DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to Congress on the Historic Preservation of Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Sites in the United States (P.L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to Congress on the Historic Preservation of Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Sites in the United States (P.L National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Report to CoCongressngress oonn tthehe HiHistoricstoric PrPreservadoneservation ooff RRevolutionaryevolutionary War anandd War ooff 1812 SiSitestes in the UUnitednited StStatesates Prepared for The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Senate The Committee on Resources United States House of Representatives Prepared by American Battlefield Protection Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC September 2007 Front Cover Brandywine Battlefield (PA200), position of American forces along Brandywine Creek, Chester County, Pennsylvania. Photo by Chris Heisey. Authorities The Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Historic The American Battlefield Protection Act of 1996, as Preservation Study Act of 1996 amended (P.L. 104-333, Sec. 604; 16 USC 469k). (P.L. 104-333, Section 603; 16 USC 1a-5 Notes). Congress authorized the American Battlefield Protection Congress, concerned that “the historical integrity of Program of the National Park Service to assist citizens, many Revolutionary War sites and War of 1812 sites is at public and private institutions, and governments at all risk,” enacted legislation calling for a study of historic levels in planning, interpreting, and protecting sites where sites associated with the two early American wars. The historic battles were fought on American soil during the purpose of the study was to: “identify Revolutionary War armed conflicts that shaped the growth and development sites and War of 1812 sites, including sites within units of the United States, in order that present and future of the National Park System in existence on the date of generations may learn and gain inspiration from the enactment of this Act [November 12, 1996]; determine the ground where Americans made their ultimate sacrifice. relative significance of the sites; assess short and long term ABPP encourages, supports, assists, recognizes, and threats to the integrity of the sites; provide alternatives for works in partnership with citizens, federal, state, local, the preservation and interpretation of the sites by federal, and tribal governments, other public entities, educational state, and local governments, or other public or private institutions, and private nonprofit organizations in entities, including designation of the sites as units of the identifying, researching, evaluating, interpreting, and National Park System; and research and propose land protecting historic battlefields and associated sites on a preservation techniques.” The legislation defined “site” national, state, and local level. as “a site or structure situated in the United States that is thematically tied with the nationally significant events that occurred during the Revolutionary War… [and] the War of 1812.” Authorities 1 National Park Service Study Team Washington, D.C. Project Leaders H. Bryan Mitchell, Manager, Heritage Preservation Services Paul Hawke, Manager, American Battlefield Protection Program John Knoerl, Ph.D., Manager, Cultural Resources Geographic Information Systems Program Project Staff – American Battlefield Protection Program Tanya M. Gossett, Preservation Planner Gerald Palushock, Database Manager Lisa Rupple, Preservation Specialist Stephen Strach, Cultural Resource Specialist Glenn Williams, Historian Project Staff – Cultural Resources Geographic Information Systems Program Danielle Berman, Database Manager David W. Lowe, Historian Deidre McCarthy, Architectural Historian James Stein, GIS Specialist Matthew Stutts, Geographer/GIS Specialist Report Authors Tanya M. Gossett and H. Bryan Mitchell Report Contributors Paul Hawke, David W. Lowe, and Diedre McCarthy 2 Report to Congress on the Historic Preservation of Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Sites in the United States (P.L. 104-333, Section 603) Acknowledgments The National Park Service thanks all those who contributed to Sawyer, Aaron L. Shriber, Steven D. Smith, Ph.D., Arthur Spiess, the success of this national study and to the preparation of this James Stein, Mike Stivers, Christopher Stratton, Matthew Stutts, report. We are especially indebted to the guidance provided by Adam Tabelski, Carole Watterson Troxler, Todd Tucky, David the Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Historic Preservation J. Vecchioli, Susan Vincent, Robert Ward, Stephen C. Ware, Study Committee members Thomas B. Williams, Brian Leigh Glenn Williams, and Gray Wood. Additional thanks to all of Dunnigan, R. David