Wg Przewoźników Outbound Czarter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wg Przewoźników Outbound Czarter Domestic and international charter operations- departing passengers by carriers in the first quarter of 2013 and 2014 2014 2013 market Carrier l.p. passengers share l.p. passengers market share Enter Air 1 36 958 24,37% 2 41 792 28,88% Travel Service 2 34 316 22,62% 1 52 118 36,01% Small Planet Airlines 3 30 079 19,83% 4 7 169 4,95% LOT Polish Airlines + Eurolot SA 4 16 205 10,68% 8 1 494 1,03% Bingo Airways 5 12 928 8,52% 3 21 050 14,55% Nesma 6 4 078 2,69% 5 5 393 3,73% SkyEurope 7 2 830 1,87% b/d b/d b/d Israir 8 1 342 0,88% 9 1 420 0,98% Thomas Cook Airlines 9 1 300 0,86% 7 2 264 1,56% Ryanair 10 1 244 0,82% 16 527 0,36% Arkia Israeli Airlines 11 1 239 0,82% 6 2 283 1,58% Nouvelair Tunisie 12 1 128 0,74% b/d b/d b/d Onur Air 13 1 114 0,73% 11 1 357 0,94% EL AL Israel Airlines 14 1 060 0,70% 13 741 0,51% Monarch Airlines 15 1 059 0,70% 21 228 0,16% Air Mediterranee 16 997 0,66% 12 993 0,69% WOW Air 17 515 0,34% b/d b/d b/d Corendon Airlines 18 440 0,29% b/d b/d b/d Jet2.com 19 420 0,28% b/d b/d b/d Europe Airpost 20 419 0,28% 14 717 0,50% Alitalia 21 294 0,19% 23 183 0,13% XL Airways France 22 189 0,12% 22 189 0,13% Thomson Airways 23 187 0,12% 24 174 0,12% Trade Air 24 180 0,12% b/d b/d b/d SmartLynx Airlines 25 178 0,12% b/d b/d b/d Other carriers 983 0,65% 4 626 3,20% Polish carriers* 108 437 71,49% 87 216 60,27% Total passengers 151 682 144 718 Source: Civil Aviation Authority of Republic of Poland, data obtained from Polish airports, Warsaw, September 2014 *Polish carriers: Enter Air, Small Planet Airlines, LOT Polish Airlines + Eurolot SA, Bingo Airways, Travel Service, SprintAir, Sky Taxi Domestic and international charter operations- departing passengers by carriers in the first Domestic and international charter operations- departing passengers by carriers in the first quarter of 2013 and 2014 2014 2013 market Carrier l.p. passengers share l.p. passengers market share Enter Air 1 36 958 24,37% 2 41 792 28,88% Travel Service 2 34 316 22,62% 1 52 118 36,01% Small Planet Airlines 3 30 079 19,83% 4 7 169 4,95% LOT Polish Airlines + Eurolot SA 4 16 205 10,68% 8 1 494 1,03% Bingo Airways 5 12 928 8,52% 3 21 050 14,55% Nesma 6 4 078 2,69% 5 5 393 3,73% SkyEurope 7 2 830 1,87% b/d b/d b/d Israir 8 1 342 0,88% 9 1 420 0,98% Thomas Cook Airlines 9 1 300 0,86% 7 2 264 1,56% Ryanair 10 1 244 0,82% 16 527 0,36% Arkia Israeli Airlines 11 1 239 0,82% 6 2 283 1,58% Nouvelair Tunisie 12 1 128 0,74% b/d b/d b/d Onur Air 13 1 114 0,73% 11 1 357 0,94% EL AL Israel Airlines 14 1 060 0,70% 13 741 0,51% Monarch Airlines 15 1 059 0,70% 21 228 0,16% Air Mediterranee 16 997 0,66% 12 993 0,69% WOW Air 17 515 0,34% b/d b/d b/d Corendon Airlines 18 440 0,29% b/d b/d b/d Jet2.com 19 420 0,28% b/d b/d b/d Europe Airpost 20 419 0,28% 14 717 0,50% Alitalia 21 294 0,19% 23 183 0,13% XL Airways France 22 189 0,12% 22 189 0,13% Thomson Airways 23 187 0,12% 24 174 0,12% Trade Air 24 180 0,12% b/d b/d b/d SmartLynx Airlines 25 178 0,12% b/d b/d b/d Other carriers 983 0,65% 4 626 3,20% Polish carriers* 108 437 71,49% 87 216 60,27% Total passengers 151 682 144 718 Source: Civil Aviation Authority of Republic of Poland, data obtained from Polish airports, Warsaw, September 2014 *Polish carriers: Enter Air, Small Planet Airlines, LOT Polish Airlines + Eurolot SA, Bingo Airways, Travel Service, SprintAir, Sky Taxi .
