DOCSLIB.ORG

War of 1812 Travel Map & Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
War of 1812 Travel Map & Guide S u sq u eh a n n a 1 Westminster R 40 r e iv v e i r 272 R 15 anal & Delaware C 70 ke Chesapea cy a Northeast River c o Elk River n 140 Havre de Chesapeake o 97 Grace City 49 M 26 40 Susquehanna 213 32 Flats 301 13 795 95 1 r e Liberty Reservoir v i R Frederick h 26 s 9 u B 695 Elk River G 70 u 340 n Sa p ssaf 695 rass 83 o Riv w er r e d 40 e v i r R R Baltimore i 13 95 v e r y M c i 213 a dd c le o B R n 70 ac iv o k e R r M 270 iv e 301 r P o to m ac 15 ster Che River 95 P 32 a R t i v a 9 e r p Chestertown 695 s 13 co R 20 1 i 213 300 1 ve r 100 97 Rock Hall 8 Leesburg 97 177 213 Dover 2 301 r ive r R e 32 iv M R 7 a r k got n hy te Ri s a v t 95 er e 295 h r p 189 S e o e C v 313 h ve i r C n R R e iv o er h 13 ka 267 495 uc 113 T Whitehall Bay Bay Bridge 50 495 Greensboro 193 495 Queen Milford Anne 7 14 50 Selby 404 Harrington Bay 1 14 Denton 66 4 113 y P 258 a a B t u rn 404 x te 66 Washington D.C. e 4 s n a 16 Greenwood t E R i v 95 e Easton 331 r Herring 313 Manassas 2 Bay 33 1 301 Dunkirk Bridgeville Hall Creek 260 North Beach Benedict (Patuxent River) — The British landed at Benedict with a 18 Chesapeake Beach force of 4,370 and marched north, ultimately burning Washington. 28 CALVERT Historic Locations 18 Interpretive signage on site. 5 333 Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum — At this50 site, Commodore 13 262 16 Joshua Barney’s Chesapeake Flotilla clashed with the British on June Federalsburg Georgetown Lower Marlboro 8 – 10 and again on June 26, 1814, in the Battles of St. Leonard Creek. of The battles, comprising the largest naval engagement in the history of DESTINATIONS 2/4 Maryland, took place where the Patuxent River meets the mouth of East Hurlock Waldorf St. Leonard Creek.C The naval engagement was supported on land by New Market War Huntingtown hop 392 American Army, Marine,ta and militia units who exchanged hundreds of 210 n shots per hour with British kforces. Exhibits and interpretation on site: er R 16 iv Indian Head 301 10515 Mackall Road, St. Leonard,i MD; 410-586-8501; www.jefpat.org 9 113 ve 313 R Gun Battery Site CHARLES Holland r Huntingtown 5 Cliff (original site) Sotterley Plantation — Sotterley was a mustering site for militia coming 1812 381 e The Reserve Site to the aid of the U.S. Chesapeake Flotilla in June 1814. Many slaves k Millsboro co 225 Dares Beach escaped from the plantation during that summer to join the British. anti Godsgrace Visitors can see the existing slave cabin and the beautifully restored N Port Oldfields Prince Frederick Laurel La Plata Plantation Colonial Revival plantation house at Sotterley, 44300 Sotterley Lane, Tobacco Hughesville Chapel Maxwell Site Prince Frederick Cambridge Hall Hollywood,iver MD; 301-373-2280; www.sotterley.org Patuxent Courthouse nk R Sharptown 6 pta City 231 ho Chaptico — 5 Hallowing C British forces conducted a raid at Chaptico where many e 16 50 Point tl houses as well as the wharf and tobacco sheds were destroyed and the 331 it L Christ Episcopal Church damaged. Rt. 234, St. Mary’s County. 6 Chapel Charlotte Hall Benedict P www.christepiscopalchaptico.org Point o Sheridan St. Leonard 16 Vienna 425 r 264 t 6 Leonardtown — British troops attacked Leonardtown. Interpretive 13 Point T o P signage at Leonardtown Wharf Public Park. N b a Calverton a a t Taney Place www.somd.com/leonardtown n c u A c j 301 x 50 q e o e St. Leonard’s Town (original site) R u m i Nanjemoy R n Lower Marlboro — A British force occupied the town June 15 to June a a t 265 o i k Fort Hill Site p e C y v Coles Landing R 95 e 16, 1814. Historic marker on site, at the end of Rt. 262. p e r i r a e C r v Broomes Island C h e e 335 r r k d a e r Maxwell Hall — Local tradition claims that Maxwell Hall served e n a k n n 224 o as a temporary headquarters for the British during their march on o ST. MARY’S e c L k 17 234 t. Washington. Historic marker on site, located near Patuxent, Charles W Sotterley S R ico Jefferson Patterson County. iv m Plantation www.hmdb.org/marker.asp?marker=28317 er 1 ic Park & Museum o Newburg Chaptico Cove Point R St. Leonard* — Interpretive signage about the St. Leonard Town Site otom i 50 P ac Creek Lower Cedar v and the First Battle of St. Leonard Creek from June 8 to 10, 1814, and e 5 Point r 235 H Salisbury the Second Battle of St. Leonard Creek on June 26, 1814. Pt. Patience o Scotch n Solomons