DOCSLIB.ORG

Brill's Companion to Propertius

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BRILL’S COMPANION TO PROPERTIUS BRILL’S COMPANION TO PROPERTIUS edited by HANS-CHRISTIAN GÜNTHER LEIDEN • BOSTON 2006 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A C.I.P. record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN-13: 978 90 04 13682 3 ISBN-10: 90 04 13682 7 © Copyright 2006 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change printed in the netherlands JOSEF DELZ In Memoriam CONTENTS Preface .......................................................................................... xi PART ONE PROPERTIUS: THE HISTORY OF PROPERTIAN SCHOLARSHIP 1. The History of Propertian Scholarship ................................ 3 Paolo Fedeli PART TWO THE TEXTUAL TRADITION OF PROPERTIUS 2. The Transmission of the Text of Propertius ........................ 25 James Butrica 3. Propertian Textual Criticism and Editing ............................ 45 Richard Tarrant PART THREE PROPERTIUS AND THE TRADITION OF GREEK AND ROMAN POETRY 4. Propertius and the Origins of Latin Love-Elegy .................. 69 Francis Cairns 5. Propertius and Hellenistic Poetry .......................................... 97 Adrian Hollis 6. Propertius and the Neoterics .................................................. 127 Peter Knox viii contents PART FOUR THE MAJOR THEMES OF PROPERTIUS’ POETRY AND HIS POETIC TECHNIQUE 7. Major Themes and Motifs in Propertius’ Love Poetry .... 147 Robert Maltby 8. The Image of Woman in Propertius’ Poetry...................... 183 Elaine Fantham 9. Propertius and Rhetoric ...................................................... 199 Tobias Reinhard PART FIVE AN INTERPRETATION OF PROPERTIUS’ WORK 10. The First Book .................................................................... 219 Gesine Manuwald 11. The Second Book ................................................................ 245 Hans Peter Syndikus 12. The Third Book: Defining a Poetic Self .......................... 319 Kevin Newman 13. The Fourth Book ................................................................ 353 Hans-Christian Günther PART SIX THE RECEPTION OF PROPERTIUS’ POETRY 14. The Reception of Propertius in Late Antiquity and Neolatin and Renaissance Literature ................................ 399 Simona Gavinelli contents ix 15. The Reception of Propertius in the Modern Age: Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s Römische Elegien and Ezra Pound’s Homage to Sextus Propertius .............................. 417 Bernhard Zimmermann Bibliography ................................................................................ 429 Index .......................................................................................... 449 Index Locorum .......................................................................... 457 PREFACE The present volume intends to provide a comprehensive introduc- tion to the major aspects of the work of one of the most difficult Latin poets. It was my aim to present both a fair picture of the pre- sent state of research and pieces of original scholarship; neither did I interfere with the specific form of contributions nor has there been any attempt of harmonizing eventually conflicting views. Propertius is an author who offers ample room for disagreement. In view of the enormous difficulties of the transmitted text a con- siderable space is given to textual matters (Part Two), and an intro- duction deals with the history of Propertian scholarship (Part One), focusing on the various approaches to textual difficulties in particu- lar. The largest space, however, is occupied by an interpretation of Propertius’ four transmitted books (Part Five). Regarding Propertius’ language, I refer the reader to H. Tränkle’s magisterial comprehensive study Die Sprachkunst des Properz und die Tradition der lateinischen Dichtersprache (Wiesbaden 1960), as well as to the same author’s more recent contribution ‘Die Sprache des Properz und die stilistischen Tendenzen der augusteischen Dichtung’ (in: G. Catanzaro – F. Santucci (eds.), Bimillenario della morte di Properzio (Atti del Convegno internazionale di studi properziani, Roma–Assisi, 21–26 maggio 1985) Assisi 1986, 155–73); however, there is also a section on language in K. Newman’s contribution on Book 3 (pp. 328f.). I am very grateful to all contributors for their collaboration and hope that this book will be useful to scholars and students alike. Special thanks for advice in the planning phase of the volume go to Arnd Kerkhecker and Gesine Manuwald. For technical help with the preparation of the volume I thank Maia Danelia and Eka Gamkrelidze. During the final stage of revision of the volume Josef Delz died in June of this year. We all hope that the dedication of this volume will be found worthy of the memory of a man whose scholarly and human merits are too well known to need further mention. Freiburg, November 2005 H.