An Account of the Origin and Progress of British Influence in Malaya by Sir Frank^,Swettenham,K.C.M.G
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
World Super Power and Regional Conflicts
121 Journal of The Siam Society WORLD SUPER POWER AND REGIONAL CONFLICTS The Triangular Game Of Great Britain With Bangkok And The Lao During The Embassies Of John Crawfurd (1821-1822) And Of Henry Burney (1825-1826) "Those men will only be seized and made grass-cutters to the king of Ava's Elephants", exclaimed the King of Siam, Rama III (1787. 1824-1851) in 1825 of the 10,000 men of the British Expeditionary Corps led by Sir Archibald Campbell when they landed in Rangoon 1• Was this the scepticism and hilarity of an assiduous reader of Napoleon's works with regard to everything British2? In fact, the image of England during this period was rather mixed, emotional and conflicting in the eyes of Asian leaders. On the one hand, "the colossal influence of the English in India has inspired terror throughout the Orient. This formidable and always growing influence has overwhelmed every Court in Asia. The King of Siam feared being thrown off his throne from the first day. When he saw a European he always took him for a British emissary. Neither could he distinguish a priest from a layman, nor a Christian from a British"3 wrote Lord Bruguieres when he arrived in Bangkok in 1829. On the other hand, with their repeated failure in other parts of Asia, they appeared to be like a "paper tiger" or a "hampered Gulliver". In 1808, 10 vessels of war, which were sent against Macao by Lord Minto, Governor General of India, disengaged themselves from the expe ditionary fleet and sailed towards Tonkin to intimidate the Hue. -
Australians Into Battle : the Ambush at Gema S
CHAPTER 1 1 AUSTRALIANS INTO BATTLE : THE AMBUSH AT GEMA S ENERAL Percival had decided before the debacle at Slim River G that the most he could hope to do pending the arrival of further reinforcements at Singapore was to hold Johore. This would involve giving up three rich and well-developed areas—the State of Selangor (includin g Kuala Lumpur, capital of the Federated Malay States), the State of Negr i Sembilan, and the colony of Malacca—but he thought that Kuala Lumpu r could be held until at least the middle of January . He intended that the III Indian Corps should withdraw slowly to a line in Johore stretching from Batu Anam, north-west of Segamat, on the trunk road and railway , to Muar on the west coast, south of Malacca . It should then be respon- sible for the defence of western Johore, leaving the Australians in thei r role as defenders of eastern Johore. General Bennett, however, believing that he might soon be called upo n for assistance on the western front, had instituted on 19th December a series of reconnaissances along the line from Gemas to Muar . By 1st January a plan had formed in his mind to obtain the release of his 22nd Brigade from the Mersing-Jemaluang area and to use it to hold the enem y near Gemas while counter-attacks were made by his 27th Brigade on the Japanese flank and rear in the vicinity of Tampin, on the main road near the border of Malacca and Negri Sembilan . Although he realised tha t further coastal landings were possible, he thought of these in terms of small parties, and considered that the enemy would prefer to press forwar d as he was doing by the trunk road rather than attempt a major movement by coastal roads, despite the fact that the coastal route Malacca-Muar- Batu Pahat offered a short cut to Ayer Hitam, far to his rear . -
Btsisi', Blandas, and Malays
BARBARA S. NOWAK Massey University SINGAN KN÷N MUNTIL Btsisi’, Blandas, and Malays Ethnicity and Identity in the Malay Peninsula Based on Btsisi’ Folklore and Ethnohistory Abstract This article examines Btsisi’ myths, stories, and ethnohistory in order to gain an under- standing of Btsisi’ perceptions of their place in Malaysia. Three major themes run through the Btsisi’ myths and stories presented in this paper. The first theme is that Austronesian-speaking peoples have historically harassed Btsisi’, stealing their land, enslaving their children, and killing their people. The second theme is that Btsisi’ are different from their Malay neighbors, who are Muslim; and, following from the above two themes is the third theme that Btsisi’ reject the Malay’s Islamic ideal of fulfilment in pilgrimage, and hence reject their assimilation into Malay culture and identity. In addition to these three themes there are two critical issues the myths and stories point out; that Btsisi’ and other Orang Asli were original inhabitants of the Peninsula, and Btsisi’ and Blandas share a common origin and history. Keywords: Btsisi’—ethnic identity—origin myths—slaving—Orang Asli—Peninsular Malaysia Asian Folklore Studies, Volume 63, 2004: 303–323 MA’ BTSISI’, a South Aslian speaking people, reside along the man- grove coasts of the Kelang and Kuala Langat Districts of Selangor, HWest Malaysia.1* Numbering approximately two thousand (RASHID 1995, 9), Btsisi’ are unique among Aslian peoples for their coastal location and for their geographic separation from other Austroasiatic Mon- Khmer speakers. Btsisi’, like other Aslian peoples have encountered histori- cally aggressive and sometimes deadly hostility from Austronesian-speaking peoples. -
