Development of Sofia Railway Junction: TRANSPORT Sofia-Voluyak Railway Section

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Connecting Europe Facility Development of Sofia Railway Junction: TRANSPORT Sofia-Voluyak railway Section Member States involved: 2014-BG-TMC-0133-W Bulgaria Orient/East-Med Corridor Implementation schedule Start date: January 2016 End date: December 2020 Budget: Estimated total cost of the action: €104,211,047 Maximum EU contribution: €76,074,064 Percentage of EU support: 73% Beneficiary & implementing body: State Enterprise National Railway Infrastructure Company (NRIC) www.rail-infra.bg Additional information: Coordinator’s Report on the Corridor http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/i nfrastructure/ten-t-guidelines/corridors The city of Sofia is one of the main railway nodes of the Balkans. The proposed Action aims to improve the Sofia–Voluyak railway section, located European Commission on the Orient/East Mediterranean Corridor, by carrying out the relevant http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infrastructu works re The Action is part of a Global Project covering the overall development of Innovation and Networks Executive the Sofia railway junction. Agency (INEA) http://ec.europa.eu/inea The Action covers seven activities: land acquisition construction works ERTMS deployment supervision of construction works and ERTMS deployment interoperability assessment archaeological monitoring project management and communication The Action is expected to have a positive impact on traffic management, modal split, congestion, inter-operability, service quality, safety/security and on environment by shifting traffic from road to rail. Please note that the present document is for information purposes only. The content and conditions of the grant agreement always prevail on any different information which may be included in this document or elsewhere. Update: October 2015 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Early History of Junction City, Kansas : the First Generation
AN EARLY HISTORY OF JUNCTION CITY, KANSAS! THE FIRST GENERATION JOHN B. JEFFRIES B. A., Oklahoma State University, 1950 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of History, Political Science and Philosophy KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1963 i-V iu,i 7i j[,j TABLE OF CONTENTS C 2- Chapter Page Table of Contents ii Introduction _-----_----_-__-____ i I. Garden of Eden — — 7 II. The Founding of Junction City _ _ _ _ _ 20 III. Transportation — --- — . _ 39 IV. Communications ------------------- 77 Mail Service 77 Newspapers -------------------- 81 Telegraph __________ — — __ — _ 89 V. Government ---------------______ 90 County ---------------_______ 90 Census ---------------------- 97 U. S. Land Office 100 Politics 102 City 104 Streets and sidewalks -- _______ 107 Licensing of Saloons --------------- 108 Stray Livestock - _____ ___ _. 109 Law and Order _---------_------_ no Fire Protection 117 Finances ___ __ _ 121 City Additions _ 123 Home Guard and Militia --_ 123 U. S. Military Forces 125 ili VI. Commerce, Industry, and Agriculture - _-_ - 129 Commerce ---------------------- 130 Industry ------- — — ----- 142 Agriculture ____ — — 151 VII. Cultural and Social Growth 166 Religious Organizations --------------- 166 Episcopal Church 167 Union Church ------------------- 166 Methodist Church 169 Baptist Church 170 Presbyterian Church ---------------- 170 Catholic Church 172 Cemetery -------- — _________ — _ 172 Fraternal Organizations _-_-------_-_-- 173 Social Organizations — - — -- — -- — 176 Cultural Organizations -___ ig_ Education ---------------------- 182 Conclusion -----------------_____ 192 Bibliography - — 199 Appendix A, Firms advertising in 1860 - -- 211 Appendix B, Firms Advertising in 1870 213 Appendix C, Firms Advertising in 1880 215 INTRODUCTION The history of Junction City, Kansas, is more than merely that of an Army town, although the Junction City-Fort Riley connection has existed from the days of the first settlers.
