HENRY VII M.Elizabeth of York (R.1485–1509)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

HENRY VII M.Elizabeth of York (R.1485–1509)

Historic Royal Places – Descriptors Small Use Width 74mm Wide and less Minimum width to be used 50mm Depth 16.5mm (TOL ) Others Various Icon 7mm Wide Dotted line for scaling Rules 0.25pt and minimum size establishment only. Does not print. HENRY VII m.Elizabeth of York (r.1485–1509) Arthur, m. Katherine HENRY VIII m.(1) Katherine m.(2) Anne m.(3) Jane m.(4) Anne of Cleves Edmund (1) James IV, m Margaret m (2) Archibald Douglas, Elizabeth Mary Catherine Prince of Wales of Aragon* (r.1509–47) Boleyn Seymour (5) Catherine Howard King of Earl of Angus (d. 1502) (6) Kateryn Parr Scotland Frances Philip II, m. MARY I ELIZABETH I EDWARD VI Mary of m. James V, Margaret m. Matthew Stewart, Lady Jane Grey King of Spain (r.1553–58) (r.1558–1603) (r.1547–53) Lorraine King of Earl of Lennox (r.1553 for 9 days) Scotland (1) Francis II, m . Mary Queen of Scots m. (2) Henry, Charles, Earl of Lennox King of France Lord Darnley Arbella James I m. Anne of Denmark (VI Scotland r.1567–1625) (I England r.1603–1625) Henry (d.1612) CHARLES I (r.1625–49) Elizabeth m. Frederick, Elector Palatine m. Henrietta Maria CHARLES II (r.1660–85) Mary m. William II, (1) Anne Hyde m. JAMES II m. (2) Mary Beatrice of Modena Sophia m. Ernest Augustus, Elector of Hanover m.Catherine of Braganza Prince of Orange (r.1685–88) WILLIAM III m. MARY II (r.1689–94) ANNE (r.1702–14) James Edward, GEORGE I (r.1714–27) Other issue Prince of Orange m. George, Prince of Denmark The ‘Old Pretender’ m. Sophia Dorothea of Celle (r.1689–1702) William, Other issue Duke of Gloucester (still born/died young) GEORGE II (r.1727–60) Sophia Dorothea (d.1700) m. Caroline of Ansbach Frederick Louis, Prince of Wales (d.1751) Anne Amelia Caroline George William Augustus, Mary Louisa m. Augusta of Saxe-Gotha Duke of Cumberland GEORGE III (r.1760–1820) m.Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz GEORGE IV (r.1820–30) Frederick, WILLIAM IV (r.1830–37) Charlotte Edward, Augusta Elizabeth Ernest Augustus Frederick, Adolphus, Mary Sophia Octavius Alfred Amelia m = married m.Caroline of Brunswick Duke of York m. Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen Duke of Kent Duke of Sussex Duke of Cambridge r = reigned m. Victoria of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld (d.1843) m. Augusta of Hesse-Cassel d = died * see elsewhere VICTORIA (r.1837–1901) on family tree m. Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha B16054 10.16.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Household of Caroline of Brunswick, Princess of Wales (From 1820, Queen) 1795-1821
Household of Caroline of Brunswick, Princess of Wales (from 1820, Queen) 1795-1821 At their marriage in 1795, £12,253 per annum was set aside out of the Prince of Wales’s newly augmented revenue for the household expenses of Caroline, Princess of Wales. In 1820 she accepted the Crown’s offer of £50,000 per annum in return for leaving the country.1 1. E. A. Smith, George IV [New Haven, 1999], p. 78; NDNB. Council Attorney General c. 1821 By 1821 Brougham, H. Solicitor General c. 1821 By 1821 Denman, T. Chamber and Bedchamber Chamberlain c. 1796-c. 1801; c. 1817-1820 By 1796 Cholmondeley, 4th Earl of By 1817 Craven, Hon. K. Secretary to the Lord Chamberlain c. 1796-c. 1801 By 1796 Brent, T. Vice Chamberlain c. 1796-1821 There appear to have been two vice chamberlains by the end of Caroline’s life. By 1796 Thomas, C. N. By 1809 St. Leger, A. By 1821 Craven, Hon. K. By 1821 Gell, Sir W. Pages of the Presence Chamber c. 1796-1820 Two pages of the Presence Chamber were appointed by 1796. One served c. 1801-c. 1808, two again thereafter. By 1796 Clark, J. By 1796 Strikeman, J. By 1808 Roberts, S. [Keeper of the] Privy Purse c. 1795-c. 1799; c. 1801-1820 By 1796 Vanneck, -- By 1801 Hayman, -- Ladies of the Bedchamber c. 1795-1821 Three ladies of the Bedchamber were appointed by 1795. Their number went down to two by 1801, but rose again to three by 1809, four c. 1814-c.
