DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide to the Archaeological Site Form V5.0 (Pdf)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide to the Archaeological Site Form V5.0 (Pdf) Guide to the Archaeological Site Form Version 5.0 Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources Bureau of Historic Preservation March 2019 Guide to the Archaeological Site Form, v5 .0 Page| 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Digital PDF Forms........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Resources on Public and Private Lands ........................................................................................................................... 5 Guidance on Updating Previously Recorded Sites ............................................................................................................ 6 ATTACHMENTS FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM ........................................................................................................ 7 General Requirements for Attachments ........................................................................................................................... 7 Site Plot on USGS 1:24,000 Scale Topographic Maps (Required) .................................................................................... 7 Site Plan Map (Required) ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Photographs or Photocopies (Encouraged) ...................................................................................................................... 8 Summary of Artifacts Collected or Excavated (Encouraged) .............................................................................................. 8 Supplementary Information (Optional) ............................................................................................................................ 8 FIELD DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM .............................................................................................. 9 GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Original / Update ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 Site #8 ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Field Date ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Form Date ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Recorder # ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Site Name(s) ................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Multiple Listing # – for use by Site File staff only – leave blank ...................................................................................... 10 Project Name ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 FMSF Survey # – for use by Site File staff only – leave blank .......................................................................................... 10 Ownership .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 LOCATION & MAPPING ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 USGS 7.5' Map Name & Date ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Plat or other map ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 City/Town .................................................................................................................................................................... 11 In City Limits? .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 County ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Township, Range & Section .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Township ..................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Range .......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Section ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 ¼ Section .................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Landgrant .................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Tax Parcel # ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 UTM Coordinates.......................................................................................................................................................... 13 UTM: Zone .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 UTM: Easting ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 UTM: Northing .............................................................................................................................................................. 13 Other Coordinates ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 Address / Vicinity / Route to ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Name of Public Tract .................................................................................................................................................... 14 TYPE OF SITE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Setting ......................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Structures or Features .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Function ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 CULTURE PERIODS ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 Guide to the Archaeological Site Form, v5 .0 Page| 3 OPINION OF RESOURCE SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................................................................. 15 Appears to meet the criteria for National Register listing individually? ........................................................................... 16 Appears to meet the criteria for National Register listing as part of a district? ................................................................ 16 Explanation of Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Recommendations for Owner or SHPO Action ................................................................................................................ 16 FIELD METHODS ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 Site Detection .............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’S Lost Colony of Roanoke
    Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’s Lost Colony of Roanoke. Roberta Estes Copyright 2009, all rights reserved, submitted for publication [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract Within genealogy circles, family stories of Native American1 heritage exist in many families whose American ancestry is rooted in Colonial America and traverses Appalachia. The task of finding these ancestors either genealogically or using genetic genealogy is challenging. With the advent of DNA testing, surname and other special interest projects2, tools now exist to facilitate grouping participants in a way that allows one to view populations in historical fashions. This paper references and uses data from several of these public projects, but particularly the Melungeon, Lumbee, Waccamaw, North Carolina Roots and Lost Colony projects3. The Lumbee have long claimed descent from the Lost Colony via their oral history4. The Lumbee DNA Project shows significantly less Native American ancestry than would be expected with 96% European or African Y chromosomal DNA. The Melungeons, long held to be mixed European, African and Native show only one ancestral family with Native DNA5. Clearly more testing would be advantageous in all of these projects. This phenomenon is not limited to these groups, and has been reported by other researchers such as Bolnick (et al, 2006) where she reports finding in 16 Native American populations with northeast or southeast roots that 47% of the families who believe themselves to be full blooded or no less than 75% Native with no paternal European admixture find themselves carrying European or African y-line DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation Polygons
