<<

Forty Years of Preservation: Virginia’s Program

By Calder Loth

The year 2006 marks the 40th anniversary of The legislation drafted by Freeman and subse- passage of the legislation establishing the quently passed by the General Assembly enabled Commonwealth’s official historic preservation owners to donate voluntarily to the state specific easement program. With the program entering rights to their , including the rights to middle age, it’s time to look at what we have demolish a landmark building, to make architec- accomplished during the past four decades. tural alterations without the state’s approval, and Before doing so, however, it may be helpful to to undertake commercial development and subdi- consider some background on the program. vision of a landmark’s historic setting. These Our easement legislation was the brainchild donations of rights took the form of of attorney George C. Freeman, who convinced restrictions, which we now call a preservation key General Assembly members that the easement. An essential aspect of these Commonwealth needed to encourage preservation was that they transfer and apply to all future own- of privately owned historic landmarks. Freeman’s ers of a property. Permanent legal protection of a idea was for the state to obtain permanent legal property was thus ensured once an easement was protection of these historic resources while keep- recorded with the deed. ing them in private and on the tax rolls. The program also was crafted so that an ease- Moreover, as Freeman and others recognized, the ment donation returned certain financial benefits best stewards of historic properties, particularly to the donor. For instance, because easement residential ones, were their owners—notwith- restrictions generally reduce the fair market value standing that the state could never afford to pur- of a property, the difference in value before and chase and maintain all of the landmarks worth after application of an easement, as determined by preserving. a qualified real appraiser, could be taken by

Elsing Green, King William County: Carter Braxton, signer of the Declaration of Independence, built this prodigious U-shaped mansion after he purchased his Pamunkey River plantation in 1753. The easement includes 1,100 acres.

Notes on Virginia 2005 49 an owner as a charitable deduction on federal ship extending over the next 37 years. The income taxes. Some years later, the General Commonwealth, through the Board of Historic Assembly passed legislation offering state tax Resources, now holds easements on nearly 400 credits, an even more generous benefit, for ease- historic properties. The majority of these ease- ment donations. Another benefit the legislation ments have been voluntary donations from private offered owners was the requirement that easement citizens. Particularly gratifying is the number restrictions be acknowledged by tax assessors in received on National Historic Landmarks, the calculating local property tax assessments, since nation’s highest category of landmark designation an easement prevented potentially lucrative subdi- and a notch above the National Register of vision and commercial development of a property. Historic Places. The Board now maintains ease- These combined financial incentives have proven ments on 23 National Historic Landmarks. It is to be significant factors in estate planning. reassuring that such outstanding, nationally signifi- cant landmarks of Virginia history and architecture have had their futures secured through easement donations; among these, the following: Westover, the circa 1730 Byrd family plantation manor in Charles City County; Tuckahoe, the Randolph family plantation where Thomas Jefferson attend- ed classes as a boy; Mount Airy, perhaps the most architecturally sophisticated of Virginia’s surviv- ing colonial mansions; Sabine Hall, the Georgian plantation mansion of Landon Carter, son of Robert “King” Carter; and Berry Hill, a premier monument of American Greek Revival and the mansion of one of Virginia’s most affluent ante- bellum planters. In addition, three other National Historic Landmarks under easement—Berkeley, Elsing Green, and Menokin—were homes of sign- ers of the Declaration of Independence. The citizens of the tiny Loudoun County vil- lage of Waterford, a National Historic Landmark historic district, have made an impressive use of the easement program. Since 1972, Waterford Waterford Historic District, Loudoun County: The homeowners as well as the Waterford Foundation quiet, shady streets of this picturesque village remain lined with regional vernacular styles, and are free of have donated easements to the Board of Historic modern intrusions. Resources on 57 properties in the district (in addi- tion to several easements held by the National Although the easement legislation was enact- Trust for Historic Preservation and the Virginia ed in 1966, the program officially started the fol- Outdoors Foundation). Waterford’s efforts to pre- lowing year, after a staff was assembled to fill the serve the character of this unique village founded Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission, prede- by Quakers illustrate the willingness of Virginians cessor to the current Board of Historic Resources to make personal sacrifices and work together to (of the Department of Historic Resources). The preserve a common heritage. Commission, the state agency authorized to accept Virginia requires that a property be indi- easements, received its first offer in 1969: a dona- vidually listed on the Virginia Landmarks tion on Old Mansion, a venerable colonial manor Register, or be classified as a contributing proper- house with 128 acres at the edge of Bowling ty in a registered historic district before the Board Green in Caroline County. Governor Miles can accept an easement donation. While most peo- Godwin, Jr., on behalf of the Commission, formal- ple might think that the easement program is ly accepted the easement from Miss Anne Maury aimed primarily at historic estates, easements have White, whose family had owned Old Mansion for been placed on a wide variety of registered land- generations. Since then, Old Mansion has changed marks. The Board holds easements on a historic owners three times, and today the house is under- sheet metal shop, a canal lock keeper’s house, going extensive restoration. tobacco factories, gristmills, historic taverns, Civil The Old Mansion easement marked the begin- War earthworks, a general store, and an ning of a remarkable demonstration of steward- almshouse— again, all privately owned. The

