Amendment 73 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde,

Proposal for a directive Citation 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

vu le traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union vu le traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne, et notamment son article 114, européenne, et notamment son article 167,

Or. fr

Amendment 74 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Citation 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Articles 11, 14, 16, 17, 38 thereof,

Or. en

Amendment 75 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(1) Le traité prévoit l'établissement d'un (1) Le traité prévoit que l'Union, dans le marché intérieur et l'instauration d'un système respect des compétences des Etats membres, propre à empêcher les distorsions de doit contribuer à l'épanouissement des concurrence dans le marché intérieur. cultures des États membres dans le respect de L'harmonisation des dispositions législatives leur diversité nationale et régionale. des États membres sur le droit d'auteur et les L'harmonisation des dispositions législatives des droits voisins devrait contribuer davantage à la États membres sur le droit d'auteur et les droits réalisation de ces objectifs. voisins devrait participer de la préservation de cette diversité culturelle.

Or. fr

Amendment 76 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2) The directives which have been adopted in (2) The directives which have been adopted in the area of copyright and related rights provide the area of copyright and related rights provide for a high level of protection for rightholders for a harmonised legal framework, which and create a framework wherein the contributes to the good functioning of the exploitation of works and other protected internal market. This legal framework should subject-matter can take place. This however be updated, taking into account new harmonised legal framework contributes to the digital technologies that pose new challenges good functioning of the internal market; it in finding the right balance between the stimulates innovation, creativity, investment protection of intellectual property rights and and production of new content, also in the the new possibilities for consumers and digital environment. The protection provided businesses to create, innovate, access and by this legal framework also contributes to the exchange copyright-protected works and other Union's objective of respecting and promoting subject matter. Furthermore, it should be cultural diversity while at the same time acknowledged that there is an increasing bringing the European common cultural number of cases where copyright hampers heritage to the fore. Article 167(4) of the Treaty innovation and creativity rather than fostering on the Functioning of the European Union them. An updated legal framework would requires the Union to take cultural aspects into contribute to the general public goal of account in its action. increasing access to, and favouring the dissemination of, creative content, information and knowledge, and to the Union's objective of respecting and promoting cultural diversity while at the same time bringing the European common cultural heritage to the fore. Article 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires the Union to take cultural aspects into account in its action.

Or. en

Amendment 77 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2) Les directives adoptées dans le domaine du (2) Les traditions constitutionnelles des Etats droit d’auteur et des droits voisins assurent un membres, ainsi que les directives européennes niveau élevé de protection aux titulaires de adoptées dans le domaine du droit d'auteur et droits et instaurent un cadre permettant des droits voisins ont pour but d'assurer un l’exploitation des œuvres et autres objets niveau élevé de protection aux titulaires de protégés. Ce cadre juridique harmonisé droits et instaurent un cadre permettant contribue au bon fonctionnement du marché l'exploitation des œuvres et autres objets intérieur; il stimule l'innovation, la créativité, protégés. Ce cadre juridique devrait permettre l'investissement et la production de nouveaux la préservation du patrimoine culturel et contenus, y compris dans l'environnement assurer le rayonnement des industries numérique. La protection qu'il assure soutient culturelles et créatives, l'objectif étant de également l’objectif de l’Union qui consiste à stimuler l'innovation, la créativité, respecter et à promouvoir la diversité culturelle l'investissement et la production de nouveaux tout en mettant en évidence l'héritage culturel contenus, y compris dans l'environnement commun de l'Europe . L’article 167, paragraphe numérique. La protection qu'il assure soutient 4, du traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union également l'objectif de l'Union qui consiste à européenne impose à l’Union de tenir compte respecter et à promouvoir la diversité culturelle des aspects culturels dans son action. tout en mettant en évidence l'héritage culturel commun de l'Europe . L'article 167, paragraphe 4, du traité sur le fonctionnement de l'Union européenne impose à l'Union de tenir compte des aspects culturels dans son action.

Or. fr

Amendment 78 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2) Directivele adoptate în domeniul dreptului (2) Directivele adoptate în domeniul dreptului de autor și al drepturilor conexe asigură un nivel de autor și al drepturilor conexe contribuie la ridicat de protecție a titularilor de drepturi și funcționarea pieței interne, asigură un nivel creează un cadru în care poate avea loc ridicat de protecție a titularilor de drepturi, exploatarea operelor și a altor obiecte protejate. facilitează procesul de obținere a drepturilor și Prezentul cadru juridic armonizat contribuie la creează un cadru în care poate avea loc buna funcționare a pieței interne, stimulând exploatarea operelor și a altor obiecte protejate. inovarea, creativitatea, investițiile și producerea Prezentul cadru juridic armonizat contribuie la de conținut nou, inclusiv în mediul digital. buna funcționare a pieței interne, stimulând Protecția oferită de prezentul cadru juridic inovarea, creativitatea, investițiile și producerea contribuie, de asemenea, la obiectivul Uniunii de conținut nou, inclusiv în mediul digital, de a respecta și a promova diversitatea culturală urmărind a se evita fragmentarea pe piața și, în același timp, de a aduce în prim-plan internă. Protecția oferită de prezentul cadru patrimoniul cultural comun european. Articolul juridic contribuie, de asemenea, la obiectivul 167 alineatul (4) din Tratatul privind Uniunii de a respecta și a promova diversitatea funcționarea Uniunii Europene conține cerința culturală și, în același timp, de a aduce în prim- ca Uniunea să țină seama de aspectele culturale plan patrimoniul cultural comun european. în acțiunile sale. Articolul 167 alineatul (4) din Tratatul privind funcționarea Uniunii Europene conține cerința ca Uniunea să țină seama de aspectele culturale în acțiunile sale.

Or. ro

Amendment 79 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2) The directives which have been adopted in (2) The directives which have been adopted in the area of copyright and related rights provide the area of copyright and related rights provide for a high level of protection for rightholders for a high level of protection for rightholders and create a framework wherein the exploitation and create a framework wherein the exploitation of works and other protected subject-matter can of works and other protected subject-matter can take place. This harmonised legal framework take place. This harmonised legal framework contributes to the good functioning of the contributes to the good functioning of the truly internal market; it stimulates innovation, integrated internal market; it stimulates creativity, investment and production of new innovation, creativity, investment and content, also in the digital environment. The production of new content, also in the digital protection provided by this legal framework environment. The protection provided by this also contributes to the Union's objective of legal framework also contributes to the Union's respecting and promoting cultural diversity objective of respecting and promoting cultural while at the same time bringing the European diversity while at the same time bringing the common cultural heritage to the fore. Article European common cultural heritage to the fore. 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the Article 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning European Union requires the Union to take of the European Union requires the Union to cultural aspects into account in its action. take cultural aspects into account in its action.

Or. en

Amendment 80 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2) The directives which have been adopted in (2) The directives which have been adopted in the area of copyright and related rights provide the area of copyright and related rights provide for a high level of protection for rightholders for a high level of protection for rightholders and create a framework wherein the exploitation and create a framework wherein the exploitation of works and other protected subject-matter can of works and other protected subject-matter can take place. This harmonised legal framework take place. A harmonised legal framework contributes to the good functioning of the contributes to the good functioning of the internal market; it stimulates innovation, internal market; it stimulates innovation, creativity, investment and production of new creativity, investment and production of new content, also in the digital environment. The content, also in the digital environment. The protection provided by this legal framework legal framework also contributes to the Union's also contributes to the Union's objective of objective of respecting and promoting cultural respecting and promoting cultural diversity diversity while at the same time bringing the while at the same time bringing the European European common cultural heritage to the fore. common cultural heritage to the fore. Article Article 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the of the European Union requires the Union to European Union requires the Union to take take cultural aspects into account in its action. cultural aspects into account in its action.

Or. en

Amendment 81 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3) Rapid technological developments continue (3) Rapid technological developments continue to transform the way works and other subject- to transform the way works and other subject- matter are created, produced, distributed and matter are created, produced, distributed and exploited. New business models and new actors enjoyed. New business models and new actors continue to emerge. The objectives and the continue to emerge, changing tremendously the principles laid down by the Union copyright market, contributing to stimulating framework remain sound. However, legal competition with the established players and uncertainty remains, for both rightholders and fostering creativity and innovation. The users, as regards certain uses, including cross- objectives and the principles laid down by the border uses, of works and other subject-matter Union copyright framework need to be updated in the digital environment. As set out in the and adapted in order to increase access to and Communication of the Commission entitled dissemination of content, information and ‘Towards a modern, more European copyright knowledge within the internal market. Indeed, framework’26 , in some areas it is necessary to legal uncertainty remains, for both rightholders adapt and supplement the current Union and users, as regards certain uses, including copyright framework. This Directive provides cross-border uses, of works and other subject- for rules to adapt certain exceptions and matter in the digital environment. As set out in limitations to digital and cross-border the Communication of the Commission entitled environments, as well as measures to facilitate ‘Towards a modern, more European copyright certain licensing practices as regards the framework’26 , in some areas it is necessary to dissemination of out-of-commerce works and adapt and supplement the current Union the online availability of audiovisual works on copyright framework. This Directive provides video-on-demand platforms with a view to for rules to adapt certain exceptions and ensuring wider access to content. In order to limitations to digital and cross-border achieve a well-functioning marketplace for environments, as well as measures to facilitate copyright, there should also be rules on rights certain licensing practices as regards the in publications, on the use of works and other dissemination of out-of-commerce works and subject-matter by online service providers the online availability of audiovisual works on storing and giving access to user uploaded video-on-demand platforms, and the use of content and on the transparency of authors' and works and other subject matters belonging to performers' contracts. the public domain, with a view to ensuring wider access to content. In order to achieve a well-functioning and fair marketplace for copyright, there should also be rules the transparency of authors' and performers' contracts. 26 COM(2015) 626 final. 26 COM(2015) 626 final.

Or. en

Amendment 82 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3) L'évolution rapide des technologies continue (3) L'évolution rapide des technologies continue à modifier la manière dont les œuvres et autres à modifier la manière dont les œuvres et autres objets protégés sont créés, produits, distribués et objets protégés sont créés, produits, distribués et exploités. Il apparaît sans cesse de nouveaux exploités. Il apparaît sans cesse de nouveaux modèles économiques et de nouveaux acteurs. modèles économiques et de nouveaux acteurs. Si les objectifs et les principes définis par le Si les objectifs et les principes définis par les cadre de l’Union en matière de droit d’auteur systèmes juridiques nationaux et repris par restent satisfaisants, une insécurité juridique l'Union en matière de droit d'auteur restent subsiste, tant pour les titulaires de droits que satisfaisants, une insécurité juridique subsiste, pour les utilisateurs, en ce qui concerne tant pour les titulaires de droits que pour les certaines utilisations, notamment utilisateurs, en ce qui concerne certaines transfrontières, d’œuvres et autres objets utilisations, notamment transfrontières, protégés dans l’environnement numérique. d'œuvres et autres objets protégés dans Comme l’indique la communication de la l'environnement numérique. Comme l'indique la Commission intitulée «Vers un cadre moderne communication de la Commission intitulée et plus européen pour le droit d'auteur»26 , il est «Vers un cadre moderne et plus européen pour nécessaire, dans certains domaines, d’adapter et le droit d'auteur»26 , il est nécessaire, dans de compléter le cadre actuel de l’Union en certains domaines, d'adapter et de compléter le matière de droit d’auteur. La présente directive cadre actuel de l'Union en matière de droit prévoit des règles visant à adapter certaines d'auteur. La présente directive prévoit des règles exceptions et limitations à l'environnement visant à adapter certaines exceptions et numérique et transfrontière, ainsi que des limitations à l'environnement numérique, ainsi mesures destinées à faciliter certaines pratiques que des mesures destinées à faciliter certaines d'octroi de licences pour la diffusion d'œuvres pratiques d'octroi de licences pour la diffusion indisponibles dans le commerce et à améliorer d'œuvres indisponibles dans le commerce et à la disponibilité en ligne d'œuvres audiovisuelles améliorer la disponibilité en ligne d'œuvres sur les plateformes de vidéo à la demande, en audiovisuelles sur les plateformes de vidéo à la vue d’assurer un accès plus large aux contenus. demande, en vue de trouver un équilibre entre Afin de réaliser un marché performant pour le le respect des droits des titulaires des droits droit d’auteur, il devrait également exister des d'auteurs ou droits voisins, qui façonnent le règles sur les droits dans les publications, sur financement de la création culturelle, et l’utilisation des œuvres et autres objets protégés assurer un accès plus large aux contenus. Afin par les prestataires de services en ligne qui de garantir une sécurité juridique pour toutes stockent et donnent accès à des contenus mis en les parties prenantes, il devrait également ligne par leurs utilisateurs, et sur la transparence exister des règles sur les droits dans les des contrats d'auteurs, interprètes et exécutants. publications, sur l'utilisation des œuvres et autres objets protégés par les prestataires de services en ligne qui stockent et donnent accès à des contenus mis en ligne par leurs utilisateurs, et sur la transparence des contrats d'auteurs, interprètes et exécutants. 26 COM(2015) 626 final. 26 COM(2015) 626 final.

Or. fr

Amendment 83 Julia Reda, Isabella Adinolfi, Max Andersson, Petras Auštrevičius, Brando Benifei, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, David Borrelli, Klaus Buchner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Matt Carthy, Dita Charanzová, Daniel Dalton, Fabio De Masi, , Stefan Eck, Bas Eickhout, Cornelia Ernst, Fredrick Federley, Laura Ferrara, Thomas Händel, Heidi Hautala, Benedek Jávor, Kaja Kallas, Ska Keller, Kostadinka Kuneva, Merja Kyllönen, Philippe Lamberts, Marju Lauristin, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Jiří Maštálka, Martina Michels, Victor Negrescu, Jozo Radoš, Evelyn Regner, Michel Reimon, Terry Reintke, Judith Sargentini, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Molly Scott Cato, Davor Škrlec, Igor Šoltes, Catherine Stihler, Dario Tamburrano, Indrek Tarand, Yana Toom, Ernest Urtasun, Bodil Valero, Monika Vana, Sophia in 't Veld, Josef Weidenholzer, Gabriele Zimmer, Laura Agea, Luke Ming Flanagan, , Nessa Childers, Rosa D'Amato, Marco Valli, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Florent Marcellesi

Proposal for a directive Recital 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3) Rapid technological developments continue (3) Rapid technological developments continue to transform the way works and other subject- to transform the way works and other subject- matter are created, produced, distributed and matter are created, produced, distributed and exploited. New business models and new actors exploited. New business models and new actors continue to emerge. The objectives and the continue to emerge. The objectives and the principles laid down by the Union copyright principles laid down by the Union copyright framework remain sound. However, legal framework remain sound. However, legal uncertainty remains, for both rightholders and uncertainty remains, for both rightholders and users, as regards certain uses, including cross- users, as regards certain uses, including cross- border uses, of works and other subject-matter border uses, of works and other subject-matter in the digital environment. As set out in the in the digital environment. As set out in the Communication of the Commission entitled Communication of the Commission entitled ‘Towards a modern, more European copyright ‘Towards a modern, more European copyright framework’26 , in some areas it is necessary to framework’26 , in some areas it is necessary to adapt and supplement the current Union adapt and supplement the current Union copyright framework. This Directive provides copyright framework. This Directive provides for rules to adapt certain exceptions and for rules to adapt certain exceptions and limitations to digital and cross-border limitations to digital and cross-border environments, as well as measures to facilitate environments, as well as measures to facilitate certain licensing practices as regards the certain licensing practices as regards the dissemination of out-of-commerce works and dissemination of out-of-commerce works and the online availability of audiovisual works on the online availability of audiovisual works on video-on-demand platforms with a view to video-on-demand platforms with a view to ensuring wider access to content. In order to ensuring wider access to content. In order to achieve a well-functioning marketplace for achieve a well-functioning marketplace for copyright, there should also be rules on rights copyright, there should also be rules on the in publications, on the use of works and other transparency of authors' and performers' subject-matter by online service providers contracts. storing and giving access to user uploaded content and on the transparency of authors' and performers' contracts. 26 COM(2015) 626 final. 26 COM(2015) 626 final.

Or. en

Amendment 84 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Recital 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3) Rapid technological developments continue (3) Rapid technological developments continue to transform the way works and other subject- to transform the way works and other subject- matter are created, produced, distributed and matter are created, produced, distributed and exploited. New business models and new actors exploited. Innovative new business models and continue to emerge. The objectives and the new actors continue to emerge in the Digital principles laid down by the Union copyright Single Market. The objectives and the framework remain sound. However, legal principles laid down by the Union copyright uncertainty remains, for both rightholders and framework remain sound. However, legal users, as regards certain uses, including cross- uncertainty remains, for both rightholders and border uses, of works and other subject-matter users, as regards certain uses, including cross- in the digital environment. As set out in the border uses, of works and other subject-matter Communication of the Commission entitled in the digital environment. As set out in the ‘Towards a modern, more European copyright Communication of the Commission entitled framework’26 , in some areas it is necessary to ‘Towards a modern, more European copyright adapt and supplement the current Union framework’26 , in some areas it is necessary to copyright framework. This Directive provides adapt and supplement the current Union for rules to adapt certain exceptions and copyright framework. This Directive provides limitations to digital and cross-border for rules to adapt certain exceptions and environments, as well as measures to facilitate limitations to digital and cross-border certain licensing practices as regards the environments, as well as measures to facilitate dissemination of out-of-commerce works and certain licensing practices as regards the the online availability of audiovisual works on dissemination of out-of-commerce works and video-on-demand platforms with a view to the online availability of audiovisual works on ensuring wider access to content. In order to video-on-demand platforms with a view to achieve a well-functioning marketplace for ensuring wider access to content. In order to copyright, there should also be rules on rights achieve a well-functioning marketplace for in publications, on the use of works and other copyright, there should also be a recognition of subject-matter by online service providers the rights of publishers, proportionate storing and giving access to user uploaded measures on the use of works and other subject- content and on the transparency of authors' and matter by active online service platforms which performers' contracts. make available to the public user uploaded content and on the transparency of authors' and performers' contracts. 26 COM(2015) 626 final. 26 COM(2015) 626 final.

Or. en

Amendment 85 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3) Rapidele evoluții tehnologice continuă să (3) Rapidele evoluții tehnologice continuă să transforme modul în care sunt create, produse, transforme modul în care sunt create, produse, distribuite și exploatate operele și alte obiecte distribuite și exploatate operele și alte obiecte protejate. Continuă să apară noi modele de protejate. Continuă să apară noi modele de afaceri și noi actori. Obiectivele și principiile afaceri și noi actori. Obiectivele și principiile stabilite în cadrul juridic al Uniunii privind stabilite în cadrul juridic al Uniunii privind drepturile de autor sunt în continuare valabile. drepturile de autor sunt în continuare valabile. Cu toate acestea, atât pentru titularii de drepturi, Cu toate acestea, atât pentru titularii de drepturi, cât și pentru utilizatori continuă să existe cât și pentru utilizatori continuă să existe insecuritate juridică în ceea ce privește anumite insecuritate juridică în ceea ce privește anumite utilizări, printre care și utilizările utilizări, printre care și utilizările transfrontaliere, ale operelor și ale altor obiecte transfrontaliere, ale operelor și ale altor obiecte protejate în mediul digital. După cum s-a protejate în mediul digital. După cum s-a enunțat în Comunicarea Comisiei intitulată enunțat în Comunicarea Comisiei intitulată „Către un cadru modern, mai european privind „Către un cadru modern, mai european privind drepturile de autor”26 , este necesar ca actualul drepturile de autor”26 , este necesar ca actualul cadru al UE privind drepturile de autor să fie cadru al UE privind drepturile de autor să fie adaptat și completat în anumite domenii. adaptat și completat în anumite domenii. Prezenta directivă conține norme pentru Prezenta directivă conține norme pentru adaptarea anumitor excepții și limitări la mediul adaptarea anumitor excepții și limitări la mediul digital și la cel transfrontalier, precum și măsuri digital și la cel transfrontalier, precum și măsuri pentru facilitarea anumitor practici de acordare pentru facilitarea anumitor practici de acordare a licențelor în ceea ce privește difuzarea a licențelor în ceea ce privește difuzarea operelor aflate în afara circuitului comercial și operelor aflate în afara circuitului comercial și disponibilitatea online a operelor audiovizuale disponibilitatea online a operelor audiovizuale pe platforme de video la cerere, în scopul pe platforme de video la cerere, în scopul asigurării unui acces mai larg la conținut. În asigurării unui acces mai larg la conținut. În vederea asigurării unei piețe performante a vederea asigurării unei piețe performante a drepturilor de autor, ar trebui să existe norme drepturilor de autor, ar trebui să existe norme pentru drepturile în cazul publicațiilor, pentru pentru exercitarea și valorificarea drepturilor utilizarea operelor și a altor obiecte protejate de în cazul publicațiilor, pentru utilizarea operelor către furnizorii de servicii online de stocare și și a altor obiecte protejate aflate pe platformele permitere a accesării conținutului încărcat de furnizorilor de servicii online de stocare și utilizatori și pentru transparența contractelor permitere a accesării conținutului încărcat de autorilor și ale artiștilor interpreți sau utilizatori și pentru transparența contractelor executanți. autorilor și ale artiștilor interpreți sau executanți. 26 COM(2015) 626 final. 26 COM(2015) 626 final.

Or. ro

Amendment 86 Julia Reda, Marietje Schaake, Kaja Kallas, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4) This Directive is based upon, and (4) This Directive is based upon, and complements, the rules laid down in the complements, the rules laid down in the Directives currently in force in this area, in Directives currently in force in this area, in particular Directive 96/9/EC of the European particular Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council27 , Directive Parliament and of the Council27 , Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and the Council28 , Directive 2006/115/EC of the of the Council 27a, Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council29 , European Parliament and of the Council28 , Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council30 , Directive Parliament and of the Council29 , Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliament and of 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council31 and Directive 2014/26/EU of the the Council30 , Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council32 . European Parliament and of the Council31 and Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council32 . 27 Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament 27 Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases (OJ L 77, 27.3.1996, p. 2 protection of databases (OJ L 77, 27.3.1996, p. 2 0–28). 0–28). 27a Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parlia ment and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on cert ain legal aspects of information society services,

in particular electronic commerce, in the Intern al Market (Directive on electronic commerce) ( OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1). 28 Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliam 28 Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the har ent and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the har monisation of certain aspects of copyright and rel monisation of certain aspects of copyright and rel ated rights in the information society (OJ L 167, ated rights in the information society (OJ L 167, 22.6.2001, p. 10–19). 22.6.2001, p. 10–19). 29 Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parlia 29 Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parlia ment and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on ment and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual pro related to copyright in the field of intellectual pro perty (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 28–35). perty (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 28–35). 30 Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliam 30 Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the le ent and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the le gal protection of computer programs (OJ L 111, gal protection of computer programs (OJ L 111, 5.5.2009, p. 16–22). 5.5.2009, p. 16–22). 31 Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliam 31 Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on cert ent and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on cert ain permitted uses of orphan works (OJ L 299, 27 ain permitted uses of orphan works (OJ L 299, 27 .10.2012, p. 5–12). .10.2012, p. 5–12). 32 Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliam 32 Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on co ent and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on co llective management of copyright and related rig llective management of copyright and related rig hts and multi-territorial licensing of rights in mus hts and multi-territorial licensing of rights in mus ical works for online use in the internal market ( ical works for online use in the internal market ( OJ L 84, 20.3.2014, p. 72–98). OJ L 84, 20.3.2014, p. 72–98).

Or. en

Amendment 87 Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4 bis) L'établissement d'hyperliens est au cœur du fonctionnement d'internet dans la mesure où il offre la possibilité d'accéder à un contenu depuis un autre à travers un lien cliquable et assure ainsi une véritable circulation de l'information en ligne, y compris pour ce qui est de la mise à disposition d'oeuvres ou d'autres objets protégés par le droit d'auteur. Dans ce contexte et afin d'assurer la sécurité juridique du public, il convient de rappeler qu'un hyperlien ne devrait pas constituer un acte de communication au public, dans les seuls cas où ayant été établi dans un but non- commercial, il dirige l'utilisateur vers un service en ligne où l'oeuvre ou l'objet protégé est accessible sans restriction, sans que pour cela il ait été fait recours à des techniques consistant, à l'instar de la transclusion, à faire apparaître le contenu sur le site dont l'hyperlien est originaire, et à la condition que la personne l'ayant établi ne savait ni n'avait de raisons valables de penser que l'oeuvre ou l'objet protégé a été publié sans autorisation sur le service en ligne de destination.

Or. fr

Amendment 88 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Buda, Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4 a) For the purpose of the application of Union law in the field of copyright, in particular of this directive, and in order to guarantee a strong level of protection for rightholders, it should be recalled that an act of communication to the public and/or of making available occurs whenever an access is given to a protected work or any other subject-

matter to people outside the normal circle or who do not belong to the closest social acquaintances of the family of the person providing such an access, irrespective of whether these people are at the same place or in different ones, or whether they perceive the protected works or other subject-matters at the same time or in different ones.

Or. en

Amendment 89 Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4 a) Prezenta directivă și prevederile sale nu se referă și nu constituie o barieră legală

pentru activitatea motoarelor de căutare și distribuitorilor de conținut digital.

Or. ro

Amendment 90 Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4 b) Prezenta directivă recunoaște drepturile utilizatorilor de servicii digitale la folosirea

unor facilități gratuite de acces la conținut online.

Or. ro

Amendment 91 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5) In the fields of research, education and (5) In the fields of research, education and preservation of cultural heritage, digital preservation of cultural heritage, digital technologies permit new types of uses that are technologies permit new types of uses that are not clearly covered by the current Union rules not clearly covered by the current Union rules on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the optional nature of exceptions and limitations optional nature of exceptions and limitations provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively and 2009/24/EC in these fields and in the field impact the functioning of the internal market. of education may negatively impact the This is particularly relevant as regards cross- functioning of the internal market. This is border uses, which are becoming increasingly particularly relevant as regards cross-border important in the digital environment. Therefore, uses, which are becoming increasingly the existing exceptions and limitations in Union important in the digital environment. Therefore, law that are relevant for scientific research, the existing exceptions and limitations in Union teaching and preservation of cultural heritage law that are relevant for scientific research, should be reassessed in the light of those new teaching and preservation of cultural heritage uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for should be reassessed in the light of those new uses of text and data mining technologies in the uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for field of scientific research, illustration for uses of text and data mining technologies in the teaching in the digital environment and for field of scientific research, illustration for preservation of cultural heritage should be teaching in the digital environment and for introduced. For uses not covered by the preservation of cultural heritage should be exceptions or the limitation provided for in this introduced. For uses not covered by the Directive, the exceptions and limitations exceptions or the limitation provided for in this existing in Union law should continue to apply. Directive, the exceptions and limitations Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be existing in Union law should continue to apply. adapted. Member States should be able to adopt or maintain in force broader provisions, compatible with the exceptions and limitations existing in Union law, for uses covered by the exceptions or the limitation provided for in this Directive. Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be adapted.

Or. en

Amendment 92 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5) In the fields of research, education and (5) In the fields of research, innovation, preservation of cultural heritage, digital education and preservation of cultural heritage, technologies permit new types of uses that are digital technologies permit new types of uses not clearly covered by the current Union rules that are not clearly covered by the current Union on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the rules on exceptions and limitations. In addition, optional nature of exceptions and limitations the optional nature of exceptions and limitations provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively impact the functioning of the internal market. impact the functioning of the internal market. This is particularly relevant as regards cross- This is particularly relevant as regards cross- border uses, which are becoming increasingly border uses, which are becoming increasingly important in the digital environment. Therefore, important in the digital environment. Therefore, the existing exceptions and limitations in Union the existing exceptions and limitations in Union law that are relevant for scientific research, law that are relevant for innovation, scientific teaching and preservation of cultural heritage research, teaching and preservation of cultural should be reassessed in the light of those new heritage should be reassessed in the light of uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for those new uses. Mandatory exceptions or uses of text and data mining technologies in the limitations for uses of text and data mining field of scientific research, illustration for technologies in the field of scientific research, teaching in the digital environment and for illustration for teaching in the digital preservation of cultural heritage should be environment and for preservation of cultural introduced. For uses not covered by the heritage should be introduced. For uses not exceptions or the limitation provided for in this covered by the exceptions or the limitation Directive, the exceptions and limitations provided for in this Directive, the exceptions existing in Union law should continue to apply. and limitations existing in Union law should Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be continue to apply. Therefore, existing well- adapted. functioning exceptions in these fields may continue to be available in Member States, as long as they do not restrict the scope of the exceptions or limitations provided for in this Directive. Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be adapted.

Or. en

Amendment 93 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5) In the fields of research, education and (5) In the fields of research, education, preservation of cultural heritage, digital preservation of cultural heritage and public technologies permit new types of uses that are lending of literary works, digital technologies not clearly covered by the current Union rules permit new types of uses that are not clearly on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the covered by the current Union rules on optional nature of exceptions and limitations exceptions and limitations. In addition, the provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC optional nature of exceptions and limitations and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, impact the functioning of the internal market. 2006/115/EC, 96/9/EC and 2009/24/EC in these This is particularly relevant as regards cross- fields may negatively impact the functioning of border uses, which are becoming increasingly the internal market and the access to creative important in the digital environment. Therefore, content, information and knowledge. This is the existing exceptions and limitations in Union particularly relevant as regards cross-border law that are relevant for scientific research, uses, which are becoming increasingly teaching and preservation of cultural heritage important in the digital environment. Therefore, should be reassessed in the light of those new the existing exceptions and limitations in Union uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for law that are relevant for scientific research, uses of text and data mining technologies in the teaching, preservation of cultural heritage and field of scientific research, illustration for public lending of literary works, should be teaching in the digital environment and for reassessed in the light of those new uses. preservation of cultural heritage should be Mandatory exceptions or limitations for uses of introduced. For uses not covered by the text and data mining technologies in the field of exceptions or the limitation provided for in this scientific research, illustration for teaching and Directive, the exceptions and limitations scientific research in the digital environment, existing in Union law should continue to apply. preservation of cultural heritage, public lending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be of literary works, and out-of-commerce works adapted. should be introduced. For uses not covered by the exceptions or the limitation provided for in this Directive, the exceptions and limitations existing in Union law should continue to apply. Directives 96/9/EC, 2001/29/EC and 2006/115/EC should be adapted.

Or. en

Amendment 94 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5) Dans les domaines de la recherche, de (5) Dans les domaines de la recherche, de l’éducation et de la préservation du patrimoine l'éducation et de la préservation du patrimoine culturel, les technologies numériques permettent culturel, les technologies numériques permettent de nouveaux types d’utilisations qui ne sont pas de nouveaux types d'utilisations qui ont d'ores clairement encadrées par les règles de l’Union et déjà été pris en comptes par certains Etats en vigueur en matière d'exceptions et de membres mais ne sont pas clairement encadrées limitations. En outre, le caractère facultatif des par les règles de l'Union en vigueur en matière exceptions et limitations prévues par les d'exceptions et de limitations. En outre, directives 2001/29/CE, 96/9/CE et 2009/24/CE certaines exceptions et limitations sont dores et dans ces domaines pourrait avoir des déjà prévues par les directives 2001/29/CE, conséquences néfastes sur le fonctionnement 96/9/CE et 2009/24/CE dans ces domaines. Il du marché intérieur, ce qui vaut en particulier conviendrait donc de réévaluer à la lumière de pour les utilisations transfrontières, dont ces nouvelles utilisations les exceptions et l'importance ne cesse de croître dans limitations prévues actuellement par la l’environnement numérique. Il conviendrait législation européenne et qui sont pertinentes donc de réévaluer à la lumière de ces nouvelles pour la recherche scientifique, l'enseignement et utilisations les exceptions et limitations prévues la préservation du patrimoine culturel. Il y aurait actuellement par la législation européenne et qui lieu d'instaurer des exceptions ou limitations sont pertinentes pour la recherche scientifique, facultatives pour l'utilisation de technologies de l’enseignement et la préservation du patrimoine fouille de textes dans le domaine de la recherche culturel. Il y aurait lieu d'instaurer des scientifique, l'illustration à des fins exceptions ou limitations obligatoires pour d'enseignement dans l'environnement l'utilisation de technologies de fouille de textes numérique et la préservation du patrimoine et de données dans le domaine de la recherche culturel. S'agissant des utilisations non scientifique, l'illustration à des fins couvertes par les exceptions ou la limitation d’enseignement dans l’environnement prévues par la présente directive, les exceptions numérique et la préservation du patrimoine et limitations en vigueur dans le droit de l'Union culturel. S'agissant des utilisations non devraient continuer à s'appliquer. Il conviendrait couvertes par les exceptions ou la limitation d'adapter les directives 96/9/CE et 2001/29/CE. prévues par la présente directive, les exceptions et limitations en vigueur dans le droit de l’Union devraient continuer à s’appliquer. Il conviendrait d'adapter les directives 96/9/CE et 2001/29/CE.

Or. fr

Amendment 95 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5) In the fields of research, education and (5) In the fields of research, education and preservation of cultural heritage, digital preservation of cultural heritage, digital technologies permit new types of uses that are technologies permit new types of uses that are not clearly covered by the current Union rules not clearly covered by the current Union rules on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the optional nature of exceptions and limitations optional nature of exceptions and limitations provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively impact the functioning of the internal market. impact the functioning of the internal market. This is particularly relevant as regards cross- This is particularly relevant as regards cross- border uses, which are becoming increasingly border uses, which are becoming increasingly important in the digital environment. Therefore, important in the digital environment. Therefore, the existing exceptions and limitations in Union the existing exceptions and limitations in Union law that are relevant for scientific research, law that are relevant for scientific research, teaching and preservation of cultural heritage teaching, libraries and preservation of cultural should be reassessed in the light of those new heritage should be reassessed in the light of uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for those new uses. Mandatory exceptions or uses of text and data mining technologies in the limitations for uses of text and data mining field of scientific research, illustration for technologies in the field of scientific research, teaching in the digital environment and for illustration for teaching in the digital preservation of cultural heritage should be environment, for preservation of cultural introduced. For uses not covered by the heritage, for user-generated content and for exceptions or the limitation provided for in this the reproduction of works permanently Directive, the exceptions and limitations situated in public places should be introduced. existing in Union law should continue to apply. For uses not covered by the exceptions or the Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be limitation provided for in this Directive, the adapted. exceptions and limitations existing in Union law should continue to apply. Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be adapted.

Or. en

Justification

The inclusion of libraries as relevant establishments is reasonable because they have an important role in the field of research, education and preservation of cultural heritage.

Amendment 96 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5) In the fields of research, education and (5) In the fields of research, innovation, preservation of cultural heritage, digital education and preservation of cultural heritage, technologies permit new types of uses that are digital technologies permit new types of uses not clearly covered by the current Union rules that are not clearly covered by the current Union on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the rules on exceptions and limitations. In addition, optional nature of exceptions and limitations the optional nature of exceptions and limitations provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively and 2009/24/EC in these fields negatively impact the functioning of the internal market. impacts the functioning of the internal market. This is particularly relevant as regards cross- This is particularly relevant as regards cross- border uses, which are becoming increasingly border uses, which are becoming increasingly important in the digital environment. Therefore, important in the digital environment. Therefore, the existing exceptions and limitations in Union the existing exceptions and limitations in Union law that are relevant for scientific research, law that are relevant for scientific research, teaching and preservation of cultural heritage teaching and preservation of cultural heritage should be reassessed in the light of those new should be reassessed in the light of those new uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for uses of text and data mining technologies in the uses of text and data mining technologies in the field of scientific research, illustration for field of scientific research and innovation, teaching in the digital environment and for illustration for teaching in the digital preservation of cultural heritage should be environment and for preservation of cultural introduced. For uses not covered by the heritage should be introduced. For uses not exceptions or the limitation provided for in this covered by the exceptions or the limitation Directive, the exceptions and limitations provided for in this Directive, the exceptions existing in Union law should continue to apply. and limitations existing in Union law should Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be continue to apply. Directives 96/9/EC and adapted. 2001/29/EC should be adapted.

Or. en

Amendment 97 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5) In the fields of research, education and (5) In the fields of research and innovation, preservation of cultural heritage, digital transformative use, education and cultural technologies permit new types of uses that are heritage, digital technologies permit new types not clearly covered by the current Union rules of uses that are not clearly covered by the on exceptions and limitations. In addition, the current Union rules on exceptions and optional nature of exceptions and limitations limitations. In addition, the optional nature of provided for in Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC exceptions and limitations provided for in and 2009/24/EC in these fields may negatively Directives 2001/29/EC, 96/9/EC and impact the functioning of the internal market. 2009/24/EC negatively impacts the functioning This is particularly relevant as regards cross- of the internal market. This is particularly border uses, which are becoming increasingly relevant as regards cross-border uses, which are important in the digital environment. Therefore, becoming increasingly important in the digital the existing exceptions and limitations in Union environment. Therefore, the existing exceptions law that are relevant for scientific research, and limitations in Union law that are relevant teaching and preservation of cultural heritage for research, teaching and preservation of should be reassessed in the light of those new cultural heritage should be reassessed and uses. Mandatory exceptions or limitations for complemented in the light of those new uses. uses of text and data mining technologies in the Mandatory exceptions or limitations for uses of field of scientific research, illustration for text and data mining technologies, illustration teaching in the digital environment and for for teaching , user-generated content, freedom preservation of cultural heritage should be of panorama and for preservation and introduced. For uses not covered by the dissemination of cultural heritage should be exceptions or the limitation provided for in this introduced. For uses not covered by the Directive, the exceptions and limitations exceptions or limitations provided for in this existing in Union law should continue to apply. Directive, the exceptions and limitations Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be existing in Union law should continue to apply. adapted. Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC should be adapted.

Or. en

Amendment 98 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5 bis) Les moteurs de recherche englobent une grande variété de services dont l'objectif est en principe de permettre au public d'accéder aux ressources disséminées sur internet. La nature des actes accomplis par ces entités diffère toutefois grandement d'un service à l'autre. Alors que les moteurs de recherche textuels fournissent un lien hypertexte cliquable dont l'objet essentiel est de conduire les utilisateurs au service en ligne référence, la plupart des moteurs de recherche spécialisés dans l'image affichent directement les œuvres référencées dans les résultats de recherche, de manière autonome par rapport au service en ligne dont elles sont issues.

Les images pouvant ensuite être consultées dans leur format original et en haute qualité, ces moteurs de recherche s'apparentent donc davantage dans leurs fonctionnalités, à des banques d'images. Les exploitations d'œuvres graphiques, plastiques ou photographiques relèvent en conséquence de l'autorisation des titulaires de droits en application des articles 2 et 3 de la directive 2001/29/CE. Compte tenu du nombre très important d'images reproduites ou communiquées au public par ces moteurs de recherche, il convient de laisser aux Etats membres la faculté de mettre en oeuvre des solutions équilibrées, assorties d'une compensation équitable.

Or. fr

Amendment 99 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Joëlle Bergeron

Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5 bis) En application du respect des principes de subsidiarité et de proportionnalité, dans les États membres où l'usage commercial du droit de panorama n'est pas autorisé, les reproductions et représentations d'œuvres architecturales et de sculptures placées en permanence sur la voie publique, réalisées par des personnes physiques doivent toujours faire l'objet d'autorisation préalable des auteurs, de leurs ayant droits ou des sociétés de gestion collective.

Le paragraphe 37 de la résolution du Parlement du 9 juillet 2015 sur la mise en œuvre de la Directive 2001/29/CE, précise que ce sujet pourrait bénéficier de règles davantage harmonisées, tout en remarquant que des différences peuvent être justifiées afin de permettre aux États membres de légiférer en fonction de leurs propres intérêts culturels et économiques.

Or. fr

Amendment 100 Virginie Rozière, , Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5 a) The Communication of the Commission Promoting a fair, efficient and competitive European copyright-based economy in the Digital Single Market (COM(2016)0592) underlines, in accordance with the impact assessment and the public consultation, that there is no evidence, as regard to cross-border issues or obstacle, that requires the Union to introduce a new "panorama exception". The

European Parliament, in its Resolution of 9 July 2015 on the implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society followed this line and did not include this exception as requiring further EU harmonisation.

Or. en

Amendment 101 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, Frédérique Ries, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 5 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(5 ter) Le droit de communication au public et le droit de mise à disposition du public définis à l'article 3 de la directive, qui met en oeuvre les principes et règles définis à l'article 8 du traité de l'OMPI sur le droit d'auteur auquel

l'Union est partie, jouent un rôle essentiel dans la société de l'information. Le droit de l'Union doit en garantir l'effet et l'efficacité pour offrir un niveau de protection élevé aux titulaires de droits.

Or. fr

Amendment 102 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 6

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(6) The exceptions and the limitation set out in (6) The exceptions and the limitation set out in this Directive seek to achieve a fair balance this Directive seek to achieve a fair balance between the rights and interests of authors and between the specific rights and interests of other rightholders on the one hand, and of users authors and other rightholders on the one hand, on the other. They can be applied only in certain and of users on the other. They can be applied special cases which do not conflict with the in certain special cases which do not conflict normal exploitation of the works or other with the normal exploitation of the works or subject-matter and do not unreasonably other subject-matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholders. rightholders. The public goal of favouring the creation, dissemination and access to content, information and knowledge within the internal market should be also duly taken into account in the balance of the different interests at stake.

Or. en

Amendment 103 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 6

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(6) Excepțiile și limitarea stabilite în prezenta (6) Excepțiile și limitările stabilite în prezenta directivă au scopul de a asigura un echilibru directivă au scopul de a asigura un echilibru corect între drepturile și interesele autorilor și corect între drepturile și interesele autorilor și ale altor titulari de drepturi, pe de o parte, și cele ale altor titulari de drepturi, pe de o parte, și cele ale utilizatorilor, pe de altă parte. Acestea pot fi ale utilizatorilor, pe de altă parte. Acestea pot fi aplicate doar în anumite cazuri speciale care nu aplicate doar în anumite cazuri speciale care nu sunt în contradicție cu exploatarea normală a sunt în contradicție cu exploatarea normală a operelor sau a altor obiecte protejate și în care operelor sau a altor obiecte protejate și în care interesele legitime ale titularilor de drepturi nu interesele legitime ale titularilor de drepturi nu sunt lezate în mod nejustificat. sunt lezate în mod nejustificat. Excepțiile conțin, de asemenea, condiții prin care se asigură conservarea bunei funcționări a piețelor, se protejează interesele titularilor de drepturi și se încurajează creația și investițiile.

Or. ro

Amendment 104 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 6

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(6) The exceptions and the limitation set out in (6) The exceptions and the limitation set out in this Directive seek to achieve a fair balance this Directive seek to achieve a fair balance between the rights and interests of authors and between the rights and interests of authors and other rightholders on the one hand, and of users other rightholders on the one hand, and of users on the other. They can be applied only in certain on the other. They can be applied only in certain special cases which do not conflict with the special cases which do not conflict with the normal exploitation of the works or other normal exploitation of the works or other subject-matter and do not unreasonably subject-matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholders. rightholders. Such cases concern, in particular, access to education, knowledge and cultural heritage and as such, are generally in the public interest.

Or. en

Amendment 105 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 6

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(6) Les exceptions et la limitation définies par la (6) Les exceptions et la limitation définies par la présente directive tendent vers un juste présente directive devraient tendre vers un juste équilibre entre les droits et les intérêts des équilibre entre les droits et les intérêts des auteurs et autres titulaires de droits, d’une part, auteurs et autres titulaires de droits, d'une part, et des utilisateurs, d’autre part. Elles ne peuvent et des utilisateurs, d'autre part. Elles ne s'appliquer que dans certains cas particuliers qui devraient pouvoir s'appliquer que dans certains ne portent pas atteinte à l'exploitation normale cas particuliers et ne pas porter atteinte à de l'œuvre ou autre objet protégé ni ne causent l'exploitation normale de l'œuvre ou autre objet un préjudice injustifié aux intérêts légitimes des protégé ni causer un préjudice injustifié aux titulaires de droits. intérêts légitimes des titulaires de droits.

Or. fr

Amendment 106 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 6

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(6) The exceptions and the limitation set out in (6) The exceptions and limitations set out in this this Directive seek to achieve a fair balance Directive seek to achieve a fair balance between between the rights and interests of authors and the rights and interests of authors and other other rightholders on the one hand, and of users rightholders on the one hand, and of users on on the other. They can be applied only in the other. They have been designed to apply certain special cases which do not conflict with only to certain special cases which do not the normal exploitation of the works or other conflict with the normal exploitation of the subject-matter and do not unreasonably works or other subject-matter and do not prejudice the legitimate interests of the unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests rightholders. of the rightholders.

Or. en

Amendment 107 Laura Ferrara, Isabella Adinolfi, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(6 bis) I consumatori oltre ad essere fruitori sono, sempre più spesso in particolare in un ambiente digitale, anche creatori e distributori di opere dagli stessi create, ancorché per finalitá non commerciali.

Or. it

Amendment 108 Julia Reda, Lucy Anderson, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg

Proposal for a directive Recital 7

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(7) The protection of technological measures (7) The protection of technological measures established in Directive 2001/29/EC remains established in Directive 2001/29/EC was essential to ensure the protection and the established to ensure the protection and the effective exercise of the rights granted to effective exercise of the rights granted to authors and to other rightholders under Union authors and to other rightholders under Union law. This protection should be maintained law. The scope of this protection should be while ensuring that the use of technological adapted in order to better ensure that the use of measures does not prevent the enjoyment of the technological measures does not prevent the exceptions and the limitation established in this users' rights to make use of the exceptions and Directive, which are particularly relevant in the limitations established in this Directive, which online environment. Rightholders should have are particularly relevant in the online the opportunity to ensure this through voluntary environment. Rightholders are often not best measures. They should remain free to choose placed to ensure this through voluntary the format and the modalities to provide the measures, because technological protection beneficiaries of the exceptions and the measures are most commonly put in place by limitation established in this Directive with the entities other than the rightsholders. All actors means to benefit from them provided that such in the value chain should provide the means are appropriate. In the absence of beneficiaries of the exceptions and limitations voluntary measures, Member States should take established in this Directive, in Directive appropriate measures in accordance with the 96/9/EC, Directive 2001/29/EC, Directive first subparagraph of Article 6(4) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU, with 2001/29/EC. the means to benefit from them. Member States should take appropriate measures in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(4) of Directive 2001/29/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 109 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 7

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(7) The protection of technological measures (7) The protection of technological measures established in Directive 2001/29/EC remains established in Directive 2001/29/EC remains essential to ensure the protection and the important to ensure the protection and the effective exercise of the rights granted to effective exercise of the rights granted to authors and to other rightholders under Union authors and to other rightholders under Union law. This protection should be maintained while law. This protection should be maintained while ensuring that the use of technological measures ensuring that the use of technological measures does not prevent the enjoyment of the does not prevent or hinder in any way the exceptions and the limitation established in this enjoyment of the exceptions and the limitation Directive, which are particularly relevant in the established in this Directive, which are online environment. Rightholders should have particularly relevant in the online environment. the opportunity to ensure this through voluntary Rightholders should have the opportunity to measures. They should remain free to choose ensure this through voluntary effective the format and the modalities to provide the measures. They should remain free to choose beneficiaries of the exceptions and the the format and the modalities to provide the limitation established in this Directive with the beneficiaries of the exceptions and the means to benefit from them provided that such limitation established in this Directive with the means are appropriate. In the absence of means to effectively benefit from them provided voluntary measures, Member States should take that such means are transparent, non- appropriate measures in accordance with the discriminatory and proportionate. In the first subparagraph of Article 6(4) of Directive absence of voluntary effective measures, 2001/29/EC. Member States should take appropriate measures in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(4) of Directive 2001/29/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 110 Julia Reda, Lucy Anderson, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg

Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(7 a) In order to ensure that technological measures do not prevent the enjoyment of the exceptions and limitations established in this Directive and in Directive 2001/29/EC, Directive 96/9/EC, Directive 2009/24/EC or Directive 2012/28/EU, Article 6(4) of Directive 2001/29/EC needs to be updated in order to take account of the fact that in the marketplace, rightsholders are often unable to make available to the beneficiary of an exception or limitation the means of benefiting from that exception or limitation, because technological protection measures are generally not applied by the rightsholders themselves, but by third party suppliers who provide the content to consumers, such as online marketplaces, some of whom enjoy a dominant market position. The inability of users to make use of their rights under copyright exceptions and limitations is not just having a negative impact on users' fundamental rights, it is also detrimental to rightsholders who often find themselves in a weaker bargaining position vis-à-vis suppliers of digital content, especially when consumers are locked into the products and services offered by that seller through the use of technological measures. It is therefore insufficient to require Member States only to place obligations upon the rightsholders, who are generally unable to remove the technological protection measures put on their works by third parties. In addition, the act of circumventing technological protection measures for the purposes of enjoying exceptions and limitations to copyright and related rights needs to be exempted from the general legal protection of effective technological measures enshrined in Article 6(1) and 6(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC. Furthermore, the definition of "technological measures" in Article 6(3) of Directive 2001/29/EC needs to be clarified so as not to include measures which are designed to restrict authorised uses under copyright exceptions and limitations.

Or. en

Amendment 111 Tadeusz Zwiefka

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) New technologies enable the automated deleted computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large amounts of information to gain new knowledge and discover new trends. Whilst text and data mining technologies are prevalent across the digital economy, there is widespread acknowledgment that text and data mining can in particular benefit the research community and in so doing encourage innovation. However, in the Union, research organisations such as universities and research institutes are confronted with legal uncertainty as to the extent to which they can perform text and data mining of content. In certain instances, text and data mining may involve acts protected by copyright and/or by the sui generis database right, notably the reproduction of works or other subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents from a database. Where there is no exception or limitation which applies, an authorisation to undertake such acts would be required from rightholders. Text and data mining may also be carried out in relation to mere facts or data which are not protected by copyright and in such instances no authorisation would be required.

Or. en

Amendment 112 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) New technologies enable the automated (8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those generally known as text and data mining. Text technologies allow researchers to process large and data mining allows for the reading and amounts of information to gain new analysis of large amounts of digitally stored knowledge and discover new trends. Whilst information to gain new knowledge and text and data mining technologies are prevalent discover new trends. across the digital economy, there is widespread acknowledgment that text and data mining can in particular benefit the research community and in so doing encourage innovation. However, in the Union, research organisations such as universities and research institutes are confronted with legal uncertainty as to the extent to which they can perform text and data mining of content. In certain instances, text and data mining may involve acts protected by copyright and/or by the sui generis database right, notably the reproduction of works or other subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents from a database. Where there is no exception or limitation which applies, an authorisation to undertake such acts would be required from rightholders. Text and data mining may also be carried out in relation to mere facts or data which are not protected by copyright and in such instances no authorisation would be required.

Or. en

Amendment 113 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) New technologies enable the automated (8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large technologies allow the processing of large amounts of information to gain new knowledge amounts of information to gain new knowledge and discover new trends. Whilst text and data and discover new trends. Whilst text and data mining technologies are prevalent across the mining technologies are prevalent across the digital economy, there is widespread digital economy, there is widespread acknowledgment that text and data mining can acknowledgment that there is a need to clarify in particular benefit the research community the legality of copies made for purposes of text and in so doing encourage innovation. and data mining in order to encourage However, in the Union, research organisations innovation and discovery in all fields. Without such as universities and research institutes are a mandatory exception applying throughout confronted with legal uncertainty as to the the Union, all entities engaging in text and extent to which they can perform text and data data mining, including research organisations mining of content. In certain instances, text such as universities and research institutes are and data mining may involve acts protected by confronted with legal uncertainty as to the copyright and/or by the sui generis database extent to which they can perform text and data right, notably the reproduction of works or mining of content. For text and data mining to other subject-matter and/or the extraction of occur, one first needs to access information contents from a database. Where there is no and then to reproduce that information. It is exception or limitation which applies, an generally only after that information is authorisation to undertake such acts would be normalised that its processing through text and required from rightholders. Text and data data mining can occur. Once there is lawful mining may also be carried out in relation to access to information, it is when that mere facts or data which are not protected by information is being normalised that a copyright and in such instances no copyright protected use takes place since this authorisation would be required. leads to a reproduction by changing the format of the information itself or an extraction from a database into one that can be subjected to text and data mining. The copyright relevant processes in the use of text and data mining technology is consequently not the text and data mining process itself which consists of a reading and analysis of digitally stored normalised information, but the process of access and the process by which information is normalised to enable its automated computational analysis. The process of access to information be it works or other subject matter protected by copyright is already regulated in the copyright related acquis. In certain instances, text and data mining could involve works protected by copyright and/or by the sui generis database right. Text and data mining may also be carried out in relation to mere facts or data which are not protected by copyright.

Or. en

Amendment 114 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) New technologies enable the automated (8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large technologies allow the processing of large amounts of information to gain new knowledge amounts of information for research purposes and discover new trends. Whilst text and data to gain new knowledge and discover new mining technologies are prevalent across the trends. Whilst text and data mining technologies digital economy, there is widespread are prevalent across the digital economy, there acknowledgment that text and data mining can is widespread acknowledgment that text and in particular benefit the research community and data mining can in particular benefit the in so doing encourage innovation. However, in research community and in so doing encourage the Union, research organisations such as innovation and competitiveness. However, in universities and research institutes are the Union, when research is carried out by confronted with legal uncertainty as to the educational establishments and organisations extent to which they can perform text and data such as universities, the public sector, cultural mining of content. In certain instances, text and heritage institutions, and research institutes, data mining may involve acts protected by there is legal uncertainty as to the extent to copyright and/or by the sui generis database which they can perform text and data mining of right, notably the reproduction of works or other content. In certain instances, text and data subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents mining may involve acts protected by copyright from a database. Where there is no exception or and/or by the sui generis database right, notably limitation which applies, an authorisation to the reproduction of works or other subject- undertake such acts would be required from matter and/or the extraction of contents from a rightholders. Text and data mining may also be database. Where there is no exception or carried out in relation to mere facts or data limitation which applies, an authorisation to which are not protected by copyright and in undertake such acts would be required from such instances no authorisation would be rightholders. Text and data mining may also be required. carried out in relation to mere facts or data which are not protected by copyright and in such instances no authorisation would be required.

Or. en

Amendment 115 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) New technologies enable the automated (8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large technologies allow to process large amounts of amounts of information to gain new knowledge digitally stored information to gain new and discover new trends. Whilst text and data knowledge and discover new trends. Text and mining technologies are prevalent across the data mining technologies are prevalent across digital economy, there is widespread the digital economy and there is a widespread acknowledgment that text and data mining can acknowledgment that text and data mining can in particular benefit the research community and in particular benefit not only the research in so doing encourage innovation. However, in community but also start ups and in so doing the Union, research organisations such as encourage innovation. In certain instances, text universities and research institutes are and data mining may involve acts protected by confronted with legal uncertainty as to the copyright and/or by the sui generis database extent to which they can perform text and data right, notably the reproduction of works or other mining of content. In certain instances, text and subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents data mining may involve acts protected by from a database. This is where research copyright and/or by the sui generis database organisations such as universities and right, notably the reproduction of works or other research institutes as well as businesses that subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents use text and data mining as their main tool are from a database. Where there is no exception or confronted with legal uncertainty as to the limitation which applies, an authorisation to extent to which they can perform text and data undertake such acts would be required from mining of content. Where there is no exception rightholders. Text and data mining may also be or limitation which applies, an authorisation to carried out in relation to mere facts or data undertake such acts would be required from which are not protected by copyright and in rightholders. Text and data mining may also be such instances no authorisation would be carried out in relation to mere facts or data required. which are not protected by copyright and in such instances no authorisation would be required.

Or. en

Amendment 116 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) Les nouvelles technologies permettent une (8) Les nouvelles technologies permettent une analyse informatique automatisée analyse informatique automatisée d’informations sous forme numérique, telles que d'informations sous forme numérique, telles que du texte, des sons, des images ou d’autres du texte, des sons, des images ou d'autres données, ce que l'on appelle généralement «la données, ce que l'on appelle généralement «la fouille de textes et de données». Ces fouille de textes et de données». Si ces technologies permettent aux chercheurs de technologies permettent aux chercheurs de traiter de grandes quantités d’informations pour traiter de grandes quantités d'informations pour acquérir de nouvelles connaissances et acquérir de nouvelles connaissances et découvrir de nouvelles tendances. Alors que les découvrir de nouvelles tendances, leurs technologies de fouille de textes et de données utilisations doivent être encadrées et limitées sont très répandues dans l’ensemble de aux seuls usages non commerciaux, l’économie numérique, il est largement notamment en ce qui concerne l'analyse de reconnu que cette fouille peut être en données. En effet, si la fouille de texte peut particulier profitable à la communauté des s'avérer profitable en matière de recherches et chercheurs et ainsi favoriser l’innovation. Or, d'innovation, elle ne doit pas porter atteinte de dans l’Union, les organismes de recherche tels façon disproportionnelle au droit d'auteur, et que les universités et les instituts de recherche ce, par une logique de profits qui viendrait se sont confrontés à une insécurité juridique, ne substituer à l'objectif pédagogique. Dans sachant pas dans quelle mesure il leur est certains cas, la fouille de textes et de données possible d'effectuer une fouille de textes et de peut porter sur des actes protégés par le droit données sur des contenus. Dans certains cas, la d'auteur et/ou par le droit sui generis de la base fouille de textes et de données peut porter sur de données, notamment en ce qui concerne la des actes protégés par le droit d’auteur et/ou par reproduction d'œuvres ou autres objets protégés le droit sui generis de la base de données, et/ou l'extraction de contenus d'une base de notamment en ce qui concerne la reproduction données. En l'absence d'exception ou de d’œuvres ou autres objets protégés et/ou limitation applicable, l'autorisation de procéder l’extraction de contenus d’une base de données. à de tels actes devrait être demandée aux En l'absence d’exception ou de limitation titulaires de droits. La fouille de textes et de applicable, l'autorisation de procéder à de tels données peut également être effectuée pour de actes devrait être demandée aux titulaires de simples éléments factuels ou données non droits. La fouille de textes et de données peut protégés par le droit d'auteur et aucune également être effectuée pour de simples autorisation ne serait nécessaire dans ce cas. éléments factuels ou données non protégés par le droit d’auteur et aucune autorisation ne serait nécessaire dans ce cas.

Or. fr

Amendment 117 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) New technologies enable the automated (8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large technologies allow citizens, startups, amounts of information to gain new knowledge researchers and journalists to process large and discover new trends. Whilst text and data amounts of information to gain new knowledge mining technologies are prevalent across the and discover new trends. Whilst text and data digital economy, there is widespread mining technologies are prevalent across the acknowledgment that text and data mining can digital economy, there is widespread in particular benefit the research community acknowledgment that text and data mining can and in so doing encourage innovation. However, also benefit citizen science, business, the in the Union, research organisations such as research community and journalism and, in so universities and research institutes are doing, encourage innovation. However, in the confronted with legal uncertainty as to the Union, individuals and legal entities having extent to which they can perform text and data authorised access to content are confronted mining of content. In certain instances, text and with legal uncertainty as to the extent to which data mining may involve acts protected by they can perform text and data mining thereof. copyright and/or by the sui generis database In certain instances, text and data mining may right, notably the reproduction of works or other involve acts protected by copyright and/or by subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents the sui generis database right, notably the from a database. Where there is no exception or reproduction of works or other subject-matter limitation which applies, an authorisation to and/or the extraction of contents from a undertake such acts would be required from database. Where there is no exception or rightholders. Text and data mining may also be limitation which applies, an authorisation to carried out in relation to mere facts or data undertake such acts would be required from which are not protected by copyright and in rightholders. Text and data mining may also be such instances no authorisation would be carried out in relation to mere facts or data required. which are not protected by copyright and in such instances no authorisation would be required.

Or. en

Amendment 118 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) Neue, im Allgemeinen als Text- und Data- (8) Neue, im Allgemeinen als Text- und Data- Mining bekannte Techniken ermöglichen es, in Mining bekannte Techniken ermöglichen es, in digitaler Form vorliegende Informationen wie digitaler Form vorliegende Informationen wie Texte, Töne, Bilder oder Daten mit Hilfe des Texte, Töne, Bilder oder Daten mit Hilfe des Computers automatisch auszuwerten. Mit Hilfe Computers automatisch auszuwerten. Mit Hilfe dieser Techniken können Forscher riesige dieser Techniken können Forscher riesige Informationsmengen verarbeiten lassen, um Informationsmengen verarbeiten lassen, um neue Erkenntnisse zu gewinnen und neue neue Erkenntnisse zu gewinnen und neue Trends zu erkennen. Das Text- und Data- Trends zu erkennen. Das Text- und Data- Mining ist die vorherrschende Technik in der Mining ist die vorherrschende Technik in der Digitalwirtschaft, doch besteht Einvernehmen Digitalwirtschaft, doch besteht Einvernehmen darüber, dass diese Technik vor allem für die darüber, dass diese Technik vor allem für die Forschung von besonderem Nutzen ist und Forschung von besonderem Nutzen ist und damit auch Anreize für Innovationen schafft. In damit auch Anreize für Innovationen schafft. In der Union sehen sich Forschungsorganisationen der Union sehen sich Forschungsorganisationen wie Hochschulen und wie Forschungseinrichtungen und Forschungseinrichtungen allerdings damit Hochschulen, Universitätsbibliotheken, konfrontiert, dass hinsichtlich des möglichen Museen und Laboratorien allerdings damit Umfangs des Text- und Data-Mining von konfrontiert, dass hinsichtlich des möglichen Inhalten Rechtsunsicherheit herrscht. Mitunter Umfangs des Text- und Data-Mining von beinhaltet das Text- und Data-Mining Inhalten Rechtsunsicherheit herrscht. Mitunter Handlungen, die durch das Urheberrecht oder beinhaltet das Text- und Data-Mining durch das Sui-generis-Recht an Datenbanken Handlungen, die durch das Urheberrecht oder geschützt sind, vor allem wenn es um die durch das Sui-generis-Recht an Datenbanken Reproduktion von Werken oder sonstigen geschützt sind, vor allem wenn es um die Schutzgegenständen und/oder um die Entnahme Reproduktion von Werken oder sonstigen von Inhalten aus einer Datenbank geht. Können Schutzgegenständen und/oder um die Entnahme keine Ausnahmen oder Beschränkungen geltend von Inhalten aus einer Datenbank geht. Können gemacht werden, müsste die Genehmigung für keine Ausnahmen oder Beschränkungen geltend solche Handlungen vom Rechteinhaber gemacht werden, müsste die Genehmigung für eingeholt werden. Erfolgt das Text- und Data- solche Handlungen vom Rechteinhaber Mining in Bezug auf reine, nicht eingeholt werden. Erfolgt das Text- und Data- urheberrechtlich geschützte Fakten oder Daten, Mining in Bezug auf reine, nicht wird keine Genehmigung benötigt. urheberrechtlich geschützte Fakten oder Daten, wird keine Genehmigung benötigt.

Or. de

Amendment 119 Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) New technologies enable the automated (8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large technologies allow researchers to process large amounts of information to gain new knowledge amounts of information to gain new knowledge and discover new trends. Whilst text and data and discover new trends. Whilst text and data mining technologies are prevalent across the mining technologies are prevalent across the digital economy, there is widespread digital economy, there is widespread acknowledgment that text and data mining can acknowledgment that text and data mining can in particular benefit the research community and in particular benefit the research community and in so doing encourage innovation. However, in in so doing encourage innovation. However, in the Union, research organisations such as the Union, research organisations such as universities and research institutes are universities and research institutes are confronted with legal uncertainty as to the confronted with legal uncertainty as to the extent to which they can perform text and data extent to which they can perform text and data mining of content. In certain instances, text and mining of content. In certain instances, text and data mining may involve acts protected by data mining may involve acts protected by copyright and/or by the sui generis database copyright and/or by the sui generis database right, notably the reproduction of works or other right, notably the reproduction of works or other subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents from a database. Where there is no exception or from a database. Where there is no exception or limitation which applies, an authorisation to limitation which applies, an authorisation to undertake such acts would be required from undertake such acts would be required from rightholders. Text and data mining may also be rightholders. Text and data mining may also be carried out in relation to mere facts or data carried out by any natural or legal person with which are not protected by copyright and in lawful access. such instances no authorisation would be required.

Or. en

Amendment 120 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) New technologies enable the automated (8) New technologies enable the automated computational analysis of information in digital computational analysis of information in digital form, such as text, sounds, images or data, form, such as text, sounds, images or data, generally known as text and data mining. Those generally known as text and data mining. Those technologies allow researchers to process large technologies allow researchers to process large amounts of information to gain new knowledge amounts of information to gain new knowledge and discover new trends. Whilst text and data and discover new trends. Whilst text and data mining technologies are prevalent across the mining technologies are prevalent across the digital economy, there is widespread digital economy, there is widespread acknowledgment that text and data mining can acknowledgment that text and data mining can in particular benefit the research community and in particular benefit the research community and in so doing encourage innovation. However, in in so doing encourage innovation. However, in the Union, research organisations such as the Union, research organisations such as universities and research institutes are universities and research institutes, their confronted with legal uncertainty as to the libraries, museums and laboratories are extent to which they can perform text and data confronted with legal uncertainty as to the mining of content. In certain instances, text and extent to which they can perform text and data data mining may involve acts protected by mining of content. In certain instances, text and copyright and/or by the sui generis database data mining may involve acts protected by right, notably the reproduction of works or other copyright and/or by the sui generis database subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents right, notably the reproduction of works or other from a database. Where there is no exception or subject-matter and/or the extraction of contents limitation which applies, an authorisation to from a database. Where there is no exception or undertake such acts would be required from limitation which applies, an authorisation to rightholders. Text and data mining may also be undertake such acts would be required from carried out in relation to mere facts or data rightholders. Text and data mining may also be which are not protected by copyright and in carried out in relation to mere facts or data such instances no authorisation would be which are not protected by copyright and in required. such instances no authorisation would be required.

Or. en

Justification

It should be clarified that libraries, museums and laboratories of universities and research institutes are covered by the exception.

Amendment 121 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(8) Les nouvelles technologies permettent une (8) Les nouvelles technologies permettent une analyse informatique automatisée analyse informatique automatisée d’informations sous forme numérique, telles que d'informations sous forme numérique, telles que du texte, des sons, des images ou d’autres du texte, des sons, des images ou d'autres données, ce que l'on appelle généralement «la données, ce que l'on appelle généralement «la fouille de textes et de données». Ces fouille de textes et de données». Ces technologies permettent aux chercheurs de technologies permettent aux chercheurs de traiter de grandes quantités d’informations pour traiter de grandes quantités d'informations pour acquérir de nouvelles connaissances et acquérir de nouvelles connaissances et découvrir de nouvelles tendances. Alors que les découvrir de nouvelles tendances. Alors que les technologies de fouille de textes et de données technologies de fouille de textes et de données sont très répandues dans l’ensemble de sont très répandues dans l'ensemble de l’économie numérique, il est largement reconnu l'économie numérique, il est largement reconnu que cette fouille peut être en particulier que cette fouille peut être en particulier profitable à la communauté des chercheurs et profitable à la communauté des chercheurs et ainsi favoriser l’innovation. Or, dans l’Union, ainsi favoriser l'innovation. Or, dans l'Union, les les organismes de recherche tels que les organismes de recherche tels que les universités universités et les instituts de recherche sont et les instituts de recherche sont confrontés à confrontés à une insécurité juridique, ne sachant une insécurité juridique, ne sachant pas dans pas dans quelle mesure il leur est possible quelle mesure il leur est possible d'effectuer une d'effectuer une fouille de textes et de données fouille de textes et de données sur des contenus. sur des contenus. Dans certains cas, la fouille de Dans certains cas, la fouille de textes et de textes et de données peut porter sur des actes données peut porter sur des actes protégés par le protégés par le droit d’auteur et/ou par le droit droit d'auteur et/ou par le droit sui generis de la sui generis de la base de données, notamment en base de données, notamment en ce qui concerne ce qui concerne la reproduction d’œuvres ou la reproduction d'œuvres ou autres objets autres objets protégés et/ou l’extraction de protégés et/ou l'extraction de contenus d'une contenus d’une base de données. En l'absence base de données. En l'absence d'exception ou de d’exception ou de limitation applicable, limitation applicable, l'autorisation de procéder l'autorisation de procéder à de tels actes devrait à de tels actes devrait être demandée aux être demandée aux titulaires de droits. La fouille titulaires de droits. La fouille de textes et de de textes et de données peut également être données peut également être effectuée pour de effectuée pour de simples éléments factuels ou simples éléments factuels ou données non données non protégés par le droit d’auteur et protégés par le droit d'auteur ou légalement aucune autorisation ne serait nécessaire dans ce accessible pour lesquels aucune autorisation ne cas. serait nécessaire dans ce cas.

Or. fr

Amendment 122 Tadeusz Zwiefka

Proposal for a directive Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9) Union law already provides certain deleted exceptions and limitations covering uses for scientific research purposes which may apply to acts of text and data mining. However, those exceptions and limitations are optional and not fully adapted to the use of technologies in scientific research. Moreover, where researchers have lawful access to content, for example through subscriptions to publications or open access licences, the terms of the licences may exclude text and data mining. As research is increasingly carried out with the assistance of digital technology, there is a risk that the Union's competitive position as a research area will suffer unless steps are taken to address the legal uncertainty for text and data mining.

Or. en

Amendment 123 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9) Union law already provides certain (9) Union law already provides certain exceptions and limitations covering uses for exceptions and limitations covering uses for scientific research purposes which may apply to scientific research purposes which may apply to acts of text and data mining. However, those acts of text and data mining. However, those exceptions and limitations are optional and not exceptions and limitations are optional and not fully adapted to the use of technologies in fully adapted to the use of technologies in scientific research. Moreover, where scientific research. Moreover, where users, researchers have lawful access to content, for including both public and private entities, as example through subscriptions to publications well as individuals have lawful access to or open access licences, the terms of the content, for example through access to the licences may exclude text and data mining. As internet or subscriptions to publications or open research is increasingly carried out with the access licences, the terms of the licences may assistance of digital technology, there is a risk exclude text and data mining. As both business that the Union's competitive position as a and research are increasingly carried out with research area will suffer unless steps are taken the assistance of digital technology, there is a to address the legal uncertainty for text and data risk that the Union's competitive position mining. globally will suffer unless steps are taken to address the legal uncertainty for text and data mining. It is important to recognize the potential of text and data mining technologies in enabling new knowledge, innovation and discovery in all fields and the role that those technologies have in the continuous development of the digital economy, providing for an exception for reproduction and the extraction of information for the purpose of text and data mining where there is lawful access.

Or. en

Amendment 124 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9) Union law already provides certain (9) Union law already provides certain exceptions and limitations covering uses for exceptions and limitations covering uses for scientific research purposes which may apply to scientific research purposes which may apply to acts of text and data mining. However, those acts of text and data mining. However, those exceptions and limitations are optional and not exceptions and limitations are optional and not fully adapted to the use of technologies in fully adapted to the use of technologies in scientific research. Moreover, where scientific research. Moreover, where there is researchers have lawful access to content, for lawful access to content, for example through example through subscriptions to publications subscriptions to publications or open access or open access licences, the terms of the licences, the terms of the licences may exclude licences may exclude text and data mining. As text and data mining. As research is increasingly research is increasingly carried out with the carried out with the assistance of digital assistance of digital technology, there is a risk technology, there is a risk that the Union's that the Union's competitive position as a competitive position as a research area will research area will suffer unless steps are taken suffer unless steps are taken to address the legal to address the legal uncertainty for text and data uncertainty for text and data mining. In terms of mining. digital economy and its growth, it is important to recognise the positive impact that text and mining has on innovation and how it can foster further development of digital economy in the Union by providing for an exception for reproductions and extractions of information to be submitted to text and data mining when there is acquired lawful access.

Or. en

Amendment 125 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9) Union law already provides certain (9) Union law already provides certain exceptions and limitations covering uses for exceptions and limitations covering uses for scientific research purposes which may apply to scientific research purposes which may apply to acts of text and data mining. However, those acts of text and data mining. However, those exceptions and limitations are optional and not exceptions and limitations are optional and not fully adapted to the use of technologies in fully adapted to the use of text and data mining scientific research. Moreover, where technologies which are relevant far beyond the researchers have lawful access to content, for area of scientific research. Moreover, where example through subscriptions to publications there is lawful access to content, for example or open access licences, the terms of the through subscriptions to publications or open licences may exclude text and data mining. As access licences, the terms of the licences may research is increasingly carried out with the exclude text and data mining. As research is assistance of digital technology, there is a risk increasingly carried out with the assistance of that the Union's competitive position as a digital technology, there is a risk that the research area will suffer unless steps are taken Union's competitive position as a research area to address the legal uncertainty for text and data and action lines envisaged in the European mining. Open Science Agenda will suffer unless steps are taken to address the legal uncertainty regarding text and data mining for all potential users. Union law should acknowledge that text and data mining is increasingly used beyond formal research organisations and for purposes other than scientific research which nevertheless contribute to innovation, technology transfer and the public interest.

Or. en

Amendment 126 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9) Union law already provides certain (9) Union law already provides certain exceptions and limitations covering uses for exceptions and limitations covering uses for scientific research purposes which may apply to scientific research purposes which may apply to acts of text and data mining. However, those acts of text and data mining. However, those exceptions and limitations are optional and not exceptions and limitations are optional and not fully adapted to the use of technologies in fully adapted to the use of technologies in scientific research. Moreover, where researchers scientific research. Moreover, where researchers have lawful access to content, for example have lawful access to content, for example through subscriptions to publications or open through subscriptions to publications or open access licences, the terms of the licences may access licences, the terms of the licences may exclude text and data mining. As research is exclude text and data mining. As research is increasingly carried out with the assistance of increasingly carried out with the assistance of digital technology, there is a risk that the digital technology, there is a risk that the Union's competitive position as a research area Union's competitive position as a research area will suffer unless steps are taken to address the will suffer unless steps are taken to address the legal uncertainty for text and data mining. legal uncertainty for text and data mining in Union law, while ensuring that text and data mining exceptions in Member States should be able to continue to be provided.

Or. en

Amendment 127 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9) Union law already provides certain (9) Union law already provides certain exceptions and limitations covering uses for exceptions and limitations covering uses for scientific research purposes which may apply to scientific research purposes which may apply to acts of text and data mining. However, those acts of text and data mining. However, those exceptions and limitations are optional and not exceptions and limitations are optional and not fully adapted to the use of technologies in fully adapted to the use of technologies in scientific research. Moreover, where scientific research. Moreover, where individuals researchers have lawful access to content, for and legal entities have authorised access to example through subscriptions to publications content, for example through subscriptions to or open access licences, the terms of the publications or open access licences, the terms licences may exclude text and data mining. As of the licences may exclude text and data research is increasingly carried out with the mining. As both research and business are assistance of digital technology, there is a risk increasingly carried out with the assistance of that the Union's competitive position as a digital technology, there is a risk that the research area will suffer unless steps are taken Union's competitive position as a research area to address the legal uncertainty for text and data will suffer unless steps are taken to address the mining. legal uncertainty for text and data mining.

Or. en

Amendment 128 Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9) Union law already provides certain (9) Union law already provides certain exceptions and limitations covering uses for exceptions and limitations covering uses for scientific research purposes which may apply to scientific research purposes which may apply to acts of text and data mining. However, those acts of text and data mining. However, those exceptions and limitations are optional and not exceptions and limitations are optional and not fully adapted to the use of technologies in fully adapted to the use of technologies in scientific research. Moreover, where researchers scientific research. Moreover, where researchers have lawful access to content, for example have lawful access to legally acquired content, through subscriptions to publications or open for example through subscriptions to access licences, the terms of the licences may publications or open access licences, the terms exclude text and data mining. As research is of the licences may exclude text and data increasingly carried out with the assistance of mining. As research is increasingly carried out digital technology, there is a risk that the with the assistance of digital technology, there Union's competitive position as a research area is a risk that the Union's competitive position as will suffer unless steps are taken to address the a research area will suffer unless steps are taken legal uncertainty for text and data mining. to address the legal uncertainty for text and data mining.

Or. en

Amendment 129 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9) Union law already provides certain (9) Union law already provides certain exceptions and limitations covering uses for exceptions and limitations covering uses for scientific research purposes which may apply to scientific research purposes which may apply to acts of text and data mining. However, those acts of text and data mining. However, those exceptions and limitations are optional and not exceptions and limitations are optional and not fully adapted to the use of technologies in fully adapted to the use of technologies in scientific research. Moreover, where researchers scientific research. Moreover, where researchers have lawful access to content, for example have acquired lawful access to content, for through subscriptions to publications or open example through subscriptions to publications access licences, the terms of the licences may or open access licences, the terms of the exclude text and data mining. As research is licences may exclude text and data mining. As increasingly carried out with the assistance of research is increasingly carried out with the digital technology, there is a risk that the assistance of digital technology, there is a risk Union's competitive position as a research area that the Union's competitive position as a will suffer unless steps are taken to address the research area will suffer unless steps are taken legal uncertainty for text and data mining. to address the legal uncertainty for text and data mining.

Or. en

Justification

It should be clarified that rented content or content accessed via another copyright exception are not intended to be addressed and a reference to the tried and tested concept of Article 5 of the Software Directive 2009/24/EC would seem appropriate.

Amendment 130 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9) Le droit de l’Union prévoit d'ores et déjà (9) Certains systèmes juridiques nationaux, certaines exceptions et limitations portant sur ainsi que le droit de l'Union prévoient d'ores et des utilisations à des fins de recherche déjà certaines exceptions et limitations portant scientifique qui pourraient s’appliquer aux actes sur des utilisations à des fins de recherche de fouille de textes et de données. Cependant, scientifique qui pourraient s'appliquer aux actes ces exceptions et limitations sont facultatives et de fouille de textes. Afin de préserver l'intégrité ne sont pas entièrement adaptées à l’utilisation du principe de droit d'auteur, ces exceptions de technologies dans le domaine de la devraient rester facultatives. Cependant, recherche scientifique. En outre, lorsque les lorsque les chercheurs ont légalement acquis du chercheurs ont légalement accès à du contenu, contenu, par exemple au moyen d'abonnements par exemple au moyen d'abonnements à des à des publications ou de licences en libre accès, publications ou de licences en libre accès, les les conditions applicables à ces licences conditions applicables à ces licences peuvent devraient pouvoir inclure la fouille de textes. exclure la fouille de textes et de données. En effet, comme les recherches s'effectuent de Comme les recherches s'effectuent de plus en plus en plus avec l'aide de la technologie plus avec l'aide de la technologie numérique, la numérique, la compétitivité des Etats membres compétitivité de l’Union en tant qu'espace de de l'Union en tant qu'espace de recherche recherche risquerait d'en pâtir, à moins que des risquerait de pâtir d'une possible impossibilité mesures ne soient prises pour remédier à de fouille de texte, à moins que des mesures ne l’insécurité juridique qui entoure la fouille de soient prises pour remédier à l'insécurité textes et de données. juridique qui l'entoure.