-C. Günther PART ONE PROPERTIUS: THE HISTORY OF PROPERTIAN SCHOLARSHIP CHAPTER ONE THE HISTORY OF PROPERTIAN SCHOLARSHIP Paolo Fedeli In the preface to his 1816 Propertius, the young Lachmann first estab- lished the criteria on which his edition was based, and then felt it necessary to distinguish the tasks of a criticus from those of an inter- pres. He claimed to be only a criticus, as his still tender age would not allow him to take on the mantle of the interpres. This apparently very modest affirmation cannot hide Lachmann’s proud conviction that the criticus is superior to the interpres; however, a true criticus must necessarily be an interpres. In any case, in the very same 1816 edi- tion, Lachmann did not limit himself to acting as a criticus, but also carried out the role of the interpres.1 Propertian studies have of course never been completely able to dissociate the two: when faced with a late and in many ways sus- pect tradition, in the presence of a text that—despite a few recent and rather unconvincing attempts to seek a way out by recourse to emendatio—had a number of highly original features compared with the usual schemas of the Augustans, from one point of view the activity of recensio cannot be reduced to pure mechanics, but implies a continuous reflection on the right way of understanding the Propertian text, while from another the task of anyone who wishes to under- stand, explain and comment can never be entirely separated from a full awareness of the limits of Propertian manuscript tradition. Before Lachmann turned his attention to it, the Propertian text had never been treated any differently from other Latin authors, for whom a vulgate tradition had become consolidated, dating back to the early humanistic editions. Regarding the editio princeps of Propertius, there were two published in Venice in 1472, the first probably being the apparently anonymous one (though it was actually printed by 1 Lachmann (1816) IV. 4 chapter one Federico de’ Conti)2 dated February, which is based on widely inter- polated manuscripts of the D family, and on a manuscript in Venice’s Biblioteca Marciana (Z = Bibl.Marc., Fondo antico 443 [1912]), which descends recta via from the Petrarchan manuscript.3 The text of the other 1472 Venetian edition, printed by Vindelino da Spira, is based on the Laurentianus plut. 36,49 (F), which was owned by Coluccio Salutati and continues to occupy a place of honor in Propertius’ critical apparatus, and on a Göttingen manuscript of lit- tle value. If, as I personally continue to believe, it is correct to divide Propertian tradition into two families (N on one side, the second family on the other), this means that the Propertian vulgate has been built upon the text of the second family. It was with Domizio Calderini (1447–1478) that the Propertian work first attracted the attention of the Humanists and became the privileged subject of a series of commentaries, which should be regarded as being the archetypes of the modern ones. Calderini4 pio- neered Propertian studies right from the first edition of his notes on the more obscure passages, included in his commentary on Statius’ Silvae and on the epistula Sapphica attributed to Ovid.5 The features of humanistic commentary are clearly delineated, and were intended to act as a rudimentary critical apparatus, aimed to exalt the fulmen ingenii when faced with the provisional nature of the manuscript tra- dition: in Calderini’s case there are a dozen or so conjectures, only one of which appears to be reliable.6 The humanistic commentaries, however, were mainly very poor of problems connected with liter- ary genres and cultural influences, and ignored any allusiveness, and were not confined to comments on the author in question. Rather, they aim to create a repertory of data that may be of use to other authors. It is clear that as far as Propertius is concerned, Calderini’s classical sources were different from the mainly Hellenistic ones that the Latin author could rely on: so the humanistic commentator attempted to show off his erudition, especially in the privileged field
Recommended publications
  • Class, Nation and the Folk in the Works of Gustav Freytag (1816-1895)

