DOCSLIB.ORG

Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European University Institute (EUI) Florence/European Private Law Forum Deutsches Notarinstitut (DNotI) Würzburg Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union General Report Final Version scientific co-ordinators: Dr. habil. Christoph U. Schmid, Ph.D. European Private Law Forum European University Institute, Florence, www.iue.it Christian Hertel, LL.M. Director DNotI (German Notary Institute), Würzburg, www.dnoti.de with contributions by Dr. Hartmut Wicke, LL.M., DNotI, Würzburg 31.5.2005 EUI-Real Property Law - General Report - page 2/103 Overview page Introduction 8 1. Principles 11 2. Land Registration 27 3. Sale of Real Estate 47 4. Special Problems concerning the Sale of Real Estate (Cases) 65 5. Sale of a house or apartment by the building company (vente d‘immeuble à construire/Bauträgervertrag) 69 6. Private International Law 82 7. Mortgages 85 8. Literature 103 EUI-Real Property Law - General Report - page 3/103 Contents page Overview 2 Contents 3 Introduction 8 Objectives 8 Families of Legal Systems 8 Terminology and Definitions 9 Countries covered by this study 10 1. Principles 11 1.1. General Features and Short History 11 1.2. Concept of Ownership (Property and Estates) 12 1.2.1. Specific Common Law Types of Ownership (Estate and Trust) 12 a) Estates and other divisions of property 12 b) Trusts, settlements and overreaching 13 1.2.2. Superficies solo cedit 14 1.3. Limited Real Rights in Land (Interests in Land) 14 1.3.1. Numerus clausus of Real Rights 14 1.3.2. System of Real Rights in Land 15 1.3.3. Rights of use (usus or prohibitio usus) 15 a) Overview 16 b) Easements or servitudes 16 1.3.4. Security Rights, in particular Mortgages and Rent Charges 17 1.3.5. Rights in Rem to Acquire Real Property, in particular Pre-emption Rights 18 1.3.6. Other Real Rights in Land 19 1.4. Apartment Ownership (Condominiums) 19 a) Basic legal models of apartment ownership 20 b) Common features of the various models 21 1.5. Building Leases 21 1.6. The Public Law and Policy Context of Real Property Transactions 22 a) Consumer Protection 22 b) Public law restrictions 23 c) Taxes 23 d) Subsidies 24 1.7. Brief Summary on "Real Property Law in Action" 24 a) Real Property Markets 24 b) Actors and Institutions 25 2. Land Registration 27 Basic assumption: 5 basic types of land registers in Europe 27 2.1. Organisation of the land register 27 2.1.1. Official terms for the national land register 27 2.1.2. Relation to cadaster (land survey) 28 2.1.3. Integration in the court system or administrative authority 30 2.1.4. Educational requirements for the land registrars 30 2.2. Contents of Registration 31 2.2.1. Percentage of land registered (questionnaire 2.1.4.) 31 2.2.2. Registration of rights or of titles 32 2.2.3. Format of registration 32 EUI-Real Property Law - General Report - page 4/103 2.3. Constitutive or declaratory effect (questionnaire 2.5.) 32 2.3.1. Substantive effects of the registration in general 32 2.3.2. Constitutive or declaratory effect of the registration 33 2.3.3. Constitutive effect for limited rights 34 2.4. Bona fides 34 2.4.1. Transfer of ownership 34 British system: 34 2.4.2. Creation of limited rights 35 2.5. Correlation between the different classification factors 35 2.5.1. Correlation between constitutive/declaratory effect and bona fides protection 36 2.5.2. Correlation between registration of rights and protection of bona fides 36 2.5.3. Correlation between constitutive effect and registration of rights 37 2.6. Summary: Types of land registers 38 2.6.1. Table of different systems 38 2.6.2. Basic types of land register in Europe 39 2.6.3. Subgroups and hybrid forms 39 2.6.4. Dual systems in France, Greece and Italy 40 2.6.5. Central European system chosen by most Eastern European reform states 40 2.6.6. Changes in the registration systems in England, Ireland and Scotland 41 2.7. Priority and rank of rights (questionnaire 2.6.) 42 2.7.1. Rank of limited rights 42 2.7.2. Transfer of ownership 42 2.7.3. Priority Notice 42 2.8. Registration Procedure (questionnaire 2.3.) 43 2.8.1. Form of filing (application) 43 2.9. Access to information (questionnaire 2.4.) 