Hearings Ibebore the Committee on Science and Astronautics U,S, House of Representatives Ninety-First Congress Second Session
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE APOLLO 13 ACCIDENT HEARINGS IBEBORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND ASTRONAUTICS U,S, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 16, 1970 [No. 191 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science and Astronautics U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 47-591 0 WASHINGTON : 1970 COJIJIITTEE OS SCIESCE ASD ASTROSAUTICS GEORGE P. MILLER, California, Chairmarr OLIS E. TEAGUE, Texas JBJIES G. FCLTOS, Pennsylvania JOSEPH E. KARTH, Minnesota CHARLES A. NOSHER, Ohio KES HECHLER, West Virginia RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH, Indiana EhIILIO Q. DADDARIO, Connecticut ALPHOKZO BELL, California JOHX W.DAVIS, Georgia THOJfAS 11. PELLY, Washington THOMAS N. DOWNING, Virginia JOHN W. WYDLER, Sew Tork JOE D. WAGGONSER, JR.,Louisiana GUT T'ASDER JAGT, Michigan DOS FUQUA, Florida LARRY WIKN, JR.,Kansas GEORGE E. BROWS, JR., California D. E. (BUZ) LUKENS, Ohio EARLE CABELL, Texas ROBERT PRICE, Texas BERTRAM L. PODELL, New York LOWELL P. WEICKER, JR.,Connecticut WAYNE N. ASPISALL, Colorado LOUIS FREY, JR.,Florida ROY A. TAYLOR, Xorth Carolina BARRY >I, GOLDWATER, JR., California HENRY HELSTOSKI, New Jersey XiRIO BIBGGI, New York JAMES W. SYXINGTON, Missouri EDWARD I. KOCH, New York CHARLESF. DVCASDER,Czecictive Director and Chief Counsel JOHS A. C.ARSTARPHES,Jr., Cltief Clerk and COitnsel PHILIPB. TEAGER,Counsel FRAsK R. HAMXILL,Jr., Coztnsel 11'. H. BoosE, Tecliiiical Consultant JAMESE. WILSOS, Tecltnical Consultant RICHARDP. HIKES,Staff Consultant HAROLDA. COULD,Technical Consztltant J. THOXASRATCHFORD, Science COllStLltant PHILIPP. DICKISSOS, Technical Consultant W~LLIAMG. WELLS,Jr., Technical Consultant K. GUILDSICHOLS, Jr., Staff Consultant ELIZABETHS. KERSAS,Scientific Research Assistant FRAKK J. GIROUX,Clerk DESIS C. QUIGLET,Publicatioits Clerk RICHARDK. SHULLAW,Assistant Publications Clerk JaJfEs A. ROSE,Jr., Minoritg Staff (11) CONTENTS STATEMENTS June 16, 1970: Page Dr. Thomas 0. Paine, Administrator, NASA _________..___________2 Edgar M. Cortright, chairman, Apollo 13 Review Board [Director, Langley Research Center) ; accompanied by the following members of the Apollo 13 Review Board: Robert F. Allnutt (assistant to the Administrator, NASA Head- quarters) Xeil Armstrong [Astronaut, Manned Spacecraft Center) Dr. John F. Clark (Director, Goddard Space Flight Center) Brig. Gen. Walter R. Hedrick, Jr. (Director of Space, DCS/ R. & D., Headquarters, USAF) Tincent L. Johnson (Deputy Associate Administrator-Engineer- ing, Office of Space Science and Applications) Milton Klein (manager, AEC-NASA Space Nuclear Propulsion Office) George Malley, counsel, Apollo 13 Review Board (chief counsel, Langley Research Center) ______________..________________3 PREPAREDSTATEMEST Edgar 11. Cortright, chairman, Apollo 13 Review Board [Director, Langley Research Center) ______.____________.__________________L_---.--..3 APPEXDIX Summary volume of Apollo 13 Review Board Report _______.__.____.._83 (111) THE APOLLO 13 ACCIDENT TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 1970 HOUSEOF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEEON SCIENCEAND ASTRONAUTICS, Washington, D.C. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10 :05 a.m., in room 2318, Rayburn House Office Building, Ron. George P. Miller, chairman, presiding. The CHAIRMAN.The committee will be in order. Dr. Paine, hfr. Cortright, members of the Apollo 13 Review Board, we are pleased to welcome you to the committee today for the purpose of presenting findings, determinations, and recommendations of the A 0110 13 Review Board. %r. Paine, I would like to commend you for the appointment of a most competent and outstanding board to review the Apollo 13 ac- cident and the circumstances surrounding it. Mr. Cortright, whom this committee knows well, has distinguished himself not only as an administrator in the NASA Headquarters or- ganization but also as a field center director at Langley Research Center. The other members of the board are similarly well qualified to have participated in this intensive and searching review. As I stated at the time of the Apollo 13 accident the committee de- cided that sufficient time should be allowed for NASA to fully investi- gate the accident and at such time that this investi ation was com- pleted the committee would convene to receive NASa ’s evaluation of the accident. Therefore, I have asked you to appear here today even though the board’s report was only submitted to you yesterday, Dr. Paine, because I feel it is important that the members of the committee receive a first- hand and timely review of the Apollo 13 accident. Dr. Paine, I understand you have a short statement and then Mr. Cortright will go into the details of the accident and the board’s findings. I want to give all members an opportunity to ask questions, so will you please proceed. Before proceeding, I would also like to make a part of the record the fact that Mr. Wilson of the staff of the committee was appointed to act as an obsen-er with the boa.rd. I want to thank you for the courtesies you have shown us and it has given us a new system of liaison. Please proceed, Dr. Paine. (1) 2 STATEMENT OF DR. THOMAS 0. PAINE, ADMINISTRATOR, NASA Dr. PAINE.Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, on April 17, Dr. George Low and I established the Apollo 18 Review Board under the direction of Mr. Edgar &I.Cortright, director of the Lang- ley Research Center. The instructions to the board are contained in a memorandum dated April 17, and the membership of the board in a memorandum dated April 20, 1970. ~vhichare reproduced in the sum- mary volume of the report you have received. The past 2 months have involved long hours and very hard work by the review board and supporting elements in NL4SA and the indus- trial community. I would like to take this opportunity to extend my thanks to them for the thoroughness of their investigation and their dedication to this arduous assignment. Since I received the review board report only yesterday, I hare not had a chance to review it in detail. Nor have I had the benefit of the independent assessment which is being carried out by the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, chaired by Dr. Charles Harrington. The Office of Manned Space Flight is also conducting a separate review of the report. In about 10 days I will receive the results of the safety panel and the manned space flight review. Until I have received and studied these re- ports. I will obviously not be in a. position to give you my evaluation of the board‘s recommendations or NASA‘s future actions. Earlier re announced a change in our lunar landing schedule in- volving a delay of the Bpollo 14 launch from October to the December launch window. However, this is subject to rei-iexT in light of the re- port of the Apollo 13 Reiyiew Board and we n-ill not fly Apollo 14 to the moon until we are confident that we have done everything necessary to eliminate the conditions that caused or contributed to the problems on Apollo 13. I believe that, as we plan man’s future course in space, the preface to this report should be a reminder of the nature of the challenge rre have undertaken. Let me quote : The Apollo 13 accident, which aborted man’s third mission to explore the sur- face of the moon, is a harsh reminder of the immense difficulty of this under- taking. The total Apollo system of ground complexes, launch vehicle, and spacecraft constitutes the most ambitious and demanding engineering development ever undertaken by man. For these missions to succeed, both men and equipment must perform to near perfection. That this system has already resulted in two success- ful lunar surface explorations is a tribute to those men and women who con- ceived, designed, built, and flew it. Perfection is not only difficult to achieve, but difficult to maintain. The im- perfection in hpollo 13 constituted a near disaster. adverted only by outstanding performance on the part of the crew and the ground control team ivhich sup- ported them. The Board feels that the nature of the Apollo 13 equipment failure ho!ds im- portant lessons rrhich, TThen applied to future missions, will contribute to the safety and effectiveness of manned space flight. Afr, Chairman, there has been time for me to reach one conclusion on the report of the Apollo 13 Review Board, and that is that the board and their supporting teams have done a. magnificent piece of technical detective work that carefully reconstructs the background and the events xhich took place aboard Apollo 13 800,000 miles from earth. 3 1 JT-ould110~ like to introduce the chairman of the rerieJT board, Mr. Edgar Cortright, who will briefly discuss the report and respond to your questions. The CH~IIRMAX.Thank you T-ery much, Dr. Paine. FFTe are very happy to have you here, Mr. Cortright. STATEMENT OF EDGAR M. CORTRIGHT, CHAIRMAN, APOLLO 13 REVIEW BOARD ; DIRECTOR, LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER Mr. CORTRIGHT.Thank you, Mr, Chairman. I have a prepared statement and, vith your permission, I will sub- mit this for the record and attempt to convey to sou JThat the Board has done and what our conclusions hare been in a more informal manner. The CHAIRMAS.Without objection, that rill be the manner in which m-e will proceed. (The prepared statement of Mr. Cortright is as follows :) PREPARED STATEMEST OF EDGAR M. CORTRIGHT, CHAIRJIKX, APOLLO 13, REVIEW BOARD, KATIOSAL AEROSAUTICS AISD SPACE ADJIISISTRATION Air. Chairman and Members of the Committee : I appreciate this opportunity to appear before the Committee to summarize tlie Report of the Apollo 13 Review Board. As you know, yesterday I presented this Report on behalf of the Board to the Administrator and Deputy Administrator. Copies of the Report vere given to the Members and Staff of the Committee, and the Report was made public yesterday afternoon, at which time Dr. Paine and I held a press conference.