<<

The Role of Magnec Fields in Structuring Clouds and Forming

Zhi-Yun Li (University of Virginia)

Collaborators: Che-Yu Chen (University of Virginia) Laura Fissel (NRAO) Patrick King (University of Virginia) Outline • Why should one care about magnec fields? • Are there measurable magnec effects on cloud structures? • What is the origin of magnecally aligned striaons? (preliminary work) • Summary & outlook I. Why should one care? Why should one care?

M = cr 2⇡G1/2 1 M for atomic ISM

! If strong enough, may make formaon difficult Why should one care? Why should one care? Magnec braking catastrophe

Equatorial density Magnec field strength

Krasnopolsky, Li, Shang, Zhao (2012)

! If strong enough, may make disk formaon difficult (e.g., Allen et al. 2003, Machida et al. 2005, Banerjee & Pudritz 2006, Price & Bate 2007, Mellon & Li 2008, Hennebelle & Fromang 2008, Duffin & Pudritz 2009, Seifried et al. 2012, Santos-Lima et al. 2012, SEE WURSTER AND COMMERCON) Evidence for magnec fields? Evidence for magnec fields?

Cepheus

Taurus

Perseus

Chamaeleon-

! Both atomic ISM & molecular clouds are magnezed 2. Measurable magnec effects on cloud structures? Yes, at least in some cases A. Examples B. Stascs

Cepheus Ophiuchus Aquila Lupus

Taurus

Perseus

Chamaeleon-Musca Orion Example #1: Field-aligned HI fibers (S. Clark, Peek & Putman 2014) Example #2: Field-aligned striaons in HI absorpon (CNM)

Riegel-Crutcher cloud

(McClure-Griffiths et al. 2006) Example #3: Field aligned CO striaons 12CO map of Taurus clouds – CO Striaons (P. Goldsmith+08) Example #4: Field-aligned Herschel (dust) striaons

(Palmeirim+2013) Dense filament perpendicular to B field… Measurable magnec effects on cloud structures?

Planck XXXII: diffuse gas >5o from Galacc plane

HRO = Histogram of More polarized ridges Relave Orientaon (J. Soler+2013)

Less polarized ridges

Diffuse structures preferenally aligned wi/ B field… Measurable magnec effects on cloud structures?

Planck XXXV: nearby molecular clouds

High column density Low column density

Diffuse, aligned; dense, perpendicular (not always clear, e.g., Lupus) Measurable magnec effects on cloud structures?

4 BLASTpol: C GMC (~700 pc, 5x10 M", massive star forming)

Herschel map (Hill+2011)

High column density Low column density Measurable magnec effects on cloud structures?

BLASTpol: Vela C GMC (a part shown)

BLASTpol (PI: Mark Devlin)

(Courtesy: Laura Fissel, >3,000 vectors, 3 bands) Measurable magnec effects on cloud structures?

BLASTpol:

Vela C GMC (Full map)

(J. Soler+2017)

(Courtesy: Laura Fissel, >3,000 vectors, 3 bands) Measurable magnec effects on cloud structures?

(Soler+2017) ! Diffuse, aligned Dense, perpendicular South-Ridge

!Unclear Measurable magnec effects on cloud structures?

• Yes, in some cases (diffuse, parallel; dense, perpendicular) e.g., Taurus, South-ridge of Vela C, Chamaeleon-Musca

• But…not always true e.g., South-nest of Vela C 3. Relave orientaon of magnec fields & structures: why transion from parallel to perpendicular? • One possible explanaon proposed in Chen, King & Li (2016)

• Based on simulaons of Low column density Chen & Ostriker (2015)

Relave orientaon of magnec fields & structures: why transion from parallel to perpendicular?

Model parameters: a=0.2 km/s, v=2 km/s (M=10), δv=0.14 km/s

-3 0 n0=1000 cm , B0=10 μG, θ=20 Magnezed colliding flow simulaons of Chen & Ostriker (2015)

x

Z

Edge-on view along y-axis Magnezed colliding flow simulaons of Chen & Ostriker (2015)

x

y

Face-on view along z-axis Fields strength-density correlaon in the simulaon

Post-shock layer

Pre-shock Inclined field lines

# X (Chen, King, Li 2016)

Z# Density# Fields strength-density correlaon & field-structure alignment in 3D • Alignment angle between density gradient and B field n B cos = r · n B |r || | (Soler +2013) Inclined field lines • B field along filaments if # X = 90 (cos = 0) • B field perpendicular to filaments if =0 (cos = 1) Z# Fields strength-density correlaon & field-structure alignment in 3D

(Soler +2013) Inclined field lines

• B field along filaments if # X = 90 (cos = 0) • B field perpendicular to filaments if =0 (cos = 1) Z# Fields strength-density correlaon & field-structure alignment in 3D

(Soler +2013) Inclined field lines

# X Why?

Z# Fields strength-density correlaon & field-structure alignment in 3D

Sub-Alfvenic

Super-Alfvenic magnec

Density # Inclined field lines

# X Why?

! Sub- to Z# Super-Alfvenic Relave orientaon of fields & structures in 2D: Correlaon between B field (from polarizaon) & column density structures?

Synthec polarizaon

Low column density

Face-on view High column density along z-axis 4. Origin of field-aligned striaons?

X # Inclined field lines

# X

Z# Dense sub-layer: unique to oblique MHD shocks

Shocked layer B field

(e.g., Shu’s textbook)

Inclined field lines

#

X

B field

Dense sub-layer! sheet w/ parallel B Z# Magnezed dense sub-layer as “bamboo sheet”

Shocked layer B field

(e.g., Shu’s textbook) B field # X

#

Z

Y #

Inclined field lines

#

X

B field

Dense sub-layer! sheet w/ parallel B Z#

Vz(y)=V0 +0.14 sin(8⇡y)

Column density

B field

#

X

# Z

Y # Inclined field lines

#

X Y#

Z#

Turbulent converging flow

Column density

B field

#

X

# Z

Y # Inclined field lines

#

X Y#

Z# Summary & Outlook

• Magnec fields important theorecally (Mestel & Spitzer 1956) • Pervasive in ISM and molecular clouds • Magnecally aligned striaons & perpendicular dense filaments • One interpretaon: relave orientaon changes from sub- to super-Alfvenic transion • Striaons: perturbed dense sub-layer w/ B field • Excing me: BLAST-TNG (Dec 2017) 2.5’#25’’, 6 x increase in resoluon, faster mapping Vela C cloud: ~1,000#100,000 vectors • Longer term: by-product of B mode cosmology?