g Clements Neck Site Solomonsa — This island was called Somervell’s Island duringFishing War of 238 R r 245 1812. www.solomonsmaryland.com Bay e Calvert Rousby Hall i v iv Fredericksburg e 349 Marine Museum Battle of r Tudor Hall (Leonardtown) — y Home of Phillip Key which now houses 218 R a Cedar Point B the St. May’s County Historical Society. Interpretive panel and exhibit. e Leonardtown Carroll s Cedar Point Woodland ’ k t n 243 4 Plantation Site www.stmaryshistory.org o r Point e c 242 e m Patuxent River i e 13 Tudor Hall t v l Calvert Marine Museum (Solomons) — The museum displays artifacts i C Naval Air Museum n Cobb t Lexington 205 R n recovered from one of the vessels of the U.S. Chesapeake Flotilla scuttled i Bay a 12 Island a on Park S ret 5 on August 22, 1814, on the Patuxent River, as well as an electric map of N B e St. Clement’s Bay the British invasion route up the river. For hours and fees, visit k Breton Bay Great Mills Textile o St. Clement’s www.calvertmarinemuseum.com er Factory Site Great Mills 235 v m 301 Island Museum i o R c 5 Linden House, Prince Frederick* — On July 19, 1814, the British o o St. Clement’s Island S Hooper Strait ic Mulberry ai burned the Calvert County Courthouse, the jail, and a tobacco P State Park nt m Field M co warehouse. www.calverthistory.org i P a W 113 249 r Porto y o s St. Mary’s City to Bello R Patuxent River Naval Air Museum* — The museum features an exhibit 363 i This map shows the extent to which local m v Port Royal e r on the Battle of Cedar Point, the first naval skirmish in Maryland. The propertyMap owners were impactedLegend by the War of 1812. a c museum presents the story of naval aviation research and development at M R St. Inigoes Manor Site Naval Air Station Patuxent River. For hours visit http://paxmuseum.com a Raid or other harassment of citizens by British soldiers t iv St. Ignatius Roman Catholic Church ta e * Interpretive signage coming in 2012 p Skirmish between British and American troops r in oni it anok River Snow Hill ra M t St. Jerome Creek S Battle between British and American troops d n R a 1 Mustering sites, camps, look-outs ll i St. George Island o v H e 413 13 r The following symbols designate locations that are publicly accessible, 202 Bowling and where you can go to learn more about the events of 1814: d Green Visitor destination 1812 site with interpretation n R u a Pocomoke City o Interpretive signage on site, includes highway markers p 3 p 17 S a er ico Riv h Yecom Point Lookout a 95 1812 interpretation/not an 1812 historic site r n State Park e n i o Visitor Information Centers g c k n Chesapeake a Crisfield 207 Cove ghts Wri T r North R e v i i R Smith Island v 360 e n r a o C k e e r Bay C l l Po u comoke River H y Tappahannock err 301 F ger 360 L n it e 644 tl s Chincoteague e s W a ico P mi co River Great W 3 icomi d co Riv er n u o Beasly Bay S 360 e R k 13 ap 200 Tangier o 30 pa Island om tank h c ka a o n n P la n P o c M k 301 P a u tt 17 m R u a p 354 n k i oni e y v e r R Accomac 2 i v 30 R r Kilmarnock e r ve River i i v R e r n a Onancock m to o 3 rr ts B Urbanna o Flee ay C 360 295 64 N N a n d u a 13 Creek A Ch ick 33 ah om in y R E ive r Belle Haven ohannock Cr 33 3 Occ P la 64 nk 64 ata er C Richmond 17 nk iv 30 R Exmore 95 5 198 r O 60 C 895 ox ad saw as Diascund Creek N Reservoir 14 14 C N o r rth C R s ar i W v g I 1 a e n r r e u 301 H R i Y v e 14 r o r k T ck B C ja ay h b i o c k M a 60 17 N Jam h 13 es River o R 5 m 64 et i i nl n v I e y e on Williamsburg t s A r ry er h R C i v e r Petersburg 295 31 L 10 156 T 460 C A ob 105 ha m Bay J a 95 m e s 64 17 85 R i 10 ve 60 r Hampton l ne North un T ge rid 664 B Newport ay B Smithfield News e 460 k a e p a s e 258 h C 0 5 10 15 20 24 Km 13 r Portsmouth e v i 64 0 5 10 15 Mi R 17 ond 58 em s 44 n a N r Virginia Beach Winsor e v i Suffolk R 264 h et b a z Chesapeakeli 95 258 E 460 13 58 What role did Southern Visit the places where history Maryland play in the war? was made during the War of 1812 ounded by the Chesapeake Bay on the the British blockaded the Patuxent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title 26 Department of the Environment, Subtitle 08 Water
