DOCSLIB.ORG

Amendment 73 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton Proposal for a Directive Citation 1 Text Proposed By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amendment 73 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton Proposal for a Directive Citation 1 Text Proposed By Amendment 73 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton Proposal for a directive Citation 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment vu le traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union vu le traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne, et notamment son article 114, européenne, et notamment son article 167, Or. fr Amendment 74 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano Proposal for a directive Citation 1 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Articles 11, 14, 16, 17, 38 thereof, Or. en Amendment 75 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton Proposal for a directive Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) Le traité prévoit l'établissement d'un (1) Le traité prévoit que l'Union, dans le marché intérieur et l'instauration d'un système respect des compétences des Etats membres, propre à empêcher les distorsions de doit contribuer à l'épanouissement des concurrence dans le marché intérieur. cultures des États membres dans le respect de L'harmonisation des dispositions législatives leur diversité nationale et régionale. des États membres sur le droit d'auteur et les L'harmonisation des dispositions législatives des droits voisins devrait contribuer davantage à la États membres sur le droit d'auteur et les droits réalisation de ces objectifs. voisins devrait participer de la préservation de cette diversité culturelle. Or. fr Amendment 76 Isabella Adinolfi, Laura Ferrara, David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano Proposal for a directive Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) The directives which have been adopted in (2) The directives which have been adopted in the area of copyright and related rights provide the area of copyright and related rights provide for a high level of protection for rightholders for a harmonised legal framework, which and create a framework wherein the contributes to the good functioning of the exploitation of works and other protected internal market. This legal framework should subject-matter can take place. This however be updated, taking into account new harmonised legal framework contributes to the digital technologies that pose new challenges good functioning of the internal market; it in finding the right balance between the stimulates innovation, creativity, investment protection of intellectual property rights and and production of new content, also in the the new possibilities for consumers and digital environment. The protection provided businesses to create, innovate, access and by this legal framework also contributes to the exchange copyright-protected works and other Union's objective of respecting and promoting subject matter. Furthermore, it should be cultural diversity while at the same time acknowledged that there is an increasing bringing the European common cultural number of cases where copyright hampers heritage to the fore. Article 167(4) of the Treaty innovation and creativity rather than fostering on the Functioning of the European Union them. An updated legal framework would requires the Union to take cultural aspects into contribute to the general public goal of account in its action. increasing access to, and favouring the dissemination of, creative content, information and knowledge, and to the Union's objective of respecting and promoting cultural diversity while at the same time bringing the European common cultural heritage to the fore. Article 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires the Union to take cultural aspects into account in its action. Or. en Amendment 77 Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Dominique Bilde, Gilles Lebreton Proposal for a directive Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) Les directives adoptées dans le domaine du (2) Les traditions constitutionnelles des Etats droit d’auteur et des droits voisins assurent un membres, ainsi que les directives européennes niveau élevé de protection aux titulaires de adoptées dans le domaine du droit d'auteur et droits et instaurent un cadre permettant des droits voisins ont pour but d'assurer un l’exploitation des œuvres et autres objets niveau élevé de protection aux titulaires de protégés. Ce cadre juridique harmonisé droits et instaurent un cadre permettant contribue au bon fonctionnement du marché l'exploitation des œuvres et autres objets intérieur; il stimule l'innovation, la créativité, protégés. Ce cadre juridique devrait permettre l'investissement et la production de nouveaux la préservation du patrimoine culturel et contenus, y compris dans l'environnement assurer le rayonnement des industries numérique. La protection qu'il assure soutient culturelles et créatives, l'objectif étant de également l’objectif de l’Union qui consiste à stimuler l'innovation, la créativité, respecter et à