44 2.9.1. Legal Restrictions on the Access to Data 44 2.9.2. Electronic Registration 44 2.9.3. EULIS 45 3. Sale of Real Estate 47 3.1. Procedure in general 47 3.1.1. Main steps of a real estate sale (matrix) 47 3.1.2. Examples of different countries 47 a) Germany 47 b) England 47 c) France (and other Code Napoleon countries) 48 d) Sweden 48 3.2. Real Estate Sales Contract 48 3.2.1. Form 48 3.2.2. Contracting (Who normally drafts the real estate sales contract?) 49 a) Professional Assistance 49 b) (Latin) Civil law notaries, British solicitors and licensed real estate agents Nordic style 50 c) Neutral or double counsel 50 3.2.3. Two consecutive transactions (preliminary contract) 51 3.2.4. Typical Real Estate Sales Contract 51 3.3. Transfer of Ownership and Payment 52 3.3.1. Requirements for Transfer of Ownership 52 a) Steps for transfer of ownership 52 b) Causal and abstract systems 53 EUI-Real Property Law - General Report - page 5/103 c) Constitutive and declaratory systems 53 d) Roman law: titulus and modus 53 3.3.2. Payment due 54 a) Systems by country 54 b) Systematic overview 54 3.3.3. Ways of the seller to enforce the payment 56 3.3.4. Transfer of possession to the buyer 56 3.3.5. Chain management 56 3.4. Seller’s Title 57 3.4.1. Title Search: Ascertaining the seller’s title 57 3.4.2. Title Search: Absence of Encumbrances 58 3.4.3. Title Insurance or Liability 58 3.4.4. Leases 59 3.5. Defects and Warranties 59 3.5.1. Statutory rules 59 3.5.2. Typical contractual clauses: the scope of caveat emptor 60 3.5.3. Liability of the Buyer for Debts of the Seller 60 3.6. Administrative Permits and Restrictions 60 3.7. Transfer Costs 60 3.7.1. Contracting and Registration 62 3.7.2. Transfer Taxes 62 a) Tax rates 62 b) Levying methods 63 3.7.3. Real Estate Agents 63 3.8. Buyer’s Mortgage 63 4. Special Problems concerning the Sale of Real Estate (Cases) 65 4.1. The Conclusion of the Contract 65 4.2. Seller’s title 65 4.2.1. Consequences of an invalid Sales Contract 65 4.2.2. The Seller is not the owner 65 4.2.1. Execution against the Seller 66 4.3. Delay in payment 66 4.4. Defects and Warranties 67 4.4.1. Misrepresentation 67 4.4.2. Destruction of the house 67 5. Sale of a house or apartment by the building company (vente d‘immeuble à construire/Bauträgervertrag) 69 5.1. Statutory Basis 70 5.1.1. National Law 70 5.1.2. Influences of EU law 71 5.2. Procedure in general 72 5.3. Conclusion of the Contract 75 5.4. Payment 76 5.4.1. Payment date 76 5.4.2. Securities (cf. also under 5.5.3) 76 5.4.3. Acquisition of Ownership 77 5.4.4. Financing of the Buyer (questionnaire 5.4.5.) 78 5.5. Builder’s Duties - Protection of Buyer 78 5.5.1. Description of the Building 78 5.5.2. Late Termination of the Building 78 EUI-Real Property Law - General Report - page 6/103 5.5.3. Material Defects 78 5.6. Builder’s Insolvency 80 5.6.1. Unfinished Building 80 5.6.2. Repayment 81 6. Private International Law 82 6.1 Contract Law 82 6.1.1. Conflict of Laws Rule 82 6.1.2. Formal Requirements 82 6.2 Real Property Law 82 6.2.1. Conflict of Laws Rule 83 6.2.2. Formal Requirements 83 6.3 Restrictions on Foreigners acquiring Land 83 6.3.1. Restrictions limited to Foreigners 83 6.3.2. Other Restrictions 83 6.4 Practical Case: Transfer of Real Estate among Foreigners 83 7. Mortgages 85 7.1. Definition and types of Mortgages 85 a) Definition 85 b) Types of Mortgages 85 c) Statutory charges and forced mortgages 86 7.2. Setting up a mortgage 86 7.2.1. Owner’s consent (Contract between owner and mortgagee) 86 7.2.2. Formal Requirements 86 7.2.3. Registration 87 7.2.4. Traditio of the mortgage certificate 87 7.2.5. Time and Cost (Questionnaire 7.2.4.) 87 7.3. Accessory and non-accessory mortgages 89 7.3.1. Accessoriness and causality in general 89 a) Definitions 89 b) Legal traditions 90 c) Mortgaging practice 90 d) Legislative developments 91 7.3.2. Invalid Loan Contract and Right of withdrawal 91 7.3.3. Changing the secured debt 92 7.3.4. Independent/abstract promise of payment 92 7.3.5. Mortgage for the land owner himself 92 7.4. Mortgagee’s rights, in particular priority in enforcement 93 7.4.1. Money only: Capital and interest 93 7.4.2. Enforcement Procedure: Forced sale or sale out of court 93 7.4.3. Overriding interests and priority (questionnaire 7.5.) 94 7.4.4. Scope of the Mortgage (questionnaire 7.6.) 95 7.5.
Recommended publications
  • Confronting Remote Ownership Problems with Ecological Law

