2006 Isbn 99940-58-55-X

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2006 Isbn 99940-58-55-X AN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUSAN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUS Second Edition May 2006 ISBN 99940-58-55-X Design and printing Contour Ltd 8, Kargareteli street, Tbilisi 0164, Georgia May, 2006 Coordinated by: In collaboration with: With the technical support of: Assisted by experts and contributors: ARMENIA MAMMEDOVA, S. NAKHUTSRISHVILI, G. POPOVICHEV, V. AGAMYAN, L. MUKHTAROV, I. NINUA, N. PTICHNIKOV, A. AGASYAN, A. NAJAFOV, A. SERGEEVA, J. BELANOVSKAYA, E. AKOPYAN, S. ORUJEV, Ad. SIKHARULIDZE, Z. SALPAGAROV, A. AMBARTSUMYAN, A. ORUJEV, Al. SOPADZE, G. SHESTAKOV, A ARZUMANYAN, G. RAKHMATULINA, I. TARKHNISHVILI, D. SKOROBOGACH, J. BALYAN, L. RZAEV, R. TOLORDAVA, K. SPIRIDONOV, V. DANYELYAN, T. SATTARZADE, R. TAMOV, M. DAVTYAN, R. SAFAROV, S. IRAN TUNIEV, B. GABRIELYAN, E. SHAMCHIYEV, T. AGHILI, A. VAISMAN, A. GLYCHIAN, D. SULEIMANOV, M. EVERETT, J. (Coordinator) BELIK, V. GRIGORYAN, E. SULTANOV, E. FARVAR, M.T. JENDEREDJIAN, K. TAGIEVA, E. JAZEBIZADEH, K. KAZARYAN, H. KAVOUSI, K. TURKEY KAZARYAN, M. GEORGIA MAHFOUZI, M. ALTINTAS, M. KHASABYAN, M. ARABULI, A. MANSURI, J. ATAY, S KHOROZYAN, I. ARABULI, G. NAGHIZADEH, N BIRSEL, A. MANVELYAN, K. (Coordinator) BERUCHASHVILI, G. NAJAFI, A. CAN, E. MARKARYAN, N. BERUCHASHVILI, N. ZIYAEE, H. CIFTCI, N. MURADYAN, S. BUKHNIKASHVILI, A. RAHMANIYAN, M. DOMAC, A. RUKHKYAN, L. BUTKHUZI, L. GURKAN, B. SHASHIKYAN, S. CHEKURISHVILI, Z. IPEK, A. TOVMASYAN, S. DIDEBULIDZE, A. RUSSIA KALEM, S. VANYAN, A. DZNELADZE, M. BIRYUKOV, N. KUCUK, M. VARDANYAN, J. EGIASHVILI, D. BLAGOVIDOV, A. KURDOGLU, O. VOSKANOV, M. GELASHVILI, A. BRATKOV, V. KURT, B. ZIROYAN, A. GOGICHAISHVILI, L. BUKREEV, S. LISE, Y. (Coordinator) ZORANYAN, V. GOKHELASHVILI, R. CHILIKIN, V. URAS, A. GURIELIDZE, Z. ERIZHEV, K. ZEYDANLI, U. JAVAKHISHVILI, Z. GALUSHIN, V. AZERBAIJAN JORJADZE, M. KHAKUNOV, B. EXTERNAL ABDULLAEV, N. KANDAUROV, A. (Coordinator) KYATKOV, V. BAUER, G. AKHMEDOV, F. KARTSIVADZE, S. KOTLOBAY, A. EVERS, M. ALIEV, K. KAVTIASHVILI, I. KREVER, O. JUNGIUS, H. ASKEROV, E. (Coordinator) KOLBIN, G. KREVER, V. (Coordinator) LANGHAMMER, P. AYDYNOV, T. KVELADZE, I. KROKHMAL, A. MOERSCHEL, F. GULIYEV, S. LABADZE, D. LUKAREVSKI, V. NAGY, S. GUSEINOVA, F. LEJAVA, V. MAMBETOV, M. SCHMIDT-KALLERT, E. ISKANDEROV, T. LOBJANIDZE, B. MEREMKULOV, M. SCHUERHOLZ, G. ISMAILOV, H. LOLUA, G. MOSKVINA, M. STALDER, H. JAFAROV, O. LOMTADZE, Z POLITKO, A. STRAND, H. KANGARLI, T. LORTKIPANIDZE, B. POLITKO, I. SYLVEN, M. LATIFOV, D. MACHARASVILI, I. POLIVANOVA, N. WILSON, A. Edited by L. Williams, Conservation Biologist, N. Zazanashvili, G. Sanadiradze and A. Kandaurov, WWF Caucasus Programme Office 1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 6 PART I. BIOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS OF THE CAUCASUS ECOREGION .................................................................................. 8 1. Overview and Conclusions of the Biological Assessments ...................................................... 8 1.1. Global Significance ................................................................................................................... 8 1.2. Physical and Biological Characteristics of the Caucasus Ecoregion ....................................... 8 1.2.1. Landscape Features ............................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2. Climate .................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2.3. Flora ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.4. Fauna ..................................................................................................................................... 11 1.3. Major Ecosystems ................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.1. Forest Ecosystems ............................................................................................................... 13 1.3.2. Freshwater Ecosystems........................................................................................................ 14 1.3.3. Marine Ecosystems ............................................................................................................... 15 1.3.4. High Mountain Ecosystems .................................................................................................. 16 1.3.5. Dry Mountain Shrubland Ecosystems .................................................................................. 16 1.3.6. Steppe Ecosystems .............................................................................................................. 17 1.3.7. Semi-Desert Ecosystems...................................................................................................... 18 1.4. The Protected Areas System in the Caucasus Ecoregion ...................................................... 18 1.4.1. Types of Protected Areas ...................................................................................................... 18 1.4.2. Current Status of the Protected Areas System ..................................................................... 