DOCSLIB.ORG

View of the Results of the North Atlantic Council Meeting of May 15Th - 17Th Ir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View of the Results of the North Atlantic Council Meeting of May 15Th - 17Th Ir * - APPROVED yiNTJTSS f. /Z A . FEC 57 FF f~C) T M ? i ■** ■■■ . ■ — â.:«*"C üefenjs FHL.rai.'j- s`c'«csiir `omîittee oevsr.tecr.th Msvting of th.- Perr-anunt narking G>taff huld at 1;..3C~a.s. or. Thursday. 1st June. i^5C. ic the Confcrcncc Rooc.7 .‘io. if. Choahan Street. London. F r e a e n t : - U.S.A. ............ Mr. K. ?. Bre ithut <Chaiman) Ur. V. Longstreet Mr. C. Hodge • • Mr. H. Mcrillat Be l g i u m ............ M. J. Deschanpa Mile. Dever Canada .... ....... Mr. A.a. Kitchie D e n n a r k ............ M. Pusck Nielson F r a n c e ............ M. R. Sergent DECLASSIFIED - PUBLIC DISCLOSURE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ - MIS EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE LECTURE EN - MIS / DÉCLASSIFIÉ DISCLOSURE - PUBLIC DECLASSIFIED M. R.P. Fc`3ty Ic e l a n d ............ M. E. Soncdik. I t a l y ............ 3r. Frcddi Col. S. Marsiliani Sr. Sasnoli Luxembourg ............ M. C. Kcisbourg Netherlands ............ Dr. J. Everts Dr. J,M. Fehmers N o r w a y ............ M. Hersleb Vogt P o r t u g a l ............ Sr. L.L. do Rego U.K. ............ Mr. J. Caimcroaa Secretariat ........... M. J.C. Debray Mr. F.P. Kelly M. P. Billecocq Mias E.A. Todd Minutes of the 13th. 15th and 16th Me et i n g s 1, Approved as amended. SECRET - 1 - è é SECRET ' FEC STAFF (50) M-17a Review of the results of the North Atlantic Council Meeting of May 15th - 17th ir. relation to current ar.d future work uf the DFEC and PVfS FSC STAFF (50) D- 16/I 2, The Chairaan opened tho discussion by informing delegates that he would be going tc Washington on Saturday, 3rd June, and would have a n opportunity to talk there with she authorities on questi ons concerning the various Committees of the North Atlantic Council and al 3o to be in contact with people who are engaged ir setting up the organization of Deputies o’’ the North Atlantic Council, The establishment of this body i3 intended, among other thinge, to create a channel for systematic liaison. He asked that delegates let him have their views, suggestions or questions that he might discuss while in Washington, and he expressed the intention of seeing as many of she delegates as possible before his departure for Washington, | • FSC STAFF (50) D-11/2 3, The Chairman aske'3. delegates if there were any particular points that night be given to the Defence Committee as guide3 in the preparation of the estimates of defence costs, He felt that the -mpcrfvnt question in this connection was not simply an overall figure but one in which the individual elements or* the estimate were identified, FRANCE 4, The French delegate pointed out the difficulty of dealing with this question until it was known how liaison with the Defence Committee was to DECLASSIFIED - PUBLIC DISCLOSURE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ - MIS EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE LECTURE EN - MIS / DÉCLASSIFIÉ DISCLOSURE - PUBLIC DECLASSIFIED be arranged and, in any case, theFTTS could only give a general indication of what they wished the Defence Committee to do. 5, The Chairman stated that he hoped that the organisation cf Deputies which is being established vould provide the P7£3 with ar. appropriate channel for liaison, ) q f t a 6, The United Kingdom delegate said that, in default of any precise KINGDOM knowledge of the nature of the Defence Plan approved by the Military Committee, it seemed impossible to do more than offer a number of general suggestions, some of -which might prove to be useful in the discussions which the Chairman was proposing to hold in Washington, He felt:« (1 ) that it was essential that the estimates of expenditures by t e various countries in connection with the Military Committee's Plan should be made or. a comparable ar.d realistic basis bearing in mind the limits imposed by physical resources and production capacity. Any detailed examination of this latter question would, of course, be for the MPSB to carry out at a later date; SECRET * • S E C R E T TEC STAFF C SO) M - 1 7 & (2) that some indication should be given regarding the phasing of the -programme in or de r - (a) to ascertain the period over which each country's expenditure on the scheme would be s p r e a d and the shape of the curve of that expenditure ; ar.d (b) to make possible a breakdown of the scheme into priorities in tine. It was also necessary that, if an attempt were made on the lines suggested, the Military Authorities should be quice certain that each itéra could be carried out as an independent undertaking and did not | • overlap with another block of vjork; (3) that there might be considerable advar.ta/e in members of the Military Coramictee seeking guidance from the financial «xperts in the Service Departments of their respective countries on the probable cost of their share of the total expenditures, 7. Much would depend, he added, on the manner In which the policy of DECLASSIFIED - PUBLIC DISCLOSURE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ - MIS EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE LECTURE EN - MIS / DÉCLASSIFIÉ DISCLOSURE - PUBLIC DECLASSIFIED balanced collective forces would be .