DOCSLIB.ORG

Historic Architectural Resources Survey of the Upper Peninsula Charleston, South Carolina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historic Architectural Resources Survey of the Upper Peninsula Charleston, South Carolina A Historic Architectural Resources Survey of the Upper Peninsula Charleston, South Carolina Final Report Prepared for City of Charleston Design, Development and Preservation Department Charleston, South Carolina Prepared by John Beaty Architectural Historian and Ralph Bailey Principal Investigator Brockington and Associates, Inc. Atlanta Charleston Raleigh January 2004 Acknowledgments In completing this survey of the Upper Peninsula, we were fortunate to have the help of many people. Lissa Felzer with the City of Charleston Design, Development, and Preservation Department provided a great deal of logistical support and a constant supply of useful questions and encouragement. Eddie Bello and Yvonne Fortenberry, also with the Design, Development, and Preservation Department, provided insight, information, and public meeting support. Greg Felzer provided the boat and piloting skills. Finally, the staff at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History, including Brad Sauls, was very helpful and accommodating. The activity that is the subject of this report has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, US Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the US Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20240. ii Table of Contents Page Section I. Introduction ......................................................1 Name of Project .............................................1 Boundaries of Project .........................................1 Number of Properties .........................................1 Geographical Area ...........................................1 Survey Staff ................................................3 Beginning and End Dates of the Survey ..........................3 Objective of Survey ..........................................3 Method of Survey ...........................................4 Historic Architectural Resources Survey ....................4 NRHP Assessment of Cultural Resources ...................6 Charleston Architectural Ranking .........................9 Section II. Overview of the Historic Settlement of the Upper Peninsula ...............11 A Brief Overview of European Settlement in and around Charleston ...11 The Protohistoric Period ...............................11 Early European Explorations ............................12 English Colonial Occupation ............................13 The Revolutionary War ................................17 Antebellum Period ....................................19 Postbellum Period ....................................22 Overview of the Upper Peninsula ..............................24 Early Settlement ......................................24 Antebellum Development ..............................28 Post-War Development ................................38 Twentieth Century Development .........................46 Summary of the Upper Peninsula Settlement History .........69 Section III. Previously Identified Historic Architectural Resources ....................70 Properties Listed on the NRHP ................................70 Properties that are Eligible/Potentially Eligible for the NRHP ........70 Previous Architecture Surveys within the Survey Universe ..........71 An Architectural, Archaeological, and Historical Survey of Selected Portions of Charleston and Mt. Pleasant: Grace Memorial Bridge Replacement, Charleston, South Carolina .................................71 Phase II Archaeological, Historical, and Architectural Investigations in the Grace and New Market Alignments: Grace Memorial Bridge Replacement, Charleston, South Carolina .......................71 iii Page Additional Archaeological and Architectural Investigations for the Grace Memorial Bridge Replacement, Charleston, South Carolina .......................73 Cultural Resource Assessment and Assessment of Effects Pursuant to 36 CFR 800 for the Replacement of the Bridges on US 17 over the Cooper River and Town Creek, Charleston County, South Carolina ......73 Intensive Cultural Resources Survey and Documentation of the Proposed Cooper River Bridge Approaches Charleston County, South Carolina .................73 Section IV. Survey Results ...................................................75 Residential Resources .......................................76 National Styles .......................................76 Folk House Types ....................................89 Commercial Resources ......................................91 Institutional Resources .......................................92 Transportation Resources .....................................97 Manufacturing Resources ....................................98 Data Gaps .................................................98 Section V. Recommendations ................................................99 