DOCSLIB.ORG

GREECE Field Work 6–15 November 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GREECE Field Work 6–15 November 2013 ASSESSMENT REPORT: The Health Situation at EU Southern Borders - Migrant Health, Occupational Health, and Public Health GREECE Field work 6–15 November 2013 The information and views set out in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect an official opinion of the EC or IOM. Neither they nor any person acting on their behalf may be therefore held responsible for any use of the information contained therein. Reproduction is authorized provided the source is acknowledged. This document is based on the Assessment undertaken by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) within the framework of the project “Fostering health provision for migrants, the Roma and other vulnerable groups” (Equi-Health). The Equi-Health project is co-financed under the 2012 work plan, within the second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008– 2013), by a direct grant awarded to IOM from the European Commission’s DG for Health and Food Safety (SANTE), through the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea). The Equi-Health project is designed and managed by the International Organization for Migration Regional Office Brussels, Migration Health Division (MHD). The methodology of the field work and analysis, based on the prior Increasing Public Health Safety alongside the New Eastern European Border Line project (PHBLM) EC co-funded IOM project experience, was developed by IOM with additional support from the Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP). The Assessment Report was drafted under IOM MHD, RO Brussels guidance by Dr. Chrisoula Botsi and Panayiotis Damaskos, and benefitted from peer reviews by Marina Rota and an anonymous reviewer. It was edited and consecutively revised and complemented by Marina Rota, Mariya Samuilova, Isabelle Beauclercq and Alexandra Bousiou. We thank DJ Krastev for his copy-editing, proofreading, and general editing assistance. IOM is grateful to local and project implementation partners involved during the field visit as well as in the National Consultative Committees (held in July 2013 and November 2014), for their personal and technical support. In particular we thank staff and representatives of: Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection, Hellenic Centre for Diseases Control and Prevention, Ministry of Labour, Social Insurance Welfare, National Centre for Health Operations, Ministry of Health, Council of Europe, Ministry of Interior, Municipality of Lesvos, Prefecture of East Macedonia and Thrace, Prefecture of North Aegean Region, Hellenic Coast Guard, FRONTEX, Act up Hellas, NGO Agkalia, Pakistani Hellenic Cultural Welfare Society, Doctors of the World (MDM), Red Cross, Doctors without Borders (MSF), the North Aegean Centre for Social Welfare, NGO Siniparksi kai Epikinwnia sto Aigaio, NGO Arsis, Praksis Policlinic, NGO Metadrasi, Association for Repatriated and Migrants Argo, Sotiria hospital for chest diseases (Athens) Children’s hospital Agia Sofia (Athens), Vostaneion general hospital (Lesvos), general hospital of Alexandroupolis. IOM would also like to convey thanks to the Greek Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection; for providing allowing access to the detention centres, as well as to the Greek Ministry of Health for the authorization to visit the hospitals mentioned in this report. We are grateful to the NGOs, local authorities and all stakeholders consulted during the field trip for their time and support during the assessment. A particular vote of thanks is due to national and international team members who carried out the field visits with great enthusiasm and professionalism, and who provided valuable insights in the process: Dr Chrisoula Botsi, Panayiotis Damaskos, and Marina Rota (national experts); Marcus Jaeger and Lucas Ritter (Council of Europe); Dr Silvia Bino (Institute of Public Health – Tirana, Albania); and IOM MHD team Roumyana Benedict, Mariya Samuilova, and Milen Petrov. The assessment would not have been possible without the support and efforts of IOM Athens and especially Andromachi Lazaridi, Kelly Namia, and Rena Simopoulou, who took care of all the logistical details surrounding the field visit and organization of multiple meetings in Greece. 1 CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 10 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 12 2.1. Irregular migration to Greece ..................................................................................................... 13 2.2. Regularization programmes ........................................................................................................ 14 2.3. Number of asylum applications and main countries of origin.................................................... 15 3. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 17 3.1. Overview of data collection ........................................................................................................ 17 3.2. Limitations ................................................................................................................................... 18 4. FIELD WORK ......................................................................................................................... 22 I. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................... 22 I.I International, EU, and national/local legislative framework on interception/reception/rescue at sea/green border ............................................................ 22 I.II Legislative and financial framework of open/closed centres ........................................... 23 I.III Entitlements to health care; health service provisions ................................................... 27 I.IV Discussion Section – I .................................................................................................... 