-‘.:>plied. If, aa a result of this policy, Atlantic Fact countries were a.le to effect considerable economies in t h e i r defence expenditure, the gap between existing resources av aJLlable for the defence of the Atlantic area and the targets recommended oy the Military Coramittee would clearly be reduced, 3. The Chairman said that he v.-ould certainly bear in mind in hi3 discussions in Washington the points made in the course of the present meeting. In particular, hie observed thit at the North Atlantic Council meeting great stress was placed oa the adoption of general principles arrd that emphasis ’«as given to this lattor point precisely because there wa| belief that balanced collective forces v/erc essential in order to make < possible the meeting of strategic requirements without serious jeopardy to sound economic conditions, F E C S TAFF ( 50 ) I M 2/1 9. Noted, FEC w rAFF (50) D-13 . 10, It was suggestod that the Chairman take uo with the appropriate people in Washington the matter of co-ordination ^mong MAT bodies. SECRET - 3 - SECRET FSC STAFF (50) M-17a 11. A suggestion was made. that the Secretariat sight produce a p a p e r rerrering various problems on ’*hEch the DFSC requires information ar direction. After further discussion it was agreed that preparation of such a paper should he deferred until more precise information is available on the Deputies organisation« FEC STAFF f 50) D - 1 5 Attachment III 12, The Chairman said that it vas clear franc thi3 (Resolution U/Q) that the North Atlantic Council is anxious for -•ark to proceed with scrae of the tasks outlined by the FTîS Priority ~ork Projects. Report of Meeting of Joint Liaison Croup (MPS3 and DFEC) 13. The United States delegate who serves as one of the FES representatives on this Group =ade a report on the first meetir^j hold on 11th May of the Secretaries and the designated representativee of the Permanent forking Staffs of the HFEC and MFS3, 14, He said that discussion had taken place on the question of li a i s o n with the Military in the development of the reply to the DFEC request for a statement of costs of the defence programme with priorities. Tho representatives cf the F7S MPS3 indicated that there v ä s l a o k of clarity in the liaison arrangements on tho military side and that one of tho chief questions is liaison between the London agencies and the S t a n d i n g Group in 'Washington. This question has been raised with the Standing Group on v/hcra the next step depends. There appeared to bo two obstacles; namely, sheer distance and the difficulties of selecting a small group DECLASSIFIED - PUBLIC DISCLOSURE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ - MIS EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE LECTURE EN - MIS / DÉCLASSIFIÉ DISCLOSURE - PUBLIC DECLASSIFIED that could adequately represent a F^S consisting of delegates of twelvo countries. It was suggested that further discussion by the Joint L i a i s o n Group on the subject might be postponed until after the meetings of the Nortli Atlantic Council (May15-16-17) '/hich it was understood would take up the problem of liaison within NATO. 15» The Joint Liaison Group also discussed the document MFSB (50)8 transmitted to the DFEC F!»S. This document which deals principally with deficiencies and capacities wa3 discussed by the ?WS DFEC at their 13th Meeting. It is under constant revision by the Regional Groups and tho S t a n di n g Croup, so far as deficiencies arc concerned, to take account of Medium Term plans 3ince the preliminary figures arc caaputcd on the basis of requirements through 1952 fox* forces now in existence. In fact, tho subject is being given continuous 3tudy by the MPSB. The opinion was expressed at the Joint Liaison meeting that further studies rill probably not alter the main conclusion readied on the basis of MFSB (50)8 that a Large amount of unused capacity exists for mooting deficiencies and that the main problem is that of financial resources. 15 .. Another document discusscd was FEC STAFF (50) D-14/1 which gives figures fear additional military production for 1952. It ’.vas generally folt that it would be desirable to rcconcilc the differences between these figures and those developed by the DFEC on additional military production.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norge Og IMCO
