Report (Pages 15-19)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report (Pages 15-19) Annex 3: Prioritized country profiles For details on data sources and methodology see the sections on Gathering information on site designation and management and Prioritizing sites for filling gaps in designation and management in the main report (pages 15-19). This table represents the information available to the compilers in January 2012 following the data gathering process described in the above-mentioned sections of the main report and may not represent the actual situation in absence of update from Range States. Keys: Designation: Whole: Whole area of IBA covered by appropriate conservation designation (>90%) = 3 Most: Most of IBA covered (including the most critical parts for the trigger species) (50–90%) = 2 Some: Some of IBA covered (10–50%) = 1 Little/unknown: Little/none/unknown of IBA covered (<10%) = 0 Management planning Compr. & Appr.: A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying species = 3 Outdated/Inc: A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive = 2 Planning begun: No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun = 1 No mgt plan r.: No management planning has been reported (including when status of management planning is unknonwn) = 0 Conservation action Compr. & Eff.: The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented = 3 Substantive: Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity = 2 Limited: Some limited conservation initiatives are in place (e.g. action by LCGs) = 1 None/Unknown: Very little or no conservation action is reported (including when status of management actions is unknown) = 0 Response score: expresses the overall level of conservation and management. High: reverse response score = 0 Medium. reverse response score = 1 Low: reverse response score = 2 Negligible: reverse response score = 3 Conservation importance score: expresses the relative international importance of the site based on the sum of proportions present of the qualifying populations weighted with their conservation status in Table 1 of the AEWA Action Plan. Priority for action score: expresses the relative importance of filling gaps in the conservation and management of the site taking into account of the conservation importance of the site and the gaps in conservation and management. To identify gaps see the columns for designation, management planning and conservation action. 0.000 indicates that no gap was reported in designation, management planning and conservation action for the site. No value indicates that the priority of the site was not assessed in the absence of quantitative information about the conservation importance of the site. Doc: AEWA/MOP 5.15 Preliminary Report on the Site Network for Waterbirds in the Agreement Area, 1st Edition - ANNEX 3 1 Country Site name Designation Management Conservation Response Conservation Priority Planning action score Importance for score action score Albania Karavasta Lagoon Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.548 1.095 Patoku lagoon Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.446 0.891 Narta Lagoon Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.164 0.492 Lake Ohrid Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.117 0.233 Lalzi Bay Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.019 0.056 Lake Shkodra (Lake Scadar) Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.024 0.048 Lake Megali Prespa Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.011 0.022 Algeria Lac Tonga Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 6.049 12.098 Lac Oubeïra Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 2.429 4.858 Lac Fetzara Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 1.521 4.562 Lac des Oiseaux / Garaet et Touyour Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 1.703 3.406 Dayette Morsli - Plaine de Remila (Dayet El Ferd) Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 1.069 3.207 Marais de Mekhada Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.902 2.706 Boulhilet Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.720 2.160 Barrage de la Cheffia Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.681 2.044 Barrage de Boughzoul Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.306 0.918 Sebkhet Baker Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.250 0.749 Sebkha d'Oran Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.326 0.652 Chott de Tinnsilt Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.208 0.624 Doc: AEWA/MOP 5.15 Preliminary Report on the Site Network for Waterbirds in the Agreement Area, 1st Edition - ANNEX 3 2 Country Site name Designation Management Conservation Response Conservation Priority Planning action score Importance for score action score Sebkhet Ez-Zemoul Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.200 0.600 Marais de la Macta Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.220 0.440 Ayata Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.136 0.408 Sebkhet Djendli Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.134 0.401 Chott Merouane et Oued Khrouf Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.181 0.362 Garaet et-Tarf Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.075 0.226 Sebkhet Djendli Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.060 0.181 Bou Redim Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.070 0.140 Plaine de Remila Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.030 0.089 Garet el-Haaies el Beni Mohammed Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.027 0.082 Gara de