19 1.4.3. Gaps in the Protected Areas System .................................................................................... 20 1.5. Major Threats to Biodiversity in the Caucasus Ecoregion ...................................................... 21 1.5.1. Illegal Logging, Fuelwood Harvesting, and the Timber Trade............................................. 21 1.5.2. Overgrazing .......................................................................................................................... 22 1.5.3. Poaching and the Illegal Wildlife Trade ............................................................................... 22 1.5.4. Overfishing ........................................................................................................................... 23 1.5.5. Infrastructure Development ................................................................................................. 23 1.5.6. Water Pollution ..................................................................................................................... 24 1.5.7. Root Causes ........................................................................................................................ 24 2. Overview and Conclusions of Socio-Economic Assessments ............................................... 25 2.1. Institutional Framework ........................................................................................................... 25 2.2. Nature Conservation Legislation ............................................................................................. 26 2.3 Economic Situation.................................................................................................................. 26 2.4. Infrastructure and Regional Development .............................................................................. 27 2.5. Demography and Social Trends .............................................................................................. 28 2.6. Stakeholders in Biodiversity Conservation in the Caucasus Ecoregion and Investment Overview ...................................................................................... 28 2.6.1. National Governments ......................................................................................................... 28 2.6.2. Bilateral and Multilateral Donors.......................................................................................... 29 2.6.3. International NGOs and Foundations .................................................................................. 30 2.6.4. Regional NGOs .................................................................................................................... 30 2.6.5. Scientific institutions ............................................................................................................ 30 2.6.6. Business Sector ................................................................................................................... 31 2.6.7. Investment Strategy of the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) for the Caucasus Hotspot and Ecoregion Conservation Plan ............................................. 31 3. Conclusions of the Biological and Socio-Economic Assessments ....................................... 32 2 PART 2. PRIORITY BIOMES, FOCAL SPECIES, AND A BIODIVERSITY VISION FOR THE CAUCASUS ECOREGION ................................................................................. 34 1. Priority Biomes ...............................................................................................................................34 1.1. Forest Biome ..........................................................................................................................34 1.2. Freshwater Biome ..................................................................................................................35 1.3. Marine Biome ..........................................................................................................................35 1.4 High Mountain Biome .............................................................................................................36 2. Focal Species .................................................................................................................................36
Recommended publications
  • ARMENIA T U a S I N S a D R B a L E W a O N T D N R O I E T S a I L I E M R N O T F S S O N C a I R E T T · I E S S E I · T T E R I