National Register Listed Properties .............................99 The Hampton Park Terrace Historic District ................99 Lowndes Grove (Resource 0073.00) ......................99 The Enston Home (Resource 0075) .......................99 Magnolia Cemetery (Resource 0077.00) ...................99 The Florence Crittenton Home (Resource 0104) ............100 National Register Eligible Properties ...........................100 The North of 17 Historic District ........................100 The Carondolet Street Historic District ...................100 The Dingle Street Historic District ......................101 The North Tracy Street Historic District ..................101 74 Fishburne Street (Resource 2065) .....................101 The Colin McKissick Grant Home (Resource 2810) .........101 The Immigration Center (Resource 2809) .................102 The Charleston Railway Bus Barn (Resource 2830) .........102 The Charleston Fire Department Engine Number Eight Building (Resource 2888) ...........102 Districts Recommended Eligible ..............................102 The Citadel Parade Ground Historic District ...............104 The Citadel Officers’ Quarters Historic District ............105 The Magnolia Umbra Cemetery District ..................105 The Rutledge Avenue Improvement Historic District ........107 iv Page The East Riverside Park Historic District .................108 The West Grove Street Historic District ..................109 Individual Resources Recommended Eligible ....................110 541 Rutledge Avenue (Resource 2249) ...................110 167 Congress Street (Resource 2309) ....................111 10 Parkwood Avenue (Resource 2328) ...................112 573 Huger Street (Resource 2336) .......................112 555 Huger Street (Resource 2352) .......................113 39 Parkwood Avenue (Resource 2403) ...................114 491 Huger Street (Resource 2450) .......................115 117 Moultrie Street (Resource 2494) .....................116 463 Huger Street (Resource 2497) .......................117 Hampton Park (Resource 2562) .........................118 540 Rutledge Avenue (Resource 2568) ...................118 90 Fishburne Street (Resource 2624) .....................119 298 Sumter Street (Resource 2678) ......................120 The Greek Orthodox Church (Resource 2715) .............120 Bethany Cemetery (Resource 2866.00) ...................122 Saint Lawrence Cemetery (Resource 2867) ................122 Saint Barnabas Evangelical Lutheran Church (Resource 2904) ...............................123 County Hall (Resource 2964) ..........................124 981 King Street (Resource 2967) ........................125 807 Rutledge Avenue (Resource 3061) ...................125 809 Rutledge Avenue (Resource 3062) ...................126 1126 King Street (Resource 3125) .......................127 28 Maple Street (Resource 3136) ........................129 60 Poplar Street (Resource 3154) .......................129 842 Rutledge Avenue (Resource 3160) ...................130 31 Cypress Street (Resource 3212) ......................131 887 Rutledge Avenue (Resource 3297) ...................131 66 Sans Souci Street (Resource 3340) ....................132 164 Maple Street (Resource 3632) .......................133 165 Maple Street (Resource 3641) .......................133 187 Grove Street (Resource 3932) .......................134 308 Grove Street (Resource 4091) .......................135 Recommendations for Future Consideration .....................136 Endangered Areas ...................................136 Areas that may be Eligible in the Future ..................137 Areas that may Warrant Protection of Special Attention ......138 Survey Summary ..........................................138 v Page References Cited ............................................................140 Appendix A. Inventory of Surveyed Resources .................................. A-1 Appendix B. Location of Surveyed Resources, County Tax Maps .....................B-1 Appendix C. SHPO Determination of NRHP Eligibility
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for the Field Collection of Archaeological Materials and Standard Operating Procedures for Curating Department of Defense Archaeological Collections
    Guidelines for the Field Collection of Archaeological Materials and Standard Operating Procedures for Curating Department of Defense Archaeological Collections Prepared for the Legacy Resource Management Program Office Legacy Project No. 98-1714 Mandatory Center of Expertise for the Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 1999 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Guidelines for the Field Collection of Archaeological Materials and Standard Operating Procedures for Curation Department of Defense Archaeological Collections 6. AUTHORS Suzanne Griset and Marc Kodack 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District 1222 Spruce Street (CEMVS-ED-Z) St. Louis, Missouri 63103-2833 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY Legacy Resource Management Program Office REPORT NUMBER Office of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental Security) Legacy Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Florida's Heritage
