Medicinal Ethnobotany of the Kamiesberg, Namaqualand, Northern Cape Province, South Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Medicinal Ethnobotany of the Kamiesberg, Namaqualand, Northern Cape Province, South Africa Medicinal ethnobotany of the Kamiesberg, Namaqualand, Northern Cape Province, South Africa by JANNEKE MARGARETHA NORTJE DISSERTATION submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTIAE in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: PROF B.-E. VAN WYK NOVEMBER 2011 UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG FACULTY OF SCIENCE DECLARATION ON SUBMISSION OF COPIES FOR EXAMINATION DECLARATION BY STUDENT STUDENT NUMBER: 201048933 ID NUMBER: 8710140052081 I, Mrs Janneke Margaretha Nortje hereby declare that this thesis submitted for the MSc degree in the department Botany and Plant biotechnology, for the ethnobotanical field of study at the University of Johannesburg, apart from the help recognised, is my own work and has not been formerly submitted to another university for a degree. APPROVED TITLE: Medicinal ethnobotany of the Kamiesberg, Namaqualand, South Africa POSTAL ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: Breyerlaan 1399 HOME: 0129931921 Waverley CELL: 0827612925 Pretoria E-MAIL: [email protected] POSTAL CODE: 0186 SIGNATURE DATE 2 DECLARATION BY SUPERVISOR Approval for submission of examination copies is hereby granted to the abovementioned student. The title is as officially approved. An article ready for publishing has been submitted / has not been submitted. Satisfactory arrangements have been made. SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR DATE FOR OFFICE USE Registration and title are in order: FACULTY OFFICER DATE 3 ABSTRACT Scientific relevance: Qualitative and quantitative data is presented that give a new perspective on the traditional medicinal plants of the Khoisan (Khoe-San), one of the most ancient of human cultures. The data is not only of considerable historical and cultural value, but allows for fascinating comparative studies relating to new species records, novel use records and the spatial distribution of traditional medicinal plant use knowledge within the Cape Floristic Region. Aim of the study: A detailed documentation and quantitative analysis of medicinal plants of the Kamiesberg area (an important Khoisan and Nama cultural centre) and their medicinal traditional uses, which have hitherto remained unrecorded. Materials and methods: During four study visits to the Kamiesberg, semi-structured and structured interviews were conducted with 23 local inhabitants of the Kamiesberg, mostly of Khoisan decent. In addition to standard methodology, a newly developed Matrix Method was used to quantity medicinal plant knowledge. Results: The Kamiesberg is an important center of extant Nama ethnomedicinal information but the knowledge is rapidly disappearing. Of a total of 101 medicinal plants and 1375 anecdotes, 21 species were recorded for the first time as having traditional medicinal uses and at least 284 medicinal use records were new. The relative importance, popularity and uses of the plants were quantified. The 97 newly documented vernacular names include 23 Nama (Khoekhoegowab) names and an additional 55 new variations of known names. The calculated Ethnobotanical Knowledge Index (EKI) and other indices accurately quantify the level of knowledge and will allow for future comparisons, not only within the Kamiesberg area but also with other southern African communities of Khoisan decent. Conclusion: The results showed that the Kamiesberg is an important focal point of Khoisan (Nama) traditional knowledge but that the medicinal plants have not yet been systematically recorded in the scientific literature. There are numerous new use records and new species records that are in need of scientific study. Comparative data is now available for broader comparisons of the pattern of Khoisan plants use in southern Africa and the study represents another step towards a complete synthesis of Cape Herbal Medicine. 4 Table of contents Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................. 10 1.1 History of ethnobotany ................................................................................ 10 1.2 Medicinal ethnobotany of the Kamiesberg .................................................. 11 Chapter 2: Study area .............................................................................................. 29 2.1 Namaqualand ................................................................................................. 29 2.2.1 The Richtersveld ...................................................................................... 32 2.2.2 Namaqualand Hardeveld / Klipkoppe ....................................................... 33 2.2.3 Namaqualand Sandveld / Kusvlakte ........................................................ 34 2.2.4 The Knersvlakte ....................................................................................... 