DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents BTC PROJECT ESIA GEORGIA RESPONSE TO COMMENTS (FROM ESIA PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PHASE) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1 1.1 Introduction 1-1 1.2 BTC Project 1-1 1.2.1 The need for the project 1-2 1.2.2 Project environmental and social goals and objectives 1-3 1.3 Environmental and social impact assessment 1-3 1.3.1 Public consultation 1-5 1.3.2 Regulatory and policy framework 1-5 1.4 Project alternatives 1-6 1.4.1 Strategic considerations 1-6 1.4.2 Routing alternatives 1-7 1.5 Project description 1-11 1.5.1 Project schedule 1-11 1.5.2 Design 1-12 1.5.3 Construction 1-12 1.5.4 Operation 1-13 1.5.5 Decommissioning 1-13 1.6 ESIA methodology 1-13 1.7 Baseline 1-14 1.7.1 Environmental baseline 1-14 1.7.2 Socio-economic baseline 1-18 1.7.3 Attitudes to the BTC project 1-19 1.8 Impacts and mitigation 1-19 1.8.1 Environmental impacts and mitigation 1-19 1.8.2 General operational mitigation measures 1-28 1.8.3 Socio-economic impacts and mitigation 1-33 1.9 Cumulative impacts 1-35 1.10 Management and monitoring 1-37 1.11 Overall project assessment 1-38 1.11.1 Environmental project assessment 1-39 1.11.2 Socio-economic project assessment 1-42 Tables Table 1-1 Major river crossings 1-15 Table 1-2 Mitigation measures 1-20 Table 1-3 Summary of mitigation measures for off ROW sites 1-26 Table 1-4 Summary of facilities and activities associated with operational phase 1-28 Table 1-5 General operational mitigation measures for pipeline operation 1-29 Table 1-6 Summary social impacts and mitigation measures 1-33 Figures Figure 1-1 The BTC pipeline route 1-2 Figure 1-2 The ESIA process 1-4 Figure 1-3 ESIA schedule for BTC in Georgia 1-5 Figure 1-4 Overview map of WREP, NREP, BTC and SCP 1-6 Figure 1-5 10km Corridors of Interest 1-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOVEMBER 2002 BTC PROJECT ESIA GEORGIA RESPONSE TO COMMENTS (FROM ESIA PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PHASE) 2 INTRODUCTION 2-1 2.1 Public disclosure process 2-1 2.1.1 Distribution of disclosure documentation 2-2 2.1.2 Disclosure meetings 2-3 2.1.3 Collection and incorporation of feedback 2-5 Figures Figure 2-1 Nazarlo Road Show community meeting, 29th June 2-5 Figure 2-2 Route by which comments were received 2-6 Figure 2-3 Sample comment from database 2-7 Figure 2-4 Template Issue Summary 2-8 Figure 2-5 Breakdown of social comments received 2-9 Figure 2-6 Breakdown of environment comments received 2-10 3 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-2 3.2 Route selection methodology 3-3 3.2.1 Basic principles 3-3 3.2.2 FCI-ROW 3-4 3.2.3 Route selection methodology 3-5 3.3 Stage 0: Identify alternative export options 3-7 3.3.1 General 3-7 3.3.2 Evaluation of export options 3-7 3.3.3 Evaluation of pipeline corridors in Georgia 3-8 3.3.4 Corridor options recommended for consideration in Stage 1 3-10 3.4 Stage 1: 10km corridor of interest 3-10 3.4.1 General 3-10 3.4.2 Terrain and geohazards 3-11 3.4.3 Environmental and social issues 3-14 3.4.4 Security 3-17 3.4.5 Constructability, reinstatement and long-term integrity 3-19 3.4.6 Conclusions 3-21 3.5 Stage 2: Route refinement (500m preferred route corridor) 3-23 3.5.1 General 3-23 3.5.2 Methodology 3-23 3.5.3 Key areas within 10km corridor 3-25 3.5.4 Azerbaijan Border to Marneuli 3-25 3.5.5 Tetriskaro area 3-27 3.5.6 Lake Tsalka area 3-30 3.5.7 Kizil-Kilisa to Tabatskuri / Ktsia Tabatskuri area 3-32 3.5.8 Tskhratskaro and Tsikhisjvari area 3-36 3.5.9 Outside Ktsia Tabatskuri Reserve 3-38 3.5.10 Mtkvari River to Turkish Border 3-38 3.6 Stage 