    Class, Nation and the Folk in the Works of Gustav Freytag (1816-1895)

    Private Lives and Collective Destinies: Class, Nation and the Folk in the Works of Gustav Freytag (1816-1895) Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Benedict Keble Schofield Department of Germanic Studies University of Sheffield June 2009 Contents Abstract v Acknowledgements vi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Literature and Tendenz in the mid-19th Century 1 1.2 Gustav Freytag: a Literary-Political Life 2 1.2.1 Freytag's Life and Works 2 1.2.2 Critical Responses to Freytag 4 1.3 Conceptual Frameworks and Core Terminology 10 1.4 Editions and Sources 1 1 1.4.1 The Gesammelte Werke 1 1 1.4.2 The Erinnerungen aus meinem Leben 12 1.4.3 Letters, Manuscripts and Archival Material 13 1.5 Structure of the Thesis 14 2 Political and Aesthetic Trends in Gustav Freytag's Vormiirz Poetry 17 2.1 Introduction: the Path to Poetry 17 2.2 In Breslau (1845) 18 2.2.1 In Breslau: Context, Composition and Theme 18 2.2.2 Politically Responsive Poetry 24 2.2.3 Domestic and Narrative Poetry 34 2.2.4 Poetic Imagination and Political Engagement 40 2.3 Conclusion: Early Concerns and Future Patterns 44 3 Gustav Freytag's Theatrical Practice in the 1840s: the Vormiirz Dramas 46 3.1 Introduction: from Poetry to Drama 46 3.2 Die Brautfahrt, oder Kunz von der Rosen (1841) 48 3.2.1 Die Brautfahrt: Context, Composition and Theme 48 3.2.2 The Hoftheater Competition of 1841: Die Brautfahrt as Comedy 50 3.2.3 Manipulating the Past: the Historical Background to Die Brautfahrt 53 3.2.4 The Question of Dramatic Hero: the Function ofKunz 57 3.2.5 Sub-Conclusion: Die
  • The Intersection of Art and Ritual in Seventeenth-Century Dutch Visual Culture

    The Intersection of Art and Ritual in Seventeenth-Century Dutch Visual Culture

    Picturing Processions: The Intersection of Art and Ritual in Seventeenth-century Dutch Visual Culture By © 2017 Megan C. Blocksom Submitted to the graduate degree program in Art History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Dr. Linda Stone-Ferrier Dr. Marni Kessler Dr. Anne D. Hedeman Dr. Stephen Goddard Dr. Diane Fourny Date Defended: November 17, 2017 ii The dissertation committee for Megan C. Blocksom certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Picturing Processions: The Intersection of Art and Ritual in Seventeenth-century Dutch Visual Culture Chair: Dr. Linda Stone-Ferrier Date Approved: November 17, 2017 iii Abstract This study examines representations of religious and secular processions produced in the seventeenth-century Northern Netherlands. Scholars have long regarded representations of early modern processions as valuable sources of knowledge about the rich traditions of European festival culture and urban ceremony. While the literature on this topic is immense, images of processions produced in the seventeenth-century Northern Netherlands have received comparatively limited scholarly analysis. One of the reasons for this gap in the literature has to do with the prevailing perception that Dutch processions, particularly those of a religious nature, ceased to be meaningful following the adoption of Calvinism and the rise of secular authorities. This dissertation seeks to revise this misconception through a series of case studies that collectively represent the diverse and varied roles performed by processional images and the broad range of contexts in which they appeared. Chapter 1 examines Adriaen van Nieulandt’s large-scale painting of a leper procession, which initially had limited viewership in a board room of the Amsterdam Leprozenhuis, but ultimately reached a wide audience through the international dissemination of reproductions in multiple histories of the city.
  • Neo-Latin News