    Polygon Date & Period Archaeological Phase Cultural - Historical Source & Comment Hist or Arch Pop & Sites Group Estimate 1 early 16th century Little Tennessee site 16th century Chiaha mid-16th century, Little Tennessee site cluster cluster and sites 7-19 and sites 7-19, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Chiaha, three populations, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Little Tennessee cluster plus additional sites, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 2 early 16th century Hiwassee site cluster mid-16th century, Hiwassee site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Hiwassee cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 3 early 16th century Chattanooga site cluster 16th century Napochies mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century Napochies, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 4 early 16th century Carters site cluster; 16th century Coosa mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Hally et al. X Barnett phase 1990:Fig. 9.1; Barnett phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century Coosa, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 5 early 16th century Cartersville site cluster; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Hally et Brewster phase al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; Brewster phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 6 early 16th century Rome site cluster; 16th century Apica mid-16th century, Rome site cluster, Hally et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Period Archaeology of Georgia
    University of Georgia Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report No. 28 Georgia Archaeological Research Design Paper No.6 PALEOINDIAN PERIOD ARCHAEOLOGY OF GEORGIA By David G. Anderson National Park Service, Interagency Archaeological Services Division R. Jerald Ledbetter Southeastern Archeological Services and Lisa O'Steen Watkinsville October, 1990 I I I I i I, ...------------------------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES ..................................................................................................... .iii TABLES ....................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................. v I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Organization of this Plan ........................................................... 1 Environmental Conditions During the PaleoIndian Period .................................... 3 Chronological Considerations ..................................................................... 6 II. PREVIOUS PALEOINDIAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN GEORGIA. ......... 10 Introduction ........................................................................................ 10 Initial PaleoIndian Research in Georgia ........................................................ 10 The Early Flint Industry at Macon .......................................................... l0 Early Efforts With Private Collections
    [Show full text]
  • SEAC Newsletter Vol. 54. No. 2 October 2012.Pdf
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE N E W S L E T T E R Volume 54, Number 2 October 2012 Edited by Phillip Hodge, Office of Social and Cultural Resources, TN-DOT 505 Deaderick Street, Suite 900, Nashville, TN 37243 ([email protected]) Inside This Issue: A Letter from SEAC President Ann Early 2 SEAC Elections 3 Public Outreach Update on the Walled City of Charleston 3 SEAC 2012 SEAC 2012 Baton Rouge, Louisiana Meeting Information 4 Hilton Capitol Center The 69 th Annual Southeastern Archaeological Conference will be Welcome to Baton Rouge 5 held November 7-10, 2012 at the Hilton Capitol Center in Baton Rouge. SEAC 2012 promises to be a rewarding and fun-filled ex- perience with a much anticipated plenary session, twelve organized SEAC 2012 symposia, 132 general session papers, 48 posters, plus special ses- Preliminary Program 6 sions organized by the Native Affairs and Student Affairs commit- tees. Social events include the Student reception Thursday after- SEAC 2012 Student Affairs noon, the conference-wide reception Thursday evening at the Events 15 Louisiana State Museum, the SEAC dance Friday evening at the Hilton, Saturday excursion tours to the famous Marksville Hope- well site, plantations in St. Francisville, and a walking tour of down- Minutes of the Mid-Year town Baton Rouge, all of which will be capped off with a Cajun Executive Committee Meeting 16 smorgasbord dinner Saturday evening! Full conference details are inside this issue of the SEAC Newsletter and available on the An- nual Meeting pages of the SEAC website. Remember that ad- Langniappe - “The Heidelberg vanced registration closes October 24! You can register Hotel” 23 online at www.southeasternarchaeology.org/annualmeeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Congress Classification
    E AMERICA E America General E11-E29 are reserved for works that are actually comprehensive in scope. A book on travel would only occasionally be classified here; the numbers for the United States, Spanish America, etc., would usually accommodate all works, the choice being determined by the main country or region covered 11 Periodicals. Societies. Collections (serial) For international American Conferences see F1404+ Collections (nonserial). Collected works 12 Several authors 13 Individual authors 14 Dictionaries. Gazetteers. Geographic names General works see E18 History 16 Historiography 16.5 Study and teaching Biography 17 Collective Individual, see country, period, etc. 18 General works Including comprehensive works on America 18.5 Chronology, chronological tables, etc. 18.7 Juvenile works 18.75 General special By period Pre-Columbian period see E51+; E103+ 18.82 1492-1810 Cf. E101+ Discovery and exploration of America Cf. E141+ Earliest accounts of America to 1810 18.83 1810-1900 18.85 1901- 19 Pamphlets, addresses, essays, etc. Including radio programs, pageants, etc. 20 Social life and customs. Civilization. Intellectual life 21 Historic monuments (General) 21.5 Antiquities (Non-Indian) 21.7 Historical geography Description and travel. Views Cf. F851 Pacific coast Cf. G419+ Travels around the world and in several parts of the world including America and other countries Cf. G575+ Polar discoveries Earliest to 1606 see E141+ 1607-1810 see E143 27 1811-1950 27.2 1951-1980 27.5 1981- Elements in the population 29.A1 General works 29.A2-Z Individual elements, A-Z 29.A43 Akan 29.A73 Arabs 29.A75 Asians 29.B35 Basques Blacks see E29.N3 29.B75 British 29.C35 Canary Islanders 1 E AMERICA E General Elements in the population Individual elements, A-Z -- Continued 29.C37 Catalans 29.C5 Chinese 29.C73 Creoles 29.C75 Croats 29.C94 Czechs 29.D25 Danube Swabians 29.E37 East Indians 29.E87 Europeans 29.F8 French 29.G26 Galicians (Spain) 29.G3 Germans 29.H9 Huguenots 29.I74 Irish 29.I8 Italians 29.J3 Japanese 29.J5 Jews 29.K67 Koreans 29.N3 Negroes.