3: Route refinement (100m specified corridor) 3-41 3.6.1 General 3-41 3.6.2 Desktop assessment 3-41 3.6.3 Route reconnaissance and field trips 3-42 3.6.4 Geotechnical assessment 3-42 3.6.5 Construction and trenching conditions 3-43 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOVEMBER 2002 BTC PROJECT ESIA GEORGIA RESPONSE TO COMMENTS (FROM ESIA PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PHASE) 3.7 Re-route evaluations 3-44 3.7.1 General 3-44 3.7.2 Rustavi re-route 3-44 3.7.3 Bakuriani / Tsikhisjvari Area alternative route evaluation 3-48 3.7.4 Bakuriani and Tabatskuri re-route evaluation 3-49 3.7.5 West of Tabatskuri 3-54 3.8 Stage 4: SCP and BTC centreline alignment 3-59 3.8.1 General 3-59 3.8.2 Discussion 3-59 3.9 References 3-60 Tables Table 3.1 Route selection stages 3-3 Table 3.2 Recommended corridor options from Stage 0 3-10 Table 3.3 Description of 10km corridor options 3-10 Table 3.4 Terrain constraint categories 3-12 Table 3.5 Comparison of severe terrain constraints 3-13 Table 3.6 Constraint categories for Environmental and Social Impact 3-14 Table 3.7 Comparison of severe environmental and social constraints 3-15 Table 3.8 Constraint categories for security assessment 3-17 Table 3.9 Summary of constraints and opportunities for the Stage 1 corridor options 3-21 Table 3.10 Route assessment summary for Azerbaijan Border to Marneuli 3-27 Table 3.11 Route assessment summary for Tetri Tskaro area 3-29 Table 3.12 Route assessment summary for Lake Tsalka area 3-32 Table 3.13 Route assessment summary for Ktsia Tabatskuri area 3-36 Table 3.14 Route assessment summary for Mtkvari River to Turkish Border 3-40 Table 3.15 Classification of terrain geohazard constraints for pipeline routing 3-56 Table 3.16 Length of routes in the terrain and geohazard constraint classes 3-57 Figures Figure 3.1 10km Corridors of Interest Figure 3.2 Standard FCI-ROW Layout Figure 3.3 Key Map of Options for the Export of Oil and Gas From Baku, Azerbaijan Figure 3.4 10km Corridor Options Recommended for Consideration in Stage 1 Figure 3.5 10km Corridor Options Assessed at Stage 1 Figure 3.6 Terrain Constraints Figure 3.7 Severe Environmental and Social constraints Figure 3.8 Azerbaijan Border to Marneuli Route Options Figure 3.9 Tetriskaro Route Options Figure 3.10 Lake Tsalka Route Options Figure 3.11 Kizil Kilisa to Tabatskuri Route Options Figure 3.12 Tskhratskaro and Tsikhisjvari Route Options Figure 3.13 Outside Ktsia Tabatskuri Reserve Route Options Figure 3.14 Mtkvari River to Turkish Border Route Options Figure 3.15 Bakuriani and Tabatskuri Re-route Sheet 1 Figure 3.16 Bakuriani and Tabatskuri Re-route Sheet 2 Figure 3.17 Bakuriani and Tabatskuri Re-route Sheet 3 Figure 3.18 Routes West of Tabatskuri Figure 3.19 Terrain Block Model – Constraint Class I Figure 3.20 Terrain Block Model – Constraint Class II Figure 3.21 Terrain Block Model – Constraint Class III TABLE OF CONTENTS NOVEMBER 2002 BTC PROJECT ESIA GEORGIA RESPONSE TO COMMENTS (FROM ESIA PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PHASE) Figure 3.22 Terrain Block Model – Constraint Class IV Figure 3.23 Terrain Block Model – Constraint Class V Figure 3.24 Main Pipeline Construction Activities 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4-1 4.1 Introduction 4-1 4.1.1 Pig traps and pigging 4-1 4.1.2 Co-location of the custody metering facilities, the Georgian off-take, and the proposed BTC PS-G1 4-2 4.1.3 Valve stations 4-2 4.1.4 Pipeline wall thickness 4-2 4.1.5 Proposed pipe yards and worker camp sites 4-2 4.1.6 Leak detection 4-3 4.1.7 Pump stations 4-3 4.1.8 Export system monitoring and pipeline surveillance 