Stock enhancement and estimation of growth rate of green tiger ( semisulcatus) and banana (Fenneropenaeus merguiensis) released in the Persian Gulf

Item Type monograph

Authors Niamaimandi, Nassir; Negarestan, H.; Keymaram, F.; Mohammadidoost, S.; Ghavampor, A.; Masandani, S.; Behpori, A.; Darvishi, M.; Khajehnori, K.; Sadeghi, M.R.; Momeni, M.; Khorshidian, K.; Faghih, Gh.; Zendehbodi, A.; Eskandari, Gh.; Safavi, S.E.; Moradi, Gh.; Barani, M.; Matinfar, A.; Khalilpazir, M.; Shamsian, Sh.; Foroghifard, H.; Gharibnia, M.

Publisher Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute

Download date 08/10/2021 01:54:21

Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/39823

–

:

(Penaeus semisulcatu s)

(Fenneropenaeus merguiensis ) :

42959

(Penaeus semisulcatu s) : Fenneropenaeus merguiensis 128004 87021 : : / :( ) ( ) : / ( ) ( ) – – – – :( ) – – – – – – – – – – – – – :( ) :( ) : 87 1/7/ : 4 : : 1392 : . .

« / »

:

(Fenneropenaeus merguiensis ) (Penaeus semisulcatu s)

04 80 12 87021 :

1392 29/2/ : 42959 :( )

.

. 18 5/ 91 11/ 25/

:

█

.

« » 1 ...... 5 ...... 1 9 ...... 11 10 ...... 111 .....11 ...... 211 16 ...... 311 24 ...... 2 24 ...... 12 25 ...... 22 28 ...... 32 ...31 ...... 42 32 ...... 52 33 ...... 62 34 ...... 72 40 ...... 82 43 ...... 3 60 ...... 4 75 ...... 79 ...... 84 ...... 101 ...... 111/...

. 1391 1388 ( )

(Penaeus semisulcatus ) (Fenneropenaeus merguiensis )

.

.

1389 1388 .

( CIST )

.

. 50000 1389 84000 1388

.

. 1390 1388

. 30000 1390 8000 1388

.

. 20

1389

50000 .

. 4700000 .

/// 222/ 2

. ( ./ 022 ) 11

( )

.

22 06/ ± 9/4 2/1

. ./ 88 41/1 16 26 .

103400 ( ./ 022 ) ( 4700000 )

. 5/2

21 . 85000

.

1

. 22 99 . ( 1391 )

. ( 38000 ./ 0026 )

.

1390 1388

. 1390 .

.

300 3

98 30 3 333/...

10 .

.

( α = 05./ () α=./ 01 )

.

52

. 44 5/

3 30 300 9 ( )

3 (3 )

. 110 .

.

( α = 05./ () α=./ 01 )

.

. 40 59 63

.

./ 46

.

.

/// 444/ 4

.

(Fenneropenaeus merguiensis ) : (Penaeus semisulcatus ) 555/...

1

.

75

. (FAO, 2002)

(Fushimi, 1999) Marsupenaeus japonicus .

(Garcia, 1996) (Wang et al., 2006) Fenneropenaeus chinesis

. (Wang and Die, 1996) Penaeu esculentus

. 1383 . 1370 )

.( 1385

.

. (Tacon, 2003; Muir, 2005)

. (Bell et al., 2005; Ye et al., 1995)

.

.

. (Restocking)

/// 666/ 6

.

(Stock enhacement)

.

.

.

(Sea .

. (Bartley, 2007) ranching)

.(Bell

et al., 2006) .

(Davenport et al., 1999; Kristiansen, 1999;

. Leber, 2002)

. (Uki, 2006)

(Travis et al., 1998;

. Hilborn, 1998) 777/...

.

.

19 ( )

. (Trengereid, 2012)

. (Liao et al. 2003; Taylor et al. 2005; Palmer, 2008)

1984 .

5 1991 (F. chinesis )

10 7 . 6

. (Hamasaki and Kitada, 2006)

.

. (Menzel, 1955)

. (Dawson, 1957., Costello, 1964; Klima, 1965)

.

.

( )

/// 888/ 8

. (Nea1, 968)

(Wheeller,

. 1963; Meyer-Warden; Tiews, 1965)

(1385 ) 17

(F. merguiensis ) (P. semisulcatus )

.

(Van

. Zalinge, 1984)

.

( Metapenaeus affinis )

. (Metapenaeus stebinggi ) (Parapenaeopsis stylifera )

(Alpheidae ) ( ) 15

.( 1380 ) ( Solenoceridae ) ( Palaemonidae )

.( 1381 ) (Fenneropenaeus indicus )

.

) . 999/...

. 1388 (

. . 4

1

2

3

4

11

. 17 342

82 ( Palaemonidae ) . 109

. (Holthuis, 1980) 34 (Pandalidae)

. 23

( ) . .

.

.

.

( Solenoceridae ) ( Palaemonidae ) (Alpheidae )

.( 1381 )

/// 101010/ 10

.

.

.

.( 1376 ) 80

.

80 . 50

.(Van Zalinge, 1984)

. (Niamaimandi et al., 2007)

(P. semisulcatus ) (F. merguiensis ) 111

.

.

.

.

. 111111 /...

.

.

. ( )

211

.

.

. 24

(Protozoeal) (Nauplian)

(Post larva) . (Mysis)

.

.

.

.

. (Dall et al., 1990)

. 1

– 2

.

/// 121212/ 12

. – 3

. .

– 4

.

.

.

.

.( Lichatowich et al.,1981 )

. .

.

.( Tung,2002 ) 27

.( Vance et al., 1998 )

.( Preston et al., 1992 ) .

.( Vance,1996 )

.( Kenyon et al.,2004 ) 131313 /...

.( 1387 )

.

.( Kathiresan and Bingham, 2001 )

.

.

Kathiresan )

.( and Bingham, 2001

.

(. Meager, 2003 )

.( Sultan, 2000 )

.( Vance et al., 1998 )

.

.( Kathiresan and Bingham, 2001 )

/// 141414/ 14

. .

.( Vance et al., 1992 )

.

. (Rothlisberg and Jackson , 1987; Niamaimandi et al., 2008)

.

70

(. Branford ,1981 )

.

.( 1385 )

. (Niamaimandi et al., 2008)

.

.

.

.

. ( )

.( 1386 ) 151515 /...

.

(Jackson et al., 2001)

. (Staples et al., 1985)

) 200

. (Beck et al., 2003) (

.