31 II. PARTNERSHIPS, NETWORKS AND MULTI-COUNTRY FRAMEWORKS ....................................... 34 II.I Description of the reception process and coordination ................................................... 34 II.II Public health in border communities ............................................................................. 38 II.III Discussion Section – II .................................................................................................. 40 III. MONITORING MIGRANT HEALTH ......................................................................................... 42 III.I Migrant health .............................................................................................................. 42 III.II Provision of health care and social services .................................................................. 43 III.III Data collection ............................................................................................................ 50 III.IV Discussion Section – III ................................................................................................ 53 IV. MIGRANT-SENSITIVE HEALTH SYSTEM ................................................................................. 55 IV.I Infrastructure and physical conditions .......................................................................... 55 IV.II Occupational health of staff ......................................................................................... 62 IV.III Health knowledge, attitudes, and practices ................................................................. 64 IV.IV Discussion Section – IV ............................................................................................... 68 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................ 70 2 V.I Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 70 V.II Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 71 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 75 ANNEXES.................................................................................................................................. 80 3 ACRONYMS ART Antiretroviral Therapy CPT European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment ECDC European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control EWRS Early Warning Response System FRA Fundamental Rights Agency FRC First Reception Centre GG Government Gazette HCDCP Hellenic Centre for Diseases Control and Prevention HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus IDU Intravenous Drug User IHR International Health Regulations MDM Médecins Du Monde (Doctors of the World) MED IN MEDical Intervention (Greek NGO) MDR TB Multidrug resistant Tuberculosis MoH Ministry of Health MSF Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors without Borders) NaHOC National Health Operations Centre NGO Non-Governmental Organization NHS National Health System RABIT Rapid
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sovereign Debt Sustainability in Greece During the Economic Adjustment Programmes: 2010-2018
    Sovereign debt sustainability in Greece during the economic adjustment programmes: 2010-2018 STUDY A study prepared by CEPS in collaboration with Nation Institute of Economic and Social Research and ECORYS for the European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Authors: Cinzia Alcidi, CEPS Angela Capolongo, CEPS Daniel Gros, CEPS Inputs from NIESR: Cyrille Lenoël, Corrado Macchiarelli & Garry Young July 2020 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE The information and views set out in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on the European Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020. PDF ISBN 978-92-76-22278-1 doi: 10.2765/356606 KC-04-20-524-EN-N © European Union, 2020 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. For any use or reproduction of material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Sovereign debt sustainability in Greece during the economic adjustment programmes 2010-2018 Table of contents Table of contents ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper No 23 Gree
    SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH PROJECT: CRIME AND CULTURE Crime as a Cultural Problem. The Relevance of Perceptions of Corruption to Crime Prevention. A Comparative Cultural Study in the EU-Accession States Bulgaria and Romania, the EU-Candidate States Turkey and Croatia and the EU-States Germany, Greece and United Kingdom Effi Lambropoulou, Theodoros Iosifidis, Nikos Papapamanolis, Eleftheria Bakali, Stella Ageli, Erifyli Bakirli, Garyfalia Massouri Corruption in Greece or Corruption of Greece? The ‘Modern’ Triumphalism Discussion Paper Series No 23 2008 2 1. Introduction In the first phase of the Greek study within the research project “Crime and Culture” we analysed either texts referring to corruption and ‘scandals’ or to the case studies (e.g. parliamentary proceedings, prosecutors’ findings, newspaper articles). In the second phase the analysis concentrated on the discourse of the target groups interviewed, in order to synthesise their views about the forms and the extent of corruption in modern Greece. In the third phase, we attempted the integration of the two periods’ findings into a theoretical context. As we have noticed in the previous report, the comparison of the target group’s (TG) discourse between the first and the second phase was not always possible. However the distance of time and the overview of the findings helped us to locate some (common) points for a more thorough examination. We focused on the discourse of each target group about itself and about corruption in general during both phases and compared their discourse with the existing specialist approaches, namely the views about certain issues relating with corruption under a socio-political and whenever necessary a historical context.