    Confronting Remote Ownership Problems with Ecological Law

    CONFRONTING REMOTE OWNERSHIP PROBLEMS WITH ECOLOGICAL LAW Geoffrey Garver* ABSTRACT ThomasBerry’s powerfulappeal foramutually enhancing human- Earthrelationshipfaces many challengesdue to theecological crisis that is co-identifiedwith dominant growth-insistenteconomic,political, andlegal systemsacrossthe world. Thedomains of environmental history, ecological restoration, and eco-culturalrestoration, as well as studies by Elinor Ostrom and othersofsustainableuse of commonpool resources,provide insightsonthe necessary conditions foramutually enhancing human-Earth relationship. Atheme commontothesedomains is theneed forintimate knowledgeofand connectiontoplace that requiresalong-standing commitment of people to theecosystems that sustainthem.Remoteprivate ownership—oftenbylarge and politically powerful multinational corporations financed by investorsseeking thehighest possiblereturns and lacking knowledgeorinterestinthe places and people they harm—is deeplyengrained in theglobal economic system.The historical rootsof remote ownership and controlgoback to territorial extensification associated with thesharpriseofcolonialismand long-distancetradeinthe earlymodernera.Yet remote owners’and investors’ detachment from place poses an enormous challenge in thequest foramutually enhancing human-Earthrelationship. ThisEssaypresents an analysis of how contemporary environmental lawundergirds theremoteownershipproblem and of how limits-insistentecological lawcouldprovide solutions. ABSTRACT..................................................................................................425
  • Read the Full Issue of the Real Estate Gazette As A

    Read the Full Issue of the Real Estate Gazette As A

    ISSUE 34 Real Estate Gazette FOCUS ON: FOREIGN INVESTMENTS www.dlapiperrealworld.com Australia Australia’s foreign investment approval regime Poland Foreign real estate Brazil investment in Poland Foreign investment in Brazil (and in Brazilian farmlands) Portugal Portugal and foreign investors Germany Foreign real estate investments in Singapore Germany — unlimited opportunities? Private education in Southeast Asia — investment plays and regulatory hurdles Morocco Real estate foreign investments in Morocco United Kingdom Taxing non-UK resident Netherlands investors in UK property The 2019 Dutch tax plan — key takeaways for inbound real estate investments WWW.DLAPIPERREALWORLD.COM A note from the Editor A very warm welcome to all our readers to DLA Piper’s first Real Estate Gazette of the year. In this issue, we focus on foreign investment. Olaf Schmidt There are many rewards to be that its legal system contains some Co-Chair of the Global Cross- had from investing in real estate unique features, such as perpetual Practice Real Estate Sector overseas, including the opportunity usufruct, which any foreign investor to diversify and the potential for would need to consider (page 22), stable and safe returns, among while our UK article focuses on the others. However, in addition to tax implications for non-UK resident such advantages, prudent investors investors in UK property (page should also be aware of the pitfalls, 32). However, it is not all doom including unfamiliar tax regimes and and gloom. Many of the articles a completely alien legal framework stress the opportunities available governing the purchasing process. for foreign investors, citing, for example, the growth in city dwellers, In our Australian article (page increasing rent levels, and the 6), the authors describe the potential for significant, long-term country’s foreign investment returns.
  • The Principles of Gift Law and the Regulation of Organ Donation Alexandra K

