DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Lease Applications 9-23-20.Xlsx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Lease Applications 9-23-20.Xlsx Summary of Shellfish Lease Applications (1/1/2015 - 9/23/2020) Waterbody County AcreageStatus Received CompleteTFL Sanctuary WC Gear Type IssuedDate Smith Creek St. Mary's 3 Recorded 1/6/15 1/6/15 11/21/16 St. Marys River St. Mary's 16.2 GISRescreen (revised) 1/6/15 1/6/15 Yes Cages Calvert Bay St. Mary's 2.5Recorded 1/6/15 1/6/15 YesCages 2/28/17 Wicomico River St. Mary's 4.5Recorded 1/8/15 1/27/15 YesCages 5/8/19 Fishing Bay Dorchester 6.1 Recorded 1/12/15 1/12/15 Yes 11/2/15 Honga River Dorchester 14Recorded 2/10/15 2/26/15Yes YesCages & Floats 6/27/18 Smith Creek St Mary's 2.6 Under Protest 2/12/15 2/12/15 Yes Harris Creek Talbot 4.1Recorded 2/19/15 4/7/15 Yes YesCages 4/28/16 Wicomico River Somerset 26.7Recorded 3/3/15 3/3/15Yes 10/20/16 Ellis Bay Wicomico 69.9Recorded 3/19/15 3/19/15Yes 9/20/17 Wicomico River Charles 13.8Recorded 3/30/15 3/30/15Yes 2/4/16 Smith Creek St. Mary's 1.7 Under Protest 3/31/15 3/31/15 Yes Chester River Kent 4.9Recorded 4/6/15 4/9/15 YesCages 8/23/16 Smith Creek St. Mary's 2.1 Recorded 4/23/15 4/23/15 Yes 9/19/16 Fishing Bay Dorchester 12.4Recorded 5/4/15 6/4/15Yes 6/1/16 Breton Bay St. Mary's 4.3Recorded 5/6/15 6/2/15 YesCages 9/22/16 Chesapeake Bay Anne Arundel 22.4 Recorded 5/7/15 5/7/15 2/4/16 Cummings Creek Talbot 7.4Recorded 5/8/15 5/8/15YesYes 8/14/18 Shipping Creek Queen Anne's 0.5 Recorded 5/26/15 6/1/15 Yes Cages & Floats 2/27/19 Chesapeake Bay Calvert 37.8Recorded 6/3/15 6/5/15YesYes 4/11/16 Cox Creek Queen Anne's 2.2Recorded 6/9/15 6/9/15 Yes YesCages 10/25/17 Herring Creek St Mary's 1.8 Recorded 6/22/15 8/14/15 Yes 10/17/16 Smith Creek St. Mary's 1.3 Recorded 6/26/15 10/8/15 Yes 9/19/16 Carthagena Creek St. Mary's 2.6Recorded 7/6/15 7/6/15Yes 3/21/17 South River Anne Arundel 4.9 Recorded 7/15/15 7/15/15 Yes Cages 2/19/16 Tred Avon River Talbot 3.2Under Protest 7/31/15 8/10/15Yes Yes Fishing Bay Dorchester 1.4 Recorded 8/28/15 9/15/15 Yes 6/1/16 Monie Bay Somerset 23.7Recorded 9/4/15 9/4/15 Yes 4/26/17 Monie Bay Somerset 27Recorded 9/4/15 9/4/15 Yes 4/26/17 Monie Bay Wicomico 47.7Recorded 9/9/15 9/9/15 7/14/16 Patuxent River Calvert 3Recorded 9/29/15 9/29/15Yes YesCages & Floats 9/18/19 Jutland Creek St. Mary's 1.6 Recorded 10/5/15 10/8/15 1/24/18 Smith Creek St. Mary's 0.5 Recorded 10/5/15 10/14/15 7/25/17 Choptank River Talbot 11Recorded 10/14/15 11/3/15YesYes 7/14/16 Cummings Creek Talbot 2.1Recorded 11/9/15 11/9/15YesYes 11/21/16 Choptank River Dorchester 9.5Recorded 11/12/15 11/12/15YesYes 7/14/16 Wicomico River Somerset 16.9Recorded 11/24/15 11/24/15Yes 10/17/16 Ellis Bay Wicomico 9.1Recorded 11/24/15 11/24/15Yes 10/17/16 Harris Creek Talbot 3.8Recorded 12/1/15 12/28/15 Yes YesCages 11/26/18 Chincoteague Bay Worcester 2.4Recorded 12/10/15 12/22/15 YesCages 10/17/16 Wicomico River St. Mary's 54.2 Recorded 12/23/15 12/23/15 Yes 2/28/17 Patuxent River St. Mary's 5.8Recorded 12/29/15 6/27/16 YesCages 9/18/19 Patuxent River St. Mary's 7.5Recorded 12/29/15 6/27/16 YesCages 9/18/19 Harris Creek Talbot 3.8Recorded 1/4/16 1/4/16 Yes YesCages 9/20/17 Harris Creek Talbot 2.5Recorded 1/4/16 1/4/16YesYes 9/20/17 Choptank River Dorchester 15.2 Recorded 1/21/16 1/21/16 Yes Yes 1/7/19 Miles River Talbot 10.4Recorded 1/21/16 1/21/16YesYes 1/8/18 Miles River Talbot 2Recorded 1/21/16 1/21/16YesYes 12/11/17 St. Inigoes Creek St. Mary's 6 Incomplete 1/21/16 Yes Wicomico River Wicomico 10.4Recorded 2/4/16 2/4/16Yes 3/21/17 Monie Bay Somerset 88.2Recorded 2/8/16 2/8/16Yes 