DOCSLIB.ORG

10:00 Registration of Participants Venue: GRAND HALL CHAMBER PLAZA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10:00 Registration of Participants Venue: GRAND HALL CHAMBER PLAZA December, 11(Tuesday) 9:00 - 10:00 Registration of participants Venue: GRAND HALL CHAMBER PLAZA Opening 10:00 - 10:03 Welcome speech - Gennadiy Chyzhykov, President of UCCI Gala session : 10:03- 12:15 «Ukraine 2019: a vision of economic growth. Industry, innovation, finance, export» Participants on stage (speeches regulations) Speech 10:03-10:25 - Volodymyr Groysman, Prime Minister of Ukraine 10:25-10:45 Questions/answers from the audience Participants of the Gala session (after completing the participation of the Prime Minister of Ukraine, the moderator invites the participants to take a seat on the stage for speeches) - Oksana Markarova, Acting Minister of Finance of Ukraine 8 min. 10:50-12:15 - Hugues Mingarelli, Head of the European Union Delegation to Ukraine 8 min. - Roman Waschuk, H.E. Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Canada to Ukraine* 8 min. - Pavlo Petrenko, Minister of Justice of Ukraine* 8 min. - Algirdas Shemeta , business ombudsman 8 min. - Anatoliy Girschfeld, Deputy Chairman of the National Committee for Industrial 8 min. Development - Executive Director - Oleksander Vlasov, acting Head of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine 8 min. - Yevgen Kravtsov, acting Chairman of the Board of PJSC "Ukrzaliznytsya" 8 min. - Anna Vinnichenko, Managing Partner of Lawyers Association WinnerLex 8 min. - Volodymyr Zolotaryov, Director for Foreign Economic Relations of PJSC "Plant 8 min. Pivdenkabel" Directions of discussion: - Budget 2019. Basic parameters of economic growth. - Revival of industry as a key factor in the growth of the national economy. - Investing in Ukraine. Should Ukraine expect investment boom next year? - Government's view of sources of affordable financing of investment and industrial projects of SMEs. - New European "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine - a reality or a myth? - Industrial policy and technological innovation in Ukraine. - Experience of Canada on financial support for industry and business rights protection. - Processing industry as a driver of the national economy. Key signals from business. - Reducing the pressure on business through the electrification of tax administration processes and the fight against the shadow economy. - Legislative initiatives of the Government aimed at ensuring the observance by law enforcement authorities of the rights and legitimate interests of economic entities. Main provisions, results achieved and further perspectives. - Government actions to protect the rights of the business from unlawful actions of law enforcement agencies, counteraction to illegal takeover and seizure of enterprises. Are they an effective tool for protecting business rights? Moderator - Pavlo Kuzheev, Leading and Chief Editor of "112 UKRAINE" TV Channel 12:15 - 12:45 Coffee-break Panel discussion: «How to succeed in industrialization in Ukraine: audit of current and prospective instruments of state and non- state support of industry» 12:45 -14:45 Part 1 Speakers: - Valeriy Geets, Director of SE “Institute of Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine”, Academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine - Victor Galasyuk, Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Industrial Policy and Entrepreneurship - Anna Artemenko, State Commissioner of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine - Stepan Kubiv, First Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine - Minister of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine*/ Maksym Nefyodov, First Deputy Minister of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine - Vasyl Furman, Member of the Council of the National Bank of Ukraine - Uliana Hromiak, Deputy Director of the Office for the Involvement and Support of Investments UkraineInvest - Chairman/Deputy Chairman of the Board of PJSC AB "UKRGAZBANK"* - Valeriy Pyatnytsyi, Vice President for Financial Issues of the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank - Oleksandr Voloshanyuk, Deputy Chairman of the Board of the Ukrainian Bank for Reconstruction and Development - Sergiy Maslichenko, Associate Director, Ph.D. Department on Energy Efficiency and Climate Change, EBRD - Vladyslav Mitrokhin, Chairman of the Public-Private Partnership Committee at UCCI - Lyudmila Musina, Coordinator of cooperation with UNIDO in Ukraine Directions of discussion: - Government / non-government instruments of industry support in the world. The best experience. - Program documents (strategy) for industrial development. Will a state authority on industrial issues / an industrial development fund be established? - Conducting a monetary policy aimed at the development of industry. The positions of the National Bank of Ukraine and the Government. - The role of public / private