DOCSLIB.ORG

Minute3 of Tho 32Nd. 53Rd and Vi-Th Meetings. (Ref

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minute3 of Tho 32Nd. 53Rd and Vi-Th Meetings. (Ref SECRET COPY NO. ( ö DRAF T MINUTES NATO FEC STAFF (51) M-35 25>thJanuary, ' 1951 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION DEFENCE FINANCIAL Aï© ECONOMIC ' COMMITTEE Thirty-fif th Meeting of the Permanent Working: Staff held at 3P»m. on Tuesday, >33rd January, 1951. in the eConfernce Room, No, I*., Chesham Street, London. S.V7.1. Present:- Eelgi-im ....................... M. A .J. Bastin (Chairman) Canada ............................. Mr. A.E. Ritchie Denmark ............................ Mr. T. Busck-NIelsen France .............................. M. R. Junqua Italy ................................' Sr. G. Freddi Col. S. Marsiliani Luxembourg ....................... M. G. Hcishourg Netherlands ..................... Mr. J.M. Fehmcrs Mr. N.C. de Groot van Embden Norway .............................. Mr. Hersleb Vogt Portugal .......................... Sr. L .L . do Ti^go U.K. .................................. Mr. J, Mark U.S....................................... Mr. R.C. Broithut Mr. A. Po3t Mr. G. Tuckcrman Interpreter ..................... Mi3s 3.C.K. Brodie Secretariat ..................... Mr, F.P. Kelly Mr. R.B. Hair.3 . Milo; M.T. Callon • Mise E.A. Tcdd DECLASSIFIED - PUBLIC DISCLOSURE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ - MIS EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE LECTURE EN - MIS / DÉCLASSIFIÉ DISCLOSURE - PUBLIC DECLASSIFIED Minute3 of tho 32nd. 53rd and Vi-th Meetings. (Ref. FEC STAFF'( 51) K-35 and M-34-j 1. Approved aa amended. Consideration of Droit Interim Report to Deputies on Mciaorandum by the Chairman of the North Atlantic Council. R[c ^ T f kC STIxFF ( 5I ) D-21/1 ) Action . 2. It was agreed that FT,'S delegates bo given an opportunity to study thia paper and to provide the Secretariat v/ith airy ■v/rltton comments for circulation before this oubject i3 fully discussed at the next meeting. ___ - 1 - SECRET SECRET ?3C STAFF ( 51 > M-55 • D iscu ssio n CHA3HMAN 3, The Chairman referred the PïïS tc the document drafted by the United Kingdom delegate which wa3 distributed at the meeting. He suggested that the United Kingdom delegate provide the FÏÏS with a 3unanaxy of the paper in view of the fact that delegates had not been able to study it prior to the meeting, UNITED 4-. The Cnitcd Kingdom delegate reported that in the last meeting of the KINGDOM Working P a r it -was proposed that he prepare a report in the nature of a draft interim report of the PITS, It had not been possible within tho time allotted to obtain the côncurrenoe of the Working Party on this draft report and thi3 should be ‘borne in mind in the F77S discussion. The presont draft incorporates much of the text of the earlier Forking Party paper on this subject (Ref. FSC STAFF (51) D-C1) with the addition of a number of points that emerged from the 7/orldLng Party <Ü3cus3ion. It wa3 for the PWS to decide whether this was the type of report that should be submitted or v/tk?thei the FITS should undertake to obtain certain factual information from the Defence Production Board. To obtain such information a3 the volume of transfers and production involved would necessarily take considerable time. In his view the need of the Deputies for a prompt report made it unfeasible for the PïïS to obtain information of this character for an interim report. 5, The proceedings were suspended to give delegatesopportunity an to read the report. 7/hilo delegates obviously were not in a position, after such a cursory examination of the paper, to make more than preliminary and personal observations, questions were raised with respect to tho principles DECLASSIFIED - PUBLIC DISCLOSURE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ - MIS EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE LECTURE EN - MIS / DÉCLASSIFIÉ DISCLOSURE - PUBLIC DECLASSIFIED on nfoich the F*7S report should be based, as follows (a) 3hould any preliminary report represent the views cf the FT/S as a Technical Advisory Group or should approval of NAT gov-- lents be obtained before submission of a report; (b) in './hat way should replies to paragraphs 9 and 10 of the High Priority Production Programme Report (Ref. D-D/192) be incorporated; (c) tc what extent, i f any, should the F.TS examine in detail 3uch questions as guarantees,I n t eAtlantic r - Fund, etc., SECRET SECRET FFC STAFF f 51) M-55 6. Insofaraa vicvs v;cre expressed, there se one d general agreementthat a preliminary report shoul d be submitted by tho PwS without askingf o r approval by individual governments, Such a report should be cade as promptly as possible and should go into the sub.iect deeply enough to5 ive the Doputics a clear idea of the ramificationso f the Memorandum in question. Accordingly, it wa3 doomed desirable to have a full discussion of this paper by the FT/S rather than by the T7orkin£ P.