12/6/16 St. Catherine Sound St Mary's 3.7 Recorded 2/8/16 2/8/16 Yes 1/6/17 Honga River Dorchester 4.9Recorded 3/8/16 3/30/16 Yes YesCages 12/6/16 Honga River Dorchester 4.8Recorded 3/8/16 3/30/16 Yes YesCages 12/6/16 Island Creek St. Mary's 2 Recorded 4/18/16 8/30/16 Yes Cages & Floats 8/14/18 Chesapeake Bay St Mary's 10.9 Under Protest 4/18/16 10/24/16 Yes Cages & Floats Fishing Bay Dorchester 4.9 Recorded 5/11/16 6/13/16 Yes Yes Cages 9/20/17 Fishing Bay Dorchester 4.6 Recorded 5/11/16 6/13/16 Yes Yes Cages 9/20/17 Tangier Sound Somerset 42.4 Recorded 6/6/16 6/6/16 5/15/17 Tangier Sound Somerset 45.2 Recorded 6/6/16 6/6/16 Yes 5/15/17 Monie Bay Somerset 45.5Recorded 6/27/16 7/5/16Yes 7/25/17 Monie Bay Somerset 50.2Recorded 6/27/16 7/5/16Yes 7/25/17 Wicomico River Wicomico 16.6Recorded 7/7/16 7/7/16Yes 6/22/17 West River Anne Arundel 35.4Recorded 8/8/16 8/18/16Yes 12/4/17 Sinepuxent Bay Worcester 2.9 Recorded 9/8/16 9/9/16 Yes Cages & Floats 6/7/20 Smith Creek St. Mary's 5.6 Recorded 9/12/16 9/12/16 Yes 2/27/19 Prospect Bay Queen Anne's 0.8Recorded 9/14/16 9/23/16 Yes YesFloats 9/19/18 Wicomico River Wicomico 5.9Recorded 9/19/16 9/19/16 9/20/17 Wicomico River Somerset 18.1Recorded 9/22/16 9/22/16Yes 8/24/17 Chesapeake Bay St. Mary's 48Recorded 9/23/16 10/3/16 YesCages 9/20/17 Patuxent River Calvert 2.8Recorded 10/17/16 10/17/16 YesCages 9/20/17 Patuxent River Calvert 2.3Recorded 10/17/16 10/17/16 YesCages 9/20/17 Honga River Dorchester 6.3Recorded 11/7/16 12/9/16Yes YesFloats 2/12/18 Prospect Bay Queen Anne's 3.4Under Protest 11/10/16 11/10/16Yes Yes Yes Cages Brockanorton Bay Worcester 6Recorded 11/15/16 12/1/16 YesFloats 7/10/19 Eastern Bay Talbot 2.8Recorded 12/5/16 12/5/16YesYes YesCages 10/25/17 Eastern Bay Talbot 4.3Recorded 12/6/16 12/6/16 Yes YesCages 10/25/17 Severn River Anne Arundel 6.4Recorded 12/8/16 12/8/16 Yes YesCages 10/25/17 Nanticoke River Dorchester 49 On Hold 12/14/16 12/14/16 Yes Yes Nanticoke River Wicomico 11.5Recorded 12/29/16 12/29/16 12/4/17 Nanticoke River Dorchester 15.1 Recorded 12/29/16 12/29/16 1/24/18 Chesapeake Bay Calvert 24Recorded 1/23/17 4/24/17YesYes 5/8/19 Chesapeake Bay Calvert 7.7Recorded 1/23/17 4/24/17YesYes YesCages 10/11/18 Patuxent River St. Mary's 25.6 Under Protest 1/24/17 2/3/17 Yes Wicomico River Charles 5.6Recorded 1/25/17 2/7/17Yes 7/10/19 Neale Sound Charles 7.9Recorded 1/25/17 2/23/17Yes YesCages 10/11/18 Tedious Creek Dorchester 2.8 Recorded 1/25/17 10/4/17 Yes Floating Upwellers 4/9/19 St. Jerome Creek St. Mary's 0.1 Recorded 1/26/17 4/24/17 Yes Floats 12/10/18 St. Jerome Creek St. Mary's 0.2 LeaseAgreementSent 1/26/17 4/2/19 Yes Floats Fishing Bay Dorchester 49.7Recorded 2/7/17 2/7/17 5/23/18 Fishing Bay Dorchester 50.2 On Hold 2/7/17 2/7/17 Little Choptank River Dorchester 11.4Recorded 2/10/17 2/10/17YesYes 2/12/18 Nanticoke River Dorchester 13.9Recorded 2/24/17 2/24/17Yes 3/15/18 Johnson Bay Worcester 6.4Recorded 3/1/17 8/10/17 YesFloats 7/10/18 Wicomico River Wicomico 91.6Recorded 3/8/17 6/9/17Yes 5/4/18 White's Neck Creek St Mary's 4 Received 3/20/17 Yes Fishing Bay Dorchester 12.2Recorded 3/31/17 3/31/17Yes 5/22/18 St. Clements Bay St Mary's 0.4 Recorded 4/3/17 5/15/17 Yes Cages 10/18/18 Choptank River Talbot 15.3Recorded 4/11/17 5/8/17YesYes 4/13/18 Choptank River Dorchester 22.3 Public Notice 4/21/17 4/21/17 Yes Choptank River Dorchester 20.7 Recorded 5/2/17 5/2/17 Yes 12/13/18 Choptank River Dorchester 5.6Recorded 5/9/17 5/9/17 Yes 12/13/18 Little Choptank River Dorchester 19.8Recorded 5/18/17 5/18/17YesYes 11/8/18 Tred Avon River Talbot 4Recorded 5/31/17 7/19/17Yes 4/23/18 Tred Avon River Talbot 15.6Recorded 5/31/17 7/19/17YesYes 4/11/18 Monie Bay Somerset 28.4Recorded 6/1/17 6/28/17 5/4/18 St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title 26 Department of the Environment, Subtitle 08 Water
