Project Number: 39295-013 February 2017

Home , Joypurhat District, Khetlal Upazila, Naogaon District, Upazila

Due Diligence Report – Social Safeguards

Document stage: Final Project number: 39295-013 February 2017

BAN: Third Urban Governance and Infrastructure Improvement (Sector) Project – Joypurhat Pourashava Water Supply Improvement Subproject (Phase 2)

Package Numbers: UGIIP-III-2/JOYP/WS/01/2016

Prepared by the Local Government Engineering Department, Government of Bangladesh, for the Asian Development Bank.

This due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

ATTACHMENT 1: DDR ON WATER SUPPLY

Sub-Project: Water supply

Package Nr: UGIIP-III-2/JOYP/WS/01/2016

JOYPURHAT POURASHAVA

February 2017

Prepared by: MDS Consultant, UGIIP-III

Due Diligence Report- Social Safeguard

Document stage: FINAL Project number: 39295 February 2017

BAN: Third Urban Governance and Infrastructure Improvement (Sector) Project (UGIIP-III) Joypurhat Pourashava Water Supply Improvement Subproject, Phase-2

Prepared for the Local Government Engineering Department (LGED), Government of Bangladesh and Asian Development Bank

WS- JOY

CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS (as of January 2017) Currency = Tk. TUkn1it. 00 = $0.0127 $1.00 = Tk. 78.95

ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AP – affected person ARIPO – Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Properties Ordinance CCL – Cash Compensation under Law DC – Deputy Commissioner DDR Due Diligence Report DPHE – Department of Public Health Engineering EMP – environmental management plan FGD – focus group discussion GICD Governance Improvement and Capacity Development GRC – grievance redressal cell GRM – grievance redress mechanism IR – involuntary resettlement LGED – Local Government Engineering Department PDB – Power Development Board PIU – project implementation unit PMO – project management office PPTA – project preparatory technical assistance ROW – right of way RF – resettlement framework RP – resettlement plan SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement ToR – terms of reference

GLOSSARY OF BANGLADESHI TERMS

Crore – 10 million (= 100 lakh) Ghat – Boat landing area along a river Hat, hut, or haat – Market (bazaar) operating certain afternoons during the week when sellers establish temporary shops. There are also some permanent shops in a Hat. Markets usually represent a significant source of income for municipalities Hartal – General strike Khal – drainage ditch/canal ii

WS- JOY

Khas or khash – land/property belonging to government Kutcha, katchha orkacca Structures built without bricks and mortar or without concrete Lakh or lac – 100,000 Mohollaor mohalla – Sub-division of a ward Mouza map – Cadastral map of mouza showing plots and their numbers Nasiman – A3-wheeler motorized vehicle Parshad – Councilor Pourashava orPaurashava – Government-recognized land area

Pucca or Puccha, puccha – Structures built partly with bricks and mortar or concrete Thana – Police station Upazila – An Administrative unit below the district level. A district is called a Zila

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Km – Kilometer M – Meter m2 – square meter Mm – Millimeter m3 – cubic meter

NOTES (i) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars,

(ii) BDT refers to Bangladeshi Taka

WS- JOY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION ...... 1 II. SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 2 III. DUE DILIGENCE ...... 20 IV. FINDINGS ...... 22 V. FUTURE CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE ...... 29 VI. MITIGATION OF SOCIAL CONCERNS ...... 31 VII. CONCLUSIONS ...... 32 VIII. APPENDIX 1: RECORDS OF PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS IN JOYPURHAT POURASHAVA FOR WATER SUPPLY ...... 34 IX. APPENDIX 2: INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACT CHECKLIST ...... 46 X. APPENDIX 3: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE/SMALL ETHNIC COMMUNITIES (SEC) IMPACTS ...... 49 XI. APPENDIX 4: SAMPLE GRIEVANCE REGISTRATION FORM ...... 51 XII. APPENDIX 5: GRIEVANCE REDRESS FORM (BANGLA VERSION) ...... 52 XIII. APPENDIX 6: VERIFICATION OF POURASHAVA OWNERSHIP (PHASE 2) OF JOYPURHAT POURASHAVA ...... 53 XIV. APPENDIX 7: PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPOSED WATER SUPPLY ALIGNMENTS OF JOYPURHAT POURASHAVA UNDER PHASE-2 OF UGIIP-III...... 54

List of Tables:

Table- 1: Components of Joypurhat Pourashava Water Supply sub-project & Ownership of Land...... 13 Table- 2: Assessment of Social /IR Impacts of Joypurhat Pourashava water supply: Sub- Project ...... 25 Table- 3: Social Safeguards Implementation Cost Related to Water Supply at Joypurhat Pourashava ...... 28

List of Figures:

Figure- 1: Map showing Lcation of Joypurhat Pourashava ...... 5

WS- JOY

Figure- 2: Map showing Location of Sub-Project water Supply Components in Joypurhat Pourashava ...... 5 Figure- 3: Strip Map of Water Supply Schemes of Joypurhat Pourashava...... 10 Figure- 4: Implementation work Schedule of Water Supply ...... 12 Figure- 5: Project Grievance Redress Mechanism ...... 31

I.INTRODUCTION

A. Background 1. The Government of Bangladesh is developing Secondary towns to improve living standards, particularly in the poorer areas, and to provide an alternative destination for rural dwellers that would otherwise join the migration to larger metropolitan centres, through Third Urban Governance and Infrastructure Improvement (Sector) project (UGIIP-3). UGIIP-3 is being implemented as a sector loan approach. After the successful implementation of Urban Governance and Infrastructure Improvement Projects (UGIIP I and II) in the selected Pourashava as, the Local Government Engineering Department (LGED) with the financial assistance of Asian Development Bank (ADB) have planned to implement a similar project (UGIIP-III) in pre-selected 31 Pourashava (Figure 1) over a period of 6 years (2014 to 2020).

2. The impact will be improved living environment in project towns. The outcome will be improved municipal service delivery and urban governance in project towns. UGIIP-3 will improve existing and provide new municipal infrastructures including (i) roads; (ii) Drainages; (iii) water supply system; (iv)solid waste management facilities; (v) slaughter houses; (vi) markets, community centres/auditorium, bus and truck terminals and river ghats; (vii) public toilets; and (viii) others such as provision for street lighting and improvement of slums.

3. A sector-lending approach is being used for the project as it has been well established and successfully practiced in the UGIIP-1 and 2. In accordance with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 requirements a Resettlement Framework (RF) have been prepared.

4. During project preparation, resettlement plans (RPs) were prepared for 3 sample Pourashavas covering roads, drainage, kitchen market and solid waste management subprojects. The RPs concluded that the project will have only temporary impacts and therefore, UGIIP-3 has been categorized as resettlement Category B as per ADB SPS 2009. As a basic development principle, significant resettlement impacts (Category A type project) should be avoided to the extent possible in future subprojects. For any components, the social and resettlement assessments documents will be formulated and approved by ADB before any physical activities start.

5. LGED will ensure that no physical displacement or economic displacement will occur until (i) compensation at full replacement cost has been paid to each displaced person, and (ii) other entitlements listed in the RPs have been provided.

6. This Resettlement and Social Impact Assessment Report has been prepared for water supply. Improvement subproject of Joypurhat Pourashava taken up in phase-2 Package Nr. UGIIP-III-2/JOYP/WS/01/2016. After selection and completion of the designs of the proposed schemes, the safeguard team of the Management, Design and Supervision Consultants (MDSC) conducted resettlement and social impact assessments through thorough investigation of different social safeguard issues including land acquisition and resettlement requirements as per ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS, 2009). The resettlement and social impact assessment report for Joypurhat Pourashava has been prepared based on the feasibility study and detailed engineering designs.

7. During investigations, it was revealed that the water supply subproject proposed for improvement under Package Nr. UGIIP-III-2/JOYP/WS/01/2016 will be implemented on the Pourashava own land and due to the improvement/ construction of the aforesaid water supply scheme are not expecting to have neither any physical nor any economic displacement of any people. As a result, there is no possibility of land acquisition and no structure affected, none found to require relocation, and consequently no involuntary resettlement (IR) impact are anticipating thus the subproject is classified as Category C for IR. Under the circumstances, this report may be treated as due diligence report (DDR) with respect to social safeguard issues for the concern subproject.

WS- JOY

B. Institutional Set-up

8. The Local Government Engineering Department (LGED) and the Department of Public Health Engineering (DPHE), both under the Local Government Division (LGD) of the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives (M/O LGRD&C) and having experience in managing urban and water supply projects financed by ADB, are the executing agencies of the project. The participating Pourashavas are the implementing agencies (IA) with a project implementation unit (PIU) within the Pourashava structure. Implementation activities will be overseen by a Project Management Office (PMO). Management, Design and Supervision Consultants (MDSC) and Governance Improvement and Capacity Development Consultants (GICDC) teams will provide support for (i) detailed engineering design, contract documents preparation and safeguards facilitation; (ii) project management and administrative support; (iii) assistance in supervising construction; (iv) awareness raising on behavioural change activities. Safeguards officers will be appointed in PMO and PIUs and will be responsible to undertake day to day safeguards tasks and requirements including implementation of project’s grievance redress mechanism.

II.SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION 9. Location: Joypurhat district is located in the north-west corner of Bangladesh under Rajshashi division. It is bordered by the West Bangal state of India to the north-west, Panchbibi Upazila to the north, Badalgachi & Dhamurhat Upazila of Naogaon district to the west, Gobindagonj to the east, and Khetlal Upazila to the south. Joypurhat Pouroshova is at the Joypurhat district headquarters. The area of Joypurhat Pourashava is 20.72.km. The total population of Pourashava is 69033 (2011) of which 35278 are male and 33755 are female. The density of population is 3332 per sq.km. Joypurhat Pourashava consist of 9(nine) wards. The rate of increase of population is 2.20% (BBS 2008) which is higher than the national rate of increase of 1.39% (BBS 2008) and the number of household is 16,555.

