Download (2MB)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download (2MB) MIXED NETWORKS IN BUILDING INNOVATIVE CAPABILITY IN DEVELOPING ECONOMIES: THE TURKISH CASE by Yesim Sungu-Eryilmaz Bachelor of City Planning (BCP), Middle East Technical University,1992 Master of City Planning (MCP) University of Pennsylvania,1997 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Public and International Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2006 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS This dissertation was presented by Yesim Sungu-Eryilmaz It was defended on July 20, 2006 and approved by Ilhan Tekeli, Professor, CRP, METU Phyllis Coontz, Associate Professor, GSPIA Clyde Mitchell-Weaver, Associate Professor, GSPIA Dissertation Advisor: Sabina E. Deitrick, Associate Professor, GSPIA ii Copyright © by Yesim Sungu-Eryilmaz 2006 iii MIXED NETWORKS IN BUILDING INNOVATIVE CAPABILITY IN DEVELOPING ECONOMIES: THE TURKISH CASE Yesim Sungu-Eryilmaz, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2006 This study investigates the networking behavior of innovative firms in two regions in Turkey: Ankara and Istanbul. Specifically, it compares the geographical extent and characteristics of innovation networks between the two regions when firms carry out innovation, i.e. developing new or improved products or processes. Ego-centric networks of 89 firms were studied to investigate the geographical extent and the nature of innovation network ties. Based on these two regional case studies, three conclusions were made: (1) when firms in developing countries introduce technological innovation of products and/or processes, they engage in mixed networks, i.e. local and non-local (interregional and international) networks, (2) while local networks are important, non-local networks are used to access capabilities that are not present locally; these networks are not substitutes for each other but complementary, and (3) innovative firms in both types of regions (new vs. established) engage in mixed networks. However, the characteristics of these networks differ based on the region’s development level. It, therefore, makes sense, analytically as well as politically, to distinguish between different types of networks, so that a much broader array of policy implications can be made for building innovative capability from this wider perspective in developing countries. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................V LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................................................. VIII LIST OF FIGURES....................................................................................................................................................X LIST OF MAPS ........................................................................................................................................................ XI ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................................................................................XII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................. XIII CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION: INNOVATION AND NETWORKING.......................................................1 1.1 AN OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2. INNOVATION, NETWORKING, AND TERRITORIAL DYNAMICS..................................5 2.1 INNOVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................................5 2.2 INNOVATION PROCESS...............................................................................................................................14 2.3 INTERACTIVE INNOVATION PROCESS: KNOWLEDGE AND INNOVATION NETWORKS ..................................17 2.4 TERRITORIAL INNOVATION MODELS.........................................................................................................19 2.4.1 Industrial districts................................................................................................................................20 2.4.2 Innovative milieu .................................................................................................................................22 2.4.3 New industrial spaces (NIS) ................................................................................................................23 2.4.4 Regional innovation system (RIS)........................................................................................................25 2.4.5 Commonalities in territorial innovation models..................................................................................26 2.5 NON-LOCAL DIMENSION IN TERRITORIAL INNOVATION MODELS .............................................................29 2.6 CONCLUSION: TOWARDS A NEW NETWORK COMPOSITION.......................................................................35 CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH METHOD ...............................................................................................................39 3.1 OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY..........................................................................................39 3.2 RESEARCH METHOD: COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY ..................................................................................41 3.2.1 Selection of cases.................................................................................................................................42 3.3 DATA COLLECTION ...................................................................................................................................43 3.3.1 Unit of analysis and selection of establishments..................................................................................43 3.3.2 Data sources ........................................................................................................................................46 3.3.3 Data and variables...............................................................................................................................48 3.3.3.1 Firm characteristics.................................................................................................................................... 