Legislative Drafting and the Rule of Law Ronan Cormacain Institute Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Legislative Drafting and the Rule of Law Ronan Cormacain Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London PhD Thesis 2017 1 Declaration The work presented in this thesis is my own. Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my long-suffering family who have endured many years of a father and husband too busy with work to spend time with his family. 2 Abstract The rule of law is a cornerstone of the UK legal order, it states that we are all subject to, and ruled in accordance with, the law. Under Bingham’s analysis, the rule of law is made up of eight separate elements. Element one has four aspects, these are that legislation ought to be accessible, intelligible, clear and predictable. Legislative drafting means turning policy ideas into legislation fit for the statute book – it is literally writing the law. It is best described as phronesis, the subjective application of wisdom. The hypothesis of this thesis is that legislative drafting principles can be derived from element one of Bingham’s definition of the rule of law, and that these drafting principles facilitate the drafting of legislation in accordance with the rule of law. The methodology is deductive reasoning, meaning that each aspect of element one is examined, and from each aspect, drafting principles are derived. The principles therefore flow directly from the rule of law. In Chapter 2 the rule of law requirement of accessibility is dissected. Accessibility means that citizens have access to the law. This leads to the conclusions that legislation ought to be drafted so as to be available (citizens can physically read it), navigable (citizens can find their way around it, particularly to the portion which directly affects them) and inclusive (containing all the relevant legal information). In Chapter 3 the rule of law requirement of predictability is analysed. Predictability means that citizens can predict the legal consequences of their actions by reference to the legislation, or in other words, that the law is fixed and certain. Drafting principles are then derived from this. These are that legislation is prospective (it has effect in the future, not the past), that it is determinate (certain, unambiguous and precise), stable (not changing all the time), it must have a clear start and stop date, it must be consistent (within individual statutes and more generally across the statute book), that it must apply in the real world, that it must be capable of being implemented, and that there must be constraints on the discretion given to officials by legislation. Chapter 4 deals with intelligibility – that the law must be capable of being understood by citizens. This means that the drafter must consider the characteristics of the individual who is most likely to be using the legislation, that both amending legislation and the legislation as amended must be comprehensible, that excessive interconnectedness must be avoided, that plain language, easification and good writing techniques must be used and finally that the legislation contain examples where appropriate to aid understanding. 3 The conclusion is that the hypothesis has been proved and that it is built on sound foundations of the importance of the rule of law, the importance of legislation and the key role of legislative drafters in the process of making legislation. Drafters are already guardians of the statute book who are already under an obligation to protect the rule of law. The hypothesis supports observance of rules, fairness, respect for human autonomy, certainty and provides a constitutional check on power. It can be extended to other jurisdictions which have a similar approach to the rule of law. 4 Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Hypothesis and methodology ..................................................................................................... 12 1.3 Structure of thesis ....................................................................................................................... 15 1.4 The Rule of Law ........................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.1 Rule of law as a principle ..................................................................................................... 16 1.4.2 Rule of law as an ideal .......................................................................................................... 19 1.4.3 Bingham and the rule of law ................................................................................................ 23 1.5 Legislative Drafting...................................................................................................................... 25 1.5.1 Legislative drafting: turning policy into legislation .............................................................. 25 1.5.2 Thornton’s five stages of the drafting process .................................................................... 26 1.5.3 Broader role of legislative counsel ....................................................................................... 27 1.5.4 Drafting as art, science or phronesis.................................................................................... 29 1.6 Principles of legislative drafting .................................................................................................. 30 1.6.1 Bentham ............................................................................................................................... 31 1.6.2 Xanthaki ............................................................................................................................... 32 1.6.3 UK drafters ........................................................................................................................... 35 1.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 36 Chapter 2 Accessibility .......................................................................................................................... 38 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Part 1 The Theory of Accessibility ......................................................................................................... 38 2.1 The Importance of Accessibility .................................................................................................. 38 2.1.1 Accessibility in the UK .......................................................................................................... 41 2.1.2 Accessibility in the UK – Prerogative Legislation ................................................................. 44 2.2 Difficulties with providing (electronic) access to legislation ....................................................... 45 5 2.2.1 Cost ...................................................................................................................................... 45 2.2.2 Volume ................................................................................................................................. 45 2.2.3 Interconnectedness ............................................................................................................. 46 2.2.4 Dynamic legislation .............................................................................................................. 46 2.2.5 Authority .............................................................................................................................. 47 2.2.6 Paper based process ............................................................................................................ 47 2.2.7 Bilingualism .......................................................................................................................... 47 Part 2 Drafting Principles that Promote Accessibility ........................................................................... 48 2.3 Availability ................................................................................................................................... 48 2.3.1 Electronic or non-electronic availability .............................................................................. 49 2.3.2 What must be available? ..................................................................................................... 49 2.3.3 Aspect 1 – availability of law as enacted ............................................................................. 50 2.3.4 Aspect 2 – availability of law as amended ........................................................................... 51 2.3.5 Aspect 3 – law at a point in time.......................................................................................... 52 2.3.6 Aspect 4 – law in a particular geographical area ................................................................. 55 2.3.7 Aspect 5 – legislation in context .......................................................................................... 58 2.3.8 Aspect 6 – findability ............................................................................................................ 61 2.3.9 A fully electronic system?