    Preserving Florida’s Heritage MMoorree TThhaann OOrraannggee MMaarrmmaallaaddee Florida’s Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan 2012 - 2016 Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION Page 1 Viva Florida Why Have a Statewide Historic Preservation Plan? CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW OF FLORIDA’S PRE-HISTORY & HISTORY Page 4 CHAPTER 2 PLANNING IN FLORIDA, A PUBLIC POLICY Page 8 CHAPTER 3 PRESERVATION PARTNERS Page 12 Federal Government Seminole Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) State Government Other Florida Department of State Programs Advisory Boards and Support Organizations Other State Agencies Formal Historic Preservation Academic Programs Local Governments Non-Profit Organizations CHAPTER 4 FLORIDA’S RESOURCES, AN ASSESSMENT Page 36 Recent Past Historic Landscapes Urbanization and Suburbanization Results from Statewide Survey of Local Historic Preservation Programs African-American Resources Hispanic Resources Transportation Religion Maritime Resources Military Recreation and Tourism Industrialization Folklife Resources CHAPTER 5 HOW THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED Page 47 Public Survey Survey Results Meetings Findings Timeframe of the Plan and Revisions CHAPTER 6 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND SUGGESTED STRATEGIES Page 53 Vision Statement for Historic Preservation in Florida CHAPTER 7 A BRIEF TIMELINE OF FLORIDA HISTORY Page 63 CHAPTER 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND OTHER RESOURCES Page 71 BIBLIOGRAPHY USEFUL LINKS FLORIDA’S HISTORICAL CONTEXTS MULTIPLE PROPERTY SUBMISSION COVERS Archaeological Thematic or Property Types Local Areas HERITAGE TRAILS SOCIAL MEDIA ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The preparation of a statewide comprehensive historic preservation plan intended for everyone across the state involved many people. We are greatly appreciative of the regional staff from the Florida Public Archaeology Network (FPAN) who hosted public meetings in five communities across the state, and to Jeannette Peters, the consultant who so ably led those meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • NEVERTHELESS, SHE PERSISTED: ANTEBELLUM WOMEN's EDUCATION and SHIFTING GENDER ROLES in the SOUTH a Thesis by BRITTNEY LYNN M
    NEVERTHELESS, SHE PERSISTED: ANTEBELLUM WOMEN’S EDUCATION AND SHIFTING GENDER ROLES IN THE SOUTH A Thesis by BRITTNEY LYNN MASLOWSKI Submitted to the Graduate School at Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2017 Department of History NEVERTHELESS, SHE PERSISTED: ANTEBELLUM WOMEN’S EDUCATION AND SHIFTING GENDER ROLES IN THE SOUTH A Thesis by BRITTNEY LYNN MASLOWSKI May 2017 APPROVED BY: Kristen Baldwin Deathridge Chairperson, Thesis Committee Sheila Phipps Member, Thesis Committee Allison Fredette Member, Thesis Committee James Goff Chairperson, Department of History Max C. Poole, Ph.D. Dean, Cratis D. Williams School of Graduate Studies Copyright by Brittney Lynn Maslowski 2017 All Rights Reserved Abstract NEVERTHELESS, SHE PERSISTED: ANTEBELLUM WOMEN’S EDUCATION AND SHIFTING GENDER ROLES IN THE SOUTH Brittney Lynn Maslowski B.S., Appalachian State University M.A., Appalachian State University Chairperson: Kristen Baldwin Deathridge During the Civil War, elite, southern families faced financial difficulties, and this prompted women to enter the workforce on an economic basis, which unintentionally instigated a social transformation of traditional gender roles. The most practical way an elite, southern, white woman could enter the workforce was as a teacher. To become a teacher, a woman needed to be educated. For wealthy, southern women the nineteenth century was a turning point in their educational background. No longer attending school just to take courses in needlework, women were sent to boarding schools to learn diverse subjects such as English, Mathematics, Geography, and French. The transition from eighteenth to nineteenth century educational standards for women can be seen in their school samplers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Edward Houstoun Plantation Tallahassee,Florida