35 2.3 Vegetation of the Kamiesberg ........................................................................ 36 2.3.1 Mountain Fynbos ...................................................................................... 37 2.3.2 Renosterveld ............................................................................................ 38 2.3.3 Upland Succulent Karoo........................................................................... 39 2.4 History of the people of Namaqualand ............................................................ 39 2.4.1 Geographical origin of the Nama people .................................................. 39 2.4.2 Khoikhoi and Europeans .......................................................................... 41 2.4.3 Khoikhoi and Dutch settlement ................................................................. 42 2.4.4 The Khoikhoi in the eighteenth century .................................................... 44 2.4.5 The Khoikhoi in the nineteenth century .................................................... 45 2.4.6 The Khoikhoi in the twentieth century ...................................................... 46 2.5 Nama identity .................................................................................................. 47 2.6 Language of the Khoikhoi ............................................................................... 49 2.7 Towns and participants in the Kamiesberg ..................................................... 50 2.7.1 Kamieskroon ............................................................................................ 52 2.7.2 Leliefontein ............................................................................................... 53 5 2.7.3 Nourivier ................................................................................................... 53 2.7.4 Paulshoek ................................................................................................ 54 Chapter 3: Methodology ........................................................................................... 56 3.1 Data collection ................................................................................................ 56 3.2 Field work ....................................................................................................... 57 3.2.1 Phase 1 - Exploration ............................................................................... 57 3.2.2 Phase 2 - Structured interviews ............................................................... 58 3.2.3 Phase 3 - Confirmation ............................................................................ 59 3.2.4 Phase 4 - Quantification and feedback .................................................... 60 3.2.4.1 Ethnobotanical Knowledge Index (EKI) ............................................. 62 3.2.4.2 Species Popularity Index (SPI) .......................................................... 63 3.2.4.3 Additional plant species ..................................................................... 63 3.2.4.4 Feedback ........................................................................................... 63 3.3 Quantitative comparisons ............................................................................... 64 3.3.1 Importance of the medicinal plants ........................................................... 64 3.3.2 Ailment categories .................................................................................... 66 3.3.3 Kamiesberg versus the Agter-Hantam ..................................................... 67 3.4 Literature study ............................................................................................... 67 3.5 The Inventory .................................................................................................. 67 3.5.1 Taxonomic data ........................................................................................ 68 3.5.2 Vernacular names .................................................................................... 68 3.5.3 Herbarium voucher specimens ................................................................. 69 3.5.4 Recorded medicinal uses ......................................................................... 69 Chapter 4: Results and discussions ......................................................................... 70 4.1 Ethnobotanical overview of Namaqualand ...................................................... 70 4.2 Medicinal plants species of the Kamiesberg ................................................... 76 4.3 Ailments treated with medicinal plants in the Kamiesberg .............................. 97 6 4.4 Quantifying medicinal plant knowledge in the Kamiesberg ........................... 111 4.5 Comparing
Recommended publications
  • Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019
    Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 3841 Number of items in BX 301 thru BX 463 1815 Number of unique text strings used as taxa 990 Taxa offered as bulbs 1056 Taxa offered as seeds 308 Number of genera This does not include the SXs. Top 20 Most Oft Listed: BULBS Times listed SEEDS Times listed Oxalis obtusa 53 Zephyranthes primulina 20 Oxalis flava 36 Rhodophiala bifida 14 Oxalis hirta 25 Habranthus tubispathus 13 Oxalis bowiei 22 Moraea villosa 13 Ferraria crispa 20 Veltheimia bracteata 13 Oxalis sp. 20 Clivia miniata 12 Oxalis purpurea 18 Zephyranthes drummondii 12 Lachenalia mutabilis 17 Zephyranthes reginae 11 Moraea sp. 17 Amaryllis belladonna 10 Amaryllis belladonna 14 Calochortus venustus 10 Oxalis luteola 14 Zephyranthes fosteri 10 Albuca sp. 13 Calochortus luteus 9 Moraea villosa 13 Crinum bulbispermum 9 Oxalis caprina 13 Habranthus robustus 9 Oxalis imbricata 12 Haemanthus albiflos 9 Oxalis namaquana 12 Nerine bowdenii 9 Oxalis engleriana 11 Cyclamen graecum 8 Oxalis melanosticta 'Ken Aslet'11 Fritillaria affinis 8 Moraea ciliata 10 Habranthus brachyandrus 8 Oxalis commutata 10 Zephyranthes 'Pink Beauty' 8 Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 Most taxa specify to species level. 34 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for bulbs 23 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for seeds 141 taxa were listed with quoted 'Variety' Top 20 Most often listed Genera BULBS SEEDS Genus N items BXs Genus N items BXs Oxalis 450 64 Zephyranthes 202 35 Lachenalia 125 47 Calochortus 94 15 Moraea 99 31 Moraea
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Study of Berkheya and Allies (Compositae)
    A systematic study of Berkheya and allies (Compositae) A thesis submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science of Rhodes University by Ntombifikile Phaliso April 2013 Supervisor: Prof. N.P. Barker (Botany Department, Rhodes University) Co-supervisor: Dr. Robert McKenzie (Botany Department, Rhodes University) Table of contents: Title ……………………………………………………………………………..I Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………...III Declaration……………………………………………………………………IV Abstract…………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 1: General Introduction……………………………………………..3 Chapter 2: The molecular phylogeny of Berkheya and allies……………...12 Aims………………………………………………………………………………………….12 2.1: Molecular (DNA-based) systematic……………………………………………………..12 2.2: Methods and Materials…………………………………………………………………..18 2.1.1: Sampling…………………………………………………………………………..18 2.1.2: DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing…………………………………..18 2.1.3: Sequence alignment……………………………………………………………..19 2.1.4: Phylogenetic Analyses …………………………………………………………...21 2.3: Results…………………………………………………………………………………..22 2.3.1: ITS data set………………………………………………………………………..22 2.3.2: psbA-trnH data set………………………………………………………………..23 2.3.3: Combined data set………………………………………………………………...24 2.4: Discussion……………………………………………………………………………….28 2.4.1: Phylogenetic relationships within the Berkheya clade……………………………28 2.4.2: Insights from the psbA-trnH & combined data set phylogenies………………….37 2.4.3: Taxonomic implications: paraphyly of Berkheya………………………………...39 2.4.4: Taxonomic Implications: Correspondence with
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY Where Passionate Gardeners Meet to Share Knowledge and Learn from Each Other
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY Where passionate gardeners meet to share knowledge and learn from each other. socalhort.org June 2013 Newsletter OUR NEXT MEETING PLANT FORUM NEXT SHARING SECRETS Bring one or more plants, QUESTION Thursday, June 13 flowers, seeds or fruits for IN THIS ISSUE Inspired by this month’s 7:30 pm display and discussion at the program, the Sharing Secrets May Meeting Recap Friendship Auditorium Plant Forum. We will soon have question for June is: by Steven Gerischer ............... 2 3201 Riverside Drive an improved, downloadable Sharing Secrets ......................... 2 Los Angeles CA 90027 PDF version of the plant "Do you preserve any of the information card. Anyone produce you grow, and Coffee in the Garden................2 We meet the second Thursday bringing in material for the how?” Upcoming Field Trips & Coffee In of each month at 7:30 pm Plant Forum table should ______________________________ The Garden ............................... 2 remember to pick up an You can answer on the cards March 2013 Green Sheet by This meeting is free to SCHS exhibitor’s ticket for the Plant we’ll supply at our June 13 James E. Henrich............3, 4 & 5 members and is $5 for non- Raffle, on nights when a raffle meeting, on our MemberLodge members without a guest pass. is conducted. These plants are website or e-mail your Horticultural Happenings also included in our response to by Bettina Gatti ........................6 newsletter’s Green Sheet. [email protected] by Friday, Upcoming 2013 SCHS June 14. Programs ................................... 7 The June Meeting In the 21st century we take food PLANT RAFFLE RETURNS! preservation for granted.