[Show full text]
Introduction: the Queen Versus the People 1
N OTES Introduction: The Queen versus the People 1 . J e a n n e L o u i s e C a m p a n , Memoirs of the Court of Marie Antoinette, Queen of France , ed. M de Lamartine (Philadelphia, PA: Parry and McMillan, 1854), pp. 158–159. 2 . Nancy Nichols Barker, “Revolution and the Royal Consort,” in Proceedings of the Consortium on Revolutionary Europe (1989): 136–143. 3 . Barker, “Revolution and the Royal Consort,” p. 136. 4 . Clarissa Campbell Orr notes in the introduction to a 2004 collection of essays concerning the role of the European queen consort in the Baroque era that “there is little comparative work in English on any facet of European Court life in the period from 1660 to 1800.” See Clarissa Campbell Orr, “Introduction” in Clarissa Campbell Orr (ed.), Queenship in Europe: 1660–1815: The Role of the Consort (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 2. There are strong exceptions to Orr’s conclusion, including the works of Jeroen Duidam and T.C.W. Blanning, which compare the culture, structure, and politics of Early Modern courts revealing both change and continuity but these stud- ies devote little space to the specific role of the queen consort within her family and court. See Jeroen Duindam, Vienna and Versailles: The Courts of Europe’s Dynastic Rivals 1550–1780 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), and T.C.W. Blanning, The Culture of Power and the Power of Culture: Old Regime Europe 1660–1789 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002). 5 . See Kevin Sharpe, The Personal Rule of Charles I (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996); Bernard Bourdin, The Theological-Political Origins of the Modern State: Controversy between James I of England and Cardinal Bellamine (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010), pp.
[Show full text]
The Commemorated Page Numbers in Bold Type Refer to Illustrations
Church Monuments Vols I–XXXII (1985–2017) The Commemorated Page numbers in bold type refer to illustrations Abbott, Christopher, 1686, XXIX: 80, 82 Allington, Lionel and Dorothe, 1638, V: 62, Abbys, Thomas, 1532/3, XXXII: 30 63; VII: 46, 74 Abell, William, 1500, XVI: 123 Allington, Richard, 1561, VII: 38; XXIII: 93 Aberford, Henry of, c.1328, XIII: 109 Alonso, Infante, 1493, VII: 27 Abernoun, John d’, 1327, I: 10; VI: 5; VIII: 5, Alphonse and Jean, sons of Louis VIII, king of 7; IX: 38; XV: 12 France, 1213, XXX: 51 Abernoun, John III d’, 1335–50, II: 13, 17–19; Alsace, Marguerite d’, 1194, XXIV: 28, 29, VII: 17 30, 31, 43 Abney, George and Ellen, 1577/8, VI: 38 Alsace, Mathieu d’, 1173, XXIV: 31, 33, 36, Accarigi, Tommaso, XXIII: 110 38 Acé, Hugues d’, 1333, XII: 23, 24, 33 Anast, Thomas d’, bishop of Quimper, 1322, Achard, Robert, 1353, IX: 46; XXXII: 24 XXX: 45 Acton, John and Elizabeth, 1625, XXIII: 81 Ancaster see Bertie Acton, Thomas, 1489, XXXII: 30 Anderson, Alexander, 1811, XV: 99 Adair family, 1852–1915, XVI: 92, 123 Anderson, Edmond, 1638, XXX: 129, 130 Adams, Richard, 1635, XXIX: 75 Anderson, Edmund, 1670, IX: 84, 85, 86 Adderley, Ralph, Margaret and Philota, 1595, Anderson, Francis, VII: 89, 90, 91, 93 VI: 40 André, Philippe and Marie, 1845, XV: 91, 93, Adelaide of Maurienne, queen of France, 1154, 96 XIX: 34 Andrew, Thomas, Frances and Mary, 1589, Adornes, Jacques, 1482, VII: 28 VIII: 54 Adyn, Edith, c.1560, XXIX: 82 Andrew, Thomas, Katherine and Mary, 1555, Aebinga, Hil van, XXXI: 118 n.