    ainable and resilient societies · transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies · transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies · transformation towards susta i n t s a u b s l e s a ddd rrr n a d www r o e t s i n l i e o i n t t a s o m rrr c o i fff e s t i n e a s rrr · t t · r s a e n i t s e f i o c r m o s a t t n i e o i l n i s t e o r w d a n r d a s e l s b u a s t n a i i a n t s a u b s l Yerevan 2018 Yerevan e s a ddd rrr n a d www r o e t s i n l i o e i n t t a s o m rrr c July 2018 July Forum on Sustainable Development Forum o Report for the UN High-level Political Political the UN High-level for Report and Resilient Societies and Resilient i fff e s t i n e a s rrr · t t · r s a e n i t s e f i o ARMENIA c VOLUNTARY NATIONAL REVIEW (VNR) NATIONAL VOLUNTARY SDG IMPLEMENTATION r m o s Transformation Towards Sustainable Towards Transformation a t t n i e o i l n i s t e o r w d a n r d a s e l u s i s e r r d n a a e e l l b b a n n i i a a t s a a r r r r r t t · s e i t e i c o s t n e i l a w w w o o t t n n o o i i t t a a m r r o f f f f s s n n n a e l b a n i a t s u s s d d d r r r e e i i t e e i c o s t n n e e i i l l i s e e r r r r d n o i t a m r o f f f s n a r r r t · s s a n i a t s u s s d d d r r r a w w w o t t n e i l i s e r r d n a e l b o t n o i t a m r o f f f s n a r r r t b a n i a t s u s s d d d r r r a w w w Contents ABBREVIATIONS 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tornero Et Al., Jhumanevolutio
    The altitudinal mobility of wild sheep at the Epigravettian site of Kalavan 1 (Lesser Caucasus, Armenia): evidence from a sequential isotopic analysis in tooth enamel Carlos Tornero, Marie Balasse, Adrian Balasescu, Chataigner Chataigner, Boris Gasparyan, Cyril Montoya To cite this version: Carlos Tornero, Marie Balasse, Adrian Balasescu, Chataigner Chataigner, Boris Gasparyan, et al.. The altitudinal mobility of wild sheep at the Epigravettian site of Kalavan 1 (Lesser Caucasus, Armenia): evidence from a sequential isotopic analysis in tooth enamel. Journal of Human Evolution, Elsevier, 2016, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.05.001. halshs-01473156 HAL Id: halshs-01473156 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01473156 Submitted on 2 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303923620 The altitudinal mobility of wild sheep at the Epigravettian site of Kalavan 1 (Lesser Caucasus, Armenia): Evidence from... Article in Journal of Human
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 1. Social Economic Background & Current Indicators of Syunik Region...........................2 2. Key Problems & Constraints .............................................................................................23 Objective Problems ...................................................................................................................23 Subjective Problems..................................................................................................................28 3. Assessment of Economic Resources & Potential ..............................................................32 Hydropower Generation............................................................................................................32 Tourism .....................................................................................................................................35 Electronics & Engineering ........................................................................................................44 Agriculture & Food Processing.................................................................................................47 Mineral Resources (other than copper & molybdenum)...........................................................52 Textiles......................................................................................................................................55 Infrastructures............................................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Endemic IUCN Red CITES Bern Bonn Georgia Species of the List Conventi Convention Caucasus on (CMS) 1
    Latin name Georgian Name English name Red List of Endemic IUCN Red CITES Bern Bonn Georgia species of the list Conventi Convention Caucasus on (CMS) 1. Capra aegagrus niamori Wild Goat, Bezoar CR VU II Erxleben. Goat 2. Capra caucasica dasavleTkavkasiuri West Caucasian EN + EN Güldenstädt & jixvi Tur Pallas. 3. Capra aRmosavleTkavkasiuri East Caucasian VU + NT cylindricornis Blyth. jixvi Tur, Dagestan Tur 4. Capreolus capreolus evropuli Sveli European Roe LC Linnaeus. Deer 5. Gazella qurciki, jeirani Goitered Gazelle RE VU II subgutturosa Güldenstädt. 6. Rupicapra arCvi, fsiti Northern Chamois EN LC II rupicapra Linnaeus. 7. Cervus elaphus keTilSobili iremi Red Deer CR LC II I Linnaeus. 8. Sus scrofa gareuli Rori, taxi Eurasian Wild LC Linnaeus. Boar 9. Canis aureus tura Golden Jackal LC III Linnaeus. 10. Canis lupus mgeli Grey Wolf LC II II Linnaeus. 11. Nyctereutes enotisebri ZaRli Racoon Dog LC procyonoides Gray. 12. Vulpes vulpes mela Red Fox LC III Linnaeus. 13. Felis chaus lelianis kata Jungle Cat VU LC II Schreber. 14. Felis silvestris tyis kata Wild Cat LC II II Shreber. 15. Felis libyca Forster. velis kata Steppe Cat 16. Lynx lynx Linnaeus. focxveri Eurasian Lynx CR LC II 17. Panthera pardus jiqi Leopard CR NT I II Linnaeus. 18. Hyaena hyaena afTari Striped Hyaena CR NT Linnaeus. 19. Lutra lutra wavi Eurasian Otter, VU NT I II Linnaeus. Common Otter 20. Martes foina kldis kverna Stone Marten, LC III Erxleben. Beech Marten 21. Martes martes tyis kverna European Pine LC Linnaeus. Marten 22. Meles meles maCvi Eurasian Badger LC Linnaeus. 23. Mustela lutreola waula European Mink EN II Linnaeus.