Or. fr

Amendment 131 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 9 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9 b) Furthermore, there is widespread acknowledgment that access to normalised information in a format which enables it to be subjected to text and data mining can in particular benefit the research community in its entirety including to smaller research organisations especially when there is no lawful access to content, for example through

subscriptions to publications or open access licences. In the Union, research organisations such as universities and research institutes are confronted with challenges to gain lawful access to the volume of digitally stored information required for new knowledge to be sought through the use of text and data mining.

Or. en

Amendment 132 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9 a) Furthermore, there is widespread acknowledgement that access to information in a format which enables it to be subjected to text and data mining can, in particular, benefit the research community in its entirety including smaller research organisations, especially where there is no lawful access to content such as through subscriptions to scientific publications or open access licences. In the Union, research organisations such as universities and research institutes, as well as organisations such as libraries and cultural

heritage institutions that support research, are confronted with challenges to gain lawful access to the volume of digitally stored information required for new knowledge to be sought by means of text and data mining. There are also many other types of content, such as trade publications, film, sound, the wider Internet, that are also the subject of analysis through text and data mining, where access can also be a problem, and where rightholders will be less able to create versions of their works in usable formats.

Or. en

Amendment 133 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9 а) Освен това е широко известно, че достъпът до информация във формат, който се поддава на извличане на информация от текст и данни, може по- специално да бъде от полза за цялата научна общност, включително за малките научни организации, особено в случаите, в които липсва законен достъп до съдържание, например чрез абонаменти за научни публикации или лицензии за свободен достъп. В Съюза научните организации като университетите и научните институти, както и организации като обществени библиотеки и институции за културно наследство, които подкрепят научните изследвания, се сблъскват със затруднения при достъпа до необходимия обем информация, съхраняван в цифров формат, от който те се нуждаят за придобиването на нови познания посредством извличане на информация от текст и данни.

Or. bg

Amendment 134 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(9 a) Scientific data produced with public funding should be made available in an open format, so that researchers, citizens and companies can access the data and re-use them, including to perform text and data mining. This obligation should create an Open Data mandate for the benefit of researchers and of European SMEs and start-ups. For the advancement of European innovation, guiding principles on text and data mining enablement should be further scrutinised along the lines of the Horizon 2020 Open Research Data Pilot. The exception for text and data mining should cover all data sources, including data hosted by information society service providers, so that concentrated and anti-competitive research models can be avoided.

Or. en

Amendment 135 Tadeusz Zwiefka

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be deleted addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new exception should be without prejudice to the existing mandatory exception on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to apply to text and data mining techniques which do not involve the making of copies going beyond the scope of that exception. Research organisations should also benefit from the exception when they engage into public-private partnerships.

Or. en

Amendment 136 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed (10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new prevent extraction from a database for the exception should be without prejudice to the purposes of text and data mining, which existing mandatory exception on temporary acts should not be subject to compensation given of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of that in view of the nature and scope of the Directive 2001/29, which should continue to exception the harm should be minimal. An apply to text and data mining techniques which additional mandatory exception should allow do not involve the making of copies going research organisations to have access to beyond the scope of that exception. Research normalised information in a format that organisations should also benefit from the enables it to be text and data mined provided exception when they engage into public-private that that process is carried out by the research partnerships. organisation. Rightholders should not be able to seek compensation for this exception that goes beyond what is necessary and proportionate to the cost of the normalisation process. Research organisations should also benefit from this exception when they engage in public-private partnerships. These new exceptions should be without prejudice to the existing mandatory exception on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to apply to text and data mining techniques which do not involve the making of copies going beyond the scope of that exception.

Or. en

Amendment 137 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed (10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new prevent extraction from a database. The new exception should be without prejudice to the exception should be without prejudice to the existing mandatory exception on temporary acts existing mandatory exception on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to Directive 2001/29, which should continue to apply to text and data mining techniques which apply to text and data mining techniques which do not involve the making of copies going do not involve the making of copies going beyond the scope of that exception. Research beyond the scope of that exception. To prevent organisations should also benefit from the unjustified dissemination of the content exception when they engage into public-private necessary for text and data mining, research partnerships. organisations should destroy the content reproduced for the purpose of text and data mining once all the acts necessary for the research have been performed. Research organisations should also benefit from the exception when they engage into public-private partnerships, provided that the text and data mining act performed relate directly to the purpose of the research carried out in the partnerhsip concerned.

Or. en

Justification

It needs to be clarified that access for the purpose of text and data mining is limited to that purpose and thus any reproduced content needs to be destroyed upon completion of the text and data mining project. The inclusion of public-private partnerships should be limited to research purposes and not to private companies generating commercial value with the data mined content.

Amendment 138 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed (10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new prevent extraction from a database. The new exception should be without prejudice to the exception should be without prejudice to the existing mandatory exception on temporary acts existing mandatory exception on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to Directive 2001/29, which should continue to apply to text and data mining techniques which apply to text and data mining techniques which do not involve the making of copies going do not involve the making of copies going beyond the scope of that exception. Research beyond the scope of that exception. To prevent organisations should also benefit from the unjustified dissemination of the content exception when they engage into public-private necessary for text and data mining, research partnerships. organisations should destroy the content reproduced for the purpose of text and data mining once all the acts necessary for the research have been performed. Research organisations should also benefit from the exception when they enter into public-private partnerships provided that the text and data mining acts performed relate directly to the purpose of the research carried out in the partnership concerned.

Or. en

Justification

It is crucial to avoid the unjustified dissemination of protected works.

Amendment 139 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed (10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the by providing for a mandatory exception for all right of reproduction and also to the right to persons, whether legal or natural, to the right prevent extraction from a database. The new of reproduction and also to the right to prevent exception should be without prejudice to the extraction from a database. The new exception existing mandatory exception on temporary acts should be without prejudice to the existing of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of mandatory exception on temporary acts of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of apply to text and data mining techniques which Directive 2001/29, which should continue to do not involve the making of copies going apply to text and data mining techniques which beyond the scope of that exception. Research do not involve the making of copies going organisations should also benefit from the beyond the scope of that exception. Stakeholder exception when they engage into public-private dialogue aimed at expanding access to partnerships. database purely for text and data mining purposes should be encouraged, where research organizations do not currently have legal access to original works.

Or. en

Amendment 140 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed (10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new prevent extraction from a database. The new exception should be without prejudice to the exception should only apply to the text and data existing mandatory exception on temporary mining process pursued for non-commercial acts of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) purpose. Rightholders should still be entitled to of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to develop licences and to receive payment. apply to text and data mining techniques which do not involve the making of copies going beyond the scope of that exception. Research organisations should also benefit from the exception when they engage into public-private partnerships.

Or. en

Amendment 141 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) Diese Rechtsunsicherheit könnte durch die (10) Diese Rechtsunsicherheit könnte durch die Einführung einer verbindlichen Ausnahme für Einführung einer verbindlichen Ausnahme für das Vervielfältigungsrecht, aber auch für das das Vervielfältigungsrecht, aber auch für das Recht, Entnahmen aus einer Datenbank zu Recht, Entnahmen aus einer Datenbank zu untersagen, beseitigt werden. Die neue untersagen, beseitigt werden. Die neue Ausnahmeregelung sollte unbeschadet der in Ausnahmeregelung sollte unbeschadet der in Artikel 5 Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG Artikel 5 Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG bereits festgelegten Ausnahme für bereits festgelegten Ausnahme für vorübergehende Vervielfältigungshandlungen vorübergehende Vervielfältigungshandlungen gelten, die weiterhin auf Text- und Data- gelten, die weiterhin auf Text- und Data- Mining-Techniken angewandt werden sollte, Mining-Techniken angewandt werden sollte, sofern diese nicht die Anfertigung von Kopien sofern diese nicht die Anfertigung von Kopien in einem über diese Ausnahme hinausgehenden in einem über diese Ausnahme hinausgehenden Umfang beinhalten. Forschungsorganisationen, Umfang beinhalten. Forschungsorganisationen, die an einer öffentlich-privaten Partnerschaft die an einer öffentlich-privaten Partnerschaft beteiligt sind, sollten auf diese Ausnahme auch beteiligt sind, sollten auf diese Ausnahme auch zurückgreifen können. zurückgreifen können, solange das an der Partnerschaft beteiligte Unternehmen ebenfalls über einen rechtmäßigen Zugang zu den Werken oder sonstigen Schutzgegenständen verfügt.

Or. de

Amendment 142 Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed (10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new prevent extraction from a database. The new exception should be without prejudice to the exception should be without prejudice to the existing mandatory exception on temporary acts existing mandatory exception on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should continue to Directive 2001/29, which should continue to apply to text and data mining techniques which apply to text and data mining techniques which do not involve the making of copies going do not involve the making of copies going beyond the scope of that exception. Research beyond the scope of that exception. Research organisations should also benefit from the organisations should also benefit from the exception when they engage into public-private exception when they engage into public-private partnerships. partnerships, provided that private partners involved in such partnerships operate on a non-for-profit basis.

Or. en

Amendment 143 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) Въпросната правна несигурност следва (10) Въпросната правна несигурност следва да се премахне, като се въведе задължително да се премахне, като се въведе задължително изключение за правото на изключение за достъпа на научните възпроизвеждане, както и за правото да организации и обществените библиотеки, не се допуска извличане от база данни. във формат, който позволява извличането Новото изключение не бива да накърнява на информация от текст. Това действащото задължително изключение за изключение не бива да накърнява временните действия на възпроизвеждане по действащото задължително изключение за член 5, параграф 1 от Директива 2001/29, временните действия на възпроизвеждане по което следва да продължи да се прилага по член 5, параграф 1 от Директива 2001/29, отношение на способите за извличане на което следва да продължи да се прилага по информация от текст и данни, които не отношение на способите за извличане на предполагат да се правят копия извън информация от текст и данни, които не обхвата на изключението. Научните предполагат да се правят копия извън организации следва също така да се обхвата на изключението. Научните възползват от изключението, когато участват организации и обществените библиотеки в публично-частни партньорства. следва също така да се възползват от изключението, когато участват в публично- частни партньорства.

Or. bg

Amendment 144 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) Cette insécurité juridique devrait être (10) Cette insécurité juridique devrait être corrigée en prévoyant une exception obligatoire corrigée en prévoyant une exception facultative au droit de reproduction ainsi qu'au droit au droit de reproduction. La nouvelle exception d’empêcher l’extraction à partir d’une base de devrait s'appliquer sans préjudice de l'exception données. La nouvelle exception devrait obligatoire en vigueur concernant les actes de s'appliquer sans préjudice de l'exception reproduction provisoires énoncée à l'article 5, obligatoire en vigueur concernant les actes de paragraphe 1, de la directive 2001/29, qui reproduction provisoires énoncée à l’article 5, devrait continuer à s'appliquer aux techniques paragraphe 1, de la directive 2001/29, qui de fouille de textes et de données n'impliquant devrait continuer à s’appliquer aux techniques pas la confection de copies qui dépassent le de fouille de textes et de données n’impliquant champ d'application de ladite exception. Les pas la confection de copies qui dépassent le organismes de recherche devraient également champ d’application de ladite exception. Les bénéficier de cette exception lorsqu'ils organismes de recherche devraient également s'engagent dans des partenariats public-privé. bénéficier de cette exception lorsqu’ils s'engagent dans des partenariats public-privé.

Or. fr

Amendment 145 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed (10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new prevent extraction from a database for research exception should be without prejudice to the purposes. The new exception should be without existing mandatory exception on temporary acts prejudice to the existing mandatory exception of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Directive 2001/29, which should continue to Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should apply to text and data mining techniques which continue to apply to text and data mining do not involve the making of copies going techniques which do not involve the making of beyond the scope of that exception. Research copies going beyond the scope of that organisations should also benefit from the exception. Member States should be able to exception when they engage into public-private determine that researchers can also benefit partnerships. from the exception when they engage into public-private partnerships.

Or. en

Amendment 146 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed (10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new prevent extraction from a database, including exception should be without prejudice to the raw data. The new exception should be without existing mandatory exception on temporary acts prejudice to the existing mandatory exception of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of on temporary acts of reproduction laid down in Directive 2001/29, which should continue to Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, which should apply to text and data mining techniques which continue to apply to text and data mining do not involve the making of copies going techniques which do not involve the making of beyond the scope of that exception. Research copies going beyond the scope of that organisations should also benefit from the exception. Legal entities could also benefit exception when they engage into public-private from the exception when they engage into partnerships. public-private partnerships.

Or. en

Amendment 147 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed (10) This legal uncertainty should be addressed by providing for a mandatory exception to the by providing for a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction and also to the right to right of reproduction and also to the right to prevent extraction from a database. The new prevent extraction from a database. Research exception should be without prejudice to the organisations should also benefit from the existing mandatory exception on temporary acts exception when they engage into public-private of reproduction laid down in Article 5(1) of partnerships. The new exception should be Directive 2001/29, which should continue to without prejudice to the existing mandatory apply to text and data mining techniques which exception on temporary acts of reproduction do not involve the making of copies going laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29, beyond the scope of that exception. Research which should continue to apply to text and data organisations should also benefit from the mining techniques which do not involve the exception when they engage into public-private making of copies going beyond the scope of that partnerships. exception.

Or. en

Amendment 148 Laura Ferrara, Isabella Adinolfi, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10 bis) Bisognerebbe considerare che l'innovazione tecnologica può costituire un fattore di obsolescenza delle norme giuridiche, per contrastare il quale sarebbe opportuno semplificare e modernizzare il quadro giuridico dei diritti d'autore e connessi introducendo una norma aperta sull'interpretazione delle eccezioni e limitazioni.

Or. it

Amendment 149 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(10 bis) Dans le cadre de partenariats public- privé, l'intervention d'un organisme privé ne devrait se faire que s'il représente une structure à but non commercial et s'il a un accès légitime au contenu.

Or. fr

Amendment 150 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(11) Research organisations across the Union deleted encompass a wide variety of entities the primary goal of which is to conduct scientific research or to do so together with the provision of educational services. Due to the diversity of such entities, it is important to have a common understanding of the beneficiaries of the exception. Despite different legal forms and structures, research organisations across Member States generally have in common that they act either on a not for profit basis or in the context of a public-interest mission recognised by the State. Such a public-interest mission may, for example, be reflected through public funding or through provisions in national laws or public contracts. At the same time, organisations upon which commercial undertakings have a decisive influence allowing them to exercise control because of structural situations such as their quality of shareholders or members, which may result in preferential access to the results of the research, should not be considered research organisations for the purposes of this Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 151 Tadeusz Zwiefka

Proposal for a directive Recital 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(11) Research organisations across the Union deleted encompass a wide variety of entities the primary goal of which is to conduct scientific research or to do so together with the provision of educational services. Due to the diversity of such entities, it is important to have a common understanding of the beneficiaries of the exception. Despite different legal forms and structures, research organisations across Member States generally have in common that they act either on a not for profit basis or in the context of a public-interest mission recognised by the State. Such a public-interest mission may, for example, be reflected through public funding or through provisions in national laws or public contracts. At the same time, organisations upon which commercial undertakings have a decisive influence allowing them to exercise control because of structural situations such as their quality of shareholders or members, which may result in preferential access to the results of the research, should not be considered research organisations for the purposes of this Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 152 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(11) Research organisations across the Union deleted encompass a wide variety of entities the primary goal of which is to conduct scientific research or to do so together with the provision of educational services. Due to the diversity of such entities, it is important to have a common understanding of the beneficiaries of the exception. Despite different legal forms and structures, research organisations across Member States generally have in common that they act either on a not for profit basis or in the context of a public-interest mission recognised by the State. Such a public-interest mission may, for example, be reflected through public funding or through provisions in national laws or public contracts. At the same time, organisations upon which commercial undertakings have a decisive influence allowing them to exercise control because of structural situations such as their quality of shareholders or members, which may result in preferential access to the results of the research, should not be considered research organisations for the purposes of this Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 153 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(11) Research organisations across the Union (11) Research organisations across the Union encompass a wide variety of entities the primary encompass a wide variety of entities the primary goal of which is to conduct scientific research or goal of which is to conduct scientific research or to do so together with the provision of to do so together with the provision of educational services. Due to the diversity of educational services. Due to the diversity of such entities, it is important to have a common such entities, it is important to have a common understanding of the beneficiaries of the understanding of the beneficiaries of the exception. Despite different legal forms and exception. Despite different legal forms and structures, research organisations across structures, research organisations across Member States generally have in common that Member States generally have in common that they act either on a not for profit basis or in the they act either on a non-commercial basis or in context of a public-interest mission recognised the context of a public-interest mission by the State. Such a public-interest mission recognised by the State. Such a public-interest may, for example, be reflected through public mission may, for example, be reflected through funding or through provisions in national laws public funding or through provisions in national or public contracts. At the same time, laws or public contracts. Research organisations upon which commercial organisations that carry out text and data undertakings have a decisive influence allowing mining for a commercial purpose, should not them to exercise control because of structural be considered research organisation for the situations such as their quality of shareholders purpose of this Directive. At the same time, or members, which may result in preferential organisations upon which commercial access to the results of the research, should not undertakings have a significant influence be considered research organisations for the allowing them to exercise control because of purposes of this Directive. structural situations such as their quality of shareholders or members, which may result in preferential access to the results of the research, should not be considered research organisations for the purposes of this Directive. Research organisations that carry out text and data mining as part of public-private partnership should benefit from the exception provided that they act on a non-profit, non-commercial purpose. Therefore, content used by research organisations that carry out text and data mining for commercial purposes as part of a public-private partnership should be lawfully acquired by their commercial partner.

Or. en

Amendment 154 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(11) In der Union gibt es eine Vielzahl von (11) In der Union gibt es eine Vielzahl von Forschungsorganisationen, deren vorrangiges Forschungsorganisationen, deren vorrangiges Ziel die wissenschaftliche Forschung ist oder Ziel die wissenschaftliche Forschung ist oder die Forschung in Verbindung mit Lehre. die Forschung in Verbindung mit Lehre. Angesichts der Vielfalt dieser Einrichtungen Angesichts der Vielfalt dieser Einrichtungen sollte ein Konsens über die Begünstigten der sollte ein Konsens über die Begünstigten der Ausnahmeregelung erzielt werden. Trotz Ausnahmeregelung erzielt werden. Trotz unterschiedlicher Rechtsformen und Strukturen unterschiedlicher Rechtsformen und Strukturen ist den Forschungsorganisationen in der Regel ist den Forschungsorganisationen in der Regel unionsweit gemein, dass sie entweder nicht unionsweit gemein, dass sie entweder nicht gewinnorientiert sind oder in staatlich gewinnorientiert bzw. nicht-geschäftlich sind anerkanntem Auftrag im öffentlichen Interesse oder in staatlich anerkanntem Auftrag im handeln. Kennzeichnend für einen solchen öffentlichen Interesse handeln. Dies gilt Auftrag im öffentlichen Interesse ist beispielsweise für Universitäten und deren beispielsweise die Finanzierung durch die Bibliotheken sowie Museen, wenn der öffentliche Hand oder sind Bestimmungen im Bildungsauftrag oder die wissenschaftliche einzelstaatlichen Recht oder öffentlichen Forschung das vorrangige Ziel darstellt. Verträgen. Für die Zwecke dieser Richtlinie Kennzeichnend für einen Auftrag im sollten hingegen Organisationen nicht als öffentlichen Interesse ist beispielsweise die Forschungsorganisationen gelten, wenn sie dem Finanzierung durch die öffentliche Hand oder bestimmenden Einfluss gewerblicher sind Bestimmungen im einzelstaatlichen Recht Unternehmen unterliegen, die aufgrund der oder öffentlichen Verträgen. Für die Zwecke strukturellen Gegebenheiten beispielsweise als dieser Richtlinie sollten hingegen Anteilseigner oder Mitglieder Kontrolle Organisationen nicht als ausüben können und dadurch einen bevorzugten Forschungsorganisationen gelten, wenn diese Zugang zu den Forschungsergebnissen erhalten mit ihrer Investition in Text und Data Mining könnten. auf Gewinnerzielung gerichtet sind, oder wenn sie dem bestimmenden Einfluss gewerblicher Unternehmen unterliegen, die aufgrund der strukturellen Gegebenheiten beispielsweise als Anteilseigner oder Mitglieder Kontrolle ausüben können und dadurch einen bevorzugten Zugang zu den Forschungsergebnissen erhalten könnten. Für den Fall, dass eine Forschungsorganisation im Rahmen einer öffentlich-privaten Partnerschaft Text- und Data-Mining zugunsten des wirtschaftlichen Unternehmens durchführt, ist es notwendig, dass auch das Unternehmen über einen rechtmäßigen Zugang zu den Werken oder sonstigen Schutzgegenständen verfügt.

Or. de

Amendment 155 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(11) Research organisations across the Union (11) Research organisations across the Union encompass a wide variety of entities the primary encompass a wide variety of entities the primary goal of which is to conduct scientific research or goal of which is to conduct scientific research or to do so together with the provision of to do so together with the provision of educational services. Due to the diversity of educational services. Due to the diversity of such entities, it is important to have a common such entities, it is important to have a common understanding of the beneficiaries of the understanding of the beneficiaries of the exception. Despite different legal forms and exception. Despite different legal forms and structures, research organisations across structures, research organisations across Member States generally have in common that Member States generally have in common that they act either on a not for profit basis or in the they act either on a not for profit and non- context of a public-interest mission recognised commercial basis or in the context of a public- by the State. Such a public-interest mission interest mission recognised by the State. Such a may, for example, be reflected through public public-interest mission may, for example, be funding or through provisions in national laws reflected through public funding or through or public contracts. At the same time, provisions in national laws or public contracts. organisations upon which commercial Such research organisations include publicly undertakings have a decisive influence allowing funded universities, including their libraries, them to exercise control because of structural museums and laboratories if their primary situations such as their quality of shareholders goal is to provide educational services and to or members, which may result in preferential conduct scientific research. Organisations access to the results of the research, should not which seek to obtain a commercial profit on be considered research organisations for the their investment in text and data mining purposes of this Directive. should not be considered research organisations for the purpose of this Directive. At the same time, organisations upon which commercial undertakings have a significant influence allowing them to exercise control because of structural situations such as their quality of shareholders or members, which may result in preferential access to the results of the research, should not be considered research organisations for the purposes of this Directive.

Or. en

Justification

It should be clarified that libraries, museums and laboratories of universities and research institutes are covered by the exception. Research organisations seeking to obtain a commercial profit on the text and data mining product should not benefit from the TDM exception.

Amendment 156 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(11) Research organisations across the Union (11) Research organisations across the Union encompass a wide variety of entities the primary encompass a wide variety and size of entities goal of which is to conduct scientific research the primary goal of which is to conduct research or to do so together with the provision of or to do so together with the provision of educational services. Due to the diversity of educational services. Taking into account the such entities, it is important to have a common diversity of such entities, for instance small understanding of the beneficiaries of the research organisations with only limited access exception. Despite different legal forms and to content, it is important that rightholders structures, research organisations across provide access to normalised datasets for the Member States generally have in common that purpose of text and data mining. Despite they act either on a not for profit basis or in the different legal forms and structures, research context of a public-interest mission recognised organisations across Member States generally by the State. Such a public-interest mission have in common that they act either on a not for may, for example, be reflected through public profit basis or in the context of a public-interest funding or through provisions in national laws mission recognised by the State. Such a public- or public contracts. At the same time, interest mission may, for example, be reflected organisations upon which commercial through public funding or through provisions in undertakings have a decisive influence national laws or public contracts. allowing them to exercise control because of structural situations such as their quality of shareholders or members, which may result in preferential access to the results of the research, should not be considered research organisations for the purposes of this Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 157 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(11) Research organisations across the Union (11) Organisations across the Union encompass, encompass a wide variety of entities the which carry out research, include the public primary goal of which is to conduct scientific sector and cultural heritage institutions, the research or to do so together with the provision primary goal of which is to conduct scientific of educational services. Due to the diversity of research or to do so together with the provision such entities, it is important to have a common of educational services. Due to the diversity of understanding of the beneficiaries of the such entities, it is important to have a common exception. Despite different legal forms and understanding of the beneficiaries of the structures, research organisations across exception. Despite different legal forms and Member States generally have in common that structures, research organisations across they act either on a not for profit basis or in the Member States generally have in common that context of a public-interest mission recognised they act either on a not for profit basis or in the by the State. Such a public-interest mission context of a public-interest mission recognised may, for example, be reflected through public by the State. Such a public-interest mission funding or through provisions in national laws may, for example, be reflected through public or public contracts. At the same time, funding or through provisions in national laws organisations upon which commercial or public contracts. At the same time, undertakings have a decisive influence allowing organisations upon which commercial them to exercise control because of structural undertakings have a decisive influence allowing situations such as their quality of shareholders them to exercise control because of structural or members, which may result in preferential situations such as their quality of shareholders access to the results of the research, should not or members, which may result in preferential be considered research organisations for the access to the results of the research, should not purposes of this Directive. be considered research organisations for the purposes of this Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 158 Tadeusz Zwiefka

Proposal for a directive Recital 12

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(12) In view of a potentially high number of deleted access requests to and downloads of their works or other subject-matter, rightholders should be allowed to apply measures where there is risk that the security and integrity of the system or databases where the works or other subject-matter are hosted would be jeopardised. Those measures should not exceed what is necessary to pursue the objective of ensuring the security and integrity of the system and should not undermine the effective application of the exception.

Or. en

Amendment 159 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 12

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(12) In view of a potentially high number of (12) In view of a potentially high number of access requests to and downloads of their works access requests to and downloads of works or or other subject-matter, rightholders should be other subject-matter, and in order to ensure allowed to apply measures where there is risk reproducibility of research results, Member that the security and integrity of the system or States shall designate a facility to safely store databases where the works or other subject- datasets used for text and data mining. matter are hosted would be jeopardised. Those measures should not exceed what is necessary to pursue the objective of ensuring the security and integrity of the system and should not undermine the effective application of the exception.

Or. en

Amendment 160 Jiří Maštálka

Proposal for a directive Recital 12

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(12) In view of a potentially high number of (12) In view of a potentially high number of access requests to and downloads of their works access requests to and downloads of their works or other subject-matter, rightholders should be or other subject-matter, rightholders should be allowed to apply measures where there is risk allowed to apply measures where there is risk that the security and integrity of the system or that the security of the system or databases databases where the works or other subject- where the works or other subject-matter are matter are hosted would be jeopardised. Those hosted would be jeopardised. measures should not exceed what is necessary to pursue the objective of ensuring the security and integrity of the system and should not undermine the effective application of the exception.

Or. en

Amendment 161 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 12

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(12) In view of a potentially high number of (12) Rightholders should be allowed to apply access requests to and downloads of their measures where there is risk that the security works or other subject-matter, rightholders and integrity of the system or databases where should be allowed to apply measures where the works or other subject-matter are hosted there is risk that the security and integrity of the could be jeopardised. Those measures should be system or databases where the works or other transparent, non-discriminatory, proportionate subject-matter are hosted would be jeopardised. and not exceed what is necessary to pursue the Those measures should not exceed what is objective of ensuring the security and integrity necessary to pursue the objective of ensuring of the system and should not undermine in any the security and integrity of the system and way the effective application of the exception. should not undermine the effective application of the exception.

Or. en

Amendment 162 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 12

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(12) С оглед на потенциално големия брой (12) С оглед на потенциално големия брой заявки за достъп и сваляне на техните заявки за достъп и сваляне на техните произведения или други обекти, носителите произведения или други обекти, носителите на права следва да имат възможност да на права следва да имат възможност да прилагат мерки, когато има риск да бъдат прилагат мерки, когато има риск да бъдат застрашени сигурността и целостта на застрашени сигурността на системите или системите или базите данни, където са базите данни, където са хоствани тези хоствани тези произведения или други произведения или други обекти. Въпросните обекти. Въпросните мерки не бива да мерки не бива да надхвърлят необходимото надхвърлят необходимото за постигане на за постигане на целта да се гарантира целта да се гарантира сигурността и сигурността на системата и не бива да целостта на системата и не бива да пречат пречат на ефективното прилагане на на ефективното прилагане на изключението. изключението.

Or. bg

Amendment 163 Tadeusz Zwiefka

Proposal for a directive Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(13) There is no need to provide for deleted compensation for rightholders as regards uses under the text and data mining exception introduced by this Directive given that in view of the nature and scope of the exception the harm should be minimal.

Or. en

Amendment 164 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(13) There is no need to provide for (13) There is no need to provide for compensation for rightholders as regards uses compensation for rightholders as regards uses under the text and data mining exception under the text and data mining exception introduced by this Directive given that in view introduced by this Directive given that in view of the nature and scope of the exception the of the nature and scope of the exception there harm should be minimal. would be no unreasonable prejudice to the interests of right holders. Use under the text and data mining exception would also not conflict with the normal exploitation of the works in a way that calls for separate compensation.

Or. en

Amendment 165 Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(13) There is no need to provide for (13) There is no need to provide for compensation for rightholders as regards uses compensation for rightholders as regards uses under the text and data mining exception under the text and data mining exception introduced by this Directive given that in view introduced by this Directive given that in view of the nature and scope of the exception the of the nature and scope of the exception the harm should be minimal. harm should be minimal. However, where rightholders are providing research organisations with normalised information enabling mining, they should be able to seek compensation related to the cost of the normalisation process.

Or. en

Amendment 166 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(13) There is no need to provide for (13) Rightholders should be compensated for compensation for rightholders as regards uses uses under the text and data mining exception under the text and data mining exception introduced by this Directive given the introduced by this Directive given that in view mandatory nature of the exception and the of the nature and scope of the exception the consequent investments that would be required harm should be minimal. by rightholders to make technically possible and facilitate the wide use of text and data mining techniques under the scope of the exception, which cause sufficient harm to justify such compensation.

Or. en

Justification

It would be better if the decision on the introduction of compensation was left to the Member States. Such an approach could also consider the differences between the Member States in this area and would leave them the possibility to adjust their system even after the implementation of the Directive, according to future experiences and developments.

Amendment 167 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(13) Не е необходимо да се предвижда (13) Необходимо е да се предвижда обезщетение за носителите на права по обезщетение за носителите на права по отношение на използването в обхвата на отношение на изключението, което въведеното с настоящата директива позволява на научните организации и изключение за извличането на информация обществените библиотеки, които нямат от текст и данни, предвид това, че с оглед законен достъп до информация, да на естеството и обхвата на получат достъп до нормализирани данни, изключението се очаква вредите да бъдат които са подходящи за извличането на минимални. информация от текст и данни, но само доколкото това обезщетение е пропорционално на разходите, свързани с процеса на нормализиране на данните

Or. bg

Amendment 168 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(13) There is no need to provide for (13) Considering the harm caused to compensation for rightholders as regards uses rightholders, Member states should provide under the text and data mining exception them with compensation as regards uses under introduced by this Directive given that in view the text and data mining exception introduced of the nature and scope of the exception the by this Directive. harm should be minimal.

Or. en

Amendment 169 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(13) Il n’est pas nécessaire de prévoir une (13) Il est nécessaire de prévoir une compensation pour les titulaires de droits en ce compensation pour les titulaires de droits en ce qui concerne les utilisations relevant de qui concerne les utilisations relevant de l'exception en matière de fouille de textes et de l'exception en matière de fouille de textes données introduite par la présente directive, introduite par la présente directive, le principe étant donné que, vu la nature et la portée de de compensation étant au cœur du modèle cette exception, le préjudice devrait être encadrant le droit d'auteur. minime.

Or. fr

Amendment 170 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(13 a) The process of text and data mining includes a substantial download of protected works and other subject matter. Therefore the storage and copy of content should be strictly

limited to what is necessary to verify results. Any copies stored should be deleted after a reasonable period of time, in order to avoid other uses not covered by the exception.

Or. en

Amendment 171 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(14) L’article 5, paragraphe 3, point a), de la (14) Certains systèmes juridiques nationaux directive 2001/29/CE autorise les États des Etats membres, ou encore l'article 5, membres à prévoir une exception ou une paragraphe 3, point a), de la directive limitation aux droits de reproduction, de 2001/29/CE dispose de la possibilité pour les communication d'œuvres au public et de mise à Etats membres de prévoir une exception ou une la disposition de ce dernier à des fins limitation aux droits de reproduction, de exclusives, notamment, d'illustration dans le communication d'œuvres au public et de mise à cadre de l'enseignement. En outre, l'article 6, la disposition de ce dernier à des fins paragraphe 2, point b) et l'article 9, point b), de exclusives, notamment, d'illustration dans le la directive 96/9/CE autorisent l’utilisation cadre de l'enseignement. En outre, l'article 6, d’une base de données et l’extraction ou la paragraphe 2, point b) et l'article 9, point b), de réutilisation d’une partie substantielle du la directive 96/9/CE autorisent l'utilisation d'une contenu de celle-ci à des fins d’illustration de base de données et l'extraction ou la réutilisation l’enseignement. La portée de ces exceptions ou d'extraits d'œuvres ou de contenu de celle-ci à limitations manque de clarté lorsqu'elles des fins d'illustration de l'enseignement. La s’appliquent aux utilisations numériques. En portée de ces exceptions ou limitations manque outre, il n'est pas clairement établi si ces de clarté lorsqu'elles s'appliquent aux exceptions ou limitations s’appliqueraient dans utilisations numériques. En outre, il n'est pas le cas de l’enseignement dispensé en ligne et clairement établi si ces exceptions ou limitations donc à distance. De plus, le cadre existant ne s'appliqueraient dans le cas de l'enseignement prévoit pas d'effet transfrontière. Cette dispensé en ligne et donc à distance. Il faudrait situation pourrait entraver le développement donc étendre cette exception ou limitation des activités d’enseignement s'appuyant sur le facultative à l'enseignement numérique pour numérique et de l’apprentissage à distance. faire en sorte que les établissements Par conséquent, l’introduction d’une nouvelle d'enseignement bénéficient d'une sécurité exception ou limitation obligatoire est juridique totale en cas d'utilisation d'extraits nécessaire pour faire en sorte que les d'œuvres ou autres objets protégés dans le cadre établissements d’enseignement bénéficient d'activités pédagogiques numériques, d’une sécurité juridique totale en cas notamment en ligne. d’utilisation d’œuvres ou autres objets protégés dans le cadre d'activités pédagogiques numériques, notamment en ligne et dans des situations transfrontières.

Or. fr

Amendment 172 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC (14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC allows Member States to introduce an exception allows Member States to introduce an exception or limitation to the rights of reproduction, or limitation to the rights of reproduction, communication to the public and making communication to the public and making available to the public for the sole purpose of, available to the public for the purpose of among others, illustration for teaching. In illustration for teaching or scientific research. addition, Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(b) of Directive In addition, Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(b) of 96/9/EC permit the use of a database and the Directive 96/9/EC permit the use of a database extraction or re-utilization of a substantial part and the extraction or re-utilization of a of its contents for the purpose of illustration for substantial part of its contents for the purpose of teaching. The scope of those exceptions or illustration for teaching. The scope of those limitations as they apply to digital uses is exceptions or limitations as they apply to digital unclear. In addition, there is a lack of clarity as uses is unclear. In addition, there is a lack of to whether those exceptions or limitations clarity as to whether those exceptions or would apply where teaching is provided online limitations would apply where teaching is and thereby at a distance. Moreover, the provided online and thereby at a distance. existing framework does not provide for a Moreover, the existing framework does not cross-border effect. This situation may hamper provide for a cross-border effect, nor allow the the development of digitally-supported teaching application of such exceptions or limitations to activities and distance learning. Therefore, the private study purposes. This situation may introduction of a new mandatory exception or hamper the development of digitally-supported limitation is necessary to ensure that teaching activities and distance learning, educational establishments benefit from full scientific research and private study. legal certainty when using works or other Therefore, the introduction of a new mandatory subject-matter in digital teaching activities, exception or limitation is necessary to ensure including online and across borders. full legal certainty when using works or other subject-matter in all teaching activities, scientific research and private study, including digital, online and across borders.

Or. en

Amendment 173 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC (14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC allows Member States to introduce an exception allows Member States to introduce an exception or limitation to the rights of reproduction, or limitation to the rights of reproduction, communication to the public and making communication to the public and making available to the public for the sole purpose of, available to the public for the sole purpose of, among others, illustration for teaching. In among others, illustration for teaching. In addition, Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(b) of Directive addition, to uneven application across EU 96/9/EC permit the use of a database and the Member States, the scope of those exceptions or extraction or re-utilization of a substantial part limitations as they apply to digital uses is of its contents for the purpose of illustration unclear. In addition, there is a lack of clarity as for teaching. The scope of those exceptions or to whether those exceptions or limitations limitations as they apply to digital uses is would apply where teaching is provided online unclear. In addition, there is a lack of clarity as and thereby at a distance. Moreover, the to whether those exceptions or limitations existing framework does not provide for a would apply where teaching is provided online cross-border effect. This situation may hamper and thereby at a distance. Moreover, the the development of digitally-supported teaching existing framework does not provide for a activities and distance learning. Therefore, the cross-border effect. This situation may hamper introduction of a new mandatory exception or the development of digitally-supported teaching limitation is necessary to ensure that educational activities and distance learning. Therefore, the establishments benefit from full legal certainty introduction of a new mandatory exception or when using works or other subject-matter in all limitation is necessary to ensure that educational teaching activities, including online and across establishments benefit from full legal certainty borders. when using works or other subject-matter in digital teaching activities, including online and across borders.

Or. en

Amendment 174 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(14) Prin articolul 5 alineatul (3) litera (a) din (14) Prin articolul 5 alineatul (3) litera (a) din Directiva 2001/29/CE, statelor membre le este Directiva 2001/29/CE, statelor membre le este permis să introducă o excepție sau o limitare a permis să introducă o excepție sau o limitare a dreptului de reproducere, a dreptului de dreptului de reproducere, a dreptului de comunicare publică și a dreptului de punere la comunicare publică și a dreptului de punere la dispoziția publicului în scopul unic, printre dispoziția publicului în scopul unic, printre altele, al ilustrării didactice. În plus, prin altele, al ilustrării didactice. În plus, prin articolul 6 alineatul (2) litera (b) și articolul 9 articolul 6 alineatul (2) litera (b) și articolul 9 litera (b) din Directiva 96/9/CE, se permite litera (b) din Directiva 96/9/CE, se permite utilizarea unei baze de date și extragerea sau utilizarea unei baze de date și extragerea sau reutilizarea unei părți substanțiale a conținutului reutilizarea unei părți substanțiale a conținutului acesteia în scopul ilustrării didactice. Domeniul acesteia în scopul ilustrării didactice. Domeniul de aplicare al acestor excepții sau limitări în de aplicare al acestor excepții sau limitări în cazul utilizărilor digitale este neclar. În plus, nu cazul utilizărilor digitale este neclar. În plus, nu se știe sigur dacă respectivele excepții sau se știe sigur dacă respectivele excepții sau limitări se aplică în cazul în care serviciul limitări se aplică în cazul în care serviciul didactic este furnizat online și, prin urmare, la didactic este furnizat online și, prin urmare, la distanță. De asemenea, cadrul actual nu prevede distanță. De asemenea, cadrul actual nu prevede niciun efect transfrontalier. Această situație ar niciun efect transfrontalier. Această situație ar putea împiedica dezvoltarea activităților de putea împiedica dezvoltarea activităților de predare pe suport digital și învățământul la predare pe suport digital și învățământul la distanță. Prin urmare, introducerea unei noi distanță. Prin urmare, introducerea unei noi excepții obligatorii sau a unei limitări este excepții obligatorii sau a unei limitări este necesară pentru a se asigura faptul că instituțiile necesară pentru a se asigura faptul că instituțiile de învățământ beneficiază de securitate juridică de învățământ beneficiază de securitate juridică deplină atunci când utilizează opere sau alte deplină atunci când utilizează opere sau alte obiecte protejate în activitățile didactice obiecte protejate în activitățile didactice digitale, inclusiv în mediul online și în cel digitale, inclusiv în mediul online și în cel transfrontalier. transfrontalier. Articolul 5 alineatul (5) din Directiva 2001/29/CE ar trebui să se aplice tuturor excepțiilor și limitărilor prevăzute de prezenta Directivă.

Or. ro

Amendment 175 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC (14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC allows Member States to introduce an exception allows Member States to introduce an exception or limitation to the rights of reproduction, or limitation to the rights of reproduction, communication to the public and making communication to the public and making available to the public for the sole purpose of, available to the public for the sole purpose of, among others, illustration for teaching. In among others, illustration for teaching. In addition, Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(b) of Directive addition, Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(b) of Directive 96/9/EC permit the use of a database and the 96/9/EC permit the use of a database and the extraction or re-utilization of a substantial part extraction or re-utilization of a substantial part of its contents for the purpose of illustration for of its contents for the purpose of illustration for teaching. The scope of those exceptions or teaching. There is a lack of clarity as to whether limitations as they apply to digital uses is those exceptions or limitations would apply unclear. In addition, there is a lack of clarity as where teaching is provided online and thereby to whether those exceptions or limitations at a distance. Moreover, the existing framework would apply where teaching is provided online does not provide for a cross-border effect. This and thereby at a distance. Moreover, the situation may hamper the development of existing framework does not provide for a digitally-supported teaching activities and cross-border effect. This situation may hamper distance learning. Therefore, the introduction of the development of digitally-supported teaching a new mandatory exception or limitation is activities and distance learning. Therefore, the necessary to ensure that educational introduction of a new mandatory exception or establishments benefit from full legal certainty limitation is necessary to ensure that educational when using works or other subject-matter in establishments benefit from full legal certainty digital teaching activities, including online and when using works or other subject-matter in across borders. digital teaching activities, including online and across borders.

Or. en

Amendment 176 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(14) Член 5, параграф 3, буква а) от (14) Член 5, параграф 3, буква а) от Директива 2001/29/ЕО позволява на Директива 2001/29/ЕО позволява на държавите членки да предвидят изключение държавите членки да предвидят изключение или ограничение за правото на или ограничение за правото на възпроизвеждане, съобщаване на публиката възпроизвеждане, съобщаване на публиката и предоставяне на публично разположение и предоставяне на публично разположение единствено за илюстриране при преподаване единствено за илюстриране при преподаване сред останалите видове използване. В сред останалите видове използване. В допълнение към това член 6, параграф 2, допълнение към това член 6, параграф 2, буква б) и член 9, буква б) от Директива буква б) и член 9, буква б) от Директива 96/9/ЕО допускат използване на база данни и 96/9/ЕО допускат използване на база данни и извличане или повторно използване на извличане или повторно използване на съществена част от нейното съдържание с съществена част от нейното съдържание с цел да се илюстрира преподаване. Неясна е цел да се илюстрира преподаване. В степента, до която тези изключения или допълнение към различното прилагане в ограничения се прилагат за цифровото държавите членки на Съюза, неясна е и използване. В допълнение към това липсва степента, до която тези изключения или яснота по въпроса дали тези изключения или ограничения се прилагат за цифровото ограничения са приложими, когато използване. В допълнение към това липсва преподаването се извършва онлайн и яснота по въпроса дали тези изключения или следователно в дистанционна форма. Нещо ограничения са приложими, когато повече, съществуващата рамка не предвижда преподаването се извършва онлайн и трансгранично действие. Това положение следователно в дистанционна форма. Нещо може да попречи на развитието на повече, съществуващата рамка не предвижда осъществявани с дигитални помощни трансгранично действие. Това положение средства преподавателски дейности и на може да попречи на развитието на дистанционното обучение. Поради това е осъществявани с дигитални помощни необходимо да се въведе ново задължително средства преподавателски дейности и на изключение или ограничение, за да се дистанционното обучение. Поради това е гарантира, че образователните институции необходимо да се въведе ново задължително се ползват от пълна правна сигурност, когато изключение или ограничение, за да се използват произведения или други обекти в гарантира, че образователните институции се дейностите за цифрово преподаване, ползват от пълна правна сигурност, когато включително онлайн и през границите. използват произведения или други обекти във всички дейности за цифрово преподаване, включително онлайн и през границите.

Or. bg

Amendment 177 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC (14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC allows Member States to introduce an exception allows Member States to introduce an exception or limitation to the rights of reproduction, or limitation to the rights of reproduction, communication to the public and making communication to the public and making available to the public for the sole purpose of, available to the public for the sole purpose of, among others, illustration for teaching. In among others, illustration for teaching. In addition, Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(b) of Directive addition, Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(b) of Directive 96/9/EC permit the use of a database and the 96/9/EC permit the use of a database and the extraction or re-utilization of a substantial part extraction or re-utilization of a substantial part of its contents for the purpose of illustration for of its contents for the purpose of illustration for teaching. The scope of those exceptions or teaching. The scope of those exceptions or limitations as they apply to digital uses is limitations as they apply to digital uses is unclear. In addition, there is a lack of clarity as unclear. In addition, there is a lack of clarity as to whether those exceptions or limitations to whether those exceptions or limitations would apply where teaching is provided online would apply where teaching is provided online and thereby at a distance. Moreover, the and thereby at a distance. Moreover, the existing framework does not provide for a existing framework does not provide for a cross-border effect. This situation may hamper cross-border effect. This situation may hamper the development of digitally-supported teaching the development of digitally-supported teaching activities and distance learning. Therefore, the activities and distance learning. Therefore, the introduction of a new mandatory exception or introduction of a new mandatory exception or limitation is necessary to ensure that educational limitation is necessary to ensure that all persons establishments benefit from full legal certainty and entities providing an educational activity when using works or other subject-matter in benefit from full legal certainty when using digital teaching activities, including online and works or other subject-matter in teaching across borders. activities, including online and across borders.

Or. en

Amendment 178 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC (14) Article 5(3)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC allows Member States to introduce an exception allows Member States to introduce an exception or limitation to the rights of reproduction, or limitation to the rights of reproduction, communication to the public and making communication to the public and making available to the public for the sole purpose of, available to the public for the purpose of, among others, illustration for teaching. In among others, illustration for teaching. In addition, Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(b) of Directive addition, Articles 6(2)(b) and 9(b) of Directive 96/9/EC permit the use of a database and the 96/9/EC permit the use of a database and the extraction or re-utilization of a substantial part extraction or re-utilization of a substantial part of its contents for the purpose of illustration for of its contents for the purpose of illustration for teaching. The scope of those exceptions or teaching. However, those exceptions and limitations as they apply to digital uses is limitations are not mandatory and some unclear. In addition, there is a lack of clarity Member States have followed a too narrow as to whether those exceptions or limitations interpretation of illustration for teaching in would apply where teaching is provided online their national implementations of the and thereby at a distance. Moreover, the exceptions. Moreover, the existing framework existing framework does not provide for a does not provide for a cross-border effect. This cross-border effect. This situation may hamper situation may hamper the development of the development of digitally-supported teaching digitally-supported teaching activities and activities and distance learning. Therefore, the distance learning. Therefore, the introduction of introduction of a new mandatory exception or a new mandatory exception or limitation is limitation is necessary to ensure that educational necessary to ensure that educational activities establishments benefit from full legal certainty benefit from full legal certainty when using when using works or other subject-matter in works or other subject-matter in research and digital teaching activities, including online and education activities, including online and across across borders. borders.

Or. en

Amendment 179 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) Докато програмите за дистанционно (15) Докато програмите за дистанционно обучение и трансгранично образование се обучение и трансгранично образование се разработват предимно на равнището на разработват предимно на равнището на висшето образование, цифрови средства и висшето образование, цифрови средства и ресурси все повече се използват на всички ресурси все повече се използват на всички равнища на образованието, по-специално за равнища на образованието, по-специално за подобряване и обогатяване на ученето. подобряване и обогатяване на ученето. Поради това изключението или Поради това изключението или ограничението, предвидено в настоящата ограничението, предвидено в настоящата директива, следва да бъде от полза за всички директива, следва да бъде от полза за всички образователни институции в основното, образователни институции в основното, средното, професионалното и висшето средното, професионалното и висшето образование, доколкото те извършват образование, както и от полза за образователна дейност с нетърговска цел. организации като библиотеки и други Организационната структура и средствата за институции за културно наследство, финансиране на образователната институция предоставящи неформално или не са решаващи фактори за определяне на самостоятелно обучение, доколкото те нетърговския характер на дейността. извършват образователна дейност с нетърговска цел. В съответствие със заключенията на Съвета от 12 май 2009 г. относно стратегическа рамка за европейско сътрудничество в областта на образованието и обучението (ЕСЕТ 2020), приносът на неофициалното и формалното образование, наред с официалното образование, следва да бъдат признати и развити с цел да се осигури постигането на целите на Съюза. Организационната структура и средствата за финансиране на образователната институция не са решаващи фактори за определяне на нетърговския характер на дейността.

Or. bg

Amendment 180 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) While distance learning and cross-border (15) While distance learning and cross-border education programmes are mostly developed at education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation learning experience. The exception or limitation provided for in this Directive should therefore provided for in this Directive should therefore benefit all educational establishments in benefit all educational establishments primary, secondary, vocational and higher recognized by the Member State in which they education to the extent they pursue their are established in primary, secondary, educational activity for a non-commercial vocational and higher education as well as purpose. The organisational structure and the libraries or other public and non - profit means of funding of an educational institutions providing non-formal or informal establishment are not the decisive factors to cultural and other education, to the extent they determine the non-commercial nature of the pursue their educational activity for a non- activity. commercial purpose. The organisational structure and the means of funding of an educational establishment are not the decisive factors to determine the non-commercial nature of the activity.

Or. en

Amendment 181 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) Deși programele de învățare la distanță și (15) Deși programele de învățare la distanță și programele educaționale transfrontaliere sunt programele educaționale transfrontaliere sunt dezvoltate cel mai adesea la nivelul dezvoltate cel mai adesea la nivelul învățământului superior, instrumentele și învățământului superior, instrumentele și resursele digitale sunt utilizate din ce în ce mai resursele digitale sunt utilizate din ce în ce mai mult la toate nivelurile de învățământ, în special mult la toate nivelurile de învățământ, în special pentru a îmbunătăți și a îmbogăți experiența de pentru a îmbunătăți și a îmbogăți experiența de învățare. De excepția sau limitarea prevăzută în învățare. De excepția sau limitarea prevăzută în prezenta directivă ar trebui, prin urmare, să prezenta directivă ar trebui, prin urmare, să beneficieze toate instituțiile de învățământ din beneficieze toate instituțiile de învățământ din cadrul învățământului primar, secundar, cadrul învățământului primar, secundar, profesional și superior, în măsura în care acestea profesional și superior, în măsura în care acestea își desfășoară activitatea educațională în scopuri își desfășoară activitatea educațională în scopuri necomerciale. Structura de organizare și necomerciale și în măsura în care acestea sunt mijloacele de finanțare ale unei instituții de recunoscute ca atare sau acreditate ca instituții învățământ nu sunt factorii decisivi pentru a de învățământ de autoritățile naționale stabili natura necomercială a activității. competente. Structura de organizare și mijloacele de finanțare ale unei instituții de învățământ nu sunt factorii decisivi pentru a stabili natura necomercială a activității.

Or. ro

Amendment 182 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) While distance learning and cross-border (15) While distance learning and cross-border education programmes are mostly developed at education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation learning experience. The exception or limitation provided for in this Directive should therefore provided for in this Directive should therefore benefit all educational establishments in benefit all educational establishments in primary, secondary, vocational and higher primary, secondary, vocational and higher education to the extent they pursue their education, also including libraries which educational activity for a non-commercial provide non-formal learning activities for a purpose. The organisational structure and the wide range of citizens across the Union every means of funding of an educational year to the extent they pursue their educational establishment are not the decisive factors to activity for a non-commercial purpose. The determine the non-commercial nature of the organisational structure and the means of activity. funding of an educational establishment are not the decisive factors to determine the non- commercial nature of the activity.

Or. en

Amendment 183 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marju Lauristin, Mary Honeyball

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) While distance learning and cross-border (15) While distance learning and cross-border education programmes are mostly developed at education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation learning experience. The exception or limitation provided for in this Directive should therefore provided for in this Directive should therefore benefit all educational establishments in benefit all educational establishments in primary, secondary, vocational and higher primary, secondary, vocational and higher education to the extent they pursue their education, as well as organizations such as educational activity for a non-commercial libraries and other cultural heritage purpose. The organisational structure and the institutions providing non-formal education to means of funding of an educational the extent they pursue their educational activity establishment are not the decisive factors to for a non-commercial purpose. The determine the non-commercial nature of the organisational structure and the means of activity. funding of an educational establishment are not the decisive factors to determine the non- commercial nature of the activity.

Or. en

Amendment 184 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) While distance learning and cross-border (15) While distance learning and cross-border education programmes are mostly developed at education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation learning experience. Such tools are also used in provided for in this Directive should therefore scientific research and private study activities. benefit all educational establishments in The exception or limitation provided for in this primary, secondary, vocational and higher Directive should therefore benefit all education to the extent they pursue their educational, scientific and private study educational activity for a non-commercial activities for a non-commercial purpose. purpose. The organisational structure and the Access to works and other subject matter means of funding of an educational should take place through a secure electronic establishment are not the decisive factors to network. The organisational structure and the determine the non-commercial nature of the means of funding of an educational activity. establishment are not the decisive factors to determine the non-commercial nature of the activity.

Or. en

Amendment 185 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) While distance learning and cross-border (15) While distance learning and cross-border education programmes are mostly developed at education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation learning experience. The exception or limitation provided for in this Directive should therefore provided for in this Directive should therefore benefit all educational establishments in benefit all research and educational activities, primary, secondary, vocational and higher including in primary, secondary, vocational and education to the extent they pursue their higher education, as well as citizens science educational activity for a non-commercial and non-formal education, to the extent they purpose. The organisational structure and the pursue their educational activity. means of funding of an educational establishment are not the decisive factors to determine the non-commercial nature of the activity.

Or. en

Amendment 186 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) While distance learning and cross-border (15) While distance learning and cross-border education programmes are mostly developed at education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation learning experience. The exception or limitation provided for in this Directive should therefore provided for in this Directive should therefore benefit all educational establishments in benefit all persons and entities providing an primary, secondary, vocational and higher educational activity, educational establishments education to the extent they pursue their in primary, secondary, vocational and higher educational activity for a non-commercial education to the extent they pursue their purpose. The organisational structure and the educational activity for a non-commercial means of funding of an educational purpose. The organisational structure and the establishment are not the decisive factors to means of funding of an educational determine the non-commercial nature of the establishment are not the decisive factors to activity. determine the non-commercial nature of the activity.

Or. en

Amendment 187 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) While distance learning and cross-border (15) While distance learning and cross-border education programmes are mostly developed at education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation learning experience. The exception or limitation provided for in this Directive should therefore provided for in this Directive should therefore benefit all educational establishments in benefit all educational establishments in primary, secondary, vocational and higher primary, secondary, vocational and higher education to the extent they pursue their education to the extent they pursue their educational activity for a non-commercial educational activity for a non-commercial purpose. The organisational structure and the purpose. The organisational structure and the means of funding of an educational means of funding of the person or entity establishment are not the decisive factors to providing the educational activity are not the determine the non-commercial nature of the decisive factors to determine the non- activity. commercial nature of the activity.

Or. en

Amendment 188 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) While distance learning and cross-border (15) While distance learning, e-learning, and education programmes are mostly developed at cross-border education programmes are mostly higher education level, digital tools and developed at higher education level, digital resources are increasingly used at all education tools and resources are increasingly used at all levels, in particular to improve and enrich the education levels, in particular to improve and learning experience. The exception or limitation enrich the learning experience. The exception or provided for in this Directive should therefore limitation provided for in this Directive should benefit all educational establishments in therefore benefit all educational establishments primary, secondary, vocational and higher in primary, secondary, vocational and higher education to the extent they pursue their education to the extent they pursue their educational activity for a non-commercial educational activity for a non-commercial purpose. The organisational structure and the purpose. The organisational structure and the means of funding of an educational means of funding of an educational establishment are not the decisive factors to establishment are not the decisive factors to determine the non-commercial nature of the determine the non-commercial nature of the activity. activity.

Or. en

Amendment 189 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(15) While distance learning and cross-border (15) While distance learning and cross-border education programmes are mostly developed at education programmes are mostly developed at higher education level, digital tools and higher education level, digital tools and resources are increasingly used at all education resources are increasingly used at all education levels, in particular to improve and enrich the levels, in particular to improve and enrich the learning experience. The exception or limitation learning experience. The exception or limitation provided for in this Directive should therefore provided for in this Directive should also benefit all educational establishments in benefit entities providing educational activities, primary, secondary, vocational and higher such as museums, libraries, archives and civil education to the extent they pursue their society organisations. The organisational educational activity for a non-commercial structure and the means of funding of an purpose. The organisational structure and the educational establishment or an entity means of funding of an educational providing educational activities are not the establishment are not the decisive factors to decisive factors to determine the non- determine the non-commercial nature of the commercial nature of the activity. activity.

Or. en

Amendment 190 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) The exception or limitation should cover (16) The exception or limitation should cover digital uses of works and other subject-matter all uses, including digital and online ones, of such as the use of parts or extracts of works to works and other subject-matter such as the use support, enrich or complement the teaching, of parts or extracts of works to support, enrich including the related learning activities. The use or complement the teaching, including the of the works or other subject-matter under the related learning activities, the scientific exception or limitation should be only in the research and private study. The exception context of teaching and learning activities should be understood as covering the specific carried out under the responsibility of accessibility needs of persons with a disability educational establishments, including during in the context of illustration for teaching or examinations, and be limited to what is scientific research, as well as private study. necessary for the purpose of such activities. The exception or limitation should cover both uses through digital means in the classroom and online uses through the educational establishment's secure electronic network, the access to which should be protected, notably by authentication procedures. The exception or limitation should be understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.

Or. en

Amendment 191 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) The exception or limitation should cover (16) The exception or limitation should cover digital uses of works and other subject-matter digital uses of works and other subject-matter such as the use of parts or extracts of works to such as the use of parts or extracts of works to support, enrich or complement the teaching, support, enrich or complement the teaching, including the related learning activities. The use including the related learning activities to the of the works or other subject-matter under the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose exception or limitation should be only in the to be achieved. The use of the works or other context of teaching and learning activities subject-matter under the exception or limitation carried out under the responsibility of should be only in the context of teaching and educational establishments, including during learning activities carried out under the examinations, and be limited to what is responsibility of educational establishments, necessary for the purpose of such activities. The including during examinations, and be limited exception or limitation should cover both uses to what is necessary for the purpose of such through digital means in the classroom and activities. Member States should be able to online uses through the educational provide for limits regarding the amount of establishment's secure electronic network, the work which could be copied in their national access to which should be protected, notably by law, as long as these achieve a fair balance authentication procedures. The exception or between the interests of users and limitation should be understood as covering the rightsholders. The exception or limitation specific accessibility needs of persons with a should cover both uses through digital means in disability in the context of illustration for the classroom and online uses, e-learning and teaching. through the educational establishment's secure electronic network, the access to which should be protected, notably by authentication procedures. The exception or limitation should be understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.

Or. en

Amendment 192 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) The exception or limitation should cover (16) The exception or limitation should cover digital uses of works and other subject-matter all uses of works and other subject-matter, such as the use of parts or extracts of works to digital or otherwise, such as the use of parts or support, enrich or complement the teaching, extracts of works to support, enrich or including the related learning activities. The use complement the teaching, including the related of the works or other subject-matter under the learning activities. The use of the works or other exception or limitation should be only in the subject-matter under the exception or limitation context of teaching and learning activities should be only in the context of teaching and carried out under the responsibility of learning activities carried out under the educational establishments, including during responsibility of educational establishments as examinations, and be limited to what is well as libraries that provide non-formal necessary for the purpose of such activities. The learning activities, including during exception or limitation should cover both uses examinations, and be limited to what is through digital means in the classroom and necessary for the purpose of such activities. The online uses through the educational exception or limitation should cover both uses establishment's secure electronic network, the through digital means in the classroom or access to which should be protected, notably by learning area and online uses through the authentication procedures. The exception or educational establishment's secure electronic limitation should be understood as covering the network, the access to which should be specific accessibility needs of persons with a protected, notably by authentication procedures. disability in the context of illustration for The exception or limitation should be teaching. understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.

Or. en

Amendment 193 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) The exception or limitation should cover (16) The exception or limitation should cover digital uses of works and other subject-matter uses of works and other subject-matter such as such as the use of parts or extracts of works to the use of parts or extracts of works to support, support, enrich or complement the teaching, enrich or complement the research and including the related learning activities. The education activities such as teaching, related use of the works or other subject-matter under learning activities and academic collaboration. the exception or limitation should be only in the The use of the works or other subject-matter context of teaching and learning activities under the exception or limitation should include carried out under the responsibility of uses during examinations, and be limited to educational establishments, including during what is necessary for the purpose of such examinations, and be limited to what is activities. The exception or limitation should necessary for the purpose of such activities. The cover both offline uses such as uses in the exception or limitation should cover both uses classroom and online uses. The exception or through digital means in the classroom and limitation should be understood as covering the online uses through the educational specific accessibility needs of persons with a establishment's secure electronic network, the disability in the context of research and access to which should be protected, notably by education. authentication procedures. The exception or limitation should be understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.

Or. en

Amendment 194 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) The exception or limitation should cover (16) The exception or limitation should cover digital uses of works and other subject-matter digital uses of works and other subject-matter such as the use of parts or extracts of works to such as the use of parts or extracts of works to support, enrich or complement the teaching, support, enrich or complement the teaching, including the related learning activities. The use including the related learning activities, but of the works or other subject-matter under the excluding musical scores. The use of the works exception or limitation should be only in the or other subject-matter or extracts under the context of teaching and learning activities exception or limitation should be only in the carried out under the responsibility of context of teaching and learning activities educational establishments, including during carried out under the responsibility of examinations, and be limited to what is educational establishments, including during necessary for the purpose of such activities. The examinations, and be limited to what is exception or limitation should cover both uses necessary for the purpose of such activities. through digital means in the classroom and Thus, for example, the exception should be online uses through the educational limited to the use of short extracts for written establishment's secure electronic network, the works, except in the case of plays and poems. access to which should be protected, notably by The exception or limitation should cover both authentication procedures. The exception or uses through digital means in the classroom and limitation should be understood as covering the online uses through the educational specific accessibility needs of persons with a establishment's secure electronic network, the disability in the context of illustration for access to which should be protected, notably by teaching. authentication procedures. The exception or limitation should be understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.

Or. en

Amendment 195 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) The exception or limitation should cover (16) The exception or limitation should cover digital uses of works and other subject-matter all uses of works and other subject-matter, such as the use of parts or extracts of works to digital or otherwise, such as the use of parts or support, enrich or complement the teaching, extracts of works to support, enrich or including the related learning activities. The use complement the teaching, including the related of the works or other subject-matter under the learning activities. The use of the works or other exception or limitation should be only in the subject-matter under the exception or limitation context of teaching and learning activities should be only in the context of teaching and carried out under the responsibility of learning activities carried out under the educational establishments, including during responsibility of educational establishments, examinations, and be limited to what is including organizations such as libraries and necessary for the purpose of such activities. The other cultural heritage institutions providing exception or limitation should cover both uses non-formal or informal education, including through digital means in the classroom and during examinations, and be limited to what is online uses through the educational necessary for the purpose of such activities. The establishment's secure electronic network, the exception or limitation should cover both uses access to which should be protected, notably by through digital means in the classroom and authentication procedures. The exception or online uses through the educational limitation should be understood as covering the establishment's secure electronic network, the specific accessibility needs of persons with a access to which should be protected, notably by disability in the context of illustration for authentication procedures. The exception or teaching. limitation should be understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.

Or. en

Amendment 196 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) Изключението или ограничението (16) Изключението или ограничението следва да обхване цифровото използване на следва да обхване цифровото използване на произведения и други обекти, като например произведения и други обекти, като например части или откъси от произведения за части или откъси от произведения за подпомагане, обогатяване или допълване на подпомагане, обогатяване или допълване на преподаването, включително свързаните с преподаването, включително свързаните с него учебни дейности. Произведения или него учебни дейности. Произведения или други обекти следва да се използват по други обекти следва да се използват по силата на изключението или ограничението силата на изключението или ограничението единствено в контекста на дейности по единствено в контекста на дейности по преподаване и учене, осъществявани под преподаване и учене, осъществявани под ръководството на образователни ръководството на образователни институции, включително по време на институции, включително организации изпити, и да се ограничат само до като библиотеки и други институции, за необходимото за целите на такива дейности. културно наследство, предоставящи Изключението или ограничението следва да неофициално или самостоятелно обхване използването както чрез цифрови обучение, включително по време на изпити, средства в класната стая, така и онлайн чрез и да се ограничат само до необходимото за сигурната електронна мрежа на целите на такива дейности. Изключението образователната институция, достъпът до или ограничението следва да обхване която следва да бъде защитен, по-специално използването както чрез цифрови средства в чрез процедури за автентификация. класната стая, така и онлайн чрез сигурната Изключението или ограничението следва да електронна мрежа на образователната се разбира като обхващащо специфичните институция, достъпът до която следва да потребности от достъпност за хората с бъде защитен, по-специално чрез процедури увреждания в контекста на илюстрирането за автентификация. Изключението или при преподаване. ограничението следва да се разбира като обхващащо специфичните потребности от достъпност за хората с увреждания в контекста на илюстрирането при преподаване.

Or. bg

Amendment 197 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) The exception or limitation should cover (16) The exception or limitation should cover digital uses of works and other subject-matter digital uses of works and other subject-matter such as the use of parts or extracts of works to such as the use of parts or extracts of works to support, enrich or complement the teaching, support, enrich or complement the teaching, including the related learning activities. The use including the related learning activities. The use of the works or other subject-matter under the of the works or other subject-matter under the exception or limitation should be only in the exception or limitation should be only in the context of teaching and learning activities context of teaching and learning activities carried out under the responsibility of carried out under the responsibility of educational establishments, including during educational establishments, including during examinations, and be limited to what is examinations, and be limited to what is necessary for the purpose of such activities. The necessary for the purpose of such activities. The exception or limitation should cover both uses exception or limitation should cover both uses through digital means in the classroom and through digital means where the teaching online uses through the educational activity is physically provided, including where establishment's secure electronic network, the it takes place outside the premises of the access to which should be protected, notably by educational establishment and online uses authentication procedures. The exception or through the educational establishment's secure limitation should be understood as covering the electronic network, the access to which should specific accessibility needs of persons with a be protected, notably by authentication disability in the context of illustration for procedures. The exception or limitation should teaching. be understood as covering the specific accessibility needs of persons with a disability in the context of illustration for teaching.

Or. en

Justification

Teaching activities may be carried out outside of the premises of educational institutions. Respecting this phenomenon more educational establishments could enjoy the benefits of the exception in a reasonable way.

Amendment 198 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) The exception or limitation should cover (16) The exception or limitation should cover digital uses of works and other subject-matter digital uses of works and other subject-matter such as the use of parts or extracts of works to such as the use of parts or extracts of works to support, enrich or complement the teaching, support, enrich or complement the teaching, including the related learning activities. The use including the related learning activities. The use of the works or other subject-matter under the of the works or other subject-matter under the exception or limitation should be only in the exception or limitation should be only in the context of teaching and learning activities context of teaching and learning activities carried out under the responsibility of carried out under the responsibility of educational establishments, including during educational establishments, including during examinations, and be limited to what is examinations, or entities providing educational necessary for the purpose of such activities. The activities and be limited to what is necessary for exception or limitation should cover both uses the purpose of such activities. The exception or through digital means in the classroom and limitation should cover both uses through digital online uses through the educational means in the classroom and online uses through establishment's secure electronic network, the the educational establishment's secure electronic access to which should be protected, notably by network, the access to which should be authentication procedures. The exception or protected, notably by authentication procedures. limitation should be understood as covering the The exception or limitation should be specific accessibility needs of persons with a understood as covering the specific accessibility disability in the context of illustration for needs of persons with a disability in the context teaching. of illustration for teaching.

Or. en

Amendment 199 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(16) Cette exception ou limitation devrait (16) Cette exception ou limitation devrait couvrir les utilisations numériques d’œuvres et couvrir les utilisations numériques d'œuvres et autres objets protégés, par exemple l’utilisation autres objets protégés, par exemple l'utilisation de parties ou d’extraits d’œuvres en vue de de parties ou d'extraits d'œuvres en vue de soutenir, d’enrichir ou de compléter soutenir, d'enrichir ou de compléter l’enseignement, ainsi que les activités l'enseignement, ainsi que les activités d’apprentissage connexes. L’utilisation des d'apprentissage connexes. L'utilisation œuvres ou autres objets protégés en vertu de d'extraits d'œuvres ou autres objets protégés en l’exception ou de la limitation devrait avoir lieu vertu de l'exception ou de la limitation devrait uniquement dans le cadre des activités avoir lieu uniquement dans le cadre des activités d’enseignement et d’apprentissage menées sous d'enseignement et d'apprentissage menées sous la responsabilité des établissements la responsabilité des établissements d’enseignement, y compris les examens, et être d'enseignement y compris les examens, et être limitée à ce qui est nécessaire aux fins de ces limitée à ce qui est nécessaire aux fins de ces activités. L’exception ou la limitation devrait activités. L'exception ou la limitation devrait porter à la fois sur les utilisations par des porter à la fois sur les utilisations par des moyens numériques dans les salles de classe et moyens numériques dans les salles de classe et sur les utilisations en ligne par l’intermédiaire sur les utilisations en ligne par l'intermédiaire du réseau électronique sécurisé de du réseau électronique sécurisé de l’établissement d’enseignement, dont l’accès l'établissement d'enseignement, dont l'accès doit doit être protégé, notamment par des procédures être protégé, notamment par des procédures d’authentification. L’exception ou la limitation d'authentification. L'exception ou la limitation devrait s'entendre comme couvrant les besoins devrait s'entendre comme couvrant les besoins spécifiques en matière d’accessibilité des spécifiques en matière d'accessibilité des personnes handicapées, dans le cadre de personnes handicapées, dans le cadre de l’illustration à des fins d’enseignement. l'illustration à des fins d'enseignement.

Or. fr

Amendment 200 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(17) Different arrangements, based on the deleted implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing agreements covering further uses, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate educational uses of works and other subject-matter. Such arrangements have usually been developed taking account of the needs of educational establishments and different levels of education. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception or limitation in relation to digital uses and cross-border teaching activities, the modalities of implementation may differ from a Member State to another, to the extent they do not hamper the effective application of the exception or limitation or cross-border uses. This should allow Member States to build on the existing arrangements concluded at national level. In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, covering at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception. This mechanism would, for example, allow giving precedence to licences for materials which are primarily intended for the educational market. In order to avoid that such mechanism results in legal uncertainty or administrative burden for educational establishments, Member States adopting this approach should take concrete measures to ensure that licensing schemes allowing digital uses of works or other subject- matter for the purpose of illustration for teaching are easily available and that educational establishments are aware of the existence of such licensing schemes.

Or. en

Amendment 201 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(17) Different arrangements, based on the deleted implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing agreements covering further uses, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate educational uses of works and other subject-matter. Such arrangements have usually been developed taking account of the needs of educational establishments and different levels of education. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception or limitation in relation to digital uses and cross-border teaching activities, the modalities of implementation may differ from a Member State to another, to the extent they do not hamper the effective application of the exception or limitation or cross-border uses. This should allow Member States to build on the existing arrangements concluded at national level. In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, covering at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception. This mechanism would, for example, allow giving precedence to licences for materials which are primarily intended for the educational market. In order to avoid that such mechanism results in legal uncertainty or administrative burden for educational establishments, Member States adopting this approach should take concrete measures to ensure that licensing schemes allowing digital uses of works or other subject- matter for the purpose of illustration for teaching are easily available and that educational establishments are aware of the existence of such licensing schemes.

Or. en

Amendment 202 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(17) Different arrangements, based on the (17) Different arrangements, based on the implementation of the exception provided for in implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing agreements covering further uses, are in place in agreements covering further uses, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate a number of Member States in order to facilitate educational uses of works and other subject- educational uses of works and other subject- matter. Such arrangements have usually been matter. Such arrangements have usually been developed taking account of the needs of developed taking account of the needs of educational establishments and different levels educational establishments and different levels of education. Whereas it is essential to of education. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception or limitation in relation to digital uses exception or limitation in relation to all uses and and cross-border teaching activities, the cross-border teaching activities, scientific modalities of implementation may differ from a research and private study, the modalities of Member State to another, to the extent they do implementation may differ from a Member not hamper the effective application of the State to another, to the extent they do not exception or limitation or cross-border uses. hamper in any way the effective application of This should allow Member States to build on the exception or cross-border uses. the existing arrangements concluded at national level. In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, covering at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception. This mechanism would, for example, allow giving precedence to licences for materials which are primarily intended for the educational market. In order to avoid that such mechanism results in legal uncertainty or administrative burden for educational establishments, Member States adopting this approach should take concrete measures to ensure that licensing schemes allowing digital uses of works or other subject-matter for the purpose of illustration for teaching are easily available and that educational establishments are aware of the existence of such licensing schemes.

Or. en

Amendment 203 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(17) Different arrangements, based on the (17) Different arrangements, based on the implementation of the exception provided for in implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing agreements covering further uses, are in place in agreements covering further uses, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate a number of Member States in order to facilitate educational uses of works and other subject- educational uses of works and other subject- matter. Such arrangements have usually been matter. Such arrangements have usually been developed taking account of the needs of developed taking account of the needs of educational establishments and different levels educational establishments and different levels of education. Whereas it is essential to of education. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception or limitation in relation to digital uses exception or limitation in relation to digital uses and cross-border teaching activities, the and cross-border teaching activities, the modalities of implementation may differ from a modalities of implementation may differ from a Member State to another, to the extent they do Member State to another, to the extent they do not hamper the effective application of the not hamper the effective application of the exception or limitation or cross-border uses. exception or limitation or cross-border uses. As This should allow Member States to build on such, any other compensation mechanisms the existing arrangements concluded at should be limited to cases where there is a risk national level. In particular, Member States of unreasonable prejudice to the legitimate could decide to subject the application of the interests of right-holders. exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, covering at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception. This mechanism would, for example, allow giving precedence to licences for materials which are primarily intended for the educational market. In order to avoid that such mechanism results in legal uncertainty or administrative burden for educational establishments, Member States adopting this approach should take concrete measures to ensure that licensing schemes allowing digital uses of works or other subject-matter for the purpose of illustration for teaching are easily available and that educational establishments are aware of the existence of such licensing schemes.

Or. en

Amendment 204 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(17) Different arrangements, based on the (17) Different arrangements, based on the implementation of the exception provided for in implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing agreements covering further uses, are in place in agreements covering further uses, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate a number of Member States in order to facilitate educational uses of works and other subject- educational uses of works and other subject- matter. Such arrangements have usually been matter. Such arrangements have usually been developed taking account of the needs of developed taking account of the needs of educational establishments and different levels educational establishments and different levels of education. Whereas it is essential to of education. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception or limitation in relation to digital uses exception or limitation in relation to digital uses and cross-border teaching activities, the and cross-border teaching activities, the modalities of implementation may differ from a modalities of implementation may differ from a Member State to another, to the extent they do Member State to another, to the extent they do not hamper the effective application of the not hamper the effective application of the exception or limitation or cross-border uses. exception or limitation or cross-border uses. This should allow Member States to build on This should allow Member States to build on the existing arrangements concluded at national the existing arrangements concluded at national level. In particular, Member States could decide level. In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, covering at least the same of adequate licences, covering at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception. This uses as those allowed under the exception. This mechanism would, for example, allow giving mechanism would, for example, allow giving precedence to licences for materials which are precedence to licences for materials which are primarily intended for the educational market. primarily intended for the educational market. In order to avoid that such mechanism results in In order to avoid that such mechanism results in legal uncertainty or administrative burden for legal uncertainty or administrative burden for educational establishments, Member States educational establishments, Member States adopting this approach should take concrete adopting this approach should take concrete measures to ensure that licensing schemes measures to ensure that licensing schemes allowing digital uses of works or other subject- allowing digital uses of works or other subject- matter for the purpose of illustration for matter for the purpose of illustration for teaching are easily available and that teaching are easily available and that educational establishments are aware of the educational establishments are aware of the existence of such licensing schemes. existence of such licensing schemes. In order to ensure the availability and accessibility of such licences for beneficiaries, Member States are encouraged to develop appropriate tools, such as a single portal or database.

Or. en

Justification

The suggested amendment would increase the accessibility of licences, however, at the same time , the decision would be left to Member States which tools they consider to be appropriate. The issue of developing a single portal or database should be carried out on a voluntary basis, since not every Member State has the capacity (or the funding) to develop such tools.

Amendment 205 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella, Robert Rochefort

Proposal for a directive Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(17) Different arrangements, based on the (17) Different arrangements, based on the implementation of the exception provided for in implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing agreements covering further uses, are in place in agreements covering further uses, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate a number of Member States in order to facilitate educational uses of works and other subject- educational uses of works and other subject- matter. Such arrangements have usually been matter. Such arrangements have usually been developed taking account of the needs of developed taking account of the needs of educational establishments and different levels educational establishments and different levels of education. Whereas it is essential to of education. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception or limitation in relation to digital uses exception or limitation in relation to digital uses and cross-border teaching activities, the and cross-border teaching activities, the modalities of implementation may differ from a modalities of implementation may differ from a Member State to another, to the extent they do Member State to another, to the extent they do not hamper the effective application of the not hamper the effective application of the exception or limitation or cross-border uses. exception or limitation or cross-border uses. This should allow Member States to build on This should allow Member States to build on the existing arrangements concluded at national the existing arrangements concluded at national level. In particular, Member States could decide level. In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, covering at least the same of adequate licences, covering at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception. This uses as those allowed under the exception. This mechanism would, for example, allow giving mechanism should not apply to materials which precedence to licences for materials which are are primarily intended for the educational primarily intended for the educational market. market, for which it should be possible to In order to avoid that such mechanism results in arrange licences. In order to avoid that such legal uncertainty or administrative burden for mechanism results in legal uncertainty or educational establishments, Member States administrative burden for educational adopting this approach should take concrete establishments, Member States adopting this measures to ensure that licensing schemes approach should take concrete measures to allowing digital uses of works or other subject- ensure that licensing schemes allowing digital matter for the purpose of illustration for uses of works or other subject-matter for the teaching are easily available and that purpose of illustration for teaching are easily educational establishments are aware of the available and that educational establishments existence of such licensing schemes. are aware of the existence of such licensing schemes.