    The Principles of Gift Law and the Regulation of Organ Donation Alexandra K

    Transplant International ISSN 0934-0874 REVIEW The principles of gift law and the regulation of organ donation Alexandra K. Glazier New England Organ Bank, Boston University School of Law, Waltham, MA, USA Keywords Summary allocation, consent, donation, ethics, legal, regulation. The principles of gift law establish a consistent international legal understand- ing of consent to donation under a range of regulatory systems. Gift law as Correspondence the primary legal principle is important to both the foundation of systems that Alexandra K. Glazier JD, MPH, Vice President prevent organ sales and the consideration of strategies to increase organ dona- & General Counsel, New England Organ tion for transplantation. Bank, Adjunct Professor, Boston University School of Law, 60 First Ave, Waltham, MA 02451, USA. Tel.: 617-244-8000; fax: 617- 558-1094; e-mail: alexandra_glazier@ neob.org Conflicts of Interest The authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Received: 13 September 2010 Revision requested: 13 October 2010 Accepted: 1 January 2011 Published online: 29 January 2011 doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01226.x Introduction The principles of gift law The regulation of consent to organ donation provides the Gift law has its origins in the legal doctrine of property. cornerstone to any system of transplantation by establish- To ‘‘give’’ is understood to mean ‘‘the act by which the ing the legal and ethical infrastructure from which the owner of a thing voluntarily transfers the title and posses- rights and duties of donors, transplant professionals and sion of the same from himself to another person without recipients can be understood. The approach to the con- consideration’’ [1].
  • The German Civil Code

    The German Civil Code

    TUE A ERICANI LAW REGISTER FOUNDED 1852. UNIERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPART=ENT OF LAW VOL. {4 0 - S'I DECEMBER, 1902. No. 12. THE GERMAN CIVIL CODE. (Das Biirgerliche Gesetzbuch.) SOURCES-PREPARATION-ADOPTION. The magnitude of an attempt to codify the German civil. laws can be adequately appreciated only by remembering that for more than fifteefn centuries central Europe was the world's arena for startling political changes radically involv- ing territorial boundaries and of necessity affecting private as well as public law. With no thought of presenting new data, but that the reader may properly marshall events for an accurate compre- hension of the irregular development of the law into the modem and concrete results, it is necessary to call attention to some of the political- and social factors which have been potent and conspicuous since the eighth century. Notwithstanding the boast of Charles the Great that he was both master of Europe and the chosen pr6pagandist of Christianity and despite his efforts in urging general accept- ance of the Roman law, which the Latinized Celts of the western and southern parts of his titular domain had orig- THE GERM AN CIVIL CODE. inally been forced to receive and later had willingly retained, upon none of those three points did the facts sustain his van- ity. He was constrained to recognize that beyond the Rhine there were great tribes, anciently nomadic, but for some cen- turies become agricultural when not engaged in their normal and chief occupation, war, who were by no means under his control. His missii or special commissioners to those people were not well received and his laws were not much respected.
  • Full Report Introduction to Project

    Full Report Introduction to Project

    THE ILLUSION OF CHOICE: Evictions and Profit in North Minneapolis Author: Principal Investigator, Dr. Brittany Lewis, Senior Research Associate Contributing Authors: Molly Calhoun, Cynthia Matthias, Kya Conception, Thalya Reyes, Carolyn Szczepanski, Gabriela Norton, Eleanor Noble, and Giselle Tisdale Artist-in-Residence: Nikki McComb, Art Is My Weapon “I think that it definitely has to be made a law that a UD should not go on a person’s name until after you have been found guilty in court. It is horrific that you would sit up here and have a UD on my name that prevents me from moving...You would rather a person be home- less than to give them a day in court to be heard first...You shouldn’t have to be home- less to be heard.” – Biracial, female, 36 years old “I’ve heard bad “There is a fear premium attached to North Min- things. He’s known neapolis. Because what’s the stereotypical image as a slumlord...But people have of North Minneapolis? I could tell you. against my better Bang, bang. People are afraid of it. If you tell people, judgment, to not I bought a property in North Minneapolis. What they wanting to be out say is, ‘Why would you do that?’” – White, male, a place and home- 58 year old, property manager and owner less and between moving, I took the first thing. It was like a desper- ate situation.” – Biracial, female, 45 years old For more visit z.umn.edu/evictions PURPOSE, SELECT LITERATURE REVIEW, RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Purpose Single Black mothers face the highest risk of eviction in the Single Black women with children living below the poverty line United States.
  • Differentiated and Compatible