banks in financing the industry (projects). - Bank financing as a tool for economic recovery. - Attracting International Development Banks. In what way Ukrainian business can receive funds from them for realization of industrial investment projects? - Creation of a non-state platform ( fund) for support of industrial investments and innovations. Experience of the Public-Private Partnership Committee at UCCI. - Activity of the Office for the Involvement and Support of Investments UkraineInvest (Facilitating the increase of foreign direct investment in Ukraine, improvement of the legal field and protection of investors). - Law of Ukraine dated 01.07.2014 № 1555-VII in action. Can government guarantees be obtained for the SME industry? - Tasks and tools for new industrialization in the context of achieving the goals of sustainable development. Moderator: - Ruslan Osypenko, Executive Director of Chinese Trade Association 14:45 - 15:30 Coffee-break 15:30 - 17:30 Part 2 Speakers: - Volodymyr Stavnyuk, Chairman of the Board of State Innovative Finance and Credit Institution - Borys Sobolev, First Deputy Minister of Foreign Economic Relations of Ukraine (1991-1993) - Leonid Kozachenko, President of the Ukrainian Agrarian Confederation - Oleksander Chalyi, President of Grant Thornton Ukraine Ltd. - Oleg Strynzha, Executive Director of the German-Ukrainian Foundation - Nataliya Kondrashova, Head of the Regulatory Policy and Entrepreneurship Department of Kyiv City State Administration - Volodymyr Vlasyuk, Chairman of the Committee on Industrial Modernization at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Olga Afanasyeva, Executive Director of the Ukrainian Association of Venture and Private Capital - Andriy Rybalchenko, General Director of the Ukrainian Association of Investment Business - Iryna Guk, Legal Advisor / Lawyer, Euro-Invest-Holding LLC - Volodymyr Khmurich, Director of Bila Tserkov Industrial Park - Pavlo Verkhnyatsky, Director of the Center for Operational-Strategic Analysis (COSA) Directions of discussion: - ECA as a real channel for filling industry with finance. When will it finally work? - Experience of the existing state institute of financial support of business entities. How can this tool be used by the business? - The State Mortgage Bank as an instrument for the stable development of the economy. - Modern industrial policy of Ukraine. Challenges and opportunities. - Successful experience of German-Ukrainian Foundation in supporting and financing SME projects in Ukraine. Can a National Agency for Business Finance be created on its basis? - Involvement of local authorities in stimulating industry (projects). - Activity of private venture investors in Ukraine. - Joint investmenting institutes as an effective mechanism for financing the real sector of the Ukrainian economy. - Industrial parks as a point of industrial growth and attracting long-term investment. What has not yet been done in Ukraine? - Competitive advantages of complacency and transparency of business with attracted financing and cooperation with international partners. Questions and Answers (20 min.) Moderator: - Elina Beketova, presenter of "112 UKRAINE" TV Channel * issues are under consideration .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Issues and US Policy
    Ukraine: Current Issues and U.S. Policy name redacted Section Research Manager April 27, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33460 Ukraine: Current Issues and U.S. Policy Summary In February 2014, the Kremlin-supported government of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych collapsed. The demise of the regime was brought about by bitter protests that had erupted in Kyiv’s Maidan Square in late 2013 over a decision by the government to reject closer relations with the European Union. What followed the turmoil of early 2014 was the emergence of a pro- Western, pro-reform government and an energized public generally anxious to lessen Moscow’s influence, committed to addressing the need for serious reform, and determined to draw closer to Europe and the United States. Despite the current Kyiv government’s commitment to reform, the pro-Western political and economic orientation, and the presence of a vibrant, yet frustrated, civil society dedicated to the implementation of change, Ukraine remains far from achieving the political and economic stability and internal security sought by the supporters of the Maidan. In fact, 2016 has already proven to be a very unsettling time for the government as frustrations have mounted over the slow pace of political reform and economic progress by pro-reformers and the West. These shortcomings initially resulted in the resignations of a popular, reform-minded economy minister and a deputy prosecutor and in warnings from the head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and several European nations that Ukraine risked losing continued international financial support if progress was not made.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforms in Ukraine After Revolution of Dignity