Or. en

Amendment 206 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(17) Différentes modalités, fondées sur la mise (17) Différentes modalités, fondées sur la mise en œuvre de l’exception prévue par la directive en œuvre de l'exception prévue par la directive 2001/29/CE ou sur des contrats de licence 2001/29/CE ou sur des contrats de licence couvrant d’autres utilisations, ont été mises en couvrant d'autres utilisations, ont été mises en place dans un certain nombre d’États membres place dans un certain nombre d'États membres afin de faciliter les utilisations pédagogiques des afin de faciliter les utilisations pédagogiques des œuvres et autres objets protégés. Ces modalités œuvres et autres objets protégés. Ces modalités ont généralement été définies en tenant compte ont généralement été définies en tenant compte des besoins des établissements d’enseignement des besoins des établissements d'enseignement et des différents niveaux d’éducation. S’il est et des différents niveaux d'éducation. Si cette essentiel d’harmoniser la portée de la nouvelle nouvelle exception ou limitation facultative par exception ou limitation obligatoire par rapport rapport aux utilisations numériques dans un aux utilisations numériques et aux activités contexte pédagogique peut s'appliquer dans d’enseignement transfrontières, les modalités tous les Etats membres, les modalités de mise de mise en œuvre peuvent varier d’un État en œuvre peuvent varier d'un État membre à membre à l’autre, pour autant qu'elles l'autre, pour autant qu'elles n'entravent pas n’entravent ni l'application effective de l'application effective de l'exception ou de la l’exception ou de la limitation ni les utilisations limitation. Les États membres pourraient ainsi transfrontières. Les États membres pourraient s'appuyer sur les accords existants conclus au ainsi s’appuyer sur les accords existants conclus niveau national. En particulier, ils pourraient au niveau national. En particulier, ils pourraient décider de subordonner l'application de décider de subordonner l’application de l'exception ou de la limitation, entièrement ou l’exception ou de la limitation, entièrement ou partiellement, à la disponibilité des licences partiellement, à la disponibilité des licences appropriées, couvrant au moins les mêmes appropriées, couvrant au moins les mêmes utilisations que celles autorisées au titre de utilisations que celles autorisées au titre de l'exception. Ce mécanisme permettrait, par l’exception. Ce mécanisme permettrait, par exemple, de donner la priorité aux licences sur exemple, de donner la priorité aux licences sur du matériel qui est principalement destiné au du matériel qui est principalement destiné au marché éducatif. Afin d'éviter qu'un tel marché éducatif. Afin d’éviter qu'un tel mécanisme n'entraîne une insécurité juridique mécanisme n'entraîne une insécurité juridique ou une charge administrative supplémentaire ou une charge administrative supplémentaire pour les établissements d'enseignement, les pour les établissements d'enseignement, les États membres adoptant cette approche États membres adoptant cette approche devraient prendre des mesures concrètes afin devraient prendre des mesures concrètes afin d'assurer un accès aisé aux systèmes de d’assurer un accès aisé aux systèmes de concession de licences permettant l'utilisation concession de licences permettant l’utilisation numérique d'extraits d'œuvres ou autres objets numérique d’œuvres ou autres objets protégés à protégés à des fins d'illustration pour des fins d’illustration pour l’enseignement, et de l'enseignement, et de faire en sorte que les faire en sorte que les établissements soient établissements soient informés de l'existence de informés de l’existence de ces systèmes. ces systèmes.

Or. fr

Amendment 207 Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(17) Different arrangements, based on the (17) Different arrangements, based on the implementation of the exception provided for in implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing Directive 2001/29/EC or on licensing agreements covering further uses, are in place in agreements covering further uses, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate a number of Member States in order to facilitate educational uses of works and other subject- educational uses of works and other subject- matter. Such arrangements have usually been matter. Such arrangements have usually been developed taking account of the needs of developed taking account of the needs of educational establishments and different levels educational establishments and different levels of education. Whereas it is essential to of education. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception or limitation in relation to digital uses exception or limitation in relation to digital uses and cross-border teaching activities, the and cross-border teaching activities, the modalities of implementation may differ from a modalities of implementation may differ from a Member State to another, to the extent they do Member State to another, to the extent they do not hamper the effective application of the not hamper the effective application of the exception or limitation or cross-border uses. exception or limitation or cross-border uses. This should allow Member States to build on This should allow Member States to build on the existing arrangements concluded at national the existing arrangements concluded at national level. In particular, Member States could decide level. In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, covering at least the same of adequate licences, covering at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception. This uses as those allowed under the exception. This mechanism would, for example, allow giving mechanism should not hamper the use of precedence to licences for materials which are licences for materials which are primarily primarily intended for the educational market. intended for the educational market and sheet In order to avoid that such mechanism results in music. In order to avoid that such mechanism legal uncertainty or administrative burden for results in legal uncertainty or administrative educational establishments, Member States burden for educational establishments, Member adopting this approach should take concrete States adopting this approach should take measures to ensure that licensing schemes concrete measures to ensure that licensing allowing digital uses of works or other subject- schemes allowing digital uses of works or other matter for the purpose of illustration for subject-matter for the purpose of illustration for teaching are easily available and that teaching are easily available and that educational establishments are aware of the educational establishments are aware of the existence of such licensing schemes. existence of such licensing schemes.

Or. en

Amendment 208 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(17 a) In order to guarantee legal certainty when a Member State decides to subject the application of the exception to the availability of adequate licences, it is necessary to specify under which conditions an educational establishment may use protected works or other subject-matter under that exception and, conversely, when it should act under a licensing scheme.

Or. en

Justification

The proposed amendment is needed in order to provide legal certainty in cases when a Member State decides to subject the application of the exception to the availability of adequate licences.

Amendment 209 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 18

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(18) An act of preservation may require a (18) An act of preservation may require a reproduction of a work or other subject-matter reproduction of a work or other subject-matter in the collection of a cultural heritage institution in the collection of a cultural heritage institution and consequently the authorisation of the and consequently the authorisation of the relevant rightholders. Cultural heritage relevant rightholders. Cultural heritage institutions are engaged in the preservation of institutions are engaged in the preservation of their collections for future generations. Digital cultural heritage for future generations. Digital technologies offer new ways to preserve the technologies offer new ways to preserve the heritage contained in those collections but they heritage contained in the collections of cultural also create new challenges. In view of these heritage institutions, but they also create new new challenges, it is necessary to adapt the challenges. One such challenge is the current legal framework by providing a systematic collection and preservation of works mandatory exception to the right of which are not originally published by reproduction in order to allow those acts of traditional analogue means, but originate in a preservation. digital form (so-called born-digital works). Whereas publishers in Member States are typically obliged to provide a reference copy of each published work to certain cultural heritage institutions for archiving purposes, such obligations often do not apply to born- digital works. In the absence of the provision of reference copies by the authors or publishers of born-digital works, cultural heritage institutions should be allowed to make reproductions of born-digital works at their own initiative whenever they are openly available on the Internet, in order to add them to their permanent collections. Cultural heritage institutions also engage in making internal reproductions for many varying purposes including insurance, rights clearance, and loans. In view of these new challenges, it is necessary to adapt the current legal framework by providing a mandatory exception to the right of reproduction.

Or. en

Amendment 210 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 18

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(18) Действията по опазването може да (18) Действията по опазването може да изискват възпроизвеждане на произведение изискват възпроизвеждане на произведение или друг обект в сбирката на институция в или друг обект в сбирката на институция в областта на културното наследство и областта на културното наследство и следователно разрешение от съответните следователно разрешение от съответните носители на права. Институциите в областта носители на права. Институциите в областта на културното наследство са ангажирани с на културното наследство, опазването на техните сбирки за бъдещите изследователските организации и поколения. Цифровите технологии предлагат учебните заведения са ангажирани с нови начини за опазване на наследството в опазването на техните сбирки за бъдещите тези сбирки, но пораждат и нови поколения. Цифровите технологии предлагат предизвикателства. С оглед на тези нови нови начини за опазване на наследството в предизвикателства е необходимо да се тези сбирки, но пораждат и нови адаптира действащата правна рамка, като се предизвикателства. Институциите в предвиди задължително изключение за областта на културно наследство, правото на възпроизвеждане, което ще изследователските организации и позволи тези действия по опазването. учебните заведения също са ангажирани с извършването на вътрешно- организационно възпроизвеждане на произведения за различни цели, включително застраховка, уреждане на правата и заеми. С оглед на тези нови предизвикателства е необходимо да се адаптира действащата правна рамка, като се предвиди задължително изключение за правото на възпроизвеждане.

Or. bg

Amendment 211 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 18

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(18) Un acte de préservation peut nécessiter la (18) Un acte de préservation peut nécessiter la reproduction d’une œuvre ou d’un autre objet reproduction d'une œuvre ou d'un autre objet protégé se trouvant dans la collection d’une protégé se trouvant dans la collection d'une institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel et institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel ou dès lors nécessiter l’autorisation des titulaires de de bibliothèques qui font parfois œuvre de droits concernés. Les institutions de gestion du préservation du patrimoine régional et/ou patrimoine culturel œuvrent à la préservation de national, et dès lors nécessiter l'autorisation des leurs collections pour les générations futures. titulaires de droits concernés. Les institutions de Les technologies numériques offrent de gestion du patrimoine culturel œuvrent à la nouvelles possibilités de préserver le patrimoine préservation de leurs collections pour les contenu dans ces collections, mais elles font générations futures. Les technologies naître également de nouveaux défis. Face à ces numériques offrent de nouvelles possibilités de derniers, il est nécessaire d’adapter le cadre préserver le patrimoine contenu dans ces juridique actuel en prévoyant une exception collections, mais elles font naître également de obligatoire au droit de reproduction pour nouveaux défis. Une exception facultative peut permettre ces actes de préservation. permettre aux Etats membres d'agir de manière proportionnée et en cohérence avec les traditions juridiques nationales, dans un objectif de préservation du patrimoine culturel.

Or. fr

Amendment 212 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 18

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(18) An act of preservation may require a (18) An act of preservation may require a reproduction of a work or other subject-matter reproduction of a work or other subject-matter in the collection of a cultural heritage institution in the collection of a cultural heritage institution and consequently the authorisation of the and consequently the authorisation of the relevant rightholders. Cultural heritage relevant rightholders. Cultural heritage institutions are engaged in the preservation of institutions are engaged in the preservation of their collections for future generations. Digital their collections for future generations. Digital technologies offer new ways to preserve the technologies offer new ways to preserve the heritage contained in those collections but they heritage contained in those collections but they also create new challenges. In view of these also create new challenges. In view of these new challenges, it is necessary to adapt the new challenges, it is necessary to adapt the current legal framework by providing a current legal framework by providing a mandatory exception to the right of mandatory exception to the right of reproduction in order to allow those acts of reproduction in order to allow those acts of preservation. preservation as well as reproductions for other purposes such as insurance and rights clearance and including long-term and cross border loans.

Or. en

Amendment 213 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 18

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(18) Un acte de préservation peut nécessiter la (18) Un acte de préservation peut nécessiter la reproduction d’une œuvre ou d’un autre objet reproduction d'une œuvre ou d'un autre objet protégé se trouvant dans la collection d’une protégé se trouvant dans la collection d'une institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel et institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel et dès lors nécessiter l’autorisation des titulaires de dès lors nécessiter l'autorisation des titulaires de droits concernés. Les institutions de gestion du droits concernés. Les institutions de gestion du patrimoine culturel œuvrent à la préservation de patrimoine culturel œuvrent à la préservation de leurs collections pour les générations futures. leurs collections pour les générations futures. Les technologies numériques offrent de Les technologies numériques offrent de nouvelles possibilités de préserver le patrimoine nouvelles possibilités de préserver le patrimoine contenu dans ces collections, mais elles font contenu dans ces collections, mais elles font naître également de nouveaux défis. Face à ces naître également de nouveaux défis. Face à ces derniers, il est nécessaire d’adapter le cadre derniers, il est nécessaire d'adapter le cadre juridique actuel en prévoyant une exception juridique actuel en prévoyant une exception obligatoire au droit de reproduction pour obligatoire au droit de reproduction pour permettre ces actes de préservation. permettre ces actes de préservation pour ces institutions de gestion du patrimoine culturel.

Or. fr

Amendment 214 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 18

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(18) An act of preservation may require a (18) An act of preservation may require a reproduction of a work or other subject-matter reproduction of a work or other subject-matter in the collection of a cultural heritage institution in the collection of a cultural heritage institution and consequently the authorisation of the and consequently the authorisation of the relevant rightholders. Cultural heritage relevant rightholders. Cultural heritage institutions are engaged in the preservation of institutions are engaged in the preservation of their collections for future generations. Digital their collections for future generations. Digital technologies offer new ways to preserve the technologies offer new ways to preserve the heritage contained in those collections but they heritage contained in those collections but they also create new challenges. In view of these could also create new challenges. In view of new challenges, it is necessary to adapt the possible new challenges, it is necessary to adapt current legal framework by providing a the current legal framework by providing a mandatory exception to the right of mandatory exception to the right of reproduction in order to allow those acts of reproduction in order to allow those acts of preservation. preservation.

Or. en

Amendment 215 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 19

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(19) Different approaches in the Member States (19) Different approaches in the Member States for acts of preservation by cultural heritage for acts of preservation, including reproduction institutions hamper cross-border cooperation by cultural heritage institutions, research and the sharing of means of preservation by organizations and educational establishments, cultural heritage institutions in the internal hamper cross-border cooperation and the market, leading to an inefficient use of sharing of means of preservation in the internal resources. market, leading to an inefficient use of resources. The collections of cultural heritage institutions, research organizations and educational establishments, if not unique, are likely to be replicated and sit in other institutions, including those in other Member States. Cultural heritage institutions, research organizations, and educational establishments could also want to create cross border preservation networks, to use resources effectively.

Or. en

Amendment 216 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 19

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(19) Les différentes approches adoptées dans (19) L'article 1 h) de la convention de les États membres pour les actes de l'UNESCO sur la protection et la promotion de préservation relevant des institutions de la diversité des expressions culturelles, à gestion du patrimoine culturel entravent la laquelle plusieurs Etats membres mais coopération transfrontière et le partage des également l'Union sont parties, réaffirme " le moyens de préservation par ces institutions droit souverain des États de conserver, dans le marché intérieur, entraînant une d'adopter et de mettre en œuvre les politiques utilisation inefficiente des ressources. et mesures qu'ils jugent appropriées pour la protection et la promotion de la diversité des expressions culturelles sur leur territoire". De ce fait, pour des exigences d'ordre légal, il est impératif que la présente directive n'entre pas en contradiction avec les obligations du droit international en matière de protection et de préservation du patrimoine culturel.

Or. fr

Amendment 217 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 19

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(19) Different approaches in the Member States (19) Different approaches in the Member States for acts of preservation by cultural heritage for acts of reproduction by cultural heritage institutions hamper cross-border cooperation institutions and educational establishments and the sharing of means of preservation by hamper cross-border cooperation. The cultural heritage institutions in the internal collections of cultural heritage institutions, if market, leading to an inefficient use of not unique, are likely to be replicated and sit in resources. other institutions, including those in other Member States. It is possible that cultural heritage institutions would also wish to create preservation networks cross borders, to use resources efficiently.

Or. en

Amendment 218 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 19

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(19) Different approaches in the Member States (19) Different approaches in the Member States for acts of preservation by cultural heritage for acts of preservation by cultural heritage institutions hamper cross-border cooperation institutions hamper cross-border cooperation and the sharing of means of preservation by and the sharing of means of preservation by cultural heritage institutions in the internal cultural heritage institutions in the internal market, leading to an inefficient use of market, leading to an inefficient use of resources. resources and risking to negatively affect the preservation of cultural heritage.

Or. en

Amendment 219 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(20) Member States should therefore be (20) Member States should therefore be required to provide for an exception to permit required to provide for an exception to permit cultural heritage institutions to reproduce works cultural heritage institutions, research and other subject-matter permanently in their organizations and educational establishments collections for preservation purposes, for to reproduce works and other subject-matter example to address technological obsolescence permanently in their collections for preservation or the degradation of original supports. Such an purposes, for example to address technological exception should allow for the making of copies obsolescence or the degradation of original by the appropriate preservation tool, means or supports or for the purpose of digitalization, technology, in the required number and at any research or education. Such an exception point in the life of a work or other subject- should allow for the making of copies by the matter to the extent required in order to produce appropriate preservation tool, means or a copy for preservation purposes only. technology, in the required number and at any point in the life of a work or other subject- matter to the extent required in order to produce a copy for preservation purposes only. Such an exception should cover in particular both cultural heritage institutions, including archeological or other museum institutions of universities and colleges holding the works or other subject-matter, and third party cultural heritage institutions or service providers, which could be requested to perform the act of reproduction on behalf of a cultural heritage institution, research organization or educational establishment, within the scope of the exception.

Or. en

Amendment 220 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(20) Member States should therefore be (20) Member States should therefore be required to provide for an exception to permit required to provide for an exception to permit cultural heritage institutions to reproduce works cultural heritage institutions and educational and other subject-matter permanently in their establishments to reproduce works and other collections for preservation purposes, for subject-matter permanently in their collections example to address technological obsolescence for the purpose of carrying out their public or the degradation of original supports. Such an interest mission in preservation, research, exception should allow for the making of education, culture and teaching, for example to copies by the appropriate preservation tool, address technological obsolescence or the means or technology, in the required number degradation of original supports, to build and at any point in the life of a work or other collections of born-digital works or for the subject-matter to the extent required in order to purpose of digitisation. Such an exception produce a copy for preservation purposes only. should allow for the making of copies in any format or medium at any point in the life of a work or other subject-matter and to the extent required for such reproduction, including via partnerships with other institutions or third parties, which could be requested to perform the act of reproduction on behalf of a cultural heritage institution within the scope of the exception.

Or. en

Amendment 221 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(20) Member States should therefore be (20) Member States should therefore be required to provide for an exception to permit required to provide for an exception to permit cultural heritage institutions to reproduce works cultural heritage institutions to reproduce works and other subject-matter permanently in their and other subject-matter permanently in their collections for preservation purposes, for collections for preservation purposes, for example to address technological obsolescence example to address technological obsolescence or the degradation of original supports. Such an or the degradation of original supports. Such an exception should allow for the making of copies exception should allow for the making of copies by the appropriate preservation tool, means or by the appropriate preservation tool, means or technology, in the required number and at any technology, in the required number and at any point in the life of a work or other subject- point in the life of a work or other subject- matter to the extent required in order to produce matter to the extent required in order to produce a copy for preservation purposes only. a copy for preservation purposes only. Such an exception should cover both cultural heritage institutions holding the works or other subject- matter and third party cultural heritage institutions or service providers, which could be requested to perform the act of reproduction on behalf of a cultural heritage institution within the scope of the exception.

Or. en

Justification

It is both necessary and practical that other third parties requested by cultural institutions may also act based on this exception on behalf of these institutions.

Amendment 222 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(20) Поради тази причина от държавите (20) Поради тази причина от държавите членки следва да се изисква да предвидят членки следва да се изисква да предвидят заключение, което да позволи на заключение, което да позволи на институциите в областта на културното институциите в областта на културното наследство да възпроизвеждат произведения наследство, изследователските и други обекти за постоянно включване в организации и учебните заведения да техните сбирки с оглед на опазването им, възпроизвеждат произведения и други например за да се решат въпросите на обекти за постоянно включване в техните технологичното остаряване или влошаването сбирки с оглед на опазването им за целите на състоянието на първоначалните опори. на изпълнението на тяхната мисия в Подобно изключение следва да даде обществен интерес в областта на възможност да се правят копия чрез опазването, научните изследвания, подходящо средство, инструмент или образованието, културата и технология за опазване, в достатъчен брой и преподаването, например за да се решат на всеки етап от жизнения цикъл на въпросите на технологичното остаряване или произведението или другия обект, доколкото влошаването на състоянието на това е необходимо, за да се създаде копие първоначалните опори или за целите на единствено за целите на опазването. цифровизацията. Подобно изключение следва да даде възможност да се правят копия във всякакъв формат или носител чрез подходящо средство, инструмент или технология за опазване, в достатъчен брой и на всеки етап от жизнения цикъл на произведението или другия обект, доколкото това е необходимо за такова възпроизвеждане на произведения, включително и чрез партньорство с други институции или трети страни.

Or. bg

Amendment 223 Laura Ferrara, Isabella Adinolfi, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(20) Gli Stati membri, pertanto, dovrebbero (20) Gli Stati membri, pertanto, dovrebbero essere tenuti a prevedere un'eccezione che essere tenuti a prevedere un'eccezione che autorizzi gli istituti di tutela del patrimonio autorizzi gli istituti di tutela del patrimonio culturale a riprodurre a fini conservativi le opere culturale a riprodurre a fini conservativi le opere e altro materiale presenti in modo permanente e altro materiale presenti in modo permanente nelle loro raccolte per far fronte, ad esempio, nelle loro raccolte, così come le tradizioni e le all’obsolescenza tecnologica o al degrado dei eredità culturali immateriali, per far fronte, ad supporti originari. Tale eccezione dovrebbe esempio, all’obsolescenza tecnologica o al consentire la realizzazione di copie con lo degrado dei supporti originari o alla perdita dei strumento, il mezzo o la tecnologia conservativa patrimoni orali o immateriali. Tale eccezione adeguata, nel numero richiesto e in qualsiasi dovrebbe consentire la realizzazione di copie momento della vita di un’opera o altro materiale con lo strumento, il mezzo o la tecnologia e nella misura necessaria a produrne una copia conservativa adeguata, nel numero richiesto e in esclusivamente a fini di conservazione. qualsiasi momento della vita di un’opera o altro materiale e nella misura necessaria a produrne una copia a fini di conservazione, consultazione, catalogazione ed archivio.

Or. it

Amendment 224 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(20) Member States should therefore be (20) Member States should therefore be required to provide for an exception to permit required to provide for an exception to permit cultural heritage institutions to reproduce works cultural heritage institutions and educational and other subject-matter permanently in their establishments to reproduce works and other collections for preservation purposes, for subject-matter, digitally or otherwise, example to address technological obsolescence permanently in their collections for preservation or the degradation of original supports. Such an purposes, for example to address technological exception should allow for the making of copies obsolescence or the degradation of original by the appropriate preservation tool, means or supports. Such an exception should allow for technology, in the required number and at any the making of copies in any format by the point in the life of a work or other subject- appropriate preservation tool, means or matter to the extent required in order to produce technology, in the required number and at any a copy for preservation purposes only. point in the life of a work or other subject- matter to the extent required in order to produce a copy for preservation purposes only.

Or. en

Amendment 225 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(20) Les États membres devraient donc être (20) Les États membres devraient donc avoir la tenus de prévoir une exception permettant aux possibilité de prévoir une exception permettant institutions de gestion du patrimoine culturel de aux institutions de gestion du patrimoine reproduire des œuvres et autres objets protégés culturel et aux bibliothèques de reproduire des de manière permanente dans leurs collections à œuvres et autres objets protégés de manière des fins de préservation, par exemple pour permanente dans leurs collections à des fins de remédier à l’obsolescence technologique ou à la préservation, par exemple pour remédier à dégradation des supports originaux. Une telle l'obsolescence technologique ou à la exception devrait permettre la confection de dégradation des supports originaux. Une telle copies en utilisant l'outil, le moyen ou la exception devrait permettre la confection de technologie de préservation qui convient, et ce copies en utilisant l'outil, le moyen ou la en nombre suffisant et à n’importe quel stade de technologie de préservation qui convient, et ce la vie d’une œuvre ou d’un autre objet protégé, en nombre suffisant et à n'importe quel stade de dans la mesure requise pour produire une copie la vie d'une œuvre ou d'un autre objet protégé, exclusivement à des fins de préservation. dans la mesure requise pour produire une copie exclusivement à des fins de préservation.

Or. fr

Amendment 226 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(20) Member States should therefore be (20) Member States should therefore be required to provide for an exception to permit required to provide for an exception to permit cultural heritage institutions to reproduce works cultural heritage institutions to reproduce works and other subject-matter permanently in their and other subject-matter permanently in their collections for preservation purposes, for collections for preservation purposes, for example to address technological obsolescence example to address technological obsolescence, or the degradation of original supports. Such an the degradation of original supports and exception should allow for the making of copies digitisation. Such an exception should allow for by the appropriate preservation tool, means or the making of copies by the appropriate technology, in the required number and at any preservation tool, means or technology, in the point in the life of a work or other subject- required number and at any point in the life of a matter to the extent required in order to produce work or other subject-matter to the extent a copy for preservation purposes only. required in order to produce a copy for preservation purposes only.

Or. en

Amendment 227 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 21

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21) Aux fins de la présente directive, les (21) Aux fins de la présente directive, les œuvres et autres objets protégés devraient être œuvres et autres objets protégés devraient être considérés comme se trouvant à titre permanent considérés comme se trouvant à titre permanent dans la collection d’une institution de gestion du dans la collection d'une institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel lorsque les copies sont patrimoine culturel lorsque les copies de ces détenues à titre permanent par cette institution oeuvres ou autres objets protégés sont détenues ou lui appartiennent, par exemple à la suite d’un à titre permanent par cette institution ou lui transfert de propriété ou d'un contrat de licence. appartiennent, par exemple à la suite d'un transfert de propriété de l'oeuvre ou autre objet protégé ou d'un contrat de licence, et ceci pour permettre le stockage du fichier sur le serveur de l'Institution.

Or. fr

Amendment 228 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 21

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21) For the purposes of this Directive, works (21) For the purposes of this Directive, works and other subject-matter should be considered to and other subject-matter should be considered to be permanently in the collection of a cultural be permanently in the collection of a cultural heritage institution when copies are owned or heritage institution when copies are owned, held permanently held by the cultural heritage on long term loan or are permanently held by institution, for example as a result of a transfer the cultural heritage institution, research of ownership or licence agreements. organization, or educational establishment, for example as a result of a transfer of ownership or licence agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 229 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Recital 21

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21) По смисъла на настоящата директива (21) По смисъла на настоящата директива произведенията и другите обекти следва да произведенията и другите обекти следва да се смятат за постоянно включени в сбирката се смятат за постоянно включени в сбирката на институция в областта на културното на институция в областта на културното наследство, когато са собственост или наследство, когато са собственост или постоянно във владение на институцията в постоянно във владение на институцията в областта на културното наследство, областта на културното наследство, например в резултат на прехвърляне на изследователската организация или собствеността или лицензионни учебното заведение, например в резултат на споразумения. прехвърляне на собствеността, лицензионни споразумения или задължително депозиране.

Or. bg

Amendment 230 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 21

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21) For the purposes of this Directive, works (21) For the purposes of this Directive, works and other subject-matter should be considered to and other subject-matter should be considered to be permanently in the collection of a cultural be permanently in the collection of a cultural heritage institution when copies are owned or heritage institution when copies are owned, held permanently held by the cultural heritage on long-term loan or are permanently held by institution, for example as a result of a transfer the cultural heritage institution, or educational of ownership or licence agreements. establishment, for example as a result of a transfer of ownership or licence agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 231 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 21

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21) Aux fins de la présente directive, les (21) Aux fins de la présente directive, les œuvres et autres objets protégés devraient être œuvres et autres objets protégés devraient être considérés comme se trouvant à titre permanent considérés comme se trouvant à titre permanent dans la collection d’une institution de gestion du dans la collection d'une institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel lorsque les copies sont patrimoine culturel ou d'une bibliothèque détenues à titre permanent par cette institution lorsque les copies sont détenues à titre ou lui appartiennent, par exemple à la suite d’un permanent par cette institution ou lui transfert de propriété ou d'un contrat de licence. appartiennent, par exemple à la suite d'un transfert de propriété ou d'un contrat de licence.

Or. fr

Amendment 232 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 a) Cultural heritage institutions, and educational establishments have long been involved in making reproductions for individual researchers in their collections, upon their request and on an ad hoc basis. This serves to support and enrich an individual's scientific research, as a researcher who cannot travel to where a work or related subject matter is held is able to request that a reproduction be made for them in compliance with current Union rules on exceptions and limitations. Research, education and learning is increasingly taking place in a cross border environment. There is however a lack of clarity as to whether the existing exceptions or limitations in Member States provide for a cross-border effect. This situation hampers scientific research and the development of the European Research Area. This legal uncertainty should be addressed, and researchers provided with a clear framework that allows them to request a cultural heritage institution, or educational establishment to make and supply them with a reproduction of a work or other subject matter for the purposes of their research, including in a cross border context.

Or. en

Amendment 233 Therese Comodini Cachia

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 a) Given the existence of divergences between collective management practices across Member States and creative and cultural sectors, a solution needs to be provided for where licencing mechanisms are not effective solutions because of, for example a lack of collective licensing or the fact that no collective management organisation has been able to achieve recognition in a Member State or for a sector. In such instances, where licensing mechanisms are lacking, it is necessary to provide for an exception that allows cultural heritage institutions to make out of commerce works held in their collection available online on their own secure technology networks. Yet in doing so, it is also necessary to provide authors with the possibility to provide licenses or to form a collective management organisation as well as to involve them in the determination of whether such licences are available or not. In addition, rightholders should be able to object to the inclusion of their work on the secure technology networks of the cultural heritage institutions.

Or. en

Amendment 234 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Frédérique Ries, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 bis) Lorsque du contenu chargé ou mis à disposition par un utilisateur comprend une utilisation courte et proportionnée, à des fins légitimes, d'une citation ou d'un extrait d'une oeuvre ou autre objet protégé, cette utilisation devrait être protégée par l'exception prévue dans la présente directive. Cette exception ne devrait être applicable que dans certains cas spéciaux qui ne portent pas atteinte à une exploitation normale de l'oeuvre ou autre objet protégé concerné ni ne cause un préjudice

injustifié aux intérêts légitimes du titulaire des droits. L'évaluation de ce préjudice devait se fonder sur le degré d'originalité du contenu concerné, sur la longueur ou la taille de la citation ou de l'extrait utilisé, sur le caractère professionnel du contenu concerné ou sur le degré de dommage économique causé, le cas échéant, sans pour autant empêcher le recours légitime à l'exception. Cette exception devrait être sans préjudice des droits moraux des auteurs de l'oeuvre ou autre objet protégé.

Or. fr

Amendment 235 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 bis) À la suite de développements technologiques, des services de la société de l'information ont émergé permettant à leurs utilisateurs de charger ou de mettre à disposition des contenus sous diverses formes et à des fins diverses telles que l'illustration

d'une idée, la critique, la parodie ou encore le pastiche. Ces contenus peuvent inclure de courts extraits d'oeuvres ou d'autres objets protégés préexistants que ces utilisateurs sont susceptibles d'avoir modifiés, combinés ou transformés.

Or. fr

Amendment 236 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 b) Different arrangements, based on the implementation of the exception provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, are in place in a number of Member States in order to facilitate cultural heritage institutions, and educational establishments to give on site access to works and other subject-matter on the premises. Such arrangements exist as educational establishments and cultural heritage institutions are involved in preserving and giving access to their digital collections on the premises. Digital technologies provide new ways of giving access to those collections on the premises, for example the use of WIFI networks to give users access to collections on their own portable devices, such as mobile

phones and laptops. The requirement to use dedicated terminals for giving access to content on the premises has proven impractical and outdated. At the same time, the maturity of digital preservation requires cultural heritage institutions to preserve and give access not just to digitised analogue works and other subject matter, but also to born-digital materials. Member States should therefore be required to provide for an exception to permit cultural heritage institutions, and educational establishments to give access to all digitised and born-digital collections on the premises or online. Such an exception should allow copies to be delivered on any technology to members of the public.

Or. en

Amendment 237 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 b) It should be acknowledged the importance of certain exceptions and limitations already provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, and the need to ensure legal certainty and harmonisation within the internal market. To this end such exceptions and limitations should be made mandatory. It should also be recognised that new technologies are enhancing and changing the ways in which the uses of copyrighted works or other subject matter can take place and be enjoyed, which often are not detrimental to rightholders. Therefore a general de minimis exception should be introduced in order to take into account technological developments.

Or. en

Amendment 238 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 ter) Malgré certains chevauchements avec les exceptions ou limitations existantes, le contenu chargé ou mis à disposition par un utilisateur qui comprend raisonnablement des extraits d'oeuvres ou d'autres objets protégés, n'est pas couvert par l'article 5 de la directive 2001/29/CE. Une telle situation crée une

insécurité juridique à la fois pour les utilisateurs et les ayants-droit. Il convient donc de prévoir une nouvelle exception spécifique pour permettre les utilisations légitimes d'extraits d'oeuvres ou d'autres objets protégés préexistants dans les contenus chargés ou mis à disposition par les utilisateurs.

Or. fr

Amendment 239 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 ter) Les prestataires des services de la société de l'information ne peuvent pas invoquer à leur profit l'exception prévue dans cette Directive, pour l'usage de citations ou d'extraits d'oeuvres protégées ou autres objets

protégés dans le contenu chargé ou mis à disposition par les utilisateurs, afin de s'exonérer de leur responsabilité ou de réduire l'étendue de leurs obligations en vertu des dispositions de l'article 13 de cette directive

Or. fr

Amendment 240 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 c) In its ruling in Case C-174/15, Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht 1a, the Court of Justice recognised that the lending of e-books can fall under the same rules as the lending of physical books. When Member States apply the limitation to copyright in Article 6 of Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 1b, libraries are able to buy any physical book on the market. Once purchased, they can lend it without restrictions linked to contract terms or other measures of protection which prevent the exercise of exceptions and limitations to copyright. That provision should also apply to e-books. Moreover, with the objective of ensuring that all citizens of the Union have access to a full selection of books and other resources, all Member States should ensure that the limitation to the exclusive public lending right in Article 6 of Directive 2006/115/EC is made mandatory. 1a Judgement of the Court of Justice of 10 Nove mber 2016, Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, ECLI:EU:C:2016:856. 1b Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parli ament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellect ual property (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 28).

Or. en

Amendment 241 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 a) In view of allowing citizens and consumers to fully benefit from the opportunities offered by new technologies, public lending of literary works, including e- lending, should be permitted within the internal market.

The concept of lending, within the meaning of Articles 1(1), 2(1)(b) and 6(1) of Directive 2006/115/EC, covers the lending not only of physical books, but also of a digital copy thereof. When Member States apply the derogation set out in Article 6 of Directive

2006/115/EC, libraries should be able to buy any physical book on the market. Once purchased, they can lend it without restrictions linked to contract terms or other measures of protection which prevent the exercise of exceptions and limitations to copyright. These provisions should also apply to e-books. In order to achieve legal certainty and harmonisation within the internal market, Member States should ensure that the exception to the exclusive public lending right set out in article 6 of Directive 2006/115/EC should be mandatory.

Or. en

Amendment 242 Julia Reda, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 d (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 d) The reconciliation of the public's interest to participate in the public sphere by means of an exception regarding the use of depictions of buildings and permanent structures is necessary. Professional photographers and other authors, rightholders, consumers, institutional users and service providers are predominantly using depictions of works on the basis of a national 'freedom of panorama'exceptions and rely on legal certainty for cross-border usage.

Or. en

Amendment 243 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 e (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 e) Following technological developments and evolving user behaviour, a significant phenomenon of cultural creation has emerged, which relies on users uploading or displaying content, in various forms, to online services. Such user-generated content may comprise extracts or quotations of protected works or other subject-matter, which may be altered, combined or transformed for different purposes by users. Such uses of extracts or

quotations within user-generated content, for various purposes such as the illustration of an idea, review or entertainment, are now widespread online and, provided that the use of such extracts or quotations of protected works or other subject-matter is proportionate, do not cause significant economic harm to the rightholders concerned and may even advertise the work used within the user-generated content.

Or. en

Amendment 244 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 f (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 f) Despite some overlap with existing voluntary exceptions or limitations, such as the ones for quotation and parody, the use of protected works or other subject-matter within user-generated content is nonetheless not properly covered by the existing list of exceptions or limitations, creating legal uncertainty for users. Particularly the voluntary nature of existing exceptions and limitations is significantly curtailing the development of user-generated content, which is typically disseminated in a borderless online environment. It is therefore necessary to provide a new mandatory specific exception to authorise the legitimate uses of extracts or quotations of protected works or other subject- matter within user-generated content.

Or. en

Amendment 245 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 21 g (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(21 g) Numerous Member States exempt certain works or other subject matter, such as official works, from copyright protection in line with Article 4 (2) of the Berne Convention. Such rules create scenarios in which content is in the public domain in a Member State, which usually results in that content not being

released under permissible licenses. If other Member States lack corresponding provisions, the legal cross-border reuse of such content is prohibited. Mutual recognition of the public domain status of works resolves any inconsistencies in the cross-border use of works exempted from copyright protection.

Or. en

Amendment 246 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 22

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(22) Cultural heritage institutions should benefit (22) Cultural heritage institutions should benefit from a clear framework for the digitisation and from a clear framework for the digitisation and dissemination, including across borders, of out- dissemination, including across borders, of out- of-commerce works or other subject-matter. of-commerce works or other subject-matter. However, the particular characteristics of the However, the particular characteristics of the collections of out-of-commerce works mean collections of out-of-commerce works mean that obtaining the prior consent of the individual that obtaining the prior consent of the individual rightholders may be very difficult. This can be rightholders may be very difficult. This can be due, for example, to the age of the works or due, for example, to the age of the works or other subject-matter, their limited commercial other subject-matter, the fact that copyright value or the fact that they were never intended terms by far exceed the average commercial for commercial use. It is therefore necessary to availability of works, their limited commercial provide for measures to facilitate the licensing value or the fact that they were never intended of rights in out-of-commerce works that are in for commercial use. It is therefore necessary to the collections of cultural heritage institutions provide for a mandatory exception with cross- and thereby to allow the conclusion of border effect to facilitate the re-use of out-of- agreements with cross-border effect in the commerce works that are in the collections of internal market. cultural heritage institutions. In order to take account of the difference between the timespan of commercial availability of the vast majority of works and their much longer copyright protection terms, works or other subject matter that were first published at least 10 years ago should be deemed to be out of commerce.

Or. en

Amendment 247 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 22

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(22) Cultural heritage institutions should benefit (22) Cultural heritage institutions, educational from a clear framework for the digitisation and establishments or other non-commercial dissemination, including across borders, of out- documentation centers should benefit from a of-commerce works or other subject-matter. clear framework for the digitisation and However, the particular characteristics of the dissemination, including across borders, of out- collections of out-of-commerce works mean of-commerce works or other subject-matter. that obtaining the prior consent of the individual However, the particular characteristics of the rightholders may be very difficult. This can be collections of out-of-commerce works mean due, for example, to the age of the works or that obtaining the prior consent of the individual other subject-matter, their limited commercial rightholders may be very difficult. This can be value or the fact that they were never intended due, for example, to the age of the works or for commercial use. It is therefore necessary to other subject-matter, their limited commercial provide for measures to facilitate the licensing value or the fact that they were never intended of rights in out-of-commerce works that are in for commercial use. It is therefore necessary to the collections of cultural heritage institutions provide for measures to facilitate the and thereby to allow the conclusion of availability of out-of-commerce works that are agreements with cross-border effect in the in the collections of cultural heritage internal market. institutions, educational establishments or other non-commercial documentation centers and thereby to allow the conclusion of agreements with cross-border effect in the internal market.

Or. en

Amendment 248 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 22

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(22) Les institutions de gestion du patrimoine (22) Les institutions de gestion du patrimoine culturel devraient bénéficier d’un cadre clair culturel ou les bibliothèques devraient pour la numérisation et la diffusion, y compris bénéficier d'un cadre clair pour la numérisation dans un contexte transfrontière, d’œuvres ou et la diffusion, d'œuvres ou autres objets autres objets protégés indisponibles dans le protégés indisponibles dans le commerce. commerce. Toutefois, les caractéristiques Toutefois, les caractéristiques particulières des particulières des collections d’œuvres collections d'œuvres indisponibles font que indisponibles font que l’obtention d'un accord l'obtention d'un accord préalable des titulaires préalable des titulaires de droits peut s’avérer de droits peut s'avérer très difficile. Cela peut très difficile. Cela peut parfois tenir, par parfois tenir, par exemple, à l'ancienneté des exemple, à l’ancienneté des œuvres ou autres œuvres ou autres objets protégés, à leur valeur objets protégés, à leur valeur commerciale commerciale limitée ou au fait qu'ils n'ont limitée ou au fait qu’ils n’ont jamais été destinés jamais été destinés à une utilisation à une utilisation commerciale. Aussi est-il commerciale. Aussi est-il nécessaire de prévoir nécessaire de prévoir des mesures pour faciliter des mesures pour faciliter la concession sous la concession sous licence de droits sur les licence de droits sur les œuvres indisponibles œuvres indisponibles qui se trouvent dans les qui se trouvent dans les collections des collections des institutions de gestion du institutions de gestion du patrimoine culturel ou patrimoine culturel et permettre ainsi la des bibliothèques. conclusion de contrats ayant un effet transfrontière au sein du marché intérieur.

Or. fr

Amendment 249 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 22

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(22) Cultural heritage institutions should benefit (22) Cultural heritage institutions should benefit from a clear framework for the digitisation and from a clear framework for the digitisation and dissemination, including across borders, of out- dissemination, including across borders, of out- of-commerce works or other subject-matter. of-commerce works or other subject-matter. However, the particular characteristics of the However, the particular characteristics of the collections of out-of-commerce works mean collections of out-of-commerce works mean that obtaining the prior consent of the individual that obtaining the prior consent of the individual rightholders may be very difficult. This can be rightholders may be very difficult. This can be due, for example, to the age of the works or due, for example, to the age of the works or other subject-matter, their limited commercial other subject-matter, their limited commercial value or the fact that they were never intended value or the fact that they were never intended for commercial use. It is therefore necessary to for commercial use. It is therefore necessary to provide for measures to facilitate the licensing provide for measures to facilitate online of rights in out-of-commerce works that are in availability out-of-commerce works that are in the collections of cultural heritage institutions the collections of cultural heritage institutions and thereby to allow the conclusion of and thereby to allow the conclusion of agreements with cross-border effect in the agreements with cross-border effect in the internal market. internal market.

Or. en

Amendment 250 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 22 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(22 a) Several Member States have already adopted extended collective licencing regimes, legal mandates or legal presumptions facilitating the licencing of out-of-commerce works. However considering the variety of works and other subject-matter in the collections of cultural heritage institutions and the variance between collective management practices across Member States and sectors of cultural production it is necessary to provide a more efficient mechanism that can reduce complexities and also apply in sectors or for types of works where the licensing mechanisms do not provide a solution, for example, because there is no practice of collective licensing or because collective management organisations are unable to achieve sufficient representation. It is therefore necessary to provide for a mandatory exception that allows cultural heritage institutions to make out of commerce works held in their collection available online. Whereas it is essential to harmonise the scope of the new mandatory exception in order to allow cross-border uses of out of commerce works, Member States should be allowed to build on the existing extended collective licencing arrangements for certain categories of works concluded at national level. Any uses under this exception should be subject to the same opt out and publicity requirements as uses authorised by a licensing mechanism.

Or. en

Amendment 251 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 22 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(22 b) Taking into account the specificities of national collective management organisations, the needs and requirements of cultural heritage institutions, and different types of works, Member States should be able to diverge from the mandatory exception provided for in this Directive and rely on extended collective licensing, legal mandates or legal presumptions, provided that they cover at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception, including cross-border uses. Any works not covered by such arrangements should be subject to the exception.

Or. en

Amendment 252 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 23

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(23) Member States should, within the (23) This directive is without prejudice to framework provided for in this Directive, have specific solutions developed by Member States flexibility in choosing the specific type of in order to deal with the issues raised by mass mechanism allowing for licences for out-of- digitisation, such as systems for out-of- commerce works to extend to the rights of commerce works. Such solutions take into rightholders that are not represented by the account the specific characteristic of the collective management organisation, in various types of work or other subject-matter accordance to their legal traditions, practices or and of the various users; they are devised on circumstances. Such mechanisms can include the basis of consensus between the extended collective licensing and presumptions stakeholders. This approach has already been of representation. adopted in the Memorandum of Understanding on Key Principles on the Digitisation and Making Available of Out-of- Commerce Works, signed on 20 September2011 by representatives of European libraries, authors, publishers and collective management organisations under the aegis of the Commission. This directive should be without prejudice to that Memorandum of Understanding, which calls on Member States and the Commission to ensure that voluntary agreements concluded between users, rightholders and collective management organisations to authorise the use of out-of- commerce works on the basis of the principles contained in the Memorandum have the benefit of legal certainty in the national and cross-border context. Member States should have a certain margin of discretion to choose the specific type of arrangement in accordance to their legal traditions, practices or circumstances. Such mechanisms can include extended collective licensing and presumptions of representation.

Or. en

Amendment 253 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 23

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(23) Member States should, within the (23) Member States should, within the framework provided for in this Directive, have framework provided for in this Directive, have flexibility in choosing the specific type of flexibility in choosing the specific type of mechanism allowing for licences for out-of- mechanism allowing cultural heritage commerce works to extend to the rights of institutions, research organizations or rightholders that are not represented by the educational establishments to disseminate their collective management organisation, in out of commerce collections, in accordance to accordance to their legal traditions, practices or their legal traditions, practices or circumstances. circumstances. Such mechanisms can include Such mechanisms should allow rightholders to extended collective licensing and presumptions exclude their works and could include extended of representation. collective licensing and presumptions of representation, and limitations and exceptions where: a) no collective management organizations exist

b) a collective management organization is unable to achieve sufficient representativity, or

c) a collective management organization is unable to offer adequate licenses to cultural heritage institutions for the types of works and other subject matter held in their collections.

Or. en

Amendment 254 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 23

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(23) Member States should, within the (23) Member States should, within the framework provided for in this Directive, have framework provided for in this Directive, have flexibility in choosing the specific type of flexibility in choosing the specific type of legal mechanism allowing for licences for out-of- mechanism allowing cultural heritage commerce works to extend to the rights of institutions, educational establishments or rightholders that are not represented by the other non-commercial documentation centers collective management organisation, in to digitise, distribute, communicate to the accordance to their legal traditions, practices or public or make available the out-of-commerce circumstances. Such mechanisms can include works permanently in their collection, in extended collective licensing and presumptions accordance to their legal traditions, practices or of representation. circumstances. Such mechanisms should allow rightholders to exclude their works, on the basis of reasonable evidence, and can include extended collective licensing and presumptions of representation. In any case, Member States should be required to provide for a mandatory general exception, applying where collective management organisations do not exist, or are unable to achieve sufficient representativity, or to offer easily available licences to cultural heritage institutions, educational establishments or other non-commercial documentation centers for the types of works and other subject matter held in their collections.

Or. en

Amendment 255 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Joëlle Bergeron, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 23

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(23) Les États membres devraient, dans le cadre (23) Les États membres devraient, dans le cadre défini par la présente directive, disposer d’une défini par la présente directive, disposer d'une certaine marge pour choisir le type spécifique certaine marge pour choisir le type spécifique de mécanisme qui permet d'étendre des de mécanisme à mettre en oeuvre concernant licences concernant des œuvres indisponibles des œuvres indisponibles en fonction de leurs aux droits de titulaires de droits qui ne sont traditions, pratiques ou situations juridiques. De pas représentés par l’organisation de gestion tels mécanismes peuvent comprendre la collective, en fonction de leurs traditions, concession de licences collectives étendues et pratiques ou situations juridiques. De tels des présomptions de représentation. La présente mécanismes peuvent comprendre la concession directive ne devrait pas préjuger des solutions de licences collectives étendues et des spécifiques développées dans les Etats présomptions de représentation. membres pour traiter la numérisation de masse des oeuvres hors commerce.

Or. fr

Amendment 256 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 24

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(24) For the purpose of those licensing (24) For the purpose of those licensing mechanisms, a rigorous and well-functioning mechanisms, a rigorous and well-functioning collective management system is important. collective management system is important. That system includes in particular rules of good That system includes in particular rules of good governance, transparency and reporting, as well governance, transparency and reporting, as well as the regular, diligent and accurate distribution as the regular, diligent and accurate distribution and payment of amounts due to individual and payment of amounts due to individual rightholders, as provided for by Directive rightholders and make use of available 2014/26/EU. Additional appropriate safeguards technological developments, as provided for by should be available for all rightholders, who Directive 2014/26/EU. Additional appropriate should be given the opportunity to exclude the safeguards should be available for all application of such mechanisms to their works rightholders, who should be given the or other subject-matter. Conditions attached to opportunity to exclude the application of such those mechanisms should not affect their mechanisms to their works or other subject- practical relevance for cultural heritage matter. Conditions attached to those institutions. mechanisms should not affect their practical relevance for cultural heritage institutions.

Or. en

Justification

Technological developments should be exploited in as much as possible in order to guarantee appropriate remuneration for authors and performs.

Amendment 257 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 24

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(24) For the purpose of those licensing (24) For the purpose of those possible licensing mechanisms, a rigorous and well-functioning mechanisms, a rigorous and well-functioning collective management system is important. collective management system is important. That system includes in particular rules of good That system includes in particular rules of good governance, transparency and reporting, as well governance, transparency and reporting, as well as the regular, diligent and accurate distribution as the regular, diligent and accurate distribution and payment of amounts due to individual and payment of amounts due to individual rightholders, as provided for by Directive rightholders, as provided for by Directive 2014/26/EU. Additional appropriate safeguards 2014/26/EU. Additional appropriate safeguards should be available for all rightholders, who should be available for all rightholders, who should be given the opportunity to exclude the should be given the opportunity to exclude the application of such mechanisms to their works application of such mechanisms to their works or other subject-matter. Conditions attached to or other subject-matter. Conditions attached to those mechanisms should not affect their those mechanisms should not affect their practical relevance for cultural heritage practical relevance for cultural heritage institutions. institutions.

Or. en

Amendment 258 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 25

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(25) Considering the variety of works and other (25) Considering the variety of works and other subject-matter in the collections of cultural subject-matter in the collections of cultural heritage institutions, it is important that the heritage institutions, it is important that the licensing mechanisms introduced by this potential licensing mechanisms are easily Directive are available and can be used in available and can be used in practice for practice for different types of works and other different types of works and other subject- subject-matter, including photographs, sound matter, including photographs, sound recordings recordings and audiovisual works. In order to and audiovisual works. In order to reflect the reflect the specificities of different categories of specificities of different categories of works and works and other subject-matter as regards other subject-matter as regards modes of modes of publication and distribution and to publication and distribution and to facilitate the facilitate the usability of those mechanisms, usability of those mechanisms, specific specific requirements and procedures may have requirements and procedures may have to be to be established by Member States for the established by Member States for the practical practical application of those licensing application of those potential licensing mechanisms. It is appropriate that Member mechanisms. It is appropriate that Member States consult rightholders, users and collective States consult rightholders, users, cultural management organisations when doing so. heritage institutions, educational establishments, other non-commercial documentation centers and collective management organisations when doing so.

Or. en

Amendment 259 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 25

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(25) Considering the variety of works and other (25) Considering the variety of works and other subject-matter in the collections of cultural subject-matter in the collections of cultural heritage institutions, it is important that the heritage institutions, it is important that the licensing mechanisms introduced by this licensing mechanisms introduced by this Directive are available and can be used in Directive are available and can be used in practice for different types of works and other practice for different types of works and other subject-matter, including photographs, sound subject-matter, including photographs, sound recordings and audiovisual works. In order to recordings and audiovisual works. In order to reflect the specificities of different categories of reflect the specificities of different categories of works and other subject-matter as regards works and other subject-matter as regards modes of publication and distribution and to modes of publication and distribution and to facilitate the usability of those mechanisms, facilitate the usability of those mechanisms, specific requirements and procedures may have specific requirements and procedures may have to be established by Member States for the to be established by Member States for the practical application of those licensing practical application of those licensing mechanisms. It is appropriate that Member mechanisms. It is appropriate that Member States consult rightholders, users and collective States consult rightholders, cultural heritage management organisations when doing so. institutions, users and collective management organisations when doing so.

Or. en

Amendment 260 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 25

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(25) Eu égard à la diversité des œuvres et autres (25) Eu égard à la diversité des œuvres et autres objets protégés dans les collections des objets protégés dans les collections des institutions de gestion du patrimoine culturel, il institutions de gestion du patrimoine culturel et importe que les mécanismes de concession de des bibliothèques, il importe que les licences instaurés par la présente directive mécanismes de concession de licences instaurés soient disponibles et puissent être utilisés dans par la présente directive soient disponibles et la pratique pour différents types d’œuvres et puissent être utilisés dans la pratique pour autres objets protégés, y compris les différents types d'œuvres et autres objets photographies, les enregistrements sonores et protégés, y compris les photographies, les les œuvres audiovisuelles. Pour tenir compte enregistrements sonores et les œuvres des spécificités des diverses catégories audiovisuelles. Pour tenir compte des d’œuvres et autres objets protégés en ce qui spécificités des diverses catégories d'œuvres et concerne les modalités de publication et de autres objets protégés en ce qui concerne les distribution et pour faciliter l’utilisation de ces modalités de publication et de distribution et mécanismes, les États membres pourraient avoir pour faciliter l'utilisation de ces mécanismes, les à définir des procédures et conditions États membres pourraient avoir à définir des spécifiques pour l'application concrète de ces procédures et conditions spécifiques pour mécanismes de concession de licences. Pour ce l'application concrète de ces mécanismes de faire, il convient que les États membres concession de licences. Pour ce faire, il convient consultent les titulaires de droits, les utilisateurs que les États membres consultent les titulaires et les organismes de gestion collective. de droits, les utilisateurs et les organismes de gestion collective.

Or. fr

Amendment 261 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(25 a) Given the existence of divergences between collective management practices across Member States and creative and cultural sectors, a solution needs to be provided for where licensing mechanisms are not effective solutions, because of, for example, a lack of collective licensing or the fact that no collective management organization has been able to achieve recognition in a Member State or for a sector. In such instances, where licensing mechanisms are lacking, it is necessary to provide for an exception that allows cultural

heritage institutions, research organizations, and educational establishments to make out of commerce works held in their collection available online. Nevertheless, in doing so, it is also necessary to provide authors and performers with the possibility to provide collective licenses or to form a collective management organization as well as to involve them in the determination of whether such licenses are available or not. Therefore, right- holders should be able to object to the dissemination of their works online in this way.

Or. en

Amendment 262 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(25 a) In order to provide legal clarity for the legitimate use of extracts or quotations of copyright-protected works, it is necessary to acknowledge the position and role of user- generated content in the online environment.

Or. en

Amendment 263 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 26

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(26) For reasons of international comity, the deleted licensing mechanisms for the digitisation and dissemination of out-of-commerce works provided for in this Directive should not apply to works or other subject-matter that are first published or, in the absence of publication, first broadcast in a third country or, in the case of cinematographic or audiovisual works, to works the producer of which has his headquarters or habitual residence in a third country. Those mechanisms should also not apply to works or other subject-matter of third country nationals except when they are first published or, in the absence of publication, first broadcast in the territory of a Member State or, in the case of cinematographic or audiovisual works, to works of which the producer's headquarters or habitual residence is in a Member State.

Or. en

Amendment 264 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 26

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(26) For reasons of international comity, the (26) For reasons of international comity, the licensing mechanisms for the digitisation and licensing mechanisms for the digitisation and dissemination of out-of-commerce works dissemination of out-of-commerce works provided for in this Directive should not apply provided for in this Directive should not apply to works or other subject-matter that are first to works or other subject-matter that are first published or, in the absence of publication, first published or, in the absence of publication, first broadcast in a third country or, in the case of broadcast in a third country or, in the case of cinematographic or audiovisual works, to works cinematographic or audiovisual works, to works the producer of which has his headquarters or the producer of which has his headquarters or habitual residence in a third country. Those habitual residence in a third country. mechanisms should also not apply to works or other subject-matter of third country nationals except when they are first published or, in the absence of publication, first broadcast in the territory of a Member State or, in the case of cinematographic or audiovisual works, to works of which the producer's headquarters or habitual residence is in a Member State.

Or. en

Amendment 265 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 27

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(27) As mass digitisation projects can entail deleted significant investments by cultural heritage institutions, any licences granted under the mechanisms provided for in this Directive should not prevent them from generating reasonable revenues in order to cover the costs of the licence and the costs of digitising and disseminating the works and other subject- matter covered by the licence.

Or. en

Amendment 266 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 27

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(27) As mass digitisation projects can entail (27) As mass digitisation projects can entail significant investments by cultural heritage significant investments by cultural heritage institutions, any licences granted under the institutions, any licences granted under the mechanisms provided for in this Directive mechanisms provided for in this Directive should not prevent them from generating should not prevent them from generating reasonable revenues in order to cover the costs reasonable revenues that should be allocated of the licence and the costs of digitising and only to cover the costs of the licence and the disseminating the works and other subject- costs of digitising and disseminating the works matter covered by the licence. and other subject-matter covered by the licence.

Or. en

Amendment 267 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 28

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(28) Les informations concernant l’utilisation (28) Les informations concernant l'utilisation actuelle et future des œuvres et autres objets actuelle et future des œuvres et autres objets protégés indisponibles par les institutions de protégés indisponibles par les institutions de gestion du patrimoine culturel sur la base des gestion du patrimoine culturel ou les mécanismes de concession de licences prévus bibliothèques, sur la base des mécanismes de par la présente directive et les modalités en concession de licences prévus par la présente vigueur permettant à tous les titulaires de droits directive et les modalités en vigueur permettant d'exclure l’application des licences à leurs à tous les titulaires de droits d'exclure œuvres ou autres objets protégés devraient faire l'application des licences à leurs œuvres ou l'objet d'une publicité suffisante. Cet élément est autres objets protégés devraient faire l'objet particulièrement important lorsque les d'une publicité suffisante. Les Etats membres utilisations s'inscrivent dans un contexte sont donc invités à mettre en place, si transfrontière au sein du marché intérieur. Il y nécessaire, un portail d'information sur le a donc lieu de prévoir la création d’un portail sujet. en ligne unique, accessible au public, afin que l’Union puisse informer ce dernier de l'utilisation transfrontière suffisamment tôt avant qu'elle n'ait lieu. En vertu du règlement (UE) n° 386/2012 du Parlement européen et du Conseil33 , l’Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (ci-après l'«Office») est chargé d'exercer des tâches et activités relatives au respect des droits de propriété intellectuelle à l’aide de ses propres moyens budgétaires, visant à faciliter et soutenir les activités des autorités nationales, du secteur privé et des institutions de l’Union relatives au respect des droits de propriété intellectuelle et, en particulier, leurs activités de lutte contre les atteintes à ces droits, y compris la prévention de ces atteintes. Il est donc approprié de confier à cet Office la mise en place et la gestion du portail européen offrant ces informations. 33 Règlement (UE) n° 386/2012 du Parlement eur 33 Règlement (UE) n° 386/2012 du Parlement eur opéen et du Conseil du 19 avril 2012 confiant à l' opéen et du Conseil du 19 avril 2012 confiant à l' Office de l'harmonisation dans le marché intérieu Office de l'harmonisation dans le marché intérieu r (marques, dessins et modèles) des tâches liées a r (marques, dessins et modèles) des tâches liées a u respect des droits de propriété intellectuelle, not u respect des droits de propriété intellectuelle, not amment la réunion de représentants des secteurs amment la réunion de représentants des secteurs public et privé au sein d'un Observatoire europée public et privé au sein d'un Observatoire europée n des atteintes aux droits de propriété intellectuell n des atteintes aux droits de propriété intellectuell e (JO L 129 du 16.5.2012, p. 1). e (JO L 129 du 16.5.2012, p. 1).

Or. fr

Amendment 268 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 28

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(28) Information regarding the future and (28) Information regarding the future and ongoing use of out-of-commerce works and ongoing use of out-of-commerce works and other subject-matter by cultural heritage other subject-matter by cultural heritage institutions on the basis of the licensing institutions on the basis of the licensing mechanisms provided for in this Directive and mechanisms provided for in this Directive and the arrangements in place for all rightholders to the arrangements in place for all rightholders to exclude the application of licences to their exclude the application of licences to their works or other subject-matter should be works or other subject-matter should be adequately publicised. This is particularly effectively publicised. This is particularly important when uses take place across borders important when uses take place across borders in the internal market. It is therefore appropriate in the internal market. It is therefore appropriate to make provision for the creation of a single to make provision for the creation of a single publicly accessible online portal for the Union publicly accessible online portal for the Union to make such information available to the public to make such information widely and explicitly for a reasonable period of time before the available to the public for at least 6 months of cross-border use takes place. Under Regulation time before the cross-border use takes place. (EU) No 386/2012 of the European Parliament Under Regulation (EU) No 386/2012 of the and of the Council33 , the European Union European Parliament and of the Council33 , the Intellectual Property Office is entrusted with European Union Intellectual Property Office is certain tasks and activities, financed by making entrusted with certain tasks and activities, use of its own budgetary measures, aiming at financed by making use of its own budgetary facilitating and supporting the activities of measures, aiming at facilitating and supporting national authorities, the private sector and the activities of national authorities, the private Union institutions in the fight against, including sector and Union institutions in the fight the prevention of, infringement of intellectual against, including the prevention of, property rights. It is therefore appropriate to rely infringement of intellectual property rights. The on that Office to establish and manage the single online portal should provide authors European portal making such information and other rightholders with means to oppose available. the making available of their works and other subject matter. It is therefore appropriate to rely on that Office to establish and manage the European portal making such information available and provide such functionality to rightholders and cultural heritage institutions. 33 Regulation (EU) No 386/2012 of the European 33 Regulation (EU) No 386/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 o Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 o n entrusting the Office for Harmonization in the I n entrusting the Office for Harmonization in the I nternal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with t nternal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with t asks related to the enforcement of intellectual pro asks related to the enforcement of intellectual pro perty rights, including the assembling of public a perty rights, including the assembling of public a nd private-sector representatives as a European O nd private-sector representatives as a European O bservatory on Infringements of Intellectual Prope bservatory on Infringements of Intellectual Prope rty Rights (OJ L 129, 16.5.2012, p. 1–6). rty Rights (OJ L 129, 16.5.2012, p. 1–6).

Or. en

Amendment 269 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 28

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(28) Information regarding the future and (28) Information regarding the future and ongoing use of out-of-commerce works and ongoing use of out-of-commerce works and other subject-matter by cultural heritage other subject-matter by cultural heritage institutions on the basis of the licensing institutions, educational establishments, other mechanisms provided for in this Directive and non-commercial documentation centers the arrangements in place for all rightholders to provided for in this Directive and the exclude the application of licences to their arrangements in place for all rightholders to works or other subject-matter should be exclude their works or other subject-matter adequately publicised. This is particularly should be adequately publicised. This is important when uses take place across borders particularly important when uses take place in the internal market. It is therefore appropriate across borders in the internal market. It is to make provision for the creation of a single therefore appropriate to make provision for the publicly accessible online portal for the Union creation of a single public online portal for the to make such information available to the public Union to make such information permanently, for a reasonable period of time before the easily and effectively available to the public, in cross-border use takes place. Under Regulation any case for at least six months before the (EU) No 386/2012 of the European Parliament cross-border use takes place. Under Regulation and of the Council33 , the European Union (EU) No 386/2012 of the European Parliament Intellectual Property Office is entrusted with and of the Council33 , the European Union certain tasks and activities, financed by making Intellectual Property Office is entrusted with use of its own budgetary measures, aiming at certain tasks and activities, financed by making facilitating and supporting the activities of use of its own budgetary measures, aiming at national authorities, the private sector and facilitating and supporting the activities of Union institutions in the fight against, including national authorities, the private sector and the prevention of, infringement of intellectual Union institutions in the fight against, including property rights. It is therefore appropriate to rely the prevention of, infringement of intellectual on that Office to establish and manage the property rights. It is therefore appropriate to rely European portal making such information on that Office to establish and manage the available. European portal making such information available. 33 Regulation (EU) No 386/2012 of the European 33 Regulation (EU) No 386/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 o Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 o n entrusting the Office for Harmonization in the I n entrusting the Office for Harmonization in the I nternal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with t nternal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with t asks related to the enforcement of intellectual pro asks related to the enforcement of intellectual pro perty rights, including the assembling of public a perty rights, including the assembling of public a nd private-sector representatives as a European O nd private-sector representatives as a European O bservatory on Infringements of Intellectual Prope bservatory on Infringements of Intellectual Prope rty Rights (OJ L 129, 16.5.2012, p. 1–6). rty Rights (OJ L 129, 16.5.2012, p. 1–6).

Or. en

Amendment 270 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 28 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(28 a) In order to substantiate the general public goal of increasing access to, and favouring the dissemination of, creative content, information and knowledge and to ensure legal certainty within the internal market, a definition of public domain should

be introduced. It should also be highlighted that the ultimate goal of most authors, performers and creators is primarily the human and societal development and prosperity rather than the potential economic gain.

Or. en

Amendment 271 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 28 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(28 b) It is of the utmost importance to clarify that once a work or other subject matter is in the public domain, any faithful reproduction, whether analogical or digital, of that work or subject matter, which does not constitute a new or transformative work or subject matter, should remain in the public domain. Public domain should encompass works or other subject matter whose copyright have expired, or have never existed or have been voluntarily relinquished by rightholders.

Or. en

Amendment 272 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 28 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(28 c) When the copyright expires on a work or other subject matter, it could be extremely difficult to establish that such work or subject matter has passed into the public domain. Public domain works or other subject matter could never be identified, thus hindering access to content, information and knowledge. Member States should allow authors, performers and producers, who do not intend to copyright their work or other subject matter, to dedicate it, in whole or in part, to the public domain. Indeed, it should be acknowledged

that the ultimate goal of most authors, performers and creators is primarily the human and societal development and prosperity rather than the potential economic gain. In light of this, Member States should encourage the use of appropriate public domain equivalent licences (e.g. creative commons). This would help authors, performers and producers to makes it clear to potential re-users that the work is in the public domain, thus spreading the dissemination of content, information and knowledge.

Or. en

Amendment 273 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 29

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(29) Les services à la demande pourraient jouer (29) Les services à la demande pourraient jouer un rôle déterminant dans la diffusion d'œuvres un rôle déterminant dans la diffusion d'œuvres européennes dans l’ensemble de l’Union européennes dans l'ensemble des Etats européenne. Cependant, les contrats relatifs à membres de l'Union européenne. Cependant, les l’exploitation en ligne de ces œuvres pourraient contrats relatifs à l'exploitation en ligne de ces se heurter à des difficultés liées à la concession œuvres pourraient se heurter à des difficultés sous licence de droits. Ces difficultés pourraient liées à la concession sous licence de droits. Ces par exemple survenir lorsque le titulaire des difficultés pourraient par exemple survenir droits relatifs à un territoire donné n’est pas lorsque le titulaire des droits relatifs à un intéressé par l’exploitation en ligne de l'œuvre territoire donné n'est pas intéressé par ou lorsqu'il existe des problèmes liés aux l'exploitation en ligne de l'œuvre ou lorsqu'il fenêtres d’exploitation. existe des problèmes liés aux fenêtres d'exploitation.

Or. fr

Amendment 274 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 29

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(29) On-demand services have the potential to (29) On-demand services have the potential to play a decisive role in the dissemination of play a decisive role in the dissemination of European works across the European Union. European works across the European Union. However, agreements on the online exploitation However, agreements on the online enjoyment of such works may face difficulties related to of such works may face difficulties related to the licensing of rights. Such issues may, for the licensing of rights. Such issues may, for instance, appear when the holder of the rights instance, appear when the holder of the rights for a given territory is not interested in the for a given territory is not interested in the online exploitation of the work or where there online exploitation of the work or where there are issues linked to the windows of exploitation. are issues linked to the windows of exploitation.

Or. en

Amendment 275 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 29 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(29 a) The reproduction of cultural works, specifically their digitisation, will in the coming years be the most powerful tool not only for the preservation of our cultural heritage but also for providing broad access to researchers, students and the general public. In contrast, access to culture would be jeopardised if these digitisations were copyrighted. Faithful reproductions of works that do not constitute a creative transformation should not be hampered by added barriers that could have a chilling effect on digitisation of cultural heritage.

Or. en

Amendment 276 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 30

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(30) To facilitate the licensing of rights in (30) To facilitate the licensing of rights in audiovisual works to video-on-demand audiovisual works to video-on-demand platforms, this Directive requires Member platforms, this Directive requires Member States to set up a negotiation mechanism States to set up a negotiation mechanism allowing parties willing to conclude an managed by a designated existing or newly agreement to rely on the assistance of an established national body allowing parties impartial body. The body should meet with the willing to conclude an agreement to rely on the parties and help with the negotiations by assistance of an impartial body. Where the providing professional and external advice. negotiation involves parties from different Against that background, Member States should Member States, they should agree beforehand decide on the conditions of the functioning of on the Member State competent, should the the negotiation mechanism, including the timing negotiation mechanism be required at some and duration of the assistance to negotiations point in their negotiation. The body should and the bearing of the costs. Member States meet with the parties and help with the should ensure that administrative and financial negotiations by providing professional and burdens remain proportionate to guarantee the external advice. Against that background, efficiency of the negotiation forum. Member States should decide on the conditions of the functioning of the negotiation mechanism, including the timing and duration of the assistance to negotiations and the division of any costs arising. Member States should ensure that administrative and financial burdens remain proportionate to guarantee the efficiency of the negotiation forum.

Or. en

Justification

This amendment aims at clarifying the term of national body.

Amendment 277 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 30

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(30) To facilitate the licensing of rights in (30) To facilitate the licensing of rights in audiovisual works to video-on-demand audiovisual works to video-on-demand platforms, this Directive requires Member platforms, this Directive requires Member States to set up a negotiation mechanism States to set up a negotiation mechanism allowing parties willing to conclude an allowing parties willing to conclude an agreement to rely on the assistance of an agreement to rely on the assistance of an impartial body. The body should meet with the impartial public body. The body should meet parties and help with the negotiations by with the parties and help with the negotiations providing professional and external advice. by providing professional, external, impartial Against that background, Member States should and affordable advice. Against that decide on the conditions of the functioning of background, Member States should decide on the negotiation mechanism, including the timing the conditions of the functioning of the and duration of the assistance to negotiations negotiation mechanism, including the timing and the bearing of the costs. Member States and duration of the assistance to negotiations, should ensure that administrative and financial the bearing of the costs and the composition of burdens remain proportionate to guarantee the such bodies. Member States should ensure that efficiency of the negotiation forum. administrative and financial burdens remain proportionate to guarantee the efficiency of the negotiation forum.

Or. en

Amendment 278 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 30

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(30) Pentru a facilita acordarea de licențe (30) Pentru a facilita acordarea de licențe privind drepturile asupra operelor audiovizuale privind drepturile asupra operelor audiovizuale către platformele de video la cerere, prezenta către platformele de video la cerere, prezenta directivă impune statelor membre să instituie un directivă impune statelor membre să instituie un mecanism de negociere care să permită părților mecanism de facilitare care să permită părților care doresc să încheie un contract să se bazeze relevante care doresc să încheie un contract să pe asistența unui organism imparțial. se bazeze pe asistența unui organism imparțial. Organismul respectiv ar trebui să se întâlnească Organismul respectiv ar trebui să se întâlnească cu părțile și să le ajute să negocieze oferind cu părțile relevante și să faciliteze negocierea, consiliere profesională și externă. În acest oferind consiliere profesională și externă. În context, statele membre ar trebui să decidă acest context, statele membre ar trebui să decidă condițiile de funcționare a mecanismului de condițiile de funcționare a mecanismului de negociere, inclusiv când și pentru cât timp se facilitare, inclusiv când și pentru cât timp se acordă asistență pentru negocieri, precum și acordă asistență pentru negocieri, precum și cine suportă costurile. Statele membre ar trebui cine suportă costurile. Statele membre ar trebui să se asigure că sarcinile administrative și să se asigure că sarcinile administrative și financiare rămân proporționale, pentru a garanta financiare rămân proporționale, pentru a garanta eficiența forumului de negociere. eficiența forumului de facilitare.

Or. ro

Amendment 279 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 30

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(30) Pour faciliter la concession sous licence de (30) Pour faciliter la concession sous licence de droits concernant des œuvres audiovisuelles à droits concernant des œuvres audiovisuelles à des plateformes de vidéo à la demande, la des plateformes de vidéo à la demande, la présente directive impose aux États membres de présente directive recommande aux États mettre en place un mécanisme de négociation membres de mettre en place un mécanisme de permettant aux parties désireuses de conclure un négociation permettant aux parties désireuses de contrat de compter sur l’assistance d’un conclure un contrat de compter sur l'assistance organisme impartial. L’organisme en question d'un organisme impartial. L'organisme en devrait se réunir avec les parties et contribuer question devrait se réunir avec les parties et aux négociations en fournissant des conseils contribuer aux négociations en fournissant des professionnels et extérieurs. Dans ce contexte, conseils professionnels et extérieurs. Dans ce les États membres devraient définir les contexte, les États membres devraient définir les conditions de fonctionnement du mécanisme de conditions de fonctionnement du mécanisme de négociation, y compris le calendrier et la durée négociation, y compris le calendrier et la durée de l’assistance aux négociations, et la prise en de l'assistance aux négociations, et la prise en charge des coûts. Ils devraient faire en sorte que charge des coûts. Ils devraient faire en sorte que les charges administratives et financières restent les charges administratives et financières restent proportionnées pour garantir l’efficacité du proportionnées pour garantir l'efficacité du forum de négociation. forum de négociation.

Or. fr

Amendment 280 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 30 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(30 a) The collection, cataloguing, preservation and making available of the Union's heritage is of the utmost importance and should be strengthened for the benefit of future generations. This should be achieved notably through the preservation of published heritage. To this end, a Union legal deposit should be created in order to ensure that publications produced within and about the Union, in particular about Union law, Union history and integration, Union policy and Union democracy, institutional, parliamentary affairs and politics, and, thereby, the Union's intellectual record and future published heritage, is collected systematically. Not only should such heritage be preserved through the creation of a Union archive for publications dealing with Union-related matters, but it should also be made available to Union citizens and future generations. The European Parliament Library, as the Library of the only Union institution directly representing Union citizens, should be designated as the Union depository library. In order not to create an excessive burden on publishers, printers and importers, preferential treatment should be given to electronic publications, such as e- books, e-journals and e-magazines for deposition in the European Parliament Library, which should make available for readers publications covered by the Union legal deposit at the European Parliament Library for the purpose of research or study following best practices of similar libraries. Furthermore, the collection and delivery procedures should seek to avoid unnecessary burden by making use of existing legal deposit requirements as well as bulk collection and delivery procedures.

Or. en

Amendment 281 Julia Reda, Isabella Adinolfi, Max Andersson, Petras Auštrevičius, Brando Benifei, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, David Borrelli, Klaus Buchner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Matt Carthy, Dita Charanzová, Daniel Dalton, Fabio De Masi, Pascal Durand, Stefan Eck, Bas Eickhout, Cornelia Ernst, Fredrick Federley, Laura Ferrara, Thomas Händel, Heidi Hautala, Benedek Jávor, Kaja Kallas, Ska Keller, Kostadinka Kuneva, Merja Kyllönen, Philippe Lamberts, Marju Lauristin, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Jiří Maštálka, Martina Michels, Jozo Radoš, Evelyn Regner, Michel Reimon, Terry Reintke, Judith Sargentini, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Molly Scott Cato, Davor Škrlec, Igor Šoltes, Catherine Stihler, Dario Tamburrano, Indrek Tarand, Yana Toom, Ernest Urtasun, Bodil Valero, Monika Vana, Sophia in 't Veld, Josef Weidenholzer, Gabriele Zimmer, Laura Agea, Luke Ming Flanagan, Yannick Jadot, Nessa Childers, Rosa D'Amato, Marco Valli, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Florent Marcellesi

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) A free and pluralist press is essential to deleted ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to information. It provides a fundamental contribution to public debate and the proper functioning of a democratic society. In the transition from print to digital, publishers of press publications are facing problems in licensing the online use of their publications and recouping their investments. In the absence of recognition of publishers of press publications as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in the digital environment is often complex and inefficient.

Or. en

Amendment 282 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) A free and pluralist press is essential to deleted ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to information. It provides a fundamental contribution to public debate and the proper functioning of a democratic society. In the transition from print to digital, publishers of press publications are facing problems in licensing the online use of their publications and recouping their investments. In the absence of recognition of publishers of press publications as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in the digital environment is often complex and inefficient.

Or. en

Amendment 283 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) A free and pluralist press is essential to deleted ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to information. It provides a fundamental contribution to public debate and the proper functioning of a democratic society. In the transition from print to digital, publishers of press publications are facing problems in licensing the online use of their publications and recouping their investments. In the absence of recognition of publishers of press publications as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in the digital environment is often complex and inefficient.

Or. en

Justification

The planned new right would make a distinction between different types of journalistic publications and it would not be based on whether such publications are protected by copyright but on certain other criteria (e.g. one criterion is that they should not be scientific journals according to Recital 33). Therefore, it seems to be a parallel protection beside the copyright on certain publications.

Amendment 284 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) Une presse libre et pluraliste est (31) Une presse libre et pluraliste est indispensable pour garantir un journalisme de indispensable pour garantir un journalisme de qualité et l’accès des citoyens à l’information. qualité et l'accès des citoyens à l'information. Elle apporte une contribution fondamentale au Elle apporte une contribution fondamentale au débat public et au bon fonctionnement d’une débat public et au bon fonctionnement d'une société démocratique. Dans le passage de la société démocratique. Dans le passage de la presse écrite à la presse numérique, les éditeurs presse écrite à la presse numérique, les éditeurs de presse sont confrontés à des difficultés pour et agences de presse sont confrontés à des concéder des licences relatives à l'utilisation en difficultés pour concéder des licences relatives à ligne de leurs publications et pour amortir leurs l'utilisation en ligne de leurs publications et investissements. Les éditeurs de publications de pour amortir leurs investissements. Ceci est presse n'étant pas reconnus comme des titulaires principalement dû au fait que certains de droits, la concession sous licence de droits et agrégateurs d'informations utilisent le contenu l'exercice de ces droits dans l’environnement des éditeurs et agences de presse, sans numérique sont souvent complexes et contracter de licence et sans rémunérer le inefficients. travail fourni de manière adéquate. Les agrégateurs d'information sont responsables des contenus qu'ils mettent à la disposition du public. Les éditeurs de publications de presse et les agences de presse n'étant pas reconnus comme des titulaires de droits, la concession sous licence de droits et l'exercice de ces droits sont souvent complexes et inefficients.