promouvoir la diversité culturelle l'investissement et la production de nouveaux tout en mettant en évidence l'héritage culturel contenus, y compris dans l'environnement commun de l'Europe . L’article 167, paragraphe numérique. La protection qu'il assure soutient 4, du traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union également l'objectif de l'Union qui consiste à européenne impose à l’Union de tenir compte respecter et à promouvoir la diversité culturelle des aspects culturels dans son action. tout en mettant en évidence l'héritage culturel commun de l'Europe . L'article 167, paragraphe 4, du traité sur le fonctionnement de l'Union européenne impose à l'Union de tenir compte des aspects culturels dans son action. Or. fr Amendment 78 Daniel Buda Proposal for a directive Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) Directivele adoptate în domeniul dreptului (2) Directivele adoptate în domeniul dreptului de autor și al drepturilor conexe asigură un nivel de autor și al drepturilor conexe contribuie la ridicat de protecție a titularilor de drepturi și funcționarea pieței interne, asigură un nivel creează un cadru în care poate avea loc ridicat de protecție a titularilor de drepturi, exploatarea operelor și a altor obiecte protejate. facilitează procesul de obținere a drepturilor și Prezentul cadru juridic armonizat contribuie la creează un cadru în care poate avea loc buna funcționare a pieței interne, stimulând exploatarea operelor și a altor obiecte protejate. inovarea, creativitatea, investițiile și producerea Prezentul cadru juridic armonizat contribuie la de conținut nou, inclusiv în mediul digital. buna funcționare a pieței interne, stimulând Protecția oferită de prezentul cadru juridic inovarea, creativitatea, investițiile și producerea contribuie, de asemenea, la obiectivul Uniunii de conținut nou, inclusiv în mediul digital, de a respecta și a promova diversitatea culturală urmărind a se evita fragmentarea pe piața și, în același timp, de a aduce în prim-plan internă. Protecția oferită de prezentul cadru patrimoniul cultural comun european. Articolul juridic contribuie, de asemenea, la obiectivul 167 alineatul (4) din Tratatul privind Uniunii de a respecta și a promova diversitatea funcționarea Uniunii Europene conține cerința culturală și, în același timp, de a aduce în prim- ca Uniunea să țină seama de aspectele culturale plan patrimoniul cultural comun european. în acțiunile sale. Articolul 167 alineatul (4) din Tratatul privind funcționarea Uniunii Europene conține cerința ca Uniunea să țină seama de aspectele culturale în acțiunile sale. Or. ro Amendment 79 Antanas Guoga, Eva Maydell Proposal for a directive Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) The directives which have been adopted in (2) The directives which have been adopted in the area of copyright and related rights provide the area of copyright and related rights provide for a high level of protection for rightholders for a high level of protection for rightholders and create a framework wherein the exploitation and create a framework wherein the exploitation of works and other protected subject-matter can of works and other protected subject-matter can take place. This harmonised legal framework take place. This harmonised legal framework contributes to the good functioning of the contributes to the good functioning of the truly internal market; it stimulates innovation, integrated internal market; it stimulates creativity, investment and production of new innovation, creativity, investment and content, also in the digital environment. The production of new content, also in the digital protection provided by this legal framework environment. The protection provided by this also contributes to the Union's objective of legal framework also contributes to the Union's respecting and promoting cultural diversity objective of respecting and promoting cultural while at the same time bringing the European diversity while at the same time bringing the common cultural heritage to the fore. Article European common cultural heritage to the fore. 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the Article 167(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning European Union requires the Union to take of the European Union requires the Union to cultural aspects into account in its action. take cultural aspects into account in its action. Or. en Amendment 80 Julia Reda Proposal for a directive Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) The directives which have been adopted in (2) The directives which have been adopted in the area of copyright and related rights provide the area of copyright and related rights provide for a high level
Load more

Recommended publications
  • En En Report