.

.

.

.( Jackson et al., 2001 )

.

. .( Marcille, 1978 )

Van Zalinge and )

.( Naamin, 1975

.

/// 161616/ 16

.

311

. 1

.

.

.

Litopenaeus Farfantepenaeus aztecus

. Farfantepenaeus duorarum setiferus

(. Loneragan et al., 2006 ) Metapenaeus affinis P. semisulcatus

. 1963

(Marsupenaeus japonicus)

1979 .

16 .

.

1 - Sea ranching – Stock enhancement - Restocking 171717 /...

. :

.

. . :

:

.

80 .

.

: 4

. (Pandalus hypsinotus ) (Metapenaes monoceros )

1300 ( M. japonicus )

. 1964 . 3700

140 300

22 .( Hamasaki and Kitada, 2006 )

5 40 ( 10 )

.( Loneragan, 2006 )

/// 181818/ 18

Hamasaki and )

.( Kitada, 2006

1000 1979 4 Fenneropenaeus chinensis

. 1990

. 20

1991 5 .

. 600

4/52/9 .( Wang et al., 2006 )

.

.

(. Wang et al., 2006 )

1980 . 720 1970 Penaeus esculentus

1980

650 .

. 390 . 2000 82 1994

. 70( ) 600

. 490 390 100 191919 /...

( 600 )

100 (Ye et al., 2006) .

. 25 1 24

. (Abdolhay, 2004) 1351

. 1376 .

.

1380 1376 (Fenneropenaeus indicus )

1382 . 1381 .( 1 )

3 .

(Penaeus . 3

1 . 1387 monodon )

. 1

1386

. .

. "

/// 202020/ 20

*( 1379 89 ) 1: – ( ) F. indicus 25 1800000 1376 F. indicus 25 5249500 F. indicus 25 2085000 77 F. indicus 25 4200000 78 F. indicus 25 1998500 79 F. indicus 1 4360000 80 F. indicus 2 270000 F. indicus 1 5400000 81 F. merguiensis 1 200000 F. indicus 6 150000 F. indicus 1 9696745 82 F. indicus 1 3500000 P. semisulcatus 2 500000 F. indicus 1 26525000 83 F. merguiensis 3 2100000 F. indicus 1 10850000 P. semisulcatus 1.5 10000000 P. semisulcatus 1 23228000 F. indicus 4 4484840 84 F. merguiensis 200000 1.5 4610829 212121 /...

F. merguiensis 1 8300000 85 F. indicus 1 500000 F. indicus 1 8900000 P. semisulcatus 1 4200000 P. semisulcatus 1 10000000 F. indicus 1 1431000 86 P. semisulcatus 1 8050000 F. merguiensis 104000 1 6909662 P. semisulcatus 1 877870 P. monodon 7 100000 87 F. indicus 1 2973985 F. merguiensis 51000 1 5325700 P. semisulcatus 1 8974932 P. semisulcatus 1 7175000 P. semisulcatus 1 8470000 88 F. indicus 1 5000000 F. merguiensis 83800 1 4782120 P. semisulcatus 1 10700000 F. merguiensis 200000 1 12701407 89

/// 222222/ 22

P. semisulcatus 1 8300000 F. merguiensis 1 6761333 90 P. semisulcatus 8346000 259987423 *

. (Rothlisberg and Preston, 1991)

.

. 1990

.

.

.

.

. 232323 /...

1111 1980 1979 .

. (Frusher, 1985) 121 . (Papua )

13310

. 1979

Al-Hosseini, )

.( 1982

)

.(

/// 242424/ 24

2

. 1388

.

.

12

.

.( 1 )

252525 /...

1:

( )

.

22

. ( )

.

15

2(. ) ( )

. ( 1 )

/// 262626/ 26

• ﻻﺭﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺰﺭﻋﻪ

• ﭘﻜﻴﻨﮓ ﻻﺭﻭ

• ﻻﺭﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺭﮔﲑﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﻪﲪﻞ ﻣﺰﺭﻋﻪ ﻻﺭﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺰﺭﻋﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺫﺧﲑﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ

2:

.

.

5/1

. 1390 1389 1388 .

.

272727 /...

3:

.

.

( )

. .

1- ﺻﻴﺪ ﺑﭽﻪ ﻣﻴﮕﻮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮ

2 - ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺗﺎﻧﻜﺮ ﻫﺎﻱ ﲪﻞ

2- ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺧﻮﺭ 4:

/// 282828/ 28

32

. 24

.

.

2 . 50000 1389 84000 1388

. 1389

.

5(. )

292929 /...

*1389 14( )7 2: ( ) 22 2 519200 1 1 24 2 494542 1.1 2 1 3 433000 1 3 211 1098332 1.6 4 11 2 282816 1 5 18 2 733578 1.3 6 18 3 617269 1.1 7 320 521664 1.2 8

4700401 200000 1 . 9 ( 50000 ) * .

/// 303030/ 30

5:

.

.

.

.

.

. 313131 /...

42

.

.

1

.

.

20 2

.

.

3

.( 67 )

/// 323232/ 32

6:

:7

52

.

.

.

.

S = D / d 333333 /...

d ( ) D S

( )

62

.

.

.( 8 )

.

8:

/// 343434/ 34

72

1388

.

.

. 1390 1388 .

.

.

. ( )

.

. 1388

( pH )

. .

PCR

. 48 200

.( 9 ) 1388 353535 /...

9:

.

.

)

. 31 (

1570

100 1470

.

3.( ) 6700 4 28

. 1388 8170

/// 363636/ 36

( 1388 ) – 3

( ) ( ) ( ) 7 6 5.5 10 4 1470 88 /8/26 88 /8/14 1 7 6 5.5 11 ./ 5 4500 88 /11 /28 88 /11 /28 2 7 6 5.5 11 ./ 5 2200 88 /12 /4 88 /12 /4 3

5/5 76

1200000 . 50 51 28 48

.( 10 )

: 10

( 1389 )

373737 /...

) .

. (.

.

.

1389

1390 .

) .

. ( ) (

) ( ) .

. (

.

4 .

.

/// 383838/ 38

( 1390 ) : 4

( ) ( )

7/9±./ 63 11000 2 28 49 11 13 10 1 50 57 7/9±./ 63 7700 1/5 28 49 12 13 27 2 50 55

5/1±./ 75 6900 2/5 4 27 47 12 13 17 3 51 01

5/1±./ 75 1650 2 3 28 48 12 13 25 4 50 57

8/25 ±78 2750 1 28 49 11 9 5

50 55

.