    Neo-Latin News

    44 SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NEWS NEO-LATIN NEWS Vol. 61, Nos. 1 & 2. Jointly with SCN. NLN is the official publica- tion of the American Association for Neo-Latin Studies. Edited by Craig Kallendorf, Texas A&M University; Western European Editor: Gilbert Tournoy, Leuven; Eastern European Editors: Jerzy Axer, Barbara Milewska-Wazbinska, and Katarzyna To- maszuk, Centre for Studies in the Classical Tradition in Poland and East-Central Europe, University of Warsaw. Founding Editors: James R. Naiden, Southern Oregon University, and J. Max Patrick, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Graduate School, New York University. ♦ Petrarch and St. Augustine: Classical Scholarship, Christian Theol- ogy and the Origins of the Renaissance in Italy. By Alexander Lee. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History, 210. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012. x + 382 pp. $177. Petrarch’s opera is extensive, that of Augustine is extraordinarily vast, and the literature on both is vaster still. To bridge them successfully is a significant undertaking. Over the past fifty years, scholars have attempted this task, from classic studies by Charles Trinkaus (often discussed here) to more recent ones such as C. Quillen’s Rereading the Renaissance: Petrarch, Augustine and the Language of Humanism (1995) and M. Gill’s Augustine in the Italian Renaissance: Art and Philosophy from Petrarch to Michelangelo (2005). In a new study, Alexander Lee argues that “Petrarch’s thought on moral questions was derived principally from the writings of St. Augustine” (24). Lee contends that Petrarch, rather than being philosophically inconsistent as is often suggested, was especially influenced by Augustine’s early works, most notably the Soliloquies and the De vera religione, which provided him with an interpretive method for incorporating classical literature and philosophy into Christian moral theology.
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Homer's Roads Not Taken

    UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Homer's Roads Not Taken

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Homer’s Roads Not Taken Stories and Storytelling in the Iliad and Odyssey A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Craig Morrison Russell 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Homer’s Roads Not Taken Stories and Storytelling in the Iliad and Odyssey by Craig Morrison Russell Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Alex C. Purves, Chair This dissertation is a consideration of how narratives in the Iliad and Odyssey find their shapes. Applying insights from scholars working in the fields of narratology and oral poetics, I consider moments in Homeric epic when characters make stories out of their lives and tell them to each other. My focus is on the concept of “creativity” — the extent to which the poet and his characters create and alter the reality in which they live by controlling the shape of the reality they mould in their storytelling. The first two chapters each examine storytelling by internal characters. In the first chapter I read Achilles’ and Agamemnon’s quarrel as a set of competing attempts to create the authoritative narrative of the situation the Achaeans find themselves in, and Achilles’ retelling of the quarrel to Thetis as part of the move towards the acceptance of his version over that of Agamemnon or even the Homeric Narrator that occurs over the course of the epic. In the second chapter I consider the constant storytelling that [ii ] occurs at the end of the Odyssey as a competition between the families of Odysseus and the suitors to control the narrative that will be created out of Odysseus’s homecoming.
  • The Arrangement and the Language of Catullus' So-Called Polymetra With