4-4 4.1.9 Helicopters 4-4 4.2 Project design basis 4-5 4.2.1 Issue: Facility design 4-5 4.2.2 Issue: Block valve specification 4-6 4.2.3 Issue: Small valve leak detection 4-7 4.2.4 Issue: AGI lightning protection 4-8 4.2.5 Issue: Facilities design 4-9 4.3 Outline of pipeline system construction 4-20 4.3.1 Issue: Construction overview 4-20 4.3.2 Issue: Pipeline Right of Way (ROW) 4-35 4.3.3 Issue: Access roads 4-36 4.3.4 Issue: Pipe and equipment transport to the ROW 4-37 4.3.5 Issue: Temporary construction facilities 4-41 4.3.6 Issue: General mitigation measures associated with pipeline construction 4-46 4.4 Testing and commissioning 4-48 4.4.1 Issue: Hydrotest water 4-48 4.5 Reinstatement and erosion control 4-49 4.5.1 Issue: Reinstatement and erosion associated with the construction of the SCP and BTC pipelines 4-49 4.5.2 Issue: Erosion control associated with landslides 4-51 4.6 Operation, control and maintenance 4-53 4.6.1 Issue: Manual inspection of pipeline 4-53 4.6.2 Issue: Facilities 4-54 4.6.3 Issue: Leak Detection System (LDS) 4-55 4.6.4 Issue: Monitoring of the river crossings 4-56 4.6.5 Issue: Pigging 4-57 4.6.6 Issue: Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) 4-58 4.6.7 Issue: Air emissions from AGI sites 4-59 4.7 Decommissioning and abandonment plans 4-63 4.7.1 Issue: Decommissioning of pipeline 4-63 4.8 Project resources, waste and emissions 4-64 4.9 Wastes 4-64 4.9.1 Waste management 4-64 4.10 quantitative risk assessment (qra) 4-69 4.10.1 Issue: QRA methodology 4-69 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOVEMBER 2002 BTC PROJECT ESIA GEORGIA RESPONSE TO COMMENTS (FROM ESIA PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PHASE) Tables Table 4.2 Quantification of emissions and toxicity 4-62 Table 4.3 Failure frequency terminology and associated frequencies used in landslide and river washout analysis 4-70 Figures Figure 4-1: Pump station layout 4-11 Figure 4-2: Pigging station layout 4-12 Figure 4-3: Location plan of Pump Station PS1 4-18 Figure 4-4: Location plan of Pump Station PS2 4-19 Figure 4-5 Mtkvari East crossing 4-23 Figure 4-6 Potskovi 1 crossing 4-24 Figure 4-7 Potskovi 2 crossing 4-25 Figure 4-8 Algeti crossing 4-26 Figure 4-9 Typical trench details 4-27 Figure 4-10 Typical thrust / Auger bored road crossing 4-27 Figure 4-11 Typical open cut road crossing 4-28 Figure 4-12 Typical open cut stone track crossing 4-28 Figure 4-13 Typical major water course crossing 4-29 Figure 4-14 Typical minor water course crossing 4-29 Figure 4-15 Typical camp layout 4-44 Figure 4-16 Schematic of morphological process potentially affecting the pipeline at river crossings 4-71 Figure 4-17 Outcome of structural analysis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Birdwatching Tour
    PIRT “Via Pontica” Birdwatching Tour PROMOTING INNOVATIVE RURAL TOURISM IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN REGION 2014 Table of Contents Birdwatching Sites .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Armenia ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Turkey ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Technical Requirements, Issues and Solutions ............................................................................................................................................................ 70 Detailed Itinerary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Isbn 99940-58-55-X