    [Show full text]
  • The ESM Stability Support Programme Greece, First & Second Reviews July 2017 Background Report
    ISSN 2443-8014 (online) The ESM Stability Support Programme Greece, First & Second Reviews July 2017 Background Report INSTITUTIONAL PAPER 064 | NOVEMBER 2017 EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic and Financial Affairs European Economy Institutional Papers are important reports analysing the economic situation and economic developments prepared by the European Commission's Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, which serve to underpin economic policy-making by the European Commission, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament. Views expressed in unofficial documents do not necessarily represent the views of the European Commission. LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this publication, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/economic-and-financial-affairs-publications_en. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on http://europa.eu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 KC-BC-17-064-EN-N (online) KC-BC-17-064-EN-C (print) ISBN 978-92-79-64712-3 (online) ISBN 978-92-79-64711-6 (print) doi:10.2765/466433 (online) doi:10.2765/915272 (print) © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Notio Aigaio
    The added value of regional programmes of innovative actions stems from the lessons that can be drawn from these innovative approaches, which allow for experimentation with new ideas and the demonstration of new hypotheses. This ranges from the possibilities of identification of good practice, to the exchange of knowledge and experience that can be trans- ferred to the Community Support Framework mainstream programmes. This publication takes a closer look both at the first and second genera- tion of the Greek regional programmes of innovative actions. Based on their implementation experiences, it illustrates their individual actions in addition to attempting to produce diverse classification typologies of these Greek "innovative actions". Europe is more than a bloc of nations. It is also a collection of regions. But regional wealth variations remain high and in most Member States it is the regions with the capital cities that have the highest per capita GDP. It is widely accepted that each region needs to brand her global (global and local) image according to its unique physical and intangible assets. Practical activities need to be designed, implemented and monitored on the spot. I hope that this book will help policy makers and other regional innova- Showcasing Innovative Greece Innovative Showcasing tion policy practitioners to make more informed choices towards this goal. Anna ANDRICOPOULOU Project Manager Net Force 2006 ISBN: 960-89350-0-8 Edited by Christos Bezirtzoglou by Christos Edited Co-financed by the ERDF Showcasing Innovative Greece EU Region of Peloponnesus Showcasing Innovative Greece Edited by Christos Bezirtzoglou Foreword The first experimental activities to support innovation in relation to regional and social policy, effectively pi- oneering the development of the knowledge-based economy at regional level, were launched by the Commis- sion in 1993-94.
    [Show full text]
  • Μελέτη Σύστασης Ανώνυμης Εταιρίας “Eleusis 2021”
    Progress Report of “Eleusis 2021” Eleusis, 18th April 2018 0 UPDATE REPORT ON THE FIRST MONITORING MEETING OF THE MONITORING AND ADVISORY PANEL FOR THE 2021 EUROPEAN CAPITALS OF CULTURE Progress report based on the panel’s recommendations (from both post-selection monitoring reports) Table of contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Contribution to the long-term strategy ................................................................................................................... 2 3. Programme ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 4. Capacity to deliver .................................................................................................................................................... 9 5. Outreach ................................................................................................................................................................. 11 6. Corporate Governace & Management .................................................................................................................. 12 7. Key milestones for 2018 ......................................................................................................................................... 17 Annex 1 Detailed analysis of all EU panel reccomendations Annex 2.1 EU Programmes
