DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction Notes Introduction 1. Two statements, made in passing, by two celebrated historians of Nazism and Soviet communism respectively, are good evi- dence of this tendency to assume that totalitarianism equals a structural model of political rule. See Ian Kershaw’s observa- tion that ‘the totalitarian concept allows comparative analysis of a number of techniques and instruments of domination’ (Kershaw, ‘“Working Towards the Führer”: Reflections on the Nature of the Hitler Dictatorship’, in, Stalinism and Nazism: Dictatorships in Comparison, ed. Ian Kershaw and Moshe Lewin [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997], 88). See also Robert Service’s statement that ‘[f]ascism was in many ways a structural copy of [the Soviet order], albeit with a different set of ideological purposes’ (Comrades. Communism: A World History [London: Pan, 2008], 9). 2. Note that here I argue against something of an emerging consensus. The case for classifying Fascist Italy as totalitarian has recently been argued most forcefully by Emilio Gentile. See Gentile, The Sacralization of Politics in Fascist Italy, trans. by Keith Botsford (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996). On the other hand, Hannah Arendt long ago established a convention of excluding the Italian case, mainly because it lacks a murderous aspect on anything approaching the same scale. See Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (London: Schocken, 2004 [orig. 1951], esp. 256–9). 3. It is an intellectual red herring to construct an account of totali- tarianism around Mussolini’s article ‘The Doctrine of Fascism’ in the Enciclopedie Italiana of 1932 (in fact authored by the ‘philosopher’ of Fascism, Giovanni Gentile). This primary docu- ment source does have the distinction, though, of championing a positive conception of ‘totalitarian’, rendered equivalent with the Fascist conception of the state. 4. See Richard Shorten, ‘Political Theology, Political Religion and Secularisation’, Political Studies Review, 8, 2 (2010), 180–91. 246 Notes 247 5. Stanley G. Payne, A History of Fascism, 1914–1945 (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1995), 494. On the debate about the ‘revolutionary’ status of totalitarianism, fascism, and com- munism, see both Roger Griffin, ‘Exploding the Continuum of History: A Non-Marxist’s Marxist Model of Fascism’s Revolutio- nary Dynamics’, in A Fascist Century (Houndmills: Macmillan, 2008) and David D. Roberts, ‘Fascism, Marxism, and the Question of Modern Revolution’, European Journal of Political Theory, 9, 2 (2010), 183–201. 6. See Richard Shorten, ‘The Failure of Political Argument: The Languages of Anti- Fascism and Anti- Totalitarianism in Post- September 11th Discourse’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11, 3 (2009), 479–503. 7. Michael Geyer (with assistance from Sheila Fitzpatrick), ‘Introduction. After Totalitarianism – Stalinism and Nazism Compared’, in Beyond Totalitarianism: Stalinism and Nazism Compared, ed. Michael Geyer and Sheila Fitzpatrick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 1–37. 8. On the German case, consult Jurgen Kocka, ‘German History before Hitler: The Debate about the German Sonderweg’, Journal of Contemporary History, 23 (1988), 3–16. For the continuity thesis in Russian history, see both Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990) and R.C. Tucker, Stalin in Power: The Revolution from Above, 1928–1941 (New York and London: W.W. Norton, 1990). 9. See, for instance, Jeffrey Herf’s suggestive notion of a ‘reaction- ary modernism’, which Herf first applied to the Third Reich and has since sought to apply more generally: Herf, Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984); Herf, ‘Liberal Legacies, Europe’s Totalitarian Era, and the Iraq War’, in A Matter of Principle: Humanitarian Arguments for War in Iraq, ed. Thomas Cushman (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2005). On anti- liberal political thought and practice, see Stephen Holmes, The Anatomy of Antiliberalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996). 10. On different strands of Marxism, see Alvin W. Gouldner, The Two Marxisms: Contradictions and Anomalies in the Development of Theory (London: Macmillan, 1980). 11. For a rejection of the concept, see Slavoj Žižek, Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism? Five Interventions in the (Mis)use of a Notion (London: Verso, 2001). 248 Notes 12. Some texts that deserve credit for breaking with this tendency are David D. Roberts, The Totalitarian Experiment in Twentieth- Century Europe: Understanding the Poverty of Great Politics (London: Routledge, 2006), and Roger Griffin, Modernism and Fascism: The Sense of a Beginning under Mussolini and Hitler (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007). 13. For this astute observation, see John Connolly, ‘Totalitarianism: Defunct Theory, Useful Word’, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 11, 4 (2010), 819. 