    AN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUSAN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUS Second Edition May 2006 ISBN 99940-58-55-X Design and printing Contour Ltd 8, Kargareteli street, Tbilisi 0164, Georgia May, 2006 Coordinated by: In collaboration with: With the technical support of: Assisted by experts and contributors: ARMENIA MAMMEDOVA, S. NAKHUTSRISHVILI, G. POPOVICHEV, V. AGAMYAN, L. MUKHTAROV, I. NINUA, N. PTICHNIKOV, A. AGASYAN, A. NAJAFOV, A. SERGEEVA, J. BELANOVSKAYA, E. AKOPYAN, S. ORUJEV, Ad. SIKHARULIDZE, Z. SALPAGAROV, A. AMBARTSUMYAN, A. ORUJEV, Al. SOPADZE, G. SHESTAKOV, A ARZUMANYAN, G. RAKHMATULINA, I. TARKHNISHVILI, D. SKOROBOGACH, J. BALYAN, L. RZAEV, R. TOLORDAVA, K. SPIRIDONOV, V. DANYELYAN, T. SATTARZADE, R. TAMOV, M. DAVTYAN, R. SAFAROV, S. IRAN TUNIEV, B. GABRIELYAN, E. SHAMCHIYEV, T. AGHILI, A. VAISMAN, A. GLYCHIAN, D. SULEIMANOV, M. EVERETT, J. (Coordinator) BELIK, V. GRIGORYAN, E. SULTANOV, E. FARVAR, M.T. JENDEREDJIAN, K. TAGIEVA, E. JAZEBIZADEH, K. KAZARYAN, H. KAVOUSI, K. TURKEY KAZARYAN, M. GEORGIA MAHFOUZI, M. ALTINTAS, M. KHASABYAN, M. ARABULI, A. MANSURI, J. ATAY, S KHOROZYAN, I. ARABULI, G. NAGHIZADEH, N BIRSEL, A. MANVELYAN, K. (Coordinator) BERUCHASHVILI, G. NAJAFI, A. CAN, E. MARKARYAN, N. BERUCHASHVILI, N. ZIYAEE, H. CIFTCI, N. MURADYAN, S. BUKHNIKASHVILI, A. RAHMANIYAN, M. DOMAC, A. RUKHKYAN, L. BUTKHUZI, L. GURKAN, B. SHASHIKYAN, S. CHEKURISHVILI, Z. IPEK, A. TOVMASYAN, S. DIDEBULIDZE, A. RUSSIA KALEM, S. VANYAN, A. DZNELADZE, M. BIRYUKOV, N. KUCUK, M. VARDANYAN, J. EGIASHVILI, D. BLAGOVIDOV, A. KURDOGLU, O. VOSKANOV, M. GELASHVILI, A. BRATKOV, V. KURT, B. ZIROYAN, A. GOGICHAISHVILI, L. BUKREEV, S. LISE, Y. (Coordinator) ZORANYAN, V. GOKHELASHVILI, R. CHILIKIN, V. URAS, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Project Proposal on Development of Tourism in the Javakheti National Park Support Zone
    Detailed Project Proposal on Development of Tourism in the Javakheti National Park Support Zone 2012 - 2013 Content: 1. Project Primary Information and Situational Analysis 2. Description of the Problem and Project Objectives Subsequent from the Problems 3. Project Objectives and Feasible Outcomes 4. Link between Planned Components and the Establishment of the Javakheti National Park in Georgia Project 5. Criteria and Methods for Selection of Beneficiaries 6. Number of Beneficiaries and its Substantiation in accordance with Poverty, Gender Balance and Other Factors 7. Project Implementation Stages and Activities 8. Project Implementation Detailed Schedule (Chart for Summarising Distribution of Activities in Timeline) 9. Detailed Budget of the Project 10. Economic Indicators and Calculation 11. Risks and Assumptions that May Impact on Achieving Goals and Mitigation Strategies 12. Project Implementation Methodology Responsibilities of Implementing Parties 13. Substantiation of Project Sustainability 14. Efficiency Indicators of Project Implementation 15. Project Implementation Monitoring Chart and Methods 16. Additional Information 17. Appendices: Appendix 1 – Study Programmes in Accordance with Training Courses Appendix 2 – Chart for Summarising Distribution of Activities in Timeline Appendix 3 - Questionnaire on Public Perception and Monitoring and Evaluation of Social Impact Appendix 4 - List of Potential Guides Appendix 5 – Business Plans Appendix 6 – Project Budget 2 1. Project Primary Information and Situational Analysis Javakheti is located in the southern part of Georgia. Geographically, it is located in the extreme northern part of the country’s Middle East Highland. The north of Javakheti is bordered by the Trialeti Ridge Slopes while the eastern and southern parts are surrounded by the Abul-Samsar and Javakheti Ranges which gradually transform into Turkey’s north-eastern plateau (the Childir “Çildir” Lake area).
