DOCSLIB.ORG

Village of Bath Heritage Conservation District Plan Is Available in PDF Format

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Village of Bath Heritage Conservation District Plan Is Available in PDF Format ç,d i “What so many fail to understand is the fact that we can have no future without having had a past on which to build the present.” —Dr H.C. Burleigh VILLAGE OF BATH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Village of Bath Heritage Conservation District Plan represents the hard work and efforts of the conservation of cultural heritage resources in the Village of Bath over the past thirty years. This report is indebted to those individuals. PROJECT TEAM Kyle Gonyou, Village of Bath Heritage Conservation District Plan Author Jim Sova, Project Manager, Planner, Loyalist Township Murray Beckel, Project Director, Director of Planning and Development Services, Loyalist Township David Casemore, GIS Support, Planning Technician, Loyalist Township LOYALIST TOWNSHIP HERITAGE COMMITTEE Barbara Monk, Chairperson Councilor Ed Daniliunas Councilor John Ibey Andrea Cross John Dixon Robert Hammond Bert Herfst Gus Panageotopoulos Warren Sleeth Virginia Thompson Denise Wolfe SPECIAL THANKS Cynthia Flavell, Fairfield-Gutzeit Society Andrew Jeanes, Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Larry Pearson, Director Historic Places Stewardship Section, Alberta Culture This program is supported by funding provided by the Government of Ontario and Loyalist Township. 2 VILLAGE OF BATH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 What is a Heritage Conservation District? ......................................................................... 7 1.2 Benefits of a Heritage Conservation District ...................................................................... 7 1.3 Purpose of Update ............................................................................................................ 8 2. Village of Bath Heritage Conservation District ........................................................................ 9 2.1 District Location ................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Red Book (1976) .............................................................................................................11 2.3 Heritage District Designation Report (1982) .....................................................................12 2.4 Designation Bylaw 514-82 ...............................................................................................12 2.5 Updated Inventory of Heritage Buildings in the Village of Bath, Ontario (2001) ................13 2.6 Heritage Districts Work! Heritage Conservation District Study, Town of Bath (2009) .......13 3. History, Growth and Development of the Village of Bath .......................................................15 3.1 Pre-Fur Trade and Madeleine de Roybon d’Allon ............................................................15 3.2 Loyalist Era ......................................................................................................................17 3.3 The Village of Bath ..........................................................................................................23 3.4 Post-War .........................................................................................................................26 3.5 Summary .........................................................................................................................27 4. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or INterest ...................................................................28 4.1 Key Heritage Attributes ....................................................................................................30 5. Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................31 5.1 Overall Heritage Conservation District .............................................................................31 5.2 Heritage Resources .........................................................................................................31 5.3 Village Streetscape & Landscape ....................................................................................31 5.4 Process ...........................................................................................................................32 5.5 Applicable Policy .............................................................................................................32 5.6 Amendments ...................................................................................................................32 6. Heritage Conservation District Shall Prevail ..........................................................................33 7. Policy ....................................................................................................................................34 7.1 Land Use & Development Pattern ...................................................................................34 7.1.1 Land Use & Development Pattern Policy ...................................................................34 VILLAGE OF BATH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN 3 7.2 