DOCSLIB.ORG

Pioneers of Early Colonial Singapore(1819- 1850)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pioneers of Early Colonial Singapore(1819- 1850) Pioneers of Early Colonial Singapore(1819- 1819-1850 by Dr Ernest Chew This is a revised version of a talk given by Dr Chew, who is a Club Advisor, at the 1850)NUS Museums last October. He has written this especially for the RTC Magazine. "cast doubt over the Raffles legend" in (Ernest Chew, 'The foundation of a British Introduction February 1994, the 175th anniversary of settlement', in A History of Singapore, ed. the founding! (I was in good company, E.C.T.Chew and E.Lee (Singapore: Oxford 1. For more than a decade, in my teaching, for the other sceptic they mentioned was University Press, 1991), p.38. research, and writing, more recently in BG George Yeo.) The Times' report was the NUS University Scholars Programme, based on a chapter I wrote in A History I also pointed out that most of the I have tried to move my audience away of Singapore, a book I co-edited with foundational work was done by from the idea that there was only one Edwin Lee (Oxford University Press, Farquhar, the man who Raffles left founder of Singapore, and that he is Sir 1991). Let me quote an extract from it: "If behind, literally and metaphorically, and Thomas Stamford Raffles. he [Raffles] is to be honoured as the that it was Crawfurd, another Scotsman, founder and architect of the British who among other things signed in August It is hard to change this perception, based 'factory' in Singapore, then the early and 1824 the treaty which made Singapore as it is on Raffles' historical achievements enterprising builders (who modified his British. and reputation -- on a whole pile of books, designs) should also be commemorated: on not one but two statues of Raffles in the first two British Residents, [William] Since then I have written separate articles the civic heart of Singapore, and on a Farquhar (1819-23) and John Crawfurd on Raffles, Farquhar, and Crawfurd for growing number of places and (1823-6), along with the known Malay, the Raffles Town Club magazine (Jan-Mar, institutions named after him. Arab, Bugis, Chinese, Indian, and Apr-Jun, and Jul-Sep 2002 issues), and European notables (mostly traders), and have attempted to reappraise their I recall that The Times of London described the numberless, unnamed pioneering respective contributions to the founding me as a Singapore sceptic who settlers" of colonial Singapore. WilliamFarquhar The Co - Founders of Colonial Singapore? 2.1.Raffles' Claims: It was undoubtedly Raffles' ambition and vision which led him to search for another British base in the Straits of Malacca, and to select Singapore as the best location to achieve British economic and strategic objectives in the region. Without Raffles, it is likely that Singapore would have remained a sparsely inhabited island, on the margins of the Dutch colonial empire in the East Indies. It was Raffles who signed the treaty of 6 February 1819 with the Sultan Hussein, whom he recognised, and this treaty enabled the British to start a settlement and port in Singapore. Raffles thus called Singapore 'a Child of my own' and 'my new Colony' . However, as Crawfurd was to point out, that treaty 'amounted to little more than a permission for the formation of a British factory....There was in reality no territorial cession giving a legal right of legislation... The native chief was considered to be the proprietor of the land, even within the bounds of the British factory' . Raffles visited his ‘Child’ and ‘new Colony’ only thrice - (1) for nine days in Tan Tock Seng January-February 1819, (2) for about four weeks in May-June that year, and - after more than three years' absence - (3) for eight months from October 1822 to June 1823. Of course, Raffles did lay down certain plans and policies which were to be vital for the development of the settlement. On his last visit, he dismissed Farquhar from the Residentship, and John Crawfurd replaced him with Crawfurd. Pioneers of Early Colonial Singapore(1819-1850) Pioneers of Early Colonial Singapore(1819- 1850) 2.2.Farquhar's Counter-Claims, alongside Even the exhibition of the Farquhar Historians have long claimed for Raffles Raffles and Crawfurd, are well summed collection of natural history drawings is all the subsequent growth of the up by Dr C. Mary Turnbull: "Singapore suspended, since the main Singapore settlement. His master touch has been was fortunate in her three early pioneer History Museum is closed for re- everywhere. In fact, the credit for administrators: Raffles, a man of development. Singapore's growth must go to those who extraordinary vision, but for whom made it grow, to the people who in Singapore would never have existed; 2.3.Crawfurd's Contributions: I do not defiance of all history built a bustling port Farquhar, who by his energy, good sense consider Dr John Crawfurd as a co- on the equator" (The British in Malaya and courage, nursed the infant settlement founder to the same extent as Raffles and (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, through its first dangerous years; and Farquhar. He did not become Resident 1965), pp.153,160.) In other words, it was Crawfurd, shrewd and sensible, with his until May-June 1823, four years after the not so much Raffles who made Singapore, feet planted firmly on the ground, who British settlement had been established. but Singapore which made Raffles! converted into reality Raffles' most practical dreams" (A History of Singapore Yet, when we consider the idea of a 1819-1988 (Singapore: OUP, 1989), p.30). British colonial settlement, we cannot The Construction