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0169/2021 21.5.2021 REPORT on the situation of sexual and reproductive health and rights in the EU, in the frame of women’s health (2020/2215(INI)) Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Rapporteur: Predrag Fred Matić RR\1233997EN.docx PE660.070v03-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_INI CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION.............................................3 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................25 MINORITY POSITION ...........................................................................................................29 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT .....................................................30 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE.................................38 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ....................................39 PE660.070v03-00 2/39 RR\1233997EN.docx EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on the situation of sexual and reproductive health and rights in the EU, in the frame of women’s health (2020/2215(INI)) The European Parliament, – having regard to Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), – having regard to Articles 5, 6 and 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, – having regard to the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) held in Cairo, its Programme of Action and the outcomes of its review conferences, – having regard to the Nairobi
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Identit〠E Democrazia
    Identità e Democrazia Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera. Identità e Democrazia (in inglese: Identity and Identità e Democrazia Democracy, ID) è un gruppo politico del Parlamento Europeo di destra, fondato nel 2019 dopo le elezioni (EN) Identity and Democracy europee del 2019. Il gruppo è il successore del gruppo Presidente Marco Zanni fondato nel 2015 Europa delle Nazioni e della Libertà. (Lega) Vicepresidente Nicolas Bay (RN) Jörg Meuthen Indice (AfD) Storia Stato Unione Obiettivi politici europea Composizione Abbreviazione ID Note Fondazione 13 giugno 2019 Voci correlate Ideologia Nazionalismo Conservatorismo Storia nazionale Populismo di Il 12 giugno 2019 è stato annunciato che il gruppo destra successore a Europa delle Nazioni e delle Libertà si Identitarismo sarebbe chiamato "Identità e Democrazia" e avrebbe Sovranismo incluso partiti come la Lega Nord (Italia), Anti-immigrazione Raggruppamento Nazionale (Francia) e Alternativa per la Collocazione Destra [1] Germania (Germania)[2]. Il leghista Marco Zanni è stato Partito europeo AEPN nominato Presidente[3]. Il 13 giugno 2019 il gruppo, composto da 73 europarlamentari, è stato lanciato a Seggi 73 / 751 Bruxelles da Marine Le Pen[4]. Europarlamento Obiettivi politici I principali obiettivi politici del gruppo sono bloccare una maggiore integrazione europea ed ottenere maggiore autonomia nelle politiche di spesa, ovvero la possibilità di fare maggiore deficit e debito senza incorrere in penalità da parte della Commissione Europea.[5] Composizione Identità e Democrazia è formato da
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 1
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Employment and Social Affairs 2020/2076(INI) 17.6.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 174 Draft opinion Jordi Cañas (PE652.607v01-00) A New Industrial Strategy for Europe (2020/2076(INI)) AM\1207099EN.docx PE653.758v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion PE653.758v01-00 2/88 AM\1207099EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Ádám Kósa Draft opinion Recital A Draft opinion Amendment A. whereas today EU industry A. whereas today EU industry employs around 35 million people and employs around 35 million people and accounts for over 80 % of exports; whereas accounts for over 80 % of exports; whereas women still remain under-represented women still remain under-represented across industrial sectors, occupations and across industrial sectors, occupations and management levels; management levels despite the fact that based on Eurostat data on educational attainment, women have already reached the Europe 2020 headline target in2013 with a proportion of 40,1% of women having completed tertiary education and despite the fact that in 2019 in the age group of 20-24 years 86,2% of women had completed at least upper secondary education while only 81% of men; Or. en Amendment 2 Marc Botenga, Leila Chaibi, Nikolaj Villumsen, Sandra Pereira, Konstantinos Arvanitis Draft opinion Recital A Draft opinion Amendment A. whereas today EU industry A. whereas Europe needs a socially employs around 35 million people and effective and environmentally sustainable accounts for over 80 % of exports; whereas industrial strategy prioritizing equal women still remain under-represented development; whereas today EU industry across industrial sectors, occupations and employs around 35 million people and management levels; accounts for over 80 % of exports; whereas women still remain under-represented across industrial sectors, occupations and management levels; Or.