.

. 5

393939 /...

5:

( 1390 )

( )

Sargassum angustifolium 13 15 10 1

Sargassum angustifolium 14 14 27 2

Gracilaria sp. 16 22 17 3

Gracilaria sp. 12 13 25 4

Sargassum angustifolium 18 18 9 5

3 )3 300 6

) 30 30 (

(1391 1390

.

96 300 9

96 3 3 96 3

/// 404040/ 40

91( 1390 ) 4 1.

. .

.

.

10

.

3 .

.

.

: 82

.

. (ANOVA)

. (King, 2006)

Gw = G i - Gf

١ . 414141 /... kw = dw/dt

(G i) (G w)

(dt) (Dw) (kw) . (G f)

.

(p i) (n i )

.(Egglestone et al., 2004)

Ni = n i / p i )1(

.(Preston et al., 1999) .

Є h = νP )2(

. ν P

Є

. (PL 15 ) 15

. 1

.

.

.

.(Hannesson, 1993) .

/// 424242/ 42

Ωg = y(A σ + Ѕ) + (Be − Bi) γτ )3(

Be Bi ( / ) Ѕ σ

t ( ) γ

. 15 .

PCR .

.

.

. (Yimin et al., 2005) 67 5/ 15

. 15 5/1 1 1

1. 75

. EXCEL

١ اتطاانازدودو( ار ) و ( آن ) ا . 434343 /...

3

45 50000

11

.( 11 )

.

: 11

33 28 22 06/ ± 9/4 27 17

./ 88 26 16 . 31 1/ ± 5/2

. 6 . 41/1

/// 444444/ 44

F. merguiensis 6:

( 1389 )

/ ) (g) ( g) ( ( ) ( ) (mm) ( g) (mm) 0.88 16.20 27 8.5 17.4 28.57 1.2 13.95 1 0.88 16.30 27 8.5 17.5 28.63 1.2 13.95 2 0.88 16.30 27 8.5 17.5 28.63 1.2 13.95 3 0.88 16.30 27 8.5 17.5 28.63 1.2 13.95 4 0.97 17.90 27 8.5 17.5 29.57 1.2 13.95 5 0.97 17.90 27 8.5 19.1 29.57 1.2 13.95 6 1.41 26.00 27 8.5 27.2 33.69 1.2 13.95 7 1.41 26.00 27 8.5 27.2 33.69 1.2 13.95 8 1.41 26.00 27 8.5 27.2 33.69 1.2 13.95 9 1.41 26.10 27 8.5 27.3 33.74 1.2 13.95 10 1.41 26.10 27 8.5 27.3 33.74 1.2 13.95 11

. ./ 022 ./ 00022

Ni = 11 /50000 =./ 00022

6( ) 19/1 6/1 1

4700000 . 1 100 ( 1389 )

١ 1 1 . ( 100 ) . 1 454545 /...

.

.

4700000 * 100 = 470000000

24 7/ ./ 022

. .

4700000 *./ 022 = 103400

:

103400 24* =7/ 2553980

2554 2553980 1389

.

/

. 85000

:

2554 * 85000 = 217090000

.

Ei = 217090000 / 470000000 = 46./

470000000 217090000 = 252910000

/// 464646/ 46

1389

.

11 . ( 56 56 26 55 )

. ( 56 24 27 06 )

.( 12 )

( 1389 ) 12: 474747 /...

27( 17 ) 1389 9

25 .

. . 46

.( 7 ) 146 136

.

S= D / d

S = 46 / 136 = 33./

S = 46 / 146 = 31./

( 1389 ) 7:

( / ) ( )

56 24E 56 56E ./ 31 –./ 33 46 30 15 1389 4 27 06N 26 55N

. 1391 1

. 99 22

1390

( 1388 ) . 1388

. 2

.

/// 484848/ 48

. ( 1390 30000 1388 8170 )

Ni = 1 / 38170 = ./ 00002

. ./ 002 ./ 00002

.

)

. (

.

51 28 27 36

. . 1391

30 1388

.( 13 ) 8 1390

. 180 494949 /...

13:

100 100

4000

.

.( 89 )

/// 505050/ 50

( 1388 ) ( ) 8:

3.14 3.15 88 /12 /3

3.22 3.59 88 /12 /7

3.5 3.9 89 /1/8

( 1388 ) ( ) 9:

0.31 0.27 88 /12 /3

0.36 0.39 88 /12 /7

0.47 0.57 89 8/1/

150

) 15

10(. ) .(

515151 /...

( 1389 ) ( ) 10:

1.3 1.3 89 /2/1 1.4 1.9 89 /2/15 2.2 2.6 89 /2/30

. 4000

1390 91

300 .

3 300 6 . 30

( ) (3 )

.

.

. ( ± 06/ = ) 97/1

( 14 )

110 . ( ± 38./ = ) 16/5

. 19/3

/// 525252/ 52

٠.٣٨ ٠.٣٢ ٣ ٠.٢ ٠.١ ٨٢. ١. وزن ٠.٠ ( ٢ ٠.١ اافر ٢.٢ ٣ م ١ ١.٩٧ ١.٨٩ ( وزن ٠

زن ( ) ( ) : 14

) 7/1

. ( ±./ =5 ) 1/5 ( ± 47./ =

.( 15 ) 4/3 110

.٠ ٠.٢ ٣ ١. ٠.٠

( ٠.١٢ ٢ ٠.٧ ٠.١١ ٣. اافر

) .٢ ١ ١.٧ ٢.١ ٢.٢ وزن ٠

( ) ( ) : 15 535353 /...

.

) 9/7 ( ± 24./ = ) 53/5

. 37/2 98 .( 16 ) ( ± 33./ =

٩ ٠.٨٣ ٨ ٠.١٩ ٠.٣٣ ٧ ٠.١٧ ٠.٢ ( ٧.٢٣ ٧.٨٣ .٧ ٣ ٣. ٢٣. اافر ٢ ١ ل ) ٠

( ) : 16 ( )

) 6

) ( ± 34./ = ) 86/7 ( ± 03./ =

. 86/1 17.(

/// 545454/ 54

١٠ ٨ ٠.٢ ٠.٣ ٠.٢ ٠.٠٣ ٠.٢ ( ٨ ٧. ٧.٨ ااف ١. ر ٢ ) ٠

( ) ( ) : 17 ( ) ) "

. .( 18

١.١. ٨٢. ٣.