Edmunds, Ph.D., Donald E. Graves, Ira the national, state, and local historic sites and parks that opened Gruber, Ph.D., Bernard Herman, Ph.D., Donald Hickey, Ph.D., their doors to the field surveyors and provided vital information Christopher McKee, Michael Steinitz, Ph.D., Camille Wells, about the condition and threats facing the battlefields and other Ph.D., Patrick A. Wilder, Virginia Steele Wood, and Robert K. sites. The National Park Service is also grateful for the hospitality Wright, Ph.D. National Park Service personnel John Durham, shown surveyors by private property owners at the study sites. Ove Jensen, Anna Von Lunz, Mark Nichipor, Dale Phillips, and Scott Sheads also lent their expertise to the committee’s During the course of the study, the National Park Service deliberations. Consultant John Long of the Newberry Library received numerous comments, suggestions, and additional also provided valuable support to the committee. information from the public about historic sites associated with the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. Thanks to everyone The National Park Service—the Southeast Regional Office in who contributed online and in letters. Atlanta, Georgia, and Boston National Historical Park—and the National Trust for Historic Preservation hosted preliminary The National Park Service gratefully acknowledges the scoping meetings for this project. The hosts and participants of contributions of Joyce A. Bear, Muscogee (Creek) Nation of those meetings helped shape the study at the onset. Oklahoma, and Light T. Cummins, Ph.D., Austin College; James G. Cusick, PK Younge Library of Florida History, University Field surveys were the heart of this project. Many thanks to the of Florida; the late William Day, Poarch Band of Creek Indians superintendents and staff of Minute Man National Historical of Alabama; and James O. Horton, Ph.D., George Washington Park, Horseshoe Bend National Military Park, George Rogers University, all of whom consulted with the study team on Clark National Historic Park, and Monmouth Battlefield State historical issues pertaining to the contributions of diverse Park for hosting survey workshops and allowing students to communities in the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. use the parks as training grounds. Sincere appreciation goes to the 72 surveyors who dedicated themselves to researching and Several private organizations have lent their support to the study. assessing the nation’s Revolutionary War and War of 1812 heritage: The National Park Service gratefully acknowledges the efforts of D. K. Abbass, Ph.D., William J. Anderson, Zara Anishanslin- the leadership of the National Society Daughters of the American Bernhardt, Charles B. Baxley, Jonathan Blair Bernhardt, Robert Revolution and Mrs. Beverly W. Jensen, former Historian General Birmingham, Linda Brown, Sylvie Browne, Stephen P. Carlson, of that organization, in particular. From the start, the Sons of the Allan D. Charles, Ph.D., Darrell E. Cook, Keri Coumanis, Leon American Revolution National Park Service Liaison Committee Cranmer, Craig W. Davis, Jeffrey B. Davis, Tracy M. Dean, Diane made itself available to help with the study in a number of ways. Kay Depew, Mary M. Donohue, Robert M. Dunkerly, Daniel T. The National Park Service appreciates its unwavering support. Elliott, Jack Elliott, Ralph Eshelman, Ph.D., Leo Finnerty, the late We thank our colleagues at the Civil War Preservation Trust for Charles Fisher, Ph.D., Ben Ford, Aaron J. Gore, Tanya Gossett, sharing their expertise with many of the Revolutionary War and Steven E. Hardegen, Al Hester, Rebecca L. Hill, Fred Holder, War of 1812 historic preservation groups and with the National Frank Hurdis, Amy Johnson, Kirk Johnston, James R. Jones III, Park Service. Catherine Hoffman Kaser, Richard A. Kastl, Katharine R. Kerr, Susan Langley, Ph.D., Connie Langum, Charles Lesher, Steve This project would not have been possible or plausible without Lesher, David Lowe, Chris Martin, David McBride, W. Stephen partners in the state and Federal Historic Preservation Offices McBride, Ph.D., Deidre McCarthy, Matthew F. McDaniel, and in tribal governments. Their expert participation in the Thomas L. Nesbitt, Gerald Palushock, John F. Pousson, Karen surveys, review of site documentation, and suggestions have Rehm, Merrill D. Reich, John S. Salmon, Sheila M. Sastry, William strengthened and enhanced this study. For their continuing Acknowledgments 3 interest and dedication to preserving the important places of the Roberts, Alma Ripps, Patrick Andrus, Laura Feller, Robie Lange, Revolutionary War and War of 1812, the National Park Service is Kristen McMasters, Larry Gall, Bob Blythe, Brenda Barrett, Steve most grateful. Elkinton, James Bird, Sue Waldron, Shannon Davis, and Kathleen Madigan. American Battlefield Protection Program assistants and In addition to the study team, the following National Park Service interns Natalie Abell, Rebecca Ballo, Jeff Everett, Brad Finfrock, personnel contributed significantly and provided unflagging Elizabeth Lang, Gweneth