Or. fr

Amendment 285 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) Für Qualitätsjournalismus und den Zugang (31) Für Qualitätsjournalismus und den Zugang zu Informationen für die Bürger ist eine freie zu Informationen für die Bürger ist eine freie und pluralistische Presse unabdingbar. Sie und pluralistische Presse unabdingbar. Sie leistet einen grundlegenden Beitrag zur leistet einen grundlegenden Beitrag zur öffentlichen Debatte und das Funktionieren öffentlichen Debatte und das Funktionieren einer demokratischen Gesellschaft. Der einer demokratischen Gesellschaft. Der Übergang von den Druckmedien zu den Übergang von den Druckmedien zu den digitalen Medien stellt Presseverlage vor das digitalen Medien stellt Presseverlage vor das Problem der Vergabe von Lizenzen für die Problem der Vergabe von Lizenzen für die Online-Nutzung ihrer Veröffentlichungen und Online-Nutzung ihrer Veröffentlichungen und der Amortisierung ihrer Investitionen. Sofern der Amortisierung ihrer Investitionen. Verlage als Rechteinhaber von Nachrichtenaggregatoren und Suchmaschinen Presseveröffentlichungen nicht anerkannt haben ihre Tätigkeiten immer mehr ausgebaut werden, gestaltet sich die Lizenzvergabe und und erzielen dabei Gewinne mit den Inhalten Durchsetzung ihrer Rechte im digitalen Umfeld von Presseverlagen. Diese Gewinne werden häufig als komplex und ineffizient. nicht gerecht zwischen den Urhebern und den Verlagen aufgeteilt. Sofern Verlage als Rechteinhaber von Presseveröffentlichungen nicht anerkannt werden, gestaltet sich die Lizenzvergabe und Durchsetzung ihrer Rechte im digitalen Umfeld häufig als komplex und ineffizient.

Or. de

Amendment 286 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Esther de Lange, Pascal Arimont

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) A free and pluralist press is essential to (31) A free and pluralist press is essential to ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to information. It provides a fundamental information. It provides a fundamental contribution to public debate and the proper contribution to public debate and the proper functioning of a democratic society. In the functioning of a democratic society. In the transition from print to digital, publishers of transition from print to digital, publishers of press publications are facing problems in press publications are facing problems in licensing the online use of their publications and licensing the online use of their publications and recouping their investments. In the absence of recouping their investments, in a context where recognition of publishers of press publications news aggregators and search engines are as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in increasingly making profit out of press the digital environment is often complex and publications, without contributing to their inefficient. development and without fairly remunerating their creators. In the absence of recognition of publishers of press publications as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in the digital environment is often complex and inefficient.

Or. en

Amendment 287 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) O presă liberă și pluralistă este esențială (31) O presă liberă și pluralistă este esențială pentru a asigura un jurnalism de calitate și pentru a asigura un jurnalism de calitate și accesul cetățenilor la informații. Aceasta are o accesul cetățenilor la informații. Aceasta are o contribuție fundamentală la dezbaterea publică contribuție fundamentală la dezbaterea publică și la buna funcționare a unei societăți și la buna funcționare a unei societăți democratice. În contextul tranziției de la presa democratice. În contextul tranziției de la presa tipărită la cea digitală, editorii de publicații de tipărită la cea digitală, editorii de publicații de presă se confruntă cu probleme în ceea ce presă se confruntă cu probleme în ceea ce privește acordarea de licențe privind drepturile privește acordarea de licențe privind drepturile de utilizare online a publicațiilor lor și de utilizare online a publicațiilor lor și recuperarea investițiilor. Atât timp cât editorii recuperarea investițiilor, precum și în ceea ce de publicații de presă nu sunt recunoscuți ca privește stabilirea unei calități procesuale titulari de drepturi, acordarea de licențe și pentru a-și afirma drepturile conferite prin asigurarea respectării acestora în mediul digital lege sau prin atribuire, licență sau alte tipuri sunt adesea complexe și ineficiente. de înțelegeri contractuale . Atât timp cât editorii de publicații de presă nu sunt recunoscuți ca titulari de drepturi, acordarea de licențe și asigurarea respectării acestora în mediul digital sunt adesea complexe și ineficiente.

Or. ro

Amendment 288 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) A free and pluralist press is essential to (31) An Open Internet and a free and pluralist ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to press are essential to ensure quality journalism information. It provides a fundamental and citizens' access to information. The press contribution to public debate and the proper provides a fundamental contribution to public functioning of a democratic society. In the debate and the proper functioning of a transition from print to digital, publishers of democratic society by investing in content. press publications are facing problems in However, in the transition from print to digital, licensing the online use of their publications publishers of press publications are facing and recouping their investments. In the absence problems in recouping their investments and of recognition of publishers of press negotiating with online service providers. publications as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in the digital environment is often complex and inefficient.

Or. en

Amendment 289 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) A free and pluralist press is essential to (31) A free and pluralist press is essential to ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to information. It provides a fundamental information. It provides a fundamental contribution to public debate and the proper contribution to public debate and the proper functioning of a democratic society. In the functioning of a democratic society. In the transition from print to digital, publishers of transition from print to digital, publishers of press publications are facing problems in press publications are facing problems in licensing the online use of their publications and licensing the online use of their publications and recouping their investments. In the absence of recouping their investments. Licensing and recognition of publishers of press publications enforcement in the digital environment is often as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in complex and inefficient. the digital environment is often complex and inefficient.

Or. en

Amendment 290 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Marju Lauristin, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) A free and pluralist press is essential to (31) An open Internet and free and pluralist ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to press is essential to ensure quality journalism information. It provides a fundamental and citizens' access to information. It provides a contribution to public debate and the proper fundamental contribution to public debate and functioning of a democratic society. In the the proper functioning of a democratic society. transition from print to digital, publishers of In the transition from print to digital, publishers press publications are facing problems in of press publications are facing problems in licensing the online use of their publications and licensing the online use of their publications and recouping their investments. In the absence of recouping their investments. In the absence of recognition of publishers of press publications recognition of publishers of press publications as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in the digital environment is often complex and the digital environment is often complex and inefficient. inefficient.

Or. en

Amendment 291 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 31

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(31) Une presse libre et pluraliste est (31) Une presse libre et pluraliste est indispensable pour garantir un journalisme de indispensable pour garantir un journalisme de qualité et l’accès des citoyens à l’information. qualité et l'accès des citoyens des Etats Elle apporte une contribution fondamentale au membres à l'information. Elle apporte une débat public et au bon fonctionnement d’une contribution fondamentale au débat public et au société démocratique. Dans le passage de la bon fonctionnement d'une société démocratique. presse écrite à la presse numérique, les éditeurs Dans le passage de la presse écrite à la presse de presse sont confrontés à des difficultés pour numérique, les éditeurs de presse sont concéder des licences relatives à l'utilisation en confrontés à des difficultés pour concéder des ligne de leurs publications et pour amortir leurs licences relatives à l'utilisation en ligne de leurs investissements. Les éditeurs de publications de publications et pour amortir leurs presse n'étant pas reconnus comme des titulaires investissements. Les éditeurs de publications de de droits, la concession sous licence de droits et presse n'étant pas reconnus comme des titulaires l'exercice de ces droits dans l’environnement de droits, la concession sous licence de droits et numérique sont souvent complexes et l'exercice de ces droits dans l'environnement inefficients. numérique sont souvent complexes et inefficients.

Or. fr

Amendment 292 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial deleted contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital uses.

Or. en

Justification

The planned new right would make a distinction between different types of journalistic publications and it would not be based on whether such publications are protected by copyright but on certain other criteria (e.g. one criterion is that they should not be scientific journals according to Recital 33). Therefore it seem to be a parallel protection next to copyright on certain publications.

Amendment 293 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial deleted contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital uses.

Or. en

Amendment 294 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial deleted contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital uses.

Or. en

Amendment 295 Julia Reda, Isabella Adinolfi, Max Andersson, Petras Auštrevičius, Brando Benifei, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, David Borrelli, Klaus Buchner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Matt Carthy, Dita Charanzová, Daniel Dalton, Fabio De Masi, Pascal Durand, Stefan Eck, Bas Eickhout, Cornelia Ernst, Fredrick Federley, Laura Ferrara, Thomas Händel, Heidi Hautala, Benedek Jávor, Kaja Kallas, Ska Keller, Kostadinka Kuneva, Merja Kyllönen, Philippe Lamberts, Marju Lauristin, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Jiří Maštálka, Martina Michels, Jozo Radoš, Evelyn Regner, Michel Reimon, Terry Reintke, Judith Sargentini, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Molly Scott Cato, Davor Škrlec, Igor Šoltes, Catherine Stihler, Dario Tamburrano, Indrek Tarand, Ernest Urtasun, Bodil Valero, Monika Vana, Sophia in 't Veld, Josef Weidenholzer, Gabriele Zimmer, Laura Agea, Luke Ming Flanagan, Yannick Jadot, Nessa Childers, Rosa D'Amato, Marco Valli, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Florent Marcellesi

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial deleted contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital uses.

Or. en

Amendment 296 Jiří Maštálka

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial deleted contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital uses.

Or. en

Amendment 297 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial (32) The organisational and financial contribution of publishers in producing press investment of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to publishing industry. provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital uses.

Or. en

Amendment 298 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial (32) The organisational and financial contribution of publishers in producing press contribution of journalists and publishers in publications needs to be recognised and further producing press publications needs to be encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the recognised and encouraged to ensure the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to sustainability of news production. provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital uses.

Or. en

Amendment 299 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) La contribution financière et (32) La contribution financière et organisationnelle des éditeurs dans la organisationnelle des éditeurs dans la production de publications de presse doit être production de publications de presse doit être reconnue et davantage encouragée pour assurer reconnue et davantage encouragée pour assurer la pérennité du secteur de l’édition. Il est dès la pérennité du secteur de l'édition. Il est dès lors nécessaire d’assurer au niveau de l’Union lors préconisé que les Etats membres prennent une protection juridique harmonisée des des mesures afin de s'assurer d'une protection publications de presse à l’égard des utilisations juridique optimale des publications de presse à numériques. Cette protection devrait être l'égard des utilisations numériques. Il est de ce assurée de manière efficace par l’introduction, fait suggéré que cette protection soit assurée dans le droit de l’Union, de droits voisins du par l'introduction, lorsque cela s'avère droit d’auteur pour la reproduction et la nécessaire, dans les systèmes juridiques diffusion auprès du public de publications de nationaux, de droits voisins du droit d'auteur presse dans le cadre des utilisations numériques. pour la reproduction et la diffusion auprès du public de publications de presse dans le cadre des utilisations numériques.

Or. fr

Amendment 300 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) La contribution financière et (32) La contribution financière et organisationnelle des éditeurs dans la organisationnelle des éditeurs et des agences de production de publications de presse doit être presse dans la production de publications de reconnue et davantage encouragée pour assurer presse doit être reconnue et davantage la pérennité du secteur de l’édition. Il est dès encouragée pour assurer la pérennité du secteur lors nécessaire d’assurer au niveau de l’Union de l'édition. Il est dès lors nécessaire d'assurer une protection juridique harmonisée des au niveau de l'Union une protection juridique publications de presse à l’égard des utilisations harmonisée des publications de presse à l'égard numériques. Cette protection devrait être des utilisations numériques. Cette protection assurée de manière efficace par l’introduction, devrait être assurée de manière efficace par dans le droit de l’Union, de droits voisins du l'introduction, dans le droit de l'Union, de droits droit d’auteur pour la reproduction et la voisins du droit d'auteur pour la reproduction et diffusion auprès du public de publications de la diffusion auprès du public de publications de presse dans le cadre des utilisations numériques. presse dans le cadre des utilisations numériques, et analogues.

Or. fr

Amendment 301 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial (32) The organisational and financial contribution of publishers in producing press contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of protection for press publications. Such digital uses. Such protection should be protection should be effectively guaranteed effectively guaranteed through the introduction, through the introduction, in Union law, of rights in Union law, of rights related to copyright for related to copyright for the reproduction and the reproduction and making available to the making available to the public of press public of press publications in respect of digital publications. uses.

Or. en

Amendment 302 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Andrzej Grzyb

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial (32) The organisational and financial contribution of publishers in producing press contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of protection for press publications. Such digital uses. Such protection should be protection should be effectively guaranteed effectively guaranteed through the introduction, through the introduction, in Union law, of rights in Union law, of rights related to copyright for related to copyright for the reproduction and the reproduction and making available to the making available to the public of press public of press publications in respect of digital publications. uses.

Or. en

Amendment 303 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Pascal Arimont

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial (32) The organisational and financial contribution of publishers in producing press contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of protection for press publications. Such digital uses. Such protection should be protection should be effectively guaranteed effectively guaranteed through the introduction, through the introduction, in Union law, of rights in Union law, of rights related to copyright for related to copyright for the reproduction and the reproduction and making available to the making available to the public of press public of press publications in respect of digital publications. uses.

Or. en

Amendment 304 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) Um die Tragfähigkeit des Verlagswesens (32) Um die Tragfähigkeit des Verlagswesens zu erhalten, gilt es, den organisatorischen und zu erhalten, gilt es, den organisatorischen und finanziellen Beitrag, den Verlage bei der finanziellen Beitrag, den Verlage bei der Produktion von Presseveröffentlichungen Produktion von Presseveröffentlichungen leisten, anzuerkennen und die Verlage weiterhin leisten, anzuerkennen und die Verlage weiterhin hierzu zu ermutigen. Daher wird auf hierzu zu ermutigen. Daher wird auf Unionsebene ein harmonisierter Rechtsschutz Unionsebene ein harmonisierter Rechtsschutz für Presseveröffentlichungen im Hinblick auf für Presseveröffentlichungen im Hinblick auf ihre digitalen Nutzungen benötigt. Ein solcher ihre digitalen Nutzungen benötigt. Ein solcher Rechtsschutz sollte wirksam gewährleistet Rechtsschutz sollte wirksam gewährleistet werden, indem im Unionsrecht die werden, indem im Unionsrecht die Vervielfältigung und öffentliche Vervielfältigung und öffentliche Zugänglichmachung von Zugänglichmachung von Presseveröffentlichungen im Hinblick auf Presseveröffentlichungen urheberrechtlich deren digitale Nutzungen urheberrechtlich geschützt werden. geschützt werden.

Or. de

Amendment 305 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) Debe reconocerse y potenciarse la (32) Debe reconocerse y potenciarse la contribución organizativa y financiera de las contribución organizativa y financiera de las editoriales a la producción de publicaciones de editoriales a la producción de publicaciones de prensa para asegurar la sostenibilidad del sector. prensa para asegurar la sostenibilidad del sector. Por consiguiente, es necesario deparar en toda la Por consiguiente, es necesario deparar en toda la Unión una protección jurídica armonizada a las Unión una protección jurídica armonizada a las publicaciones de prensa en relación con los usos publicaciones de prensa en relación con los usos digitales. Dicha protección debe garantizarse digitales. Dicha protección debe garantizarse efectivamente mediante la introducción, en el efectivamente mediante la introducción, en el Derecho de la Unión, de derechos afines a los Derecho de la Unión, de derechos afines a los derechos de autor para la reproducción y puesta derechos de autor para la reproducción y puesta a disposición del público de publicaciones de a disposición del público de publicaciones de prensa en relación con los usos digitales. prensa

Or. es

Justification

La propuesta solo proporciona derechos para usos digitales. Se entiende el derecho conexo de los editores a los usos analógicos.

Amendment 306 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 32

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(32) The organisational and financial (32) The organisational and financial contribution of publishers in producing press contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital public of press publications. uses.

Or. en

Justification

The proposal only provides rights for digital uses, whereas the role of the publisher is both for print and digital. Other neighbouring rights in fact enjoy ta full scope of rights, i.e. film producers and broadcasting organisations. Hence, the provision should be applicable to both.

Amendment 307 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Marju Lauristin

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is deleted necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of hyperlinking which do not constitute communication to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 308 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is deleted necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of hyperlinking which do not constitute communication to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 309 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is deleted necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of hyperlinking which do not constitute communication to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 310 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is deleted necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of hyperlinking which do not constitute communication to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 311 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) Pro účely této směrnice je třeba definovat vypouští se pojem tiskové publikace tak, aby zahrnoval pouze novinářské publikace zveřejněné poskytovatelem služeb, které jsou periodicky nebo pravidelně aktualizovány v jakýchkoli médiích, za účelem informování nebo zábavy. Tyto publikace by zahrnovaly například deníky, týdenní nebo měsíční časopisy s obecnou nebo speciální tématikou a zpravodajské internetové stránky. Na periodické publikace vydávané pro vědecké či akademické účely, jako jsou například odborné časopisy, by se ochrana tiskových publikací podle této směrnice vztahovat neměla. Tato ochrana se nevztahuje na úkony vkládání hypertextových odkazů, které nepředstavují sdělování veřejnosti.

Or. cs

Amendment 312 Julia Reda, Isabella Adinolfi, Max Andersson, Petras Auštrevičius, Brando Benifei, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, David Borrelli, Klaus Buchner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Matt Carthy, Dita Charanzová, Daniel Dalton, Fabio De Masi, Pascal Durand, Stefan Eck, Bas Eickhout, Cornelia Ernst, Fredrick Federley, Laura Ferrara, Thomas Händel, Heidi Hautala, Benedek Jávor, Kaja Kallas, Ska Keller, Kostadinka Kuneva, Merja Kyllönen, Philippe Lamberts, Marju Lauristin, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Jiří Maštálka, Martina Michels, Victor Negrescu, Jozo Radoš, Evelyn Regner, Michel Reimon, Terry Reintke, Judith Sargentini, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Molly Scott Cato, Davor Škrlec, Igor Šoltes, Catherine Stihler, Dario Tamburrano, Indrek Tarand, Yana Toom, Ernest Urtasun, Monika Vana, Bodil Valero, Sophia in 't Veld, Josef Weidenholzer, Gabriele Zimmer, Laura Agea, Luke Ming Flanagan, Yannick Jadot, Nessa Childers, Rosa D'Amato, Marco Valli, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Florent Marcellesi

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is (33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to define the concept of press necessary to clarify the scope of protection set publication in a way that embraces only out in Article s2 and 3 of Directive journalistic publications, published by a 2001/29/EC. In order to improve legal service provider, periodically or regularly certainty for all concerned parties, and to updated in any media, for the purpose of ensure the freedom to carry out certain acts informing or entertaining. Such publications necessary for the normal functioning of the would include, for instance, daily newspapers, Internet as well as to take account of certain weekly or monthly magazines of general or fundamental rights, these Articles should not special interest and news websites. Periodical extend to acts of hyperlinking, which do not publications which are published for scientific constitute communication to the public. or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of hyperlinking which do not constitute communication to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 313 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) A los efectos de la presente Directiva, es (33) A los efectos de la presente Directiva, es necesario definir el concepto de publicación de necesario definir el concepto de publicación de prensa de modo que solamente englobe las prensa de modo que solamente englobe las publicaciones periodísticas, publicadas por un publicaciones periodísticas, publicadas por un proveedor de servicios, que se actualizan proveedor de servicios, que se actualizan periódica o regularmente en cualquier soporte, periódica o regularmente en cualquier soporte, para fines de información o entretenimiento. para fines de información o entretenimiento. Entre esas publicaciones se cuentan, por Entre esas publicaciones se cuentan, por ejemplo, los periódicos de publicación diaria, ejemplo, los periódicos de publicación diaria, las revistas semanales o mensuales de interés las revistas semanales o mensuales de interés general o especial y los sitios web de noticias. general o especial y los sitios web de noticias. Las publicaciones periódicas que se publican Esta protección no se extiende a actos de con fines científicos o académicos, como las hiperenlace que no constituyan una revistas científicas, no han de estar cubiertas comunicación al público. por la protección que se brinda a a las publicaciones de prensa en el marco de la presente Directiva. Esta protección no se extiende a actos de hiperenlace que no constituyan una comunicación al público.

Or. es

Justification

Las publicaciones científicas son parte de la prensa periódica pero en la propuesta están explicitamente excluidas.

Amendment 314 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) În sensul prezentei directive, este necesar (33) În sensul prezentei directive, este necesar ca noțiunea de publicație de presă să fie definită ca noțiunea de publicație de presă să fie definită în așa fel încât să cuprindă numai publicațiile în așa fel încât să cuprindă numai publicațiile jurnalistice publicate periodic sau actualizate jurnalistice publicate periodic sau actualizate regulat, de către un furnizor de servicii, în orice regulat, de către un furnizor de servicii, în orice formă de media, în scop de informare sau de formă de media, în scop de informare sau de divertisment. Printre astfel de publicații s-ar divertisment. Printre astfel de publicații s-ar număra, de exemplu, cotidienele, revistele număra, de exemplu, cotidienele, revistele săptămânale sau lunare de interes general sau de săptămânale sau lunare de interes general sau de specialitate și site-urile de știri. Publicațiile specialitate și site-urile de știri. Protecția nu se periodice care sunt publicate în scop științific aplică actelor de introducere de hyperlinkuri, sau academic, cum ar fi revistele științifice, nu deoarece aceste acte nu constituie o comunicare ar trebui să intre în domeniul de aplicare al publică. protecției acordate publicațiilor de presă în temeiul prezentei directive. Protecția nu se aplică actelor de introducere de hyperlinkuri, deoarece aceste acte nu constituie o comunicare publică.

Or. ro

Amendment 315 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is (33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to define the concept of press necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications and news websites. This protection does not which are published for scientific or academic extend to acts of hyperlinking which do not purposes, such as scientific journals, should constitute communication to the public. not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of hyperlinking which do not constitute communication to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 316 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Esther de Lange, Pascal Arimont

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is (33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to define the concept of press necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not purposes, such as scientific journals, should be be covered by the protection granted to press covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of protection should notably apply where the hyperlinking which do not constitute content is automatically generated by, for communication to the public. example, news aggregators but does not extend to acts which do not constitute communication to the public as it may be the case with acts of hyperlinking.

Or. en

Amendment 317 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is (33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to define the concept of press necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic which are published strictly for scientific, purposes, such as scientific journals, should not academic or non-commercial purposes, such as be covered by the protection granted to press scientific journals, should not be covered by the publications under this Directive. This protection granted to press publications under protection does not extend to acts of this Directive. This protection does not extend hyperlinking which do not constitute to acts of hyperlinking which do not constitute communication to the public. communication to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 318 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) Aux fins de la présente directive, il est (33) Aux fins de la présente directive, il est nécessaire de définir la notion de publication de nécessaire de définir la notion de publication de presse de manière à couvrir uniquement les presse de manière à couvrir uniquement les publications journalistiques, diffusées par un publications journalistiques, diffusées par un prestataire de services, périodiquement ou prestataire de services, périodiquement ou régulièrement actualisées sur tout support, à des régulièrement actualisées sur tout support, à des fins d’information ou de divertissement. Ces fins d'information ou de divertissement. Ces publications pourraient inclure, par exemple, publications pourraient inclure, par exemple, des journaux quotidiens, des magazines des journaux quotidiens, des magazines hebdomadaires ou mensuels généralistes ou hebdomadaires ou mensuels généralistes ou spécialisés, et des sites internet d’information. spécialisés, et des sites internet d'information. Les publications périodiques qui sont diffusées Les publications périodiques qui sont diffusées à des fins scientifiques ou universitaires, telles à des fins scientifiques ou universitaires, telles que les revues scientifiques, ne devraient pas que les revues scientifiques, ne devraient pas être couvertes par la protection accordée aux être couvertes par la protection accordée aux publications de presse en vertu de la présente publications de presse en vertu de la présente directive. Cette protection ne s’étend pas aux directive. Cette protection ne s'étend pas aux actes de création de liens hypertextes qui ne actes de création de liens hypertextes lorsque constituent pas une communication au public. ces actes ne constituent pas une communication au public.

Or. fr

Amendment 319 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) Für die Zwecke dieser Richtlinie ist es (33) Für die Zwecke dieser Richtlinie ist es notwendig, den Begriff der notwendig, den Begriff der Presseveröffentlichung so zu definieren, dass er Presseveröffentlichung so zu definieren, dass er nur journalistische Veröffentlichungen umfasst, nur journalistische Veröffentlichungen umfasst, die, unabhängig vom Medium, von einem die, unabhängig vom Medium, von einem Diensteanbieter für die Zwecke der Information Diensteanbieter für die Zwecke der Information oder Unterhaltung veröffentlicht und in oder Unterhaltung veröffentlicht und in bestimmten Zeitabständen oder regelmäßig bestimmten Zeitabständen oder regelmäßig aktualisiert werden. Solche Veröffentlichungen aktualisiert werden. Solche Veröffentlichungen umfassen beispielsweise Tageszeitungen oder umfassen beispielsweise Tageszeitungen oder wöchentlich oder monatlich erscheinende wöchentlich oder monatlich erscheinende Magazine von allgemeinem oder besonderem Magazine von allgemeinem oder besonderem Interesse sowie Nachrichtenwebsites. Periodika Interesse sowie Nachrichtenwebsites. Periodika wie beispielsweise Wissenschaftsjournale, die wie beispielsweise Wissenschaftsjournale, die für wissenschaftliche oder akademische Zwecke für wissenschaftliche oder akademische Zwecke verlegt werden, sollten nicht unter den auf der verlegt werden, sollten ebenfalls unter den auf Grundlage dieser Richtlinie gewährten Schutz der Grundlage dieser Richtlinie gewährten für Presseveröffentlichungen fallen. Dieser Schutz für Presseveröffentlichungen fallen. Schutz erstreckt sich nicht auf das Verknüpfen Dieser Schutz erstreckt sich nicht auf das mit Hyperlinks, da dies keine öffentliche Verknüpfen mit Hyperlinks, da dies keine Wiedergabe darstellt. öffentliche Wiedergabe darstellt.

Or. de

Amendment 320 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is (33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to define the concept of press necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of protection does not extend to acts of a hyperlinking which do not constitute computation referencing or indexing system communication to the public. such as hyperlinking.

Or. en

Amendment 321 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) A los efectos de la presente Directiva, es (33) A los efectos de la presente Directiva, es necesario definir el concepto de publicación de necesario definir el concepto de publicación de prensa de modo que solamente englobe las prensa de modo que solamente englobe las publicaciones periodísticas, publicadas por un publicaciones periodísticas, publicadas por un proveedor de servicios, que se actualizan proveedor de servicios, que se actualizan periódica o regularmente en cualquier soporte, periódica o regularmente en cualquier soporte, para fines de información o entretenimiento. para fines de información o entretenimiento. Entre esas publicaciones se cuentan, por Entre esas publicaciones se cuentan, por ejemplo, los periódicos de publicación diaria, ejemplo, los periódicos de publicación diaria, las revistas semanales o mensuales de interés las revistas semanales o mensuales de interés general o especial y los sitios web de noticias. general o especial y los sitios web de noticias. Las publicaciones periódicas que se publican Las publicaciones periódicas que se publican con fines científicos o académicos, como las con fines científicos o académicos, como las revistas científicas, no han de estar cubiertas revistas científicas, deberían estar cubiertas por por la protección que se brinda a a las la protección que se brinda a las publicaciones publicaciones de prensa en el marco de la de prensa en el marco de la presente Directiva. presente Directiva. Esta protección no se Esta protección no se extiende a actos de extiende a actos de hiperenlace que no hiperenlace que no constituyan una constituyan una comunicación al público. comunicación al público.

Or. es

Justification

Las publicaciones científicas son parte de la prensa periódica pero en la propuesta están explicitamente excluidas.

Amendment 322 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Recital 33

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is (33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to define the concept of press necessary to define the concept of press publication in a way that embraces only publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or for instance, daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest monthly magazines of general or special interest and news websites. Periodical publications and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This publications under this Directive. This protection does not extend to acts of protection does not include hyperlinking which hyperlinking which do not constitute does not constitute communication to the communication to the public. public.

Or. en

Amendment 323 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 324 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Marju Lauristin

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 325 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 326 Julia Reda, Isabella Adinolfi, Max Andersson, Petras Auštrevičius, Brando Benifei, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, David Borrelli, Klaus Buchner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Matt Carthy, Dita Charanzová, Daniel Dalton, Fabio De Masi, Pascal Durand, Stefan Eck, Bas Eickhout, Cornelia Ernst, Fredrick Federley, Laura Ferrara, Thomas Händel, Heidi Hautala, Benedek Jávor, Kaja Kallas, Ska Keller, Kostadinka Kuneva, Merja Kyllönen, Philippe Lamberts, Marju Lauristin, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Jiří Maštálka, Martina Michels, Victor Negrescu, Jozo Radoš, Evelyn Regner, Michel Reimon, Terry Reintke, Judith Sargentini, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Molly Scott Cato, Davor Škrlec, Igor Šoltes, Catherine Stihler, Dario Tamburrano, Indrek Tarand, Yana Toom, Ernest Urtasun, Bodil Valero, Monika Vana, Sophia in 't Veld, Josef Weidenholzer, Gabriele Zimmer, Laura Agea, Luke Ming Flanagan, Yannick Jadot, Nessa Childers, Rosa D'Amato, Marco Valli, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Florent Marcellesi

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 327 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 328 Jiří Maštálka

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 329 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 330 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) Práva udělená vydavatelům tiskových vypouští se publikací podle této směrnice by měla mít stejný rozsah jako práva na rozmnožování a zpřístupňování veřejnosti stanovená ve směrnici 2001/29/ES, pokud jde o digitální užití. Měla by rovněž podléhat stejným ustanovením o výjimkách a omezeních, která se vztahují na práva vymezená ve směrnici 2001/29/ES, včetně výjimky týkající se citátů pro takové účely, jako je kritika nebo recenze, stanovené v čl. 5 odst. 3 písm. d) uvedené směrnice.

Or. cs

Amendment 331 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Joëlle Bergeron, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) Les droits conférés aux éditeurs de (34) Les droits conférés aux éditeurs de publications de presse en vertu de la présente publications de presse et aux agences de presse directive devraient avoir la même portée que les en vertu de la présente directive devraient avoir droits de reproduction et de mise à disposition la même portée que les droits de reproduction et du public institués dans la directive de mise à disposition du public institués aux 2001/29/CE, en ce qui concerne les utilisations articles 2 et 3 paragraphe 2 de la directive numériques. Ils devraient en outre être soumis 2001/29/CE, et aux articles 3 et 9 de la aux mêmes dispositions en matière d'exceptions Directive 2006/115/CE en ce qui concerne les et de limitations que celles applicables aux utilisations de publications de presse. Les droits établis dans la directive 2001/29/CE, y courts extraits de publications de presse compris l’exception de citation à des fins de lorsqu'ils sont protégés par le droit d'auteur, critique ou de revue prévue à l’article 5, constituent une reproduction étant donné leur paragraphe 3, point d), de ladite directive. valeur économique. Leur utilisation non autorisée ne devrait donc pas être permise, à moins que ce soit dans le cadre d'un usage privé et non commercial.

Ces droits devraient en outre être soumis aux mêmes dispositions en matière d'exceptions et de limitations que celles applicables aux droits établis dans la directive 2001/29/CE, y compris l'exception de citation à des fins de critique ou de revue prévue à l'article 5, paragraphe 3, point d), de ladite directive. La protection conférée aux éditeurs et agences de presse par cette directive devrait inclure le contenu généré automatiquement par les agrégateurs d'informations.

Or. fr

Amendment 332 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) Die Rechte, die Presseverlagen auf der (34) Die Rechte, die Presseverlagen auf der Grundlage dieser Richtlinie gewährt werden, Grundlage dieser Richtlinie gewährt werden, sollten den gleichen Umfang haben wie die in sollten den gleichen Umfang haben wie die in der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG festgelegten Rechte der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG festgelegten Rechte auf Vervielfältigung und öffentliche auf Vervielfältigung und öffentliche Zugänglichmachung, sofern es sich um digitale Zugänglichmachung. Sie sollten zudem Nutzungen handelt. Sie sollten zudem denselben Bestimmungen für Ausnahmen und denselben Bestimmungen für Ausnahmen und Beschränkungen unterliegen, die auch für die in Beschränkungen unterliegen, die auch für die in der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG festgelegten Rechte der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG festgelegten Rechte gelten, einschließlich der Ausnahme für Zitate gelten, einschließlich der Ausnahme für Zitate zu Zwecken wie Kritik oder Rezensionen zu Zwecken wie Kritik oder Rezensionen gemäß Artikel 5 Absatz 3 Buchstabe d jener gemäß Artikel 5 Absatz 3 Buchstabe d jener Richtlinie. Der Schutz, der Richtlinie. Presseveröffentlichungen im Rahmen dieser Richtlinie gewährt wird, sollte auch im Falle automatisch generierter Inhalte, etwa durch Nachrichtenaggregatoren, Anwendung finden.

Or. de

Justification

Mit dieser Änderung soll sichergestellt werden, dass auch Ausschnitte (Snippets) unter das Recht für Presseverlage fallen.

Amendment 333 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of (34) The rights granted to the publishers of press publications under this Directive should press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC as well as as digital uses are concerned. They should also the rights of distribution and rental and be subject to the same provisions on exceptions lending provided for in Directive 2006/115/EC. and limitations as those applicable to the rights They should also be subject to the same provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including provisions on exceptions and limitations as the exception on quotation for purposes such as those applicable to the rights provided for in criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception of that Directive. on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 334 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) Les droits conférés aux éditeurs de (34) Les droits possiblement conférés aux publications de presse en vertu de la présente éditeurs de publications de presse par les Etats directive devraient avoir la même portée que les membres qui en décident en vertu de la droits de reproduction et de mise à disposition présente directive devraient avoir la même du public institués dans la directive portée que les droits de reproduction et de mise 2001/29/CE, en ce qui concerne les utilisations à disposition du public institués dans la numériques. Ils devraient en outre être soumis directive 2001/29/CE, en ce qui concerne les aux mêmes dispositions en matière d'exceptions utilisations numériques. Ils devraient en outre et de limitations que celles applicables aux être soumis aux mêmes dispositions en matière droits établis dans la directive 2001/29/CE, y d'exceptions et de limitations que celles compris l’exception de citation à des fins de applicables aux droits établis dans la directive critique ou de revue prévue à l’article 5, 2001/29/CE, y compris l'exception de citation à paragraphe 3, point d), de ladite directive. des fins de critique ou de revue prévue à l'article 5, paragraphe 3, point d), de ladite directive.

Or. fr

Amendment 335 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) Los derechos reconocidos a las editoriales (34) Los derechos reconocidos a las editoriales de publicaciones de prensa en virtud de la de publicaciones de prensa en virtud de la presente Directiva deben tener el mismo alcance presente Directiva deben tener el mismo alcance que los derechos de reproducción y puesta a que los derechos de reproducción y puesta a disposición del público previstos en la Directiva disposición del público previstos en la Directiva 2001/29/CE en la medida en que se refieran a 2001/29/CE y que los derechos de distribución usos digitales. También deben estar sujetos a las y de alquiler y préstamo previstos en la mismas disposiciones sobre excepciones y Directiva 2006/115/EC . También deben estar limitaciones que las aplicables a los derechos sujetos a las mismas disposiciones sobre previstos en la Directiva 2001/29/CE, incluida excepciones y limitaciones que las aplicables a la excepción relativa a las citas con fines tales los derechos previstos en la Directiva como la crítica o la reseña a que se refiere el 2001/29/CE, incluida la excepción relativa a las artículo 5, apartado 3, letra d), de dicha citas con fines tales como la crítica o la reseña a Directiva. que se refiere el artículo 5, apartado 3, letra d), de dicha Directiva.

Or. es

Justification

La propuesta sólo otorga derechos para usos digitales, mientras que el papel del editor y la inversión del editor en las empresas editorials es para usos impresos y digitales, independientemente del método de difusión. Otros titulares de derechos conexo gozan de los derechos completos. Al sólo conceder derechos para usos digitales parece que la edición impresa no merece el mismo nivel de protección y no tiene en cuenta la reproducción, distribución y alquiler / préstamo no autorizado, No tener derechos análogos sería similar a no cubrir DVD y CDs para para los productores de peliculas.

Amendment 336 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Pascal Arimont

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of (34) The rights granted to the publishers of press publications under this Directive should press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC. They as digital uses are concerned. They should also should also be subject to the same provisions on be subject to the same provisions on exceptions exceptions and limitations as those applicable to and limitations as those applicable to the rights the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including including the exception on quotation for the exception on quotation for purposes such as purposes such as criticism or review laid down criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive. of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 337 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Andrzej Grzyb

Proposal for a directive Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34) The rights granted to the publishers of (34) The rights granted to the publishers of press publications under this Directive should press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC. They as digital uses are concerned. They should also should also be subject to the same provisions on be subject to the same provisions on exceptions exceptions and limitations as those applicable to and limitations as those applicable to the rights the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including including the exception on quotation for the exception on quotation for purposes such as purposes such as criticism or review laid down criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive. of that Directive.

Or. en

Amendment 338 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Frédérique Ries, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 34 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(34 bis) Lors de la réutilisation des extraits par un agrégateur, l'éditeur ou l'agence de presse devrait pouvoir décider pour des motifs particuliers de lui accorder une licence gratuite.

Or. fr

Amendment 339 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Marju Lauristin

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) The protection granted to publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should not affect the rights of the authors and other rightholders in the works and other subject- matter incorporated therein, including as regards the extent to which authors and other rightholders can exploit their works or other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated. Therefore, publishers of press publications should not be able to invoke the protection granted to them against authors and other rightholders. This is without prejudice to contractual arrangements concluded between the publishers of press publications, on the one side, and authors and other rightholders, on the other side.

Or. en

Amendment 340 Julia Reda, Isabella Adinolfi, Max Andersson, Petras Auštrevičius, Brando Benifei, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, David Borrelli, Klaus Buchner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Matt Carthy, Dita Charanzová, Daniel Dalton, Fabio De Masi, Pascal Durand, Stefan Eck, Bas Eickhout, Cornelia Ernst, Fredrick Federley, Laura Ferrara, Thomas Händel, Heidi Hautala, Benedek Jávor, Kaja Kallas, Ska Keller, Kostadinka Kuneva, Merja Kyllönen, Philippe Lamberts, Marju Lauristin, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Jiří Maštálka, Martina Michels, Victor Negrescu, Jozo Radoš, Evelyn Regner, Michel Reimon, Marietje Schaake, Judith Sargentini, Helmut Scholz, Molly Scott Cato, Davor Škrlec, Igor Šoltes, Catherine Stihler, Dario Tamburrano, Indrek Tarand, Yana Toom, Ernest Urtasun, Bodil Valero, Monika Vana, Sophia in 't Veld, Josef Weidenholzer, Gabriele Zimmer, Laura Agea, Luke Ming Flanagan, Yannick Jadot, Nessa Childers, Rosa D'Amato, Marco Valli, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Florent Marcellesi

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) The protection granted to publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should not affect the rights of the authors and other rightholders in the works and other subject- matter incorporated therein, including as regards the extent to which authors and other rightholders can exploit their works or other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated. Therefore, publishers of press publications should not be able to invoke the protection granted to them against authors and other rightholders. This is without prejudice to contractual arrangements concluded between the publishers of press publications, on the one side, and authors and other rightholders, on the other side.

Or. en

Amendment 341 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) The protection granted to publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should not affect the rights of the authors and other rightholders in the works and other subject- matter incorporated therein, including as regards the extent to which authors and other rightholders can exploit their works or other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated. Therefore, publishers of press publications should not be able to invoke the protection granted to them against authors and other rightholders. This is without prejudice to contractual arrangements concluded between the publishers of press publications, on the one side, and authors and other rightholders, on the other side.

Or. en

Amendment 342 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) The protection granted to publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should not affect the rights of the authors and other rightholders in the works and other subject- matter incorporated therein, including as regards the extent to which authors and other rightholders can exploit their works or other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated. Therefore, publishers of press publications should not be able to invoke the protection granted to them against authors and other rightholders. This is without prejudice to contractual arrangements concluded between the publishers of press publications, on the one side, and authors and other rightholders, on the other side.

Or. en

Amendment 343 Jiří Maštálka

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) The protection granted to publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should not affect the rights of the authors and other rightholders in the works and other subject- matter incorporated therein, including as regards the extent to which authors and other rightholders can exploit their works or other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated. Therefore, publishers of press publications should not be able to invoke the protection granted to them against authors and other rightholders. This is without prejudice to contractual arrangements concluded between the publishers of press publications, on the one side, and authors and other rightholders, on the other side.

Or. en

Amendment 344 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) The protection granted to publishers of deleted press publications under this Directive should not affect the rights of the authors and other rightholders in the works and other subject- matter incorporated therein, including as regards the extent to which authors and other rightholders can exploit their works or other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated. Therefore, publishers of press publications should not be able to invoke the protection granted to them against authors and other rightholders. This is without prejudice to contractual arrangements concluded between the publishers of press publications, on the one side, and authors and other rightholders, on the other side.

Or. en

Amendment 345 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) Ochranou poskytnutou vydavatelům vypouští se tiskových publikací podle této směrnice by neměla být dotčena práva autorů a jiných nositelů práv k dílům a jiným předmětům ochrany, které jsou jejich součástí, a to i pokud jde o rozsah, v jakém mohou autoři a jiní nositelé práv využívat svá díla a jiné předměty ochrany nezávisle na tiskové publikaci, jejíž jsou součástí. Proto by vydavatelé tiskových publikací neměli mít možnost dovolávat se vůči autorům a jiným nositelům práv ochrany, která jim byla poskytnuta. Tím nejsou dotčena smluvní ujednání uzavřená mezi vydavateli tiskových publikací na jedné straně a autory a jinými nositeli práv na straně druhé.

Or. cs

Amendment 346 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) Der Schutz, der Presseverlagen auf der (35) Der Schutz, der Presseverlagen auf der Grundlage dieser Richtlinie gewährt wird, sollte Grundlage dieser Richtlinie gewährt wird, sollte die Rechte der Urheber oder sonstiger Inhaber die Rechte der Urheber oder sonstiger Inhaber von Rechten an den in Presseveröffentlichungen von Rechten an den in Presseveröffentlichungen enthaltenen Werken und sonstigen enthaltenen Werken und sonstigen Schutzgegenständen nicht beeinträchtigen, auch Schutzgegenständen nicht beeinträchtigen, auch nicht im Hinblick auf den Umfang, in dem nicht im Hinblick auf den Umfang, in dem Urheber und sonstige Rechteinhaber ihre Werke Urheber und sonstige Rechteinhaber ihre Werke oder sonstigen Schutzgegenstände unabhängig oder sonstigen Schutzgegenstände unabhängig von der Presseveröffentlichung, in der sie von der Presseveröffentlichung, in der sie enthalten sind, verwerten können. Daher sollten enthalten sind, verwerten können. Daher sollten sich Presseverlage gegenüber Urhebern und sich Presseverlage gegenüber Urhebern und sonstigen Rechteinhabern nicht auf den ihnen sonstigen Rechteinhabern nicht auf den ihnen gewährten Schutz berufen können. Dies gilt gewährten Schutz berufen können. Dies gilt unbeschadet der vertraglichen Vereinbarungen, unbeschadet der vertraglichen Vereinbarungen, die zwischen den Presseverlagen und den die zwischen den Presseverlagen und den Rechteinhabern geschlossen wurden. Rechteinhabern geschlossen wurden. Die Mitgliedstaaten sollten sicherstellen, dass ein angemessener Anteil der Vergütung, die sich aus der Nutzung der Rechte der Presseverlage ergibt, den Journalisten, Autoren und anderen Rechtinhabern zufließt.

Or. de

Amendment 347 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) La protection accordée aux éditeurs de (35) La protection accordée aux éditeurs de publications de presse en vertu de la présente publications de presse et agences de presse en directive ne devrait pas porter atteinte aux droits vertu de la présente directive ne devrait pas des auteurs et autres titulaires de droits à l’égard porter atteinte aux droits des auteurs et autres des œuvres et autres objets protégés intégrés titulaires de droits à l'égard des œuvres et autres dans ces publications, notamment en ce qui objets protégés intégrés dans ces publications, concerne la mesure dans laquelle les auteurs et notamment en ce qui concerne la mesure dans autres titulaires de droits peuvent exploiter leurs laquelle les auteurs et autres titulaires de droits œuvres ou autres objets protégés peuvent exploiter leurs œuvres ou autres objets indépendamment de la publication de presse protégés indépendamment de la publication de dans laquelle ils sont intégrés. Par conséquent, presse dans laquelle ils sont intégrés. Par les éditeurs de publications de presse ne conséquent, les éditeurs de publications de devraient pas pouvoir opposer aux auteurs et presse et agences de presse ne devraient pas autres titulaires de droits la protection qui leur pouvoir opposer aux auteurs et autres titulaires est accordée. Cet élément est sans préjudice des de droits la protection qui leur est accordée. Cet modalités contractuelles fixées entre les éditeurs élément est sans préjudice des modalités de publications de presse, d’une part, et les contractuelles fixées entre les éditeurs de auteurs et autres titulaires de droits, d’autre part. publications de presse ou agences de presse d'une part, et les auteurs et autres titulaires de droits, d'autre part.

Or. fr

Amendment 348 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 35

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(35) La protection accordée aux éditeurs de (35) La protection accordée aux éditeurs de publications de presse en vertu de la présente publications de presse par les Etats membres directive ne devrait pas porter atteinte aux droits qui le souhaitent en vertu de la présente des auteurs et autres titulaires de droits à l’égard directive ne devrait pas porter atteinte aux droits des œuvres et autres objets protégés intégrés des auteurs et autres titulaires de droits à l'égard dans ces publications, notamment en ce qui des œuvres et autres objets protégés intégrés concerne la mesure dans laquelle les auteurs et dans ces publications, notamment en ce qui autres titulaires de droits peuvent exploiter leurs concerne la mesure dans laquelle les auteurs et œuvres ou autres objets protégés autres titulaires de droits peuvent exploiter leurs indépendamment de la publication de presse œuvres ou autres objets protégés dans laquelle ils sont intégrés. Par conséquent, indépendamment de la publication de presse les éditeurs de publications de presse ne dans laquelle ils sont intégrés. Par conséquent, devraient pas pouvoir opposer aux auteurs et les éditeurs de publications de presse ne autres titulaires de droits la protection qui leur devraient pas pouvoir opposer aux auteurs et est accordée. Cet élément est sans préjudice des autres titulaires de droits la protection qui leur modalités contractuelles fixées entre les éditeurs est accordée. Cet élément est sans préjudice des de publications de presse, d’une part, et les modalités contractuelles fixées entre les éditeurs auteurs et autres titulaires de droits, d’autre part. de publications de presse, d'une part, et les auteurs et autres titulaires de droits, d'autre part.

Or. fr

Amendment 349 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Recital 36

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36) Publishers, including those of press deleted publications, books or scientific publications, often operate on the basis of the transfer of authors' rights by means of contractual agreements or statutory provisions. In this context, publishers make an investment with a view to the exploitation of the works contained in their publications and may in some instances be deprived of revenues where such works are used under exceptions or limitations such as the ones for private copying and reprography. In a number of Member States compensation for uses under those exceptions is shared between authors and publishers. In order to take account of this situation and improve legal certainty for all concerned parties, Member States should be allowed to determine that, when an author has transferred or licensed his rights to a publisher or otherwise contributes with his works to a publication and there are systems in place to compensate for the harm caused by an exception or limitation, publishers are entitled to claim a share of such compensation, whereas the burden on the publisher to substantiate his claim should not exceed what is required under the system in place.

Or. en

Amendment 350 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 36

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36) Publishers, including those of press deleted publications, books or scientific publications, often operate on the basis of the transfer of authors' rights by means of contractual agreements or statutory provisions. In this context, publishers make an investment with a view to the exploitation of the works contained in their publications and may in some instances be deprived of revenues where such works are used under exceptions or limitations such as the ones for private copying and reprography. In a number of Member States compensation for uses under those exceptions is shared between authors and publishers. In order to take account of this situation and improve legal certainty for all concerned parties, Member States should be allowed to determine that, when an author has transferred or licensed his rights to a publisher or otherwise contributes with his works to a publication and there are systems in place to compensate for the harm caused by an exception or limitation, publishers are entitled to claim a share of such compensation, whereas the burden on the publisher to substantiate his claim should not exceed what is required under the system in place.

Or. en

Amendment 351 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 36

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36) Publishers, including those of press deleted publications, books or scientific publications, often operate on the basis of the transfer of authors' rights by means of contractual agreements or statutory provisions. In this context, publishers make an investment with a view to the exploitation of the works contained in their publications and may in some instances be deprived of revenues where such works are used under exceptions or limitations such as the ones for private copying and reprography. In a number of Member States compensation for uses under those exceptions is shared between authors and publishers. In order to take account of this situation and improve legal certainty for all concerned parties, Member States should be allowed to determine that, when an author has transferred or licensed his rights to a publisher or otherwise contributes with his works to a publication and there are systems in place to compensate for the harm caused by an exception or limitation, publishers are entitled to claim a share of such compensation, whereas the burden on the publisher to substantiate his claim should not exceed what is required under the system in place.

Or. en

Amendment 352 Jiří Maštálka

Proposal for a directive Recital 36

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36) Publishers, including those of press deleted publications, books or scientific publications, often operate on the basis of the transfer of authors' rights by means of contractual agreements or statutory provisions. In this context, publishers make an investment with a view to the exploitation of the works contained in their publications and may in some instances be deprived of revenues where such works are used under exceptions or limitations such as the ones for private copying and reprography. In a number of Member States compensation for uses under those exceptions is shared between authors and publishers. In order to take account of this situation and improve legal certainty for all concerned parties, Member States should be allowed to determine that, when an author has transferred or licensed his rights to a publisher or otherwise contributes with his works to a publication and there are systems in place to compensate for the harm caused by an exception or limitation, publishers are entitled to claim a share of such compensation, whereas the burden on the publisher to substantiate his claim should not exceed what is required under the system in place.

Or. en

Amendment 353 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 36

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36) Publishers, including those of press (36) Publishers, including those of press publications, books or scientific publications, publications, books, music or scientific often operate on the basis of the transfer of publications, often operate on the basis of the authors' rights by means of contractual transfer of authors' rights by means of agreements or statutory provisions. In this contractual agreements or statutory provisions. context, publishers make an investment with a In other cases, they operate based on view to the exploitation of the works contained agreements where authors grant a right to in their publications and may in some instances claim a share of the income. In this context, be deprived of revenues where such works are publishers make an investment with a view to used under exceptions or limitations such as the the exploitation of the works contained in their ones for private copying and reprography. In a publications and may in some instances be number of Member States compensation for deprived of revenues where such works are used uses under those exceptions is shared between under exceptions or limitations such as the ones authors and publishers. In order to take account for private copying and reprography. In a of this situation and improve legal certainty for number of Member States compensation for all concerned parties, Member States should be uses under those exceptions is shared between allowed to determine that, when an author has authors and publishers. In order to take account transferred or licensed his rights to a publisher of this situation and improve legal certainty for or otherwise contributes with his works to a all concerned parties, Member States should be publication and there are systems in place to allowed to determine that, when an author has compensate for the harm caused by an transferred, assigned or licensed his rights, exception or limitation, publishers are entitled including the right to claim a share of income, to claim a share of such compensation, whereas to a publisher or otherwise contributes with his the burden on the publisher to substantiate his works to a publication and there are systems in claim should not exceed what is required under place to compensate for the harm caused by an the system in place. exception or limitation, publishers are entitled to claim a share of such compensation, whereas the burden on the publisher to substantiate his claim should not exceed what is required under the system in place.

Or. en

Amendment 354 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 36

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36) Les éditeurs, y compris ceux de (36) Les agences de presses, les éditeurs, y publications de presse, de livres ou de compris ceux de publications de presse, de publications scientifiques, s'appuient souvent livres et de publications scientifiques s'appuient sur la cession de droits d’auteur dans le cadre souvent sur la cession de droits d'auteur dans le d’accords contractuels ou de dispositions cadre d'accords contractuels ou de dispositions statutaires. Dans ce contexte, ils réalisent un statutaires. Dans ce contexte, ils réalisent un investissement en vue d’exploiter les œuvres investissement en vue d'exploiter les œuvres contenues dans leurs publications et peuvent, contenues dans leurs publications et peuvent, dans certains cas, être privés de revenus lorsque dans certains cas, être privés de revenus lorsque ces œuvres sont utilisées en vertu d'exceptions ces œuvres sont utilisées en vertu d'exceptions ou de limitations comme celles relatives à la ou de limitations comme celles relatives à la copie privée et à la reprographie. Dans un copie privée et à la reprographie. Dans un certain nombre d’États membres, les auteurs et certain nombre d'États membres, les auteurs et les éditeurs se partagent la compensation prévue les éditeurs se partagent la compensation prévue pour les utilisations relevant de ces exceptions. pour les utilisations relevant de ces exceptions. Afin de tenir compte de cette situation et Afin de tenir compte de cette situation et d'améliorer la sécurité juridique pour toutes les d'améliorer la sécurité juridique pour toutes les parties concernées, les États membres devraient parties concernées, les États membres devraient être autorisés à prévoir que, lorsqu’un auteur a être autorisés à prévoir que, lorsqu'un auteur a cédé ou accordé sous licence ses droits à un cédé ou accordé sous licence ses droits à un éditeur ou contribue par ses œuvres à une éditeur ou une agence de presse ou contribue publication et qu'il existe des systèmes pour par ses œuvres à une publication et qu'il existe compenser le manque à gagner causé par une des systèmes pour compenser le manque à exception ou limitation, les éditeurs sont en gagner causé par une exception ou limitation, droit de réclamer une part de cette les éditeurs et agences de presse sont en droit compensation, la charge pesant sur eux pour de réclamer une part de cette compensation, la étayer leur réclamation ne devant pas excéder ce charge pesant sur eux pour étayer leur qui est nécessaire en vertu du système en place. réclamation ne devant pas excéder ce qui est nécessaire en vertu du système en place.

Or. fr

Amendment 355 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Recital 36

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36) Publishers, including those of press (36) Publishers, including those of press publications, books or scientific publications, publications, books or scientific publications, often operate on the basis of the transfer of often operate on the basis of the transfer of authors' rights by means of contractual authors' rights by means of contractual agreements or statutory provisions. In this agreements or statutory provisions. In this context, publishers make an investment with a context, publishers make an investment with a view to the exploitation of the works contained view to the exploitation of the works contained in their publications and may in some instances in their publications and may in some instances be deprived of revenues where such works are be deprived of revenues where such works are used under exceptions or limitations such as the used under exceptions or limitations such as the ones for private copying and reprography. In a ones for private copying and reprography. In a number of Member States compensation for number of Member States compensation for uses under those exceptions is shared between uses under those exceptions is shared between authors and publishers. In order to take account authors and publishers. In order to take account of this situation and improve legal certainty for of this situation and improve legal certainty for all concerned parties, Member States should be all concerned parties, Member States should be allowed to determine that, when an author has allowed to determine that, when an author has transferred or licensed his rights to a publisher transferred or licensed his rights to a publisher or otherwise contributes with his works to a or otherwise contributes with his works to a publication and there are systems in place to publication and there are systems in place to compensate for the harm caused by an compensate for the harm caused by an exception or limitation, publishers are entitled exception or limitation, publishers are entitled to claim a share of such compensation, whereas to claim a share of such compensation. the burden on the publisher to substantiate his claim should not exceed what is required under the system in place.

Or. en

Amendment 356 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 36

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36) Verlage, einschließlich solcher, die (36) Verlage, einschließlich solcher, die Presseveröffentlichungen, Bücher oder Presseveröffentlichungen, Bücher, wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen verlegen, wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen oder arbeiten häufig auf der Grundlage vertraglicher Musikwerke verlegen, arbeiten häufig auf der Vereinbarungen oder gesetzlicher Grundlage vertraglicher Vereinbarungen oder Bestimmungen über die Übertragung von gesetzlicher Bestimmungen über die Urheberrechten. Dies stellt eine Investition der Übertragung von Urheberrechten. Dies stellt Verlage im Hinblick auf die Verwertung der in eine Investition der Verlage im Hinblick auf die ihren Veröffentlichungen enthaltenen Werke Verwertung der in ihren Veröffentlichungen dar, so dass ihnen unter Umständen Einnahmen enthaltenen Werke dar, so dass ihnen unter entgehen, wenn diese Werke im Rahmen von Umständen Einnahmen entgehen, wenn diese Ausnahmen oder Beschränkungen, etwa für die Werke im Rahmen von Ausnahmen oder Vervielfältigung zu privaten Zwecken und die Beschränkungen, etwa für die Vervielfältigung Reprografie, genutzt werden. In einigen zu privaten Zwecken und die Reprografie, Mitgliedstaaten wird der für diese Ausnahmen genutzt werden. In einigen Mitgliedstaaten wird gewährte Ausgleich auf die Urheber und der für diese Ausnahmen gewährte Ausgleich Verlage aufgeteilt. Um dieser Situation auf die Urheber und Verlage aufgeteilt. Um Rechnung zu tragen und um die dieser Situation Rechnung zu tragen und um die Rechtssicherheit für alle Beteiligten zu erhöhen, Rechtssicherheit für alle Beteiligten zu erhöhen, sollten die Mitgliedstaaten festlegen können, sollten die Mitgliedstaaten festlegen können, dass für den Fall, dass ein Urheber seine Rechte dass für den Fall, dass ein Urheber seine Rechte an einen Verlag übertragen, diesem eine Lizenz an einen Verlag übertragen, diesem eine Lizenz erteilt oder anderweitig mit seinen Werken zu erteilt oder anderweitig mit seinen Werken zu einer Veröffentlichung beigetragen hat, und einer Veröffentlichung beigetragen hat, und soweit Systeme bestehen, um den durch eine soweit Systeme bestehen, um den durch eine Ausnahme oder Beschränkung entstandenen Ausnahme oder Beschränkung entstandenen Schaden auszugleichen, Verlage das Recht Schaden auszugleichen, Verlage das Recht erhalten, einen Anteil an dieser erhalten, einen Anteil an dieser Ausgleichsleistung zu fordern, wobei dem Ausgleichsleistung zu fordern, wobei dem Verlag kein größerer Aufwand für die Verlag kein größerer Aufwand für die Begründung seiner Ansprüche entstehen darf als Begründung seiner Ansprüche entstehen darf als nach dem geltenden System. nach dem geltenden System.

Or. de

Amendment 357 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 36 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36 a) In its ruling in Case 174/15 (VOB vs Stichting Leenrecht), the Court of Justice recognised that the lending of e-books can fall under the same rules as the lending of physical books. When Member States apply the limitation to copyright under Article 6 of the rental and Lending Directive, libraries are able to buy any physical book on the market. Once purchased, they can lend it without restrictions linked to contract terms or other measures of protection which prevent the exercise of exceptions and limitations to copyright. These provisions should also apply to e-books.

Moreover, with the objective of ensuring that all citizens of the European Union have access to a full selection of books and other resources, all Member States should ensure that the limitation to the exclusive public lending right in Article 6 of the Rental and Lending Directive is mandatory.

Or. en

Amendment 358 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Frédérique Ries, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 36 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(36 bis) L'obligation de conclure des licences devrait aussi s'appliquer aux agrégateurs d'information.

Or. fr

Amendment 359 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) Over the last years, the functioning of the deleted online content marketplace has gained in complexity. Online services providing access to copyright protected content uploaded by their users without the involvement of right holders have flourished and have become main sources of access to content online. This affects rightholders' possibilities to determine whether, and under which conditions, their work and other subject-matter are used as well as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it.

Or. en

Amendment 360 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) En los últimos años, el funcionamiento del (37) La evolución de las tecnologías digitales mercado de contenidos en línea ha adquirido ha conducido al surgimiento de nuevos mayor complejidad. Los servicios en línea que modelos de negocio y ha reforzado el papel de facilitan acceso a contenidos protegidos por Internet como mercado principal para la derechos de autor cargados por sus usuarios sin distribución y acceso a contenidos protegidos intervención de los titulares de los derechos se por derechos de autor. En los últimos años, el han generalizado, convirtiéndose en las funcionamiento de este mercado ha adquirido principales fuentes de acceso a los contenidos mayor complejidad. Los servicios en línea que en línea. Esta situación reduce las posibilidades facilitan acceso a contenidos protegidos por de que los titulares de derechos averigüen si sus derechos de autor cargados por sus usuarios sin obras y otras prestaciones se están utilizando y intervención de los titulares de los derechos se en qué condiciones, así como sus posibilidades han generalizado, convirtiéndose en las de obtener una remuneración adecuada por ese principales fuentes de acceso a los contenidos uso. en línea. Esta situación reduce las posibilidades de que los titulares de derechos averigüen si sus obras y otras prestaciones se están utilizando y en qué condiciones, así como sus posibilidades de obtener una remuneración adecuada por ese uso. El sector creativo contribuye de manera significativa, tanto económica como culturalmente, a la fortaleza de la Unión y la importancia de este sector ha sido reconocida desde hace tiempo por la legislación de la Unión, incluida la Directiva 2001/29/CE, que garantiza un marco en el que puedan tener lugar la explotación de obras y otros tipos de material protegido. Las dificultades a las que se enfrentan los titulares de derechos cuando pretenden conceder licencias de sus derechos a determinados proveedores de servicios en línea y recibir una remuneración por la distribución en línea de sus obras y su contenido pueden poner en peligro dicho objetivo. Para mantener un alto nivel de protección que permita a los sectores creativos seguir contribuyendo cultural y económicamente a la Unión, es necesario garantizar la seguridad jurídica tanto para los titulares de derechos como para los usuarios de obras y objetos protegidos, y que los titulares de derechos puedan negociar licencias de derechos de autor con los prestadores de servicios de contenidos cargados por usuarios, que distribuyan dichos contenidos.

Or. es

Justification

Se pretende explicar con más detalle el contexto y la necesidad de disposiciones que tengan por objeto proporcionar un marco legislativo adecuado para acuerdos de licencias entre los titulares de derechos y los servicios de la UUC para el uso del contenido de derechos de autor

Amendment 361 Luis de Grandes Pascual

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) Over the last years, the functioning of the (37) Evolution of digital technologies has led online content marketplace has gained in to the emergence of new business models and complexity. Online services providing access to reinforced the role of the Internet as the main copyright protected content uploaded by their marketplace for the distribution of and access users without the involvement of right holders to copyright-protected content. Over the last have flourished and have become main sources years, the functioning of the online content of access to content online. This affects marketplace has gained in complexity. Online rightholders' possibilities to determine whether, services providing access to copyright protected and under which conditions, their work and content uploaded by their users without the other subject-matter are used as well as their involvement of right holders have flourished possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration and have become main sources of access to for it. content online. This affects rightholders' possibilities to determine whether, and under which conditions, their work and other subject- matter are used as well as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it.

The creative sector contributes significantly both economically and culturally to the strength of the Union, and the importance of the sector has long been recognised by Union law including Directive 2001/29/EC, which aims to guarantee a framework wherein the exploitation of works and other protected subject-matter can take place. Difficulties faced by rightholders when seeking to license their rights to certain online services and be remunerated for the online distribution of their works and subject matter risks undermining that aim. To uphold a high level of protection that enables the creative sectors to continue to contribute culturally and economically to the Union it is necessary to ensure that legal certainty is provided both for rightholders and users of protected works and subject-matter and that rightholders are able to negotiate copyright licenses with user – uploaded content services that distribute their content.

Or. en

Justification

To explain in more detail the context and the need for provisions that aim to provide an adequate legislative environment for concluding licenses between right holders and UUC services for use of copyright content.

Amendment 362 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) Over the last years, the functioning of the (37) Over the last years, the functioning of the online content marketplace has gained in online content marketplace has gained in complexity. Online services providing access to complexity. Online services providing access to copyright protected content uploaded by their copyright protected content uploaded by their users without the involvement of right holders users without the involvement of right holders have flourished and have become main sources have flourished and have become main sources of access to content online. This affects of access to content online. This affects rightholders' possibilities to determine whether, rightholders' possibilities to determine whether, and under which conditions, their work and and under which conditions, their work and other subject-matter are used as well as their other subject-matter are used as well as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it. for it. As a result this transfer of value undermines the efficiency of the online market, distorts competition and drives down the overall value of cultural content online. It also limits consumer choice for new and innovative legitimate services in the European Digital Single Market and puts at risk cultural and creative industries.

Or. en

Amendment 363 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) În ultimii ani, funcționarea pieței (37) Evoluția tehnologiilor digitale a conținuturilor online a devenit din ce în ce mai determinat apariția unor noi modele de afaceri complexă. Serviciile online care oferă acces la și a consolidat rolul internetului de principală conținuturi protejate prin drept de autor care piață pentru distribuirea și accesarea sunt încărcate de către utilizatorii lor fără conținutului protejat prin drepturi de autor. În implicarea titularilor drepturilor s-au înmulțit și ultimii ani, funcționarea acestei piețe a devenit au devenit principalele surse de acces la din ce în ce mai complexă. Serviciile online conținuturile online. Această situație afectează care oferă acces la conținuturi protejate prin posibilitățile titularilor de drepturi de a stabili drept de autor care sunt încărcate de către dacă și în ce condiții opera lor și alte obiecte utilizatorii lor fără implicarea titularilor protejate sunt utilizate, precum și posibilitățile drepturilor s-au înmulțit și au devenit lor de a obține o remunerație adecvată pentru principalele surse de acces la conținuturile utilizarea respectivă. online. Această situație afectează posibilitățile titularilor de drepturi de a stabili dacă și în ce condiții opera lor și alte obiecte protejate sunt utilizate, precum și posibilitățile lor de a obține o remunerație adecvată pentru utilizarea respectivă.

Or. ro

Amendment 364 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) In den letzten Jahren wurde der Markt für (37) In den letzten Jahren wurde der Markt für Online-Inhalte immer komplexer. Online- Online-Inhalte immer komplexer. Online- Dienste, die Zugang zu urheberrechtlich Dienste, die Zugang zu urheberrechtlich geschützten Inhalten bieten, die von ihren geschützten Inhalten bieten, die von ihren Nutzern ohne Einbeziehung der Rechteinhaber Nutzern ohne Einbeziehung der Rechteinhaber hochgeladen wurden, haben sich ausgeweitet hochgeladen wurden, haben sich ausgeweitet und wurden zur Hauptquelle für den Zugriff auf und wurden zur Hauptquelle für den Zugriff auf Online-Inhalte. Dies schränkt die Rechteinhaber Online-Inhalte. Dadurch erzielen die Online- in ihren Möglichkeiten ein, festzustellen, ob und Dienste häufig Gewinne durch Inhalte, deren unter welchen Umständen ihr Werk oder Urheber sie nicht sind, wobei die Gewinne sonstiger Schutzgegenstand verwendet wird, nicht immer gerecht mit den jeweiligen und eine angemessene Vergütung zu erhalten. Urhebern geteilt werden. Dies schränkt die Rechteinhaber in ihren Möglichkeiten ein, festzustellen, ob und unter welchen Umständen ihr Werk oder sonstiger Schutzgegenstand verwendet wird, und eine angemessene Vergütung zu erhalten.

Or. de

Amendment 365 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) Over the last years, the functioning of the (37) Over the years, online services enabling online content marketplace has gained in users to upload works and to make them complexity. Online services providing access to accessible to the public have flourished and copyright protected content uploaded by their have become important sources of access to users without the involvement of right holders content online and of creativity. At the same have flourished and have become main sources time, when protected content is uploaded of access to content online. This affects without prior authorisation from right holders, rightholders' possibilities to determine they have generated challenges. whether, and under which conditions, their work and other subject-matter are used as well as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it.

Or. en

Amendment 366 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) Over the last years, the functioning of the (37) Online services providing access to online content marketplace has gained in copyright protected content uploaded by their complexity. Online services providing access to users without the involvement of right holders copyright protected content uploaded by their have flourished and have become main sources users without the involvement of right holders of access to content online, allowing for have flourished and have become main sources diversity and creation of new content, while of access to content online. This affects stimulating the revenues of the creative sector rightholders' possibilities to determine to grow in the digital environment. whether, and under which conditions, their work and other subject-matter are used as well as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it.

Or. en

Amendment 367 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) Over the last years, the functioning of the (37) Especially over the last years, the online content marketplace has gained in functioning of the online content marketplace complexity. Online services providing access to has gained in complexity. Online services copyright protected content uploaded by their providing access to copyright protected content users without the involvement of right holders uploaded by their users without the involvement have flourished and have become main sources of right holders have flourished and have of access to content online. This affects become important sources of easy access to rightholders' possibilities to determine content online, also causing challenges when whether, and under which conditions, their copyright protected content is uploaded work and other subject-matter are used as well without prior authorization from rightholders. as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it.

Or. en

Amendment 368 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) Over the last years, the functioning of the (37) Over the last years, the functioning of the online content marketplace has gained in online content marketplace has gained in complexity. Online services providing access to complexity. Active online services providing copyright protected content uploaded by their access to copyright protected digital content users without the involvement of right holders uploaded by their users without the involvement have flourished and have become main sources of right holders have flourished and have of access to content online. This affects become main sources of access to copyright rightholders' possibilities to determine whether, protected content online. This affects and under which conditions, their work and rightholders' possibilities to determine whether, other subject-matter are used as well as their and under which conditions, their work and possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration other subject-matter are used as well as their for it. possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it.

Or. en

Amendment 369 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37) Over the last years, the functioning of the (37) Over the last years, the functioning of the online content marketplace has gained in online content marketplace has gained in complexity. Online services providing access to complexity. Online services hosting copyright copyright protected content uploaded by their protected content uploaded by their users users without the involvement of right holders without the involvement of right holders have have flourished and have become main sources flourished and have become important sources of access to content online. This affects of access to content online allowing for rightholders' possibilities to determine diversity and ease of access to content but also whether, and under which conditions, their generating challenges when copyright work and other subject-matter are used as well protected content is uploaded without prior as their possibilities to get an appropriate authorisation from rightholders. remuneration for it.

Or. en

Amendment 370 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Christian Ehler, Robert Rochefort, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Jean-Marie Cavada, Angelika Niebler, Pervenche Berès, Milan Zver, Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Sylvie Guillaume, Luigi Morgano, Constance Le Grip, Mady Delvaux

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 a) Despite the fact that more creative content is being consumed today than ever before, on services such as user-uploaded content platforms and content aggregation services, yielding significant profits, the creative sectors have not seen a comparable increase in revenues from this increase in consumption. The value of cultural and creative works has been diverted away from the authors, artists, producers and others rights holders, generating an unsustainable "value gap". This transfer of value, due to the lack of clarity regarding the status of these

online services under copyright and e- commerce law, undermines the efficiency of the online market, distorts competition and drives down the overall value of cultural content online. It also limits consumer choice for new and innovative legitimate services in the European Digital Single Market and puts at risk cultural and creative industries that create significant jobs and growth for EU economy, as underlined by the European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2016 on a "coherent EU policy for cultural and creative industries (2016/2072(INI))"

Or. en

Amendment 371 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 a) Sectorul creativ contribuie în mod semnificativ, atât economic, cât și cultural la consolidarea puterii Uniunii, iar importanța acestui sector a fost mult timp recunoscută de dreptul Uniunii, inclusiv în Directiva 2001/29/CE, care urmărește să garanteze un cadru legislativ în care poate avea loc exploatarea operelor și a altor obiecte protejate. Titularii de drepturi de autor se confruntă, adesea, cu dificultăți, atunci când încearcă să încheie licențe cu privire la drepturile lor cu anumiți furnizori de servicii on-line și să fie remunerați pentru distribuirea online a operelor lor, aspect care riscă să le submineze activitatea. Pentru a menține un nivel ridicat de protecție care permite sectorului creativ să continue să contribuie în mod cultural și economic la consolidarea Uniunii, este necesar să se asigure că securitatea juridică este garantată atât pentru titularii de drepturi, cât și pentru utilizatorii de opere protejate și că titularii de drepturi sunt în măsură să negocieze licențele de drepturi de autor cu furnizorii de servicii de conținut care distribuie conținutul lor.

Or. ro

Amendment 372 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 a) The creative sector contributes significantly both economically and culturally to the strength of the Union, and the importance of the sector has long been recognised by European Union legislation including Directive 2001/29/EC, which aims to guarantee a framework wherein the exploitation of works or other protected subject-matter can take place. The difficulties faced by rightholders when seeking to license their rights to certain online services and to receive remuneration for the online distribution of their works or other subject matter risk undermining that aim. To uphold a high level of protection that enables the creative sectors to continue to contribute culturally and economically to the Union it is necessary to ensure that legal certainty is provided both for rightholders and users of protected works or other subject-matter and that rightholders are able to negotiate copyright licenses with user – uploaded content services that distribute their content.

Or. en

Amendment 373 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 bis) Los servicios de contenidos cargados por usuarios atraen a los usuarios y obtienen un valor económico por proporcionar acceso a obras y otras prestaciones protegidas, a menudo incluyendo la optimización de su presentación, su organización y promoción. Al hacerlo, estos servicios compiten directamente con proveedores de contenidos amparados por una licencia por los mismos usuarios y beneficios. No obstante, a diferencia de los servicios amparados por una licencia, estos servicios de contenidos cargados por usuarios no pagan ninguna remuneración, o pagan una remuneración muy baja, a los creadores, por las obras en las que se basan sus modelos de negocio, amparándose de forma indebida en las disposiciones sobre puertos seguros de la Directiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo.

Or. es

Amendment 374 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 a) Heute werden mehr kreative Inhalte konsumiert als je zuvor. Dies geschieht meist mittels Plattformdiensten, bei denen die Inhalte von Nutzern hochgeladen werden, oder mittels „Content Aggregation"-Diensten. Gleichzeitig sind die Einnahmen für die Kreativwirtschaft nicht annähernd im gleichen Maße gestiegen. Dadurch ist eine sogenannte

„Wertschöpfungslücke" ("Value Gap") entstanden: Plattformdienste behalten den Wert kultureller und kreativer Arbeiten ein, der den Urhebern entgeht. Der Werttransfer hat zu einem ineffizienten und unfairen Markt geführt und bedroht die langfristige Solidität der Kreativwirtschaft in der Union und den Erfolg des digitalen Binnenmarkts.

Or. de

Amendment 375 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, Frédérique Ries, Christian Ehler, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 bis) Il devrait être clairement pris en compte que le régime d'exemption de responsabilité ne s'applique pas aux services qui jouent un rôle actif dans la mise en ligne des oeuvres et autres objets protégés du public. En conséquence, les service UUC qui accomplissent des actes de communication au public au travers de leur intervention indispensable à la communication au public et initiée par les personnes qui chargent le contenu ne sont pas couverts par la directive 2000/31/CE s'agissant du droit d'auteur et sont donc soumis aux règles de la directive 2001/29/CE à l'instar des fournisseurs de services de contenu numérique.

Or. fr

Amendment 376 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Christian Ehler, Robert Rochefort, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Jean-Marie Cavada, Angelika Niebler, Pervenche Berès, Milan Zver, Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Sylvie Guillaume, Luigi Morgano, Constance Le Grip, Mady Delvaux

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 b) Digital platforms are means of providing wider access to cultural and creative works and offer great opportunities for cultural and creative industries to develop new business models; consideration is to be made of how this process can function with more legal certainty and fairness and respect for right holders; importance of transparency and of ensuring a level playing field is necessary; in this regard, protection of right holders within the copyright and intellectual property framework is necessary in order to ensure recognition of values and stimulation of innovation, creativity, investment, to guarantee the success of a Digital Single Market, offering all diverse and quality cultural and creative works.

Or. en

Amendment 377 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 b) Digitale Plattformen dienen dazu, einen breiteren Zugang zu kulturellen und kreativen Werken zu schaffen. Sie bieten der Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft großartige Möglichkeiten, neue Geschäftsmodelle zu entwickeln. Daher sollte geprüft werden, wie dieser Prozess mit mehr Rechtssicherheit und Achtung der Rechteinhaber einhergehen

kann. Es ist äußerst wichtig, für Transparenz und faire Wettbewerbsbedingungen zu sorgen. Der Schutz der Rechteinhaber im Rahmen des Urheberrechts und der Rechte des geistigen Eigentums ist erforderlich, um die Anerkennung von Werten sicherzustellen und Innovation, Kreativität, Investitionen und die Produktion von Inhalten zu stimulieren.

Or. de

Amendment 378 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 ter) Esta transferencia de valor debilita la eficacia del mercado en línea, distorsiona la competencia y disminuye el valor en general de los contenidos culturales en línea. También reduce las posibilidades de elección por parte de los consumidores de nuevos y legítimos servicios innovadores en el Mercado único digital europeo, poniendo en peligro a la industria cultural y creativa que contribuye de manera sustancial a la generación de empleo y al crecimiento, tal y como se puso de relieve en la Resolución del Parlamento Europeo, de 13 de diciembre de 2016, sobre una política de la Unión coherente para los sectores cultural y creativo (2016/2072(INI)).

Or. es

Amendment 379 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Christian Ehler, Robert Rochefort, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Jean-Marie Cavada, Angelika Niebler, Pervenche Berès, Milan Zver, Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Sylvie Guillaume, Luigi Morgano, Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Recital 37 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(37 c) This is why liability exemptions can only apply to genuinely neutral and passive online service providers, and not to services that play an active role in distributing, promoting and monetising content at the expense of creators.

Or. en

Amendment 380 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Recital 38

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(38) deleted

Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the public, they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with rightholders, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 .

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or other subject- matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parlia ment and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on cert ain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Intern al Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 381 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 38

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(38) deleted

Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the public, they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with rightholders, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 .

