DOCSLIB.ORG

The Restriction of Civil Liberties During Times of Crisis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Restriction of Civil Liberties During Times of Crisis Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Government and International Relations Honors Government and International Relations Papers Department 5-2009 The Restriction of Civil Liberties during Times of Crisis: The volutE ion of America's Response to National Military Threats Matthew .D Fairman Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/govhp Part of the American Politics Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Fairman, Matthew D., "The Restriction of Civil Liberties during Times of Crisis: The vE olution of America's Response to National Military Threats" (2009). Government and International Relations Honors Papers. 7. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/govhp/7 This Honors Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Government and International Relations Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government and International Relations Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. THE RESTRICTION OF CIVIL LIBERTIES DURING TIMES OF CRISIS THE EVOLUTION OF AMERICA’S RESPONSE TO NATIONAL MILITARY THREATS An Honors Thesis Presented By Matthew David Fairman To the Department of Government in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors in the Major Field CONNECTICUT COLLEGE NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT MAY 1, 2009 ABSTRACT This treatise explores the nature and significance of the threat posed to civil liberties during times of major national military crisis and evaluates changes in the nature of wartime repression over the course of American history. It tests the thesis that the evolution in Americans’ response to such crises has not been a simple progression toward increasing restraint on the part of federal, state, and local policymakers, as is sometimes assumed. Rather, major twentieth and twenty-first century developments related to the nature of threats to American national security and government capabilities to covertly repress dissent have interacted with evolutionary changes in the nature of wartime repression in reinforcing and conflicting ways. Because of those changes, modern crises will last longer, the restriction of civil liberties during wartime will increasingly be accomplished through covert forms of repression, and, therefore, the durability of wartime restrictions will be greater. In sum, during future crises, Americans’ civil liberties will be restricted for longer periods, with the return to normalcy after those crises becoming increasingly difficult. To test this thesis, this treatise uses the past major national military crises in American history as case studies. They include the Quasi-War with France at the end of the 18th century, the Civil War, World War I, World War II, and the Cold War. The concluding chapter connects the “War on Terror” to these arguments. Overall, the case study analysis in Chapters I through V combined with the overarching assessment of historical changes in the nature of wartime repression and the durability of wartime restrictions in Chapter VI prove the validity of this thesis. To my parents, Mary and David, Whose support and encouragement helped me to finish this treatise, And to Julia, whose support, understanding, and reminders not to drive myself too hard Kept me sane these last few months. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Review of Relevant Literature .................................................................................................... 5 Methodology and Sources........................................................................................................... 6 Overview of Chapters ................................................................................................................. 7 I. QUASI-WAR WITH FRANCE (1798-1800) ............................................................................. 8 Background of the Crisis ............................................................................................................ 8 Trigger of the crisis ................................................................................................................. 8 Reaction to the crisis ............................................................................................................. 11 Restriction of Civil Liberties .................................................................................................... 13 Federal restrictions ................................................................................................................ 14 State and local restrictions .................................................................................................... 23 Executive tone toward civil liberties..................................................................................... 23 Deference of the U.S. Supreme Court .................................................................................. 26 Return to ―Normal‖ ................................................................................................................... 27 End of the crisis .................................................................................................................... 27 Duration of restrictions ......................................................................................................... 29 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 30 II. CIVIL WAR (1861-1865) ........................................................................................................ 32 Background of the Crisis .......................................................................................................... 32 Trigger of the crisis ............................................................................................................... 32 Reaction to the crisis ............................................................................................................. 36 Restriction of Civil Liberties .................................................................................................... 37 Federal restrictions ................................................................................................................ 37 State and local restrictions .................................................................................................... 56 Executive tone toward civil liberties..................................................................................... 