٣ ٣ ٢.٢ ٢.٢ .٢ ٢ ١.٩٧ ٢.١ ١.٧ ١.٨٩ ١

٠ ٠/١١/١٣٩٠ ١٧/١١/١٣٩٠ ٠٩/١٢/١٣٩٠ ٢٧/١٢/٩٠ ١٢/٠٢/١٣٩١ ٢/٠٢/١٣٩١

ون ( ) : 18 ( ) 555555 /...

.( 11 ) ( α = 05./ () α=./ 01 )

.

11: ( ) F EMS ESS s ./ 11 1/9 19 /76 10

FS = ./ 11 F5% = 96/4 F1% = 10 04/ 30 .

( 27 ) 8 ( 63 ) 20

( 44 525/ ) 4

.( 12 )

.

: 12 ( ) 3 2 1 %52 %27 %63 %50 %44 /5 %43 %33 %27

/// 565656/ 56

. ( )

38/4 .( 19 ) 124 83/9 45/5

.

١٢

١٠ ٠.٢ ٠.٠٧ ٨ ٠.١٧ ٠.٢٣ ٠.٠٠

٩.٨٣ ) ٨.٢٩

٩٨. ) ٩. . ٢

٠ ٩/٣/١٣٩١ ٢٣/١/٩١ ٢٠/١٢/٩٠ ٢١/١١/٩٠ /١١/٩٠

( ) ( ) 19: ( )

29/5 124

. 47/4 .( 20 ) 76/9 575757 /...

١٢

١٠ ٠.٢٨ ٠.١٧ ٨ ٠.١٧ ٠.٣ ٠.٣٧

٩.٧ ) ٨.٢

٧. ) ٩١. ٢٩. ٢

٠ ٩/٣/١٣٩١ ٢٣/١/٩١ ٢٠/١٢/٩٠ ٢١/١١/٩٠ /١١/٩٠

( ) 20: ( ) 61/4 124

. 3 /74 .( 21 ) 35/8

٩ ٠.٣ ٨ ٠.٨ ٧ ٠.٧ ٠.٩ ٨.٣

( ٧.١٢ ٣ .

) ١. ٢ ١ ٠ ٩/٣/١٣٩١ ٢٣/١/٩١ ٢٠/ ١٢/٩٠ ٢١/١١/٩٠

( ) 21: ( )

/// 585858/ 58

.

( α = 05./ () α=./ 01 )

.( 13 )

: 13 ( ) F EMS ESS s

6/63 19 /17 153 /36 8

FS = 63/6 F5% = 32/5 F1% = 11 26/ ( )

.( 14 )

: 14 ( ) 3 2 1 %59 %63 %53 %60 %40 %40 %43 %36 %63 %63 %66 %60

( 66 ) 20

. ( 36 ) 11 595959 /...

.

. .

23.( 22 ) ( )

22:

2 23:

.

/// 606060/ 60

4 ( )

./ 022 . ( )

. ./ 0026

.

1382 84 .( )

.

. (Niamaimandi et al., 2010) 5/2

. 1383 84

( ) (F. merguiensis )

. 31 24 7/ 130

(L ∞) (K) . 13/1( ± 26./ ) 41/1 ./ 88

.( 1377 . ) ( ) 48 8/1

1

.

(P. semisulcatus )

1 dL/dt=K*(L ∞-Lt) , dW/dt=K*(W ∞-Wt )

616161 /...

.

.

121 . 1111 ) 11

150 .(

150 80 .

.( Frusher, 1985 )

.

. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

/// 626262/ 62

.

.

.

. 1

.

.

.

.

:

1

.

2

.

1- Kuwait Institute for Scintific Research (KISR) 636363 /...

.

( )

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Bryopsis pennata , Sargassum piluliferum , Padina boeregesenii , Gracilaria corticata ,

(. 1386 ) Gracilaria pygmaeu and Ahnfeltopsis pygmaea

Halodule uninervis

/// 646464/ 64

H. pinulos . (Coles et al., 1987)

. (Staples, 1987) E. acoroides

H. uninervis ( )

. (Abdulqader and Naylor, 1995)

H. uninervis E. acoroides

. (Loneragan et al., 1996)

.(Mohammad et al., 1981; Jones and Al-Attar,

1982; Liu and Loneragan, 1996)

. (Loneregan et al., 1994)

.

. .

.

.

.

3 .

.

1

656565 /...

2

. 3

.

1

.

.

11 6000

1/4 . (Pauly and Palomores, 1987)

. ./ 55 ( )

.

.

.( 1370 )

.

.

.

١ .

/// 666666/ 66

.

.

.

.

. .

.

.

.

10 . (Purcell and Kirby, 2006)

19 40

.

676767 /...

. (Palmer, 2008)

.

.

.

.

(Stock enhancement)

. (Uki, 2006)

.

.

.

.

25

.

. (Bell et al., 2006)

.

/// 686868/ 68

.

:

.

.

(1390 )

(. )

12 70 ) 6

.( 1383 .1389 ) (

. 2 98

.

.

.

.

. . 696969 /...

.

.

.

.

.

63

. 5/7 . 27

11 . 3 63 40

. 13

.

5

.(Benton and Lightner, 1972)

. (Castello and Allen, 1969)

7

. (Frederick, 1997)

/// 707070/ 70

.

(Litopenaeus vannamei )

53 98 4

. . 63

.( Eduardo and Chiu, 2006)

. (Forrester, 1990)

1

. (Riley, 1966)

110

14 .

. ( ± 38./ ) /5 16 ( ± 06./ ) /1 97 110

. ( ± )5./ (1/5 ± 47./ ) 7/1 15( )

. ( ) (4/3 ) 2/3

29/5 124 .

83/9 ( ±./ 006 ) 45/5 . ( ±./ 28) 76/9 ( ± 37./ )

47/4 .( 20 19 ) ( ± )2./

. . 38/4

. 717171 /...

.

.

.

.

.

. (Chew, 1968)

. (Neal, 1968)

(Benton and 8

5 . Lightner, 1972)

.

. (Castello and Allen, 1969)

/// 727272/ 72

.

.

. .

.

.

. .

.

.

.

.

(Mugil cephalus)

. (Dawson, 1957)

7 . (Frederick, 1997)

737373 /...

. .

( 1376 90 ) 15

.( 1 )

.