    THE EDWARD HOUSTOUN PLANTATION TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA INCLUDING A DISCUSSION OF AN UNMARKED CEMETERY ON FORMER PLANTATION LANDS AT THE CAPITAL CITY COUNTRY CLUB Detail from Le Roy D. Ball’s 1883 map of Leon County showing land owned by the Houstoun family.1 JONATHAN G. LAMMERS APRIL, 2019 adlk jfal sk dj fsldkfj Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 The Houstoun Plantation ................................................................................................................................. 2 Edward Houstoun ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Patrick Houstoun ........................................................................................................................................... 6 George B. Perkins and the Golf Course .................................................................................................. 10 Golf Course Expansion Incorporates the Cemetery .......................................................................... 12 The Houstoun Plantation Cemetery ............................................................................................................. 15 Folk Burial Traditions ................................................................................................................................. 17 Understanding Slave Mortality ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 37 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 37 NO. 3 FALL 1987 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio TERM EXPIRESs A.SO. OFFICERS Back Issues President Maitha Potter Otto. Ohio Historical Society, Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Columbus, OH 43211-Tel, 614/297-2641; Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N Converse $ 5,00 Home 614/846-7640 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 4 00 Vice-President Donald A Casto, 138 Ann Ct., Lancaster Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N Converse $10.00 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N Converse $15 00 OH 43130-Tel 614/653-9477 Back issues —black and white —each $ 4 00 Exec Sec. Michael W Schoenfeld, 524 Sycamore Dr.. Back issues —lour full color plates -each $ 4 00 Pickenngton. OH 43147 -Tel 614/837-7088 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 Treasurer Stephen J Parker, 1859 Frank Dr., Lancaster, are generally out of print but copies are available from time to OH43130-Tel 614 653-6642 time Write to business office for prices and availability Recording See Barbara Motts, 7050 Refugee Rd . Canal Winchester, OH 431 10-Tel 614/837-4862; ASO Chapters Bus 614 898-41 16 Ininied. Past Pres. Don Gehlbach, 3435 Sciotangy Dr., Aboriginal Explorers Club Columbus, OH 43221 -Tel, 614/459-0808; President: Mark Cline. 1127 Esther, Wellsville, OH 439 Bus 614/888-3572 Blue Jacket Editor Robert N Converse. 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, President: Phil Brandt. 6796 C.R 14, West Liberty, OH 43357 OH 43064 - Tel 614 873-5471 Cuyahoga Valley 1990 Stephen Puttera, Jr., 4696 Hillside Rd., Seven Hills, OH President: Bill Mitchell, 153 Sterling Ave,, Orrville, OH 44667 Meeting Place: Summit Lapidary Club, 244 Chestnut Blvd 44131 -Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • U. S. Department of the Interior National Park Service
    Vicksburg NATIONAL MILITARY PARK • MISSISSIPPI "Vicksburg is the key.... The war can never be to reduce Vicksburg, but once again Union at­ On May 14, the Federals took Jackson, scat­ brought to a close until that key is in our tempts met with failure. tering the defenders. Grant then turned his pocket." A. Lincoln army west. Pemberton, meanwhile, brought his By the spring of 1863 three courses of action field army east from Vicksburg. On May 16, were open to Grant. With Memphis as a base, the two forces clashed at Champion Hill. Af­ he could advance southward into Mississippi, ter this hotly contested battle, and one on the On July 4, 1863, Maj. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant put using the railroads to supply his army and in­ following day at Big Black Bridge, Pemberton's the key In President Lincoln's pocket. Vicksburg vest Vicksburg from the east. Secondly, he army fell back to Vicksburg's defensive works. fell, and 5 days later Port Hudson surrendered, could attack Vicksburg from directly across On May 18, leading elements of Grant's army giving Union forces control of the Mississippi. the river. Or, he could march down the west were approaching the bristling Confederate This victory came because of the type of war bank, cross well below Vicksburg, and then defense line. Grant chose to fight in the West, as opposed to swing into position to attack from the south. warfare back East where thousands of soldiers He had to choose the method that would buy Believing that Southern morale had deterio­ moved back and forth between Washington and victory at the lowest cost in Northern lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortification Renaissance: the Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne
    FORTIFICATION RENAISSANCE: THE ROMAN ORIGINS OF THE TRACE ITALIENNE Robert T. Vigus Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2013 APPROVED: Guy Chet, Committee Co-Chair Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Co-Chair Walter Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Vigus, Robert T. Fortification Renaissance: The Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne. Master of Arts (History), May 2013, pp.71, 35 illustrations, bibliography, 67 titles. The Military Revolution thesis posited by Michael Roberts and expanded upon by Geoffrey Parker places the trace italienne style of fortification of the early modern period as something that is a novel creation, borne out of the minds of Renaissance geniuses. Research shows, however, that the key component of the trace italienne, the angled bastion, has its roots in Greek and Roman writing, and in extant constructions by Roman and Byzantine engineers. The angled bastion of the trace italienne was yet another aspect of the resurgent Greek and Roman culture characteristic of the Renaissance along with the traditions of medicine, mathematics, and science. The writings of the ancients were bolstered by physical examples located in important trading and pilgrimage routes. Furthermore, the geometric layout of the trace italienne stems from Ottoman fortifications that preceded it by at least two hundred years. The Renaissance geniuses combined ancient bastion designs with eastern geometry to match a burgeoning threat in the rising power of the siege cannon. Copyright 2013 by Robert T. Vigus ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the assistance and encouragement of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Photography, Filming and Videography On
    THE CITADEL The Military College of South Carolina 171 Moultrie Street Charleston, SC 29409 MEMORANDUM 13 August 2010 NUMBER 7-1 PHOTOGRAPHY, FILMING, AND VIDEOGRAPHY ON CAMPUS 1. PURPOSE As an educational institution, The Citadel seeks to further its mission of education, research, and public service, and to minimize activities that disrupt or are inconsistent with that mission. In pursuit of this mission, this Memorandum establishes policies and regulations for photography, filming, and videography on The Citadel campus. 2. REFERENCES S.C. Code Ann. 12-62-10, et. seq. 3. DEFINITIONS A. “Private photography, filming, and videography” is the capturing of images by individuals for their personal use. B. “Professional photography, filming, and videography” is the capturing of images on behalf of other parties, including campus offices, regardless of whether or not there is compensation for the services rendered. 4. POLICY A. Photography in the Barracks i. Barracks at The Citadel are residences for cadets, summer school students, and other designated persons. Entry into the barracks is limited to these individuals and certain members of the faculty and staff of The Citadel, as well as designated employees of The Citadel’s janitorial contractor. Persons in violation of Citadel policies regarding entry into barracks are considered trespassers who may be escorted from the premises by Campus Public Safety, and/or prosecuted under applicable South Carolina law. Page 1 Residents of the barracks are permitted photography, filming, and videography within the barracks for personal use. During periods when the public is allowed access into the barracks, such as Parents’ Day, Homecoming, and Corps Day, private photography, filming, and videography are permitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Buildings Around Campus
    Buildings Around Campus The Daniel Library was constructed in 1960 and is named in honor of the late Charles E. Daniel, Citadel 1918, and the late R. Hugh Daniel, Citadel 1929, both distinguished Citadel men who were lifelong benefactors of the college. The men established the Daniel International Corporation - at one time the third largest construction company in the world. The main library collection contains more than 1,128,798 books, bound periodicals, and government documents and pamphlets. Facilities include a 12,000 volume reference collection and 449,390 microfilm and microfilm readers. Wireless internet is accessible from most major seating areas of the first and second floors. Eight Citadel murals and portraits of The Citadel's superintendents, presidents (a term used after 1922), and distinguished alumni are featured on the interior walls. Summerall Chapel was erected during 1936-1937. Cruciform in design, the Chapel is a shrine of religion, patriotism, and remembrance. From the air the red clay tile roof forms a cross. It was designed in the spirit of 14th century Gothic. The furniture throughout is plain-sawed Appalachian Mountain white oak stained cathedral brown. The ceiling and timbering are pine. The lighting fixtures are handcrafted wrought iron throughout. Hanging from the walls are flags from the 50 states and the territories. The Chapel is in use year round with weekly religious services and weddings. The Grave of General Mark W. Clark. By his choice, and with the approval of the Board of Visitors and the General Assembly of South Carolina, General Mark W. Clark was buried on The Citadel campus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barton Site: Thousands of Years of Occupation
