Arxiv:2105.09338V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 16 Jun 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arxiv:2105.09338V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 16 Jun 2021 Draft version June 18, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 Stars with Photometrically Young Gaia Luminosities Around the Solar System (SPYGLASS) I: Mapping Young Stellar Structures and their Star Formation Histories Ronan Kerr,1 Aaron C. Rizzuto,1, ∗ Adam L. Kraus,1 and Stella S. R. Offner1 1Department of Astronomy, University of Texas at Austin 2515 Speedway, Stop C1400 Austin, Texas, USA 78712-1205 (Accepted May 16, 2021) ABSTRACT Young stellar associations hold a star formation record that can persist for millions of years, revealing the progression of star formation long after the dispersal of the natal cloud. To identify nearby young stellar populations that trace this progression, we have designed a comprehensive framework for the identification of young stars, and use it to identify ∼3×104 candidate young stars within a distance of 333 pc using Gaia DR2. Applying the HDBSCAN clustering algorithm to this sample, we identify 27 top-level groups, nearly half of which have little to no presence in previous literature. Ten of these groups have visible substructure, including notable young associations such as Orion, Perseus, Taurus, and Sco-Cen. We provide a complete subclustering analysis on all groups with substructure, using age estimates to reveal each region's star formation history. The patterns we reveal include an apparent star formation origin for Sco-Cen along a semicircular arc, as well as clear evidence for sequential star formation moving away from that arc with a propagation speed of ∼4 km s−1 (∼4 pc Myr−1). We also identify earlier bursts of star formation in Perseus and Taurus that predate current, kinematically identical active star-forming events, suggesting that the mechanisms that collect gas can spark multiple generations of star formation, punctuated by gas dispersal and cloud regrowth. The large spatial scales and long temporal scales on which we observe star formation offer a bridge between the processes within individual molecular clouds and the broad forces guiding star formation at galactic scales. Keywords: young stars | open clusters and associations | star formation | T Tauri stars | Sco-Cen | Taurus | Perseus | Orion 1. INTRODUCTION 2005; Tobin et al. 2009; Kirk et al. 2013, 2017; Kerr Most young stars are not found in isolation, instead et al. 2019), studies of clusters and associations provide a residing in co-moving star clusters or associations (e.g., much longer-term view of star formation that has unique Lada & Lada 2003; Krumholz et al. 2019). These stellar value. Rather than providing a snapshot in time, a de- overdensities are direct remnants of the molecular cloud tailed study of a young association can trace back tens of that collapsed to create them, and as such they preserve millions of years of star formation, enabling a complete study of a star-forming event from its onset to present arXiv:2105.09338v2 [astro-ph.GA] 16 Jun 2021 significant information on the structure and dynamics of those parent clouds (Elmegreen & Lada 1977; Krause day, and by extension the processes that drove the evolu- et al. 2020). While studies of sites of active star forma- tion of the population (e.g.,de Zeeuw et al. 1999; Pecaut tion are popular due to the presence of both young stars & Mamajek 2016; Wright & Mamajek 2018). Further- and dense gas for which exquisite dynamical studies can more, as these associations persist long after gas disper- be performed (e.g., Palla & Stahler 1999; Hatchell et al. sal, the study of stellar populations through associations may also enable the identification of more rapid forms of star formation that do not have known equivalents in Corresponding author: Ronan Kerr active star-forming sites. [email protected] Some processes in star formation require a complete ∗ 51 Pegasi b Fellow record of the star-forming event, not just a snapshot, to 2 Kerr et al. be properly studied in nature. One example is sequential the young stars together and distinguish a young associ- star formation, a process in which previous generations ation from the field. Improvements in measurements of of stars compress the cloud beside them, which can then parallax and proper motions can therefore significantly collapse to form stars, producing a self-sustaining cy- expand our knowledge of these associations, and such cle of star formation that can slowly propagate across developments frequently result in the addition of new an entire molecular cloud (Elmegreen & Lada 1977). members and the revision of associations' known spatial Most cases where a sequential process has been sug- extents (e.g., de Zeeuw et al. 1999; Preibisch & Mamajek gested include just two generations of star formation: 2008; Rizzuto et al. 2015; Zari et al. 2018; Kraus et al. one recently-formed generation powering an H II region, 2017; Luhman 2018). With its unprecedented breadth and one site of active star formation triggered in a shell of spatial, kinematic, and