Lobbying : the Art of Political Persuasion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lobbying : the Art of Political Persuasion lobbying_fullcover:lobbying 30/09/2008 09:54 Page 1 "This book covers the waterfront of what Lobbying is a global industry which thrives wherever democratic "The leading book on lobbying by the UK's lobbying is, why we need it, who the key governments are established. This book straddles the globe, from the Lobbying leading expert. Lionel Zetter takes a players are and how it all works. Lionel USA to Japan. It covers the Westminster and Scottish Parliaments, and comprehensive, in-depth approach and Zetter has combined hard facts, expert the Welsh, Northern Ireland and London Assemblies. It examines the Lionel Zetter writes with authority and enthusiasm. interpretation and real-world practitioner lobbying scenes in the USA and Brussels. Finally, the book also deals with Whether you're in PR, PA, in house, insights into a very readable whole." Asia, and touches on the Middle East. consultancy or a client - this is the book for Tim Rycroft, Diageo you." This book examines and explains all aspects of lobbying in an expert yet Elisabeth Lewis-Jones, President, the accessible manner. Areas covered include: "Rigorous and insightful...the definitive Chartered Institute of Public Relations handbook for anyone interested in the • The historical background to lobbying, and the ethical and regulatory craft of lobbying, from industry veteran frameworks "If you read only one book on lobbying, make sure it's this one. Zetter's mastery of his to A-Level politics student." • The mechanics of lobbying, and the techniques employed by lobbyists subject proves why the industry voted him John Lehal, Managing Director, around the world Insight Public Affairs Public Affairs Personality of the Year 2008." • The various types of lobbying and public affairs campaigns Francis Ingham, Director General & "Public affairs in the UK has no more • Advice on how to break in to lobbying Managing Director, Public Relations diplomatic an ambassador and no more Consultants Association valiant a champion than Zetter." • The procedure for appointing a public affairs consultancy Jonathan Bracken, Partner and Head of • How to use third party advocates in support of a campaign "Public affairs, so often misunderstood and Public Policy, Bircham Dyson Bell poorly explained, has a superb champion in The author is an acknowledged expert in his field, and this book Lionel Zetter: he writes a brilliant analysis of Lionel Zetter represents a distillation of his decades of experience. There are also ‘top lobbying that is a must read for anyone tips’ from some of the most senior lobbyists in the world, as well as wanting to understand the industry, from the The author has been associate director of contributions from elected politicians. seasoned practitioner to the curious the Media Information Group, company Lionel Zetter observer." secretary of PR+CI, managing director of Robbie MacDuff, Director of Public Affairs, "If you buy one book about lobbying make it this one" Parliamentary Monitoring Services Ltd and Precise Public Affairs and Chair of the Jon McLeod, Chairman, UK Public Affairs, Weber Shandwick Political Wizard Ltd, and non-executive Association of Professional Political deputy chairman of Dods Parliamentary Consultants (APPC) Communications Ltd. He is a former "This will be the new Bible for lobbyists. An indispensable guide for chairman of the Government Affairs public affairs professionals." Neil Sherlock, Partner Public Affairs, KPMG "Lionel Zetter understands better than most Group, and former president of the the realities of lobbying and its relevance to Chartered Institute of Public Relations. He good governance in the UK. This is an is a member of the NUJ, and a Fellow of "The best book on the art of lobbying yet written" Iain Dale, Blogger and publisher, Total Politics Lobbying affectionate yet serious analysis by somebody the Royal Society of Arts. In 2008 he was who cares about the lobbying industry. It voted Personality of the Year by the "The best definition of politics is who gets what, when, where and how. should be read by anybody who wants to readers of Public Affairs News. This excellent book shows you the when, where and how." understand how British politics really - Edmund King, President, Automobile Association The Art of Political Persuasion works..." He is currently an independent consultant, Peter Bingle, Chairman, a director of the Enterprise Forum, and Bell Pottinger Public Affairs vice president of PublicAffairsAsia. ISBN 978-1905641697 "Comprehensive, wide ranging and accessible...the first book to span the world Hh Harriman House Hh Hh of lobbying from London, Brussels and £24.99 9 781905 641697 Washington to Asia." David Earnshaw, Chairman, Burson-Marsteller Brussels Lobbying The Art of Political Persuasion by Lionel Zetter HARRIMAN HOUSE LTD 3A Penns Road Petersfield Hampshire GU32 2EW GREAT BRITAIN Tel: +44 (0)1730 233870 Fax: +44 (0)1730 233880 Email: [email protected] Website: www.harriman-house.com First published in Great Britain in 2008 Copyright © Harriman House Ltd The right of Lionel Zetter to be identified as the author has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. 