14. See Kershaw and Lewin (eds), Stalinism and Nazism. 15. See Anson Rabinbach, ‘Moments of Totalitarianism’, History and Theory, 45 (2006), 72–100. 16. Beyond Mao’s China, the extension of the term ‘totalitarian’ to apply to the whole global range of communist regimes that evolved in the post-1945 era is conventional in some uses of the vocabulary. However, that use is rejected in this book. Another convention is that ‘Stalinism’ be used to include political rule in the satellite states of Eastern Europe after 1945. That is also rejected here. 17. Sheldon Wolin, Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008). 18. Peter Baehr, ‘The Novelty of Jihadist Terror’, Society, 46, 3 (2009), 210–13. 19. Shorten, ‘The Failure of Political Argument’, esp. 491–6. 20. This is one drawback of the otherwise excellent account in Roberts, The Totalitarian Experiment. Recent historical sur- veys of this kind are: Alan Bullock, Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives (London: HarperCollins, 1991); Kershaw and Lewin (eds), Stalinism and Nazism; Henry Rousso (ed.), Stalinism and Nazism: History and Memory Compared (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2004), trans. by Lucy Golsan et al.; Richard J. Overy, The Dictators: Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia (New York: W.W. Norton, 2004); Robert Gellately, Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler: The Age of Social Catastrophe (New York: Knopf, 2007). 21. See for example Margaret Canovan, Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of her Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), which locates totalitarianism at the centre of Arendt’s political philosophy. 22. Timothy Snyder, Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin (London: Bodley Head, 2010), 19. Notes 249 23. Intellectuals were drawn to totalitarianism, and the theme is a fascinating one. Nevertheless, it is not a principal theme of this book. See esp. Mark Lilla, The Reckless Mind: Intellectuals in Politics (New York: NYRB, 2001). For an excellent case study, see also Tony Judt, Past Imperfect: French Intellectuals, 1945–1956 (London: University of California Press, 1992). 24. At this point detractors might still complain that I have made an argument for thinking in terms of, say, ‘Nazi political thought’ or ‘Bolshevik political thought’, but not in terms of Hitler’s or Stalin’s political thought as such. It is true that nothing specific has been said that implies the centrality of the worldview of political leaders. However, this is where some of the historians who count themselves as ‘revisionists’ of the totalitarian model have overreached themselves: for example, there may have been no straight line from Mein Kampf to the Holocaust, and the sources of power in Nazi Germany may have been more dispersed than was once thought to be the case, but this is not to have demonstrated that Hitler’s writings and speeches did not express a view of the world that was internally coherent and, moreover, one around which the Nazi state was organised. There are good discussions of these issues (by two leading protagonists) in Martin Malia, ‘Revolution Fulfilled: How the Revisionists are Still Trying to Take the Ideology out of Stalinism’, Times Literary Supplement, 15 June 2001, 3–4; and Sheila Fitzpatrick, ‘Revisionism in Soviet History’, History and Theory, 46, 4 (2007), 77–91. In respect of current historiographic trends, ‘post-revisionism’ tends to point towards the linguistic turn and a more sophisticated appreciation of discourse and discursive practices. 25. Czeslaw Milosz, The Captive Mind (London: Penguin, 2001 [orig. 1953]), 199. 26. Tzvetan Todorov, Hope and Memory: Reflections on the Twentieth Century (London: Atlantic, 2005). 27. Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, vii–ix. 28. A fine attempt to do justice to the breadth and subtlety of Arendt on totalitarianism, which also reads her in connec- tion with her interlocutors, is Peter Baehr, Hannah Arendt, Totalitarianism, and the Social Sciences (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010). 29. On the historical approach to political thought, see Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics, Vol. 1: Regarding Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002); and J.G.A. Pocock, Political 250 Notes Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009). One short case study on anti- totalitarian discourse that also takes this contextualist approach is Robert Brier, ‘Adam Michnik’s Understanding of Totalitarianism and the Western European Left: A Historical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Total Work of Art in European Modernism Series Editor: Peter Uwe Hohendahl, Cornell University