10. Components: Joypurhat Pourashava has submitted the water supply subproject package for water supply improvement with production tube wells, new pipe laying and rehabilitation of pipes. Package includes 5 production tube wells (PTW) (installation & rehabilitation), complete with pump houses, 01 Overhead tank (680 m3), and 34.3 km new pipe lines connection in different words etc. These schemes will increase the water supply system coverage. The Package Nr. is UGIIP-III-2/NABI/WS/01/2016.

11. Presently, water supply system exists in the Pourashava. 10 nos. of PTWs were installed earlier. At present only 07 PTWS are functioning. Average production per day is 5,800 m3. Average operational hour is 11 hours per day. Around 60 kilometres of total pipelines diameter ranging from 100mm to 300mm is available in the PS, out of which around 14.0 km is transmission and remaining 46.0 km is distribution pipelines. Different types of service connections are existed in the Pourashava; sizes of pipes ranging from 13mm to 25mm. Total 2

WS- JOY

no. of service connections are 3,900. Out of which 3,679 nos. is domestic and 221 nos. is commercial connections. Both metered and non-metered type connections are found in the Pourashava during field visit of MDS consultants. 2,100 nos. of connections are metered and 1,800 nos. of connections are without meters. 3 nos. of street hydrants also exist in the Pourahava. However, 2,500 new service connections (including 1,800 connections without meter) will be constructed with meter. Efficiency of existing 04 nos. submersible pumps are decreasing day by day. Filter bed sand condition of IRP is not up to the mark. Some repair and maintenance works also is required. So, Pourashava has given priority in improvement or rehabilitation of water supply component.

12. The components of the sub-project seek to upgrade and expand the urban services. The water supply schemes are located in different wards of the Pourashava. The proposal is concerned with activities, which address the most acute needs for better urban services and facilities to inhabitants of the Pourashava. Participatory process, involving the stakeholders, has been adopted in selecting the subproject components. Figure-1 shows the location of Joypurhat Pourashava, Figure- 2 shows the Proposed Water Supply Area in Joypurhat Pourashava and in Figure- 3 shows the strip maps of water supply subproject.

13. The Sub-project contains 07 (Seven) Test Tube-well, 07 (Seven) production Tube-wells (PTW) including 05 pump houses, Construction of an overhead Tank (Capacity 680 m3), Expansion a) distribution 32.0 km pipeline network, Construction of 3.50 km transmission pipelines, Construction 2500 Nos. of new connections & Establishment of existing 1800 Nos. Water Service connections with meter etc. All subsequent designs have been done according to the Pourashava/ PMO demand, recommendations and suggestions. Table-1 shows the subproject components including possible social impact and ownership of land.

14. The measures taken in selecting the components: The subproject went through the process of meeting the selection criteria (general and technical), environmental and social safeguard screening and conforming to the municipal infrastructure development plan (PDP) and water supply master plan prepared for Joypurhat Pourashava in UGIIP-II. Locations and sitting of the proposed water supply considered: (i) locating components on government-owned land and/or within existing right-of-way (ROW) to avoid acquisition of land, (ii) taking all possible measures in design and selection of sites to avoid resettlement impacts; if needed (iv) avoiding where possible locations that will result in destruction/disturbance to historical and cultural places/values; (v) avoiding tree-cutting where possible; and (vi) ensuring all planning and design interventions and decisions are made in consultation with beneficiaries, local communities and reflecting inputs from public consultation and disclosure for site selection.

15. Implementation Schedule. Substantial time is required spanning the continuum of subproject preparation, approval, survey, design & estimate, contract award and contract

WS- JOY

execution. Efforts need to be made to follow the schedule of timely implementation of work. Normally the construction work season in Bangladesh runs from October to May (eight months). The Construction works are sometimes impeded for the following reasons:

 Early floods in April/May,  Late floods in September/October,  Natural calamities (cyclone/tornado, excessive floods) occur in April/May and October/November.

16. Normally, the best construction period is only for 6 months a year (October to March). The construction period is sometimes squeezed to 4 months due to natural calamities. However, sometimes, based on time constraint or expediency, construction work may even need to be carried out in the monsoon. Whenever possible, parallel activities can be implemented and consequently, quantum of work can be maximized through efficient planning and adoption of best available practices.

17. Considering the above facts, it has been estimated that the implementation of phase- II of UGIIP-III, water supply of Joypurhat Pourashava will cover 16-months period (tentative), and major works are advisable to take place from January, 2017 to November, 2017. The tentative time-schedule for implementation (as indication) is shown in Figur-4:

WS- JOY

Figure- 1: Map showing Lcation of Joypurhat Pourashava

Figure- 2: Map showing Location of Sub-Project water Supply Components in Joypurhat Pourashava

Strip Map of pump House

WS- JOY

Strip Map of pump House

WS- JOY

Strip Map of P.T.W.

WS- JOY

Strip Map of P.T.W.

WS- JOY

Strip Map of pump House

Figure- 3: Strip Map of Water Supply Schemes of Joypurhat Pourashava.

WS- JOY

Consultation with Mayor & officials of Joypurhat PS Consultation for PTWl near Masua Bazar

Consultation with local people for production tube-well & water supply pipe lines at Joypurhat Pourashava

WS- JOY

Sub-projects Implementation schedule for Package No. UGIIP-III-2/JOYP/WS/01/2016 Period : July '2016-December '2017 YEAR 2016 2017 Item of works MONTH MONTH 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Compliance of Sub- project and approval

Preparation of the bid documents Tendering of the sub-project and the work order

Execution of physical work

Final inspection and complete certification

Figure- 4: Implementation work Schedule of Water Supply

WS-JOY

Table- 1: Components of Joypurhat Pourashava Water Supply sub-project & Ownership of Land. Package No.UGIIP-III-2/JOYP/WS/01/2016 Name of the project Length of Size of the Physical Land PDP Location/Road – Width Road ROW Length PIPES to be Description of required Availability of Sl. No./ Where the of Road Name of Scheme while pipe of Pipe laid in that Road/area where as per Land & No. Scheme T.W./pipeline will be (ROW) will be laid Line (m) Road Pipeline will be Design Ownership No. laid (m) (m) (mm) Installed. (sqm) (m) 1. PDP-19 PART-A: (i) At Bus Terminal N.A N.A N.A N.A Besides 15X9 each Land is available Installation of Test (ii) At Truck Terminal Residential area, P.T.W. & Owner of the TW Size: 38mm (Harail), (iii) At and Educational land is dia, Depth 70m Khanjanpur High institutions, Pourashava (no-05) School mour, (iv) At Markets, Bus and Khanjanpur Bazar (v) Truck Terminal, At Gulsan more Business centre.

2. PDP-19 PART-B: (ii) At Bus Terminal N.A N.A N.A N.A Besides 15X9 each Land is available Installation of (ii) At Truck Terminal Residential area, P.T.W. & Owner of the PTWs Size: (Harail), (iii) At and Educational land is 350mmx150mm , Khanjanpur High institutions, Pourashava Depth-70m School mour (iv) At Markets, Bus and (no-05) Khanjanpur Bazar (v) Truck Terminal, At Gulshan mour Business centre.

3. TLCC PART-C: (i) At Bus Terminal, (ii) N.A N.A N.A N.A Besides 15X9 each Land is available Installation of At Truck Terminal Residential area (Pump & Owner of the Pump house (Civil (Harail), (iii) At and, Educational house) land is works) (no-04) Khanjanpur Bazar, (iv) institutions, Pourashava At Gulsan mour Markets, Bus and Truck Terminal, Business centre. .

4. TLCC Installation of Project Location : At N.A N.A N.A Residential area, 50X60 Land is available Over Head Tank Bus Terminal in Educational Land & Owner of land (OHT) (680-m3) Joypurhat Pourashava institutional, required is (no-01) Business centre, Pourashava Commercial Works Shops, Govt. office.

WS-JOY

Name of the project Length of Size of the Physical Land PDP Location/Road – Width Road ROW Length PIPES to be Description of required Availability of Sl. No./ Where the of Road Name of Scheme while pipe of Pipe laid in that Road/area where as per Land & No. Scheme T.W./pipeline will be (ROW) will be laid Line (m) Road Pipeline will be Design Ownership No. laid (m) (m) (mm) Installed. (sqm) (m) 5. PDP-21 Installation of new Installation of pipe line 1000 34300 16 uPVC Besides Pipeline Land is available pipeline from Bus Terminal to diameter Residential area, will be laid & Owner of land 34300 m Truck Terminal. ranging from Educational along the is Pourashava 110-225 institutions, edge of the Markets, Bus and existing Truck Terminal, roads Business centre, Govt. office. Installation of pipe line 700 6 Do Do Do Do from East road of housing Estate (Via Harail). Installation of pipe line 300 5 Do Do Do Do from west road of housing estate. Installation of pipe line 400 5 Do Do Do Do from S.P office road to police lines. Installation of pipe line 200 5 Do Do Do Do in front of scout Bhaban road. Installation of pipe line 600 3 Do Residential area Do Do from veterinary hospital Hospital, Govt. mour to Sabujnagar office Installation of pipe line 450 6 Do Do Do Do from Tulumandal para to Kutir Shipla. Installation of pipe line 800 5 Do Do Do Do from Tulu Mandal para to Zia college road Installation of pipe line 300 3 Do Do Do Do Madargang Mosque road