    The Arrangement and the Language of Catullus' So-Called Polymetra With

    proceedings of the British Academy, 93, 335-375 The Arrangement and the Language of Catullus’ so-called polymetra with Special Reference to the Sequence 10-11-12 H. D. JOCELYN Summary. It is contended that the order of the first 61 of the items transmitted under the name of ‘Catullus Veronensis’ shows signs of a conscious design, whether by the author or by some editor, that item 61 should be placed with its predecessors rather than with the seven ‘long’ poems which follow, that the widely used term ‘polymetrum’ is a thoroughly confusing misnomer, that metrical pattern requires the division of the 61 items into three distinct groups - ZmyphppaTa in ‘Phalaecian’ verse, L“apPoi, and p+ - and, most importantly, that even where they take up apparently similar themes the pih~distin- guish themselves in verbal style markedly from the ‘Phalaecian’ Z7riyphppa.ra and only a little less markedly from the L“apPoi. In order to illustrate this last point the lyric item 11 is compared in systematic detail with the two ‘Phalaecian’ epigrams which precede and follow it in the transmitted collection. Discussion of each feature of items 10,ll and 12 centres on its relationship with what third- and second-century BC poets might have written and with what first-century speakers of Latin might have said. The character of our record of the Latin of the two centuries following 240 BC makes a degree of tentativeness inevitable. The three groups of the 61 items in question take us to a linguistic world distant from that of items 62-68.
  • Późnoantyczny Epos Miniaturowy Grecki I Łaciński: Badania Porównawcze I Genologiczne

    Późnoantyczny Epos Miniaturowy Grecki I Łaciński: Badania Porównawcze I Genologiczne

    UNIWERSYTET JAGIELLOŃSKI W KRAKOWIE WYDZIAŁ FILOLOGICZNY Natalia Cichoń Późnoantyczny epos miniaturowy grecki i łaciński: badania porównawcze i genologiczne Rozprawa doktorska napisana pod kierunkiem dr hab. Anny Marii Wasyl Kraków 2019 Składam serdecznie podziękowania mojej promotor, dr hab. Annie Marii Wasyl, która wzbudziła we mnie zainteresowanie epyllionem i epoką późnego antyku, nieustannie inspirowała mnie do pracy i poszerzania wiedzy oraz zawsze służyła nieocenioną pomocą. 2 SPIS TREŚCI Wstęp ……………………………………………………...……………….…….. 4 Rozdział 1. Kontekst literacko-kulturowy późnoantycznej epiki miniaturowej .... 11 1.1. Felix Carthago: twórczość literacka w Afryce Północnej na prze- łomie V i VI wieku n.e. ....…………...…………………………….. 17 1.2. Poeci wędrowni – grecki świat literacki między IV a VI wiekiem n.e. 41 Rozdział 2. Epos miniaturowy – historia i charakterystyka …………………….. 59 2.1. Problemy genologii antycznej …………………….……………… 61 2.2. Historia badań nad epyllionem …………………….…………….. 76 2.3. Epyllion epok wcześniejszych …………..………………….……. 95 Rozdział 3. Epos miniaturowy w późnym antyku ……..…………………...…... 109 3.1. Kompozycja utworu i techniki narracyjne ………………………. 110 3.2. Analiza proemium: zestawienie i interpretacja wypowiedzi poety- narratora na temat źródeł inspiracji poetyckiej …………….…….. 137 3.3. Narrazione commentata: obecność i rola narratora ………...……. 168 3.4. Intergatunkowość w obrębie struktury epyllionu ………………... 206 3.5. Oryginalność i reinterpretacja mitu ……………………………... 272 3.6. Bohaterowie w epyllionie ……………………...…………………
  • Caieta's Undying Fame

    Caieta's Undying Fame

    Caieta’s Undying Fame : Aeneid 7.1-7 Autor(en): Skempis, Marios Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Museum Helveticum : schweizerische Zeitschrift für klassische Altertumswissenschaft = Revue suisse pour l'étude de l'antiquité classique = Rivista svizzera di filologia classica Band (Jahr): 67 (2010) Heft 2 PDF erstellt am: 05.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-109709 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Caieta’s Undying Fame: Aeneid 7.1–7 By Marios Skempis, Erfurt Abstract: This paper discusses the Hellenistic background of Virgil’s epic by pointing out an unnoticed point of intersection between Callimachus’ Hecale and the Aeneid.
  • The Humanist Discourse in the Northern Netherlands