    The Total Work of Art in European Modernism Series editor: Peter Uwe Hohendahl, Cornell University Signale: Modern German Letters, Cultures, and Thought publishes new English- language books in literary studies, criticism, cultural studies, and intellectual history pertaining to the German-speaking world, as well as translations of im- portant German-language works. Signale construes “modern” in the broadest terms: the series covers topics ranging from the early modern period to the present. Signale books are published under a joint imprint of Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library in electronic and print formats. Please see http://signale.cornell.edu/. The Total Work of Art in European Modernism David Roberts A Signale Book Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library Ithaca, New York Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library gratefully acknowledge the support of The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation for the publication of this volume. Copyright © 2011 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writ- ing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2011 by Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roberts, David, 1937– The total work of art in European modernism / David Roberts. p. cm. — (Signale : modern German letters, cultures, and thought) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5023-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Modernism (Aesthetics) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • June 10 Invite Crimes Against History
    Invitation to the virtual panel discussion: RUSSIA: “CRIMES AGAINST HISTORY” June 10, 4:00 pm (Paris time) State historical memory policy is often indicative Virtual panel of the extent to which the state respects human rights. In an attempt to legitimize the regime and discussion launching justify repressive policies, some states falsify history, impose censorship and crack down on the FIDH report alternative viewpoints of the past. Arbitrary arrests, fines and imprisonment, harassment and "Crimes against smear campaigns against historians, journalists, NGOs and other "history producers" daring to history in Russia" contradict the official narrative, when committed systematically, might amount to what one historian calls "crimes against history". > registration link: As the new FIDH report demonstrates, this term is particularly relevant to today's Russia. In 2020, the http://bit.ly/historycrimes official historical narrative, which centres on the victory in the Second World War, has been enshrined in the Constitution, where Russia is presented as the "successor to the Soviet Union" and the protector of "historical truth". Recent memory laws restrict freedom of expression, including the prohibition of criticism of the Soviet Union’s actions during the Second World War, historians like Yuri Dmitriev are prosecuted, NGOs face “Foreign Agent” laws. The monopoly on historical memory has become one of the pillars of the modern Russia, and anyone who dares to argue with the official narrative is persecuted by the regime. Virtual panel discussion (co-organised by FIDH and Mémorial-France): RUSSIA: “CRIMES AGAINST HISTORY” June 10, 4:00 pm (Paris time) Moderation: Panellists: Isabelle Mandraud, Grigory Vaypan Lead author of the report, Ph.D., Russian human rights lawyer and advocate for Le Monde victims of Soviet-era repressions.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo JOURNAL WATCH, a to I H-Diplo Journal and Periodical Review Third Quarter 2015 20 July 2015
    [jw] H-Diplo JOURNAL WATCH, A to I H-Diplo Journal and Periodical Review Third Quarter 2015 20 July 2015 Compiled by Erin Black, University of Toronto African Affairs, Vol.114, No. 456 (July 2015) http://afraf.oxfordjournals.org/content/vol114/issue456/ . “Rejecting Rights: Vigilantism and violence in post-apartheid South Africa,” by Nicholas Rush Smith, 341- . “Ethnicity, intra-elite differentiation and political stability in Kenya,” by Biniam E. Bedasso, 361- . “The political economy of grand corruption in Tanzania,” by Hazel S. Gray, 382- . The political economy of property tax in Africa: Explaining reform outcomes in Sierra Leone,” by Samuel S. Jibao and Wilson Prichard, 404- . “After restitution: Community, litigation and governance in South African land reform,” by Christiaan Beyers and Derick Fay, 432- Briefing . “Why Goodluck Jonathan lost the Nigerian presidential election of 2015,” by Olly Owen and Zainab Usmanm 455- African Historical Review, Vol. 46, No.2 (December 2014) http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rahr20/46/2 . “The Independence of Rhodesia in Salazar's Strategy for Southern Africa,” by Luís Fernando Machado Barroso, 1- This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. H-Diplo Journal Watch [jw], A-I, Third Quarter 2015 . “‘The Rebellion From Below’ and the Origins of Early Zionist Christianity,” by Barry Morton, 25- . “The Stag of the Eastern Cape: Power, Status and Kudu Hunting in the Albany and Fort Beaufort Districts, 1890 to 1905,” by David Gess & Sandra Swart, 48- .