978-1-905641-69-1 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A CIP catalogue record for this book can be obtained from the British Library. All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the Publisher. This book may not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published without the prior written consent of the Publisher. We have done our utmost to contact all the necessary copyright holders prior to publication for all photos and press clippings that are not owned by the author. Printed and bound in Great Britain by Athenaeum Press Limited, Tyne & Wear. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person or corporate body acting or refraining to act as a result of reading material in this book can be accepted by the Publisher, by the Author, or by the employer of the Author. Praise for Lobbying “If you read only one book on lobbying, make sure it's this one. Zetter's mastery of his subject proves why the industry voted him Public Affairs Personality of the Year 2008.” – Francis Ingham, Director General & Managing Director, Public Relations Consultants Association “The leading book on lobbying by the UK's leading expert. Lionel Zetter takes a comprehensive, in-depth approach and writes with authority and enthusiasm. Whether you're in PR, PA, in house, consultancy or a client – this is the book for you.” – Elisabeth Lewis-Jones, President, Chartered Institute of Public Relations “Public affairs, so often misunderstood and poorly explained, has a superb champion in Lionel Zetter: he writes a brilliant analysis of lobbying that is a must read for anyone wanting to understand the industry, from the seasoned practitioner to the curious observer.” – Robbie MacDuff, Director of Public Affairs, Precise Public Affairs and Chair of the Association of Professional Political Consultants (APPC) “This will be the new Bible for lobbyists. An indispensable guide for public affairs professionals.” – Neil Sherlock, Partner Public Affairs, KPMG “The best book on the art of lobbying yet written.” – Iain Dale, Blogger and publisher Total Politics “If you buy one book about lobbying make it this one.” – Jon McLeod, Chairman, UK Public Affairs, Weber ShandWick iii Lobbying – The Art of Political Persuasion “Lionel Zetter understands better than most the realities of lobbying and its relevance to good governance in the UK. This is an affectionate yet serious analysis by somebody who cares about the lobbying industry. It should be read by anybody who wants to understand how British politics really works ...” – Peter Bingle, Chairman, Bell Pottinger Public Affairs “To my knowledge this book is unique in its breadth, depth and geographical scope and I have no doubt that it will quickly become established as an essential companion for public affairs practitioners. It pulls off the unusual feat of being both practical and entertaining and, in my experience, it all rings true. It is an added bonus that Lionel Zetter's fabled network of contacts has also enabled him to pull together incisive and useful tips from senior practitioners across the lobbying business.” – Michael Burrell, Edleman “The best definition of politics is who gets what, when, where and how. This excellent book shows you the when, where and how.” – Edmund King, President, Automobile Association “Lionel runs the range from nuts and bolts public affairs handbook to lobbying masterclass – this will be required reading for lobbyists, clients and policymakers.” – KeVin Bell, Regional President, Fleishman Hillard UK, Africa and the Middle East “This book is great! As someone who has almost been around as long as Lionel – it was great to have such an up-to-date take on who we are, what we actually do and why we are worth it. This book is very informed, illuminating and, I think, the ultimate guide to lobbying.” – Gill Morris, Managing Director, Connect Public Affairs “This book covers the waterfront of what lobbying is, why we need it, who the key players are and how it all works. Lionel Zetter has combined hard facts, expert interpretation and real-world practitioner insights into a very readable whole.” – Tim Rycroft, Diageo iv Praise for Lobbying “Comprehensive, wide ranging and accessible...the first book to span the world of lobbying from London, Brussels and Washington to Asia.” – David Earnshaw, Chairman, Burson-Marsteller Brussels “Zetter provides one of the most in-depth analyses of lobbying and how it works. Unlike many, he has looked beyond Brussels, Westminster and the Beltway to examine the role of lobbying in the emerging markets.
