Neoplatonic Identities: Literary Representation and the Politics of Queen Henrietta Maria's Court Circle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neoplatonic Identities: Literary Representation and the Politics of Queen Henrietta Maria's Court Circle Neoplatonic Identities: literary representation and the politics of Queen Henrietta Maria's court circle by Karen Ruth Britland Submitted in accordance with the requirements of the degree of PhD The University of Leeds School of English August 2000 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. ii Acknowledgements I owe a debt of gratitude to Professor Martin Butler for his support and encouragement during the last four years. I am particularly grateful to him for his generosity in sharing with me his own work. Thanks, too, to Mr David Lindley and to Professor Diane Purkiss, especially for their words of wisdom at times when I wanted to strangle Henrietta Maria. Katharine Craik and Sarah Poynting have also been very generous and have offered support that has been most appreciated. I was fortunate to receive a Leverhulme Study-Abroad Studentship in 1998-9 which allowed me to undertake research for this thesis in Paris. Many thanks go to the Leverhulme Trust, and particularly to Jean Cater whose good humour and efficiency will go down in legend. Thanks, too, to Professor Bernard Cottret for his warm welcome in France and for allowing me to attend his seminars at the Sorbonne. I would also like to thank Tim Amos, Adam Smyth, and Ross Parry for their weird enthusiasms for Renaissance culture, and Sarah Graham and Fiona Richards for always being there with cake. Thanks are also due to my brother, Ian, for the suggestion that every honourable thesis should end with the conclusion, 'It didn't work'. Most of all, however, I want to thank my Mum and Dad, without whom I would never have been daft enough to do this in the first place. This thesis is dedicated to them. iii Abstract Author: Karen Ruth Britland Title: Neoplatonic Identities: literary representation and the politics of Queen Henrietta Maria's court circle Degree: PhD Date: August 2000 My thesis investigates Queen Henrietta Maria's cultural activities at the Caroline court, paying particular attention to her connections with France and with French politics. In contrast to previous studies of her life, I am concerned not only with her position as a Catholic in a Protestant country, but with her status as a culturally and politically active woman. I discuss the significance of her importation of French cultural fashions on to the English stage (most notably the innovation of the female actor), and investigate notions of female identity put forward in her masques and pastoral plays. By tracing the influences of both neoplatonism and reformed Catholic theology in the Queen's theatrical productions, I. demonstrate how courtly women came to be privileged as the arbiters of taste and judgement, and show how this led to a perception of them as properly political agents. I also demonstrate that the Queen's court masques promoted a 'counterpublic' space inside the court from which ideas independent of King Charles's own policies could be expressed. I investigate Henrietta Maria's involvement in international current affairs, illustrating how her political alignments could be manifested in her court productions. Finally, I discuss her position as an exile at the French court during the English civil war, showing how, despite her lack of funds, she managed to maintain a political, religious, and social presence in France. iv Table of Contents page Acknowledgements ii Abstract Contents iv List of Illustrations v A Note on Procedures vi Introduction Bones of Contention: Re-membering Henrietta Maria 1 Chapter 1A Fairy-tale Marriage: The Myth of the Caroline Romance 28 Chapter 2 'La verite de la Religion': Pastoral Cares at the English Court 52 Chapter 3 Translated to the Skies: The Generation of Meaning in Caroline Court Masques 81 Chapter 4 Eternity and Maternity: The Possibility of Difference in the Queen's Masques 106 Chapter 5 Royal Subjects: Intriguing Voices in The Shepherds' Paradise 139 Chapter 6A Means to an End : Divine Providence and The Temple of Love 170 Chapter 7 Making Connections: Fleshing Out the Plot of 1635 192 Chapter 8 Uninvited Guests: Spectres at the Feasts of the Last Masques 216 Conclusion Historical Exiles: Henrietta Maria's Return to France 242 Appendix Professional Singers? The Question of Madame Coniack 258 Bibliography 262 V List of Illustrations page Figure 1 Daniel Mytens, with additions by Van Dyck, Charles I and Henrietta Maria, 1630-2 95 Figure 2 Robert van Voerst's engraving of Van Dyck's Charles and Henrietta Maria, 1634 95 VI A Note on Procedures Dating There were two calendars in use during the seventeenth century. Continental Europe used the Gregorian, or New Style, system of dating, while England maintained the Julian, or Old Style, and was thus ten