    REFORMS IN UKRAINE AFTER REVOLUTION OF DIGNITY What was done, why not more and what to do next This publicaon was produced with financial Responsibility for the informaon and views set out assistance from the EBRD-Ukraine Stabilisaon and in this publicaon lies enrely with the authors. The Sustainable Growth Mul-Donor Account, the EBRD makes no representaon or warranty, express donors of which are Denmark, Finland, France, or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, informaon set forth in the publicaon. The EBRD Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, has not independently verified any of the informaon the United States of America and the European contained in the publicaon and the EBRD accepts Union, the largest donor. The views expressed herein no liability whatsoever for any of the informaon can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion contained in the publicaon or for any misstatement of the EBRD or any donor of the account. or omission therein. The publicaon remains the property of the EBRD. REFORMS IN UKRAINE AFTER REVOLUTION OF DIGNITY What was done, why not more and what to do next Editors Ivan Miklos Pavlo Kukhta Contents Foreword 4 Introducon What was done, why not more and what to do next: Ukrainian reforms aer the Revoluon of Dignity 7 Chapter 1 Polical economy of reforms: polical system, governance and corrupon 10 Chapter 2 Macroeconomic policies 35 Chapter 3 Rule of law 48 Chapter 4 Energy policy 75 Chapter 5 Business environment 87 Chapter 6 Land reform 101 Chapter 7 Privasaon and SOE reform 112 Chapter 8 Healthcare reform 132 Chapter 9 Ukraine and the European Union 144 Annex 1 Report on reforms in 2016-17 162 Annex 2 The role of the government and MPs in reform implementaon in Ukraine 167 About SAGSUR (Strategic Advisory Group for Support of Ukrainian Reforms) 173 Glossary of terms 174 Foreword Foreword | 4 Foreword Maeo Patrone and Peter M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF GLOBAL AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OLIGARCHIC PLURALISM IN THE 2014 EUROMAIDAN: HOW THE RISE OF OLIGARCHS IN GOVERNMENT SHAPED DEMOCRACY UN UKRAINE SIOBHAN FRANCES LEONARD SPRING 2020 A thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree with honors in Comparative Literature and International Studies with honors in Global and International Studies Reviewed and approved* by the following: JOSEPH WRIGHT PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL SCIENCE Thesis Supervisor JONATHAN ABEL PROFESSOR OF COMPARATIVE LITERATURE AND JAPANESE Honors Adviser * Electronic approvals are on file. ABSTRACT During the 1990s, Ukraine experienced a change in its political system, becoming a nominal liberal democratic with contested multiparty elections in combination with post-Soviet oligarch community. These newly established dimensions impacted two major revolutionary periods in Ukraine, dating from 1992-2004 and 2005-2014, reaching a climax of violent civil unrest during the Ukrainian Revolution of 2014. The Ukrainian Revolution, also known as the Euromaidan and Revolution of Dignity, illustrates the stages of modernization in a post-Soviet society. The Euromaidan mobilized a variety of regional and ethno-linguistic groups to demand political and economic reform. Members of oligarch clans, consisting mostly of ethnically Russian economic elites, are often appointed in regional government positions largely in the East, and hold substantial power in Ukrainian politics. My research question poses: “How did oligarchic concentration of economic and media power influence government functions such as public service delivery, and shape corruption patterns preceding the protest uprising in 2014?” In my thesis, I seek to study the impact of oligarch clans as holding centralized power, and how this system may affect Ukrainian national politics as seen under the leadership of former democratically elected, Pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych, during the Ukrainian Revolution of 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The Donbas Blockade: Another Blow to the Minsk Peace Process Hrant Kostanyan and Artem Remizov