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG2732 Public Disclosure Authorized THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STARTEGIES OF SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI AND MTSKETA-MTIANETI Public Disclosure Authorized Third Regional Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December, 2016 Abbreviations GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan RDS Regional Development Strategy RTDS Regional Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 THIRD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RDP III) ..................................................... 12 1.2 REGIONAL AND SECTORAL CONTEXT: RDS AND RTDS FOR SAMTSKHE- JAVAKHETI AND MTSKHETA-MTIANETI REGIONS ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SABUKO Society for Nature Conservation
    SABUKO Society for Nature Conservation Non-Profit (Non-Commercial) Legal Entity | Reg. N.: B14067081 | ID N.: 405057174 Address (Juridical): Nutsubidze plateau 3, 1-7-10 | Tbilisi 0160 | Georgia Address (Current): 44 Abashidze Street | Tbilisi 0172 | Georgia E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.sabuko.org Important Bird Areas (IBA) by the BirdLife International The 12,000 IBAs represent the largest global network of important sites for biodiversity. They are identified using internationally agreed criteria applied by local experts IBAs are the sites needed to ensure the survival of viable populations of most of the world’s bird species. They hold a large and representative proportion of other biodiversity too Only 40% of IBAs have any form of protection. Protecting the rest is among the most urgent of global conservation priorities Recognising that formal protection can disadvantage local people, BirdLife works with communities at IBAs to combine conservation with sustainable livelihoods. BirdLife’s Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) Programme aims to identify, monitor and protect a global network of IBAs for the conservation of the world's birds and other wildlife. BirdLife Partners take responsibility for the IBA Programme nationally, with the BirdLife Secretariat taking the lead on international aspects and in some priority non-Partner countries. Birds have been shown to be effective indicators of biodiversity in other animal groups and plants – especially when used to define a set of sites for conservation. So although the IBA network is defined by its bird fauna, the conservation of these sites would ensure the survival of a correspondingly large number of other animals and plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia) - Lake Arpi NP (Armenia) and Sites South of Yerevan
    Trip report Javakheti NP (Georgia) - Lake Arpi NP (Armenia) and sites South of Yerevan 27.04.-05.05.16 1 INTRODUCTION The National Parks of Javakheti (Georgia) and Lake Arpi (Armenia) were visited in the scope of a tourism development project. Main goal of the trip was to evaluate the potential of these parks for birdwatchers and develop recommendations for the promotion of eco-tourism activities. This also involved a couple of meetings and the visit of the park’s infrastructure, so not all the time spent in the National Parks could be dedicated to birdwatching. Figure 1: Geographical situation 1 Trip Report Georgia & Armenia April/May 2016 The following sites were visited: . Javakheti National Park (Georgia) . Lake Arpi National Park (Armenia) . Sites south of Yerevan (Armenia): Vedi, Armash Our “travel group” comprised Mariana, Steffen, Soso and myself being the only serious birdwatcher. In Lake Arpi NP we were supported by the Armenian birder Vasil Ananian, to whom I am also grateful for providing useful information about Armash and Vedi. The trip started and ended in Tbilisi (flight with Pegasus from Basel/Mulhouse via Istanbul, 390 EUR). Roads Roads in Javakheti NP are mostly paved and most sites can be accessed with a normal car. At Lake Arpi the situation is worse, a 4x4 is definitely recommended for most tracks away from the main road. Due to the rainy weather most tracks were in a terrible state. Accommodation In Javakheti we stayed in a hotel in Hotel Art Seg in the city centre of Akhalkalaki (31 Mesrop Mashtotsi Street), which was ok though a bit unfriendly.