Recommended publications
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutionalism and the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act Reference Shannon Hale* and Dwight Newman, QC**
    31 Constitutionalism and the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act Reference Shannon Hale* and Dwight Newman, QC** I. Introduction In the July 10, 2020 decision in Reference re Genetic Non-Discrimination Act (GNDA Reference),1 the Supreme Court of Canada arrived at a complex three-to-two-to-four outcome, with a slim five-justice majority in two separate judgments upholding challenged portions of the fed- eral Genetic Non-Discrimination Act (GNDA)2 as a valid exercise of Parliament’s criminal law power. The legislation, which some thought fundamentally oriented to the goal of preventing genetic discrimination, seemed to have attractive policy objectives, though we will ultimately suggest that the form of the legislation was not entirely in keeping with these aims. While it may have appeared pragmatically attractive to uphold the legislation, we suggest that the majority’s decision to do so comes at great cost to basic federalism principles, to legal predict- ability, and to prospects for well-informed intergovernmental cooperation. We argue that the courts must properly confine the effects of the GNDA Reference in accordance with established principles on the treatment of fragmented judicial opinions. We also argue that the courts must take significant steps to ensure that federalism jurisprudence remains well-grounded in legal principle, without the actual or apparent influence of extra-legal policy considerations. * BA, MSc, JD, Member of the Ontario bar. Research Associate, University of Saskatchewan College of Law (September 2020 to December 2020 term). ** BA, JD, BCL, MPhil, DPhil, Member of the Ontario and Saskatchewan bars. Professor of Law & Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Rights in Constitutional and International Law, University of Saskatchewan College of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • OPENING PANDORA's BOX David Cameron's Referendum Gamble On
    OPENING PANDORA’S BOX David Cameron’s Referendum Gamble on EU Membership Credit: The Economist. By Christina Hull Yale University Department of Political Science Adviser: Jolyon Howorth April 21, 2014 Abstract This essay examines the driving factors behind UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s decision to call a referendum if the Conservative Party is re-elected in 2015. It addresses the persistence of Euroskepticism in the United Kingdom and the tendency of Euroskeptics to generate intra-party conflict that often has dire consequences for Prime Ministers. Through an analysis of the relative impact of political strategy, the power of the media, and British public opinion, the essay argues that addressing party management and electoral concerns has been the primary influence on David Cameron’s decision and contends that Cameron has unwittingly unleashed a Pandora’s box that could pave the way for a British exit from the European Union. Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank the Bates Summer Research Fellowship, without which I would not have had the opportunity to complete my research in London. To Professor Peter Swenson and the members of The Senior Colloquium, Gabe Botelho, Josh Kalla, Gabe Levine, Mary Shi, and Joel Sircus, who provided excellent advice and criticism. To Professor David Cameron, without whom I never would have discovered my interest in European politics. To David Fayngor, who flew halfway across the world to keep me company during my summer research. To my mom for her unwavering support and my dad for his careful proofreading. And finally, to my adviser Professor Jolyon Howorth, who worked with me on this project for over a year and a half.