M. Ricklefs an Inventory of the Javanese Manuscript Collection in the British Museum
M. Ricklefs An inventory of the Javanese manuscript collection in the British Museum In: Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 125 (1969), no: 2, Leiden, 241-262 This PDF-file was downloaded from http://www.kitlv-journals.nl Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 11:29:04AM via free access AN INVENTORY OF THE JAVANESE MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM* he collection of Javanese manuscripts in the British Museum, London, although small by comparison with collections in THolland and Indonesia, is nevertheless of considerable importance. The Crawfurd collection, forming the bulk of the manuscripts, provides a picture of the types of literature being written in Central Java in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, a period which Dr. Pigeaud has described as a Literary Renaissance.1 Because they were acquired by John Crawfurd during his residence as an official of the British administration on Java, 1811-1815, these manuscripts have a convenient terminus ad quem with regard to composition. A large number of the items are dated, a further convenience to the research worker, and the dates are seen to cluster in the four decades between AD 1775 and AD 1815. A number of the texts were originally obtained from Pakualam I, who was installed as an independent Prince by the British admini- stration. Some of the manuscripts are specifically said to have come from him (e.g. Add. 12281 and 12337), and a statement in a Leiden University Bah ad from the Pakualaman suggests many other volumes in Crawfurd's collection also derive from this source: Tuwan Mister [Crawfurd] asked to be instructed in adat law, with examples of the Javanese usage. -
A Vs B of Main Range Granite Fig. 10.22 Abnormal Pressure Malay
Index Air Hangat, Langkawi, cement 363 alumina vs. silica, volcanic rocks Fig. A Air Hitam. Johor Graben 157 9.10 AKF diagram aluminous enclaves 223 A vs B of Main Range Granite Fig. Jerai aureole Fig. 11.8 Alur Lebey Fault 269, Fig. 12.3 10.22 Stong Complex Fig. 11.3 amang 339 abnormal pressure Taku Schist Fig. 11.5 treatment plants in 2004 331 Malay Basin 189 albite alteration, Raub 360 ammonites, Triassic, Gua Musang Penyu Basin 196 Alcock Rise 33 Formation 104 Abodonlophora in Jurong Alexander, J.B. 1 Ampang Fault Fig. 13.13 Formation, 112 algae, amphibole aborted rift, Semantan 114 Chuping Limestone 93 bearing granite 217 abrasion platform placers 338 Kodiang Limestone 90 eastern Belt granites 222 accessory minerals algal Main Range granite 217 Eastern Belt 222 boundstones, Gua Panjang 104 schist 45, 47, Fig. 4.2, Table 4.1 Main Range 218 Kodiang Limestone 88, 92 amphibolite accretionary wedge 52, Fig. 3.4 alkali Batu Melintang Fig. 4.5 Semanggol provenance 99 basalt lavas 197, facies accumulation of hydrocarbons 379 SE Asia 208, 209 dating 304 ACF diagram, Neogene 40 metamorphism 237, Fig. 11.3 Jerai aureole Fig. 11.8 feldspar Jerai aureole… Fig. 11.7 Stong Complex Fig. 11.3 alteration, Raub 360 Genting Sempah… Fig. 4.4 Taku Schist Fig. 11.5 decomposition 19 Taku Schist 238 acknowledgements v Eastern Belt granites 222 Stong Complex 236 ACNK olivine basalt, Kuantan 209 Anak Datai Beds 58 granite values 225 plot of granites 226 Anambas zone 32 vs SiO2 for granites Fig. 10.13 series 224 anatexis, Stong Complex 237 acreage chemistry 229 andalusite allocations 365 vs. -
THE UNIVERSITY Heritage Trail
THE UNIVERSITY Heritage Trail Established by The University of Auckland Business School www.business.auckland.ac.nz ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORIC ATTRACTIONS The University of Auckland Business School is proud to establish the University Heritage Trail through the Business History Project as our gift to the City of Auckland in 2005, our Centenary year. In line with our mission to be recognised as one of Asia-Pacific’s foremost research-led business schools, known for excellence and innovation in research, we support the aims of the Business History Project to identify, capture and celebrate the stories of key contributors to New Zealand and Auckland’s economy. The Business History Project aims to discover the history of Auckland’s entrepreneurs, traders, merchants, visionaries and industrialists who have left a legacy of inspiring stories and memorable landmarks. Their ideas, enthusiasm and determination have helped to build our nation’s economy and encourage talent for enterprise. The University of Auckland Business School believes it is time to comprehensively present the remarkable journey that has seen our city grow from a collection of small villages to the country’s commercial powerhouse. Capturing the history of the people and buildings of our own University through The University Heritage Trail will enable us to begin to understand the rich history at the doorstep of The University of Auckland. Special thanks to our Business History project sponsors: The David Levene Charitable Trust DB Breweries Limited Barfoot and Thompson And -