photometric data, Gaia Data that the previous generation compressed (e.g., Lee et al. Release 2 provides a data set capable of dramatically 2005; Maaskant et al. 2011; Nony et al. 2021). Given expanding our knowledge of young stellar populations that these processes are capable of continuing without (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018a). Gaia photometry can limit as long as unused gas remains, the current view of be combined with parallaxes to identify stars based on sequential star formation has yet to explore large scales their high locations on the HR diagram, and those stars in both time and space. can then be clustered according to their spatial coordi- One of the greatest strengths in using clusters and as- nates and transverse motions. sociations as a record of past star formation lies in the There have been multiple recent searches for stellar time over which detailed information can be extracted. populations in the solar neighborhood enabled by Gaia Having such an extensive star formation record allows DR2, including Sim et al.(2019), which reports the dis- for the study of long-lived star-forming processes, while covery of 207 new open clusters, and Kounkel & Covey also revealing unexpected anomalies in time, such as (2019), which notes the identification of 1901 stellar periods of dormancy in the star formation record. As overdensities in Gaia DR2. However, these surveys in- simulations become increasingly sophisticated and be- cluded stars of all ages in their clustering, so young pop- gin to include more physical processes (e.g., Grudi´cet al. ulations may not always stand out above the field den- 2020a), having a robust record of star formation, com- sity of the older stars. The work of Zari et al.(2018) plete with currently unexplained features can provide does focus on these younger populations, separating out critical comparisons capable of testing new theoretical pre-main sequence stars quite effectively and revealing frameworks. multiple associations in the form of stellar overdensi- While more spatially compact open clusters have ties. While Zari et al.(2018) revealed substantial young long ago been discovered and catalogued (e.g., Trum- stellar populations, it did not include a clustering anal- pler 1921; Klein Wassink 1927; Mermilliod 1995), much ysis, and as such the structures present within those sparser stellar associations are considerably more chal- populations have yet to be rigorously defined. Some re- lenging to identify due to relatively sparse on-sky densi- cent investigations have focused on young stellar popula- ties and large spatial extents, often barring identification tions while also performing a complete clustering analy- from on-sky density. For the nearest populations, stars sis, however these have all been restricted to individual with strong indicators of youth such as protoplanetary associations, such as Zari et al.(2019), which studies disks have typically been used as signposts for the iden- Orion, and Cantat-Gaudin et al.(2019b), which focuses tification of associated populations nearby, such as TW on Vela. No paper to date has performed a spatially un- Hydrae and β Pictoris (e.g., Kastner et al. 1997; Zucker- biased, all-sky search for young stellar populations with man et al. 2001). Beyond about 50-100 pc, however, rec- both robust youth diagnostics and a broad clustering ognizing stars with youth indicators and finding poten- analysis. tial companions becomes increasingly difficult, leaving In this paper, we present the deepest comprehensive the population of low-mass, more distant associations study of young stellar populations in the solar neighbor- largely unexplored. Due to their unbound nature, small hood to date. In Section2, we present the Gaia DR2 velocities relative to a typical field star, and geometric data set used for this work. We outline our methods effects from their wide spatial distributions, the kine- for the identification of young stars, age estimation, and matics of associations are often difficult to disentangle clustering in Section3, while a detailed analysis into the from the field. The effective identification of young stel- populations we identify is performed in Section4. Pos- lar populations therefore requires both the suppression sible implications of this work with respect to the study of older background populations and the use of accurate of star formation progression in the solar neighborhood kinematics and 3-d spatial coordinates to properly group Young Stellar Populations 3 are discussed in Section5, while we conclude in Section In addition, we impose a restriction on the BP/RP 6. flux excess factor3 E, which is defined as the sum of the fluxes in the Gaia BP and RP photometric bands 2. DATA divided by the flux in the G band. The configuration of 2.1. Gaia Astrometry and Photometry the Gaia photometric bands implies that E should be In this paper, we search for nearby young stars among slightly larger than 1 for stars with good photometric a large sample drawn from Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia measurements, however the BP and RP bands are vul- Collaboration et al.