    Allierte på kollisjonskurs? Norge og den amerikanske skipsfartspolitikken Norge1948-60 og IMCO André MariusGarborg Malmer Rustand - MasteroppgaveMasteroppgave ii historie historie Institutt for arkeologi,Universitetet konservering i Oslo og historie (IAKH) Universitetet i Oslo Våren 2012 Våren 2009 2 Norge og IMCO Marius Malmer - Masteroppgave i historie Universitetet i Oslo Våren 2012 3 4 Forord Å jobbe med denne oppgaven har vært en interessant erfaring. Spesielt har det vært lærerikt å sette seg inn i et komplisert og ukjent tema med de utfordringene det medfølger. Det er mange som fortjener en takk for å ha hjulpet meg med denne masteroppgaven. Først og fremst vil jeg takke min veileder Helge Pharo, for godt samarbeid, gode tilbakemeldinger og nyttige råd underveis i arbeidet med oppgaven. En stor takk går også til Dag Malmer Halvorsen, Nina Britt Berge, og William Ekås Sæter for hjelp med korrekturlesning og konstruktive kommentarer. Til sist vil jeg takke Trond Synnestvedt i Utenriksdepartementets arkiv for god hjelp og service. Oslo, mai 2012 Marius Malmer 5 Innholdsfortegnelse Forord ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Innholdsfortegnelse .................................................................................................................... 6 Forkortelser ................................................................................................................................ 8 1 Innledning ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stiftende M0te Ble Avholdt I Oslo Handelsstands Forening Lordag 19. Februar 1977 Etter Innbydelse Av Den Interimskomite Som Var Nedsatt 10Rdag 16
    NORSK POSTHISTORISK SELSKAP Stiftende m0te ble avholdt i Oslo Handelsstands Forening lordag 19. februar 1977 etter innbydelse av den interimskomite som var nedsatt 10rdag 16. oktober 1976. M0tet ble ledet av interimskomiteens fonnann, Harry Snarvold, og referert av interimskomiteens sekretaer, Paul H. Jensen. 1. Motet ble apnet av Harry Snarvold 2. Som fremmotte stiftende medlemmer ble felgende registrert: Edw. Chr. Hannevig Borre T. Soot-Ryen Hosle Per Gellein Oslo Bjorn E. Bunaes Morten Hans Chr. Nielsen Sokna Sig. Lokeberg T0nsberg Paul H. Jensen Oslo Bjarne Fjeld Oslo Sture Larsson Kolbotn Lars Frogner Oslo Postmuseet v/HSkon Stensrud Oslo Leiv A, 'Brecke Oslo Arne Thune - Larsen Oslo Bjorn H. Gronstad Botne i Vestfold Harry Snarvold Partille, Sverige Videre hadde folgende, ikke tilstedevaerende personer skriftlig gitt sin tilslutning til stiftelsen, og ble dermed ogsS registrert som stiftende medlemmer: Knut J. Buskum Gjovik Erling Dehli Oslo Kristian Fasting Kristiansund N Tore Gjelsvik Ranheim Per Hansen Oslo Wiegand Hansen Holte, Denmark Oddvin Indreb0 Forde R. G. Jones Wales, Storbritania Einar Lundstr0m Stockholm* Sverige Fridolf Lundstrom Oslo Borge Lundh Kobenhavn, Danmark F.'C. Moldenhauer Bergen Reidar Norby Washington DC, USA Johnny E. Pedersen Vagsbygd Inge Rian Ytre Sni11 fjord Karl U. Sanne Luxembourg Henrik.Thrap - Meyer Oslo Hersleb Vogt Stockholm, Sverige Kr. Wilhelmsen Tromso Arne Bye Borre Efren Rebolledo Hosle Erland Brand Goteborg Audun Nordanger Skudesneshavn - 2 - 3. Referat fra interimskomi teens m0te 16.10.1976 ble fremlagt. Formann og sekretar redegjorde for det arbeid som var utfort av interimskomi teen. Forsamlingen tiltradte referatet og rapporten. 4. Foreningens navn ble vedtatt & v$re NORSK POSTHISTORISK SELSKAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Paris Act Relating to the Berne Convention for the Protec Tion Of
    No. 18338 MULTILATERAL Paris Act relating to the Berne Convention for the Protec tion of Literary and Artistic Works of September 9, 1886, completed at Paris on May 4, 1896, revised at Berlin on November 13, 1908, completed at Berne on March 20, 1914, revised at Rome on June 2, 1928, revised at Brussels on June 26, 1948, and revised at Stockholm on July 14, 1967 (with appendix). Con cluded at Paris on 24 July 1971 Authentic texts: French and English. Registered by the Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 28 February 1980. MULTILATERAL Acte de Paris à la Convention de Berne pour la protection des œuvres littéraires et artistiques du 9 septembre 1886, complétée à Paris le 4 mai 1896, révisée à Berlin le 13 novembre 1908, complétée à Berne le 20 mars 1914, révisée à Rome le 2 juin 1928, révisée à Bruxelles le 26 juin 1948 et révisée à Stockholm le 14 juillet 1967 (avec annexe). Conclu à Paris le 24 juillet 1971 Textes authentiques : français et anglais. Enregistré par le Directeur général de l'Organisation mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle, agissant au nom des Parties, le 28 février 1980. Vol. 1161,1-18338 1980_____United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités______31 BERNE CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF LITERARY AND ARTISTIC WORKS OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1886,© COMPLETED AT PARIS ON MAY 4, 1896,2 REVISED AT BERLIN ON NOVEMBER 13, 1908,3 COMPLETED AT BERNE ON MARCH 20, 1914,4 AND REVISED AT ROME ON JUNE 2, 1928, 5 AT BRUSSELS ON JUNE 26, 1948,6 AT STOCKHOLM ON JULY 14, 1967,7 AND AT PARIS ON JULY 24, 1971 s The countries of the Union, being equally animated by the desire to protect, in as effective and uniform a manner as possible, the rights of authors in their literary and artistic works, Recognizing the importance of the work of the Revision Conference held at Stockholm in 1967, Have resolved to revise the Act adopted by the Stockholm Conference, while maintaining without change Articles 1 to 20 and 22 to 26 of that Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Politikken Til Charles De Gaulle, 1958–1967
    KRISE OG NYE MOGLEGHEITER Norske reaksjonar på den franske NATO-politikken til Charles de Gaulle, 1958–1967 Bjørn Ivar Austevik Voll Masteroppgåve i historie Institutt for arkeologi, konservering og historie (IAKH) Universitetet i Oslo Hausten 2014 II Oppgåvetittel: ”Krise og nye moglegheiter: norske reaksjonar på den franske NATO-politikken til Charles de Gaulle i åra 1958–1967”. Framsidebilde: Møte i Det nordatlantiske rådet i NATO på forsvarsministernivå 14. desember 1966, der Nuclear Defence Affairs Committee og Nuclear Planning Group blei oppretta. (Foto: frå Flickr-kontoen til NATO, www.flickr.com/photos/n-a-t-o/) III Copyright Bjørn Ivar Austevik Voll 2014 Krise og nye moglegheiter: norske reaksjonar på den franske NATO-politikken til Charles de Gaulle, 1958–1967 Forfattar: Bjørn Ivar Austevik Voll http://Www.duo.uio.no Trykk: Webergs Printshop IV Ved regjeringsskiftet høsten 1965 var NATO på vei inn i en av de utviklingsfaser som utenrikspolitiske korrespondenter gjerne ynder å kalle «en alvorlig krise». Karakteristikken var denne gang ikke helt uberettiget. John Lyng, utanriksminister (1965–1970)1 1 Lyng 1976: 102. V VI FORORD Å skrive ei masteroppgåva kan vere som ei pilegrimsvandring. Det er vandringa, vegen, som er målet blir det sagt. Og ein kan nok kjenne seg litt tom når det heilage målet står framom deg, har eg erfart. I dette tilfellet kanskje tanketom? Eg vil retta ei stor takk til rettleiaren min, Olav Njølstad, for retningsgivande spørsmål og eit og anna ”tja” i margen. Eg har fått spelerom til å føre oppgåva dit ho har teke meg og eg har fått gode innspel når eg har trengt det, spesielt i den lange innspurten.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol 21 Annexed to the Universal Copyright
    1974_____ United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 311 PROTOCOL 21 ANNEXED TO THE UNIVERSAL COPYRIGHT CONVENTION AS REVISED AT PARIS ON 24 JULY 1971 2 CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THAT CONVENTION TO THE WORKS OF CERTAIN INTERNATIONAL ORGANI ZATIONS The States party hereto, being also party to the Universal Copyright Con vention as revised at Paris on 24 July 1971 2 (hereinafter called "the 1971 Convention"), Have accepted the following provisions: 1. (a) The protection provided for in article II (1) of the 1971 Conven tion shall apply to works published for the first time by the United Nations, by the Specialized Agencies in relationship therewith, or by the Organization of American States. (b) Similarly, article II (2) of the 1971 Convention shall apply to the said organization or agencies. 2. (a) This Protocol shall be signed and shall be subject to ratification or acceptance, or may be acceded to, as if the provisions of article VIII of the 1971 Convention applied hereto. (b) This Protocol shall enter into force for each State on the date of deposit of the instrument of ratification, acceptance or accession of the State concerned or on the date of entry into force of the 1971 Convention with respect to such State, whichever is the later. IN FAITH WHEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Protocol. 1 Came into force on 10 July 1974, the date of entry into force of the Universal Copyright Convention as revised at Paris on 24 July 1971, in respect of the following States on whose behalf an instrument of ratification, acceptance or accession had been deposited with the Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization on the dates indicated below, in accordance with paragraph 2 (b): Date of deposit of the instrument of ratification.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation
    TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 17-510 ________________________________________________________________________ CULTURAL EXCHANGES, PROPERTY AND COOPERATION International Exhibitions Convention Between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and OTHER GOVERNMENTS Signed at Paris on November 22, 1928, and Supplemented by the Protocols of May 10, 1948, November 16, 1966, November 30, 1972, and the Amendments of June 24, 1982 and May 31, 1988 Acceded to by the United States on May 9, 2017 with Related Documents NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 (80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— “. .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence . of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.” MULTILATERAL Cultural Exchanges, Properties and Cooperation: International Expositions Convention signed at Paris November 22, 1928, and Supplemented by the Protocols of May 10, 1948, November 16, 1966, November 30, 1972, and the Amendments of June 24, 1982 and May 31, 1988; Acceded to by the United States May 9, 2017; Entered into force for the United States May 10, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Lastningsland, I Stor Grad Portrettert Gjennom Norske Utvandrerøyne
    De der ute - vi her hjemme Pressehistoriske skrifter 6/2006 Redaksjon for Pressehistorisk skrifter: Hans Fredrik Dahl Martin Eide Guri Hjeltnes Rune Ottosen Idar Flo (redaksjonssekretær) © Forfattarane 2006 Trykk: Lobo Media AS Omslagsutforming: Thomas Lewe ISSN 1503-9161 ISBN 82-92587-05-5 Utgitt av Norsk pressehistorisk forening med støtte fra Norsk faglitterær forfatter- og oversetterforening(NFF) Abonnement er gratis Pressehistoriske skrifter IMK Universitetet i Oslo Postboks l 093 Blindern 0317 Oslo Tlf: (+47)70 07 52 22 Faks: (+47)70 07 52 01 E-post: [email protected] Internett: www .pressehistorisk.no 2 KJÆRE LESER!. .....____ ____ _ _____ 5 FORTELLINGER OM VERDEN - UTENLANDSDEKNINGEN I TRE NORSKE AVISER 1880 · 1940 .... 7 Av Anne Hege Simonsen I. INNLEDNING ........................................................................................................................••••••....•........................ 7 2. HVORDAN SKREV AVISENE OM UTLANDET? ........................................................................................................ 13 Sjanger ................................................................................................................................................................ 15 lnnholdsdefinisjoner:, ........................................................................................................................................ 20 3. VERDEN DER UTE SETT GJENNOM TRE NORSKE AVISER ..............................................••••.•••••.............................. 23 I 880:
    [Show full text]
  • Norges Handelsflåte I Norsk Og Alliert Forsvar
    Skipsfartens plass i det vestlige forsvar Etableringen og konsolideringen av skipsfartsberedskap i NATO og Norge 1949-1967 Avhandling til bedømmelse for doktorgrad Det historisk-filosofiske fakultet Universitetet i Bergen Lars Christian Jenssen Institutt for forsvarsstudier 31. mai 2001 Innhold Forord ........................................................................................................................... 6 I Bakgrunn ...................................................................................................................... 7 1 Perspektiver ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Geostrategi .................................................................................................................................... 11 Internasjonalisme og samarbeid .................................................................................................... 14 Hegemoni-teori ............................................................................................................................. 16 ”Fellesgode” og ”myk maktanvendelse” ................................................................................... 17 Regimeorientert hegemoni-teori ............................................................................................... 18 Utenriks- og sikkerhetspolitisk hegemoni-teori ........................................................................ 20 Korporatisme ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deliberative Diplomacy: the Nordic Approach to Global Governance and Societal Representation at the United Nations International Relations Studies Series