Recommended publications
  • First Quarter of 201468.89 KB
    Domestic and international scheduled operations- departing passengers by carriers in the first quarter of 2013 and 2014 2014 2013 Carrier l.p. passengers market share l.p. passengers market share Ryanair 1 662 356 27,92% 1 629 961 28,50% LOT Polish Airlines + Eurolot SA 2 605 843 25,54% 2 608 771 27,54% Wizz Air 3 447 006 18,85% 3 432 337 19,56% Lufthansa 4 194 985 8,22% 4 161 077 7,29% EasyJet 5 60 438 2,55% 5 50 869 2,30% Norwegian Air Shuttle 6 51 385 2,17% 7 35 880 1,62% SAS 7 40 596 1,71% 8 35 710 1,62% Air Berlin 8 39 218 1,65% 15 13 619 0,62% Air France 9 38 593 1,63% 6 37 508 1,70% Eurolot SA 10 25 997 1,10% 10 23 373 1,06% KLM Royal Dutch Airlines 11 25 288 1,07% 9 24 299 1,10% Swiss International Air Lines 12 23 543 0,99% 11 22 550 1,02% Aeroflot-Russian Airlines 13 20 981 0,88% 12 19 348 0,88% British Airways 14 19 115 0,81% 13 17 431 0,79% Emirates Airline 15 18 310 0,77% 16 12 274 0,56% Austrian Airlines 16 14 336 0,60% 14 16 066 0,73% Alitalia 17 13 441 0,57% 21 6 625 0,30% Finnair 18 12 009 0,51% 17 10 851 0,49% Qatar Airways 19 10 605 0,45% 18 9 288 0,42% Turkish Airlines (THY) 20 7 630 0,32% 19 7 392 0,33% Ukraine International Airlines 21 5 985 0,25% 35 39 0,00% Aer Lingus 22 5 637 0,24% 20 7 184 0,32% Czech Airlines 23 4 775 0,20% 22 5 658 0,26% TAP Portugal 24 4 772 0,20% 23 5 243 0,24% Aegean Airlines 25 4 362 0,18% 30 641 0,03% Other carriers 14 758 0,62% 16 757 0,76% Polish carriers* 634 427 26,75% 634 830 28,72% LCC** 1 266 331 53,39% 1 169 045 52,88% Total passengers 2 371 964 2 210 751 Source: Civil Aviation Authority of Republic of Poland, data obtained from Polish airports, Warsaw, September 2014 *Polish carriers: LOT Polish Airlines + Eurolot SA, Eurolot SA, SprintAir, Bingo Airways, Small Planet Airlines **LCC Ryanair, Wizz Air, EasyJet, Norwegian Air Shuttle, Air Berlin, Air Baltic, Jet2.com, Germanwings Note: Eurolot SA - own operations realized by Eurolot SA Domestic and international scheduled operations- departing passengers by carriers in the first quarter of 2013 and 2014 2014 2013 Carrier l.p.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Prior Compliance List of Aircraft Operators Specifying the Administering Member State for Each Aircraft Operator – June 2014
    Prior compliance list of aircraft operators specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator – June 2014 Inclusion in the prior compliance list allows aircraft operators to know which Member State will most likely be attributed to them as their administering Member State so they can get in contact with the competent authority of that Member State to discuss the requirements and the next steps. Due to a number of reasons, and especially because a number of aircraft operators use services of management companies, some of those operators have not been identified in the latest update of the EEA- wide list of aircraft operators adopted on 5 February 2014. The present version of the prior compliance list includes those aircraft operators, which have submitted their fleet lists between December 2013 and January 2014. BELGIUM CRCO Identification no. Operator Name State of the Operator 31102 ACT AIRLINES TURKEY 7649 AIRBORNE EXPRESS UNITED STATES 33612 ALLIED AIR LIMITED NIGERIA 29424 ASTRAL AVIATION LTD KENYA 31416 AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY TAJIKISTAN 30020 AVIASTAR-TU CO. RUSSIAN FEDERATION 40259 BRAVO CARGO UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 908 BRUSSELS AIRLINES BELGIUM 25996 CAIRO AVIATION EGYPT 4369 CAL CARGO AIRLINES ISRAEL 29517 CAPITAL AVTN SRVCS NETHERLANDS 39758 CHALLENGER AERO PHILIPPINES f11336 CORPORATE WINGS LLC UNITED STATES 32909 CRESAIR INC UNITED STATES 32432 EGYPTAIR CARGO EGYPT f12977 EXCELLENT INVESTMENT UNITED STATES LLC 32486 FAYARD ENTERPRISES UNITED STATES f11102 FedEx Express Corporate UNITED STATES Aviation 13457 Flying
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Office