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecoregional Conservation Plan for the Caucasusan Ecoregional Conservation Plan for the Caucasus
    AN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUSAN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUS Second Edition May 2006 ISBN 99940-58-55-X Design and printing Contour Ltd 8, Kargareteli street, Tbilisi 0164, Georgia May, 2006 Coordinated by: In collaboration with: With the technical support of: Assisted by experts and contributors: ARMENIA MAMMEDOVA, S. NAKHUTSRISHVILI, G. POPOVICHEV, V. AGAMYAN, L. MUKHTAROV, I. NINUA, N. PTICHNIKOV, A. AGASYAN, A. NAJAFOV, A. SERGEEVA, J. BELANOVSKAYA, E. AKOPYAN, S. ORUJEV, Ad. SIKHARULIDZE, Z. SALPAGAROV, A. AMBARTSUMYAN, A. ORUJEV, Al. SOPADZE, G. SHESTAKOV, A ARZUMANYAN, G. RAKHMATULINA, I. TARKHNISHVILI, D. SKOROBOGACH, J. BALYAN, L. RZAEV, R. TOLORDAVA, K. SPIRIDONOV, V. DANYELYAN, T. SATTARZADE, R. TAMOV, M. DAVTYAN, R. SAFAROV, S. IRAN TUNIEV, B. GABRIELYAN, E. SHAMCHIYEV, T. AGHILI, A. VAISMAN, A. GLYCHIAN, D. SULEIMANOV, M. EVERETT, J. (Coordinator) BELIK, V. GRIGORYAN, E. SULTANOV, E. FARVAR, M.T. JENDEREDJIAN, K. TAGIEVA, E. JAZEBIZADEH, K. KAZARYAN, H. KAVOUSI, K. TURKEY KAZARYAN, M. GEORGIA MAHFOUZI, M. ALTINTAS, M. KHASABYAN, M. ARABULI, A. MANSURI, J. ATAY, S KHOROZYAN, I. ARABULI, G. NAGHIZADEH, N BIRSEL, A. MANVELYAN, K. (Coordinator) BERUCHASHVILI, G. NAJAFI, A. CAN, E. MARKARYAN, N. BERUCHASHVILI, N. ZIYAEE, H. CIFTCI, N. MURADYAN, S. BUKHNIKASHVILI, A. RAHMANIYAN, M. DOMAC, A. RUKHKYAN, L. BUTKHUZI, L. GURKAN, B. SHASHIKYAN, S. CHEKURISHVILI, Z. IPEK, A. TOVMASYAN, S. DIDEBULIDZE, A. RUSSIA KALEM, S. VANYAN, A. DZNELADZE, M. BIRYUKOV, N. KUCUK, M. VARDANYAN, J. EGIASHVILI, D. BLAGOVIDOV, A. KURDOGLU, O. VOSKANOV, M. GELASHVILI, A. BRATKOV, V. KURT, B. ZIROYAN, A. GOGICHAISHVILI, L. BUKREEV, S. LISE, Y. (Coordinator) ZORANYAN, V. GOKHELASHVILI, R. CHILIKIN, V. URAS, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Conclusions on the Representation of Bird Species from Res
    Final Conclusions on the representation of bird species from Res. No. 6 (1998) of the Bern Convention in proposed, candidate and adopted Emerald Network sites in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia Remarks: - If the conclusion is ‘EXCL REF LIST’, countries must ensure that the feature is deleted from all sites. - If the conclusion includes ‘CD’ (correction of data), countries need to amend appropriately the population types and/or assessments of the species concerned. - Countries are adviced to check systematically if proposed sites for each species do contain the habitat of the species. During the seminar there were a number of cases in Georgia and Azerbaijan, where participants expressed serious doubts if the proposed sites host the typical habitat for the species (e.g. forest species within wetland sites and vice versa). This problem is not always reflected as “CD” in the conclusions. Code Species Name iso Final Conclusion Final Conclusion Comments Gaviiformes A001 Gavia stellata AZ EXCL REF LIST/CD Delete from remaining sites A001 Gavia stellata GE SUF A002 Gavia arctica AZ EXCL REF LIST/CD A002 Gavia arctica GE SUF Podicipediformes A007 Podiceps auritus AZ SUF A007 Podiceps auritus GE SUF Procellariiformes A464 Puffinus yelkouan GE MR Pelecaniformes A019 Pelecanus onocrotalus AM SUF A019 Pelecanus onocrotalus AZ IN MOD Kura River Delta, Araz river A019 Pelecanus onocrotalus GE IN MOD IN MOD: Kartsakhi lake A020 Pelecanus crispus AM SUF A020 Pelecanus crispus AZ IN MOD IN MOD: IBAs along the Caspian Sea coast, Araz reservoir, Jandara