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LCSH Section L
    L (The sound) Formal languages La Boderie family (Not Subd Geog) [P235.5] Machine theory UF Boderie family BT Consonants L1 algebras La Bonte Creek (Wyo.) Phonetics UF Algebras, L1 UF LaBonte Creek (Wyo.) L.17 (Transport plane) BT Harmonic analysis BT Rivers—Wyoming USE Scylla (Transport plane) Locally compact groups La Bonte Station (Wyo.) L-29 (Training plane) L2TP (Computer network protocol) UF Camp Marshall (Wyo.) USE Delfin (Training plane) [TK5105.572] Labonte Station (Wyo.) L-98 (Whale) UF Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (Computer network BT Pony express stations—Wyoming USE Luna (Whale) protocol) Stagecoach stations—Wyoming L. A. Franco (Fictitious character) BT Computer network protocols La Borde Site (France) USE Franco, L. A. (Fictitious character) L98 (Whale) USE Borde Site (France) L.A.K. Reservoir (Wyo.) USE Luna (Whale) La Bourdonnaye family (Not Subd Geog) USE LAK Reservoir (Wyo.) LA 1 (La.) La Braña Region (Spain) L.A. Noire (Game) USE Louisiana Highway 1 (La.) USE Braña Region (Spain) UF Los Angeles Noire (Game) La-5 (Fighter plane) La Branche, Bayou (La.) BT Video games USE Lavochkin La-5 (Fighter plane) UF Bayou La Branche (La.) L.C.C. (Life cycle costing) La-7 (Fighter plane) Bayou Labranche (La.) USE Life cycle costing USE Lavochkin La-7 (Fighter plane) Labranche, Bayou (La.) L.C. Smith shotgun (Not Subd Geog) La Albarrada, Battle of, Chile, 1631 BT Bayous—Louisiana UF Smith shotgun USE Albarrada, Battle of, Chile, 1631 La Brea Avenue (Los Angeles, Calif.) BT Shotguns La Albufereta de Alicante Site (Spain) This heading is not valid for use as a geographic L Class (Destroyers : 1939-1948) (Not Subd Geog) USE Albufereta de Alicante Site (Spain) subdivision.
    [Show full text]
  • Cato, Roman Stoicism, and the American 'Revolution'
    Cato, Roman Stoicism, and the American ‘Revolution’ Katherine Harper A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Arts Faculty, University of Sydney. March 27, 2014 For My Parents, To Whom I Owe Everything Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... i Abstract.......................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One - ‘Classical Conditioning’: The Classical Tradition in Colonial America ..................... 23 The Usefulness of Knowledge ................................................................................... 24 Grammar Schools and Colleges ................................................................................ 26 General Populace ...................................................................................................... 38 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 45 Chapter Two - Cato in the Colonies: Joseph Addison’s Cato: A Tragedy .......................................... 47 Joseph Addison’s Cato: A Tragedy .......................................................................... 49 The Universal Appeal of Virtue ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Biological Opinion on the U.S
    NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion Agencies: The Bureau ofOcean Energy Management The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement Activities Considered: Programmatic Geological and Geophysical Activities in the Mid­ and South Atlantic Planning Areas from 2013 to 2020 Consultation Conducted hy: Endangered Species Act Interagency Cooperation Division of the Office of Protected Resources, NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service Approved by: ~~~ 6<- -;y>c>. ~,~ Date: JUl 19 2013 Section 7(a)(2) ofthe Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. ] 531 et seq.) requires that each federal agency shall ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification ofcritical habitat of such species. When the action ofa federal agency "may affect" a listed species or critical habitat that has been designated for such species, that agency is required to consult with NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and/or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), depending upon the listed resources that may be affected. This ESA section 7 consultation considers BOEM's proposed geological and geophysical (O&G) activities in support of its oil and gas, renewable energy, and marine minerals programs in the Mid-and South Atlantic Planning Areas from 2013 through 2020, as described in BOEM's Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DPEIS) for Atlantic OCS Proposed Geological and Geophysical Activities in the Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic Planning Areas (BOEM 2012a).