49 3.3.3.2 Innovation activities................................................................................................................................... 50 3.3.3.3 Innovation networks and their characteristics............................................................................................ 55 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................................................66 CHAPTER 4. RESEARCH SETTING................................................................................................................69 4.1 NATIONAL CONTEXT: INNOVATION AND INDUSTRIALIZATION POLICIES SINCE 1923................................69 4.1.1 Liberal era: 1923-1930........................................................................................................................71 4.1.2 State involvement in the 1930-1949.....................................................................................................73 4.1.3 Liberalism in 1950s .............................................................................................................................76 4.1.4 Import substitution industrialization: 1960-1980 ................................................................................79 v 4.1.5 Macro economic reforms and structural adjustment policies after 1980 ............................................82 4.2 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY REGIONS..........................................................................................................90 4.2.1 Industrial geography in Turkey ...........................................................................................................90 4.2.2 Population size and change in Ankara and Istanbul ...........................................................................91 4.2.3 Economic trajectories and profiles......................................................................................................93 4.2.4 Innovation profiles.............................................................................................................................101 4.3 CONCLUSION...........................................................................................................................................103 CHAPTER 5. INNOVATION ACTIVITIES AND NETWORKING IN THE ANKARA REGION ..........104 5.1 WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INNOVATIVE FIRMS IN ANKARA?................................................105 5.1.1 The Spatial distribution of firms in Ankara .......................................................................................108 5.1.2 Entrepreneurship and incubation ......................................................................................................112 5.1.3 Geography of markets........................................................................................................................116 5.2 THE LEVEL OF INNOVATION ACTIVITIES IN ANKARA .............................................................................118
Recommended publications
  • Across the Slope” Interpretation Pack
    Ahmet Öğüt “Across the Slope” interpretation pack interpretation pack contents 3 Introduction to SALT 4 Modern Essays 1: Ahmet Öğüt “Across the Slope” 5 TO EDUCATORS 6 OPENING DISCUSSION: The Fiat 131 7 UNIT ONE: Mobility & the Automobile 9 Re-Imagining urban Transit 11 unit two: Marketing Modernity 14 The Place you cannot go is not yours 18 research & discuss: The Devrim 19 closing discussion: The People’s Car 20 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION TO SALT SALT explores critical and timely issues in visual and material culture, and cultivates innovative programs for research and experimental thinking. Assuming an open attitude and establishing itself as a site of learning and debate SALT aims to challenge, excite and provoke its visitors by encouraging them to offer critique and response. SALT Research sources diverse fields of knowledge and provides outlets for thought within the fissures and crossovers of different disciplines. The institution’s research projects expand beyond linear chronologies, medium-based questions, and the traditional separation of fields of study. SALT assembles archives of recent art, architecture, design, urbanism, and social and economic histories to make them available for research and public use. These resources will be interpreted in SALT’s activities are distributed between two the form of exhibitions and discussed in all other landmark buildings located no more than a areas of programming. fifteen-minute walk apart, and also shared via saltonline. The first building, SALT Beyoğlu, is on the pedestrian street İstiklal Caddesi, and shares its audience with a cluster of private cultural institutions, galleries and organizations. SALT Beyoğlu’s program and circulation interiors are mostly occupied by exhibition and event spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation May 2019 Herkese Açık | Public Contents 2
