DOCSLIB.ORG

North Carolina Archaeology, Vol. 48

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

North Carolina Archaeology Volume 48 1999 1 North Carolina Archaeology (formerly Southern Indian Studies) Published jointly by The North Carolina Archaeological Society, Inc. 109 East Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27601-2807 and The Research Laboratories of Archaeology University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120 R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr., Editor Officers of the North Carolina Archaeological Society President: Robert V. Graham, 2140 Woodland Ave., Burlington, NC 27215. Vice President: Michelle Vacca, 125 N. Elm Street, Statesville, NC 28677. Secretary: Linda Carnes-McNaughton, Historic Sites Section, N.C. Division of Archives and History, 4621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4621. Treasurer: E. William Conen, 804 Kingswood Dr., Cary, NC 27513. Editor: R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr., Research Laboratories of Archaeology, CB 3120, Alumni Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120. Associate Editor (Newsletter): Dee Nelms, Office of State Archaeology, N.C. Division of Archives and History, 4619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4619. At-Large Members: Thomas Beaman, Department of Anthropology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858. Danny Bell, 903 Greenwood Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27514. Wayne Boyko, XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg, Public Works Business Center, Environmental Projects, Fort Bragg NC, 23807-5000 Jane Brown, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723. Randy Daniel, Department of Anthropology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858. Rick Langley, M.D., N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC. Information for Subscribers North Carolina Archaeology is published once a year in October. Subscription is by membership in the North Carolina Archaeological Society, Inc. Annual dues are $15.00 for regular members, $25.00 for sustaining members, $10.00 for students, $20.00 for families, $250.00 for life members, $250.00 for corporate members, and $25.00 for institutional subscribers. Members also receive two issues of the North Carolina Archaeological Society Newsletter. Membership requests, dues, subscriptions, changes of address, and back issue orders should be directed to: Dee Nelms, Office of State Archaeology, N.C. Division of Archives and History, 4619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4619. Information for Authors North Carolina Archaeology publishes articles on the archaeology of North Carolina and neighboring states. One copy of each manuscript, with accompanying tables, figures, and bibliography, should be submitted to the Editor. Manuscripts should be double spaced with ample margins throughout. Style should conform to guidelines published in American Antiquity, vol. 57, no. 4 (October, 1992). The Editor can assist those wishing to submit a manuscript but who are unfamiliar with American Antiquity style. North Carolina Archaeology Volume 48 October 1999 CONTENTS Prehistoric Pottery: Series and Sequence on the Carolina Coast organized and compiled by Joseph M. Herbert Introduction to “Prehistoric Pottery: Series and Sequence on the Carolina Coast” Joseph M. Herbert............................................................................................. 1 Early Ceramic Traditions on the Southern Coastal Plain of North Carolina: Radiocarbon Data from 31CB114 Erica E. Sanborn and Lawrence E. Abbott, Jr.................................................. 3 Oak Island: A Retiring Series Mark A. Mathis ................................................................................................ 18 Prehistoric Pottery Taxonomy and Sequence on the Southern Coast of North Carolina Joseph M. Herbert............................................................................................ 37 Woodland Burial Mounds in the North Carolina Sandhills and Southern Coastal Plain Jeffrey D. Irwin, Wayne C. J. Boyko, Joseph M. Herbert, and Chad Braley .............................................................................................. 59 Interior Rim Impressions as an Indicator of Typological Relationships Adam Marshall................................................................................................. 87 Ceramic Types and Typology in Northeastern North Carolina: The View from the Davenport Site (31BR39) John E. Byrd..................................................................................................... 95 “Chesapeake” Pipes and Uncritical Assumptions: A View from Northeastern North Carolina Dane T. Magoon ............................................................................................. 107 About the Authors......................................................................................... 