    [Show full text]
  • National Report of Georgia (MOP4)
    FORMAT FOR REPORTS OF THE PARTIES AGREEMENT ON THE CONSERVATION OF AFRICAN-EURASIAN MIGRATORY WATERBIRDS (The Hague, 1995) Implementation during the period 2005 - 2008 Contracting Party: Designated AEWA Administrative Authority: Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural Resources of Georgia Full name of the institution: Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural Resources of Georgia Name and title of the head of the institution: Mr. Irakli Gvaladze, Minister Mailing address: 6 Gulua str, Tbilisi 0114 Georgia Telephone: (+995 32) 72 72 12 Fax: (+995 32) 72 72 37 Email: [email protected] Name and title (if different) of the designated contact officer for AEWA matters: Ms. Irine Lomashvili, Main specialist of the Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Mailing address (if different) for the designated contact officer: 6 Gulua str, Tbilisi 0114, Georgia Telephone: (+995 32) 72 72 31 Fax: (+995 32) 72 72 31 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Table of Contents 1. Overview of Action Plan implementation 5 2. Species conservation 7 Legal measures 7 Single Species Action Plans 14 Emergency measures 15 Re-establishments 15 Introductions 15 3. Habitat conservation 15 Habitat inventories 15 Conservation of areas 16 Rehabilitation and restoration 18 4. Management of human activities 18 Hunting 18 Eco-tourism 19 Other human activities 20 5. Research and monitoring 20 Status of research and monitoring programmes for species 20 6. Education and information 20 Training and development programmes 20 Raising public awareness 21 7. Final comments 21 8. Progress to implement Resolutions and Recommendations of the Meeting of the Parties 23 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection
    National Statistics Office of Georgia Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2015 Statistical Publication Tbilisi 2016 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2015 Statistical Publication Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection Editor: Maia Guntsadze Vasil Tsakadze Person responsible for the publication: Vasil Tsakadze Nino Kverghelidze Prepared by: Nino Kverghelidze Georgia, Tbilisi 0180, Tsotne Dadiani Ave. 30 Telephone: 2 36 72 10 (500) E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.geostat.ge National Statistic Office of Georgia, 2016. STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2015 FOREWORD! The present statistical publication, “Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protec- tion” provides data on use and protection of land, forest and water resources, protected areas and natural hazards. It also provides some methodological explanations from different scientific sources. The data given in the publication reflect the main trends in the field of natural resources of Geor- gia and environmental protection activities in 1995-2015. Notation keys: ... No data - Event does not exist 0.0 Insignificant value An insignificant difference between the summation result and the sum of the summands in some cases can be explained by rounding of the data values. 1 | FOREWORD STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Geographic location and natural resources of Georgia ----------------------------------------------------- 4 Land Resources ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10