Landscape/Streetscape ...................................................................................................35 7.2.1 Landscape/Streetscape Policy ......................................................................................35 7.3 Contributing Resources ...................................................................................................36 7.3.1 Contributing Resources Policy ..................................................................................36 7.4 Non-Contributing Resources............................................................................................37 7.4.1 Non-Contributing Resources Policy ...........................................................................37 7.5 New Development ...........................................................................................................38 7.5.1 New Development Policy ..........................................................................................38 7.6 Adjacency ........................................................................................................................38 7.6.1 Adjacency Policy .......................................................................................................39 7.7 Archaeological Resources ...............................................................................................39 7.7.1 Archaeological Resources Policy ..............................................................................39 7.8 Demolition .......................................................................................................................40 7.8.1 Demolition Policy .......................................................................................................40 8. Municipal Policy ....................................................................................................................41 8.1 Official Plan .....................................................................................................................41 8.1.1 Official Plan Recommendations ................................................................................41 8.2 Zoning Bylaw ...................................................................................................................42 8.2.1 Zoning Bylaw Recommendations ..............................................................................44 8.3 Signage Bylaw .................................................................................................................44 8.4 Emergency Response Plan .............................................................................................45 8.4.1 Emergency Response Plan Recommendations ........................................................46 8.5 Heritage Impact Statement ..............................................................................................46 8.5.1 Heritage Impact Statement Recommendations .........................................................46 8.6 Heritage Permit................................................................................................................47 9. Heritage Permit .....................................................................................................................48 9.1 Applicability .....................................................................................................................49 9.2 Delegated Authority .........................................................................................................49 9.3 Timeline ...........................................................................................................................49 9.4 Fee ..................................................................................................................................50 9.5 Heritage Permit & Building Permit....................................................................................50 9.6 Heritage Conservation Easements ..................................................................................50 4 VILLAGE OF BATH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN 9.7 Case of Emergency or Catastrophe .................................................................................51 9.8 Appeals ...........................................................................................................................51
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toronto's Cartographic Birth Certificate