    Official Journal L 139 of the European Union Volume 64 English edition Legislation 23 April 2021 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/662 of 22 April 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) . 1 ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/663 of 22 April 2021 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for chlordecone in or on certain products (1) . 148 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/664 of 22 April 2021 on a regulatory framework for the U-space (1) . 161 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/665 of 22 April 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373 as regards requirements for providers of air traffic management/air navigation services and other air traffic management network functions in the U-space airspace designated in controlled airspace (1) . 184 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/666 of 22 April 2021 amending Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 as regards requirements for manned aviation operating in U-space airspace (1) . 187 (1) Text with EEA relevance. Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. EN The titles of all other acts are printed in bold type
    [Show full text]
  • KLM Vs. LOT Vs. Divi Divi Air. Wat Verbergt Zich Achter De Namen Van Luchtvaartmaatschappijen in Polen En in Het Nederlandse Taalgebied?
    Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis No 3619 Neerlandica Wratislaviensia XXIV Wrocław 2014 Jacek KARPIŃSKI (Universiteit Wrocław) KLM vs. LOT vs. Divi Divi Air. Wat verbergt zich achter de namen van luchtvaartmaatschappijen in Polen en in het Nederlandse taalgebied? Abstract Boarding an aircraft, a passenger immediately enters into a different world and encounters a dif- ferent culture. For this reason, airlines are often viewed as national symbols, which is oftentimes strengthened by their names (e.g. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij, Brussels Airlines, Polskie Linie Lotnicze LOT or Air Aruba). However, there are also airlines whose names were created in a totally different way (e.g. Transavia, Jetairfly or Bingo Airways). In this paper, I will make an at- tempt at providing the answer to the question of how the names of the airlines functioning in Poland and the Dutch-speaking territories were created and what influence the cultures of those countries had on this name-formation process. The major goal is thus to present the outcomes of a semantic analysis of the names of 113 Dutch, Belgian, Surinamese and Polish (both contemporary and non- existent) airlines. The study will also involve tracing the differences and similarities in the history of the formation of the names under analysis. Als je het toestel van een of andere luchtvaartmaatschappij instapt, kom je meteen terecht in de sfeer van een andere wereld, van een andere cultuur. Amsterdam, Schiphol. Een grondstewardess roept de vlucht om: „De KLM- vlucht KL0867 naar Osaka is nu gereed om in te stappen. Passagiers wordt ver- zocht aan boord te gaan via gate E24”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Passenger Air Transport Development in Poland Over the Period 2010-2018
    European Research Studies Journal Volume XXIII, Issue 1, 2020 pp. 13-30 The Analysis of Passenger Air Transport Development in Poland over the Period 2010-2018 Submitted 18/11/19, 1st revision 12/12/19, 2nd revision 22/01/19, accepted 20/01/20 Katarzyna Wąsowska1 Abstract: Purpose: The aim of the conducted research was analysis of data regarding aviation activities in the field of passenger transport at Polish airports over the period 2010-2018. Design/Methodology/Approach: The Analysis of the air travel segment referring passenger transport in Polish airports is based on available literature, analysis and statistical documentation of the air transport market for the years 2010-2018. Findings: The Polish market of air services continues to be in a state of flux. The pace at which changes occur results from a combination of external and internal factors, which precondition the behaviour of air carriers and customers, and the operation of airports. When analysing air transport development forecast, we can see a further upward trend in the number of activities of all market participants. That said, in the near future we should be expecting an expansion of connections, erection of state-of-the-art infrastructure, new air services, and above all a growth of importance of Poland on the aviation map of Europe. Practical Implications: Having regard to data included in the study, without a doubt the Polish aviation market should be considered a strongly developing one, having enormous potential ensuing not only from population mobility different EU standards, but also from demographic potential of Poland, gradual wealth gaining of the Polish society, and Poland’s geographic location.