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapters 01-10 2 26.08.01.00 Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapter 01 General Authority: Environment Article, §§9-313—9-316, 9-319, 9-320, 9-325, 9-327, and 9-328, Annotated Code of Maryland 3 26.08.01.01 .01 Definitions. A. General. (1) The following definitions describe the meaning of terms used in the water quality and water pollution control regulations of the Department of the Environment (COMAR 26.08.01—26.08.04). (2) The terms "discharge", "discharge permit", "disposal system", "effluent limitation", "industrial user", "national pollutant discharge elimination system", "person", "pollutant", "pollution", "publicly owned treatment works", and "waters of this State" are defined in the Environment Article, §§1-101, 9-101, and 9-301, Annotated Code of Maryland. The definitions for these terms are provided below as a convenience, but persons affected by the Department's water quality and water pollution control regulations should be aware that these definitions are subject to amendment by the General Assembly. B. Terms Defined. (1) "Acute toxicity" means the capacity or potential of a substance to cause the onset of deleterious effects in living organisms over a short-term exposure as determined by the Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Condition of US Mid-Atlantic Estuaries, 1997–1998
    Marine Pollution Bulletin 46 (2003) 1224–1244 www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul Review Ecological condition of US Mid-Atlantic estuaries, 1997–1998 John A.Kiddon a,*, John F.Paul b, Harry W.Buffum c, Charles S.Strobel a, Stephen S.Hale a, Donald Cobb a, Barbara S.Brown a a US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology Division, 27 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA b US Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, NHEERL, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA c Computer Sciences Corporation, 27 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA Abstract The Mid-Atlantic Integrated Assessment (MAIA-Estuaries) evaluated ecological conditions in US Mid-Atlantic estuaries during the summers of 1997 and 1998.Over 800 probability-based stations were monitored in four main estuarine systems––Chesapeake Bay, the Delaware Estuary, Maryland and Virginian coastal bays, and the Albemarle–Pamlico Estuarine System.Twelve smaller estuaries within the four main systems were also assessed to establish variance at the local scale.A subset of the MAIA-Estuaries data is used here to estimate the extent of eutrophication, sediment contamination, and benthic degradation in mid-Atlantic estuaries.An Envi- ronmental Report Card and Index of Environmental Integrity summarize conditions in individual estuaries, the four estuarine systems, and the entire MAIA region.Roughly 20–50% of the region showed signs of eutrophication (high nutrients, excessive production of organic matter, poor water clarity, or depleted dissolved oxygen), 30% had contaminated sediments, and 37% had degraded benthic communities.Compared with the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP)-Virginian Province study in 1990– 1993, larger fractions of Chesapeake Bay (17%) and Delaware River (32%) had increased metals or organics in sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Nautical Information for Skippers and Crews
    Sail Plan Pentagon Sailing Club 2016 Memorial Day Raft­up: “STORM FRONT COMING” 28­30 May 2016 Nautical Information for Skippers and Crews FLOAT PLAN ******************************************************************************************** References: NOAA Charts ­12270 Chesapeake Bay – Chesapeake Eastern Bay and South River; 1:40,000 ­12266 Chesapeake Bay – Chesapeake – Choptank and Herring Bay; 1:40,000 ­12280 Chesapeake Bay – 1:200,000 Pentagon Sailing Club Raft­Up Guidelines (revised 06/2005; link online at the PSC site under “Raft­Up”) Saturday, 28 May 16. Sail from Annapolis, MD the Chesapeake Bay to Trippe Creek, vicinity of Choptank River. Raft up Saturday night (see Navigation below). Distance from Annapolis (direct route past Thomas Point to Choptank River, Tred Avon River, then Trippe Creek and raft up location) is approximately 33 nm Sunday, 29 May 16. Exit Trippe Creek, Tred Avon River, then Choptank River to Campbell’s Boatyard LLC, Bachelor’s Point Marina (Oxford, MD). Dinner will be held at “The Masthead at Pier Street Marina” restaurant in Oxford, MD; cocktails from 5pm, and dinner from 6 to 8pm. Monday, 30 May 16. Sail back to respective points of origin NAVIGATION ******************************************************************************************** Saturday, 28 May: Sail from Annapolis, MD to Raft up destination is in the Trippe Creek vic 038º 42.8 North; 076º 07.3 West. See Chart A and B. From Annapolis R “2” Fl R 2.5s (Lat 038º 56.4 N; Lon 076º 25.3 W) ­Sail from R “2” Fl R 2.5s 185º M to WP A (Lat 038º