days behind the rest of Europe. I have used Old Style dating for English events, and have indicated both dates when discussing Continental affairs. I have also taken January, rather than March, to be the beginning of the calendar year. Thus, for example, the performance of Tempe Restored is given as February 1632, rather than 1631/2. Editions I have quoted Jonson from Herford and Simpson's edition of his works (1925-50), and Carew from the edition of Rhodes Dunlap (1949). I have chosen not to use Cedric C. Brown's edition of Townshend because of its lack of a line count, preferring instead to quote Townshend, along with Davenant, from Orgel and Strong's convenient Inigo Jones: The Theatre of the Stuart Court (1973). INTRODUCTION Bones of Contention: Re-membering Henrietta Maria Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live. Ezekiel 37.5 Henrietta Maria no longer has a tomb. Indeed, she barely has a grave. What is left of her body is bricked up behind a wall in the crypt of Saint Denis cathedral with the muddled bones of her royal relations, torn from their sepulchres during the French Revolution of 1789. As the citizenry rose against their King, they tried to wipe out the memory of centuries of monarchical rule by razing the tombs of Louis XVI's ancestors and dismembering the bodies. The attack on the crypt at Saint Denis was a violent bid for cultural forgetting, an attempt to wipe out centuries of privilege and oppression by erasing the remains. At the same time, it was a bid to control remembering; the spectres of the Bourbon kings can only ever now return in the shadow of the Revolution that dismembered them. ' My thesis invokes the return of a Bourbon princess by seeking to know how her scattered remains have been articulated through and across history. It is also concerned with the nature of remembrance per se, and poses questions about the legitimacy of historiographical representation. The image of the defiled crypt of Saint Denis illustrates at once the physical reality of my subject, and yet furnishes a metaphor for the impossibility of ever satisfactorily reconstructing her. Henrietta Maria's skeleton cannot be re-membered, neither can her history. Just as her remains were scattered around Saint Denis cathedral, so her image has been dispersed across a multitude of texts; her bones are confused with the bones of her relations and her history is a jumble of received interpretations, imaginations and suppositions. Thus,, while this thesis is structured as a 'The ransacking of Saint Denis was authorised by a decree of the Revolutionary Convention of Ist August 1793. It was part of an official attack on France's ecclesiastical, feudal and royal past, occurring alongside a policy of dechristianisation and preceding the removal of the images of kings from the front of Notre Dame cathedral in October 1793. See Simon Schama, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution (London: Viking, 1989), p. 829; William Doyle, The Oxford History of the French Revolution (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), pp. 260-1. 2 historical biography, inserting 'nerv' evidence into an already extant narrative that seeks to shed light upon the Queen's character and life, it also aims to unpack the strategies at work behind cultural representation to show how the production of an identity and the production of a history are closely intertwined. The common perception of Henrietta Maria is one of a petulant, spoilt child, whose love of Catholic spectacle helped to provoke England to rise against its King. This view is not just prevalent in popular culture, it is also to be found in the work of historians whose descriptions of Henrietta Maria as a frivolous pleasure-seeker lend an air of intellectual authority to her unflattering public image: Henrietta Maria must have had a lightweight mind, because important (and usually male) historians have said that this was so. My aim here is certainly to challenge this opinion and to recast Henrietta Maria as a figure who had an impact upon history. However, I am also interested in the notion of history per se; in the way its narrative has traditionally been organised around great events and people in order to create a coherent, teleological notion of the past. This type of history, with its emphasis on the retrievable interiority of a unified subject, not only progresses in a linear fashion towards the future, but allows its readers to conceive of themselves as unified subjects, held in the present through their relationship with a knowable past. Through an investigation into Henrietta Maria's neoplatonic fashion, with its emphasis on the world as a shadowy illusion, and through a consideration of the fragmented nature of women's identities in a culture which privileges an implicitly masculine form of self-presence, I want to problematise this notion, considering history as a fluid concept, as the work of memory, mourning, and ghosts.
