DOCSLIB.ORG

Whole Day Download the Hansard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whole Day Download the Hansard Tuesday Volume 599 15 September 2015 No. 44 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 15 September 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 885 15 SEPTEMBER 2015 886 House of Commons Sajid Javid: My hon. Friend highlights an important issue. [HON.MEMBERS: “Shambles!”] Labour Members are talking about their EU policy, but my hon. Friend Tuesday 15 September 2015 wants to hear my answer. We want more free trade, which means that, at this point, we have to work with the EU. For example, if the free trade agreement being The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock negotiated between the EU and the US—the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership—goes through as planned, it will add £10 billion a year to GDP, which is PRAYERS worth £400 for every hard-working family in Britain. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Kelvin Hopkins (Luton North) (Lab): I utterly reject the idea that TTIP will be beneficial, but that is another question. The head of Vauxhall has said today that he is fairly relaxed about whether Britain remains a member Oral Answers to Questions of the European Union. We still import twice as many cars as we export, so there is plenty of scope for Britain to expand its manufacturing sector. BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND SKILLS Sajid Javid: Under this Government, the manufacturing sector in Britain has been growing strongly, thanks to The Secretary of State was asked— our policies to reduce the deficit and bring back economic EU Membership: Business confidence. As I have said, working with our EU partners is hugely important to increasing trade, particularly 1. Huw Irranca-Davies (Ogmore) (Lab): What recent exports, and for sectors such as the automotive industry. assessment he has made of the UK’s membership of They are doing very well, but they could do better if we keep working with our partners. the EU on businesses. [901321] The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Neil Carmichael (Stroud) (Con): Given that so many Skills and President of the Board of Trade (Sajid Javid): of our firms are in supply chains that benefit from the The UK was the fastest growing major advanced economy single market, does the Secretary of State agree that it is in 2014. The OECD forecasts that that is to continue in absolutely necessary for the Prime Minister to make 2015. This Government’s ambition is for Britain to be sure that we reform that single market so that we can the most prosperous major nation in the world by the stay in the European Union and continue to thrive as a 2030s, and free trade with the rest of Europe has a very nation? important role to play in that. Sajid Javid: We are focused on delivering a successful Huw Irranca-Davies: I welcome those words. The renegotiation, and once that is done we will let the First Minister of Wales, Carwyn Jones, was in Japan British people make the decision in the referendum. only last week, building on our strong cultural, economic Having a better single market is at the heart of that and social ties with that country, which have developed renegotiation: it is about having more competition, less over a long time, and promoting our exports, which red tape and more free trade. increased by 27% in Wales last year, building on the work of established companies such as Toyota, Sony Michelle Thomson (Edinburgh West) (SNP): Firms and Sharp. Those companies view Wales and the UK’s such as Nestlé and automotive companies such as Hyundai membership of the European Union as key to the and Ford have indicated that a Brit exit could result in trading relationship and the thousands of jobs it underpins. their scaling back. The UK automotive industry employs Does the Minister agree with them? more than 700,000 people and accounts for 3% of GDP, according to KPMG. Does the Secretary of State really Sajid Javid: I respect the hon. Gentleman, but given believe that it is worth risking foreign investment in the the utter shambles of his party’s EU policy I am surprised UK to solve an ideological battle within the Tory party? that he wants to ask that question. It is clear that free trade is hugely important to the prosperity of our Sajid Javid: The hon. Lady will know that the debate nation, and that means working with our EU partners about the EU has been going on for many years and the on more free trade agreements. That is at the heart of right thing to do is to renegotiate. In order for that our renegotiation, because we want more free trade renegotiation to be successful, it is right to have a with an EU that is outward looking, not just inward referendum. That is exactly what this Government are looking. doing, and then the British people will decide. It is also Mr Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con): First, may I clear that this Government have many policies that help congratulate the new Leader of the Opposition on his industries such as the automotive industry to succeed, shift in policy in making Labour more Eurosceptic? such as our investment in skills. Is it not the truth that the European Union holds us back on free trade? Does our current account deficit of Apprenticeships some £50 billion not prove that we would be better off out of the EU, with more free trade, more jobs and 2. Kevin Foster (Torbay) (Con): What plans he has to more business? increase the number of