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or other subject- matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parlia ment and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on cert ain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Intern al Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 382 Jiří Maštálka

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers deleted store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the public, they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with rightholders, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parlia ment and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on cert ain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Intern al Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 383 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers deleted store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the public, they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with rightholders, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parlia ment and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on cert ain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Intern al Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 384 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Lorsque les prestataires de services de la société Lorsque les prestataires de services de la société de l'information stockent et proposent au public de l'information stockent et proposent au public des œuvres ou autres objets protégés par le droit des œuvres ou autres objets protégés par le droit d’auteur chargés par leurs utilisateurs, allant d'auteur chargés par leurs utilisateurs, allant ainsi au-delà de la simple fourniture ainsi au-delà de la simple fourniture d’équipements et de l'acte de communication au d'équipements et effectuant un acte de public, ils sont tenus de conclure des contrats de reproduction, ainsi qu'un acte de licence avec les titulaires de droits, à moins de communication au public y compris la mise à pouvoir bénéficier de l’exemption de disposition dont le processus a démarré avec le responsabilité prévue à l’article 14 de la chargement des œuvres et autres objets directive n° 2000/31/CE du Parlement européen protégés par leurs utilisateurs, ils sont tenus de et du Conseil34 . conclure des contrats de licence avec les titulaires de droits qui le demandent pour les droits de reproduction et de communication au public , à moins de pouvoir bénéficier de l'exemption de responsabilité prévue à l'article 14 de la directive n° 2000/31/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil34. En ce qui concerne l'exception de responsabilité prévue à l'article 14, il y a lieu de vérifier si le prestataire de services joue un rôle actif, notamment en optimisant à des fins de sélection, de catégorisation ou d'agrégation des contenus protégés mis en ligne ou en assurant leur promotion ou leur recommandation indépendamment de la nature des moyens employés à ces fins. Lorsqu'un prestataire de service joue un rôle actif il ne peut être éligible à l'exemption de responsabilité prévue à l'article 14 de la directive 2000/31/CE.

Sauf s'ils agissent à titre professionnel, la responsabilité des utilisateurs des services pour les actes relevant du droit d'auteur est couverte par les contrats de licences conclus par les ayants droit avec les prestataires de services. 34 Directive 2000/31/CE du Parlement européen e 34 Directive 2000/31/CE du Parlement européen e t du Conseil du 8 juin 2000 relative à certains asp t du Conseil du 8 juin 2000 relative à certains asp ects juridiques des services de la société de l'infor ects juridiques des services de la société de l'infor mation, et notamment du commerce électronique, mation, et notamment du commerce électronique, dans le marché intérieur (JO L 178 du 17.7.2000, dans le marché intérieur (JO L 178 du 17.7.2000, p. 1). p. 1).

Or. fr

Amendment 385 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Where an information society service is store and provide access to the public to provided that consists of the storage of copyright protected works or other subject- information provided by a recipient of the matter uploaded by their users, thereby going service and providers of the service enable beyond the mere provision of physical facilities users to upload works in such as a way as to and performing an act of communication to make them available to the public and obtains the public, they are obliged to conclude knowledge after receiving notification by the licensing agreements with rightholders, unless rightholders that the work is used in an they are eligible for the liability exemption unauthorised manner and subject to copyright provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC and related rights, those providers are obliged of the European Parliament and of the Council34 to take that content down in order to be eligible . for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. However, it is in the interests of all parties involved that the content remain online. Therefore, the possibility of concluding a licensing agreement between rightholders and the service providers on fair and reasonable terms for that purpose should be enabled.

In order to ensure that notifications of works subject to copyright and related rights are valid, rightholders should provide service providers with an accurate identification of both the protected works and the uploaded content deemed to be unauthorised, including its exact location. To prevent misuses or abuses of notifications, and protect freedom of information and expression and the limitations and exceptions to copyright law, users should have access to redress and complaint mechanisms. 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 386 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to that store information provided by a recepient copyright protected works or other subject- of the service conduct licencing agreements matter uploaded by their users, thereby going with rightsholders on a voluntary basis, the beyond the mere provision of physical facilities users' fundamental rights to privacy, freedom and performing an act of communication to of expression and freedom of information are the public, they are obliged to conclude often not sufficiently taken into account and licensing agreements with rightholders, unless their ability to assert their right of use under they are eligible for the liability exemption an exception or limitation is often unjustly provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC curtailed by the measures put in place as part of the European Parliament and of the of those licencing agreements. In order to Council34 . correct this situation and provide legal certainty to users who are exercising their right of use under an exception or limitation that exists under national law in the country in which the use is made, a legal framework governing those licencing agreements is necessary. In order to protect fundamental rights and improve legal certainty for all concerned parties in light of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, it is necessary that any agreements on measures between rightsholders and information society service providers do not impose a general obligation on information society service providers to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor a general obligation actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity. 34 . 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 387 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Cuando los proveedores de servicios de la Los proveedores de servicios de la sociedad de sociedad de la información almacenan y la información almacenan y facilitan el acceso facilitan el acceso público a obras u otras público a obras u otras prestaciones protegidas prestaciones protegidas por derechos de autor por derechos de autor cargadas por sus usuarios, cargadas por sus usuarios, actividad que no se no se limitan a la mera puesta a disposición de limita a la mera puesta a disposición de instalaciones materiales y, por tanto, instalaciones materiales y constituye un acto de intervienen en el acto de comunicación al comunicación al público, están obligados a público que se origina por sus usuarios que suscribir acuerdos de licencia con los titulares cargan dichas obras y otras prestaciones de derechos, a menos que puedan acogerse a la protegidas. Dichos proveedores de servicios exención de responsabilidad prevista en el están obligados a suscribir acuerdos de licencia artículo 14 de la Directiva 2000/31/CE del con los titulares de derechos, en relación con Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo34 . los derechos de comunicación al público y de reproducción, a menos que puedan acogerse a la exención de responsabilidad prevista en el artículo 14 de la Directiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo34. Con el fin de proporcionar seguridad jurídica a los usuarios individuales, las licencias concedidas a dichos proveedores de servicios han de cubrir la responsabilidad de los actos pertinentes de sus usuarios, siempre que estos no intervengan de forma profesional. 34 Directiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento Europeo 34 Directiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 8 de junio de 2000, relativa a d y del Consejo, de 8 de junio de 2000, relativa a d eterminados aspectos jurídicos de los servicios de eterminados aspectos jurídicos de los servicios de la sociedad de la información, en particular el co la sociedad de la información, en particular el co mercio electrónico en el mercado interior (DO L mercio electrónico en el mercado interior (DO L 178 de 17.7.2000, pp. 1-16). 178 de 17.7.2000, pp. 1-16).

Or. es

Justification

Las plataformas UUC realizan actos de comunicación al público mediante su intervención en los actos de comunicación al público que efectúan sus usuarios. Se requiere aclarar la redacción para evitar que los puertos seguros puedan ser aplicados a las plataformas UUC que tienen un papel activo en la puesta a disposición del público de las obras conforme a una correcta interpretación de la Directiva de Comercio electrónico. La licencia otorgada a la plataforma cubre las subidas que efectúan los usuarios, para garantizar la máxima seguridad jurídica, cuando no haya fines profesionales.

Amendment 388 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Julie Ward, Theresa Griffin, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Silvia Costa

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Information society service providers store and store and provide access to the public to provide access to the public to copyright copyright protected works or other subject- protected works or other subject-matter matter uploaded by their users, thereby going uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond beyond the mere provision of physical facilities the mere provision of physical facilities and and performing an act of communication to the intervening in the act of communication to the public, they are obliged to conclude licensing public, initiated by their users uploading such agreements with rightholders, unless they are works and other subject matter. These service eligible for the liability exemption provided in providers are thus obliged to conclude licensing Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the agreements with rightholders both for the European Parliament and of the Council34 . communication to the public and reproductions rights in which they play an indispensable role, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . In order to provide legal certainty for users, the authorization granted to these service providers shall cover the liability of their users for the relevant copyright acts, when the user is acting on a non-commercial basis. 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 389 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Speichern Diensteanbieter der Speichern Diensteanbieter der Informationsgesellschaft urheberrechtlich Informationsgesellschaft urheberrechtlich geschützte Werke oder sonstige geschützte Werke oder sonstige Schutzgegenstände, die von ihren Nutzern Schutzgegenstände, die von ihren Nutzern hochgeladen wurden, oder machen sie diese hochgeladen wurden, oder machen sie diese öffentlich zugänglich und gehen damit über die öffentlich zugänglich und gehen damit über die bloße Bereitstellung der physischen bloße Bereitstellung der physischen Einrichtungen hinaus und führen sie damit eine Einrichtungen hinaus und führen sie damit eine Handlung der öffentlichen Wiedergabe durch, Handlung der öffentlichen Wiedergabe und sind sie zum Abschluss von eine Handlung der Vervielfältigung durch, sind Lizenzvereinbarungen mit den Rechteinhabern sie zum Abschluss von Lizenzvereinbarungen verpflichtet, sofern sie nicht unter den mit den Rechteinhabern verpflichtet, um die Haftungsausschluss nach Artikel 14 der berechtigten Interessen der Rechteinhaber zu Richtlinie 2000/31/EG des Europäischen schützen, sofern sie nicht unter den Parlaments und des Rates fallen34 . Haftungsausschluss nach Artikel 14 der Richtlinie 2000/31/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates fallen34 . Dieser Haftungsausschluss kann jedoch nur für vollständig neutrale und passive Anbieter von Onlinediensten gelten, wie sie in der Richtlinie über den elektronischen Geschäftsverkehr und in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH definiert sind, und nicht für Dienste, die eine aktive Rolle bei der Verteilung, Förderung und Verwertung von Inhalten auf Kosten der Kulturschaffenden spielen. 34 Richtlinie 2000/31/EG des Europäischen Parla 34 Richtlinie 2000/31/EG des Europäischen Parla ments und des Rates vom 8. Juni 2000 über besti ments und des Rates vom 8. Juni 2000 über besti mmte rechtliche Aspekte der Dienste der Informa mmte rechtliche Aspekte der Dienste der Informa tionsgesellschaft, insbesondere des elektronische tionsgesellschaft, insbesondere des elektronische n Geschäftsverkehrs, im Binnenmarkt (ABl. L 17 n Geschäftsverkehrs, im Binnenmarkt (ABl. L 17 8 vom 17.7.2000, S. 1). 8 vom 17.7.2000, S. 1).

Or. de

Amendment 390 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to store and provide access to the public copyright copyright protected works or other subject- works uploaded by their users, they should matter uploaded by their users, thereby going conclude agreements with rightholders that beyond the mere provision of physical facilities ensure appropriate remuneration for authors, and performing an act of communication to unless they are qualified for the liability the public, they are obliged to conclude exemptions provided in Articles 12, 13, 14 and licensing agreements with rightholders, unless 15 of Directive 2000/31/EC. they are eligible for the liability exemption Such agreements should take into provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC consideration the interests of authors, of the European Parliament and of the performers, all end-users and information Council34 . society services.

To avoid multiple licensing for the use of the same work on the same information society service providers, which would lead to fragmentation of the Digital Single Market, rightholders should offer a single agreement or license covering the relevant copyrighted works and should offer pan-European licence for the use of their work covered by this recital. 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 391 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

În cazul în care furnizorii de servicii ale În cazul în care furnizorii de servicii ale societății informaționale stochează opere sau societății informaționale stochează, indexează, alte obiecte protejate prin drept de autor clasifică opere sau alte obiecte protejate prin încărcate de utilizatorii lor și oferă publicului drept de autor încărcate de utilizatorii lor și acces la acestea, depășind astfel simpla oferă publicului acces la acestea, depășind astfel furnizare a instalațiilor fizice și realizând un act simpla furnizare a instalațiilor fizice și realizând de comunicare publică, aceștia au obligația de a un act de comunicare publică sau de punere la încheia contracte de licență cu titularii de dispoziția publicului, după caz, aceștia au drepturi, cu excepția cazului în care îndeplinesc obligația de a încheia contracte de licență cu condițiile pentru exonerarea de răspundere titularii de drepturi sau de a preveni prevăzută la articolul 14 din Directiva disponibilitatea neautorizată privind operele 2000/31/CE a Parlamentului European și a sau alte obiecte protejate prin drepturi de autor Consiliului34 . care sunt oferite prin serviciile lor, cu excepția cazului în care îndeplinesc condițiile pentru exonerarea de răspundere prevăzută la articolul 14 din Directiva 2000/31/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului34 . 34 Directiva 2000/31/CE a Parlamentului Europea 34 Directiva 2000/31/CE a Parlamentului Europea n și a Consiliului din 8 iunie 2000 privind anumit n și a Consiliului din 8 iunie 2000 privind anumit e aspecte juridice ale serviciilor societății informa e aspecte juridice ale serviciilor societății informa ționale, în special ale comerțului electronic, pe pi ționale, în special ale comerțului electronic, pe pi ața internă (JO L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ața internă (JO L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. ro

Amendment 392 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Information society service providers that store store and provide access to the public to and provide access to the public to copyright copyright protected works or other subject- protected works or other subject-matter matter uploaded by their users, thereby going uploaded by their users, go beyond the mere beyond the mere provision of physical facilities provision of physical facilities and intervene in and performing an act of communication to the the act of communication to the public initiated public, they are obliged to conclude licensing by their users uploading such works and other agreements with rightholders, unless they are subject matter. These service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in thus obliged to conclude licensing agreements Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the with rightholders both for the communication European Parliament and of the Council34 . to the public and reproducing rights in which they play an indispensable role, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Justification

As User Uploaded Content (UUC) services undertake acts of communication to the public through their indispensable intervention in the communication to the public initiated by uploaders, it is necessary to clarify the wording so that the safe harbour non-liability regime does not apply to the services that play an active role in making the works and other subject matter available to the public. Such services are not covered by Directive 2000/31/EC for copyright purposes and they are subject to the rules of Directive 2001/29/EC as any digital content service provider.

Amendment 393 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- significant amounts of copyright protected matter uploaded by their users, thereby going works or other subject-matter uploaded by their beyond the mere provision of physical facilities users, therefore going beyond the mere and performing an act of communication to the provision of physical facilities and performing public, they are obliged to conclude licensing an act of communication to the public as well as agreements with rightholders, unless they are an act of reproduction, they are obliged to eligible for the liability exemption provided in conclude licensing agreements with Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the rightholdres that request such agreements, European Parliament and of the Council34 . unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34. 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 394 Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Qualora i prestatori di servizi della società Qualora i prestatori di servizi della società dell’informazione memorizzino e diano dell'informazione, siano indipendentememte pubblico accesso a opere o altro materiale dalla natura del mezzo utilizzato a tal fine protetti dal diritto d’autore caricati dagli coinvolti nella messa a disposizione del utenti, andando così oltre la mera fornitura di pubblico di opere di terzi caricate dagli utenti e attrezzature fisiche ed effettuando in tal modo qualora tale attività non sia di natura un atto di comunicazione al pubblico, essi sono puramente tecnica, automatica e passiva, essi obbligati a concludere accordi di licenza con i sono obbligati a concludere accordi di licenza titolari dei diritti, a meno che non rientrino con i titolari dei diritti. E' comunque fatto salvo nell’esenzione di responsabilità di cui l'utilizzo delle opere nell'ambito di all’articolo 14 della direttiva 2000/31/CE del un'eccezione o limitazione al diritto d'autore e Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio34 . l'utilizzo di contenuti originali creati dagli utenti. 34 Direttiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento europeo 34 Direttiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, dell'8 giugno 2000, relativa a talu e del Consiglio, dell'8 giugno 2000, relativa a talu ni aspetti giuridici dei servizi della società dell'inf ni aspetti giuridici dei servizi della società dell'inf ormazione, in particolare il commercio elettronic ormazione, in particolare il commercio elettronic o, nel mercato interno (GU L 178 del 17.7.2000, o, nel mercato interno (GU L 178 del 17.7.2000, pag.1). pag.1).

Or. it

Amendment 395 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users, thereby going matter uploaded by their users, they should beyond the mere provision of physical facilities conclude licensing agreements with and performing an act of communication to rightholders in order to ensure fair the public, they are obliged to conclude remuneration, unless they are eligible for the licensing agreements with rightholders, unless liability exemption provided in Article 14 of they are eligible for the liability exemption Directive 2000/31/EC of the European provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC Parliament and of the Council34 . of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 396 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users, thereby going matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the and performing an act of communication to the public, they are obliged to conclude licensing public and/or an act of reproduction, they are agreements with rightholders, unless they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with eligible for the liability exemption provided in rightholders requiring so, unless they are Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the eligible for the liability exemption provided in European Parliament and of the Council34 . Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 397 Luis de Grandes Pascual

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users, thereby going matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the and performing an act of communication or public, they are obliged to conclude licensing making available to the public, as the case may agreements with rightholders, unless they are be, they are obliged to conclude licensing eligible for the liability exemption provided in agreements with rightholders, unless they are Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the eligible for the liability exemption provided in European Parliament and of the Council34 . Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34. 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Justification

It is necessary to clarify that the acts of UUC services could also fall under the right of “making available to the public”, because this is the right which applies to on-demand distribution or streaming by UUC services for certain right holders, such as producers and performers. It should also be clarified that service providers need to implement technologies in case where such exist, meaning that service providers are not obliged to invest into developing their own technologies.

Amendment 398 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Cuando los proveedores de servicios de la Cuando los proveedores de servicios de la sociedad de la información almacenan y sociedad de la información almacenan y facilitan el acceso público a obras u otras facilitan el acceso público a obras u otras prestaciones protegidas por derechos de autor prestaciones protegidas por derechos de autor cargadas por sus usuarios, actividad que no se cargadas por sus usuarios, actividad que no se limita a la mera puesta a disposición de limita a la mera puesta a disposición de instalaciones materiales y constituye un acto de instalaciones materiales y constituye un acto de comunicación al público, están obligados a comunicación al público o puesta a disposición suscribir acuerdos de licencia con los titulares de este, según sea el caso, están obligados a de derechos, a menos que puedan acogerse a la suscribir acuerdos de licencia con los titulares exención de responsabilidad prevista en el de derechos, a menos que puedan acogerse a la artículo 14 de la Directiva 2000/31/CE del exención de responsabilidad prevista en el Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo34 . artículo 14 de la Directiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo34 . 34 Directiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento Europeo 34 Directiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 8 de junio de 2000, relativa a d y del Consejo, de 8 de junio de 2000, relativa a d eterminados aspectos jurídicos de los servicios de eterminados aspectos jurídicos de los servicios de la sociedad de la información, en particular el co la sociedad de la información, en particular el co mercio electrónico en el mercado interior (DO L mercio electrónico en el mercado interior (DO L 178 de 17.7.2000, pp. 1-16). 178 de 17.7.2000, pp. 1-16).

Or. es

Amendment 399 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Where information society service providers are store and provide access to the public to actively involved in the making available, copyright protected works or other subject- promoting and curating copyright protected matter uploaded by their users, thereby going digital content uploaded by their users, to the beyond the mere provision of physical facilities public, thereby going beyond the mere and performing an act of communication to the provision of physical facilities and performing public, they are obliged to conclude licensing an act of communication to the public, they are agreements with rightholders, unless they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with eligible for the liability exemption provided in rightholders, unless they are eligible for the Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of European Parliament and of the Council34 . Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 400 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where information society service providers Where information society service providers store and provide access to the public to that store and provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users, thereby going matter uploaded by their users, go beyond the beyond the mere provision of physical facilities mere provision of physical facilities and and performing an act of communication to the perform an act of communication to the public, public, they are obliged to conclude licensing they are obliged to conclude licensing agreements with rightholders, unless they are agreements with rightholders, unless they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . European Parliament and of the Council. 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam 34 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliam ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l ent and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain l egal aspects of information society services, in pa egal aspects of information society services, in pa rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar rticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Mar ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16). ket (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16).

Or. en

Amendment 401 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify deleted whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

Or. en

Amendment 402 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify deleted whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

Or. en

Amendment 403 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify deleted whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

Or. en

Amendment 404 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify deleted whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

Or. en

Amendment 405 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify deleted whether the service provider plays an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

Or. en

Amendment 406 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify In respect of the application of Article 14 of the whether the service provider plays an active Directive 2000/31/EC, it is necessary to verify role, including by optimising the presentation whether the role played by the service provider of the uploaded works or subject-matter or is an active role. An active role includes, inter promoting them, irrespective of the nature of alia, optimization for the purpose of the the means used therefor. presentation by the service of the uploaded works or subject-matter or their promotion by the service, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor. The service providers that play such an active role are ineligible for the liability exemption of such Article 14.

Or. en

Justification

It should be clarified that the provision refers to two acts that are "storing" and "giving access" that correspond to two copyright relevant acts, "reproduction right" and "communication to the public right" respectively. Therefore, both acts should be mentioned, since both of them need to be licensed if the service plays an active role.

Amendment 407 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Julie Ward, Theresa Griffin, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Silvia Costa

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify In respect of the application of Article 14 of the whether the service provider plays an active Directive 2000/31/EC, unless it has been role, including by optimising the presentation ascertained that the role of the service provider of the uploaded works or subject-matter or is of a purely passive nature, the service promoting them, irrespective of the nature of provider would not be eligible for the liability the means used therefor. exemption of Article 14 of the Directive 2000/31/EC and would be deemed to play an active role. An active role includes, inter alia, optimisation for the purpose of the presentation by the service of the uploaded works or subject- matter or their promotion by the service, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor. A service provider can be deemed active even where it has no editorial control over the content which it makes available.

Or. en

Amendment 408 Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Per quanto concerne l’articolo 14 è necessario Al fine dell'applicabilità del regime di verificare se il prestatore di servizi svolge un responsabilità di cui all'articolo 14 della ruolo attivo, anche ottimizzando la direttiva 2000/31/CE del Parlamento europeo e presentazione delle opere o altro materiale del Consiglio è necessario verificare se il caricati o promuovendoli, indipendentemente prestatore di servizi svolge un ruolo attivo, dalla natura del mezzo utilizzato a tal fine. anche ottimizzando la presentazione delle opere o altro materiale caricati, promuovendoli o sfruttandoli economicamente, indipendentemente dalla natura del mezzo utilizzato a tal fine, ivi compresi i processi automatizzati. Il prestatore di servizi non può appellarsi al fatto di non svolgere un ruolo attivo per singole opere o altro materiale laddove svolga un ruolo attivo per quanto riguarda il funzionamento generale del servizio.

Or. it

Amendment 409 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify In respect of Article 14 of Directive whether the service provider plays an active 2000/31/EC and the liability exemption role, including by optimising the presentation of provided therein, it is necessary to verify the uploaded works or subject-matter or whether the service provider plays an active promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the role, including by optimising the presentation of means used therefor. the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

In such case, the provider should no longer be considered to be merely hosting copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users, should be ineligible for the liability exemption and therefore subjected to the provisions of Directive 2001/29/EC as any digital service provider.

Or. en

Amendment 410 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

En lo que se refiere al artículo 14, es preciso En lo que se refiere a la aplicación del artículo comprobar si el proveedor de servicios 14 de la Directiva 2000/31/CE, es preciso desempeña un papel activo, en particular comprobar si el papel que desempeña el optimizando la presentación de las obras o proveedor de servicios es de carácter activo. Un prestaciones cargadas o promocionándolas, papel activo incluye, entre otros, la independientemente de la naturaleza de los optimización con fines de presentación por el medios utilizados a tal fin. servicio de las obras o prestaciones cargadas o promocionándolas, independientemente de la naturaleza de los medios utilizados a tal fin. En este supuesto, los proveedores de servicios no pueden acogerse a la exención de responsabilidad del artículo 14.

Or. es

Amendment 411 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify whether the service provider plays an active whether the service provider has played an role, including by optimising the presentation of active role with knowledge of the copyright the uploaded works or subject-matter or protected digital content in question, including promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the by optimising the presentation of the uploaded means used therefor. works or subject-matter or promoting them, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

Or. en

Amendment 412 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In respect of Article 14, it is necessary to verify In respect of Article 14 of Directive whether the service provider plays an active 2000/31/EC, it is necessary to verify whether role, including by optimising the presentation of the service provider plays an active role, the uploaded works or subject-matter or including by optimising the presentation of the promoting them, irrespective of the nature of content provided by the service or promoting the means used therefor. such content, irrespective of the nature of the means used therefor.

Or. en

Amendment 413 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any deleted licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or other subject- matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 414 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any deleted licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or other subject- matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 415 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any deleted licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or other subject- matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 416 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any deleted licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or other subject- matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 417 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected public to significant amounts of copyright works or other subject-matter uploaded by their protected works or other subject-matter users should take appropriate and proportionate uploaded by their users should take appropriate measures to ensure protection of works or other and proportionate measures to ensure protection subject-matter, such as implementing effective of works or other subject-matter, such as technologies. This obligation should also apply implementing effective technologies. This when the information society service providers obligation should also apply when the are eligible for the liability exemption provided information society service providers, eligible in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC, store and provide access to the public to significant amounts of copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users.

Or. en

Amendment 418 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected public to copyright protected works or other works or other subject-matter uploaded by their subject-matter uploaded by their users, should users should take appropriate and proportionate take appropriate and proportionate measures to measures to ensure protection of works or other ensure protection of works or other subject- subject-matter, such as implementing effective matter, such as implementing effective technologies. This obligation should also apply technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. Such licence agreements should also cover the content uploaded by users of these services, as well as their liability, including where they perform an act of reproduction and/or of communication to the public, insofar they act on a non-professional basis.

Or. en

Justification

Should be a new recital 38a

Amendment 419 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

En aras del correcto funcionamiento de los En aras del correcto funcionamiento de los acuerdos de licencia, los proveedores de acuerdos de licencia o para procurar la puesta servicios de la sociedad de la información que a disposición de servicios de contenidos no almacenen y faciliten el acceso público a cubiertos por tales acuerdos, los proveedores grandes cantidades de obras u otras de servicios de la sociedad de la información prestaciones protegidas por derechos de autor que almacenen y faciliten el acceso público a cargadas por sus usuarios deben adoptar una cantidad significativa de obras u otras medidas adecuadas y proporcionadas para prestaciones protegidas por derechos de autor garantizar la protección de las obras u otras cargadas por sus usuarios deben adoptar prestaciones, entre ellas la aplicación de medidas adecuadas y proporcionadas para tecnologías eficaces. Esta obligación también ha garantizar la protección de las obras u otras de ser aplicable cuando los proveedores de prestaciones, entre ellas la aplicación de servicios de la sociedad de la información tecnologías eficaces coherentes con las pueden acogerse a la exención de tecnologías dominantes y mejores prácticas responsabilidad prevista en el artículo 14 de la empresariales, siempre que existan tales Directiva 2000/31/CE. tecnologías. Esta obligación también ha de ser aplicable cuando los proveedores de servicios de la sociedad de la información pueden acogerse a la exención de responsabilidad prevista en el artículo 14 de la Directiva 2000/31/CE.

Or. es

Justification

Es necesario aclarar que los actos de los servicios de la UUC podrían también caer bajo el derecho de "poner a disposición del público", porque es el derecho que se aplica a la distribución a la carta o la transmisión por los servicios de la UUC para ciertos titulares de derechos, como productores y ejecutantes. También debe aclararse que los proveedores de servicios necesitan implementar tecnologías en el caso de que existan, lo que significa que los proveedores de servicios no están obligados a invertir en el desarrollo de sus propias tecnologías.

Amendment 420 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the providers storing and providing access to public to large amounts of copyright protected significant amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate users and performing an act of communication measures to ensure protection of works or other to the public should take appropriate and subject-matter, such as implementing effective proportionate measures to ensure protection of technologies. This obligation should also apply works or other subject-matter, such as when the information society service providers implementing effective technologies. Those are eligible for the liability exemption provided measures should not require the identity of in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. individual users uploading content in order to protect their privacy. Furthermore, those measures should be limited to preventing the availability of specifically identified and duly notified works and should not lead to a general obligation to monitor content uploaded by the users.

Or. en

Amendment 421 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected public to copyright protected works or other works or other subject-matter uploaded by their subject-matter uploaded by their users should users should take appropriate and proportionate take appropriate and proportionate measures to measures to ensure protection of works or other ensure protection of works or other subject- subject-matter, such as implementing effective matter. technologies. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 422 Luis de Grandes Pascual

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service licensing agreement or to prevent the providers storing and providing access to the availability on their services of content not public to large amounts of copyright protected covered by such agreements, information works or other subject-matter uploaded by their society service providers storing and providing users should take appropriate and proportionate access to the public to large amounts of measures to ensure protection of works or other copyright protected works or other subject- subject-matter, such as implementing effective matter uploaded by their users should take technologies. This obligation should also apply appropriate and proportionate measures to when the information society service providers ensure protection of works or other subject- are eligible for the liability exemption provided matter, such as implementing effective in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. technologies consistent with prevailing technologies and industry best practices, and provided such technology exists. This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.

Or. en

Justification

It is necessary to clarify that the acts of UUC services could also fall under the right of “making available to the public”, because this is the right which applies to on-demand distribution or streaming by UUC services for certain right holders, such as producers and performers. It should also be clarified that service providers need to implement technologies in case where such exist, meaning that service providers are not obliged to invest into developing their own technologies.

Amendment 423 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the providers actively making available to the public to large amounts of copyright protected public copyright protected digital content, works or other subject-matter uploaded by their works or other subject matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or measures to their value and size to ensure other subject-matter, such as implementing protection of that digital content, in effective technologies. This obligation should accordance with technological developments. also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 424 Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

In order to ensure the functioning of any In order to ensure the functioning of any licensing agreement, information society service licensing agreement, information society service providers storing and providing access to the providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users should take appropriate and proportionate users should take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure protection of works or other measures to ensure protection of works or other subject-matter, such as implementing effective subject-matter. Such measures should respect technologies. This obligation should also apply users' rights and process personal data when the information society service providers according to Directive 95/46/EC and the are eligible for the liability exemption provided Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC. Parliament and of the Council (General Data Protection Regulation) . This obligation should also apply when the information society service providers are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 425 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Pentru a asigura funcționarea unui contract de Pentru a asigura funcționarea unui contract de licență, furnizorii de servicii ale societății licență sau pentru a preveni disponibilitatea informaționale care stochează cantități mari de neautorizată a serviciilor lor privind conținutul opere sau alte obiecte protejate prin drept de neacoperit de astfel de contracte, furnizorii de autor încărcate de utilizatorii lor și oferă servicii ale societății informaționale care publicului acces la acestea ar trebui să ia măsuri stochează, indexează, clasifică opere sau alte corespunzătoare și proporționale pentru a obiecte protejate prin drept de autor sau care asigura protecția operelor sau a altor obiecte oferă publicului acces la acestea ar trebui să ia protejate, de exemplu prin utilizarea unor măsuri corespunzătoare și proporționale pentru tehnologii eficace. Această obligație ar trebui să a asigura protecția operelor sau a altor obiecte se aplice și atunci când furnizorii de servicii ale protejate, de exemplu prin utilizarea unor societății informaționale îndeplinesc condițiile tehnologii eficace. Această obligație ar trebui să pentru exonerarea de răspundere prevăzută la se aplice și atunci când furnizorii de servicii ale articolul 14 din Directiva 2000/31/CE. societății informaționale îndeplinesc condițiile pentru exonerarea de răspundere prevăzută la articolul 14 din Directiva 2000/31/CE.

Or. ro

Amendment 426 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Afin de garantir le bon fonctionnement de tout Afin de garantir le bon fonctionnement de tout contrat de licence, les prestataires de services de contrat de licence, les prestataires de services de la société de l’information qui stockent un grand la société de l’information qui stockent un grand nombre d’œuvres ou autres objets protégés par nombre d’œuvres ou autres objets protégés par le droit d'auteur chargés par leurs utilisateurs et le droit d'auteur chargés par leurs utilisateurs et qui proposent ces contenus au public devraient qui proposent ces contenus au public devraient prendre des mesures appropriées et prendre des mesures appropriées et proportionnées pour assurer la protection de ces proportionnées pour assurer la protection de ces œuvres et autres objets protégés, par exemple œuvres et autres objets protégés, par exemple par la mise en œuvre de technologies efficaces. par la mise en œuvre de technologies efficaces. Cette obligation devrait également s’appliquer Cette obligation, qui permettra de garantir le lorsque les prestataires de services de la société partage de la valeur en ligne, devrait également de l’information peuvent se prévaloir de s’appliquer lorsque les prestataires de services l’exemption de responsabilité visée à l’article 14 de la société de l’information peuvent se de la directive 2000/31/CE. prévaloir de l’exemption de responsabilité visée à l’article 14 de la directive 2000/31/CE.

Or. fr

Amendment 427 Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Per garantire il funzionamento di qualsiasi Per garantire il funzionamento di qualsiasi accordo di licenza, i prestatori di servizi della accordo di licenza, i prestatori di servizi della società dell’informazione che memorizzano e società dell'informazione che, danno pubblico accesso ad un grande numero indipendentememte dalla natura del mezzo di opere o altro materiale protetti dal diritto utilizzato a tal fine, sono coinvolti nella messa d'autore caricati dagli utenti dovrebbero a disposizione del pubblico di opere di terzi adottare misure appropriate e proporzionate per caricate dagli utenti dovrebbero adottare misure garantire la protezione di tali opere o altro appropriate e proporzionate per garantire la materiale, ad esempio tramite l'uso di protezione di tali opere, ad esempio tramite l'uso tecnologie efficaci. L'obbligo dovrebbe di tecnologie efficaci. L'obbligo dovrebbe sussistere anche quando i prestatori di servizi sussistere anche quando i prestatori di servizi della società dell’informazione rientrano della società dell'informazione rientrano nel nell’esenzione di responsabilità di cui regime di responsabilità di cui all'articolo 14 all’articolo 14 della direttiva 2000/31/CE. della direttiva 2000/31/CE.

Or. it

Amendment 428 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

For the implementation of such measures, rightholders should provide service providers with accurately identified works or subject matter over which they consider to have rights in copyright. Rigtholders retain responsibility for claims made by third parties over the use of works which they would have identified as being their own in the implementation of any agreement reached with the service provider.

Or. en

Amendment 429 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

For the implementation of such measures rightholders should provide the information society service providers with the necessary data to ensure the proper functioning of the measures they deployed. Rightholders should also provide due justification for the rights they claim.

Or. en

Amendment 430 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(38 a) The EU copyright framework aims at providing a high level of protection, especially for authors, which is crucial in order to maintain the dynamism of European intellectual creation. The EU copyright framework should remain consistent with this objective and therefore should not introduce unnecessary, unbalanced and unjustified exceptions such as an exception for "user generated content", where the issues related to the use of works or other subject-matters by users comes from the interpretation made of the rules applicable to online service providers that play an active role in distributing the contents.

In order to clarify the situation and provide legal certainty, the liability of online service providers which give access to user generated content should be clarified. In this regard, such online service providers should not be covered by the liability exemption and licencing agreements concluded with rightholders should cover the acts of users who do not act on a professional basis.

Or. en

Amendment 431 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(38 a) Any agreements on measures between rightsholders and information society service providers that might be concluded should provide for an obligation for rightholders to provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content in a publicly accessible

database. Such obligation should help clarify the responsibility of rightholders for claims made by third parties over the use of works which they would have identified as being their own in the implementation of any agreement reached with the service provider.

Or. en

Amendment 432 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(38 bis) Afin de garantir le bon fonctionnement de tout contrat de licence, ou pour prévenir l'accès non autorisé à des oeuvres ou autres objets protégés par le droit d'auteur chargés par les utilisateurs, les prestataires de services de la société de l'information qui stockent et diffusent ces contenus et qui les proposent au public doivent prendre des mesures appropriées et proportionnées pour assurer la protection de ces œuvres et autres objets protégés, par exemple par la mise en œuvre de technologies efficaces.

Or. fr

Amendment 433 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 38 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(38 ter) Cette obligation s'applique également aux prestataires de services de la société de l'information qui peuvent se prévaloir de l'exemption de responsabilité visée à l'article 14 de la directive 2000/31/CE, lorsqu'ils stockent et donnent accès au public à des quantités significatives d'oeuvres et autres objets protégés par le droit d'auteur chargés

par leurs utilisateurs.

Un prestataire de service qui ne prendrait pas en compte ou ne réagirait pas de manière efficace aux demandes faites par les ayants droit de conclure des contrats de licence pourra pas bénéficier des protections offertes dans l'article 14 (1) de la directive 2000/31/CE.

Or. fr

Amendment 434 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society deleted service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the functioning of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 435 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society deleted service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the functioning of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 436 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society deleted service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the functioning of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 437 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society deleted service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the functioning of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 438 Jiří Maštálka

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society deleted service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the functioning of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 439 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) La collaboration entre les prestataires de (39) La collaboration entre les prestataires de services de la société de l’information qui services de la société de l'information qui stockent un grand nombre d’œuvres ou autres stockent et donnent accès aux œuvres ou autres objets protégés par le droit d'auteur chargés par objets protégés par le droit d'auteur chargés par leurs utilisateurs et qui proposent au public un leurs utilisateurs et qui proposent au public un accès à ceux-ci est essentielle au bon accès à ceux-ci est essentielle au bon fonctionnement des technologies, comme les fonctionnement des technologies, telles que les technologies de reconnaissance des contenus. technologies de reconnaissance des contenus. Dans de tels cas, les titulaires de droits Dans de tels cas, les titulaires de droits sont devraient fournir les données nécessaires pour tenus de fournir les données nécessaires pour permettre aux services de reconnaître leurs permettre aux services de reconnaître leurs contenus, et les services devraient être contenus, et les services sont tenus d' être transparents à l'égard des titulaires de droits transparents à l'égard des titulaires de droits quant aux technologies déployées, afin de leur quant aux technologies déployées, afin de leur permettre d'apprécier le caractère approprié de permettre d'apprécier le caractère approprié de ces dernières. Les services devraient en ces dernières. Les services devraient en particulier fournir aux titulaires de droits des particulier fournir aux titulaires de droits des informations sur le type de technologies utilisé, informations sur le type de technologies utilisé, la manière dont ces technologies sont exploitées la manière dont ces technologies sont exploitées et leur taux de réussite en termes de et leur taux de réussite en termes de reconnaissance des contenus des titulaires de reconnaissance des contenus des titulaires de droits. Ces technologies devraient aussi droits. Ces technologies devraient aussi permettre aux titulaires de droits d’obtenir des permettre aux titulaires de droits d'obtenir des informations de la part des prestataires de informations de la part des prestataires de services de la société de l’information sur services de la société de l'information sur l’utilisation de leurs contenus faisant l'objet d'un l'utilisation de leurs contenus faisant l'objet d'un accord. accord. Lorsque les mesures et technologies mises en place sur la base de cette directive affectent le chargement de contenus couvert par une exception ou une autorisation, il est nécessaire de demander aux fournisseurs de services de mettre en place des systèmes de réclamation et de correction au bénéfice des utilisateurs dont les contenus sont affectés par lesdites mesures. Ces systèmes doivent veiller à maintenir un équilibre entre le besoin d'assurer que le contenu couvert par des exceptions au droit d'auteur ou des autorisations n'est pas indûment affecté par les mesures et le besoin de s'assurer que les systèmes de réclamation et de correction ne causent pas un préjudice injustifié à l'efficacité des mesures. Pour atteindre cet objectif, les systèmes de réclamation et de correction doivent permettre aux ayants droit de recevoir l'information adéquate pour évaluer les réclamations et y répondre.

Les systèmes de réclamation et de correction doivent également prévoir une période de temps adéquate pour que les ayants droit puissent répondre aux réclamations.

Or. fr

Amendment 440 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society (39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright to the public to significant amounts of protected works or other subject-matter copyright protected works or other subject- uploaded by their users and rightholders is matter uploaded by their users and rightholders essential for the functioning of technologies, is essential for the functioning of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders should provide the such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services should be their content and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement. use of their content covered by an agreement. Given the requirements under this Directive in terms of agreements and cooperation between information society service providers and rightholders, it is necessary to provide an intermediary procedure for parties to seek an amicable solution to any dispute regarding the relevant provisions thereof. Members States should support such a mechanism by designating an impartial body with relevant experience and competence to assist the parties in the resolution of their dispute.

Or. en

Amendment 441 Luis de Grandes Pascual

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society (39) In cases when the measures and service providers storing and providing access technologies deployed in accordance with this to the public to large amounts of copyright Directive affect the upload of content covered protected works or other subject-matter by an exception or authorization granted, it is uploaded by their users and rightholders is necessary to require service providers to set up essential for the functioning of technologies, complaints and redress mechanisms for the such as content recognition technologies. In benefit of users whose content has been such cases, rightholders should provide the affected by the measures. Such mechanisms necessary data to allow the services to identify should strike an appropriate balance between their content and the services should be the need to ensure that content covered by transparent towards rightholders with regard exceptions to copyright or authorisations is not to the deployed technologies, to allow the unduly affected by the measures, and the need assessment of their appropriateness. The to ensure that complaints and redress services should in particular provide mechanisms do not unreasonably prejudice the rightholders with information on the type of effectiveness of the measures. technologies used, the way they are operated To achieve that aim, complaints and redress and their success rate for the recognition of mechanisms should prescribe minimum rightholders' content. Those technologies standards for complaints to ensure right should also allow rightholders to get holders are provided with adequate information from the information society information to assess and respond to service providers on the use of their content complaints. covered by an agreement. Properly functioning complaints and redress mechanisms should provide rightholders with an adequate period to respond to complaints, taking into account the number of complaints being processed by the recipient rightholder at the time of the complaint

Or. en

Justification

Given that in some cases the content uploaded by users on UUC service can be affected by the measures under Article 13, such as when it is covered by an exception or authorization, it is necessary to ensure that such content can continue to be available on UUC services and that users have at their disposal a mechanism that would allow them to submit complaints when the upload is prevented, and would allow right holders to assess and respond to users’ complaints.

Amendment 442 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society (39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright to the public to significant amounts of protected works or other subject-matter copyright protected works or other subject- uploaded by their users and rightholders is matter uploaded by their users and rightholders essential for the functioning of technologies, is essential for the functioning of technologies, such as content recognition technologies. In such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders should provide the such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services should be their content and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement. use of their content covered by an agreement. In accordance with Directive 95/46/EC, Directive 2002/58/EC and the General Data Protection Regulation, those technologies should not require the identification of individual users and the processing of their personal data and therefore should not lead to general monitoring obligation.

Or. en

Amendment 443 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society (39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright to the public to copyright protected works or protected works or other subject-matter other subject-matter uploaded by their users and uploaded by their users and rightholders is rightholders is essential for the implementation essential for the functioning of technologies, of reasonable and appropriate measures. such as content recognition technologies. In Therefore, rightholders should provide the such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify necessary data to allow the services to identify their content to which they have rights in their content and the services should be copyright and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard transparent towards rightholders and provide to the deployed technologies, to allow the them with information on the measures, the assessment of their appropriateness. The way they are operated and their success rate for services should in particular provide the recognition of rightholders' content. rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 444 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society (39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access service providers and right holders is essential to the public to large amounts of copyright to facilitate the accurate identification of protected works or other subject-matter unauthorised works online. Appropriate uploaded by their users and rightholders is safeguards should however be put in place essential for the functioning of technologies, where they agree on the introduction of such as content recognition technologies. In voluntary measures to ensure that these do not such cases, rightholders should provide the infringe the fundamental rights of users, necessary data to allow the services to identify namely their right to protection of their their content and the services should be personal data and their freedom to receive or transparent towards rightholders with regard impart information, in accordance with Articles to the deployed technologies, to allow the 8 and 11 of the Charter of Fundamental rights assessment of their appropriateness. The of the European Union, in particular their services should in particular provide rights to the use of works made in accordance rightholders with information on the type of with an exception or limitation to copyright. technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 445 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society (39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access service providers, storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright to the public to significant amounts of protected works or other subject-matter copyright protected works or other subject- uploaded by their users and rightholders is matter uploaded by their users and performing essential for the functioning of technologies, an act of communication to the public, and such as content recognition technologies. In rightholders is essential for the functioning of such cases, rightholders should provide the technologies, such as content recognition necessary data to allow the services to identify technologies. In such cases, rightholders should their content and the services should be provide the necessary data to allow the services transparent towards rightholders with regard to to identify their content, such as reference files the deployed technologies, to allow the and metadata. They should deliver reference assessment of their appropriateness. The files on a timely basis and in an appropriate services should in particular provide file format. Metadata should be complete and rightholders with information on the type of accurate for each reference file. The services technologies used, the way they are operated should be transparent towards rightholders with and their success rate for the recognition of regard to the deployed technologies, to allow rightholders' content. Those technologies should the assessment of their appropriateness. The also allow rightholders to get information from services should in particular provide the information society service providers on the rightholders with information on the type of use of their content covered by an agreement. technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 446 Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society (39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright to the public to large amounts of copyright protected works or other subject-matter protected works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users and rightholders is uploaded by their users and rightholders is essential for the functioning of technologies, essential for the functioning of technologies. In such as content recognition technologies. In such cases, rightholders should provide the such cases, rightholders should provide the necessary data to allow the services to identify necessary data to allow the services to identify their content and the services should be their content and the services should be transparent towards rightholders with regard to transparent towards rightholders with regard to the deployed technologies, to allow the the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate. Those technologies and their success rate for the recognition of should also allow rightholders to get rightholders' content. Those technologies information from the information society should also allow rightholders to get service providers on the use of their content information from the information society covered by an agreement. service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 447 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society (39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access service providers actively making available to to the public to large amounts of copyright the public copyright protected digital content, protected works or other subject-matter works or other subject matter uploaded by their uploaded by their users and rightholders is users and rightholders is essential for the essential for the functioning of technologies, functioning of technologies, such as content such as content recognition technologies. In recognition technologies. In such cases, such cases, rightholders should provide the rightholders should provide the necessary data necessary data to allow the services to identify to allow the services to identify their content their content and the services should be and the services should be transparent towards transparent towards rightholders with regard to rightholders with regard to the deployed the deployed technologies, to allow the technologies, to allow the assessment of their assessment of their appropriateness. The appropriateness. The services should in services should in particular provide particular provide rightholders with information rightholders with information on the type of on the type of technologies used, the way they technologies used, the way they are operated are operated and their success rate for the and their success rate for the recognition of recognition of rightholders' content. Those rightholders' content. Those technologies should technologies should also allow rightholders to also allow rightholders to get information from get information from the information society the information society service providers on the service providers on the use of their content use of their content covered by an agreement. covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 448 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Recital 39

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39) Collaboration between information society (39) Collaboration between information society service providers storing and providing access service providers storing and providing access to the public to large amounts of copyright to the public to copyright protected works or protected works or other subject-matter other subject-matter uploaded by their users and uploaded by their users and rightholders is rightholders is essential for the functioning of essential for the functioning of technologies, technologies, such as content recognition such as content recognition technologies. In technologies. In such cases, rightholders should such cases, rightholders should provide the provide the necessary data to allow the services necessary data to allow the services to identify to identify their content and the services should their content and the services should be be transparent towards rightholders with regard transparent towards rightholders with regard to to the deployed technologies, to allow the the deployed technologies, to allow the assessment of their appropriateness. The assessment of their appropriateness. The services should in particular provide services should in particular provide rightholders with information on the type of rightholders with information on the type of technologies used, the way they are operated technologies used, the way they are operated and their success rate for the recognition of and their success rate for the recognition of rightholders' content. Those technologies should rightholders' content. Those technologies should also allow rightholders to get information from also allow rightholders to get information from the information society service providers on the the information society service providers on the use of their content covered by an agreement. use of their content covered by an agreement.

Or. en

Amendment 449 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39 a) În cazurile în care măsurile și tehnologiile implementate în conformitate cu prezenta directivă afectează încărcarea conținutului acoperit de o excepție sau acordat prin autorizație, este necesar să se solicite furnizorilor de servicii să instituie mecanisme de reclamații și recurs în beneficiul utilizatorilor al căror conținut a fost afectat de aceste măsuri / tehnologii. Astfel de mecanisme ar trebui să ofere un echilibru adecvat între necesitatea de a se asigura că un conținut acoperit de excepțiile de la dreptul de autor sau acordat prin autorizație nu este afectat în mod nejustificat de măsuri / tehnologii, pe de o parte, și necesitatea de a se asigura că mecanismele de reclamații și recurs

nu aduc atingere în mod nejustificat eficacități măsurilor, pe de altă parte. Pentru a realiza acest obiectiv, mecanismele de reclamații și recurs ar trebui să prevadă standarde minime pentru plângeri, pentru a se asigura că titularilor de drepturi le sunt furnizate informații adecvate pentru a evalua și răspunde plângerilor.

Funcționarea corectă a mecanismelor de reclamații și recurs ar trebui să ofere titularilor de drepturi o perioadă suficientă pentru a răspunde plângerilor, ținând seama de numărul de plângeri care sunt prelucrate de către titularul dreptului - destinatar la momentul plângerii.

Or. ro

Amendment 450 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39 bis) En los casos en que las medidas y tecnologías aplicadas de conformidad con la presente Directiva afecten a la carga de contenidos cubiertos por una excepción o autorización concedida, es necesario exigir a los proveedores de servicios que establezcan mecanismos de reclamación y de reparación en beneficio de los usuarios cuyo contenido se vea afectado por dichas medidas. Dichos mecanismos deben encontrar un equilibrio adecuado entre la necesidad de garantizar que el contenido cubierto por las excepciones al derecho de autor o las autorizaciones no se vea indebidamente afectado por dichas medidas y la necesidad de garantizar que los mecanismos

de reclamación y de reparación no perjudiquen injustificadamente la eficacia de las mismas. Para lograr ese objetivo, los mecanismos de reclamación y de recurso deben establecer normas mínimas, a fin de garantizar que se proporcione a los titulares de derechos la información adecuada para examinar las reclamaciones y darles respuesta. Los mecanismos de reclamación y de recurso que funcionen adecuadamente deberían proporcionar a los titulares de los derechos un plazo adecuado para su tramitación, teniéndose en cuenta el número de reclamaciones tramitadas relativas al titular de los derechos en el momento de la reclamación.

Or. es

Justification

Dado que, en algunos casos, el contenido subido por los usuarios del servicio UUC puede verse afectado por las medidas contempladas en el artículo 13, como cuando está cubierto por una excepción o autorización, es necesario garantizar que dicho contenido pueda seguir estando disponible en los servicios UUC y que los usuarios tengan a su disposición un mecanismo que les permita presentar denuncias cuando se impida la subida, y permita los titulares de derechos evaluar y responder a las quejas de los usuarios.

Amendment 451 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Silvia Costa, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39 a) The use of technical measures is essential for online licensing and rights management purposes, and content recognition technologies in particular are readily available and affordable. Such technical measures do not require the identity of uploaders and involve targeted technical cooperation between rightholders and information service providers, based on the data provided by rightholders. Provided they are used in such a way, the use of technical measures is fully compatible with Article 15 of Directive 2000/31/EC and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. In order to promote collaboration between rightholders and information society services providers, Member States should encourage industry agreements between rightholders and information society services, and if necessary the Commission may bring forward proposals for a Code of Conduct at a later date.

Or. en

Amendment 452 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39 a) The market for content recognition technologies is already well developed and destined to grow in a data based economy. Existence and competition of such technology solution providers are therefore supposed to ensure affordable and easy access for all interested parties, including SMEs, regardless

of their size, fully respecting all the fundamental rights. However, without clear legislative obligations to use such technologies, the player in the market and especially the dominant ones, refuse regularly to use such tools that are appropriate for licensing and rights management purposes.

Or. en

Justification

Provided that all fundamental rights are fully respected, it shall be clarified that targeted content identification technologies that are already used in the market without any problem can be deployed by the platforms without any negative impact on fundamental rights or any obstacle for services of different sizes, including SMEs.

Amendment 453 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 39 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39 quater) El mercado de técnicas de reconocimiento de contenidos se encuentra ya bien desarrollado, con una previsión de crecimiento en una economía basada en datos. La existencia y competencia entre los proveedores de este tipo de tecnologías debe por lo tanto asegurar el acceso económico y sencillo de las pymes al crear un mercado en condiciones equitativas para todas las empresas, con independencia de su tamaño. Sin embargo, la ausencia de obligaciones legales claras de uso de dichas tecnologías permite en particular a los operadores dominantes en el mercado negarse a utilizar dichas herramientas que son adecuadas para fines de concesión de licencias y de gestión de derechos.

Or. es

Amendment 454 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39 bis) Les mesures techniques mises en place permettent, à la demande et en coopération avec les ayants droit, de reconnaître un contenu cible identifié. Elles n'ont pas pour objectif d'imposer une obligation générale de contrôle et de recherche de données sur le

contenu, et ne nécessitent pas l'utilisation de données personnelles relatives à l'utilisateur final. Ces mesures sont donc parfaitement compatibles avec l'article 15 de la directive 2000/31/CE et la Charte des Droits Fondamentaux de l'Union européenne.

Or. fr

Amendment 455 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 39 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39 ter) El uso de medios técnicos resulta esencial para el funcionamiento de la concesión de licencias en línea y la gestión de derechos. Dichos medios técnicos utilizados por la tecnología actual no requieren acceder a la identidad de los usuarios individuales que cargan contenidos, y por lo tanto, no suponen ningún riesgo para la privacidad de los usuarios finales individuales. Además, dichos medios técnicos parten de una cooperación técnica muy precisa entre titulares de derechos y prestadores de servicios de la sociedad de información basada en los datos facilitados por los titulares de derechos, y por lo tanto, no conllevan ninguna obligación general de supervisión ni de realizar búsquedas de hechos sobre los contenidos. Por consiguiente, lo dispuesto en el artículo 13 de esta Directiva es plenamente compatible con el artículo 15 de la Directiva 2000/31/CE y con la Carta Europea de los Derechos Fundamentales.

Or. es

Amendment 456 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, Kostadinka Kuneva, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 39 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39 ter) Les Etats membres devraient prévoir la mise en place de mesures intermédiaires permettant aux prestataires de services et aux ayants droits de rechercher le cas échéant une solution amiable à tout différend concernant les dispositions relatives aux accords de coopération entre eux. Les Etats membres devraient, pour ce faire, désigner un organisme indépendant disposant de la compétence et de l'expérience adéquate pour aider les parties à résoudre leur différend.

Or. fr

Amendment 457 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 39 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(39 quater) Il convient de rappeler que, tant de manière générale qu'au vu des références faites à l'article 3 de la directive 2001/29/CE dans la présente directive, une oeuvre et/ou un objet protégé est communiqué au public et/ou mis à la disposition du public lorsqu'une personne physique ou morale en donne l'accès à des personnes étrangères au cercle de ses

relations intimes et personnelles, qui se définit comme le cercle normal de sa famille ou de son entourage le plus immédiat. Il est indifférent à cet égard que ces dernières soient en mesure d'avoir accès aux oeuvres et/ou objets protégés en un même lieu ou en des lieux différents au même moment ou à des moments différents.

Or. fr

Amendment 458 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 40

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(40) Certain rightholders such as authors and (40) Certain rightholders such as authors and performers need information to assess the performers as well as bodies who use public economic value of their rights which are money for the purchase of content need harmonised under Union law. This is especially information to assess the economic value of the case where such rightholders grant a licence rights which are harmonised under Union law. or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. This is especially the case where such As authors and performers tend to be in a rightholders grant a licence or a transfer of weaker contractual position when they grant rights in return for remuneration, including licences or transfer their rights, they need cases where subsequently these works are information to assess the continued economic licensed to or these rights are transferred to value of their rights, compared to the third parties . As authors and performers tend to remuneration received for their licence or be in a weaker contractual position when they transfer, but they often face a lack of grant licences or transfer their rights, they need transparency. Therefore, the sharing of information to assess the continued economic adequate information by their contractual value of their rights, compared to the counterparts or their successors in title is remuneration received for their licence or important for the transparency and balance in transfer, but they often face a lack of the system that governs the remuneration of transparency. Therefore, the regular sharing of authors and performers. information by their contractual counterparts, their successors in title or third parties to whom licences have been granted or rights have been transferred is important for the transparency and balance in the system that governs the remuneration of authors and performers.

Or. en

Amendment 459 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Constance Le Grip, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 40

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(40) Certains titulaires de droits tels que les (40) Certains titulaires de droits tels que les auteurs, interprètes et exécutants ont besoin auteurs, interprètes et exécutants ont besoin d’informations pour apprécier la valeur d'informations pour apprécier la valeur économique de leurs droits qui sont harmonisés économique de leurs droits qui sont harmonisés par le droit de l’Union. C’est en particulier le par le droit de l'Union. C'est en particulier le cas cas lorsque ces titulaires de droits concèdent lorsque ces titulaires de droits concèdent une une licence ou cèdent des droits en contrepartie licence ou cèdent des droits en contrepartie d’une rémunération. Comme les auteurs, d'une rémunération. Comme les auteurs, interprètes et exécutants sont généralement dans interprètes et exécutants sont généralement dans une position contractuelle moins favorable une position contractuelle moins favorable lorsqu’ils concèdent des licences ou cèdent leurs lorsqu'ils concèdent des licences ou cèdent leurs droits, ils ont besoin d’informations pour droits, ils ont besoin d'informations pour déterminer la valeur économique constante de déterminer la valeur économique constante de leurs droits par rapport à la rémunération perçue leurs droits par rapport à la rémunération perçue en contrepartie de leur licence ou de la cession, en contrepartie de leur licence ou de la cession, mais ils sont souvent confrontés à un manque de mais ils sont souvent confrontés à un manque de transparence. Par conséquent, la communication transparence. Par conséquent, la communication d’informations adéquates par leurs partenaires d'informations adéquates par leurs partenaires contractuels ou leurs ayants droit est importante contractuels ou leurs ayants droit est importante pour la transparence et l’équilibre du système pour la transparence et l'équilibre du système qui régit la rémunération des auteurs, interprètes qui régit la rémunération des auteurs, interprètes et exécutants. et exécutants. L'obligation d'information doit être transmise avec les droits et donc accompagner l'oeuvre à travers toutes les formes d'exploitation, indépendamment de qui exploite et sur quel territoire.

Or. fr

Amendment 460 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 40

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(40) Certain rightholders such as authors and (40) Certain rightholders such as authors and performers need information to assess the performers need information to assess the economic value of their rights which are economic value of their rights which are harmonised under Union law. This is especially harmonised under Union law. This is especially the case where such rightholders grant a licence the case where such rightholders grant a licence or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. As authors and performers tend to be in a As authors and performers are in a weaker weaker contractual position when they grant contractual position when they grant licences or licences or transfer their rights, they need transfer their rights, they need accurate information to assess the continued economic information to assess the continued economic value of their rights, compared to the value of their rights, compared to the remuneration received for their licence or remuneration received for their licence or transfer, but they often face a lack of transfer, but they often face a lack of transparency. Therefore, the sharing of adequate transparency. Therefore, the sharing of adequate information by their contractual counterparts or information by their contractual counterparts their successors in title is important for the and subsequent transferees or licences, as well transparency and balance in the system that as their successors in title is important for the governs the remuneration of authors and transparency and balance in the system that performers. governs the remuneration of authors and performers. The reporting and transparency obligation should follow the work across all form of exploitation and across borders.

Or. en

Amendment 461 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 40

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(40) Certain rightholders such as authors and (40) Certain rightholders such as authors, performers need information to assess the creators and performers often face a lack of economic value of their rights which are transparency regarding the information they harmonised under Union law. This is especially need to assess and the economic value of their the case where such rightholders grant a licence rights, which are harmonised under Union law. or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. This is especially the case where such As authors and performers tend to be in a rightholders grant a licence or a transfer of weaker contractual position when they grant rights in return for remuneration. Such licences or transfer their rights, they need information should be adequate, accurate and information to assess the continued economic comprehensive in order to allow authors and value of their rights, compared to the performers, who tend to be in a weaker remuneration received for their licence or contractual position when they grant licences or transfer, but they often face a lack of transfer their rights, to assess the continued transparency. Therefore, the sharing of economic value of those rights, compared to the adequate information by their contractual remuneration originally agreed for their licence counterparts or their successors in title is or transfer. Therefore, the sharing of adequate, important for the transparency and balance in accurate and comprehensive information by the system that governs the remuneration of their contractual counterparts or their successors authors and performers. in title is essential for the transparency, equality and fairness in the system that governs the remuneration of authors and performers.

Or. en

Amendment 462 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Recital 40

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(40) Certain rightholders such as authors and (40) Certain rightholders such as authors and performers need information to assess the performers need information to assess the economic value of their rights which are economic value of their rights which are harmonised under Union law. This is especially harmonised under Union law. This is especially the case where such rightholders grant a licence the case where such rightholders grant a licence or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. As authors and performers tend to be in a As authors and performers could be in a weaker weaker contractual position when they grant contractual position when they grant licences or licences or transfer their rights, they need transfer their rights, they need information to information to assess the continued economic assess the continued economic value of their value of their rights, compared to the rights, compared to the remuneration received remuneration received for their licence or for their licence or transfer, but they often face a transfer, but they often face a lack of lack of transparency. Therefore, the sharing of transparency. Therefore, the sharing of appropriate information by their contractual adequate information by their contractual counterparts and transferees or licensees and counterparts or their successors in title is by their successors in title is important for the important for the transparency and balance in transparency and balance in the system that the system that governs the remuneration of governs the remuneration of authors and authors and performers. performers.

Or. en

Amendment 463 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 40

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(40) Certain rightholders such as authors and (40) Certain rightholders such as authors and performers need information to assess the performers need information to assess the economic value of their rights which are economic value of their rights which are harmonised under Union law. This is especially harmonised under Union law. This is especially the case where such rightholders grant a licence the case where such rightholders grant a licence or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. or a transfer of rights in return for remuneration. As authors and performers tend to be in a As authors and performers are in a weaker weaker contractual position when they grant contractual position when they grant licences or licences or transfer their rights, they need transfer their rights, they need information to information to assess the continued economic assess the continued economic value of their value of their rights, compared to the rights, compared to the remuneration received remuneration received for their licence or for their licence or transfer, but they often face a transfer, but they often face a lack of lack of transparency. Therefore, the sharing of transparency. Therefore, the sharing of adequate adequate information by their contractual information by their contractual counterparts or counterparts or their successors in title is their successors in title is important for the important for the transparency and balance in transparency and balance in the system that the system that governs the remuneration of governs the remuneration of authors and authors and performers. performers.

Or. en

Amendment 464 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 41

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(41) When implementing transparency (41) When implementing transparency obligations, the specificities of different content obligations, the specificities of different content sectors and of the rights of the authors and sectors and of the rights of the authors and performers in each sector should be considered. performers in each sector should be considered. Member States should consult all relevant Member States should consult all relevant stakeholders as that should help determine stakeholders as that should help determine sector-specific requirements. Collective sector-specific requirements and standard bargaining should be considered as an option to reporting statements and procedures. reach an agreement between the relevant Collective bargaining should be considered as stakeholders regarding transparency. To enable an option to reach an agreement between the the adaptation of current reporting practices to relevant stakeholders regarding transparency. the transparency obligations, a transitional To enable the adaptation of current reporting period should be provided for. The transparency practices to the transparency obligations, a obligations do not need to apply to agreements transitional period should be provided for. The concluded with collective management transparency obligations do not need to apply to organisations as those are already subject to agreements concluded with collective transparency obligations under Directive management organisations as those are already 2014/26/EU. subject to transparency obligations under Directive 2014/26/EU, on the condition that Member States have transposed Directive 2014/26/EU and taken all necessary measures to ensure that the management of all collective management organisations is carried out in a sound, prudent and appropriate manner. Member States should also ensure that collective management organisations act in the best interest of the right holders whose rights they represent and regularly, diligently and accurately distribute and pay amounts due to rightholders and make public an annual transparency report, in full compliance with Directive 2014/26/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 465 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 41

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(41) When implementing transparency (41) When implementing transparency obligations, the specificities of different content obligations, the specificities of different content sectors and of the rights of the authors and sectors and of the rights of the authors and performers in each sector should be considered. performers in each sector should be considered Member States should consult all relevant in line with the nature of their contribution to stakeholders as that should help determine the overall outcome of the work or sector-specific requirements. Collective performance. Member States should consult all bargaining should be considered as an option to relevant stakeholders as that should help reach an agreement between the relevant determine sector-specific requirements, if these stakeholders regarding transparency. To enable are not already applicable or enforced in the the adaptation of current reporting practices to Member State. Collective bargaining should be the transparency obligations, a transitional considered as an option to reach an agreement period should be provided for. The transparency between the relevant stakeholders regarding obligations do not need to apply to agreements transparency. To enable the adaptation of concluded with collective management current reporting practices to the transparency organisations as those are already subject to obligations, a transitional period should be transparency obligations under Directive provided for. The transparency obligations do 2014/26/EU. not need to apply to agreements concluded with collective management organisations as those are already subject to transparency obligations under Directive 2014/26/EU, or where agreements have already been made on the basis of collective bargaining agreements or equivalent arrangements in Member States.

Or. en

Amendment 466 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Constance Le Grip, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 41

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(41) Lors de la mise en œuvre des obligations (41) Lors de la mise en œuvre des obligations en matière de transparence, les spécificités des en matière de transparence, les spécificités des différents secteurs de contenus et des droits des différents secteurs de contenus et des droits des auteurs, interprètes et exécutants dans chaque auteurs, interprètes et exécutants dans chaque secteur devraient être prises en considération. secteur devraient être prises en considération. Les États membres devraient consulter toutes Les États membres veillent à ce que les les parties prenantes, ce qui devrait les aider à organisations représentatives de toutes les déterminer les exigences propres aux différents parties prenantes, déterminent les exigences secteurs. La négociation collective devrait être propres aux différents secteurs, et établissent considérée comme une possibilité de parvenir à des procédures et modèles de présentation de un accord entre les parties prenantes concernant l'information standardisés pour chaque la transparence. Afin de permettre l’adaptation secteur, favorisant un traitement automatisé de aux obligations de transparence des pratiques l'information à l'aide des technologies actuelles en matière d’établissement de rapports, numériques et des identifiants internationaux il conviendrait de prévoir une période des œuvres. La négociation collective devrait transitoire. Les obligations de transparence ne être considérée comme une possibilité de doivent pas s’appliquer aux contrats conclus parvenir à un accord entre les parties prenantes avec des organisations de gestion collective concernant la transparence. Afin de permettre comme celles qui sont déjà soumises à des l'adaptation aux obligations de transparence des obligations de transparence en vertu de la pratiques actuelles en matière d'établissement de directive 2014/26/UE. rapports, il conviendrait de prévoir une période transitoire. Les obligations de transparence ne doivent pas s'appliquer aux contrats conclus avec des organisations de gestion collective car elles sont déjà soumises à des obligations de transparence en vertu de la directive 2014/26/UE.

Or. fr

Amendment 467 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 41

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(41) When implementing transparency (41) When implementing transparency obligations, the specificities of different content obligations, the specificities of different content sectors and of the rights of the authors and sectors and of the rights of the authors and performers in each sector should be considered. performers in each sector should be considered. Member States should consult all relevant Member States should consult all relevant stakeholders as that should help determine stakeholders as that should help determine sector-specific requirements. Collective sector-specific requirements. Collective bargaining should be considered as an option to bargaining should be considered as an option to reach an agreement between the relevant reach an agreement between the relevant stakeholders regarding transparency. To enable stakeholders regarding transparency. To enable the adaptation of current reporting practices to the adaptation of current reporting practices to the transparency obligations, a transitional the transparency obligations, a transitional period should be provided for. The period should be provided for. transparency obligations do not need to apply to agreements concluded with collective management organisations as those are already subject to transparency obligations under Directive 2014/26/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 468 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 41

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(41) Atunci când se pun în aplicare obligațiile în (41) Atunci când se pun în aplicare obligațiile în materie de transparență, ar trebui să se ia în materie de transparență, ar trebui să se ia în considerare particularitățile diferitelor sectoare considerare particularitățile diferitelor sectoare de conținut și ale drepturilor autorilor și de conținut și ale drepturilor autorilor și artiștilor interpreți sau executanți din fiecare artiștilor interpreți sau executanți din fiecare sector. Statele membre ar trebui să se consulte sector, precum și importanța contribuției cu toate părțile interesate relevante, deoarece o autorilor ori artiștilor interpreți sau executanți astfel de consultare ar trebui să contribuie la la opera ori interpretarea sau execuția în stabilirea cerințelor specifice fiecărui sector. ansamblu. Statele membre ar trebui să se Negocierile colective ar trebui considerate o consulte cu toate părțile interesate relevante, posibilitate prin care părțile interesante deoarece o astfel de consultare ar trebui să relevante să ajungă la un acord în ceea ce contribuie la stabilirea cerințelor specifice privește transparența. Pentru a permite fiecărui sector. Acordurile de negociere adaptarea practicilor actuale de raportare la colectivă sau acordurile contractuale similare obligațiile de transparență, ar trebui prevăzută o ar trebui considerate ca îndeplinind obligațiile perioadă de tranziție. Nu este necesar ca în materie de transparență. Pentru a permite obligațiile de transparență să se aplice adaptarea practicilor actuale de raportare la acordurilor încheiate cu organismele de gestiune obligațiile de transparență, ar trebui prevăzută o colectivă, deoarece acestea sunt deja supuse perioadă de tranziție. Nu este necesar ca obligațiilor de transparență prevăzute în obligațiile de transparență să se aplice Directiva 2014/26/UE. acordurilor încheiate cu organismele de gestiune colectivă, deoarece acestea sunt deja supuse obligațiilor de transparență prevăzute în Directiva 2014/26/UE.

Or. ro

Amendment 469 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Recital 41

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(41) When implementing transparency (41) When implementing transparency obligations, the specificities of different content obligations, the specificities of different content sectors and of the rights of the authors and sectors and of the rights of the authors and performers in each sector should be considered. performers in each sector should be considered. Member States should consult all relevant Member States should consult all relevant stakeholders as that should help determine stakeholders as that should help determine sector-specific requirements. Collective sector-specific requirements and facilitate the bargaining should be considered as an option to design of standard reporting statements and reach an agreement between the relevant procedures for each sector. Collective stakeholders regarding transparency. To enable bargaining should be considered as an option to the adaptation of current reporting practices to reach an agreement between the relevant the transparency obligations, a transitional stakeholders regarding transparency and where period should be provided for. The collective bargaining agreements containing transparency obligations do not need to apply transparency are in place the obligations of to agreements concluded with collective transparency shall be deemed to have been management organisations as those are satisfied. To enable the adaptation of current already subject to transparency obligations reporting practices to the transparency under Directive 2014/26/EU. obligations, a transitional period should be provided for.

Or. en

Amendment 470 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 41

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(41) When implementing transparency (41) When implementing transparency obligations, the specificities of different content obligations, the specificities of different content sectors and of the rights of the authors and sectors and of the rights of the authors and performers in each sector should be considered. performers in each sector should be considered. Member States should consult all relevant Member States should consult all relevant stakeholders as that should help determine stakeholders as that could help determine sector-specific requirements. Collective sector-specific requirements. Collective bargaining should be considered as an option to bargaining may be considered as an option to reach an agreement between the relevant reach an agreement between the relevant stakeholders regarding transparency. To enable stakeholders regarding transparency. To enable the adaptation of current reporting practices to the adaptation of current reporting practices to the transparency obligations, a transitional the transparency obligations, a transitional period should be provided for. The transparency period should be provided for. The transparency obligations do not need to apply to agreements obligations do not need to apply to agreements concluded with collective management concluded with collective management organisations as those are already subject to organisations as those are already subject to transparency obligations under Directive transparency obligations under Directive 2014/26/EU. 2014/26/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 471 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 41 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(41 a) The creative drive is present in every human being, and needs to be nurtured, protected and stimulated in order to lay the foundations for the continuous renewal of creative talents. Therefore, the fundamental and prominent role of authors, creators and

performers in the creative process and within society should be recognised. To this end, Member States should ensure that they are entitled to a fair and proportionate remuneration of the revenues derived from the exploitation of their works.

Or. en

Amendment 472 Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Recital 41 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(41 a) Die Mitgliedstaaten sollten sicherstellen, dass Urheber und ausübende Künstler eine angemessene und gerechte Vergütung aus den durch die Verwertung ihrer Werke entstehenden Einnahmen erhalten.

Or. de

Amendment 473 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Recital 42

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(42) Anumite contracte privind exploatarea (42) Anumite contracte privind exploatarea drepturilor armonizate la nivelul Uniunii sunt de drepturilor armonizate la nivelul Uniunii sunt de lungă durată și oferă autorilor și artiștilor lungă durată și oferă autorilor și artiștilor interpreți sau executanți puține posibilități de a interpreți sau executanți puține posibilități de a le renegocia cu partenerii lor contractuali sau cu le renegocia cu partenerii lor contractuali sau cu succesorii în drepturi ai acestora. Prin urmare, succesorii în drepturi ai acestora. Prin urmare, fără a aduce atingere legislației aplicabile fără a aduce atingere legislației aplicabile contractelor din statele membre, ar trebui să contractelor din statele membre, ar trebui să existe un mecanism de ajustare a remunerațiilor existe un mecanism de ajustare a remunerațiilor pentru cazurile în care remunerația convenită pentru cazurile în care remunerația convenită inițial pe baza unei licențe sau a unui transfer de inițial pe baza unei licențe sau a unui transfer de drepturi este disproporționat de scăzută în drepturi a devenit disproporționat de scăzută în comparație cu veniturile și beneficiile relevante comparație cu veniturile nete relevante generate generate de exploatarea operei sau de fixarea de exploatarea operei sau de fixarea interpretării interpretării ori a execuției, având în vedere mai ori a execuției, având în vedere mai ales ales transparența asigurată de prezenta directivă. transparența asigurată de prezenta directivă. La La evaluarea situației ar trebui să se țină seama evaluarea situației ar trebui să se țină seama de de circumstanțele specifice fiecărui caz în parte, circumstanțele specifice fiecărui caz în parte, precum și de particularitățile și practicile precum și de particularitățile economice sau diferitelor sectoare de conținut. În cazul în care alte particularități și practici ale diferitelor părțile nu ajung la un acord privind ajustarea sectoare de conținut, precum și de natura și remunerațiilor, autorul ori artistul interpret sau importanța contribuției autorului sau artistului executant ar trebui să aibă dreptul de a introduce interpret sau executant la operă ori o acțiune în fața unei instanțe judecătorești sau a interpretare sau execuție în ansamblu. În cazul unei alte autorități competente. în care părțile nu ajung la un acord privind ajustarea remunerațiilor, autorul ori artistul interpret sau executant ar trebui să aibă dreptul de a introduce o acțiune în fața unei instanțe judecătorești sau a unei alte autorități competente.

Or. ro

Amendment 474 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 42

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of (42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of rights harmonised at Union level are of long rights harmonised at Union level are of long duration, offering few possibilities for authors duration, offering few possibilities for authors and performers to renegotiate them with their and performers to renegotiate them with their contractual counterparts or their successors in contractual counterparts or their successors in title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law applicable to contracts in Member States, there applicable to contracts in Member States, there should be a remuneration adjustment should be a remuneration adjustment mechanism for cases where the remuneration mechanism which would be applicable for originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of cases where the remuneration originally agreed rights is disproportionately low compared to the under a licence or a transfer of rights is relevant revenues and the benefits derived from disproportionately low compared to the the exploitation of the work or the fixation of subsequent and unanticipated revenues and the the performance, including in light of the net profit derived from the exploitation of the transparency ensured by this Directive. The work or the fixation of the performance, assessment of the situation should take account including in light of the transparency ensured by of the specific circumstances of each case as this Directive. The assessment of the situation well as of the specificities and practices of the should take account of the specific different content sectors. Where the parties do circumstances of each case as well as of the not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, specificities and practices of the different the author or performer should be entitled to content sectors. Where the parties do not agree bring a claim before a court or other competent on the adjustment of the remuneration, the authority. author or performer may be entitled to bring a claim before a court or other competent authority. However, where agreements with collective management organisations are applicable or where agreements with individuals are already in place and enforced, the remuneration mechanism should not apply.

Or. en

Amendment 475 Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Recital 42

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of (42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of rights harmonised at Union level are of long rights harmonised at Union level are of long duration, offering few possibilities for authors duration, offering few possibilities for authors and performers to renegotiate them with their and performers to renegotiate them with their contractual counterparts or their successors in contractual counterparts or their successors in title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law applicable to contracts in Member States, there applicable to contracts in Member States, a should be a remuneration adjustment remuneration adjustment mechanism should be mechanism for cases where the remuneration introduced for cases where the remuneration originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of rights is disproportionately low compared to the rights is clearly disproportionately low relevant revenues and the benefits derived from compared to the unanticipated relevant net the exploitation of the work or the fixation of revenues derived from the exploitation of the the performance, including in light of the work or the fixation of the performance, transparency ensured by this Directive. The including in light of the transparency ensured by assessment of the situation should take account this Directive. The assessment of the situation of the specific circumstances of each case as should take account of the specific well as of the specificities and practices of the circumstances of each case as well as of the different content sectors. Where the parties do specificities and practices of the different not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, content sectors. Where the parties do not agree the author or performer should be entitled to on the adjustment of the remuneration, the bring a claim before a court or other competent author or performer should be entitled to bring a authority. claim before a court or other competent authority. Such remuneration adjustment mechanism should only apply to direct contractual parties. It should not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard the overall work or performance.

Or. en

Amendment 476 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Constance Le Grip, Frédérique Ries, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Recital 42

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(42) Certains contrats d’exploitation de droits (42) Certains contrats d'exploitation de droits harmonisés au niveau de l’Union sont de longue harmonisés au niveau de l'Union sont de longue durée et offrent peu de possibilités aux auteurs, durée et offrent peu de possibilités aux auteurs, interprètes et exécutants de les renégocier avec interprètes et exécutants de les renégocier avec leurs partenaires contractuels ou leurs ayants leurs partenaires contractuels ou leurs ayants droit. Par conséquent, sans préjudice du droit droit. Par conséquent, sans préjudice du droit applicable aux contrats dans les États membres, applicable aux contrats dans les États membres, il conviendrait de mettre en place un ces derniers pourraient mettre en place un mécanisme d’adaptation des rémunérations pour mécanisme d'adaptation des rémunérations pour les cas où la rémunération initialement les cas où la rémunération initialement convenue dans le cadre d’une licence ou d'une convenue dans le cadre d'une licence ou d'une cession de droits est exagérément faible par cession de droits est exagérément faible par rapport aux recettes et bénéfices tirés de rapport aux recettes et bénéfices tirés de l’exploitation de l'œuvre ou de l'interprétation, l'exploitation de l'œuvre ou de l'interprétation, notamment au regard de la transparence garantie notamment au regard de la transparence garantie par la présente directive. L’évaluation de la par la présente directive. Il est en effet situation doit tenir compte des circonstances indispensable que la position contractuelle des particulières de chaque cas ainsi que des auteurs, interprètes et exécutants soit spécificités et des pratiques des différents renforcée afin qu'ils puissent bénéficier secteurs de contenus. Lorsque les parties ne qu'une rémunération équitable et inaliénable parviennent pas à se mettre d’accord sur et d'éviter tout déséquilibre de pouvoir entre l’adaptation des rémunérations, l’auteur ou les parties. Cette disposition ne s'applique que l’artiste, interprète ou exécutant doit avoir le pour les parties directement liées par contrat. droit d’introduire un recours devant un tribunal Lorsque les parties ne parviennent pas à se ou une autre autorité compétente. mettre d'accord sur l'adaptation des rémunérations, l'auteur ou l'artiste, interprète ou exécutant doit avoir le droit d'introduire un recours devant un tribunal ou une autre autorité compétente ou de mettre un terme à son contrat.