^jrty in order that the form and substance of the report to the eDputies should be acre clearly determined. Some opposition wr.3 expressedo ncerningc the decree "which the present draft v/ent into various aspects of tho Memorandum, especially the naming of individual NAT qovorroenti in connection \/ith the proposed guarantee plan. The consensus '.ns that tho preliminary report should not necessarily express the official views of NAT governments, that the Deputies should be "iven an opportunity to say whether they wish to receive a report which v.ns approved by govarar.«int3 and also v/hcthor they.Y/ish the FT7S to make such a report. As for paragraphs 9 and 10 of the Kiqh Priority production Programs Report (Ref. D-D/192),seemed it desirable to discuss 3thee it*:an3 separately, but to cover then in the Interim Report, Action 7. A Working Party, composed of the Canadian, French, United Kingdom and United States delegates, vas appointed to3tudy the defence expenditure data submitted v/ith tho view to reconciliation to the iaaximvn extent possible of classification used by countries in allocating their expenditures. This DECLASSIFIED - PUBLIC DISCLOSURE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ - MIS EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE LECTURE EN - MIS / DÉCLASSIFIÉ DISCLOSURE - PUBLIC DECLASSIFIED Working Forty was also asked to cons:!.der -what helpl d wou be required in collating this report, such as statisticians, graphie experts, etc.. Discussion 8, The Chairman obsorv-jd that since tho 3lat meeting replies had been received from the Canadian delegate, the Italian delegate and supplementary information from the United Stetes delegate. As for the procedure to bo followed by the in co-ordinating these reports, he asked the Canadian delegate for suggestions ?.nd for comments v/ith reference to tho Memorandum by the Canadian Deputy (Kef. NACD. D-D(51 )1 9). - 3 - SECRET • 6G66/'///G/a# SECRET FSC Sr/JF (51) M-55 CANADA 9. The Canadian delegate gave the FIS a brief oral backgroundsursnary with references to the Memorandum by the Canadian Deputy and the workc f tho ’’ancrphoua" ^roup referred tc therein, Ke considered that it might be •v^'orth v.hile for theFTÎS to review the replies submitted -«dLth a view to achieving maximum uniformity in the classification of defence expenditure data. A 'forking Party night be appointed to put the replies into a cofnmon form, cither for sending to the Deputies or for inclusion ir. a Progros3 Report, 10. At the suggestion of the Chairman, the PT7S ogrer-d tol ow fol the procedure outlined by the Canadian delegate, Accordingly, a forking Party, consisting of the delegates fron Canada., France, United Kingdom and United States, was appointed. It was also suggested that the 7/orking Party should look into the question of obtaining such assistance as statisticians and exports or. presentation for preparation of a collated report. Other Business, North Atlantic Planning Board for Ocean Shiriinr. (Ref. FEC ST.IFF5 1 )( D-20/3 •and 0- 7.0/K ) c t i u m j s 11. The Chairman ivportcd that tho United States delegate and he had attended a further meeting at th<; Ministry of Transport T./ith Mr. Bullwinklo of the London Technical Conzr.ittee of NAP30S. Ko and the United States delegate have dooided to prop ire a report which they would3 ubmit to nieabers of the London Te-hnieal Cccmitteo of üCAFBOS, -`f ter \ixich they would 3ubrr.it it to the P’iVS as a proposed report to the Deputies. Or. tho basis of the two meetings vith the NAP30S representatives, tho report v/ould not go to any DECLASSIFIED - PUBLIC DISCLOSURE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ - MIS EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE LECTURE EN - MIS / DÉCLASSIFIÉ DISCLOSURE - PUBLIC DECLASSIFIED great length. Date and Time cf Next M eeting. 12. Tho next mooting was scheduled for 10.30 a.m. on Saturday, 27th January, 1951* The meeting closed at 5 p .r~* - - SECRET.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norge Og IMCO
