DOCSLIB.ORG

You Know the Place: Identifying a Special-Use Site in a Region Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

YOU KNOW THE PLACE: IDENTIFYING A SPECIAL-USE SITE IN A REGION OF ENDURING BIOTIC RICHNESS by Lauren Anne Walls B.S., College of Charleston, 2007 A thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences The University of West Florida In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2014 ©2014 Lauren Anne Walls ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis is the result of more than two years of research and field work that would not have been possible without the support of a great many people. First, I would like to thank the members of my committee. To Dr. Ramie Gougeon for always making time for me, giving me leadership opportunities in the field and in the lab, and encouraging me to stay focused above all else. To Cathy Parker for simplifying the complicated world of zooarchaeology, and for all those kind words and anecdotes over coffee and snacks that magically distracted me from the stresses of this project. To Dr. John Worth for getting the float tank that launched me back into my love affair with Paleoethnobotany, for letting me barge into his office with questions and requests, and for making me aware of the importance of my research to the discipline. To Dr. Elizabeth Benchley for abundant financial support throughout two seasons of fieldwork and many months of lab work, covering the costs of modifying the flotation tank, and matching the Scholarly and Creative Activities grant that allowed me to obtain radiocarbon dates for the features at Thompson’s Landing. I could not have stayed here and undertaken this amazing project without that generous support. To Jan Lloyd for hiring me in the lab within my first few months here, and for always making sure that I had a job come rain or shine, Spring Break, summer, or Christmas; you brought me into the fold and under your wing. To Jen Melcher for all those graphics, spreadsheets, ceramic IDs, chocolate, and Tylenol; you cured all my headaches. To the field crew and lab workers that excavated and helped process the material for this project; I couldn’t have done it alone. iv To Steve Mclin, Roberto Delasantos, and Fritz Sharar of UWF Marine Services Center for their patience with me during the flotation tank modification; I will never forget the beauty and simplicity of a test plug or quick release valve- even if I can’t pick the right one out at the hardware store. Thanks to my fellow graduate students, especially Sarah Sexton, Sarah Bennett, Patricia McMahon, Lindsey Cochran, Colin Bean; Your help in the field and lab helped make this project a huge success. To James Burkhalter for educating me on the tenets of scientific botany, local plant life, and the natural communities on campus. To Adam Harvey, for taking a chance and accompanying me on this whirlwind journey with me; this would have been a lonely road without you. To my father, Allan Walls for always lending a helping hand, words of advice, and never letting me think that I couldn’t achieve a goal. I dedicate this thesis to my mother, Judith Walls, who pushed me to fully realize my potential. Through the process of coming back to school and undertaking this research project I have realized what is to be a disciplined and dedicated scientist. I now have the confidence and know-how that I need to purse my career as a professional archaeologist. Thank you for the encouragement that you gave me in your final days; even though it took a few years to get the ball rolling, I did it! v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................x ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................1 Research Questions and Goals .....................................................................1 Previous Research ........................................................................................2 Recent Research ...........................................................................................4 Interpretive Framework ...............................................................................6 Thesis Outline ..............................................................................................7 CHAPTER 2: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................................................9 Physiography, Topography, and Geology .................................................10 Modern Climate .........................................................................................12 Natural Communities .................................................................................12 Mesic Hammock ........................................................................................14 Sandhills .....................................................................................................15 Floodplain Swamp and Floodplain Forest .................................................16 Escambia River and Escambia Bay Vertebrate and Invertebrate Fauna ....17 Environmental Summary ...........................................................................21 CHAPTER 3: REGIONAL CHRONOLOGY AND CULTURE HISTORY ...................22 Introduction ................................................................................................22 Woodland Stage (1000 B.C. to A.D. 1000) ...............................................22 Deptford .....................................................................................................25 Santa Rosa-Swift Creek .............................................................................27 Weeden Island ............................................................................................28 The Mississippi Stage (A.D. 1000- A.D. 1450) .........................................30 Pensacola....................................................................................................32 CHAPTER 4: FIELD AND LAB METHODS ..................................................................35 Introduction and Background ....................................................................35 Remote Sensing and Gridded Survey ........................................................38 Unit Excavation and Sample Collection ....................................................41 vi Flotation Tank and Associated Procedures ................................................44 Zooarchaeological Methods .......................................................................53 Radiocarbon Dating ...................................................................................58 CHAPTER 5: RESULTS ...................................................................................................61 Feature 550.................................................................................................63 Feature 551.................................................................................................70 Feature 552.................................................................................................78 Feature 556.................................................................................................90 Feature 557.................................................................................................97 CHAPTER 6: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ....................................................103 Feature 550 and 551 .................................................................................109 Feature 552...............................................................................................114 Feature 556...............................................................................................119 Feature 557...............................................................................................122 Conclusions ..............................................................................................124 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................127 APPENDIXES .................................................................................................................136 A. Vertebrate and Invertebrate species ....................................................138 B. Plant species ........................................................................................140 vii LIST OF TABLES 1. Cultural Sequence for Northwest Florida ..............................................................22 2. Soil Sample Provenience and Volume ...................................................................44 3. Specimens in Comparative Ethnobotanical Collection..........................................52 4. Constant Values for Estimated Biomass Calculations ...........................................57 5. Radiocarbon Sample Data ......................................................................................59 6. General Feature Characteristics .............................................................................61 7. Contents of Column Sample ..................................................................................63 8. Faunal Assemblage from
Recommended publications
  • Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St

    Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St

    LATE MISSISSIPPIAN CERAMIC PRODUCTION ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA Anna M. Semon A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Vincas P. Steponaitis C. Margaret Scarry R. P. Stephen Davis Anna Agbe-Davis John Scarry © 2019 Anna M. Semon ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Anna M. Semon: Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St. Catherines Island, Georgia (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis) This dissertation examines Late Mississippian pottery manufacturing on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. Data collected from five ceramic assemblages, three village and two mortuary sites, were used to characterize each ceramic assemblage and examine small-scale ceramic variations associated with learning and making pottery, which reflect pottery communities of practice. In addition, I examined pottery decorations to investigate social interactions at community and household levels. This dissertation is organized in six chapters. Chapter 1 provides the background, theoretical framework, and objectives of this research. Chapter 2 describes coastal Georgia’s culture history, with focus on the Mississippian period. Chapters 3 and 4 present the methods and results of this study. I use both ceramic typology and attribute analyses to explore ceramic variation. Chapter 3 provides details about the ceramic typology for each site. In addition, I examine the Mississippian surface treatments for each assemblage and identified ceramic changes between middle Irene (A.D. 1350–1450), late Irene (A.D. 1450–1580), and early Mission (A.D. 1580–1600) period.
  • Preserving Florida's Heritage

    Preserving Florida's Heritage

    Preserving Florida’s Heritage MMoorree TThhaann OOrraannggee MMaarrmmaallaaddee Florida’s Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan 2012 - 2016 Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION Page 1 Viva Florida Why Have a Statewide Historic Preservation Plan? CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW OF FLORIDA’S PRE-HISTORY & HISTORY Page 4 CHAPTER 2 PLANNING IN FLORIDA, A PUBLIC POLICY Page 8 CHAPTER 3 PRESERVATION PARTNERS Page 12 Federal Government Seminole Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) State Government Other Florida Department of State Programs Advisory Boards and Support Organizations Other State Agencies Formal Historic Preservation Academic Programs Local Governments Non-Profit Organizations CHAPTER 4 FLORIDA’S RESOURCES, AN ASSESSMENT Page 36 Recent Past Historic Landscapes Urbanization and Suburbanization Results from Statewide Survey of Local Historic Preservation Programs African-American Resources Hispanic Resources Transportation Religion Maritime Resources Military Recreation and Tourism Industrialization Folklife Resources CHAPTER 5 HOW THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED Page 47 Public Survey Survey Results Meetings Findings Timeframe of the Plan and Revisions CHAPTER 6 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND SUGGESTED STRATEGIES Page 53 Vision Statement for Historic Preservation in Florida CHAPTER 7 A BRIEF TIMELINE OF FLORIDA HISTORY Page 63 CHAPTER 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND OTHER RESOURCES Page 71 BIBLIOGRAPHY USEFUL LINKS FLORIDA’S HISTORICAL CONTEXTS MULTIPLE PROPERTY SUBMISSION COVERS Archaeological Thematic or Property Types Local Areas HERITAGE TRAILS SOCIAL MEDIA ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The preparation of a statewide comprehensive historic preservation plan intended for everyone across the state involved many people. We are greatly appreciative of the regional staff from the Florida Public Archaeology Network (FPAN) who hosted public meetings in five communities across the state, and to Jeannette Peters, the consultant who so ably led those meetings.
  • Bioarchaeology (Anthropological Archaeology) - Mario ŠLAUS