    Herkese Açık | Public Investor Presentation May 2019 Herkese Açık | Public Contents 2 . About Ford Otosan 3 . Plants and Facilities 11 . Products 18 . Investment Case 25 . Operating and Financial Performance 45 . Guidance 65 . Contacts 66 Herkese Açık | Public 3 About Ford Otosan Herkese Açık | Public Company Profile 4 Key Indicators, 2018 Revenues $6.9 billion Export Revenues $5.7 billion EBITDA $590 million Ford Motor Co. Koç Group Ford Otosan Profit Before Tax $364 million 41% 41% Net Profit $348 million ROE 43.2% Free Float EBITDA margin 8.6% 18% Annual Production Capacity 455,000 Gölcük (Transit & Custom) 330,000 Yeniköy (Courier) 110,000 İnönü (Cargo) 15,000 Paid-in Capital: TL 350,910,000 Total Employees 10,598 Traded on Borsa Istanbul since 13 January 1986 Hourly 8,086 Ticker: FROTO.IS Salaried 2,512 Herkese Açık | Public Ford Otosan at a Glance 5 First Turkish passenger car Anadol (1966) Pioneer of Turkish Turkey’s first domestic diesel engine Erk (1986) automotive Turkey’s first private R&D center in automotive (1961) First export of Turkish automotive to the US (2009) Turkey’s export champion Strong value Turkey’s 2nd largest industrial enterprise contribution Highest employment in Turkish automotive Ford’s largest commercial vehicle manufacturer in Europe Leadership and Widest product range in Turkish automotive scale 31% market share in Turkish commercial vehicles Herkese Açık | Public Leading the Turkish Automotive Industry 6 24% 31% of Turkey’s of Turkey’s Total automotive Commercial vehicle production sales 71% 74% of
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation March 2021 Public Contents 2
    Public Investor Presentation March 2021 Public Contents 2 . About Ford Otosan 3 . Plants and Facilities 11 . Products 19 . Electrification Roadmap 26 . Investment Case 31 . Operating and Financial Performance 55 . Sustainability Commitment 76 . Covid-19 Update 93 . Guidance 97 . Contacts 98 Public 3 About Ford Otosan Public Company Profile 4 Key Indicators, 2020 Revenues $7.0 billion Export Revenues $4.9 billion EBITDA $815 million Ford Motor Co.* Koç Group Ford Otosan Profit Before Tax $585 million 41% 41% Net Profit $598 million ROE 59.6% Free Float EBITDA margin 11.6% 18% Annual Production Capacity 455,000 Gölcük (Transit & Custom) 330,000 Yeniköy (Courier) 110,000 Eskişehir (Cargo) 15,000 Paid-in Capital: TL 350,910,000 Total Employees 12,517 Traded on Borsa Istanbul since 13 January 1986 Hourly 9,913 Ticker: FROTO.IS Salaried 2,604 * Ford Deutschland Holding GmbH: %100 owned by Ford Motor Company Public Ford Otosan at a Glance 5 First Turkish passenger car Anadol (1966) Pioneer of Turkish Turkey’s first domestic diesel engine Erk (1986) automotive Turkey’s first private R&D center in automotive (1961) First export of Turkish automotive to the US (2009) Turkey’s export champion Strong value Turkey’s 2nd largest industrial enterprise contribution Highest employment in Turkish automotive Ford’s largest commercial vehicle manufacturer in Europe Leadership and Widest product range in Turkish automotive scale 39% market share in Turkish commercial vehicles Public Leading the Turkish Automotive Industry 6 of Turkey’s of Turkey’s Total automotive
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation February 2020 Public Contents 2
    Public Investor Presentation February 2020 Public Contents 2 . About Ford Otosan 3 . Plants and Facilities 11 . Products 19 . Investment Case 26 . Operating and Financial Performance 50 . Sustainability Commitment 72 . Guidance 86 . Contacts 87 Public 3 About Ford Otosan Public Company Profile 4 Key Indicators, 2019 Revenues $6.9 billion Export Revenues $5.9 billion EBITDA $563 million Ford Motor Co.* Koç Group Ford Otosan Profit Before Tax $342 million 41% 41% Net Profit $343 million ROE 42.0% Free Float EBITDA margin 8.2% 18% Annual Production Capacity 455,000 Gölcük (Transit & Custom) 330,000 Yeniköy (Courier) 110,000 Eskişehir (Cargo) 15,000 Paid-in Capital: TL 350,910,000 Total Employees 10,899 Traded on Borsa Istanbul since 13 January 1986 Hourly 8,290 Ticker: FROTO.IS Salaried 2,609 * Ford Deutschland Holding GmbH: %100 owned by Ford Motor Company Public Ford Otosan at a Glance 5 First Turkish passenger car Anadol (1966) Pioneer of Turkish Turkey’s first domestic diesel engine Erk (1986) automotive Turkey’s first private R&D center in automotive (1961) First export of Turkish automotive to the US (2009) Turkey’s export champion Strong value Turkey’s 2nd largest industrial enterprise contribution Highest employment in Turkish automotive Ford’s largest commercial vehicle manufacturer in Europe Leadership and Widest product range in Turkish automotive scale 34% market share in Turkish commercial vehicles Public Leading the Turkish Automotive Industry 6 25% 34% of Turkey’s of Turkey’s Total automotive Commercial vehicle production
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Strategic Alliances on the Development of Automotive Industry: the Case of Turkey
    Journal of Global Strategic Management | V. 1 | N. 1 | 2007-June | isma.info | 124-132 | DOI: 10.20460/JGSM.2007118721 THE EFFECT OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY: THE CASE OF TURKEY Ayúegül Samsunlu Beykent University, Ali Akdemir Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University ABSTRACT able about the sector. Strategic alliances are formed in order to spread risk, Key words: Strategic alliances, automotive sector, increase market power, preempt resources, access new exports, labor, research and development. markets and gain organizational learning. Among the various functions, knowledge acquisition, transfer and generation of technology have been regarded as the primary motives of strategic alliances in certain INTRODUCTION industries especially highly technological industries. The automotive industry is one of the most important sectors that have effect on the development of the The strategic alliances in the automotive sector have economy of a country. Due to the increase in the use been formed among the companies that operate in of passenger cars especially in the developed countries four regions on the world. These regions are USA and and recently all around the world there is an increase NAFTA, European Union, Japan and Korea. GM and in the amount of manufactured cars and the number of Saab have entered into a strategic alliance in 1990. exported cars. GM and FIAT has formed a strategic alliance in 2001. During recent years, some alliances have been formed According to the 2004 statistics of world figures, 80% in China. FAW -Toyota and Zongfeng -Nissan are the of the passenger cars that have been manufactured are two examples of these alliances.