    [Show full text]
  • P.S.: You Had Better Remove the Records: Early Federal Archives
    “P.S.: You had better remove the records” Early Federal Archives and the Burning of Washington during the War of 1812 By Jessie Kratz hen British troops began to advance toward And so clerks packed Wthe United States’ new capital of Wash­ such things as the books and ington in the summer of 1814, it was clear that papers of the State Department; government leaders had not prepared an adequate unpublished secret journals of defense for the city and its government buildings. Congress; George Washington’s The British navy already had control of nearby Chesa­ commission and correspondence; peake Bay and some 4,500 troops in the port town of the Articles of Confederation; papers Benedict, Maryland—poised for an attack on the capital. of the Continental Congress; and all the Despite the show of force, the secretary of war, treaties, laws, and correspondence dating John Armstrong, was convinced the British were back to 1789. more interested in the port of Baltimore than in Along with these early records, the clerks Washington, which then had only 8,200 residents. also bagged up the Charters of Freedom—the Secretary of State James Monroe felt differently collective term for the Declaration of Indepen­ and met with President James Madison to discuss dence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. the enemy’s intentions. Then Monroe himself rode And so these three documents began a long jour­ by horse, accompanied by cavalry, into southern ney as the War of 1812 raged. Maryland to scout the situation. The journey would not end until 1952, when Upon seeing the British advancing toward all three were placed together, side by side, in special Washington, Monroe dispatched a note to Presi­ encasements in the Rotunda of the National Archives dent Madison.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Federal Political Career of Andrew Fisher
    SOME ASPECTS OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL CAREER OF ANDREW FISHER By EDWARD WIL.LIAM I-IUMPHREYS, B.A. Hans. MASTER OF ARTS Department of History I Faculty of Arts, The University of Melbourne Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degr'ee of Masters of Arts (by Thesis only) JulV 2005 ABSTRACT Andrew Fisher was prime minister of Australia three times. During his second ministry (1910-1913) he headed a government that was, until the 1940s, Australia's most reformist government. Fisher's second government controlled both Houses; it was the first effective Labor administration in the history of the Commonwealth. In the three years, 113 Acts were placed on the statute books changing the future pattern of the Commonwealth. Despite the volume of legislation and changes in the political life of Australia during his ministry, there is no definitive full-scale biographical published work on Andrew Fisher. There are only limited articles upon his federal political career. Until the 1960s most historians considered Fisher a bit-player, a second ranker whose main quality was his moderating influence upon the Caucus and Labor ministry. Few historians have discussed Fisher's role in the Dreadnought scare of 1909, nor the background to his attempts to change the Constitution in order to correct the considered deficiencies in the original drafting. This thesis will attempt to redress these omissions from historical scholarship Firstly, it investigates Fisher's reaction to the Dreadnought scare in 1909 and the reasons for his refusal to agree to the financing of the Australian navy by overseas borrowing.
    [Show full text]
  • River Raisin National Battlefield Park Lesson Plan Template
    River Raisin National Battlefield Park 3rd to 5th Grade Lesson Plans Unit Title: “It’s Not My Fault”: Engaging Point of View and Historical Perspective through Social Media – The War of 1812 Battles of the River Raisin Overview: This collection of four lessons engage students in learning about the War of 1812. Students will use point of view and historical perspective to make connections to American history and geography in the Old Northwest Territory. Students will learn about the War of 1812 and study personal stories of the Battles of the River Raisin. Students will read and analyze informational texts and explore maps as they organize information. A culminating project will include students making a fake social networking page where personalities from the Battles will interact with one another as the students apply their learning in fun and engaging ways. Topic or Era: War of 1812 and Battles of River Raisin, United States History Standard Era 3, 1754-1820 Curriculum Fit: Social Studies and English Language Arts Grade Level: 3rd to 5th Grade (can be used for lower graded gifted and talented students) Time Required: Four to Eight Class Periods (3 to 6 hours) Lessons: 1. “It’s Not My Fault”: Point of View and Historical Perspective 2. “It’s Not My Fault”: Battle Perspectives 3. “It’s Not My Fault”: Character Analysis and Jigsaw 4. “It’s Not My Fault”: Historical Conversations Using Social Media Lesson One “It’s Not My Fault!”: Point of View and Historical Perspective Overview: This lesson provides students with background information on point of view and perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew FISHER, PC Prime Minister 13 November 1908 to 2 June 1909; 29 April 1910 to 24 June 1913; 17 September 1914 to 27 October 1915