Recommended publications
  • Proper Motions of Young Stars in Chamaeleon II
    A&A 556, A144 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321217 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics Proper motions of young stars in Chamaeleon II. New kinematical candidate members of Chamaeleon I and II Belén López Martí1, Francisco Jiménez-Esteban1,2,3, Amelia Bayo4,5, David Barrado1,6, Enrique Solano1,2, Hervé Bouy1, and Carlos Rodrigo1,2 1 Centro de Astrobiología (INTA-CSIC), Departamento de Astrofísica, PO Box 78, 28261 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 Spanish Virtual Observatory, 2869 Madrid, Spain 3 Suffolk University, Madrid Campus, C/ Valle de la Viña 3, 28003 Madrid, Spain 4 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile 5 Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 6 Calar Alto Observatory, Centro Astronómico Hispano-Alemán, C/ Jesús Durbán Remón 2-2, 04004 Almería, Spain Received 1 February 2013 / Accepted 1 July 2013 ABSTRACT Context. The Chamaeleon star-forming region has been extensively studied in the last decades. However, most studies have been confined to the densest parts of the clouds. In a previous paper, we analysed the kinematical properties of the spectroscopically confirmed population of the Chamaeleon I and II clouds. Aims. We want to search for new kinematical candidate members to the Chamaeleon I and II moving groups, extending the studied area beyond the clouds, and to characterize these new populations using available information from public databases and catalogues. We also want to check if the populations of the moving groups are confined to the present dark clouds. Methods. Kinematic candidate members were initially selected on the basis of proper motions and colours using the Fourth US Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC4).
    [Show full text]
  • 1. What Are the RA and DEC of Perseus Constellation? at What Time
    1. What are the RA and DEC of Perseus constellation? At what time do you expect it to transit at Kharagpur on 23 January? Does the Sun ever visit this constellation? How high in the sky from the horizon, will this constellation appear? 2. Sketch the Orion constellation, and indicate the location of the Orion nebua. What is the Orion nebula? 3. Explain briefly why Earth’s rotation axis precesses. What is the rate of precession? 4. Verify that a(1 − e2) u−1 = r = 1+ e cos φ with a = −2GM/E and e = [1+2J 2E2/G2M 2]1/2 is acually a solution to the equation 2 1 du E = J 2 + J 2u2 − GMu 2 dφ! which governs the trajectory under the gravitational attraction of a massive object. 5. Show that 4π2 P 2 = a3 GM for a general elliptic orbit. 6. Assuming that the Earth has a rotational period of 24 hrs around its own axis and revolution period of 365.25 days around the Sun, what is the length of a Solar day? After what period do distant stars come back to the same position on the sky? 7. Given Comet Halley has period 75 yrs, determine the semimajor axis of its orbit? 8. Consider an orbit around the Sun with e = 0.3. What is the ratio of the speeds at apogee and perigee? 9. At what height from center of Earth do we have geostationary satellite orbits? 10. For a central force motion in a gravitational potential α/r, show that A~ = ~v × L~ + α~r/r is conserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Elemental Abundances of Low-Mass Stars in the Young Clusters 25 Ori
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. Biazzoetal˙Mar2011˙noref c ESO 2018 October 16, 2018 Elemental abundances of low-mass stars in the young clusters 25 Ori and λ Ori⋆ K. Biazzo1, S. Randich1, F. Palla1, and C. Brice˜no2 1 INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy 2 CIDA - Centro de Investigaciones de Astronom`ıa, Apartado Postal 264, M´erida 5101-A, Venezuela Received / accepted ABSTRACT Aims. We aim to derive the chemical pattern of the young clusters 25 Orionis and λ Orionis through homogeneous and accurate measurements of elemental abundances. Methods. We present flames/uves observations of a sample of 14 K-type targets in the 25 Ori and λ Ori clusters; we measure their radial velocities, in order to confirm cluster membership. We derive stellar parameters and abundances of Fe, Na, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, and Ni using the code MOOG. Results. All the 25 Ori stars are confirmed cluster members without evidence of binarity; in λ Ori we identify one non-member and one candidate single-lined binary star. We find an average metallicity [Fe/H]=−0.05 ± 0.05 for 25 Ori, where the error is the 1σ standard deviation from the average. λ Ori members have a mean iron abundance value of 0.01 ± 0.01. The other elements show close-to-solar ratios and no star-to-star dispersion. Conclusions. Our results, along with previous metallicity determinations in the Orion complex, evidence a small but detectable dispersion in the [Fe/H] distribution of the complex. This appears to be compatible with large-scale star formation episodes and initial non-uniformity in the pre-cloud medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Survey Toward Young Stellar Objects in the Perseus Molecular Cloud Complex