    [Show full text]
  • The Carlyle Society
    THE CARLYLE SOCIETY SESSION 2006-2007 OCCASIONAL PAPERS 19 • Edinburgh 2006 President’s Letter This number of the Occasional Papers outshines its predecessors in terms of length – and is a testament to the width of interests the Society continues to sustain. It reflects, too, the generosity of the donation which made this extended publication possible. The syllabus for 2006-7, printed at the back, suggests not only the health of the society, but its steady move in the direction of new material, new interests. Visitors and new members are always welcome, and we are all warmly invited to the annual Scott lecture jointly sponsored by the English Literature department and the Faculty of Advocates in October. A word of thanks for all the help the Society received – especially from its new co-Chair Aileen Christianson – during the President’s enforced absence in Spring 2006. Thanks, too, to the University of Edinburgh for its continued generosity as our host for our meetings, and to the members who often anonymously ensure the Society’s continued smooth running. 2006 saw the recognition of the Carlyle Letters’ international importance in the award by the new Arts and Humanities Research Council of a very substantial grant – well over £600,000 – to ensure the editing and publication of the next three annual volumes. At a time when competition for grants has never been stronger, this is a very gratifying and encouraging outcome. In the USA, too, a very substantial grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities means that later this year the eCarlyle project should become “live” on the internet, and subscribers will be able to access all the volumes to date in this form.
    [Show full text]
  • A British Reflection: the Relationship Between Dante's Comedy and The
    A British Reflection: the Relationship between Dante’s Comedy and the Italian Fascist Movement and Regime during the 1920s and 1930s with references to the Risorgimento. Keon Esky A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. University of Sydney 2016 KEON ESKY Fig. 1 Raffaello Sanzio, ‘La Disputa’ (detail) 1510-11, Fresco - Stanza della Segnatura, Palazzi Pontifici, Vatican. KEON ESKY ii I dedicate this thesis to my late father who would have wanted me to embark on such a journey, and to my partner who with patience and love has never stopped believing that I could do it. KEON ESKY iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis owes a debt of gratitude to many people in many different countries, and indeed continents. They have all contributed in various measures to the completion of this endeavour. However, this study is deeply indebted first and foremost to my supervisor Dr. Francesco Borghesi. Without his assistance throughout these many years, this thesis would not have been possible. For his support, patience, motivation, and vast knowledge I shall be forever thankful. He truly was my Virgil. Besides my supervisor, I would like to thank the whole Department of Italian Studies at the University of Sydney, who have patiently worked with me and assisted me when I needed it. My sincere thanks go to Dr. Rubino and the rest of the committees that in the years have formed the panel for the Annual Reviews for their insightful comments and encouragement, but equally for their firm questioning, which helped me widening the scope of my research and accept other perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • From War to War – Europe During the First Half of the 20 Century
    From War to War – Europe during the first half of the 20th Century 15304.0052 – Winter Semester 2018/19 Lecturer: Dr. Johannes Müller, Mon – 10-11:30 – R. 0.01 (Building 326) European History during the 20th Century has been described as an “Age of Extremes” (Eric Hobsbawm), as a period in which the “Dark Continent” (Mark Mazower) went “to Hell and Back” (Ian Kershaw) and then had to be rebuild “Out of Ashes” (Konrad Jarausch). This is all the more surprising as the 19th Century seemed to forebode an age of culminating progress, characterised by scientific triumphs, civilizing achievements, accelerated discoveries and technological solutions for all problems and needs of mankind. Yet, the 20th century saw the most barbaric set- back Europe had experienced for ages: Two world-wars, slaughter and repression of entire people and populations, excesses of intolerance, hate and violence, dictatorship, tyranny and the spectre of nuclear apocalypse. Examining the first half of the 20th century is examining how Europe arrived at the edge of self-destruction. It also means to identify the lessons to be learnt by successive generations – as at least in part the second half of the century is reacting to and trying to avoid the errors of the first half. Historiography has just started to historicize the last century as a whole. Hence, we will also deal with competing interpretations which try to integrate the first half of the century into a comprehensive view of the entire epoch. Language of Sessions: English Papers may be written in English, German, French, Italian and Spanish Oral exams, where applicable, can be given in English, Italian and German.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Germany and Its Entanglements with Other Empires