    5 Andrew FISHER, PC Prime Minister 13 November 1908 to 2 June 1909; 29 April 1910 to 24 June 1913; 17 September 1914 to 27 October 1915. Andrew Fisher became the 5th prime minister when the Liberal- Labor coalition government headed by Alfred Deakin collapsed due to loss of parliamentary Labor support. Fisher’s first period as prime minister ended when the new Fusion Party of Deakin and Joseph Cook defeated the government in parliament. His second term resulted from an overwhelming Labor victory at elections in 1910. However, Labor lost power by one seat at the 1913 elections. Fisher was prime minister again in 1914, as a result of a double-dissolution election. Fisher resigned from office in October 1915, his health affected by the pressures of political life. Member of the Australian Labor Party c1901-28. Member of the House of Representatives for the seat of Wide Bay (Queensland) 1901-15; Minister for Trade and Customs 1904; Treasurer 1908-09, 1910-13, 1914-15. Main achievements (1904-1915) Under his prime ministership, the Commonwealth Government issued its first currency which replaced bank and State currency as the only legal tender. Also, the Commonwealth Bank was established. Strengthened the Conciliation and Arbitration Act. Introduced a progressive land tax on unimproved properties. Construction began on the trans-Australian railway, linking Port Augusta and Kalgoorlie. Established the Australian Capital Territory and brought the Northern Territory under Commonwealth control. Established the Royal Australian Navy. Improved access to invalid and aged pensions and brought in maternity allowances. Introduced workers’ compensation for federal public servants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parking Committee's Report on Public Shoreline Access and Rights
    The Parking Committee’s Report on Public Shoreline Access and Rights-of-Way in Jamestown April 7, 1999 Prepared by committee members: Lisa Bryer Claudette Cotter Darcy Magratten Pat Bolger It is not the intent of this study to comment on the status of private versus public ownership on any rights-of-way (ROW). Rather, this study endeavors to compile a list of all CRMC-designated rights-of-way, identified potential ROWs, and public shoreline access points in Jamestown for the purpose of description, review and recommendations to the Town Council for future planning purposes. SIZE, OWNERSHIP & DESCRIPTION: In this report, we have relied upon the work of Rebecca Carlisle, Planning Office intern in the summer of 1992 (a report she compiled which was later forwarded to CRMC and has become the basis of identifying ROWs in Jamestown), the CRMC progress report as of June 1998, reference to the Coastal Resource Center’s publication "Public Access to the Rhode Island Coast", survey maps drawn by Robert Courneyor as part of Rebecca Carlisle’s report, Jamestown Planning Offices plat maps, Jamestown GIS material and recent photographs. REVIEW: Each member of the subcommittee visited, walked, noted current conditions, discussed each site, and also reviewed prior recommendations where applicable. The review took into consideration how accessible each site was–both by car and foot, the access & grade to the shoreline, the proximity of neighbors, the availability of parking, the availability of trash receptacles and other recreational facilities. RECOMMENDATIONS: A rating system of 1 to 3 was used to prioritize each site. Number 1 sites should be fully supported and maintained with existing parking and facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lodge History Book Centennial Crate
    LODGE HISTORY BOOK CENTENNIAL CRATE National Order of the Arrow Committee July 2012 Members of the Lodge Key-3: You hold in your hand our Centennial Lodge History Book Binder. We ask that you use it as a guide to RAY CAPP write a history of the Order of the Arrow in your council as part of a nationwide project to collect local Chairman th histories of the Order as we lead up to our celebration of the 100 Anniversary of the Order (2015). JOHN P. REHM National Chief-2012 There are several well researched histories of the Order of the Arrow written from a national PRESTON H. MARQUIS perspective. This project, however, asks you to tell your perspective. Through it, we will endeavor to National Vice Chief-2012 gather almost three hundred histories from across the nation. Each lodge present at the 2012 CLYDE M. MAYER National Conference will be receiving this binder. One of the commonalities which bind all Arrowmen OA Director together is that we each have raised our hand and promised to “observe and preserve the traditions BRADLEY E. HADDOCK of the Order of the Arrow”. This is a terrific chance to do so locally in concert with your brothers from Immediate Past Chairman all over the country who will also be telling their stories. L. RONALD BELL Arrowhead of Service Contained in your binder is a template for helping your lodge research and compose the story of the Award Recipient Order of the Arrow in the council you serve. Notice that we are not necessarily asking for a lodge CRAIG B.