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0168/2020 10.6.2020 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 143 of the Rules of Procedure on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list Christine Anderson, Gerolf Annemans, Gunnar Beck, Aurelia Beigneux, Lars Patrick Berg, Dominique Bilde, Markus Buchheit, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gilbert Collard, Marcel de Graaff, Filip De Man, Derk Jan Eppink, Nicolaus Fest, Emmanouil Fragkos, Gianna Gancia, Catherine Griset, Roman Haider, Virginie Joron, Maximilian Krah, Joachim Kuhs, Jean-Lin Lacapelle, Gilles Lebreton, Jaak Madison, Thierry Mariani, Jörg Meuthen, Guido Reil, Jérôme Rivière, Rob Rooken, Robert Roos, Hermann Tertsch, Tom Vandendriessche, Harald Vilimsky, Charlie Weimers, Bernhard Zimniok, Milan Zver RE\1207171EN.docx PE647.651v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0168/2020 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list The European Parliament, – having regard to the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (2001/931/CFSP)1, ,– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/20 of 13 January 2020 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2019/13412,, – having regard to Rule 143 of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas a terrorist act is defined in Article 1(3) of the abovementioned Council Common Position; B. whereas Antifa has organised and carried out violent attacks in the United States under the guise of protesting the death of George Floyd; whereas Antifa is known to have incited and committed violence in Europe; whereas the movement has allegedly received training from other terrorist groups in Syria; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • France EN Q3
    Should The Parliament censor the European Commission? The vote of the MEPs Shortly after receiving the approbation from the Members of the European Parliament, the new President of the Commission was involved in a litigation regarding his responsibilities in defining tax policies in Luxembourg, where he was Prime Minister, for multinational businesses tax-breaks-related issues. The censure motion to the Commission executive was tabled by Eurosceptic MEPs from EFDD and ENF, was largely rejected by more than 70% of the Members. However, more than 189 Members did not vote against the motion, therefore questioning the Juncker’s leadership over the European Commission. EPP, S&D, ALDE and the Greens sided with the Juncker-led Commission, whereas most of the members of ECR and GUE-NGL decided to abstain. Despite, the low level of support from French MEPs gathered by Juncker during the approbation of the Commission, a large majority of French MEPs rejected the motion of censure. DISTRIBUTION OF FRENCH POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN In fact, only the MEPs from the PARLIAMENT IN 2016 National Front supported the motion, Non-Inscrits : Front national, List "Les Français European United Left-Nordic Green whereas all MEPs from the Socialist libres" Left: Front de gauche, List "union Party, the Republicans and the Europe of Freedom and Direct pour les Outre-Mer" Democratic Movement defended the Democracy: one non-affiliated The Greens - EU executive. Interestingly, although member European Free most of the Members of the Alliance: Europe Europe des nations et Ecologie Greens/EFA group voted against the des libertés : Front motion of censure, only one French national, Progressive Alliance Rassemblement bleu of Socialists and Green, José Bové, followed the Marine Democrats: Parti group’s line.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Parlement Européen (2019-2024)
    Le Parlement européen (2019-2024) Le parlement européen est composé de députés européens qui sont au nombre de 705 (L’un des sièges espagnol reste vacant à ce jour). A cela il faut ajouter 32 membres de la Commission et 32 membres du Conseil. Le parlement européen comprend donc au total 769 membres. Les députés européens sont élus au suffrage universel direct pour exercer un mandat de 5 ans renouvelable, en réalité nous avons 28 délégations de députés européens et le nombre de députés par pays est proportionnel à la population du pays (plus il y a d’habitants, plus l’Etat compte de députés). Le minimum de députés est fixé à 6 pour les Etats les moins peuplés (Malte, Estonie…). Depuis 1979, les députés européens sont élus au suffrage universel direct par les citoyens de chaque Etat membre. Le Parlement européen constitue le deuxième plus grand espace démocratique au monde (après l’Inde et avant les USA). FONCTIONS : Le Parlement européen exerce les fonctions classiques d’un parlement national, c’est un lieu de débat. Les députés européens évoquent les sujets d’intérêt européen, ils peuvent adopter des motions, des décisions sur n’importe quel sujet concernant l’Europe. La deuxième fonction du Parlement européen est de voter le budget annuel de 160 milliards d’euros avec le Conseil de l’Union européenne (très faible car à titre de comparaison, le budget annuel américain réservé uniquement à la défense est de 300 milliards). La troisième fonction du Parlement européen est de voter la législation européenne avec le Conseil toujours, il a le droit d’amendement, d’opposition et même le droit d’initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Opinion