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 7 June 2002 ENGLISH ONLY ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (Fifteenth session, 2- 4 September 2002, agenda item 6) STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS DEVELOPMENTS AND ACTIVITIES IN 2000 AND 2001 FINAL REPORT Transmitted by TINA and the European Commission (EU) Note: The report is reproduced as received from TINA and the European Commission (EU). * * * TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 2 EUROPEAN COMMISSION TRANSPORT STRATEGIES DG ENERGY & TRANSPORT STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS DEVELOPMENTS AND ACTIVITIES IN 2000 AND 2001 FINAL REPORT Vienna, April 2002 TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 6 EXTENDING THE EUROPEAN UNION TO CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE 7 THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS 7 CO-ORDINATION OFFICE FOR THE RAILWAY CORRIDORS IV AND X AND CORRIDOR VII - DANUBE 9 FINANCING INSTRUMENTS provided by the European Commission for projects along the Corridors 10 FINANCIAL AID FROM THE TEN-T BUDGET FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE EU MEMBER STATES 10 FINANCIAL AID FROM REGIONAL FUNDS 10 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS TO ASSIST THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES IN THE PREPARATION FOR ACCESSION 12 TACIS PROGRAMME FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE NEW INDEPENDENT STATES (NIS) 13 INTERNATIONAL FINANCING INSTITUTIONS 14 TRADE AND TRAFFIC FLOWS 17 EU AND ACCESSION COUNTRIES 17 TRAFFIC FLOWS 20 STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS
    [Show full text]
  • Business Review 2013
    BUSINESS REVIEW 2013 BUSINESS REVIEW 2013 Table of Contents page BRIEF HISTORY ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 KEY INDICATORS .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN .................................................................................................................................................................... 11 LETTER FROM THE MANAGING DIRECTOR - CEO ........................................................................................................................................ 15 SHARE .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE BANK’S CAPITAL STRENGTHENING PLAN .......................................................................................... 22 ACQUISITION OF EMPORIKI BANK, RESTRUCTURING PLAN AND REALISATION OF SYNERGIES ................................................................ 24 1. THE GREEK AND THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMY IN 2013 AND THE OUTLOOK FOR 2014 .................................................................... 27 2. BUSINESS UNITS .....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Not for Sale: the Struggle for Food Sovereignty in the Age of Austerity in Greece | 3 Glossary
    Democracy Not For Sale The Struggle for Food Sovereignty in the Age of Austerity in Greece o AUTHORS: (in alphabetical order) Stephan Backes, Jenny Gkiougki, Sylvia Kay, Charalampos Konstantinidis, Emily Mattheisen, Christina Sakali, Eirini-Erifyli Tzekou, Leonidas Vatikiotis, Pietje Vervest. COPYEDITOR: Deborah Eade DESIGN: Brigitte Vos www.vosviscom.nl PRINT: Jubels Amsterdam, Heidelberg, Athens/Thessaloniki, November, 2018. Published by Transnational Institute, FIAN International and Agroecopolis. ABOUT THE RESEARCH COLLECTIVE: This report is the result of a collective research process undertaken by the abovementioned authors between October 2017 and September 2018. The research relies on original fieldwork and interviews with persons throughout Greece, macro-economic statistical analysis, and literature reviews of key texts. For a more detailed description of our research locations and persons interviewed, refer to the methodological note in the Annex. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank the following persons (in alphabetical order) for their contributions to the production of this report: Ilias Bantekas, Felipe Bley-Folly, Nick Buxton, Christos Giovanopoulos, Raphaël Gonçalves Alves, Rolf Künnemann, Andrea Nuila, Emma Luce Scali, Yifang Slot-Tang, Ana Maria Suárez Franco, Yiorgos Vassalos, Renaud Vivien. Table of Contents Glossary 4 Executive summary 5 Foreword 11 Introduction 19 Chapter 1. Austerity and the agri-food system 24 1.1 The Greek agri-food system from 1981 to 2010 24 1.1 (a) Undermining food sovereignty: the role
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece
    EUROPEAN ECONOMY Occasional Papers 94 | March 2012 The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece March 2012 Economic and Financial Affairs Occasional Papers are written by the Staff of the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them. The “Papers” are intended to increase awareness of the technical work being done by the staff and cover a wide spectrum of subjects. Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official views of the European Commission. Comments and enquiries should be addressed to: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Publications B-1049 Brussels Belgium E-mail: mailto:[email protected] Legal notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this publication, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from the website ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications A great deal of additional information is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (ec.europa.eu ) KC-AH-12-094-EN-N ISBN 978-92-79-22849-0 doi: 10.2765/20231 © European Union, 2012 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece March 2012 OUTLINE OF THE REPORT Executive summary 1 1. Introduction 5 2. Macroeconomic developments 11 3. Financial markets and financial sector developments 17 4. Programme implementation and policy discussions 21 4.1 Fiscal policy 21 4.2 Fiscal strategy in 2012 and subsequent years 24 4.3 Structural fiscal reforms 31 4.3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in Greece Or Corruption of Greece? the "Modern" Triumphalism