    [Show full text]
  • Treffpunkt Biologische Vielfalt VI
    Horst Korn & Ute Feit (Bearb.) Treffpunkt Biologische Vielfalt VI Aktuelle Forschung im Rahmen des Übereinkommens über die biologischen Vielfalt vorgestellt auf einer wissenschaftlichen Expertentagung an der Internationalen Naturschutzakademie Insel Vilm vom 22. – 26. August 2005 Bundesamt für Naturschutz Bonn – Bad Godesberg 2006 Titelbild: Annette Pahl Konzeption und Redaktion: Dr. habil. Horst Korn, Ute Feit Bundesamt für Naturschutz INA Insel Vilm 18581 Putbus Fachbetreuung des F+E-Vorhabens durch das BfN: Ute Feit Die BfN-Skripten sind nicht im Buchhandel erhältlich. Herausgeber: Bundesamt für Naturschutz Konstantinstr.110 53179 Bonn Tel.: +49 228/ 8491-0 Fax: +49 228/ 8491-200 URL: http://www.bfn.de Der Herausgeber übernimmt keine Gewähr für die Richtigkeit , die Genauigkeit und Vollständigkeit der Angaben sowie für die Beachtung privater Rechte Dritter. Die in den Beiträgen geäußerten Ansichten und Meinungen müssen nicht mit denen des Herausgebers übereinstimmen. Nachdruck, auch in Auszügen, nur mit Genehmigung des BfN. Druck: BMU-Druckerei Gedruckt auf 100% Altpapier Bonn – Bad Godesberg 2006 Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort .........................................................................................................................................................7 ANDREAS ZEHM Inter- und transdisziplinäre Forschung am Beispiel des BMBF-Förderschwerpunktes „Sozial- ökologischen Forschung“ (SÖF) ...................................................................................................................9 SUSANNE SCHÖN
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
    Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld.
    [Show full text]
  • Plethora of Plants - Collections of the Botanical Garden, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb (2): Glasshouse Succulents
    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 27 No 2 407-420* ZAGREB December 31, 2018 professional paper/stručni članak – museum collections/muzejske zbirke DOI 10.20302/NC.2018.27.28 PLETHORA OF PLANTS - COLLECTIONS OF THE BOTANICAL GARDEN, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB (2): GLASSHOUSE SUCCULENTS Dubravka Sandev, Darko Mihelj & Sanja Kovačić Botanical Garden, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 9a, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia (e-mail: [email protected]) Sandev, D., Mihelj, D. & Kovačić, S.: Plethora of plants – collections of the Botanical Garden, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb (2): Glasshouse succulents. Nat. Croat. Vol. 27, No. 2, 407- 420*, 2018, Zagreb. In this paper, the plant lists of glasshouse succulents grown in the Botanical Garden from 1895 to 2017 are studied. Synonymy, nomenclature and origin of plant material were sorted. The lists of species grown in the last 122 years are constructed in such a way as to show that throughout that period at least 1423 taxa of succulent plants from 254 genera and 17 families inhabited the Garden’s cold glass- house collection. Key words: Zagreb Botanical Garden, Faculty of Science, historic plant collections, succulent col- lection Sandev, D., Mihelj, D. & Kovačić, S.: Obilje bilja – zbirke Botaničkoga vrta Prirodoslovno- matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu (2): Stakleničke mesnatice. Nat. Croat. Vol. 27, No. 2, 407-420*, 2018, Zagreb. U ovom članku sastavljeni su popisi stakleničkih mesnatica uzgajanih u Botaničkom vrtu zagrebačkog Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta između 1895. i 2017. Uređena je sinonimka i no- menklatura te istraženo podrijetlo biljnog materijala. Rezultati pokazuju kako je tijekom 122 godine kroz zbirku mesnatica hladnog staklenika prošlo najmanje 1423 svojti iz 254 rodova i 17 porodica.
    [Show full text]
  • Aloe Scientific Primer International Aloe Science Council
    The International Aloe Science Council Presents an Aloe Scientific Primer International Aloe Science Council Commonly Traded Aloe Species The plant Aloe spp. has long been utilized in a variety of ways throughout history, which has been well documented elsewhere and need not be recounted in detail here, particularly as the purpose of this document is to discuss current and commonly traded aloe species. Aloe, in its various species, can presently and in the recent past be found in use as a decorative element in homes and gardens, in the creation of pharmaceuticals, in wound care products such as burn ointment, sunburn protectant and similar applications, in cosmetics, and as a food, dietary supplements and other health and nutrition related items. Recently, various species of the plant have even been used to weave into clothing and in mattresses. Those species of Aloe commonly used in commerce today can be divided