    Bioarchaeology (Anthropological Archaeology) - Mario ŠLAUS

    PHYSICAL (BIOLOGICAL) ANTHROPOLOGY - Bioarchaeology (Anthropological Archaeology) - Mario ŠLAUS BIOARCHAEOLOGY (ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY) Mario ŠLAUS Department of Archaeology, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Zagreb, Croatia. Keywords: Bioarchaeology, archaeological, forensic, antemortem, post-mortem, perimortem, traumas, Cribra orbitalia, Harris lines, Tuberculosis, Leprosy, Treponematosis, Trauma analysis, Accidental trauma, Intentional trauma, Osteological, Degenerative disease, Habitual activities, Osteoarthritis, Schmorl’s nodes, Tooth wear Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Definition of Bioarchaeology 1.2. History of Bioarchaeology 2. Analysis of Skeletal Remains 2.1. Excavation and Recovery 2.2. Human / Non-Human Remains 2.3. Archaeological / Forensic Remains 2.4. Differentiating between Antemortem/Postmortem/Perimortem Traumas 2.5. Determination of Sex 2.6. Determination of Age at Death 2.6.1. Age Determination in Subadults 2.6.2. Age Determination in Adults. 3. Skeletal and dental markers of stress 3.1. Linear Enamel Hypoplasia 3.2. Cribra Orbitalia 3.3. Harris Lines 4. Analyses of dental remains 4.1. Caries 4.2. Alveolar Bone Disease and Antemortem Tooth Loss 5. Infectious disease 5.1. Non–specific Infectious Diseases 5.2. Specific Infectious Disease 5.2.1. Tuberculosis 5.2.2. Leprosy 5.2.3. TreponematosisUNESCO – EOLSS 6. Trauma analysis 6.1. Accidental SAMPLETrauma CHAPTERS 6.2. Intentional Trauma 7. Osteological and dental evidence of degenerative disease and habitual activities 7.1. Osteoarthritis 7.2. Schmorl’s Nodes 7.3. Tooth Wear Caused by Habitual Activities 8. Conclusion Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) PHYSICAL (BIOLOGICAL) ANTHROPOLOGY - Bioarchaeology (Anthropological Archaeology) - Mario ŠLAUS 1. Introduction 1.1. Definition of Bioarchaeology Bioarchaeology is the study of human biological remains within their cultural (archaeological) context.
  • The Brickhill Bluff Site, Cumberland Island, Georgia

    The Brickhill Bluff Site, Cumberland Island, Georgia

    MODELING VARIABILITY IN PRE-COLUMBIAN WOODLAND HABITATION AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION: THE BRICKHILL BLUFF SITE, CUMBERLAND ISLAND, GEORGIA by Stephen Andrew Wise A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL August 2017 Copyright by Stephen Andrew Wise 2017 ii iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor Dr. Arlene Fradkin for her continued encouragement and patience. This work would not have been possible without her persistence and guidance. I am especially indebted to Dr. Mike Russo, Archaeologist for the National Park Service, for his reassurance and help. I also would like to thank Valentina Martinez who taught me how to excavate features and the proper way to hold a trowel. Her comments and suggestions were invaluable to the organization and construction of this thesis. Thank you for being supportive of my goals. I am grateful to everyone whom I have had the pleasure to work with on this and other related projects. Whether in the field or in the lab, the members of my excavation team and the many supportive voices at Florida Atlantic University and the National Park Service have contributed to my growth as an archeologist and as a person. I would especially like to thank Dr. David Morgan, Dr. Michael Harris, Richard Vernon, Hank Kratt, Charlie Sproul, and John Cornelison who have guided my academics and career. They have served as mentors and shown me how to be a professional archaeologist and friend.
  • Fall Quarter 2018 Class Schedule