[Show full text]
King George Iv
KING GEORGE IV “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project King George IV HDT WHAT? INDEX KING GEORGE IV KING GEORGE IV 1283 King Edward I of England conquered Wales. DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION? GOOD. King George IV “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX KING GEORGE IV KING GEORGE IV 1701 The Act of Settlement declared that those royals who chose to get married with Roman Catholics were to become ineligible for the line of succession to the throne of England. ANTI-CATHOLICISM HDT WHAT? INDEX KING GEORGE IV KING GEORGE IV 1762 August 12, Thursday: George Augustus Frederick was born at St James’s Palace in London, the eldest son of King George III. At birth he automatically became Duke of Cornwall and Duke of Rothesay. He would become popularly known as “Prinny” because a few days later the infant would be anointed as Prince of Wales, Earl of Chester, and heir apparent to the British throne. George, the eldest son of George III, was born in 1762. George rebelled against his father’s strict discipline. At the age of eighteen he became involved with an actress, Mrs. Perdita Robinson. This was followed by a relationship with Lady Melbourne. The Prince of Wales also rebelled against his father’s political views. Whereas George III preferred Tory ministers, George, Prince of Wales, was friendly with the Whigs, Charles Fox and Richard Sheridan. In 1784 the Prince of Wales, met a fell in love with Mrs.
[Show full text]
French Revolution and English Revolution Comparison Chart Print Out
Socials 9 Name: Camilla Mancia Comparison of the English Revolution and French Revolution TOPIC ENGLISH REVOLUTION FRENCH REVOLUTION SIMILARITIES DIFFERENCES 1625-1689 Kings - Absolute monarchs - Absolute monarchs - Kings ruled as Absolute - English Kings believed in Divine - James I: intelligent; slovenly - Louis XIV: known as the “Sun King”; Monarchs Right of Kings and French did habits; “wisest fool in saw himself as center of France and - Raised foreign armies not Christendom”; didn’t make a forced nobles to live with him; - Charles I and Louis XVI both - Charles I did not care to be good impression on his new extravagant lifestyle; built Palace of did not like working with loved whereas Louis XVI initially subjects; introduced the Divine Versailles ($$) Parliament/Estates General wanted to be loved by his people Right Kings - Louis XV: great grandson of Louis XIV; - Citizens did not like the wives of - Charles I did not kill people who - Charles I: Believed in Divine only five years old when he became Charles I (Catholic) and Louis were against him (he Right of Kings; unwilling to King; continued extravagances of the XVI (from Austria) imprisoned or fined them) compromise with Parliament; court and failure of government to - Both Charles I and Louis XVI whereas Louis XVI did narrow minded and aloof; lived reform led France towards disaster punished critics of government - Charles I called Lord Strafford, an extravagant life; Wife - Louis XVI; originally wanted to be Archbishop Laud and Henrietta Maria and people loved; not interested
[Show full text]
Of Catherine Howard, Henry's Fifth Wife, and How, After Ordering Her
book 1, chapter 43 Of Catherine Howard, Henry’s Fifth Wife, and How, after Ordering Her Put to Death, He Married Katherine Parr1 Within eight days, the king married Catherine Howard, the duke of Norfolk’s niece (his brother’s daughter).2 But though the king was pleased beyond mea- sure with his new bride, that did not stop him from inflicting his cruelty on Catholics. Thus, on July 30, he put to death three saintly doctors of theology for having defended the cause of Queen Doña Catherine and for now denying the king’s pontifical power. Alongside them he condemned three Zwinglian heretics, ordering that they be paraded two by two, a Catholic together with a heretic, as a blacker mockery of religion and a worse torment to the Catholics, who received more pain from this awful company than from their own deaths. When a knight of the king’s household saw them borne off to death, com- panioned in this manner, and learned that some were condemned for being Catholics and the others for not being so, he said, “On this account I will take care henceforth to be of the king’s religion—that is to say, none at all!”3 Then, on August 2, he also dispatched the prior of Doncaster with three other monks and two laymen, on the same grounds, as well as for refusing to acknowledge the royal supremacy.4 1 Sander, De origine ac progressu, 214–19. 2 Henry and Catherine were married on June 28, 1540, several weeks after the finalization of the divorce from Anne.