into three primary categories: those used primarily in the production of crude drugs, those used primarily for decorative purposes, and those used in health, nutritional and related products. For reference purposes, this paper will outline the primary species and their uses, but will focus on the species most widely used in commerce for health, nutritional, cosmetic and supplement products, such as aloe vera. Components of aloe vera currently used in commerce The Aloe plant, and in particular aloe vera, has three distinct raw material components that are processed and found in manufactured goods: leaf juice; inner leaf juice; and aloe latex. A great deal of confusion regarding the terminology of this botanical and its components has been identified, mostly because of a lack of clear definitions, marketing, and other factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Unearthing Belowground Bud Banks in Fire-Prone Ecosystems
    Unearthing belowground bud banks in fire-prone ecosystems 1 2 3 Author for correspondence: Juli G. Pausas , Byron B. Lamont , Susana Paula , Beatriz Appezzato-da- Juli G. Pausas 4 5 Glo'ria and Alessandra Fidelis Tel: +34 963 424124 1CIDE-CSIC, C. Naquera Km 4.5, Montcada, Valencia 46113, Spain; 2Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin Email [email protected] University, PO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia; 3ICAEV, Universidad Austral de Chile, Campus Isla Teja, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile; 4Depto Ci^encias Biologicas,' Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av P'adua Dias 11., CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil; 5Instituto de Bioci^encias, Vegetation Ecology Lab, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Av. 24-A 1515, 13506-900 Rio Claro, Brazil Summary To be published in New Phytologist (2018) Despite long-time awareness of the importance of the location of buds in plant biology, research doi: 10.1111/nph.14982 on belowground bud banks has been scant. Terms such as lignotuber, xylopodium and sobole, all referring to belowground bud-bearing structures, are used inconsistently in the literature. Key words: bud bank, fire-prone ecosystems, Because soil efficiently insulates meristems from the heat of fire, concealing buds below ground lignotuber, resprouting, rhizome, xylopodium. provides fitness benefits in fire-prone ecosystems. Thus, in these ecosystems, there is a remarkable diversity of bud-bearing structures. There are at least six locations where belowground buds are stored: roots, root crown, rhizomes, woody burls, fleshy
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Aloiampelos Klopper & Gideon F.Sm
    Revision of Aloiampelos Klopper & Gideon F.Sm. (Xanthorrhoeaceae subfam. Asphodeloideae) Kristen Ellis (199203377) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae to be awarded at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University. December 2013 Department of Botany Supervisor: Prof. E.E. Campbell Co-supervisor: Prof. G.F. Smith TABLE OF CONTENTS: Declaration 4 List of figures 5 List of tables 6 List of plates 7 Abstract 9 1. Introduction 10 1.1. Hypotheses 11 2. Literature review 12 2.1. Family placement 14 2.2. New generic classification of Aloe 15 2.3. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) classification system and its effect on the classification of aloes 15 2.4. The Aloes of The World Project 17 2.5. Descriptions of the rambling aloes 18 2.5.1. Aloiampelos ciliaris (Haw.) Klopper & Gideon.F.Sm. 18 2.5.2. Aloiampelos tenuior (Haw.) Klopper & Gideon.F.Sm. 22 2.5.3. Aloiampelos gracilis (Haw.) Klopper & Gideon.F.Sm. 24 2.5.4. Aloiampelos striatula (Haw.) Klopper & Gideon.F.Sm. 26 2.5.5. Aloiampelos commixta (A.Berger) klopper & Gideon.F.Sm. 28 2.5.6. Aloiampelos juddii (Van Jaarsv.) Klopper & Gideon.F.Sm. 30 2.5.7. Aloiampelos decumbens (Reynolds) Klopper & Gideon.F.Sm. 31 3. Morphology 35 3.1. Introduction 35 3.2. Materials & Methods 36 3.3. Results 40 2 3.4. Discussion 46 3.5. Conclusions 53 3.6. Gardening trends – orange form of A. tenuior 53 4. Historical taxonomy 58 5. Palynology 63 5.1. Introduction 63 5.2. Materials & Methods 64 5.3.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY Where Passionate Gardeners Meet to Share Knowledge and Learn from Each Other