127 INTRODUCTION TO “PREHISTORIC POTTERY: SERIES AND SEQUENCE ON THE CAROLINA COAST” by Joseph M. Herbert In the summer of 1954 William G. Haag, then a relatively new faculty member in the Department of Geology and Anthropology at Louisiana State University, launched one of the first exploratory archaeological expeditions along the coast of North Carolina. Bill’s work with William S. Webb in the WPA and TVA archaeology programs and his graduate studies with James B. Griffin at the University of Michigan had developed in him a passion for prehistory and a penchant for scientific inquiry. Public interest in the archaeological research of the lost colony and Fort Raleigh was running high. When the U.S. Navy began a research project to study the natural and cultural history of the North Carolina coast, they hired Bill for the task of discovering what he could of the remains of the misbegotten Roanoke voyagers and the Indians among whom they settled. Taking the assignment to heart, Haag requisitioned a post-war jeep and a graduate-student assistant, and began a survey of coastal sites that would take the better part of four summers. Beginning with Fort Raleigh, at the present site of the Elizabethan Gardens in Manteo, they explored sites on Albemarle Sound as far west as Chowan River, east to Currituck County, and down the Outer Banks to the Cape Creek or Croatan site on Hatteras Island. Data collected those first two summers (1954–1955) were the basis of monograph titled The Archaeology of Coastal North Carolina. This eloquently written report illustrates Bill’s affinity for describing the natural environment of coastal Carolina and his understanding of its prehistoric past. His descriptions of the results of testing and surveying sites along the northern coast of North Carolina provided the foundation for the prehistoric ceramic sequence still in use today. Collections were also made during the summers of 1956 and 1957 at sites on Pamlico, Neuse, New, and Cape Fear rivers. Before he was satisfied, Bill and his assistant had surface-collected 79 sites in coastal North Carolina, 73 sites in South Carolina, and 18 in Georgia. Back in the laboratory with artifacts spread across every available tabletop, the task of making sense of those remains must have seemed daunting; however, as fate would have it, the job was cut short. Wanting to do Bill a favor and to impress the Navy with the great research Bill was doing, a university administrator invited a visiting admiral to visit the archaeology facility. After patiently touring the lab the admiral turned to Bill and said, “Do you mean to tell me that the Navy is paying for all these rocks? Well, not any more!” Sure enough, it wasn’t long before funding for the project was withdrawn, effectively eliminating the possibility for further analysis and publication. 1 NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGY [Vol. 48, 1999] Archaeology on the Carolina coast (and Federal policy regarding the funding of archaeological research) has come a long way since that first jeep survey. But our imaginations are still fired by traces of ancient cultures amidst an environment unique in its beauty and resources. The challenges of unraveling the tangled evidence of prehistoric Native American peoples are no less daunting, but the way has been substantially smoothed by the hard work of previous researchers. In the spirit of this quest and in celebration of Bill Haag’s initial explorations, a symposium was organized at the Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference in Greenville, South Carolina. Bill was not able to attend the symposium, but he welcomed Bennie Keel into his home for a videotaped interview. Thanks to Bill and Bennie, the tape was aired at the 1998 conference along with a wonderful assortment of slides that Bill took during his survey. Needless to say, it was very warmly received. The symposium papers reflect some of the most important current research of coastal North Carolina prehistory. Six of these papers are published as articles in this volume of North Carolina Archaeology, as a tribute to the pioneering efforts of William G. Haag. The remainder will appear in the next volume. The articles that appear here are arranged roughly in order of the age of their archaeological subjects, from early to late, and geographically from south to north. Erica Sanborn and Lea Abbott begin with a description of the Riegelwood site in Columbus County and pottery found in contexts that produced several surprisingly early radiocarbon dates. Mark Mathis presents the data that have led him to call for retiring the shell-tempered Oak Island series and describes the ramifications of this proposed retirement. Joe Herbert reviews pottery taxonomies for the lower Cape Fear basin and presents several recently obtained thermo- luminescence
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography of North Carolina Underwater Archaeology