    [Show full text]
  • Drugi Kwartał 2011-2012 R
    Liczba pasażerów odlatujących obsłużonych w polskich portach lotniczych w krajowym i międzynarodowym ruchu czarterowym w drugim kwartale 2011 i 2012 roku 2012 2011 liczba liczba Przewoźnik l.p. pasażerów udział l.p. pasażerów udział Enter Air 1 140 679 28,76% 1 129 239 28,49% Travel Service AS 2 91 708 18,75% 2 70 618 15,57% Small Planet Airlines 3 31 222 6,38% 6 16 700 3,68% OLT Express Poland 4 27 998 5,72% – – – Nouvelair Tunisie 5 21 574 4,41% 18 6 261 1,38% Travel Service Polska 6 18 406 3,76% – – – OLT Express Regional 7 17 072 3,49% – – – Air Cairo 8 16 905 3,46% 10 15 147 3,34% LOT Polish Airlines + EuroLOT 9 14 671 3,00% 3 36 437 8,03% Yes Airways 10 14 467 2,96% 4 29 438 6,49% Pegasus Airlines 11 14 282 2,92% – – – Bingo Airways 12 9 966 2,04% – – – Sky Airlines 13 7 871 1,61% 11 12 480 2,75% SprintAir 14 7 828 1,60% – – – Nesma 15 6 849 1,40% 15 8 034 1,77% Corendon Airlines 16 5 946 1,22% 14 8 399 1,85% Aegean Airlines 17 3 345 0,68% 16 6 684 1,47% Bulgarian Air Charter 18 2 752 0,56% 19 4 552 1,00% Sky Express 19 2 227 0,46% 49 105 0,02% Air Arabia 20 2 036 0,42% – – – Air Fiji 21 1 282 0,26% – – – Israir 22 1 257 0,26% 23 1 048 0,23% Privilege Style 23 1 168 0,24% – – – Alitalia 24 1 166 0,24% 28 388 0,09% EL AL Israel Airlines 25 1 145 0,23% 20 3 251 0,72% Pozostali przewoźnicy 25 257 5,16% 104 776 23,10% Przewoźnicy polscy* 282 656 57,79% 232 469 51,25% SUMA 489 079 453 557 *Przewoźnicy polscy: Enter Air, Small Planet Airlines, OLT Express Poland, Travel Service Polska, OLT Express Regional, LOT Polish Airlines + EuroLOT, Yes Airways, Bingo Airways, SprintAir, Air Poland Źródło: Opracowanie ULC na podstawie informacji uzyskanych z portów lotniczych, Warszawa, październik 2012 Liczba pasażerów obsłużonych w polskich portach lotniczych w krajowym i międzynarodowym ruchu czarterowym w pierwszym półroczu 2011 i 2012 roku 2012 2011 liczba liczba Przewoźnik l.p.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC
    9.5.2015 NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES Publication pursuant to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast) (1) of decisions by Member States to grant, suspend or revoke operating licences EN (Text with EEA relevance) (2015/C 154/07) In accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast), the European Commission publishes the decisions to grant, suspend or revoke operating licences taken by Member States between the period of 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014 (2). Operating licences granted Official Journal of the European Union Decision effective Member State Name of air carrier Address of air carrier Permitted to carry Category (1) since Austria Sky Taxi Luftfahrt GmbH Bahnhofstraße 10, 6900 Bregenz passengers, cargo, mail B 27.1.2014 Bulgaria AIR VOLTA Ltd. 3A, Nikolay Haytov Str., Sofia, 1113 passengers, cargo, mail A 17.3.2014 Bulgaria AVB 2012 Ltd. 14, Iskar Str., Sofia, 1000 – Contact Address: passengers A 27.3.2014 23, Alexandar Malinov Blvd., Sofia, 1729 Czech Republic PRAGA AVIATION s.r.o. U Císařské cesty 219, Praha - Benice, PSČ 103 00 passengers, cargo, mail B 28.4.2014 France AIR PLUS Hélicoptère 20, Impasse Camille Langlade, 31100 Toulouse passengers, cargo, mail B 4.6.2014 France Dassault Falcon Service France BP 10, 1445 avenue de l'Europe, aéroport du passengers, cargo, mail A 12.12.2014 Bourget, 93352 Le Bourget Cedex France DreamJet (trademark: La Compagnie) 53 avenue Jean Jaurès passengers, cargo, mail A 27.6.2014 93350 Le Bourget France EWA AIR Place de France - Immeuble Issoufali - BP 52 passengers, cargo, mail A 1.1.2014 97610 Dzaoudzi C 154/7 (1) OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Office