WS-JOY

Name of the project Length of Size of the Physical Land PDP Location/Road – Width Road ROW Length PIPES to be Description of required Availability of Sl. No./ Where the of Road Name of Scheme while pipe of Pipe laid in that Road/area where as per Land & No. Scheme T.W./pipeline will be (ROW) will be laid Line (m) Road Pipeline will be Design Ownership No. laid (m) (m) (mm) Installed. (sqm) (m) Installation of pipe line 720 4 Do Do Do Do from Kazipara to Jamalganj road Installation of pipe line 850 4 uPVC 110 Do Do from Alhera school to Diameter Gouripara jamalganj road Installation of pipe line 300 4 uPVC 110 Do Do in front of Pourashava Diameter road Installation of pipe line 620 3.00 uPVC Market Business Do Do from shiswas para Diameter area, Shops Banda Botgash to Ranging from Kashia bari culvert 110-225 Installation of pipe line 1200 5-10 Do Do Do Do Rail Ghumti Kazipara (1200m Installation of pipe line 400 3.50 Do Do Do Do in Hazi Badaruddin road Installation of pipe line 600 3.50 Do Do Do Do in Charaktali to Dhali Bari Installation of pipe line 950 3.50 Do Do Do Do from Rupnagar to Balopara up to Safiq house Installation of pipe line 700 4.00 Do Do Do Do station road to Adarshapara culvert Installation of pipe line 900 4.00 Do Do Do Do from Adarshapara rail Gait Rahmatpur

WS-JOY

Name of the project Length of Size of the Physical Land PDP Location/Road – Width Road ROW Length PIPES to be Description of required Availability of Sl. No./ Where the of Road Name of Scheme while pipe of Pipe laid in that Road/area where as per Land & No. Scheme T.W./pipeline will be (ROW) will be laid Line (m) Road Pipeline will be Design Ownership No. laid (m) (m) (mm) Installed. (sqm) (m) Installation of pipe line 350 3.50 Do Do Do Do in Khanganpur Anser Champ road Installation of pipe line 1200 3.50 Do Do Do Do from Rail Ghumti to Kazipara Installation of pipe line 950 4.00 uPVC 110- Do Do Do from Rupnagar to 225 diameter Balopara up to Safiq house Installation of pipe line 700 3.50 Do Do Do Do station road to Adarshapara culvert Installation of pipe line 900 4.00 Do Do Pipeline will Land is available from Adarshapara rail be laid & Owner of land Gait Rahmatpur along the is Pourashava edge of the existing road Do Installation of pipe line 350 3.00 Do Do Do Do in Khanganpur Anser Champ road Installation of pipe line 70 3.50 Do Do Do Do in Dhurbango road. Installation of Pipe line 3.00 5 Do Do Do Do from West Side Road Off Housing Estate

Installation of Pipe line 700 4 Do Do Do Do from Sadar Road To Pachurchalk Sadhin more Installation of Pipe line 500 3 uPVC 110 Educational Do Do from Pachurchalk Institutions, Internal road

WS-JOY

Name of the project Length of Size of the Physical Land PDP Location/Road – Width Road ROW Length PIPES to be Description of required Availability of Sl. No./ Where the of Road Name of Scheme while pipe of Pipe laid in that Road/area where as per Land & No. Scheme T.W./pipeline will be (ROW) will be laid Line (m) Road Pipeline will be Design Ownership No. laid (m) (m) (mm) Installed. (sqm) (m) Markets. Business centre etc. Installation of Pipe line 300 3-4 Do Do Do Do from Pachurchalk Internal road Installation of Pipe line 600 4 Do Do Do Do from Pashu Hospital More To Sabuz Nagar Internal road Installation of Pipe line 300 4 Do Do Do Do from Zia Collage To Pachurchlak road Installation of Pipe line 300 3 Do Do Do Do from Kundupara road Installation of Pipe line 290 2 Do Do Do Do from SheikPara Internal road Installation of Pipe line 230 3 Do Do Do Do from Sadar Para Primary School road Installation of Pipe line 220 2-3 Do Do Do Do from Meheruddin Link road Installation of Pipe line 400 2-3 Do Do Do Do from Ayin Dr. Para road Installation of Pipe line 200 3-4 Do Residential area, Do Do from Debipur Internal Educational road Institution & Residential area Installation of Pipe line 400 4.00 Do Do Do Do in Cadet College road

WS-JOY

(NO-700) etc. Pourashava 8. PDP-14 Supply and Near pourashava N/A N/A Residential area, N/A Do Installation of masua bazar and Near Business area submersible pump khanjanpur high school Educational

(No-02) mour institution 9. DPD-8 Rehabilitation Joypurhat Bus Terminal N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Do work of IRP area

(No-01) 10. DPD-9 Rehabilitation Khanjanpur High N/A N/A N/A N/A 50X60 Do work of Over School mour (OHT) Head Tank (OHT)

(No-01) 11. TLCC PART-A: A Supply N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A of O&M tools

(No-01) 12. TLCC Component-06: N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Environmental Mitigation Enhancement Works (No-01)

WS-JOY

*Note: Installation of PTWs and Construction of Pump Houses will be done on the same site.

WS- JOY

III.DUE DILIGENCE

A. Objectives of the Study/ Investigation 18. This Social Impact Assessment Report/Due Diligence Report has been prepared to meet the following objectives:

 thorough assessment of social safeguard issues and impacts - major objective is to assess and identify all the possible socioeconomic and resettlement impacts including impacts on women, poor and vulnerable;

 to plan to avoid, minimize, mitigate or compensate for the potential adverse impact;

 to describe the extent of land acquisition and involuntary resettlement impacts;

 to inform and consult the affected people to make them aware about the project activities and take feedback to prepare safeguard plans summarizing mitigation measures, monitoring program/ mechanism, institutional arrangement and presenting budget for resettlement;

 to describe the likely economic impacts and identified livelihood risks of the proposed project components; and

 to describe the process undertaken during project design to engage stakeholders and the planned information disclosure measures and the process for carrying out consultation with affected people and facilitating their participation during project implementation;

 to establish a framework for grievance redress mechanism for affected persons (APs);

 to describe the applicable national and local legal framework for the project, and define the IR policy principles applicable to the project; and

 to define entitlements of affected persons, and assistance and benefits available under the project;

B. Methodology used for Assessing Land Acquisition and Resettlement 19. Data collection Necessary data regarding social, economic and gender information has been collected primarily through desk work, field visits to the proposed subproject sites and one- on-one interviews with stakeholders.

WS- JOY

20. Consultations with public and Stakeholders: Comprehensive discussions with MDSC, Joypurhat Pourashava officials, community people living near by the proposed subprojects schemes, public representatives and other stakeholders to identify different issues, problems/ constraints and prospects and feedback from the participants in connection to water supply subproject construction under the subproject. The consultation covers mainly information dissemination about the project/subproject and its scope, possible positive and negative impacts, involvement of local people in different activities of the project and employment in project works, etc. The public participation process included (i) identifying interested parties (stakeholders); (ii) informing and providing the; (iii) creating opportunities and mechanisms whereby they can participate and raise their views (issues, comments, and concerns) with regard to the proposed development; (iv) giving the stakeholders feedback on process findings and recommendations; and (v) ensuring compliance to process requirements with regards to the environmental and related legislation. A record of public consultation has been annexed with the report as appendix-1.

21. The safeguard team of MDSC visited Joypurhat Pourashava from 09-10 December, 2015 had meetings with Mayor, Executive Engineer, M.E, Assistant Engineer (water supply), Sub Assistant Engineer of the Pourashava, community leaders, local public representatives and different stakeholders at Pourashava office and at subproject areas with local people, community leaders, and local government’s representatives. The purposes of these meetings were public consultations as outlined above. During field visits, the consultants investigated about the existing condition of the water supply alignments and emphasized on the issues like land acquisition, resettlement and rehabilitation. The participants were also informed of the subproject cut-off date of 30 January 2016 (date of completion of census survey).

22. As a part of public consultation, relevant consultants and Pourashava officials arranged meetings at Pourashava office and at different places locations. Four formal meetings were arranged by the Pourashava official with the stakeholders. The meeting sites were at Khanjanpur (ward no-02), Harail Masua bazaar, Joypurhat bus terminal, Joypurhat Pourashava on 09.12.15 and 10.12.15. Near about 50 participants were present during the consultation. The main agenda was installation of production tube-well repair & maintenance of production tube-well, installation of water supply pipe lines. The potential affected persons and local residents/ community leaders and other stakeholders were also consulted through group meetings and personal contract. During field visits, consultants physically visited the above mentioned scheme sites to verify the likely impacts on the people with respect to land acquisition & resettlement, and other social safeguard issues. During site visits, concern Executive engineer, Assistant Engineer, one Sub Assistant Engineer, and a surveyor of Pourashava accompanied the consultants to assist to identify the locations of proposed water supply sub projects and organized consultations/ meetings with the local representatives and people of the subproject area.

WS- JOY

23. During discussions, the local people mentioned about the insufficiency of civic facilities, conditions of existing water supply facilities. The people expressed their happiness for getting project assistance for improvement of the Pourashava facilities. The proposed water supplies under the subprojects were a long felt demand of the people of the town. The records of public consultation have been shown in APPENDIX-1

24. Transect walks. The MDSC Regional Resettlement Specialist together with Joypurhat Pourashava engineering staff conducted transect walks during November to December 2015 to do rapid appraisal of the proposed locations and alignments of subprojects using a standard IR checklist annexed with this report as Appendix 2.

25. Reconnaissance Survey. The MDSC’s social safeguard team visited Joypurhat Pourashava during 20 December to 22 December/2015 to measure the length of the proposed water supply subprojects under Package No. UGIIP-III-2/JOYP/WS/01/2016, count the number of trees, structures, natural resources, mobile vendors/ hawkers, and other facilities, etc. along ROWs, conduct informal discussions with local communities, formal discussions with Pourashava engineers, and visual assessment of IR impacts. The output of the survey was discussed with the design engineers of the project to incorporate into the designs to minimize the IR impacts.