    The Donbas Blockade: Another blow to the Minsk peace process Hrant Kostanyan and Artem Remizov No 2017/08, June 2017 Abstract The Minsk peace process that was set up to address the Ukraine crisis has had a bumpy ride from the start. The current conflict has its origins in the Kremlin’s reaction to the Euromaidan revolution in Ukraine: Russia annexed Crimea in March 2014 and has orchestrated a war in the east of Donbas. In January 2017, some veterans of Ukraine’s volunteer battalions blockaded pro-Russian separatist-held territories in the eastern Donbas, the so-called ‘Donetsk People’s Republic’ (DPR) and ‘Luhansk People’s Republic’ (LPR). After unsuccessful attempts to disperse the veterans and activists blocking several checkpoints, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko gave in to increasing public support for the blockade and transformed a rogue operation into official Ukrainian government policy. Russian President Vladimir Putin responded with a decree to recognise certain personal identity documents issued by the breakaway ‘republics’, and separatists ‘nationalised’ Ukrainian companies in the eastern Donbas. These events have led the National Bank of Ukraine to revise downwards its previous economic growth forecast for 2017; indeed, the blockade poses a major challenge to companies located in both the eastern and western Donbas due to the interconnection of their production cycles. The blockade exposed the failure of the so-called ‘Rotterdam Plus’ formula − a new methodology for calculating wholesale market prices on electricity, intended to help Ukraine diversify its energy sector. But ultimately, the blockade by Kyiv, the recognition by Russia of the separatist republics’ identity documents and the ‘nationalisation’ of Ukrainian companies in the eastern Donbas amount to yet another blow for the Minsk peace process.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Security and Judicial Reforms Under Zelensky
    POLICY BRIEF GUARDING THE GUARDIANS: UKRAINE’S SECURITY AND JUDICIAL REFORMS UNDER ZELENSKY Gustav Gressel August 2019 SUMMARY Despite Ukrainians’ deep unhappiness with the corruption and inefficiency of the judiciary and security bodies, the Poroshenko administration failed to reform these services. Political interference and personal enrichment have long been part of the practice of these services, overshadowing the strong work they are often capable of and holding back reformist elements. The office of the prosecutor general and the Ukrainian Security Service need particular attention, but merely passing new laws will not be enough: replacing incumbent high-level officials should be an early step. The EU, US, and NATO have worked effectively together on encouraging reform in Ukraine, but they must now ensure that these services remain high in the minds of the Zelensky administration and of Rada members. Introduction Since 2014, much of Europe’s public debate on Ukraine has revolved around the geopolitical contest between the West and Russia, the war in Donbas, and their security implications for Europe. But, at its core, Ukraine’s Revolution of Dignity was an anti-corruption uprising that only became geopolitical later. Ukrainians longed for a government that was less corrupt, more responsive to citizens’ demands, and bound by the rule of law. They ousted a government that had denied them their rights, fought the foreign invasion that would have reinstated a repressive kleptocracy, and elected new political leaders. However, these new leaders did not meet expectations – in either Ukraine or the West. Disappointment with the slow progress of reforms, particularly a series of setbacks in the fight against corruption, was key to the subsequent collapse in popularity of former president Petro Poroshenko and of established political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone of the System. Old and New Oligarchs in Ukraine
    59 KEYSTONE OF THE SYSTEM OLD AND NEW OLIGARCHS IN UKRAINE Wojciech Konończuk NUMBER 59 WARSAW auGusT 2016 KEYSTONE OF THE SYSTEM OLD AND NEW OLIGARCHS IN UKRAINE Wojciech Konończuk © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies Content editor Adam Eberhardt Editor Halina Kowalczyk Co-operation Katarzyna Kazimierska, Anna Łabuszewska Translation Jim Todd Charts Wojciech Mańkowski Graphic design PARA-BUCH DTP GroupMedia Illustration on cover Shutterstock Publisher Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-62936-82-3 Contents SUMMARY /5 INTRODUCTION /8 I. OliGarchs in The sysTem of posT-Maidan Ukraine /11 1. The ‘old’ oligarchs (temporarily) on the defensive /11 2. Co-operation with the new government /15 II. New oliGarchs in The GOVernmenT /21 1. The business-political circle of President Poroshenko /22 2. The business-political circle of Arseniy Yatsenyuk and the People’s Front /28 III. The de-oliGarchisaTion THAT neVer happened /35 SUMMARY • For the last two decades, oligarchs, or big entrepreneurs who have been able to turn their business prowess into power- ful political influence, have been among the most important actors in Ukraine’s politics. More than two years after the Maidan revolution, it is fully justified to say that the oligar- chic system remains a key mechanism in Ukraine’s political and economic life. While it is true that the influence of the for- merly most powerful oligarchic groups has eroded during this period, no such group except for the Family, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Reform Conference: Delegations List