    23.4.2021 ES Diar io Ofi cial de la Unión Europea L 139/1 II (Actos no legislativos) REGLAMENTOS REGLAMENTO (UE) 2021/662 DE LA COMISIÓN de 22 de abril de 2021 por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CE) n.o 748/2009 de la Comisión sobre la lista de operadores de aeronaves que han realizado una actividad de aviación enumerada en el anexo I de la Directiva 2003/87/CE el 1 de enero de 2006 o a partir de esta fecha, en la que se especifica el Estado miembro responsable de la gestión de cada operador (Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE) LA COMISIÓN EUROPEA, Visto el Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea, Vista la Directiva 2003/87/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 13 de octubre de 2003, por la que se establece un régimen para el comercio de derechos de emisión de gases de efecto invernadero en la Unión y por la que se modifica la Directiva 96/61/CE del Consejo (1), y en particular su artículo 18 bis, apartado 3, letra b), Considerando que: (1) Las actividades de la aviación están incluidas en el régimen para el comercio de derechos de emisión de gases de efecto invernadero dentro de la Unión (en lo sucesivo, «RCDE UE»). (2) El Reglamento (CE) n.o 748/2009 de la Comisión (2) establece una lista de los operadores de aeronaves que han realizado una actividad de aviación enumerada en el anexo I de la Directiva 2003/87/CE el 1 de enero de 2006 o a partir de esta fecha.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Engines 2013
    SPECIAL REPORT COMMERCIAL ENGINES 2013 IN ASSOCIATION WITH Sponsor Advert LEAP year We’re writing to confirm a date we made with our customers in 2008. The first LEAP engine will begin testing this autumn. Right on schedule. Just like our last 21 engines. Adjust your calendars, we’ve made this a LEAP year. Go to cfmaeroengines.com See the LEAP engine come to life. Get the CFM LEAP app NOW. CFM International is a 50/50 joint company between Snecma (Safran) and GE. Superior performance | Lower cost of ownership | Greater reliability MORE TO BELIEVE IN Flightglobal Insight | 3 C31925.029_CFM_CALENDAR_CommEngRep_17June_267x197_v1.indd 1 06/06/2013 15:02 COMMERCIAL ENGINES 2013 FOREWORD So far so good is probably the best way to summarise progress on engine for the A320neo family. The PW1100G – which has entered key commercial engine programmes during the past 12 months. flight testing – was designed with a variable area fan nozzle, but Prospects for the long-term profitability of many of the world’s P&W has decided this can be removed to “make the engine lighter airlines rest on the ability of CFM International and Pratt & Whitney and less complex”. to deliver the powerplants that should enable the next generation of narrowbodies to provide a step-change improvement in operating In the widebody sector, the prototype Airbus A350 XWB had its Rolls- economics. Royce Trent XWB engines installed and was expected to fly for the first time by the end of June 2013. The recent grounding of the latest Choosing the right engine may never have been more important – widebody twinjet to enter airline service - Boeing’s 787 - means the or harder – than with the Airbus A320neo family.
    [Show full text]
  • Group ROW by State of Administration