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-AG-Environmental-Audit.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER ONE: YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER AND DEEP CREEK LAKE .................. 4 I. Background .......................................................................................................... 4 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ........................................................... 9 III. The Youghiogheny River/Deep Creek Lake Audit, May 16, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned............................................................................................. 12 CHAPTER TWO: COASTAL BAYS ............................................................................. 15 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 15 II. Active Enforcement Efforts and Pending Matters ............................................. 17 III. The Coastal Bays Audit, July 12, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned .. 20 CHAPTER THREE: WYE RIVER ................................................................................. 24 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 24 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ......................................................... 26 III. The Wye River Audit, October 10, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned 27 CHAPTER FOUR: POTOMAC RIVER NORTH BRANCH AND SAVAGE RIVER 31 I. Background .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Management in Chesapeake Bay C
    Shoreline Management In Chesapeake Bay C. S. Hardaway, Jr. and R. J. Byrne Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William and Mary 1 Cover Photo: Drummond Field, Installed 1985, James River, James City County, Virginia. This publication is available for $10.00 from: Sea Grant Communications Virginia Institute of Marine Science P. O. Box 1346 Gloucester Point, VA 23062 Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 356 Virginia Sea Grant Publication VSG-99-11 October 1999 Funding and support for this report were provided by... Virginia Institute of Marine Science Virginia Sea Grant College Program Sea Grant Contract # NA56RG0141 Virginia Coastal Resource Management Program NA470Z0287 WILLIAM& MARY Shoreline Management In Chesapeake Bay By C. Scott Hardaway, Jr. and Robert J. Byrne Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1999 4 Table of Contents Preface......................................................................................7 Shoreline Evolution ................................................................8 Shoreline Processes ..............................................................16 Wave Climate .......................................................................16 Shoreline Erosion .................................................................20 Reach Assessment ................................................................23 Shoreline Management Strategies ......................................24 Bulkheads and Seawalls
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Lease Applications 9-23-20.Xlsx
    Summary of Shellfish Lease Applications (1/1/2015 - 9/23/2020) Waterbody County AcreageStatus Received CompleteTFL Sanctuary WC Gear Type IssuedDate Smith Creek St. Mary's 3 Recorded 1/6/15 1/6/15 11/21/16 St. Marys River St. Mary's 16.2 GISRescreen (revised) 1/6/15 1/6/15 Yes Cages Calvert Bay St. Mary's 2.5Recorded 1/6/15 1/6/15 YesCages 2/28/17 Wicomico River St. Mary's 4.5Recorded 1/8/15 1/27/15 YesCages 5/8/19 Fishing Bay Dorchester 6.1 Recorded 1/12/15 1/12/15 Yes 11/2/15 Honga River Dorchester 14Recorded 2/10/15 2/26/15Yes YesCages & Floats 6/27/18 Smith Creek St Mary's 2.6 Under Protest 2/12/15 2/12/15 Yes Harris Creek Talbot 4.1Recorded 2/19/15 4/7/15 Yes YesCages 4/28/16 Wicomico River Somerset 26.7Recorded 3/3/15 3/3/15Yes 10/20/16 Ellis Bay Wicomico 69.9Recorded 3/19/15 3/19/15Yes 9/20/17 Wicomico River Charles 13.8Recorded 3/30/15 3/30/15Yes 2/4/16 Smith Creek St. Mary's 1.7 Under Protest 3/31/15 3/31/15 Yes Chester River Kent 4.9Recorded 4/6/15 4/9/15 YesCages 8/23/16 Smith Creek St. Mary's 2.1 Recorded 4/23/15 4/23/15 Yes 9/19/16 Fishing Bay Dorchester 12.4Recorded 5/4/15 6/4/15Yes 6/1/16 Breton Bay St.