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Employment and Social Affairs 2020/0104(COD) 16.10.2020 OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs for the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Recovery and Resilience Facility (COM(2020)0408 – C9-0150/2020 – 2020/0104(COD)) Rapporteur for opinion: Dragoș Pîslaru AD\1213057EN.docx PE655.646v02-00 EN United in diversityEN PA_Legam PE655.646v02-00 2/62 AD\1213057EN.docx EN SHORT JUSTIFICATION On 28 May 2020, the Commission put forward a proposal for the establishment of a Recovery and Resilience Facility which replaces the withdrawn Commission’s proposal for a Reform Support Programme (RSP). The new proposal is based on the latest text on RSP and is closely aligned with the policy guidance provided under the European Semester. Its objectives have been revised and the delivery mode of the Facility has been adapted to take into account the new realities resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. In this new context, it is of crucial importance to strategically plan the recovery and ensure sustainable growth by strengthening the resilience of the European economies and societies. The Recovery and Resilience Facility will be a key programme of the European Union Recovery Instrument as part of the revised Multiannual Financial Framework. The Facility is also part of a range of measures developed in response to the current COVID-19 pandemic such as the “Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative”. The Facility aims to provide large scale financial support to boost the design and implementation of much needed longer-term reforms and related public investments in the Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Members François ALFONSI Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance France Régions et Peuples Solidaires Eric ANDRIEU Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament France Parti socialiste Mathilde ANDROUËT Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national Manon AUBRY The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL France La France Insoumise Jordan BARDELLA Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national Nicolas BAY Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national Aurélia BEIGNEUX Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national François-Xavier BELLAMY Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Les Républicains Stéphane BIJOUX Renew Europe Group France La République en marche Dominique BILDE Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national Benoît BITEAU Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance France Europe Écologie Manuel BOMPARD The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL France La France Insoumise Gilles BOYER Renew Europe Group France Indépendant 01/04/2021 1 Annika BRUNA Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national Sylvie BRUNET Renew Europe Group France Mouvement Démocrate Pascal CANFIN Renew Europe Group France Liste Renaissance Damien CARÊME Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance France Europe Écologie Catherine CHABAUD Renew Europe Group France Mouvement Démocrate Leila CHAIBI The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL France La France Insoumise Ilana CICUREL Renew Europe
    [Show full text]
  • Elections Européennes – Analyse Des Résultats
    Elections européennes – Analyse des résultats LA COMPOSITION DU PARLEMENT Les principales tendances Une participation en nette hausse : la participation s’est élevée à 50,97 % dans l’UE (50,12 % en France contre 42,43 % en 2014) Une montée des partis écologistes : avec notamment 20,7% en Allemagne (Grüne), 13,4% en France (EELV) et 15% en Finlande (La Ligue Verte) Une montée des partis eurosceptiques : avec 23,4 % des voix en France (RN), 33,6% en Italie (La Ligue) et 31,7% au Royaume Uni (Parti du Brexit) Aucune majorité ne se dégage : les deux grands groupes, PPE (177 sièges) et S&D (149 sièges), n'ont plus la majorité à eux deux. C’est la première fois depuis 1979. La répartition des sièges LES PROCHAINES ECHEANCES A la Commission (Présidence) 28 mai : début du processus de désignation au cours d’un dîner informel des chefs d’États (Présidence) 20 et 21 juin : décision des Etats Membres sur le Président (Présidence) 1er juillet : vote au Parlement sur le candidat présenté par le Conseil. Si le candidat n’est pas approuvé, les Etats membres devront proposer un autre candidat (Commissaires européens) Été 2019 : chaque État membre désigne un commissaire et le président de la Commission propose une répartition des postes (Commissaires européens) Septembre/octobre : auditions par les commissions parlementaires (Commissaires européens) : Session plénière d’octobre : élection de la nouvelle Commission Au Parlement (Présidence) 2 juillet : vote au Parlement lors de la session constitutive (Présidence des groupes) 24 juin : date limite de communication de la composition des groupes (Session constitutive) 2 juillet : session constitutive de la 9e législature à Strasbourg (Session constitutive) 8 juillet : première semaine de commissions Au Conseil Européen Le calendrier n’est pas encore défini mais le nouveau Président devrait être désigné durant l’été 1 LES DEPUTES FRANÇAIS ELUS La France envoie 79 représentants au Parlement européen.