    Allierte på kollisjonskurs? Norge og den amerikanske skipsfartspolitikken Norge1948-60 og IMCO André MariusGarborg Malmer Rustand - MasteroppgaveMasteroppgave ii historie historie Institutt for arkeologi,Universitetet konservering i Oslo og historie (IAKH) Universitetet i Oslo Våren 2012 Våren 2009 2 Norge og IMCO Marius Malmer - Masteroppgave i historie Universitetet i Oslo Våren 2012 3 4 Forord Å jobbe med denne oppgaven har vært en interessant erfaring. Spesielt har det vært lærerikt å sette seg inn i et komplisert og ukjent tema med de utfordringene det medfølger. Det er mange som fortjener en takk for å ha hjulpet meg med denne masteroppgaven. Først og fremst vil jeg takke min veileder Helge Pharo, for godt samarbeid, gode tilbakemeldinger og nyttige råd underveis i arbeidet med oppgaven. En stor takk går også til Dag Malmer Halvorsen, Nina Britt Berge, og William Ekås Sæter for hjelp med korrekturlesning og konstruktive kommentarer. Til sist vil jeg takke Trond Synnestvedt i Utenriksdepartementets arkiv for god hjelp og service. Oslo, mai 2012 Marius Malmer 5 Innholdsfortegnelse Forord ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Innholdsfortegnelse .................................................................................................................... 6 Forkortelser ................................................................................................................................ 8 1 Innledning ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stiftende M0te Ble Avholdt I Oslo Handelsstands Forening Lordag 19. Februar 1977 Etter Innbydelse Av Den Interimskomite Som Var Nedsatt 10Rdag 16
    NORSK POSTHISTORISK SELSKAP Stiftende m0te ble avholdt i Oslo Handelsstands Forening lordag 19. februar 1977 etter innbydelse av den interimskomite som var nedsatt 10rdag 16. oktober 1976. M0tet ble ledet av interimskomiteens fonnann, Harry Snarvold, og referert av interimskomiteens sekretaer, Paul H. Jensen. 1. Motet ble apnet av Harry Snarvold 2. Som fremmotte stiftende medlemmer ble felgende registrert: Edw. Chr. Hannevig Borre T. Soot-Ryen Hosle Per Gellein Oslo Bjorn E. Bunaes Morten Hans Chr. Nielsen Sokna Sig. Lokeberg T0nsberg Paul H. Jensen Oslo Bjarne Fjeld Oslo Sture Larsson Kolbotn Lars Frogner Oslo Postmuseet v/HSkon Stensrud Oslo Leiv A, 'Brecke Oslo Arne Thune - Larsen Oslo Bjorn H. Gronstad Botne i Vestfold Harry Snarvold Partille, Sverige Videre hadde folgende, ikke tilstedevaerende personer skriftlig gitt sin tilslutning til stiftelsen, og ble dermed ogsS registrert som stiftende medlemmer: Knut J. Buskum Gjovik Erling Dehli Oslo Kristian Fasting Kristiansund N Tore Gjelsvik Ranheim Per Hansen Oslo Wiegand Hansen Holte, Denmark Oddvin Indreb0 Forde R. G. Jones Wales, Storbritania Einar Lundstr0m Stockholm* Sverige Fridolf Lundstrom Oslo Borge Lundh Kobenhavn, Danmark F.'C. Moldenhauer Bergen Reidar Norby Washington DC, USA Johnny E. Pedersen Vagsbygd Inge Rian Ytre Sni11 fjord Karl U. Sanne Luxembourg Henrik.Thrap - Meyer Oslo Hersleb Vogt Stockholm, Sverige Kr. Wilhelmsen Tromso Arne Bye Borre Efren Rebolledo Hosle Erland Brand Goteborg Audun Nordanger Skudesneshavn - 2 - 3. Referat fra interimskomi teens m0te 16.10.1976 ble fremlagt. Formann og sekretar redegjorde for det arbeid som var utfort av interimskomi teen. Forsamlingen tiltradte referatet og rapporten. 4. Foreningens navn ble vedtatt & v$re NORSK POSTHISTORISK SELSKAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Paris Act Relating to the Berne Convention for the Protec Tion Of
    No. 18338 MULTILATERAL Paris Act relating to the Berne Convention for the Protec tion of Literary and Artistic Works of September 9, 1886, completed at Paris on May 4, 1896, revised at Berlin on November 13, 1908, completed at Berne on March 20, 1914, revised at Rome on June 2, 1928, revised at Brussels on June 26, 1948, and revised at Stockholm on July 14, 1967 (with appendix). Con cluded at Paris on 24 July 1971 Authentic texts: French and English. Registered by the Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 28 February 1980. MULTILATERAL Acte de Paris à la Convention de Berne pour la protection des œuvres littéraires et artistiques du 9 septembre 1886, complétée à Paris le 4 mai 1896, révisée à Berlin le 13 novembre 1908, complétée à Berne le 20 mars 1914, révisée à Rome le 2 juin 1928, révisée à Bruxelles le 26 juin 1948 et révisée à Stockholm le 14 juillet 1967 (avec annexe). Conclu à Paris le 24 juillet 1971 Textes authentiques : français et anglais. Enregistré par le Directeur général de l'Organisation mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle, agissant au nom des Parties, le 28 février 1980. Vol. 1161,1-18338 1980_____United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités______31 BERNE CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF LITERARY AND ARTISTIC WORKS OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1886,© COMPLETED AT PARIS ON MAY 4, 1896,2 REVISED AT BERLIN ON NOVEMBER 13, 1908,3 COMPLETED AT BERNE ON MARCH 20, 1914,4 AND REVISED AT ROME ON JUNE 2, 1928, 5 AT BRUSSELS ON JUNE 26, 1948,6 AT STOCKHOLM ON JULY 14, 1967,7 AND AT PARIS ON JULY 24, 1971 s The countries of the Union, being equally animated by the desire to protect, in as effective and uniform a manner as possible, the rights of authors in their literary and artistic works, Recognizing the importance of the work of the Revision Conference held at Stockholm in 1967, Have resolved to revise the Act adopted by the Stockholm Conference, while maintaining without change Articles 1 to 20 and 22 to 26 of that Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Politikken Til Charles De Gaulle, 1958–1967