    [Show full text]
  • War of 1812 Travel Map & Guide
    S u sq u eh a n n a 1 Westminster R 40 r e iv v e i r 272 R 15 anal & Delaware C 70 ke Chesapea cy a Northeast River c o Elk River n 140 Havre de Chesapeake o 97 Grace City 49 M 26 40 Susquehanna 213 32 Flats 301 13 795 95 1 r e Liberty Reservoir v i R Frederick h 26 s 9 u B 695 Elk River G 70 u 340 n Sa p ssaf 695 rass 83 o Riv w er r e d 40 e v i r R R Baltimore i 13 95 v e r y M c i 213 a dd c le o B R n 70 ac iv o k e R r M 270 iv e 301 r P o to m ac 15 ster Che River 95 P 32 a R t i v a 9 e r p Chestertown 695 s 13 co R 20 1 i 213 300 1 ve r 100 97 Rock Hall 8 Leesburg 97 177 213 Dover 2 301 r ive r R e 32 iv M R 7 a r k got n hy te Ri s a v t 95 er e 295 h r p 189 S e o e C v 313 h ve i r C n R R e iv o er h 13 ka 267 495 uc 113 T Whitehall Bay Bay Bridge 50 495 Greensboro 193 495 Queen Milford Anne 7 14 50 Selby 404 Harrington Bay 1 14 Denton 66 4 113 y P 258 a a B t u rn 404 x te 66 Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport
    The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport The Last Battle of the Revolution Less than a quarter of a century after the close of the American Revolution, Great Britain and the United States were again in conflict. Britain and her allies were engaged in a long war with Napoleonic France. The shipping-related industries of the neutral United States benefited hugely, conducting trade with both sides. Hundreds of ships, built in yards on America’s Atlantic coast and manned by American sailors, carried goods, including foodstuffs and raw materials, to Europe and the West Indies. Merchants and farmers alike reaped the profits. In Cambridge, men made plans to profit from this brisk trade. “[T]he soaring hopes of expansionist-minded promoters and speculators in Cambridge were based solidly on the assumption that the economic future of Cambridge rested on its potential as a shipping center.” The very name, Cambridgeport, reflected “the expectation that several miles of waterfront could be developed into a port with an intricate system of canals.” In January 1805, Congress designated Cambridge as a “port of delivery” and “canal dredging began [and] prices of dock lots soared." [1] Judge Francis Dana, a lawyer, diplomat, and Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, was one of the primary investors in the development of Cambridgeport. He and his large family lived in a handsome mansion on what is now Dana Hill. Dana lost heavily when Jefferson declared an embargo in 1807. Britain and France objected to America’s commercial relationship with their respective enemies and took steps to curtail trade with the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING Nav-06.Indd
    SPRING 2006 AUXILIARY LAYS WREATH VOL. 33, NO. 1 AT NATIONAL CEMETERY ® s Last November, the U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary was granted the rare privilege of laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknowns in Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. The honor of actually laying the wreath was bestowed upon Joe Lifesaver Volunteer America’s Stern, IPDCP-11 D1SR, (second from left), who received permission from Arlington National Cemetary to perform the ceremony. A U.S. Marine Corps veteran and former Korean War POW, Stern commented, “This was one of the greatest honors I ever had.” Joining him at the ceremony are Gail Venezio, DDO; Tom Venezio, VCO; and Manuel Padilla, FC 11-11 all D1SR. Photo by Burt Hurvich, D-AA and DSO-PA 1SR. AMERICA’S Coast Guard Auxiliary Association, Inc. NON-PROFIT WATERWAY WATCH The Auxiliary Center U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 842 9449 Watson Industrial Park JACKSONVILLE, FL. IN ACTION! St. Louis, MO 63126 Address service requested AST G CO U . S E M P E R A AUXILIARY GUARD COAST STATES UNITED S R . D U S P A A R A T U U Y XILIA R Spring 2006 Navigator 1 Auxiliary Artist Accepted AST G CO U . S E M P E R A S R . D U S P A A R A T U U Y XILIA R Contents SPRING 2006 VOL. 33, NO. 1 3 Rare Medal awarded to NY Auxiliarist 5 Dogs Learning to Fly 6 COMO Seibert 8 NACON 2006 is set 11 Interpreter asked to help on Midway 12 Color Guard launches dedication ceremonies 37 2006-07 13 U.S.-Canada RBS Initiatives EDITION 14 In Memoriam DEADLINES FALL 17 Auxiliary Wins NWSC and AFRAS awards AUGUST 15 18 USCG Rear Admiral and CGAUX WINTER Division Captain Cross Paths NOVEMBER 15 SPRING 20 Auxiliary Training Saves the Day FEBRUARY 15, 2007 23 New Requirements Cape Cod Jayhawk About to Embark on Katrina Rescue.
    [Show full text]