escape the fact that it was only the Anglo- Farquhar was a pretty tough 'nurse'. He Malay Treaty of August 1824, which was both British Resident and Crawfurd concluded with the Malay and the Early Builders Commandant (a post which he rajas, which made Singapore a British previously held in Malacca), and helped possession. This treaty followed the It is difficult to make a clear-cut distinction to secure the settlement against attacks Anglo-Dutch Treaty of London, in March between founders and builders of early from the irate Dutch authorities. Through 1824, by which the Dutch recognised that colonial Singapore. If "founding" is his connexions with the Malay rajas, and Singapore and the Malay States were in equated with "establishment", and taken with Malacca,he attracted many traders the British sphere of political influence. to be a process rather than an initial act, from the peninsula and archipelago to It was also the Anglo-Dutch treaty then we can regard the earliest leaders of Singapore. He had to administer the which led to the exchange of Dutch the various communities in Singapore to settlement with little help from Raffles, Malacca for British Bencoolen. have been co-founders as well as early who was stationed in Bencoolen in west builders of the settlement . Certainly we Sumatra. 2.4.Others? The work of founding or can consider all of them as ‘pioneers’. establishing colonial Singapore was not When Farquhar finally left Singapore at accomplished by one, two or three 3.1.The Malay Rajas: the end of 1823, he was given a grander persons, but was the collaborative effort Moving away from the British triad of co- farewell from the local community than of other official and non-official pioneers. founders -- Raffles, Farquhar, Crawfurd - Raffles had received in June. No wonder It was the joint success of all their - we must start with the Malay rajas - he was upset when Raffles and later Lady endeavours which lent lustre to the name (1) Sultan Hussein, who with his followers Raffles emphasised Raffles' solo role as and reputation of Raffles. occupied the Kampong Glam area; and "founder". Farquhar registered his own (2) Temenggong Abdu'r Rahman, who claim for some recognition, and when he Dr K.G. Tregonning puts this succinctly: with his followers lived along the died in 1839, the inscription on his tomb "Singapore remained British, in the final Singapore River and then moved in Perth, Scotland, stated that he outcome, because unlike the other westwards to Telok Blangah. "founded" the settlement of Singapore! settlements initiated by Raffles, it was found worth keeping; it saved itself by While Singapore became increasingly I think it a real pity that there is so little its own exertions. ... "Raffles paid only cosmopolitan as a commercial centre, the recognition of Farquhar in present-day three brief visits to Singapore. Malays still constituted about 60% of the Singapore. The only road named after He played no part whatever in its population in 1821 (3,000 out of 5,000), in him, Farquhar Street, was erased in the retention, hardly any in its development. what was still an Anglo-Malay early 1990s. condominium, until 1824. A Quarterly Publication of Raffles Town Club 11 Pioneers of Early Colonial Singapore(1819-1850) The Sultan’s and Temenggong's networks, By 1840 the Chinese comprised about 3.6.The Europeans: In the social pecking- as well as Farquhar’s links with Malacca, 50% of the population of Singapore. (For order, the most influential traders were led to this influx and growth. more details on the Chinese, see Song of course the Europeans, and the most Ong Siang, One Hundred Years' History of influential among them were the Scots. 3.2.The Straits and Nanyang Chinese: the Chinese in Singapore (1923; reprint, Again, I take my cue from Dr Mary The earliest Chinese builders of the Singapore: University of Malaya Press, Turnbull who writes: "Most of the earliest settlement came from the immediate 1967.) Europeans were former merchant navy vicinity, from the Malay Peninsula and men or agents of Calcutta firms.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Super Power and Regional Conflicts
    121 Journal of The Siam Society WORLD SUPER POWER AND REGIONAL CONFLICTS The Triangular Game Of Great Britain With Bangkok And The Lao During The Embassies Of John Crawfurd (1821-1822) And Of Henry Burney (1825-1826) "Those men will only be seized and made grass-cutters to the king of Ava's Elephants", exclaimed the King of Siam, Rama III (1787. 1824-1851) in 1825 of the 10,000 men of the British Expeditionary Corps led by Sir Archibald Campbell when they landed in Rangoon 1• Was this the scepticism and hilarity of an assiduous reader of Napoleon's works with regard to everything British2? In fact, the image of England during this period was rather mixed, emotional and conflicting in the eyes of Asian leaders. On the one hand, "the colossal influence of the English in India has inspired terror throughout the Orient. This formidable and always growing influence has overwhelmed every Court in Asia. The King of Siam feared being thrown off his throne from the first day. When he saw a European he always took him for a British emissary. Neither could he distinguish a priest from a layman, nor a Christian from a British"3 wrote Lord Bruguieres when he arrived in Bangkok in 1829. On the other hand, with their repeated failure in other parts of Asia, they appeared to be like a "paper tiger" or a "hampered Gulliver". In 1808, 10 vessels of war, which were sent against Macao by Lord Minto, Governor General of India, disengaged themselves from the expe­ ditionary fleet and sailed towards Tonkin to intimidate the Hue.