50 Notes on Virginia 2005 Mount Moriah Baptist Church, Roanoke: This simple country church overlooking the bustle of suburban Roanoke was built in 1908 by a congregation organized in the mid 1800s as a Sunday school for slaves. house types on which easements have been placed package as the Historic Landmarks Commission, are diverse as well and include, in addition to and it is authorized to accept gifts of easement on colonial plantation houses, Jeffersonian dwellings, significant open space. In some cases, where a Victorian mansions, workers’ houses, and Colonial considerable amount of land is involved with an Revival houses. Thirteen exceptionally fine town- historic landmark, usually in excess of 200 acres, houses in Old Town Alexandria are under ease- the Board and the Foundation have agreed to be ment protection. Virginia’s African-American co-grantees of the easement. At present, 14 of the heritage is represented in several easement proper- Board’s easements are co-held with the ties: noteworthy examples include Madden’s Foundation. Tavern in Culpeper County, Mount Moriah Baptist To be effective, long-term instruments for Church in Roanoke, and the Dover Slave Quarter preservation, it is essential that easements remain Complex in Goochland County. flexible, meaning that they allow for the present- While most easements involve historic build- day use of a historic building to be different from ings, the Board has acquired easements on several that for which it was originally used. For that rea- highly significant archaeological sites. Among son, nearly all the Board’s easement leave them are Cactus Hill in Sussex County, a site of unrestricted a historic building’s function and thus human occupation extending back some 15,000 accommodate adaptive re-use when its original years, as well as four tracts in the Thunderbird Archaeological District in Warren County, protect- ing National Historic Landmark Paleo-Indian sites dating to 9500 B.C. Notable colonial-period archaeological sites under easement are Corotoman, the site of Robert “King” Carter’s mansion in Lancaster County, and Fort Vause, a frontier fortification in Southwest Virginia, estab- lished in 1756. Shadwell, the birth site of Thomas Jefferson, is also under easement. Throughout its existence, the Board has main- Pleasant Hall, Virginia Beach: Although surrounded tained a close working relationship with the by modern sprawl, Pleasant Hall survives as an ele- Virginia Outdoors Foundation. The Foundation gant, tangible reminder of the rich history of former was established under the same 1966 legislative Princess Anne County. The easement covers 1.1 acres.

Notes on Virginia 2005 51 Seaboard Passenger Station, Suffolk: The 1885 train depot served the city until 1968. After standing abandoned for several years it was restored as a railroad museum by the Suffolk-Nansemond Historical Society. use is no longer viable. This is important because General Assembly limits its grants to properties a change in function can instill new life into a his- owned by local governments or non-profit organi- toric property. For example, the Branch House, an zations. The easements brought about by the enormous early 20th-century, Tudor-style grants cover a broad assortment of property types, Richmond mansion on historic Monument Avenue including courthouses, taverns, theaters, schools, was recently converted from an insurance office to railroad stations, churches, as well as four National the Virginia Center for Architecture. The previous- Historic Landmarks. All of these properties were ly mentioned Berry Hill, in Halifax County, was candidates for varying degrees of restoration, thus unoccupied for nearly 50 years before conversion helping to generate jobs in historic rehabilitation. from a grand manor to a training center and later Additional grants made in the 2005 General to a destination resort. Pleasant Hall, built in Assembly session increased the number of ease- 1763, in Virginia Beach also was transformed ments obtained through this program. from a residence to a funeral home, and is now a An enlightened use of the easement program church-owned meeting facility. Rippon Lodge, a has been made in the Oregon Hill Historic District mid 18th-century dwelling, was sold from family in Richmond. Oregon Hill, originally a working- ownership to Prince William County, and is now class neighborhood, is made up mostly of modest undergoing conversion into a house museum. late 19th- and early 20th-century wooden town While most of the Board’s preservation ease- houses. Numerous Oregon Hill houses became ments have been voluntary donations, a significant derelict in recent decades. The city condemned number of easements have been generated through many as health and safety hazards and subse- other means. Legislation passed in 1992 requires quently demolished them. Concern for the loss of that historic properties receiving a General cohesiveness in the neighborhood spurred the for- Assembly matching grant of $50,000 or more mation of the Oregon Hill Home Improvement must be placed under easement. The purpose of Council (OHHIC). Loans and grants enabled the this requirement is to protect not only the land- council to purchase remaining abandoned mark, but also the public’s investment in the prop- dwellings slated for demolition and undertake erty. This regulation has resulted in over 50 their rehabilitation. OHHIC then placed the prop- landmarks being placed under easement, making erties under easement with the Board before sell- the department a permanent partner with their ing them for owner occupancy. Through this owners for the benefit of the resource. The program some 22 historic houses, that otherwise

