DOCSLIB.ORG

1 a Philosophical Analysis of STEM Education Dissertation Presented In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 a Philosophical Analysis of STEM Education Dissertation Presented In A Philosophical Analysis of STEM Education Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jamie Eric Teeple Graduate Program in Educational Studies The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee Bryan R. Warnick, Advisor Michael J. Glassman Bruce A. Kimball 1 Copyrighted by Jamie Eric Teeple 2018 2 Abstract In this dissertation, I critique STEM education as the educational apotheosis of neoliberal governmentality and reconceptualize it for an egalitarian democracy. Part and parcel of this analysis is considering Wendy Brown’s (2015) contention that the contemporary subject is interpolated by the prevailing norms of neoliberalism as a governing form of political rationality and thus expresses itself not as a political subject, or “homo politicus”, but as a self-investing and economized subject, or “homo oeconomicus”. I hypothesize that students as emergent homo oeconomicus seek out STEM education as the best means for survival within a technocratic marketplace. In this sense, STEM literacy is rendered the paradigmatic form of symbolic capital within the capitalist state. The thrust of my critical response to this milieu figures left-libertarian or social-anarchist thought as the diametrically opposed and thus apposite ideological rejoinder to the right- authoritarian status quo, not only for political activism writ large, but also for educational reform proposals and even the preparation of preservice teachers. In the end, my research is an attempt to explore how students’ narratives can assist critical educators with leveraging pedagogy into a potent means for cultivating within educational systems the social imaginaries and political subjects needed to eschew the aims of a right- authoritarian status quo and embrace the aims of an egalitarian, left-libertarian society-to- be. ii Dedication For Kristen. iii Acknowledgments I would like to begin by thanking my teachers, colleagues, and peers. Without your patient guidance and invaluable advice, I would never have been able to produce this document. In particular, I would like to acknowledge Bryan Warnick, Bruce Kimball, Michael Glassman, Phil Smith, Shirley Yu, Karen Graves, Emily Nemeth, and Suzanne Baker. I would also like to acknowledge my family. Without your care and unwavering support, this road would have been far bumpier. Mom, you are the greatest educator I have ever known. Jennifer, you are my coconspirator. And Kristen, my love and my life, I cannot wait to see what our future holds. iv Vita Work August 2018-May 2019: Denison University: Visiting Instructor August 2017-May 2019: Columbus State Community College: Adjunct Instructor Education 2013-2018: The Ohio State University, College of Education and Human Ecology: Seeking Doctor of Philosophy Degree 2011-2013: The University of Toledo, Judith Herb College of Education: Master of Education Degree 2004-2008: McGill University, Faculty of Arts: Bachelor of Arts Degree Publications October 2018: Teeple, J. E. Toward a state-critical STEM education. Critical Education, 9(16), 67-83. March 2018: Kuznetcova, I., Teeple, J., & Glassman, M. The dialectic of the avatar: Developing in-world identities in Second Life. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 10(1), 59-71. Fields of Study Major Field: Educational Studies Specialization: Philosophy of Education v Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iv Vita ...................................................................................................................................... v List of Figures .................................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. The Emergence of the Debate Over STEM Education ..................................... 7 Chapter 3. A Critique of Education and the Status Quo ................................................... 19 Precedents for Socio-Educational Critique ................................................................... 19 Giroux’s Critique of the Status Quo ............................................................................. 28 The State of the State .................................................................................................... 30 The American State as Imperialist System ................................................................... 35 Imperial Neoliberalism as Governing Political Rationality .......................................... 40 Chapter 4. STEM Education and the Status Quo .............................................................. 50 Chesky and Wolfmeyer’s Critique of STEM Education .............................................. 50 Bybee’s Case for STEM Education .............................................................................. 58 Hacker’s Case for STEM Education ............................................................................. 63 Comparing the Cases .................................................................................................... 69 Pursuing Excellence ...................................................................................................... 72 Origins of the Excellence Agenda ................................................................................ 74 Critiques of the Excellence Agenda .............................................................................. 76 A Critique of Bybee ...................................................................................................... 78 Lessons and Limits of Hacker ....................................................................................... 80 The Critical Value of Student Experience .................................................................... 81 Chapter 5. Student Experience of STEM Education ........................................................ 85 Where Theory Meets Practice? ..................................................................................... 85 Exploring Student Experience in “STEM School” ....................................................... 86 Method .......................................................................................................................... 89 vi Findings......................................................................................................................... 