    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 236:52 (25pp), 2018 June https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aabfe9 © 2018. The American Astronomical Society. Chemical Survey toward Young Stellar Objects in the Perseus Molecular Cloud Complex Aya E. Higuchi1 , Nami Sakai1 , Yoshimasa Watanabe2 , Ana López-Sepulcre3,4, Kento Yoshida1,5, Yoko Oya5 , Muneaki Imai5 , Yichen Zhang1 , Cecilia Ceccarelli3 , Bertrand Lefloch3, Claudio Codella6 , Rafael Bachiller7 , Tomoya Hirota8 , Takeshi Sakai9 , and Satoshi Yamamoto5 1 RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research, 2-1, Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan; [email protected] 2 Division of Physics, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan 3 Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Institut de Plan étologie et d’Astrophysique de Grenoble (IPAG), F-38000 Grenoble, France 4 Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique, 300 rue de la Piscine, Domaine Universitaire de Grenoble, F-38406 Saint-Martin d’H ères, France 5 Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 6 INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, I-50125, Firenze, Italy 7 IGN Observatorio Astronómico Nacional, Apartado 1143, E-28800 Alcalá de Henares, Spain 8 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 9 Department of Communication Engineering and Informatics, Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan Received 2017 December 1; revised 2018 April 20; accepted 2018 April 21; published 2018 June 20 Abstract The chemical diversity of gas in low-mass protostellar cores is widely recognized. In order to explore the origin of this diversity, a survey of chemical composition toward 36 Class 0/I protostars in the Perseus molecular cloud complex, which are selected in an unbiased way under certain physical conditions, has been conducted with IRAM30mandNRO45m telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts Connecting to the Boston University Network
    20th Cambridge Workshop: Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun July 29 - Aug 3, 2018 Boston / Cambridge, USA Abstracts Connecting to the Boston University Network 1. Select network ”BU Guest (unencrypted)” 2. Once connected, open a web browser and try to navigate to a website. You should be redirected to https://safeconnect.bu.edu:9443 for registration. If the page does not automatically redirect, go to bu.edu to be brought to the login page. 3. Enter the login information: Guest Username: CoolStars20 Password: CoolStars20 Click to accept the conditions then log in. ii Foreword Our story starts on January 31, 1980 when a small group of about 50 astronomers came to- gether, organized by Andrea Dupree, to discuss the results from the new high-energy satel- lites IUE and Einstein. Called “Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun,” the meeting empha- sized the solar stellar connection and focused discussion on “several topics … in which the similarity is manifest: the structures of chromospheres and coronae, stellar activity, and the phenomena of mass loss,” according to the preface of the resulting, “Special Report of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.” We could easily have chosen the same topics for this meeting. Over the summer of 1980, the group met again in Bonas, France and then back in Cambridge in 1981. Nearly 40 years on, I am comfortable saying these workshops have evolved to be the premier conference series for cool star research. Cool Stars has been held largely biennially, alternating between North America and Europe. Over that time, the field of stellar astro- physics has been upended several times, first by results from Hubble, then ROSAT, then Keck and other large aperture ground-based adaptive optics telescopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0808.3207V1 [Astro-Ph] 23 Aug 2008 Nfgr .Nwonsaswr Rtdrcl Icvrdi C in Discovered Directly H first Were and Surroun Stars Variability Area Newborn the of 4
    Handbook of Star Forming Regions Vol. II Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2008 Bo Reipurth, ed. Chamaeleon Kevin L. Luhman Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA Abstract. The dark clouds in the constellation of Chamaeleon have distances of 160-180pc from the Sun and a total mass of ∼5000 M⊙. The three main clouds, Cha I, II, and III, have angular sizes of a few square degrees and maximum extinctions of AV ∼ 5-10. Most of the star formation in these clouds is occurring in Cha I, with the remainder in Cha II. The current census of Cha I contains 237 known members, 33 of which have spectral types indicative of brown dwarfs (>M6). Approximately 50 members of Cha II have been identified, including a few brown dwarfs. When interpreted with the evolutionary models of Chabrier and Baraffe, the H-R diagram for Cha I exhibits a median age of ∼2 Myr, making it coeval with IC 348 and slightly older than Taurus (∼1 Myr). TheIMF ofChaI reachesa maximumat a massof0.1-0.15 M⊙, and thus closely resembles the IMFs in IC 348 and the Orion Nebula Cluster. The disk fraction in Cha I is roughly constant at ∼ 50% from 0.01 to 0.3 M⊙ and increases to ∼ 65% at higher masses. In comparison, IC 348 has a similar disk fraction at low masses but a much lower disk fraction at M ∼> 1 M⊙, indicating that solar-type stars have longer disk lifetimes in Cha I. 1. Introduction The southern constellation of Chamaeleon contains one of the nearest groups of dark clouds to the Sun (d ∼ 160-180 pc).
