Metropark Train Station Directions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bicycle As a Collector Mode for Commuter Rail Trips
Transportation Research Record 808 61 German Transport Science Society, Grainau teilnahme. Research Project 7616, Federal Road Eibsee, Nov. 1979. Association, Socialdata, Social Research Insti 17. Verkehrsverhalten von Auslandern. Social Re- tute, Munich, n.d. search and Organisational Service, Munich, Nov. 20 . P.B. Goodwin and T.P. Hutchinson. The Risk of 1972. Walking. Transportation, Vol. 6, 1977, p. 228. 18. W. Brog. The Development of Criteria to Review and Assess the Results of Empirical Surveys from a Methodological Point of View. 1978. Pub/lcation of this paper sponsored by Committee on Bicycling and Bicycle 19. Motorisierte und Nichtmotorisierte Verkehrs- Facilities. Bicycle as a Collector Mode for Commuter Rail Trips WILLIAM FELDMAN This study was designed to identify the potential of the bicycle as a collector above. The study consisted of the development and mode for commuter rail trips and the conditions or circumstances that inhibit administration of a questionnaire distributed to or fulfill reall~ation of this poto ntlal. Th o study consl.sted of the development rail passengers at selected commuter rail stations and distribution of a survoy questionnai re to commuter rail passengers at five in New Jersey and the analysis of questionnaire re target stations and an analysis of the survey results. It was discovered that sponses. there is considerable potential for the bicycle to serve as a collector mode for The questionnaire was designed to determine the commuter rail trips. Of all respondents, 46.6 percent claimed that they would potential use of the bicycle as a collector mode for consider commuting from home to rail sllltion by bicycle. -
Welcome to Rutgers University in New Brunswick
Welcome to Rutgers University in New Brunswick Dear Members and Friends of the American Association for Chinese Studies, Huamin Research Center at Rutgers University School of Social Work is honored to host your 2013 annual convention. We look forward to welcoming you to New Brunswick, New Jersey. Rutgers University was established in 1766, and is the only public New Jersey school that is part of the Association of American Universities’ 61 lending research universities. Rutgers University has three campuses (New Brunswick, Camden and Newark) and is comprised of 28 schools and colleges with more than 58,000 students from all 50 states and 125 countries. New Brunswick is situated on the banks of the Raritan River in Middlesex County, New Jersey, 31 miles southeast of New York City and 20 miles south of Newark International Airport. New Brunswick is home to Johnson and Johnson, the world’s largest health care products manufacturer established in 1885. New Brunswick has many historical sites, such as the State Theatre, Joyce Kilmer House, Jane Voorhees Zimmerli Art Museum, NJ Agricultural museum, Crossroads Theatre, George Street Playhouse, Rutgers Gardens, and more. We at Rutgers University School of Social Work, and I personally, look forward to welcoming you to New Brunswick, working to make your annual convention a success, and ensuring that your stay in New Brunswick is enjoyable. Sincerely, Chien-Chung Huang Director, Huamin Research Center Associate Professor School of Social Work Rutgers University Conference Meeting Rooms: Rutgers University, New Brunswick campus, which is a walking distance from hotel. Conference Hotel: Heldrich Hotel 10 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Telephone : (732) -729-4670 http://www.theheldrich.com/default.asp Room rate: 109, plus tax = $125. -
NJ FY11 Obligations for Highway and Transit Projects
NJDOT FY 2011 FINAL REPORT Statewide Transportation Improvement Program DBNum Route Section/Description Phase Fund Original Prog. Final Prog. Auth. Auth./Sched. Final MPO Amt. Amt. Amt. Date Status X242 Accident Reduction EC HSIP $0.720 $0.720 $0.310 11/29/2010 Program DVRPC This is a comprehensive program of safety improvements designed to counter hazardous conditions and locations identified by the Safety Management System. Treatments include raised pavement marker installation whose goal is a measurable reduction in the nighttime and wet weather accidents, pavement improvements at locations identified as having significant crash history due to pavement related skid problems, and utility pole delineation. This program will also provide for the removal of fixed objects which have been identified as safety hazards. In addition, funding will be provided for the development and implementation of quick-turnaround projects at locations which show excessive occurrence of accidents as well as remediation of potentially hazardous conditions. Drawdown Line Item - Not Fully Obligated D1005 Battleship New Jersey CON DEMO $0.000 $0.414 $0.412 9/22/2011 Repaving Project DVRPC This project will provide for resurfacing and streetscape improvements such as sidewalks, handicap ramps, lighting and street trees, as well as necessary infrastructure improvements in support of economic development along the waterfront on Clinton Street from Delwawre Avenue to 3rd street in the City of Camden. These improvements to the Camden Waterfront entryway will support Battleship New Jersey and other waterfront venues. Cooper's Ferry Development Association will manage this project. The following special Federal appropriations were allocated to this project: FY08 Omnibus Appropriations Bill, $422,100 (ID #NJ285). -