92 STEM Education as Symbolic Capital ......................................................................... 99 STEM Education for Homo Oeconomicus ................................................................. 102 Variation in the Experience of STEM Education ....................................................... 105 Variation in STEM Educational Policy ...................................................................... 107 Where Practice Meets Theory ..................................................................................... 108 Chapter 6. Avenues for STEM Education ...................................................................... 112 Confronting Antidemocratic Systems ......................................................................... 112 A Socio-Economic Heuristic ...................................................................................... 113 Left-Libertarianism as a Response to the Status Quo ................................................. 116 Social-Anarchist Education ........................................................................................ 120 Social-Anarchism and STEM Education .................................................................... 123 A Critique of Social-Anarchism ................................................................................. 126 A Critique of Social-Anarchist Education .................................................................. 132 Chesky and Wolfmeyer’s Anarcho-Critical STEM Education ................................... 135 A Reply to Chesky and Wolfmeyer’s Conceptualization ........................................... 137 Examples of “State-Critical” STEM Education .......................................................... 141 Considerations for “State-Critical” STEM Education ................................................ 143 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 149 Review ........................................................................................................................ 149 Outlook ....................................................................................................................... 151 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 153 Appendix A. A Consolidation of the Theoretical Critique ............................................. 160 The Vega Model ......................................................................................................... 162 Amending the Model .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Political Parties and Party Ideology
    Government Federal Political Parties and Party Ideology I Basics for the Teacher I Overview See Activity Sheet 4-2: Political Ideologies Discussed for the basics for This lesson is focused on devel- this lesson. oping knowledge of and understanding about the core political ideologies as they I Student Handouts evolved in the 20th century. The lesson is not intended to Activity Sheet 4-1: Your Political Compass create significant depth on Activity Sheet 4-2: Political Ideologies Discussed each ideology but to expose Activity Sheet 4-3: Political Ideologies Chart students to the range of politi- cal ideas that have some cur- Activity Sheet 4-4: Town Hall Meeting rency in modern politics. The lesson is also expected to aid in the refinement of existing polit- Instructions for the Teacher ical thought held by the stu- The curriculum you will teach is contained in the various handouts dents in your class. and answer keys contained in this lesson. Activity sheets provide background details, knowledge components, directions and assigned work. The materials developed for this lesson use a vari- ety of strategies but emphasize active learning and listening and I Objectives presentation skills to help prepare students. Access to a computer, at home or at school, will be an important component of these les- Students will: sons. However, materials have been provided to allow the teach- • Identify and understand ing of this lesson without classroom computer use - with the excep- the political platform of tion of some extension activities. each major federal party. • Understand the funda- Activity 1: Your Political Compass mental tenets of each fed- • This activity is designed to introduce the concept of political eral party’s ideology and ideology to the students and have them recognize that they place each party within have already formed a core of beliefs related to a political ide- the political spectrum or ology.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the 2017 Edition
    Introduction to the 2017 Edition Sheldon Wolin was our most important contemporary political theorist. He gave us a modern vocabulary to describe our decayed democracy and the poi- sonous effects of empire. He was a scholar who detested orthodoxies, rooted his understanding of democracy in the ancient concept of the Athenian demos and believed, like Max Weber, that politics was a vocation. Ralph Nader gave me Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism when it first came out in 2008. Nader, who has been fighting the abuse of corporate power longer and with perhaps more success than any other American, called it a “masterpiece.” Wolin cap- tured the political mutations caused by neoliberalism and coined the term “inverted totalitarianism” for the novel political and economic system it had spawned. He foresaw that this system of inverted totalitarianism would, as it has, eventually crush or hollow out our democratic institutions and give rise to an authoritarian or even totalitarian regime. Inverted totalitarianism is different from classical forms of totalitarianism. It does not find its expression in a demagogue or charismatic leader but in the faceless anonymity of the corporate state. Inverted totalitarianism pays out- ward fealty to the facade of electoral politics, the Constitution, civil liberties, freedom of the press, the independence of the judiciary, and the iconography, traditions and language of American patriotism, but it has effectively seized all of the mechanisms of power to render the citizen impotent. “Unlike the Nazis, who made life uncertain for the wealthy and privileged while providing social programs for the working class and poor, inverted totali- tarianism exploits the poor, reducing or weakening health programs and social services, regimenting mass education for an insecure workforce threatened by the importation of low- wage workers,” Wolin wrote.