    Document generated on 09/26/2021 3:49 a.m. Ontario History Toronto’s Cartographic Birth Certificate Hiding in Plain Sight for 350 Years Rick Laprairie Volume 110, Number 2, Fall 2018 Article abstract This article posits that the earliest map to have ever used the name Toronto as a URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1053510ar place is uncovered. Previously unnoticed, the name “Tarontos Lac,” for today’s DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1053510ar Lake Simcoe, is on a 1678 map by Jean-Baptiste-Louis Franquelin. His map, “Carte pour servir a l’eclaircissement du Papier Terrier de la Nouvelle France,” is See table of contents now recognized as Toronto’s cartographic birth certificate. The article describes the map, discusses how the discovery came about and why the name may have gone unnoticed until now. This cartographic study is set in the history of the Publisher(s) exploration of the Great Lakes region and the Mississippi River. Three other unsigned and undated period maps, often claimed as “Toronto” firsts, are also The Ontario Historical Society examined. These claims are dismissed, as revised attributions show them to have been by different cartographers and dated later than originally thought, making ISSN Franquelin’s map the oldest. The cartographic genealogy of the name Toronto is traced back through three and a half centuries to its initial appearance on 0030-2953 (print) Franquelin’s map. 2371-4654 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Laprairie, R. (2018). Toronto’s Cartographic Birth Certificate: Hiding in Plain Sight for 350 Years. Ontario History, 110(2), 152–175.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Macleod
    STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF MACLEOD QUARRY V NORTH HALF OF LOT 2, CONCESSION 4 FORMER GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF CORNWALL, NOW TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH STORMONT, UNITED COUNTIES OF STORMONT, DUNDAS AND GLENGARRY STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT MACLEOD QUARRY V NORTH HALF OF LOT 2, CONCESSION 4 FORMER GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF CORNWALL, NOW TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH STORMONT, UNITED COUNTIES OF STORMONT, DUNDAS AND GLENGARRY Prepared for: Mr. Mark Priddle, P.Geo. Manager, Environmental Science & Engineering McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. 115 Walgreen Road R.R. #3 Carp, Ontario K0A 1L0 Phone: (613) 836-2184 x 2236 Email: [email protected] Re: Aggregate Resources Act (Ontario) Prepared by: Selena Barre and Jessalyn Miller Student Archaeologist Staff Archaeologist Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. 4534 Bolingbroke Road, R.R. #3 Maberly, Ontario K0H 2B0 Phone: (613) 267-7028 Email: [email protected] PRAS Project No.: PR16-24 Licencee: Adam Pollock, Licence P336 Staff Archaeologist Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. P.I.F. No.: P336-0141-2016 Date: September 16th, 2016 Original Report Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment MacLeod Quarry V Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mr. Mark Priddle, P.Geo., Manager, Environmental Science & Engineering, and Mr. Dan Arnott, P.Eng., Geo-Environmental Engineer, McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd., provided background information, logistical support and project mapping. Mr. Travis Mitchell of Cornwall Gravel Co. Ltd., provided site access permission and transportation during the site visit. PROJECT PERSONNEL Licence Holder Adam Pollock, M.A., Licence P336 Historical Research Selena Barre Site Visit Jessalyn Miller, B.A., Licence R1111 Report Writing Selena Barre Jessalyn Miller Report Draughting Jessalyn Miller Report Review Jeff Earl, M.Soc.Sc., Licence P031 ii Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment MacLeod Quarry V Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Class Ea For
    STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT CLASS EA FOR BELL BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT PART OF LOTS 37 AND 38, CONCESSION 2 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF SIDNEY NOW CITY OF BELLEVILLE COUNTY OF HASTINGS STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, CLASS EA FOR BELL BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT PART OF LOTS 37 AND 38, CONCESSION 2, GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF SIDNEY NOW CITY OF BELLEVILLE, COUNTY OF HASTINGS Prepared for: Ray Ford Deputy Director / Manager of Engineering Engineering & Development Services City of Belleville 169 Front Street Belleville, Ontario K8N 2Y8 Phone: (613) 967-3200, ext. 3231 Email: [email protected] Re: Class Environmental Assessment Prepared by: Stephanie Cleland, M.A., P1201 Staff Archaeologist Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. 4534 Bolingbroke Road, R.R. #3 Maberly, Ontario K0H 2B0 Phone: (613) 267-7028 Email: [email protected] PRAS Project No.: PR18-59 Licensee: Peter Sattelberger, M.A., Licence P111 Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. P.I.F. No.: P111-0074-2018 Date: February 4th, 2019 Original Report Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Bell Boulevard Widening Project Class EA Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mr. Ray Ford, Deputy Director/Manager of Engineering with the Engineering and Development Services Department at the City of Belleville, provided assistance with coordinating information and logistics for this project. PROJECT PERSONNEL Project Manager Jeff Earl, M.Soc.Sc. (P031) Licence Holder Peter Sattelberger, M.A. (P111) Historical Research Stephanie Cleland, M.A. (P1201) Property Inspection Peter Sattelberger GIS/Drafting Stephanie Cleland Report Writing Stephanie Cleland Report Review Jeff Earl ii Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Bell Boulevard Widening Project Class EA Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowing Landscape: Living, Discussing, and Imagining the Toronto Carrying Place