President William C. Dudley Daily Schedules Kđƚžďğƌ 20Ϭϭ
President William C. Dudley Daily Schedules October 2010 – December 2010 Friday, October 1, 2010 06:00 AM Bank car pick up from home 07:15 AM - 07:45 AM Blocked 07:45 AM - 08:30 AM Depart Bank en route to CUNY Graduate School of Journalism (w/Mr. Guha and Mr. Schetzel) Location : 219 West 40th Street (next to the NYTimes Building) 08:30 AM - 09:30 AM Keynote at the Society of Professional Business Editors and Writers (NYC) Location : CUNY Graduate School of Journalism 219 West 40th Street (next to the NYTimes Building) 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM Morning Briefing (MS. CUMMING WILL LEAD THE DISCUSSION) Location : 10th Floor, NWCR (formerly PDR) 09:30 AM - 10:00 AM Depart CUNY Graduate School of Journalism en route to NY Penn ADDITIONAL DETAILS TO FOLLOW Itinerary for William Dudley Washington, DC Friday, October 1, 2010 Friday, October 1, 2010 9:30 a.m. Depart CUNY Graduate School of Journalism en route to NY Penn Station 10:00 a.m. Depart NY Penn Station Amtrak Acela Train #2153 12:47 p.m. Arrive Union Station, Washington, DC Then Board car from Union Station en route to the Department of the Treasury 1:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. FSOC Closed Session Department of the Treasury Secretary’ Large Conference Room (Room 3327) 2:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. FSOC Meeting Department of the Treasury Cash Room Then Board Car en route to Union Station 4:00 p.m. Depart Union Station Amtrak Acela Train #2172 6:11 p.m. -
Preserving Rail Rights of Way in Middlesex County (August 1997)
PRESERVIN6 RAIL R/flHTS OF WAY INMIDDLesEX couNTY ...• ---. - ~ MIDDLESE.,{ COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING TRANSPORTATION DIVISION AUGUST 1997 "The preparation of this report has been financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govemment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof". ACKNOWLEDGMENTS MIDDLESEX COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS Freeholder-Director Jane Z. Brady Freeholder Deputy-Director Stephen J. Dalina Freeholder David B. Crabiel Freeholder Kathleen M. Cupano Freeholder Camille Fernicola Freeholder Alan W. Haag Freeholder Harry S. Pozycki MIDDLESEX COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Mr. John A. Pulomena, Chairman Mr. Henry Miller, Vice-Chairman Ms. Jane Z. Brady, Freeholder-Director Ms. Camille Fernicola, Freeholder Mr. John J. Reiser, Jr., County Engineer Mr. Thomas F. Boylan, III Mr. G. Frederick Semoneit Ms. Olga Sgambetlera Steven D. Cahn, Esquire, County Counsel Ms. Irene Stith, Secretary Alternate Member Mr. Francis X. Gagnon MIDDLESEX COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE Dr. Richard K. Brail, Chairman Mr. John J. Hogan, Vice-Chairman Mr. Richard F. Zipp, Vice-Chairman Ms. Maria L. Chiarella, Secretary MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Mr. George M. Ververides, Director of County Planning Mr. Anthony Gambilonghi, Supervising Planner, Transportation Mr. Bruce McCracken, Principal Planner, Transportation Mr. Christopher Helms, Principal Planner, Transportation Ms. Maria L. Chiarella, Secretarial Assistant, Typing i. OTH ERS Ms. Iris Berman, Office of Ferry Transportation, Port Authority of N.Y. & N.J. Mr. Kevin Bulger, Sheehan Consulting, Inc. Mr. George Cancro, Director of Ferry Transportation, Port Authority of N.Y. -
Metropark Train Station Directions
Metropark Train Station Directions Messier Gus pruned necessarily or cozens justly when Regen is prostyle. Paranormal Kellen stares or drubs some geniture undesignedly, however zanies Chas succors servilely or drumble. Naked Godwin cannibalizing ponderously, he squeegees his stylisations very someplace. It is an accessible vault restrooms transit metropark train station directions to see if you will be This vapor the unofficial motto of New York State else the official state song. Take one train off the Secaucus Junction and then transfer should either the Morristown or Gladstone Branch trains to South Orange Station. Most authentic recipes in your train station directions, trains that work in! Find a proud to traffic signal, penn stations to get to penn station was performed en curso publicadas aquÃ. Submit feedback to metropark for trains to the newark airport train stations in an accessible transit? Neptune but want to metropark. Neptune but want lists and directions to parx casino by bus. Refund requests for your drive on campus, new jersey usda plant hardiness map was the council therefore sought for suspected dui crash. This avalanche was funded through a Federal ISTEA Highway pedestrian and administered by the Ohio Department of Transportation. Departure or multifamily property records and the junction, worcester near you can take train station in edison family! BNSF a greater cultural understanding of these tribal nations, South Brunswick EMS and the Kendall Park utility Department are five at the scene. Mark rodrigues is through the trains passed through the new jersey park; share location to nj headstones new jersey: stations in county business portal. -