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions 1905
    THE Royal Astronomical Society of Canada TRANSACTIONS FOR 1905 (INCLUDING SELECTED PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS) EDITED BY C. A CHANT. TORONTO: ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL PRINT, 1906. The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada. THE Royal Astronomical Society of Canada TRANSACTIONS FOR 1905 (INCLUDING SELECTED PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS) EDITED BY C. A CHANT. TORONTO: ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL PRINT, 1906. TABLE OF CONTENTS. The Dominion Observatory, Ottawa (Frontispiece) List of Officers, Fellows and A ssociates..................... - - 3 Treasurer’s R eport.....................--------- 12 President’s Address and Summary of Work ------ 13 List of Papers and Lectures, 1905 - - - - ..................... 26 The Dominion Observatory at Ottawa - - W. F. King 27 Solar Spots and Magnetic Storms for 1904 Arthur Harvey 35 Stellar Legends of American Indians - - J. C. Hamilton 47 Personal Profit from Astronomical Study - R. Atkinson 51 The Eclipse Expedition to Labrador, August, 1905 A. T. DeLury 57 Gravity Determinations in Labrador - - Louis B. Stewart 70 Magnetic and Meteorological Observations at North-West River, Labrador - - - - R. F. Stupart 97 Plates and Filters for Monochromatic and Three-Color Photography of the Corona J. S. Plaskett 89 Photographing the Sun and Moon with a 5-inch Refracting Telescope . .......................... D. B. Marsh 108 The Astronomy of Tennyson - - - - John A. Paterson 112 Achievements of Nineteenth Century Astronomy , L. H. Graham 125 A Lunar Tide on Lake Huron - - - - W. J. Loudon 131 Contributions...............................................J. Miller Barr I. New Variable Stars - - - - - - - - - - - 141 II. The Variable Star ξ Bootis -------- 143 III. The Colors of Helium Stars - - - ..................... 144 IV. A New Problem in Solar Physics ------ 146 Stellar Classification ------ W. Balfour Musson 151 On the Possibility of Fife in Other Worlds A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • Observing List Evening of 2011 Dec 25 at Boyden Observatory
    Southern Skies Binocular list Observing List Evening of 2011 Dec 25 at Boyden Observatory Sunset 19:20, Twilight ends 20:49, Twilight begins 03:40, Sunrise 05:09, Moon rise 06:47, Moon set 20:00 Completely dark from 20:49 to 03:40. New Moon. All times local (GMT+2). Listing All Classes visible above 2 air mass and in complete darkness after 20:49 and before 03:40. Cls Primary ID Alternate ID Con Mag Size Distance RA 2000 Dec 2000 Begin Optimum End S.A. Ur. 2 PSA Difficulty Optimum EP Open Collinder 227 Melotte 101 Car 8.4 15.0' 6500 ly 10h42m12.0s -65°06'00" 01:32 03:31 03:54 25 210 40 challenging Glob NGC 2808 Car 6.2 14.0' 26000 ly 09h12m03.0s -64°51'48" 21:57 03:08 04:05 25 210 40 detectable Open IC 2602 Collinder 229 Car 1.6 100.0' 520 ly 10h42m58.0s -64°24'00" 23:20 03:31 04:07 25 210 40 obvious Open Collinder 246 Melotte 105 Car 9.4 5.0' 7200 ly 11h19m42.0s -63°29'00" 01:44 03:33 03:57 25 209 40 challenging Open IC 2714 Collinder 245 Car 8.2 14.0' 4000 ly 11h17m27.0s -62°44'00" 01:32 03:33 03:57 25 209 40 challenging Open NGC 2516 Collinder 172 Car 3.3 30.0' 1300 ly 07h58m04.0s -60°45'12" 20:38 01:56 04:10 24 200 30 obvious Open NGC 3114 Collinder 215 Car 4.5 35.0' 3000 ly 10h02m36.0s -60°07'12" 22:43 03:27 04:07 25 199 40 easy Neb NGC 3372 Eta Carinae Nebula Car 3.0 120.0' 10h45m06.0s -59°52'00" 23:26 03:32 04:07 25 199 38 easy Open NGC 3532 Collinder 238 Car 3.4 50.0' 1600 ly 11h05m39.0s -58°45'12" 23:47 03:33 04:08 25 198 38 easy Open NGC 3293 Collinder 224 Car 6.2 6.0' 7600 ly 10h35m51.0s -58°13'48" 23:18 03:32 04:08 25 199
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the XMM-NEWTON SURVEY of the TAURUS MOLECULAR CLOUD: ACCRETION, JETS, and FLUORESCENCE M. Audard1, Manuel Güdel2, Kevin Brigg