    [Show full text]
  • Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes: a Comparison of Stalinism and Putinism
    TOTALITARIAN AND AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES: A COMPARISON OF STALINISM AND PUTINISM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ONUR YENGİL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EURASIAN STUDIES AUGUST 2016 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Pamir Dietrich Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Co-Supervisor Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Işık Kuşçu Bonnenfant (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı (METU, ADM) Assist. Prof. Dr. Yuliya Biletska (Karabük, IR) PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Onur Yengil Signature : iii ABSTRACT TOTALITARIAN AND AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES: A COMPARISON OF STALINISM AND PUTINISM Yengil, Onur M. Sc., Department of Eurasian Studies Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Co-Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ayşe Pamir Dietrich August 2016, 164 pages This thesis aims to compare and contrast Stalin’s Soviet Union with Putin’s post- Soviet Russia by looking at the totalitarian and authoritarian characteristics that these two periods as well as these two leaders display.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI Working Papers
    ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2011/57 ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES EUDO - European Union Democracy Observatory FOUR FUNERALS AND A PARTY? THE POLITICAL REPERTOIRE OF THE ITALIAN RADICALS Claudio M. Radaelli and Samuele Dossi EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES EUDO - EUROPEAN UNION DEMOCRACY OBSERVATORY Four Funerals and a Party? The Political Repertoire of the Italian Radicals CLAUDIO M. RADAELLI AND SAMUELE DOSSI EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2011/57 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper, or other series, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © 2011 Claudio M. Radaelli and Samuele Dossi Printed in Italy, November 2011 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), created in 1992 and directed by Stefano Bartolini since September 2006, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research and to promote work on the major issues facing the process of integration and European society. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes and projects, and a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration and the expanding membership of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Krisis
    WPF Historic Publication The Politics of Krisis Richard Sakwa December 31, 2010 Original copyright © 2010 by World Public Forum Dialogue of Civilizations Copyright © 2016 by Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute The right of Richard Sakwa to be identified as the author of this publication is hereby asserted. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views and opinions of the Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute, its co-founders, or its staff members. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, please write to the publisher: Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute gGmbH Französische Straße 23 10117 Berlin Germany +49 30 209677900 [email protected] The Politics of Krisis Richard Sakwa Professor of Russian and European Politics, University of Kent at Canterbury, United Kingdom Originally published 2010 in World Public Forum Dialogue of Civilizations Bulletin 7, 57–74. 1 The fall of the communist systems between 1989 and 1991 represented anti-revolutions, repudiating not just the systems themselves but also the political practices associated with them.1 These anti-revolutions were more than simply counter-revolutions but sought to transcend the logic on which the communist orders had been constructed. The collapse of the communist systems signalled the exhaustion of the ideology of Enlightenment revolution, the view that radical social change could be achieved by the application of reason and the political will of enlightened elites.
    [Show full text]
  • Being and Becoming Political in the Classroom
    Andreas Petrik Being and becoming political in the classroom The "foundation of a village-community"-simulation as genetic teaching and research setting The democracy and ideology gap in civic education When reflecting on the future of civic education and its best practices we should keep in mind the most salient similarity between teaching and politics: the gap between programs and practice. This is why we can talk about an important "rejuvenation" of this subject both in the United States and in Germany by the recent empirical turn. Instead of accepting the evidence that many students consider civic education as boring and see no learning effect, we started to examine by surveys and assessments, how civics is being taught and how it might be best taught, including to find explications and solutions for the youthful indifference toward institutional politics (e.g., Niemi & Niemi, 2007, 34- 35). So I will start with real classroom practice to unfold my perspective on the problems and challenges of present teaching and develop theoretical and practical didactical answers. Though my own best practice research refers to German experience, I will link my approach to the recent American didactic discussion to outline common future tasks. As I didn't get a chance yet to do research in American classes, I will inductively develop my didactic starting point using a classroom scene with a 11th or 12th grader published by Nancy and Richard Niemi (2007, 44-45). I have chosen it because the authors see it as typical and we can find here in a nutshell the core of two outstanding teaching and learning problems to be solved both in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Compass and Why Libertarianism Is Not Right-Wing
    The Political Compass and Why Libertarianism is not Right-Wing J C Lester Abstract The political distinction between left and right remains ideologically muddled. This was not always so, but an immediate return to the pristine usage is impractical. Putting a theory of social liberty to one side, this essay defends the interpretation of left-wing as personal-choice and right-wing as property-choice. This allows an axis that is north/choice (or state-free) and south/control (or state-ruled). This Political Compass clarifies matters without being tendentious or too complicated. It shows that what is called ‘libertarianism’ is north-wing. A quiz gives the reader’s Political Compass reading. Pristine clarity and modern confusion The modern political left/right division is too crude to accommodate many important political positions in a way that makes any sense. Libertarianism (or extreme classical liberalism) is sometimes placed, often implicitly or vaguely, somewhere on the extreme right. But can we say whether it ought to be to the right or left of other „right-wing‟ ideologies? How are we to indicate the extreme tolerance of personal choice (as regards drug use and consenting sexual practices, for instance) that libertarianism entails but which is not normally thought of as being right-wing? Samuel Brittan sees clearly the confusion in the modern left and right (though assuming a libertarian view of liberty): The dilemma of the [classical] liberal is that while Conservatives now use the language of individual freedom, they apply this only—if at all—to domestic economic questions. They are the less libertarian of the two parties—despite individual exceptions—on all matters of personal and social conduct, and are much the more hawk-like in their attitude to „foreign affairs‟.