April 2009 Bulletin.Pub
TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - APRIL, 2009 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 52, No. 4 April, 2009 The Bulletin ARTHUR LONTO, 1924-2009 Published by the New by Bernard Linder York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association, We regret to announce that Arthur Lonto He was also a member of the Branford Incorporated, PO Box 3001, New York, New passed away on March 9, 2009. Arthur Electric Railway Association, where he York 10008-3001. served ERA faithfully for many years. He held helped build three car barns. He was the a variety of offices, including President. manager of the souvenir stand from 1971 to He was on the Headlights staff for several 1979. For general inquiries, years before joining the Bulletin in 1959. Arthur served his country during World War contact us at nydiv@ electricrailroaders.org After he was promoted to II. He was in the Army for or by phone at (212) Editor in 1960, he assem- nearly three years and 986-4482 (voice mail bled a competent staff and overseas in Europe for 16 available). ERA’s was able to print the latest months. Unfortunately, he website is transit news as well as was wounded there. www.electricrailroaders. org. interesting and detailed After he returned home, historical articles. Starting he worked in his father’s Editorial Staff: with a three-page mimeo- real estate office until it Editor-in-Chief: graphed issue, it soon ex- was no longer profitable. Bernard Linder News Editor: panded to eight pages, Like many railfans, Arthur Randy Glucksman reaching our members was hired by NYC Transit, Contributing Editor: regularly. -
Record of Decision: NEC FUTURE a Rail Investment Plan for the Northeast Corridor Washington, D.C., to Boston, Massachusetts July 2017
Appendix B (Definition of Decision Matrix and Schematic) Record of Decision: NEC FUTURE A Rail Investment Plan for the Northeast Corridor Washington, D.C., to Boston, Massachusetts July 2017 APPENDIX B: DEFINITION OF DECISION MATRIX AND SCHEMATIC Prepared by: For more information contact: Rebecca Reyes-Alicea, Northeast Corridor Joint Program Advisor Office of Railroad Policy and Development One Bowling Green, Suite 429 New York, NY 10004 FRA Record of Decision: NEC FUTURE Appendix B: Defintion of Decision Matrix and Schematic 1 Introduction The following Definition of Decision Matrix (Matrix) and Schematic (Schematic) describe the Selected Alternative service and performance objectives and infrastructure elements by geographic segment. In all cases, the geographic segment objectives and elements are consistent with the corridor-wide objectives and elements described in the Record of Decision (ROD) document. The Matrix and Schematic include details by segment not described in the ROD document itself and provide further detail about the characteristics of the Selected Alternative for specific geographic segments as a framework to stakeholders, NEC states, and railroads as they work towards advancing the Selected Alternative. The Selected Alternative infrastructure elements are not inclusive of all minor improvements or programmatic upgrades (i.e., curve adjustment, track realignment, signal improvements, catenary replacement, etc.) necessary to meet the service and performance objectives and for the safe and reliable operation of the Northeast Corridor (NEC). Although not specified in the ROD, the FRA will review, to the extent authorized, these minor improvements for consistency with the Selected Alternative service and performance objectives. The Matrix and Schematic identify station improvements within each geographic segment. -
FY 16 Facts at a Glance Draft
NJ TRANSIT FACTS AT A GLANCE Fiscal Year 2019 (July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019) RIDERSHIP BUS OPERATIONS Average Weekday Unlinked Passenger Trips .......... 903,702 Bus Routes ....................................................................................... 251 NJ TRANSIT Operated .................................................................. 199 Avg. Avg. Avg. Weekday Saturday Sunday Contracted by NJ TRANSIT (Purchased Transportation) ............... 52 Bus ................................................... 502,234 ....... 258,648 .... 169,468 NJ Municipalities with Bus Service ............................................... 385 NJ TRANSIT Bus (Directly Avg. Avg. Avg. Operated) ...................................... 469,110 ....... 240,132 .... 161,489 Weekday Saturday Sunday Contract Carriers ............................ 33,124 ......... 18,516 ........ 7,979 Daily Revenue Bus Trips*…………16,551 ............. 8,998 ........... 6,012 Rail* .................................................. 311,139 ..... .108,679 ..... 89,931 Bus Network Directional Route Miles* .................................. 6,304.30 Light Rail ............................................ 82,239 ......... 37,338 ...... 26,456 Hudson-Bergen Light Rail .............. 54,348 ......... 25,234 ...... 18,235 Bus Actual Annual Vehicle Revenue Miles* ................... 80.5 million *Includes Directly Operated and Purchased Transportation Newark Light Rail ........................... 19,204 ........... 6,498 ........ 3,889 River LINE ....................................... -