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY Where passionate gardeners meet to share knowledge and learn from each other. socalhort.org May 2012 Newsletter OUR NEXT MEETING TOURS AND EVENTS NEXT SHARING SECRETS IN THIS ISSUE QUESTION Thursday, May 10 Our recent one-day tour/events April Meeting Recap 7:30 pm to Altadena with Nuccio’s The Sharing Secrets question(s) by Steven Gerischer ................ 2 Friendship Auditorium Nursery and the picnic which for May is: “What have you Sharing Secrets responses to : 3021 Riverside Drive followed, and the tour of the made to personalize your Which irises do you Los Angeles Hall garden in Pasadena were garden, or how have you re- grow ? ........................................2 successful and a lot of fun for purposed materials?” (Or We meet the second Thursday everyone involved. If you have both) On-line membership services..2 of each month at 7:30 pm any ideas of one-day tours or LA Science Fair Awards by Joan You can answer on the cards events you would like to see Citron..........................................2 It is free to SCHS members and we’ll supply at our May 10 SCHS organize, please contact $5 for non-members without a meeting or e-mail your Green Sheet by Jorge Ochoa and either Steve Gerischer at guest pass, which is found on response to Sula Vanderplank...............3 & 4 [email protected]. or Joel the front of your member card. [email protected] by Lichtenwalter at Horticultural Happenings ______________________________ Friday, May 11. [email protected]. by S. Gerischer......................... 5 Upcoming Programs ................. 6 The May Meeting considers her approach to making gardens to be rooted in childhood outdoor play.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2019
    BCSS Southampton & District Branch September 2019 Newsletter Branch Secretary Newsletter EditorPage 1 British Cactus & Succulent Society David Neville Vinay Shah 6 Parkville Road 29 Heathlands Road Southampton & District Branch Swaythling Eastleigh Southampton Hampshire Newsletter Hampshire SO53 1GU SO16 2JA [email protected] [email protected] September 2019 (023) 80551173 or (023) 80261989 07974 191354 price admission by showing their membership card Editorial ........................................................... 1 (issued with the March Journal). And due to this Announcements ............................................... 1 being our Branch’s 65th Anniversary, we will be Last Month’s Meeting ..................................... 1 subsiding visitors to the event – just visit David Plant Focus Evening ............................................. 1 Neville’s stand at the event to have your name recorded and to claim £5. Next Month’s Meeting .................................... 5 Forthcoming Events ........................................ 5 Last Month’s Meeting Editorial At the start of the meeting, Michelle Fox-Rousell had some photographs to share with the audience. The evenings are now starting to be dark by 8pm She mentioned that 12 years ago she had bought a and we’ll soon be at the autumnal equinox. The large Melocactus. It flowered and after about 6 temperatures are cooler than they were a month ago years, the cephalium at the top seemed to go brown and my plants seem to prefer these conditions more. and the plant sulked for a while and she almost gave up on it - but she then noticed that baby plants were Announcements forming in the cephalium. These eventually turned A couple of weeks ago, the BCSS sadly announced into small plants and then developed cephaliums of that Gordon Rowley had passed away, at the age of their own and one of these had flowered.
    [Show full text]
  • Literaturverzeichnis
    Literaturverzeichnis Abaimov, A.P., 2010: Geographical Distribution and Ackerly, D.D., 2009: Evolution, origin and age of Genetics of Siberian Larch Species. In Osawa, A., line ages in the Californian and Mediterranean flo- Zyryanova, O.A., Matsuura, Y., Kajimoto, T. & ras. Journal of Biogeography 36, 1221–1233. Wein, R.W. (eds.), Permafrost Ecosystems. Sibe- Acocks, J.P.H., 1988: Veld Types of South Africa. 3rd rian Larch Forests. Ecological Studies 209, 41–58. Edition. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. 146 pp. (eds.), 2006: Lamto. Structure, Functioning, and Adam, P., 1990: Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge Uni- Dynamics of a Savanna Ecosystem. Ecological Stu- versity Press. Cambridge, 461 pp. dies 179, 415 pp. Adam, P., 1994: Australian Rainforests. Oxford Bio- Abbott, R.J. & Brochmann, C., 2003: History and geography Series No. 6 (Oxford University Press), evolution of the arctic flora: in the footsteps of Eric 308 pp. Hultén. Molecular Ecology 12, 299–313. Adam, P., 1994: Saltmarsh and mangrove. In Groves, Abbott, R.J. & Comes, H.P., 2004: Evolution in the R.H. (ed.), Australian Vegetation. 2nd Edition. Arctic: a phylogeographic analysis of the circu- Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. marctic plant Saxifraga oppositifolia (Purple Saxi- 395–435. frage). New Phytologist 161, 211–224. Adame, M.F., Neil, D., Wright, S.F. & Lovelock, C.E., Abbott, R.J., Chapman, H.M., Crawford, R.M.M. & 2010: Sedimentation within and among mangrove Forbes, D.G., 1995: Molecular diversity and deri- forests along a gradient of geomorphological set- vations of populations of Silene acaulis and Saxi- tings.
    [Show full text]