1382 .

.

. .

) 200 50 1389

15 .( 1

.

.

.

: .

.

/// 747474/ 74

(14 )

.

757575 /...

•

1

3 . (Metapenaeus affinis )

3

.

2

. 5/2

.

. 3

.

.

.

.

4

. ( )1

.

/// 767676/ 76

• 1

.

.

2

.

.

3

.

.

.

4

.

.

.

. 5

. 777777 /...

6

.

.

/// 787878/ 78

( )

. ( )

.

.

)

(

.

797979 /...

. . . 1370 . • . 48 . . . 1383 . • 58 . . . 1383 . • . 64 . . . 1377 . . • . 32 . 1381. . . . . . . • . 77 2( ) . 1387 . • . 184 . 8 . 1370 . • . 92 . . . . 1376 . • 11. . 1385 . • . 87 . . 1386 . • 14 23 3. . (Penaeus semisulcatus . 1389 . . • . 149 160 1. . . DeHaan, 1844) • Abdolhay, H. 2004., Strogeon stocking programme in the Caspian Sea with emphasis on Iran. Marine ranching , FAO fisheries technical paper 429 . 133-161. • Abdulqader, E.A.A. and Naylor, E., 1995. Bionomics and migration patterns of the green tiger prawn, Penaeus semisulcatus , in Bahrain waters. Fisheries Research 21. 395-407.

/// 808080/ 80

• Al-Hosseini, M., 1982. Shrimp tagging technique used in Kuwait. Report of the workshop on assessment of the shrimp stocks of the west coast of the Gulf between iran and Arabian peninsula Kuwait 17- 22 October1981. 159-163. • Bartley, D.M. 2007. Responsible stock enhancement, restocking and sea ranching: rational and terminology. Ecosystem based stock enhancement programmes, Bruges Begium. FAO publication. 5pp. • Bell, J.D., Rothlisberg, P.C., Munro, J.L., Loneragan, N.R., Nash, W.J., Ward, R.D. and Andrew, N.L., 2005. The restocking and stock enhancement of marine invertebrate fisheries. Adv. Mar. Biol. 49, 1– 370. • Bell, J.D., Bartley, D.M., Lorenzen, K. and Loneragan, N.R. 2006. Restocking and stock enhancement of coastal fisheries: Potential, problems and progress. Fisheries Research 80, 1–8 • Brandford, J R. 1981. Sediment and the distribution of Penaeid shrimp in the Sudanese Red Sea. Estuarine coastal shelf science. No 13. 349-354. • Benton, R.C. and Lightner, D., 1972 . Spray marked juvenile shrimp with granular fluorescent pigment. Contribution of Marine Science Vol. 16. 65-69. • Castello, T.J. and Allen, D.M., 1969. Survival and stained , tagged and unmarked shrimp in the presence of predator. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst, 14. 16-19. • Castello, T.J., 1964. Field techniques for staining-recapture experiment with commercial shrimp. Spec. Scient. Rep. U. S. Fish wild1 , Serv 484. 13 p. • Coles, R.G., Lee Long, W.J., Squire, B. and Bibby, J.M., 1987. Distribution of seagrasses and associated juvenile commercial penaeid in northeastern Queensland waters. Australian Journal of Marine Freshwater 36: 103-119. • Dall, W., Hill, B.J., Rothlisberg, P.C. and Staples, D.J., 1990. Advances in marine biology, volume 27, the biology of. Academic Penaeidae, London press. 282-306. • Davenport, J., Ekaratne, S.U.K., Walgama, S.A., Lee, D. and Hills, J.M., 1999. Successful stock enhancement of a lagoon prawn fishery at Rekawa, Sri Lanka using cultured post-larvae of penaeid shrimp. 180 , 65–78. • Dawson, C.E., 1957. Studies on the marking of commercial shrimp with biological stain. Spec. Scient. Rep. U. S. Fish wild1 , Serv 231. 24 p. • Eduardo, M.L. and Chiu, L., 2006. Tagging of Litopenaeus vannamei by uropod cutting: a comporison of two methods. Aquaculture Research 37 , 885-890. • Eggleston D.B., Johnson E.G. and Hightower J.E., 2004. Population Dynamics and stock Assessment of the Blue in North Carolina , final Report for contracts 99-FEG-10 and 00-FEG-11 to the North Corolina Fishery Resource Grant Program, North Corolina Sea Grant, and the North Corolina Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries. 112 p. • FAO, 2002. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture, Food and Agriculture Organization. The United Nations, Italy. Available at http://www.fao.org/documents. • Frusher, S. D. 1985. Tagging of Penaeus merguiensis in the Gulf of Papua, Papua New Guinea. In: Rothilsberg, P. C., Hill, B. J., Staples, D. J. (eds.) Second Australian national prawn seminar. NPS2, Cleveland, , 65 p. • Fushimi, H., 1999. How to Detect the Effect in Releasing Operation of Hatchery Raised Kuruma Prawn Postlarvae?—Case Study of the Operation in the Hamana Lake, vol. 62. Bulletin of the Tohoku National Fisheries Research Institute, pp. 1–12. • Frederick, J.L., 1997. Evaluation of fluorcent elastomer injection as a method for marking mall fish. Bulletin of marine science, 61(2) . 399-408. • Forrester, G.E., 1995. Strong density-dependent survival and recruitment regulate the abundance of a coral reef fish. Oecologia 103: 275-282. • Guan, R.Z., 1997. An improved method formarking cray¢sh. Crustaceana 70 ,641-652. • Garcia, S. and Le Reste. 1981. Life cycle, dynamics, exploitation and management of coastal penaeid shrimp stocks. Rome. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 203. 180 p • Gracia, A., 1996. White shrimp ( Penaeus setiferus ) recruitment overfishing.Mar. Freshwater Res. 47 , 59–65. • Hamasaki, K.and Kitada, S., 2006. A review of kuruma prawn Penaeus japonicus stock enhancement programme in Japan. Fish. Res. 80, 80–90. • Hannesson, R., 1993. Bioecnomic Analysis of Fisheries. Fishing News Books, London, 138 p. • Hilborn, R., 1998. The economic performance of marine stock enhancement projects. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62 , 661–674. 818181 /...

• Holthuis, L.B. 1980. FAO catalogue. Volume 1 - and prawns of the world. An annotated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. 125 p. • Jackson, C.J., Rothlisbery, P.C and Pendrey, R.C. 2001. Role of larval distribution and abundance in overall life – history dynamics: a study of the prawn , P. semisulcatus Albatrass Bay, Gulf of carpentaria, Australia. Mar.Ecol.Prog.Ser 213 . 241-252.