    [Show full text]
  • Otomotiv Sektör Raporu |Ocak 2017
    Otomotiv Sektör Raporu |Ocak 2017 Otomotiv Sektör Raporu Türkiye Otomotiv Sanayii Rekabet Gücü ve Talep Dinamikleri Perspektifinde 2020 İç Pazar Beklentileri | Ocak 2017 Sercan Pişkin [email protected] TSKB Ekonomik Araştırmalar Otomotiv Sektör Raporu |Ocak 2017 Otomotiv Ana Sanayii sektörünün analizi amacıyla hazırlanmış olan bu rapor, Türkiye Sınai Kalkınma Bankası A.Ş.’nin uzman kadrosun- ca güvenilir olarak kabul edilen kaynaklardan elde edilen verilerle hazırlanmıştır. Raporda yer alan görüşler ve öngörüler, rapor kapsa- mında belirtilen ve kullanılan yöntemler ile sektör temsilcileriyle yapılan görüşmelerle üretilen sonuçları yansıtmakta olup bu verilerin tamlığı ve doğruluğundan Türkiye Sınai Kalkınma Bankası A.Ş.'nin herhangi bir sorumluluğu bulunmamaktadır. Raporda yer alan sonuç- lar, görüşler, düşünceler ve öngörüler, Türkiye Sınai Kalkınma Bankası A.Ş. tarafından açık ya da gizli olarak bir garanti ve beklenti oluş- turmaz. Diğer bir ifadeyle; bu raporda yer alan tüm bilgi ve verileri kullanma ve uygulama sorumluluğu, doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak, bu rapora dayanarak yatırım kararı veren ya da finansman sağlayan kişilere ait olup, elde edilen sonuçtan dolayı üçüncü kişilerin doğ- rudan ya da dolaylı olarak uğradıkları zarardan Türkiye Sınai Kalkınma Bankası A.Ş. hiçbir şekilde sorumlu tutulamaz. Bu doküman ileriye dönük tahminleri de kapsamaktadır. Türkiye Sınai Kalkınma Bankası A.Ş. bu tahminlere ulaşılamaması ya da Ra- por’daki bilgilerin tam ve doğru olmamasından sorumlu tutulamaz. © 2017 Bu raporun tüm hakları saklıdır. Türkiye Sınai Kalkınma Bankası A.Ş.’nin izni olmadan raporun içeriği herhangi bir şekilde bası- lamaz, çoğaltılamaz, fotokopi veya teksir edilemez, dağıtılamaz. 2 Otomotiv Sektör Raporu |Ocak 2017 İçindekiler Yönetici Özeti ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Bölüm 1: Küresel Otomotiv Endüstrisi Otomotiv Endüstrisinin Önemi..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Automotive and Spare Parts
    © Republic of Turkey - Ministry of Economy, 2012 0 AUTOMOTIVE AND SPARE PARTS TURKEY’S VEHICLE INDUSTRY Production Vehicle industry production in Turkey dates back to the mid-1950s and the industry gained momentum in the early 1960s. After manufacturing some prototype vehicles during the 1950s, the first vehicle assembly company was established in 1954 (Turk Willys Overland Ltd.) for jeep manufacturing. By 1955, trucks, and by 1963, buses were being assembled in Turkey. Then passenger car assembly companies, namely TOFAŞ (FIAT), OYAK (RENAULT) and OTOSAN (FORD) began operations in the next three years. In 1966, the industry also began to assemble its own cars (OTOSAN). The Turkish-made passenger car of those times, “ANADOL”, is nostalgia now. The two major producers of cars, TOFAŞ and OYAK-RENAULT, under Italian and French licenses respectively, established their production lines in 1971. Recently, Japanese and South Korean car manufacturers have established joint-ventures in Turkey. In 1999, Turkish truck manufacturer BMC began to export its own design trucks to the United Kingdom, Spain and Portugal. As to passenger cars and light commercial vehicles, Turkish manufacturers are becoming world production centers of global companies, with whom they have license agreements. At present, Turkey is the biggest light commercial vehicle and bus manufacturer in the European Union. Today, 13 companies are manufacturing various types of vehicles such as passenger cars, buses, trucks, pick-ups, mini and midi-buses and trailers. Five companies are producing passenger cars (FIAT, HONDA, HYUNDAI, RENAULT, TOYOTA), ten companies are producing pick-ups and trucks (ANADOLU ISUZU, BMC, FORD OTOSAN, HYUNDAI, KARSAN, M.A.N., MERCEDES-BENZ, OTOKAR, TEMSA, TOFAŞ) and nine companies are producing buses and mini buses ( BMC, FORD, HYUNDAI, ANADOLU ISUZU, KARSAN, M.A.N, MERCEDES-BENZ, OTOKAR, TEMSA).