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapters 01-10 2 26.08.01.00 Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapter 01 General Authority: Environment Article, §§9-313—9-316, 9-319, 9-320, 9-325, 9-327, and 9-328, Annotated Code of Maryland 3 26.08.01.01 .01 Definitions. A. General. (1) The following definitions describe the meaning of terms used in the water quality and water pollution control regulations of the Department of the Environment (COMAR 26.08.01—26.08.04). (2) The terms "discharge", "discharge permit", "disposal system", "effluent limitation", "industrial user", "national pollutant discharge elimination system", "person", "pollutant", "pollution", "publicly owned treatment works", and "waters of this State" are defined in the Environment Article, §§1-101, 9-101, and 9-301, Annotated Code of Maryland. The definitions for these terms are provided below as a convenience, but persons affected by the Department's water quality and water pollution control regulations should be aware that these definitions are subject to amendment by the General Assembly. B. Terms Defined. (1) "Acute toxicity" means the capacity or potential of a substance to cause the onset of deleterious effects in living organisms over a short-term exposure as determined by the Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Decisions Regarding Nutrient and Sediment Load Allocations and New Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Restoration Goals
    To: Principal Staff Committee Members and Representatives of Chesapeake Bay “Headwater” States From: W. Tayloe Murphy, Jr., Chair Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee Subject: Summary of Decisions Regarding Nutrient and Sediment Load Allocations and New Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Restoration Goals For the past twenty years, the Chesapeake Bay partners have been committed to achieving and maintaining water quality conditions necessary to support living resources throughout the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. In the past month, Chesapeake Bay Program partners (Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, the District of Columbia, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Chesapeake Bay Commission) have expanded our efforts by working with the headwater states of Delaware, West Virginia and New York to adopt new cap load allocations for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment. Using the best scientific information available, Bay Program partners have agreed to allocations that are intended to meet the needs of the plants and animals that call the Chesapeake home. The allocations will serve as a basis for each state’s tributary strategies that, when completed by April 2004, will describe local implementation actions necessary to meet the Chesapeake 2000 nutrient and sediment loading goals by 2010. This memorandum summarizes the important, comprehensive agreements made by Bay watershed partners with regard to cap load allocations for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediments, as well as new baywide and local SAV restoration goals. Nutrient Allocations Excessive nutrients in the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries promote undesirable algal growth, and thereby, prohibit light from reaching underwater bay grasses (submerged aquatic vegetation or SAV) and depress the dissolved oxygen levels of the deeper waters of the Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • War of 1812 Travel Map & Guide