    [Show full text]
  • An Account of the Origin and Progress of British Influence in Malaya by Sir Frank^,Swettenham,K.C.M.G
    pf^: X 1 jT^^Hi^^ ^^^^U^^^ m^^^l^0l^ j4 '**^4sCidfi^^^fc^^l / / UCSB LIBRAIX BRITISH MALAYA BRITISH MALAYA AN ACCOUNT OF THE ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF BRITISH INFLUENCE IN MALAYA BY SIR FRANK^,SWETTENHAM,K.C.M.G. LATE GOVERNOR &c. OF THE STRAITS COLONY & HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR THE FEDERATED MALAY STATES WITH A SPECIALLY COMPILED MAP NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS RE- PRODUCED FROM PHOTOGRAPHS 6f A FRONTISPIECE IN PHOTOGRAVURE 15>W( LONDON i JOHN LANE THE BODLEY HEAD NEW YORK: JOHN LANE COMPANY MDCCCCVH Plymouth: william brendon and son, ltd., printers PREFACE is an article of popular belief that Englishmen are born sailors probably it would be more true to IT ; say that they are born administrators. The English- man makes a good sailor because we happen to have hit upon the right training to secure that end ; but, though the Empire is large and the duties of administra- tion important, we have no school where they are taught. Still it would be difficult to devise any responsibility, how- ever onerous and unattractive, which a midshipman would not at once undertake, though it had no concern with sea or ship. Moreover, he would make a very good attempt to solve the problem, because his training fits him to deal intelligently with the unexpected. One may, however, question whether any one but a midshipman would have willingly embarked upon a voyage to discover the means of introducing order into the Malay States, when that task was thrust upon the British Government in 1874. The object of this book is to explain the circumstances under which the experiment was made, the conditions which prevailed, the features of the country and the character of the people ; then to describe the gradual evolution of a system of administration which has no exact parallel, and to tell what this new departure has done for Malaya, what effect it has had on the neighbour- ing British possessions.
    [Show full text]
  • M. Ricklefs an Inventory of the Javanese Manuscript Collection in the British Museum
    M. Ricklefs An inventory of the Javanese manuscript collection in the British Museum In: Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 125 (1969), no: 2, Leiden, 241-262 This PDF-file was downloaded from http://www.kitlv-journals.nl Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 11:29:04AM via free access AN INVENTORY OF THE JAVANESE MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM* he collection of Javanese manuscripts in the British Museum, London, although small by comparison with collections in THolland and Indonesia, is nevertheless of considerable importance. The Crawfurd collection, forming the bulk of the manuscripts, provides a picture of the types of literature being written in Central Java in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, a period which Dr. Pigeaud has described as a Literary Renaissance.1 Because they were acquired by John Crawfurd during his residence as an official of the British administration on Java, 1811-1815, these manuscripts have a convenient terminus ad quem with regard to composition. A large number of the items are dated, a further convenience to the research worker, and the dates are seen to cluster in the four decades between AD 1775 and AD 1815. A number of the texts were originally obtained from Pakualam I, who was installed as an independent Prince by the British admini- stration. Some of the manuscripts are specifically said to have come from him (e.g. Add. 12281 and 12337), and a statement in a Leiden University Bah ad from the Pakualaman suggests many other volumes in Crawfurd's collection also derive from this source: Tuwan Mister [Crawfurd] asked to be instructed in adat law, with examples of the Javanese usage.