26. Census of affected persons and inventory of affected assets. As nobody was found who may be affected by the subproject activities, no structures to be removed/relocated/demolished, and no mobile hawkers/vendors in the subproject alignments, the census of affected persons and inventory of affected assets was not required.

27. Social Safeguard Unit of MDSC has verified the proposed water supply subproject through the questionnaire that is titled” Initial Evaluation Assessment Format”. Through this format, the team members have organized consultation with water supply subprojects users and gathered feedback on the sub projects. Finally, it has been concluded that there is no impacts on involuntary resettlement.

IV.FINDINGS

28. Involuntary Resettlement. As per results of the data gathering, detailed survey of the sites and alignments together with review of land records made, the IR Checklist has been completed (Appendix 2). The results show the subprojects is considered as Category C, i.e., the subproject is considered as Category C, i.e. the subproject does not require temporary or permanent land acquisition, and there are no impacts involving the loss of land, structures, crops and trees, businesses or income.

29. All water supply subprojects components under Package Nr: UGIIP-III- 2/JOYP/WS/01/2016 will involve construction & installation of water supply schemes and improvement activities for the existing system as mentioned in table-1. The schemes will be 22

WS- JOY

implemented on the Pourashava owned land and along the edge of the existing roads. MDSC together with PMO confirmed ownership and land records of Joypurhat Pourashava of the existing pipe line and required widths in the ROWs therefore no land acquisition is required. Ownership certificate is given in Appendix-5.

30. The Social Safeguard Unit of MDSC of UGIIP-III further verified and checked the water supply subproject through the questionnaire that is titled “Initial Evaluation Assessment Format”. Through this format, the team members have organized consultation with subprojects users and gathered feedback on the subprojects. There are no encroachers, squatters, mobile vendors and hawkers along the ROW of proposed water supply subprojects. Thus, it has been concluded that there is no IR impact and the subproject is classified as Category C for IR. For recording and documentation purpose the following are the socio-economic information and profile of survey participants:

(i) No BPL on proposed subproject location and alignments (ii) No indigenous people (IP) on proposed subproject location and along the proposed water supply alignments.

31. There is sufficient space along the ROWs for staging area, construction equipment, and stockpiling of materials. Besides, there is no possibility of affecting any structure needing relocation by the subproject activities as per detailed design of the components. Moreover, there is no possibility of loss of livelihood, neither permanent nor temporary due to loss of land/ assets occupied or squatting by anybody, is expected for the proposed development. Therefore, the potential impact of the subproject on privately owned land/ assets has been fully eliminated, and correspondingly, no issues relating to involuntary resettlement will occur during implementation of the subproject.

32. Although concerned water supply subprojects schemes unlikely to have any IR or resettlement impact, however, the construction/ installation of the sub-project components may cause minor temporary disturbances limited to dust and noise, movement of people, etc. which will be limited to the construction period only and can easily be mitigated by quick and timely completion of works, taking dust suppression measures removal of debris regularly, providing alternate roads/ pathways and access to houses during construction erecting different road furniture where required to make the vehicular movement safe and to minimize road accidents. For mitigating noise pollution, brick crushing yards, bituminous hot mix plants and concrete batching plants shall be located sufficiently away from habitation (at least 1km). Workers at the vicinity of strong noise shall wear earplugs.

33. All the above measures will be taken by the contractors during construction as per conditions included in the contract documents. The contractors shall avoid congested areas and narrow roads for carrying construction materials and equipment to site and schedule transportation to avoid peak traffic period on certain roads and sequence activities to minimize disturbances. The contractors shall also maintain vehicles and construction machinery and prohibit the use of air horns in settlement areas. Thus impacts during construction phase can be

WS- JOY

mitigated through good construction practices as documented in the subproject’s initial environmental examination report and environmental management plan (EMP).

34. Table- 2 summarizes the findings of the data collection, field visits and surveys. If in the course of subproject implementation land will be required and stakeholders are willing to donate any land, donation procedures will follow the RF and to be endorsed by an independent third party evaluator (e.g., civil society and non ex- officio representatives of the TLCC) to ensure there is no significant social and economic impact due to land donation.

WS-JOY

Table- 2: Assessment of Social /IR Impacts of Joypurhat Pourashava water supply: Sub-Project Package Nr. UGIIP-III-2/WS/JOYP/01/ 2016.

PDP Resettle SL No./ Type of Name of ment Indigenous Name of Schemes Possible Social IR Impact Remarks No Scheme Loss/Effect APs required People No. or not

1. PDP-19 PART-A: Installation of No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not Not Test TW Size: 38mm dia, reported applicable  No requirement for land acquisition required found Affected Depth 70m  Temporary (no-05) disturbance of Pedestrian and vehicles to be addressed in the Sub-Project environmental management plan (EMP) 2. PDP-19 PART-B: Installation of No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found Not PTWs Size: reported applicable  No requirement for land acquisition required Affected 350mmx150mm , Depth-  Temporary disturbance of Pedestrian 70m (no-05) and vehicles to be addressed in the Sub-Project environmental management plan (EMP) 3. TLCC PART-C: Installation of No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found Not Pump house (Civil works) reported applicable  No requirement for land acquisition required Affected (no-04)  Temporary disturbance of Pedestrian and vehicles to be addressed in the Sub-Project environmental management plan (EMP)

WS-JOY

PDP Resettle SL No./ Type of Name of ment Indigenous Name of Schemes Possible Social IR Impact Remarks No Scheme Loss/Effect APs required People No. or not

4. TLCC Installation of Over Head No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found Not 3 Tank (OHT) (680-m ) reported applicable  No requirement for land acquisition required Affected (no-01)  Temporary disturbance of Pedestrian and vehicles to be addressed in the Sub-Project environmental management plan (EMP)

5. PDP-21 Installation of new pipeline No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found Not 34300 m reported applicable  No requirement for land acquisition required Affected  Temporary disturbance of Pedestrian and vehicles to be addressed in the Sub-Project environmental management plan (EMP) 6. PDP-18 Supply of Meter Box No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found Not ( NO-2500) reported applicable required Affected 7. PDP-22 Installation of new Service No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found connection reported applicable  No requirement for land acquisition required Not

 Temporary disturbance of Pedestrian Affected (NO-700) and vehicles to be addressed in the Sub-Project environmental management plan (EMP) 8. PDP-14 Supply and Installation of No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found submersible pump reported applicable  No requirement for land acquisition required Not

 Temporary disturbance of Pedestrian Affected (No-02) and vehicles to be addressed in the Sub-Project environmental management plan (EMP))

WS-JOY

PDP Resettle SL No./ Type of Name of ment Indigenous Name of Schemes Possible Social IR Impact Remarks No Scheme Loss/Effect APs required People No. or not

9. DPD-8 Rehabilitation work of IRP No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found reported applicable  No requirement for land acquisition required Not (No-01)  Temporary disturbance of Pedestrian Affected and vehicles to be addressed in the Sub-Project environmental management plan (EMP) 10. DPD-9 Rehabilitation work of Over No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found Head Tank (OHT) reported applicable  No requirement for land acquisition required Not  Temporary disturbance of Pedestrian Affected (No-01) and vehicles to be addressed in the Sub-Project environmental management plan (EMP) 11. TLCC PART-A: A Supply of O&M No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found tools reported applicable required Not Affected (No-01)

12. TLCC Environmental Mitigation No loss Not  No IR impacts Not Not found Enhancement Works reported applicable required Not Affected (No-01)

35. Indigenous People. In Joypurhat Pourashava there are no indigenous people. The IP Categorization form is attached as Appendix 3. The subproject has no impact on IP and thus has been classified as Category C for IP. 36. Others. The subproject will not (i) result in labour retrenchment or encourage child labour or (ii) directly or indirectly contribute to the spread of HIV/AIDS, human trafficking, or the displacement of girls and women. The subproject will have no potential impact on any female-headed household. 37. Cost. Table 3 below provides the costs and sources of funds to ensure social safeguards are considered in the subproject implementation.

Table- 3: Social Safeguards Implementation Cost Related to Water Supply at Joypurhat Pourashava

Activities Amount (Tk) Source of Funds (i) public consultation and disclosure 300,000 PIU (ii) grievance redress mechanism 100,000 PIU (iii) safeguards capacity building program 50,000 Under MDSC costs (vi)materials for awareness raising and 330,000 Under GICDC costs implementation of consultation and participation plan

38. Outcome of the Subproject will be improved water supply facilities, increased service coverage to the citizens of core areas, improved capacity of managing water supply system, increased capacity for maintenance of the system, etc. and increased revenue for the Pourashava. The subproject is expected to guarantee health condition of the residents of the town.

39. Subproject benefits. Joypurhat Pourashava subprojects have been designed to improve the quality of life of its citizens, including poor communities and slum residents and to enhance the town’s role as a market, transportation, services and manufacturing centre. Residents and visitors will both benefit from improved water supply. The town economy will be enhanced through improved Pourashava management and efficiency, improved productivity as a result of health improvement, improvement in basic services, improvement of capacity for maintenance of the assets and generation of employment. 40. Many people will also be employed in construction activities. Construction of water supply facilities will improve effectiveness of water supply system causing higher standards of living of individual and public health. Significant benefits of the subprojects will: (i) Increase in land values (ii) Increase of trade and business (iii) Employment generation (iv) Improvement in health and productivity (v) Revenue generation from improved services and enlarged service population.

41. The implementation of the sub-project will improve the water supply situation as well as living conditions of the urban dwellers through getting safe drinking water. Health condition of the dwellers will be improved and earning capacity will be increased. Overall, the selected sub-project will ensure the safe drinking water and decrease the diarrhoea, cholera and other water borne diseases.