Recommended publications
  • 'A Ffitt Place for Any Gentleman'?
    ‘A ffitt place for any Gentleman’? GARDENS, GARDENERS AND GARDENING IN ENGLAND AND WALES, c. 1560-1660 by JILL FRANCIS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham July 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis sets out to investigate gardens, gardeners and gardening practices in early modern England, from the mid-sixteenth century when the first horticultural manuals appeared in the English language dedicated solely to the ‘Arte’ of gardening, spanning the following century to its establishment as a subject worthy of scientific and intellectual debate by the Royal Society and a leisure pursuit worthy of the genteel. The inherently ephemeral nature of the activity of gardening has resulted thus far in this important aspect of cultural life being often overlooked by historians, but detailed examination of the early gardening manuals together with evidence gleaned from contemporary gentry manuscript collections, maps, plans and drawings has provided rare insight into both the practicalities of gardening during this period as well as into the aspirations of the early modern gardener.
    [Show full text]
  • HENRY VII M.Elizabeth of York (R.1485–1509)
    Historic Royal Places – Descriptors Small Use Width 74mm Wide and less Minimum width to be used 50mm Depth 16.5mm (TOL ) Others Various Icon 7mm Wide Dotted line for scaling Rules 0.25pt and minimum size establishment only. Does not print. HENRY VII m.Elizabeth of York (r.1485–1509) Arthur, m. Katherine HENRY VIII m.(1) Katherine m.(2) Anne m.(3) Jane m.(4) Anne of Cleves Edmund (1) James IV, m Margaret m (2) Archibald Douglas, Elizabeth Mary Catherine Prince of Wales of Aragon* (r.1509–47) Boleyn Seymour (5) Catherine Howard King of Earl of Angus (d. 1502) (6) Kateryn Parr Scotland Frances Philip II, m. MARY I ELIZABETH I EDWARD VI Mary of m. James V, Margaret m. Matthew Stewart, Lady Jane Grey King of Spain (r.1553–58) (r.1558–1603) (r.1547–53) Lorraine King of Earl of Lennox (r.1553 for 9 days) Scotland (1) Francis II, m . Mary Queen of Scots m. (2) Henry, Charles, Earl of Lennox King of France Lord Darnley Arbella James I m. Anne of Denmark (VI Scotland r.1567–1625) (I England r.1603–1625) Henry (d.1612) CHARLES I (r.1625–49) Elizabeth m. Frederick, Elector Palatine m. Henrietta Maria CHARLES II (r.1660–85) Mary m. William II, (1) Anne Hyde m. JAMES II m. (2) Mary Beatrice of Modena Sophia m. Ernest Augustus, Elector of Hanover m.Catherine of Braganza Prince of Orange (r.1685–88) WILLIAM III m. MARY II (r.1689–94) ANNE (r.1702–14) James Edward, GEORGE I (r.1714–27) Other issue Prince of Orange m.