    KNOWING LANDSCAPE: LIVING, DISCUSSING, AND IMAGINING THE TORONTO CARRYING PLACE ANNIE VEILLEUX A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Programme in Interdisciplinary Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario December 2011 © Annie Veilleux, 2011 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-88656-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-88656-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 8.1
    Appendix 1 8.1 CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCES AND CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPES EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PRELIMINARY IMPACT ASSESSMENT WEST TRUNK SEWER DIVERSIONS CITY OF MISSISSAUGA REGION OF PEEL, ONTARIO FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Hatch Corporation 2265 Upper Middle Road East, 5th Floor Oakville, ON L6M 2W2 ASI File: 18CH-112 May 2019 (Revised June 2019 and April and May 2020) 8.1 CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCES AND CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPES EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PRELIMINARY IMPACT ASSESSMENT WEST TRUNK SEWER DIVERSIONS CITY OF MISSISSAUGA REGION OF PEEL, ONTARIO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ASI was contracted by Hatch Corporation to conduct a Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA) for the Peel West Trunk Sewer Diversions Schedule ‘B’ Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA), in the City of Mississauga, for the Region of Peel, Ontario. This project involves construction of diversion sewers connecting the existing Credit Valley Trunk Sewer to the new West Trunk Sewer at Erin Mills Parkway. The study area comprises three proposed alignment alternatives: 1, 2a, and 2b. The study area is located in an urban context in the community of Streetsville within the City of Mississauga. The results of background historical research and a review of secondary source material revealed a study area with an urban land use history dating back to the early nineteenth century. A field review was conducted for the proposed alignment alternatives to confirm the location of and to document previously identified cultural heritage resources, and to identify and document any potential additional ones. Background research, data collection, and field review conducted for the study area determined that thirteen potential cultural heritage resources (including seven built heritage resources and six cultural heritage landscapes) are located within and/or adjacent to the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto's Cartographic Birth Certificate
    Document generated on 09/29/2021 8:10 a.m. Ontario History Toronto’s Cartographic Birth Certificate Hiding in Plain Sight for 350 Years Rick Laprairie Volume 110, Number 2, Fall 2018 Article abstract This article posits that the earliest map to have ever used the name Toronto as a URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1053510ar place is uncovered. Previously unnoticed, the name “Tarontos Lac,” for today’s DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1053510ar Lake Simcoe, is on a 1678 map by Jean-Baptiste-Louis Franquelin. His map, “Carte pour servir a l’eclaircissement du Papier Terrier de la Nouvelle France,” is See table of contents now recognized as Toronto’s cartographic birth certificate. The article describes the map, discusses how the discovery came about and why the name may have gone unnoticed until now. This cartographic study is set in the history of the Publisher(s) exploration of the Great Lakes region and the Mississippi River. Three other unsigned and undated period maps, often claimed as “Toronto” firsts, are also The Ontario Historical Society examined. These claims are dismissed, as revised attributions show them to have been by different cartographers and dated later than originally thought, making ISSN Franquelin’s map the oldest. The cartographic genealogy of the name Toronto is traced back through three and a half centuries to its initial appearance on 0030-2953 (print) Franquelin’s map. 2371-4654 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Laprairie, R. (2018). Toronto’s Cartographic Birth Certificate: Hiding in Plain Sight for 350 Years. Ontario History, 110(2), 152–175.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Study