    [Show full text]
  • British Debate on the Failure of John Crawfurd's Mission To
    The Anxieties of Empire: British Debate on the Failure of John Crawfurd’s Mission to Siam, c. 1820-1830 Ithi Sophonpanich George Washington University Abstract—The failure of John Crawfurd’s mission to Siam in 1821-2 to gain significant concessions over trade sparked a debate in the press and journals. The focus of this article is on the rhetorical strategies that British authors used to describe Siam and where they thought Siam was located in the hierarchy of civilizations. The Siamese were represented as too low in the scale of nations to see the benefit of trade with the British. Behind this posturing, the East India Company was fighting to retain its monopoly privileges. Introduction The East India Company (EIC or Company) trade mission to Siam in 1821-2 was the first major diplomatic contact between Siam and Great Britain in over a century. After the failure of its factory in Bangkok in the late 17th century, the EIC found trade with Siam unprofitable and best left to private merchants and country traders. The sack of Ayutthaya by the Burmese in 1767 then sent Siam into several decades of military rebellions and political chaos.1 By the beginning of the 19th century, however, occasional British ships from Calcutta (Kolkata) were arriving in Bangkok for trade. Knowledge of the country was soon acquired and disseminated in London. By 1805, the Mariner’s Directory and Guide to the Trade and Navigation of the Indian and China Seas included detailed information on how to bribe Siamese officials and obtain trading permits.2 Thus, when the EIC appointed John Crawfurd to lead the mission to Siam and Cochin China, it possessed much basic information on Siam, even though there had been no direct diplomatic contact for over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Charney 2001 from Congested Identities to Contested
    [Draft published as Charney, Michael (2014) 'The Shifting China-Burma relationship and Categorizations of Chinese Migrants in Burma, 1740-1940.' In: Wade, Geoff and Chin, James K., (eds.), China and Southeast Asia: Historical Interactions. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge. (Routledge Studies in the Modern History of Asia] "From Congested Identities to Contested Identifications: The Shifting China-Burma Relations and Categorizations of Chinese Migrants in Burma, 1740-1940"1 by Michael W. Charney (National University of Singapore) Introduction China's relationship with Southeast Asia has undergone serious reevaluation in the past twenty years, both in terms of how we perceive the history of that relationship (Hamashita 1997, Sun 2000) and in terms of how our changing understanding of that relationship requires adjusting how we understand Southeast Asia as a region and as an accurate unit of analysis (Liu 2000). For historians, the record of official state relations was once the nearly sole focus of the study of the relationship between China and Southeast Asia. The historiography is balancing out significantly due to efforts to understand the roles and history of Overseas Chinese who settled in Southeast Asia throughout the early modern and colonial periods (Blusse 1986), as well as in the present (McKeown 1999). We also know more about the overall sub-regional groups of Chinese and their merchant activities in Southeastern China (Ng 1983) and Overseas (Wang 1990 & 1996). Although this paper focuses specifically upon the Chinese in Burma, it is in the 1 The author has benefited considerably from conversations with Hong Liu, Takeshi Hamashita, Laichen Sun, James Chin Kong, and Atsuko Naono concerning the Overseas Chinese in Burma.