    [Show full text]
  • "This Court Doth Keep All England in Quiet": Star Chamber and Public Expression in Prerevolutionary England, 1625–1641 Nathaniel A
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 8-2018 "This Court Doth Keep All England in Quiet": Star Chamber and Public Expression in Prerevolutionary England, 1625–1641 Nathaniel A. Earle Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Earle, Nathaniel A., ""This Court Doth Keep All England in Quiet": Star Chamber and Public Expression in Prerevolutionary England, 1625–1641" (2018). All Theses. 2950. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2950 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "THIS COURT DOTH KEEP ALL ENGLAND IN QUIET" STAR CHAMBER AND PUBLIC EXPRESSION IN PREREVOLUTIONARY ENGLAND 1625–1641 A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts History by Nathaniel A. Earle August 2018 Accepted by: Dr. Caroline Dunn, Committee Chair Dr. Alan Grubb Dr. Lee Morrissey ABSTRACT The abrupt legislative destruction of the Court of Star Chamber in the summer of 1641 is generally understood as a reaction against the perceived abuses of prerogative government during the decade of Charles I’s personal rule. The conception of the court as an ‘extra-legal’ tribunal (or as a legitimate court that had exceeded its jurisdictional mandate) emerges from the constitutional debate about the limits of executive authority that played out over in Parliament, in the press, in the pulpit, in the courts, and on the battlefields of seventeenth-century England.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Queen Versus the People 1
    N OTES Introduction: The Queen versus the People 1 . J e a n n e L o u i s e C a m p a n , Memoirs of the Court of Marie Antoinette, Queen of France , ed. M de Lamartine (Philadelphia, PA: Parry and McMillan, 1854), pp. 158–159. 2 . Nancy Nichols Barker, “Revolution and the Royal Consort,” in Proceedings of the Consortium on Revolutionary Europe (1989): 136–143. 3 . Barker, “Revolution and the Royal Consort,” p. 136. 4 . Clarissa Campbell Orr notes in the introduction to a 2004 collection of essays concerning the role of the European queen consort in the Baroque era that “there is little comparative work in English on any facet of European Court life in the period from 1660 to 1800.” See Clarissa Campbell Orr, “Introduction” in Clarissa Campbell Orr (ed.), Queenship in Europe: 1660–1815: The Role of the Consort (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 2. There are strong exceptions to Orr’s conclusion, including the works of Jeroen Duidam and T.C.W. Blanning, which compare the culture, structure, and politics of Early Modern courts revealing both change and continuity but these stud- ies devote little space to the specific role of the queen consort within her family and court. See Jeroen Duindam, Vienna and Versailles: The Courts of Europe’s Dynastic Rivals 1550–1780 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), and T.C.W. Blanning, The Culture of Power and the Power of Culture: Old Regime Europe 1660–1789 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002). 5 . See Kevin Sharpe, The Personal Rule of Charles I (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996); Bernard Bourdin, The Theological-Political Origins of the Modern State: Controversy between James I of England and Cardinal Bellamine (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commemorated Page Numbers in Bold Type Refer to Illustrations
    Church Monuments Vols I–XXXII (1985–2017) The Commemorated Page numbers in bold type refer to illustrations Abbott, Christopher, 1686, XXIX: 80, 82 Allington, Lionel and Dorothe, 1638, V: 62, Abbys, Thomas, 1532/3, XXXII: 30 63; VII: 46, 74 Abell, William, 1500, XVI: 123 Allington, Richard, 1561, VII: 38; XXIII: 93 Aberford, Henry of, c.1328, XIII: 109 Alonso, Infante, 1493, VII: 27 Abernoun, John d’, 1327, I: 10; VI: 5; VIII: 5, Alphonse and Jean, sons of Louis VIII, king of 7; IX: 38; XV: 12 France, 1213, XXX: 51 Abernoun, John III d’, 1335–50, II: 13, 17–19; Alsace, Marguerite d’, 1194, XXIV: 28, 29, VII: 17 30, 31, 43 Abney, George and Ellen, 1577/8, VI: 38 Alsace, Mathieu d’, 1173, XXIV: 31, 33, 36, Accarigi, Tommaso, XXIII: 110 38 Acé, Hugues d’, 1333, XII: 23, 24, 33 Anast, Thomas d’, bishop of Quimper, 1322, Achard, Robert, 1353, IX: 46; XXXII: 24 XXX: 45 Acton, John and Elizabeth, 1625, XXIII: 81 Ancaster see Bertie Acton, Thomas, 1489, XXXII: 30 Anderson, Alexander, 1811, XV: 99 Adair family, 1852–1915, XVI: 92, 123 Anderson, Edmond, 1638, XXX: 129, 130 Adams, Richard, 1635, XXIX: 75 Anderson, Edmund, 1670, IX: 84, 85, 86 Adderley, Ralph, Margaret and Philota, 1595, Anderson, Francis, VII: 89, 90, 91, 93 VI: 40 André, Philippe and Marie, 1845, XV: 91, 93, Adelaide of Maurienne, queen of France, 1154, 96 XIX: 34 Andrew, Thomas, Frances and Mary, 1589, Adornes, Jacques, 1482, VII: 28 VIII: 54 Adyn, Edith, c.1560, XXIX: 82 Andrew, Thomas, Katherine and Mary, 1555, Aebinga, Hil van, XXXI: 118 n.