56 Deference of the U.S. Supreme Court .................................................................................. 58 Return to ―Normal‖ ................................................................................................................... 60 End of the crisis .................................................................................................................... 60 Duration of restrictions ......................................................................................................... 63 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 65 III. WORLD WAR I (1917-1918) ................................................................................................ 67 Background of the Crisis .......................................................................................................... 67 Trigger of the crisis ............................................................................................................... 67 Reaction to the crisis ............................................................................................................. 69 Restriction of Civil Liberties .................................................................................................... 72 Federal restrictions ................................................................................................................ 73 State and local restrictions .................................................................................................... 88 Executive tone toward civil liberties..................................................................................... 90 Deference of the U.S. Supreme Court .................................................................................. 94 Return to ―Normal‖ ................................................................................................................... 95 End of the crisis .................................................................................................................... 96 Duration of restrictions ......................................................................................................... 97 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 106 IV. WORLD WAR II (1938-1945) ............................................................................................. 108 Background of the Crisis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Early Understandings of the "Judicial Power" in Statutory Interpretation
    ARTICLE ALL ABOUT WORDS: EARLY UNDERSTANDINGS OF THE 'JUDICIAL POWER" IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION, 1776-1806 William N. Eskridge, Jr.* What understandingof the 'judicial Power" would the Founders and their immediate successors possess in regard to statutory interpretation? In this Article, ProfessorEskridge explores the background understandingof the judiciary's role in the interpretationof legislative texts, and answers earlier work by scholars like ProfessorJohn Manning who have suggested that the separation of powers adopted in the U.S. Constitution mandate an interpre- tive methodology similar to today's textualism. Reviewing sources such as English precedents, early state court practices, ratifying debates, and the Marshall Court's practices, Eskridge demonstrates that while early statutory interpretationbegan with the words of the text, it by no means confined its searchfor meaning to the plain text. He concludes that the early practices, especially the methodology ofJohn Marshall,provide a powerful model, not of an anticipatory textualism, but rather of a sophisticated methodology that knit together text, context, purpose, and democratic and constitutionalnorms in the service of carrying out the judiciary's constitutional role. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................... 991 I. Three Nontextualist Powers Assumed by English Judges, 1500-1800 ............................................... 998 A. The Ameliorative Power .............................. 999 B. Suppletive Power (and More on the Ameliorative Pow er) .............................................. 1003 C. Voidance Power ..................................... 1005 II. Statutory Interpretation During the Founding Period, 1776-1791 ............................................... 1009 * John A. Garver Professor ofJurisprudence, Yale Law School. I am indebted toJohn Manning for sharing his thoughts about the founding and consolidating periods; although we interpret the materials differently, I have learned a lot from his research and arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section L
    L (The sound) Formal languages La Boderie family (Not Subd Geog) [P235.5] Machine theory UF Boderie family BT Consonants L1 algebras La Bonte Creek (Wyo.) Phonetics UF Algebras, L1 UF LaBonte Creek (Wyo.) L.17 (Transport plane) BT Harmonic analysis BT Rivers—Wyoming USE Scylla (Transport plane) Locally compact groups La Bonte Station (Wyo.) L-29 (Training plane) L2TP (Computer network protocol) UF Camp Marshall (Wyo.) USE Delfin (Training plane) [TK5105.572] Labonte Station (Wyo.) L-98 (Whale) UF Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (Computer network BT Pony express stations—Wyoming USE Luna (Whale) protocol) Stagecoach stations—Wyoming L. A. Franco (Fictitious character) BT Computer network protocols La Borde Site (France) USE Franco, L. A. (Fictitious character) L98 (Whale) USE Borde Site (France) L.A.K. Reservoir (Wyo.) USE Luna (Whale) La Bourdonnaye family (Not Subd Geog) USE LAK Reservoir (Wyo.) LA 1 (La.) La Braña Region (Spain) L.A. Noire (Game) USE Louisiana Highway 1 (La.) USE Braña Region (Spain) UF Los Angeles Noire (Game) La-5 (Fighter plane) La Branche, Bayou (La.) BT Video games USE Lavochkin La-5 (Fighter plane) UF Bayou La Branche (La.) L.C.C. (Life cycle costing) La-7 (Fighter plane) Bayou Labranche (La.) USE Life cycle costing USE Lavochkin La-7 (Fighter plane) Labranche, Bayou (La.) L.C. Smith shotgun (Not Subd Geog) La Albarrada, Battle of, Chile, 1631 BT Bayous—Louisiana UF Smith shotgun USE Albarrada, Battle of, Chile, 1631 La Brea Avenue (Los Angeles, Calif.) BT Shotguns La Albufereta de Alicante Site (Spain) This heading is not valid for use as a geographic L Class (Destroyers : 1939-1948) (Not Subd Geog) USE Albufereta de Alicante Site (Spain) subdivision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Expansion of Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Legal Implications for Public Institutions of Higher Education Krista Michele Mooney