    Bibliography of North Carolina Underwater Archaeology

    i BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH CAROLINA UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY Compiled by Barbara Lynn Brooks, Ann M. Merriman, Madeline P. Spencer, and Mark Wilde-Ramsing Underwater Archaeology Branch North Carolina Division of Archives and History April 2009 ii FOREWARD In the forty-five years since the salvage of the Modern Greece, an event that marks the beginning of underwater archaeology in North Carolina, there has been a steady growth in efforts to document the state’s maritime history through underwater research. Nearly two dozen professionals and technicians are now employed at the North Carolina Underwater Archaeology Branch (N.C. UAB), the North Carolina Maritime Museum (NCMM), the Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and East Carolina University’s (ECU) Program in Maritime Studies. Several North Carolina companies are currently involved in conducting underwater archaeological surveys, site assessments, and excavations for environmental review purposes and a number of individuals and groups are conducting ship search and recovery operations under the UAB permit system. The results of these activities can be found in the pages that follow. They contain report references for all projects involving the location and documentation of physical remains pertaining to cultural activities within North Carolina waters. Each reference is organized by the location within which the reported investigation took place. The Bibliography is divided into two geographical sections: Region and Body of Water. The Region section encompasses studies that are non-specific and cover broad areas or areas lying outside the state's three-mile limit, for example Cape Hatteras Area. The Body of Water section contains references organized by defined geographic areas.
  • Pdf Version of This Report

    Pdf Version of This Report

    Tier 1 Preliminary Evaluation of Pollutant Sources to the Impounded Reaches of Five Dams in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina December 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Raleigh Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 Tier 1 Preliminary Evaluation of Pollutant Sources to the Impounded Reaches of Five Dams in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina Executive Summary: Impounded reaches behind dams can trap and accumulate sediments through time. In some cases, those sediments can accumulate contaminants, and at high concentrations those contaminants can have adverse toxicological effects in-place as well as upon movement downstream. We used the framework of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Army Corps of Engineers technical guidance manual on disposal of dredged material in inland waters to evaluate the potential for sediment contamination within the impoundments created by five small dams on the Neuse River and tributaries in Wake, Wayne, Wilson, and Lenoir Counties, North Carolina. A tier 1 review of existing information on pollutant sources and sinks, similar to an initial environmental audit, was conducted. This report presents the methods, results, and recommendations from the tier 1 assessment. Review of existing information (State and federal databases on pollutant sources, previous environmental assessments, and limited analytical chemistry data for Neuse River and Crabtree Creek, Little River, Contentnea Creek and Southwest Creek) indicated no known significant organic or inorganic pollutant problems in a one-mile assessment area surrounding the impounded reaches of each dam. Much of the assessment area for the dams on Little River, Contentnea Creek and Southwest Creek remains in an undeveloped rural character (forestry and small farms).
  • Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’S Lost Colony of Roanoke

    Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’S Lost Colony of Roanoke

    Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’s Lost Colony of Roanoke. Roberta Estes Copyright 2009, all rights reserved, submitted for publication [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract Within genealogy circles, family stories of Native American1 heritage exist in many families whose American ancestry is rooted in Colonial America and traverses Appalachia. The task of finding these ancestors either genealogically or using genetic genealogy is challenging. With the advent of DNA testing, surname and other special interest projects2, tools now exist to facilitate grouping participants in a way that allows one to view populations in historical fashions. This paper references and uses data from several of these public projects, but particularly the Melungeon, Lumbee, Waccamaw, North Carolina Roots and Lost Colony projects3. The Lumbee have long claimed descent from the Lost Colony via their oral history4. The Lumbee DNA Project shows significantly less Native American ancestry than would be expected with 96% European or African Y chromosomal DNA. The Melungeons, long held to be mixed European, African and Native show only one ancestral family with Native DNA5. Clearly more testing would be advantageous in all of these projects. This phenomenon is not limited to these groups, and has been reported by other researchers such as Bolnick (et al, 2006) where she reports finding in 16 Native American populations with northeast or southeast roots that 47% of the families who believe themselves to be full blooded or no less than 75% Native with no paternal European admixture find themselves carrying European or African y-line DNA.
  • FINAL REPORT Cultural Resource Investigations for the Milburnie Dam