42. Thus the subproject implementation will bring economic gains to the local people in the form of increased employment and less spending on healthcare and productivity. Extended benefits will include employment opportunity for local people during construction and maintenance.

V.FUTURE CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE

43. This due diligence report and other relevant documents will be made available at public locations in the Pourashava and posted on the websites of LGED and ADB. The same information will be posted in Joypurhat Pourashava and provided to members of TLCC and community representatives.

44. .A consultation and participation plan is prepared for UGIIP-3; consultation activities will be coordinated by the PMO, PIU (Joypurhat Pourashava) and consultant team to ensure that the communities are fully aware of the activities at all stages of the project implementation. During construction phase, Joypurhat Pourashava with assistance of consultant teams will conduct (i) public meetings with affected communities to discuss and plan work programs and allow issues to be raised and addressed once construction has started; and (ii) smaller-scale meetings to discuss and plan construction work with individual communities to reduce disturbance and other impacts, and to provide a mechanism through which stakeholders can participate in project monitoring and evaluation. The PIU will coordinate the schedule with the contractors and will ensure proper public consultations are held prior to start of civil works. Documentation should be included in the social safeguards monitoring report.

45. The relevant information in this due diligence report together with following information on GRM will be translated to local language and disclosed to persons in the subproject area. Documentation will be included during social safeguard monitoring report. The social safeguard officers (XEN) will disclose information.

46. Grievances redress mechanism. A project-specific grievance redress mechanism (GRM) will be established to receive, evaluate and facilitate the resolution of AP’s concerns, complaints, and grievances about the social and environmental performance at the level of the project. This is outlined in Figure 7 below The GRM will aim to provide a time-bound and transparent mechanism to voice and resolve social and environmental concerns linked to the project. The multi-tier GRM for the project is outlined below, each tier having time-bound schedules and with responsible persons identified to address grievances and seek appropriate persons’ advice at each stage, as required. The PMO, MDSC safeguards team and GICDC team assist the PIU in establishing the GRM and building the capacity of the GRC members to address project-related complaints/grievances. Once contractors are mobilized, inform them of their role and responsibilities and procedures involved in the GRM.

47. PIU and governance improvement and capacity building consultants (GICDC) will conduct Pourashava wise awareness campaigns to ensure that people in the subproject area are made aware of grievance redress procedures and entitlements, and will work with the PMO and MDSC to help ensure that their grievances are addressed.

48. Affected persons will have the flexibility of conveying grievances /suggestions by dropping grievance redress/suggestion forms in complaints/suggestion boxes that have already been installed by PIU or through telephone hot lines, M-01712362200,01730302703, by post or by written in a complains register in PIU of Joypurhat Pourashava office, Appendix- 4 has the sample grievance registration form.

49. Careful documentation of the name of the complainant, date of receipt of the complaint, address/contact details of the person, location of the problem area, and how the problem was resolved will be undertaken. PMO safeguard officer will have the overall responsibility for timely grievance redress on environmental and social safeguards issues and for registration of grievances, related disclosure, and communication with the suggested party through the PIU designated safeguard focal person.

50. Grievance redresses process. In case of grievances that are immediate and urgent in the perception of the complainant, the contractor and MDSC on-site personnel will provide the most easily accessible or first level of contact for quick resolution of grievances. Contact phone numbers and names of the concerned PIU safeguard focal person and contractors; will be posted at all construction sites at visible locations. Sample of grievance registration form has been given Appendix-04.

(i) 1st Level Grievance. The phone number of the PIU office should be made available at the construction site signboards. The contractors and PIU safeguard focal person can immediately resolve on-site in consultation with each other, and will be required to do so within 7 days of receipt of a complaint/grievance.

(ii) 2nd Level Grievance. All grievances that cannot be redressed within 7 days at field/ward level will be reviewed by the grievance redress cell (GRC) headed by Panel Mayor1 of the Pourashava with support from PIU designated safeguard focal person and MDSC regional environment and resettlement specialists. GRC will attempt to resolve them within 15 days.2 The PIU designated safeguard focal person will be responsible to see through the process of redress of each grievance.

(iii) 3rd Level Grievance. The PIU designated safeguard focal person will refer any unresolved or major issues to the PMO safeguard officer and MDSC national environmental and resettlement specialists. The PMO in consultation with these officers/specialists will resolve them within 30 days.

51. Despite the project GRM, an aggrieved person shall have access to the country's legal system at any stage, and accessing the country's legal system can run parallel to accessing the GRM and is not dependent on the negative outcome of the GRM.

52. In the event that the established GRM is not in a position to resolve the issue, the affected person also can use the ADB Accountability Mechanism (AM) through directly contacting (in writing) the Complaint Receiving Officer (CRO) at ADB headquarters or the ADB Bangladesh Resident Mission (BRM). The complaint can be submitted in any of the official languages of ADB’s DMCs. The ADB Accountability Mechanism information has been included in the PID to be distributed to the affected communities, as part of the project GRM.

53. Record keeping. Records of all grievances received, including contact details of complainant, date the complaint was received, nature of grievance, agreed corrective actions and the date these

1Grievance redress committee (GRC) has been formed at Joypurhat Pourashava. The GRC comprises of the Panel Mayor-1 as Chairperson, 1(one) male, 1 female councilor, a PIU representative (Secretary of the Pourashava), 1 NGO representative, as members and the complainant will also be included as member of the committee. For project related grievances, if arises, representatives of APs, Community based organizations (CBOs), eminent citizens, will be invited as observers. 30

were affected and final outcome will be kept by PIU. The number of grievances recorded and resolved and the outcomes will be displayed/disclosed in the PMO office, Pourashava office, and on the web, as well as reported in monitoring reports submitted to ADB on a semi-annual basis.

54. Periodic review and documentation of lessons learned. The PMO safeguard officer will periodically review the functioning of the GRM in each Pourashava and record information on the effectiveness of the mechanism, especially on the project’s ability to prevent and address grievances.

55. Costs. All costs involved in resolving the complaints (meetings, consultations, communication and reporting/information dissemination) will be borne by the concerned PIU at Pourashava-level; while costs related to escalated grievances will be met by the PMO. Cost estimates for grievance redress are included in the resettlement cost estimates for affected persons.

Affected person

Yes, within7 days st Field/ward level Grievance 1 Level redressed and Grievance Contractor and PIU designated safeguard focal person record keeping

No Yes, within Pourashava level (GRC) 15 days Grievance 2nd Level PIU designated safeguard focal person, redressed and Grievance MDSC regional environmental and record keeping resettlement specialists

No Yes, PMO level Grievance rd within30 3 Level PMO Safeguard Officer and MDSC days redressed and Grievance national environmental and resettlement record keeping specialists

Note: GRC = Grievance Redress Cell; PIU = Project Implementation Unit; MDSC = Management. Design and Supervision Consultants; PMO = Project Management Office

Figure- 5: Project Grievance Redress Mechanism

VI.MITIGATION OF SOCIAL CONCERNS

56. Although the road and drainage schemes under the subproject of UGIIP-III construction/improvement is not expecting any land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, physical or economic displacement, or temporary restrictions to land use. However, some

assumptions were made that during civil works for different schemes, pedestrians, residents and shop keepers/different business operators carrying out different economic activities particularly beside the road; customers might face temporary disturbances in connection to movement and operate their business. In order to avoid even minor temporary disturbances during the construction activities, the following measures are suggested to eliminate such impacts:  Informing all the residents, local households and traders about the nature and duration of works in advance, so that they can make necessary preparation to face the situation.  Providing wooden walkways/ planks across trenches for pedestrians and metal sheets where vehicles access is required.  Increasing the workforce and using the appropriate equipment to complete the work in a minimum timeframe.  Suggest people to wear musk to protect from dust problem during construction.  Other social concern, if any, shall be properly solved by the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) under the Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) of the project to be formed by the PIU.  Any other preventive measures to be adopted as required considering the situation during construction. 57. The above mitigation measures during construction activities will ease the temporary disturbances in connection to movement and operation business of the local residents, pedestrian customers and clients from shopping locally or using the usual services from local business.

VII.CONCLUSIONS

58. Important findings of the study in connection to social safeguard issues are (i) improvement of water supply will be carried out on the Pourashava owned land and along the edge of ROWs of the existing alignments of the roads and there will be no requirement of land acquisition; (ii) most of the pipeline will be constructed in the road side shoulder along the edge of the road; (iii) there are no structures, houses, shops, trees or any other establishments on the ROWs of the proposed water supply subprojects alignments; (iv) as a result no dislocation, demolition of houses or structures will be required due to the development activities; (vi) the local people unanimously welcomed the project and showed positive attitude to the improvement of the proposed subproject. None was found to oppose the subproject; (vii) urban residents and the rural residents in surrounding hinterland will benefit from the proposed water supply subproject for making available the pure drinking water creating better access to urban markets & social services provided in the project town;(viii) no potential negative impact could not be identified and (ix) business or economic activities will not be impeded resulting losses in income or asset.

59. A due diligence process was conducted for the subproject to examine the IR issues particularly with respect to the requirements of the ADB’s SPS (2009) and ARIPO. The sup project of water supply proposed will be of straight forward construction on the existing ROWs. So, implementation of the subproject will neither affect any land or structure. Any disturbances will be limited to construction period only. The likely impacts are short-term, localized and could easily be avoided or mitigated. The results of the study suggest that the impact of this subproject does not incur any land acquisition, resettlement or economic displacement.

60. The Project Director (PD) will carry out internal monitoring through the PMO and PIU with the support from MDSC. For this subproject, PIU will provide PMO regular updates on (i) GRM

establishment; (ii) report of public consultations and disclosures conducted; (iv) complaints/grievance received, if any, and resolutions conducted; and (iv) unanticipated IR impacts during subproject implementation not included in this due diligence report.