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2005 The Evolution and Expansion of Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Legal Implications for Public Institutions of Higher Education Krista Michele Mooney Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION THE EVOLUTION AND EXPANSION OF ELEVENTH AMENDMENT IMMUNITY: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION By KRISTA MICHELE MOONEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Semester Approved Fall Semester, 2005 Copyright © 2005 Krista Michele Mooney All Rights Reserved The members of the committee approved the dissertation of Krista Michele Mooney defended on October 7, 2005. ______________________________ Joseph C. Beckham Professor Directing Dissertation ______________________________ Michael J. Mondello Outside Committee Member ______________________________ Dale W. Lick Committee Member ______________________________ Robert A. Schwartz Committee Member Approved: ____________________________________________________________________________ Joseph C. Beckham, Interim Chair, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii For my mother and father: my sounding boards, my cheerleaders, my
    [Show full text]
  • James Buchanan As Savior? Judicial Power, Political Fragmentation, and the Failed 1831 Repeal of Section 25
    MARK A. GRABER* James Buchanan as Savior? Judicial Power, Political Fragmentation, and the Failed 1831 Repeal of Section 25 A ntebellum Americans anticipated contemporary political science when they complained about the tendency of embattled political elites to take refuge in the judiciary. Recent scholarship on comparative judicial politics suggests that judicial review is a means by which constitutional framers provided protection for certain class interests that may no longer be fully protected in legislative settings. Tom Ginsburg claims, "[I]f they foresee themselves losing in postconstitutional elections," the politicians responsible for the constitution "may seek to entrench judicial review as a form of political insurance." 1 Such a constitutional design ensures "[e]ven if they lose the election, they will be able to have some access to a forum in which to challenge the legislature."2 In 1801, Thomas Jefferson foreshadowed this strategy. He asserted that the defeated Federalist Party had "retired into the judiciary as a stronghold ...and from that battery all the works of republicanism are to be beaten down and erased.",3 More than a half century later, Chief Justice David S. *Professor of Law and Government, University of Maryland School of Law. This Article was written while the author was the 2008-09 Wayne Morse Chair at the University of Oregon School of Law. I am grateful to the Morse Foundation, Margaret Hallock, and Elizabeth Weber for their remarkable support. I am also grateful to numerous colleagues at the University of Maryland School of Law and elsewhere who read and commented on what follows without giggling too much.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING Nav-06.Indd
    SPRING 2006 AUXILIARY LAYS WREATH VOL. 33, NO. 1 AT NATIONAL CEMETERY ® s Last November, the U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary was granted the rare privilege of laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknowns in Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. The honor of actually laying the wreath was bestowed upon Joe Lifesaver Volunteer America’s Stern, IPDCP-11 D1SR, (second from left), who received permission from Arlington National Cemetary to perform the ceremony. A U.S. Marine Corps veteran and former Korean War POW, Stern commented, “This was one of the greatest honors I ever had.” Joining him at the ceremony are Gail Venezio, DDO; Tom Venezio, VCO; and Manuel Padilla, FC 11-11 all D1SR. Photo by Burt Hurvich, D-AA and DSO-PA 1SR. AMERICA’S Coast Guard Auxiliary Association, Inc. NON-PROFIT WATERWAY WATCH The Auxiliary Center U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 842 9449 Watson Industrial Park JACKSONVILLE, FL. IN ACTION! St. Louis, MO 63126 Address service requested AST G CO U . S E M P E R A AUXILIARY GUARD COAST STATES UNITED S R . D U S P A A R A T U U Y XILIA R Spring 2006 Navigator 1 Auxiliary Artist Accepted AST G CO U . S E M P E R A S R . D U S P A A R A T U U Y XILIA R Contents SPRING 2006 VOL. 33, NO. 1 3 Rare Medal awarded to NY Auxiliarist 5 Dogs Learning to Fly 6 COMO Seibert 8 NACON 2006 is set 11 Interpreter asked to help on Midway 12 Color Guard launches dedication ceremonies 37 2006-07 13 U.S.-Canada RBS Initiatives EDITION 14 In Memoriam DEADLINES FALL 17 Auxiliary Wins NWSC and AFRAS awards AUGUST 15 18 USCG Rear Admiral and CGAUX WINTER Division Captain Cross Paths NOVEMBER 15 SPRING 20 Auxiliary Training Saves the Day FEBRUARY 15, 2007 23 New Requirements Cape Cod Jayhawk About to Embark on Katrina Rescue.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistorical Description of Eight Villages Adjoining Cape Hatteras
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cape Hatteras National Seashore Manteo, North Carolina Final Technical Report - Volume Two: Ethnohistorical Description of the Eight Villages Adjoining Cape Hatteras National Seashore and Interpretive Themes of History and Heritage Cultural Resources Southeast Region Final Technical Report – Volume Two: Ethnohistorical Description of the Eight Villages adjoining Cape Hatteras National Seashore and Interpretive Themes of History and Heritage November 2005 prepared for prepared by Cape Hatteras National Seashore Impact Assessment, Inc. 1401 National Park Drive 2166 Avenida de la Playa, Suite F Manteo, NC 27954 La Jolla, California 92037 in fulfillment of NPS Contract C-5038010616 About the cover: New Year’s Eve 2003 was exceptionally warm and sunny over the Mid-Atlantic states. This image from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument on the Aqua satellite shows the Atlantic coast stretching from the Chesapeake Bay of Virginia to Winyah Bay of South Carolina. Albemarle and Pamlico sounds separate the long, thin islands of the Outer Banks from mainland North Carolina. Image courtesy of NASA’s Visible Earth, a catalog of NASA images and animations of our home planet found on the internet at http://visiblearth.nasa.gov. 1. Acknowledgements We thank the staff at the Cape Hatteras National Seashore headquarters in Manteo for their helpful suggestions and support of this project, most notably Doug Stover, Steve Harrison, Toni Dufficy, Steve Ryan, and Mary Doll. The following staff of the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries shared maps, statistics, and illustrations: Scott Chappell, Rodney Guajardo, Trish Murphy, Don Hesselman, Dee Lupton, Alan Bianchi, and Richard Davis.