Annual Report2003&Stats
���������������������������������� ������������� ����������� 1 Libraries Board of South Australia Annual Report 2002-2003 Annual report production Coordination and editing by Carolyn Spooner, Project Officer. Assistance by Danielle Disibio, Events and Publications Officer. Cover photographs reproduced with kind permission of John Gollings Photography. Desktop publishing by Anneli Hillier, Reformatting Officer. Scans by Mario Sanchez, Contract Digitiser. Cover and report design by John Nowland Design. Published in Adelaide by the Libraries Board of South Australia, 2003. Printed by CM Digital. ISSN 0081-2633. If you require further information on the For information on the programs or services programs or services of the State Library please of PLAIN Central Services please write to the write to the Director, State Library of South Associate Director, PLAIN Central Services, Australia, GPO Box 419, Adelaide SA 5001, or 8 Milner Street, Hindmarsh SA 5007, or check call in person to the State Library on North the website at Terrace, Adelaide, or check the website at www.plain.sa.gov.au www.slsa.sa.gov.au Telephone (08) 8207 7200 Telephone (08) 8348 2311 Freecall 1800 182 013 Facsimile (08) 8340 2524 Facsimile (08) 8207 7207 Email [email protected] Email [email protected] 2 Libraries Board of South Australia 3 Libraries Board of South Australia Annual Report 2002-2003 Annual Report 2002-2003 CONTENTS The Libraries Board of South Australia 4 Chairman’s message 5 Organisation structure and Freedom of Information 6 State Library of South -
SIR WILLIAM JERVOIS Papers, 1877-78 Reel M1185
AUSTRALIAN JOINT COPYING PROJECT SIR WILLIAM JERVOIS Papers, 1877-78 Reel M1185 Mr John Jervois Lloyd’s Lime Street London EC3M 7HL National Library of Australia State Library of New South Wales Filmed: 1981 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE Sir William Francis Drummond Jervois (1821-1897) was born at Cowes on the Isle of Wight and educated at Dr Burney’s Academy near Gosport and the Royal Military Academy at Woolwich. He was commissioned as a lieutenant in the Royal Engineers in 1839. He was posted to the Cape of Good Hope in 1841, where he began the first survey of British Kaffirland. He subsequently held a number of posts, including commanding royal engineer for the London district (1855-56), assistant inspector-general of fortifications at the War Office (1856-62) and secretary to the defence committee (1859-75). He was made a colonel in 1867 and knighted in 1874. In 1875 Jervois was sent to Singapore as governor of the Straits Settlements. He antagonised the Colonial Office by pursuing an interventionist policy in the Malayan mainland, crushing a revolt in Perak with troops brought from India and Hong Kong. He was ordered to back down and the annexation of Perak was forbidden. He compiled a report on the defences of Singapore. In 1877, accompanied by Lieutenant-Colonel Peter Scratchley, Jervois carried out a survey of the defences of Australia and New Zealand. In the same year he was promoted major-general and appointed governor of South Australia. He immediately faced a political crisis, following the resignation of the Colton Ministry. There was pressure on Jervois to dissolve Parliament, but he appointed James Boucaut as premier and there were no further troubles. -
British Debate on the Failure of John Crawfurd's Mission To
The Anxieties of Empire: British Debate on the Failure of John Crawfurd’s Mission to Siam, c. 1820-1830 Ithi Sophonpanich George Washington University Abstract—The failure of John Crawfurd’s mission to Siam in 1821-2 to gain significant concessions over trade sparked a debate in the press and journals. The focus of this article is on the rhetorical strategies that British authors used to describe Siam and where they thought Siam was located in the hierarchy of civilizations. The Siamese were represented as too low in the scale of nations to see the benefit of trade with the British. Behind this posturing, the East India Company was fighting to retain its monopoly privileges. Introduction The East India Company (EIC or Company) trade mission to Siam in 1821-2 was the first major diplomatic contact between Siam and Great Britain in over a century. After the failure of its factory in Bangkok in the late 17th century, the EIC found trade with Siam unprofitable and best left to private merchants and country traders. The sack of Ayutthaya by the Burmese in 1767 then sent Siam into several decades of military rebellions and political chaos.1 By the beginning of the 19th century, however, occasional British ships from Calcutta (Kolkata) were arriving in Bangkok for trade. Knowledge of the country was soon acquired and disseminated in London. By 1805, the Mariner’s Directory and Guide to the Trade and Navigation of the Indian and China Seas included detailed information on how to bribe Siamese officials and obtain trading permits.2 Thus, when the EIC appointed John Crawfurd to lead the mission to Siam and Cochin China, it possessed much basic information on Siam, even though there had been no direct diplomatic contact for over a century. -