[Show full text]
Henrietta Maria: the Betrayed Queen
2018 V Henrietta Maria: The Betrayed Queen Dominic Pearce Stroud: Amberley, 2015 Review by: Andrea Zuvich Review: Henrietta Maria: The Betrayed Queen Henrietta Maria: The Betrayed Queen. By Dominic Pearce. Stroud: Amberley, 2015. ISBN 978-1-4456-4547-6. 352 pp. £20. enrietta Maria, the controversial uncrowned queen consort of the equally provocative Charles I of England, Scotland, and Ireland, H continues to have a reputation for shrewish obstinacy and religious bigotry, with little—if any—attention given to the more positive qualities of her character. The premise behind Dominic Pearce’s biography is that historians have betrayed the queen, because she has been largely ignored and/or disrespected. Pearce shows Henrietta Maria as a fully-fleshed person: her weaknesses and strengths are equally stated. The text is followed by a list of Henrietta Maria’s descendants, notes, a bibliography, acknowledgements, and an index. The 2010s have seen a positive trend in biographies seeking to re- examine the Stuart monarchs of the seventeenth century, notably Mark Kishlansky’s Charles I: An Abbreviated Life (2014), and White King: Charles I – Traitor, Murderer, Martyr by Leanda de Lisle (2018). Such critical re-evaluations have led to studies that are more balanced and more aware of the complexities of the figures of the seventeenth-century Stuart dynasty than the prejudices of Whig historians have previously allowed. Pearce’s book is no exception and, while it competently adds to the scholarship of the Caroline period, it perhaps can be argued that it does not add a great deal more than what has already been written in other relatively recent works on or featuring Henrietta Maria, such as Alison Plowden’s Henrietta Maria: Charles I’s Indomitable Queen (2001), or Katie Whitaker’s A Royal Passion: The Turbulent Marriage of King Charles I of England and Henrietta Maria of France (2010).
[Show full text]
Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2003 Reform, Radicalism, and Royalty: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide Eileen Robin Hintz College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hintz, Eileen Robin, "Reform, Radicalism, and Royalty: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide" (2003). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626412. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ehge-1b89 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REFORM, RADICALISM, AND ROYALTY: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Eileen Hintz 2003 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Eileen Hintz Approved by the Committee, December 2003 _ ___ James McCord Chandos Brown ff — Gilbert McArthur TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS v ABSTRACT vi INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER I. THE DEATH OF PRINCESS CHARLOTTE [NOVEMBER 1817] 6 CHAPTER II.
[Show full text]
Copyrighted Material
33_056819 bindex.qxp 11/3/06 11:01 AM Page 363 Index fighting the Vikings, 52–54 • A • as law-giver, 57–58 Aberfan tragedy, 304–305 literary interests, 56–57 Act of Union (1707), 2, 251 reforms of, 54–55 Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen, queen of reign of, 50, 51–52 William IV, 268, 361 Alfred, son of King Aethelred, king of Áed, king of Scotland, 159 England, 73, 74 Áed Findliath, ruler in Ireland, 159 Ambrosius Aurelianus (Roman leader), 40 Aedán mac Gabráin, overking of Dalriada, 153 Andrew, Prince, Duke of York (son of Aelfflaed, queen of Edward, king Elizabeth II) of Wessex, 59 birth of, 301 Aelfgifu of Northampton, queen of Cnut, 68 as naval officer, 33 Aethelbald, king of Mercia, 45 response to death of Princess Diana, 313 Aethelbert, king of Wessex, 49 separation from Sarah, Duchess of York, Aethelflaed, daughter of Alfred, king of 309 Wessex, 46 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 57, 58, 63 Aethelfrith, Saxon king, 43 Anglo-Saxons Aethelred, king of England, 51, 65–66 appointing an heir, 16 Aethelred, king of Mercia, 45, 46, 55 invasion of Britain, 39–41 Aethelred, king of Wessex, 50 kingdoms of, 37, 42 Aethelstan, king of Wessex, 51, 61–62 kings of, 41–42 Aethelwold, son of Aethelred, king of overview, 12 Wessex, 60 Anna, queen of Scotland, 204 Aethelwulf, king of Wessex, 49 Anne, Princess Royal, daughter of Africa, as part of British empire, 14 Elizabeth II, 301, 309 Agincourt, battle of, 136–138 Anne, queen of England Albert, Prince, son of George V, later lack of heir, 17 George VI, 283, 291 marriage to George of Denmark, 360–361 Albert of
[Show full text]
{PDF} Young and Damned and Fair: the Life and Tragedy of Catherine