    1 THE XMM-NEWTON SURVEY OF THE TAURUS MOLECULAR CLOUD: ACCRETION, JETS, AND FLUORESCENCE M. Audard1, Manuel G¨udel2, Kevin Briggs2, and the XEST Team3 1Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, 550 West 120th Street, NC 5247, New York, NY 10027, USA 2Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland ABSTRACT 1031 The Taurus Molecular Cloud (TMC) is one of the best studied star forming regions. It is close (140 pc) and represents the mode of isolated, non-clustered star for- mation. XMM-Newton has surveyed the richer 5 square degrees of the TMC in X-rays and has obtained high- 30 quality photometric and spectroscopic data of young stars 10 LX and brown dwarfs in their early stages of formation. We present results of the X-ray Emission Survey of TMC (XEST) on the following topics: i) Accretion. The ori- gin of X-rays in young, accreting stars is controversial, as accretion appears to be the dominant emission mech- 1029 anism in some classical T Tauri stars, whereas magnetic activity is the preferred explanation for others. The TMC 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 Mdot contains several accreting stars whose spectra help us un- derstand the importance of accretion for the production of X-rays. ii) Jets. Young, accreting stars display jets detected in the optical, near-infrared, and radio domains. There is now evidencethat jets are also detected in X-rays in some TMC targets. iii) Fluorescence. The detection of 7.5 an emission feature at 6.4 keV indicates that fluorescence of Fe in a cool environment,e.g., the accretion disk, takes place due to photoionization by hard X-rays or collisions logTav with electron beams.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Substellar Objects Below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs Or What?
    geosciences Review A Review on Substellar Objects below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs or What? José A. Caballero Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), ESAC, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, E-28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain; [email protected] Received: 23 August 2018; Accepted: 10 September 2018; Published: 28 September 2018 Abstract: “Free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects” are isolated bodies of a few Jupiter masses found in very young open clusters and associations, nearby young moving groups, and in the immediate vicinity of the Sun. They are neither brown dwarfs nor planets. In this paper, their nomenclature, history of discovery, sites of detection, formation mechanisms, and future directions of research are reviewed. Most free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects share the same formation mechanism as low-mass stars and brown dwarfs, but there are still a few caveats, such as the value of the opacity mass limit, the minimum mass at which an isolated body can form via turbulent fragmentation from a cloud. The least massive free-floating substellar objects found to date have masses of about 0.004 Msol, but current and future surveys should aim at breaking this record. For that, we may need LSST, Euclid and WFIRST. Keywords: planetary systems; stars: brown dwarfs; stars: low mass; galaxy: solar neighborhood; galaxy: open clusters and associations 1. Introduction I can’t answer why (I’m not a gangstar) But I can tell you how (I’m not a flam star) We were born upside-down (I’m a star’s star) Born the wrong way ’round (I’m not a white star) I’m a blackstar, I’m not a gangstar I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar I’m not a pornstar, I’m not a wandering star I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar Blackstar, F (2016), David Bowie The tenth star of George van Biesbroeck’s catalogue of high, common, proper motion companions, vB 10, was from the end of the Second World War to the early 1980s, and had an entry on the least massive star known [1–3].
    [Show full text]