    S u sq u eh a n n a 1 Westminster R 40 r e iv v e i r 272 R 15 anal & Delaware C 70 ke Chesapea cy a Northeast River c o Elk River n 140 Havre de Chesapeake o 97 Grace City 49 M 26 40 Susquehanna 213 32 Flats 301 13 795 95 1 r e Liberty Reservoir v i R Frederick h 26 s 9 u B 695 Elk River G 70 u 340 n Sa p ssaf 695 rass 83 o Riv w er r e d 40 e v i r R R Baltimore i 13 95 v e r y M c i 213 a dd c le o B R n 70 ac iv o k e R r M 270 iv e 301 r P o to m ac 15 ster Che River 95 P 32 a R t i v a 9 e r p Chestertown 695 s 13 co R 20 1 i 213 300 1 ve r 100 97 Rock Hall 8 Leesburg 97 177 213 Dover 2 301 r ive r R e 32 iv M R 7 a r k got n hy te Ri s a v t 95 er e 295 h r p 189 S e o e C v 313 h ve i r C n R R e iv o er h 13 ka 267 495 uc 113 T Whitehall Bay Bay Bridge 50 495 Greensboro 193 495 Queen Milford Anne 7 14 50 Selby 404 Harrington Bay 1 14 Denton 66 4 113 y P 258 a a B t u rn 404 x te 66 Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Manokin River Watershed Characterization
    Manokin River Watershed Characterization May 2001 In support of Somerset County’s Watershed Restoration Action Strategy for the Manokin River Watershed Product of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources In partnership with Somerset County Parris N. Glendening, Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, Lt. Governor Sarah J. Taylor-Rogers, Secretary Stanley K. Arthur, Deputy Secretary David Burke, Director, Chesapeake and Coastal Watershed Service (CCWS) Maryland Department of Natural Resources Tawes State Office Building 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Telephone for CCWS 410-260-8739 Call toll free: 1-877-620-8DNR TTY for the Deaf: 1-410-974-3683 www.dnr.state.md.us The Mission of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources To inspire people to enjoy and live in harmony with their environment, and to protect what makes Maryland unique – our treasured Chesapeake Bay, our diverse landscapes, and our living and natural resources. The facilities and services of the Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, physical or mental disability. Important Contributors to the Manokin River Watershed Characterization Robin Bunting Somerset County Director of Recreation and Parks Max Chambers Flomax Marine Nursery Larry Fykes, Manager, Somerset Soil Conservation District Roman Jesien University of Maryland Eastern Shore Joan Kean Dept. of Technical and Community Services Tom Lawton Dept. of Technical and Community Services Somerset County Alphabetical Order Earl
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Maximum Fish Meals Each Year For
    Recommended Maximum Meals Each Year for Maryland Waters Recommendation based on 8 oz (0.227 kg) meal size, or the edible portion of 9 crabs (4 crabs for children) Meal Size: 8 oz - General Population; 6 oz - Women; 3 oz - Children NOTE: Consumption recommendations based on spacing of meals to avoid elevated exposure levels Recommended Meals/Year Species Waterbody General PopulationWomen* Children** Contaminants 8 oz meal 6 oz meal 3 oz meal Anacostia River 15 11 8 PCBs - risk driver Back River AVOID AVOID AVOID Pesticides*** Bush River 47 35 27 PCBs - risk driver Middle River 13 9 7 Northeast River 27 21 16 Patapsco River/Baltimore Harbor AVOID AVOID AVOID American Eel Patuxent River 26 20 15 Potomac River (DC Line to MD 301 1511 9 Bridge) South River 37 28 22 Centennial Lake No Advisory No Advisory No Advisory Methylmercury - risk driver Lake Roland 12 