    [Show full text]
  • La Duchesse De Chevreuse PRINCIPAUX OUVRAGES DU MÊME AUTEUR La Femme Dans La Peinture Moderne, Paris, Plon, 1955 (Épuisé)
    La duchesse de Chevreuse PRINCIPAUX OUVRAGES DU MÊME AUTEUR La Femme dans la peinture moderne, Paris, Plon, 1955 (épuisé). Fontaines de Paris, Paris, Le Centurion, 1958 (épuisé). Evocation du Grand Paris, 31., Paris, Éd. de Minuit, 1956-1961 (épuisé). Histoire souriante de Paris, Paris, Berger-Levrault, 1962 (épuisé). Napoléon et Paris, Paris, Berger-Levrault, 1964 (épuisé). Ile-de-France, pays du dimanche, Paris, Arts et métiers graphiques, 1964- 1965 (épuisé). Moyen Age en Ile-de-France, Paris, Fayard, 1965 (épuisé). Châteaux d'Ile-de-France, Paris, Balland, 1968 (épuisé). Éd. allemande, Munich, 1968. Dictionnaire des églises de France : Ile-de-France (en coll.), Paris, Laffont, 1968. Le Val-de-Marne, Paris, Éd. de Minuit, 1968 (épuisé). Couronné par l'Académie française. Album Saint-Simon, Paris, Bibl. de la Pléiade, 1969 (épuisé). Les Châteaux de la Loire, Paris, Alpha, 3e éd., 1972 (épuisé). Inventaire des églises des Hauts-de-Seine, Paris, Fédération des Sociétés historiques de la région parisienne, 1973-1975. Les Musées de France, Pans, coll. Que sais-je?, P.U.F. 3e éd., 1976. Cette curieuse famille d'Orléans, Paris, Perrin, 2e éd., 1977 (épuisé). 3e éd. en préparation. Histoire des grands boulevards, Paris, Le Cadratin, 1980. Couronné par l'Académie française. Histoire et histoires de Sceaux, préface de Georges Duhamel, Sceaux, 3e éd., 1981 (épuisé). Charenton-le-Pont, cinq mille ans d'histoire, Paris, L'Albatros, 1982. Dix siècles à Montfort-l'Amaury (avec M.-H. Hadrot), préface de Jacques de Lacretelle, Montfort-l'Amaury 1983. Couronné par l'Académie française. L'Essonne dans la Seine-et-Oise d'autrefois, Roanne, Horvath, 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • La Cour De Louis XIV
    La Cour de Louis XIV (Période 1640-1720) D’après : Le Siècle de Louis XIV, Anthologie des mémorialistes du siècle de Louis XIV, par ALAIN NIDERST, Robert Laffont, Paris 1997. Les valets de chambre de Louis XIV, par MATHIEU DA VINHA, Perrin, Paris 2004. Louis XIV, par FRANÇOIS BLUCHE, Fayard, Perrin 1986. Ducs et pairs, paieries laïques à l’époque moderne (1519-1790), par CHRISTOPHE LEVANTAL, Mai- sonneuve et Larose 1996. I – Les personnages La cour de Louis XIV a laissé le souvenir impérissable de ses grands personnages. Mais beaucoup d’autres, plus ou moins connus, nobles ou roturiers, participaient à la vie de la cour. Pour les curieux d’Histoire qui se penchent sur cette époque, il a paru intéressant de dresser la liste de ceux qui ont marqué le règne du Roi-Soleil. Les noms ont été pris parmi les plus souvent cités dans les Mémoires des témoins de l’époque, qu’ils soient désignés par leur nom, leur titre ou leur fonction. Ont été explicitées les identités des personnages habituellement désignés à l’époque par leur seul statut, comme "Monseigneur", "Monsieur le Duc", "Monsieur le Grand",.. Pour certaines grandes familles, sont cités des personnages repères : Condé (Monsieur le Prince) : familles de Conti, Longueville, du Maine, Vendôme. Colbert : familles de Beauvillier, Croissy, Desmarets, Seignelay, Torcy ; voir la généalogie de la famille COLBERT en 4e partie. La Vrillère : familles de Châteauneuf, Maurepas, Phélypeaux, Pontchartrain. Louvois : familles de Barbézieux, Courtenvaux, Le Tellier. Mazarin : familles de Conti, La Meilleraye, Nevers. Turenne : famille de Bouillon. II - Les enfants de Louis XIV, légitimes et naturels.