apprenticeships. [901322] 887 Oral Answers15 SEPTEMBER 2015 Oral Answers 888 The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and engineering. Will the Secretary of State tell the House Skills and President of the Board of Trade (Sajid Javid): how he hopes to close the skills gap when there are so The coalition Government have delivered over 2.3 million few apprenticeship opportunities in those subjects? apprenticeship starts since May 2010, and this Government will support 3 million new apprenticeship starts over Sajid Javid: May I again welcome the hon. Lady to this Parliament. We are developing a comprehensive her place and to her new position? I agree with her that plan for growth, including more work with large employers, there is a skills shortage. When we talk to employers more help for small businesses and a new funding across the country, that is one of the first issues that system supported by an employer levy. they bring up. That is why the Government have brought significant investment and focus to bear on the issue. Kevin Foster: I thank the Secretary of State for his For example, we launched our higher apprenticeships answer. Support for further education colleges, including earlier this year and I would like to see those increase; as South Devon college in Torbay, will be vital to delivering I have said, we are currently seeing record growth. We more higher level apprenticeships and, in particular, are also setting up a network of national colleges: there degree-level apprenticeships, which provide the highest will be seven national colleges, and I hope that they will level of training. What plans does he have to support all be operational by September 2017. FE colleges, including South Devon college, in delivering that type of training for employers? Ms Eagle: I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his second welcome in as many days. I hope that there are Sajid Javid: I know that my hon. Friend is very some things we can agree on, even though we started off passionate about this issue. I am happy to congratulate on very disagreeable terms with the Trade Union Bill South Devon college on its plans. Degree apprenticeships yesterday. are a fantastic route to higher level training. I assure my There are serious concerns that in the rush to meet hon. Friend that my Department is working hard with the Government’s artificial, politically driven target, colleges, universities and employers to support what is many apprenticeships are really little more than a rebranding an increasingly popular route. of entry level jobs. The latest Government figures show Jenny Chapman (Darlington) (Lab): I am afraid that that only 3% of new apprenticeships starts were at the there is an issue not just with quantity, but with quality. higher level. How can that be compatible with the With further education in a state that is getting close to Government’s aim of creating a highly skilled workforce? desperate, too few apprenticeships are of a high enough quality. I visited Mech-Tool in my constituency, where Sajid Javid: As the hon. Lady perhaps knows, we are apprenticeships are four years long and people get good starting to see a significant increase in the number of jobs afterwards. What will the Secretary of State do to people taking STEM-related apprenticeships and higher make sure that we improve quality for the rest of our apprenticeships. She will also be aware that, in the apprentices? recent Budget, we announced the introduction of the apprenticeship levy, which will help to make sure that Sajid Javid: The hon. Lady makes an important there is long-term sustainable funding not just for the point. No one wants an increase just in quantity; we at quantity of apprenticeships, but for their quality. I hope the same time want to see quality improve. I hope that she welcomes that. that the hon. Lady will, for example, support the Enterprise Bill, when it is introduced in the other place Mr Alan Mak (Havant) (Con): I welcome the on Thursday, which will for the first time protect the Government’s move to ensure that all big Government term “apprenticeship”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disposal Services Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2006-2007
    Annual Report & Accounts 2006-2007 DisposalSMART 1 What is the Disposal Services Agency? The Disposal Services Agency (DSA) is the sole authority for the disposal process of all surplus defence equipment, with the exception of nuclear, land and buildings. The Agency targets potential markets particularly in developing countries in a pro-active manner; to enable them to procure formally used British defence equipment instead of equipment from other countries. The principal activity of the Agency is the provision of disposal and sales services to MoD and other parts of the public sector. These services include Government-to-Government Sales, Asset Realisation, Inventory Disposals, Site Clearances, Repayment Sales, Waste Management and Consultancy and Valuation Services. DSA’s Aim: To secure the best nancial return from the sale of surplus equipment and stores; to minimise the cost of sales and to operate as an intelligent contracting organisation with various agreements with British Industry and Commerce. DSA’s Mission: To provide Defence and other users with an agreed, effective and ef cient disposals and sales service in order to support UK Defence capability. DSA’s Vision: To be the best government Disposals organisation in the world. DisposalSMART Annual Report & Accounts 2006-2007 A Defence Agency of the Ministry of Defence Annual Report and Accounts 2006-2007 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 7 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 23rd July 2007 HC 705