    [Show full text]
  • Bordering Two Unions: Northern Ireland and Brexit
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics de Mars, Sylvia; Murray, Colin; O'Donoghue, Aiofe; Warwick, Ben Book — Published Version Bordering two unions: Northern Ireland and Brexit Policy Press Shorts: Policy & Practice Provided in Cooperation with: Bristol University Press Suggested Citation: de Mars, Sylvia; Murray, Colin; O'Donoghue, Aiofe; Warwick, Ben (2018) : Bordering two unions: Northern Ireland and Brexit, Policy Press Shorts: Policy & Practice, ISBN 978-1-4473-4622-7, Policy Press, Bristol, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv56fh0b This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/190846 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Legislation (Wales) Bill
    Number: WG34368 Welsh Government Consultation Document Draft Legislation (Wales) Bill Date of issue : 20 March 2018 Action required : Responses by 12 June 2018 Mae’r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg. This document is also available in Welsh. © Crown Copyright Overview This document sets out the Welsh Government’s proposals to improve the accessibility and statutory interpretation of Welsh law, and seeks views on the Draft Legislation (Wales) Bill. How to respond Please send your written response to the address below or by email to the address provided. Further information Large print, Braille and alternative language and related versions of this document are available on documents request. Contact details For further information: Office of the Legislative Counsel Welsh Government Cathays Park Cardiff CF10 3NQ email: [email protected] telephone: 0300 025 0375 Data protection The Welsh Government will be data controller for any personal data you provide as part of your response to the consultation. Welsh Ministers have statutory powers they will rely on to process this personal data which will enable them to make informed decisions about how they exercise their public functions. Any response you send us will be seen in full by Welsh Government staff dealing with the issues which this consultation is about or planning future consultations. In order to show that the consultation was carried out properly, the Welsh Government intends to publish a summary of the responses to this document. We may also publish responses in full. Normally, the name and address (or part of the address) of the person or 1 organisation who sent the response are published with the response.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Agenda for Constitutional Reform
    UCL DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Constitution Unit Department of Political Science UniversityThe Constitution College London Unit 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU phone: 020 7679 4977 fax: 020 7679 4978 The Conservative email: [email protected] www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit A genda for Constitutional The Constitution Unit at UCL is the UK’s foremost independent research body on constitutional change. It is part of the UCL School of Public Policy. THE CONSERVATIVE Robert Hazell founded the Constitution Unit in 1995 to do detailed research and planning on constitutional reform in the UK. The Unit has done work on every aspect AGENDA of the UK’s constitutional reform programme: devolution in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the English regions, reform of the House of Lords, electoral reform, R parliamentary reform, the new Supreme Court, the conduct of referendums, freedom eform Prof FOR CONSTITUTIONAL of information, the Human Rights Act. The Unit is the only body in the UK to cover the whole of the constitutional reform agenda. REFORM The Unit conducts academic research on current or future policy issues, often in collaboration with other universities and partners from overseas. We organise regular R programmes of seminars and conferences. We do consultancy work for government obert and other public bodies. We act as special advisers to government departments and H parliamentary committees. We work closely with government, parliament and the azell judiciary. All our work has a sharply practical focus, is concise and clearly written, timely and relevant to policy makers and practitioners. The Unit has always been multi disciplinary, with academic researchers drawn mainly from politics and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bills in Parliament
    House of Commons Background Paper: Public Bills in Parliament Standard Note: SN/PC/06507 Last updated: 17 December 2012 Author: Simon Patrick and Mark Sandford Section Parliament & Constitution Centre This Standard Note sets out how legislation is passed through the House of Commons and the House of Lords and explains the terms involved. It includes details of public Bills - i.e. legislation introduced by the Government and by backbench members of Parliament – and hybrid Bills – legislation normally introduced by the Government but which has some specific effects on particular localities or groups of people. The third type of legislation, private Bills, is handled via a number of quite different procedures. These are described in the Library standard note Private Bills in Parliament (SN/PC/06508). Bills are draft laws, and must be considered by and agreed to by both Houses of Parliament in an agreed form before they become Acts of Parliament. Most of those that become law are introduced by the Government: however, individual Members can introduce Private Members’ Bills. These rarely become law without Government support. A Bill undergoes similar procedures in each House. It has three ‘readings’ and, between second and third readings, a ‘committee stage’; in the latter, the Bill is scrutinised clause by clause. There is normally also a ‘report stage’ after the committee stage. After the Bill passes all of these stages in one House, it moves on to the other House. Most high-profile bills, though not all, begin in the Commons. The annual Finance Bill, which gives effect to the Budget, always begins in the Commons as the House of Lords has limited powers in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • Custom, Law and John Company in Kumaon