    STAGE 1 AND 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MADAWASKA SHORES SUBDIVISION PART LOT 9, CONCESSION 7 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF MCNAB NOW TOWNSHIP OF MCNAB/BRAESIDE RENFREW COUNTY, ONTARIO STAGE 1 AND 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MADAWASKA SHORES SUBDIVISION, PART LOT 9, CONCESSION 7, GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF MCNAB, NOW TOWNSHIP OF MCNAB/BRAESIDE, RENFREW COUNTY, ONTARIO Prepared for: Tracy Zander, M.Pl., MCIP, RPP Planning Consultant ZanderPlan Inc. P.O. Box 20148 Perth, ON K7H 3M6 Phone: 613-264-9600 E-mail: [email protected] Re: Planning Act, Plan of Subdivision Application Prepared by: Caitlyn Howard, B.A. Staff Archaeologist Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. 4534 Bolingbroke Road, R.R. #3 Maberly, ON K0H 2B0 Phone: 613-267-7028 E-mail: [email protected] PRAS Project No.: PR16-30 Licensee: Peter Sattelberger, M.A., Licence P111 Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. P.I.F. No.: P111-0032-2016 Date: September 23th, 2016 Original Report Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment Madawaska Shores Subdivision Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Ms. Tracy Zander, Planning Consultant at ZanderPlan Inc., provided project mapping and overall project direction. Mr. Bob Wachna of Madawaska Shores Development assisted with access to the property. Thanks to archaeological colleagues Nick Adams of Adams Heritage, Jacquie Fisher of Fisher Archaeological Consulting, Bill Fox of Trent University, Nick Gromoff of Ground Truth Archaeology Limited and Ken Swayze of Kinickinick Heritage Consulting for sharing their insights regarding the biface found during this assessment. PROJECT PERSONNEL Project Manager Brenda Kennett, M.A. (P030) Licence Holder Peter Sattelberger, M.A. (P111) Field Director Caitlyn Howard, B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Russell Lord
    ''Iiow cmr people do such Chitlgs to their own country-weaken its base, befoul its bearrty, darken its/r&cre-How can they do srrch things and seem never to realize what they are doing? How can thejl countenance and join itz a contirrrcal defacemerzt and destr~dctionof the body of their land?" -RUSSELL LORD. (Over the page)-Throughoul the history of the watershed the forest has formed a "back- drop" for the whole area in all its commercial and community life-White Pine on the 7th Concession of Hope Township. A KEPOKT ON THE GANARASKA WATERSHED 0 A study in land use with plans for the rehabilitation of the area in the post-war period A. H. R I CHARDSON, n/r.A., s.n/l.SILK, F.E. Chief Conservation Engineer Department of Planning and Development With an introduction by Chairman of the Sub-committee on Conservation and Development of Natural Resources, of the Dominion Advisory Committee on Reconstruction: Published jointly by the Dominion and Ontario Governments by T. E. BOWMAN. Printer to The King's Most Excellent Majesty Toronto First Edition , 1944 4.500 copies Published jointly by the Dominion and Ontario Governments (Department of Lands and Forests) Second Edition I946 3,000 copies Published by the ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT HON. DANA PORTER Minister A. H. RICHARDSON Chief Conservation Engineer INTRODUCTION ETERIORATION of soil, due in large meas'ure to the removal .of D forest cover, has given rise to serious problems in many parts of Canada. The soundest and most economical methods must be found by which such land may be brought back into productive use.
    [Show full text]
  • France and the St. Lawrence Mission Villages in War and Peace, 1630-1730
    IN EACH OTHER’S ARMS: FRANCE AND THE ST. LAWRENCE MISSION VILLAGES IN WAR AND PEACE, 1630-1730. by JEAN-FRANÇOIS LOZIER A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Graduate Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Jean-François Lozier (2012) In Each Other’s Arms: France and the St. Lawrence Mission Villages in War and Peace, 1630-1730 Jean-François Lozier Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2012 Abstract Beginning in the late 1630s, a diversity of Algonquian and Iroquoian peoples established under the auspices of Jesuit and, later, Sulpician missionaries a string of village communities in the St. Lawrence Valley. A diversity of peoples, whom the French lumped under the rubrics of “Algonquins”, “Montagnais”, “Hurons”, “Iroquois”, “Abenakis” and “Loups”, migrated to these villages in the hope of bettering their lives in trying times. This dissertation retraces the formation and the early development of these communities, exploring the entangled influence of armed conflict, diplomacy, kinship, and leadership on migration, community-building, and identity formation. The historiography of the St. Lawrence Valley – the French colonial heartland in North America – has tended to relegate these Aboriginal communities to the margins. Moreover, those scholars who have considered the formation of mission villages have tended to emphasize missionary initiative. Here, these villages are reimagined as a joint creation, the result of intersecting French and Aboriginal desires, needs, and priorities. The significance of these villages as sites of refuge becomes readily apparent, the trajectories of individual communities corresponding with the escalation of conflict or with ii its tense aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Vaughan Official Plan Archaeological and First Nations Policy Study