    FINAL REPORT Cultural Resource Investigations for the Milburnie Dam

    FINAL REPORT Cultural Resource Investigations for the Milburnie Dam Mitigation Bank Project Wake County, North Carolina North Carolina Environmental Review (ER) #06-3114 Lead Federal Agency - US Army Corps of Engineers Action ID SAW-2010-0020 Prepared for: Restoration Systems LLC 1101 Haynes Street Suite 211 Raleigh, NC 27604 Prepared by: Deborah Joy, MA, RPA Legacy Research Associates 3333 Durham-Chapel Hill Boulevard Suite A-100 Durham, NC 27707 September 15, 2014 Cultural Resource Investigations for the Milburnie Dam Mitigation Bank Project Wake County, North Carolina North Carolina Environmental Review (ER) #06-3114 US Army Corps of Engineers Action ID SAW-2010-0020 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..........................................................................................................................................................................................iv LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................................................................... viii MANAGEMENT SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................................................ix Archaeological Site 31WA1625/1625** - Milburnie East ....................................................... ix Archaeological Site 31WA1872/1872** - Milburnie West ....................................................... x Archaeological Site 31WA1873** .........................................................................................
  • Neuse River Basin Roundtable

    Neuse River Basin Roundtable

    Neuse River Basin Roundtable August 24, 2017 North Carolina Emergency Management Major Contributors to Neuse Watershed At Smithfield 1,220 Sq. Miles Swift Creek 13% 160 Sq. Miles Increase Middle Creek 9% 130 Sq. Miles Increase Above Goldsboro 2,090 Sq. Miles Little River 15% 320 Sq. Miles Increase Above Contentnea Cr 2,590 Sq. Miles North Carolina Emergency Management North Carolina Emergency Management North Carolina Emergency Management Matthew Floyd 1% Annual Chance Flood (100-year flood) Fran North Carolina Emergency Management Hurricane Matthew - Major Contributors to Neuse At Smithfield 1,220 Sq. Miles Swift Creek 160 Sq. Miles Middle Creek 130 Sq. Miles Above Goldsboro 2,090 Sq. Miles Little River 320 Sq. Miles Above Contentnea Cr 2,590 Sq. Miles North Carolina Emergency Management Neuse River Basins - Topography North Carolina Emergency Management NCFMP Neuse River Flood Studies North Carolina Emergency Management NCFMP Neuse River Flood Studies . Hydraulics . HEC-RAS hydraulic models for the entire river in 5 segments downstream of Falls of Neuse (2003-2013) . 10, 25, 50, 100 and 500-year storm events and Hurricane Floyd in model runs . Hydrology . Falls of Neuse Reservoir discharges provided by the US Army Corps of Engineers . Regression analysis and gage analyses used to determine downstream discharges in models North Carolina Emergency Management NCFMP FIMAN Library Models . Hydraulics . HEC-RAS hydraulic models for: . Neuse River at Clayton . Neuse River at Smithfield . Neuse River at Goldsboro . Neuse River at Kinston . Extend
  • US History- Sweeney

    US History- Sweeney

    ©Java Stitch Creations, 2015 Part 1: The Roanoke Colony-Background Information What is now known as the lost Roanoke Colony, was actually the third English attempt at colonizing the eastern shores of the United States. Following through with his family's thirst for exploration, Queen Elizabeth I of England granted Sir Walter Raleigh a royal charter in 1584. This charter gave him seven years to establish a settlement, and allowed him the power to explore, colonize and rnle, in return for one-fifth of all the gold and silver mined in the new lands. Raleigh immediately hired navigators Philip Amadas and Arthur Barlowe to head an expedition to the intended destination of the Chesapeake Bay area. This area was sought due to it being far from the Spanish-dominated Florida colonies, and it had milder weather than the more northern regions. In July of that year, they landed on Roanoke Island. They explored the area, made contact with Native Americans, and then sailed back to England to prove their findings to Sir Walter Raleigh. Also sailing from Roanoke were two members oflocal tribes of Native Americans, Manteo (son of a Croatoan) and Wanchese (a Roanoke). Amadas' and Barlowe's positive report, and Native American assistance, earned the blessing of Sir Walter Raleigh to establish a colony. In 1585, a second expedition of seven ships of colonists and supplies, were sent to Roanoke. The settlement was somewhat successful, however, they had poor relations with the local Native Americans and repeatedly experienced food shortages. Only a year after arriving, most of the colonists left.
  • EPA Surveyneuse River WQ Report

