P.S.: You Had Better Remove the Records: Early Federal Archives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

P.S.: You Had Better Remove the Records: Early Federal Archives “P.S.: You had better remove the records” Early Federal Archives and the Burning of Washington during the War of 1812 By Jessie Kratz hen British troops began to advance toward And so clerks packed Wthe United States’ new capital of Wash­ such things as the books and ington in the summer of 1814, it was clear that papers of the State Department; government leaders had not prepared an adequate unpublished secret journals of defense for the city and its government buildings. Congress; George Washington’s The British navy already had control of nearby Chesa­ commission and correspondence; peake Bay and some 4,500 troops in the port town of the Articles of Confederation; papers Benedict, Maryland—poised for an attack on the capital. of the Continental Congress; and all the Despite the show of force, the secretary of war, treaties, laws, and correspondence dating John Armstrong, was convinced the British were back to 1789. more interested in the port of Baltimore than in Along with these early records, the clerks Washington, which then had only 8,200 residents. also bagged up the Charters of Freedom—the Secretary of State James Monroe felt differently collective term for the Declaration of Indepen­ and met with President James Madison to discuss dence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. the enemy’s intentions. Then Monroe himself rode And so these three documents began a long jour­ by horse, accompanied by cavalry, into southern ney as the War of 1812 raged. Maryland to scout the situation. The journey would not end until 1952, when Upon seeing the British advancing toward all three were placed together, side by side, in special Washington, Monroe dispatched a note to Presi­ encasements in the Rotunda of the National Archives dent Madison. It said that the British were pushing Building in Washington, D.C. toward the capital, American troops were retreat- ing—and they were outnumbered. Early Federal Papers Faced “The enemy are in full march for Washington. Many Moves, Poor Storage Have the materials prepared to destroy the bridges,” Each year, millions of people visit the National Archives Build­ Monroe wrote. And in a significant postscript, he ing to view the Charters of Freedom in the Rotunda. Within the added: “You had better remove the records.” Archives’ vaults and stacks, millions of other federal records are safely Monroe’s message set off a scramble among gov­ stored, ensuring they will be available to researchers for years to come. ernment officials to round up all the records they This was not always the case. could. The British surely would burn them if they reached the capital. Andrew Ellicott’s 1794 plan of the proposed location for the city of Washington. 36 Prologue Summer 2014 Prologue 37 The Taking of the City of Washington by the British Forces under Major General Ross on August 24, 1814. Officials saved the nation’s founding documents, but many congressional records, and archives of the Navy,War, and Treasury Departments were lost in fires. Between the First Continental Con­ the new federal government would create. up furniture, books, and papers—including, gress in 1774 and the establishment of the At the same time, it left each federal depart- most likely, the Declaration, Constitution, and National Archives in 1934, the government’s ment or court responsible for keeping its the Bill of Rights (newly passed in 1791)— records lacked a stable and secure storage own archives. In doing so, Congress failed shipped them up the Delaware River, and environment. Early in the nation’s history, to create a consistent record-keeping policy carted them to Trenton, New Jersey. federal records faced a number of potential or a central, safe place for storing the new When the department moved back to calamities, including poor storage condi­ government’s records. Philadelphia, clerks took the reverse trip. tions, neglect, theft, and fire. The Residence Act of 1790 created a new They repeated this process three times, each Perhaps the most striking example of home for the federal government, in a yet- time putting the nation’s most precious his- the perilous conditions the Charters faced to-be-built city along the Potomac River on torical records in jeopardy. occurred two centuries ago during the land donated by Maryland and Virginia. The In May 1800, federal department heads War of 1812. The first Congress under the act, however, scheduled the move to the new began moving their offices and staffs to the Constitution gave the responsibility to pre­ capital for 10 years later, in 1800, and forced new federal city: Washington. The govern- serve records of the government to the new federal clerks to pack official papers and move ment loaded its books and papers, including Department of State. them from New York—the prior seat of gov- the archives and the Charters of Freedom, These early records included the papers of ernment—to Philadelphia, the interim seat of onto ships and transported them south to the old Department