[Show full text]
Transit Drives Business Decisions
Metroplanning.org/transitmeansbusiness Introduction: Transit Drives Business Decisions McDonald's. Caterpillar. Motorola Solutions. These Chicago region-based companies have many things in common: Table of Contents They employ thousands, help drive our region’s economy, Introduction: Transit Drives Business and cite transit as a key factor in their location and Decisions 3 recruitment strategy. Transit Has a Net Economic Benefit 5 Talent Prefers Transit 7 Businesses throughout the region rely on and benefit from metropolitan Chicago’s transit system. Transit Delivers Talent 10 However, the critical connection between transit investments and our ability to recruit and retain business in metropolitan Chicago is not broadly understood. With Transit Means Business, the Job Creation is Accelerated Near Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC) is bringing together business leaders, transit leadership and state Transit 12 and local government to advocate for stronger investments in our region’s transit system. Transit Fosters Economic Resiliency 14 The reasons to mobilize now are clear. Businesses are betting on transit, but without sufficient Transit Delivers Value to Business 15 investment the competitive advantage our system provides is eroding and will start to fail. Our metropolitan-wide research shows: Case Studies 17 - Businesses are choosing to locate near transit to access larger labor pools; End Notes & Acknowledgements 47 - Locations near transit offer businesses increased resiliency; - Transit-accessible locations outperform the regional average on job growth, especially near rail. This report dives into the data to reveal how transit supports businesses, and profiles companies who are making transit-based decisions that benefit their bottom line. A growing and thriving transit system means a growing and thriving economy.
[Show full text]
2014 Maine State Rail Plan
Maine State Rail Plan TABLE OF CONTENTSview Chapter 1 Framework of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.1 Purpose of the State Rail Plan 1.1 1.2 Visions, Goals, Objectives of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.3 1.3 Transportation and Rail Planning in Maine 1.6 . Figure 1-1: MaineDOT Organizational Chart 1.7 . Figure 1-2: Maine’s MPO Areas 1.10 . Figure 1-3: Regional Planning and Development Councils 1.11 1.4 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 1.12 1.5 Review of Freight and Passenger Rail Planning Studies 1.17 1.6 Evaluation Criteria 1.18 Chapter 2 Freight Rail System 2.1 Overview 2.1 . Figure 2-1: North American Class I Rail Connections 2.2 . Figure 2-2: Map of MM&A Abandonment 2.6 . Figure 2-3: State of Maine Owned Rail Status 2.10 2.2 Freight Rail Industry Development 2.10 2.3 Maine’s Freight Railroad Facilities 2.12 2.4 International, National and Regional Context 2.21 . Figure 2-4: Canadian Class I Connections to Maine System 2.21 . Figure 2-5: Northeast U.S. Rail Freight System 2.22 . Figure 2-6: NS, CP, PAS and PAR Corridors 2.23 . Figure 2-7: Railroad Return on Investment and Cost of Capital 2.24 2.5 Freight Rail Issues and System Constraints 2.24 . Figure 2-8: Estimated National Highway System Peak-Period Congestion 2.25 . Figure 2-9: Estimated Rail Freight Service Levels, 2035 2.25 . Figure 2-10: Rail Clearance and Weight Constraints 2.28 .
[Show full text]
Villach Fill the Gap!
VILLACH FILL THE GAP! EUROPAN15 competition brief by EUROPAN Austria VILLACH / Fill the Gap! Competition Brief Welcome! Dear participants, Welcome to the international competition Europan 15 “Productive Cities 2”! We like to thank you for choosing to participate in Europan Austria! Since 1989—thirty years now—Europan has acted as an international platform in Europe and is one of the world´s largest competitions, including follow-up implementation. It brings together European cities and young international professionals under the age of 40 in architectural, urban, and landscape design. This time Europan Austria presents five Austrian sites: Innsbruck, Graz, Weiz, Wien and Villach. We would like to thank all partners, actors, and organizations for having been open to travel with Europan to enter a sphere of productive uncertainty— the only starting point for honest and responsible innovation! We are looking forward to your projects. Good luck! Best regards, Europan Austria EUROPAN 15 - productive cities 2 15 - productive EUROPAN 2 VILLACH / Fill the Gap! Competition Brief EUROPAN AUSTRIA RULES c/o Haus der Architektur Please follow the European webpage Palais Thinnfeld, Mariahilferstrasse 2 http://europan-europe.eu 8020 Graz Austria QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Dependance Vienna: UPDATE OF MATERIAL Mariahilferstrasse 93/1/14 Please use and check the forum online 1060 Vienna http://europan-europe.eu Austria T +43. 1. 212 76 80 34 SITE VISIT F +43. 1. 212 76 80 99 Thursday 25.04.2019 / 13:00-16:00 [email protected] Meeting point: Park & Ride Westbahnhof, Steinwender Straße, 9500 https://www.europan.at Villach https://www.facebook.com/EuropanAustria Registration: http://europan-europe.eu Please confirm your participation via email to February 2017 [email protected] (name, number of participants, mobile number) Registration deadline: 24.04.2019 CALENDAR >Mo.