    KRISE OG NYE MOGLEGHEITER Norske reaksjonar på den franske NATO-politikken til Charles de Gaulle, 1958–1967 Bjørn Ivar Austevik Voll Masteroppgåve i historie Institutt for arkeologi, konservering og historie (IAKH) Universitetet i Oslo Hausten 2014 II Oppgåvetittel: ”Krise og nye moglegheiter: norske reaksjonar på den franske NATO-politikken til Charles de Gaulle i åra 1958–1967”. Framsidebilde: Møte i Det nordatlantiske rådet i NATO på forsvarsministernivå 14. desember 1966, der Nuclear Defence Affairs Committee og Nuclear Planning Group blei oppretta. (Foto: frå Flickr-kontoen til NATO, www.flickr.com/photos/n-a-t-o/) III Copyright Bjørn Ivar Austevik Voll 2014 Krise og nye moglegheiter: norske reaksjonar på den franske NATO-politikken til Charles de Gaulle, 1958–1967 Forfattar: Bjørn Ivar Austevik Voll http://Www.duo.uio.no Trykk: Webergs Printshop IV Ved regjeringsskiftet høsten 1965 var NATO på vei inn i en av de utviklingsfaser som utenrikspolitiske korrespondenter gjerne ynder å kalle «en alvorlig krise». Karakteristikken var denne gang ikke helt uberettiget. John Lyng, utanriksminister (1965–1970)1 1 Lyng 1976: 102. V VI FORORD Å skrive ei masteroppgåva kan vere som ei pilegrimsvandring. Det er vandringa, vegen, som er målet blir det sagt. Og ein kan nok kjenne seg litt tom når det heilage målet står framom deg, har eg erfart. I dette tilfellet kanskje tanketom? Eg vil retta ei stor takk til rettleiaren min, Olav Njølstad, for retningsgivande spørsmål og eit og anna ”tja” i margen. Eg har fått spelerom til å føre oppgåva dit ho har teke meg og eg har fått gode innspel når eg har trengt det, spesielt i den lange innspurten.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol 21 Annexed to the Universal Copyright
    1974_____ United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 311 PROTOCOL 21 ANNEXED TO THE UNIVERSAL COPYRIGHT CONVENTION AS REVISED AT PARIS ON 24 JULY 1971 2 CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THAT CONVENTION TO THE WORKS OF CERTAIN INTERNATIONAL ORGANI ZATIONS The States party hereto, being also party to the Universal Copyright Con vention as revised at Paris on 24 July 1971 2 (hereinafter called "the 1971 Convention"), Have accepted the following provisions: 1. (a) The protection provided for in article II (1) of the 1971 Conven tion shall apply to works published for the first time by the United Nations, by the Specialized Agencies in relationship therewith, or by the Organization of American States. (b) Similarly, article II (2) of the 1971 Convention shall apply to the said organization or agencies. 2. (a) This Protocol shall be signed and shall be subject to ratification or acceptance, or may be acceded to, as if the provisions of article VIII of the 1971 Convention applied hereto. (b) This Protocol shall enter into force for each State on the date of deposit of the instrument of ratification, acceptance or accession of the State concerned or on the date of entry into force of the 1971 Convention with respect to such State, whichever is the later. IN FAITH WHEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Protocol. 1 Came into force on 10 July 1974, the date of entry into force of the Universal Copyright Convention as revised at Paris on 24 July 1971, in respect of the following States on whose behalf an instrument of ratification, acceptance or accession had been deposited with the Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization on the dates indicated below, in accordance with paragraph 2 (b): Date of deposit of the instrument of ratification.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Exchanges, Property and Cooperation
    TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 17-510 ________________________________________________________________________ CULTURAL EXCHANGES, PROPERTY AND COOPERATION International Exhibitions Convention Between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and OTHER GOVERNMENTS Signed at Paris on November 22, 1928, and Supplemented by the Protocols of May 10, 1948, November 16, 1966, November 30, 1972, and the Amendments of June 24, 1982 and May 31, 1988 Acceded to by the United States on May 9, 2017 with Related Documents NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 (80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— “. .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence . of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.” MULTILATERAL Cultural Exchanges, Properties and Cooperation: International Expositions Convention signed at Paris November 22, 1928, and Supplemented by the Protocols of May 10, 1948, November 16, 1966, November 30, 1972, and the Amendments of June 24, 1982 and May 31, 1988; Acceded to by the United States May 9, 2017; Entered into force for the United States May 10, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Lastningsland, I Stor Grad Portrettert Gjennom Norske Utvandrerøyne
    De der ute - vi her hjemme Pressehistoriske skrifter 6/2006 Redaksjon for Pressehistorisk skrifter: Hans Fredrik Dahl Martin Eide Guri Hjeltnes Rune Ottosen Idar Flo (redaksjonssekretær) © Forfattarane 2006 Trykk: Lobo Media AS Omslagsutforming: Thomas Lewe ISSN 1503-9161 ISBN 82-92587-05-5 Utgitt av Norsk pressehistorisk forening med støtte fra Norsk faglitterær forfatter- og oversetterforening(NFF) Abonnement er gratis Pressehistoriske skrifter IMK Universitetet i Oslo Postboks l 093 Blindern 0317 Oslo Tlf: (+47)70 07 52 22 Faks: (+47)70 07 52 01 E-post: [email protected] Internett: www .pressehistorisk.no 2 KJÆRE LESER!. .....____ ____ _ _____ 5 FORTELLINGER OM VERDEN - UTENLANDSDEKNINGEN I TRE NORSKE AVISER 1880 · 1940 .... 7 Av Anne Hege Simonsen I. INNLEDNING ........................................................................................................................••••••....•........................ 7 2. HVORDAN SKREV AVISENE OM UTLANDET? ........................................................................................................ 13 Sjanger ................................................................................................................................................................ 15 lnnholdsdefinisjoner:, ........................................................................................................................................ 20 3. VERDEN DER UTE SETT GJENNOM TRE NORSKE AVISER ..............................................••••.•••••.............................. 23 I 880:
    [Show full text]
  • Norges Handelsflåte I Norsk Og Alliert Forsvar
    Skipsfartens plass i det vestlige forsvar Etableringen og konsolideringen av skipsfartsberedskap i NATO og Norge 1949-1967 Avhandling til bedømmelse for doktorgrad Det historisk-filosofiske fakultet Universitetet i Bergen Lars Christian Jenssen Institutt for forsvarsstudier 31. mai 2001 Innhold Forord ........................................................................................................................... 6 I Bakgrunn ...................................................................................................................... 7 1 Perspektiver ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Geostrategi .................................................................................................................................... 11 Internasjonalisme og samarbeid .................................................................................................... 14 Hegemoni-teori ............................................................................................................................. 16 ”Fellesgode” og ”myk maktanvendelse” ................................................................................... 17 Regimeorientert hegemoni-teori ............................................................................................... 18 Utenriks- og sikkerhetspolitisk hegemoni-teori ........................................................................ 20 Korporatisme ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deliberative Diplomacy: the Nordic Approach to Global Governance and Societal Representation at the United Nations International Relations Studies Series
    DELIBERATIVE DIPLOMACY: THE NORDIC APPROACH TO GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND SOCIETAL REPRESENTATION AT THE UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS STUDIES SERIES Series Editor Patrick James University of Southern California Editorial Board Mark Theodore Berger, Naval Postgraduate School Annette Freyberg-Inan, University of Amsterdam Ewan Harrison, Washington University, St. Louis Axel Huelsemeyer, Concordia University Steven Lamy, University of Southern California Stephen M. Seideman, McGill University VOLUME 11 DELIBERATIVE DIPLOMACY: THE NORDIC APPROACH TO GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND SOCIETAL REPRESENTATION AT THE UNITED NATIONS by Norbert Gtz DORDRECHT 2011 Cover Design / Illustration: studio Thorsten / The Royal Library Copenhagen This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISSN 1570-6451 hardbound ISBN 9789089790583 paperback ISBN 9789089790590 Copyright 2011 Republic of Letters Publishing BV, Dordrecht, The Netherlands / St. Louis, MO All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Republic of Letters Publishing has made all reasonable efforts to trace all rights holders to any copyrighted material used in this work. In cases where these efforts have not been successful the publisher welcomes communications from copyright holders, so that the appropriate acknowledgements can be made in future editions, and to settle other permission matters. Authorization to photocopy items for personal use is granted by Republic of Letters Publishing BV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA Fees are subject to change CONTENTS Preface vii List of figures and tables ix List of abbreviations xi 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Oppvekstvilkår for Barn Med Norsk Mor Og Tysk Far I Norsk Etterkrigstid
    © Norges forskningsråd 1999 Norges forskningsråd Postboks 2700 St. Hanshaugen 0131 OSLO Telefon: 22 03 70 00 Telefaks: 22 03 70 01 [email protected] www.forskningsradet.no/ Publikasjonen kan bestilles via internett: www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner eller grønt nummer telefaks: 800 83 001 Grafisk design omslag: Foto/ill. omslagsside: Trykk: GCS as 1. Opplag: juni 1999: 700 2. opplag : april 2000: 300 Oslo, juni 1999 ISBN 82-12-01319-7 (trykksak) ISBN 978-82-12-02416-8 (pdf) Området for kultur og samfunn Fiendens barn? Kunnskapsstatus Undersøkelse av noen sider ved norske myndigheters behandling av tysk-norske krigsbarn etter andre verdenskrig Kunnskapsbehov Oppvekstvilkår for barn med norsk mor og tysk far i norsk etterkrigstid Norges forskningsråd INNHOLD FORORD...............................................................................................................................................................5 1. OPPDRAGET FRA SHD ....................................................................................................................................5 2. FORSKNINGSRÅDETS TOLKNING/AVGRENSNING AV OPPDRAGET.....................................................................5 3. ORGANISERINGEN...........................................................................................................................................6 4. KONTAKTEN MED ORGANISASJONENE.............................................................................................................6 5. KONTAKTEN MELLOM FORSKNINGSRÅDET
    [Show full text]
  • Mormon Opposition Literature: a Historiographical Critique and Case Study, 1844-57
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1994 Mormon Opposition Literature: A Historiographical Critique and Case Study, 1844-57 William P. Connors Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Connors, William P., "Mormon Opposition Literature: A Historiographical Critique and Case Study, 1844-57" (1994). Theses and Dissertations. 4617. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4617 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. mormon opposition literature A historiographical critique and case study 1844571844 57 A thesis presented to the department of history brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts by william P connors april 1994 this thesis by william P connors is accepted in its present form by the department of history of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis requirement for the degree of master of arts aviVv i K teebjtfu vvimalcolm R thorp committee chairchaintiduhidu 62C 15c01Q CA brian Q cannon committee member q afamhaghawfa X bruce A vanorden committee member A W 11 date kendall W brown department chair PREFACE growing up in a very conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Bid for the 2025 World Expo
    City of Toronto Feasibility study in respect of hosting the 2025 World Expo 11 November 2013 City of Toronto Feasibility Study in Respect of Hosting the 2025 World Expo Contents TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 WORLD EXPO BID PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE FOR THE 2025 WORLD EXPO ................................................................................................................................................... 29 LESSONS LEARNED ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO A POTENTIAL BID FOR EXPO 2025 ............................................................................................................ 35 ECONOMIC IMPACT ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]