    Ukrainian Delegation Prime Minister Mr Volodymyr Groysman Mrs Ivanna Klympush- Vice Prime Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration Tsintsadze Minister of the Cabinet of Ministers Mr Oleksandr Sayenko Minister of Finance Mr Oleksandr Danyliuk Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr Pavlo Klimkin Minister of Justice Mr Pavlo Petrenko Minister of Defence Mr Stepan Poltorak Minister of Social Policy Mr Andrii Reva Acting Minister of Health Mrs Ulana Suprun Minister for Temporarily Occupied Territories Mr Vadym Chernysh and Internally Displaced Persons Other National Delegations Head of Eastern Europe and Central Asia Austria Mrs Katharina Ann Wieser Department, MFA Chargé d'Affaires a.i., Embassy of Belgium to Belgium Mr Jan Bayart the UK Bulgaria Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr Yuri Borissov Sterk Canada Minister of Foreign Affairs Hon Chrystia Freeland Croatia State Secretary for Political Affairs Mrs Zdravka Bušić Cyprus Deputy Foreign Minister Mr Alexandros Zenon Czech Republic Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr Jakub Dürr Denmark Minister for Foreign Affairs Mr Anders Samuelsen Estonia Acting Undersecretary, Political Affairs Mr Paul Teesalu Finland Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Mr Kai Aslak Mykkänen France Political Director Mr Nicolas de Rivière Germany Political Director Mr Andreas Michaelis Mr Terens Spenser Nikolaos Greece Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Quick Hungary Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Mr Péter Szijjártó Director General for European Neighbourhood Ireland and Policy, Department of
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Implementation of the Associations and Free Trade
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY The state of implementation of the associations and free trade agreements with Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova with a particular focus on Ukraine and systemic analysis of key sectors ABSTRACT Signing and ratifying Association Agreements with Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine has proven to be an impressive affirmation of Brussels’ soft power. The EU’s overtures have persuaded elites and mobilised societies despite the fact that the Agreements come neither with a membership promise nor with the kind of financial assistance that has been given to the EU’s new member states. EU assistance has been effective in restoring macro-financial stability in all three countries. While costs of compliance with the DCFTA were calculated, level of investment associated with the necessary modernisation to make these economies competitive were neglected. The discrepancy between costs and benefits should prompt the EU to be more flexible. Brussels’ achievements remain fragile. Informal interests continue to play important roles in these countries and have the potential to thwart reforms. In the absence of strong, de-politicised institutions, the EU should work to support political consolidation—the alternative is further polarisation and political fragility—while at the same time insisting on adherence to democratic standards and strengthened institutional checks and balances. EP/EXPO/B/AFET/2017/05 EN November 2017 - PE 603836 © European Union, 2017 Policy Department, Directorate-General for External
    [Show full text]
  • Memory of Stalinist Purges in Modern Ukraine
    The Gordian Knot of Past and Present: Memory of Stalinist Purges in Modern Ukraine HALYNA MOKRUSHYNA Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the PdD in Sociology School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Halyna Mokrushyna, Ottawa, Canada, 2018 ii Table of Contents Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv Preface ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Research question ............................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Conceptual framework ................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2: Social memory framework .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Responsible Accountable Democratic Assembly (Rada) Program
    EVALUATION OF THE RESPONSIBLE ACCOUNTABLE DEMOCRATIC ASSEMBLY (RADA) PROGRAM PO No. AID-121-O-17-00040 DISCLAIMER: This is an external assessment. The view expressed in this document are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Submitted to: USAID/Ukraine Prepared by: John Lis, Team Lead Taras Kuzio, International Governance Expert Andriy Meleshevych, Local Governance Expert Oksana Vynnychuk, Logistician Submitted February 2018 Contractor: Democracy International, Inc. 7600 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1010 Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: 301-961-1660 www.democracyinternational.com I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i EVALUATION PURPOSE AND QUESTIONS 1 PROGRAM BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 2 EVALUATION METHODS AND LIMITATIONS 4 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 8 LESSONS LEARNED 33 ANNEX A: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IN UKRAINIAN 35 ANNEX B: EVALUATION