Or. fr

Amendment 477 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 42

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of (42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of rights harmonised at Union level are of long rights harmonised at Union level are of long duration, offering few possibilities for authors duration, offering few possibilities for authors and performers to renegotiate them with their and performers to renegotiate them with their contractual counterparts or their successors in contractual counterparts or their successors in title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law applicable to contracts in Member States, there applicable to contracts in Member States, there should be a remuneration adjustment should be a remuneration adjustment mechanism for cases where the remuneration mechanism for cases where the remuneration originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of rights is disproportionately low compared to the rights is disproportionately low compared to the relevant revenues and the benefits derived from relevant revenues and the benefits derived from the exploitation of the work or the fixation of the exploitation of the work or the fixation of the performance, including in light of the the performance, including in light of the transparency ensured by this Directive. The transparency ensured by this Directive. Such assessment of the situation should take account mechanism should allow authors and of the specific circumstances of each case as performers, individually or through well as of the specificities and practices of the representative organisations, to claim an different content sectors. Where the parties do additional and equitable remuneration. The not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, assessment of the situation should take account the author or performer should be entitled to of the specific circumstances of each case as bring a claim before a court or other competent well as of the specificities and practices of the authority. different content sectors. Where the parties do not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, the author or performer should be entitled to bring a claim before a court or other competent judicial authority.

Or. en

Amendment 478 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Recital 42

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of (42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of rights harmonised at Union level are of long rights harmonised at Union level are for the duration, offering few possibilities for authors entire duration of copyright, offering no and performers to renegotiate them with their possibilities for authors and performers to contractual counterparts or their successors in renegotiate them with their contractual title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law counterparts or their successors in title. applicable to contracts in Member States, there Therefore, without prejudice to the law should be a remuneration adjustment applicable to contracts in Member States, there mechanism for cases where the remuneration should be a remuneration adjustment originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of mechanism for cases where the remuneration rights is disproportionately low compared to the originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of relevant revenues and the benefits derived from rights is disproportionately low compared to the the exploitation of the work or the fixation of revenues and the benefits derived from the the performance, including in light of the exploitation of the work or the fixation of the transparency ensured by this Directive. The performance, including in light of the assessment of the situation should take account transparency ensured by this Directive. of the specific circumstances of each case as Collective bargaining should be considered as well as of the specificities and practices of the an option to reach an agreement. The different content sectors. Where the parties do assessment of the situation should take account not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, of the specific circumstances of each case and the author or performer should be entitled to of the specificities of the different sectors. bring a claim before a court or other competent Where the parties do not agree on the authority. adjustment of the remuneration, the author or performer should be entitled to bring a claim before a court or other competent authority.

Or. en

Amendment 479 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Recital 42

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of (42) Most contracts for the exploitation of rights rights harmonised at Union level are of long harmonised at Union level are for the entire duration, offering few possibilities for authors duration of copyright, offering no possibilities and performers to renegotiate them with their for authors and performers to renegotiate them contractual counterparts or their successors in with their contractual counterparts or their title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law successors in title. Therefore, without prejudice applicable to contracts in Member States, there to the law applicable to contracts in Member should be a remuneration adjustment States, there should be a remuneration mechanism for cases where the remuneration adjustment mechanism for cases where the originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of remuneration originally agreed under a licence rights is disproportionately low compared to the or a transfer of rights is disproportionately low relevant revenues and the benefits derived from compared to the relevant revenues and the the exploitation of the work or the fixation of benefits derived from the exploitation of the the performance, including in light of the work or the fixation of the performance, transparency ensured by this Directive. The including in light of the transparency ensured by assessment of the situation should take account this Directive. Collective bargaining should be of the specific circumstances of each case as considered as an option to reach an well as of the specificities and practices of the agreement. Where the parties do not agree on different content sectors. Where the parties do the adjustment of the remuneration, the author not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, or performer should be entitled to bring a claim the author or performer should be entitled to before a court or other competent authority. bring a claim before a court or other competent authority.

Or. en

Amendment 480 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Recital 42

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of (42) Certain contracts for the exploitation of rights harmonised at Union level are of long rights harmonised at Union level are of long duration, offering few possibilities for authors duration, offering few possibilities for authors and performers to renegotiate them with their and performers to renegotiate them with their contractual counterparts or their successors in contractual counterparts or their successors in title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law title. Therefore, without prejudice to the law applicable to contracts in Member States, there applicable to contracts in Member States, there should be a remuneration adjustment should be a remuneration adjustment mechanism for cases where the remuneration mechanism for cases where the remuneration originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of originally agreed under a licence or a transfer of rights is disproportionately low compared to the rights is disproportionately low compared to the relevant revenues and the benefits derived from unanticipated relevant revenues and the the exploitation of the work or the fixation of benefits derived from the exploitation of the the performance, including in light of the work or the fixation of the performance, transparency ensured by this Directive. The including in light of the transparency ensured by assessment of the situation should take account this Directive. The assessment of the situation of the specific circumstances of each case as should take account of the specific well as of the specificities and practices of the circumstances of each case as well as of the different content sectors. Where the parties do specificities and practices of the different not agree on the adjustment of the remuneration, content sectors. Where the parties do not agree the author or performer should be entitled to on the adjustment of the remuneration, the bring a claim before a court or other competent author or performer should be entitled to bring a authority. claim before a court or other competent authority.

Or. en

Amendment 481 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Recital 43

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(43) Authors and performers are often reluctant (43) Authors and performers are often unable to to enforce their rights against their contractual enforce their rights against their contractual partners before a court or tribunal. Member partners before a court or tribunal. Member States should therefore provide for an States should therefore provide for an alternative dispute resolution procedure that alternative dispute resolution procedure that addresses claims related to obligations of addresses claims related to obligations of transparency and the contract adjustment transparency and the contract adjustment mechanism. mechanism. The dispute settlement resolution could also be agreed upon in collective agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 482 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Recital 43

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(43) Authors and performers are often reluctant (43) Authors and performers are often reluctant to enforce their rights against their contractual to enforce their rights against their contractual partners before a court or tribunal. Member partners before a court or tribunal. Member States should therefore provide for an States should therefore provide for a voluntary alternative dispute resolution procedure that and public alternative dispute resolution addresses claims related to obligations of procedure that addresses claims related to transparency and the contract adjustment obligations of transparency and the contract mechanism. adjustment mechanism.

Or. en

Amendment 483 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Recital 43

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(43) Authors and performers are often reluctant (43) Authors and performers are often reluctant to enforce their rights against their contractual to enforce their rights against their contractual partners before a court or tribunal. Member partners before a court or tribunal. Member States should therefore provide for an States should therefore provide for an efficient alternative dispute resolution procedure that alternative dispute resolution procedure that addresses claims related to obligations of addresses claims related to obligations of transparency and the contract adjustment transparency and the contract adjustment mechanism. mechanism.

Or. en

Amendment 484 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Recital 43 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(43 a) There is in many cases a lack of information and availability of data regarding the holders of copyright and related rights, which prevents potential users of works to obtain a license to use or reproduce that work and directly remunerate the author or creator of that work. A centralised database should

therefore be established to enable an easier identification of works subject to copyright and related rights, decrease complexity and costs in authors and performers's rights administration and to facilitate the remuneration and payment of licenses to artists and performers for their work.

Or. en

Amendment 485 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 44

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(44) Les objectifs de la présente directive, à (44) Le droit d'auteur bénéficiant d'ores et savoir la modernisation de certains aspects du déjà d'un cadre au niveau de l'Union, l'objectif cadre de l’Union applicable au droit d’auteur de la présente directive, qui est d'en afin de tenir compte des progrès technologiques moderniser certains aspects afin de tenir et des nouveaux canaux de distribution des compte des progrès technologiques et des contenus protégés au sein du marché intérieur, nouveaux canaux de distribution des contenus ne peuvent être atteints de manière suffisante protégés, justifie une action de l'Union sur ce par les États membres mais peuvent, du fait de sujet. Celle-ci peut donc adopter des mesures leur portée, de leurs effets et de leur dimension conformément au principe de subsidiarité transfrontière, être mieux atteints au niveau de énoncé à l'article 5 du traité sur l'Union l’Union. Celle-ci peut donc adopter des mesures européenne. Conformément au principe de conformément au principe de subsidiarité proportionnalité tel qu'énoncé audit article, la énoncé à l’article 5 du traité sur l’Union présente directive n'excède pas ce qui est européenne. Conformément au principe de nécessaire pour atteindre ces objectifs. proportionnalité tel qu'énoncé audit article, la présente directive n'excède pas ce qui est nécessaire pour atteindre ces objectifs.

Or. fr

Amendment 486 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Recital 45

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(45) La présente directive respecte les droits (45) La présente directive respecte les droits fondamentaux et observe les principes fondamentaux tels que prévus par les traditions reconnus en particulier par la charte des droits constitutionnelles des Etats membres. Il y a fondamentaux de l'Union européenne. Il y a donc lieu d'interpréter et d'appliquer la présente donc lieu d'interpréter et d'appliquer la présente directive conformément à ces droits et directive conformément à ces droits et principes. principes.

Or. fr

Amendment 487 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Recital 47 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(47 bis) En general, incluyendo cuando se indica en la presente Directiva, se considera que una obra u otra prestación protegida por derechos de autor es comunicada al público y/o puesta a disposición del público conforme a lo dispuesto en el artículo 3 de la Directiva 2001/29/CE cuando las personas que pueden

acceder a dicha obra o prestación van más allá del núcleo familiar o del ámbito estrictamente doméstico. Resulta indiferente que dichas personas se encuentren efectivamente en el mismo sitio o en sitios diferentes, o que reciban las obras o prestaciones protegidas de forma simultánea o sucesiva.

Or. es

Justification

Varias disposiciones se basan en la noción del derecho de comunicación pública, concepto que ha sido objeto de varias decisiones jurisprudenciales, que ha llevado a una serie de discrepancias entre la interpretación del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (por ejemplo, en los asuntos C-135/10 Del Corso o en el asunto Reha Training C-117/15) y la Organización Mundial de Propiedad Intelectual (teniendo en cuenta la Guía de la OMPI sobre tratados internacionales del año 2003).

Amendment 488 Laura Ferrara, Isabella Adinolfi, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. La presente direttiva stabilisce norme volte ad 1. La presente direttiva stabilisce norme volte ad armonizzare ulteriormente il quadro giuridico armonizzare ulteriormente il quadro giuridico dell’Unione applicabile al diritto d’autore e ai dell’Unione applicabile al diritto d’autore e ai diritti connessi nell’ambito del mercato interno, diritti connessi nell’ambito del mercato interno, tenendo conto in particolare degli utilizzi tenendo conto in particolare degli utilizzi digitali e transfrontalieri dei contenuti protetti. digitali e transfrontalieri dei contenuti protetti. Stabilisce inoltre norme riguardanti le eccezioni Stabilisce inoltre, senza compromettere e le limitazioni e l'agevolazione della probabili future ulteriori modifiche al quadro concessione delle licenze, nonché norme miranti normativo che tengano conto degli sviluppi a garantire il buon funzionamento del mercato tecnologici, norme riguardanti le eccezioni e le per lo sfruttamento delle opere e altro materiale. limitazioni e l'agevolazione della concessione delle licenze, nonché norme miranti a garantire il buon funzionamento del mercato per lo sfruttamento delle opere e altro materiale.

Or. it

Amendment 489 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. La présente directive fixe des règles visant à 1. La présente directive vise à moderniser le poursuivre l'harmonisation du droit de l'Union droit de l'Union applicable au droit d'auteur et applicable au droit d’auteur et aux droits voisins aux droits voisins, compte tenu, en particulier, dans le cadre du marché intérieur, compte des utilisations numériques des contenus tenu, en particulier, des utilisations numériques protégés. Elle prévoit également des et transfrontières des contenus protégés. Elle dispositions relatives aux exceptions et prévoit également des dispositions relatives aux limitations, à la facilitation des contrats de exceptions et limitations, à la facilitation des licences ainsi que des règles destinées à assurer contrats de licences ainsi que des règles le bon équilibre entre les intérêts de toutes les destinées à assurer le bon fonctionnement du parties prenantes pour l'exploitation des œuvres marché pour l'exploitation des œuvres et des et des autres objets protégés. autres objets protégés.

Or. fr

Amendment 490 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. This Directive lays down rules which aim at 1. This Directive lays down rules which aim at further harmonising the Union law applicable to further harmonising the Union law applicable to copyright and related rights in the framework of copyright and related rights in the framework of the internal market, taking into account in the internal market, taking into account in particular digital and cross-border uses of particular digital and cross-border uses of protected content. It also lays down rules on protected content. It also lays down rules on exceptions and limitations, on the facilitation of exceptions and limitations, on the facilitation of licences as well as rules aiming at ensuring a licences as well as rules aiming at ensuring a well-functioning marketplace for the well-functioning marketplace for the enjoyment exploitation of works and other subject-matter. of works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 491 Laura Ferrara, Isabella Adinolfi, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 bis. Gli Stati Membri, inoltre, sono invitati ad armonizzare la durata della protezione dei diritti d'autore e connessi a un periodo che non superi gli attuali standard internazionali stabiliti nella convenzione di Berna, tenendo

conto del tempo necessario al recupero dell'investimento, della vita commerciale media dell'opera nonché dell'interesse pubblico alla disseminazione delle opere dell'ingegno.

Or. it

Amendment 492 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Except in the cases referred to in Article 6, 2. Except in the cases referred to in Article 6, this Directive shall leave intact and shall in no this Directive shall leave intact and shall in no way affect existing rules laid down in the way affect existing rules laid down in the Directives currently in force in this area, in Directives currently in force in this area, in particular Directives 96/9/EC, 2001/29/EC, particular Directives 96/9/EC, 2000/31/EC, 2006/115/EC, 2009/24/EC, 2012/28/EU and 2001/29/EC, 2006/115/EC, 2009/24/EC, 2014/26/EU. 2012/28/EU and 2014/26/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 493 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Except in the cases referred to in Article 6, 2. Except in the cases referred to in Article 6, this Directive shall leave intact and shall in no this Directive shall leave intact and shall in no way affect existing rules laid down in the way affect existing rules laid down in the Directives currently in force in this area, in Directives currently in force in this area, in particular Directives 96/9/EC, 2001/29/EC, particular Directives 96/9/EC, 2000/31/EC, 2006/115/EC, 2009/24/EC, 2012/28/EU and 2001/29/EC, 2006/115/EC, 2009/24/EC, 2014/26/EU. 2012/28/EU and 2014/26/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 494 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Except in the cases referred to in Article 6, 2. Except in the cases referred to in Article 6, this Directive shall leave intact and shall in no this Directive shall leave intact and shall in no way affect existing rules laid down in the way affect existing rules laid down in the Directives currently in force in this area, in Directives currently in force in this area, in particular Directives 96/9/EC, 2001/29/EC, particular Directives 96/9/EC, 2001/29/EC, 2006/115/EC, 2009/24/EC, 2012/28/EU and 2000/31/EC, 2006/115/EC, 2009/24/EC, 2014/26/EU. 2012/28/EU and 2014/26/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 495 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Except in the cases referred to in Article 6, 2. Except in the cases referred to in Article 6, this Directive shall leave intact and shall in no this Directive shall leave intact and shall in no way affect existing rules laid down in the way affect existing rules laid down in the Directives currently in force in this area, in Directives currently in force in this area, in particular Directives 96/9/EC, 2001/29/EC, particular Directives 96/9/EC, 2000/31/EC, 2006/115/EC, 2009/24/EC, 2012/28/EU and 2001/29/EC, 2006/115/EC, 2009/24/EC, 2014/26/EU. 2012/28/EU and 2014/26/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 496 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Evelyn Regner, Marju Lauristin, Mary Honeyball

Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. The processing of personal data carried out within the framework of this Directive

shall be subject to Directive 95/46/EC and the General Data Protection Regulation.

Or. en

Amendment 497 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

‘research organisation’ means a university, a deleted research institute or any other organisation the primary goal of which is to conduct scientific research or to conduct scientific research and provide educational services:

(a) on a non-for-profit basis or by reinvesting all the profits in its scientific research; or

(b) pursuant to a public interest mission recognised by a Member State;

Or. en

Amendment 498 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

„Forschungsorganisation“: eine Hochschule, ein „Forschungsorganisation“: eine Hochschule Forschungsinstitut oder eine sonstige einschließlich ihrer Bibliotheken, ein Organisation, deren vorrangiges Ziel die Forschungsinstitut oder eine sonstige wissenschaftliche Forschung oder die Organisation, deren vorrangiges Ziel die Forschung in Verbindung mit Lehre ist, und die wissenschaftliche Forschung oder die Forschung in Verbindung mit Lehre ist, und die

Or. de

Amendment 499 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

‘research organisation’ means a university, a ‘educational establishment' means a school, research institute or any other organisation the college, university, a research institute or any primary goal of which is to conduct scientific other organisation with the primary goal of research or to conduct scientific research and providing educational services. provide educational services:

Or. en

Amendment 500 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

‘research organisation’ means a university, a ‘research organisation’ means a university, a research institute or any other organisation the research institute or any other organisation the primary goal of which is to conduct scientific primary goal of which is to conduct and support research or to conduct scientific research and scientific research or to conduct scientific provide educational services: research and provide educational services:

Or. en

Amendment 501 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

„научна организация“ означава университет, „научна организация“ означава университет, научен институт или друга организация, научен институт или друга организация, чиято основна цел е да извършва научни чиято основна цел е да извършва научни изследвания или да извършва научни изследвания или да извършва и подкрепя изследвания и да предоставя образователни научни изследвания и да предоставя услуги: образователни услуги:

Or. bg

Amendment 502 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) on a non-for-profit basis or by reinvesting deleted all the profits in its scientific research; or

Or. en

Amendment 503 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) on a non-for-profit basis or by reinvesting all (a) on a non-for-profit basis or by reinvesting all the profits in its scientific research; or the profits in its educational activities; or

Or. en

Amendment 504 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a a) "person" means a public or private entity

or an individual.

Or. en

Amendment 505 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) pursuant to a public interest mission deleted recognised by a Member State;

Or. en

Amendment 506 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

in such a way that the access to the results deleted generated by the scientific research cannot be enjoyed on a preferential basis by an undertaking exercising a decisive influence upon such organisation;

Or. en

Amendment 507 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

in such a way that the access to the results deleted generated by the scientific research cannot be enjoyed on a preferential basis by an undertaking exercising a decisive influence upon such organisation;

Or. en

Amendment 508 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

in such a way that the access to the results in such a way that the access to the results generated by the scientific research cannot be generated by the scientific research cannot be enjoyed on a preferential basis by an enjoyed on a preferential basis by an undertaking exercising a decisive influence undertaking exercising a significant influence upon such organisation; upon such organisation;

Or. en

Amendment 509 Tadeusz Zwiefka

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2) ‘text and data mining’ means any deleted automated analytical technique aiming to analyse text and data in digital form in order to generate information such as patterns, trends and correlations;

Or. en

Amendment 510 Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2) ‘text and data mining’ means any automated (2) 'text and data mining' means any analytical technique aiming to analyse text and computational technique which analyses works data in digital form in order to generate and other subject matter in digital form in order information such as patterns, trends and to generate information including, but not correlations; limited to, inferences, insights, attributes, patterns, trends and correlations;

Or. en

Amendment 511 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2) ‘text and data mining’ means any automated (2) 'text and data mining' means any automated analytical technique aiming to analyse text and analytical technique which analyses works and data in digital form in order to generate other subject matter in digital form in order to information such as patterns, trends and generate information, including, but not limited correlations; to, patterns, trends and correlations.

Or. en

Amendment 512 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2) «fouille de textes et de données», toute (2) «fouille de textes », toute technique technique d'analyse automatisée visant à d'analyse automatisée visant à analyser des analyser des textes et des données sous forme textes sous forme numérique afin d'en dégager numérique afin d'en dégager des informations des informations telles que des constantes, des telles que des constantes, des tendances et des tendances et des corrélations; corrélations;

Or. fr

Amendment 513 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(2 a) "beneficiary" means any individual or entity, public or private, with lawful access to content

;

Or. en

Amendment 514 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3) ‘cultural heritage institution’ means a (3) ‘cultural heritage institution’ means publicly publicly accessible library or museum, an accessible libraries, educational establishments archive or a film or audio heritage institution; and museums, as well as archives, film or audio heritage institutions and public-service broadcasting organisations;

Or. en

Amendment 515 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3) ‘cultural heritage institution’ means a (3) ‘cultural heritage institution’ means a publicly accessible library or museum, an publicly accessible library, gallery or museum, archive or a film or audio heritage institution; an archive or a film or audio heritage institution or public broadcaster;

Or. en

Amendment 516 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3 a) 'public domain' means the status of a work or other subject matter when the copyright and related rights therein : (a) have expired, or

(b) have never existed, or

(c) have been voluntarily relinquished by rightholders;

Or. en

Amendment 517 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(3 a) "user generated content" means an image, a set of moving images with or without sound, a phonogram, text, software, data, or a combination of the above, which is uploaded to an online service by one or more users;

Or. en

Amendment 518 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4) ‘press publication’ means a fixation of a deleted collection of literary works of a journalistic nature, which may also comprise other works or subject-matter and constitutes an individual item within a periodical or regularly-updated publication under a single title, such as a newspaper or a general or special interest magazine, having the purpose of providing information related to news or other topics and published in any media under the initiative, editorial responsibility and control of a service provider.

Or. en

Amendment 519 Julia Reda, Isabella Adinolfi, Max Andersson, Petras Auštrevičius, Brando Benifei, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, David Borrelli, Klaus Buchner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Matt Carthy, Daniel Dalton, Fabio De Masi, Pascal Durand, Stefan Eck, Bas Eickhout, Cornelia Ernst, Fredrick Federley, Laura Ferrara, Thomas Händel, Benedek Jávor, Kaja Kallas, Ska Keller, Kostadinka Kuneva, Merja Kyllönen, Philippe Lamberts, Marju Lauristin, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Jiří Maštálka, Martina Michels, Jozo Radoš, Evelyn Regner, Michel Reimon, Terry Reintke, Judith Sargentini, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Molly Scott Cato, Davor Škrlec, Igor Šoltes, Dario Tamburrano, Indrek Tarand, Yana Toom, Ernest Urtasun, Bodil Valero, Monika Vana, Sophia in 't Veld, Josef Weidenholzer, Gabriele Zimmer, Laura Agea, Luke Ming Flanagan, Yannick Jadot, Nessa Childers, Rosa D'Amato, Marco Valli, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Florent Marcellesi

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4) ‘press publication’ means a fixation of a deleted collection of literary works of a journalistic nature, which may also comprise other works or subject-matter and constitutes an individual item within a periodical or regularly-updated publication under a single title, such as a newspaper or a general or special interest magazine, having the purpose of providing information related to news or other topics and published in any media under the initiative, editorial responsibility and control of a service provider.

Or. en

Amendment 520 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4) ‘press publication’ means a fixation of a deleted collection of literary works of a journalistic nature, which may also comprise other works or subject-matter and constitutes an individual item within a periodical or regularly-updated publication under a single title, such as a newspaper or a general or special interest magazine, having the purpose of providing information related to news or other topics and published in any media under the initiative, editorial responsibility and control of a service provider.

Or. en

Justification

The planned new neighbouring right would make a distinction between different types of journalistic publications and it would not be based on whether such publications are protected by copyright, but on certain other criteria.

Amendment 521 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4) ‘press publication’ means a fixation of a deleted collection of literary works of a journalistic nature, which may also comprise other works or subject-matter and constitutes an individual item within a periodical or regularly-updated publication under a single title, such as a newspaper or a general or special interest magazine, having the purpose of providing information related to news or other topics and published in any media under the initiative, editorial responsibility and control of a service provider.

Or. en

Amendment 522 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4) „Presseveröffentlichung“: Aufzeichnung (4) „Presseveröffentlichung“: Aufzeichnung einer Sammlung literarischer Werke einer Sammlung literarischer Werke journalistischer Art, die auch sonstige Werke journalistischer Art, die von einem oder oder Schutzgegenstände beinhalten kann und mehreren Urhebern erstellt wurde, und die innerhalb einer unter einem einheitlichen Titel auch sonstige Werke oder Schutzgegenstände periodisch oder regelmäßig erscheinenden beinhalten kann und innerhalb einer unter einem Veröffentlichung, wie Zeitungen oder Magazine einheitlichen Titel periodisch oder regelmäßig von allgemeinem oder besonderem Interesse, erscheinenden Veröffentlichung, wie Zeitungen eine Einzelausgabe darstellt und dem Zweck oder Magazine von allgemeinem oder dient, über Nachrichten oder andere Themen zu besonderem Interesse, eine Einzelausgabe informieren, und die, unabhängig vom Medium, darstellt und dem Zweck dient, über auf Initiative sowie unter der redaktionellen Nachrichten oder andere Themen zu Verantwortung und der Aufsicht eines informieren, und die, unabhängig vom Medium, Diensteanbieters veröffentlicht wird. auf Initiative sowie unter der redaktionellen Verantwortung und der Aufsicht eines Diensteanbieters veröffentlicht wird.

Or. de

Amendment 523 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4 a) 'Out of commerce work' means a work or other subject-matter that is not available to the public through customary channels of commerce, and it refers to both works that have previously been available commercially and works that have never been commercially available;

Or. en

Amendment 524 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4 a) 'significant amount' means fairly large in quantity or relevant in quality in the sense of importance of the uploaded copyright protected works for the creative sector or the users;

Or. en

Amendment 525 Enrico Gasbarra, Luigi Morgano, Silvia Costa

Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(4 a) "lawful access" means access to content

acquired with the consent of the rightholder;

Or. en

Amendment 526 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 2 bis (5) « accès légal », accès à un contenu acquis dans le respect de la législation en vigueur;

Or. fr

Amendment 527 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 2 ter (6) « service automatisé de référencement d'images », tout service en ligne dans le cadre duquel sont reproduits ou mis à disposition du public, à des fins d'indexation et

de référencement, des oeuvres graphiques, plastiques ou photographiques collectées de manière automatisée à partir de service en ligne tiers.

Or. fr

Amendment 528 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Title 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

MESURES VISANT À ADAPTER LES MESURES VISANT À ADAPTER LES EXCEPTIONS ET LIMITATIONS À EXCEPTIONS ET LIMITATIONS À L'ENVIRONNEMENT NUMÉRIQUE ET L'ENVIRONNEMENT NUMÉRIQUE TRANSFRONTIÈRE

Or. fr

Amendment 529 Tadeusz Zwiefka

Proposal for a directive Article 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 3 deleted

Text and data mining

1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to carry out text and data mining of works or other subject-matter to which they have lawful access for the purposes of scientific research.

2. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in paragraph 1 shall be unenforceable.

3. Rightholders shall be allowed to apply measures to ensure the security and integrity of the networks and databases where the works or other subject-matter are hosted. Such measures shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.

4. Member States shall encourage rightholders and research organisations to define commonly-agreed best practices concerning the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 3.

Or. en

Justification

The potential of content mining techniques should be recognized and should contribute to breakthroughs in research. Stakeholders should collaborate to create and improve user-friendly platforms to facilitate the access to text and data mining licences and material. Universities and research facilities are already granted free licences to screen texts and search for data. The commercial use of TDM seems to be regulated by the market, therefore there is no need to introduce the new exception which add no value to the already existed practice.

Amendment 530 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Fouille de textes et de données Fouille de textes

Or. fr

Amendment 531 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to made by research organisations. carry out text and data mining of works or other subject-matter to which they have lawful access for the purposes of scientific research.

Or. en

Amendment 532 Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2, 3 and 4 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to made by any natural or legal person in order to carry out text and data mining of works or other carry out text and data mining of works or other subject-matter to which they have lawful access subject matter to which the person performing for the purposes of scientific research. such acts has lawful access, and for the incidental inclusion of such works and other subject matter in other material in accordance with fair practice.

Or. en

Amendment 533 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to made in order to carry out text and data mining carry out text and data mining of works or other of works or other subject-matter to which they subject-matter to which they have lawful access have lawful access for non-commercial for the purposes of scientific research. research purposes. Member States may continue to provide text and data mining exceptions in accordance with Article 5 (3) (a) of Directive 2001/29/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 534 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to carry made by research organisations, public libraries out text and data mining of works or other and cultural heritage institutions in order to subject-matter to which they have lawful access carry out text and data mining of works or other for the purposes of scientific research. subject-matter to which they have acquired lawful access for the sole purposes of scientific research.

Or. en

Justification

Libraries with a public mandate and cultural heritage institutions should equally benefit from the exception if they are using the possibility of text and data mining for scientific research purposes. A reference to the concept of Article 5 of the Software Directive 2009/24//EC seems appropriate to limit the application to content which is acquired in a lawful manner.

Amendment 535 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Les États membres prévoient une exception 1. Les États membres prévoient une exception aux droits visés à l'article 2 de la directive aux droits visés à l'article 2 de la directive 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à l'article 7, 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, et à paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, et à l'article 11, paragraphe 1, de la présente l'article 11, paragraphe 1, de la présente directive pour les reproductions et extractions directive pour les reproductions et extractions effectuées par des organismes de recherche, en effectuées par des organismes de recherche, en vue de procéder à une fouille de textes et de vue de procéder à une fouille de textes et de données sur des œuvres ou autres objets données sur des œuvres ou autres objets protégés auxquels ils ont légitimement accès à protégés avec le consentement des ayant droits des fins de recherche scientifique. auxquels ils ont légitimement accès à des fins non commerciales de recherche scientifique.

Or. fr

Amendment 536 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC, Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive and Article 4(1)(a) of Directive made by research organisations in order to 2009/24/EC for reproductions and extractions carry out text and data mining of works or other made by persons or legal entities in order to subject-matter to which they have lawful access carry out text and data mining of works or other for the purposes of scientific research. subject-matter to which they have authorised access for the purposes of scientific research.

Or. en

Amendment 537 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to carry made by research organisations in order to carry out text and data mining of works or other out text and data mining of works or other subject-matter to which they have lawful access subject-matter to which they have acquired for the purposes of scientific research. lawful licence-based access for the purposes of non-commercial scientific research.

Or. en

Amendment 538 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to made in order to carry out text and data mining carry out text and data mining of works or other of works or other subject-matter. This includes, subject-matter to which they have lawful access for the sole purpose of text and data mining, for the purposes of scientific research. the permission to extract contents of databases and to make reproductions.

Or. en

Amendment 539 Jytte Guteland

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to carry made by research organisations and cultural out text and data mining of works or other heritage institutions in order to carry out text subject-matter to which they have lawful access and data mining of works or other subject- for the purposes of scientific research. matter to which they have lawful access for the purposes of scientific research.

Or. en

Justification

The proposal to introduce a mandatory exemptionfor text and data mining is positive and recognize the great potential in this area in terms of research and innovation. This proposal should however be extended to cultural heritage institutions that act on behalf of the public interest.

Amendment 540 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Die Mitgliedstaaten sehen eine Ausnahme 1. Die Mitgliedstaaten sehen eine Ausnahme von den in Artikel 2 der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG von den in Artikel 2 der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG und in Artikel 5 Buchstabe a und Artikel 7 und in Artikel 5 Buchstabe a und Artikel 7 Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 96/9/EG sowie in Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 96/9/EG sowie in Artikel 11 Absatz 1 dieser Richtlinie Artikel 11 Absatz 1 dieser Richtlinie festgelegten Rechten für Vervielfältigungen und festgelegten Rechten für Vervielfältigungen und Entnahmen vor, die durch Entnahmen vor, die durch Forschungsorganisationen von Werken oder Forschungsorganisationen von Werken oder sonstigen Schutzgegenständen, zu denen sie für sonstigen Schutzgegenständen, zu denen sie für die Zwecke der wissenschaftlichen Forschung die Zwecke der nicht-kommerziellen Nutzung, rechtmäßig Zugang haben, für das Text- und wie z. B. der wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Data-Mining vorgenommen wurden. rechtmäßig Zugang haben, für das Text- und Data-Mining vorgenommen wurden.

Or. de

Amendment 541 Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions made by research organisations in order to carry made by research organisations in order to carry out text and data mining of works or other out text and data mining of works or other subject-matter to which they have lawful access subject-matter to which they have acquired for the purposes of scientific research. lawful access for the purposes of scientific research.

Or. en

Amendment 542 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions in made by research organisations in order to order to carry out text and data mining of works carry out text and data mining of works or other or other subject-matter to which a lawful access subject-matter to which they have lawful access is acquired for the sole purpose of text and for the purposes of scientific research. data mining.

Or. en

Amendment 543 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Articles 2, 3 and 4 Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this of Directive 96/9/EC, and Article 11(1) of this Directive for reproductions and extractions Directive for reproductions and extractions, made by research organisations in order to made in order to carry out text and data mining carry out text and data mining of works or other of works or other subject-matter as long as the subject-matter to which they have lawful access body performing these acts has lawful access. for the purposes of scientific research.

Or. en

Amendment 544 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Les États membres prévoient une exception 1. Les États membres peuvent prévoir une aux droits visés à l'article 2 de la directive exception aux droits visés à l'article 2 de la 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à l'article 7, directive 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, et à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, l'article 11, paragraphe 1, de la présente et à l'article 11, paragraphe 1, de la présente directive pour les reproductions et extractions directive pour les reproductions et extractions effectuées par des organismes de recherche, en effectuées par des organismes de recherche, en vue de procéder à une fouille de textes et de vue de procéder à une fouille de textes sur des données sur des œuvres ou autres objets œuvres ou autres objets protégés auxquels ils protégés auxquels ils ont légitimement accès à ont légitimement accès à des fins de recherche des fins de recherche scientifique. scientifique..

Or. fr

Amendment 545 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4 (1) of Directive Directive for reproductions and extractions 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive made by research organisations in order to carry for reproductions and extractions made by out text and data mining of works or other research organisations in order to carry out text subject-matter to which they have lawful access and data mining of works or other subject- for the purposes of scientific research. matter lawfully accessed.

Or. en

Amendment 546 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States shall encourage rightholders who market works or other subject- matter primarily for research purposes, to allow research organisations, not having lawful access to those works or other subject - matter to access datasets that enable them to carry out only text and data mining. Member States may also provide for rightholders to have a right to request

compensation for meeting this obligation as long as this compensation is reasonable. Member States shall promote stakeholder dialogue between the rightholders for other formats and types of content, research organisations and representatives of users in order to promote meaningful access to usable information for text and data mining elsewhere.

Or. en

Amendment 547 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States shall provide for rightholders who market works or other subject-matter primarily for research purposes, to have an obligation to allow research organisations not having lawful access to those works or other subject-matter access to datasets that are optimised for enabling them to carry out text and data mining on all aspects of the works. Member States may also provide for rightholders to have a right to request compensation for meeting this obligation as long as that compensation is related to the cost of formatting these datasets and does not exceed what is necessary and appropriate to cover those costs.

Or. en

Amendment 548 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Any contractual provision contrary to the 2. Any contractual provision or legal protection exception provided for in paragraph 1 shall be of technological measures contrary to the unenforceable. exception provided for in paragraph 1 shall be unenforceable.

Or. en

Amendment 549 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. Kopien der gemäß den Bestimmungen des Absatz 1 erhaltenen Inhalte können für die Dauer der Forschungsarbeiten gespeichert und auf sichere Weise aufbewahrt werden. Forschungsorganisationen löschen die zum Zweck der Text- und Data-Mining vervielfältigten Inhalte, sobald alle für die Forschung erforderlichen Handlungen durchgeführt wurden.

Or. de

Amendment 550 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. Research organisations shall delete the reproductions of the works or other subject- matter made pursuant to paragraph 1 once the

text and data mining acts necessary for the purposes of scientific research have been carried out.

Or. en

Justification

The dissemination of protected works shall be avoided.

Amendment 551 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Rightholders shall be allowed to apply 3. Rightholders shall not be allowed to apply measures to ensure the security and integrity of measures to prevent or hinder beneficiaries the networks and databases where the works or from benefiting from the exception provided other subject-matter are hosted. Such measures for in paragraph 1, unless such measures are shall not go beyond what is necessary to to ensure the security and integrity of the achieve that objective. networks and databases where the works or other subject-matter are hosted may be applied. Such measures shall not exceed what is necessary to pursue the objective of ensuring the security of the system and shall not undermine the effective application of the exception. These measures shall not prevent or unreasonably restrict the ability to text and data mine or the ability to develop text and data mining tools different from those offered by the right holders as long as the security of the networks and databases are protected.

Or. en

Amendment 552 Laura Ferrara, Isabella Adinolfi, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Rightholders shall be allowed to apply 3. Rightholders shall not be allowed to apply measures to ensure the security and integrity of technological measures to prevent or hinder the networks and databases where the works or beneficiaries from benefiting from the other subject-matter are hosted. Such measures exception provided for in paragraph 1, unless shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve to ensure the security and integrity of the that objective. networks and databases where the works or other subject-matter are hosted. Such measures shall be transparent, non-discriminatory, proportionate, shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective and be justified by objective reasons.

Or. en

Amendment 553 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Rightholders shall be allowed to apply 3. Rightholders shall not be allowed to apply measures to ensure the security and integrity of technological measures to prevent or hinder the networks and databases where the works or beneficiaries from benefiting from the other subject-matter are hosted. Such measures exception provided for in paragraph 1, unless shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve to ensure the security and integrity of the that objective. networks and databases where the works or other subject-matter are hosted. Such measures shall be transparent, non-discriminatory, proportionate and shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.

Or. en

Amendment 554 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Rightholders shall be allowed to apply 3. Rightholders shall not be allowed to apply measures to ensure the security and integrity of measures to technologically limit the right to the networks and databases where the works or exercise the exception adopted pursuant to other subject-matter are hosted. Such paragraph 1. measures shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.

Or. en

Amendment 555 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Rightholders shall be allowed to apply 3. Rightholders shall not be allowed to apply measures to ensure the security and integrity of measures to prevent or to hinder beneficiaries the networks and databases where the works or from benefiting from the exception provided in other subject-matter are hosted. Such paragraph 1 measures shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.

Or. en

Amendment 556 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3 a. Copies of content obtained for mining text and data shall be stored or preserved in a controlled and protected way, for a reasonable period of time, in the sole purpose of

verification of results. Any copies of content obtained for mining text and data which are stored or preserved for longer than what is reasonable, shall constitute infringing copies.

Or. en

Amendment 557 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States shall encourage rightholders 4. Member States shall encourage rightholders and research organisations to define and beneficiaries to define commonly-agreed commonly-agreed best practices concerning the best practices across the Union concerning the application of the measures referred to in development of technologies implementing the paragraph 3. exception provided for in paragraph 1 as well as the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 3. These best practices shall be made easily and effectively accessible to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 558 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States shall encourage rightholders 4. Member States shall encourage rightholders and research organisations to define and educational establishments to define commonly-agreed best practices concerning the commonly-agreed best practices concerning the application of the measures referred to in application of the measures referred to in paragraph 3. paragraph 3.

Or. en

Amendment 559 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States shall encourage rightholders 4. Member States shall designate a facility to and research organisations to define safely store datasets used for text and data commonly-agreed best practices concerning mining and to make them accessible for the application of the measures referred to in verification purposes. paragraph 3.

Or. en

Amendment 560 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States shall encourage rightholders 4. Member States shall encourage rightholders and research organisations to define to make technological measures that might commonly-agreed best practices concerning have an impact upon use of the exception the application of the measures referred to in provided for in paragraph 1, transparent to the paragraph 3. public.

Or. en

Amendment 561 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States shall encourage rightholders 4. Member States shall encourage rightholders and research organisations to define and beneficiaries to define commonly-agreed commonly-agreed best practices concerning the best practices concerning the application of the application of the measures referred to in measures referred to in paragraph 3. paragraph 3.

Or. en

Amendment 562 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4 a. Reproducerile de opere sau alte obiecte protejate, efectuate în conformitate cu alineatul 1, trebuie depozitate în condiții de siguranță împotriva accesului neautorizat pentru perioada necesară efectuării extragerii de text și date, necesare în scopul cercetării științifice și trebuie șterse la finalizarea procesului. Orice reproduceri de opere sau alte obiecte protejate, obținute pentru extragerea textului și a datelor, care sunt depozitate sau conservate pentru o perioadă de timp mai îndelungată decât este necesar sunt considerate copii contrafăcute.

Or. ro

Amendment 563 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Joëlle Bergeron, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4 bis. Les copies du contenu accessible dans le cadre de la fouille de textes et de données doivent être conservées de manière sécurisée. Elles ne peuvent être ni stockées ni conservées sous quelque forme que ce soit au-delà de la fin du projet nécessitant la fouille de textes et de données. Toute copie conservée ou stockée plus de 6 mois après la fin du projet sera considérée comme une copie illicite.

Or. fr

Amendment 564 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4 a. Research data, including research articles, produced with public funding shall be made available in an open format optimised for enabling text and data mining, without licence restrictions on the re-use of such data.

Or. en

Amendment 565 Jiří Maštálka

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4 a. Member States shall designate a facility to store scientific datasets used in research by text and data mining technologies securely and to make such datasets accessible only for verification purposes.

Or. en

Amendment 566 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4 a. Member States may provide for fair compensation for the harm incurred by

rightholders due to the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1.

Or. en

Justification

Such an approach could also consider the differences between the Member States in this area and would leave them a possibility to adjust their system even after the implementation of the Directive, according to future experiences and developments.

Amendment 567 Laura Ferrara, Isabella Adinolfi, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 3 bis Diritto di prelievo per copia privata Gli Stati Membri provvedono a disciplinare il diritto di prelievo per copia privata in maniera tale da informare i cittadini sull'entità effettiva, sulle finalità e sulle modalità di utilizzazione del prelievo.

Or. it

Amendment 568 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of works and other subject-matter in digital Use of works and other subject-matter in digital and cross-border teaching activities and cross-border teaching activities and scientific research

Or. en

Amendment 569 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of works and other subject-matter in digital Use of works and other subject-matter in and cross-border teaching activities teaching activities

Or. en

Amendment 570 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of works and other subject-matter in digital Use of works and other subject-matter in and cross-border teaching activities research and education activities

Or. en

Amendment 571 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Utilisation d'œuvres et d'autres objets protégés Utilisation d'œuvres et d'autres objets protégés dans le cadre d'activités d'enseignement dans le cadre d'activités d'enseignement numériques et transfrontières numériques

Or. fr

Amendment 572 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- for the digital use of works and other subject- matter for the sole purpose of illustration for matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching, to the extent justified by the non- teaching or scientific research, including commercial purpose to be achieved, provided private study, to the extent justified by the non- that the use: commercial purpose to be achieved, provided that the use is accompanied by the indication of the source, including the author's name, unless this turns out to be impossible.

Or. en

Amendment 573 Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- for the digital use of works and other subject- matter for the sole purpose of illustration for matter, or extracts of it, with the exception of teaching, to the extent justified by the non- sheet music and materials primarily intended commercial purpose to be achieved, provided for the educative market, for the sole purpose that the use: of illustration for teaching, to the extent and duration justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, provided that the use:

Or. en

Amendment 574 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella, Robert Rochefort

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- for the digital use of works and other subject- matter for the sole purpose of illustration for matter or extract thereof, except for contents teaching, to the extent justified by the non- that are primarily intended to the educational commercial purpose to be achieved, provided and musical scores markets, for the sole that the use: purpose of illustration for teaching, to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, provided that the use:

Or. en

Amendment 575 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- for the use of works and other subject-matter for matter for the sole purpose of illustration for the sole purpose of research and education, teaching, to the extent justified by the non- provided that the use: commercial purpose to be achieved, provided that the use:

Or. en

Amendment 576 Josef Weidenholzer, Evelyn Regner

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- for the digital use of works and other subject- matter for the sole purpose of illustration for matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching, to the extent justified by the non- teaching, provided that the use: commercial purpose to be achieved, provided that the use:

Or. en

Amendment 577 Jean-Marie Cavada, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Les États membres prévoient une exception 1. Les États membres prévoient une exception ou une limitation aux droits visés aux articles 2 ou une limitation aux droits visés aux articles 2 et 3 de la directive 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, et 3 de la directive 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de la point a), et à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, à l'article 4, paragraphe 1, directive 96/9/CE, à et à l'article 11, paragraphe de la directive 2009/24/CE et à l'article 11, 1, de la présente directive pour permettre paragraphe 1, de la présente directive pour l'utilisation numérique des œuvres et autres permettre l'utilisation numérique des œuvres et objets protégés à seule fin d'illustration dans le autres objets protégés à seule fin d'illustration cadre de l'enseignement, dans la mesure dans le cadre de l'enseignement, dans la mesure justifiée par l'objectif non commercial à justifiée par l'objectif non commercial à atteindre, à condition que cette utilisation: atteindre, à condition que cette utilisation:

Or. fr

Amendment 578 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Държавите членки предвиждат 1. Държавите членки предвиждат изключение или ограничение за правата, изключение или ограничение за правата, посочени в членове 2 и 3 от Директива посочени в членове 2 и 3 от Директива 2001/29/ЕО, член 5, буква а) и член 7, 2001/29/ЕО, член 5, буква а) и член 7, параграф 1 от Директива 96/9/ЕО, член 4, параграф 1 от Директива 96/9/ЕО, член 4, параграф 1 от Директива 2009/24/ЕО и член параграф 1 от Директива 2009/24/ЕО и член 11, параграф 1 от настоящата директива, за 11, параграф 1 от настоящата директива, за да позволят цифровото използване на да позволят цифровото използване на произведенията и другите обекти единствено произведенията и другите обекти единствено за целите на илюстрирането при преподаване за целите на илюстрирането при преподаване до степен, която е оправдана от или научни изследвания до степен, която е предвиденото нетърговско предназначение, оправдана от предвиденото нетърговско при условие че това използване: предназначение, при условие че това използване:

Or. bg

Amendment 579 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- for the digital use of works and other subject- matter for the sole purpose of illustration for matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching, to the extent justified by the non- teaching or scientific reasearch, to the extent commercial purpose to be achieved, provided justified by the non-commercial purpose to be that the use: achieved, provided that the use:

Or. en

Amendment 580 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marju Lauristin

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- for the digital use of works and other subject- matter for the sole purpose of illustration for matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching, to the extent justified by the non- teaching or scientific research, to the extent commercial purpose to be achieved, provided justified by the non-commercial purpose to be that the use: achieved, provided that the use:

Or. en

Amendment 581 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Les États membres prévoient une exception 1. Les États membres prévoient une exception ou une limitation aux droits visés aux articles 2 ou une limitation aux droits visés aux articles 2 et 3 de la directive 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, et 3 de la directive 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de la point a), et à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, à l'article 4, paragraphe 1, de directive 96/9/CE, à l'article 4, paragraphe 1, de la directive 2009/24/CE et à l'article 11, la directive 2009/24/CE et à l'article 11, paragraphe 1, de la présente directive pour paragraphe 1, de la présente directive pour permettre l'utilisation numérique des œuvres et permettre l'utilisation numérique d'extraits autres objets protégés à seule fin d'illustration d'œuvres et autres objets protégés à seule fin dans le cadre de l'enseignement, dans la mesure d'illustration dans le cadre de l'enseignement, justifiée par l'objectif non commercial à dans la mesure justifiée par l'objectif non atteindre, à condition que cette utilisation: commercial à atteindre, à condition que cette utilisation:

Or. fr

Amendment 582 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for an exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of works and other subject- for the digital use of works and other subject- matter for the sole purpose of illustration for matter for educational purposes, to the extent teaching, to the extent justified by the non- justified by the non-commercial purpose to be commercial purpose to be achieved, provided achieved, provided that the use: that the use:

Or. en

Amendment 583 Enrico Gasbarra, Luigi Morgano, Silvia Costa

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

-a is limited, for written works, printed and digital, to short parts of a work or small scale works and individual articles from newspapers and periodicals which are not made available individually and separately by right holders,

Or. en

Amendment 584 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

-a soit limitée, pour les œuvres écrites, imprimées et numériques, à de courts extraits ou à de petites œuvres ;

Or. fr

Amendment 585 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) takes place on the premises of an deleted educational establishment or through a secure electronic network accessible only by the educational establishment's pupils or students and teaching staff;

Or. en

Amendment 586 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) takes place on the premises of an deleted educational establishment or through a secure electronic network accessible only by the educational establishment's pupils or students and teaching staff;

Or. en

Amendment 587 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) takes place on the premises of an educational (a) takes place on the premises of an educational establishment or through a secure electronic establishment or a cultural heritage institution network accessible only by the educational through a secure electronic network accessible establishment's pupils or students and teaching only by the educational establishment's pupils or staff; students and teaching staff or registered members of a cultural heritage institution who are enrolled into the non-formal education activities provided by a cultural heritage institution;

Or. en

Amendment 588 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) ait lieu dans les locaux d'un établissement (a) ait lieu dans les locaux d'un établissement d'enseignement ou au moyen d'un réseau d'enseignement ou au moyen d'un réseau électronique sécurisé accessible uniquement aux électronique sécurisé accessible uniquement aux élèves, aux étudiants et au personnel enseignant élèves, aux étudiants et au personnel enseignant de cet établissement; de cet établissement, et pour la durée nécessaire à l'illustration du cours.

Or. fr

Amendment 589 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) ait lieu dans les locaux d'un établissement (a) se déroule sur les lieux où se déroulent les d'enseignement ou au moyen d'un réseau activités d'enseignement d'un établissement électronique sécurisé accessible uniquement aux d'enseignement reconnu par l'État membre élèves, aux étudiants et au personnel enseignant dans lequel il est établi ou par un réseau de cet établissement; électronique sécurisé accessible uniquement aux élèves ou aux étudiants et au personnel enseignant de l'établissement d'enseignement;

Or. fr

Amendment 590 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) takes place on the premises of an educational (a) takes place on the premises of an educational establishment or through a secure electronic establishment or other educational venue, such network accessible only by the educational as cultural heritage institutions, research establishment's pupils or students and teaching organizations, or through a secure electronic staff; network accessible only by the educational establishment's pupils or students and teaching staff;

Or. en

Amendment 591 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marju Lauristin, Mary Honeyball

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) takes place on the premises of an educational (a) takes place on the premises of an educational establishment or through a secure electronic establishment or other educational venue, such network accessible only by the educational as cultural heritage institutions, or through a establishment's pupils or students and teaching secure electronic network accessible only by the staff; educational establishment's pupils or students and teaching staff;

Or. en

Amendment 592 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) takes place on the premises of an educational (a) takes place on the premises of an educational establishment or through a secure electronic establishment or through a secure electronic network accessible only by the educational network, including through a secure network establishment's pupils or students and teaching access by the dedicated users on their own staff; devices, accessible only by the educational establishment's pupils or students and teaching staff;

Or. en

Justification

Already Directive 2001/29/EC allows for access at “dedicated terminals”. This approach needs modernisation.

Amendment 593 Enrico Gasbarra, Luigi Morgano, Silvia Costa

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) takes place on the premises of an educational (a) takes place on the premises of an educational establishment or through a secure electronic establishment or through a secure electronic network accessible only by the educational network accessible only by the educational establishment's pupils or students and teaching establishment's pupils or students and teaching staff; staff directly involved in the teaching activities where the work is being used;

Or. en

Amendment 594 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point а

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

а) се осъществява в помещенията на а) се ограничава до специфичната група образователна институция или чрез лица, участващи в преподавателската сигурна електронна мрежа, достъпна дейност, например учениците или единствено за учениците или студентите и студентите и преподавателите или преподавателите от тази образователна регистрирани членове на институция за институция; културно наследство, ангажирани с неформално образование;

Or. bg

Amendment 595 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) takes place on the premises of an educational (a) takes place on the premises of an educational establishment or through a secure electronic establishment or on the premises of an entity network accessible only by the educational providing educational activities or through a establishment's pupils or students and secure electronic communications network; teaching staff;

Or. en

Amendment 596 Enrico Gasbarra, Luigi Morgano, Silvia Costa

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a a) is limited to the duration justified by the

illustrative purpose;

Or. en

Amendment 597 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) is accompanied by the indication of the deleted source, including the author's name, unless this turns out to be impossible.

Or. en

Amendment 598 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) s'accompagne d'une indication de la source, (b) soit limitée aux courts extraits d'œuvres notamment le nom de l'auteur, sauf si cela écrites imprimées et numériques, d'oeuvres s'avère impossible. éditées en petit nombre, aux articles individuels de journaux et de périodiques qui ne soient pas accessibles individuellement et séparément par les ayant droit et s'accompagne d'une indication de la source, notamment le nom de l'auteur sauf si cela s'avère impossible

Or. fr

Amendment 599 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) is accompanied by the indication of the (b) is accompanied by the indication of the source, including the author's name, unless this source, including the author's name, unless this turns out to be impossible. cannot be ascertained without disproportionate effort.

Or. en

Justification

In order not to allow too much bureaucracy the introduction of an effort limitation seems adequate.

Amendment 600 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) s'accompagne d'une indication de la (b) soit accompagnée de l'indication de la source, notamment le nom de l'auteur, sauf si source, y compris du nom de l'auteur, sauf si cela s'avère impossible. cela s'avère impossible.

Or. fr

Amendment 601 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

L'exception prévue au paragraphe 1 doit pouvoir permettre l'accès au cours de manière numérique tant dans le pays où se situe l'établissement où est donné le cours que dans celui où se trouve l'élève.

Or. fr

Amendment 602 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 bis. Toute disposition contractuelle contraire à l'exception prévue au paragraphe 1 est inapplicable. L'exception prévue au paragraphe 1 ne s'applique pas aux cas où des licences sont disponibles.

Or. fr

Amendment 603 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States shall provide that any contractual provision contrary to the exception

or limitation adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be unenforceable.

Or. en

Amendment 604 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in paragraph 1 shall be null and void.

Or. en

Amendment 605 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. deleted

Member States may provide that the exception adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply generally or as regards specific types of works or other subject- matter, to the extent that adequate licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 are easily available in the market.

Member States availing themselves of the provision of the first subparagraph shall take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate availability and visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for educational establishments.

Or. en

Amendment 606 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that the exception deleted adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply generally or as regards specific types of works or other subject-matter, to the extent that adequate licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 are easily available in the market.

Or. en

Amendment 607 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that the exception deleted adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply generally or as regards specific types of works or other subject-matter, to the extent that adequate licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 are easily available in the market.

Or. en

Amendment 608 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that the exception deleted adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply generally or as regards specific types of works or other subject-matter, to the extent that adequate licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 are easily available in the market.

Or. en

Amendment 609 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that the exception Any contractual provision contrary to the adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not exception provided for in paragraph 1 shall be apply generally or as regards specific types of unenforceable works or other subject-matter, to the extent that adequate licences authorising the acts . described in paragraph 1 are easily available in the market.

Or. en

Amendment 610 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Statele membre pot prevedea că excepția Statele membre pot prevedea că excepția prevăzută la alineatul (1) nu se aplică în general prevăzută la alineatul (1) nu se aplică în general sau în cazul anumitor tipuri de opere sau alte sau în cazul anumitor tipuri de opere sau alte obiecte protejate, în măsura în care pe piață sunt obiecte protejate, în măsura în care pe piață sunt disponibile cu ușurință licențe adecvate de disponibile cu ușurință licențe adecvate de autorizare a actelor descrise la alineatul (1). autorizare a actelor descrise la alineatul (1), care sunt adaptate nevoilor și particularităților instituțiilor de învățământ.

Or. ro

Amendment 611 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les États membres peuvent prévoir que Les États membres prévoient que l'exception l'exception adoptée conformément au adoptée en application du paragraphe 1 ne paragraphe 1 ne s'applique pas de façon s'applique pas de manière générale ou en ce qui générale ou à certains types d'œuvres ou autres concerne des types spécifiques d'œuvres ou objets protégés, si des licences appropriées d'autres objets, dans la mesure où des licences autorisant les actes décrits au paragraphe 1 adéquates autorisant au moins les actes décrits peuvent facilement être obtenues sur le marché. au paragraphe 1 sont facilement disponibles sur le marché.

Or. fr

Amendment 612 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that the exception Member States may provide that the exception adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply generally or as regards specific types of works generally or as regards specific types of works or other subject-matter, to the extent that or other subject-matter, to the extent that adequate licences authorising the acts described adequate licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 are easily available in the in paragraph 1 are available in the market. market.

Or. en

Amendment 613 Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that the exception Member States may provide that the exception adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply generally or as regards specific types of works generally or as regards specific types of works or other subject-matter, to the extent that or other subject-matter, to the extent that adequate licences authorising the acts described licences authorising the acts described in in paragraph 1 are easily available in the paragraph 1 are available in the market. market.

Or. en

Amendment 614 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States availing themselves of the deleted provision of the first subparagraph shall take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate availability and visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for educational establishments.

Or. en

Amendment 615 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States availing themselves of the deleted provision of the first subparagraph shall take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate availability and visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for educational establishments.

Or. en

Amendment 616 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States availing themselves of the deleted provision of the first subparagraph shall take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate availability and visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for educational establishments.

Or. en

Amendment 617 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Marju Lauristin, Mary Honeyball

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States availing themselves of the Member States availing themselves of the provision of the first subparagraph shall take the provision of the first subparagraph shall take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate necessary measures to ensure appropriate availability and visibility of the licences availability and visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for educational establishments. educational establishments and cultural heritage institutions.

Or. en

Amendment 618 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States availing themselves of the Member States availing themselves of the provision of the first subparagraph shall take the provision of the first subparagraph shall take the necessary measures to ensure appropriate necessary measures to ensure appropriate availability and visibility of the licences availability and visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 for educational establishments. educational establishments and cultural heritage institutions.

Or. en

Amendment 619 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les États membres qui recourent à la Les États membres peuvent exclure de disposition du premier alinéa prennent les l'exception ou de la limitation prévue au mesures nécessaires à la disponibilité et à la paragraphe 1 les matériels principalement bonne visibilité des licences autorisant les destinés au marché de l'éducation. actes décrits au paragraphe 1 pour les établissements d'enseignement.

Or. fr

Amendment 620 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les États membres qui recourent à la Les États membres prennent les mesures disposition du premier alinéa prennent les nécessaires à la disponibilité et à la bonne mesures nécessaires à la disponibilité et à la visibilité des licences autorisant les actes décrits bonne visibilité des licences autorisant les actes au paragraphe 1 pour les établissements décrits au paragraphe 1 pour les établissements d'enseignement. d'enseignement.

Or. fr

Amendment 621 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. Aux fins de l'application du paragraphe 2, les États membres contribuent activement à assurer la disponibilité des licences autorisant au moins les actes visés au paragraphe 1, par exemple en acquérant des licences collectives pour le compte des établissements d'enseignement établis sur leur territoire ou en facilitant le dialogue entre les titulaires de droits et les établissements d'enseignement en vue d'établir des autorisations spécifiques autorisant les actes visés au paragraphe 1.

Les États membres veillent à la visibilité des licences autorisant les actes visés au paragraphe 1 par des outils appropriés, tels qu'un portail unique ou une base de données accessible aux établissements d'enseignement, où les licences disponibles sont énumérées et mises à jour.

Or. en

Amendment 622 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. For the purposes of applying paragraph 2, Member States shall actively assist in facilitating dialogue between rightholders and educational establishments with a view to establishing specific licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1. Member States may be encouraged to ensure the visibility of the licences authorising the acts described in paragraph 1 through appropriate tools, such as a single portal or database accessible to educational establishments, where the available licences shall be listed and kept up- to-date.

Or. en

Justification

The amendment would increase the accessibility of licences, however, at the same time, the decision would be left to Member States which tools they consider to be appropriate. E.g. developing a single portal or database should be carried out on a voluntary basis, since not every Member State has the capacity (or the funding) to develop such tools.

Amendment 623 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. The use of works and other subject-matter for 3. The use of works and other subject-matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching the sole purpose of illustration for teaching through secure electronic networks undertaken through secure electronic communications in compliance with the provisions of national networks undertaken in compliance with the law adopted pursuant to this Article shall be provisions of national law adopted pursuant to deemed to occur solely in the Member State this Article shall be deemed to occur solely in where the educational establishment is the Member State where the educational established. establishment or the entity providing educational activities is established.

Or. en

Amendment 624 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. The use of works and other subject-matter for 3. The use of works and other subject-matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching the sole purpose of illustration for teaching through secure electronic networks undertaken through secure electronic networks undertaken in compliance with the provisions of national in compliance with the provisions of national law adopted pursuant to this Article shall be law adopted pursuant to this Article shall be deemed to occur solely in the Member State deemed to occur solely in the Member State where the educational establishment is where the person or entity providing the established. educational activity is established.

Or. en

Amendment 625 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. L'utilisation des œuvres et autres objets 3. L'utilisation d'extraits d'oeuvres et autres protégés à seule fin d'illustration dans le cadre objets protégés à seule fin d'illustration dans le de l'enseignement au moyen de réseaux cadre de l'enseignement au moyen de réseaux électroniques sécurisés, lorsqu'elle a lieu en électroniques sécurisés, lorsqu'elle a lieu en conformité avec les dispositions de droit interne conformité avec les dispositions de droit interne adoptées en application du présent article, est adoptées en application du présent article, est réputée avoir lieu uniquement dans l'État réputée avoir lieu uniquement dans l'État membre dans lequel l'établissement membre dans lequel l'établissement d'enseignement est établi. d'enseignement est établi.

Or. fr

Amendment 626 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. The use of works and other subject-matter for 3. The use of works and other subject-matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching the sole purpose of research or education through secure electronic networks undertaken online undertaken in compliance with the in compliance with the provisions of national provisions of national law adopted pursuant to law adopted pursuant to this Article shall be this Article shall be deemed to occur solely in deemed to occur solely in the Member State the Member State from where the educational where the educational establishment is activity originates. established.

Or. en

Amendment 627 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. The use of works and other subject-matter for 3. The use of works and other subject-matter for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching the sole purpose of illustration for teaching or through secure electronic networks undertaken scientific research, including private study, in compliance with the provisions of national undertaken in compliance with the provisions of law adopted pursuant to this Article shall be national law adopted pursuant to this Article deemed to occur solely in the Member State shall be deemed to occur solely in the Member where the educational establishment is State where the beneficiary is established. established.

Or. en

Amendment 628 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States may provide for fair 4. Member States shall ensure that compensation for the harm incurred by the rightholders have the right to grant royalty- rightholders due to the use of their works or free licences authorising the acts described in other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1. paragraph 1, generally or as regards specific types of works or other subject-matter that they may choose. Member States may provide for fair compensation for the demonstrable harm incurred by the rightholders due to the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1 , provided that it does not go beyond what is necessary and proportionate to compensate such demonstrable harm, and that rightholders do not require that the beneficiaries of the exception or limitation referred to in paragraph 1 provide information on individual uses made pursuant to paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 629 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States may provide for fair 4. Member States may provide for fair compensation for the harm incurred by the compensation for the harm incurred by the rightholders due to the use of their works or rightholders due to the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1. other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1. Any such compensation shall be paid in a lump-sum.

Or. en

Justification

Single entries would inadequate for higher-education institutions and single entry requirements would lead to disproportionate bureaucracy.

Amendment 630 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States may provide for fair 4. Member States may provide for fair compensation for the harm incurred by the compensation for any unreasonable prejudice rightholders due to the use of their works or to the legitimate interests of rightholders due to other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1. the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 631 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States may provide for fair 4. Member States shall provide for fair compensation for the harm incurred by the compensation for the harm incurred by the rightholders due to the use of their works or rightholders due to the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1. other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 632 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States may provide for fair 4. Member States shall provide for fair compensation for the harm incurred by the compensation for the harm incurred by the rightholders due to the use of their works or rightholders due to the use of their works or other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1. other subject-matter pursuant to paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 633 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Les États membres peuvent prévoir une 4. Les États membres doivent prévoir une compensation équitable du préjudice subi par compensation équitable du préjudice subi par les titulaires de droits du fait de l'utilisation de les titulaires de droits du fait de l'utilisation de leurs œuvres ou autres objets protégés au titre leurs œuvres ou autres objets protégés au titre du paragraphe 1. du paragraphe 1.

Or. fr

Amendment 634 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4 a. Member States shall ensure that the rightholders have the right to grant royalty- free licences authorising the acts described in

paragraph 1, generally or as regards specific types of works or other subject-matter that they may choose.

Or. en

Amendment 635 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Preservation of cultural heritage Reproduction by cultural heritage institutions and educational establishments, including cross-border activities

Or. en

Amendment 636 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Preservation of cultural heritage Preservation of cultural heritage and safeguarding the Public Domain

Or. en

Amendment 637 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Preservation of cultural heritage Preservation and accessibility of cultural heritage

Or. en

Justification

The Article should not only provide for rules on the preservation but also on the public procurement of our cultural heritage by entrusted public institutions in the framework of their subscribed mandate.

Amendment 638 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide for an exception to 1.Member States shall provide for an exception the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive to the rights provided for in Article 2 of 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting cultural heritage institutions, to make permitting cultural heritage institutions, copies of any works or other subject-matter that research organizations or educational are permanently in their collections, in any establishments to make copies of any works or format or medium, for the sole purpose of the other subject-matter that are permanently in preservation of such works or other subject- their collections, in any format or medium, for matter and to the extent necessary for such the sole purpose of the preservation of such preservation. works or other subject-matter and to the extent necessary for such reproduction, for the purpose of, individually or collaboratively with others, carrying out their public interest mission in preservation, research, culture, education and teaching.

Or. en

Amendment 639 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Държавите членки предвиждат изключение Държавите членки предвиждат изключение за правата, посочени в член 2 от Директива за правата, посочени в член 2 от Директива 2001/29/ЕО, член 5, буква а) и член 7, 2001/29/ЕО, член 5, буква а) и член 7, параграф 1 от Директива 96/9/ЕО, член 4, параграф 1 от Директива 96/9/ЕО, член 4, параграф 1, буква а) от Директива параграф 1, буква а) от Директива 2009/24/ЕО и член 11, параграф 1 от 2009/24/ЕО и член 11, параграф 1 от настоящата директива, което позволява на настоящата директива, което позволява на институциите в областта на културното институциите в областта на културното наследство да правят копия от произведения наследство, изследователските или други обекти, постоянно включени в организации и учебните заведения да техните сбирки, в произволен формат и на правят копия от произведения или други произволен носител, единствено с цел обекти, постоянно включени в техните опазване на тези произведения или други сбирки, в произволен формат и на обекти и до степента, необходима за произволен носител, единствено с цел опазването им. опазване на тези произведения или други обекти и до степента, необходима за възпроизвеждане, с цел, индивидуално или съвместно с други лица, осъществяване на тяхната мисия в обществен интерес за опазването им, изследванията, културата, образованието и обучението.

Or. bg

Amendment 640 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les États membres prévoient une exception aux Les États membres prévoient une exception aux droits visés à l'article 2 de la directive droits visés à l'article 2 de la directive 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à l'article 7, 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, à l'article paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, à l'article 4, paragraphe 1, de la directive 2009/24/CE et à 4, paragraphe 1, de la directive 2009/24/CE et à l'article 11, paragraphe 1, de la présente l'article 11, paragraphe 1, de la présente directive, permettant aux institutions de gestion directive, permettant aux institutions de gestion du patrimoine culturel de réaliser des copies de du patrimoine culturel désignés comme tel par toute œuvre ou tout autre objet protégé qui se leur Etat membre, de réaliser des copies de trouve en permanence dans leurs collections, toute œuvre ou tout autre objet protégé qui se quel que soit sa forme ou son support, à la seule trouve en permanence dans leurs collections, fin de la préservation de ces œuvres et autres quel que soit sa forme ou son support, à objets protégés et dans la mesure nécessaire à condition qu'il ne soit pas raisonnablement cette préservation. possible d'acquérir une copie de ces oeuvres ou autres objets protégés à la seule fin de la préservation de ces œuvres et autres objets protégés et dans la mesure nécessaire à cette préservation.

Or. fr

Amendment 641 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide for an exception to Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting cultural heritage institutions, to make permitting cultural heritage institutions or copies of any works or other subject-matter that educational establishments to make copies of are permanently in their collections, in any any works or other subject-matter that are in format or medium, for the sole purpose of the their collections or publicly accessible on the preservation of such works or other subject- Internet, in any format or medium, to the extent matter and to the extent necessary for such necessary for such reproduction, for the preservation. purpose of, individually or collaboratively with others, carrying out their public interest mission in preservation, research, culture, education and teaching.

Or. en

Amendment 642 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide for an exception to Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting cultural heritage institutions, to make permitting cultural heritage institutions, copies of any works or other subject-matter that including museums, to make copies of and are permanently in their collections, in any allow access through a secure electronic format or medium, for the sole purpose of the network to any works or other subject-matter preservation of such works or other subject- that are permanently in their collections or that matter and to the extent necessary for such they might legally acquire in the future, in any preservation. format or medium, for the sole purpose of and to the extent necessary for the preservation of such works or other subject-matter as well as for cultural imparting.

Or. en

Justification

An exception for the preservation of the cultural heritage should be complemented by an exemption for public cultural imparting of cultural heritage institutions within their prescribed public tasks.

Amendment 643 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide for an exception to Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting cultural heritage institutions, to make permitting cultural heritage institutions or copies of any works or other subject-matter that educational facilities, to make copies of any are permanently in their collections, in any works or other subject-matter that are format or medium, for the sole purpose of the permanently in their collections, in any format preservation of such works or other subject- or medium, for the sole purpose of the matter and to the extent necessary for such preservation of such works or other subject- preservation. matter and to the extent necessary for such preservation.

Or. en

Amendment 644 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide for an exception to Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting cultural heritage institutions, to make permitting cultural heritage institutions, to make copies of any works or other subject-matter that copies of any works or other subject-matter that are permanently in their collections, in any are permanently in their collections or use the format or medium, for the sole purpose of the facilities of third parties to do so, in any format preservation of such works or other subject- or medium, for the sole purpose of the matter and to the extent necessary for such preservation of such works or other subject- preservation. matter and to the extent necessary for such preservation.

Or. en

Amendment 645 Laura Ferrara, Isabella Adinolfi, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Gli Stati membri dispongono un'eccezione ai Gli Stati membri, in ragione dell'interesse diritti di cui all’articolo 2 della direttiva pubblico alla disseminazione della cultura e 2001/29/CE, all'articolo 5, lettera a) e della conoscenza, dispongono un'eccezione ai all'articolo 7, paragrafo 1, della direttiva diritti di cui all’articolo 2 della direttiva 96/9/CE, all’articolo 4, paragrafo 1, lettera a), 2001/29/CE, all'articolo 5, lettera a) e della direttiva 2009/24/CE e all’articolo 11, all'articolo 7, paragrafo 1, della direttiva paragrafo 1, della presente direttiva per 96/9/CE, all’articolo 4, paragrafo 1, lettera a), consentire agli istituti di tutela del patrimonio della direttiva 2009/24/CE e all’articolo 11, culturale di realizzare copie di qualunque opera paragrafo 1, della presente direttiva per o altro materiale presente permanentemente consentire agli istituti di tutela del patrimonio nelle loro raccolte, in qualsiasi formato o su culturale di realizzare copie di qualunque opera qualsiasi supporto, al solo fine della o altro materiale presente permanentemente conservazione di detta opera o altro materiale e nelle loro raccolte, in qualsiasi formato o su nella misura necessaria a tale conservazione. qualsiasi supporto, al fine della conservazione, consultazione e catalogazione di detta opera o altro materiale.

Or. it

Amendment 646 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les États membres prévoient une exception aux Les États membres peuvent prévoir une droits visés à l'article 2 de la directive exception aux droits visés à l'article 2 de la 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à l'article 7, directive 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a), et à paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, à l'article l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de la directive 96/9/CE, 4, paragraphe 1, de la directive 2009/24/CE et à à l'article 4, paragraphe 1, de la directive l'article 11, paragraphe 1, de la présente 2009/24/CE et à l'article 11, paragraphe 1, de la directive, permettant aux institutions de gestion présente directive, permettant aux institutions de du patrimoine culturel de réaliser des copies de gestion du patrimoine culturel et aux toute œuvre ou tout autre objet protégé qui se bibliothèques de réaliser des copies de toute trouve en permanence dans leurs collections, œuvre ou tout autre objet protégé qui se trouve quel que soit sa forme ou son support, à la seule en permanence dans leurs collections, quel que fin de la préservation de ces œuvres et autres soit sa forme ou son support, à la seule fin de la objets protégés et dans la mesure nécessaire à préservation de ces œuvres et autres objets cette préservation. protégés et dans la mesure nécessaire à cette préservation.

Or. fr

Amendment 647 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide for an exception to Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting cultural heritage institutions, to make permitting cultural heritage institutions, to make copies of any works or other subject-matter that copies of any works or other subject-matter that are permanently in their collections, in any are permanently in their collections, in any format or medium, for the sole purpose of the format or medium, for the sole purpose of the preservation of such works or other subject- preservation of such works or other subject- matter and to the extent necessary for such matter and to the extent necessary for such preservation. preservation , without modifying them.

Or. en

Amendment 648 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les oeuvres en permanence dans une collection, sont les oeuvres qui sont la propriété de l'institution de gestion du

patrimoine culturel, et non des oeuvres qui sont sous licence et accessibles via un serveur tiers.

Or. en

Amendment 649 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. For the purpose of enjoying the exception under the first paragraph of this Article, cultural heritage institutions may request that another cultural heritage institution or a service provider perform on their behalf the act of copying or digitising the works or other subject-matter that are permanently in the collection of the requesting cultural heritage institution, provided that no such copies shall remain available by the requested institution or service provider.

Or. en

Amendment 650 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. Member States shall recognise that once a work is in the public domain because the copyright and related rights therein have expired or never existed, faithful reproductions

in full or in part of that work, regardless of the mode of reproduction and including digitalisation, shall equally not be subject to copyright or related rights.

Or. en

Amendment 651 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. Member States shall recognise that once a work is in the public domain because the copyright and other related rights therein have expired or never existed, accurate reproductions in full or in part of that work shall not be subject to copyright or related rights.

Or. en

Amendment 652 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1b. Member States shall recognise that once a work is in the public domain because the copyright and related rights therein have expired or never existed, faithful reproductions

in full or in part of that work, regardless of the mode of reproduction and including digitisation, shall equally not be subject to copyright or related rights.

Or. en

Amendment 653 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les services automatisés de référencement d'images sont aussi susceptibles d'être concernés par cette exception pour permettre

la préservation de ces œuvres ou objets protégés, dans la mesure nécessaire à cette preservation.

Or. en

Amendment 654 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in paragraph 1 shall be null and void.

Or. en

Amendment 655 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in paragraph 1 shall be unenforceable.

Or. en

Amendment 656 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception set out in paragraph 1 shall be unenforceable.

Or. en

Amendment 657 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 a Document delivery by cultural heritage institutions and educational establishments 1. Member States shall provide an exception to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting cultural heritage institutions or educational establishments to make

reproductions in any format or medium upon request, for the sole purpose of a person's scientific research or private study, as long as the source, including the author's name is indicated, unless inclusion of the name is impractical.

2. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception set out in paragraph 1 shall be unenforceable.

Or. en

Amendment 658 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 bis Utilisation d'extraits d'oeuvres et d'autres objets protégés préexistants dans des contenus chargés ou mis à disposition par les utilisateurs 1) Les Etats membres prévoient une exception aux droits visés aux articles 2 et 3 de la directive 2001/29/CE, à l'article 5, point a et à l'article 7, paragraphe 1 de la directive 96/9/CE et à l'article 4 paragraphe 1 point a de la directive 2009/24/CE pour permettre l'utilisation d'extraits d'œuvres et d'autres objets protégés préexistants dans des contenus chargés ou mis à disposition par les utilisateurs, lorsqu'ils n'agissent pas à titre professionnel, à des fins de critique, de commentaire, d'illustration, de caricature, de parodie ou de pastiche à condition que ces

extraits : a) concernent des œuvres ou autres objets protégés ayant été licitement mis à la disposition du public;

b) s'accompagnent d'une indication de la source, notamment le nom de l'auteur, sauf si cela s'avère impossible; et,

c) soient conformes aux bons usages et utilisés dans la mesure justifiée par le but poursuivi.

2) Toute disposition contractuelle contraire à l'exception prévue au présent article est sans effet.

3) Cette exception est sans préjudice des dispositions de l'article 13 de cette Directive.

Or. fr

Amendment 659 Julia Reda, Nessa Childers

Proposal for a directive Article 5 e (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 e User-generated content exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Directive 2001/29/EC, point (a) of Article 5 and Article 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, point (a) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 13 of this Directive in order to allow for the digital use of quotations or extracts of works and other subject-matter comprised within user- generated content for purposes such as criticism, review, entertainment, illustration, caricature, parody or pastiche provided that the quotations or extracts: (a) relate to works or other subject-matter that have already been lawfully made available to the public;

(b) are accompanied by the indication of the source, including the author's name, unless this turns out to be impossible; and

(c) are used in accordance with fair practice and in a manner that does not extend beyond the specific purpose for which they are being used.

2. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in this paragraph 1 shall be unenforceable.

Or. en

Amendment 660 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 5 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 c Public lending of literary works 1. Member States shall provide for a limitation to the rights provided in Article 1 of Directive 2006/115/EC in order to allow the lending of literary works in any format to the public, where such works have been legitimately acquired. This is without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 6(2) and 6(3) of Directive 2006/115/EC . 2. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in paragraph 1 shall be unenforceable.

3. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting libraries to make reproductions of literary works in order to facilitate public lending where the literary works have been legitimately acquired, but are not available in the format or medium required as part of the lending service.