    Fall Quarter 2018 Class Schedule

    FALL QUARTER 2018 CLASS SCHEDULE COURSE NUMBER COURSE TITLE SPECIAL TOPIC (IF APPLICABLE) INSTRUCTOR Core Course Archaeology M201A Graduate Core Seminar Monica Smith Archaeology C220 Archaeology of Death John Papadopoulos Anthropology 219 Selected Topics in Anthropological/Archaeological Theory Issues in Indigenous Archaeology Stephen Acabado Ancient Near East 260 Seminar: Ancient Near Eastern Archaeology Elizabeth Carter Ancient Near East 261 Practical Field Archaeology Archaeological Fieldwork (Ethiopia) Willeke Wendrich Graduate Art and Architecture of Ancient Egypt, Predynastic Period to Ancient Near East C267A Kara Cooney Seminars New Kingdom Art History C216A Middle Byzantine Art & Architecture Sharon Gerstel Art History C248A Art and Material Culture, Neolithic to 210 B.C. Art & Material Culture of Early China Lothar von Falkenhausen Art History C249A Selected Topics in Chinese Art Lothar von Falkenhausen Classics 245 Computing and Classics Chris Johanson Classics 250 Topics in Greek and Roman Culture and Literature Women's History Amy Richlin Archaeology M205A Selected Laboratory Topics in Archaeology Experimental Archaeology Tom Wake Conservation M210L Cultural Materials Science Laboratory: Technical Study Ioanna Kakoulli Conservation 231 Conservation Laboratory: Stone and Adobe Christian Fischer Conservation 238 Conservation Laboratory: Organic Materials II Ellen Pearlstein Lab Courses Conservation Laboratory: Rock Art, Wall Paintings, and Conservation M250 Ioanna Kakoulli Mosaics Structure, Properties, and Deterioration of
  • The Edward Houstoun Plantation Tallahassee,Florida

    The Edward Houstoun Plantation Tallahassee,Florida

    THE EDWARD HOUSTOUN PLANTATION TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA INCLUDING A DISCUSSION OF AN UNMARKED CEMETERY ON FORMER PLANTATION LANDS AT THE CAPITAL CITY COUNTRY CLUB Detail from Le Roy D. Ball’s 1883 map of Leon County showing land owned by the Houstoun family.1 JONATHAN G. LAMMERS APRIL, 2019 adlk jfal sk dj fsldkfj Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 The Houstoun Plantation ................................................................................................................................. 2 Edward Houstoun ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Patrick Houstoun ........................................................................................................................................... 6 George B. Perkins and the Golf Course .................................................................................................. 10 Golf Course Expansion Incorporates the Cemetery .......................................................................... 12 The Houstoun Plantation Cemetery ............................................................................................................. 15 Folk Burial Traditions ................................................................................................................................. 17 Understanding Slave Mortality ..................................................................................................................
  • Cultural Resources Survey of the RDA Mine Tract

    Cultural Resources Survey of the RDA Mine Tract

    Cultural Resources Survey of the RDA Mine Tract Williamsburg County, South Carolina June 2017 15 June2017 SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF Larry James ARCHIVESO HISTORY Brockington and Associates 498 Wando Park Blvd, Ste 700 Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 Re: CR$ of RDA Mine Tract Williamsburg County, South Carolina SHPO Project No. 17-ADOO14 Dear Mr. James: Our office has received the documentation dated June 6, 2017 that you submitted as due diligence for the project referenced above, including the description of and plans for avoidance of site 3$WGOY85. This letter is for preliminary, informational purposes only and does not constitute consultation or agency coordination with our office as defined in 36 CFR $00: “Protection of Historic Properties” or by any state regulatory process. The recommendation stated below could change once the responsible federal and/or state agency initiates consultation with our office. The updated plans call for preservation in place of site 3$WG0185, which is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, through preservation in place, a 50-foot buffer around the site, and perimeter fencing during mining activities within 1000 feet of the site. Our office agrees that these measures are sufficient to protect the site. If the project were to require state permits or federal permits, licenses, funds, loans, grants, or assistance for development, we would recommend to the federal or state agency or agencies that the project will have no adverse effect on cultural resources. We do request, however, that our office be notified immediately if archaeological materials or human skeletal remains are encountered prior to or during construction on the project site.
  • The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations

    The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations

    Anthropology 6146 Sec 211G/ CBD 234 Dr. Susan D. deFrance Spring 2016 1350-B Turlington Hall/1112 Turlington [email protected] Office hours Tues & Thursday 2-3:30 pm and by appt. The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations Course Objectives and Goals: This seminar examines issues pertaining to human maritime adaptations in archaeological, ethnohistoric and ethnographic contexts. Issues to be examined include: 1) Definitions of Maritime Adaptations 2) History of Investigations 3) Characteristics of Marine Resources 4) Technology and Organization of Maritime Predation 5) Limitations on Maritime Subsistence 6) Ownership, Territory, and Resource Rights 7) Population, Settlement and Site Size 8) Economic and Political Organization 9) Complexity of Maritime Societies Populations and cultures exhibiting maritime adaptations, among others, include: Jomon, Pacific Islands, Yagan, Andean Coast, Chumash, Northwest Coast, Eskimo/Aleut, Red Paint Archaic, Calusa, European Mesolithic, Coastal Maya Readings are available on the course elearning/Sakai site. Written Work and Class Presentations: 1) Weekly Assignments: 1-2 page review (critique, evaluation – not summaries) of ALL weekly readings. These are due at the start of class; late papers are not accepted without prior permission. 2) Each session students will be assigned one reading to present in detail (max. 15 minutes). Oral presentations will rotate between students depending on the number of reading assignments per week. All students must be prepared to discuss all the weekly readings at class time. 3) Final Paper (due APRIL 25 AT 4 PM- NO late papers, No incompletes, emergencies excluded) – on an approved topic related to the Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations. Final Paper should follow American Antiquity format for bibliography with a minimum of 2 references per page.
  • Ethnographic Overview and Assessment of Ocmulgee National Monument

    Ethnographic Overview and Assessment of Ocmulgee National Monument

    FINAL REPORT September 2014 Ethnographic Overview and Assessment of Ocmulgee National Monument for the National Park Service Task Agreement No. P11AT51123 Deborah Andrews Peter Collings Department of Anthropology University of Florida Dayna Bowker Lee 1 I. Introduction, by Deborah Andrews 6 II. Background: The History of Ocmulgee National Monument 8 A. The Geography of Place 8 B. Preservation and Recognition of Ocmulgee National Monument 10 1. National Monument Designation 10 2. Depression Era Excavations 13 C. Research on and about Ocmulgee National Monument 18 III. Ethnohistory and Archaeology of Ocmulgee National Monument 23 A. The Occupants and Features of the Site 23 1. The Uchee Trading Path 24 2. PaleoIndian, Archaic and Woodland Eras 27 3. The Mississippian Mound Builders 37 4. The Lamar Focus and Migration 47 5. Proto-historic Creek and Spanish Contact 56 6. Carolina Trading Post and English Contact 59 7. The Yamassee War 64 8. Georgia Colony, Treaties and Removal 66 B. Historic Connections, Features and Uses of the Site 77 1. The City of Macon 77 2. Past Historic Uses of the Site 77 a. The Dunlap Plantation 78 b. Civil War Fortification 80 c. Railroads 81 2 d. Industry and Clay Mining 83 e. Interstate 16 84 f. Recreation and Education 85 C. Population 87 IV. Contemporary Views on the Ocmulgee National Monument Site, by Dayna Bowker Lee 93 A. Consultation 93 B. Etvlwu: The Tribal Town 94 C. The Upper and Lower Creek 98 D. Moving the Fires: The Etvlwv in Indian Territory, Oklahoma 99 E. Okmulgee in the West 104 F.
  • Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’S Lost Colony of Roanoke

    Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’S Lost Colony of Roanoke

    Where Have All the Indians Gone? Native American Eastern Seaboard Dispersal, Genealogy and DNA in Relation to Sir Walter Raleigh’s Lost Colony of Roanoke. Roberta Estes Copyright 2009, all rights reserved, submitted for publication [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract Within genealogy circles, family stories of Native American1 heritage exist in many families whose American ancestry is rooted in Colonial America and traverses Appalachia. The task of finding these ancestors either genealogically or using genetic genealogy is challenging. With the advent of DNA testing, surname and other special interest projects2, tools now exist to facilitate grouping participants in a way that allows one to view populations in historical fashions. This paper references and uses data from several of these public projects, but particularly the Melungeon, Lumbee, Waccamaw, North Carolina Roots and Lost Colony projects3. The Lumbee have long claimed descent from the Lost Colony via their oral history4. The Lumbee DNA Project shows significantly less Native American ancestry than would be expected with 96% European or African Y chromosomal DNA. The Melungeons, long held to be mixed European, African and Native show only one ancestral family with Native DNA5. Clearly more testing would be advantageous in all of these projects. This phenomenon is not limited to these groups, and has been reported by other researchers such as Bolnick (et al, 2006) where she reports finding in 16 Native American populations with northeast or southeast roots that 47% of the families who believe themselves to be full blooded or no less than 75% Native with no paternal European admixture find themselves carrying European or African y-line DNA.
  • MAX D. PRICE EDUCATION Ph.D. 2016 Harvard University

    MAX D. PRICE EDUCATION Ph.D. 2016 Harvard University

    MAX D. PRICE Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Materials Science and Engineering 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. 2016 Harvard University Department of Anthropology, Dissertation Title: Pigs and Power: Pig Husbandry in Northern Mesopotamia during the Emergence of Social Complexity (6500-2000 BC) B.A. 2009 The University of Chicago Department of Anthropology (with honors) ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2017-Present Lecturer in Archaeology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, MIT 2017 Postdoctoral Researcher (Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter), Graduate School “Human Development in Landscapes,” Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel 2016-2017 Postdoctoral Fellow, Peabody Museum & Department of Anthropology, Harvard University RESEARCH INTERESTS Animal Domestication; Human-Environment Interaction; Foodways; Social Inequality; Near Eastern Archaeology; Stable Isotope Ecology; Zooarchaeology BOOKS In Press Evolution of a Taboo: Pigs and People in the Ancient Near East. Oxford University Press (expected date of publication: March 2020). PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS In Review Price, M. D., Y. M. Rowan, M. Kersel, and C. Makarewicz. "Cattle in the Ghor and Grain-Eating Boar: Isotopic Perspectives on Animal Husbandry at Chalcolithic Marj Rabba" Submitted to Anthropological and Archaeological Sciences August 2019. In Press Price, M. D. “Pigs in Between: Pig Husbandry in the Late Neolithic in Northern Mesopotamia.” Archaeozoology of the Near East XII. Lockwood Press. In Press Price, M. D. and H. Hongo. “The Archaeology of Pig Domestication: Methods, Models, and Case Studies.” Journal of Archaeological Research. Accepted March 2019. 2019 Frantz, L. A. F., J. Haile, A. T. Lin, A. Scheu, C. Geörg, N. Benecke, M. Alexander, A. Linderholm, V. E. Mullin, K.
  • Guide to the Archaeological Site Form V5.0 (Pdf)

    Guide to the Archaeological Site Form V5.0 (Pdf)

    Guide to the Archaeological Site Form Version 5.0 Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources Bureau of Historic Preservation March 2019 Guide to the Archaeological Site Form, v5 .0 Page| 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Digital PDF Forms........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Resources on Public and Private Lands ........................................................................................................................... 5 Guidance on Updating Previously Recorded Sites ............................................................................................................ 6 ATTACHMENTS FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM ........................................................................................................ 7 General Requirements for Attachments ........................................................................................................................... 7 Site Plot on USGS 1:24,000 Scale Topographic Maps (Required) .................................................................................... 7 Site Plan Map (Required) ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Photographs or Photocopies