12 12 Pesticides*** - risk driver Liberty Reservoir 96 48 48 Methylmercury - risk driver Tuckahoe Lake No Advisory 93 56 Black Crappie Upper Potomac: DC Line to Dam #3 64 49 38 PCBs - risk driver Upper Potomac: Dam #4 to Dam #5 77 58 45 PCBs & Methylmercury - risk driver Crab meat Patapsco River/Baltimore Harbor 96 96 24 PCBs - risk driver Crab "mustard" Middle River DO NOT CONSUME Blue Crab Mid Bay: Middle to Patapsco River (1 meal equals 9 crabs) Patapsco River/Baltimore Harbor "MUSTARD" (for children: 4 crabs ) Other Areas of the Bay Eat Sparingly Anacostia 51 39 30 PCBs - risk driver Back River 33 25 20 Pesticides*** Middle River 37 28 22 Northeast River 29 22 17 Brown Bullhead Patapsco River/Baltimore Harbor 17 13 10 South River No Advisory No Advisory 88 * Women = of childbearing age (women who are pregnant or may become pregnant, or are nursing) ** Children = all young children up to age 6 *** Pesticides = banned organochlorine pesticide compounds (include chlordane, DDT, dieldrin, or heptachlor epoxide) As a general rule, make sure to wash your hands after handling fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Watersheds.Pdf
    Watershed Code Watershed Name 02130705 Aberdeen Proving Ground 02140205 Anacostia River 02140502 Antietam Creek 02130102 Assawoman Bay 02130703 Atkisson Reservoir 02130101 Atlantic Ocean 02130604 Back Creek 02130901 Back River 02130903 Baltimore Harbor 02130207 Big Annemessex River 02130606 Big Elk Creek 02130803 Bird River 02130902 Bodkin Creek 02130602 Bohemia River 02140104 Breton Bay 02131108 Brighton Dam 02120205 Broad Creek 02130701 Bush River 02130704 Bynum Run 02140207 Cabin John Creek 05020204 Casselman River 02140305 Catoctin Creek 02130106 Chincoteague Bay 02130607 Christina River 02050301 Conewago Creek 02140504 Conococheague Creek 02120204 Conowingo Dam Susq R 02130507 Corsica River 05020203 Deep Creek Lake 02120202 Deer Creek 02130204 Dividing Creek 02140304 Double Pipe Creek 02130501 Eastern Bay 02141002 Evitts Creek 02140511 Fifteen Mile Creek 02130307 Fishing Bay 02130609 Furnace Bay 02141004 Georges Creek 02140107 Gilbert Swamp 02130801 Gunpowder River 02130905 Gwynns Falls 02130401 Honga River 02130103 Isle of Wight Bay 02130904 Jones Falls 02130511 Kent Island Bay 02130504 Kent Narrows 02120201 L Susquehanna River 02130506 Langford Creek 02130907 Liberty Reservoir 02140506 Licking Creek 02130402 Little Choptank 02140505 Little Conococheague 02130605 Little Elk Creek 02130804 Little Gunpowder Falls 02131105 Little Patuxent River 02140509 Little Tonoloway Creek 05020202 Little Youghiogheny R 02130805 Loch Raven Reservoir 02139998 Lower Chesapeake Bay 02130505 Lower Chester River 02130403 Lower Choptank 02130601 Lower
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset County, Maryland
    - H L 350 350 S S t t e e o o s s m r m r e e SSoommeerrsseett 350350 H L - Annemessex River landscape, Aerial photograph by Joey Gardner, 2016 Native Americans, Explorers and Settlement of Somerset n August 22, 1666, Cecil Calvert, Lord proprietor of the province of Maryland, authorized legislation creating OSomerset County, and 350 years later in this anniversary year, we look back as well as forward in celebration to honor and cherish our past as we continue to live here in the present and future. Somerset’s first inhabitants, however, were the native tribes of the lower Eastern Shore. Native American occupation of the region dates back thousands of years; its earliest inhabitants occupied a landscape far different than today with much lower sea levels. Spanning over fifteen to twenty thousand years, native American