SOW 43 ANNEX C: EVALUATION TEAM 58 ANNEX D: EVALUATION WORK PLAN 59 ANNEX E: CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENTS 94 ANNEX F: LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED 95 ANNEX G: LISTS OF KEY INFORMANTS, FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSANTS AND SURVEY RESPONDENTS 97 ANNEX H: DATA COLLECTION TOOLS 107 ANNEX I: SURVEY RESULTS 116 ANNEX J: FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION SUMMARIES 127 ANNEX K: TABLE OF EVALUATION FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 131 ANNEX L: MS POWERPOINT PRESENTATION OF EVALUATION DESIGN, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 134 ANNEX M: RADA PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 135 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVALUATION PURPOSE AND QUESTIONS The objective of this final performance evaluation is to assess the relevance and effectiveness of the RADA Program in advancing parliamentary reform in Ukraine and, more specifically, in improving public representation in the legislative process and strengthening independent legislative oversight of the executive branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Delegation Leaves OSCE Meeting Over Statements On
    Table of Contents • Ukraine’s delegation leaves OSCE meeting over statements on ‘Russian Crimea’ • BREAKING NEWS: From Ukrainian jails to freedom in Moscow • BREAKING NEWS: Ukraine-Russia prisoner swap: 70 prisoners released in all • Post-election Ukraine. More of the same or a new human rights agenda? • UK to contribute 100,000 pounds to establishment of criminal court in Hague to deal with MH17 case • Ukraine’s state language law enshrines the lingua franca • Remember Odessa 2nd May 2014 Tragedy • Language law: In anticipation of shake-up in print media market • Ukraine has a Jewish President and a Jewish Prime Minister. What about anti-Semitism? • Opinions about the first round of the presidential election • Police receive more than 2,000 reports of electoral violations on Sunday – Interior Ministry • Observation findings by CVU and OPORA of the Election Day • Zelensky leading in presidential polls, followed by Poroshenko, Hrytsenko, Tymoshenko – RAND poll • Ukrainian official charged in acid attack on activist after outcry • Number of Ukrainians who trust church falls 6% last year - opinion poll Ukraine’s delegation leaves OSCE meeting over statements on ‘Russian Crimea’ Ukrinform (17.09.2019) - https://bit.ly/2kGZGe7 - A delegation from Ukraine has left the OSCE session hall in Warsaw during the discussion of the topic of freedom of speech in protest at statements about "Russian Crimea," according to Crimean Tatar television channel ATR. "The Ukrainian delegation has suspended participation in the working meeting. Consultations are being held with partners on further actions," the statement reads. In this way, the Ukrainian delegation reacted to statements by Crimean propagandists who said during their introduction: "Crimea, Russia," the report said.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Ukraine's Anti-Corruption Reforms Working?
    Research Paper John Lough and Vladimir Dubrovskiy Russia and Eurasia Programme | November 2018 Are Ukraine’s Anti-corruption Reforms Working? Chatham House Are Ukraine’s Anti-corruption Reforms Working? Contents Summary 2 1. Introduction 3 2. Assessing the Impact of Anti-corruption Measures in Key Sectors 10 3. Conclusion 34 Abbreviations and Acronyms 40 About the Authors 41 Acknowledgments 42 1 | Chatham House Are Ukraine’s Anti-corruption Reforms Working? Summary • Starting in 2014, Ukraine has undertaken significant reforms to address corruption in public life. So far, there has been greater success in restricting the opportunities for corruption than in bringing corrupt officials to justice. • Corruption is a symptom of the poor system of governance in the country, not the cause of it. A decisive breakthrough will require opening the political system to more actors, creating greater competition and developing credible institutions to support the rule of law. • Anti-corruption successes include the cleaning up of Naftogaz and reforms in administrative services, banking, the patrol police, procurement and taxation. Decentralization is also creating new opportunities for citizens to hold local authorities accountable for managing local public resources. • Progress is lacking in priority areas such as customs, deregulation, privatization, de- monopolization and the reform of public administration. Defence spending is particularly opaque. Corruption schemes remain untouched in some parts of the energy sector. An overhaul of the civil service is also essential. • Reforms of the law enforcement agencies are proceeding slowly, if at all. It is too early to say whether judicial reform will lead to improvements in the functioning of the courts because of the deep underlying culture of corruption in the judicial system.
    [Show full text]