    EPA Surveyneuse River WQ Report

    CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Neuse River Water Quality Sampling Final Report June 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary Neuse River Water Quality Sampling ES.1 Study Summary........................................................................................................................................ ES-1 ES.2 Study Overview ........................................................................................................................................ ES-1 ES.3 Key Results ................................................................................................................................................ ES-1 ES.4 Recommendations for Future Work ............................................................................................... ES-3 Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background.................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Study Objectives and Report Format ............................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Constituents of Interest in the Neuse River ................................................................................... 1-3 Section 2 Water Quality of the Neuse River 2.1 NCDENR Data ............................................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.1.1 DO and Chlorophyll Exceedances .....................................................................................
  • Raleigh Greenway

    Raleigh Greenway

    PARKING TRAIL GRID ID MILEAGE SURFACE FEATURES AND AMENITIES DESCRIPTION PARK FACILITIES For Your Safety And AREAS youtube.com/raleighparksandrec The Safety Of Others • Great Blue Heron habitat Follows Abbotts Creek from the Neuse River Trail to Simms Branch Trail near Abbotts Creek • Connects to Falls River Shopping Center 2, 3, 4, 53, P-8 2.9 Paved the intersection of Durant Road and Cub Trail. The trail is connected by sidewalk • Be alert Trail 54, 83 • Connects to North Wake Landfill District Park, Neuse River Trail, along two sections of Falls River Avenue and along Durant Road. instagram.com/raleighparks • Patrons should be aware of their Simms Branch Trail, and Durant Nature Preserve Discover surroundings on the trail Baileywick Trail H-8 0.6 Paved • Connects to Baileywick Park and Baileywick Elementary School Connects from Strickland Rd to Baileywick Road by passing through Baileywick Park. 73 Our Parks At • Obey signs A natural surface trail located adjacent to Beaver Dam Creek between Wade Beaver Dam maps.raleighnc. pinterest.com/raleighparks H-20 0.8 Unpaved • Connects to Hymettus Woods Park and Windemere Beaver Dam Park Avenue and Devonshire Drive that passes through Windemere Beaver Dam Park. 29 • Wear appropriate safety equipment Trail including helmets, kneepads, elbow pads, The trail is connected by a sidewalk along Dixie Trail. gov/parklocator Birch Ridge A wide sidewalk that connects Poole Road to the Walnut Creek Softball Complex wrist pads, etc Q-26 0.3 Paved • Connects to Walnut Creek Softball Complex Connector (Walnut Creek North Park). — twitter.com/raleighparks • The use of headphones is discouraged— Abbotts Creek Park (Q-8) Centennial • Connects to North Carolina Farmers Market and NC State University headphones impair your ability to hear A multi-purpose path adjacent to Centennial Parkway on the NC State University Anderson Point Park (U-25) Bikeway H-25 2.3 Paved Centennial Campus — your surroundings Centennial Campus.
  • The Import of European Livestock Into Virginia and Its Impact on Colonial Life

    The Import of European Livestock Into Virginia and Its Impact on Colonial Life

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1987 Taking Stock: The Import of European Livestock into Virginia and its Impact on Colonial Life Louise Horowitz Tincher College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Agricultural Economics Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Tincher, Louise Horowitz, "Taking Stock: The Import of European Livestock into Virginia and its Impact on Colonial Life" (1987). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625411. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-mwfs-8v87 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TAKING STOCK: THE IMPORTATION OF EUROPEAN LIVESTOCK INTO VIRGINIA AND ITS IMPACT ON COLONIAL LIFE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Louise Horowitz Tincher 1987 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Approved, January 1987 James Axtell l/yr^lfaKJpi4r>‘ 'araes Whittenberg i i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT........................................ iv CHAPTER I....ENGLISH TRADITIONS . ........................ 2 CHAPTER II. INDIAN TRADITIONS ........................ 13 CHAPTER III. THE ENGLISH IN VIRGINIA...................... 24 CHAPTER IV. INDIANS AND LIVESTOCK ........................ 41 CONCLUSION ............................................
  • Conservation Assessment of the Neuse River Lowgrounds and Mill Creek Watersheds in Johnston County