    BELGIUM CRCO Identification no. Operator Name State of the Operator 46463 ACE BELGIUM FREIGHTERS BELGIUM S.A. 31102 ACT AIRLINES TURKEY 38484 AEROTRANSCARGO MOLDOVA, REPUBLIC OF 41049 AHS AIR INT PAKISTAN 7649 AIRBORNE EXPRESS UNITED STATES 33612 ALLIED AIR LIMITED NIGERIA 27011 ASL AIRLINES BELGIUM BELGIUM 31416 AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY TAJIKISTAN 30020 AVIASTAR-TU CO. RUSSIAN FEDERATION 123 Abelag Aviation NV BELGIUM 908 BRUSSELS AIRLINES BELGIUM 25996 CAIRO AVIATION EGYPT 4369 CAL CARGO AIRLINES ISRAEL 29517 CAPITAL AVTN SRVCS NETHERLANDS f11336 CORPORATE WINGS LLC UNITED STATES 32909 CRESAIR UNITED STATES 32432 EGYPTAIR CARGO EGYPT f12977 EXCELLENT INVESTMENT UNITED STATES LLC 32486 FAYARD ENTERPRISES UNITED STATES f11102 FedEx Express Corporate UNITED STATES Aviation 13457 Flying Partners CVBA BELGIUM 29427 Flying Service N.V. BELGIUM 24578 GAFI GENERAL AVIAT MAURITIUS f12983 GREEN DIESEL LLC UNITED STATES 29980 HAINAN AIRLINES (2) CHINA 23700 HEWA BORA AIRWAYS CONGO 28582 INTER WETAIL AG SWITZERLAND 9542 INTL PAPER CY UNITED STATES 27709 KALITTA AIR UNITED STATES 28087 LAS VEGAS CHARTER UNITED STATES 32303 MASTER TOP LINHAS BRAZIL 37066 MERIDIAN (AIRWAYS) BELGIUM 1084 MIL BELGIUM BELGIUM 31207 N604FJ LLC UNITED STATES f11462 N907WS AVIATION LLC UNITED STATES 26688 NEWELL RUBBERMAID UNITED STATES f10341 OfficeMax Inc UNITED STATES 31660 RIPPLEWOOD AVTN UNITED STATES 2344 SAUDIA SAUDI ARABIA 29222 SILVERBACK CARGO RWANDA 39079 SOLARIUS AVIATION UNITED STATES 35334 SONOCO PRODUCTS CO UNITED STATES BELGIUM 26784 SOUTHERN AIR UNITED STATES 38995 STANLEY BLACK&DECKER UNITED STATES 27769 Sea Air BELGIUM 34920 TRIDENT AVIATION SVC UNITED STATES 30011 TUI AIRLINES - JAF BELGIUM 27911 ULTIMATE ACFT SERVIC UNITED STATES 13603 VF CORP UNITED STATES 36269 VF INTERNATIONAL SWITZERLAND 37064 VIPER CLASSICS LTD UNITED KINGDOM f11467 WILSON & ASSOCIATES OF UNITED STATES DELAWARE LLC 37549 YILTAS GROUP TURKEY BULGARIA CRCO Identification no.
    [Show full text]
  • 514 505 57,76% 415 827 51,15% 890 760 812
    Liczba pasażerów obsłużonych w polskich portach lotniczych w krajowym i międzynarodowym ruchu czarterowym w drugim kwartale 2011 i 2012 roku 2012 2011 liczba liczba Przewoźnik l.p. pasażerów udział l.p. pasażerów udział Enter Air 1 254 553 28,58% 1 232 834 28,64% Travel Service AS 2 165 637 18,60% 2 128 620 15,82% Small Planet Airlines 3 57 828 6,49% 7 28 535 3,51% OLT Express Poland 4 48 877 5,49% – – – Nouvelair Tunisie 5 38 893 4,37% 17 10 969 1,35% Travel Service Polska 6 35 978 4,04% – – – OLT Express Regional 7 31 845 3,58% – – – Air Cairo 8 31 139 3,50% 9 27 891 3,43% LOT Polish Airlines + EuroLOT 9 26 484 2,97% 3 64 381 7,92% Yes Airways 10 26 299 2,95% 4 52 798 6,49% Pegasus Airlines 11 25 995 2,92% – – – Bingo Airways 12 17 963 2,02% – – – Sky Airlines 13 14 843 1,67% 11 22 149 2,72% SprintAir 14 13 976 1,57% – – – Nesma 15 12 693 1,42% 15 14 117 1,74% Corendon Airlines 16 10 632 1,19% 14 14 344 1,76% Aegean Airlines 17 5 866 0,66% 16 11 753 1,45% Bulgarian Air Charter 18 4 628 0,52% 19 7 062 0,87% Sky Express 19 4 184 0,47% 54 170 0,02% Air Arabia 20 3 512 0,39% – – – Israir 21 2 354 0,26% 23 2 235 0,27% Privilege Style 22 2 339 0,26% – – – Alitalia 23 2 248 0,25% 29 781 0,10% Air Fiji 24 2 151 0,24% – – – Hi Fly 25 2 014 0,23% – – – Pozostali przewoźnicy 47 829 5,37% 194 339 23,90% Przewoźnicy polscy* 514 505 57,76% 415 827 51,15% SUMA 890 760 812 978 *Przewoźnicy polscy: Enter Air, Small Planet Airlines, OLT Express Poland, Travel Service Polska, OLT Express Regional, LOT Polish Airlines + EuroLOT, Yes Airways, Bingo Airways, SprintAir, Air Poland Źródło: Opracowanie ULC na podstawie informacji uzyskanych z portów lotniczych, Warszawa, październik 2012 Liczba pasażerów obsłużonych w polskich portach lotniczych w krajowym i międzynarodowym ruchu czarterowym w pierwszym półroczu 2011 i 2012 roku 2012 2011 liczba liczba Przewoźnik l.p.
    [Show full text]