    [Show full text]
  • Sandgrousevolume 42(1) 2020
    SandgrouseVOLUME 42(1) 2020 ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE MIDDLE EAST THE CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE MIDDLE EAST THE CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA For details of OSME’s aims, membership, meetings, conservation and research funding, OSMEBirdNet, OSME recommended bird taxonomy, Sandgrouse instructions for authors and news and tweets see www.osme.org. VICE PRESIDENTS (AS AT FEBRUARY 2020): Dr Sergey Sklyarenko (Kazakhstan), Dr Ali Adhami Mirhosseyni (Iran), Dr Azzam Alwash (Iraq), Melis Charalambides (Cyprus), Dr Nabegh Ghazal Asswad (Syria). COUNCIL (AS AT FEBRUARY 2020): Michael Blair ([email protected], ORL Listmaster) Dr Robert Sheldon ([email protected], Paul Donald ([email protected], Chairman) Sandgrouse editor) AbdulRahman Al-Sirhan Tomas Haraldsson (youthdevelopment@ ([email protected], osme.org, Youth Development Officer) Website management–co-opted) Ian Harrison Paul Stancliffe Chris Hughes ([email protected], Effie Warr ([email protected], membership@ [email protected], Joint Treasurer & Advertising) osme.org, Sales & Membership–co-opted) Georgia Locock John Warr ([email protected], Nick Moran Joint Treasurer–co-opted). Sajidah Ahmad ([email protected], Secretary) CONSERVATION FUND COMMITTEE (AS AT FEBRUARY 2020): Dr Maxim Koshkin (Convener), Dr Nabegh Ghazal Asswad, Mick Green, Sharif Jbour, Richard Porter. OSME CORPORATE MEMBERS: Avifauna Nature Tours, Birdfinders, Birdtour Asia, Greentours, NHBS, Oriole Birding, Rockjumper Birding Tours, Sunbird. Sandgrouse: OSME’s peer-reviewed scientific journal publishes
    [Show full text]
  • Geological and Geomorfological Investigations of the Javakheti Plateau (South Georgia)
    saqarTvelos mecnierebaTa erovnuli akademiis moambe, t. 11, #4, 2017 BULLETIN OF THE GEORGIAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, vol. 11, no. 4, 2017 Geology Geological and Geomorfological Investigations of the Javakheti Plateau (South Georgia) Givi Maisuradze,* Tamaz Giorgobiani,* David Zakaraia,** Levan Basheleishvili* * Al. Janelidze Institute of Geology, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia ** Caucasus Mining Group, LTD, Tbilisi, Georgia (Presented by Academy Member Mirian Topchishvili) ABSTRACT. In the article the territory of transport corridor on the Javakheti volcanic plateau (South Georgia) with its geological and geomorphologic structure and association of relief forms with young volcanism is considered. Neotectonic and morphotectonic structures, volcanic centers and modern exodynamic processes established by us in the region are characterized there. Volcanic activity in the study region was connected with interzonal and intrazonal deep faults. Volcanism was of subaerial type. Acid volcanism of Mio-Pliocene (Goderdzi suit) was replaced by heavy outpourings of basic lava in the Eopleistocene. Vast volcanic plateaus (sheets), stratovolcanoes and numerous small volcanic centers, extrusive cons, were formed. Among the outbursts of pulsation of volcanoes at the separate areas of land compensated troughs were formed in the lake basins. The second cycle that started, according to numerous isotopic, paleomagnetic and biostratigraphic evidence, about 3.5 Ma ago is characterized by outflow of huge masses of mafic lavas which formed extensive basaltic plateaus in South Georgia, West Armenia and East Anatolia. The centers of these basalts were mainly shield-shaped volcanoes of relative altitude 100-300 m. The most complete sections number up to 30 individual flows (5-15 m thick), with total thickness reaching 250-300 m.
    [Show full text]