4. Member States, libraries, authors and publishers shall work together to ensure that libraries can acquire and lend on reasonable terms, including remotely, all commercially available literary works in any format, including digital, that have legally entered their collections or to which they have legal access. The Commission shall report on progress towards this goal no later than two years after ... [date of entry into force of this Directive].

Or. en

Amendment 661 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 a Public lending of literary works 1. Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided in Article 1 of Directive 2006/115/EC, permitting public libraries to lend literary works in any format to the public, including remotely, where such literary works have entered into their collections or to which they have authorised access. This is without prejudice to the provisions laid down in Article 6 of Directive 2006/115/EC. 2. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in paragraph 1 shall be null and void.

3. Member States shall, in consultation with authors, publishers and public libraries, ensure that public libraries can acquire and lend on reasonable terms, in any format, including remotely, all literary works which have already been lawfully made available to the public and have entered into their collections or to which they have authorised access.

4. Member States shall report to the Commission on the steps taken according to paragraph 3. The Commission shall facilitate the exchange of best practices among Member States and make them easily and effectively accessible to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 662 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide for a limitation to the rights provided in Article 1 of Directive 2006/115/EC in order to allow for the lending of literary and/or scientific works in any format to the public, including remotely, where these have been legitimately acquired. This is without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 6(2) and 6(3) of that Directive. 2. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be unenforceable.

3. Member States should authorise legal circumvention of TPMs that restrict the exercise of lawful exceptions and limitations, including the derogation/exception for "public lending".

4. Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, Member States, libraries, authors and publishers shall work together to ensure that libraries can acquire and lend in reasonable terms, including remotely, all commercially available literary or scientific works in any format, including digital, that have legally entered their collections or to which they have legal access.

The Commission shall report on progress towards this goal no later than 2 years after ....(the date of entry into force of this Directive).

Or. en

Amendment 663 Angelika Niebler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 a Datenbanken Die Mitgliedstaaten legen Bestimmungen fest, mit denen Gerichte, Schiedsgerichte oder

Behörden für Zwecke der Rechtspflege und der öffentlichen Sicherheit die in Artikel 2 und Artikel 3 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG genannten Rechte erhalten.

Or. de

Justification

Die Anlage und Pflege von Datenbanken mit Informationen, die für eine geordnete Rechtspflege unerlässlich sind, muss urheberrechtlich weiterhin unbedenklich bleiben. Die Bereitstellung einer Datenbank ist in vielen Fällen eine notwendige Informationsquelle für eine schnelle und geordnete Durchführung von Verfahren. Daher sollte auch für den Bereich der Rechtspflege und öffentlichen Sicherheit eine entsprechende Ausnahmeregelung vorgesehen werden.

Amendment 664 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 a Freedom of Panorama Member Sates shall provide for an exception that grants the right to reproduce works

permanently located in public spaces by way of still or moving images and to distribute and communicate to the public such images in full or in parts.

Or. en

Amendment 665 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. Member States shall provide for an exception that grants the right to reproduce works permanently located in public spaces by

way of still or moving images and to distribute and communicate to the public such images in full or in parts.

Or. en

Amendment 666 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 a 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC and point (a) of Article 5 and Article 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, permitting the reproduction and use of works, such as works of architecture or sculpture, made to be located permanently in public places and

created by private individuals, with the exception of any usage related to a commercial purpose. 2. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in this Article shall be unenforceable

.

Or. en

Justification

There should be an exception to copyright as regards the reproduction and use of works located permanently in the public sphere in order to stimulate innovation and allow for enhanced partaking in cultural goods. However, such an exception should be limited to non-commercial purposes in order not to undermine national structures to finance and support the cultural sectors.

Amendment 667 Julia Reda, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Article 5 d (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 d Freedom of Panorama 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC and point (a) of Article 5 and Article 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, permitting the reproduction

and use of works, such as works of architecture or sculpture, made to be located permanently in public places.

2. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception provided for in this Article shall be unenforceable.

Or. en

Amendment 668 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 a Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights to use

photographs, video footage or other images of works permanently placed in public spaces.

Or. en

Amendment 669 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 5 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 b General de minimis exception 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Article 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, and Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2009/24/EC, to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, regardless of the format or medium used, in the following cases: (a) uses for the benefit of persons with a disability, which is directly related to the disability, to the extent required by the specific disability;

(b) reproduction, communication to the public or making available of published articles on current economic, political or religious topics or of broadcast works or other subject-matter of the same character, in cases where such use is not expressly reserved, and as long as the source, including the author's name, is indicated or use of works or other subject- matter in connection with the reporting of current events, to the extent justified by the informatory purpose and as long as the source, including the author's name, is indicated, unless this turns out to be impossible;

(c) quotations for purposes such as criticism or review, provided that they relate to a work or other subject-matter which has already been lawfully made available to the public, that, unless this turns out to be impossible, the source, including the author's name, is indicated, and that their use is in accordance with fair practice, and to the extent required by the specific purpose;

(d) uses for the purposes of public security or to ensure the proper performance or reporting of administrative, parliamentary or judicial proceedings;

(e) use of political speeches as well as extracts of public lectures or similar works or subject- matter to the extent justified by the informatory purpose and provided that the source, including the author's name, is indicated, except where this turns out to be impossible;

(f) incidental inclusion of a work or other subject-matter in other material;

(g) uses for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche;

(h) uses in connection with the demonstration or repair of equipment, or the reconstruction of an original or a copy of a work;

(i) making of a back-up copy of a work by a person having a right to use it and insofar as it is necessary for that use;

2. Any other use that is analogous to the uses enumerated in paragraph 1 is permitted provided that the corresponding requirements of the relevant exceptions or limitations are met and the use does not conflict with the normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the authors or rightholders, and taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.

Or. en

Amendment 670 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 5 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 b Access for the purposes of research or private study to the collections of cultural heritage institutions or educational establishments 1. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive for the communication or making available of works and other subject matter contained in the collections of cultural heritage institutions, or educational establishments, for the purpose of research or private study, to members of the public on the premises of those institutions, or establishments and online.

2. Any contractual provision contrary to the exception set out in paragraph (1) shall be unenforceable.

Or. en

Amendment 671 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 5 f (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5 f Mutual recognition of public domain provisions Member States shall recognize works and

other subject matter to be in the public domain if such works are exempted from copyright protection in the country of origin of the works.

Or. en

Amendment 672 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Constance Le Grip, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

L'article 5, paragraphe 5, et l'article 6, 1. L'accès au contenu couvert par une paragraphe 4, premier, troisième et cinquième exception prevue dans la présente directive ne alinéas, de la directive 2001/29/CE s'appliquent donne pas droit à l'utilisateur d'en faire une aux exceptions et à la limitation prévues dans le autre utilisation en application d'une autre présent titre. exception.

2. L'article 5, paragraphe 5, et l'article 6, paragraphe 4, premier, troisième, quatrième et cinquième alinéas, de la directive 2001/29/CE s'appliquent aux exceptions et à la limitation prévues dans le présent titre.

Or. fr

Amendment 673 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 5(5) and the first, third and fifth The first and fifth subparagraphs of Article 6(4) subparagraphs of Article 6(4) of Directive of Directive 2001/29/EC shall apply to the 2001/29/EC shall apply to the exceptions and exceptions and the limitation provided for under the limitation provided for under this Title. this Title.

Or. en

Amendment 674 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Sauf dans les cas visés à l'article 17, la présente directive laisse intactes et n'affecte pas les exceptions et limitations prévues aux paragraphes 2 et 3 de l'article 5 de la directive

2001/29/CE, aux articles 6 et 9 de la directive 96/9/CE et aux articles 5 et 6 de la directive 2009/24/CE, notamment en ce qui concerne leur caractère facultatif.

Or. fr

Amendment 675 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Any contractual provision contrary to the exceptions and limitations provided for in this Directive shall be unenforceable.

Or. en

Amendment 676 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of out-of-commerce works by cultural Use of out-of-commerce works by cultural heritage institutions heritage institutions, educational establishments or other non-commercial documentation centers

Or. en

Amendment 677 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of out-of-commerce works by cultural Use of out-of-commerce works heritage institutions

Or. en

Amendment 678 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide that when a 1. Member States after consulting with collective management organisation, on behalf rightholders and their representing of its members, concludes a non-exclusive organisations, cultural heritage institutions licence for non-commercial purposes with a and other users, shall provide a legal cultural heritage institution for the digitisation, mechanism enabling exclusive or non- distribution, communication to the public or exclusive licences for the digitisation, making available of out-of-commerce works or distribution, communication to the public or other subject-matter permanently in the making available of out-of-commerce works or collection of the institution, such a non- other subject-matter permanently in the exclusive licence may be extended or presumed collection of the institution, provided that: to apply to rightholders of the same category as those covered by the licence who are not represented by the collective management organisation, provided that:

Or. en

Amendment 679 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Les États membres prévoient que lorsqu'un 1. Les États membres peuvent prévoir, sans organisme de gestion collective conclut, au nom préjudice de leur modèle national concernant de ses membres, un contrat de licence non les œuvres indisponibles, que lorsqu'un exclusive à des fins non commerciales avec une organisme de gestion collective conclut, au nom institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel, en de ses membres, un contrat de licence non vue de la numérisation, la distribution, la exclusive à des fins non commerciales avec une communication au public ou la mise à institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel, en disposition d'œuvres ou d'autres objets protégés vue de la numérisation, la distribution, la indisponibles dans le commerce qui se trouvent communication au public ou la mise à en permanence dans la collection de disposition d'œuvres ou d'autres objets protégés l'institution, cette licence non exclusive peut indisponibles dans le commerce qui se trouvent être étendue, ou présumée s'appliquer, aux en permanence dans la collection de titulaires de droits de la même catégorie que l'institution, cette licence non exclusive peut ceux couverts par la licence qui ne sont pas être étendue, ou présumée s'appliquer, aux représentés par l'organisme de gestion titulaires de droits de la même catégorie que collective, à condition: ceux couverts par la licence qui ne sont pas représentés par l'organisme de gestion collective, à condition:

Or. fr

Amendment 680 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide that when a 1. Member States shall provide for an exception collective management organisation, on behalf to the rights set out in Articles 2 and 3 of of its members, concludes a non-exclusive Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of licence for non-commercial purposes with a Directive 96/9/EC and Article 4(1) of Directive cultural heritage institution for the 2009/24/EC, permitting cultural heritage digitisation, distribution, communication to the institutions, educational establishments or public or making available of out-of-commerce other non-commercial documentation centers, works or other subject-matter permanently in to digitise, distribute, communicate to the the collection of the institution, such a non- public or make available out-of-commerce exclusive licence may be extended or presumed works or other subject-matter permanently in to apply to rightholders of the same category as their collection for non-commercial purposes. those covered by the licence who are not represented by the collective management organisation, provided that:

Or. en

Amendment 681 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) the collective management organisation is, deleted on the basis of mandates from rightholders, broadly representative of rightholders in the category of works or other subject-matter and of the rights which are the subject of the licence;

Or. en

Amendment 682 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) the collective management organisation is, (a) the organisation in charge of granting on the basis of mandates from rightholders, licences is broadly representative of broadly representative of rightholders in the rightholders according to the law of the category of works or other subject-matter and Member State; of the rights which are the subject of the licence;

Or. en

Amendment 683 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) equal treatment is guaranteed to all deleted rightholders in relation to the terms of the licence;

Or. en

Amendment 684 Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b a) Right-holders may at any time object to their works or other subject-matter being deemed to be out of commerce and may

exclude their works from being made available on the secure electronic network of the cultural heritage institution.

Or. en

Amendment 685 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(c) all rightholders may at any time object to deleted their works or other subject-matter being deemed to be out of commerce and exclude the application of the licence to their works or other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 686 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(c) all rightholders may at any time object to (c) all rightholders are duly informed and may their works or other subject-matter being at any time object to their works or other deemed to be out of commerce and exclude the subject-matter being deemed to be out of application of the licence to their works or other commerce and exclude the application of the subject-matter. licence to their works or other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 687 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

When implementing the exception laid down in the first subparagraph, Member States may provide for remuneration schemes to compensate any unreasonable prejudice to the legitimate interests of rightholders. Rightholders may at any time, on the basis of reasonable evidence, object to their works or other subject-matter being deemed to be out of commerce and be able to exclude the application of the exception laid down in the first subparagraph.

Or. en

Amendment 688 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(c a) Member States shall, in consultation with rightsholders, collective management organisations and cultural heritage institutions, evaluate the effectiveness of such licensing solutions.

Or. en

Amendment 689 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

This legal mechanism may, among others, be based on extended collective licensing, a legal mandate or a presumption.

Or. en

Amendment 690 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

This legal mechanism may, among others, be based on extended collective licensing, a legal mandate or a presumption.

Or. en

Amendment 691 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States may estabish that the exception adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 does not apply generally or as regards specific types of out-of-commerce works or other subject-matter, to the extent that operational non-exclusive licences, concluded between a collective management organisation, on behalf of its member, and a cultural heritage institution, an educational establishment or another non-commercial documentation center, authorising the uses provided for in paragraph 1, exist and are easily available. In this case, such non-exclusive licences may be extended or presumed to apply to rightholders of the same category as those covered by the licences who are not represented by the collective management organisation, provided that: (a) the collective management organisation is, on the basis of mandates from rightholders, broadly representative of rightholders in the category of works or other subject-matter and of the rights which are the subject of the licence;

(b) equal treatment is guaranteed to all rightholders in relation to the terms of the licence;

(c) all rightholders may at any time, on the basis of reasonable evidence, object to their works or other subject-matter being deemed to be out of commerce and exclude the application of the licence to their works or other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 692 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights provided for in Article 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Articles 5(a) and 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC, and Article 11(1) of this Directive, permitting cultural heritage institutions, to make copies of out-of-commerce works that are located in their collections available online, provided that: (a) the name of the author or any other identifiable rightholder is indicated, unless this turns out to be impossible;

(b) all rightholders may at any time object to their works or other subject-matter being deemed to be out of commerce and exclude the application of the exception to their works or other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 693 Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States shall provide for exceptions to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Article 5(a) and Article 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC and Article 11(1) of this Directive in order to allow cultural heritage institutions to make copies of out-of-

commerce works that are permanently located in their collections publicly available for non- commercial purposes on their websites, provided that the name of the author or another identifiable rightholder is indicated, unless such indication turns out to be impossible.

Or. en

Amendment 694 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 b. Member States may provide that the exception adopted pursuant to paragraph 1a does not apply in sectors or for types of works where extended collective licensing-based solutions provided for in paragraph 1 are available. Member states shall, in consultation with authors, other rightholders, collective management organisations and cultural heritage institutions, determine the availability of extended collective licensing-based solutions for specific sectors or types of works.

Or. en

Amendment 695 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 c. Member States shall, in consultation with rightholders, collective management organisations and cultural heritage institutions, ensure that the requirements used to determine whether works and other subject- matter can be licensed in accordance with paragraph 1 or used in accordance with paragraph 1a do not extend beyond what is necessary and reasonable and do not preclude the possibility to determine the out-of-

commerce status of a collection as a whole, when it is reasonable to presume that all works or other subject-matter in the collection are out of commerce. In any case, works that have first been published at least 10 years ago shall be deemed to be out of commerce, without prejudice to the possibility for rightsholders to object to their works or other subject-matter being deemed to be out of commerce in accordance with paragraph 1 or 1a.

Or. en

Amendment 696 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. deleted

A work or other subject-matter shall be deemed to be out of commerce when the whole work or other subject-matter, in all its translations, versions and manifestations, is not available to the public through customary channels of commerce and cannot be reasonably expected to become so.

Member States shall, in consultation with rightholders, collective management organisations and cultural heritage institutions, ensure that the requirements used to determine whether works and other subject-matter can be licensed in accordance with paragraph 1 do not extend beyond what is necessary and reasonable and do not preclude the possibility to determine the out- of-commerce status of a collection as a whole, when it is reasonable to presume that all works or other subject-matter in the collection are out of commerce.

Or. en

Amendment 697 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

A work or other subject-matter shall be deleted deemed to be out of commerce when the whole work or other subject-matter, in all its translations, versions and manifestations, is not available to the public through customary channels of commerce and cannot be reasonably expected to become so.

Or. en

Amendment 698 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

A work or other subject-matter shall be deemed A work or other subject-matter shall be deemed to be out of commerce when the whole work or to be out of commerce when the whole work or other subject-matter, in all its translations, other subject-matter, in all its translations, versions and manifestations, is not available to versions and manifestations, is not available to the public through customary channels of the public through customary, easily accessible, commerce and cannot be reasonably expected channels of commerce. Out-of-commerce to become so. works shall also include works that have never been, or were never intended, to be in commerce.

Or. en

Amendment 699 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

A work or other subject-matter shall be deemed A work or other subject-matter shall be deemed to be out of commerce when the whole work or to be out of commerce when the whole work or other subject-matter, in all its translations, other subject-matter, in all its versions and versions and manifestations, is not available to manifestations, is not available to the public the public through customary channels of through customary channels of commerce and commerce and cannot be reasonably expected to cannot be reasonably expected to become so in become so. the Member States where the cultural heritage institution is established.

Or. en

Justification

Translations should not be included in the first subparagraph, because this approach does not take into consideration the linguistic and cultural diversity of the Member States. This approach may have a negative effect on cultural diversity, because certain language versions of a work may disappear as they cannot be considered out-of-commerce while another language version is still available.The out-of-commerce status shall be assessed in each country separetely and not on the EU level.

Amendment 700 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall, in consultation with Member States shall, in consultation with rightholders, collective management rightholders, collective management organisations and cultural heritage institutions, organisations, cultural heritage institutions, ensure that the requirements used to determine educational establishments or other non- whether works and other subject-matter can be commercial documentation centers, ensure that licensed in accordance with paragraph 1 do the requirements used to determine whether not extend beyond what is necessary and works and other subject-matter can be deemed reasonable and do not preclude the possibility to be out of commerce, do not extend beyond to determine the out-of-commerce status of a what is reasonable and proportionate and do collection as a whole, when it is reasonable to not preclude the possibility to determine the presume that all works or other subject-matter out-of-commerce status of a collection as a in the collection are out of commerce. whole, when it is reasonable to presume that all works or other subject-matter in the collection are out of commerce.

Or. en

Amendment 701 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States shall provide that appropriate 3. Member States shall provide that appropriate publicity measures are taken regarding: and effective publicity measures are taken regarding:

Or. en

Amendment 702 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) the licence, and in particular its application (b) any licence, and in particular its application to unrepresented rightholders; to unrepresented rightholders;

Or. en

Amendment 703 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point c – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

the possibility of rightholders to object, referred the possibility of rightholders to object, referred to in point (c) of paragraph 1; to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 and in point (c) of paragraph 1a;

Or. en

Amendment 704 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 4 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Member States shall ensure that the licences 4. Member States shall ensure that the licences referred to in paragraph 1 are sought from a referred to in paragraph 1 are in the Member collective management organisation that is State where: representative for the Member State where:

Or. en

Amendment 705 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point c

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(c) the cultural heritage institution is (c) the cultural heritage institution, educational established, when a Member State or a third establishment or non-commercial country could not be determined, after documentation center is established, when a reasonable efforts, according to points (a) and Member State or a third country could not be (b). easily determined according to points (a) and (b).

Or. en

Amendment 706 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

5. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall not apply to the deleted works or other subject-matter of third country nationals except where points (a) and (b) of paragraph 4 apply.

Or. en

Amendment 707 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

5. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall not apply to the deleted works or other subject-matter of third country nationals except where points (a) and (b) of paragraph 4 apply.

Or. en

Amendment 708 Jytte Guteland

Proposal for a directive Article 7 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 7 a Use at national level by cultural heritage institutions of works in their collection Member States may provide that Article 7 shall not apply in situations where a collective agreement between an organisation and a

cultural heritage institution concerning the use in that Member State of works or other subject matter in the collection of the institution, by virtue of national law, is extended to apply also to rights of rightholders not represented by the organisation.

Or. en

Amendment 709 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 8

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 8 supprimé

Utilisations transfrontières

1. Les œuvres et autres objets protégés faisant l'objet d'une licence accordée conformément à l'article 7 peuvent être utilisés par l'institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel dans tous les État membres, dans le respect des conditions de la licence.

2. Les États membres veillent à ce que des informations permettant l'identification des œuvres ou autres objets protégés faisant l'objet d'une licence accordée conformément à l'article 7 ainsi que des informations sur la faculté d'opposition des titulaires de droits mentionnée à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, point c), soient accessibles au public, sur un portail internet unique, pendant au moins six mois avant que ces œuvres ou autres objets protégés soient numérisés, distribués, communiqués au public ou rendus disponibles dans des États membres autres que celui dans lequel la licence est accordée, et pendant toute la durée de la licence.

3. Le portail mentionné au paragraphe 2 est mis en place et géré par l’Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle conformément au règlement (UE) n° 386/2012.

Or. fr

Amendment 710 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Les œuvres et autres objets protégés faisant supprimé l'objet d'une licence accordée conformément à l'article 7 peuvent être utilisés par l'institution de gestion du patrimoine culturel dans tous les État membres, dans le respect des conditions de la licence.

Or. fr

Amendment 711 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Works or other subject-matter covered by a 1. Works or other subject-matter used in licence granted in accordance with Article 7 accordance with Article 7 may be used by the may be used by the cultural heritage institution cultural heritage institution in all Member in accordance with the terms of the licence in States. all Member States.

Or. en

Amendment 712 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Works or other subject-matter covered by a 1. Out-of-commerce works or other subject- licence granted in accordance with Article 7 matter may be used, in accordance with Article may be used by the cultural heritage institution 7, by cultural heritage institutions in all in accordance with the terms of the licence in Member States. all Member States.

Or. en

Amendment 713 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Les États membres veillent à ce que des supprimé informations permettant l'identification des œuvres ou autres objets protégés faisant l'objet d'une licence accordée conformément à l'article 7 ainsi que des informations sur la faculté d'opposition des titulaires de droits mentionnée à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, point c), soient accessibles au public, sur un portail internet unique, pendant au moins six mois avant que ces œuvres ou autres objets protégés soient numérisés, distribués, communiqués au public ou rendus disponibles dans des États membres autres que celui dans lequel la licence est accordée, et pendant toute la durée de la licence.

Or. fr

Amendment 714 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Statele membre se asigură că informațiile 2. Statele membre se asigură că informațiile care permit identificarea operelor sau a altor care permit identificarea operelor sau a altor obiecte protejate care intră în domeniul de obiecte protejate care intră în domeniul de aplicare al unei licențe acordate în conformitate aplicare al unei licențe acordate în conformitate cu articolul 7 și informațiile privind posibilitatea cu articolul 7 și informațiile privind posibilitatea titularilor de drepturi de a obiecta, menționată la titularilor de drepturi de a obiecta, menționată la articolul 7 alineatul (1) litera (c), sunt publicate articolul 7 alineatul (1) litera (c), sunt publicate pe un portal online unic cu cel puțin șase luni pe un portal online unic, accesibil publicului, înainte ca operele sau alte obiecte protejate să cu cel puțin șase luni înainte ca operele sau alte fie digitalizate, distribuite, comunicate sau puse obiecte protejate să fie digitalizate, distribuite, la dispoziția publicului în alte state membre comunicate sau puse la dispoziția publicului în decât cel în care se acordă licența și rămân la alte state membre decât cel în care se acordă dispoziția publicului pe toată durata de licența și rămân la dispoziția publicului pe toată valabilitate a licenței. durata de valabilitate a licenței.

Or. ro

Amendment 715 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Member States shall ensure that information 2. Member States shall ensure that information that allows the identification of the works or that allows the identification of the works or other subject-matter covered by a licence other subject-matter covered by Article 7 and granted in accordance with Article 7 and information about the possibility of rightholders information about the possibility of rightholders to object referred to in Article 7(1)(c) are made to object referred to in Article 7(1)(c) are made publicly accessible in a single online portal for publicly accessible in a single online portal for at least six months before the works or other at least six months before the works or other subject-matter are digitised, distributed, subject-matter are digitised, distributed, communicated to the public or made available communicated to the public or made available in Member States other than the one where the in Member States other than the one where the licence is granted, and for the whole duration of licence is granted, and for the whole duration of the licence. the licence.

Or. en

Amendment 716 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Member States shall ensure that information 2. Member States shall ensure that information that allows the identification of the works or that allows the identification of the works or other subject-matter covered by a licence other subject-matter used in accordance with granted in accordance with Article 7 and Article 7 and information about the possibility information about the possibility of rightholders of rightholders to object referred to in the to object referred to in Article 7(1)(c) are made second subparagraph of Article 7(1) and publicly accessible in a single online portal for Article 7(1a)(c) are made permanently, easily at least six months before the works or other and effectively accessible in a public single subject-matter are digitised, distributed, online portal, and in any case for at least six communicated to the public or made available months before the works or other subject-matter in Member States other than the one where the are digitised, distributed, communicated to the licence is granted, and for the whole duration public or made available in Member States. of the licence.

Or. en

Amendment 717 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Le portail mentionné au paragraphe 2 est supprimé mis en place et géré par l’Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle conformément au règlement (UE) n° 386/2012.

Or. fr

Amendment 718 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure a regular dialogue Member States shall ensure a regular dialogue between representative users' and rightholders' between representative users' and rightholders' organisations, and any other relevant organisations, and any other relevant stakeholder organisations, to, on a sector- stakeholder organisations, to, on a sector- specific basis, foster the relevance and usability specific basis, foster the effectiveness of the of the licensing mechanisms referred to in measures applied to implement the exception Article 7(1), ensure the effectiveness of the referred to in Article 7, including the relevance safeguards for rightholders referred to in this and usability of the licensing mechanisms Chapter, notably as regards publicity measures, referred to in Article 7(1), ensure the and, where applicable, assist in the effectiveness of the safeguards for rightholders establishment of the requirements referred to in referred to in this Chapter, notably as regards the second subparagraph of Article 7(2). publicity measures, and, where applicable, assist in the establishment of the requirements referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 7(2).

Or. en

Amendment 719 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les États membres veillent à instaurer un Les Etats membres peuvent instaurer un dialogue régulier entre des organisations dialogue régulier entre des organisations représentant les utilisateurs et les titulaires de représentant les utilisateurs et les titulaires de droits, et toutes autres organisations de parties droits, et toutes autres organisations de parties intéressées, afin d'accroître, sur une base intéressées, afin d'accroître, sur une base sectorielle, la pertinence et l'utilité du système sectorielle, la pertinence et l'utilité du système de licences visé à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, de licences visé à l'article 7, paragraphe 1, d'assurer l'efficacité des garanties protégeant les d'assurer l'efficacité des garanties protégeant les titulaires de droits mentionnées dans le présent titulaires de droits mentionnées dans le présent chapitre, notamment en ce qui concerne les chapitre, notamment en ce qui concerne les mesures de publicité, et, le cas échéant, de mesures de publicité, et, le cas échéant, de contribuer à la définition des critères visés à contribuer à la définition des critères visés à l'article 7, paragraphe 2, second alinéa. l'article 7, paragraphe 2, second alinéa.

Or. fr

Amendment 720 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 9 a Exploitation of European audiovisual works on video-on-demand platforms 1. Member States shall ensure that producers and the transferees of the rights make their best efforts to make European audiovisual works available to the public on at least one video-on-demand platform.

2. Member States shall take appropriate

measures to ensure the application of paragraph 1, including by encouraging the conclusion of professional agreements between representative organisations of authors, including their collective management organisations and representative organisations of producers and other stakeholders, as well as video-on-demand platforms, in a larger context of continuous exploitation of European audiovisual works.

Or. en

Amendment 721 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 9 a Exploitation of audiovisual works on video-on- demand platforms 1. Member States shall ensure that producers and the transferees of the rights make their best efforts to make European audiovisual works on at least one video-on-demand platform.

2. Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure the application of paragraph 1, including by encouraging the conclusion of professional agreements between representative organisations of authors and representative organisations of producers and other stakeholders, as well as video-on-demand platforms in a larger of continuous exploitation of audiovisual works.

Or. en

Amendment 722 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 9 a Public domain Member States shall ensure that once a work or other subject-matter is in the public domain, faithful reproductions, in any format or medium, in full or in part of that work or subject matter, which does not constitute a new work or subject matter, shall equally not be subject to copyright or related rights.

Or. en

Amendment 723 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les États membres veillent à ce que, lorsque des Les États membres veillent à ce que, lorsque des parties qui souhaitent conclure un contrat en vue parties qui souhaitent conclure un contrat en vue d'offrir des œuvres audiovisuelles sur des d'offrir des œuvres audiovisuelles sur des plateformes de vidéo à la demande rencontrent plateformes de vidéo à la demande rencontrent des difficultés en matière de licence de droits, des difficultés en matière de licence de droits, elles puissent demander l'assistance d'un elles puissent demander l'assistance d'un organisme impartial doté de l'expérience organisme impartial doté de l'expérience adéquate. Ledit organisme apporte son adéquate. Ledit organisme apporte son assistance dans la négociation et aide les parties assistance dans la négociation et aide les parties à aboutir à un accord. à aboutir à un accord.

Le présent paragraphe n'est pas applicable à l'octroi des licences pour les oeuvres et autres objets protégés par les entités soumises aux articles 3 (a) et 2 (3) de la directive 2014/26/CE.

Or. fr

Amendment 724 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that where parties Member States shall ensure that where parties wishing to conclude an agreement for the wishing to conclude an agreement for the purpose of making available audiovisual works purpose of making available audiovisual works on video-on-demand platforms face difficulties on video-on-demand platforms face difficulties relating to the licensing of rights, they may rely relating to the licensing of rights, they may rely on the assistance of an impartial body with on the assistance of an impartial public body relevant experience. That body shall provide with relevant experience. That body shall assistance with negotiation and help reach provide impartial and affordable assistance agreements. with negotiation and help reach agreements.

Or. en

Amendment 725 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that where parties Member States shall ensure that where parties wishing to conclude an agreement for the wishing to conclude an agreement for the purpose of making available audiovisual works purpose of making available audiovisual works on video-on-demand platforms face difficulties on video-on-demand platforms face difficulties relating to the licensing of rights, they may rely relating to the licensing of audiovisual rights, on the assistance of an impartial body with they may rely on the assistance of an impartial relevant experience. That body shall provide body with relevant experience. That body shall assistance with negotiation and help reach provide assistance with negotiation and help agreements. reach agreements.

Or. en

Justification

In order to address ambiguity it should be specified that this article concerns only the audiovisual licensing.

Amendment 726 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Statele membre se asigură că, în cazul în care Statele membre se asigură că, în cazul în care părțile doritoare să încheie un acord pentru părțile relevante doritoare să încheie un acord punerea la dispoziție a unor opere audiovizuale pentru punerea la dispoziție a unor opere pe platforme de video la cerere se confruntă cu audiovizuale pe platforme de video la cerere se dificultăți legate de acordarea de licențe privind confruntă cu dificultăți legate de acordarea de drepturile, acestea pot recurge la asistența unui licențe privind drepturile, acestea pot recurge la organism imparțial cu experiență relevantă. asistența unui organism imparțial cu experiență Organismul respectiv oferă asistență pentru relevantă. Organismul respectiv oferă asistență negocieri și încheierea de acorduri. pentru facilitarea negocierilor.

Or. ro

Amendment 727 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that where parties Member States shall ensure that where SMEs wishing to conclude an agreement for the wishing to conclude an agreement for the purpose of making available audiovisual works purpose of making available audiovisual works on video-on-demand platforms face difficulties on video-on-demand platforms face difficulties relating to the licensing of rights, they may rely relating to the licensing of rights, they may rely on the assistance of an impartial body with on the assistance of an impartial body with relevant experience. That body shall provide relevant experience. That body shall provide assistance with negotiation and help reach assistance with negotiation and help reach agreements. agreements.

Or. en

Justification

The amendment seeks to clarify the intention behind this article, as it is SME's, who are the parties facing difficulties to the licensing of rights.

Amendment 728 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 10 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 10 a Union Legal Deposit 1. Member States shall ensure that publications covered by national legal deposit requirements and published within the Union or related to Union matters shall also be subject to a Union Legal Deposit. 2. The European Parliament Library shall be entitled to delivery, free of charge, of one copy of every publication referred to in paragraph 1.

3. The obligation set out in paragraph 1 shall be rendered under equivalent terms as the national deposit requirements and shall apply to publishers, printers and importers of publications for the works they publish, print or import in the Union. Member States shall allow for the bulk collection and bulk delivery

of publications referred to in paragraph 1 by national libraries or other designated agents.

4. From the day of the delivery to the European Parliament Library, the publications referred to in paragraph 1 shall become part of the European Parliament Library permanent collection. They shall be made available to users of the European Parliament Library's services.

5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt decisions and delegated acts to specify the modalities relating to the delivery to the European Parliament Library of publications referred to in paragraph 1 and also of publications created or published by the Union and its institutions.

Or. en

Amendment 729 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 10 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 10 bis Les Etats membres veillent à ce que les producteurs et cessionnaires de droits soient tenus d'une obligation de recherche d'exploitation suivie des oeuvres audiovisuelles européennes incluant la mise à disposition du public des-dites oeuvres sur les plateformes de vidéo à la demande.

Les Etats membres prennent des mesures

appropriées pour veiller à l'application de l'obligation de moyen prévue au paragraphe 1, notamment en encourageant la conclusion d'accords professionnels entre les organisations représentatives des auteurs et les organisations représentatives des producteurs et autres parties, ainsi que les plateformes de vidéo à la demande, dans un contexte d'exploitation suivie des oeuvres audiovisuelles.

Or. fr

Amendment 730 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 10 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 10 ter Les présentes dispositions sont sans préjudice de l'application des règles relatives à la chronologie des médias, de la liberté d'un producteur ou d'un distributeur de consentir des exclusivités d'exploitation pour les oeuvres

audiovisuelles considérées, et de la liberté d'un diffuseur ou d'une plateforme de vidéo à la demande d'acquérir et de diffuser ou de mettre à disposition à la demande les oeuvres de son choix, dans le respect de sa liberté et responsabilité éditoriales.

Or. fr

Amendment 731 Julia Reda, Isabella Adinolfi, Jan Philipp Albrecht, Max Andersson, Petras Auštrevičius, Brando Benifei, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, David Borrelli, Klaus Buchner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Matt Carthy, Dita Charanzová, Daniel Dalton, Fabio De Masi, Pascal Durand, Stefan Eck, Bas Eickhout, Cornelia Ernst, Fredrick Federley, Laura Ferrara, Thomas Händel, Heidi Hautala, Benedek Jávor, Kaja Kallas, Ska Keller, Kostadinka Kuneva, Merja Kyllönen, Philippe Lamberts, Marju Lauristin, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Jiří Maštálka, Martina Michels, Victor Negrescu, Jozo Radoš, Evelyn Regner, Michel Reimon, Terry Reintke, Judith Sargentini, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Molly Scott Cato, Davor Škrlec, Igor Šoltes, Catherine Stihler, Dario Tamburrano, Indrek Tarand, Yana Toom, Ernest Urtasun, Bodil Valero, Monika Vana, Sophia in 't Veld, Josef Weidenholzer, Gabriele Zimmer, Laura Agea, Luke Ming Flanagan, Yannick Jadot, Nessa Childers, Rosa D'Amato, Marco Valli, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Florent Marcellesi

Proposal for a directive Article 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 11 deleted

Protection of press publications concerning digital uses

1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications.

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other rightholders, in respect of the works and other subject-matter incorporated in a press publication. Such rights may not be invoked against those authors and other rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive them of their right to exploit their works and other subject- matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated.

3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.

Or. en

Amendment 732 Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 11 deleted

Protection of press publications concerning digital uses

1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications.

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other rightholders, in respect of the works and other subject-matter incorporated in a press publication. Such rights may not be invoked against those authors and other rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive them of their right to exploit their works and other subject- matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated.

3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.

Or. en

Amendment 733 József Szájer, Andrea Bocskor

Proposal for a directive Article 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 11 deleted

Protection of press publications concerning digital uses

1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications.

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other rightholders, in respect of the works and other subject-matter incorporated in a press publication. Such rights may not be invoked against those authors and other rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive them of their right to exploit their works and other subject- matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated.

3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.

Or. en

Justification

The introduction of a new neighbouring right for publishers regarding the online uses of certain specified publications as defined in Article 2 and in the related recitals is not reasonable. The planned new right would make a distinction between different types of journalistic publications and it would not be based on whether such publications are protected by copyright but on certain other criteria. Therefore, it seems create be a parallel protection beside the copyright on certain publications.

Amendment 734 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Marju Lauristin

Proposal for a directive Article 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 11 deleted

Protection of press publications concerning digital uses

1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications.

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other rightholders, in respect of the works and other subject-matter incorporated in a press publication. Such rights may not be invoked against those authors and other rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive them of their right to exploit their works and other subject- matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated.

3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.

Or. en

Justification

The introduction of press publishers right is unnecessary as publishers are already protected by copyright law, based on transfers or licences of the author's rights from the respective authors. The challenges currently faced by news sector cannot be solved by granting additional rights. Approach based on partnership negotiation, self -regulation, existing technical tools, new business models and most of all innovation, to preserve open access to information, is more suitable for the digital era.

Amendment 735 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 11 deleted

Protection of press publications concerning digital uses

1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications.

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other rightholders, in respect of the works and other subject-matter incorporated in a press publication. Such rights may not be invoked against those authors and other rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive them of their right to exploit their works and other subject- matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated.

3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.

Or. en

Amendment 736 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Article 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Článek 11 vypouští se

Ochrana tiskových publikací v souvislosti s digitálním užitím

1. Členské státy poskytnou vydavatelům tiskových publikací práva stanovená v článku 2 a v čl. 3 odst. 2 směrnice 2001/29/ES k digitálnímu užití jejich tiskových publikací.

2. Právy uvedenými v odstavci 1 nejsou dotčena a nijak ovlivněna žádná práva, která právní předpisy Unie poskytují autorům a jiným nositelům práv v souvislosti s díly a jinými předměty ochrany, které jsou součástí tiskové publikace. Těchto práv se nelze vůči těmto autorům a jiným nositelům práv dovolávat, a zejména je nesmí zbavit práva využívat svá díla a jiné předměty ochrany nezávisle na tiskové publikaci, jejíž jsou součástí.

3. Ve vztahu k právům uvedeným v odstavci 1 se použijí obdobně články 5 až 8 směrnice 2001/29/ES a směrnice 2012/28/EU.

4. Práva uvedená v odstavci 1 uplynou 20 let po zveřejnění tiskové publikace. Tato lhůta se počítá od prvního dne měsíce ledna roku následujícího po dni zveřejnění.

Or. cs

Amendment 737 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Protection des publications de presse en ce qui Protection des publications de presse concerne les utilisations numériques

Or. fr

Amendment 738 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Schutz von Presseveröffentlichungen im Schutz von Presseveröffentlichungen Hinblick auf digitale Nutzungen

Or. de

Amendment 739 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Protection of press publications concerning Protection of press publications digital uses

Or. en

Amendment 740 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Andrzej Grzyb

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Protection of press publications concerning Protection of press publications digital uses

Or. en

Amendment 741 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Stefano Maullu, Pascal Arimont

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Protection of press publications concerning Protection of press publications digital uses

Or. en

Amendment 742 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Protection of press publications concerning Protection of press publications digital uses

Or. en

Justification

The rights of publishers of press publications should encompass digital as well as analogue uses

Amendment 743 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Marju Lauristin

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of deleted press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications.

Or. en

Amendment 744 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of deleted press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications.

Or. en

Justification

The market relevance of such an intervention mechanism has not been demonstrated.

Amendment 745 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of deleted press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications.

Or. en

Amendment 746 Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Die Mitgliedstaaten legen Bestimmungen 1. Die Mitgliedstaaten legen Bestimmungen fest, mit denen Presseverlage die in Artikel 2 fest, mit denen Presseverlage die in Artikel 2 und Artikel 3 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie und Artikel 3 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG genannten Rechte für die digitale 2001/29/EG genannten Rechte für die Nutzung Nutzung ihrer Presseveröffentlichung erhalten. ihrer Presseveröffentlichung erhalten, einschließlich eines unverzichtbaren Rechts auf eine angemessene Vergütung für diese Nutzung. Das unverzichtbare Recht auf eine angemessene Vergütung kann ausschließlich durch eine Verwertungsgesellschaft durchgesetzt werden.

Or. de

Amendment 747 Mady Delvaux, Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin, Sorin Moisă

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of 1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications. publications and shall ensure that a fair share of the revenue derived from the uses of the press publishers right is attributed to journalists and other employees.

Or. en

Amendment 748 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of 1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press 2001/29/EC and Article 3 and 9 of Directive publications. 2006/115/EC for the use of their press publications and an unwaivable right to obtain an equitable remuneration for such use.

Or. en

Justification

Publishers of press publications should be treated equally to other holders of ancillary rights such as film production companies, phonogram producers, broadcasting stations, etc. Therefore, their rights should encompass all the basic rights irrespective of digital and/or analogue use. The introduction of an unwaivable right to obtain an equitable remuneration would prevent market- dominating search engine operators from thwarting such a right, as was the case in Germany.

Amendment 749 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of 1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for press publications with a presumption of in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive representation of authors of literary works 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press contained in publications and the legal publications. possibility to sue in their own name when defending the rights of such author for the digital use of their press publications.

Or. en

Amendment 750 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of 1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press 2001/29/EC and Article 3 and 9 of Directive publications. 2006/115/EC for the digital use of their press publications.

Or. en

Amendment 751 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Les États membres confèrent aux éditeurs de 1. Les États membres peuvent conférer, s'ils en publications de presse les droits prévus à décident ainsi, aux éditeurs de publications de l'article 2 et à l'article 3, paragraphe 2, de la presse les droits prévus à l'article 2 et à l'article directive 2001/29/CE pour l'utilisation 3, paragraphe 2, de la directive 2001/29/CE numérique de leurs publications de presse. pour l'utilisation numérique de leurs publications de presse.

Or. fr

Amendment 752 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Los Estados miembros reconocerán a las 1. Los Estados miembros reconocerán a las editoriales de publicaciones de prensa los editoriales de publicaciones de prensa los derechos previstos en el artículo 2 y en el derechos previstos en el artículo 2 y en el artículo 3, apartado 2, de la Directiva artículo 3, apartado 2, de la Directiva 2001/29/CE para el uso digital de sus 2001/29/CE y en los artículos 3 y 9 de la publicaciones de prensa. Directiva 2006/115/CE para el uso de sus publicaciones de prensa.

Or. es

Justification

La propuesta sólo otorga derechos para usos digitales, mientras que el papel del editor y la inversión del editor en las empresas editorials es para usos impresos y digitales, independientemente del método de difusión. Otros titulares de derechos conexo gozan de los derechos completos. Al sólo conceder derechos para usos digitales parece que la edición impresa no merece el mismo nivel de protección y no tiene en cuenta la reproducción, distribución y alquiler / préstamo no autorizado, No tener derechos análogos sería similar a no cubrir DVD y CDs para para los productores de peliculas.

Amendment 753 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Constance Le Grip, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Les États membres confèrent aux éditeurs de 1. Les États membres confèrent aux éditeurs de publications de presse les droits prévus à publications de presse et agences de presse les l'article 2 et à l'article 3, paragraphe 2, de la droits prévus à l'article 2 et à l'article 3, directive 2001/29/CE pour l'utilisation paragraphe 2, de la directive 2001/29/CE pour numérique de leurs publications de presse. l'utilisation numérique de leurs publications de presse.

Or. fr

Amendment 754 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of 1. Member States may provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for press publications the legal capacity to sue in in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive their own name when defending the rights of 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press authors for the digital use of their press publications. publications.

Or. en

Amendment 755 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Andrzej Grzyb

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of 1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press 2001/29/EC for the use of their press publications. publications.

Or. en

Amendment 756 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of 1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press 2001/29/EC for the use of their press publications. publications.

Or. en

Amendment 757 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Stefano Maullu, Pascal Arimont

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall provide publishers of 1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press 2001/29/EC for the use of their press publications. publications.

Or. en

Amendment 758 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Die Mitgliedstaaten legen Bestimmungen 1. Die Mitgliedstaaten legen Bestimmungen fest, mit denen Presseverlage die in Artikel 2 fest, mit denen Presseverlage die in Artikel 2 und Artikel 3 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie und Artikel 3 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG genannten Rechte für die digitale 2001/29/EG genannten Rechte für die Nutzung Nutzung ihrer Presseveröffentlichung erhalten. ihrer Presseveröffentlichung erhalten.

Or. de

Amendment 759 Mady Delvaux

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States shall ensure that the private and non-commercial use of content through links and other means, such as citations, are excluded from the provisions and rights laid down in paragraph 1 .

Or. en

Amendment 760 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States may provide that rights set forth in paragraph 1 and related to the use of excerpts of press publications by search

engines and other aggregators can be exercised by collective management organisations.

Or. en

Justification

Taking into consideration that there are different approaches regarding the enforcement of the right to equitable remuneration, the Directive should at least stipulate that Member States may enable collective management organisations to exercise the rights. A better enforcement is needed in order to provide publishers of press publications with sufficient bargaining power and to prevent strong market players from undermining their rights.

Amendment 761 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Sorin Moisă, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with an unwaivable right to

obtain equitable remuneration for the use of their press publications.

Or. en

Amendment 762 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 b. Member States shall provide for the following exception or limitation in respect of the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC with regard to the use by search engines and providers of services which process the content correspondingly: (a) The reproduction of printed and electronic press publications for the purpose of indexing or other comparable systematic data capture, and making excerpts available to the public or embedding them in other ways in their own offers, by providers of search engines and providers of services which process the content correspondingly;

(b) Excerpts from press publications that are:

- textual content: text excerpt up to a length of [250] characters including spaces and heading;

- visual content: thumbnail up to a maximum resolution of [250 x 250] pixels;

- audio content: audio excerpt up to a maximum length of [30] seconds;

- video content: video excerpt up to a maximum length of [30] seconds;

Where a press publication is used within the meaning of point (a), the source is to be clearly cited at all times; the descriptors required for this purpose shall not be taken into account when determining the admissible excerpts set out in point (b).

Member States shall ensure that the providers of search engines and services which process the content correspondingly, as a compensation for the exception or limitation set out in points (a) and (b) and in the conditions set out in the second subparagraph, shall be under obligation to set aside at least once a year a percentage of the revenues they have received from operating the search engine and/or from providing services which process the content correspondingly in the territory of the Member States during the year immediately preceding the year for which such compensation is to be paid. Such payments shall accrue in full to the holders of copyrights or ancillary rights, including the producers of the press publications. The expression "revenues" shall refer to the proceeds obtained by the providers of search engines and/or by providers of services which process the content correspondingly and payment in kind before the deduction of costs.

The Member States shall ensure that the publishers of press publications receive a minimum share of the remuneration to be paid pursuant to third subparagraph.

Or. en

Amendment 763 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 c. Member States shall ensure that the claim to payment of fair compensation as set out in third and fourth subparagraphs of paragraph 1b can only be exercised by collective management organisations in compliance with the following provisions: (a) the claim is unwaivable and may only be assigned to a collective management organisation in advance; this shall not apply to any assignment of the claim by an author or a holder of ancillary rights to publishers of a press publication which contains the rightholder's work or subject-matter for the purpose of transferring it to a collective management organisation;

(b) to avoid imposing an unreasonable burden, the Member States may provide that the obligation to pay equitable compensation shall not apply to microenterprises if the payments are patently not in a reasonable ratio to the costs involved in collecting and administering the revenues;

(c) where a party entitled to a claim has not transferred the management of its claim to a collective management organisation, the organisation which manages claims of the same category shall be deemed to be mandated to manage that party's claim; in the event that more than one collective management organisation is eligible, those collective management organisations shall be deemed jointly mandated; should the party entitled to a claim choose a specific collective management organisation, then this organisation shall be deemed to be mandated.

(d) a party entitled to a claim shall have the same rights and obligations resulting from the agreement between the user and the collective management organisation which is deemed to be mandated to manage that party's right as the parties to a claim which have mandated that collective management organisation; the party entitled to a claim may exercise its claim within a term, to be fixed by the Member State concerned which, calculated from the date upon which the relevant press publication excerpt has been made available to the public or otherwise embedded as set out in paragraph 1b, which may not be shorter than three years.

Or. en

Amendment 764 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 d (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 d. At regular intervals, the Commission shall review the length of the press publications excerpts as set out in point (b) of paragraph 1b, as well as the amount of the fair

compensation as set out in third and fourth subparagraphs of that paragraph and adopt any necessary amendments by means of delegated acts.

Or. en

Amendment 765 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall deleted leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other rightholders, in respect of the works and other subject-matter incorporated in a press publication. Such rights may not be invoked against those authors and other rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive them of their right to exploit their works and other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated.

Or. en

Justification

The market relevance of such an intervention mechanism has not been demonstrated.

Amendment 766 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Marju Lauristin

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall deleted leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other rightholders, in respect of the works and other subject-matter incorporated in a press publication. Such rights may not be invoked against those authors and other rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive them of their right to exploit their works and other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated.

Or. en

Amendment 767 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall deleted leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other rightholders, in respect of the works and other subject-matter incorporated in a press publication. Such rights may not be invoked against those authors and other rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive them of their right to exploit their works and other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated.

Or. en

Amendment 768 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Les droits visés au paragraphe 1 laissent 2. Les droits visés au paragraphe 1 laissent intacts et n'affectent en aucune façon les droits intacts et n'affectent en aucune façon les droits conférés par le droit de l'Union aux auteurs et conférés par les systèmes juridiques nationaux autres titulaires de droits, à l'égard des œuvres et et le droit de l'Union aux auteurs et autres autres objets protégés inclus dans une titulaires de droits, à l'égard des œuvres et autres publication de presse. Ces droits sont objets protégés inclus dans une publication de inopposables aux auteurs et autres titulaires de presse. Ces droits sont inopposables aux auteurs droits et, en particulier, ne sauraient les priver et autres titulaires de droits et, en particulier, ne de leur droit d'exploiter leurs œuvres et autres sauraient les priver de leur droit d'exploiter leurs objets protégés indépendamment de la œuvres et autres objets protégés publication de presse dans laquelle ils sont indépendamment de la publication de presse inclus. dans laquelle ils sont inclus.

Or. fr

Amendment 769 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall 2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other provided for in Union law to authors, rightholders, in respect of the works and other performers and other rightholders, in respect of subject-matter incorporated in a press the works and other subject-matter incorporated publication. Such rights may not be invoked in a press publication. Such rights may not be against those authors and other rightholders and, invoked against those authors and other in particular, may not deprive them of their right rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive to exploit their works and other subject-matter them of their right to exploit their works and independently from the press publication in other subject-matter independently from the which they are incorporated. press publication in which they are incorporated.

Or. en

Justification

Performers are in fact included and for coherency-purposes, this should be stated here as well.

Amendment 770 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. Die in Absatz 1 genannten Rechte erstrecken sich nicht auf das Verknüpfen mit

Hyperlinks, da dies keine Handlung der öffentlichen Wiedergabe darstellt.

Or. de

Amendment 771 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and deleted Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 772 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and deleted Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

Or. en

Justification

The market relevance of such an intervention mechanism has not been demonstrated.

Amendment 773 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Marju Lauristin

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and deleted Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 774 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and deleted Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 775 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Les articles 5 à 8 de la directive 2001/29/CE 3. Les agrégateurs d'information utilisent le et de la directive 2012/28/UE s'appliquent contenu des éditeurs et agences de presse, et mutatis mutandis aux droits mentionnés au sont responsables des contenus qu'ils mettent à paragraphe 1. la disposition du public.

Or. fr

Amendment 776 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3 bis. Les éditeurs et les agences de presse doivent être également garantis face à l'exploitation en masse de leurs contenus, et

notamment envers les agrégateurs d'information au même titre que les titulaires de droits, notamment au moyen de licences.

Or. fr

Amendment 777 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall deleted expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.

Or. en

Justification

The market relevance of such an intervention mechanism has not been demonstrated.

Amendment 778 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall deleted expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.

Or. en

Amendment 779 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall deleted expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.

Or. en

Amendment 780 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Marju Lauristin

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall deleted expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.

Or. en

Amendment 781 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Stefano Maullu, Daniel Buda, Pascal Arimont

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall 4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press expire 15 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the the first day of January of the year following the date of publication. date of publication.

Or. en

Amendment 782 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall 4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press expire 30 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the the first day of January of the year following the date of publication. date of publication.

Or. en

Amendment 783 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Die in Absatz 1 genannten Rechte erlöschen 4. Die in Absatz 1 genannten Rechte erlöschen 20 Jahre nach der Veröffentlichung der 15 Jahre nach der Veröffentlichung der Presseveröffentlichung. Die Berechnung dieser Presseveröffentlichung. Die Berechnung dieser Zeitspanne erfolgt ab dem 1. Januar des auf den Zeitspanne erfolgt ab dem 1. Januar des auf den Tag der Veröffentlichung folgenden Jahres. Tag der Veröffentlichung folgenden Jahres.

Or. de

Amendment 784 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4 a. Die Mitgliedstaaten stellen sicher, dass die Journalisten, Autoren und sonstigen Rechteinhaber angemessen an der Vergütung

beteiligt werden, die sich aus der Nutzung der in Absatz 1 genannten Rechte aufgrund einer Presseveröffentlichung ergibt.

Or. de

Amendment 785 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 11 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 11 a Provision of hyperlinks to works The provision on a website of hyperlinks to works available on another website, where such links only contain information necessary to find or request the source's contents, shall not constitute a communication to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 786 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 12

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 12 deleted

Claims to fair compensation

Member States may provide that where an author has transferred or licensed a right to a publisher, such a transfer or a licence constitutes a sufficient legal basis for the publisher to claim a share of the compensation for the uses of the work made under an exception or limitation to the transferred or licensed right.

Or. en

Amendment 787 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 12

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 12 deleted

Claims to fair compensation

Member States may provide that where an author has transferred or licensed a right to a publisher, such a transfer or a licence constitutes a sufficient legal basis for the publisher to claim a share of the compensation for the uses of the work made under an exception or limitation to the transferred or licensed right.

Or. en

Amendment 788 Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that where an deleted author has transferred or licensed a right to a publisher, such a transfer or a licence constitutes a sufficient legal basis for the publisher to claim a share of the compensation for the uses of the work made under an exception or limitation to the transferred or licensed right.

Or. en

Amendment 789 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that where an deleted author has transferred or licensed a right to a publisher, such a transfer or a licence constitutes a sufficient legal basis for the publisher to claim a share of the compensation for the uses of the work made under an exception or limitation to the transferred or licensed right.

Or. en

Amendment 790 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that where an deleted author has transferred or licensed a right to a publisher, such a transfer or a licence constitutes a sufficient legal basis for the publisher to claim a share of the compensation for the uses of the work made under an exception or limitation to the transferred or licensed right.

Or. en

Justification

The market relevance of such an intervention mechanism has not been demonstrated.

Amendment 791 Enrico Gasbarra, Luigi Morgano, Silvia Costa, Mary Honeyball

Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that where an Member States may provide that where an author has transferred or licensed a right to a author has transferred or licensed a right to a publisher, such a transfer or a licence constitutes publisher, that publisher is a rightholder by a sufficient legal basis for the publisher to claim virtue and to the extent of such a transfer or a a share of the compensation for the uses of the licence. Therefore, this transfer or licence work made under an exception or limitation to constitutes a sufficient legal basis for the the transferred or licensed right. publisher to claim a share of the compensation for the uses of the work made under an exception, statutory collective licensing or limitation to the transferred or licensed right.

Or. en

Amendment 792 Virginie Rozière, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that where an Member States shall provide that where an author has transferred or licensed a right to a author has transferred, assigned or licensed a publisher, such a transfer or a licence constitutes right, including a right to claim a share of a sufficient legal basis for the publisher to claim income, to a publisher, such a transfer, a share of the compensation for the uses of the assignment or a licence constitutes a sufficient work made under an exception or limitation to legal basis for the publisher to claim a share of the transferred or licensed right. the compensation for the uses of the work made under an exception or limitation to the transferred, assigned or licensed right.

Or. en

Amendment 793 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States may provide that where an Member States may provide that where an author has transferred or licensed a right to a author or performer has transferred or licensed publisher, such a transfer or a licence constitutes a right to a publisher, such a transfer or a a sufficient legal basis for the publisher to claim licence constitutes a sufficient legal basis for the a share of the compensation for the uses of the publisher to claim a share of the compensation work made under an exception or limitation to for the uses of the work made under an the transferred or licensed right. exception or limitation to the transferred or licensed right.

Or. en

Amendment 794 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les États membres ont la faculté de prévoir une exception ou une limitation aux droits visés aux articles 2 et 3 de la directive 2001/29/CE pour permettre la mise à

disposition du public d'oeuvres par des services automatisés de référencement d'images, à condition que les titulaires de droit reçoivent une compensation equitable.

Or. fr

Amendment 795 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Ivo Belet, Virginie Rozière, Marc Tarabella, Hannu Takkula, Jean-Marie Cavada, Constance Le Grip

Proposal for a directive Chapter 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Chapter 3 a Protection of sport event organizers

Member States shall provide sport event

organizers with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3 (2) of Directive 2001/29/EC and Article 7 of Directive 2006/115/EC.

Or. en

Justification

Article 165(1) TFEU states that the Union is to contribute to the promotion of European sporting issues. The protection of intellectual property of sport event organisers has already been envisaged in recital 52 to Directive 2010/13/EU and was supported by the European Parliament in several reports on sport. The Court held in Joined cases C-403/08 and C-429/08, FAPL, EU:C:2011:631, that sporting events have a unique and original character worthy of protection comparable to the protection of works. To date five Member States have granted a neighbouring right to sport event organisers.

Amendment 796 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Chapter 4 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Certain uses of protected content by online Certain uses of protected content by the users of services online services.

Or. en

Amendment 797 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Michel Reimon, Max Andersson, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Chapter 4 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Certain uses of protected content by online Certain uses of protected content by users of services online services

Or. en

Amendment 798 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 deleted

Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject- matter uploaded by their users

1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.

3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.

Or. en

Amendment 799 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 deleted

Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject- matter uploaded by their users

1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.

3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.

Or. en

Amendment 800 Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 deleted

Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject- matter uploaded by their users

1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.

3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.

Or. en

Amendment 801 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of protected content by information society Use of protected content in certain information service providers storing and giving access to society services. large amounts of works and other subject- matter uploaded by their users

Or. en

Amendment 802 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of protected content by information society Use of copyright protected content uploaded by service providers storing and giving access to users of information society service providers large amounts of works and other subject- matter uploaded by their users

Or. en

Amendment 803 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of protected content by information society Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject- significant amounts of copyright protected matter uploaded by their users works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users

Or. en

Amendment 804 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of protected content by information society Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to service providers storing information provided large amounts of works and other subject- by their users matter uploaded by their users

Or. en

Amendment 805 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Utilisation de contenus protégés par des Utilisation de contenus protégés par des prestataires de services de la société de prestataires de services de la société de l'information qui stockent et donnent accès à un l'information qui stockent et donnent accès à des grand nombre d'œuvres et d'autres objets œuvres ou d'autres objets protégés chargés par protégés chargés par leurs utilisateurs leurs utilisateurs

Or. fr

Amendment 806 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Buda, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Use of protected content by information society Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject- works and other subject-matter uploaded by matter uploaded by their users their users

Or. en

Amendment 807 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that deleted store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 808 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Les prestataires de services de la société de 1. Les prestataires de services de la société de l'information qui stockent un grand nombre l'information qui mettent à disposition et d'œuvres ou d'autres objets protégés chargés proposent au public des œuvres ou d'autres par leurs utilisateurs et qui donnent accès à ces objets protégés par le droit d'auteur mis à œuvres et autres objets prennent, en disposition par leurs utilisateurs sont tenus de coopération avec les titulaires de droits, des conclure des contrats de licences avec les mesures destinées à assurer le bon titulaires de droits qui le demandent, pour les fonctionnement des accords conclus avec les droits de reproduction et de communication au titulaires de droits en ce qui concerne public, à moins de pouvoir bénéficier de l'utilisation de leurs œuvres ou autres objets l'exemption de responsabilité prévue par protégés ou destinées à empêcher la mise à l'article 14 de la directive 2000/31/CE. Au disposition, par leurs services, d'œuvres ou terme de ces contrats de licence, ces d'autres objets protégés identifiés par les prestataires de services de la société prennent, titulaires de droits en coopération avec les en coopération avec les titulaires de droits, des prestataires de services. Ces mesures, telles que mesures destinées à assurer le bon le recours à des techniques efficaces de fonctionnement de ces contrats de licences en reconnaissance des contenus, doivent être ce qui concerne l'utilisation de leurs œuvres appropriées et proportionnées. Les prestataires ou autres objets protégés. de services fournissent aux titulaires de droits Un prestataire de service de la société de des informations suffisantes sur le l'information qui ne mettra pas en place des fonctionnement et la mise en place des mesures, mesures techniques efficaces et rapides pour ainsi que, s'il y a lieu, des comptes rendus répondre aux demandes des ayants droit en réguliers sur la reconnaissance et l'utilisation application du présent article, ne pourra pas des œuvres et autres objets protégés. bénéficier de la protection prévue à l'article 14 (1) de la directive 2000/31/CE .

Sauf s'ils agissent à titre professionnel, la responsabilité des utilisateurs des services pour les actes relevant du droit d'auteur est couverte par les contrats de licences conclus avec les prestataires de services.

Les prestataires de services de la société de l'information qui jouent un rôle actif mais ne sont pas sollicités par les ayants droits pour conclure un accord de licence pour les œuvres et autres objets protégés qu'ils stockent et offrent au public, sont tenus de prendre, en coopération avec les ayants droits, des mesures destinées à empêcher la mise à disposition, par leurs services, d'œuvres ou d'autres objets protégés identifiés par les titulaires de droit en coopération avec les prestataires de services.

Les prestataires de services qui peuvent se prévaloir de l'exemption de responsabilité prévue à l'article 14 de la directive 2000/31/CE mais stockent et offrent au public des quantités significatives d'oeuvres et autres objets protégés par le droit d'auteur, sont tenu de prendre, en coopération avec les ayants droit, des mesures destinées à assurer le bon fonctionnement des accords conclus avec les ayants droit en ce qui concerne l'utilisation de leurs oeuvres ou autres objets protégés, ou destinés à empêcher la mise à disposition, par leurs services, d'oeuvres ou d'autres objets protégés identifiés par les titulaires de droits en coopération avec les prestataires de services

Ces mesures, telles que le recours à des techniques efficaces de la reconnaissance des contenus, doivent être appropriées et proportionnées. Les prestataires de services fournissent aux titulaires de droits des informations suffisantes sur le fonctionnement et la mise en place des mesures, ainsi que s'il y a lieu, des comptes rendus réguliers sur la reconnaissance et l'utilisation des oeuvres et autres objets protégés. De leur côté, les ayants droit fournissent aux prestataires de services les éléments nécessaires pour assurer le bon fonctionnement des mesures déployées par les prestataires de service.

Or. fr

Amendment 809 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject-matter amounts of copyright protected content uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation uploaded by their users shall conclude with rightholders, take measures to ensure the agreements with rightholders, unless they fall functioning of agreements concluded with under the scope of Articles 12, 13,14 and 15 of rightholders for the use of their works or other Directive 2000/31/EC. subject-matter or to prevent the availability on User uploads, storing and granting public their services of works or other subject-matter access to that upload, amount to a single use identified by rightholders through the that shall be covered by one agreement. cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content Rightholders and information society services recognition technologies, shall be appropriate shall conduct negotiations in good faith. and proportionate. The service providers shall Agreements shall be fair and balanced and provide rightholders with adequate take into account the interests of users of information on the functioning and the information society services. In particular, deployment of the measures, as well as, when rightholders shall offer the conclusion of pan- relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition European agreements. and use of the works and other subject-matter. The implementation of such agreements shall respect users' rights under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

No obligation shall be imposed on service providers to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor an obligation shall be imposed upon them to actively seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity.

This Article is without prejudice to the ability of rightholders to request the removal of infringing content in accordance with Directive 2000/31/EC.

Member States shall ensure that agreements provide adequate level of transparency, legal certainty and predictability to users, without prejudice to trade and commercial secrets.

Where appropriate, reporting shall be conducted under the conditions set out by Directive 2014/26/EU.

Or. en

Justification

Internet today is the most crucial source of information available to many users. Making online service providers responsible for the uploaded content, including texts, videos or images to be filtered and monitored is against users’ interests and the rights of creators. Monitoring and filtering large volume of materials before it is uploaded on the web will not only be only financially challenging for small companies, but it will change the Internet as we know. The eCommerce directive provides for a well balanced practice with removal of the illegal content following the notification.

Amendment 810 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Buda, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Member States shall ensure that any store and provide to the public access to large licencing agreement between information amounts of works or other subject-matter society service providers, that store and provide uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation to the public access to protected works or other with rightholders, take measures to ensure the subject-matter uploaded by their users, and functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders, shall include : rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 811 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Los proveedores de servicios de la sociedad 1. Los proveedores de servicios de la sociedad de la información que almacenen y faciliten de la información que almacenen y faciliten acceso público a grandes cantidades de obras u acceso público a obras u otras prestaciones otras prestaciones cargadas por sus usuarios cargadas por sus usuarios realizan un acto de adoptarán, en cooperación con los titulares de comunicación al público o de puesta a derechos, las medidas pertinentes para asegurar disposición de este. En casos donde aquellos el correcto funcionamiento de los acuerdos proveedores de servicios almacenen y faciliten celebrados con los titulares de derechos para el acceso a grandes cantidades de obras u de otros uso de sus obras u otras prestaciones o para materiales cargados por sus usuarios, los impedir que estén disponibles en sus servicios proveedores de servicios, en cooperación con obras u otras prestaciones identificadas por los los titulares de derechos, tomarán medidas titulares de los derechos en cooperación con los efectivas para asegurar el correcto proveedores de servicios. Esas medidas, como funcionamiento de los acuerdos celebrados con el uso de técnicas efectivas de reconocimiento los titulares de derechos para el uso de sus obras de contenidos, serán adecuadas y u otras prestaciones o para impedir que estén proporcionadas. Los proveedores de servicios disponibles en sus servicios obras u otras proporcionarán a los titulares de derechos prestaciones identificadas por los titulares de los información adecuada sobre el funcionamiento derechos en cooperación con los proveedores de y el despliegue de las medidas, así como, en su servicios. Esas medidas, como el uso de caso, información adecuada sobre el técnicas efectivas de reconocimiento de reconocimiento y uso de las obras y otras contenidos, serán adecuadas y proporcionadas. prestaciones. Los proveedores de servicios proporcionarán a los titulares de derechos información adecuada sobre el funcionamiento y el despliegue de las medidas, así como, en su caso, información adecuada sobre el reconocimiento y uso de las obras y otras prestaciones.

Or. es

Amendment 812 Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Silvia Costa

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject-matter amounts of works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation uploaded by their users shall either conclude with rightholders, take measures to ensure the agreements with rightholders for the use of functioning of agreements concluded with their works or other subject-matter and take rightholders for the use of their works or other measures, in cooperation with rightholders, to subject-matter or to prevent the availability on ensure the functioning of such agreements or their services of works or other subject-matter take measures to prevent the availability on identified by rightholders through the their services of works or other subject-matter cooperation with the service providers. Those identified by rightholders through the measures, such as the use of effective content cooperation with the service providers. The recognition technologies, shall be appropriate measures referred to in the first sentence shall and proportionate. The service providers shall be appropriate and proportionate and shall provide rightholders with adequate information respect users' rights and process personal data on the functioning and the deployment of the according to Directive 95/46/EC and the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate General Data Protection Regulation. The reporting on the recognition and use of the service providers shall provide rightholders with works and other subject-matter. adequate information on the functioning of those measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the use of the works and other subject-matter. This paragraph shall cover all the service providers which play an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject- matter or promoting them, and that are therefore not covered by Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 813 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large store and provide to the public access to amounts of works or other subject-matter significant amounts of copyright protected uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation works or other subject-matter uploaded by their with rightholders, take measures to ensure the users and perform an act of communication to functioning of agreements concluded with the public shall, in cooperation with rightholders for the use of their works or other rightholders, take measures to ensure the subject-matter or to prevent the availability on functioning of agreements concluded with their services of works or other subject-matter rightholders for the use of their works or other identified by rightholders through the subject-matter or, in case such agreements cooperation with the service providers. Those have not been concluded, to prevent the measures, such as the use of effective content availability on their services of works or other recognition technologies, shall be appropriate subject-matter identified by rightholders. Those and proportionate. The service providers shall measures, such as the use of effective content provide rightholders with adequate information recognition technologies, shall be appropriate, on the functioning and the deployment of the proportionate and compliant with the relevant measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate industry standards. The service providers shall reporting on the recognition and use of the provide rightholders with adequate information works and other subject-matter. on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the rightholders' own works and other subject- matter in a commonly agreed reporting format. The rightholders shall provide the service providers with the necessary data to allow the services to identify their content, such as reference files and metadata.

Or. en

Amendment 814 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Diensteanbieter der Informationsgesellschaft, 1. Diensteanbieter der Informationsgesellschaft, die große Mengen der von ihren Nutzern die große Mengen der von ihren Nutzern hochgeladenen Werke und sonstigen hochgeladenen urheberrechtlich geschützten Schutzgegenstände in Absprache mit den Werke und sonstigen Schutzgegenstände Rechteinhabern speichern oder öffentlich speichern oder öffentlich zugänglich machen zugänglich machen, ergreifen Maßnahmen, um und damit über die bloße Bereitstellung der zu gewährleisten, dass die mit den physischen Einrichtung hinaus gehen und Rechteinhabern geschlossenen Vereinbarungen, somit eine Handlung der öffentlichen die die Nutzung ihrer Werke oder sonstigen Wiedergabe durchführen, sind zum Abschluss Schutzgegenstände regeln, oder die die von Lizenzvereinbarungen mit den Zugänglichkeit der von den Rechteinhabern Rechteinhabern verpflichtet. Diese genannten Werke oder Schutzgegenstände Diensteanbieter fallen nicht unter den über ihre Dienste untersagen, eingehalten Haftungsausschluss nach Artikel 14 der werden. Diese Maßnahmen wie beispielsweise Richtlinie 2000/31/EC des Europäischen wirksame Inhaltserkennungstechniken müssen Parlaments und des Rates, da dieser nur für geeignet und angemessen sein. Die vollständig neutrale und passive Anbieter von Diensteanbieter müssen gegenüber den Onlinediensten gilt. Diese Diensteanbieter Rechteinhabern in angemessener Weise ergreifen in Absprache mit den darlegen, wie die Maßnahmen funktionieren Rechteinhabern Maßnahmen, um zu und eingesetzt werden und ihnen gewährleisten, dass die mit den Rechteinhabern gegebenenfalls über die Erkennung und geschlossenen Vereinbarungen, die die Nutzung Nutzung ihrer Werke und sonstigen ihrer Werke oder sonstigen Schutzgegenstände Schutzgegenstände Bericht erstatten. regeln, eingehalten werden. Diensteanbieter, die unter den Haftungsausschluss nach Artikel 14 der Richtlinie 2000/31/EC fallen, ergreifen in Absprache mit den Rechteinhabern Maßnahmen, um zu gewährleisten, dass die Zugänglichkeit der von den Rechteinhabern genannten Werke oder Schutzgegenstände über ihre Dienste untersagt wird.

Or. de

Amendment 815 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large store and provide to the public access to amounts of works or other subject-matter significant amounts of copyright-protected uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation works or other subject-matter uploaded by their with rightholders, take measures to ensure the users shall enter into fair licensing agreements functioning of agreements concluded with with any requesting rightholder of such works rightholders for the use of their works or other or other subject matter. Under the terms of subject-matter or to prevent the availability on such agreements concluded with the their services of works or other subject-matter rightholders, such information society service identified by rightholders through the providers shall take measures to ensure the cooperation with the service providers. Those functioning of agreements concluded with measures, such as the use of effective content rightholders for the use of their works or other recognition technologies, shall be appropriate subject-matter. and proportionate. The service providers shall Where information society service providers provide rightholders with adequate are eligible to the liability exemption provided information on the functioning and the for in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC but deployment of the measures, as well as, when store and provide access to the public to relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition significant amounts of copyright-protected and use of the works and other subject-matter. works or other subject matter, such information society service providers shall take measures to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers.

Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate.

Or. en

Amendment 816 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large store information provided by a recipient of the amounts of works or other subject-matter service and enable users to upload works in uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation such a way as to make them available to the with rightholders, take measures to ensure the public shall, upon obtaining knowledge or functioning of agreements concluded with awareness that an uploaded work subject to rightholders for the use of their works or other copyright and other related rights is used in an subject-matter or to prevent the availability on unauthorised manner, act expeditiously to their services of works or other subject-matter remove or to disable access to the content, identified by rightholders through the except where service providers conclude a cooperation with the service providers. Those licensing agreement with rightholders measures, such as the use of effective content enabling the content to remain available. recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 817 Luis de Grandes Pascual

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large store and provide to the public access to works amounts of works or other subject-matter or other subject-matter uploaded by their users uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation perform an act of communication or making with rightholders, take measures to ensure the available to the public. In cases where those functioning of agreements concluded with service providers store and provide access to rightholders for the use of their works or other large amounts of works or other subject-matter subject-matter or to prevent the availability on uploaded by their users, the service providers their services of works or other subject-matter shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take identified by rightholders through the effective measures to ensure the functioning of cooperation with the service providers. Those agreements concluded with rightholders for the measures, such as the use of effective content use of their works or other subject-matter or to recognition technologies, shall be appropriate prevent the availability on their services of and proportionate. The service providers shall works or other subject-matter identified by provide rightholders with adequate information rightholders through the cooperation with the on the functioning and the deployment of the service providers. Those measures, such as the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate use of effective content recognition reporting on the recognition and use of the technologies, shall be appropriate and works and other subject-matter. proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Justification

In order to provide legal certainty about the status of UUC services that build their businesses on the use of copyright content, it is necessary to clarify that UUC services that store and provide access to protected content fall under copyright.

Amendment 818 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that are store and provide to the public access to large actively involved in making available digital amounts of works or other subject-matter content uploaded by their users, including by uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation promoting and curating to the public copyright with rightholders, take measures to ensure the protected work and with knowledge of the functioning of agreements concluded with copyright protected content in question, shall, rightholders for the use of their works or other in cooperation with rightsholders in the subject-matter or to prevent the availability on creative sectors, take effective measures to their services of works or other subject-matter ensure the functioning of agreements concluded identified by rightholders through the with rightholders for the use of their digital cooperation with the service providers. Those content, works or other subject matter or to measures, such as the use of effective content prevent the availability on their services of recognition technologies, shall be appropriate digital content, works or other subject matter and proportionate. The service providers shall identified by rightholders through the provide rightholders with adequate information cooperation with active service providers. Those on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, such as the use of effective content measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate recognition technologies, shall be appropriate reporting on the recognition and use of the and proportionate. The active service providers works and other subject-matter. shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the digital content, works or other subject matter.

Or. en

Amendment 819 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject-matter amounts of works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall and proportionate, and shall ensure the provide rightholders with adequate information protection of individual user data as far as on the functioning and the deployment of the possible, in compliance with Directive measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate 95/46/EC and Directive 2002/58/EC, and the reporting on the recognition and use of the General Data Protection Regulation. The works and other subject-matter. service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 820 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Where information society service providers store and provide to the public access to large that store information provided by recipients of amounts of works or other subject-matter the service, conclude agreements with uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation rightholders, the implementation of such with rightholders, take measures to ensure the agreements shall respect the users' functioning of agreements concluded with fundamental rights and shall in particular not rightholders for the use of their works or other convey an obligation upon the information subject-matter or to prevent the availability on society service provider to monitor the their services of works or other subject-matter information which they transmit or store, nor a identified by rightholders through the general obligation actively to seek facts or cooperation with the service providers. Those circumstances indicating illegal activity. The measures, such as the use of effective content service providers shall cooperate and work recognition technologies, shall be appropriate together with rightholders to ensure that the and proportionate. The service providers shall functioning and implementation of such provide rightholders with adequate agreements are full and transparent towards information on the functioning and the the users. deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 821 Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. I prestatori di servizi della società 1. I prestatori di servizi della società dell’informazione che memorizzano e danno dell'informazione che, indipendendentemente pubblico accesso a grandi quantità di opere o dalla natura del mezzo utilizzato a tal fine, altro materiale caricati dagli utenti adottano, in sono coinvolti nella messa a disposizione del collaborazione con i titolari dei diritti, misure pubblico di opere di terzi caricate dagli utenti e miranti a garantire il funzionamento degli qualora tale attività non sia di natura accordi con essi conclusi per l’uso delle loro puramente tecnica, automatica e passiva opere o altro materiale ovvero volte ad adottano misure adeguate e proporzionate per impedire che talune opere o altro materiale garantire il funzionamento degli accordi identificati dai titolari dei diritti mediante la obbligatoriamente conclusi con i titolari dei collaborazione con gli stessi prestatori siano diritti per l'utilizzo delle loro opere, ovvero messi a disposizione sui loro servizi. Tali volte ad impedire che talune opere o altro misure, quali l’uso di tecnologie efficaci per il materiale identificati dai titolari dei diritti riconoscimento dei contenuti, sono adeguate e mediante la collaborazione con gli stessi proporzionate. I prestatori di servizi forniscono prestatori siano messi a disposizione sui loro ai titolari dei diritti informazioni adeguate sul servizi. Tali misure, quali l'uso di tecnologie funzionamento e l’attivazione delle misure e, se efficaci per il riconoscimento dei contenuti, del caso, riferiscono adeguatamente sul sono adeguate e proporzionate. I prestatori di riconoscimento e l’utilizzo delle opere e altro servizi forniscono ai titolari dei diritti materiale. informazioni adeguate sul funzionamento e l'attivazione delle misure e, se del caso, riferiscono adeguatamente sul riconoscimento e l'utilizzo delle opere e altro materiale.