• Jones, R. and Al-Attar, M., 1982. Observation on the postlarval and juvenile habitats of Penaeus semisulcatus in Kuwait Bay and adjacent waters. Kuwait Bulletin of Marine Science 10. 49-55. • Kathiresan K and Bingham, B.L., 2001, Biology of mangroves and mangrove Ecosystems , Advances in Marine Biology , Vol. 40, Pp. 81-251. • Kenyon R. A., Loneragan, N.R., Manson, F.J. , Vance, D.J. and Venables, W.N., 2004, Allopatric distribution of juvenile red-legged banana prawns (Penaeus indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1837) and juvenile white banana prawns ( Penaeus merguiensis De Man, 1888), and inferred extensive migration, in the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf, northwest Australia , Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 309. 79– 108. • King., M. 2006. Fisheries biology, assessment and management. Second edition. Blackwell. Toogoom, Queensland Australia. 377 p. • Kristiansen, T.S., 1999. Enhancement studies of costal cod (Gadus morhua L.) in Nord-Trondelag, Norway. In: Howell, B.R., Moksness, E., Svasand, T. (Eds.), Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching. Fishing News Books. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, pp. 277–292. • Klima, E.F. 1965. Evaluation of biological stain, ink, and fluorescent pigments as mark for shrimp. Spec. Scient. Rep. U. S. Fish wild1 , Serv 511. 8 p. • Leber, K.M., 2002. Advances in marine stock enhancement: shifting emphasis to theory and accountability. In: Stickney, R.R., McVey, J.P. (Eds.), Responsible Marine Aquaculture. CAB International, pp. 79–90. • Liao, I.C., Su, M.S. and Laeño, E.M. 2003. Status of research in stock enhancement and sea ranching. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 13: 151-163. • Loneragan, N.R., Kenyon, R.A., Haywood, M.D.E. and Staples, D.J., 1994. Population dynamics of juvenile tiger prawns, Penaeus esculentus and Penaeus semisulcatus in seagrass habitats of the western Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Marine biology . 119: 133-143. • Loneragan R.N., Ye, Y., Kenyon, R.A. and Haywood, M.D.E., 2006, New directions for research in prawn (shrimp) stock enhancement and the use of models in providing directions for research, Fisheries Research 80, 91–100. • Lorenzen, K., 2006, Population management in fisheries enhancement: Gaining key information from release experiments through use of a size-dependent mortality model, Fisheries Research 80, 19–27. • Liu, H. and Loneragan, N.R., 1996. Size and time of day affect the response of postlarvae and early juvenile grooved tiger prawn, Penaeus semisulcatus to natural and artificial seagrass in the laboratory. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 211: 263-277. • Marcille, J. 1978. Daynamique des populatione de crevettes Penaeides exploitees a Madagascar. Life cycle, daynamics, exploitation and management of coastal Penaeid shrimp stock. 114-116. • McCulloch, R., Penn, J.W., Sellars, M., Grewe, P., Ye, Y., Harch, B., Bravington, M., Toscas, P. (Eds.), Developing Techniques for Enhancing Prawn Fisheries, with a Focus on Brown Tiger Prawns ( Penaeus esculentus ) in Exmouth Gulf. CSIRO Marine Research, Australia , pp. 60–135 • Meager, J.J., 2003, The Microhabitat Distribution of Juvenile Banana Prawns, Penaeus merguiensis de Man and Processes Affecting their Distribution and Abundance, Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Queensland University of Technology, 1-219. • Meyer-Warden, and Tiews, K. 1965. Further results of the Cerman shrimp research. Special meeting to consider problems in the exploitation and regulation of fisheries for crustacea. Papp. Cons. Int. Mar 156. 131-138. • Menzel, R.W. 1955. Marking of shrimp. Science, N. Y, 121. 446 p. • Mohammed, K.H., El-Musa, M. and El-Ghaffar, A.R., 1981. Observation on the biology of an exploited species of shrimp, Penaeus semisulcatus in Kuwait. Kuwait Bulletin of Marine Science 2. 33-52 • Muir, J., 2005. Managing to harvest? Perspectives on the potential of aquaculture. Phil. trans. R. Soc. B 360, 191–218. • Neal, R 1968. Methods of marking shrimp. National marine fisheries service. Contribution of marine science 256. Galveston, Texas. 17 p.

/// 828282/ 82

• Niamaimandi, N., Aziz, A., Siti Khalijah, D., Che Roos, S. and Kiabi, B. 2007. Population dynamic of green tiger prawn, P. semisulcatus in Bushehr coastal waters, Persian Gulf. Fisheries research 86. 105- 112. • Niamaimandi, N., Aziz, A., Siti Khalijah, D., Che Roos, S. and Kiabi, B. 2008. Reproductive biology of the green tiger prawn ( Penaeus semisulcatus ) in coastal waters of Bushehr, Persian Gulf. – ICES Journal of Marine Science , 65: 1593–1599. • Niamaimandi, N., Aziz, A., Siti Khalijah, D., Che Roos, S. and Kiabi, B. 2010. The Movement and Migration of Shrimp, Penaeus semisulcatus in Bushehr Coastal Waters, Persian Gulf. Asian Fisheries Science 23,145-158.