    [Show full text]
  • Stocktaking Exercise to Identify Legal, Institutional, Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Gaps and Barriers in Water Resour
    “National Adaptation Plan to advance medium and long-term adaptation planning in Armenia” UNDP-GCF Project Stocktaking exercise to identify legal, institutional, vulnerability assessment and adaptation gaps and barriers in water resources management under climate change conditions Prepared by “Geoinfo” LLC Contract Number: RFP 088/2019 YEREVAN 2020 Produced by GeoInfo, Ltd., Charents 1, Yerevan, Armenia Action coordinated by Vahagn Tonoyan Date 11.06.2020 Version Final Produced for UNDP Climate Change Program Financed by: GCF-UNDP “National Adaptation Plan to advance medium and long-term adaptation planning in Armenia” project Authors National experts: Liana Margaryan, Aleksandr Arakelyan, Edgar Misakyan, Olympia Geghamyan, Davit Zakaryan, Zara Ohanjanyan International consultant: Soroosh Sorooshian 2 Content List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 1. ANALYSIS OF POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF WATER SECTOR AND IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS AND BARRIERS IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ............................. 19 Summary of Chapter 1 .......................................................................................................................... 19 1.1 The concept and criteria of water resources adaptation to climate change .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Report 2007 - 2011
    REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA MINISTRY OF NATURE PROTECTION MINISTERIAL REPORT 2007 - 2011 YEREVAN 2011 2 REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA The 2007-2011 Ministerial Report was developed by the working group of the Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia. The 2007-2011 Ministerial Report was translated and published with financial assistance of the United Nations Development Programme in Armenia MINISTERIAL REPORT 2007-2011 3 CONTENTS Foreword of Mr. Aram Harutyunyan, Minister of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia ............................................................................ 4 Introduction ................................................................................................. 7 1. State Governance of the Environment. Mechanisms for Nature Protection ............................................................................................ 8 1.1 Legislation Regulating the Environmental Sector and Institutional Issues .......................................................................... 8 1.2 Economic Mechanisms ................................................................. 10 1.3 Awareness, Participation and Environmental Education .............. 22 1.3.1 Participation and Public Awareness .................................... 22 1.3.2 Environmental Education .................................................... 24 1.4 Environmental Monitoring ............................................................. 25 1.5 Inspection Control .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the Protected Area System of Armenia
    UNDP Project Document – Amendment for split of the project into two subprojects After decision to execute one part of the project by WWF, the project was split into two subprojects by means of budget revision, creating two AWPs with separate Atlas numbers and budgets. The signed versions of AWP between UNDP and WWF Armenia and the signed version of the budget revision of the existing AWP between UNDP and the Ministry of Nature Protection are attached in PIMS database and Atlas system. UNDP-GEF Medium-Size Project (MSP) Government of Republic of Armenia United Nations Development Programme PIMS: 3986 Subproject with NEX execution: Atlas Award 00057439; Atlas Project ID 00070966 Subproject with NGO execution: Atlas Award 00060500; Atlas Project ID 00076187 Developing the Protected Area System of Armenia Brief description: The project’s goal is to conserve globally significant biodiversity in Armenia. The project’s objective is to catalyze the expansion of the nature reserves to provide better representation of ecosystems within Armenia’s current protected area system and enable active