    The Humanist Discourse in the Northern Netherlands

    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Clashes of discourses: Humanists and Calvinists in seventeenth-century academic Leiden Kromhout, D. Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Kromhout, D. (2016). Clashes of discourses: Humanists and Calvinists in seventeenth- century academic Leiden. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 Chapter 1: The humanist discourse in the Northern Netherlands This chapter will characterize the discourse of the Leiden humanists in the first decade of the seventeenth century. This discourse was in many aspects identical to the discourse of the Republic of Letters. The first section will show how this humanist discourse found its place at Leiden University through the hands of Janus Dousa and others.
  • What the Poet Saw: Ovid, the Error and the Theme of Sight in Tristia 2

    What the Poet Saw: Ovid, the Error and the Theme of Sight in Tristia 2

    Accademia Editorale What the Poet Saw: Ovid, the Error and the Theme of Sight in Tristia 2 Author(s): Jennifer Ingleheart Reviewed work(s): Source: Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici, No. 56 (2006), pp. 63-86 Published by: Fabrizio Serra editore Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40236287 . Accessed: 25/07/2012 10:01 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Fabrizio Serra editore and Accademia Editorale are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici. http://www.jstor.org Jennifer Ingleheart What The Poet Saw: Ovid, the error and the thème of sight in Tristiaz1 famously attributeshis relegation of ad 8 to two distinct causes: a poem and a mysterious mistake, which he must not discuss for fear that talking about it might compound the of- fence alreadycaused by his misdeeds to Augustus, the agent of his banishment: perdiderintcum me duo elimina, Carmenet error, alterius facti culpa silenda mihi:2 nam non sum tanti, renouem ut tua uulnera, Caesar, quem nimio plus est indoluisse semel. itera pars superest, qua, turpi carminé facto,3 1 Audiences at the Classical Association Annual Conference in Warwick in 2003, and Durham, Exeter, Manchester, Oxford and ucl between January 2003 and Febru- ary 2005, hâve helped to improve this paper.
  • Metaliteracy & Theatricality in French & Italian Pastoral

    Metaliteracy & Theatricality in French & Italian Pastoral

    THE SHEPHERD‘S SONG: METALITERACY & THEATRICALITY IN FRENCH & ITALIAN PASTORAL by MELINDA A. CRO (Under the Direction of Francis Assaf) ABSTRACT From its inception, pastoral literature has maintained a theatrical quality and an artificiality that not only resonate the escapist nature of the mode but underscore the metaliterary awareness of the author. A popular mode of writing in antiquity and the middle ages, pastoral reached its apex in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries with works like Sannazaro‘s Arcadia, Tasso‘s Aminta, and Honoré d‘Urfé‘s Astrée. This study seeks to examine and elucidate the performative qualities of the pastoral imagination in Italian and French literature during its most popular period of expression, from the thirteenth to the seventeenth century. Selecting representative works including the pastourelles of Jehan Erart and Guiraut Riquier, the two vernacular pastoral works of Boccaccio, Sannazaro‘s Arcadia, Tasso‘s Aminta, and D‘Urfé‘s Astrée, I offer a comparative analysis of pastoral vernacular literature in France and Italy from the medieval period through the seventeenth century. Additionally, I examine the relationship between the theatricality of the works and their setting. Arcadia serves as a space of freedom of expression for the author. I posit that the pastoral realm of Arcadia is directly inspired not by the Greek mountainous region but by the Italian peninsula, thus facilitating the transposition of Arcadia into the author‘s own geographical area. A secondary concern is the motif of death and loss in the pastoral as a repeated commonplace within the mode. Each of these factors contributes to an understanding of the implicit contract that the author endeavors to forge with the reader, exhorting the latter to be active in the reading process.
  • Peasant Life in Old German Epics; Meier Helmbrecht and Der Arme