52 Notes on Virginia 2005 would have been razed, have become neighbor- hood assets. OHHIC’s efforts have stabilized an urban historic district that was very much at risk. Consequently, values in Oregon Hill have since increased substantially, and private developers as well as OHHIC are now building architecturally compatible infill houses on many of the area’s vacant lots. The Commonwealth of Virginia, spurred by the encouragement of DHR, is increasingly recogniz- ing the importance of its own stewardship of state- owned historic properties. Until recently, the state Parsons House, Oregon Hill, Richmond: In recent generally demolished historic structures for which years the Parsons House had stood abandoned and in it had no use and then sold the land unencum- serious disrepair (left), until developer Robin Miller bered. A significant precedent, however, was set in purchased the property from the state and undertook its 2000 with the state-owned Parsons House in the rehabilitation (right). It is now one of the architectural Oregon Hill Historic District; Samuel P. Parsons, highlights of the historic Oregon Hill neighborhood. superintendent of the state penitentiary once locat- structures, had been used as a state correctional ed nearby, built the house in 1817–19. The peni- facility for the past two decades. When the site tentiary was razed in the early 1990s, and in 2000 was vacated by the Department of Corrections, the the badly vandalized dwelling was sold for rehabili- General Assembly allowed the property to be tation to developers with the stipulation that the transferred to the city of Staunton, with the property be placed under easement at time of trans- requirement that the historic property be placed fer. The house has since been handsomely restored, under easement. The transfer took place in and today it accommodates several apartments. October 2005, and the easement is now in place. Most recently, a similar transaction occurred The property will be transferred to developers for with the former Western State mental hospital rehabilitation of the buildings for mixed use. The complex in Staunton. Originally begun as a easement has secured this unique site and ensures “lunatic” hospital in 1828, the antebellum com- that the rehabilitations respect the architectural plex, consisting of five architecturally outstanding integrity of the structures.

Western State Hospital, Staunton: The 1828 main building at the former Western State Hospital is one of the Commonwealth’s outstanding works of institutional architecture.

Notes on Virginia 2005 53 Western State: The vaulted chapel is on the top floor of the chapel/refectory building. The 1851 Henry Erben organ was donated to the hospital by William Wilson Corchran.

It is important to remember that each ease- ment acquired by the Board imposes a permanent legal obligation on the Commonwealth to admin- ister the easement and to protect the state’s inter- est in the historic resource involved. Ongoing administration of the program by the Department of Historic Resources’ staff entails regular inspec- tions of the properties, providing technical assis- tance to the property owners, and educating new owners when to an easement property trans- fers. Ownership of nearly 50 percent of the Board’s easement properties has changed since the The south annex building at Western State was built by master mason William B. Phillips, who had worked for easements were originally recorded. Thomas Jefferson at the University of Virginia. Virginia has been fortunate to secure at mini- mal expense the permanent legal protection of approximately 400 historic resources to date rep- value of hundreds of millions of dollars that other- resenting the full spectrum of Virginia’s history wise would have been vulnerable. These tangible and culture. The easement program is an impres- acts of stewardship will enable a rich and irre- sive demonstration of vision and choice. It took placeable legacy to be passed intact to future vision to recognize the importance of preserving generations. the state’s outstanding legacy of historic resources and to provide the legal vehicle to accomplish this task. The success of the program is due largely to Calder Loth is a senior architectural historian at the its respect for property rights since it offers own- Department of Historic Resources. He is the author, ers a choice—the choice to preserve a place editor, or contributor to numerous books, including The important to everybody, rather than exploit it. The Virginia Landmarks Register, The Making of Virginia Commonwealth takes great pride in its many citi- Architecture, and Virginia Landmarks of Black History. zens who have voluntarily elected to preserve important historic resources through the easement program, properties with a combined fair market

54 Notes on Virginia 2005