of Foreign Affairs; the government, then later to Washington. Washington. Unfortunately, the move did papers of the Confederation and Continen­ not immediately improve the safety and tal Congresses; George Washington’s papers The New Capital, Washington: security of federal records. as Commander of the Continental Army; No Better Place for Records Early transplants to Washington faced con- and the Declaration of Independence and While in Philadelphia, the State Depart- ditions unlike those in Philadelphia or New Constitution. ment moved to several locations around the York City. Architect Pierre L’Enfant created a The First Congress also charged the city, as well as outside of the city to avoid recur- very ambitious plan for the new city, but by Department of State with gathering and ring yellow fever epidemics. For each move the time the government began moving in, his preserving many of the important records out of Philadelphia, the department packed plan was not even close to being realized. 38 Prologue Summer 2014 and 17th Street, NW. Again, the Department of State shared space with other government offices, including the Department of War and the Department of the Navy. Though the numerous relocations did not require traveling great distances, conditions in Washington made any move difficult. In dry weather the dirt streets turned to dust bowls; in the rain the roads became rivers of mud. Getting around Washington on foot or even carriage often became a nightmare—the city had few discernible roads, no street signs, and only a handful of buildings to serve as land- marks. These were not ideal, or even suitable, conditions for transporting and safekeeping the nation’s most valuable documents. With each move within the city, the archives faced the same problems as they had before arriving in Washington—the records had to be packed up and moved, A 1792 plan for the City of Washington shows locations for the Capitol and the Presidents House and city then unpacked and stored again. boundaries. Congress had approved the site for the new seat of government in 1790. Government officials of the era knew In 1800 Washington bore little resem- icated space. For the first few months, State and that the nation’s most precious documents blance to a city, let alone the majestic seat several other government offices shared the Trea- endured inadequate storage conditions. In of empire L’Enfant had envisioned. Many sury Department Building, east of the White 1810, Congress investigated the condition of planned buildings remained under con- House on Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. federal archives housed in public buildings. struction or altogether unbuilt. The city was Luckily, the State Department’s move turned During the investigation, Secretary of barely equipped to house anyone, let alone out to be very well timed. In January 1801 a State Robert Smith reported on the “ancient the federal government and its archives. fire destroyed a portion of the Treasury Depart- records and papers” in his custody. He Newly arriving government officials ment’s records, including both current docu- described how the records, which he deemed expressed their disappointment with the ments and historical records. Had State not “highly important to the History of the lack of amenities the new city offered. moved out of Treasury’s building, the nation’s United States,” were housed in trunks and One member of Congress described his sur- most important early records, including the boxes in the cramped attics in their building. roundings as “both melancholy and ludicrous Charters, likely would have burned. Smith acknowledged his department’s . a city in ruins.” Another Representative com- inability to properly store the papers and pared L’Enfant’s plan with what he actually saw: pleaded with Congress to build a fireproof Packing, Unpacking, Packing building, remove the papers from his cus- The Pennsylvania Avenue, leading, as Again Around Washington tody, and “to employ a person to arrange the laid down on paper, from the Capitol A few months later, the State Department papers in proper order.” to the President’s Mansion, was then briefly moved into a house on the north side of After all departments reported on the condi- nearly the whole distance a deep morass, Pennsylvania Avenue between 21st and 22nd tion of their archives, the committee acknowl- covered with alder bushes, which were Streets, NW. The following summer, they edged the records were in “a state of great cut through the width of the intended packed up their archives and the Charters and disorder and exposure; and in a situation nei- avenue during the then ensuing winter. moved yet again—this time into a new build- ther safe nor convenient nor honorable to the ing west of the Executive Mansion, on the site nation.” They further concluded records had By June 7, 1800, the Department of State and where the Old Executive Office Building now been exposed to fire and robbery, dangers aug- its archives, including the Charters, lacked a ded- sits at the corner of Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, mented by the lack of security and fireproofing.