• Palmer, R.M., 2008. The feasibility of stock enhancement as a management tool for dusky kob (Argyrosomus japonicus ) in South Africa. A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the • requirements of the Degree of Master of Science, Rhodes University. 179 p. • Pauly, D. and Palomores, L. 1987. Shrimp consumption by fish in Kuwait waters, a methodology, preliminary results and their implications for management and research. Kuwait Bulletin of Marine Science 9 . 101-111. • Pendery, R.P. and Vance, D.J. ; 1996. The role of coastal nursery habitats in determining the long-term productivity of prawn populations in the northern prawn fishery. Final report to the fisheries research and development corporation of Australia. FRDC 92/45. 72 p. • Purcell, S.W and Kirby, D.S., 2006. Restocking the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra : sizing no-take zones through individual-based movement modelling. Fish. Res . 80, 53–61. • Preston, N.P., Brennan, D.C and Crocos, P.J., 1999. Comparative costs of postlarval production from wild or domesticated Kuruma shrimp, Penaeus japonicus (Bate), broodstock. Aqua. Res . 30, 191–197. • Preston N.P. , Burford, M.A., Coman, F.E. and Rothlisberg, P.C., 1992, Natural diet of larval Penaeus merguiensis (: Penaeidae) and its effect on survival, Marine Biology (113), 2: 181-191. • Rothlisberg, P C. and Jackson, C J. 1987. Larval ecology of Penaeids of the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Biology of Penaeid prawns in northern Australia . 23-28. • Riley, J. D., 1966. Liquid latex marking technique for small fish. J. Cons. 30: 354-357. • Rothlisberg P.C. and Preston N.P., 1992. Technical aspects of stocking: batch marking and stock assessment. In: Recruitment Processes, Australian Society for Fish Biology Workshop (ed. by D.A. Hancock). 187-191. • Staples, D J. 1987. Effects of environmental variability and fishing pressure on the catches of penaeid prawns in Gulf of Carpentaria , Australia. IR., Poiner. Staples D J. and Kenyon, K., Seagrass communities of the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. 1987 . 121-131 • Shiagman, A., Lewinson, C. and Tom, M. 1986. Aspects of the reproductive activity of Penaeus semisulcatus along the south eastern coast of the Mediterranean. Marine biology 7(1). 15-22. • Staples, D. J., Vance, D J. and Heales, D S. 1985. Habitat requirments of juvenile penaeid prawns and their relationship to offshore fisheries. Second Australian National Prawn Seminar . NPS2 Cleveland, Australia. 41-45. • Sultan R., 2000, Bionomics and population structure of juvenile shrimp with special reference to the genus Penaeus occurring in Karachi backwaters (PhD thesis), University of Karachi, 1-259. • Tacon, A.J., 2003. Aquaculture production and trends analysis. In: Review of the State of World Aquaculture. FAO Fishery Circular No. 886, Rev . 2. FAO, Rome, pp. 5–30. • Taylor, M.D., Palmer, P.J., Fielder, D.S. and Suthers, I.M. 2005. Responsible estuarine finfish stock enhancement: an Australian perspective. Journal of Fish Biology 67(2): 299-331. • Thomas, M.M. 1975. Reproduction fecundity and sex relation of the green tiger prawn, Penaeus semisulcatus , in Cochin. C.M.F.R.I 18. 125-163. • Travis, J., Coleman, F.C., Grimes, C.B., Conover, D., Bert, T.M and Tringali, M. 1998. Critically assessing stock enhancement: an introduction to the Mote Symposium. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62, 305–311. • Trengereid, H. 2012., Shelter seeking and competitive behavior in hatchery reared juvenile European ( Homarus gammarus ) exposed to predator odors. Master of Science in Aquaculture Biology. Institute of Marine Research University of Bergen, Department of Biology. 102 p. • Uki, N., 2006. Stock enhancement of the Japanese scallop Patinopecten yessoensis in Hokkaido. Fish. Res . 80, 62–66. • Van Zalinge, N P. and Naamin, N. 1975. The cilap based trawl fishery shrimp along the south coast of Java. Penaeid shrimps-their biology and management . 99-107. 838383 /...

• Van Zalinge, N.P. 1984. The shrimp fisheries in the Gulf between Iran and Arabian Peninsula. Penaeid shrimps-their biology and management . 71-78. • Vance D.J., Haywood, M.D.E., Heales, D.S., Kenyon, R.A., Loneragan, N.R. and Pendrey, R.C., 1996, How far do prawns and fish move into mangroves? Distribution of juvenile banana prawns Penaeus merguiensis and fish in a tropical mangrove forest in northern Australia, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser ., Vol. 131: 115-124. • Vance, D.J., Haywood, M.D.E., Heales, D.S., Kenyon, R.A., and Loneragan, N.R., 1998, Seasonal and annual variation in abundance of postlarval and juvenile banana prawns Penaeus merguiensis and environmental variation in two estuaries in tropical Northeastern Australia: a six year study, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser ., 163: 21-36. • Vance, D.J., Staples, D.J. and Kerr, J.D., 1981, Factors affecting the year to year variation in the catch of banana prawns (Penaeus merguiensis) in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia, J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer 42: 83-97. • Wang, Q., Zhuang, Z., Deng, J., Ye, Y., 2006. Stock enhancement and transplantation of marine shrimp Penaeus chinensis in China. Fish. Res . 80, 67–79. • Wang, Y.G and Die, D., 1996. Stock–recruitment relationships of the tiger prawns ( Penaeus esculentus and Penaeus semisulcatus ) in the Australian Northern Prawn Fishery. Mar. Freshwater Res. 47, 87–95. • Wheeler, R.S. 1963. Immersion staining of postlarval shrimp. Ciro. Fish Wild1 , Serv 161. 90 p. • Ye, C.C., Deng, J.Y., Li, P.J and Xu, J.Z., 1995. Fishery Stock Enhancement: Theory, Method, Evaluation and Management. Fisheries Press , Jilong, in Chinese. 89 p. • Ye, Y., Loneragan, N., Die, D., Watson, R., and Harch, B. 2006, Bioeconomic modelling and risk assessment of tiger prawn ( Penaeus esculentus ) stock enhancement in Exmouth Gulf Australia, Fisheries Research 73, 231–249. • Yimin, Y., Loneragan, N., David, D., Watson , R. and Harch, B. 2005. Bioeconomic modelling and risk assessment of tiger prawn ( Penaeus esculentus ) stock enhancement in Exmouth Gulf, Australia. Fisheries Research 73. 231–249.

/// 848484/ 84

858585 /...

1:

/// 868686/ 86

2: 878787 /...

3:

/// 888888/ 88

4: 898989 /...

5:

/// 909090/ 90

( ) 6: 919191 /...

7:

/// 929292/ 92

8: 939393 /...

9:

/// 949494/ 94

10: 959595 /...

11:

/// 969696/ 96 15:19 1391/5/31 33946 : : 12:

20 : . 20 : . 20 30 « » . 10 90 : : . : . 20 . : : . . 979797 /...

: 13

89 1/8/ . TAG )) P.merguiensis ) )

. " 27 108 . .

/// 989898/ 98

17 14:

. " 1

.

2

.

3

.(optimum size)

4

.

. 5

. 6

.

. 105 .

. PCR 999999 /...

.

7

.

. 8

.

9

.

50 50 10

.

11

.

11 12

11

.

.( ) 13

.

/// 100100100

14

.

15

.

16

.