    Custom, law and John Company in Kumaon. The meeting of local custom with the emergent formal governmental practices of the British East India Company in the Himalayan region of Kumaon, 1815–1843. Mark Gordon Jones, November 2018. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University. © Copyright by Mark G. Jones, 2018. All Rights Reserved. This thesis is an original work entirely written by the author. It has a word count of 89,374 with title, abstract, acknowledgements, footnotes, tables, glossary, bibliography and appendices excluded. Mark Jones The text of this thesis is set in Garamond 13 and uses the spelling system of the Oxford English Dictionary, January 2018 Update found at www.oed.com. Anglo-Indian and Kumaoni words not found in the OED or where the common spelling in Kumaon is at a great distance from that of the OED are italicized. To assist the reader, a glossary of many of these words including some found in the OED is provided following the main thesis text. References are set in Garamond 10 in a format compliant with the Chicago Manual of Style 16 notes and bibliography system found at http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org ii Acknowledgements Many people and institutions have contributed to the research and skills development embodied in this thesis. The first of these that I would like to acknowledge is the Chair of my supervisory panel Dr Meera Ashar who has provided warm, positive encouragement, calmed my panic attacks, occasionally called a spade a spade but, most importantly, constantly challenged me to chart my own way forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Politics
    the Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson The Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson The Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson Department of Politics University of Sussex Brighton, United Kingdom ISBN 978-1-137-50661-0 ISBN 978-1-137-50664-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-50664-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016963256 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identified as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub- lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism
    The Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism The Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism is the first major interdisciplinary centre in the UK to develop a broad, yet focused, interface between law, justice and journalism in society. The centre aims to harness and maximise opportunities for research collaboration, knowledge transfer and teaching to become an international centre of excellence and brings together expertise in the disciplines of Law, Criminology and Journalism at City University London. CLJJ Working Papers Reframing Libel is the fir st set of working papers in a series from the Centre for Law Justice and Journalism at City University London. The papers on Reframing Libel contain articles by leading lawyers, academics and journalists in the field who presented at the symposium organised by the Centre in November 2010 at City University. The papers are edited by Connie St Louis who was instrumental in organizing the symposium. Leadership and Expertise The Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism (CLJJ) is directed by three of City University London’s leading academics, as well as being supported by a number of specialists from the university. Professor Professor Professor Howard Tumber, Lorna Woods, Eugene McLaughlin, CLJJ Director CLJJ Director CLJJ Director (Journalism) (Law) (Justice) Howard Tumber, Professor Associate Dean of Eugene McLaughlin, of Journalism and Research at The City Law Professor of Criminology at Communication within School, City University the School of Social the Graduate School of London, Lorna Woods has Sciences, City University Journalism, City University research interests in London, has written London, has published broadcasting law and extensively on policing, widely in the field of the policy, regulation of the criminal justice and public sociology of news and media and the related policy and criminological journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Political Communications in a Mass Media Democracy Ivor Gaber* Media and Politics, University of Bedfordshire, UK
    Journal of Public Affairs J Public Affairs 7: 219-234 (2007) ..*";• ®w)l£Y Published online in Wiley InterScience %^ (www.interscicnce.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/pa.266 ^** Too much of a good thing: the 'problem' of political communications in a mass media democracy Ivor Gaber* Media and Politics, University of Bedfordshire, UK • Francis Fukuyama asks: '.. .is liberal democracy prey to serious internal contradictions, contradictions so serious tbat they will eventually undermine it as a political system?' Tfjis paper argues that one of tbese internal contradictions' is tbe political communications process and it can be sufficiently serious to undermine the democratic system—but such an undermining is not inevitable. Tbe problem can be described as follows: Democratic systems require tbat citizens are kept fully informed by governments (and others) iti the interests of transparency and ultimately accountability. Hence, all political communi- cations have, as tbeir final objective, tbe accountability of politicians at the ballot box. Wus all political communications bave wbat can be described as 'above' and 'below' tbe line content We above-the-line is tbe actual content of tbe message, tbe below-tbe-line is the implicit one of think better of me and my colleagues think worse of my opponents'. Consequently, no tnatter bow personally honest and open ati individual politician might be, the democratic system requires her or him to be always thinking about securing a successful result at tbe ballot box. Thus we bave tbe 'political communications paradox'. Voters tvatit politicians to be botiest atid accountable but this very demand tneans that politicians, implicitly, always bave to have another agenda in operation wben they are communicating witb tbe public, i.e.
    [Show full text]