    VIRTUAL ARCHAEOLOGY’S IMPACT • A MAYA PIONEER • OUR PHOTO CONTEST WINNERS american archaeologyFALL 2003 a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 7 No. 3 The Barton Site: Thousands of Years of Occupation 33> $3.95 7525274 91765 archaeological tours led by noted scholars superb itineraries, unsurpassed service For the past 28 years, Archaeological Tours has been arranging specialized tours for a discriminating clientele. Our tours feature distinguished scholars who stress the historical, anthropological and archaeological aspects of the areas visited. We offer a unique opportunity for tour participants to see and understand historically important and culturally significant areas of the world. Robert Bianchi in Egypt 2003 TOURS SRI LANKA MAYA SUPERPOWERS MUSEUMS OF SPAIN Among the first great Buddhist kingdoms, the island of This exciting tour examines the ferocious political Bilbao, Barcelona & Madrid Sri Lanka offers wonders far exceeding its small size. struggles between the Maya superpowers in the Late October 2 – 12, 2003 11 Days As we explore this mystical place, we will have a Classical period including bitter antagonism between Led by Prof. Ori Z. Soltes, Georgetown University glimpse of life under kings who created sophisticated Tikal in northern Guatemala and Calakmul across the irrigation systems, built magnificent temples and huge border in Mexico. New roads will allow us to visit these OASES OF THE WESTERN DESERT dagobas, carved 40-foot-tall Buddhas and one who ancient cities, as well as Copan in Honduras, Lamanai Alexandria, Siwa, Bahariya, Dakhla & Kharga, Luxor chose to build his royal residence, gardens and pools and the large archaeological project at Caracol in Belize October 3 – 20, 2003 18 Days on the top of a 600-foot rock outcropping.
    [Show full text]
  • East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2018 East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Randle, L.(2018). East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4962 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility By Lisa Briggitte Randle Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina, 1979 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 1990 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2009 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2018 Accepted by: Kenneth G. Kelly, Major Professor Leland Ferguson, Committee Member Michael E. Hodgson, Committee Member Kimberly Simmons, Committee Member Terrance Weik, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Lisa Briggitte Randle, 2018 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION I am honored to dedicate this dissertation to my friend and mentor, Dr. Leland G. Ferguson, for initiating the East Branch of the Cooper River Project and for his wise words of support when the completion of this dissertation seemed overwhelming. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the financial support of the University of South Carolina’s African American Professorial Program, the Anthropology Department’s Dorothy O’Dell Travel Grant, and a grant from the Archaeological Society of South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Patterns and Political Development in Precolumbian Southwest Florida
    SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND PROCESS OF NONAGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION: SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT IN PRECOLUMBIAN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA By ROBERT B. PATTON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2001 Copyright 2001 by Robert Barnett Patton This dissertation is dedicated to my family. Without them it would never have been attempted, for they taught me that knowing the past can and should inform the decisions that shape our world. Without their loving support and my hope for their bright future, it would never have been accomplished. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A work such as this represents the efforts of many people too numerous to recall. Nevertheless, it is important to give credit to those who contributed to its completion. I thank and beg the pardon of any whose names I have omitted through oversight. Preliminary research was made possible in part through a 1995 Survey and Planning Grant to the Charlotte Harbor Environmental Center. The grant was provided by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior and administered through the Florida Department of State, Division of Historic Resources, Bureau of Historic Preservation. In-kind assistance was provided by the University of Florida Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies, the Charlotte Harbor Environmental Center, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and by many individuals in Charlotte County and at the University of Florida who graciously donated their time and expertise. George M. Luer coordinated the 1995 grant and Dr. Michael E. Moseley acted as Principal Investigator for archaeological and historical research.
    [Show full text]