    [Show full text]
  • Provider Directory Directorio De Proveedores Maryland Healthchoice Program
    Provider Directory Directorio De Proveedores Maryland HealthChoice Program Southern Maryland: Calvert, Charles and St. Mary’s Counties Sur de Maryland: condados de Calvert, Charles y St. Mary 1-800-600-4441 (TTY 711) www.myamerigroup.com/md MD-PD-0019-18 Provider Directory Directorio De Proveedores Maryland HealthChoice Program Southern Maryland: Calvert, Charles and St. Mary’s Counties Sur de Maryland: condados de Calvert, Charles y St. Mary 1-800-600-4441 (TTY 711) www.myamerigroup.com/MD MD-PD-0019-18 Maryland Provider Directory / Maryland directorio de proveedores Table of Contents / Tabla de contenido PAGE Welcome to Amerigroup Community Care / Bienvenido a Amerigroup Community Care 1 Symbols Index / Índice de símbolos ................................................................................... 4 Urgent Care, Walk-In Clinics, After Hours Physicians / Cuidado urgente, clínica sin cita previa, después de médicos de horas ................................................................................ 9 Hospitals / Hospitales ......................................................................................................... 10 Primary Care Providers / Proveedores de cuidado primario ............................................. 11 Health Centers and Clinics / Centros y clinicas de salud .................................................. 28 OB/GYN Providers / Proveedores de obstetricia y ginecología ......................................... 29 Specialists / Especialistas .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Budget and Program I S C a L
    F Capital Budget and Program I S C A L Y E A Appendix 2 of 4 R Roads and Bridges Traffic Control Storm Drains 2 Waterway Improvement 0 Janet S. Owens 0 County Executive 3 Roads & Bridges Class Project Title Page Appendix Project Title Page Appendix Arundel Mills Tax District 91 2-180 Hospital Drive Extension 70 2-137 Arundel On The Bay Rd 72 2-141 Hwy Sfty Improv (HSI) 86 2-170 Brockbridge Rd Brdg/Patuxent 79 2-155 Idlewilde Road 92 2-182 Cap St Claire Rd Wide 76 2-150 Jennifer Road Ramp 74 2-145 Catherine Ave/MD 100 82 2-161 Jumpers Hole Rd 3 67 2-133 Catherine Avenue Widening 95 2-188 Magothy Bch/Magothy Brdg Con 78 2-154 Chesapeake Center Drive 82 2-162 Masonry Reconstruction 87 2-172 Chg Agst R & B Clsd Projects 66 2-131 MD 175/Odenton Town Center 73 2-144 Chstnt Tre/Grn Holly 77 2-151 MD 214 @ MD 468 Impr 98 2-194 Countywide Sidewalks 71 2-140 MD173/MD177 Connection 74 2-146 Crestwood Sidewalk,Curb,Gutter 90 2-177 Medical Boulevard 68 2-135 Dicus Mill/Severn Run 80 2-157 Mjr Bridge Rehab (MBR) 86 2-169 Dorchester Tax District 88 2-174 Morgan Road Extended 67 2-132 Dundee Rdway,Sdwk,C&G 94 2-185 National Business Pk 84 2-166 East Park Drive 93 2-183 Odenton Marc Enchance Phase II 97 2-191 East-West Blvd. 65 2-129 Odenton Rd Sdwk-So 89 2-176 Farmington Vill Tax Dis 89 2-175 Odenton Rd Sidewalk 66 2-130 FBRM Project Plan 75 2-148 Parole Intermodal Transit Fac.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Fort Mchenry.Pdf
    American Battlefield Trust Volume 5 BROADSIDE A Journal of the Wars for Independence for Students Fort McHenry and the Birth of an Anthem Of all the battles in American history none is more With a war being fought on the periphery of the Unit- connected with popular culture than the battle of Fort ed States the British, under the influence of Admiral McHenry fought during the War of 1812. The British George Cockburn, decided to bring the war more di- attack on Fort McHenry and the rectly to America by attacking the large garrison flag that could be Chesapeake Region. The British seen through the early morning Navy, with Marines and elements mist, inspired Washington, DC of their army wreaked havoc along lawyer Francis Scott Key to pen the Chesapeake burning numer- what in 1931 would be adopted ous town and settlements. Howev- by Congress as our National An- er, Cockburn had two prizes in them, the Star-Spangled Ban- mind – Washington, DC and Bal- ner. The anthem is played be- timore, Maryland. Retribution for fore countless sports