Recommended publications
  • Discover Woman American History
    soei D g American Democracy et. 07 How Women Shaped American Life and Culture Prepared by Susan Sullivan Lagon,Ph.D., Historian, The Jefferson, Washington, DC The Jefferson, Washington, DC • 1200 16th St. NW • Washington DC, 20036 1 The Jefferson, Washington, DC • 1200 16th St. NW • Washington DC, 20036 How Women Shaped American Life and Culture Prepared by Susan Sullivan Lagon, Ph.D., Historian, The Jefferson, Washington, DC John Adams, whose bust is opposite Thomas Jefferson’s in the lobby, was a faithful correspondent with his wife Abigail while she remained in Massachusetts. In a famous letter from Abigail to her husband on March 31, 1776, she wrote: “I long to hear that you have declared an independency. And, by the way, in the new code of laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands. Remember, all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation.” Day One Walking Tour From the hotel, head south on 16th St. to Lafayette Square. The large building at H St. and Madison Place is Dolley Madison House. The stately home was built in 1820 by Congressman Richard Cutts who was married to Dolley Madison’s sister Anna.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, William Howard, ed. The Eye of Thomas Jefferson. Blake, Channing. “The Early Interiors of Carrère and Hastings.” Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1981. The Magazine Antiques 110 (1976): 344–351. Aikman, Lonnelle. We, the People: The Story of the United Blum, John M., et. al., eds. The National Experience. New States Capitol. Washington: U. S. Capitol Historical Society, 1991. York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1963. Alex, William. Calvert Vaux: Architect & Planner. New York: Bowling, Kenneth R. Creating the Federal City, 1774–1800: Ink, Inc., 1994. Potomac Fever. Washington: The American Institute of Archi- tects Press, 1988. Alexander, R. L. “The Grand Federal Edifice.” Documentary Editing 9 (June 1987): 13–17. Bowling, Kenneth R., and Helen E. Veit., eds. The Diary of William Maclay and Other Notes On Senate Debates. Balti- Allen, William C. “In The Greatest Solemn Dignity”: The Capi- more: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988. tol’s Four Cornerstones. Washington: Government Printing Bristow, Ian C. Interior House-Painting Colours and Tech- Office, 1995. nology 1615–1840. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996. ———. “‘Seat of Broils, Confusion, and Squandered Thousands’: Brown, Glenn. “Dr. William Thornton, Architect.” Architectural Building the Capitol, 1790–1802.” The United States Capitol: Record 6 (1896): 53–70. Designing and Decorating a National Icon. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2000. ———. History of the United States Capitol. 2 vols. Washing- ton: Government Printing Office, 1900, 1902. ———. The Dome of the United States Capitol: An Architec- tural History. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1992. ———. Memories: A Winning Crusade to Revive George Washington’s Vision of a Capital City.
    [Show full text]
  • War of 1812 Primary Source Packet Madison
    War of 1812 Primary Source Packet Madison Becomes President Digital History ID 211 Author: John Adams Date:1809 Annotation: Distressed by the embargo's failure, Jefferson looked forward to his retirement from the presidency. "Never," he wrote, "did a prisoner, released from his chains, feel such relief as I shall on shaking off the shackles of power." The problem of American neutrality now fell to Jefferson's hand-picked successor, James Madison. A quiet and scholarly man, who secretly suffered from epilepsy, "the Father of the Constitution" brought a keen intellect and wealth of experience to the presidency. As Jefferson's Secretary of State, he had kept the United States out of the Napoleonic wars and was committed to using economic coercion to force Britain and France to respect America's neutral rights. In this letter, former President Adams notes Madison's ascension to the presidency. Document: Jefferson expired and Madison came to Life last night...I pity poor Madison. He comes to the helm in such a storm as I have seen in the Gul[f] Stream, or rather such as I had to encounter in the Government in 1797. Mine was the worst however, because he has a great Majority of the officers and Men attached to him Survival Strategies Digital History ID 662 Author: Tecumseh Date:1810 Annotation: Told by Governor Harrison to place his faith in the good intentions of the United States, Tecumseh offers a bitter retort. He calls on Native Americans to revitalize their societies so that they can regain life as a unified people and put an end to legalized land grabs.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Stones of the National Mall