YOUNG AND DAMNED AND FAIR: THE LIFE AND TRAGEDY OF CATHERINE HOWARD AT THE COURT OF HENRY VIII PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Gareth Russell | 512 pages | 12 Jan 2017 | HarperCollins Publishers | 9780008128272 | English | London, United Kingdom Adam Kay shortlisted for Slightly Foxed Best First Biography Prize | The Bookseller But there's no agenda here: Russell neither seeks to restore Catherine's good name at the expense of the various men who abused and exploited her, nor does he slander hers and dismiss her on account of her actions at Lambeth and later at court. Instead Russell truly seeks to consider Catherine objectively and carefully and come to understand her, and that he does so means we do so as well, and all the better than I was consistently entertained and informed throughout. Russell is able to situate Catherine's circumstances and character against the larger backdrop of daily life and expectations for the aristocrats and courtiers of Tudor England, and brings forth a fully imagined world with its rules and laws, writ and unspoken and revised, made by God, man, and sometimes both, and how and why Catherine's eventual downfall could only come to pass from a particular set of political and social circumstances of Henry VIII's court. And as good as his early chapters are, tracing Catherine's early childhood and coming of age and early predilections for lightly bending or bucking the established codes of conduct, his reconstruction of the whirlwind of activity and investigation is absolutely fantastic. While Catherine shared the fate of her cousin, Anne Boleyn, and the downfalls of both queens cost men their lives, Russell shows just how diligently and thoroughly and carefully the king's counsellors proceeded with the inquest into Catherine's relations with Dereham, and later with Culpeper, in stark contrast to the Boleyn proceedings in which by some contemporary and most modern sources show just how politically engineered Anne's downfall was.
[Show full text]
Literature Review the Outline of My Research Topic Will Encompass
Literature Review The outline of my research topic will encompass Anne of Denmark’s role as queen consort in Scotland and England, from 1589 to 1619, in order to investigate her political influence. To fully understand Anna’s political role, recent historiography surrounding influential women in early modern England and, in particular, the role of the queen consort will be evaluated in depth. My research will contribute to these two growing fields and fill a gap by re-examining Anna, who historians once considered frivolous and vain. Accompanied by re-definitions of high politics at one end of the spectrum and court masques at the other, a re-assessment of her character throughout her reign as queen consort of Scotland and England is accordingly needed. The value of analysing Anna in a political light will be demonstrated in this essay through an examination of the historiography surrounding influential women in early modern England, queen consorts in general and then Anna herself. Previous study has excluded women from high politics because it was considered part of the public sphere, rather than the private sphere that they belonged to. In her article ‘Women and Politics in Early Tudor England’, Harris challenges the traditional view of high politics by emphasising its redefinition to include the influence of women.1 Sara Mendelson and Patricia Crawford’s book, Women in Early Modern England, echoes this view. Although women exercised some influence in high politics, this is not 1 B. Harris., ‘Women and Politics in Early Tudor England’, The Historical Journal, 33:2 (1990), pp.259-281, p.259.
[Show full text]
HENRY VIII TRAIL the Story of Henry’S Visit with His Allegedly Adulterous Queen, Catherine Howard in 1541
HENRY VIII TRAIL The story of Henry’s visit with his allegedly adulterous Queen, Catherine Howard in 1541. The King sat nearly 2 weeks, ulcerous, syphilitic and constipated, fuming and waiting for his nephew James V of Scotland to attend a peace conference that never happened. Lavish preparations were made for the King’s reception by a City Council so terrified of the King after the Pilgrimage of Grace that they grovelled in the mud to meet him. Henry also closed down all the Monasteries and hospitals in York, even the public lavatories, because of alleged hanky-panky by the monks and nuns. St Leonards Hospital This was founded by King Athelstan in 935 AD as the Hospital of St Peter’s and may go back even further. It was refounded as the Hospital of St Leonard by King Stephen after the great fire of York in 1137. At its height the Hospital stretched almost the Minster-the Theatre Royal is built on its Undercrofts and the Red House incorporates part of its gatehouse. The Time Team Excavation of 1999 and At its height it had over 200 people in its care ranging from the poor to those who chose to retire there to live out their days. It had 13 Augustinian Canons, 8 Nuns plus Lay Brothers and servants making perhaps 300 people in all. It was surrendered to the Crown in 1539 and all had to leave. It was the last of the great religious house in York to close on 1st Dec 1540. The last Master, Thomas Magnus, got a manor at Beningbrough Grange.
[Show full text]