    DELIBERATIVE DIPLOMACY: THE NORDIC APPROACH TO GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND SOCIETAL REPRESENTATION AT THE UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS STUDIES SERIES Series Editor Patrick James University of Southern California Editorial Board Mark Theodore Berger, Naval Postgraduate School Annette Freyberg-Inan, University of Amsterdam Ewan Harrison, Washington University, St. Louis Axel Huelsemeyer, Concordia University Steven Lamy, University of Southern California Stephen M. Seideman, McGill University VOLUME 11 DELIBERATIVE DIPLOMACY: THE NORDIC APPROACH TO GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND SOCIETAL REPRESENTATION AT THE UNITED NATIONS by Norbert Gtz DORDRECHT 2011 Cover Design / Illustration: studio Thorsten / The Royal Library Copenhagen This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISSN 1570-6451 hardbound ISBN 9789089790583 paperback ISBN 9789089790590 Copyright 2011 Republic of Letters Publishing BV, Dordrecht, The Netherlands / St. Louis, MO All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Republic of Letters Publishing has made all reasonable efforts to trace all rights holders to any copyrighted material used in this work. In cases where these efforts have not been successful the publisher welcomes communications from copyright holders, so that the appropriate acknowledgements can be made in future editions, and to settle other permission matters. Authorization to photocopy items for personal use is granted by Republic of Letters Publishing BV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA Fees are subject to change CONTENTS Preface vii List of figures and tables ix List of abbreviations xi 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Oppvekstvilkår for Barn Med Norsk Mor Og Tysk Far I Norsk Etterkrigstid
    © Norges forskningsråd 1999 Norges forskningsråd Postboks 2700 St. Hanshaugen 0131 OSLO Telefon: 22 03 70 00 Telefaks: 22 03 70 01 [email protected] www.forskningsradet.no/ Publikasjonen kan bestilles via internett: www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner eller grønt nummer telefaks: 800 83 001 Grafisk design omslag: Foto/ill. omslagsside: Trykk: GCS as 1. Opplag: juni 1999: 700 2. opplag : april 2000: 300 Oslo, juni 1999 ISBN 82-12-01319-7 (trykksak) ISBN 978-82-12-02416-8 (pdf) Området for kultur og samfunn Fiendens barn? Kunnskapsstatus Undersøkelse av noen sider ved norske myndigheters behandling av tysk-norske krigsbarn etter andre verdenskrig Kunnskapsbehov Oppvekstvilkår for barn med norsk mor og tysk far i norsk etterkrigstid Norges forskningsråd INNHOLD FORORD...............................................................................................................................................................5 1. OPPDRAGET FRA SHD ....................................................................................................................................5 2. FORSKNINGSRÅDETS TOLKNING/AVGRENSNING AV OPPDRAGET.....................................................................5 3. ORGANISERINGEN...........................................................................................................................................6 4. KONTAKTEN MED ORGANISASJONENE.............................................................................................................6 5. KONTAKTEN MELLOM FORSKNINGSRÅDET
    [Show full text]
  • Mormon Opposition Literature: a Historiographical Critique and Case Study, 1844-57
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1994 Mormon Opposition Literature: A Historiographical Critique and Case Study, 1844-57 William P. Connors Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Connors, William P., "Mormon Opposition Literature: A Historiographical Critique and Case Study, 1844-57" (1994). Theses and Dissertations. 4617. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4617 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. mormon opposition literature A historiographical critique and case study 1844571844 57 A thesis presented to the department of history brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts by william P connors april 1994 this thesis by william P connors is accepted in its present form by the department of history of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis requirement for the degree of master of arts aviVv i K teebjtfu vvimalcolm R thorp committee chairchaintiduhidu 62C 15c01Q CA brian Q cannon committee member q afamhaghawfa X bruce A vanorden committee member A W 11 date kendall W brown department chair PREFACE growing up in a very conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Bid for the 2025 World Expo
    City of Toronto Feasibility study in respect of hosting the 2025 World Expo 11 November 2013 City of Toronto Feasibility Study in Respect of Hosting the 2025 World Expo Contents TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 WORLD EXPO BID PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE FOR THE 2025 WORLD EXPO ................................................................................................................................................... 29 LESSONS LEARNED ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO A POTENTIAL BID FOR EXPO 2025 ............................................................................................................ 35 ECONOMIC IMPACT ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]