    The Geological Society of America Field Guide 40 2015 Building stones of the National Mall Richard A. Livingston Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Carol A. Grissom Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA Emily M. Aloiz John Milner Associates Preservation, 3200 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22207, USA ABSTRACT This guide accompanies a walking tour of sites where masonry was employed on or near the National Mall in Washington, D.C. It begins with an overview of the geological setting of the city and development of the Mall. Each federal monument or building on the tour is briefly described, followed by information about its exterior stonework. The focus is on masonry buildings of the Smithsonian Institution, which date from 1847 with the inception of construction for the Smithsonian Castle and continue up to completion of the National Museum of the American Indian in 2004. The building stones on the tour are representative of the development of the Ameri­ can dimension stone industry with respect to geology, quarrying techniques, and style over more than two centuries. Details are provided for locally quarried stones used for the earliest buildings in the capital, including A quia Creek sandstone (U.S. Capitol and Patent Office Building), Seneca Red sandstone (Smithsonian Castle), Cockeysville Marble (Washington Monument), and Piedmont bedrock (lockkeeper's house). Fol­ lowing improvement in the transportation system, buildings and monuments were constructed with stones from other regions, including Shelburne Marble from Ver­ mont, Salem Limestone from Indiana, Holston Limestone from Tennessee, Kasota stone from Minnesota, and a variety of granites from several states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes of the Civil War
    THE CAUSES OF THE CIVIL WAR: A NEWSPAPER ANALYSIS by DIANNE M. BRAGG WM. DAVID SLOAN, COMMITTEE CHAIR GEORGE RABLE MEG LAMME KARLA K. GOWER CHRIS ROBERTS A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Communication and Information Sciences in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2013 Copyright Dianne Marie Bragg 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT This dissertation examines antebellum newspaper content in an attempt to add to the historical understanding of the causes of the Civil War. Numerous historians have studied the Civil War and its causes, but this study will use only newspapers to examine what they can show about the causes that eventually led the country to war. Newspapers have long chronicled events in American history, and they offer valuable information about the issues and concerns of their communities. This study begins with an overview of the newspaper coverage of the tariff and territorial issues that began to divide the country in the early decades of the 1800s. The study then moves from the Wilmot Proviso in 1846 to Lincoln’s election in 1860, a period in which sectionalism and disunion increasingly appeared on newspaper pages and the lines of disagreement between the North and the South hardened. The primary sources used in this study were a diverse sampling of articles from newspapers around the country and includes representation from both southern and northern newspapers. Studying these antebellum newspapers offers insight into the political, social, and economic concerns of the day, which can give an indication of how the sectional differences in these areas became so divisive.
    [Show full text]
  • War of 1812 Booklist Be Informed • Be Entertained 2013
    War of 1812 Booklist Be Informed • Be Entertained 2013 The War of 1812 was fought between the United States and Great Britain from June 18, 1812 through February 18, 1815, in Virginia, Maryland, along the Canadian border, the western frontier, the Gulf Coast, and through naval engagements in the Great Lakes and the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. In the United States frustrations mounted over British maritime policies, the impressments of Americans into British naval service, the failure of the British to withdraw from American territory along the Great Lakes, their backing of Indians on the frontiers, and their unwillingness to sign commercial agreements favorable to the United States. Thus the United States declared war with Great Britain on June 18, 1812. It ended with the signing of the Treaty of Ghent on December 24, 1814, although word of the treaty did not reach America until after the January 8, 1815 Battle of New Orleans. An estimated 70,000 Virginians served during the war. There were some 73 armed encounters with the British that took place in Virginia during the war, and Virginians actively fought in Maryland, Virginia, and Ohio and in naval engagements. The nation’s capitol, strategically located off the Chesapeake Bay, was a prime target for the British, and the coast of Virginia figured prominently in the Atlantic theatre of operations. The War of 1812 helped forge a national identity among the American states and laid the groundwork for a national system of homeland defense and a professional military. For Canadians it also forged a national identity, but as proud British subjects defending their homes against southern invaders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thomas Jefferson Memorial, Washington