    [Show full text]
  • EAST INDIA COMPANY Straits Settlements Factory Records, 1769-1830 Reels M470-535
    AUSTRALIAN JOINT COPYING PROJECT EAST INDIA COMPANY Straits Settlements factory records, 1769-1830 Reels M470-535 India Office Library 197 Blackfriars Road London SE1 8NG National Library of Australia State Library of New South Wales Filmed: 1960 HISTORICAL NOTE Under its charter, granted by Queen Elizabeth I on 31 December 1600, the East India Company had a monopoly of all English trade in Asia and the Pacific. Its trading activities were initially focussed on the port and sultanate of Bantam on the western end of Java, where the Company established a ‘factory’ in 1603. Bantam was a major trading centre, particularly for pepper, and also for exotic spices from Ambon and other eastern islands, silks and porcelain from China, scented woods and Indian textiles. The Dutch East India Company also founded a trading factory at Bantam in 1603 and, after years of conflict and competition, it forced the English company out of Java in 1682. In 1685, however, the East India Company succeeded in setting up a factory at Bencoolen on the south-west coast of Sumatra and it was to be a major source of pepper for the next century. It was transferred to Dutch rule in 1825. In the late seventeenth century the interest of the Company shifted to India. Trading posts were established at Surat (1619), Madras (1639), Bombay (1668), and Calcutta (1690). The factories developed into forts: Fort William (Calcutta), Fort St George (Madras) and Bombay Castle. Surat was the Company’s first presidency in India, but by the early eighteenth century the presidencies, each with their own army, were Bombay, Madras and Calcutta.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Concerning Sovereignty Over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore)
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS AND SOUTH LEDGE (MALAYSIA/SINGAPORE) JUDGMENT OF 23 MAY 2008 2008 COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRE|TS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES AFFAIRE RELATIVE Av LA SOUVERAINETÉ SUR PEDRA BRANCA/PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS ET SOUTH LEDGE (MALAISIE/SINGAPOUR) ARRE|T DU 23 MAI 2008 Official citation: Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2008,p.12 Mode officiel de citation: Souveraineté sur Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks et South Ledge (Malaisie/Singapour), arrêt, C.I.J. Recueil 2008,p.12 Sales number ISSN 0074-4441 No de vente: 937 ISBN 978-92-1-071046-6 23 MAY 2008 JUDGMENT SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/ PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS AND SOUTH LEDGE (MALAYSIA/SINGAPORE) SOUVERAINETÉ SUR PEDRA BRANCA/ PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS ET SOUTH LEDGE (MALAISIE/SINGAPOUR) 23 MAI 2008 ARRE|T 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs 1. CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE 1-15 2. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS 16-19 3. GENERAL HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 20-29 4. HISTORY OF THE DISPUTE 30-36 5. SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/PULAU BATU PUTEH 37-277 5.1. Arguments of the Parties 37-42 5.2. The question of the burden of proof 43-45 5.3. Legal status of Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh before the 1840s 46-117 5.3.1. Original title to Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh 46-80 5.3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Siamese Economic Relations:British Trade,Capital
    ANGLO-SIAMESE ECONOMIC RELATIONS:BRITISH TRADE,CAPITAL AND ENTERPRISE IN SIAM,1856-1914. PETER SEK WANNAMETHEE. Submitted for PhD. LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON. UMI Number: U615757 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615757 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 T\4£S£S F 6GS2- x c5 MolS/37/ 1 Acknowledgement. I would like to express my gratitude to the following who have made it possible for me to complete the doctorial thesis.Firstly to my former supervisor,Prof.M.E.Falkus,who drew my attention to Thai economic history,assisted me in the structure of the thesis, and guided me throughout my research.Secondly,to the staff at the National Archives in Bangkok,for their patience and tolerance during my research.Thirdly,to the National Security Council,whose permission in consulting certain confidential files has been of value.Fourthly,to HM's Principal Private Secretary,M.L.Thavisan Ladawan,for the privilege he granted me in exploring the archive at the Royal Secretariat.The research undertaken in Bangkok was facilitated by the financial support awarded by the Central Research Fund.I would like to extend my appreciation to my tutor, D r .
    [Show full text]
  • V14-Issue4 Farquhar.Pdf
    BIBLIOASIA JAN - MAR 2019 VOL. 14 ISSUE 04 FEATURE In 1830, William Farquhar (1774–1839) wrote to The Asiatic Journal explaining Farquhar why he was due “at least a large share” iof the credit in forming Singapore.1 Yet, & it is Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) alone who is hailed as the founder of Singapore. This notion, propounded by his biographers, has been reinforced by constant repetition, official acceptance and the omnipresence of Raffles’ name in Singapore. In contrast, Farquhar’s pivotal role in the events leading up to the founding of the British settlement in Singapore in (Above) Colonel William Farquhar, c. 1830. Image source: Wikimedia Commons. February 1819 and during its nascent Raffles years has been vastly underrated. To (Above right) A portrait of Sir Stamford Raffles presented by his nephew, W.C. Raffles Flint, to London’s National Gallery Portrait Gallery in 1859. Image source: Wikimedia Commons. add insult to injury, Farquhar has been mocked, and his character and accom- The Untold Story plishments belittled over the years. ing School and paved the way for his recently included in the history curriculum To understand the origins of this employment at India House, while his of Singapore schools, the Raffles myth The founding of Singapore in 1819 and aberration in Singapore’s history, we later career and status were propelled has prevailed. A group of students who its early development have traditionally must turn to the biographies of Raffles. by his patron, Lord Minto, the Governor- re-assessed the roles of Raffles and Far- The first, The Life of Sir Stamford Raffles, General of Bengal.