Beghai Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.021 0.062 Complexe de zones humides de la plaine de Guerbes- Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.024 0.048 Sanhadja Angola Iona National Park Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.029 0.057 Cuelei Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible Luando Strict Nature Reserve Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low Mupa National Park Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low Quiçama Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low Mombolo (Missão da Namba) Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible Mussulo Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible Armenia Lake Arpi Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 1.875 5.625 Doc: AEWA/MOP 5.15 Preliminary Report on the Site Network for Waterbirds in the Agreement Area, 1st Edition - ANNEX 3 3 Country Site name Designation Management Conservation Response Conservation Priority Planning action score Importance for score action score Metsamor Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.271 0.813 Amasia Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.238 0.715 Gndasar Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.195 0.584 Tashir Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.194 0.581 Armash fish-farm Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.114 0.342 Lake Sevan Whole Compr. & Appr. Substantive High 0.751 0.000 Austria Neusiedler See Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 1.043 2.086 Southern Seewinkel and Zitzmannsdorfer Wiesen Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.969 1.937 March/Thaya riverine forest Most No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.037 0.074 Tyrolian Lech valley Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.010 0.030 Azerbaijan Gizilagach State Reserve Most Outdated/Inc Substantive Medium 18.480 18.480 Aggyol National Park Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 4.001 8.002 Lake Sarysu Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 1.811 5.432 Lake Gyzylgyol Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 1.400 4.201 Kura Delta Little/unknown No mgt plan r. Limited Negligible 1.371 4.113 Caspian Coast: Gobustan Bay Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.646 1.939 Sangachal Bay Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.634 1.903 Lake Hajigabul Little/unknown Planning begun Substantive Low 0.903 1.807 Lake Mahmudchala Little/unknown No mgt plan r. Substantive Low 0.729 1.458 Pirsagat Islands and Los Island Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.405 1.215 Doc: AEWA/MOP 5.15 Preliminary Report on the Site Network for Waterbirds in the Agreement Area, 1st Edition - ANNEX 3 4 Country Site name Designation Management Conservation Response Conservation Priority Planning action score Importance for score action score Shahdidi spit Whole No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Low 0.607 1.213 Absheron archipelago (north) and Pirallahi bay Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.278 0.835 Red Lake Little/unknown No mgt plan r. Limited Negligible 0.231 0.694 Shamkir Reservoir Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.220 0.660 Yashma Island Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.192 0.577 Sahil settlement - 'Shelf' factory Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.190 0.571 Divichi liman (or Lake Akzibir) Little/unknown No mgt plan r. Compr. & Eff. Low 0.219 0.438 Glynanyi island Little/unknown No mgt plan r. None/Unknown Negligible 0.145 0.435 Caspian coast: Baku bay-Denizkanary Little/unknown No mgt plan r.
Recommended publications
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda
    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The W&L Traveller
    58-25 Queens Blvd., Woodside, NY 11377 T: (718) 280-5000; (800) 627-1244 F: (718) 204-4726 E:[email protected] W: www.classicescapes.com Nature & Cultural Journeys for the Discerning Traveler YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO JOIN THE W&L TRAVELLER ON A WILDLIFE EXPEDITION TO MADAGASCAR SEPTEMBER 21 TO OCTOBER 8, 2016 Schedules, accommodations and prices are accurate at the time of writing. They are subject to change. MADAGASCAR ~ AN OVERVIEW Madagascar split off from the African continent 80 million years ago to form the world’s fourth largest island. It’s a living laboratory for evolution, where the adventurous traveler can explore its diverse landscape of spiny desert, tropical moist and dry forests, and mountainous terrain in search of Madagascar’s renowned odd creatures and botanical marvels. The vast majority of its flora and fauna are endemic, meaning they exist nowhere else in the world. These include more than 100 species of lemurs. The most endangered tortoise in the world, Angokoka—commonly known as ploughshare—and many unusual birds, frogs and chameleons all make their home in a country with a unique blend of Asian and African cultures. Marco Polo first reported the island’s existence. Throughout the centuries, embattled African slaves, intrepid Indian and Portuguese traders, European pirates, and French colonists arrived at its shores, eventually establishing 18 official “tribes.” During our travels, we’ll discover the creative spirit of the Malagasy people expressed in their thoughtful and colorful monuments honoring their ancestors. As we traverse this beautiful island paradise of contrasting arid and tropical landscapes, we’ll discover the gift of Malagasy hospitality along with a vast store of incomparable memories.