    City of Vaughan Official Plan Archaeological and First Nations Policy Study Prepared for: City of Vaughan Policy Planning and Urban Design Department 2141 Major Mackenzie Drive Vaughan, ONL6A 1T1 Tel. 905.832.2281 Fax. 905.832.8595 ASI File 08SP-32 March 2010 City of Vaughan Official Plan Archaeological and First Nations Policy Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An Archaeological and First Nations Policy Study is an important response to an old problem – how to deal with evidence of the past that is, for the most part, not visible because it is buried underground. The City of Vaughan has a long cultural history that begins approximately 11,000 years ago and continues to the present. The archaeological sites that are the physical remains of this lengthy settlement history represent a fragile and non-renewable cultural heritage resource. The common response of “out of sight, out of mind,” however, is no longer possible in today’s political and legal climate. Recent court cases involving Aboriginal land claims, not to mention stop- work orders issued when human remains are uncovered on a development site, are but two examples of the ways in which archaeological resources affect property owners and the municipalities in which they are located. Policy initiatives, such as those found in the report of the Ipperwash inquiry, recommending that every municipality in Ontario adopt a master plan for archaeological resources so as to identify their flashpoints and put in place a way of dealing with them before they happen, coupled with more stringent heritage resource conservation policies in the Provincial Policy Statement (Planning Act), the Ontario Cemeteries Act, and the Ontario Heritage Act, require municipalities to more wisely plan for the conservation of archaeological resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario Maritime Cultural Landscape
    LAKE ONTARIO MARITIME CULTURAL LANDSCAPE A Dissertation by BENJAMIN LOUIS FORD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2009 Major Subject: Anthropology LAKE ONTARIO MARITIME CULTURAL LANDSCAPE A Dissertation by BENJAMIN LOUIS FORD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Kevin Crisman Committee Members, Michael Alvard Donny Hamilton Jonathan Smith Head of Department, Donny Hamilton August 2009 Major Subject: Anthropology iii ABSTRACT Lake Ontario Maritime Cultural Landscape. (August 2009) Benjamin Louis Ford, B.A., University of Cincinnati; M.A., College of William and Mary Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Kevin Crisman The goal of the Lake Ontario Maritime Cultural Landscape project was to investigate the nature and distribution of archaeological sites along the northeast shoreline of Lake Ontario while examining the environmental, political, and cultural factors that influenced the position of these sites. The primary method of investigation was a combined archaeological and historical survey of the shoreline within seven 1-km square areas. The archaeological component of the survey covered both the terrestrial and submerged portions of the shore through marine remote sensing (side-scan sonar and magnetometer), diving surveys, pedestrian surveys, and informant interviews. A total of 39 sites and 51 isolated finds were identified or further analyzed as a result of this project. These sites ranged from the Middle Archaic period (ca. 5500–2500 B.C.) through the 19th century and included habitation, military, transportation, and recreational sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense of Canada Under Louis XIV, 1643-1701
    70- 26,298 HARDCASTLE, David Paul, 1937- THE DEFENSE OF CANADA UNDER LOUIS XIV, 1643- 1701. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1970 History, modem University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan 4 I THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE DEFENSE OF CANADA UNDER LOUIS XIV, 1643-1701 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By David Paul Hardcastle, B.A., B.D., M.A. The Ohio State University 1970 Approved by Adviser Department of History ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to thank his parents, family, teachers, and friends--all of whom contributed in their way toward making this work possible. VITA September 18, 1937 .... Born - Little Rock, Arkansas 1959 ..................... B.A., Texas Christian Univer­ sity, Ft. Worth, Texas 1965 ...................... B.D., Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 1966 ......................M.A , The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1966-1970................. Teaching Associate, Department of History, The Ohio State Univer­ sity, Columbus, Ohio PUBLICATIONS "Some Causes of the Indian Massacre at Jamestown, 1622," Argo (Phi Alpha Theta Publication), 1968. FIELDS OF STUDY Early Modern Europe (Major Field): Professor John C. Rule Renaissance and Reformation: Professor Harold J. Grimm Medieval Europe: Professor Frank C. Pegues iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS i i VITA .................................................. iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS. i ..................... v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.............................. vi INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND........................ 1 Chapter I. THE DEFENSE OF CANADA UNDER THE COMPANY OF NEW FRANCE, 1643-1663............. 36 Local Defense ........................ 44 Colonial Defense...................... 71 II. THE ROYAL INTERVENTION, 1663-1667. 112 III.
    [Show full text]