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Hansard
    House of Commons Hansard The Government's Plan for Brexit 07 December 2016 Volume 618 Mr Speaker I inform the House that I have selected amendment (a) in the name of the Prime Minister. 12:51:00 Keir Starmer (Holborn and St Pancras) (Lab) I beg to move, That this House recognises that leaving the EU is the defining issue facing the UK; notes the resolution on parliamentary scrutiny of the UK leaving the EU agreed by the House on 12 October 2016; recognises that it is Parliament’s responsibility to properly scrutinise the Government while respecting the decision of the British people to leave the European Union; confirms that there should be no disclosure of material that could be reasonably judged to damage the UK in any negotiations to depart from the European Union after Article 50 has been triggered; and calls on the Prime Minister to commit to publishing the Government’s plan for leaving the EU before Article 50 is invoked. For months, Labour has been pressing the Prime Minister and the Government to set out their plan for Brexit. For months, the Prime Minister and a succession of Ministers have refused to do so, either in writing or from this Dispatch Box. Facing defeat on today’s motion, the Government have now caved in—last-minute amendments tell their own story and everybody knows it. This is a victory for common sense. I thank those from various Opposition parties who backed putting pressure on the Government to disclose their plan, and I thank the Conservative Members who, rightly, want to see far more detail about the approach their Front Benchers are intending to take.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY A. INTERVIEWS Jacob Rees-Mogg MP (London), 9th February 2016. Jesse Norman MP (London), 12th September 2016. Nicholas Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Ann Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Peter Hitchens (London), 11th October 2016. Anne Widdecombe (London), 11th October 2016. Lord Salisbury (London), 12th October 2016. Sir William Cash MP (London), 13th October 2016. Sir Edward Leigh MP (London), 17th January 2017. David Burrowes MP (London), 17th January 2017. Charles Moore (London), 17th January 2017. Philip Davies MP (London), 19th January 2017. Sir Gerald Howarth MP (London), 19th January 2017. Dr. Myles Harris (London), 27th January 2017. Lord Sudeley (London), 6th February 2017. Jonathan Aitken (London), 6th February 2017. David Nicholson (London), 13th February 2017. Gregory Lauder-Frost (telephone), 23rd February 2017. Richard Ritchie (London), 8th March 2017. Tim Janman (London), 27th March 2017. Lord Deben (London), 4th April 2017. Lord Griffths of Fforestfach (London), 6th April 2017. Lord Tebbit (London), 6th April 2017. Sir Adrian Fitzgerald (London), 10th April 2017. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 191 K. Hickson, Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27697-3 192 BIBLIOGRAPHY Edward Norman (telephone), 28th April 2017. Cedric Gunnery (London), 2nd May 2017. Paul Bristol (London), 3rd May 2017. Harvey Thomas (London), 3rd May 2017. Ian Crowther (telephone), 12th May 2017. Iain Duncan Smith MP (London), 4th July 2017. Angela Ellis-Jones (London), 4th July 2017. John Hayes MP (London), 4th July 2017. Dennis Walker (London), 24th July 2017. Lord Howard of Lympne (London), 12th September 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 572 9 December 2013 No. 90 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 9 December 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON.DAVID CAMERON,MP,MAY 2010) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. David Cameron, MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt Hon. Nick Clegg, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. William Hague, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. George Osborne, MP CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE TREASURY—The Rt Hon. Danny Alexander, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS—The Rt Hon. Vince Cable, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Iain Duncan Smith, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. Chris Grayling, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Michael Gove, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt Hon. Eric Pickles, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH—The Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. Owen Paterson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • British Conservatism, Family Law and the Problem of Change