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Submarine
    Foreign submarine A serious political conflict between Sweden and the Soviet Union, in which a Lund physicist played an active role. Foreign submarine 426 427 Foreign submarine in Swedish archipelago On the evening of 28 October 1981 the front pages of the newspapers were filled with a surprising piece of news. A Soviet submarine on a secret mission had run aground on a rock in Blekinge archipelago. It was well inside a restricted military area and not far from Karlskrona naval base. Heightened state of alert Swedish military units from the navy and coastal rangers, among others, were assembled in the area over the following days. A large area was cordoned off. Helicopters and fighter aircraft patrolled the airspace and Swedish submarines were stationed underwater along the limit of territorial waters. The naval ship Thule was stationed as a barrier in the strait out towards open water. Foreign submarine 428 429 In all probability armed In an extra edition of the television news pro- gramme Aktuellt, a week after the grounding, Prime Minister Torbjörn Fälldin revealed that the submarine: ”… in all probability …” was armed with nuclear weapons. Political activity in Sweden and internationally was great. This was world news! Dagens Nyheter, 6 November 1981. The day after the Prime Minister’s revelation that there were nuclear weapons on board the submarine U137. On a secret mission In order to investigate whether the submarine was armed with nuclear weapons, measurements of the ionising radiation needed to be carried out. Reader Ragnar Hellborg from the Department of Physics in Lund was one of those who performed the measure- ments on behalf of the Swedish Defence Research Agency: It was around dinnertime on All Hallows’ Eve when the phone rang.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 UNEP-WCMC Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas Lysenko I., Besançon C., Savy C
    2007 UNEP-WCMC Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas Lysenko I., Besançon C., Savy C. No TBPA Name Country Protected Areas Sitecode Category PA Size, km 2 TBPA Area, km 2 Ellesmere/Greenland 1 Canada Quttinirpaaq 300093 II 38148.00 Transboundary Complex Greenland Hochstetter Forland 67910 RAMSAR 1848.20 Kilen 67911 RAMSAR 512.80 North-East Greenland 2065 MAB-BR 972000.00 North-East Greenland 650 II 972000.00 1,008,470.17 2 Canada Ivvavik 100672 II 10170.00 Old Crow Flats 101594 IV 7697.47 Vuntut 100673 II 4400.00 United States Arctic 2904 IV 72843.42 Arctic 35361 Ia 32374.98 Yukon Flats 10543 IV 34925.13 146,824.27 Alaska-Yukon-British Columbia 3 Canada Atlin 4178 II 2326.95 Borderlands Atlin 65094 II 384.45 Chilkoot Trail Nhp 167269 Unset 122.65 Kluane 612 II 22015.00 Kluane Wildlife 18707 VI 6450.00 Kluane/Wrangell-St Elias/Glacier Bay/Tatshenshini-Alsek 12200 WHC 31595.00 Tatshenshini-Alsek 67406 Ib 9470.26 United States Admiralty Island 21243 Ib 3803.76 Chilkat 68395 II 24.46 Chilkat Bald Eagle 68396 II 198.38 Glacier Bay 1010 II 13045.50 Glacier Bay 22485 V 233.85 Glacier Bay 35382 Ib 10784.27 Glacier Bay-Admiralty Island Biosphere Reserve 11591 MAB-BR 15150.15 Kluane/Wrangell-St Elias/Glacier Bay/Tatshenshini-Alsek 2018 WHC 66796.48 Kootznoowoo 101220 Ib 3868.24 Malaspina Glacier 21555 III 3878.40 Mendenhall River 306286 Unset 14.57 Misty Fiords 21247 Ib 8675.10 Misty Fjords 13041 IV 4622.75 Point Bridge 68394 II 11.64 Russell Fiord 21249 Ib 1411.15 Stikine-LeConte 21252 Ib 1816.75 Tetlin 2956 IV 2833.07 Tongass 13038 VI 67404.09 Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas ©2007 UNEP-WCMC 1 of 78 No TBPA Name Country Protected Areas Sitecode Category PA Size, km 2 TBPA Area, km 2 Tracy Arm-Fords Terror 21254 Ib 2643.43 Wrangell-St Elias 1005 II 33820.14 Wrangell-St Elias 35387 Ib 36740.24 Wrangell-St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Researcher's Guide to Earth Observations
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration A Researcher’s Guide to: Earth Observations This International Space Station (ISS) Researcher’s Guide is published by the NASA ISS Program Science Office. Authors: William L. Stefanov, Ph.D. Lindsey A. Jones Atalanda K. Cameron Lisa A. Vanderbloemen, Ph.D Cynthia A. Evans, Ph.D. Executive Editor: Bryan Dansberry Technical Editor: Carrie Gilder Designer: Cory Duke Published: June 11, 2013 Revision: January 2020 Cover and back cover: a. Photograph of the Japanese Experiment Module Exposed Facility (JEM-EF). This photo was taken using External High Definition Camera (EHDC) 1 during Expedition 56 on June 4, 2018. b. Photograph of the Momotombo Volcano taken on July 10, 2018. This active stratovolcano is located in western Nicaragua and was described as “the smoking terror” in 