kilcullen from the United States and abroad. Submit articles for consideration to the Ambassador Jacques Paul Klein address above or by email to [email protected] with “Attention Submissions Dr. Roger B. Myerson Editor” in the subject line. Dr. Moisés Naím This is the authoritative, official U.S. Department of Defense edition of PRISM. MG William L. Nash, USA (Ret.) Any copyrighted portions of this journal may not be reproduced or extracted Ambassador Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • From Yemen War to Joint Army? WP Egyptian-Saudi Differences Over Arab Military Cooperation
    Introduction Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Comments From Yemen War to Joint Army? WP Egyptian-Saudi Differences over Arab Military Cooperation Jessica Noll and Stephan Roll S On 25 March 2015 a Saudi-led coalition of Arab states launched air strikes on Yemen to halt the advance of the Houthi movement. A few days later the summit of the Arab League decided to set up a joint Arab army. Nevertheless, the two most important Arab countries support opposing concepts for military cooperation: Egypt proposes institu- tionalised long-term military cooperation to increase its political weight in the region, while Saudi Arabia prefers ad hoc coalitions precisely in order to avoid long-term dependency on other countries, not least Egypt. However, the two events suggest that states in the region are stepping up military cooperation. Germany and the European Union should treat this development with scepticism. Experience shows that such col- laborations tend to exacerbate rather than resolve regional conflicts. At their summit meeting at the Egyptian of the Saudi military operation against the resort of Sharm al-Sheikh on 28 and 29 Houthi movement in Yemen, there is no March 2015, the members of the Arab direct connection between the two events. League agreed to set up joint armed forces. Consequently the Arab League resolution According to the final declaration of the makes no mention of the Yemen conflict. summit, the force should be capable of In fact, the joint army project is an Egyptian rapid intervention to guarantee the national initiative that President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi sovereignty of member states and protect first floated in February 2015 in connection them against territorial threats.
    [Show full text]
  • GUNS and BUTTER in the EGYPTIAN ARMY by Hillel Frisch*
    GUNS AND BUTTER IN THE EGYPTIAN ARMY By Hillel Frisch* This article analyzes the Egyptian army, its mission, development and modernization during the past several decades, and its relationship to the political and general civilian spheres. The article contends that Egypt's armed forces have elements of both modern and post-modern armies, and answers the riddle of how Egypt's army has neither sacrificed quantity or quality of its weapons systems, nor slashed military salaries severely, despite a seemingly shrinking budget. The Egyptian army seems to possess Sa'id, director of Egypt's prestigious al-Ahram the characteristics of a modern army (in the Center for Political and Strategic Studies 1950s' sense, when nationalism and patriotism praises the benefits of U.S. civilian aid unquestionably prevailed in military compared to its military aid, though more establishments) in a post-modern age. While money is earmarked for the latter category.(5) the post-modern army is often seen as being Newspapers devote many articles to praising professionally small, the Egyptian army the army's "civilian" and development- remains rather large. While the post-modern oriented services, as if to defend its army is typified by increasing civilian- contribution to the nation on this more military integration, the Egyptian army has important front.(6) constructed at least 17 military cities to isolate This tension between supporting a the military from the civilian population.(1) large military while coming to grips with the Bernard Boene claims that Western acute, almost insurmountable, social problems militaries in the post-modern age must cope facing Egypt, is a central factor in analyzing with its cadre having professional wives who the mission and political status of the want to integrate into civilian society.(2) But Egyptian armed forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Analysis of Egypt
    Helpdesk Report Conflict analysis of Egypt Anna Louise Strachan 27. 02. 2017 Question What does the literature indicate about the current conflict dynamics in Egypt (excluding the Sinai Peninsula1), including key actors, proximate and structural causes, dynamics and triggers, and opportunities for peace and institutional resilience? Contents 1. Overview 2. Conflict dynamics and triggers 3. Key actors 4. Proximate causes of conflict 5. Structural causes of conflict 6. External pressures 7. Opportunities for peace and institutional resilience 8. References 1. Overview In 2011 Egypt experienced mass protests culminating in the fall of long serving president, Hosni Mubarak. The country’s first democratically elected President, the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi’s, time in power was short-lived. He was deposed by Egypt’s military on 3 July 2013, following anti-government demonstrations (Tobin et al, 2015, p. 31). Abdul Fatah el-Sisi, former head of the armed forces, was elected in June 2014 (Tobin et al, 2015, p. 31). Sisi’s presidency has seen a return to military rule. There has also been a rise in the number of terrorist attacks in Egypt since he came to power in 2014. 1 For a conflict analysis of the Sinai Peninsula see Idris, I. (2017). Conflict analysis of Sinai (K4D Helpdesk Research Report). Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.. The K4D helpdesk service provides brief summaries of current research, evidence, and lessons learned. Helpdesk reports are not rigorous or systematic reviews; they are intended to provide an introduction to the most important evidence related to a research question. They draw on a rapid desk-based review of published literature and consultation with subject specialists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Egyptian Military in Domestic Society