conservation of biodiversity. The project’s two components will focus upon: (1) rationalization of the PA system through improving the regulatory and institutional framework relevant to Sanctuary establishment and operation; and (2) institutional capacity building by piloting a suite of Sanctuary management tools largely absent from Armenian’s current protected area management regime. This project’s efforts will result in a national protected area system better equipped to include and conserve currently under- represented ecosystems and associated species. Project investment will be in community areas to improve management of productive landscapes while helping to promote connectivity and alleviate poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Allium L. Subgen. Rhizirideum Sensu Lato in Iran, Two New Records and a Synopsis of Taxonomy and Phytogeography
    ALLIUM L. SUBGEN. RHIZIRIDEUM SENSU LATO IN IRAN, TWO NEW RECORDS AND A SYNOPSIS OF TAXONOMY AND PHYTOGEOGRAPHY F. Memariani, M. R. Joharchi & F. O. Khassanov Memariani, F., Joharchi, M. R. & Khassanov, F. O. 2007 08 01: Allium L. subgen. Rhizirideum sensu lato in Iran, two new records and a synopsis of taxonomy and phytogeography. -Iran. Journ. Bot. 13(1): 12.-20. Tehran. Based on botanical collections from NE Iran (Khorassan), two new rhizomatous Allium species are reported for the flora of Iran: A. barsczewskii Lipsky and A. tenuicaule Regel. A taxonomic review of all rhizomatous Allium species occurring in Iran is provided based on new intrageneric classification of the genus. Supplementary data and notes on geographical distribution of most species are given. An identification key and some distribution maps are provided for the Iranian rhizomatous species. Farshid Memariani (corresponding author) & Mohammad Reza Joharchi, Research Institute of Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran. - Furkat O. Khassanov, Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Key words. Allium, Rhizirideum, new record, Khorassan, Iran. ﮔﻴﺎﻫﺎن رﻳﺰوم دار ﺟﻨﺲ .Allium L در اﻳﺮان: ﮔﺰارش دو ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺮاي اﻳﺮان و ﻣﺮوري ﺑﺮ ر دهﺑﻨﺪي و ﺟﻐﺮاﻓﻴﺎي ﮔﻴﺎﻫﻲ ﻓﺮﺷﻴﺪ ﻣﻌﻤﺎرﻳﺎﻧﻲ، ﻣﺤﻤﺪرﺿﺎ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﭼﻲ و ﻓﻮرﻛﺖ ﺧﺴﻨﻮف دو ﮔﻮﻧﻪ رﻳﺰومدار A. barsczewskii Lipsky و A. tenuicaule Regel ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﮔﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎي ﺟﺪﻳﺪي ﺑﺮاي ﻓﻠﻮر اﻳﺮان از ﺷﻤﺎل ﺷﺮق ﻛﺸﻮر (ﺧﺮاﺳﺎن) ﮔﺰارش ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ. ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺑﻨﺪي درون ﺟﻨﺲ Allium، ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﺴﻮﻧﻮﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﺗﻤﺎم ﮔﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎي رﻳﺰومدار اﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺲ در اﻳﺮان ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺎزﻧﮕﺮي ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ و ﻧﻘﺸﻪﻫﺎي ﭘﺮاﻛﻨﺶ ﺟﻐﺮاﻓﻴﺎﻳﻲ و ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ آﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ اﻃﻼﻋﺎت ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻲ از ﺷﻤﺎل ﺷﺮق ﻛﺸﻮر اراﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺮدد.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudoacanthocephalus
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Smales, Lesley R and Allain, Steven J. R. and Wilkinson, John W. and Harris, Eileen (2020) A new species of Pseudoacanthocephalus (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae) from the guttural toad, Sclerophrys gutturalis (Bufonidae), introduced into Mauritius, with comments on the implications of the introductions of toads and their parasites into the UK. Journal of Helminthology, 94 . DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/80268/ Document Version Publisher pdf Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Journal of Helminthology A new species of Pseudoacanthocephalus (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae) from cambridge.org/jhl the guttural toad, Sclerophrys gutturalis (Bufonidae), introduced into Mauritius, Research Paper with comments on the implications of the Cite this article: Smales LR, Allain SJR, Wilkinson JW, Harris E (2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]