    [Show full text]
  • NPRC) VIP List, 2009
    Description of document: National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP list, 2009 Requested date: December 2007 Released date: March 2008 Posted date: 04-January-2010 Source of document: National Personnel Records Center Military Personnel Records 9700 Page Avenue St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 Note: NPRC staff has compiled a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold. They call this their VIP Listing. You can ask for a copy of any of these files simply by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the address above. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPSTONE 19-4 Indo-Pacific Field Study
    CAPSTONE 19-4 Indo-Pacific Field Study Subject Page Combatant Command ................................................ 3 New Zealand .............................................................. 53 India ........................................................................... 123 China .......................................................................... 189 National Security Strategy .......................................... 267 National Defense Strategy ......................................... 319 Charting a Course, Chapter 9 (Asia Pacific) .............. 333 1 This page intentionally blank 2 U.S. INDO-PACIFIC Command Subject Page Admiral Philip S. Davidson ....................................... 4 USINDOPACOM History .......................................... 7 USINDOPACOM AOR ............................................. 9 2019 Posture Statement .......................................... 11 3 Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip S. Davidson, U.S. Navy Photos Admiral Philip S. Davidson (Photo by File Photo) Adm. Phil Davidson is the 25th Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM), America’s oldest and largest military combatant command, based in Hawai’i. USINDOPACOM includes 380,000 Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen and Department of Defense civilians and is responsible for all U.S. military activities in the Indo-Pacific, covering 36 nations, 14 time zones, and more than 50 percent of the world’s population. Prior to becoming CDRUSINDOPACOM on May 30, 2018, he served as
    [Show full text]
  • President John Adams and Four Chief Justices: an Essay for James F
    NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 57 Issue 3 Supreme Court Narratives: Law, History, Article 3 and Journalism January 2013 President John Adams and Four Chief Justices: An Essay for James F. Simon R.B. Bernstein New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Judges Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal History Commons, President/ Executive Department Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation R.B. Bernstein, President John Adams and Four Chief Justices: An Essay for James F. Simon, 57 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. (2012-2013). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. VOLUME 57 | 2012/13 R.B. Bernstein President John Adams and Four Chief Justices: An Essay for James F. Simon 57 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 441 (2012–2013) ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Law, New York Law School, and Adjunct Professor of Political Science and History, Skadden, Arps Honors Program in Legal Studies, City College of New York. I thank my colleagues and friends at New York Law School—including Dean Emeritus James F. Simon and Professors William P. LaPiana, Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Marcey Grigsby, and Nadine Strossen, as well as co-panelists Akhil Reed Amar of Yale University, Richard D. Friedman of the University of Michigan Law School, and Lucas A. Powe, Jr. of the University of Texas at Austin.