61. Based on the findings presented in this due diligence report, the Joypurhat Pourashava Subproject Package Nr: UGIIP-III-2/JOYP/WS/01/2016 will not require land acquisition and will not cause any involuntary resettlement impacts. There is also no IPs identified in the subproject area. Thus it is concluded that the subproject is Category C for IR and Category C for IP as per ADB SPS 2009.

VIII.APPENDIX 1: RECORDS OF PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS IN JOYPURHAT POURASHAVA FOR WATER SUPPLY

Public Consultation Meeting: 01 Venue: Harail truck terminal, No of Participants: 10 Date: 09/12/2015, Time: 3.40 PM Agenda: Consultation Meeting in Planning, Installation of production tube-well at truck terminal, Joypurhat Pourashava (phase-2).

The public consultation meeting was held near Joypurhat Pourashava at harail truck terminal for the subproject: “Installation of production Tube-well and was presided over by the Executive .Engineer”. Consultants from Social Safeguard Unit of MDSC, UGIIP-III were present in the meeting. In the meeting water users, other beneficiaries of the water supply sub-project, local community leaders, businessmen, representative of drivers, ME & AE of Pourashava and others were also present. The XEN and the Safeguard Officer of the Pourashava briefed the participants regarding the goals and objectives of the project and safeguard issues relating to public disturbance during construction period and provable mitigation measures and informed the meeting that the proposed sub-project will be implemented on the Pourashava owned land and there will be no land acquisition for implementation of the sub-project and public donation of land will also not be required. He also informed the meeting that no indigenous/ tribal people will be affected.

A project brief containing an overview of potential resettlement impacts and entitlement for the affected persons (APs), were provided and explained to the participants. The Pourashava officials, some beneficiaries and few community leaders representing the area participated in the discussion. Some issues were raised during public consultations that have been addressed in the Due Diligence Report (DDR), but these issues would not pose any significant constraint in the implementation of proposed sub-project. The meeting concluded with thanks from the chair to the participants. The list of Participants and a Photograph of the consultation meeting are given below:

Attendance of Participants

Consultation at truck terminal (Harail) area Date: 09/12/2015.

Key Issues of Discussion

Key issues Major Findings 1 Water Supply Water supply system has been existing in the Pourashava. 10 PTWs were installed earlier. Of which 5 are out of order. The present system can cover only 30% of the area. So the present system cannot fulfill the demand of the people. The Pourashava area has expanded and the population has increased. To fulfill the demand, 5 more PTWs need to be installed and regeneration of two old PTWs. Harial Truck -Terminal is close to the Pourashava. This area does not have piped water supply. People have long been demanding piped water supply service in the area. They now depend on hand- tube well for water. They want to have the advantage of water supply system. The ‘Truck -Owners’ Association’ and the ‘Labors’ Association’ have fervently requested a PTW in the Joypurhat truck terminal area. They are looking for better services from Pourashava and it will create interest among the people to pay bill as well as tax. 2 Service and tax of The residents of this community pay tax regularly. Both metered and non-metered Pourashava water tariff system is available in the PS. Billing is done regularly and the billing system has been computerized. If water supply is extended, the people of the extended area will pay the water tariff regularly including other taxes. People are looking forward for better services from the PS. With the water supply services in operation the people would be more inspired to pay tax.

Local people’s opinions on The Community has expressed strong opinion that they will participate in the 3 improvement of the condition operation and maintenance of the water supply system and will pay water tariff of water supply regularly as this will bring them safe drinking water.

People will willingly support this water supply project and they are ready to co-operate Community’s willingness to 4 for development of water supply and installation of water line, service connections support Pourashava including meters.

Consultation Meeting 02

Venue: Joypurhat bus stand, No of Participants: 11 Date: 09.12.2015, Time: 3.30 P.M. Agenda: Consultation Meeting in Planning, installation of production tube-well for water supply in phase-2.

The public consultation meeting was held at Joypurhat Bus Terminal and was presided over by the Executive .Engineer of Joypurhat Pourashava.for the subproject: “Installation of production Tube- well”. Consultants from Social Safeguard Unit of MDSC, UGIIP-III were present in the meeting. In the meeting, water users, beneficiaries of the water supply of local people, Pourashava officials, road users, were present.

A project brief prepared for each Pourashava that provided an overview of potential resettlement impacts and explained proposed entitlement for affected persons (APs), were provided and explained to the participants. XEN, the Safeguard Officer of the Pourashava, informed that the proposed subproject will not encroach on any private land as the land of the ROWs belongs to the Pourashava and the sub-project will be implemented on the Pourashava own land and along the side of the existing roads and there will be no land acquisition for implementation of the sub-project. Public donation of land will also not be required.

The XEN also briefed the participants regarding the goals and objectives of the projects and safeguard issues relating to public disturbance during construction period and also probable mitigation measures in view of ADB guideline of safeguard measures and also informed the meeting that no indigenous /tribal people will be affected.

The, some beneficiaries and few community leaders representing the area participated in the discussion. Some issues were raised during public consultations that have been addressed in the Due Diligence Report (DDR), but these issues would not pose any significant constraint in the implementation of proposed sub-project.

During open discussion session, participants raised following questions, queries and suggestions:  Ensure quality work and timely completion of proposed road.  Avoid land acquisition and livelihood loss.  Continuous communication with community and ensure public consultation.  The authority should not disturbing livelihood of low income group of the Pourashava.  Ensuring proper safely measures during construction period.

The meeting concluded with thanks from the chair to the participants.

Participants list and a Photograph of consultation meeting is given below:

Attendance of Participants

Consultation for production tube-well at Joypurhat bus terminal

Key Issues of Discussion

Key issues Major Findings 1. Water Supply

Water supply system has been existing in the Pourashava. 10 PTWs were installed earlier. Of which 5 are out of order. The present system can cover only 30% of the area. So the present system cannot fulfill the demand of the people. The Pourashava area has expanded and the population of Pourashava has increased & their status of living have enhanced. On the other hand, labour association and owners association of Joypurhat Truck Terminal fervently requested to construct a Production Tube Well in the bus terminal area. At present they are using hand-tube-wells for wash, drinking and other purposes. Sufficient groundwater is available in the shallow aquifer which .can be harnessed through PTWs and use for domestic water supply.

2 Service and tax of The residents of this community are paying tax regularly. The people strongly Pourashava committed to pay taxes in future including water tariff when the water supply system will be operative in their area.

3 Local people’s opinions on At present both volumetric and fixed tariff systems have been existing. The people improvement of the want volumetric tariff system with meter connections to reduce wastage and water condition of water supply loss. In their opinion the present non-metered fixed rate is very low.

4 Community’s willingness to People will willingly support this water supply (installation of production tube-well) support Pourashava system. They are ready to co-operate for development of water supply and installation of PTWs, water lines, meters, etc .

Consultation Meeting 03

Venue: Khanjanpur Bazaar, Ward no-02 No of Participants: 17 Date: 09.12.2015, Time: 4:50 P.M. Agenda: Consultation Meeting in Planning, installation of production tube-well and water supply line in phase-2.

The public consultation meeting was presided over by the Asstt. Engineer (W.S) of the PS at Khanjanpur bazar in Ward No. 02 for “Installation of production Tube-well & water supply pipe line (Phase-2).” The Participants came from urban communities/road users/ drainage beneficiaries, members of ward committees and representatives of local government agencies. Consultants from Social Safeguard Unit of MDSC, UGIIP-III were also present in the meeting.

Asstt. Engineer (W.S), Pourashava informed the meeting that the proposed subproject will not encroach on any land as the subproject will be implemented on Pourashava owned land and along the sides of the existing roads. ROWs of the land belong to Pourashava.

A project brief prepared for the Pourashava that provided an overview of potential resettlement impacts and explained proposed entitlement for affected persons (APs), were provided and explained to the participants. Asstt .Engineer (W.S) Pourashava informed that the proposed subproject will not encroach on any land.

The safeguard officer of the Pourashava also briefed the participants regarding the goals and objectives of the projects and safeguard issues relating to public disturbance during construction period and also probable mitigation measures highlighting that there will be no land acquisition or public donation of land for subproject implementation as the activities will be implemented inside the ROW’s and also informed the meeting that no indigenous /tribal people will be affected.

The Pourashava officials, some beneficiaries and few community leaders representing the area participated in the discussion. Some issues were raised during public consultations that have been addressed in the Due Diligence Report (DDR), but these issues would not pose any significant constraint in the implementation of proposed sub-project.

During open discussion session, participants raised following questions, queries and suggestions:  Ensure quality of work and timely completion of proposed road.  Avoid land acquisition and livelihood loss.  Continuous communication with community and ensure public consultation.  The authority should not disturbing livelihood of low income group of the Pourashava.  Ensuring proper safely measures during construction period.

The meeting concluded with thanks from the chair to the participants. Participants list and a Photograph of consultation meeting are given below:

Attendance of Participants:-

Consultation at Khanjanpur bazaar (word no-02) for production tube-well and water supply pipe line

Key issues of Discussion

Sl. Key issues Major Findings No. Water supply system has been existing in the Pourashava for long time. The present system cannot fulfill the demand of the people. The Pourashava area has expanded, the population of Pourashava has increased & the status of living of Pourashava people has improved. On the other hand, the local people of Khanjahanpur bazaar 1. Water Supply area (ward-2) has fervently requested for constructing a Production Tube Well in their area. At present they are using hand-tube-wells for wash, drinking and other purposes. Sufficient groundwater is available in the shallow aquifer which .can be harnessed through PTWs and use for domestic water supply.