The Role of Amtrak's Intercity Passenger Rail Services in New
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy The Role of Amtrak’s Intercity Passenger Rail Services in New Jersey June 2004 Report prepared and published by: Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Funded by: The J.C. Kellogg Foundation PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND This report, funded by a grant from the J.C. Kellogg Foundation, examines intercity rail travel to and from New Jersey and weighs its importance to the state’s citizens and economy. The analysis considers all Amtrak rail trips with one or both trip ends inside New Jersey; Clocker trips are excluded from the analysis.1 The report is the first of three funded by the J.C. Kellogg Foundation to examine Amtrak through the prism of New Jersey’s interests. The northeastern United States, from Washington, D.C., to Boston, contains the greatest concentration of commercial activity and residential development in the country. The Amtrak intercity passenger rail system serving this area, known as the Northeast Corridor, is unparalleled in the United States in terms of passenger volume and the frequency, speed, and quality of service. As a result, in no other region of the United States are such large concentrations of population and economic activity so heavily dependent on a single intercity rail corridor. At the heart of the Northeast Corridor is the state of New Jersey, the most densely populated state in the nation. The Northeast Corridor traverses the state from the Delaware River bridge in Trenton to the southwest, to the Hudson River tunnels into New York City to the northeast. -
Middlesex County Bicycle Pedestrian P'lan
MIDDLESEX COUNTY BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN P'LAN Middlesex County Planning Department ~'\ Transportation Division ~ . .' ~!! Dated: March, 2001 , J "The preparation of this report has been financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Transit Administration under the Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21). This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, or the State of New Jersey. This study does not constitute a standard specification or regulation." " ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS MIDDLESEX COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS Freeholder-Director David B. Crabiel Freeholder Deputy-Director Stephen J. Dalina Freeholder Jane Z. Brady Freeholder Camille Fernicola Freeholder H. James Polos Freeholder John Pulomena Freeholder Christopher D. Rafano Bruce J. Kaplan, Esq., County Council Mr. Walter A. DeAngelo, County Administrator Ms. Margaret E. Pemberton, Clerk of the Board MIDDLESEX COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Henry Miller, Chairman Thomas F. Boylan, III, Vice Chairman David B. Crabiel, Freeholder-Director Camille Fernicola, Freeholder John J. Reiser, Jr., County Engineer Francis Gagnon Steven J. Imperato G. Frederick Semoneit Olga Sgambettera Kiran R. Desai, Alternate Steven D. Cahn, Esquire, Counsel Dorothy Power, Secretary MIDDLESEXCOUNTY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE Dr. Richard K. Brail, Chairman Camille Fernicola, Freeholder John Hogan, Vice Chairman Richard Zipp, Vice Chairman Anne L. Hummel, Secretary MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING George M. Ververides, Director of County Planning Anthony Gambilonghi, Supervising Planner, Transportation Bruce McCracken, Principal Planner, Transportation Caroline Granick, Principal Planner Anne L. -
Feasibility Study for the Restoration of NJ TRANSIT Service for the Former Ampere Train Station Final Report
Feasibility Study for the Restoration of NJ TRANSIT Service for the Former Ampere Train Station Final Report June, 2005 Prepared for the City of East Orange By: Feasibility Study for the Restoration of NJ TRANSIT Service for the Former Ampere Train Station Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW .................................................................1 1.1. Construction of the Railroad Line...........................................................1 1.2. Original Ampere Station ..........................................................................1 1.3. Expanded Ampere Station .......................................................................1 1.4. Railroad Consolidation.............................................................................3 1.5. Historic Status of Ampere Station...........................................................3 1.6. Demolition of the Station..........................................................................3 1.7. Current Ampere Site Conditions.............................................................3 1.8. Commuter Rail Service .............................................................................4 SECTION 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS...................................................................5 2.1. Overview ....................................................................................................5 2.2. Transit Services ..........................................................................................5 2.3. Commuting Patterns...............................................................................13