habitation matured from hunter-gathers to settled communities of tribes who resided along the region’s A characteristic Paleo-Indian fluted numerous waterways, many of which still carry their names. The Pocomoke, Manokin, projectile point from Maryland’s Eastern Annemessex, Monie and Wicomico waterways are named for these native tribes. Shore, Nancy Kurtz. Native American occupation is also represented by the thousands of artifacts that turn up in the soil, or through the written historical record as Anglo-American explorers, traders and ultimately settlers interacted with them across the peninsula. One of the earliest explorers to leave a written record of his visit, describing the local inhabitants as well as their activities was Giovanni da Verrazano, who, during the 1520s, traveled along what later became Somerset County.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report the Brock Environmental Center
    Moving Forward 2016 ANNUAL REPORT THE BROCK ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER Leading the Way It has been a heady year for the Brock Environmental Center (pictured right). Located in Virginia Beach, Virginia, the facility welcomed tens of thousands of visitors, including Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe—who experienced one of the center’s most unique features when he sampled a glass of Brock’s treated rainwater (Brock is the first commercial building in the U.S. permitted to treat rainwater for drinking). The center has received 20 awards, including the 2015 Engineering News-Record’s “Best Green Project.” In May, Brock achieved a designation that was more than a year in the making: International Living Future Institute’s Living Building Certification. Brock is only the tenth building in the world to achieve the organization’s “full petal” certification, which requires a building to produce more energy than it uses over the course of a year, in addition to other strict criteria. Through the Brock Center, CBF is inspiring visitors and demonstrating how each of us can reduce our footprint and actually give back to the environment. contents To schedule a tour of the Brock educate ................................................................................... 2 Environmental Center, please advocate ................................................................................. 4 call 757/622-1964 x3312 or email [email protected]. litigate ..................................................................................... 6 restore ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland's and Virginia's Chesapeake Bay
    United States Region III Monitoring and Tidal Monitoring EPA 903-R-04-008 Environmental Chesapeake Bay Analysis and Analysis CBP/TRS 268/04 Protection Agency Program Office Subcommittee Workgroup October 2004 Chesapeake Bay Program Analytical Segmentation Scheme — Revisions, Decisions and Rationales, 1983–2003 Chesapeake Bay Program Chesapeake Bay Program Analytical Segmentation A Watershed Partnership Scheme Revisions, Decisions and Rationales 1983–2003 October 2004 Chesapeake Bay Program A Watershed Partnership U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III Chesapeake Bay Program Office Annapolis, Maryland 1-800-YOUR-BAY Monitoring and Analysis Subcommittee and Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup Chesapeake Bay Program Analytical Segmentation Scheme Revisions, Decisions and Rationales 1983–2003 Prepared by the Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring and Analysis Subcommittee Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup Annapolis, Maryland October 2004 Miii Contents Executive Summary . v Acknowledgments . xi I. Introduction . 