    [Show full text]
  • Ben Jonson and the Mirror: Folly Knows No Gender
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 6-2001 Ben Jonson and The Mirror: Folly Knows No Gender Sherry Broadwell Niewoonder Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, and the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Niewoonder, Sherry Broadwell, "Ben Jonson and The Mirror: Folly Knows No Gender" (2001). Dissertations. 1382. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1382 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEN JONSON AND THE MIRROR: FOLLY KNOWS NO GENDER by Sherry Broadwell Niewoonder A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2001 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. BEN JONSON AND THE M IR R O R : FO LLY KNOWS NO GENDER Sherry Broadwell Niewoonder, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2001 Ben Jonson, Renaissance poet and playwright, has been the subject of renewed evaluation in recent scholarship, particularly new historicism and cultural materialism. The consensus among some current scholars is that Jonson overtly practices and advocates misogyny in his dramas. Such theorists suggest that Jonson both embodies and promulgates the anti­ woman rhetoric of his time, basing their position on contemporary cultural material, religious tracts, and the writings of King James I.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Development of Groves in English Formal Gardens
    This is a repository copy of The history and development of groves in English formal gardens. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/120902/ Version: Accepted Version Book Section: Woudstra, J. orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-2998 (2017) The history and development of groves in English formal gardens. In: Woudstra, J. and Roth, C., (eds.) A History of Groves. Routledge , Abingdon, Oxon , pp. 67-85. ISBN 978-1-138-67480-6 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ The history and development of groves in English formal gardens (1600- 1750) Jan Woudstra It is possible to identify national trends in the development of groves in gardens in England from their inception in the sixteenth century as so-called wildernesses. By looking through the lens of an early eighteenth century French garden design treatise, we can trace their rise to popularity during the second half of the seventeenth and early eighteenth century to their gradual decline as a garden feature during the second half of the eighteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Corpo-Realities in Shakespeare's Late Romances 2017
    Action Bodies / Acting Bodies: Performing Corpo-Realities in Shakespeare's Late Romances Von der Philosophischen Fakultät der Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover zur Erlangung des Grades einer Doktorin der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) genehmigte Dissertation von Eve-Marie Oesterlen geboren am 24. April 1974 in München 2017 Referentin: Prof. Dr. Liselotte Glage Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Rainer Emig Tag der Promotion: 24. November 2016 Zusammenfassung Ausgangspunkt dieser Arbeit ist die Annahme, dass das Spätwerk Shakespeares sich durchgängig und intensiv damit auseinandersetzt, „was es heißt zu wissen, dass andere, dass wir Körper haben“ (Stanley Cavell). Untersucht wird die Bedeutung, die ein solcher corporeal turn für die Rezeption von drei der von der Shakespeare-Forschung bisher eher vernachlässigten Romanzen hat: Pericles, The Winter’s Tale und Cymbeline. Das Augenmerk der Analyse richtet sich hierbei insbesondere auf die Art und Weise, in der sich Repräsentationen des handelnden Körpers im doppelten Sinne (action body/acting body) zur dichten textuellen und theatralischen Selbstreflexion der Stücke verhalten. Hierbei rekurriert die Analyse auf kritische Ansätze, die sich aus der neueren kulturwissenschaftlichen Diskurswende in Bezug auf Körper und Performanz ergeben. Shakespeare, Körper, Performanz Abstract Proceeding from the premise that in his late plays Shakespeare continuously engages with the question of “what it is to know that others, that we, have bodies” (Stanley Cavell), this thesis examines the significance of such a ‘corporeal turn’ for the dramatic analysis of three of Shakespeare’s late romances: Pericles, The Winter's Tale, and Cymbeline. Following in the wake of critical approaches that have emerged from a new focus of interest in the body and performance, this thesis supplements a reading of the playtext with a reading of the text in performance to illustrate how representations of the performing body are bound up with and shaped by the plays’ intense textual and theatrical self-reflection.