    •o -o " -o Z - •" " • "• •< z o ," u " o Cri ...... C.ltu ..t P",bw," rho 1010".'0 01 ,," ..option, of [or"'ptlon to Crime P,...ntlon. A COlnpu>t1 .. Cultu",1 St"d~ In the (U·AccMl1on SW•• lulQ;lr1 ••nd lon.nl., tho EU~.ndldl .. Sh... TIIrkoy .nd C", ..t ...d the (U·st.t.. 'onn.nv, ',..,o.nd Un! .... Ktngdoll Effi Lambropou[oU, Theodoros losifidis, Nikos PapapamanoLis, Eleftheria BakaLi,SteLLa Ageli, ErifyLi BakirLi, GaryfaLia MassDuri Corruption in Greece or Corruption of Greece? The "Modern" Triumphalism .... ,. at tile E.ro~ Conmfolf... • N.' ..... "'....... ,. SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH PROJECT: CRIME AND CULTURE Crime as a Cultural Problem. The Relevance of Perceptions of Corruption to Crime Prevention. A Comparative Cultural Study in the EU-Accession States Bulgaria and Romania, the EU-Candidate States Turkey and Croatia and the EU-States Germany, Greece and United Kingdom Effi Lambropoulou, Theodoros Iosifidis, Nikos Papapamanolis, Eleftheria Bakali, Stella Ageli, Erifyli Bakirli, Garyfalia Massouri Corruption in Greece or Corruption of Greece? The ‘Modern’ Triumphalism Discussion Paper Series No 23 2008 2 1. Introduction In the first phase of the Greek study within the research project “Crime and Culture” we analysed either texts referring to corruption and ‘scandals’ or to the case studies (e.g. parliamentary proceedings, prosecutors’ findings, newspaper articles). In the second phase the analysis concentrated on the discourse of the target groups interviewed, in order to synthesise their views about the forms and the extent of corruption in modern Greece. In the third phase, we attempted the integration of the two periods’ findings into a theoretical context.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal and Illegal Chinese Immigrants in Greece Status, Stories, Narratives from a Fieldwork in Thessaloniki
    UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA MA in Politics and Economics of Contemporary Eastern and South-Eastern Europe Legal and illegal Chinese immigrants in Greece Status, stories, narratives from a fieldwork in Thessaloniki Student: Supervisor: Yang Jie Fotini Tsimpiridou Thessaloniki, 2017 1 CONTENTS Abstract..................................................................4 Introduction...........................................................5 History of Chinese Immigration in Thessaloniki.......8 Time............................................................................................8 Two groups.................................................................................8 Motivation.................................................................................10 Channels....................................................................................11 Geographical distribution and main features…........................15 Population Size and Business Activities…………...................16 Daily Exchange and Organization of Chinese Immigrant Communities.............................................20 The Inside of Chinese Immigrant Community……………….20 1) The Chamber of Commerce……………………..…………………..22 2) Chinese gangland –mafia……………..……………..………………25 3) Inside conflicts……………...……………………………………….28 Chinese immigrants and Greece……………………………...29 2 Life stories and narratives…………………..40 1) Mr. Yang………………………………….…………….40 2) Mr. Lee………………………………………………….42 3) Miss Zhang……………………………………………..44 4) Mr. Chen………………………………………………..49 5) Mr. Zhao………………………………….……………..51
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece First Review - December 2012
    ISSN 1725-3209 EUROPEAN ECONOMY Occasional Papers 123 | December 2012 The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece First Review - December 2012 Economic and Financial Affairs Occasional Papers are written by the Staff of the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them. The “Papers” are intended to increase awareness of the technical work being done by the staff and cover a wide spectrum of subjects. Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official views of the European Commission. Comments and enquiries should be addressed to: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Publications B-1049 Brussels Belgium E-mail: mailto:[email protected] Legal notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this publication, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from the website ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications A great deal of additional information is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (ec.europa.eu ) KC-AH-12-123-EN-N ISBN 978-92-79-22928-2 doi: 10.2765/25398 © European Union, 2012 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece First Review December 2012 EUROPEAN ECONOMY Occasional Papers 123 OUTLINE OF THE REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2.
    [Show full text]