    WARNING! The views expressed in FMSO publications and reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. The Role of the Egyptian Military in Domestic Society LTC Stephen H. Gotowicki, U.S. Army This paper was written in conjunction with a series of strategic seminars conducted between analysts from Egypt and the United States under the auspicies of the Institute of National Strategic Studies, National Defense University in 1994-1995. It should be published by the National Defense University in the summer of 1997. S.E. Finer1 says that an army is a purposive instrument, rationally conceived to fulfil certain objectives; its central purpose is to fight and win wars in defense of the state.2 Throughout the world, with few exceptions, armies represent professional, highly structured, hierarchal organizations characterized by high levels of discipline and motivation. By virtue of their function and training, armies also acquire highly prized skills and values, such as the capacity for intercommunication, an esprit de corps, and self sufficiency. A military's unique structure facilitates rapid decision making and efficient execution of these decisions. These institutional characteristics provide military organizations with the potential to undertake social action well beyond the defense function. The military also comes to serve as the corporate representation of and defender of a state's nationalism. Military organizations are generally considered to have an organizational structure sufficiently capable to conduct the affairs of state, manage national projects and resolve political chaos.
    [Show full text]
  • MAX Security Report [email protected] +44 203 540 0434
    MAX Security Report [email protected] +44 203 540 0434 Daily MAX - MENA Region Daily Summary - 15 December 15, 2020 DEC 12:19 UTC The following report reviews current events in the MENA region and their possible effect on business continuity and security. Highlights of the Day Iran: British-Iranian national sentenced to prison in Tehran, per December 14 reports; government crackdown on dissent likely to persist Iran: Police officers, civilians shot by armed robbers in West Azerbaijan’s Mahabad on December 13; highlights risk of collateral damage Qatar: Authorities detain two Australian nationals for five months, per December 14 reports; notable due to rarity of such arrests Tunisia: Clashes recorded between residents along Kebili, Medenine governorate borders on December 14; notable due to scale of local dispute Turkey: US State Department announces sanctions on Turkey over purchase S-400 defense system on December 14; notable as unprecedented Actionable Items Turkey: Authorities will impose nationwide lockdown starting from December 31 until January 4, 2021; adhere to government instructions According to Turkey’s official news agency, the authorities will impose a lockdown across Turkey starting from 21:00 (local time) on December 31 until 05:00 on January 4, 2021. This measure is part of the government’s efforts to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus pandemic. Those operating or residing in Turkey between December 31 and January 4 are advised to adhere to the government’s instructions and take necessary precautions to ensure business continuity due to the slated lockdown. Remain apprised of the authorities’ updates regarding additional restrictions on movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Reconstruction of Egyptian Morale During the Aftermath of the 1967 Six Day War: an Arab Perspective
    Document created: 1 April 02 Examining the Reconstruction of Egyptian Morale During the Aftermath of the 1967 Six Day War: An Arab Perspective by Lt Youssef H. Aboul-Enein, USN Introduction If you say the Arabic words Al-Naksah (The Catastrophe) to an Egyptian, you get an immediate reaction that is unmistakable. For Palestinians, the same term referred to as Al-Nakbah, means the partition of Palestine in 1948. However to Egyptians it means only one date June 5, 1967, the Six-Day War. Most historians are aware of the specifics of the military campaign and the events leading to Israel’s surprise attack and destruction of the armed forces of Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects on Egyptian morale and the particular ways in which the nation was able to recover its morale from a sociologic and military perspective. Few Americans have taken time to examine the writings of Egyptian scholars about the 1967 War. Some do not care to study losing side. Also there is the cumbersome task of reading and understanding Arabic. The author will utilize Arabic sources in discussing this topic. A basic understanding of Egyptian history and the Arab-Israeli Wars is necessary for readers to have a full appreciation of the period of time covered in Egyptian history (1967-1973). As the author does not intend to focus on military tactics, this will allow a more thorough examination of socio-political events. The Egyptian armed forces will only be explored as a subsection of society. This paper will explore the emotions of the military, Egypt’s youth, social questioning of the defeat, the effect the war had on popular culture, the reform of the military and finally the effects on the country’s political culture.
    [Show full text]