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Overview of Architectural Competitons in Turkey
    5th International Conference on Competitions 2014 Delft A Critical Overview of Architectural Competitons in Turkey Two Contradicted Competition Stories in Istanbul: IMC Blocks / Zorlu Center Projects Devrim Isikkaya 308 5th International Conference on Competitions 2014 Delft A CRITICAL OVERVIEW of Architectural Competitons in Turkey: TWO CONTRADICTED COMPETITION STORIES IN ISTANBUL: IMC BLOCKS / ZORLU CENTER PROJECTS Assist. Prof. Devrim ISIKKAYA Faculty of Architecture and Design Bahcesehir University Istanbul e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Short Introduction of the Topic of Research: Upon the demand of Linen Drapers and Cloth Merchants Market Cooperative, in 1954-55 an area between Bozdogan Archway and Unkapani Bridge along the edge of the historical peninsula Istanbul. Again, upon the demand of the cooperative, the “Site Construction Plan” competition was opened in 1958 for this area and Cihat Findikoglu and his team won the competition. Later on, in 1959, an invitee architecture design competition which covered about 160.000sqm was organized on the area. This competition was won by SITE Architecture Group. The project was constructed in 1961-1967, by remaining true to a majority of its characteristics and was opened with a ceremony by the Prime Minister of the time. The Research Methods: Evaluation of the documents regarding the both competition process, site analysis, interviews with the clients, designer groups and the consumer and the owner of the erected buildings, critical overview and competitive analysis of the both projects Preliminary Results: Contradictory characteristics of the both multi-leg competition mix-used projects regarding the jury, client, designer, urban and architectural design approaches The Specific Theme (of the Conference): - What is a competition? A critical debate on their roles, their contribution to the quality of our built environment and their characteristics across countries and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Automotive and Autoparts Industries in Turkey
    AUTOMOTIVE AND AUTOPARTS INDUSTRIES IN TURKEY Prepared by Sinan YÜZAL 2007 Export Promotion Center of Turkey AUTOMOTIVE AND AUTOPARTS INDUSTRIES IN TURKEY TURKEY’S VEHICLE INDUSTRY PRODUCTION Vehicle industry production in Turkey dates back to the mid­1950s and the industry gained momentum in the early 1960s. After manufacturing some prototype vehicles during the 1950s, the first vehicle assembly company was established in 1954 (Turk Willys Overland Ltd.) for jeep manufacturing. By 1955 trucks and by 1963 buses were being assembled in Turkey. Then passenger car assembly companies, namely TOFAŞ (FIAT), OYAK (RENAULT) and OTOSAN (FORD) started operations in the following three years. In 1966 the industry also began to assemble its own cars (OTOSAN). The Turkish­made passenger car of those times “ANADOL” is nostalgia now. The two major producers of cars, TOFAŞ and OYAK­RENAULT, under Italian and French licenses respectively, established their production lines in 1971. Recently Japanese and South Korean car manufacturers have established joint­ventures in Turkey. In 1999, Turkish truck manufacturer BMC began to export its own design trucks to the United Kingdom, Spain and Portugal. BMC also signed a contract with Iran covering delivery of 10,000 buses and trucks in CBU or CKD/SKD form –for assembly­ to Iran. As to passenger cars and light commercial vehicles, Turkish manufacturers are becoming world production centers of global companies, whom they have licence agreements with. Today 15 companies are manufacturing various types of vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • FORMATO PDF Ranking Instituciones No Acadã©Micas Por Sub áRea