    [Show full text]
  • Roberta Estes
    Roberta Estes ect shows significantly less Native American ancestry than would be expected with 96% European or African Within genealogy circles, family stories of Native Y chromosomal DNA. The Melungeons, long held to be American1 heritage exist in many families whose Ameri- mixed European, African and Native show only one can ancestry is rooted in Colonial America and traverses ancestral family with Native DNA.4 Clearly more test- Appalachia. The task of finding these ancestors either ing would be advantageous in all of these projects. genealogically or using genetic genealogy is challenging. This phenomenon is not limited to these groups, and has With the advent of DNA testing, surname and other been reported by other researchers. For example, special interest projects, tools now exist to facilitate the Bolnick (2006) reports finding in 16 Native American tracing of patrilineal and matrilineal lines in present-day populations with northeast or southeast roots that 47% people, back to their origins in either Native Americans, of the families who believe themselves to be full-blooded Europeans, or Africans. This paper references and uses or no less than 75% Native with no paternal European data from several of these public projects, but particular- admixture, find themselves carrying European or ly the Melungeon, Lumbee, Waccamaw, North Carolina African Y chromosomes. Malhi et al. (2008) reported Roots and Lost Colony projects.2 that in 26 Native American populations, non-Native American Y chromosomes occurred at a frequency as The Lumbee have long claimed descent from the Lost high as 88% in the Canadian northeast, southwest of Colony via their oral history.3 The Lumbee DNA Proj- Hudson Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • SEAC Bulletin 55.Pdf
    SOUTHEA S TERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDING S OF THE 69TH ANNUAL MEETING November 7-10, 2012 BULLETIN 55 — 2012 HILTON BATON ROUGE CA P ITOL CENTER BATON ROUGE , LOUI S IANA Blank Page Bulletin 55—2012 Southeastern Archaeological Conference BULLETIN 55 2012 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 69TH ANNU A L MEETING NOVE mb ER 7-10, 2012 HILTON BA TON ROUGE Cap ITOL CENTER BA TON ROUGE , LOUISI A N A Edited by: Rebecca Saunders Donald G. Hunter Beverly Nuschler Hosted by: Coastal Environments, Inc. LSU Museum of Natural Science LSU Department of Geography and Anthropology Louisiana Division of Archaeology Meeting Organizers: Richard A. Weinstein Rebecca Saunders David B. Kelley i Southeastern Archaeological Conference Front Cover Image: A portion of George Henry Victor Collot’s 1796 Plan of Fort Baton Rouge showing the location of Spanish Governor Bernardo de Galvez’s artillery (Item “G”) situated on top of a “mound” during the attack against the British Fort at Baton Rouge (Item “H”) in September 1779. Historical Markers place the location of Galvez’s battery approximately 500 feet south of the Hilton Baton Rouge Capitol Center near the present intersections of North Boulevard and Third Streets. Recent historic map overlays suggest the actual location of the bat- tery was about 300 feet east of the hotel location on Convention Street about midway between Lafayette and Third streets. The British fort was immediately south of the Pentagon Barracks between North Third and Front streets, approximately 1,200 feet south of the Louisiana State Capitol Building. Production & Layout by: Donald G. Hunter, Coastal Environments, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Archaeological Conference
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 71ST ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 12-15, 2014 GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA BULLETIN 57 SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE BULLETIN 57 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 71ST ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 12-15, 2014 HYATT REGENCY GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA Edited by: Karen Y. Smith, Charlie Cobb, Brandy Joy, and Keith Stephenson Organized by: Charlie Cobb, Karen Y. Smith, and Nena Powell Rice Hosted by: South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology iii Cover: Postcard, early 20th c., Woodside Cotton Mills, Greenville, South Carolina. Printing of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 57—2014 funded by © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2014 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Maps of Greenville .......................................................................................................... vi See also http://www.greenvillesc.gov/PublicWorks/forms/trolleymap.pdf Hyatt Regency Meeting Room Floor Plan .................................................................. vii Preface and Acknowledgements ................................................................................ viii List of Donors .................................................................................................................. xi SEAC at a Glance.............................................................................................................. 1 General Information and Special Events ...................................................................... 2 Program Thursday Morning, November
    [Show full text]
  • Port Bienville Railroad Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    PORT BIENVILLE RAILROAD DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX B: DRAFT PBRR CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT CHAPTER 1 TO CHAPTER 4 B-1 Port Bienville Railroad Environmental Impact Statement PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED CONNECTION BETWEEN THE PORT BIENVILLE RAILROAD AND THE NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAIL LINE NEAR INTERSTATE 59, NORTH OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION’S JOHN C. STENNIS SPACE CENTER, PEARL RIVER AND HANCOCK COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI PROJECT NO. FRA‐0023‐00(003)/105494 101000‐102000 By J. Howard Beverly, Clayton Tinsley, Megan Koszarek, Ann Keen, and Ann Wilkinson Prepared by: August 2017 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report describes the field and laboratory methods for and the results of a Phase I Archaeological and Cultural Historic Reconnaissance survey conducted for the Mississippi Department of Transportation, the Federal Railroad Administration, and the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission for a proposed new freight rail line that would provide a direct connection between the Port Bienville Railroad and the Norfolk Southern rail line near Interstate 59, north of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s John C. Stennis Space Center (Project No. FRA‐ 0023‐00(003)/105494 101000‐102000). This connection would provide a second Class 1 rail connection to Port Bienville and the Industrial Park. The Archaeological APE’s boundary is defined as a 100‐foot buffer on either side of the proposed railroad segments. The segments total 38.1 kilometers (23.7 miles) in length, and the Archaeological APE encompasses 575 acres (232.7 hectares). The Revised Port Bienville Short Line Railroad Proposed Cultural Resources Survey Field Methodology, MDO # FRA‐0023‐ 00(003)/105494 101000‐102000, MDAH Project Log #03‐082‐16, (Report # TBA), Hancock and Peal River Counties was reviewed and accepted by the Mississippi Department of Archives and History (MDAH) on May 2, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Weeden Island Ceramic Complex: an Analysis of Distribution
    THE WEEDEN ISLAND CERAMIC COMPLEX: AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION » By Karl T. Steinen A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1976 Copyright 1976 By Karl T. Steinen DEDICATED TO: Nancy Sears Steinen TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract vi Introduction 1 Chapter I: Cultural Evolution in the Southeast to Weeden Island 4 Paleo Indian 4 Archaic 5 Formative 5 Sacred and Secular 9 Sacred Development :Yent, Green Point and Weeden Island 11 Kolomoki, Early County, Georgia 16 Midden 19 Mounds 2 Chapter II Ceramic Analysis and Sacred and Secular Distribution. 27 Three Series 33 Secular Ceramic Analysis 34 Weeden Island Distribution: Sacred.... 65 Data Presentation 71 Northwest Coast and Inland Pottery Deposit Types 72 Western Panhandle 73 Central Panhandle 74 Three Rivers 7 8 Eastern Panhandle 80 Chattahoochee River 8 2 Peninsular Coast 83 Northcentral Florida 8 5 Miscellaneous Sites 86 Discussion 87 A Definition of Weeden Island 88 Chapter III Hypothesis and Tests 103 The Northwest Florida Coast and Adjacent Areas of Alabama and Georgia 105 Weeden Island Genesis 105 Weeden Island Origins 110 Chronology and Temporal Placement .... 114 '. Chapter IV Some Suggestions for Future Weeden . Island Research 150 Problem I : Secular Ceramics 150 Problem II : Sacred Ceramics 153 Problem III: Complicated Stamped Pottery.. 154 Problem IV 154 iv Chapter IV continued Problem V: Excavations 157 Problem VI: Cultural Relationships .