    Conservation Assessment of the Neuse River Lowgrounds and Mill Creek Watersheds in Johnston County

    Conservation Assessment of the Neuse River Lowgrounds and Mill Creek Watersheds in Johnston County Prepared by Leigh Ann Cienek and Jon Scott Triangle Land Conservancy Funding provided by the NC Attorney General’s Office Environmental Enhancement Grant July 30th, 2010 Introduction In the late 1990’s Triangle Land Conservancy (TLC) began focusing efforts to protect land within the Neuse River Lowgrounds in Johnston County. Although development pressure in the Lowgrounds has lagged behind other portions of the Triangle, this vast wilderness with many unique natural features faces other pressures such as logging, agriculture and mining which threaten water quality and the natural integrity of the area. During the past 10 years, development pressure in Johnston County has risen dramatically with a population increase of 40% for the County. Completion of the US-70 Clayton Bypass has also reduced the commute times to central portion of Johnston County including Smithfield, further drawing residents who commute to jobs in RTP and points west. In 2000, TLC with support from the Conservation Trust for North Carolina and funding from the NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund, completed the “Riparian Corridor Design for the Neuse River: From I-95 to Ferry Bridge Road in Johnston and Wayne Counties, North Carolina”. The design was limited to an evaluation of parcels along the Neuse River corridor and identified priorities for both restoration and preservation. As part of a renewed effort to protect this significant natural area, TLC applied to the NC Attorney General’s Office for an Environmental Enhancement Grant in 2008 to update the 2000 plan and expand the focus area to include the entire Neuse Lowgrounds watershed as well as the Mill Creek watershed, which includes Hannah Creek and several other important riparian corridors, farm and forest land, and cultural resources such as the Bentonville Battleground.
  • Information to Users

    Information to Users

    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI* Expedient Truths: Aspects of Nanative Representation in Elizabethan Voyage Literature. by Robert Gordon Griffiths B.A., University of Birmingham, 1983 M.A., University of York, 1992 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English We accept this dissertation as conforming to the required standard Dr.
  • Roberta Estes

    Roberta Estes

    Roberta Estes ect shows significantly less Native American ancestry than would be expected with 96% European or African Within genealogy circles, family stories of Native Y chromosomal DNA. The Melungeons, long held to be American1 heritage exist in many families whose Ameri- mixed European, African and Native show only one can ancestry is rooted in Colonial America and traverses ancestral family with Native DNA.4 Clearly more test- Appalachia. The task of finding these ancestors either ing would be advantageous in all of these projects. genealogically or using genetic genealogy is challenging. This phenomenon is not limited to these groups, and has With the advent of DNA testing, surname and other been reported by other researchers. For example, special interest projects, tools now exist to facilitate the Bolnick (2006) reports finding in 16 Native American tracing of patrilineal and matrilineal lines in present-day populations with northeast or southeast roots that 47% people, back to their origins in either Native Americans, of the families who believe themselves to be full-blooded Europeans, or Africans. This paper references and uses or no less than 75% Native with no paternal European data from several of these public projects, but particular- admixture, find themselves carrying European or ly the Melungeon, Lumbee, Waccamaw, North Carolina African Y chromosomes. Malhi et al. (2008) reported Roots and Lost Colony projects.2 that in 26 Native American populations, non-Native American Y chromosomes occurred at a frequency as The Lumbee have long claimed descent from the Lost high as 88% in the Canadian northeast, southwest of Colony via their oral history.3 The Lumbee DNA Proj- Hudson Bay.