    Ranking Instituciones No Académicas por sub área OCDE 2020 2. Ingeniería y Tecnología > 2.03 Ingeniería Mecánica PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE FRANCE Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 1 5,000 CHINA Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 5,000 USA United States Department of Energy (DOE) 3 5,000 GERMANY Helmholtz Association 4 5,000 RUSSIA Russian Academy of Sciences 5 5,000 FRANCE CNRS - Institute for Engineering & Systems Sciences (INSIS) 6 5,000 FRANCE CEA 7 5,000 USA National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA) 8 5,000 USA United States Department of Defense 9 5,000 ITALY Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) 10 5,000 GERMANY German Aerospace Centre (DLR) 11 5,000 CHINA University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS 12 5,000 ITALY Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare 13 5,000 USA Sandia National Laboratory 14 5,000 USA Oak Ridge National Laboratory 15 5,000 GERMANY Max Planck Society 16 5,000 CZECH REPUBLIC Czech Academy of Sciences 17 5,000 USA Los Alamos National Laboratory 18 5,000 JAPAN Japan Atomic Energy Agency 19 5,000 USA United States Air Force 20 5,000 USA General Electric 21 5,000 POLAND Polish Academy of Sciences 22 5,000 SPAIN Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC) 23 5,000 GERMANY Siemens AG 24 5,000 USA Argonne National Laboratory 25 5,000 GERMANY Fraunhofer Gesellschaft 26 5,000 USA NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) 27 5,000 INDIA Bhabha Atomic Research Center 28 5,000 SOUTH KOREA Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) 29 5,000 USA Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Brief Turkish – Canadian Relations
    TURKEY BRIEF TURKISH – CANADIAN RELATIONS May 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE……………………………………………………1 1 COUNTRY PROFILE: 1.1 INTRODUCING TURKEY………………………...……………………...3 1.2 FUTURE PROSPECTS…………………………………………………… 6 2 TURKISH-CANADIAN ECONOMIC RELATIONS. .....................................7 2.1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................. 7 2.2 TURKISH-CANADIAN BUSINESS COUNCIL ........................................8 2.3 HIGHLIGHTS IN 2006 AND 2007 ............................................................10 2.4 BILATERAL TRADE .................................................................................13 2.5 CANADIAN INVESTMENTS IN TURKEY .............................................15 2.6 EDC IN TURKEY.......................................................................................16 3 BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES ..........................................................................17 CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE DEVLOPMENT ......................20 DEFENSE ....................................................................................................30 ENERGY ......................................................................................................36 ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA ............................................................62 FINANCIAL SERVICES .............................................................................64 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ....................................................................80 EDUCATION ...............................................................................................85
    [Show full text]
  • Hisar-A and Hisar-O Air Defence Missile Systems and Test Activities
    VOLUME 14 . ISSUE 96 . YEAR 2019 ADVENT A PLATFORM ATMACA’S FIRST INDEPENDENT CMS NAVAL LAUNCH CONDUCTED SUCCESSFULLY FROM TCG KINALIADA AIRBUS PROGRAM CORVETTE UPDATES SHARED WITH MEDIA AT THE 8TH TRADE MEDIA BRIEFING IN GERMANY ALTAY TURKEY’S EXPERTS IN MILITARY & CIVILIAN CUSTOMER SPECIFIC SOFTWARE A LOOK AT ISSN 1306 5998 HİSAR-A AND HİSAR-O AIR DEFENCE MISSILE SYSTEMS AND TEST ACTIVITIES Publisher 20 30 Hatice Ayşe EVERS Editor in Chief Ayşe AKALIN [email protected] Managing Editor Cem AKALIN [email protected] International Relations Director Şebnem AKALIN [email protected] PAC to Initiate the Delivery of MFI-395 Super Mushshak to the Editor Turkish Air Force in June 2020 İbrahim SÜNNETÇİ [email protected] Administrative Coordinator Yeşim BİLGİNOĞLU YÖRÜK [email protected] ALTAY Turkey’s 32 Correspondent Saffet UYANIK Experts in Military [email protected] and Civilian Translation Customer Specific Tanyel AKMAN [email protected] Software Editing Mona Melleberg YÜKSELTÜRK Graphics & Design Gülsemin BOLAT Görkem ELMAS [email protected] 18 SaSaD: “Event Photographer Evaluation & Sinan Niyazi KUTSAL Decision Committee Advisory Board to be Established (R) Major General Fahir ALTAN by the SSB, MoND (R) Navy Captain Zafer BETONER and SaSaD as a Prof Dr. Nafiz ALEMDAROĞLU Cem KOÇ Solution for Event Asst. Prof. Dr. Altan ÖZKİL Excessiveness in Kaya YAZGAN Ali KALIPÇI Turkey.” Zeynep KAREL DEFENCE TURKEY Administrative Office DT Medya LTD.STI Airbus
    [Show full text]