. 17

101101101 /...

Abstract Present study was conducted in the Persian Gulf (Iranian waters) from 2009 to 2012. The main objective of the research was economical evalution of the stock enhancement of banana prawn ( Fenneropenaeus merguiensis ) and green tiger shrimp ( Penaeus semisulcatus ) in the studied area. Also tagging effects on the growth and mortality of tagged shrimp were studied. In banana prawn, broodstock shrimps were hatched in June. In July 2010 and 2011some of the juvenile of this species were marked by red fluorescent liquid injection and released were made at night in the estuaries of Tiab, Kolahi and Koolgan in the Hormozgan province. 84000 juveniles of banana prawn in 2010 and about 50000 in 2011 were released in this area. In Bushehr province waters, adults shrimp were reared and when juveniles reached to optimum size, some of them were tagged by red and blue coloures and were released in the coastal waters of Bandargah and Delvar. Tagging and releasing program of green tiger prawn was performed in 2010 and 2012. A total number of 8000 prawn in 2010 and about 30000 juveniles prawn in 2010 were released. Activities for recaptured shrimps were informed by posters describing the tagging program that were distributed to local peoples, as well as local magazines, and a tagging program awareness film was broadcast on national television three times prior to the shrimp fishing season and during catch season. To encourage people to report recaptures a reward of two handered thousent riales was paid for the return of each marked shrimp accompanied by information. Economical evaluation of banana prawn was performed based on releasing and recaptured program in 2011. As it mentioned in this year 50000 of juvenile shrimp were tagged and released. At the same time 4700000 of unmarked shrimp were released in this area. In the shrimp season 11 (./022%) of tagged shrimp were recaptured. Movements of tagged shrimp were northwesterly to released area. Weight average of tagged prawns was 1.2 gram. Mean weight of the recaptured prawns was 22.06±4.9 gram. Body weight Growth of the recaptured prawns was between 16-26 grams with the growth speed of 0.88-1.41 per week. The number of recaptured prawn to the released prawn was 0.022 percent. Based on the released prawns (4700000) to the recaptured percent (./022%), about 103400 of released shrimp with mean weight of 2.5 tones were observed in the Hormozgan shrimp catch. The average price of shrimp in the studied year in the local market was 85000 Rials per kilogram. These results showed that the ratio of profit is 210 milion riales. In the taggiing program of green tiger prawn in the Bushehr waters only one recaptured shrimp was observed in the catch season (2012). Total weigth and total length of this prawn was 99 gram and 22 centimeter respectively .given the small percentage of the recaptured, economical analyses was not performed on this species. The effects of tagging on the growth and mortality of green tiger prawn were studied. The present study was carried out in the shrimp research station in Bandargah and Abzistan shrimp Hatchery Company in Delvar during 2010 and 2012. The accuracy of the study was more rialable in 2012. In this year growth and mortality of juveniles that was marked by red and blue coloures, were studied in both area Bandargah and Delvar. In Bandargah, three tanks of 300 l each with 30 specimens were used for untagged shrimp as a control group, and tagged with injected liquid fluorescent during 98 days. Length and weigh of 10 specimens were measured evenly in different times. ANOVA results ( α = 0.1 and α = 0.5) showed no significant differences between length growth of tagged shrimp and control group. The mortality of two groups was evaluated by numbering of remained shrimps and the average of survival was 52 percent in the tagged and 44.5 percent in tagged shrimps. In the Delvar station, Abzistan Company, the specimens were kept in the 9 tanks each 300 l that included of 30 untagged shrimps, 30 blue tagged shrimps and 30 red florescent tagged shrimp. The growth and mortality of this station were evaluated during 110 days. The growth rate of the specimens were measured and recorded evenly. The results of ANOVA ( α = 0.1 and α = 0.5) showed no difference significantly in the weight growth of tagged and control groups. The mortality rates among the control group, red tagged and blue tagged were 63 percent, 59 percent and 40 percent. The mortality of the groups was differences in the two stations and it seems the management and environmental conditions were more affected on the mortalities. The results of the study show that the ratio of profit to the coast is 0.46 that is covering half of the coasts, so that the expenditures are two times more than profit. This result is the minimum of economical value of stock enhacement of shrimp. The results of study showed that the injected tags into the body tissue of shrimp has no affected on the growth rate and mortality. Keywords: Stock enhancement, Banan prawn, Fenneropenaeus merguiensis , Green tiger prawn, Penaeus semisulcatus , Persian Gulf, Iranian waters

Ministry of Jihad – e – Agriculture AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, EDUCATION & EXTENSION ORGANIZATION IRANIAN FISHERIES RESEARCH ORGANIZATION – Shrimp Researsh Center

Project Title : Stock enhancement and estimation of growth rate of green tiger prawn (Penaeus semisulcatus ) and Banana shrimp ( Fenneropenaeus merguiensis ) released in the Persian Gulf Apprpved Number: 04-80-12-87021 Author: Nassir Niamaimandi Project leader : Nassir Niamaimandi Collaborator province(s): Nassir Niamaimandi (Shrimp Researsh Center), Gh.Zarshenas (Persian Gulf and Oman Sea Ecology Research Center ), H.Ansari(South Aquaculture Research Center) Collaborator(s) : H.Negarestan, F.Keymaram, S.Mohammadidoost, A.Ghavampor, S.Masandani, A.Behpori, M.Darvishi, K.Khajehnori, M.R.Sadeghi, M.Momeni, K.Khorshidian, Gh.Faghih, A.Zendehbodi, Gh.Eskandari, S.E.Safavi, Gh.Moradi, M.Barani, A.Matinfar, M.Khalilpazir, Sh.Shamsian, H.Foroghifard, M.Gharibnia Advisor(s): - Supervisor:- Location of execution : Bushehr province Date of Beginning : 2009 Period of execution : 4 Years Publisher : Iranian Fisheries Research Organization Date of publishing : 2013 All Right Reserved . No Part of this Publication May be Reproduced or Transmitted without indicating the Original Reference

MINISTRY OF JIHAD - E - AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, EDUCATION & EXTENSION ORGANIZATION IRANIAN FISHERIES RESEARCH ORGANIZATION - Shrimp Researsh Center

Project Title : Stock enhancement and estimation of growth rate of green tiger prawn ( Penaeus semisulcatus ) and Banana shrimp ( Fenneropenaeus merguiensis ) released in the Persian Gulf

Project leader : Nassir Niamaimandi

Register NO.

42959