[Show full text]
2021 Historical Calendar Cta 2021 January
cta 2021 Historical Calendar cta 2021 January Built in 1936 by the St. Louis Car Company, Chicago Surface Lines trolley bus #184 heads eastbound via Diversey to Western. Trolley bus service was first introduced in Chicago on the #76 Diversey route in 1930. Other trolley bus routes were soon added, some as extensions of existing streetcar lines and later as conversions of streetcar lines to trolley bus service. Trolley bus extensions to existing streetcar lines were an economical way to serve new neighborhoods that were established in outlying parts of the city. Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat ABCDEFG: December 2020 February 2021 B C CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Group Days Off 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 t Alternate day off if 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 you work on this day 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 l Central offices closed 27 28 29 30 31 28 1 New Year’s Day 2 C D E F G A B 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 B C D E F G A 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G Martin Luther King, 17 18 Jr. Day 19 20 21 22 23 G A B C D E F 24 F 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 cta 2021 February Car #1643 was an example of Chicago’s first electric streetcars.
[Show full text]
Inner Circumferential Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
INNER CIRCUMFERENTIAL COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT and STV Inc. April 1999 Inner Circumferential Commuter Rail Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FOREWORD ............................................................. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................... 5 2.1 Alignment Options .................................................. 5 2.2 Description of Alignments ............................................ 8 2.3 Land Use and Zoning ................................................ 12 2.4 Potential Station Locations ............................................ 12 2.5 Environmental Issues ................................................ 19 3.0 FUTURE PLANS .................................................. 24 3.1 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics .......................... 24 3.2 Municipal Development Plans. ........................................ 27 3.3 Railroads and Other Agencies .......................................... 34 4.0 POTENTIAL OPERATIONS ...................................... 39 4.1 Option 1: IHB-BRC ................................................. 40 4.2 Option 2 :MDW-BRC. .............................................. 41 4.3 Option 3: WCL-CSX-BRC ........................................... 42 4.4 Option 4: IHB-CCP-BRC ............................................ 43 5.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ....................................
[Show full text]
Conceptual Service Patterns
Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Organization of this Report .................................................................................. 4 1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. 5 2.1 CTA Rail Forest Park Branch ................................................................................ 5 3.0 SERVICE PATTERNS ........................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Car Requirements ................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Train Requirements ................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Train Schedules ....................................................................................................... 6 4.0 POTENTIAL FUTURE SERVICE SCHEDULE .......................................................... 8 4.1 Average Daily Boarding Analysis ....................................................................... 8 4.2 Future Service Plan Options ................................................................................. 9 5.0 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION ................................................................................
[Show full text]
Federal Transit Administration Region V Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
Federal Transit Administration Region V RED-PURPLE BYPASS PROJECT IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) A. Introduction This document provides the basis for a determination by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Red‐Purple Bypass Project. This determination is made in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 4332(2)(c); FTA’s implementing procedures (23 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] § 771.121); Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966, 49 U.S.C. § 303; and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq. FTA, as the federal lead agency, and Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), as the local project sponsor, jointly prepared the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Section 4(f) Evaluation to describe potential impacts on the human and natural environment and historic integrity that may result from the Red‐Purple Bypass Project on the CTA Red and Purple lines. The EA was prepared pursuant to 23 CFR § 771.119 and issued by FTA on May 19, 2015. This FONSI is prepared by FTA pursuant to 23 CFR § 771.121., and incorporates by reference the EA and other cited documentation. B. Existing Conditions Figure 1 is a map of the project limits. The Red‐Purple Bypass Project area is approximately 5 miles north of downtown Chicago, in the Lakeview community area. The project area, just north of Belmont station, includes the existing junction where three CTA rail lines, the Red, Purple, and Brown lines, converge at an existing flat junction (known as Clark Junction), mainline Red and Purple line tracks extend north to Newport and Cornelia Avenues, and the Brown Line branch extends west to approximately Seminary Avenue.