    [Show full text]
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY Monographs Drama at the Courts Of
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Monographs Drama at the Courts of Queen Henrietta Maria (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006; paperback edition, 2009) [Reviewed in the Times Literary Supplement, Renaissance Quarterly, Journal of British Studies, American Historical Review, Notes & Queries, Cambridge Quarterly, Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England, Theatre Research International, Canadian Journal of History, H-Albion] Textual Editions John Marston’s The Dutch Courtesan (London: Bloomsbury [Arden Early Modern Drama], 2018), xx + 276pp. [Reviewed in the Times Literary Supplement] The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson, 7 volumes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), General Editors: Martin Butler, David Bevington, Ian Donaldson; Associate Editors: Karen Britland, Eugene Giddens [Honourable Mention, 2015 PROSE Award for eProduct, Best in Humanities] CWBJ print edition Editor of Ben Jonson’s Mortimer His Fall (a play fragment) in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson, 7 volumes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), vol. 7, pp. 403-16 CWBJ electronic edition Editor of the “Dubia” section of the electronic component of The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson (and author of essays on Jonson’s putative involvement in The Widow, The London Prodigal, and The Fair Maid of the Inn) Compiler of Performance Archive (with Eugene Giddens). Responsible for “Amateur and professional productions of Ben Jonson’s plays and masques to 1850: a database” Assistant on the Masque Archive: “An archive of documents relating to Ben Jonson’s masques and entertainments” (compiled by Katharine Craik) Elizabeth Cary’s The Tragedy of Mariam (London: A&C Black [New Mermaids], 2010; repr. 2016; 2018), xxxii + 101pp. Critical Edition Henry V: Continuum Renaissance Drama, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Habsburg Relations and the Outbreak of the War of Three Kingdoms, 1630-1641
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Charles I and the Spanish Plot: Anglo-Habsburg Relations and the Outbreak of the War of Three Kingdoms, 1630-1641 A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Patrick Ignacio O’Neill March 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Thomas Cogswell, Chairperson Dr. Randolph Head Dr. Georg Michels Copyright by Patrick Ignacio O’Neill 2014 The Dissertation of Patrick Ignacio O’Neill is approved: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Bertolt Brecht posed the question, “Young Alexander conquered India./ He alone?” Like any great human endeavor, this dissertation is not the product of one person’s solitary labors, but owes much to the efforts of a great number of individuals and organizations who have continually made straight my paths through graduate school, through archival research, and through the drafting process. First and foremost, I would like to thank my dissertation chair, Dr. Thomas Cogswell, for his excellent guidance throughout my years at the University of California, Riverside. When I arrived as a first-year graduate student, I had very little certainty of what I wanted to do in the field of Early Modern Britain, and I felt more than a bit overwhelmed at the well-trod historiographical world I had just entered. Dr. Cogswell quickly took me under his wing and steered me gently through a research path that helped me find my current project, and he subsequently took a great interest in following my progress through research and writing. I salute his heroic readings and re-readings of drafts of chapters, conference papers, and proposals, and his perennial willingness to have a good chat over a cup of coffee and to help dispel the many frustrations that come from dissertation writing.
    [Show full text]