1902. The geothermal field that surrounds this volcano creates ideal conditions to produce thermal renewable energy. c. Photograph of the Betsiboka River Delta in Madagascar taken on June 29, 2018. This river is comprised of interwoven channels carrying sediment from the mountains into Bombetoka Bay and the Mozambique Channel. The heavy islands of built-up sediment were formed as a result of heavy deforestation on Madagascar since the 1950s. 2 The Lab is Open Orbiting the Earth at almost 5 miles per second, a structure exists that is nearly the size of a football field and weighs almost a million pounds. The International Space Station (ISS) is a testament to international cooperation and significant achievements in engineering. Beyond all of this, the ISS is a truly unique research platform. The possibilities of what can be discovered by conducting research on the ISS are endless and have the potential to contribute to the greater good of life on Earth and inspire generations of researchers to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Usedom Wolin
    IKZM Forschung für ein Integriertes Küstenzonenmanagement Oder in der Odermündungsregion IKZM-Oder Berichte 4 (2004) Ergebnisse der Bestandsaufnahme der touristischen Infrastruktur im Untersuchungsgebiet Peene- strom Ostsee Karlshagen Pommersche Bucht Zinnowitz (Oder Bucht) Wolgast Zempin Dziwna Koserow Kolpinsee Ückeritz Bansin HeringsdorfSwina Ahlbeck Miedzyzdroje Usedom Wolin Anklam Swinoujscie Kleines Haff Stettiner (Oder-) Polen Haff Deutschland Wielki Zalew Ueckermünde 10 km Oder/Odra Autoren: Wilhelm Steingrube, Ralf Scheibe & Marc Feilbach Institut für Geographie und Geologie Universität Greifswald ISSN 1614-5968 IKZM-Oder Berichte 4 (2004) Ergebnisse der Bestandsaufnahme der touristischen Infrastruktur im Untersuchungsgebiet von Wilhelm Steingrube, Ralf Scheibe und Marc Feilbach Institut für Geographie und Geologie Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeographie Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald Makarenkostraße 22, D -17487 Greifswald Greifswald, November 2004 Impressum Die IKZM-Oder Berichte erscheinen in unregelmäßiger Folge. Sie enthalten Ergebnisse des Projektes IKZM-Oder und der Regionalen Agenda 21 “Stettiner Haff – Region zweier Nationen” sowie Arbeiten mit Bezug zur Odermündungsregion. Die Berichte erscheinen in der Regel ausschließlich als abrufbare und herunterladbare PDF-Files im Internet. Das Projekt “Forschung für ein Integriertes Küstenzonenmanagement in der Odermündungsregion (IKZM-Oder)” wird vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung unter der Nummer 03F0403A gefördert. Die Regionale Agenda 21 “Stettiner Haff – Region zweier Nationen” stellt eine deutsch-polnische Kooperation mit dem Ziel der nachhaltigen Entwicklung dar. Die regionale Agenda 21 ist Träger des integrierten Küstenzonenmanagements und wird durch das Projekt IKZM-Oder unterstützt. Herausgeber der Zeitschrift: EUCC – Die Küsten Union Deutschland e.V. Poststr. 6, 18119 Rostock, http://www.eucc-d.de.de/ Dr. G. Schernewski & N. Löser Für den Inhalt des Berichtes sind die Autoren zuständig.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Testing of Tools for Intercalibration of Phytoplankton, Macrovegetation and Benthic Fauna in Danish Coastal Areas
    DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF TOOLS FOR INTERCALIBRATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON, MACROVEGETATION AND BENTHIC FAUNA IN DANISH COASTAL AREAS Scientifi c Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 93 2014 AARHUS AU UNIVERSITY DCE – DANISH CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY [Blank page] DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF TOOLS FOR INTERCALIBRATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON, MACROVEGETATION AND BENTHIC FAUNA IN DANISH COASTAL AREAS Scientifi c Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and EnergyNo. 93 2014 Jacob Carstensen Dorte Krause-Jensen Alf Josefson Aarhus University, Department of Bioscience AARHUS AU UNIVERSITY DCE – DANISH CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY Data sheet Series title and no.: Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 93 Title: Development and testing of tools for intercalibration of phytoplankton, macrovegetation and benthic fauna in Danish coastal areas Authors: Jacob Carstensen, Dorte Krause-Jensen, Alf Josefson Institution: Aarhus University, Department of Bioscience Publisher: Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy © URL: http://dce.au.dk/en Year of publication: March 2014 Editing completed: February 2014 Referees: Peter Henriksen, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University Financial support: Danish Nature Agency (NST) Please cite as: Carstensen, J., Krause-Jensen, D., Josefson, A. 2014. Development and testing of tools for intercalibration of phytoplankton, macrovegetation and benthic fauna in Danish coastal areas. Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, 85 pp. Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 93. http://dce2.au.dk/pub/SR93.pdf Reproduction permitted provided the source is explicitly acknowledged Abstract: This report contributes to the development of indicators and assessment tools for ecological status classification according to the European Water Framework Directive as well as the intercalibration of the phytoplankton biomass indicator with Sweden and Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Production of Edible Seaweed Flags: Danish Small Islands & Bornholm Islands of Anholt, Fejø, Skarø, Årø, Bjørnø, Ertholmene, Bornholm, Thurø (Denmark)
    European Commission Project Case Study Production of edible seaweed FLAGs: Danish Small Islands & Bornholm Islands of Anholt, Fejø, Skarø, Årø, Bjørnø, Ertholmene, Bornholm, Thurø (Denmark) Project overview Anholt This project involves cooperation between stakeholders from two Danish FLAGs, one on the island of Bornholm and the other covering DENMARK SWEDEN smaller islands, in commercially exploiting sea- weed, an overlooked resource in Danish waters. Arø Ertholmene By promoting the sustainable cultivation, har- Thurø Bornholm vesting and processing of seaweed, the project Bjørnø Skarø will assist in diversifying the local economies of Fejø the islands, thereby helping to maintain strong local populations and vibrant communities. GERMANY Context and Key Challenges The small Danish islands and Bornholm are remote areas, threatened by depopulation and a loss of business opportuni- ties. Seaweed production presents a potential new opportu- nity for local entrepreneurs, including fishermen. If exploited successfully, it could help to broaden the range of products offered locally and lead to increased earnings for local food producers and restaurants. While there is no tradition of cultivating, harvesting, or exploiting seaweed in Denmark, with the growing popularity of sushi and the development of the New Nordic Cuisine, Danish seaweed is increasingly in demand. Danish waters pro- duce, or can produce, similar seaweed species to those grown in East Asia or in the Atlantic. The quality of this seaweed is excellent, and for some purposes even better than imported dried seaweeds because of the limited salinity levels in some parts of the Danish waters. Many of the 27 small Danish Islands with less than 1 000 inhabitants are, together with Bornholm, well known for food production.
    [Show full text]
  • Wadden Sea Quality Status Report Geomorphology
    Photo: Rijkswaterstaat, NL (https://beeldbank.rws.nl). Zuiderduin 2011. Wadden Sea Quality Status Report Geomorphology A. P. Oost, C. Winter, P. Vos, F. Bungenstock, R. Schrijvershof, B. Röbke, J. Bartholdy, J. Hofstede, A. Wurpts, A. Wehrmann This report downloaded: 2018-11-23. This report last updated: 2017-12-21. This report should be cited as: Oost A. P., Winter C., Vos P., Bungenstock F., Schrijvershof R., Röbke B., Bartholdy J., Hofstede J., Wurpts A. & Wehrmann A. (2017) Geomorphology. In: Wadden Sea Quality Status Report 2017. Eds.: Kloepper S. et al., Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Last updated 21.12.2017. Downloaded DD.MM.YYYY. qsr.waddensea-worldheritage.org/reports/geomorphology 1. Introduction The hydro- and morphodynamic processes of the Wadden Sea form the foundation for the ecological, cultural and economic development of the area. Its extraordinary ecosystems, its physical and geographical values and being an outstanding example of representing major stages of the earth’s history are factors why the Wadden Sea received a World Heritage area qualification (UNESCO, 2016). During its existence, the Wadden Sea has been a dynamic tidal system in which the geomorphology of the landscape continuously changed. Driving factors of the morphological changes have been: Holocene sea-level rise, geometry of the Pleistocene surface, development of accommodation space for sedimentation, sediment transport mechanisms (tides and wind) and, the relatively recent, strong human interference in the landscape. In this report new insights into the morphology of the trilateral Wadden Sea gained since the Quality Status Report (QSR) in 2009 (Wiersma et al., 2009) are discussed. After a summary of the Holocene development (sub-section 2.1), the sand-sharing inlet system approach as a building block for understanding the morhodynamic functioning of the system with a special emphasis on the backbarrier (sub-section 2.2) is discussed, followed by other parts of the inlet-system.
    [Show full text]