    Journal of Global History (2017), 12, pp. 206–227 © Cambridge University Press 2017 doi:10.1017/S1740022817000055 Colonial crossovers: Nazi Germany and its entanglements with other empires Patrick Bernhard Niels Henrik Abels vei 36, Blindernveien 11, 0851 Oslo, Norway E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Nazi Germany’s place in the wider world is a controversial topic in historiography. While scholars such as Ian Kershaw argue that Hitler’s dictatorship must be understood as a unique national phenomenon, others analyse Nazism within comparative frameworks. Mark Mazower, for example, argues that the international concept of ‘empire’ is useful for comprehending the German occupation of Europe. Using an approach native to transnational cultural studies, my contribution goes a step further: I analyse how the Nazis themselves positioned their regime in a wider international context, and thus gave meaning to it. My main thesis is that, while the Nazis took a broad look at international colonialism, they differentiated considerably between the various national experiences. French and British empire-building, for instance, did not receive the same attention as Japanese and Italian colonial projects. Based on new archival evidence, I show that the act of referring in particular to the Italian example was crucial for the Nazis. On the one hand, drawing strong parallels between Italian colonialism and the German rule of eastern Europe allowed Hitler to recruit support for his own visions of imperial conquest. On the other hand, Italian colonialism served as a blueprint for the Nazis’ plans for racial segregation. The article thus shows the importance of transnational exchange for under- standing ideological dynamics within the Nazi regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the 2017 Edition
    Introduction to the 2017 Edition Sheldon Wolin was our most important contemporary political theorist. He gave us a modern vocabulary to describe our decayed democracy and the poi- sonous effects of empire. He was a scholar who detested orthodoxies, rooted his understanding of democracy in the ancient concept of the Athenian demos and believed, like Max Weber, that politics was a vocation. Ralph Nader gave me Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism when it first came out in 2008. Nader, who has been fighting the abuse of corporate power longer and with perhaps more success than any other American, called it a “masterpiece.” Wolin cap- tured the political mutations caused by neoliberalism and coined the term “inverted totalitarianism” for the novel political and economic system it had spawned. He foresaw that this system of inverted totalitarianism would, as it has, eventually crush or hollow out our democratic institutions and give rise to an authoritarian or even totalitarian regime. Inverted totalitarianism is different from classical forms of totalitarianism. It does not find its expression in a demagogue or charismatic leader but in the faceless anonymity of the corporate state. Inverted totalitarianism pays out- ward fealty to the facade of electoral politics, the Constitution, civil liberties, freedom of the press, the independence of the judiciary, and the iconography, traditions and language of American patriotism, but it has effectively seized all of the mechanisms of power to render the citizen impotent. “Unlike the Nazis, who made life uncertain for the wealthy and privileged while providing social programs for the working class and poor, inverted totali- tarianism exploits the poor, reducing or weakening health programs and social services, regimenting mass education for an insecure workforce threatened by the importation of low- wage workers,” Wolin wrote.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth, Gender, and Education in Fascist Italy, 1922-1939 Jennifer L
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current Honors College Spring 2015 The model of masculinity: Youth, gender, and education in Fascist Italy, 1922-1939 Jennifer L. Nehrt James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019 Part of the European History Commons, History of Gender Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Nehrt, Jennifer L., "The model of masculinity: Youth, gender, and education in Fascist Italy, 1922-1939" (2015). Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current. 66. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019/66 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Model of Masculinity: Youth, Gender, and Education in Fascist Italy, 1922-1939 _______________________ An Honors Program Project Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate College of Arts and Letters James Madison University _______________________ by Jennifer Lynn Nehrt May 2015 Accepted by the faculty of the Department of History, James Madison University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors Program. FACULTY COMMITTEE: HONORS PROGRAM APPROVAL: Project Advisor: Jessica Davis, Ph.D. Philip Frana, Ph.D., Associate Professor, History Interim Director, Honors Program Reader: Emily Westkaemper, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, History Reader: Christian Davis, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, History PUBLIC PRESENTATION This work is accepted for presentation, in part or in full, at Honors Symposium on April 24, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitating the Witch: the Literary Representation of the Witch