    [Show full text]
  • ANT4824 – Field Sessions in Archaeology
    Cover Sheet: Request 10567 ANT4824 Field Sessions in Archaeology Info Process Course|Modify|Ugrad/Pro Status Pending Submitter Krigbaum,John [email protected] Created 11/24/2015 2:18:57 PM Updated 12/10/2015 4:09:29 PM Description We aim to make ANT 4824 'Field Sessions in Archaeology' a repeatable course for anthropology majors. Actions Step Status Group User Comment Updated Department Approved CLAS - deFrance, 11/24/2015 Anthropology Susan D 011602000 Deleted ANT_4824_2D22_Field_Sessions_Arch_Wallis_Spring2015.pdf 11/24/2015 College Approved CLAS - College Pharies, David 12/10/2015 of Liberal Arts A and Sciences Added Alachua Field School 2015 Syllabus_revised.docx 11/24/2015 University Pending PV - University 12/10/2015 Curriculum Curriculum Committee Committee (UCC) No document changes Statewide Course Numbering System No document changes Office of the Registrar No document changes Student Academic Support System No document changes Catalog No document changes College Notified No document changes Course|Modify for request 10567 Info Request: ANT4824 Field Sessions in Archaeology Submitter: Krigbaum,John [email protected] Created: 11/24/2015 2:18:57 PM Form version: 1 Responses Current Prefix: ANT Course Level: 4 Number : 824 Lab Code : None Course Title : Field Sessions in Archaeology Effective Term : Earliest Available Effective Year : Earliest Available Requested Action : Other (selecting this option opens additional form fields below) Change Course Prefix?: No Change Course Level?: No Change Course Number?: No Change Lab Code?: No Change Course Title?: No Change Transcript Title?: No Change Credit Hours?: No Change Variable Credit?: No Change S/U Only?: No Change Contact Type?: No Change Rotating Topic Designation?: No Change Repeatable Credit?: Yes Repeatable Credit: From Non-repeatable to Repeatable Maximum Repeatable Credits: 12 Change Course Description?: No Change Prerequisites?: No Change Co-requisites?: No Rationale: We aim to make the 6-credit course ANT 4824 'Field Sessions in Archaeology' a repeatable course for anthropology majors.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    HUMAN BIOLOGICAL VARIATION AND BIOLOGICAL DISTANCE IN PRE-CONTACT FLORIDA: A MORPHOMETRIC EXAMINATION OF BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL CONTINUITY AND CHANGE By MARANDA ALMY KLES A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 Maranda Almy Kles 2 To the two people in my life who made this possible: my husband, Joseph Kles, and my mother, Marion Almy. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the support and guidance of many people, probably more than I list here. Firstly I would like to acknowledge my co-chairs Dr. Michael Warren and Dr. John Krigbaum who have helped me become the biological anthropologist I am through their mentorship from my undergraduate years onward. Also, many thanks to Dr. Kenneth Sassaman for piquing my interest in anthropology in his General Anthropology course and second for helping me go from the daughter of an archaeologist to a biological anthropologist who better understands the complexities of the archaeological record. Secondly, I want to acknowledge the people who have provided insight and input on my research. Dr. George Luer, his input and support have helped me immensely. I appreciate the invaluable information provided by Donna Ruhl, Louis Tesar, Dr. Robert Austin, and Dr. David Dickel about sites and collections. Dr. Jerald Milanich, who has been a mentor in various ways and who showed me many years ago that you can blend archaeology, history, and biological anthropology. I am also indebted to Katie Miyar for traveling with me to collections, allowing me to stay in her house while working, and providing me with a supportive ear through this process.
    [Show full text]