events the burning of York was never far from high school through the from his mind and what a blow he ranks of professional games. thought, would it be to American The story of the creation of the morale if he could torch the still Star-Spangled Banner is as developing American capital. Af- compelling as the story of the ter pushing aside a motley assort- attack on Baltimore. ment of American defenders of the approach to Washington, DC In 1812, a reluctant President at the battle of Bladensburg, Mar- James Madison asked Congress yland, Cockburn and his forces for a Declaration of War against entered the city and put the torch Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Arundel County Corridor Growth Management Plan Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Anne Arundel County Corridor Growth Management Plan July 20, 2012 LEGEND Baltimore City US 50 MD 2 South MD 2 North Howard County I-97 MD 32 MD 100 4.6-Miles MD 295 MD 3 MD 607-MD 173 14-Miles 2.5-Miles 16-Miles Benfield Blvd. 13-Miles MD176 14-Miles 17-Miles MD170 4.6-Miles MD 713 Ridge Rd. 11-Miles AACOBoundary Anne Arundel County 17-Miles 7-Miles 19-Miles 4-Miles Prince George's County Prepared by: µ 0 1 2 4 Miles a Joint Venture 7055 Samuel Morse Dr., Suite 100 | Columbia, MD 21406 | 410.741.3500 Corridor Growth Management Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 CHAPTER 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................1-1 1.1 OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Purpose and Scope ................................................................................ 1-2 1.1.2 Project Costs .......................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.3 Alternatives Tested ............................................................................... 1-2 1.1.4 Priorities ................................................................................................ 1-4 1.1.5 Next Steps ............................................................................................. 1-4 1.2 US 50 .................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.3 MD 2 - NORTH ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Here 4 Events GETTING HERE 5 Itineraries Dunkirk AIRPORTS MILEAGE 6 Communities Owings Baltimore/Washington Washington D.C
    Photo by dK.i Photography CONTENTS 3 Getting Here 4 Events GETTING HERE 5 Itineraries Dunkirk AIRPORTS MILEAGE 6 Communities Owings Baltimore/Washington Washington D.C. ...................36 miles During your visit to our relaxing waterside community, we 8 Arts & Culture North Beach International Thurgood Annapolis, MD ...................... 29 miles hope you take time to fully experience the Chesapeake Bay 8 Antiques & Collectibles Marshall Airport (BWI) Baltimore, MD ....................... 53 miles lifestyle. We promise an unforgettable experience and wish 9 Maritime & Local History Located south of Baltimore Chesapeake Beach Richmond, VA .........................111 miles you happy discoveries as you “catch our drift” and experience 10 Hiking, Trails & Parks Drive Time: 1 hour Philadelphia, PA ...................150 miles all the great things Calvert County has to offer. 11 Fun For Families Pittsburgh, PA ..................... 270 miles 12 Get on the Water Reagan National New York, NY .......................230 miles Calvert County Board of County Commissioners 14 Marinas Airport (DCA) 15 Beaches Located in Washington, D.C. 16 Foodie Scene Drive Time: 1 hour LOCAL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 18 Sweet Treats 19 Breweries & Wineries Dulles International (IAD) Enterprise Rent-A-Car: 410-414-2500 Huntingtown 20 Lodging Located in Northern Virginia Public Bus Service: 410-535-4510 21 Wedding Venues Drive Time: 1 hour, 20 minutes Checker Taxi: 240-508-2001 Smart Ride Inc.: 410-535-6932 CONNECT WITH US GROUP TOURS Facebook.com/VisitCalvertCounty For information on a variety of group tours and events, visit ChooseCalvert.com. @VisitCalvertCounty Find us on Youtube This guide has been compiled on behalf of the Calvert County Board of County Commissioners Prince Frederick to assist you while visiting Calvert County.
    [Show full text]