    RICE UNIVERSITY Rehabilitating the Witch: The Literary Representation of the Witch from the Malleus Maleficarum to Les Enfants du sabbat by Lisa Travis Blomquist A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE Doctor of Philosophy APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE Dr. Bernard Aresu Dr. Elias Bongmba, Professor ofRe · ious Studies Holder of the Harry and Hazel Chavanne Chair in Christian Theology HOUSTON, TX DECEMBER 2011 ABSTRACT Rehabilitating the Witch: The Literary Representation of the Witch from the Malleus Maleficarum to Les Enfants du sabbat by Lisa Travis Blomquist The representation of the witch in French literature has evolved considerably over the centuries. While originally portrayed as a benevolent and caring healer in works by Marie de France, Chretien de Troyes, and the anonymous author of Amadas et Ydoine, the witch eventually underwent a dramatic and unfortunate transformation. By the fifteenth century, authors began to portray her as a malevolent and dangerous agent of the Christian Devil. Martin Le Franc, Pierre de Ronsard, Joachim du Bellay, Fran9ois Rabelais, and Pierre Comeille all created evil witch figures that corresponded with this new definition. It was not until the eighteenth century, through the works of Voltaire and the Encyclopedistes, that the rehabilitation of the witch began. By the twentieth century, Anne Hebert, Jean-Paul Sartre, Maryse Conde, and Sebastiano Vassalli began to rewrite the witch character by engaging in a process of demystification and by demonstrating that the "witch" was really just a victim of the society in which she lived. These authors humanized their witch figures by concentrating on the victimization of their witch protagonists and by exposing the ways in which their fictional societies unjustly created identities for their witch protagonists that were based on false judgments and rumors.
    [Show full text]
  • Mussolini's Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità
    “A Mysterious Revival of Roman Passion”: Mussolini’s Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità Benjamin Barron Senior Honors Thesis in History HIST-409-02 Georgetown University Mentored by Professor Foss May 4, 2009 “A Mysterious Revival of Roman Passion”: Mussolini’s Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità CONTENTS Preface and Acknowledgments ii List of Illustrations iii Introduction 1 I. Mussolini and the Power of Words 7 II. The Restrained Side of Mussolini’s Romanità 28 III. The Shift to Imperialism: The Second Italo-Ethiopian War 1935 – 1936 49 IV. Romanità in Mussolini’s New Roman Empire 58 Conclusion 90 Bibliography 95 i PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first came up with the topic for this thesis when I visited Rome for the first time in March of 2008. I was studying abroad for the spring semester in Milan, and my six-month experience in Italy undoubtedly influenced the outcome of this thesis. In Milan, I grew to love everything about Italy – the language, the culture, the food, the people, and the history. During this time, I traveled throughout all of Italian peninsula and, without the support of my parents, this tremendous experience would not have been possible. For that, I thank them sincerely. This thesis would not have been possible without a few others whom I would like to thank. First and foremost, thank you, Professor Astarita, for all the time you put into our Honors Seminar class during the semester. I cannot imagine how hard it must have been to read all of our drafts so intently. Your effort has not gone unnoticed.
    [Show full text]
  • Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes: a Comparison of Stalinism and Putinism
    TOTALITARIAN AND AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES: A COMPARISON OF STALINISM AND PUTINISM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ONUR YENGİL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EURASIAN STUDIES AUGUST 2016 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Pamir Dietrich Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Co-Supervisor Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Işık Kuşçu Bonnenfant (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı (METU, ADM) Assist. Prof. Dr. Yuliya Biletska (Karabük, IR) PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Onur Yengil Signature : iii ABSTRACT TOTALITARIAN AND AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES: A COMPARISON OF STALINISM AND PUTINISM Yengil, Onur M. Sc., Department of Eurasian Studies Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Co-Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ayşe Pamir Dietrich August 2016, 164 pages This thesis aims to compare and contrast Stalin’s Soviet Union with Putin’s post- Soviet Russia by looking at the totalitarian and authoritarian characteristics that these two periods as well as these two leaders display.
    [Show full text]