1 II. 1983 Segmentation Scheme . 3 Literature Cited . 5 III. 1997–1998 Segmentation Scheme . 7 Factors Considered in the Revision Process . 8 Salinity . 8 Natural geographic partitions and features . 8 Original segmentation boundaries . 11 Segmentation Scheme Revision Process . 11 1997 Interim segmentation scheme . 11 1998 Segmentation scheme . 11 Tidal monitoring station names . 12 1997–1998 Segmentation Revision Decisions in Detail . 12 IV. 2003 Segmentation Scheme . 19 Sub-segments for State Water Quality Standards Applications . 21 Maryland’s split segments for shallow water bay grass designated use . 21 Virginia’s upper James River split segment . 22 Literature Cited . 22 V. Information Related to the Segmentation Schemes . 25 Monitoring Stations and Past/Present Segmentation Schemes . 25 2003 Segmentation Statistics . 26 Segment Boundary Coordinates . 29 Web Access to Segmentation Schemes .
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Abundance of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay: a Scientific Summary
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1-1-1982 Distribution and Abundance of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay: A Scientific Summary Robert J. Orth Virginia Institute of Marine Science Kenneth A. Moore Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Orth, R. J., & Moore, K. A. (1982) Distribution and Abundance of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay: A Scientific Summary. Special Reports in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering (SRAMSOE) No. 259. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/V58454 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY: A SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY by Robert J. Orth and Kenneth A. Moore Virginia Institute of Marine Science of the College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Special Report No. 259 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY: A SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY by Robert J. Orth and Kenneth A. Moore Virginia Institute of Marine Science of the College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Special Report No. 259 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering CONTENTS List of Figures •• . iii List of Tables. iv 1. Introduction. 1 2. Methods. 4 3. Present Distribution •• 5 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay - 1987
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 4-1989 Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay - 1987 R J. Orth Adam A. Frisch Virginia Institute of Marine Science Judith F. Nowak Virginia Institute of Marine Science Ken Moore Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Orth, R. J., Frisch, A. A., Nowak, J. F., & Moore, K. (1989) Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay - 1987. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/m2-p5ey-kz36 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay QH 541.5 Virginia Institute of Marine Science .~8 School of Marine Science 11.:. E-,.:-nr-c-tll Prntecfion figency 083 College of William and Mary F:<;Y~ r r fntrrnai\on Rts$urce 1987 <;-::r I 2~~521 $1; CLn~'lu'SfrCcf 1987 Phli~I~Ip~bi,'1 13107 Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay - 1987 Robert J. Orth, Adam A. Fri sch, Judith F. Nowak, and Kenneth A. Moore Virginia Institute of Marine Science School of Marine Science College of Will iam and Mary Gloucester Point, VA 23062 Contributions by: Nancy Rybicki U.S.
    [Show full text]