    PSA Annual Conference 2014, Midland Hotel, Manchester Conservatives and Conservatism Specialist Group Panel One: Constitutionalism, Rights and the Law in British Conservatism From ‘Pretended Family Relationship’ to ‘Ultimate Affirmation’: British Conservatism and the Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships Andrew Gilbert Principal Lecturer in Law, Anglia Ruskin University PhD Candidate, Faculty of Laws, UCL The legal regulation of the family in a liberal state often gives rise to controversy. It is also an area where conservative commitments to tradition and institutions are tested in the face of (proposed) innovations in family law and policy. How to deal with non- heterosexuality has been a particular source of tension within the body of postwar Conservatism, laying bare the authoritarian and libertarian dispositions at war in its members. This paper will first sketch out the Conservative Party’s record on homosexual law reform since the 1980s, and then go on to consider arguments around the legal recognition of same-sex relationships in relevant political thought. This discussion will then inform the examination of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 and the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act. The article concludes by observing that, while there were some similarities in the Party’s approach to the two Bills, conservative arguments in favour of the legal recognition of same-sex relationships were more readily articulated in the civil partnership debates chiefly because it was seen as an evolutionary innovation and there was no existing institution which would be the subject of change. How Conservatives perceived notions of change in the legislation was indicative of whether the Bills would attract their support (and vice versa), signifying the limited utility of a classical conservative understanding of change as a practical theory for supporting major social developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Members 1979-2010
    Members 1979-2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/33 28 April 2010 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979 to the dissolution of Parliament on 12 April 2010. The Paper also provides basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. This Paper replaces an earlier version, Research Paper 09/31. Oonagh Gay Richard Cracknell Jeremy Hardacre Jean Fessey Recent Research Papers 10/22 Crime and Security Bill: Committee Stage Report 03.03.10 10/23 Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill [HL] [Bill 79 of 2009-10] 08.03.10 10/24 Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill: Committee Stage Report 08.03.10 10/25 Northern Ireland Assembly Members Bill [HL] [Bill 75 of 2009-10] 09.03.10 10/26 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report 11.03.10 10/27 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2010 17.03.10 10/28 Transport Policy in 2010: a rough guide 19.03.10 10/29 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2010/11 26.03.10 10/30 Digital Economy Bill [HL] [Bill 89 of 2009-10] 29.03.10 10/31 Economic Indicators, April 2010 06.04.10 10/32 Claimant Count Unemployment in the new (2010) Parliamentary 12.04.10 Constituencies Research Paper 10/33 Contributing Authors: Oonagh Gay, Parliament and Constitution Centre Richard Cracknell, Social and General Statistics Section Jeremy Hardacre, Statistics Resources Unit Jean Fessey, House of Commons Information Office This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • View on Contactpoint Carried out by Secondary Schools
    Monday Volume 497 12 October 2009 No. 121 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 12 October 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT.HON.GORDON BROWN,MP,JUNE 2007) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt. Hon. Gordon Brown, MP LEADER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS,LORD PRIVY SEAL AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN AND EQUALITY—The Rt. Hon. Harriet Harman, QC, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE,SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt. Hon. The Lord Mandelson CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt. Hon. Alistair Darling, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon. David Miliband, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE AND LORD CHANCELLOR—The Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt. Hon. Alan Johnson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon. Hilary Benn, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT—The Rt. Hon. Douglas Alexander, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt. Hon. John Denham, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR CHILDREN,SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES—The Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessional Diary 2003–04
    HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSIONAL DIARY 2003–04 26 November 2003 to 18 November 2004 Prepared in the Journal Office of the House of Commons INTRODUCTION 1. This diary records the business on which the House spent its time in Session 2003–04, analysed into categories, and similar information for sittings in Westminster Hall. It is intended mainly to provide information in response to statistical inquiries, and in using it the following points should be borne in mind: (a) The diary does not include business which took little or no time, such as presentations of bills, unopposed private business, and motions agreed to without debate or division. (b) Divisions are normally included with the business to which they relate. (c) Timings are taken from the Official Report, using the printed times where available, and otherwise taking a column of debate to last three minutes. Daily prayers are assumed to last a standard five minutes (and are not itemised in the analysis), and the time at which the House rose is taken from the Votes and Proceedings. (d) Periods of suspension are included in the total sitting time, and are listed in section 14h of the analysis (Miscellaneous). However, the 2½-hour suspension from 11.30 to 14.00 in Westminster Hall on most Tuesdays and Wednesdays (introduced on 1 January 2003) is shown in brackets in the “Duration” column and is left out of the totals. Other suspensions in Westminster Hall are included in the totals and in the analysis under section 5. (e) The times in the column headed “After appointed time” refer to business taken after the time appointed as the “moment of interruption”.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers in the 2010 Coalition Government