[Show full text]
CTA: BUILDING a 21ST CENTURY TRANSIT SYSTEM PRESIDENT’S 2016 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS CTA FY16 Budget Chicago Transit Board
CTA: BUILDING A 21ST CENTURY TRANSIT SYSTEM PRESIDENT’S 2016 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS CTA FY16 Budget Chicago Transit Board Terry Peterson, Chairman Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Ashish Sen, Vice Chairman Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Arabel Alva Rosales Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Andre Youngblood Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Rev. Charles E. Robinson Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Alejandro Silva Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Kevin Irvine Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Dorval R. Carter Jr., President CTA FY16 Budget Table of Contents Letter from the President ............................................................................................................................................... 1 CTA Organizational Chart ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 2015 Operating Budget Performance 2015 Operating Budget Performance Summary ..............................................................................................31 2015 Operating Budget Schedule.............................................................................................................................40 President’s 2016 Proposed Operating Budget President’s 2016 Proposed Operating Budget Summary ............................................................................41
[Show full text]
Final Report Appendices
1 Contents Acronyms Used in this Rail Plan ......................................................................................................... 4 Glossary of Common Terms............................................................................................................... 6 Freight Railroad Carrier Profiles ...................................................................................................... 11 BNSF Railway ..................................................................................................................... 11 Union Pacific Railroad .......................................................................................................... 12 Cimarron Valley Railroad ....................................................................................................... 13 Colorado & Wyoming Railway ................................................................................................. 14 Denver Rock Island Railroad ................................................................................................... 14 Great Western Railway of Colorado .......................................................................................... 15 Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad ................................................................................................ 16 Kyle Railroad Company ......................................................................................................... 17 Nebraska Kansas & Colorado Railway ........................................................................................
[Show full text]
Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation
RRREDEDED ---P-PPPURPLE BBBYPASS PPPROJECT EEENVIRONMENTAL AAASSESSMENT AND SSSECTION 4(4(4( FFF))) EEEVALUATION Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation Memorandum Date: May 14, 2015 Subject: Red-Purple Bypass Project Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Transit Data Supporting Documentation CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation Contents CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation ........................................................................................... 1 CTA. 2013a. Passenger Trips through Clark Junction .......................................................................... 1 CTA. 2013b. Existing Peak Ridership Demand ..................................................................................... 2 CTA. 2014a. ‘L’ Train Route & Individual Station Schedules/TimetablesSchedules/Timetables .............................................. 5 CTA. 2014b. Historic North Side Ridership Growth ............................................................................... 5 CTA. 2014c. Peak Period Trip Data ...................................................................................................... 8 CTA. 2014d. QuicTrak Circuit Data ..................................................................................................... 10 CTA. 2014e. December 2014 Ridership Report .................................................................................. 12 CTA. 2014g. TCRP Capacity Calculations for Clark Junction ............................................................. 12 CTA. 2014h. RedRed----PurplePurple
[Show full text]
ASAP Strategic Plan - July 2018 I
All Stations Accessibility Program (ASAP) Strategic Plan Final ASAP Strategic Plan - July 2018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................. IV ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... ES-1 CHAPTER 1: STRATEGIC PLAN OVERVIEW ............................................................... 1 Program Goal and Development .......................................................................................... 1 Background and Context ........................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 2: PRIORITIZATION PROCESS .................................................................. 13 Needs and Complexity .......................................................................................................... 13 Scoring Process ........................................................................................................................ 15 Scoring Results ......................................................................................................................... 19 Elevator Replacement Program Prioritization ..................................................................... 23 CHAPTER 3: DESIGN APPROACH .......................................................................... 26
[Show full text]