    Differentiated and Compatible

    Search the Sit FEBRUARY 2009 » FEATURE ShareThis Differentiated and Compatible The Secretary’s Standards revisited. By Steven W. Semes Curiously, historic preservation has once again become a hot topic as architects, preservationists, public officials and citizen activists debate the criteria used to evaluate proposed additions to historic structures or infill buildings in historic districts. This comes in response to growing public opposition to recent decisions by some preservation authorities to approve starkly contrasting Modernist additions to historic buildings or dissonant new structures in traditional settings. The debate has been particularly lively in New York City and Charleston, SC, where preservation commissions have approved a series of contrasting Modernist structures in historic settings. However, it has also aroused students, faculty and alumni at the University of Virginia, where the debate has spilled onto the pages of the student newspaper and the internet. In the historic center of Rome, Richard Meier’s Ara Pacis Museum stirred such intense opposition that upon being elected, the new mayor of Rome called for a referendum to decide whether to remove the new building! If the purpose of historic preservation is to safeguard historic buildings and neighborhoods, how does one justify such recent interventions as Norman Foster’s glass tower on top of the landmark Hearst Building or Renzo Piano’s additions to the Morgan Library, to take but a couple of New York City examples? Weren’t the preservation laws passed decades ago precisely to prevent these kinds of intrusions on historic fabric? The debate has arisen now because we are seeing the logical consequences of policies developed decades ago when the architectural culture was quite different.
  • Colorado Amends Unclaimed Property Law Regarding Gift Cards; Will Other States Follow?

    Colorado Amends Unclaimed Property Law Regarding Gift Cards; Will Other States Follow?

    Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives Volume 23, Number 10, February 2014 Department: PROCEDURE Colorado Amends Unclaimed Property Law Regarding Gift Cards; Will Other States Follow? States are reviewing their processes and looking for the means to enhance revenue, a course that includes increasing enforcement efforts and accelerating dormancy periods and reporting deadlines. By: JAMSHID EBADI AND SAMUEL SCHAUNAMAN JAMSHID EBADI is a Director with the Abandoned and Unclaimed Property Practice at Ryan LLC, in Greenwood Villa, Colorado. SAMUEL SCHAUNAMAN, J.D., is a Senior Manager with the same practice group, in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and he has previously written for The Journal. This article appears in and is reproduced with the permission of the Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives, Vol. 23, No. 10, February 2014. Published by Warren, Gorham & Lamont, an imprint of Thomson Reuters. Copyright (c) 2014 Thomson Reuters/Tax & Accounting. All rights reserved. All states, as well as an increasing number of foreign countries, have laws regulating the reporting and remitting of unclaimed property to the respective jurisdictions. Colorado has recently amended its Unclaimed Property Act ("Colorado Act" or "the Act") and the following discussion provides a synopsis of the Act and highlights the recent legislative developments in Colorado affecting the Act. First, however, we provide an overview of what typically constitutes unclaimed property. While not a "tax," unclaimed property nevertheless has become a significant source of funds for many states. The field of unclaimed property (also referred to as "abandoned property" or "escheat") concerns the requirement that businesses holding such property (the "holders") report the property to state governments.
  • ANNALES Inheritance and Gift Tax in Poland

    ANNALES Inheritance and Gift Tax in Poland

    ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁODOWSKA LUBLIN — POLONIA VOL. XLV SECTIO G 1998 Zakład Prawa Finansowego ANTONI HANUSZ Inheritance and gift tax in Poland Podatek od spadków i darowizn w Polsce I Inheritance tax has been around for a very long time - already in ancient times, it was one of the fiscal measures used. From time imme­ morial, it has been held that the moment of handing down a legacy after the death of an owner is, because of the increase in the assets of the heir, a suitable opportunity to impose a special tax upon him. The economic character of inheritance and gift tax assigns it to the category of property tax, since it draws, as a single, extraordinary levy, on the increase in the assets, which usually becomes the source of the collection of this tax. For a relatively long time inheritance and gift tax had not occurred in the Polish tax system as a separate tax. It was however part of an entirely different property rights acquisition tax. It reemerged as a separate inheritance and gift tax in 1975 and is now regulated according to an act of July 28,1983, which has been frequently amended. II Inheritance and gift tax is a levy imposed solely on individuals for only persons can be, since 1990, payers of this tax. In respect to a type 176 ANTONI HANUSZ of personal bond between the vendee and the person from whom or after whom the property or the rights to property have been acquired, the bond being kinship or adoption, the payers of this tax can be divided into three groups.
  • Article1. Land Law Article2. Land Ownership Arlicle 3. Unified