Or. it

Amendment 822 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large store and provide access to the public to amounts of works or other subject-matter copyright-protected works or other subject- uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation matter uploaded by their users shall, in with rightholders, take measures to ensure the cooperation with rightholders, take reasonable functioning of agreements concluded with and appropriate measures to ensure the rightholders for the use of their works or other functioning of agreements concluded with subject-matter or to prevent the availability on rightholders for the use of their works or other their services of works or other subject-matter subject-matter. Those measures may take into identified by rightholders through the account various available technological cooperation with the service providers. Those developments that would be appropriate for the measures, such as the use of effective content nature of services of the information society recognition technologies, shall be appropriate provider. The service providers shall cooperate and proportionate. The service providers shall with rightholders and provide them with provide rightholders with adequate adequate reporting on the recognition and use of information on the functioning and the the works and other subject-matter. deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 823 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Information society service providers that 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large store and provide to the public access to amounts of works or other subject-matter significantly large amounts of works or other uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation subject-matter uploaded by their users shall, in with rightholders, take measures to ensure the cooperation with rightholders, take measures to functioning of agreements concluded with ensure the functioning of license agreements rightholders for the use of their works or other concluded with rightholders for the use of their subject-matter or to prevent the availability on works or other subject-matter or to prevent the their services of works or other subject-matter availability on their services of works or other identified by rightholders through the subject-matter identified by rightholders cooperation with the service providers. Those through the cooperation with the service measures, such as the use of effective content providers. Those measures, such as the use of recognition technologies, shall be appropriate effective content recognition technologies, shall and proportionate. The service providers shall be appropriate and proportionate and shall provide rightholders with adequate information ensure the fair redistribution of value towards on the functioning and the deployment of the the rightholders. The service providers shall measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate provide rightholders with adequate information reporting on the recognition and use of the on the functioning and the deployment of the works and other subject-matter. measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Justification

It is important to introduce a de minimis threshold in order to limit these obligations to information society service providers which are hosting indeed above the average large amounts of copyright protected material in order to avoid bureaucratic or financial burden for SMEs. The aim of the Article should be the sharing of generated value with the rightholders.

Amendment 824 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Los proveedores de servicios de la sociedad 1. Los proveedores de servicios de la sociedad de la información que almacenen y faciliten de la información que almacenen y faciliten acceso público a grandes cantidades de obras u acceso público a una cantidad significativa de otras prestaciones cargadas por sus usuarios obras u otras prestaciones cargadas por sus adoptarán, en cooperación con los titulares de usuarios adoptarán, en cooperación con los derechos, las medidas pertinentes para asegurar titulares de derechos, las medidas pertinentes el correcto funcionamiento de los acuerdos para asegurar el correcto funcionamiento de los celebrados con los titulares de derechos para el acuerdos celebrados con los titulares de uso de sus obras u otras prestaciones o para derechos para el uso de sus obras u otras impedir que estén disponibles en sus servicios prestaciones o para impedir que estén obras u otras prestaciones identificadas por los disponibles en sus servicios obras u otras titulares de los derechos en cooperación con los prestaciones identificadas por los titulares de los proveedores de servicios. Esas medidas, como derechos en cooperación con los proveedores de el uso de técnicas efectivas de reconocimiento servicios. Esas medidas, como el uso de de contenidos, serán adecuadas y técnicas efectivas de reconocimiento de proporcionadas. Los proveedores de servicios contenidos, serán adecuadas y proporcionadas, proporcionarán a los titulares de derechos ajustándose a las normas sectoriales información adecuada sobre el funcionamiento pertinentes. Los proveedores de servicios y el despliegue de las medidas, así como, en su proporcionarán a los titulares de derechos caso, información adecuada sobre el información adecuada sobre el funcionamiento reconocimiento y uso de las obras y otras y el despliegue de las medidas, así como, en su prestaciones. caso, información adecuada y puntual sobre el reconocimiento y uso de las obras y otras prestaciones.

Or. es

Amendment 825 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. În cooperare cu titularii de drepturi, furnizorii 1. În cooperare cu titularii de drepturi, furnizorii de servicii ale societății informaționale care de servicii ale societății informaționale care stochează cantități mari de opere sau alte stochează, indexează, clasifică opere sau alte obiecte protejate încărcate de utilizatorii lor și obiecte protejate încărcate de utilizatorii lor și oferă publicului acces la acestea iau măsuri care oferă publicului acces la acestea iau măsuri pentru a asigura funcționarea acordurilor eficiente pentru a asigura funcționarea încheiate cu titularii de drepturi pentru utilizarea acordurilor încheiate cu titularii de drepturi operelor lor sau a altor obiecte protejate sau pentru utilizarea operelor lor sau a altor obiecte pentru a împiedica punerea la dispoziție, prin protejate sau pentru a împiedica punerea la intermediul serviciilor lor, a operelor sau a altor dispoziție neautorizată, prin intermediul obiecte protejate identificate de către titularii de serviciilor lor, a operelor sau a altor obiecte drepturi în cadrul cooperării cu furnizorii de protejate identificate de către titularii de drepturi servicii. Măsurile respective, cum ar fi utilizarea în cadrul cooperării cu furnizorii de servicii. de tehnologii eficace de recunoaștere a Măsurile respective, cum ar fi utilizarea de conținutului, sunt adecvate și proporționale. tehnologii eficace de recunoaștere a Furnizorii de servicii prezintă titularilor de conținutului, sunt adecvate și proporționale. drepturi informații adecvate privind Furnizorii de servicii prezintă titularilor de funcționarea și aplicarea măsurilor, precum și, drepturi informații adecvate privind dacă este cazul, rapoarte adecvate privind funcționarea și aplicarea măsurilor, precum și, recunoașterea și utilizarea operelor și a altor dacă este cazul, rapoarte adecvate privind obiecte protejate. recunoașterea și utilizarea operelor și a altor obiecte protejate.

Or. ro

Amendment 826 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Buda, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) an obligation for the information service provider to take measures, such as the use of content recognition technologies, to ensure the

effective functioning of the agreement concluded for the use of the protected works or other subject-matters;

Or. en

Amendment 827 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Buda, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) the coverage of the content uploaded by the users, as well as their liability, including where they perform an act of reproduction and/or of communication to the public, insofar they act on a non-professional basis.

Or. en

Amendment 828 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Where information society service providers take the measures referred to in paragraph 1, such measures shall not violate any privacy rights of the users, and shall be in compliance with Directives 95/46/EC and 2002/58/EC, as well as the General Data Protection Regulation. Measures to prevent the availability of copyright protected works or other subject-matter shall be limited to preventing the availability of specifically identified and duly notified works and shall not consist in an active monitoring of all the data of each user of the service.

Or. en

Amendment 829 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Buda, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member States shall ensure that in the absence of a licencing agreement as referred to in paragraph 1, either because it was not required by rightholders or because the information society service provider is eligible to the liability exemption regime set out in

Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC, information service providers shall take measures to prevent the availability on their services of protected works or other subject- matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers.

Or. en

Amendment 830 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Rightholders shall provide the information society service providers with the necessary data to ensure the proper functioning of the measures deployed by the providers in application of paragraph 1. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter

.

Or. en

Amendment 831 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Die in Absatz 1 genannten Maßnahmen beinhalten beispielsweise wirksame Inhaltserkennungstechniken. Sie müssen geeignet und angemessen sein. Sämtliche Diensteanbieter müssen gegenüber den Rechteinhabern in angemessener Weise darlegen, wie die Maßnahmen funktionieren und eingesetzt werden und ihnen gegebenenfalls über die Erkennung und Nutzung ihrer Werke und sonstigen Schutzgegenstände Bericht erstatten.

Or. de

Amendment 832 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. In order to be valid, the notification of an unauthorised protected content shall include, in particular, the identification by the right holder of the work subject to copyright and related rights claimed to have been infringed and the identification of the uploaded work, including its exact location, that is considered to be using work subject to copyright and related rights.

Or. en

Amendment 833 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. In order to ensure the transparency of the agreements mentioned in paragraph 1, rightholders shall provide, in a publicly accessible database, all the necessary data

related to the holder of the right, the protected subject matter and relevant territories, in order to allow the service providers to identify accurately their content.

Or. en

Amendment 834 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. For this purpose, rightholders shall provide service providers with accurately

identified works or subject matter over which they enjoy rights.

Or. en

Amendment 835 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 b. In order to ensure a proportionate implementation of the voluntary agreements mentioned in paragraph 1, Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that rightholders and information society service providers make available to the beneficiary of an exception or limitation provided for in national law in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 and with [Articles XXX of this Directive] the means of benefiting from that exception or limitation, to the extent necessary to benefit from that exception or limitation.

Or. en

Amendment 836 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Buda, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 b. The measures, referred to in paragraphs 1

and 1a shall be appropriate and proportionate.

Or. en

Amendment 837 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Buda, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 c (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 c. For the purpose of ensuring a proper application of the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 1a : a) rightholders shall provide information society service providers with all relevant and necessary information in order to identify protected works and other-subject matter available on their services, and

b) the service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 1a, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter.

Or. en

Amendment 838 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Member States shall ensure that the service deleted providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 839 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Member States shall ensure that the service 2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1. paragraph 1. These mechanisms shall in particular ensure that where the removal of the content referred to in paragraph 1 is not justified, the content in question shall be reinstated online within a reasonable time. As a last resort, Member States shall ensure the possibility of judicial redress.

Or. en

Amendment 840 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Les États membres veillent à ce que les 2. Les États membres veillent à ce que les prestataires de services visés au paragraphe 1 prestataires de services visés au paragraphe 1 mettent en place des dispositifs de plainte et de mettent en place des dispositifs de plainte et de recours à l'intention des utilisateurs pour les recours à l'intention des utilisateurs pour les litiges relatifs à l'application des mesures visées litiges relatifs à l'application des mesures visées au paragraphe 1. au paragraphe 1, y compris concernant le contenu chargé par les utilisateurs qui serait retiré sans raison valable par les prestataires de services. L'ayant droit concerné devra traiter de la plainte dans un délai raisonnable et fournir une justification adéquate pour les droits qu'il revendique.

Or. fr

Amendment 841 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Statele membre se asigură că furnizorii de 2. Statele membre se asigură că furnizorii de servicii menționați la alineatul (1) instituie servicii menționați la alineatul (1) instituie mecanisme de reclamații și despăgubiri de care mecanisme de reclamații și despăgubiri de care să dispună utilizatorii în caz de litigiu cu privire să dispună utilizatorii în caz de litigiu cu privire la aplicarea măsurilor menționate la alineatul la aplicarea măsurilor menționate la alineatul (1). (1), în special în ceea ce privește posibila aplicare a unei excepții sau a unei autorizații de utilizare referitoare la conținutul în cauză. Aceste mecanisme nu aduc atingere în mod nejustificat eficacității măsurilor prevăzute la alineatul (1).

Or. ro

Amendment 842 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Los Estados miembros velarán por que los 2. Los Estados miembros velarán por que los proveedores de servicios contemplados en el proveedores de servicios contemplados en el apartado 1 implanten mecanismos de apartado 1 implanten mecanismos de reclamación y recurso a los que puedan acceder reclamación y recurso a los que puedan acceder los usuarios en caso de litigio sobre la los usuarios en caso de litigio sobre la aplicación de las medidas a que se refiere el aplicación de las medidas a que se refiere el apartado 1. apartado 1, en particular en lo referente a la posible aplicación de una excepción o una autorización de uso relacionada con el contenido en cuestión. Tales mecanismos no deberán perjudicar sin razón la efectividad de las medidas contempladas en el apartado 1.

Or. es

Justification

En algunos casos, el contenido subido por los usuarios de los servicios UUC puede verse afectado por las medidas implementadas, por ejemplo cuando está cubierto por una excepción. Por lo tanto, es necesario aclarar que el mecanismo de reclamaciones y compensación debe tener esto en cuenta, al mismo tiempo que no afecte a la aplicación de las medidas.

Amendment 843 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Member States shall ensure that the service 2. Member States shall ensure that end users providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place have the means to communicate effectively complaints and redress mechanisms that are with the rightholders who have requested the available to users in case of disputes over the measures referred to in paragraph 1 in order to application of the measures referred to in challenge the application of those measures paragraph 1. such as when they are applied to a use which falls under a copyright limitation or exception or to public domain material. Services referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required to disclose the identity of users to rightholders.

Or. en

Amendment 844 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Member States shall ensure that the service 2. Member States shall ensure and provide providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place measures that the service providers referred to complaints and redress mechanisms that are in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and available to users in case of disputes over the redress mechanisms that are available to users application of the measures referred to in in case of disputes over the application of the paragraph 1. measures referred to in paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 845 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Member States shall ensure that the service 2. Member States shall ensure that national law providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in provides users with access to a court or other place complaints and redress mechanisms that relevant authority for the purpose of asserting are available to users in case of disputes over their right of use under an exception or the application of the measures referred to in limitation. paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 846 Constance Le Grip, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Buda, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Member States shall ensure that the service 2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1. paragraphs 1 and 1a.

Or. en

Amendment 847 Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 bis. Le misure di cui al paragrafo 1 sono attuate fatto salvo l'utilizzo delle opere nell'ambito di un'eccezione o limitazione del diritto d'autore e fatto salvo l'utilizzo di contenuti originali creati dagli utenti. A tal fine, gli Stati membri garantiscono che agli utenti sia consentito comunicare rapidamente ed efficacemente con i titolari dei diritti che hanno chiesto le misure di cui al paragrafo 1 al fine di contestare l'applicazione di tali misure.

Or. it

Amendment 848 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. The agreements referred to in paragraph 1 shall be implemented without prejudice to the use of works made within an exception or limitation to copyright. To this end, Member States shall ensure that users are allowed to

communicate rapidly and in an effective manner with the rightholders who have requested any measures within the scope of agreements referred to in paragraph 1 in order to challenge the application of those measures.

Or. en

Amendment 849 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 bis. En ce qui concerne les litiges relatifs à l'application des mesures visées au paragraphe 1, notamment en ce qui concerne l'application d'une possible exception ou d'une autorisation

d'utilisation pour le contenu concerné, les mécanismes ne peuvent pas causer de préjudice injustifié à l'efficacité des mesures visées dans le paragraphe 1.

Or. fr

Amendment 850 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. In order to ensure uniform protection of users and right holders across the Union, the European Commission shall develop guidelines on the conditions that need to be

met for the validity of the notification referred to in paragraph 1a and for the complaint and redress mechanisms referred to in paragraph 2.

Or. en

Amendment 851 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. Any complaint filed under the mechanism referred to in paragraph 2 shall be dealt with by the relevant rightholder within a reasonable

period of time and in an effective manner. The rightholder shall provide due justification for the rights it claims.

Or. en

Amendment 852 Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. Where a user makes use of the complaints and redress mechanisms referred to in paragraph 2, service providers and rightholders whose content is involved in any such conflict or dispute shall be obliged to resolve such conflict or dispute in a timely manner.

Or. en

Amendment 853 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Marju Lauristin, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. Member States shall ensure that users have access to a court or other relevant judicial authority.

Or. en

Amendment 854 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 b. Member States shall provide that disputes between rightholders and information society service providers concerning the application of paragraph 1 of this Article may be submitted to an alternative dispute resolution mechanism. Member States shall create or designate an impartial body with relevant expertise to assist the parties in the resolution of their dispute under the mechanism provided for in the first subparagraph of this paragraph.

No later than [date mentioned in Article 21(1)] Member States shall notify to the Commission the body referred to in second subparagraph of this paragraph.

Or. en

Amendment 855 Julia Reda, Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake, Nessa Childers, Max Andersson, Michel Reimon, Brando Benifei

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States shall facilitate, where deleted appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.

Or. en

Amendment 856 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States shall facilitate, where deleted appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.

Or. en

Amendment 857 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States shall facilitate, where 3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to rightholders through stakeholder dialogues. define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.

Or. en

Justification

Copyright legislation should regulate activities and not technologies. Since the rationale of this article is to encourage collaboration, it is necessary to have a wording that is not restrictive and leaves enough flexibility for all parties to discuss what serves their mutual interests

Amendment 858 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States shall facilitate, where 3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological and their effectiveness in light of technological developments. developments. In cooperation with the Member States, the Commission shall encourage the exchange of best practices regarding the results of any cooperation established pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article.

Or. en

Amendment 859 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States shall facilitate, where 3. The Commission, in cooperation with appropriate, the cooperation between the Member States shall facilitate, where information society service providers and appropriate, the cooperation between the rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to information society service providers referred define best practices, such as appropriate and to in paragraph 1, users and right holders proportionate content recognition through stakeholder dialogues to define best technologies, taking into account, among practices for the implementation of paragraph others, the nature of the services, the 1. availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.

Or. en

Amendment 860 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Les États membres favorisent, lorsque c'est 3. Les États membres favorisent, lorsque c'est utile, la coopération entre les prestataires de utile, la coopération entre les prestataires de services de la société de l'information et les services de la société de l'information et les titulaires de droits, grâce à des dialogues entre titulaires de droits, grâce à des dialogues entre parties intéressées, afin de définir de bonnes parties intéressées, afin de définir de bonnes pratiques, telles que les techniques appropriées pratiques, telles que les techniques appropriées et proportionnées de reconnaissance des et proportionnées de reconnaissance des contenus, compte tenu, notamment, de la nature contenus, compte tenu, notamment, de la nature des services, de la disponibilité des outils des services, de la disponibilité des outils techniques et de leur efficacité au vu des techniques et de leur efficacité au vu des évolutions technologiques. évolutions technologiques. La Commission encourage l'échange de bonnes pratiques dans toute l'Union européenne.

Or. fr

Amendment 861 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States shall facilitate, where 3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and define best practices, of measures that are proportionate content recognition proportionate and effective to ensure the technologies, taking into account, among protection of rightholders' works or other others, the nature of the services, the availability subject matter, taking into account, among of the technologies and their effectiveness in others, the nature of the services, the availability light of technological developments. of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments.

Or. en

Amendment 862 Luis de Grandes Pascual

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States shall facilitate, where 3. Member States shall ensure that the service appropriate, the cooperation between the providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in information society service providers and place complaints and redress mechanisms that rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to are available to users in case of disputes over define best practices, such as appropriate and the application of the measures referred to in proportionate content recognition paragraph 1, in particular regarding the technologies, taking into account, among possible application of an exception or an others, the nature of the services, the authorisation of use relating to the content availability of the technologies and their concerned. Such mechanisms shall not effectiveness in light of technological unreasonably prejudice the effectiveness of developments. measures referred to in paragraph 1.

Or. en

Justification

In some cases the content uploaded by users on UUC services can be affected by the implemented measures, for instance when it is covered by an exception. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify that the complaints and redress mechanism needs to take this into account, while at the same time not affecting the implementation of the measures.

Amendment 863 Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States shall facilitate, where 3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and define best practices, taking into account, proportionate content recognition among others, the nature of the services, the technologies, taking into account, among availability of the technologies and their others, the nature of the services, the availability effectiveness in light of technological of the technologies and their effectiveness in developments. light of technological developments.

Or. en

Amendment 864 Victor Negrescu, Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová, Marietje Schaake

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3 a. Member States shall ensure that where service providers take voluntary measures, these measures do not infringe the fundamental rights of users, namely their right to protection of their personal data and their freedom to receive or impart information, in accordance with Articles 8 and 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular their rights to the use of works made within an exception or limitation to copyright.

Or. en

Amendment 865 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3 bis. Los Estados miembros deberán implementar soluciones proporcionadas y

disuasorias en caso de incumplimiento de las obligaciones dispuestas en el apartado 1.

Or. es

Justification

Es una práctica común que cuando una propuesta legislativa introduce una obligación específica, también debe haber una disposición correspondiente sobre sanciones en caso de incumplimiento de la obligación prescrita.

Amendment 866 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3 a. Member States shall implement proportionate and dissuasive remedies for non

- compliance with the obligations set out in paragraph 1.

Or. en

Amendment 867 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 a Licensing agreements for information society service providers that store and/or provide access to the public to significant amounts of copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users 1. Information society service providers that store and/or provide access to the public to copyright protected works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users, thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities and performing an act of communication to the public and of reproduction, shall conclude licensing agreements with rightholders, unless

they are eligible for the liability exemption provided in Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2. Service providers that play an active role, including by optimising the presentation of the uploaded works or subject-matter or promoting them, are not eligible for the safe harbour liability exemption.

3. Licenses acquired by information society service providers shall cover all the acts of their individual users, which are not for direct or indirect economic or commercial advantage.

Or. en

Amendment 868 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 a Protection of audiovisual authors for the making available of their works 1. Member States shall ensure that when an audiovisual author has transferred or assigned his making available right to a producer, that author shall retain the right to obtain a fair and proportionate remuneration. 2. This right to obtain a fair and proportionate remuneration for the making available of the author's work is inalienable and cannot be waived.

3. The administration of this right to obtain a fair and proportionate remuneration for the making available of the author's work shall be entrusted to collective management organisations representing audiovisual authors, unless other collective agreements, including voluntary collective management agreements, guarantee such remuneration to audiovisual authors for their making available right.

4. Authors' collective management organisations shall collect the fair and proportionate remuneration from audiovisual media services making audiovisual works available to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 869 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 a User Generated Content Member States shall provide for an exception to the rights provided for in Articles 2, 3, and 4 of Directive 2001/29/EC, Article 5 and Article 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC, Article 4(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC, Articles 7(1) and 8(1) of Directive 2006/115/EC and Article 11 (1) of this Directive in order to allow natural persons to use an existing work or other subject-matter in the creation of a new work or other subject- matter and use the new work or other subject-

matter, provided that: (a) the work or other subject-matter has already been lawfully made available to the public;

(b) the source, including, if available, the name of the author, performer, producer, or broadcaster - is indicated;

(c) there is a certain level of creativity in the new work which substantially differentiates it from the original work.

Or. en

Amendment 870 Rosa Estaràs Ferragut

Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 bis Derecho irrenunciable de remuneración 1. Los Estados miembros velarán por que el autor de una obra audiovisual tenga derecho a obtener una remuneración equitativa, cuando haya transferido o cedido su derecho de puesta a disposición a un productor audiovisual. 2. Este derecho a obtener una remuneración equitativa por la puesta a disposición de la obra del autor es irrenunciable e intransmisible.

3. La gestión de este derecho de remuneración equitativa por la puesta a disposición de la obra del autor se confiará a las entidades de gestión colectiva que representen a los autores de la obra audiovisual.

4. Las entidades de gestión colectiva de los autores de la obra audiovisual recaudarán la remuneración equitativa de los servicios audiovisuales que pongan las obras audiovisuales a disposición del público.

Or. es

Justification

Este derecho debe basarse en los ingresos que se perciben por la explotación comercial de la obra audiovisual, siendo responsable del pago, la plataforma o distribuidora final que pone las obras audiovisuales a disposición del público, garantizando así una remuneración financiera proporcional para el autor por la explotación real de la obra. La administración de este derecho debe confiarse a las entidades de gestión colectiva, centralizando los pagos como una suerte de ventanilla única, que facilita su liquidación por los usuarios, y otorga mayor seguridad jurídica en el mercado.

Amendment 871 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Victor Negrescu, Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 a Modification to Directive 2001/29/EC Directive 2001/29/EC shall be amended as follows: The following Article shall be added:

Article 5(3) bis

User Generated Content

Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the rights set out in Articles 2, 3 and 4 for the use by natural persons of an existing work or other subject-matter in the creation of a new work or other subject-matter,

provided that:

(a) the work or other subject-matter has already been lawfully made available to the public;

(b) the source, including, if available, the name of the author, is indicated;

(c) there is a certain level of originality in the new work.

This exception is without prejudice to the exceptions and limitations provided for in Article 5.

Or. en

Amendment 872 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 a Right of use under an exception or limitation 1. Member States shall ensure that national law provides users with the necessary mechanisms, including the possibility of access to court, to exercise the right of use a work or other subject matter in application of an exception or limitation under this Directive, Directive 2001/29/EC, Directive 96/09/EC, Directive 2009/24/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU.

2. The right of use of a work or other subject- matter in accordance to paragraph 1 shall not be limited by technological measures in application of Article 6 of Directive 2001/29/EC.

Or. en

Amendment 873 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Pervenche Berès, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 bis Les Etats membres prévoient que les différends entre les ayants-droit et les services de la société de l'information concernant l'application du paragraphe 1 de l'article 13 peuvent être soumis à un système alternatif de règlement des conflits. Les Etats membres créent ou désignent un organisme impartial et disposant de l'expertise nécessaire dans le but d'aider les parties à résoudre leur différend au titre de ce système.

Pas plus tard que (date mentionnée dans l'article 21(1)) les Etats membres informent la Commission de la mise en place de cet organisme.

Or. fr

Amendment 874 Pascal Durand, Helga Trüpel, Bart Staes

Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 a Where a performer has transferred or assigned the exclusive right of making available on demand, and independent of any agreed terms for such transfer or assignment, the performer shall have the right to obtain an equitable remuneration to be paid by the user for the

making available to the public of his fixed performance. The right of the performer to obtain an equitable remuneration for the making available to the public of his performance shall be unwaivable and collected and administered by a performers' collective management organization.

Or. en

Amendment 875 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 13 a Unwaivable right to remuneration Member States shall ensure that when an author has transferred or assigned his making available right to a producer, that author shall retain the right to obtain equitable remuneration. This right is unwaivable and

inalienable. This right can be entrusted to collective management organisations representing authors, unless other collective agreements, including voluntary collective management agreements, guarantee such remuneration to authors for their making available right.

Or. en

Justification

An unwaivable and inalienable right to remuneration for authors would ensure a financial reward for them, proportional to the real exploitation of their works, without hindering or complicating the exploitation chain of their works.

Amendment 876 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Constance Le Grip, Frédérique Ries

Proposal for a directive Chapter 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

CHAPITRE 2 BIS PROTECTION DES AUTEURS AUDIOVISUELS POUR LA MISE A DISPOSITION DE LEURS OEUVRES

Article -14

1. Les Etats membres prévoient que lorsqu'un auteur ou artiste interprète ou un exécutant d'une oeuvre audiovisuelle cède son droit de

mise à disposition du public à un producteur, il conserve le droit d'obtenir une rémunération équitable et proportionnelle aux recettes d'exploitation de l'oeuvre, sous réserve que ces mesures ne soient pas incluses dans le contrat initial.

2. Ce droit à une rémunération équitable et proportionnelle est incessible et ne peut pas faire l'objet d'une renonciation.

Or. fr

Amendment 877 Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Gli Stati membri provvedono a che gli autori 1. "Gli Stati membri provvedono a che gli e gli artisti (interpreti o esecutori) ricevano, autori, gli artisti (interpreti o esecutori), gli periodicamente e tenendo conto delle specificità editori, i produttori e i loro rispettivi aventi di ciascun settore, informazioni tempestive, causa, nell'ambito degli accordi di licenza di adeguate e sufficienti sullo sfruttamento delle cui all'articolo 13, ricevano, periodicamente e loro opere ed esecuzioni da parte di coloro ai tenendo conto delle specificità di ciascun quali hanno concesso in licenza o trasferito i settore, informazioni e rendicontazioni diritti, in particolare per quanto riguarda le tempestive, adeguate, accurate e sufficienti modalità di sfruttamento, i proventi generati e sullo sfruttamento delle loro opere, la remunerazione dovuta. rappresentazioni ed esecuzioni, da parte di coloro ai quali hanno concesso in licenza o trasferito i diritti, in particolare indicando le modalità di sfruttamento, le modalità di promozione, i proventi generati e la remunerazione dovuta".

Or. it

Amendment 878 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers, who are in a contractual into account the specificities of each sector, relationship where there are ongoing payment timely, adequate and sufficient information on obligations, receive on a regular basis and no the exploitation of their works and less than once a year and taking into account performances from those to whom they have the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate, licensed or transferred their rights, notably as accurate and comprehensive information on regards modes of exploitation, revenues the exploitation of their works and generated and remuneration due. performances from those to whom they have licensed or transferred their rights, or their successors in title, notably as regards modes of exploitation, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Justification

The legal relationship and status of authors and performers, the time of their payment obligations, as well as the quality of the obtained information shall be clear and workable.

Amendment 879 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors, performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers, and those bodies who use public into account the specificities of each sector, money for the purchase of content, receive on timely, adequate and sufficient information on a regular basis and taking into account the the exploitation of their works and specificities of each sector, timely, and performances from those to whom they have comprehensive information on the exploitation licensed or transferred their rights, notably as of works and performances from those to whom regards modes of exploitation, revenues or by whom works are licensed or rights are generated and remuneration due. transferred, notably as regards modes of exploitation, payments made, revenues generated and remuneration due. Such information should be made freely available in the public domain.

Or. en

Amendment 880 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers in case of contracts with ongoing into account the specificities of each sector, payment obligations receive on a regular basis, timely, adequate and sufficient information on and at least once a year, and taking into the exploitation of their works and account the specificities of each sector, timely, performances from those to whom they have adequate and sufficient information on the licensed or transferred their rights, notably as exploitation of their works and performances regards modes of exploitation, revenues from those to whom they have licensed or generated and remuneration due. transferred their rights or from any other third party holding such information, notably as regards modes of exploitation, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Justification

Performers of commissioned productions should not be excluded from a right of information. The information should at least be received once per year as is the usual practice in the sector and be limited to contracts with payment obligations.

Amendment 881 Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Die Mitgliedstaaten gewährleisten, dass die 1. Die Mitgliedstaaten gewährleisten, dass die Urheber und ausübenden Künstler regelmäßig Urheber und ausübenden Künstler auf Anfrage und unter Berücksichtigung der maximal einmal jährlich und unter sektorspezifischen Besonderheiten, zeitnahe, Berücksichtigung der sektorspezifischen angemessene und hinreichende Informationen Besonderheiten, zeitnahe, angemessene und über die Verwertung ihrer Werke und hinreichende Informationen über die Darbietungen vor allem im Hinblick auf die Art Verwertung ihrer Werke und Darbietungen vor der Verwertung, die erzielten Einnahmen und allem im Hinblick auf die Art der Verwertung, die fällige Vergütung von denjenigen erhalten, die erzielten Einnahmen und die fällige denen sie Lizenzrechte erteilt oder an die sie Vergütung von denjenigen erhalten, denen sie Rechte übertragen haben. Lizenzrechte erteilt oder an die sie Rechte übertragen haben. Dieser Anspruch gilt nicht für untergeordnete Werkbeiträge.

Or. de

Amendment 882 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis, and no into account the specificities of each sector, less than once a year and taking into account timely, adequate and sufficient information on the specificities of each sector, accurate and the exploitation of their works and comprehensive information on the exploitation performances from those to whom they have of their works and performances from those to licensed or transferred their rights, notably as whom they have licensed or transferred their regards modes of exploitation, revenues rights, including subsequent transferees or generated and remuneration due. licensees, notably as regards modes of exploitation, promotion, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 883 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate and sufficient information on accurate, timely, adequate and sufficient the exploitation of their works and information on the exploitation and promotion performances from those to whom they have of their works and performances from those to licensed or transferred their rights, notably as whom they have licensed or transferred their regards modes of exploitation, revenues rights,including subsequent transferees or generated and remuneration due. licensees, notably as regards modes of promotion, exploitation, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 884 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and no into account the specificities of each sector, less than once a year and taking into account timely, adequate and sufficient information on the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate, the exploitation of their works and accurate and sufficient information on the performances from those to whom they have exploitation of their works and performances licensed or transferred their rights, notably as from those to whom they have licensed or regards modes of exploitation, revenues transferred their rights or their successors in generated and remuneration due. title, notably as regards modes of exploitation, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 885 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Die Mitgliedstaaten gewährleisten, dass die 1. Die Mitgliedstaaten gewährleisten, dass die Urheber und ausübenden Künstler regelmäßig Urheber und ausübenden Künstler regelmäßig, und unter Berücksichtigung der aber nicht seltener als ein Mal pro Jahr, und sektorspezifischen Besonderheiten, zeitnahe, unter Berücksichtigung der sektorspezifischen angemessene und hinreichende Informationen Besonderheiten, genaue, zeitnahe, angemessene über die Verwertung ihrer Werke und und hinreichende Informationen über die Darbietungen vor allem im Hinblick auf die Art Verwertung und Bewerbung ihrer Werke und der Verwertung, die erzielten Einnahmen und Darbietungen vor allem im Hinblick auf die Art die fällige Vergütung von denjenigen erhalten, der Verwertung, die erzielten Einnahmen und denen sie Lizenzrechte erteilt oder an die sie die fällige Vergütung von denjenigen erhalten, Rechte übertragen haben. denen sie Lizenzrechte erteilt oder an die sie Rechte übertragen haben.

Or. de

Amendment 886 Jytte Guteland

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate and sufficient information on timely, accurate and comprehensive the exploitation of their works and information on the exploitation of their works performances from those to whom they have and performances from those to whom they licensed or transferred their rights, notably as have licensed or transferred their rights, notably regards modes of exploitation, revenues as regards modes of exploitation, the direct and generated and remuneration due. indirect revenues generated and the remunerations due.

Or. en

Amendment 887 Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate and sufficient information on timely, adequate and sufficient information on the exploitation of their works and the exploitation of their works and performances from those to whom they have performances , notably as regards modes of licensed or transferred their rights, notably as exploitation, revenues generated and regards modes of exploitation, revenues remuneration due. generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 888 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate and sufficient information on timely, adequate, accurate and sufficient the exploitation of their works and information on the exploitation of their works performances from those to whom they have and performances from those to whom they licensed or transferred their rights, notably as have licensed or transferred their rights, notably regards modes of exploitation, revenues as regards modes of exploitation, modes of generated and remuneration due. promotion, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 889 Therese Comodini Cachia

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate and sufficient information on timely, adequate, accurate and sufficient the exploitation of their works and information on the exploitation of their works performances from those to whom they have and performances from those to whom they licensed or transferred their rights, notably as have licensed or transferred their rights, notably regards modes of exploitation, revenues as regards modes of exploitation, modes of generated and remuneration due. promotion, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 890 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate and sufficient information on timely, adequate, accurate and comprehensive the exploitation of their works and information on the exploitation of their works performances from those to whom they have and performances from those to whom their licensed or transferred their rights, notably as works are licensed or their rights are regards modes of exploitation, revenues transferred, notably as regards all modes of generated and remuneration due. exploitation, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 891 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate and sufficient information on timely, adequate, accurate and sufficient the exploitation of their works and information on the exploitation of their works performances from those to whom they have and performances from those to whom they licensed or transferred their rights, notably as have licensed or transferred their rights, notably regards modes of exploitation, revenues as regards modes of exploitation and generated and remuneration due. promotion, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 892 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate and sufficient information on timely, accurate and comprehensive the exploitation of their works and information on the exploitation of their works performances from those to whom they have and performances from those to whom their licensed or transferred their rights, notably as works are licensed or their rights are regards modes of exploitation, revenues transferred, notably as regards all modes of generated and remuneration due. exploitation, revenues generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 893 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Catherine Stihler, Virginie Rozière, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Mary Honeyball

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1. Member States shall ensure that authors and 1. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers receive on a regular basis and taking performers receive on a regular basis and taking into account the specificities of each sector, into account the specificities of each sector, timely, adequate and sufficient information on timely, accurate and sufficient information on the exploitation of their works and the exploitation of their works and performances from those to whom they have performances from those to whom they have licensed or transferred their rights, notably as licensed or transferred their rights, notably as regards modes of exploitation, revenues regards modes of exploitation, revenues generated and remuneration due. generated and remuneration due.

Or. en

Amendment 894 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. If those to whom the authors' or performers' works have been licensed or transferred, have licensed themselves the works or transferred themselves the rights to third parties, then authors and performers and those bodies who use public money for the

purchase of content, shall also be able to rely upon the provision of information in accordance with paragraph 1 from those third parties, provided that the third parties' acts of usage are substantial for the commercial exploitation of the work.

Or. en

Amendment 895 Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Member states shall provide that producers compulsorily communicate, free of charge, to collective management organisations for the purpose of effective

administration of rights, complete and accurate information as is necessary in order to identify the use of the work or other subject matter and the corresponding right-holders.

Or. en

Amendment 896 Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 a. Deținătorii și intermediarii de drepturi de autor au responsabilitatea de a întreprinde

acțiuni concrete pentru a se evita difuzarea de conținut care încalcă drepturile de autor.

Or. ro

Amendment 897 Victor Negrescu

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1 b. Deținătorii și intermediarii de drepturi de autor au responsabilitatea de a integra coduri

și sisteme de verificare automată în conținutul difuzat.

Or. ro

Amendment 898 Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. L’obbligo di cui al paragrafo 1 è soppresso proporzionato ed effettivo e garantisce un livello adeguato di trasparenza in ogni settore. Tuttavia, nel caso in cui l’onere amministrativo da esso derivante fosse sproporzionato rispetto ai proventi generati dallo sfruttamento dell’opera o esecuzione, gli Stati membri possono adeguare l’obbligo di cui al paragrafo 1, a condizione che esso continui a sussistere e garantisca un livello di trasparenza adeguato.

Or. it

Amendment 899 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be 2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate and effective and shall ensure an proportionate and effective and shall ensure a appropriate level of transparency in every high level of transparency in every sector. sector. However, in those cases where the administrative burden resulting from the obligation would be disproportionate in view of the revenues generated by the exploitation of the work or performance, Member States may adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, provided that the obligation remains effective and ensures an appropriate level of transparency.

Or. en

Amendment 900 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be 2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate and effective and shall ensure an proportionate and effective and shall ensure an appropriate level of transparency in every appropriate level of transparency in every sector. However, in those cases where the sector. administrative burden resulting from the obligation would be disproportionate in view of the revenues generated by the exploitation of the work or performance, Member States may adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, provided that the obligation remains effective and ensures an appropriate level of transparency.

Or. en

Amendment 901 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Virginie Rozière, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Evelyn Regner, Jytte Guteland, Mary Honeyball

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be 2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate and effective and shall ensure an proportionate and effective and shall ensure an appropriate level of transparency in every appropriate level of transparency in every sector. However, in those cases where the sector. administrative burden resulting from the obligation would be disproportionate in view of the revenues generated by the exploitation of the work or performance, Member States may adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, provided that the obligation remains effective and ensures an appropriate level of transparency.

Or. en

Amendment 902 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Julie Ward, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be 2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate and effective and shall ensure an proportionate and effective and shall ensure a appropriate level of transparency in every high level of transparency in every sector, as sector. However, in those cases where the well as author's right to audit. administrative burden resulting from the obligation would be disproportionate in view of the revenues generated by the exploitation of the work or performance, Member States may adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, provided that the obligation remains effective and ensures an appropriate level of transparency.

Or. en

Amendment 903 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be 2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate and effective and shall ensure an proportionate and effective and shall ensure a appropriate level of transparency in every high level of transparency in every sector, as sector. However, in those cases where the well as authors' right to audit. However, in administrative burden resulting from the those cases where the administrative burden obligation would be disproportionate in view of resulting from the obligation would be the revenues generated by the exploitation of disproportionate in view of the revenues the work or performance, Member States may generated by the exploitation of the work or adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, provided performance, Member States may adjust the that the obligation remains effective and ensures obligation in paragraph 1 under the condition an appropriate level of transparency. that the level of disproportionality is duly justified, and provided that the obligation remains effective and ensures an appropriate level of transparency.

Or. en

Justification

Allowing exceptions to transparency such as in those cases where the resulting "administrative burden" would be "disproportionate in view of the revenues generated by the work" is too general and could lead therefore to abuses of the right to transparent reporting. To prevent this it is required that any derogation from the reporting obligation must be duly justified.

Amendment 904 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be 2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall ensure a proportionate and effective and shall ensure an high degree of transparency in every sector, as appropriate level of transparency in every well as authors' right to audit. However, in sector. However, in those cases where the those cases where the administrative burden administrative burden resulting from the resulting from the obligation would be obligation would be disproportionate in view of disproportionate in view of the revenues the revenues generated by the exploitation of generated by the exploitation of the work or the work or performance, Member States may performance, Member States may adjust the adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, provided obligation in paragraph 1 only if the level of that the obligation remains effective and ensures disproportionality could be justified, and an appropriate level of transparency. provided that the obligation remains effective and ensures an appropriate level of transparency.

Or. en

Amendment 905 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Задължението по параграф 1 трябва да е 2. Задължението по параграф 1 трябва да е съразмерно и ефективно и да гарантира съразмерно и ефективно и да гарантира подходяща степен на прозрачност във всеки висока степен на прозрачност във всеки сектор. При все това, в случаите, в които сектор, както и правото на одит от произтичащата от задължението страна на авторите. При все това, в административна тежест би била случаите, в които произтичащата от несъразмерна с оглед на получените от задължението административна тежест би използването на произведението или била несъразмерна с оглед на получените от изпълнението приходи, държавите членки използването на произведението или могат да адаптират задължението по изпълнението приходи, държавите членки параграф 1, при условие че задължението могат да адаптират задължението по запази своята ефективност и гарантира параграф 1, при условие че задължението подходяща степен на прозрачност. запази своята ефективност и гарантира висока степен на прозрачност.

Or. bg

Amendment 906 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall be 2. The obligation in paragraph 1 shall ensure a proportionate and effective and shall ensure an high degree of transparency in every sector. appropriate level of transparency in every However, in those cases where the sector. However, in those cases where the administrative burden resulting from the administrative burden resulting from the obligation would be disproportionate in view of obligation would be disproportionate in view of the revenues generated by the exploitation of the revenues generated by the exploitation of the work or performance, Member States may the work or performance, Member States may adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, under the adjust the obligation in paragraph 1, provided condition that the level of disproportionality is that the obligation remains effective and ensures duly justified, provided that the obligation an appropriate level of transparency. remains effective and ensures an appropriate level of transparency.

Or. en

Amendment 907 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. Die in Absatz 1 genannte Pflicht muss 2. Die in Absatz 1 genannte Pflicht muss angemessen und wirksam sein und ein angemessen und wirksam sein und ein hohes angemessenes Maß an Transparenz in jedem Maß an Transparenz in jedem Sektor Sektor gewährleisten. Ist jedoch der gewährleisten. Ist jedoch der Verwaltungsaufwand aufgrund dieser Pflicht im Verwaltungsaufwand aufgrund dieser Pflicht im Verhältnis zu den durch die Verwertung des Verhältnis zu den durch die Verwertung des Werks oder der Darbietung erzielten Einnahmen Werks oder der Darbietung erzielten Einnahmen unverhältnismäßig hoch, können die unverhältnismäßig hoch, können die Mitgliedstaaten die in Absatz 1 genannte Pflicht Mitgliedstaaten die in Absatz 1 genannte Pflicht anpassen, sofern diese wirksam bleibt und ein anpassen, sofern diese wirksam bleibt und ein angemessenes Maß an Transparenz angemessenes Maß an Transparenz gewährleistet ist. gewährleistet ist.

Or. de

Amendment 908 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. Member States shall ensure that sector- specific standard reporting statements and

procedures are developed through stakeholder dialogues.

Or. en

Amendment 909 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Virginie Rozière, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Mary Honeyball

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States may decide that the deleted obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work or performance.

Or. en

Amendment 910 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States may decide that the deleted obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work or performance.

Or. en

Amendment 911 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States may decide that the deleted obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work or performance.

Or. en

Amendment 912 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States may decide that the deleted obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work or performance.

Or. en

Amendment 913 Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States may decide that the deleted obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work or performance.

Or. en

Amendment 914 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States may decide that the 3. The obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when when the contribution of the author or the contribution of the author or performer is performer has no relevance with regard to the not significant having regard to the overall overall work or performance or when reporting work or performance. obligations have been agreed by the parties, for example through collective bargaining agreements which are reflected in the terms of the contract with the author or performer or which are otherwise applicable.

Or. en

Justification

The exception would need to be more concise. To avoid creating further layers of burdensome administrative and financial obligations, renegotiation of contracts should not be possible in the event that collective bargaining agreements already apply.

Amendment 915 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States may decide that the 3. The obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when when the contribution of the author or the contribution of the author or performer is performer is not significant having regard to the not significant having regard to the overall work overall work or performance or when reporting or performance. obligations have been agreed by parties, for instance through collective bargaining agreements which are reflected in terms of the contract.

Or. en

Amendment 916 Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Die Mitgliedstaaten können festlegen, dass 3. Die Mitgliedstaaten können festlegen, dass die in Absatz 1 genannte Pflicht keine die in Absatz 1 genannte Pflicht keine Anwendung findet, wenn der Beitrag des Anwendung findet, wenn der Beitrag des Urhebers oder ausübenden Künstlers vor dem Urhebers oder ausübenden Künstlers vor dem Hintergrund des Gesamtwerks oder der Hintergrund des Gesamtwerks oder der Gesamtdarbietung nicht erheblich ist. Gesamtdarbietung nicht erheblich ist oder wenn es keine nennenswerte Verbindung zwischen dem spezifischen Werk oder der Darbietung und den Vergütungsverpflichteten gibt.

Or. de

Amendment 917 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States may decide that the 3. Member States shall ensure that the obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when representative organizations of relevant the contribution of the author or performer is stakeholders determine sector-specific not significant having regard to the overall standard reporting statements and procedures work or performance. and foster in particular automated processing making use of digital technologies and international identifiers of works.

Or. en

Justification

The wording of this paragraph is too vague and could potentially undermine the effectiveness of the whole article. This derogation shall be therefore deleted. Concrete situations shall be addressed in the sector-specific standard reporting statements and procedures to be negotiated at national level.

Amendment 918 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Julie Ward, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Mady Delvaux

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Member States may decide that the 3. Member States shall ensure that the obligation in paragraph 1 does not apply when representative organisations of relevant the contribution of the author or performer is stakeholders determine sector-specific not significant having regard to the overall standard reporting statements and procedures work or performance. and foster automated processing making use of digital technologies and international identifiers of works.

Or. en

Amendment 919 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3. Statele membre pot decide că obligația 3. Obligația menționată la alineatul (1) nu se menționată la alineatul (1) nu se aplică în cazul aplică în cazul în care obligația de transparență în care contribuția autorului ori a artistului a fost stabilită deja prin acordul părților sau interpret sau executant nu este semnificativă contribuția autorului ori a artistului interpret sau având în vedere opera ori interpretarea sau executant nu este semnificativă având în vedere execuția în ansamblu. opera ori interpretarea sau execuția în ansamblu.

Or. ro

Amendment 920 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Paragraph 1 shall not be applicable to deleted entities subject to the transparency obligations established by Directive 2014/26/EU.

Or. en

Amendment 921 Sajjad Karim, Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

4. Paragraph 1 shall not be applicable to entities 4. Paragraph 1 shall not be applicable to subject to the transparency obligations agreements subject to the transparency established by Directive 2014/26/EU. obligations established by Directive 2014/26/EU or to agreements with collective management organisations or agreements with individual authors or performers, which are based on collective bargaining or equivalent provisions.

Or. en

Amendment 922 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 14 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 14 a Establishment of a central database 1. The Commission is empowered to take measures for the establishment of a central database enabling the electronic transfer of data on works subject to copyright and other related rights from existing databases of collective management organisations and providing the possibility for independent authors or performers to submit individually the data related to their respective works. 2. The database shall provide the following non exhaustive information regarding the work subject to copyright and related rights :

(a) the type of use

(b) the means of distribution

(c) the territory

(d) the duration of the copyright

(e) the name of the holder(s) of the relevant rights

(d) the organisation or person managing the rights

(f) the rights metadata

3. For the purpose of paragraph 1, collective management organisations shall make their databases available in the public domain.

4. The database shall provide to the user the possibility to request, obtain and pay for the use of the content subject to copyright and related rights through a secure online platform, or in cases where the content cannot be obtained directly, the possibility to contact the collective management organisation or any other third party managing the rights.

5. The Commission is empowered to take measures to ensure that the database is managed in an independent and transparent manner.

Or. en

Amendment 923 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin, Helga Trüpel

Proposal for a directive Article 14 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 14 a Unwaivable right to equitable remuneration 1. Member States shall ensure that when a performer or audiovisual author has transferred or assigned his making available right to a producer, that performer or audiovisual author shall retain the right to obtain an equitable remuneration. 2. This right to obtain an equitable remuneration for the making available of the performer or audiovisual author's work is inalienable and cannot be waived.

3. The administration of this right to obtain an equitable remuneration for the making

available of the performer or audiovisual author's work shall be entrusted to collective management organisations representing audiovisual authors and/or performers, unless other collective agreements, including voluntary collective management agreements, guarantee such remuneration to performers or audiovisual authors for their making available right.

4. Performers' and audiovisual authors' collective management organisations shall collect the equitable remuneration from audiovisual media services making works available to the public.

Or. en

Amendment 924 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Contract adjustment mechanism Remuneration for the use of works or performances

Or. en

Amendment 925 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph -1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

-1 Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to a proportionate and equitable remuneration of the revenues derived from the exploitation of their works. Member States shall also ensure that representative organizations of authors and performers, whether collective management

organizations, unions or guilds, and representative organizations of users, set standards for equitable and proportionate remuneration of authors and performers for the use of their works and performances, taking into account the specificities of each sector.

Or. en

Justification

The fair remuneration of authors and performers should be here affirmed as a general EU principle and not just implicitly as a consequence of a contract adjustment mechanism. This may contribute to a just protection of their work in accordance to the fundamental principles of EU law. Given that authors' and performers' careers are usually too unstable for them to challenge their contracts in courts, it will be in practice very useful and less expensive for them to allow representative organizations to challenge collectively their contracts or interests in court.

Amendment 926 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph -1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

-1 Die Mitgliedstaaten stellen sicher, dass Urheber und ausübende Künstler ein Recht auf eine angemessene und gerechte Vergütung aus den durch die Verwertung ihrer Werke entstehenden Einnahmen haben.

Or. de

Amendment 927 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph -1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

-1 Member States shall, in any case, ensure that authors and performers are entitled to a fair and proportionate remuneration of the revenues derived from the exploitation of their works.

Or. en

Amendment 928 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph -1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

-1 Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to a proportionate remuneration of the revenues derived from all models of exploitation and every use of their works.

Or. en

Amendment 929 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph -1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

-1 Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to a proportionate remuneration of the revenues derived from all modes of exploitation and every use of their works.

Or. en

Amendment 930 Jytte Guteland

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph -1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

-1 a Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to proportionate

and equitable remuneration of the revenues derived from the exploitation of their works.

Or. en

Amendment 931 Luis de Grandes Pascual

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Los Estados miembros velarán por que los Los Estados miembros velarán por los autores, autores y los artistas intérpretes o ejecutantes artistas e intérpretes o ejecutantes, para que tengan derecho a solicitar una remuneración tengan derecho a una remuneración adicional adecuada a la parte con la que hayan suscrito equitativa derivada de la explotación de sus un contrato para la explotación de los derechos obras. en caso de que la remuneración inicialmente pactada sea desproporcionadamente baja en La remuneración adicional deberá ser ajustada comparación con las ingresos y beneficios para la parte con la que se haya suscrito un subsiguientes derivados de la explotación de contrato para la explotación de los derechos, en las obras o interpretaciones. caso de que la inicialmente pactada sea desproporcionalmente inferior en comparación con los ingresos y beneficios netos percibidos y previstos al inicio de dicha explotación.

Or. es

Justification

Con frecuencia los autores e intérpretes se ven obligados a ceder sus derechos por precios menores de lo que pudiera significar el valor de su obra. Cuando sus obras ven incrementadas su valor de manera sustancial, es necesario garantizar que su remuneración sea ajustada conforme a la explotación real y no prevista, de dichas obras.

Amendment 932 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Statele membre se asigură că autorii și artiștii Statele membre pot decide dacă autorii și artiștii interpreți sau executanți au dreptul de a cere o interpreți sau executanți a căror contribuție este remunerație suplimentară adecvată părții cu care semnificativă având în vedere opera ori au încheiat un contract pentru exploatarea interpretarea sau execuția în ansamblu au drepturilor atunci când remunerația convenită dreptul de a cere ajustarea contractului sau o inițial este disproporționat de scăzută în raport remunerație suplimentară adecvată părții cu care cu veniturile și beneficiile relevante ulterioare au încheiat un contract pentru exploatarea obținute din exploatarea operelor ori a drepturilor atunci când remunerația convenită interpretărilor sau a execuțiilor. inițial devine disproporționat de scăzută în raport cu veniturile nete și beneficiile relevante ulterioare obținute din exploatarea operelor ori a interpretărilor sau a execuțiilor. La evaluarea disproporționalității, sunt luate în considerare circumstanțele corespunzătoare fiecărui caz în parte, inclusiv natura și importanța contribuției autorilor și artiștilor interpreți sau executanți la opera ori interpretarea sau execuția în ansamblu.

Or. ro

Amendment 933 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Constance Le Grip, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Les États membres veillent à ce que les auteurs, Les États membres veillent à ce que les auteurs, interprètes et exécutants aient le droit de interprètes et exécutants aient le droit de demander, à la partie avec laquelle ils ont demander, à la partie avec laquelle ils ont conclu un contrat d'exploitation des droits, une conclu un contrat d'exploitation des droits, une rémunération supplémentaire appropriée lorsque rémunération supplémentaire appropriée lorsque la rémunération initialement convenue est la rémunération initialement convenue est exagérément faible par rapport aux recettes et exagérément faible ou inattendue par rapport bénéfices ultérieurement tirés de l'exploitation aux recettes et bénéfices ultérieurement tirés de des œuvres ou interprétations. l'exploitation des œuvres ou interprétations sous réserve que ces mesures ne soient pas incluses dans le contrat initial.

Les Etats membres pourront prévoir l'expiration de ce droit lorsque celui-ci ne sera pas exercé dans un délai raisonnable à compter de l'acte d'exploitation en question.

Or. fr

Amendment 934 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers are entitled to an appropriate appropriate remuneration from the party with remuneration for the exploitation of their works whom they entered into a contract for the or performances. exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low compared to the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 935 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers are entitled to claim additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with equitable contractual adjustments from the whom they entered into a contract for the party with whom they entered into a contract for exploitation of the rights when the remuneration the exploitation of the rights, or their originally agreed is disproportionately low successors in title, when the remuneration compared to the subsequent relevant revenues originally agreed is disproportionately low and benefits derived from the exploitation of the compared to the subsequent relevant revenues works or performances. and benefits derived from all forms of exploitation, direct or indirect of the works or performances. Authors and performers may individually or collectively appoint a representative organization to file such claim on their behalf.

Or. en

Justification

Rights in completed works and catalogues of works are frequently sold, production companies disappear, and very often the company in control is no longer the production company with whom authors or performers entered into the contract. Therefore it shall be clarified, that they can claim contractual adjustments, including additional remuneration, from the producer's successor in title if this happens.

Amendment 936 Emil Radev

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Държавите членки гарантират, че авторите и Държавите членки гарантират, че авторите и артистите изпълнители имат право да артистите изпълнители имат право на поискат подходящо допълнително пропорционалнo и справедливо възнаграждение от страната, с която са възнаграждение от последващите приходи и сключили договор за упражняване на ползи от използването на техните права, когато първоначално договореното произведения. възнаграждение е несъразмерно ниско в сравнение с последващите приходи и ползи от използването на произведенията или изпълненията.

Or. bg

Amendment 937 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers are entitled to request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with appropriate remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when the remuneration exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low originally agreed is disproportionately low compared to the subsequent relevant revenues compared to the unanticipated subsequent and benefits derived from the exploitation of the relevant net revenues and benefits derived from works or performances. the exploitation of the works or performances. This mechanism shall guarantee fair compensation, taking into account the specificities of each sector.

Or. en

Justification

The revenues must be unexpected, not only for the author or performer but also the contracting party before a right of renegotiation can be afforded. Due costs and investments to the work need to be taken into account when assessing the revenue. In order to avoid legal uncertainty, the special features of different sectors need to be taken into account.

Amendment 938 Sajjad Karim

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States may provide for authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers to request additional, appropriate appropriate remuneration from the party with remuneration from the party with whom they whom they entered into a contract for the entered into a contract for the exploitation of the exploitation of the rights when the remuneration rights when the remuneration agreed is originally agreed is disproportionately low disproportionately low compared to the compared to the subsequent relevant revenues subsequent relevant revenues and benefits and benefits derived from the exploitation of the derived from the exploitation of the works or works or performances. performances. Factors determining disproportionate remuneration shall include the nature, significance and contribution to the work of the author or performer.

Or. en

Amendment 939 Virginie Rozière, Mary Honeyball, Sylvie Guillaume, Pervenche Berès, Marc Tarabella

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers, or representatives they appoint, are appropriate remuneration from the party with entitled to request additional, fair, appropriate whom they entered into a contract for the remuneration from the party with whom they exploitation of the rights when the remuneration entered into a contract for the exploitation of the originally agreed is disproportionately low rights, or their successor in title, when it is duly compared to the subsequent relevant revenues justified to claim that the remuneration and benefits derived from the exploitation of the originally agreed is disproportionately low works or performances. compared to the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 940 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers are entitled to request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with equitable remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when the remuneration exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low originally agreed is disproportionately low compared to the subsequent relevant revenues compared to the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances. works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 941 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers, individually or through appropriate remuneration from the party with representative organisations, are entitled to whom they entered into a contract for the claim an additional and equitable remuneration exploitation of the rights when the remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a originally agreed is disproportionately low contract for the exploitation of the rights when compared to the subsequent relevant revenues the remuneration originally agreed is and benefits derived from the exploitation of the disproportionately low compared to the works or performances. subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 942 Jytte Guteland

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers or any representatives appointed by appropriate remuneration from the party with them are entitled to claim additional whom they entered into a contract for the remuneration from the party with whom they exploitation of the rights when the remuneration entered into a contract for the exploitation of the originally agreed is disproportionately low rights when the remuneration originally agreed compared to the subsequent relevant revenues is disproportionately low compared to the and benefits derived from the exploitation of the subsequent revenues and benefits derived from works or performances. the exploitation of the works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 943 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Die Mitgliedstaaten gewährleisten, dass Die Mitgliedstaaten stellen darüber hinaus Urheber und ausübende Künstler das Recht sicher, dass Urheber und ausübende Künstler haben, eine zusätzliche und angemessene das Recht haben, eine zusätzliche und Vergütung von der Partei zu verlangen, mit der angemessene Vergütung von der Partei zu sie einen Vertrag über die Verwertung ihrer verlangen, mit der sie einen Vertrag über die Rechte geschlossen haben, wenn die Verwertung ihrer Rechte geschlossen haben, ursprünglich vereinbarte Vergütung im wenn die ursprünglich vereinbarte Vergütung Vergleich zu den späteren einschlägigen im Vergleich zu den späteren einschlägigen Einnahmen und Gewinnen aus der Verwertung Einnahmen und Gewinnen aus der Verwertung der Werke oder Darbietungen der Werke oder Darbietungen unverhältnismäßig niedrig ist. unverhältnismäßig niedrig ist.

Or. de

Amendment 944 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers or their representative appropriate remuneration from the party with organisations are entitled to request additional, whom they entered into a contract for the appropriate remuneration from the party with exploitation of the rights when the remuneration whom they entered into a contract for the originally agreed is disproportionately low exploitation of the rights when the remuneration compared to the subsequent relevant revenues originally agreed is disproportionately low and benefits derived from the exploitation of the compared to the subsequent relevant revenues works or performances. and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 945 Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers are entitled to request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with proportionate and appropriate remuneration whom they entered into a contract for the from the party with whom they entered into a exploitation of the rights when the remuneration contract for the exploitation of the rights when originally agreed is disproportionately low the remuneration originally agreed is compared to the subsequent relevant revenues disproportionately low compared to the and benefits derived from the exploitation of the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits works or performances. derived from the exploitation of the works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 946 Stefano Maullu

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States may require that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers are entitled to request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with appropriate remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when the remuneration exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low originally agreed is clearly disproportionately compared to the subsequent relevant revenues compared to the unanticipated subsequent and benefits derived from the exploitation of relevant net revenues derived from the the works or performances. exploitation of the works or performances

Or. en

Amendment 947 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that authors and Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to request additional, performers are entitled to claim additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with equitable remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the whom they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when the remuneration exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low originally agreed is disproportionately low compared to the subsequent relevant revenues compared to the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances. works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 948 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Where a performer has transferred or assigned an exclusive right of making available on demand, and independent of any agreed terms for such transfer or assignment, the performer shall have the right to obtain an equitable remuneration to be paid by the user for the making available to the public of his fixed performance. The right of the performer to obtain an equitable remuneration for the making available to the public of his performance shall be unwaivable and collected and administrated by a performer´s collective management organisation.

Or. en

Amendment 949 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. The transfer of licensing of exclusive economic rights in a given work or performance may not include or be deemed to include rights that do or did not exist at the time of the signature of the contractual arrangement.

In addition, the scope of such transfer or licensing may not include or may not be deemed to have included territories, formats, modes of exploitation, technologies or any other aspect that do or did not exist at the time of the signature of the contractual arrangement.

Or. en

Amendment 950 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. Member States shall ensure that authors and performers or their representative organisations are entitled to request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the

exploitation of the rights when originally agreed remuneration is disproportionately low in comparison to the unexpected success and therefore net revenues derived from the exploitation of their works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 951 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

1a. Member states shall ensure that authors and performers or their representative organisations are entitled to claim additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with whom they entered into a contract for the

exploitation of the rights when the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low compared to subsequent revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works or performances.

Or. en

Amendment 952 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide authors with a reversion right to enable them to terminate a contract when the other party fails to meet its obligation to exploit, to promote copyright-

protected works or to pay the remuneration foreseen as well as when it does not meet its regular reporting duties as foreseen in Article 14(1).

Or. en

Amendment 953 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide authors and performers with a reversion right to enable them to terminate a contract in case of

insufficient exploitation and promotion, payment of the remuneration foreseen, as well as insufficient or lack of regular reporting.

Or. en

Justification

As most copyright contracts contain rights assignments for the entire term duration of the copyright. However, publishers and producers stop frequently promoting and exploiting these rights after 5 or 10 years. Therefore it useful to introduce a rights reversion right, as notably was introduced in Germany, allowing authors and performers to claim back their rights after a certain period of time. In this way may be ensured a fair level playing field for authors and performers

Amendment 954 Jens Rohde

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Paragraph 1 shall not apply when the contribution of the author or performer is not significant having regard to the overall work

or performance or a collective bargaining agreement is in place or forms the basis for an individual agreement.

Or. en

Justification

As in Article 14, a certain significance should be established before the right of renegotiation should be entitled. In the case of collective bargaining agreements the author or performer seem to be already sufficiently protected.

Amendment 955 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that representative organisations of authors and performers may

make the claim for additional, equitable remuneration on behalf of their members.

Or. en

Amendment 956 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that representative organisations of authors and performers may

make the claim for additional, equitable remuneration on behalf of their members.

Or. en

Amendment 957 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Any contractual provision contrary to

paragraph 1 shall be null and void.

Or. en

Amendment 958 Pavel Svoboda

Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide authors with reversion right to enable them to terminate a contract in case of insufficient exploitation

and promotion, payment of the remuneration foreseen and also in case of insufficient reporting.

Or. en

Amendment 959 Angelika Niebler, Christian Ehler, Axel Voss

Proposal for a directive Article 15 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 15 a Rückrufrecht wegen Nichtausübung Die Mitgliedstaaten legen Bestimmungen fest, nach denen Urheber und ausübene Künstler ein ausschließliches Nutzungsrecht

zurückrufen können, wenn der Inhaber des ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechts dieses Recht nicht oder nur unzureichend ausübt und dadurch die berechtigte Interessen des Urhebers erheblich verletzt werden.

Or. de

Amendment 960 Laura Ferrara, Isabella Adinolfi, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 15 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 15 bis Termine obbligatorio per l'utilizzazione dei diritti trasferiti Gli Stati Membri, al fine di riequilibrare il potere contrattuale tra gli autori e gli editori, possono prevedere un termine obbligatorio, di durata ragionevole, per l'utilizzazione dei diritti trasferiti dall'autore ad un terzo, a pena di regresso.

Or. it

Amendment 961 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Victor Negrescu, Virginie Rozière, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati

Proposal for a directive Article 15 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 15 a Member States shall ensure that contracts include a rights reversion mechanism, allowing authors to terminate a contract in cases of unsatisfactory promotion, remuneration or lack of transparency.

Or. en

Amendment 962 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide that disputes Member States shall provide that disputes concerning the transparency obligation under concerning the transparency obligation under Article 14 and the contract adjustment Article 14 and the contract adjustment mechanism under Article 15 may be submitted mechanism under Article 15 shall be submitted to a voluntary, alternative dispute resolution to an voluntary, alternative dispute resolution procedure. procedure.

The author´s or the performer´s contractual counterpart shall take part, in good faith, in the dispute resolution procedure.

Or. en

Amendment 963 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide that disputes Without prejudice to other judicial remedies, concerning the transparency obligation under Member States may provide that disputes Article 14 and the contract adjustment concerning the transparency obligation under mechanism under Article 15 may be submitted Article 14 and the contract adjustment to a voluntary, alternative dispute resolution mechanism under Article 15 may be submitted procedure. to a voluntary and public alternative dispute resolution procedure.

Or. en

Amendment 964 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin

Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide that disputes Member States shall provide that disputes concerning the transparency obligation under concerning the transparency obligation under Article 14 and the contract adjustment Article 14 and the contract adjustment mechanism under Article 15 may be submitted mechanism under Article 15 may be submitted to a voluntary, alternative dispute resolution to an alternative dispute resolution procedure. procedure.

Or. en

Amendment 965 Angel Dzhambazki

Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall provide that disputes Member States may provide that disputes concerning the transparency obligation under concerning the transparency obligation under Article 14 and the contract adjustment Article 14 and the contract adjustment mechanism under Article 15 may be submitted mechanism under Article 15 may be submitted to a voluntary, alternative dispute resolution to a voluntary, alternative dispute resolution procedure. procedure.

Or. en

Amendment 966 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Such mechanism shall guarantee impartiality and be affordable, equally accessible and shall

comply with the national constitutional rights and safeguards provided for the parties.

Or. en

Amendment 967 Kostas Chrysogonos, Jiří Maštálka, Kostadinka Kuneva

Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Proceedings in respect of a dispute may also be brought on behalf of authors and performers by their representative organizations, whether collective management organizations, unions or guilds.

Or. en

Justification

Mediation already exists in all EU Member States and can be useful to avoid court proceedings. However, individual authors may be as reluctant to refer to the alternative dispute mechanism, as they are to a court. It would therefore be useful to open the proceedings to representative organizations of authors.

Amendment 968 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that representative organisations of authors and performers may

represent their members in the alternative dispute resolution procedure.

Or. en

Amendment 969 Mary Honeyball, Virginie Rozière, Julie Ward, Giorgos Grammatikakis, Marc Tarabella, Pervenche Berès, Theresa Griffin, Mady Delvaux

Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Member States shall ensure that representative organisations of authors and performers may

represent their members in the alternative dispute resolution procedure.

Or. en

Amendment 970 Antanas Guoga

Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Proceedings in respect of a dispute may be also brought on behalf of authors and performers by their representative organisations.

Or. en

Amendment 971 Jytte Guteland

Proposal for a directive Article 16 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

Article 16 a When an organisation, on behalf of rightholders whose rights it represents, enters into a collective agreement for the exploitation of works or other subject matter, Member States may provide, subject to safeguards provided for in national law, that such an agreement may be extended to apply to rights of rightholders who are not represented by the organisation.

Or. en

Justification

A well-functioning copyright is dependent on the useful opportunities to license copyright content. Collective licensing agreements that has been existing for a long time in several Member States provide a flexible solution that enables to use a large amount of works both benefiting users and copyright holders. The new copyright directive within the digital single market should clarify the status of collective licensing agreements at EU level.

Amendment 972 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new) Directive 96/9/EC Article 1 – paragraph 3a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(-a) In Article 1, the following paragraph is added:

"3a. Protection under this Directive shall apply only to databases that are recorded in a single publicly accessible online registry established and managed by the European Union Intellectual Property Office."

Or. en

Amendment 973 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a Directive 96/9/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

b) lorsqu'il y a utilisation uniquement à des fins b) lorsqu'il y a utilisation uniquement à des fins d'illustration de l'enseignement ou de recherche d'illustration de l'enseignement ou de recherche scientifique, toujours sous réserve d'indiquer la scientifique, toujours sous réserve d'indiquer la source, dans la mesure justifiée par le but non source, dans la mesure justifiée par le but non commercial poursuivi, sans préjudice des commercial poursuivi, sans préjudice des exceptions et de la limitation prévues dans la exceptions et de la limitation facultatives directive [la présente directive];. prévues dans la directive [la présente directive];.

Or. fr

Amendment 974 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a Directive 96/9/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) where there is use for the sole purpose of (b) where there is use for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching or scientific research, as illustration for teaching or scientific research, as long as the source is indicated and to the extent long as the source is indicated and to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be justified by the purpose to be achieved, without achieved, without prejudice to the exceptions prejudice to the exceptions and the limitation and the limitation provided for in Directive [this provided for in Directive [this Directive]; Directive];

Or. en

Amendment 975 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b Directive 96/9/EC Article 9 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

b) lorsqu'il s'agit d'une extraction à des fins b) lorsqu'il s'agit d'une extraction à des fins d'illustration de l'enseignement ou de recherche d'illustration de l'enseignement ou de recherche scientifique, toujours sous réserve d'indiquer la scientifique, toujours sous réserve d'indiquer la source, dans la mesure justifiée par le but non source, dans la mesure justifiée par le but non commercial poursuivi, sans préjudice des commercial poursuivi, sans préjudice des exceptions et de la limitation prévues dans la exceptions et de la limitation facultatives directive [la présente directive];. prévues dans la directive [la présente directive];.

Or. fr

Amendment 976 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b Directive 96/9/EC Article 9 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b) in the case of extraction for the purposes of (b) in the case of extraction for the purposes of illustration for teaching or scientific research, as illustration for teaching or scientific research, as long as the source is indicated and to the extent long as the source is indicated and to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be justified by the purpose to be achieved, without achieved, without prejudice to the exceptions prejudice to the exceptions and the limitation and the limitation provided for in Directive [this provided for in Directive [this Directive]; Directive];

Or. en

Amendment 977 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(-a) In Article 2 the introductory part is replaced by the following:

"2. Member States shall provide for the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit direct or indirect, temporary or permanent reproduction by any means and in any form that preserves the inner structure of the work or other subject-matter, in whole or in part:

Or. en

Amendment 978 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point -a a (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 1 –subparagraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(-a a) In Article 5(1), subparagraph 1 a (new) is added:

"The acts of reproduction referred to in Article 2 are considered to be permissible if they are a necessary precondition for lawful acts of communication to the public or making available in accordance with Article 3.

Or. en

Amendment 979 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point -a b (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(-a b) In Article 5 (2) the introductory part is replaced by the following:

"2. Member States shall provide for exceptions or limitations to the reproduction right provided for in Article 2 in the following cases:"

Or. en

Amendment 980 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

c) lorsqu'il s'agit d'actes de reproduction c) lorsqu'il s'agit d'actes de reproduction spécifiques effectués par des bibliothèques spécifiques effectués par des bibliothèques accessibles au public, des établissements accessibles au public, des établissements d'enseignement ou des musées ou par des d'enseignement ou des musées ou par des archives, qui ne recherchent aucun avantage archives, qui ne recherchent aucun avantage commercial ou économique direct ou indirect, commercial ou économique direct ou indirect, sans préjudice des exceptions et de la limitation sans préjudice des exceptions et de la limitation prévues dans la directive [la présente directive];. facultatives prévues dans la directive [la présente directive];.

Or. fr

Amendment 981 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a a) In Article 5 (2), the introductory part is replaced by the following:

"2. Member States shall provide for exceptions or limitations to the reproduction right provided for in Article 2 in the following cases:"

Or. en

Amendment 982 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a a) In Article 5(3) the introductory part is replaced by the following:

"3. Member States shall provide for exceptions or limitations to the rights provided for in Articles 2 and 3 in the following cases :"

Or. en

Amendment 983 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

a) lorsqu'il s'agit d'une utilisation à des fins a) lorsqu'il s'agit d'une utilisation à des fins exclusives d'illustration dans le cadre de exclusives d'illustration dans le cadre de l'enseignement ou de la recherche scientifique, l'enseignement ou de la recherche scientifique, sous réserve d'indiquer, à moins que cela ne sous réserve d'indiquer, à moins que cela ne s'avère impossible, la source, y compris le nom s'avère impossible, la source, y compris le nom de l'auteur, dans la mesure justifiée par le but de l'auteur, dans la mesure justifiée par le but non commercial poursuivi, sans préjudice des non commercial poursuivi, sans préjudice des exceptions et de la limitation prévues dans la exceptions et de la limitation facultatives directive [la présente directive];. prévues dans la directive [la présente directive];.

Or. fr

Amendment 984 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(a) use for the sole purpose of illustration for (a) use for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching or scientific research, as long as the teaching or scientific research, as long as the source, including the author's name, is source, including the author's name, is indicated, unless this turns out to be impossible indicated, unless this turns out to be impossible and to the extent justified by the non- and to the extent justified by the purpose to be commercial purpose to be achieved, without achieved, without prejudice to the exceptions prejudice to the exceptions and the limitation and the limitation provided for in Directive [this provided for in Directive [this Directive]; Directive];

Or. en

Amendment 985 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point n

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b a) In Article 5(3), point (n) is replaced by the following:

"(n) use through communication or making available, for the purpose of research or private study, to members of the public of works and other subject-matter by establishments referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2 which are contained in their collections;"

Or. en

Amendment 986 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b a) In Article 5(3) the introductory part is replaced by the following:

"3. Member States shall provide for exceptions or limitations to the rights provided for in Article 2 and 3 in the following cases:"

Or. en

Amendment 987 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point o a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b b) In Article 5(3), the following point is added:

"(oa) use through communication or making available by libraries, educational establishments, museums or archives for the purpose of publicly available catalogues of their respective collections;"

Or. en

Amendment 988 Julia Reda

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b c (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 5 – paragraph 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b c) Article 5(5) is replaced by the following:

"5. Any contractual provision contrary to the exceptions and limitations provided for in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 shall be unenforceable."

Or. en

Amendment 989 Julia Reda, Lucy Anderson, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b d (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b d) In Article 6, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:

"3. For the purposes of this Directive, the expression "technological measures" means any technology, device or component that, in the normal course of its operation, is designed to prevent or restrict acts, in respect of works or other subject-matter, which are not authorised by the rightholder of any copyright or any right related to copyright as provided for by law or the sui generis right provided for in Chapter III of Directive 96/9/EC, and which are not authorised by national or Union law. Technological measures shall be deemed "effective" where the use of a protected work or other subject-matter is controlled by the rightholders through application of an access control or protection process, such as encryption, scrambling or other transformation of the work or other subject- matter or a copy control mechanism, which achieves the protection objective."

Or. en

Amendment 990 Julia Reda, Lucy Anderson, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b e (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 6 – paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

(b e) In Article 6(4), the following subparagraph is added:

"The protections provided for in paragraph 1 and 2 shall not apply to acts described in paragraph 1 and 2 whose sole purpose is to enable a user's right to enjoy the exceptions and limitations to copyright and related rights outlined in this Directive or in Directive 96/9/EC, Directive 2009/24/EC Directive 2012/28/EU or Directive ... [this directive], to the extent necessary to benefit from that exception or limitation and where that beneficiary has legal access to the protected work or subject-matter concerned;"

Or. en

Amendment 991 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point c Directive 2001/29/EC Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point e

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

e) d'étudier l'incidence de la transposition de la e) d'étudier l'incidence de la transposition de la directive [la présente directive] sur le directive [la présente directive] sur le bon fonctionnement du marché intérieur et de équilibre entre les intérêts de toutes les parties mettre en lumière toute difficulté de prenantes et de mettre en lumière toute transposition; difficulté de transposition;

Or. fr

Amendment 992 Jean-Marie Cavada, Robert Rochefort, Frédérique Ries, Joëlle Bergeron, António Marinho e Pinto

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new) Directive 2001/29/EC Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point g a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 bis. In Article 12(4) the following point is added:

"(ga) d'inclure les éditeurs et les agences de presse pour qu'ils soient ajoutés à la liste des bénéficiaires de droits voisins énumérés dans l'article 2 de la directive 2001/29/CE pour le droit à reproduction."

Or. fr

Amendment 993 Kosma Złotowski

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2 a. Member States may adopt or maintain in force broader provisions, compatible with the exceptions and limitations existing in Union law, for uses covered by the exceptions or the limitation provided for in this Directive

.

Or. en

Amendment 994 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano

Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new) Directive 2006/115/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1

Present text Amendment

2 a. 2 a.

" Article 6 - paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: Member States may derogate from the exclusive right provided for in Article 1 in respect of " public lending, provided that at least authors Member States may derogate from the exclusive obtain a remuneration for such lending. Member right provided for in Article 1 in respect of States shall be free to determine this public lending, provided that at least authors remuneration taking account of their cultural obtain a remuneration for such lending, without promotion objectives. prejudice to the exceptions provided for in Directive [this Directive]. Member States shall " be free to determine this remuneration taking account of their cultural promotion objectives.

"

Or. en

( This amendment seeks to amend a provision within the existing act - Article 6, paragraph 1 - that was not referred to in the Commission proposal. )

Amendment 995 Julia Reda, Isabella Adinolfi, Max Andersson, Petras Auštrevičius, Brando Benifei, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, David Borrelli, Klaus Buchner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Matt Carthy, Dita Charanzová, Daniel Dalton, Fabio De Masi, Pascal Durand, Stefan Eck, Bas Eickhout, Cornelia Ernst, Fredrick Federley, Laura Ferrara, Thomas Händel, Heidi Hautala, Benedek Jávor, Kaja Kallas, Ska Keller, Kostadinka Kuneva, Merja Kyllönen, Philippe Lamberts, Marju Lauristin, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Jiří Maštálka, Martina Michels, Victor Negrescu, Jozo Radoš, Evelyn Regner, Michel Reimon, Terry Reintke, Judith Sargentini, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Molly Scott Cato, Davor Škrlec, Igor Šoltes, Catherine Stihler, Dario Tamburrano, Indrek Tarand, Yana Toom, Ernest Urtasun, Bodil Valero, Monika Vana, Sophia in 't Veld, Josef Weidenholzer, Gabriele Zimmer, Laura Agea, Luke Ming Flanagan, Yannick Jadot, Nessa Childers, Rosa D'Amato, Marco Valli, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Florent Marcellesi

Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

2. The provisions of Article 11 shall also apply deleted to press publications published before [the date mentioned in Article 21(1)].

Or. en

Amendment 996 Daniel Buda

Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment

3 a. Prevederile articolului 15 se aplică numai în situațiile în care remunerația a devenit

surprinzător de disproporționată după [data menționată la articolul 21 alineatul (1)].

Or. ro