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06544, 15 October 2017 Ministers in the 2010 Compiled by Coalition Government Sarah Priddy This list notes ministerial office holders in the 2010 Coalition Government. Ministers’ dates of office Until the 2015 General Election, all Minsters carried on in their posts. After the Conservative party won a majority in the 2015 General Election, the Prime Minister announced senior government Cabinet appointments on 8 May 2015 at which point all Liberal Democrat Ministers ceased to be Ministers. Where a Conservative Minister continued to serve in the new Government, this is indicated in the end date column in the note: • Continued to hold the same office is indicated by ‘continued in post’ • Continued in Government but in another Department, is shown by ‘continued in Govt’ • Another role within the same government department is shown by ‘continued in Dept’ An end-date is given for all Ministers who left the Government where known. Further information The Commons briefing paper on limitations on the number of Ministers and the size of the payroll vote sets out the statutory limits that apply to ministerial appointments. Further information on Ministers is available on the Ministers’ topic page on the Parliament website which contains links to briefings produced by the House of Commons Library, the House of Lords Library and Select Committee reports. Sources Members Names Information Service; DODS People; Hansard and Number 10 press notices and the Government List of Ministerial Responsibilities. Feedback Please send any comments or corrections to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ministers' Interests
    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE December 2011 1 CONTENTS Introduction 3-4 Prime Minister 5-6 Deputy Prime Minister 7 Attorney General‟s Office 8 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 9-11 Cabinet Office 12-13 Department for Communities and Local Government 14-15 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 16 Ministry of Defence 17-18 Department for Education 19-20 Department of Energy and Climate Change 21 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 22-23 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 24-25 Government Equalities Office 26 Department of Health 27-28 Home Office 29-30 Department for International Development 31 Ministry of Justice 32-33 Northern Ireland Office 34 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 35 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 36 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 37 Scotland Office 38 Department for Transport 39 HM Treasury 40-41 Wales Office 42 Department for Work and Pensions 43-44 Government Whips – Commons 45-48 Government Whips – Lords 49-50 2 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code This is the second List of Ministers‟ Interests to be published for the Coalition Government. Interests not previously published have been annotated with a „*‟ to show that it is an update or a new entry. Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list in writing of all relevant interests known to them which might be thought to give rise to a conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservatives in Crisis
    garnett&l 8/8/03 12:14 PM Page 1 The Conservatives in crisis provides a timely and important analysis incrisis Conservatives The of the Conservative Party’s spell in Opposition following the 1997 general election. It includes chapters by leading academic experts The on the party and commentaries by three senior Conservative politicians: Lord Parkinson, Andrew Lansley MP and Ian Taylor MP. Having been the dominant force in British politics in the twentieth century, the Conservative Party suffered its heaviest general Conservatives election defeats in 1997 and 2001. This book explores the party’s current crisis and assesses the Conservatives’ failure to mount a political recovery under the leadership of William Hague. The Conservatives in crisis includes a detailed examination of the reform of the Conservative Party organisation, changes in ideology in crisis and policy, the party’s electoral fortunes, and Hague’s record as party leader. It also offers an innovative historical perspective on previous Conservative recoveries and a comparison with the revival of the US Republican Party. In the conclusions, the editors assess edited by Mark Garnett and Philip Lynch the failures of the Hague period and examine the party’s performance under Iain Duncan Smith. The Conservatives in crisis will be essential reading for students of contemporary British politics. Mark Garnett is a Visiting Fellow in the Department of Politics at the University of Leicester. Philip Lynch is a Senior Lecturer in Politics at the University of Leicester. Lynch Garnett eds and In memory of Martin Lynch THE CONSERVATIVES IN CRISIS The Tories after 1997 edited by Mark Garnett and Philip Lynch Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Manchester University Press 2003 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors.
    [Show full text]