    [Show full text]
  • Piracy and Political Economy in Malaya, 1824- 1874
    ABSTRACT A COVERT WAR AT SEA: PIRACY AND POLITICAL ECONOMY IN MALAYA, 1824- 1874 Scott C. Abel, PhD Department of History Northern Illinois University, 2016 Eric A. Jones, Director Piracy around the Malay Peninsula during the 19th century was extraordinarily prevalent and resulted in the death and loss of liberty for an untold number of people. This dissertation examines the connections between the piracy of this era and the political economies of the Straits Settlements and the Malay states in the region. Malays pirates often had the support of local rulers who required the goods and slaves brought back by pirates to reinforce their own political and socio-economic positions. The piratical system supported by the rulers was a component of the overall Malay economic system known as kerajaan economics, which helped maintain the status quo for Malay states. This system came under threat once Great Britain and the Netherlands worked to suppress piracy in the region and helped persuade the Malay elite to phase out state-sanctioned piracy. Some people living in Malaya took advantage of the characteristics of British and Malay political economies to engage in acts of piracy regardless of the policies of the British and Malay governments. This study of piracy enables us to understand better the experiences of people of various backgrounds living in 19th-century Malaya, along with how piracy influenced their worldviews. NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY DE KALB, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2016 A COVERT WAR AT SEA: PIRACY AND POLITICAL ECONOMY IN MALAYA, 1824-1874 BY SCOTT C. ABEL © 2016 Scott Abel A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Doctoral Director: Eric A.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas in Singapore: Casinos and the Taming of Vice
    Las Vegas in Singapore: Casinos and the Taming of Vice By Kah-Wee Lee A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Architecture and the Designated Emphasis in Global Metropolitan Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nezar AlSayyad, Chair Professor C. Greig Crysler Professor Andrew M. Shanken Professor Aihwa Ong Fall 2012 Las Vegas in Singapore: Casinos and the Taming of Vice ©2012 Kah-Wee Lee 1 Abstract Las Vegas in Singapore: Casinos and the Taming of Vice by Kah-Wee Lee Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture University of California, Berkeley Professor Nezar AlSayyad, Chair This dissertation investigates the historical formation of the modern casino as a “dividing practice” that cuts society along moral, legal and economic lines. It analyzes specific episodes in Singapore’s and Las Vegas’ histories when the moral problem of vice was transformed into a series of practical interventions devised by lawyers, detectives, architects and bureaucrats to criminalize and legalize gambling. Spatial containment and aesthetic form are key considerations and techniques in these schemes. I show how such schemes revolve around the complex management of the political costs and practical limits of changing the moral-legal status of gambling, whether it is to criminalize a popular form of illegality or to legalize an activity that threatens the normative order of society. The rise of the modern casino as a spatially bounded and concentrated form of gambling that is seamless with corporate management practices and popular culture is an indication of how far such costs and limits have been masked and stretched.
    [Show full text]
  • Apr–Jun 2021 (PDF)
    Vol. 17 Issue 01 APR–JUN 2021 10 / A Banquet of Malayan Fruits 16 / Nature Conservation – A History 22 / A Beastly Business 38 / The Nature of Poetry 44 / Finding Magic Everywhere 50 / Plantation Agriculture The Nature Issue Deforestation’s deadly impact in early Singapore p. 56 Our cultural beliefs influence how we view the natural environment as well as our understanding Director’s and attitudes towards animals and plants. These views and perceptions impact our relationship with the natural world. Note Some people see nature as wild and chaotic while others view nature as orderly, acting according to natural “laws”. There are those who perceive nature as an economic resource to be exploited for profit or for human enjoyment, yet there are also many who strongly believe that nature should be left untouched to flourish in its natural state. This issue of BiblioAsia looks at how human activities over the past 200 years have affected and transformed our physical environment, and how we are still living with the consequences today. This special edition accompanies an exciting new exhibition launched by the National Library – “Human x Nature” – at the Gallery on Level 10 of the National Library Building on Victoria Street. Do visit the exhibition, which will run until September this year. Georgina Wong, one of the curators of the show, opens this issue by exploring the relationship between European naturalists and the local community as plants and animals new to the West were uncovered. Not unexpectedly, indigenous input was often played down, dismissed, or exoticised. Farish Noor examines this phenomenon by taking a hard look at Walter Skeat’s book Malay Magic.
    [Show full text]