2. Local people’s opinions Local people have expressed happiness on hearing that the water supply system of on improvement of the Joypurhat Pourashava would be improved by providing new PTWs and repairing old existing water supply ones including installation of new pipelines and water meters. The people opined that system issues by the implementation of the sub-project, pure drinking water would be available to them. Their long felt demand would thus be fulfilled. People urged for strong maintenance system so that they can have uninterrupted services. 3. Service and tax of The residents of this community are paying tax regularly. The people are strongly Pourashava committed to pay taxes in future also including water tariff when the water supply system will be operative in their area. 4. Community’s willingness People of this area will willingly support this project. Nobody was found to oppose the to support Pourashava project; rather they are very happy with the Pourashava for taking initiatives to improve the water supply system.

Consultation Meeting: 04

Venue: Masua bazaar (near Pourashava office), No of Participants: 10 Date: 09.12.2015, Time: 03:00 P.M.

Agenda: Consultation Meeting for maintenance of production tube-well.

The public consultation meeting was presided over by the Asstt. Engineer (W.S) at Masua bazaar (near Pourashava office) for maintenance of production tube-well. The Participants came from urban communities/road users/ drainage beneficiaries, members of ward committees, businessmen including hotel/ restaurant owners, students, drivers, and representatives of local government agencies, etc. Consultants from Social Safeguard Unit of MDSC, UGIIP-III were also present in the meeting. About 30% participants were women.

Asstt. Engineer (W.S) Pourashava informed that the proposed subproject will not encroach on any private land.

The safeguard officer of the Pourashava briefed the participants regarding the goals and objectives of the projects and safeguard issues relating to public disturbance during construction period and also probable mitigation measures in view of ADB guideline of safeguard measures highlighting that there will be no land acquisition or public donation of land for subproject implementation as the activities will be implemented inside the ROW’s and also informed the meeting that no indigenous /tribal people will be affected.

The meeting concluded with thanks from the chair to the participants. Participants list and a Photograph of consultation meeting are given below:

Attendance of Participants

Consultation for maintenance of production tube-well at masua bazaar near Pourashava office

Key Issues of Discussion

Sl. Key issues Major Findings No. 1 Water Supply Water supply system is existing in the Pourashava for long time. The present system cannot fulfill the demand of the people. The Pourashava area has expanded, the population of Pourashava has increased & the status of living of Pourashava people has improved. On the other hand, the local people of Masua bazaar area has fervently requested for maintaining/ repairing the Production Tube Well in their area. Sufficient groundwater is available in the shallow aquifer which .can be harnessed through PTWs and use for domestic water supply if maintained properly.

2 Service and Tax of The residents of this community are paying tax regularly. The people are strongly Pourashava committed to pay taxes in future also including water tariff when the water supply system will be operative in their area. Local People’s opinion Local people have expressed happiness on hearing that the water supply system of 3 on improvement of the Joypurhat Pourashava would be improved by providing new PTWs and repairing old condition of water ones including installation of water meters. The people opined that by the supply implementation of the sub-project, pure drinking water would be available to them. Their long felt demand would thus be fulfilled. People urged for strong maintenance system so that they can have uninterrupted services and agreed to participate in the operation and maintenance of the system. People also feel that meters should be installed to prevent water loss.

Community’s People of this area will willingly support this project. Nobody was found to oppose willingness to support the project; rather they are very happy with the Pourashava for taking initiatives to 4 Pourashava improve the water supply system.

IX.APPENDIX 2: INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACT CHECKLIST

Note: This is an expanded checklist based on ADB IR Impact Assessment Checklist. The modifications are indented to facilitate quick IR assessment by PIUs of a proposed subproject. The checklist may be modified as deemed necessary during project implementation

A. Introduction Each subproject/component needs to be screened for any involuntary resettlement impacts which will occur or have already occurred. This screening determines the necessary action to be taken by the project team/design consultants.

B. Information on proposed scheme/subproject: a. District name: Joypurhat b. Location: Joypurhat Pourashava (District H.Q) c. Proposed scheme considered in this checklist: (check one)

roads slaughterhouse drainages market x water supply community centre/auditorium solid waste management bus and truck terminals sanitation river ghats (Toilets, septage management. etc.) Others (please specify) street lighting

C. Screening Questions for Involuntary Resettlement Impact PDP: Installation of production tube-well near Masua Bazaar in Joypurhat Pourashava .

Not Involuntary Resettlement Impacts Yes No Remarks Known Will the project include any physical X Installation of 5 production tube-wells, construction work? construction & rehabilitation of 4 pump houses construction of 01 (one) over head tank, and pipeline installation. etc. Does the proposed activity include X upgrading or rehabilitation of existing physical facilities? A. Land (not applicable for public ROWs) 1. Ownership of land known? X (if yes, check appropriate) X government(Rehabilitation of Existing works) ___ private ___ trust/community ___ traditional (IPs/tribal) ___ Others (specify) ____Pourashava______2. Land purchase/acquisition (answer required even for land donation and/or negotiated land purchase)- Not applicable a. permanent (owner/s required to X (if yes, provide purpose) transfer ownership/rights to Pourashava) b. temporary (owner/s retain X (if yes, provide purpose) rights/ownership) c. not required X (check appropriate) __X_ land owned by Pourashava ___ land owned by other government agency

Not Involuntary Resettlement Impacts Yes No Remarks Known ___ proposal will not require land (scheme will be along right of way or existing facility) 3. Current usage of the land known? X if yes, check as appropriate: ___ agricultural ___ residential ___ commercial/business ___ community use ___ vacant/not used ___ private access road ___ others specify)_Roads_& Drains______4. Are there any non-titled people X (if yes, provide description) who live or earn their livelihood at the site/land? 5. Are there any existing structures X on land? (if yes, complete the following Not information) applicable - Residential X (if yes, provide number) - Business/shops/stalls X (if yes, provide number) - Fences X (if yes, provide description – brick, bamboo, wired, etc.) - Water wells X (if yes, provide number) - Sanitation facility X (if yes, provide description)

- Others (specify) X (if yes, provide description) ______6. Are there any trees on land? X (if yes, provide number) 7. Are there any crops on land? X (if yes, provide if perennial or seasonal)

8. Will people lose access to: X - any facility X (if yes, provide description)

- services X (if yes, provide description)

- natural resources X (if yes, provide description)

9. Will any social or economic X activities be affected by land use- related changes? 10. Are any of the affected persons X (if yes, provide description) (AP) from indigenous or ethnic minority groups? B. Linear Works 1. Within public RoW? X 2. Structures on RoW? (applicable X to full or partial parts, applicable to permanent/semi-permanent structures) - Residential X - Commercial/business/stalls X - Fence/boundary walls X - Sanitation facility X - Community facility X - School/educational facility X - Religious structure X - Service provision (light poles, water X wells, etc)

Not Involuntary Resettlement Impacts Yes No Remarks Known - Others (specify) X 3. Any mobile vendors/hawkers using X RoW? 4. Will there be loss of agricultural X plots? 5. Will there be loss of trees? X 6. Will there be loss of crops? X 5. Will people lose access to: - any facility X (if yes, provide description)

- services X (if yes, provide description)

- natural resources X (if yes, provide description)

6. Are any of the affected persons X (if yes, provide description) (AP) from indigenous or ethnic minority groups?

D. Attachments 1. Subproject with land requirement: Not applicable a. Photograph/s of site/s: not applicable b. Photograph/s of existing structure/s (permanent/semi-permanent): not applicable 2. Subproject along ROWs: a. Photograph/s of each alignment (chainage-wise at least 200 meters): not applicable b. Photograph/s of existing structure/s (permanent/semi-permanent): Not applicable c. Photograph/s of trees/crops: Not applicable

Prepared by: S..B..I.M. Safiq-ud-doula Verified by: Md. Abdul Karim

Signature: Name: S.B.I.M. Safiq-ud-doula Signature: Position: Regional Resettlement Specialist, UGIIP- Name: Md. Abdul Karim III Position: Deputy Team Leader, UGIIP-III Date: 30th June 2016 Date: 30th June 2016

______THIS PORTION IS FOR PMO AND MDSC SAFEGUARD TEAM USE ONLY Date Checklist Received: Database/Record Number: Assigned category and __x_ Category C further actions ___ Category B (tentative) _____ for verification of land purchase/acquisition _____ for verification of land donation _____ for verification of non-land donation _____ for verification of voluntary resettlement ___ Category B

Assessed by: Noted by:

Signature: Signature: Name: Name: Position: Position: Date: Date:

X.APPENDIX 3: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE/SMALL ETHNIC COMMUNITIES (SEC) IMPACTS

A. Introduction

1. Each project/subproject/component needs to be screened for any indigenous people Impacts which will occur or have already occurred. This screening determines the necessary Action to be taken by the project team:

B. Information on project/subproject/component: a. District name: Joypurhat b. Location (km): Joypurhat Pourashava (District H.Q) c. Civil work dates (proposed): From May 2016 September 2017 d. Technical description: Installation of 7(seven) PTW, Construction of 5(five) pump houses, Expansion of 32.00 km distribution pipe line network and Construction of 700 NOs Service Connection, etc.

B. Screening Questions for Indigenous People/SEC Impact

KEY CONCERNS NO NOT (Please provide elaborations YES Remarks KNOWN in the “Remarks” column) A. Indigenous Peoples/SEC Identification 1. Are there socio cultural groups present in or using the X project area who may be considered "tribes" (hill tribes, scheduled tribes, IP/SEC), "minorities" (ethnic or national minorities), or "indigenous communities"? 2. Are there national or local laws or policies as well as X anthropological researches/studies that consider these groups present in or using the project area as belonging to "ethnic minorities," scheduled tribes, IP/SEC, national minorities, or cultural communities? 3. Do such groups self-identify as being part of a distinct X social and cultural group? 4. Do such groups maintain collective attachments to X distinct habitats or ancestral territories and/or to the natural resources in these habitats and territories? 5. Do such groups maintain cultural, economic, social, and X political institutions distinct from the dominant society and culture? 6. Do such groups speak a distinct language or dialect? X 7. Have such groups been historically, socially, and X Economically marginalized, disempowered, excluded, and/or discriminated against? 8. .Are such groups represented as "indigenous X peoples,""ethnic minorities," "scheduled tribes," or "IP populations" in any formal decision-making bodies at the national or local levels?