    JL, JLornclt ),//,.,on Wn*ooio/ memorial ACTION PUBLICATIONS Alexandria, Va. JL" llo*oo )"ff",.", TLln^o,io/ This great National Memorial to the aurhor of the Declaration of Indepen- dence and the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, First Secretary of State and Third President of the United States, possesses mlny of the qualities ascribed to the brilliant revolutionary leader in whose memory it has been dedicated by a grateful Nation It is magnificent-as Jefferson's chrracter was magnificent. Simple as his Democracy. Aesthetic as l.ris thoughts. Courageous as his chempion- ship of the righrs of man. The memorial structure is in itself a tribute to Jefferson's artistic tastes and preference and a mark of respect for his architectural and scientific achievements. A farmer by choice, a lawyer by profession, and an architect by avocation, JelTer- son \r,as awed by the remarkable beauty of design and noble proportions of the Pantheon in Rome and foilou,ed irs scheme in the major architectururl accom- plishments of his oq,n life Its inlluence is evident in his ovu'n home at Monticello and in the Rotunda of the University of Virginia at Cl.rarkrttesville, which he designed. The monumental portico complimenrs Jellerson's design for the Yir- ginia State Capitol at Richmond. h But it is not alone the architectural splendor or the beiruty of its settir,g ',irhich makes this memcrial one of the mosr revered American patriotic shrines. In it the American people find the spirit of the living Jefferson and the fervor which inspired their colonial forbears to break, by force of erms, the ties which bound them to tyrannical overlords; to achieve not only nltional independence.
    [Show full text]
  • James Buchanan As Savior? Judicial Power, Political Fragmentation, and the Failed 1831 Repeal of Section 25
    MARK A. GRABER* James Buchanan as Savior? Judicial Power, Political Fragmentation, and the Failed 1831 Repeal of Section 25 A ntebellum Americans anticipated contemporary political science when they complained about the tendency of embattled political elites to take refuge in the judiciary. Recent scholarship on comparative judicial politics suggests that judicial review is a means by which constitutional framers provided protection for certain class interests that may no longer be fully protected in legislative settings. Tom Ginsburg claims, "[I]f they foresee themselves losing in postconstitutional elections," the politicians responsible for the constitution "may seek to entrench judicial review as a form of political insurance." 1 Such a constitutional design ensures "[e]ven if they lose the election, they will be able to have some access to a forum in which to challenge the legislature."2 In 1801, Thomas Jefferson foreshadowed this strategy. He asserted that the defeated Federalist Party had "retired into the judiciary as a stronghold ...and from that battery all the works of republicanism are to be beaten down and erased.",3 More than a half century later, Chief Justice David S. *Professor of Law and Government, University of Maryland School of Law. This Article was written while the author was the 2008-09 Wayne Morse Chair at the University of Oregon School of Law. I am grateful to the Morse Foundation, Margaret Hallock, and Elizabeth Weber for their remarkable support. I am also grateful to numerous colleagues at the University of Maryland School of Law and elsewhere who read and commented on what follows without giggling too much.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-8-2020 "The Men Were Sick of the Place" : Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812 Joseph R. Miller University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Joseph R., ""The Men Were Sick of the Place" : Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3208. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3208 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THE MEN WERE SICK OF THE PLACE”: SOLDIER ILLNESS AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE WAR OF 1812 By Joseph R. Miller B.A. North Georgia University, 2003 M.A. University of Maine, 2012 A DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May 2020 Advisory Committee: Scott W. See, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-advisor Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History, Co-advisor Liam Riordan, Professor of History Kathryn Shively, Associate Professor of History, Virginia Commonwealth University James Campbell, Professor of Joint, Air War College, Brigadier General (ret) Michael Robbins, Associate Research Professor of Psychology Copyright 2020 Joseph R.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the War of 1812 Sources