    [Show full text]
  • EU ELECTIONS Factsheet: Meps That Voted for NATURE in the COMMON FISHERIES POLICY
    EU ELECTIONS Factsheet: MEPs that voted FOR NATURE in the COMMON FISHERIES POLICY TECHNICAL CONSERVATION MEASURES (TCM) REGULATION INFO In 2016, the European Commission made a proposal to establish new fishing rules in europe. These rules range from the mesh size of the net to to limit fishers from catching baby fish, to temporal closures to limit the impact of fishing on marine ecosystems (such as when seabirds are bycaught). On 16th January 2018, the European parliament voted on this file. Below we provide voting information on 4 key amendments that provide indication whether Members of the European voted for strengthening of the protection of marine ecosystems or on the contrary. BirdLife reaction: https://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/pr/16-January-2017 VOTE results: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/seance_pleniere/proces_verbal/2018/01- 16/liste_presence/P8_PV(2018)01-16(RCV)_XC.pdf 1. Vote on AM 83 (Approved 358 in favour, 314 against, 5 abstained) This amendment changed the definition of driftnets to allow for semi-driftneting (when there is an anchor attached to the bottom of the net). Semi-driftnets are a major problem for the marine environment and by changing this definition, it doesn’t ban them from being used in particular in the Baltic and Mediterranean. Many marine species are bycaught in driftnets, including semi-driftnets. MEPs who voted in favour (+) of this amendment voted for the dilution of the definition and hence supported for increased number of marine species to drown in fishing gear (driftnets). 2. Vote on AM 295 (Not approved 175 in favour, 454 against, 43 abstained) This amendment set a quantifiable target that within 5 years, the bycatch of juvenile fish would be reduced by 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2019-2024
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2019)1204_3 MINUTES Extraordinary meeting of 4 December 2019, 9.00-9.30 BRUSSELS Opening of the meeting with the provisional Chair The meeting opened at 9.07 on Wednesday, 4 December 2019, with Zdzisław Krasnodębski (the provisional Chair) presiding. The provisional Chair declared the meeting open and reminded the members of the purpose of the meeting: the election of the Chair in accordance with Rule 213 of the Rules of Procedure. 1. Election of the Chair The provisional Chair ensured the establishment of a quorum (1/4 of members) (Rule 218(2)), and called for nominations for the election of the Chair. Maria De Graça Carvalho, on behalf of the EPP Group, nominated Cristian-Silviu Buşoi (EPP) who accepted to be a candidate. Markus Buchheit, on behalf of the ID Group, nominated Joëlle Mélin (ID) who also accepted to be a candidate. There were no other nominations. Cristian-Silviu Buşoi was elected Chair by secret ballot (electronic vote) with 52 votes in favour, while Joëlle Mélin received 6 votes in favour. With the newly elected Chair The meeting continued with Cristian-Silviu Buşoi presiding. 2. Chair’s announcements PV\1194829EN.docx PE644.944v01-00 EN United in diversityEN None. 3. Next meetings 4 December 2019, 10.00 – 10.15 (Brussels) (Joint ITRE-TRAN meeting) 4 December 2019, 10.00 – 12.30 and 14.30 – 18.00 (Brussels) 5 December 2019, 9.00 – 10.30 (Brussels) The meeting closed at 9.16. PE644.944v01-00 2/6 PV\1194829EN.docx EN ПРИСЪСТВЕН ЛИСТ/LISTA
    [Show full text]