    Peasant Life in Old German Epics; Meier Helmbrecht and Der Arme

    nf Jlnrt^a Ctbrartpfi RECORDS OF CIVILIZATION SOURCES AND STUDIES Edited tinder the auspices of the DEPAKTMENT OF HISTOEY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY General Editor Austin P. Evans, Ph.D. Professor of History Associate Editors Frederick Barry, Ph.D. John Dickinson, Ph.D. Associate Professor of the History of Professor of Cottstitutionat Law, Unu Science versity of Pennsylvania Advisory Board Franklin H. Giddings, LL.D. Dana Carleton Munro, L.H.D. and Dodge Professor Medieval History, Professor Emeritus _ of Sociology of the History of Civilisation in Residence Princeton University Carlton J. H. Hayes, Litt.D. David Muzzey, Ph.D. Professor of History Professor of History F. J. Foakes Jackson, D.D. James T. Shotwell, LL.D. Charles A. Briggs Graduate Professor Professor of History; Director of the Di- of Christian Institutions in Union Theo- vision of Economics and History, Carnegie logical Seminary Endowment for International Peace A. V. Williams Jackson, LL.D. Lynn Thorndike, Ph.D. Professor of Indo-Iranian Languages Professor of History Charles Knapp, Litt.D. William L. Westermann, Ph.D. Professor of Greek and Latin Professor of Ancient History Howard Lee McBain, LL.D. Frederick J. E. Woodbridge, LL.D. Ruggles Professor of Constitutional Johnsonian Professor of Philosophy Law and Dean of the Graduate Facul- ties Volume XIII PEASANT LIFE IN OLD GERMAN EPICS From •Drutschc Utcraturcicschichic," hy Alfred Birsr, by prrmlsxioii of C. //. Brch'schc Verhuisbucliliandhinij. Hartmann von Aue From a miniature of the VVeirigartner Liecierhaiidschrift. PEASANT LIFE IN OLD GERMAN EPICS MEIER HELMBRECHT AND DER ARME HEINRICH TRANSLATED FROM THE MIDDLE HIGH GERMAN OF THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY BY CLAIR HAYDEN BELL ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF GERMAN, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA NEW YORK COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS 19 3 I :B4 33p Copyright 1931 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS Published October, 1931 Printed in the United States of America The Torch Press, Cedar Rapids, Iowa PREFACE Medieval writings which depict the life of humble folk are rare.
  • Myrtia, Nº 26 (2011) Jennifer Ingleheart, a Commentary on Ovid

    Myrtia, Nº 26 (2011) Jennifer Ingleheart, a Commentary on Ovid

    366 Reseñas Myrtia, nº 26 (2011) Jennifer Ingleheart, A Commentary on Ovid, Tristia, Book 2, Oxford 2010, 448 pages. Jennifer Ingleheart states in the preface that this book began life as a D. Phil. thesis at Oxford. She thanks her supervisors, Stephen Heyworth and Adrian Hollis, for their generosity and kindness. Dr Ingleheart has written an introduction, in which she explains the literary background to Ovid’s Tristia. She also adds a note on the manuscript tradition of the text: cf. page 28. The Latin text is then printed together with an English translation. I would now like to make the following observations on the text of the poem. On page 74 I. mentions Teuthras. Propertius refers to Teuthras at 1,11,11. I have recently argued that we should print the variant reading Titanis instead of the reading Teuthrantis in this passage. For the variant Titanis cf. Burman’s note ad loc. For Titanis = Circe cf. Ovid, Met. 14,14. Cf. moreover, my Studies in the Text of Propertius (Athens 2002), page 22. Burman used manuscripts in order to correct the text of Propertius: cf. my Studies, page 16 (note 3). On page 89 I. notes that Ovid “plays on the etymology of Augustus’ name.” Propertius was also interested in etymologies: cf. my Studies, page 78. At 2,34,53 Propertius mentions Stygias ... erumnas (“Stygian cares”, i.e. death). The variant reading erumnas was preserved for us by Burman. On page 199 I. discusses the words novissima .../ ...terra. It is possible that novissima means “most strange”. Cf. Lewis-Short, s.v.