    Source Guide to the War of 1812 Table of Contents I. Military Journals, Letters and Personal Accounts 2 Service Records 5 Maritime 6 Histories 10 II. Civilian Personal and Family Papers 12 Political Affairs 14 Business Papers 15 Histories 16 III. Other Broadsides 17 Maps 18 Newspapers 18 Periodicals 19 Photos and Illustrations 19 Genealogy 21 Histories of the War of 1812 23 Maryland in the War of 1812 25 This document serves as a guide to the Maryland Center for History and Culture’s library items and archival collections related to the War of 1812. It includes manuscript collections (MS), vertical files (VF), published works, maps, prints, and photographs that may support research on the military, political, civilian, social, and economic dimensions of the war, including the United States’ relations with France and Great Britain in the decade preceding the conflict. The bulk of the manuscript material relates to military operations in the Chesapeake Bay region, Maryland politics, Baltimore- based privateers, and the impact of economic sanctions and the British blockade of the Bay (1813-1814) on Maryland merchants. Many manuscript collections, however, may support research on other theaters of the war and include correspondence between Marylanders and military and political leaders from other regions. Although this inventory includes the most significant manuscript collections and published works related to the War of 1812, it is not comprehensive. Library and archival staff are continually identifying relevant sources in MCHC’s holdings and acquiring new sources that will be added to this inventory. Accordingly, researchers should use this guide as a starting point in their research and a supplement to thorough searches in MCHC’s online library catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Sourcebook, Volume III
    Our Documents Teacher Sourcebook, Volume III Our Documents is a program of: The Sourcebook is sponsored by: The National Archives and Records Administration, National History Day, and The History Channel are proud to continue their partnership in the Our Documents initiative and this third volume of the Our Documents Teacher Sourcebook. This program is not just about looking at old documents. The documents serve as a catalyst to help teachers, students, parents, and all Americans to strengthen their understanding and appreciation of the records and values that undergird our democracy. Exploring the historical milestones they represent teaches us about our continual quest to “form a more perfect union.” This year we are again making available more supporting material for the 100 documents, sharing additional ideas about how teachers can use these documents in their classes, and illustrating how they might help their students connect these pivotal documents to major themes in American history and to events and issues they face in their own lives. When President Bush launched the Our Documents initiative in September 2002 he noted, “Our history is not a story of perfection. It is a story of imperfect people working toward great ideas.” We hope you find this sourcebook helpful as your classes explore the great ideas at the heart of our union that continue to shape the nation’s future. John W. Carlin Cathy Gorn, Ph.D. Libby O’Connell, Ph.D. Archivist of the Executive Director Historian in Residence United States National History Day The History
    [Show full text]
  • The Attached Document Was Submitted to the Washoe County Board Of
    The attached document was submitted to the Washoe County Board of Commissioners during the meeting held on Uch^p-^ ^; -^o( by m^^^s. O-ff?'c e. for Agenda Item No. (Q and included here pursuant to NRS 241.020(8). YOUR CHARTERS OF FREEDOM DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE * UNITED STATES CONSTmJTION BILL OF RIGHTS \ ^ _OB CO "0 v <o o > CM 0'g ^ "0 (0 <U 0 Q YOUR Charters of FREEDOM Tke Charters of Freedom are our country's founding documents. These three original documents; Tke Declaration of Independence, Tke United States Constitution, and Tke Bill of Rigkts are on display in the National Archives in Washington, D.C. Tkey are open to the public and free to view. TKe Declaration of Independence was primaril}? penned \sy Thomas Jefferson between June II and June 28, 1776. Tlie document was finalized and approved on July 9, 1776. All 13 colonies signed the parchment document by August 2, 1776. first Jraft of Tlie Unitect States Constitution was approved on August 6 , 1787. Only after tke ratification of tke first ten amendments, known as our Bill of Rights, was tke final draft of Tke Constitution ratified on September 17, 1787. During the process of ratification of The Constitution, there was a demand for a bill of rights to defend indivijual liberties from a possible oppressive government James Madison worked to get 17 amendments through the House. These were later reduced to 12 amendments by tke Senate. Of tkese 12 amendments, 10 were approved on December 15, 1791 and aJJed to Tke Constitution.
    [Show full text]