B. Identification of Potential Impacts 9. Will the project directly or indirectly benefit or target Y indigenous peoples?

KEY CONCERNS NO NOT (Please provide elaborations YES Remarks KNOWN in the “Remarks” column) 10. Will the project directly or indirectly affect indigenous X peoples' traditional socio cultural and belief practices (e.g. child-rearing, health, education, arts, and governance)?

11. Will the project affect the livelihood systems of X Indigenous peoples (e.g., food production system, natural resource management, crafts and trade, employment status)? 12. Will the project be in an area (land or territory) X occupied, owned, or used by indigenous peoples, and/or claimed as ancestral domain? C. Identification of Special Requirements Will the project activities include: 13. Commercial development of the cultural resources X and knowledge of indigenous peoples? 14. Physical displacement from traditional or customary X lands? 15. Commercial development of natural resources (such X as minerals, hydrocarbons, forests, water, hunting or fishing grounds) within customary lands under use that would impact the livelihoods or the cultural, ceremonial, and spiritual uses that define the identity and community of indigenous peoples? 16. Establishing legal recognition of rights to lands and X territories that are traditionally owned or customarily used, occupied, or claimed by indigenous peoples? 17. Acquisition of lands that are traditionally owned or X customarily used, occupied, or claimed by indigenous peoples?

C. Indigenous People/SEC Impact After reviewing the answers above, expecting agency/safeguard team confirms that the proposed subsection/ section/subproject/component (tick as appropriate)

[ ] has indigenous people (IP)/SEC impact, so an SECDP or specific SEC action plan is required. [ ] has No IP/SEC impact, so no SECDP/specific action plan is required.

Prepared by: S. .B. I .M. Safiq-ud-doula Verified by: Md. Abdul Karim

Signature: Name: S .B .I .M .Safiq-ud-doula Signature: Name: Md. Abdul Karim Position: Regional Resettlement Specialist, UGIIP-III Position: Deputy Team Leader, UGIIP-III

XI.APPENDIX 4: SAMPLE GRIEVANCE REGISTRATION FORM

(To be available in Bengali and English)

The Project welcomes complaints, suggestions, queries and comments regarding project implementation. We encourage persons with grievance to provide their name and contact information to enable us to get in touch with you for clarification and feedback. Should you choose to include your personal details but want that information to remain confidential, please inform us by writing/typing “CONFIDENTIAL” above your name. Thank you.

Date Place of registration

Contact Information/Personal Details Name Gender * Male Age * Home Address Female Place Phone no. E-mail Complaint/Suggestion/Comment/Question Please provide the details (who, what, where and how) of your grievance below:

If included as attachment/note/letter, please tick here:

How do you want us to reach you for feedback or update on your comment/grievance?

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Registered by: (Name of Official registering grievance)

Mode of communication: Note/Letter /E-mail /Verbal/Telephonic

Reviewed by: (Names/Positions of Official(s) reviewing grievance)

Action Taken:

Whether Action Taken Disclosed:

Yes ( ) No ( ) Means of Disclosure:

XII. APPENDIX 5: GRIEVANCE REDRESS FORM (BANGLA VERSION) Awf‡hvM `vwLj I wbimb d‡g©i bgybv Z…Zxq bMi cwiPvjb I AeKvVv‡gv DbœwZKiY (‡m±i) cÖK‡íi mdj ev¯Íevq‡bi †ÿ‡Î †h †Kvb AvcwË, Awf‡hvM, civgk©, cÖkœ Ges gZvgZ‡K cÖK‡í (Project) ¯^vMZ RvbvB| Avgiv Awf‡hvMKvwi‡K Awf‡hv‡Mi mv‡_ bvg-I †hvMv‡hv‡Mi wVKvbv w`‡Z Drmvn †`B hv‡Z Zvu‡ì Awf‡hvM wbimbK‡í cÖ‡qvRbxq †hvMv‡hvM Ki‡‡Z I c`‡ÿc m¤^‡Ü Zv‡uì mgq g‡Zv Rvbv‡bv hvq| Acwb hw` Avcbvi cwiPq Rvbv‡Z Pvb A_P Zv Rbm¤§~‡L †Mvcb ivL‡Z B”Qv †cvlY K‡ib Zvn‡j ‡Mvcbxq kãwU d‡g©i Dc‡i D‡jøL Kiæb| abëv`| ZvwiLt †iwR‡÷k‡bi ¯’vbt †hvMv‡hv‡Mi wVKvbv/e¨w³MZ Z_¨t bvgt wj½ t c~iælt eqmt (wUK bvix t w`b) eZ©gvb wVKvbvt †dvb bs B-‡gBj (hw` _v‡K) AvcwË/ Awf‡hvM/ civgk©/ cÖkœ /gZvgZ AbyMÖn K‡i Avcbvi Awf‡hv‡Mi mv‡_ we¯ÍvwiZ eY©bv (†K, wK, †Kv_vq, wKfv‡e BZ¨vw`) cÖ`vb Kiæb|

hw` Gi mv‡_ †Kvb mshyw³/‡bvU/wPwV/Qwe †hvM Kiv nq Zvn‡j wUK w`bt

ïaygvÎ `vßwiK Kv‡R e¨env‡ii R‡b¨ bvgt (†h Kg©KZ©vi Øviv Awf‡hvM †iwRw÷ªK…Z) †h-gva¨‡g Awf‡hvM 1. †bvU /wPwVt M„nxZt (wUK w`b) 2. B-‡gBj t

3. ‡Uwj‡dv‡b/mkix‡i-†gŠwLK t †h Kg©KZ©v Awf‡hvMwU ch©v‡jvPbv K‡ibt GB Awf‡hv‡Mi †cÖwÿ‡Z †h c`‡ÿc MÖnY Kiv n‡q‡Qt c`‡ÿcwU Rbm¤§~‡L 1. n¨u t cÖPvi Kiv n‡q‡Q wK ? (wUK w`b) 2. bv t †h-gva¨‡g c`‡ÿcwU Rbm¤§~‡L cÖPvi Kiv n‡q‡Qt

XIII.APPENDIX 6: VERIFICATION OF POURASHAVA OWNERSHIP (PHASE 2) OF JOYPURHAT POURASHAVA

XIV.APPENDIX 7: PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPOSED WATER SUPPLY ALIGNMENTS OF JOYPURHAT POURASHAVA UNDER PHASE-2 OF UGIIP-III.

Proposed Installation of (PTW) near Khanjanpur Proposed Installation of (PTW) at Khanjanpur Bazar High school more Joypurhat Joypurhat

Proposed Installation of (PTW) near Gulsan More Proposed Installation of (PTW) near Truck Terminal Joypurhat Joypurhat

Proposed Installation of (PTW) at Bus Terminal Proposed Installation of (PTW) near Puraton IRP Joypurhat Side Joypurhat

Construction of Pipe line from Station Road to Construction of Pipe line from S.P Office Mour To Adarosho para culvert via sagor para Police Line Gate (Wide-5m)

Construction of Pipe line from Main Road Bus Terminal Construction of Pipe line from East Side Road Of To Truck Terminal (wide-16m Housing Estate Via Harail Road (Wide 5m)

Construction of Pipe line from West Side Road Off Construction of Pipe line from Sadar Road To Housing Estate (Wide 5m) Pachurchalk Sadhin Mour 1(wide 4m)

Construction of Pipe line from Sadar Road to Construction of Pipe line from Pachurchalk Internal Pachurchalk Sadhin Mour 2 (wide 4m) Road -1 (wide 3m)

Construction of Pipe line from Pachurchalk Internal Construction of Pipe line from Pashu Hospital Mour to Road -2 (wide 3-4m) Sabuz Nagar Internal Road-1 (Wide-4m)

Construction of Pipe line from Pashu Hospital Mour to Construction of Pipe line from Zia Collage to Sabuz Nagar Internal Road-2 (Wide-2m-3m) Pachurchlak Road (wide-4m)

Construction of Pipe line from Madargong Mosque Construction of Pipe line from Zia Collage Road to Road (wide-3m) Paglir Mour (wide-4m)

Construction of Pipe line from Kundupara Road (Wide Construction of Pipe line from Front Side Road Of 3m) Scout Bhabon

Construction of Pipe line from All-Hera School to Construction of Pipe line from Jamalgong Road to Gouri para via Jamalgong Road (wide-4m) Kazipara (Wide-4m)

Construction of Pipe line from Sheik Para internal Construction of Pipe line from Sadar Para Primary Road (wide-2m) School Road (wide-3m)

Construction of Pipe line from Meheruddin Link Road Construction of Pipe line from Ayin Dr. Para Road (Wide-2-3m) (wide 2-3m)

Construction of Pipe line from Madrasha Para Leader Construction of Pipe line from Professor Para late to Rebeka House Road (Wide 2-3m) Mahfuz House Road (wide 2-3m)

Construction of Pipe line from Haji Bodor Uddin Road Construction of Pipe line from Debipur Internal Road (wide 4m) (wide 3-4m)

Construction of Pipe line from Debipur Internal Road-2 Construction of Pipe line from Rail Gomti to Kaji Para (wide 3-4m) (Wide 5-10m)

Construction of Pipe line from Front Side Road Of Construction of Pipe line from Rail Gomti to Kaji Para Scout Bhabon (Wide 5-10m)

Construction of Pipe line from Aram Nagar North Side Construction of Pipe line from Benu Chairman House Road (Wide 4-m) Road (wide-2m)

Proposed construction site for Over Head Tank (OHT) at Bus Terminal Joypurhat