    [Show full text]
  • SIGCHI Conference Paper Format
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: Feltwell, Tom, Wood, Gavin, Brooker, Phillip, Rowland, Scarlett, Baumer, Eric, Long, Kiel, Vines, John, Barnett, Julie and Lawson, Shaun (2020) Broadening Exposure to Socio-Political Opinions via a Pushy Smart Home Device. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’20): April 25–30, 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, NY. ISBN 9781450367080 Published by: Association for Computing Machinery, Inc URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376774 <https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376774> This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/41952/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neoliberal Pariah
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Education Theses and Dissertations College of Education Spring 2019 THE NEOLIBERAL PARIAH Jeremiah Howe DePaul University Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/soe_etd Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Howe, Jeremiah, "THE NEOLIBERAL PARIAH" (2019). College of Education Theses and Dissertations. 148. https://via.library.depaul.edu/soe_etd/148 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Education at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Education Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running Head: NEOLIBERAL PARIAH DePaul University College of Education THE NEOLIBERAL PARIAH A Master’s Thesis in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Education by Jeremiah Howe ©2019 Jeremiah Howe Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Education April, 2019 NEOLIBERAL PARIAH 1 NEOLIBERAL PARIAH 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................................4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................6 CHAPTER 1: Pariah(s) and the Jew as Pariah..............................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Polit
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2019-01-01 Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians? Jacqueline Ann Fiest University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Fiest, Jacqueline Ann, "Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians?" (2019). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1985. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1985 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? JACQUELINE ANN FIEST Master’s Program in Communication APPROVED: Eduardo Barrera, Ph.D., Chair Sarah De Los Santos Upton, Ph.D. Pratyusha Basu, Ph.D. Stephen Crites, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Jacqueline Ann Fiest 2019 Dedication This paper is dedicated to my dear friend Charlotte Wiedel. This would not have been possible without you. Thank you. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? by JACQUELINE ANN FIEST, BA THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010
    The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 Edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/rudd_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The Rudd government : Australian Commonwealth administration 2007 - 2010 / edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans. ISBN: 9781921862069 (pbk.) 9781921862076 (eBook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Rudd, Kevin, 1957---Political and social views. Australian Labor Party. Public administration--Australia. Australia--Politics and government--2001- Other Authors/Contributors: Aulich, Chris, 1947- Evans, Mark Dr. Dewey Number: 324.29407 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by ANU E Press Illustrations by David Pope, The Canberra Times Printed by Griffin Press Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Contributors . ix Part I. Introduction 1 . It was the best of times; it was the worst of times . 3 Chris Aulich 2 . Issues and agendas for the term . 17 John Wanna Part II. The Institutions of Government 3 . The Australian Public Service: new agendas and reform . 35 John Halligan 4 . Continuity and change in the outer public sector .
    [Show full text]
  • Document Version Publisher Pdf
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Pabst, Adrian (2016) Is Liberal Democracy Sliding into 'Democratic Despotism'? The Political Quarterly, 87 (1). pp. 91-95. ISSN 1467-923X. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12209 Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/51548/ Document Version Publisher pdf Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html The Political Quarterly Is Liberal Democracy Sliding into ‘Democratic Despotism’? ADRIAN PABST Abstract Post-democracy and cognate concepts suggest that the postwar period of democratisation has given way to a concentration of power in the hands of small groups that are unrepresen- tative and unaccountable, as exemplified by the rise of multinational corporations and their influence on democratic politics. This article goes further to argue that this does not fully capture the triple threat facing liberal democracy: first, the rise of a new oligarchy that strengthens executive power at the expense of parliament and people; second, the resurgence of populism and demagogy linked to a backlash against technocratic rule and procedural politics; third, the emergence of anarchy associated with the atomisation of society and a weakening of social ties and civic bonds.
    [Show full text]