Charney 2001 from Congested Identities to Contested
[Draft published as Charney, Michael (2014) 'The Shifting China-Burma relationship and Categorizations of Chinese Migrants in Burma, 1740-1940.' In: Wade, Geoff and Chin, James K., (eds.), China and Southeast Asia: Historical Interactions. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge. (Routledge Studies in the Modern History of Asia] "From Congested Identities to Contested Identifications: The Shifting China-Burma Relations and Categorizations of Chinese Migrants in Burma, 1740-1940"1 by Michael W. Charney (National University of Singapore) Introduction China's relationship with Southeast Asia has undergone serious reevaluation in the past twenty years, both in terms of how we perceive the history of that relationship (Hamashita 1997, Sun 2000) and in terms of how our changing understanding of that relationship requires adjusting how we understand Southeast Asia as a region and as an accurate unit of analysis (Liu 2000). For historians, the record of official state relations was once the nearly sole focus of the study of the relationship between China and Southeast Asia. The historiography is balancing out significantly due to efforts to understand the roles and history of Overseas Chinese who settled in Southeast Asia throughout the early modern and colonial periods (Blusse 1986), as well as in the present (McKeown 1999). We also know more about the overall sub-regional groups of Chinese and their merchant activities in Southeastern China (Ng 1983) and Overseas (Wang 1990 & 1996). Although this paper focuses specifically upon the Chinese in Burma, it is in the 1 The author has benefited considerably from conversations with Hong Liu, Takeshi Hamashita, Laichen Sun, James Chin Kong, and Atsuko Naono concerning the Overseas Chinese in Burma. -
Text and Screen Representations of Puteri Gunung Ledang
‘The legend you thought you knew’: text and screen representations of Puteri Gunung Ledang Mulaika Hijjas Abstract: This article traces the evolution of narratives about the supernatural woman said to live on Gunung Ledang, from oral folk- View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE lore to sixteenth-century courtly texts to contemporary films. In provided by SOAS Research Online all her instantiations, the figure of Puteri Gunung Ledang can be interpreted in relation to the legitimation of the state, with the folk- lore preserving her most archaic incarnation as a chthonic deity essential to the maintenance of the ruling dynasty. By the time of the Sejarah Melayu and Hikayat Hang Tuah, two of the most impor- tant classical texts of Malay literature, the myth of Puteri Gunung Ledang had been desacralized. Nevertheless, a vestigial sense of her importance to the sultanate of Melaka remains. The first Malaysian film that takes her as its subject, Puteri Gunung Ledang (S. Roomai Noor, 1961), is remarkably faithful to the style and sub- stance of the traditional texts, even as it reworks the political message to suit its own time. The second film, Puteri Gunung Ledang (Saw Teong Hin, 2004), again exemplifies the ideology of its era, depoliticizing the source material even as it purveys Barisan Nasional ideology. Keywords: myth; invention of tradition; Malay literature; Malaysian cinema Author details: Mulaika Hijjas is a British Academy Postdoctoral Fel- low in the Department of South East Asia, SOAS, Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG, UK. E-mail: [email protected]. -
South-East Asia Second Edition CHARLES S
Geological Evolution of South-East Asia Second Edition CHARLES S. HUTCHISON Geological Society of Malaysia 2007 Geological Evolution of South-east Asia Second edition CHARLES S. HUTCHISON Professor emeritus, Department of geology University of Malaya Geological Society of Malaysia 2007 Geological Society of Malaysia Department of Geology University of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Geological Society of Malaysia ©Charles S. Hutchison 1989 First published by Oxford University Press 1989 This edition published with the permission of Oxford University Press 1996 ISBN 978-983-99102-5-4 Printed in Malaysia by Art Printing Works Sdn. Bhd. This book is dedicated to the former professors at the University of Malaya. It is my privilege to have collabo rated with Professors C. S. Pichamuthu, T. H. F. Klompe, N. S. Haile, K. F. G. Hosking and P. H. Stauffer. Their teaching and publications laid the foundations for our present understanding of the geology of this complex region. I also salute D. ]. Gobbett for having the foresight to establish the Geological Society of Malaysia and Professor Robert Hall for his ongoing fascination with this region. Preface to this edition The original edition of this book was published by known throughout the region of South-east Asia. Oxford University Press in 1989 as number 13 of the Unfortunately the stock has become depleted in 2007. Oxford monographs on geology and geophysics.