    [Show full text]
  • In Plain Sight: African Americans at Andersonville National Historic Site a Special History Study
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR In Plain Sight: African Americans at Andersonville National Historic Site A Special History Study December 2020 2QWKH&RYHU 7RSLPDJH7KUHHXQLGHQWLILHGZRPHQQHDU$QGHUVRQYLOOH³$QGHUVRQYLOOH6KDQW\´LQIROGHU GDWHG³´$PLVWDG5HVHDUFK&HQWHU7XODQH8QLYHUVLW\1HZ2UOHDQV %RWWRPLPDJH*URXSRI$IULFDQ$PHULFDQJLUOVFRXWVSODFLQJIODJVRQPDUNHUVDW$QGHUVRQYLOOH 1DWLRQDO&HPHWHU\RQ0HPRULDO'D\6XPWHU&RXQW\0D\&RXUWHV\*HRUJLD$UFKLYHV 9DQLVKLQJ*HRUJLD&ROOHFWLRQVXP (7,& Andersonville National Historic Site In Plain Sight: African Americans at Andersonville National Historic Site, A Special History Study Georgia December 2020 Evan Kutzler, Julia Brock, Ann McCleary, Keri Adams, Ronald Bastien, and Larry O. Rivers $33529('%<$3$335352929('(' %<< 6XSHULQWHQGHQW$QGHUVRQYLOOH1DWLRQDO+LVWRULF6LWH6X6XSHSHULULQWQWHQHQGHGHQWQW $Q$QGHGHUVUVRQRQYLYLOOOOHH1D1DWLWLRQRQDOD +LVLVWRWRULU FF 6L6LWHWH )R)RU CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... iii Illustrations .................................................................................................................................................. v Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ xi Chapter One: From Slavery to Freedom at Andersonville ....................................................................... 1 Slavery in Southwest Georgia .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MR. CHISHOLM and the ELEVENTH AMENDMENT William
    MR. CHISHOLM AND THE ELEVENTH AMENDMENT William F. Swindler Copyright 1981 by the Supreme Court Historical Society From Yearbook 1981 Supreme Court Historical Society One of the touchiest questions raised in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, and one of the most sensitive issues in the ratification debates of 1787-88, had to do with the sovereignty of the states within the proposed Federal system. Immunity from suit by an individual was firmly held to be a fundamental attribute of sovereignty--"the sovereign may not be sued without his consent" was a legal maxim rooted in feudal law and universally proclaimed by each state. This was all well and good within the borders of each state, where its own courts had exclusive jurisdiction; but what of a suit brought in another forum, e.g., a Federal court? The Convention had been at pains to allay the fears of the state sovereignty defenders, but the jurisdictional clause in the judicial article of the Constitution, as finally drafted, was hardly reassuring. It gave the Federal courts jurisdiction in cases where there was a suit between a state and a resident of another state, and in such cases, where the state was a party, the Supreme Court was to have original jurisdiction. The theory behind the language was pragmatic enough: it assured a national, uniform forum for issues which before then had had to be litigated in distant and unfamiliar courts where--even if consent to suit was granted--the chance for an objective determination of the matter was dubious. The problem was that the constitutional language clearly inferred that a state was suable without its consent; and while supporters of ratification tried to minimize the liability of sovereign states under these provisions, they simply were blinking at the obvious and plain meaning of the words.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the U.S. Supreme Court
    HISTORY OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT 1 THE U.S. CONSTITUTION • Article III – The Judiciary – Section 1 - Establishes the Supreme Court – Section 2 - Defines the Court’s Powers – Section 3 – Defines treason • Article II – The Executive – Section 2 – Nomination of judges • Qualification of the Justices 2 THE COURT • Selection and Appointments • Historical Composition of the Court • The Court Term • Drafting and Releasing Opinions • The Chief Justice’s Role 3 THE JAY COURT 1789 - 1795 • Selecting the First Court • Few Willing to Serve on the Court – No Cases to Hear – Riding Circuit 5 JAY COURT CASES • Chisholm v. Georgia – Background – Decision – Reaction – 11 th Amendment • Glass v. Sloop Betsey 6 THE RUTLEDGE COURT 1795 • The Jay Treaty • Jay Leaves the Court • The Court’s First Recess Appointment • Rutledge Makes a Very Unwise Remark • The Senate Refuses to Confirm 8 THE ELLSWORTH COURT 1796 - 1800 • Ware v. Hylton • A New Home • Alien & Sedition Acts of 1798 – Naturalization Act – Alien Friends Act – Alien Enemies Act – Sedition Act 10 ELECTION OF 1800 • The Federalist Are Routed – “Mad Tom” Jefferson Elected President – His Republican Followers Would Control Congress • The Federalists Hope that Judges Could Save the Constitution From These Radicals • Chief Justice Ellsworth is Ailing and Resigns • John Jay is Asked to Serve Again – He Refuses • President Adams Nominates His Secretary of State, John Marshall, to the Supreme Court 11 THE MARSHALL COURT 1801 – 1835 "My gift of John Marshall to the people of the United States may be the proudest act of my life" John Adams ~ President •John Marshall •Marbury v. Madison – Marshall’s Decision •Impeachment of Justice Samuel Chase 13 The Next 15 Years • McCulloch v.
    [Show full text]