    Article1. Land Law Article2. Land Ownership Arlicle 3. Unified

    LAND CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN The present Code regulates land relations and it is directed at the rational use and protection of land, recreation of fertility of the soil, maintenance and improvement of the natural environment and for equal development ofall forms ofeconomic activity in Tajikistan. Chapter 1. BASIC PROVISIONS Article 1. Land law Land relations in the Republic of Tajikistan are regulated by this Code and other Land Laws issued on the basisofthis Code. Issues related to the ownership and use of mountains, forests and water resources, to use and protection of the flora and fauna, protection of the environment is regulated by the current legislation of the Republic ofthe Republic ofTajikistan. Article2. Land ownership Land in the Republic of Tajikistan is an exclusive ownership of the state. The state guarantees its effective use in the interests of its citizens. Certiorari oflands, which belonged to the ancestors, is banned. Arlicle 3. Unified national resources In accordance with the purpose they serve, all national land resources of the Republic of Tajikistan are divided into the following categories: 1. Farming lands, 2. Populated lands (cities, towns, and villages), 3. Land used for industrial, transport, communications, defense and other purposes, 4. Conservation land, land ofhistoric and cultural value, land used for health-improvement and recreation purposes, 5. Lands ofnational wood reserves, 6. Lands ofnational water reserves, 7. State land reserves. The category ofland is stated in the following documents: a) In the state land cadastre; b) In the land use register; 238 c) In the decisions ofexecutive bodies about land allotment; d) In title deeds to land use and tillage.
  • Comparative Commercial Law of Egypt and the Arabian Gulf

    Comparative Commercial Law of Egypt and the Arabian Gulf

    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 34 Issue 1 Conference on Comparative Links between Islamic Law and the Common Law: Article 12 Cross-Cultural Interaction between Islamic Law and Other Legal Systems 1985 Comparative Commercial Law of Egypt and the Arabian Gulf Ian Edge University of London Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Commercial Law Commons, and the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Ian Edge, Comparative Commercial Law of Egypt and the Arabian Gulf, 34 Clev. St. L. Rev. 129 (1985-1986) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARATIVE COMMERCIAL LAW OF EGYPT AND THE ARABIAN GULF IAN EDGE* I. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 129 II. COLONIAL RULE ....................................... 130 A. Ottoman Turkey .................................. 131 B . Egypt ............................................ 131 III. POST SECOND WORLD WAR TO 1970 ..................... 132 IV. THE DECADE OF 1970 To 1980 .......................... 134 V. FROM 1980 TO PRESENT ................................ 136 VI. MODERNIZATION OF LAW IN THE ARABIAN GULF .......... 138 A. Practice of Law ................................... 138 B . Legislation ......................................
  • Law Enforcement Technology Roadmap: Lessons to Date from the Northwest Technology Desk and the Northwest FADE Pilots

    Law Enforcement Technology Roadmap: Lessons to Date from the Northwest Technology Desk and the Northwest FADE Pilots

    PNNL-20314 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Law Enforcement Technology Roadmap: Lessons to Date from the Northwest Technology desk and the Northwest FADE Pilots CL West SJ Kreyling April 2011 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Rd., Alexandra, VA 22312 ph: (800) 553-NTIS (6847) email: [email protected] <http://www.ntis.gov/about/from.aspx> Online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov PNNL-20314 Law Enforcement Technology Roadmap: Lessons to Date from the Northwest Technology desk and the Northwest FADE CL West SJ Kreyling April 2011 Prepared for The U.S.
  • Time for Europe to Get Migrant Integration Right

    Time for Europe to Get Migrant Integration Right

    The arrival of over one million people seeking protection in our Time for Europe continent in recent months has profoundly shaken Europe and found European governments unprepared to face up to the challenge of providing adequate reception. to get migrant Preoccupied with short-term imperatives, European governments have lost sight of more long-term challenges posed by these arrivals. integration right Little, if any, significant debate about how to promote the successful integration of these migrants into their new host societies has taken place. With this paper, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights fills this gap and provides guidance to governments and parliaments on the design and implementation of successful integration policies. In particular, he presents the international legal standards which govern this field and sets forth a number of recommendations to facilitate the integration of migrants, with a focus on family reunification, residence rights, language and integration courses, access to the labour market and quality education, as well as protection from discrimination. www.commissioner.coe.int 055616 PREMS ENG The Council of Europe is the continent’s leading Issue paper human rights organisation. It comprises 47 member states, 28 of which are members of the European Union. All Council of Europe member states have signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, a treaty designed to protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law. The European Court of Human Rights oversees the implementation of the Convention in the member states. Time for Europe to get migrant integration right Issue paper published by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Council of Europe The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe.